From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 10:20:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B40152F for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E818FC0C for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAJAK1Au011056 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qAJAK19h011055; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:20:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211191020.qAJAK19h011055@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: kern/173659: PF fatal trap on 9.1 (taskq fatal trap on pf_test_rule) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gleb Smirnoff List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:20:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/173659; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/173659: PF fatal trap on 9.1 (taskq fatal trap on pf_test_rule) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:13:23 +0400 Since Patricks mail server bounces my mail, try to communicate via GNATS. ----- Forwarded message from Gleb Smirnoff ----- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:59:58 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Patrick Tracanelli Subject: Re: kern/173659: PF fatal trap on 9.1 (taskq fatal trap on pf_test_rule) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Patrick, couple of questions on the problem report: 1) Do you have ability to test FreeBSD 10 in the same conditions? pf in 10 differs much from 9. 2) Can you please send me pf rulesets? 3) Can you please provide the below info from the crash dump: P> #7 0xffffffff81525888 in pf_addrcpy (dst=0xfffffe0013942918, src=0x10, P> af=2 '\002') at /usr/src/sys/modules/pf/../../contrib/pf/net/pf.c:522 P> #8 0xffffffff8152fdbf in pf_test_rule (rm=0xffffff80002e5848, P> sm=0xffffff80002e5840, direction=1, kif=0xfffffe0004c9e000, P> m=0xfffffe0004febd00, off=20, h=0xfffffe0013331010, P> pd=0xffffff80002e5780, am=0xffffff80002e5850, rsm=0xffffff80002e5838, P> ifq=0x0, inp=0x0) P> at /usr/src/sys/modules/pf/../../contrib/pf/net/pf.c:3900 P> #9 0xffffffff8153333c in pf_test (dir=1, ifp=Variable "ifp" is not available. P> ) P> at /usr/src/sys/modules/pf/../../contrib/pf/net/pf.c:6884 P> #10 0xffffffff8153a9eb in pf_check_in (arg=Variable "arg" is not available. P> ) P> at /usr/src/sys/modules/pf/../../contrib/pf/net/pf_ioctl.c:4131 (kgdb) frame 8 (kgdb) info locals -- Totus tuus, Glebius. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Totus tuus, Glebius.