From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 01:35:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4006E106566C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erich@alogreentechnologies.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A468FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q0M1EPUG026738; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:14:28 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: ALO Green Technologies Pte Ltd To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:15:35 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:50:21 +0000 Cc: Jerry Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:35:03 -0000 Hi, I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500 > Michael Scheidell articulated: >=20 > > I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him > > there was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more > > that would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix > > some device drivers). > >=20 > > He asked "how many"? >=20 I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on their = machines. Erich > I have experienced the same exact problem when contacting various > companies regarding drivers suitable for FreeBSD. Virtually none of > them are interested in developing and maintaining drivers for what they > consider a niche environment. One such company did what yours did, > asked to to name other users of the device I was inquiring about. I > felt rather embarrassed to admit that I could not name a single one. At > least you had one. >=20 > Good luck! >=20 > --=20 > Jerry =E2=99=94 >=20 > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 03:09:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C09106566B; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02198FC19; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0M39nHH024793; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:09:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4F1B7DFD.6080005@missouri.edu> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:09:49 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports References: <4F1B27ED.9070005@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4F1B27ED.9070005@missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: LDFLAGS mystery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:09:51 -0000 On 01/21/2012 03:02 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > If I build a port that uses "USE_FORTRAN", then the variable ${LDFLAGS} > has an extra space in it. For example > > %cd /usr/ports/math/lapack > %make -V LDFLAGS > -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 > > %make -V MAKE_ENV > .... LDFLAGS=" -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46" ... > > I am trying to create a port in which this creates problems. > > Where does the extra space at the beginning come from, and how do I get > rid of it? I solved the mystery. Inside /usr/share/mk/sys.mk is the line: LDFLAGS ?= I think that it is a bug in "make" that XXX= XXX+=xxx results in XXX having the value " xxx". From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 03:13:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DED106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin@colinbaker.org) Received: from mail.derivataters.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:0:202::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8E98FC15 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.derivataters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BC26782E for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:08:34 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from mail.derivataters.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colinb.colo.supranet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12QPTfRBH-q7 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:08:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from vein.home.derivataters.com (97-88-245-202.static.mdsn.wi.charter.com [97.88.245.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.derivataters.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4490067825 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:08:33 -0600 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:13:10 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Colin Baker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.60 (Win32) Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:13:38 -0000 On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:12:53 -0600, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him there > was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more that > would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix some > device drivers). > > He asked "how many"? > > Well, I sure can't go back to him and tell him that there was only one > company who contacted me back who said that they used VMware in > production systems, with FreeBSD guest os. > > If there isn't anyone else with VMware problems, and I really want to be > clear: VMware is a 'for profit' company, so, small numbers won't > impress them, but if there are any companies (aside from the one that > contacted me.. you don't have to again, I have your email). > > If no one else, I'll call him back on the phone and apologize for > bothering him. > > I was really hoping to get some of the virtual nic issues, and hgfs > issues worked out, but, I guess there isn't enough commercial interest. My company uses FreeBSD on VMware in production quite extensively. We've had a support case open with VMware for almost two years about guest crashes that occur randomly (basically, guests just completely stop responding and require reboot. We've had this happen on different hardware, multiple storage backends, multiple FreeBSD versions, multiple different VMware clusters), and frequently enough to cause serious complaints from users. VMware has yet to give us any answers, other than "enable ____ additional debug logging". I don't believe they've taken our issue seriously, it hasn't been escalated, and it has gone on far too long without any solution. The benefits of their product still outweigh the drawbacks (though we've moved the most critical systems back to native hardware), but it's gotten to the point in which as soon as a competitor has the features we need, we're gone. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 03:42:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEB9106566C; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D228FC0C; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0M3g2xQ038137; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:42:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4F1B858B.3000102@missouri.edu> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:42:03 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports References: <4F1B27ED.9070005@missouri.edu> <4F1B7DFD.6080005@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4F1B7DFD.6080005@missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: LDFLAGS mystery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:42:04 -0000 On 01/21/2012 09:09 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 01/21/2012 03:02 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> If I build a port that uses "USE_FORTRAN", then the variable ${LDFLAGS} >> has an extra space in it. For example >> >> %cd /usr/ports/math/lapack >> %make -V LDFLAGS >> -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 >> >> %make -V MAKE_ENV >> .... LDFLAGS=" -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46" ... >> >> I am trying to create a port in which this creates problems. >> >> Where does the extra space at the beginning come from, and how do I get >> rid of it? > > I solved the mystery. Inside /usr/share/mk/sys.mk is the line: > > LDFLAGS ?= > > I think that it is a bug in "make" http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164361 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 05:17:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7594C106566C; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F808FC23; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so1917130vcb.13 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:17:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9p5VYbvmnvRQ5Gx4F6aCfBK5YXyHPa9O4n0eJRe5RX4=; b=LjAizRLjTdjEYBmkDAlYRxeMMnoiYAiAWg2QzcFrrqpms+nITqXJQbGShmegzcY2b2 JFIIJsn35OkhKemiMxg/khL3r8hu7d+L8fUQQEnScaPdSdcu1xccMNaW9oukgQIL0jSF iKkIKaE/8Tq15X4xlw7VppbV55II5H+e9SyhM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.154.2 with SMTP id m2mr1981663vcw.27.1327208001082; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:53:21 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.36.5 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:53:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:53:21 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LhQH0CdmdGqqEV9VwON3oOaaI64 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:17:32 -0000 .. maybe the correct(er) solution would be "We've got a couple of companies who would love to take on the responsibility of hacking on and testing the vmware driver support for FreeBSD, please consider negotiating an NDA to get whatever source opened up?" Adrian On 21 January 2012 12:12, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him there was > a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more that would, if > just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix some device drivers). > > He asked "how many"? > > Well, I sure can't go back to him and tell him that there was only one > company who contacted me back who said that they used VMware in production > systems, with FreeBSD guest os. > > If there isn't anyone else with VMware problems, and I really want to be > clear: VMware is a 'for profit' company, so, small numbers won't impress > them, but if there are any companies (aside from the one that contacted > me.. you don't have to again, I have your email). > > If no one else, I'll call him back on the phone and apologize for > bothering him. > > I was really hoping to get some of the virtual nic issues, and hgfs issues > worked out, but, I guess there isn't enough commercial interest. > > -- > Michael Scheidell, CTO > o: 561-999-5000 > d: 561-948-2259 > >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation > > * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 > * Best Intrusion Prevention Product > * Hot Company Finalist 2011 > * Best Email Security Product > * Certified SNORT Integrator > > -- > This mail is for the internal use of the FreeBSD project committers, > and as such is private. This mail may not be published or forwarded > outside the FreeBSD committers' group or disclosed to other unauthorised > parties without the explicit permission of the author(s). > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 08:13:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239091065672 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC438FC12 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so4762989iag.13 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:13:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bCkspS7xTexCawwAk3nNnoEQH3qHdPkjFLWMoTvRnCE=; b=PiO8UDPMoZ7RLLcgj0sQ8FSRRiRswwccTeib623+HoG+P5Z9eJMSPTJTPnw5nnIOLW tQXl2CCebqFf3qp/0ypWTJMQrhlQBR7thNWECO8KIsgTBGUU2OnnKpB6WidLSTNeb4Fv 07NcGZe2PvwmJmuB5L0NQ+R6LfIpUwrG8HJCY= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr4747792icv.8.1327220026300; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:13:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:13:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120121204614.GH4729@lonesome.com> References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F17DB1C.6080503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F193FD5.8070208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120121204614.GH4729@lonesome.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:13:15 +0000 Message-ID: To: Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOT_FOR_ARCHS considered harmful [was: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:13:47 -0000 On 21 Jan 2012 20:46, "Mark Linimon" wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:20:05AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Actually I take your point, that it should be possible to distinguish > > between ports that permanently won't work on some architectures by > > design, and ports that temporarily don't work because of mistakes or > > broken dependencies or so forth, and that are expected to be fixed > > sooner rather than later. > > There's a secondary problem which I keep meaning to write up a rant > on. =A0This thread seems as good a place as any. > > Warning: the following is only my own opinion, not portmgr's. > > We made a design mistake by allowing in NOT_FOR_ARCHS as an alternative > to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS. =A0This has always been a shortcut to say "doesn't > build on !(amd64!i386)". =A0As long as the archs were (alpha|amd64|i386| > sparc64) this was merely annoying. > > The problem comes when we start up package builds on new archs. =A0 The > primary utility of package builds for tier-2s has arguably been to QA > whether the ports build at all. =A0The secondary utility, in order: > > =A0- test that the arch's srcbase has't regressed to the point where it's > =A0 too unstable to build packages > > =A0- flag ports (and infrastructure) with bad assumptions about wordlengt= h > =A0 and endianness > > =A0- create usable packages (really, only the most fundamental ports will > =A0 have packages that are timely, due to the > 1 month cycle times) > > In general, I claim if a port already has some kind of NOT_FOR_ARCH > entry, it's unlikely to build on a new arch. =A0This was clearly demonstr= ated > a couple of years ago when I first started powerpc builds once we had a > machine donated (note: powerpc =3D 32-bit). =A0The errors were correlated= to > sparc64, but only roughly. > > sparc64 builds tend to trip up on the following, in order of which I > think we should care: > > =A0- 64-bit issues (which have a high correlation to amd64 build failures= ), > > =A0- lack of arch-specific build stanzas (which have a high correlation t= o > =A0 powerpc), > > =A0- endianness issues. > > The powerpc build also pointed out that many ports assumed that 32bit <> = i386. > On occasion, I fix notable occurences of this (e.g. python). > > So, why does this matter? =A0Surely our sparc64 and powerpc/Mac userbases > are tiny. > > The reason to do this work is that there is demand for arm and mips build= s > for embedded systems[1], and once these are turned on, we're going to hav= e > a bazillion build errors to sort through. > > To the extent that our first attempts include only ports that don't have > the NOT_FOR stanzas, IMHO we're going to make more progress more quickly. > > Now, for mips, only the "fundamental" ports are ever going to matter, > since there are no viable mips desktops to worry about. =A0But, for > embedded, getting a subset of things in net/ and sysutils/ (and to > some extent things like lang/perl) is going to be useful -- again, not > so much for uploadable packages, but to ensure buildability when vendors > try to use these in their products. > > (I'm told that people are speculating about running desktop stuff on > native arm, so that's why I picked mips for the use-case. =A0I have no > idea if that's anything but blue-sky.) > > So IMHO we should do a sweep: > > =A0- move all the true cases of NOT_FOR_ARCHS to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS > > =A0- move all the false cases of NOT_FOR_ARCHS to BROKEN > > and then drop support for NOT_FOR_ARCHS. > > If anyone is interested in coming up with patches, I'll do the -exp > run (on amd64 :-) ) to prove that there are no regressions on that > arch at least. > > Finally, for those willing to investigate how messed-up the metadata > currently are, pull up the following page: > > =A0http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html > > You'll find a column marked "skipped". =A0That contains URLs to files > called "duds.verbose" for each buildenv. =A0This file is the output of > 'make ignorelist-verbose' called from the top of the tree. > > The reason that we decided to archive these per-pointyhat-run is so > that you can tell _exactly_ why pointyhat believed that it did not have > to try to build that package at that exact point in time. =A0In the past, > you had to impute it from whatever the state of the tree was. =A0Since > the tree evolves so quickly, it was impossible to tell. =A0(There are > also a very small handful of degenerate cases where things don't > build on pointyhat due to its build environment. =A0I've worked on gettin= g > these down to < 10 over the past few years.) > > tl;dr: I want to switch the default assumption we're making. > > IMHO when new ports come into the tree, we should make our default > assumption that we will try to build them on amd64 and i386. =A0For cases > that this does not hold, we consider this Bad and committer-must-fix. > For the tier-2s, we shift the default assumption to "only set it to > buildable once it has been shown to be so". =A0So, the burden of proof > shifts the other way: to a user of a tier-2 to claim "I tried this and > it works", rather than portmgr saying "we tried this and it doesn't work"= . > > (Of course, for things like p5-* it doesn't really matter; if perl > builds, to a first approximation they'll build as well. =A0I'm talking > about the things like biology/, deskutils/, games/, math/, science, > x11*/, and so forth.) > > What do people think? > I think we'll end up with a FreeBSD that only works on amd64 and IA-32... Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 08:20:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD83106566B for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4418FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Roseg-000H6h-W7; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:20:03 +0000 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:20:01 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Erich Dollansky In-Reply-To: <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:20:04 -0000 > I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on > their machines. i do, servers in tokyo and seattle. and am quite happy. i know a bunch of folk who do. i am trying to understand the relationship between $subject, end of net predicted, and the op calling vmware and being asked how many users. randy From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 10:41:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DA51065674 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4A98FC16 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0MAf3J4016720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:41:03 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q0MAf3J4016720 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1327228863; bh=pTjwTh4CIIN0D0u9sE9O6td6B49aJ3m2FhwBbm+DYJ0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=0G6iQEfQS0b0CuVopg7ljvVQ/qTgfDM1UT5MNcoP8rVB+gNeCrQwuzHETtU94EHn2 u8r+RGRZo7fERiQOz87Pf1LYBL53fu7RGG6WA0mB2zt1L+Tbfy8/2o87srCnaXkKBH 4wm+i/418lBdOWwCWAkgMH/y8CUpSKmc5LlqJWYI= Message-ID: <4F1BE7B4.6090702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:40:52 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F17DB1C.6080503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F193FD5.8070208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120121204614.GH4729@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120121204614.GH4729@lonesome.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC76853508DF2E094B1C2127F" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: NOT_FOR_ARCHS considered harmful [was: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:41:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC76853508DF2E094B1C2127F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/01/2012 20:46, Mark Linimon wrote: > tl;dr: I want to switch the default assumption we're making. >=20 > IMHO when new ports come into the tree, we should make our default > assumption that we will try to build them on amd64 and i386. For cases= > that this does not hold, we consider this Bad and committer-must-fix. > For the tier-2s, we shift the default assumption to "only set it to > buildable once it has been shown to be so". So, the burden of proof > shifts the other way: to a user of a tier-2 to claim "I tried this and > it works", rather than portmgr saying "we tried this and it doesn't wor= k". Doesn't your proposed change in semantics of the 'FOR_ARCHS' stuff mean that over time, as other architectures become more popular, most ports will have to have an explicit 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' setting? If the default effectively becomes 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=3D i386 amd64' then as ports are show= n to work on different platforms they will need an ONLY_FOR_ARCHS line in their Makefiles listing where they are known to work? Or else the ports becomes effectively i386 / amd64 only? > (Of course, for things like p5-* it doesn't really matter; if perl > builds, to a first approximation they'll build as well. I'm talking > about the things like biology/, deskutils/, games/, math/, science, > x11*/, and so forth.) >=20 > What do people think? There are a lot of ports where the distinction between CPU architectures is pretty much irrelevant. I can't see portmaster(8) (for example) failing to work anywhere the base system works. I was thinking about this a while back. Test the contents of packages to see if they install any object code -- ports/129210 -- and mark the ones that don't as arch-independent in some way (CATEGORIES+=3D arch-inde= p perhaps?) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigC76853508DF2E094B1C2127F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8b574ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxXmQCfYjwQIA677xnDR8WrPO76BnO7 dHQAn09XwVl5biS13KX9+Vs90Xyu6ttx =y+jm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC76853508DF2E094B1C2127F-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 12:19:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B687C1065677 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobias.rehbein@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de (fmmailgate03.web.de [217.72.192.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B9F8FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moweb002.kundenserver.de (moweb002.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.108]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3847A1B05A155 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:04:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from sushi.pseudo.local ([62.227.157.203]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LmuMO-1SITbk0Ggm-00hYwK; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:04:04 +0100 Received: from sushi.pseudo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sushi.pseudo.local (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0MC41DL051461 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:04:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tobi@sushi.pseudo.local) Received: (from tobi@localhost) by sushi.pseudo.local (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0MC410r051460 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:04:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tobi) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:04:00 +0100 From: Tobias Rehbein To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120122120400.GA8653@sushi.pseudo.local> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:8SxfBfW1HMCXeHcZSkPBrWsQrgVLcl2RTZpRM71gbW4 Ws8Lk2lsZxs3TzVvMu+kwF6u+9NQYKE5l9nm4aCL4MWHmUdNiI 1srX3an/CH7K4sKkZs9qHr995klJDtUkgI4aDIiPXhb3RDctuq coYudePodbuBZwyXQaQbGQDGhSiTGeur10cqiHp43fRaf7LqCo 5LZEVJ67dxxXDfR0z2Ihw== Subject: Is there an unofficial graphics/gimp 2.7.4 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:19:16 -0000 Hi all, I will participate in a GIMP workshop this wednesday. GIMP 2.7.4 will be used in this workshop. As this is a development snapshot and therefore not in the ports tree I wondered if anyone on this list has an unofficial port of GIMP 2.7.4 I could use? gnome@freebsd.org, being the maintainer of graphics/gimp(-app) is in CC. I am not subscribed to gnome@freebsd.org so please keep me in CC. Kind regards, Tobias From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 13:35:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54071106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2048FC0A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E4C5C28 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:29:43 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 185355C21 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:29:43 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:13:15 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: What is the best way to _not_ install licenses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:35:29 -0000 I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113. I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbook (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to achieve this? I have already put in the Makefile (thanks Alex): NO_LICENSES_INSTALL=yes and in post-install: @${RM} ${WRKDIR}/GPLv2 but I still get it installed. I have some instructions in post-extract which remove unneeded files, should I put a remove instruction there instead? Also, what should I do about this error: pkg_delete: '/compat/linux/var/cache/ldconfig/aux-cache' fails original MD5 checksum - deleted anyway. This was from redports (thanks redports for the tools :) ). Can I do anything to restore this file if other linux-ports touch it? TIA From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 13:44:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF53106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F758FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so5080574iag.13 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:44:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=wr7ipizmQz3zJEt2HUw50gZgG+hIyaSnr/pgLNfegh4=; b=o4Gt4HaTlZYVCJtpjKq2bLgBqgaZSoV5tjQ0Gp11pj6H+THKABP6C1MdZB7WB+WgGm nip5fV/F6emVK1NvYdT5bwRAoBnIy/GSCQBbGvgFGJqEx8gIAd+0v3WEGKdFGmEYbkGQ Cr5eKwzlILcIwFlwfUIJHlDH7ly1KONA3JdA8= Received: by 10.50.202.105 with SMTP id kh9mr6551361igc.3.1327239896248; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:44:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:44:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:25 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QX5nH5zXVNudM7Ya663kLAzERWU Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: What is the best way to _not_ install licenses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:57 -0000 On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock wrote: > I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113. > > I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbook > (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to achieve this? Huh? Why don't you want to install the licence? Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 13:59:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E07C106566B for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FDB8FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB0C5C28 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:12:06 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 184E95C21 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:12:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1C155A.3020408@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:55:38 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: What is the best way to _not_ install licenses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:59:35 -0000 On 01/22/12 23:44, Chris Rees wrote: > On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock > wrote: >> I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113. >> >> I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbook >> (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to achieve this? > Huh? Why don't you want to install the licence? According to the handbook there is enough copies to go around and the system doesn't need to be overloaded with license copies (GPL only). Meh... I'll comply. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/dads-misc.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 14:39:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21DC106566B for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15A7B8FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2012 14:12:40 -0000 Received: from f055203057.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO mandree.no-ip.org) [78.55.203.57] by mail.gmx.net (mp067) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2012 15:12:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX192RP0LF7N2mOdSw4liQ1oya23yZ+VFwR8ThH/bfV FgQjG16YstLzx1 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E3323CE8F for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:12:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:12:39 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:39:21 -0000 Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky: > Hi, > > I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. > > On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500 >> Michael Scheidell articulated: >> >>> I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him >>> there was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more >>> that would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix >>> some device drivers). >>> >>> He asked "how many"? >> > I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on their machines. I dual-boot FreeBSD, either bare-bones, or into a virtual machine - BUT that is VirtualBox with the PUEL'ed extension pack, on a 64-bit Linux amd64 host. And I don't care about VMWare at all since they took VMWare server 1.x off the market. I've seen their pricing policies since the early days of VMWare Workstation 1.X many a year ago, and it's ridiculous (meaning way overpriced), and there are more reasons... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 14:55:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FED7106566C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F038FC12 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-iy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z16so5158728iag.13 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:55:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=48iX5LtGKS90+EamOLdJk1T5beZJu+gJWczgeCV/fYE=; b=ZPt9Bt/6EOFIglixi34CSZiZiFk42AA61mibJQgpyMkibC15YxJ9ok6/H3ah0x3zDg vaa8LumCPR3kEJoUxdBxp+IWPsAC39V22fKnj61WclEY8pLD7nSOydrsWHXnaZGic5GZ VhXKSwxqetYPsP5rU3j91hzuiYExzHIbFb/6c= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr5896406icv.8.1327244101359; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:55:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:54:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1C155A.3020408@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F1C155A.3020408@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:54:30 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tNvJs-8TdgTC5btm1gkqsYEl5lo Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: What is the best way to _not_ install licenses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:55:02 -0000 On 22 January 2012 13:55, Da Rock wrote: > On 01/22/12 23:44, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock >> =A0wrote: >>> >>> I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113. >>> >>> I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbo= ok >>> (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to achieve >>> this? >> >> Huh? Why don't you want to install the licence? > > According to the handbook there is enough copies to go around and the sys= tem > doesn't need to be overloaded with license copies (GPL only). Meh... I'll > comply. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/dads-mi= sc.html Ah, that refers to people sticking the GPL in to pkg-descr. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 15:14:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFFE106566C; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F388FC13; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p4FC43082.dip.t-dialin.net [79.196.48.130]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D93E844017; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:13:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.12]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A69D15B8; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:13:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:13:44 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20120122161344.000028a2@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs42 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 2D93E844017.A01BC X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1327850030.5539@IK2n1dwEOwTrrIuTI22cIQ X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: What is the best way to _not_ install licenses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:14:03 -0000 On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:25 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock > wrote: > > I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113. > > > > I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters > > handbook (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way > > to achieve this? > > Huh? Why don't you want to install the licence? Seems there's a little bit of confusion around. The port itself is fine, the version in ports does not install any license. The redports log he looked at was based upon what he submitted, but it is not what I committed. So for the port there's nothing to do ATM. The problem with the licenses framework and the linuxulator ports is, that the licenses framework assumes, that PREFIX/share does not need to be removed (it needs to be removed in the linuxulator case). My workaround was to specify NO_LICENSES_INSTALL=yes. Another problem is probably, that the licenses framework writes the license to WRKDIR/license_name and the linuxulator ports install everything from WRKDIR except "WRKDIR/.*". This way we get PREFIX/license_name, again without a PLIST entry like the PREFIX/share directory. My workaround was to do a RM PREFIX/license_name in post-install. I submitted a PR regarding the deficits of the licenses framework when used in linuxulator ports. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 15:14:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E4C1065670 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984FC8FC25 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0697B5C2B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:27:17 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77B375C29 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:27:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1C26F8.4020301@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:10:48 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F1C155A.3020408@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: What is the best way to _not_ install licenses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:14:46 -0000 On 01/23/12 00:54, Chris Rees wrote: > On 22 January 2012 13:55, Da Rock > wrote: >> On 01/22/12 23:44, Chris Rees wrote: >>> On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock >>> wrote: >>>> I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113. >>>> >>>> I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters handbook >>>> (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way to achieve >>>> this? >>> Huh? Why don't you want to install the licence? >> According to the handbook there is enough copies to go around and the system >> doesn't need to be overloaded with license copies (GPL only). Meh... I'll >> comply. >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/dads-misc.html > Ah, that refers to people sticking the GPL in to pkg-descr. That probably could be clearer... but if it complains about the GPL file not being removed from the system on deinstall, what then? It specifically mentions plist as well. So what is it supposed to do? Is there another linux port that shows how it should be handled correctly that I could check out? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 15:24:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2676106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DA08FC08 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD8C5C28 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:36:55 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A63C5C21 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:36:55 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1C293C.4020809@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:20:28 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1C0B6B.2040106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120122161344.000028a2@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120122161344.000028a2@unknown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: What is the best way to _not_ install licenses? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:24:25 -0000 On 01/23/12 01:13, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:44:25 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 22 January 2012 13:13, Da Rock >> wrote: >>> I'm back to resolve some issues with my new port ports/164113. >>> >>> I have to not install license as per instructions in the porters >>> handbook (which I wasn't aware it was doing). What is the best way >>> to achieve this? >> Huh? Why don't you want to install the licence? > Seems there's a little bit of confusion around. The port itself is > fine, the version in ports does not install any license. The redports > log he looked at was based upon what he submitted, but it is not what I > committed. So for the port there's nothing to do ATM. > > The problem with the licenses framework and the linuxulator ports is, > that the licenses framework assumes, that PREFIX/share does not need to > be removed (it needs to be removed in the linuxulator case). My > workaround was to specify NO_LICENSES_INSTALL=yes. > > Another problem is probably, that the licenses framework writes the > license to WRKDIR/license_name and the linuxulator ports install > everything from WRKDIR except "WRKDIR/.*". This way we get > PREFIX/license_name, again without a PLIST entry like the PREFIX/share > directory. My workaround was to do a RM PREFIX/license_name in > post-install. I tried that, but it came up error again. I haven't yet tried with the rm in post-extract, but I thought I'd check in first to see if I was on the right track. The other issues I mentioned are a bit of a worry as well. Sorry, I'm a bit pedantic :) Also, what exactly is QATty in reports? It goes with a bang... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 15:25:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E1F1065673 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@diogunix.com) Received: from mail.kepos.org (mail.kepos.org [64.120.5.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECE58FC1E for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:25:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "tom@diogunix.com" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:24:47 +0100 References: <201201212100.59941.tom@diogunix.com> <4F1B1E9A.6030805@freebsd.org> <201201212304.04674.gelraen.ua@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201201212304.04674.gelraen.ua@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201221624.47915.tom@diogunix.com> Cc: Maxim Ignatenko Subject: Re: databases/mysql-workbench52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:25:03 -0000 > > I've stumbled across a weird issue with building the databases/mysql- > > > workbench52 port on a brandnew / fresh FreeBSD 9 RELEASE machine: > its in the makefile for mysql-workbench51 > DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 51 > IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL= 41 55 > > the maintainer thinks it won't work with mysql55 > > you can delete that line and see what happens. Thanks for the hint, Michael. Unfortunately, I get an error then: In file included from ./my_global.h:383, from mysys_priv.h:17, from charset-def.cpp:17: /usr/include/sys/timeb.h:42:2: warning: #warning "this file includes which is deprecated" In file included from mysys_priv.h:17, from charset-def.cpp:17: ./my_global.h:1017: error: redeclaration of C++ built-in type 'bool' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser/source. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- oss-5.2.1/library. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- oss-5.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- oss-5.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. > if it works, open a pr > with a patch. if you can get it to work, open a pr with a patch. I could not figure out what's actually up there. @Maxim: Is that the reason why you excluded MySQL 55 from that Makefile ? @all Is there any chance to somehow get the build working with MySQL 55 ? kind regards Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 15:32:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961961065676 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@diogunix.com) Received: from mail.kepos.org (mail.kepos.org [64.120.5.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871458FC12 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:32:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "tom@diogunix.com" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:32:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201221632.38932.tom@diogunix.com> Cc: Maxim Ignatenko Subject: databases/mysql-workbench52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:32:42 -0000 I now tried to build the same port on an older machine ruunning - FreeBSD 8 / KDE - MySQL 5.1 Result: The build was successful in so far as I did not get any compile errors. But when trying to start the Workbench, it just crashes (needs to get killed). There's not even a splash screen. Did not do any further investigations so far. It somehow seems, there are major issues with the Workbench port(s) which is sad as the Workbench might be seen as an important tool for MySQL users on FreeBSD :-( kind regards Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 16:54:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79545106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4239A8FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so5305032iag.13 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lHH6Vy+pt3e+uu5mg449sdNc9PbGDoxDWj4Z3mEpJuE=; b=Sz2y1EA07bfYzoVfA417VVkkOsRRKNOdiOZKsAlaU5oXptI/gJY2A3IgKcTCMrrZZk i2SWIS3rff9KeXqwrjLLaEUQ1GIRMhMOPvy2dcDO0YXTT6j1LJ9EP5/kbSpChJYNKf4u wrH6wvjAqFnxc6t/Ga2MgA8S/5jqx24P6TLhk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr6244695icv.8.1327251292318; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201201221624.47915.tom@diogunix.com> References: <201201212100.59941.tom@diogunix.com> <4F1B1E9A.6030805@freebsd.org> <201201212304.04674.gelraen.ua@gmail.com> <201201221624.47915.tom@diogunix.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:54:52 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: "tom@diogunix.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Maxim Ignatenko , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql-workbench52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:54:53 -0000 On 22 Jan 2012 15:25, "tom@diogunix.com" wrote: > > > > I've stumbled across a weird issue with building the databases/mysql- > > > > > workbench52 port on a brandnew / fresh FreeBSD 9 RELEASE machine: > > its in the makefile for mysql-workbench51 > > DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 51 > > IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL= 41 55 > > > > the maintainer thinks it won't work with mysql55 > > > > you can delete that line and see what happens. > > Thanks for the hint, Michael. > > Unfortunately, I get an error then: > > In file included from ./my_global.h:383, > from mysys_priv.h:17, > from charset-def.cpp:17: > /usr/include/sys/timeb.h:42:2: warning: #warning "this file includes > which is deprecated" > In file included from mysys_priv.h:17, > from charset-def.cpp:17: > ./my_global.h:1017: error: redeclaration of C++ built-in type 'bool' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser/source. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > oss-5.2.1/library. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > oss-5.2.1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > oss-5.2.1. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. > > > if it works, open a pr > > with a patch. if you can get it to work, open a pr with a patch. > > I could not figure out what's actually up there. > > @Maxim: > Is that the reason why you excluded MySQL 55 from that Makefile ? Looks like some incompatibility; perhaps it reimplements something now included by mysql. Let's assume that was the reason, and let's not ask Maxim any more questions on it directly-- he's resigned as maintainer and can chose to answer questions on ports@ if he chooses :) > @all > Is there any chance to somehow get the build working with MySQL 55 ? Have you contacted upstream? > kind regards > Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 17:25:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041FF1065670 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9123E8FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaai10 with SMTP id i10so929765eaa.13 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:25:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=piTDATJwkaAiIfUP/VbomtkYdoqWd5btNGKIGtLDJxo=; b=jQ91QcWZ3ORht6LHb7WkAI7RiqyhISrh8SCjx2PjFuMKFcToVtPyrpfgz3F8XnQxcw qSProCFYVmsvX8Byw6Oel4TaTOkf6JXDOvo17lkdmXM4Q63zrEYq0yHaPk/rRV5UscRe 6FgRHVoa/I0alnH3aaMITA5weR4JQnYX5KpHc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.22.193 with SMTP id o1mr973047ebb.125.1327253138518; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:25:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.3.68 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:25:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120122120400.GA8653@sushi.pseudo.local> References: <20120122120400.GA8653@sushi.pseudo.local> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:25:38 +0100 Message-ID: From: Olivier Duchateau To: Tobias Rehbein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: Is there an unofficial graphics/gimp 2.7.4 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:25:40 -0000 2012/1/22 Tobias Rehbein : > Hi all, > > I will participate in a GIMP workshop this wednesday. GIMP 2.7.4 will be = used in > this workshop. As this is a development snapshot and therefore not in the= ports tree I > wondered if anyone on this list has an unofficial port of GIMP 2.7.4 I co= uld > use? > > gnome@freebsd.org, being the maintainer of graphics/gimp(-app) is in CC. = I am > not subscribed to gnome@freebsd.org so please keep me in CC. > > Kind regards, > > =A0 =A0 Tobias When Gimp 2.7.3 was released, I have done an unofficial port, but not with 2.7.4. You can try this one, be careful, I use an old version of poppler-gtk. You can clone my mercurial repository: hg clone https://code.google.com/p/olivier-freebsd-ports/ The Gimp is found in graphics/gimp. --=20 olivier From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 19:54:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590551065674 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05D08FC0A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id VAA23691; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:54:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Rp3UG-000Meu-Hn; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:54:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4F1C6954.8010908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:53:56 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Erich Dollansky , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:54:05 -0000 on 22/01/2012 16:12 Matthias Andree said the following: > Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. >> >> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500 >>> Michael Scheidell articulated: >>> >>>> I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him >>>> there was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more >>>> that would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix >>>> some device drivers). >>>> >>>> He asked "how many"? >>> >> I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on their machines. > > I dual-boot FreeBSD, either bare-bones, or into a virtual machine - BUT > that is VirtualBox with the PUEL'ed extension pack, on a 64-bit Linux > amd64 host. > > And I don't care about VMWare at all since they took VMWare server 1.x > off the market. > I've seen their pricing policies since the early days of VMWare > Workstation 1.X many a year ago, and it's ridiculous (meaning way > overpriced), and there are more reasons... I appreciate your and Erich's urge to speak out in this thread, but the thread-starter asked about something different. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 21:43:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AC51065670; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F728FC0C; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DE442083A; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:43:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F1C82FE.1030907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:43:26 +0100 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:43:19 -0000 On 2012-01-21 21:12, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him there was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more that would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix some device drivers). > > He asked "how many"? > > Well, I sure can't go back to him and tell him that there was only one company who contacted me back who said that they used VMware in production systems, with FreeBSD guest os. > > If there isn't anyone else with VMware problems, and I really want to be clear: VMware is a 'for profit' company, so, small numbers won't impress them, but if there are any companies (aside from the one that contacted me.. you don't have to again, I have your email). > > If no one else, I'll call him back on the phone and apologize for bothering him. > > I was really hoping to get some of the virtual nic issues, and hgfs issues worked out, but, I guess there isn't enough commercial interest. count +1 from me. Except my private test/build machine I run everything on ESX clusters From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 22:00:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F70D1065674 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B748FC08 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 885B42083A; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:00:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F1C8707.4040502@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:00:39 +0100 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthias Andree Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:00:33 -0000 On 2012-01-22 15:12, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. >> >> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500 >>> Michael Scheidell articulated: >>> >>>> I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him >>>> there was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more >>>> that would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix >>>> some device drivers). >>>> >>>> He asked "how many"? >>> >> I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on their machines. > > I dual-boot FreeBSD, either bare-bones, or into a virtual machine - BUT > that is VirtualBox with the PUEL'ed extension pack, on a 64-bit Linux > amd64 host. > > And I don't care about VMWare at all since they took VMWare server 1.x > off the market. > I've seen their pricing policies since the early days of VMWare > Workstation 1.X many a year ago, and it's ridiculous (meaning way > overpriced), and there are more reasons... Private and enterprise are two different things (also in prising) If our devs need a machine for testing or a project I can deploy a new machine in short time at one of our data-centers which is not doable with bare metal. For private you can use the free ESXi and small corporates can use the foundation version ( less then 1000,- for three servers including VCenter ). Most companies I know run everything virtual, one of the big plus is having all servers the same (virtual) HW platform, load balancing, failover .... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 20:59:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4987106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny@abellohome.net) Received: from mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9D68FC08 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.abellohome.net (ool-44c58eab.dyn.optonline.net [68.197.142.171]) by mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0LY7001P3VLWG850@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:29:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.20.100.144] (Vinny-PC.abellohome.net [172.20.100.144]) by mail.abellohome.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5259E84433; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:29:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:29:56 -0500 From: Vinny Abello In-reply-to: <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> To: Matthias Andree Message-id: <4F1C71C4.5050808@abellohome.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:24:05 +0000 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:59:58 -0000 On 1/22/2012 9:12 AM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 22.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Erich Dollansky: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. >> >> On Sunday 22 January 2012 04:10:24 Jerry wrote: >>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:12:53 -0500 >>> Michael Scheidell articulated: >>> >>>> I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him >>>> there was a lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more >>>> that would, if just VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix >>>> some device drivers). >>>> >>>> He asked "how many"? >>> >> I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on their machines. > > I dual-boot FreeBSD, either bare-bones, or into a virtual machine - BUT > that is VirtualBox with the PUEL'ed extension pack, on a 64-bit Linux > amd64 host. > > And I don't care about VMWare at all since they took VMWare server 1.x > off the market. > I've seen their pricing policies since the early days of VMWare > Workstation 1.X many a year ago, and it's ridiculous (meaning way > overpriced), and there are more reasons... FWIW, I have around a dozen FreeBSD machines in production under VMWare ESXi for network telemetry and caching name servers. -Vinny From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 22:09:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55962106566B for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from winkelr@missouri.edu) Received: from mxnip01-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu (mxnip01-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu [209.106.229.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121668FC0A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:09:05 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjgKAJeBHE/RauUp/2dsb2JhbABDhQmnTlB9gQWBcgEBBSMVQBELGgIFEwMLAgIJAwIBAgErGhMIAQGuZIdtiQWBL4dbggaBFgSIO59L Received: from um-nsmtpout1.um.umsystem.edu ([209.106.229.41]) by mxnip01-mizzou-out.um.umsystem.edu with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2012 15:39:56 -0600 Received: from um-nsmtpout1.um.umsystem.edu ([209.106.229.34]) by um-nsmtpout1.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:39:56 -0600 Received: from slab.local ([69.29.93.231]) by um-nsmtpout1.um.umsystem.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:39:55 -0600 Message-ID: <4F1C822A.6020806@missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:39:54 -0600 From: Rich Winkel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> <4F1C6954.8010908@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F1C6954.8010908@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2012 21:39:55.0767 (UTC) FILETIME=[61C1D070:01CCD94E] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:24:14 +0000 Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:09:06 -0000 FWIW, we're running a number of fbsd servers under vmware here at missouri.edu. Aside from ntpd issues, remedied by running ntpdate from cron, there have been no problems that I'm aware of. I can forward a 8.2 kernel config to anyone who's interested. It's nothing special though. Rich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 05:02:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F051065672 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beckman@angryox.com) Received: from nog.angryox.com (nog.angryox.com [70.164.19.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75028FC18 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nog.angryox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nog.angryox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B992C3FFC; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:44:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=angryox.com; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type; s=powerfulgood; bh=9jMnJHZvyXRtRAUOUlJFFpEqjPw=; b= EJPhG48LbIRgcwwT2jWx/IiRb51tpbM5Gu7mPyA1AMTIyrf+NAakuK/WRx30jq5S iiqt4njGVH+MTAKa4VB2lCodZb4TdmI53+CCiah6zXfIbqxKr83cUQf93YwUGa8D z1d2Axvvr5Z2wo1azZcLLXnIxSLSo00LhEmwKP7T4CE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=angryox.com; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=powerfulgood; b=qhHlKlq7xi65j65/YhzSbZJy Fr36OsFscJR+JFbrwTQbP/aMJm0oqMYrMF8rLdzAEMoRpxTuc4cE94eIm+EWivLw XLq6MZjRkEkbOzzaGa6O+AUdoIjYv82f175FsW7ukoUgtpgRvckpmFAEEfz88WPw 3Z4WYeg8Q2S6TZfMZvg= Received: by nog.angryox.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B91942C3FF7; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nog.angryox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B452C3FF3; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:44:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:44:56 -0500 From: Peter Beckman To: Erich Dollansky In-Reply-To: <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> Message-ID: References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Jerry , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:02:18 -0000 On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Erich Dollansky wrote: > I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. There is some Dell Blade Hardware that I could not get to run FreeBSD 8. So I installed ESXi and installed FreeBSD as a VM so I didn't have to switch providers. It works OK. > I do not know anybody who runs FreeBSD in a VM. All run it native on their machines. I run two. But I use ESXi (the free version); I only have paid for VMware Fusion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman@angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 05:20:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09711106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@diogunix.com) Received: from mail.kepos.org (mail.kepos.org [64.120.5.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E658A8FC0A for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:20:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "tom@diogunix.com" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:20:18 +0100 References: <201201212100.59941.tom@diogunix.com> <201201221624.47915.tom@diogunix.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201230620.18940.tom@diogunix.com> Cc: Chris Rees Subject: Re: databases/mysql-workbench52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:20:29 -0000 > > > > I've stumbled across a weird issue with building the > > > > databases/mysql-workbench52 port on a brandnew / fresh FreeBSD 9 > > > > RELEASE machine: > > > its in the makefile for mysql-workbench51 > > > DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 51 > > > IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL= 41 55 > > > > > > you can delete that line and see what happens. > > > > Thanks for the hint, Michael. > > > > Unfortunately, I get an error then: > > > > In file included from ./my_global.h:383, > > > > from mysys_priv.h:17, > > > > from charset-def.cpp:17: > > /usr/include/sys/timeb.h:42:2: warning: #warning "this file includes > > which is deprecated" > > In file included from mysys_priv.h:17, > > > > from charset-def.cpp:17: > > ./my_global.h:1017: error: redeclaration of C++ built-in type 'bool' > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > > oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser/source. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > > oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > > oss-5.2.1/library. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > > oss-5.2.1. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- > > oss-5.2.1. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. > > > > I could not figure out what's actually up there. > > > Looks like some incompatibility; perhaps it reimplements something now > included by mysql. > > Let's assume that was the reason > > > @all > > Is there any chance to somehow get the build working with MySQL 55 ? > > Have you contacted upstream? I'm terribly sorry but I'm not familiar with the term "upstream". Do you mean the MySQL team at Sun/Oracle ? Then the answer is no. The list here is my only contact so far. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 06:28:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D7A106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper-int.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e002::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CEC8FC0A for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alph.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e010:862b:2bff:febc:8956]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0N6SVU8031874; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:28:41 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0N6SSxB067679; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:28:30 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:28:06 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120123.152806.1580085486858415873.hrs@allbsd.org> To: cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz, rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <4F10EB56.1020006@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F139C43.1050609@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20111206.012658.206418063559678049.hrs@allbsd.org> <20111102110904.GA173@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <4F10EB56.1020006@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.4 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_15_28_06_2012_267)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:28:44 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.6 required=13.0 tests=BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: acroread8/9 cups support (Re: acroead8 and libcups dependencies) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:28:55 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_15_28_06_2012_267)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Da Rock wrote in <4F139C43.1050609@herveybayaustralia.com.au>: fr> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of the acroread ports to see if fr> they can put in a dependency on linux-f10-cups-libs for the ease of fr> use by general users, and to enable acceptance by the graphics fr> industry niche. Cejka Rudolf wrote in <20111102110904.GA173@fit.vutbr.cz>: ce> do you have plans to add support for cups printing from acroread9-9.4.2? I added CUPS support into both acroread8 and acroread9. It seems working as far as I can check all versions in the ports tree, but please test them. Thank you. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_15_28_06_2012_267)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk8c/fYACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1mJACgqtiMiZeQkR5DIn05O2rQcw8s pooAn3QhIPY06+KWou1hRDvjaq2X5gxs =Qxh6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan_23_15_28_06_2012_267)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 06:32:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22601106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7358FC1B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B935C2B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:45:11 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E76195C21 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:45:10 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1CFE1A.5060003@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:28:42 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F10EB56.1020006@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120123.152806.1580085486858415873.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120123.152806.1580085486858415873.hrs@allbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: acroread8/9 cups support (Re: acroead8 and libcups dependencies) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:32:40 -0000 On 01/23/12 16:28, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Da Rock wrote > in<4F139C43.1050609@herveybayaustralia.com.au>: > > fr> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of the acroread ports to see if > fr> they can put in a dependency on linux-f10-cups-libs for the ease of > fr> use by general users, and to enable acceptance by the graphics > fr> industry niche. > > Cejka Rudolf wrote > in<20111102110904.GA173@fit.vutbr.cz>: > > ce> do you have plans to add support for cups printing from acroread9-9.4.2? > > I added CUPS support into both acroread8 and acroread9. It seems > working as far as I can check all versions in the ports tree, but > please test them. Thank you. > > -- Hiroki Will do. Cheers Hiroki From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 07:25:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CFA1065686; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D2F8FC0A; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wald.nfv.gwdg.de ([134.76.242.31] helo=pc028.nfv) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpDoZ-0001UL-21; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:55:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1D0464.2070306@gwdg.de> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:55:32 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato References: <4F10EB56.1020006@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120123.152806.1580085486858415873.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120123.152806.1580085486858415873.hrs@allbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz, ports@FreeBSD.org, rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au Subject: Re: acroread8/9 cups support (Re: acroead8 and libcups dependencies) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:25:38 -0000 Am 23.01.2012 07:28 (UTC+1) schrieb Hiroki Sato: > Da Rock wrote > in<4F139C43.1050609@herveybayaustralia.com.au>: > > fr> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of the acroread ports to see if > fr> they can put in a dependency on linux-f10-cups-libs for the ease of > fr> use by general users, and to enable acceptance by the graphics > fr> industry niche. > > Cejka Rudolf wrote > in<20111102110904.GA173@fit.vutbr.cz>: > > ce> do you have plans to add support for cups printing from acroread9-9.4.2? > > I added CUPS support into both acroread8 and acroread9. It seems > working as far as I can check all versions in the ports tree, but > please test them. Thank you. I can confirm that acroread9 does work with CUPS for a longer time now and it works well. Rainer > -- Hiroki From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 09:20:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838CA106566C for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDF38FC1A for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so6698117iag.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:20:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W7amR60LAP+PI/F231TUyMQwVkJTJYwfT38LLQGl0AI=; b=B71PR6T7Ke8M1Wh3KFgPfs7XU1INicg02Pne1QDtQdl4GDVSyekR/bBw8FLURpZtnm c91PW09E3R9um/54vmoiRBh+MG4MPPaxTvDTNkqJnONvxaOWgBgAs0nDEIEVOayCSrzj bC+X4iT1vF8GompfMIhHeYCcIHvmrlOR542qQ= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr8731374icv.8.1327310449277; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:20:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:20:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201201230620.18940.tom@diogunix.com> References: <201201212100.59941.tom@diogunix.com> <201201221624.47915.tom@diogunix.com> <201201230620.18940.tom@diogunix.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:20:18 +0000 Message-ID: To: "tom@diogunix.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql-workbench52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:20:50 -0000 On 23 January 2012 05:20, tom@diogunix.com wrote: > >> > > > I've stumbled across a weird issue with building the >> > > > databases/mysql-workbench52 port on a brandnew / fresh FreeBSD 9 >> > > > RELEASE machine: >> > > its in the makefile for mysql-workbench51 >> > > DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=3D =A0 =A0 =A051 >> > > IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL=3D =A0 =A0 =A041 55 >> > > >> > > you can delete that line and see what happens. >> > >> > Thanks for the hint, Michael. >> > >> > Unfortunately, I get an error then: >> > >> > In file included from ./my_global.h:383, >> > >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 from mysys_priv.h:17, >> > >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 from charset-def.cpp:17: >> > /usr/include/sys/timeb.h:42:2: warning: #warning "this file includes >> > which is deprecated" >> > In file included from mysys_priv.h:17, >> > >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 from charset-def.cpp:17: >> > ./my_global.h:1017: error: redeclaration of C++ built-in type 'bool' >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- >> > oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser/source. >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- >> > oss-5.2.1/library/sql-parser. >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- >> > oss-5.2.1/library. >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- >> > oss-5.2.1. >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52/work/mysql-workbench- >> > oss-5.2.1. >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. >> > *** Error code 1 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql-workbench52. >> > >> > I could not figure out what's actually up there. >> > >> Looks like some incompatibility; perhaps it reimplements something now >> included by mysql. >> >> Let's assume that was the reason >> >> > @all >> > Is there any chance to somehow get the build working with MySQL 55 ? >> >> Have you contacted upstream? > > I'm terribly sorry but I'm not familiar with the term "upstream". > > Do you mean the MySQL team at Sun/Oracle ? > Then the answer is no. The list here is my only contact so far. > Hm, well the page at [1] claims that 5+ should be supported, and it's from the 5.5 docs. I would try asking the mailing list at http://lists.mysql.com/internals . I would love to help you, but I'm a little snowed under with pgsql at the moment ;) Chris [1] http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/workbench.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 09:37:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFC41065691 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@gid0.org) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AD68FC27 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcse1 with SMTP id e1so1921948qcs.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:37:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.198.3 with SMTP id em3mr7858741qab.23.1327311457563; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:37:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.217.207 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:37:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1C71C4.5050808@abellohome.net> References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <20120121161024.444a11c2@scorpio> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <4F1C1957.6040401@gmx.de> <4F1C71C4.5050808@abellohome.net> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:37:37 +0100 Message-ID: From: Olivier Smedts To: Vinny Abello Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Matthias Andree , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:37:38 -0000 2012/1/22 Vinny Abello : > FWIW, I have around a dozen FreeBSD machines in production under VMWare > ESXi for network telemetry and caching name servers. Would be interested in running some on ESXi at work if driver support is quite good. --=20 Olivier Smedts=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 _ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier@gid0.org=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 - against HTML email & vCards=A0 X www: http://www.gid0.org=A0 =A0 - against proprietary attachments / \ =A0 "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : =A0 ceux qui comprennent le binaire, =A0 et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 11:06:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632DA106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509C08FC13 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0NB67de080131 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:07 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0NB662Y080129 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:06 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:06 GMT Message-Id: <201201231106.q0NB662Y080129@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:07 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/164401 [maintainer update] update multimedia/xbmc to 11.0 bet f ports/164391 [port update] net-im/pidgin-sipe to 1.12.0 o ports/164386 IceWM MenuIconSize option does not work o ports/164379 security/p5-Crypt-DH-GMP update to 0.00010 o ports/164377 New port: www/trac-permredirect o ports/164376 New port: graphics/opennurbs allows to transfer 3D geo o ports/164373 [patch] lang/sdcc-devel: update to 3.1.2.2012.01.22 o ports/164364 New port: multimedia/banshee-devel Music management an o ports/164355 misc/gpt will not install using pkg_add o ports/164352 [patch] irc/inspircd Makefile fixes o ports/164345 Mk/bsd.licenses.mk framework not suitable for linuxula o ports/164309 New port: graphics/pinta Simple drawing/painting progr o ports/164306 update mail/mailagent to 3.1.77 and utmpx fix f ports/164283 [NEW PORT] net-p2p/RetroShare: A private and secure de o ports/164277 new port: mail/roundcube-automatic_addressbook f ports/164274 [PATCH] net/scribe: fix missing perl module compilatio s ports/164242 net/openafs port breaks with KERNCONFDIR and include o ports/164199 Ports fail to acknowlegde newly created users o ports/164181 [PATCH] www/xterm: Fix ssl_ca_file path and style o ports/164177 audio/squeezeboxserver should require mysql 5.0 server o ports/164110 [PATCH] math/R-cran-igraph: Re-adding the deleted port o ports/164060 net/ucarp doesn't work on FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE o ports/164055 sysutils/zfs-periodic: Test if scrubbing is in process f ports/164029 [PATCH] graphics/bmeps fix build with databases/gdbm o ports/164015 devel/php5-pinba: pinba crahes PHP when built with pro f ports/164012 [patch] x11/dmenu version upgrade 4.5 and Xft support o ports/163998 mail/dovecot2: no tcpwrap s ports/163977 Update www/davical f ports/163976 Update devel/php-libawl o ports/163963 Mk/bsd.port.mk, math/spooles-mpich, science/mpqc-mpich o ports/163955 input packet for interface are counted twice o ports/163948 Python incompatibility on ports: deskutils/calibre o ports/163942 [patch] fix i386 build of dns/inadyn f ports/163933 Update security/zenmap to same vers as nmap o ports/163886 New port: net/drawterm Plan9 cpu client o ports/163872 devel/ioncube and distfiles o ports/163861 new port: devel/art A Resource Tracer (A resource trac o ports/163850 New port: cad/linux-bricscad o ports/163806 New port: devel/arduino-lib-irremote: A Multi-Protocol f ports/163800 net-mgmt/nagiosql: All files are Windows-converted f ports/163766 multimedia/openshot fails to find "main" and "gtk" mod f ports/163721 [patch update] multimedia/libbluray 0.2.20110219 -> 0. o ports/163616 [new port] games/quadra: A tetris like multiuser actio o ports/163583 [patch] x11/kdelibs3 conflicts with openssl-1 o ports/163490 www/moinmoin port fix o ports/163467 Ports using python 2.7 and "waf" intermittently hang o f ports/163441 databases/couchdb multiple port installation issues. o ports/163368 [patch] audio/id3lib: unbreak build with clang/gcc46 o ports/163314 [maintainer update] www/ocsigen to version 2.0.2 o ports/163205 graphics/gauche-gl won't build with gauche 0.9.2 f ports/163126 security/sshguard changed from syslog.conf to daemon b o ports/163084 net-mgmt/bsnmptools fails to build o ports/162956 New port: devel/bmkdep: Construct Makefile dependency f ports/162743 new port: benchmarks/worldbench, portable benchmark of o bin/162681 ports pkg_add(1): new installer does not add doc packages o ports/162676 [NEW PORT] net-mgmt/ssgless: View ScreenOS configurati o ports/162674 graphics/rawtherapee freezes after demosaic when tryin o ports/162585 group mismatch in mail/mailman o ports/162511 [NEW PORT] net-im/imspector-devel devel version of ims o ports/162480 New port: net-mgmt/cacti-with-plugins Web-driven graph f ports/162447 net/isc-dhcp41-server: starting with rc-script fails o ports/162240 net/nss-pam-ldapd should allow openldap24-sasl-client f ports/162221 9.0-RC1 new problem building lang/spidermonkey f ports/162167 New port: sysutils/torque2 s ports/162088 inconsistencies in locally generated INDEX file o ports/162045 print/ghostview 1.5_2 coredumps on certain files f ports/161867 Revised Port: www/web-traceroute f ports/161694 sysutils/dvd+rw-tools: growisofs fails to close disc o ports/161690 New port: games/prboom-plus Port of ID Software's Doom o ports/161578 devel/strace is not working o ports/161518 [patch] update/add devel/scons version 2.1.0 o ports/161462 net-mgmt/zabbix-agent: Zabbix_agentd opens a lot of fi f ports/161406 [PATCH] net-mgmt/netdisco: update to 1.1 o ports/161271 [patch] x11/cl-clx: loading with clozure fails, dep-op o ports/161268 sysutils/fusefs-ntfs fails to mount ntfs "invalid argu f ports/161148 New port: databases/infobright -- the infobright colum o ports/161106 sysutils/openipmi is dropping core o ports/161103 graphics/rawtherapee fails to build f ports/161070 infinite loop for graphics/xfig on 9.0-CURRENT f ports/160993 New port: security/sqlcipher o ports/160969 [patch] sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt: embed ruby version o ports/160930 [PATCH] devel/gdb: HW watchpoint support for amd64 o ports/160861 New port: security/racoon-tool Manage setkey and racoo s ports/160821 audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails f ports/160539 [PATCH] security/botan: update to 1.10.1 o ports/160262 New port: net-mgmt/better-cacti-templates - better Cac o ports/159874 [patch] sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt: respect local time f ports/159728 sysutils/htop 0.9.0_1 is broken (does not show process f ports/159636 [patch] net/freevrrpd: RC script for freevrrpd that co f ports/159619 net-mgmt/netams install cgi scripts without exec permi f ports/159205 net-mgmt/zabbix-agent: No active checks on server: hos o ports/159187 [patch] sysutils/am-utils patch to add nolockd to nfs f ports/159177 sysutils/muse on 8.2-STABLE o ports/159121 net/freevrrpd: Make adv_int a runtime configurable opt o ports/159003 devel/cross-gcc attempts to use $PRFIX/../../ranlib on o ports/159001 devel/cross-gcc: 4.5.2 libiberty fails on missing sys/ o ports/158983 [NEW PORT] devel/pecl-dtrace: PHP DTrace provider o ports/158904 [PATCH] finance/openerp-web: update to 6.0.2 s ports/158878 [patch] textproc/dadadodo assumes long is 32 bits o ports/158692 devel/cross-gcc: minor patch to enable arm-none-eabi s o ports/158506 In multimedia/emotion leave only one backend enabled b f ports/157398 emulators/open-vm-tools is broken on FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 o ports/157342 devel/gdb: Problem with running simple pthreads progra o ports/157301 [New port] net-mgmt/zbxlog: Syslog server receives mes f ports/157109 conflict between net/netpipes and sysutils/timelimit f ports/157107 conflict between mail/p5-Mail-SPF and mail/libspf2 o ports/156834 New port: games/fairymax-devel latest version of games o ports/156143 New port: devel/arduino-mk: Build Arduino sketches fro f ports/155898 Update port devel/libthai o ports/155697 ports-mgmt/pkg_replace doesn't want to replace java/op o ports/155115 devel/doxygen: dependancy loop o ports/154897 emulators/open-vm-tools: Bug in open-vm-tools-313025_2 o ports/154711 security/heimdal: kadmin: hdb_open: hdb_open failed in o ports/154682 net/iaxmodem: add rc script for running more than 1 ia f ports/153810 [PATCH] Fix usb_interrupt_read() in devel/libusb for f o ports/153429 [patch] Fix explicite uses of unzip in ports o ports/153386 devel/valgrind does not build/include man pages f ports/152915 russian/xmms v. 1.2.11_12 don't see cdinfo and tag's i o ports/152899 devel/valgrind: unhandled syscall: 506 o ports/152236 [patch] x11/slim: Enable pam support, add hald and dbu o ports/151747 new port: emulators/wine-fbsd64: request for (a variat o ports/150903 databases/dbf: options --sql / --csv does produce crap o ports/150425 www/squid31: rc.d/squid's squid_fib setting ineffectiv f ports/150086 [NEW PORT] net-im/tkabber-plugins-devel: External Plug f ports/149949 emulators/open-vm-tools: Problems with DHCP on startup o ports/142743 [PATCH] devel/cross-binutils: installed by *-rtems-gcc o ports/139872 [PATCH] ports-mgmt/porttools: improve port's directory a ports/139203 sysutils/freebsd-snapshot more careful patch not depen o ports/92651 graphics/gmt - WITH_EVERYTHING doesn't fetch o ports/57498 HEIMDAL_HOME should be defined in src or ports Makefil 130 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 12:05:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0FE1065676 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erich@alogreentechnologies.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283948FC15 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q0NC5MVD030668; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:05:26 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: ALO Green Technologies Pte Ltd To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:06:31 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <201201220815.36115.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201231906.31842.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:16:43 +0000 Cc: Jerry Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:05:31 -0000 Hi, On Monday 23 January 2012 11:44:56 Peter Beckman wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > I wonder why I should run FreeBSD under VMware. > > There is some Dell Blade Hardware that I could not get to run FreeBSD 8. > So I installed ESXi and installed FreeBSD as a VM so I didn't have to > switch providers. It works OK. > I never thought of this. Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 15:31:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D44106564A for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@diogunix.com) Received: from mail.kepos.org (mail.kepos.org [64.120.5.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5445D8FC12 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:31:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "tom@diogunix.com" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:31:14 +0100 References: <201201212100.59941.tom@diogunix.com> <201201230620.18940.tom@diogunix.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201231631.14633.tom@diogunix.com> Cc: Chris Rees Subject: Re: databases/mysql-workbench52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:31:24 -0000 > Hm, well the page at [1] claims that 5+ should be supported, and it's > from the 5.5 docs. > > I would try asking the mailing list at > http://lists.mysql.com/internals . Did so, awaiting reply there. I also mentioned we did not have a port maintainer this time. May be we'll be lucky ... Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 16:08:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD75106566C for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:08:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6208FC08 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghy10 with SMTP id 10so1353324ghy.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0v4bO8BPGHx+w7I+8VN+M+4VcOH9UKi5SfX2EeLPvGQ=; b=UoEXg5ixuVJKXNse5k+3frCVlmjBt/uifkQRO4jI5ZVxo4pqQYXKXvkn5GRj6Glh7S gZIg7fQpQ4yAY9AksyXlF5U4Bu4ZrSyDnzk1R017ez1C7Bae9yBziNve91YV+++qN0Th xYnySBrkE863qZC4i4eQRa6dBuR4WV0m2iO/g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.202.105 with SMTP id kh9mr11179263igc.3.1327334925050; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:08:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:08:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201201231631.14633.tom@diogunix.com> References: <201201212100.59941.tom@diogunix.com> <201201230620.18940.tom@diogunix.com> <201201231631.14633.tom@diogunix.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:08:44 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: "tom@diogunix.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql-workbench52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:08:47 -0000 On 23 Jan 2012 15:31, "tom@diogunix.com" wrote: > > > > Hm, well the page at [1] claims that 5+ should be supported, and it's > > from the 5.5 docs. > > > > I would try asking the mailing list at > > http://lists.mysql.com/internals . > > Did so, awaiting reply there. > > I also mentioned we did not have a port maintainer this time. > May be we'll be lucky ... > Maintaining ports isn't hard, with all the help available here. Just saying ;) Chris PS You know you want to.... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 17:18:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804541065675; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6771E8FC1B; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0NHI7TX031294; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:18:07 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0NHI7Ya031293; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:18:07 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:18:03 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Alexander Churanov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:18:07 -0000 --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/01/2012 00:44 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:18:09PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>=20 > >> Alexander, guys, > >>=20 > >> are there boost 1.48.0 ports available in any form? Patches for testin= g, > >> alternative repo, etc. > >>=20 > >> Thank you. > >=20 > > There have been people saying they were working on it, but I don't reme= mber > > who. > >=20 > > maybe sunpoet? not sure >=20 > Using this hint and google I found the sunpoet's patch for boost 1.47. >=20 I have written this myself: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.48.diff= and I need testers for it. regards, Bapt --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8dlksACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExHSACeM8kVAlfr5pBsvM35puuiWqxP lb8AmgKNCATC/OAwfIHiwP/tEUz0TMbt =4mHY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 20:09:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B00106564A for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C77E8FC0A for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A186ED23C2E for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:09:24 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC7FD23C2B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:09:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:09:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1DBE72.5030701@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:09:22 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: confused: RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS} vs = vs duplication X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:09:25 -0000 I am SO confused. One helpful person told me: don't do this: BUILD_DEPENDS= daq>=0.6.2:${PORTSDIR}/net/daq \ ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libnet11/libnet.a:${PORTSDIR}/net/libnet RUN_DEPENDS= daq>=0.6.2:${PORTSDIR}/net/daq \ ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libnet11/libnet.a:${PORTSDIR}/net/libnet or this RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS} But, do this: RUN_DEPENDS:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS}. (if they are truly == before kbobs..) so, for each PR i have taken, I have looked at them (portlint -C complains with RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS}) but, I read this and it seems you DON'T want RUN_DEPENDS:=${BUILD_DEPENDS}: am I reading this wrong? " At the moment 1385 ports use BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} and 450 ports use BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS}. This patch fixes ports that are currently broken. This is a temporary measure until we organically stop using := or someone(s) spend a lot of time changing all the ports over. Explicit duplication> :=> = and this just moves ports one step to the left " I am fine if I know, but I just get tired of being told its wrong, no matter what I do. (ps, that small change, and a recompile made tinderbox recompile 19 modules.. that didn't change except for that change) so, behind the covers, does := do something BAD? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 20:18:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A12106566C; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D0A8FC13; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so1344891lag.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:18:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:x-gm-message-state:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LMUFe451DCAaOl+ZfQDmFzlrfCWpaATZ8eyTU84sPlw=; b=PVbAyV7XgPyuR/eVuRR3tj+iGoFNBv109vgpDrovOawKT7s6kH23Gr2RSzWhJxb41b zXljqoLA4ZKtz9cVNZKtnmbNAPNPBpt2kQeeQvie08T+umKTmHhDFHM7u6fuAW0M001/ gdMwUHsfGJAqGMAkxGqf0qG2Ks9L/x7j1JmYo= Received: by 10.152.111.229 with SMTP id il5mr3331948lab.19.1327349917235; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:18:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.25.196 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:18:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1DBE72.5030701@freebsd.org> References: <4F1DBE72.5030701@freebsd.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:18:06 -0500 Message-ID: To: Michael Scheidell X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcr23zD/kKcmg+x06Bal5eOHyJ1tWlPvSgH/It5X9v1zLkKKKbQqOG/pM9QFMGaNkCnWi/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: confused: RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS} vs = vs duplication X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:18:40 -0000 Quick explanation: I was confused by some of portmgr@'s comments and thought they were speaking with a hat on instead of personal preference. On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I am SO confused. > > One helpful person told me: > don't do this: > > BUILD_DEPENDS=3D =C2=A0daq>=3D0.6.2:${PORTSDIR}/net/daq \ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0${LOCALBASE}/lib/l= ibnet11/libnet.a:${PORTSDIR}/net/libnet > RUN_DEPENDS=3D =C2=A0 =C2=A0daq>=3D0.6.2:${PORTSDIR}/net/daq \ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0${LOCALBASE}/lib/l= ibnet11/libnet.a:${PORTSDIR}/net/libnet This is fine > or this > > RUN_DEPENDS=3D${BUILD_DEPENDS} This is broken > But, do this: > > RUN_DEPENDS:=3D ${BUILD_DEPENDS}. This is fine > Explicit duplication> =C2=A0:=3D> =C2=A0=3D and this just moves ports one= step to the left Ignore this comment > so, behind the covers, does :=3D do something BAD? No. The paragraph at the end of http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-depend.html#A= EN2173 is correct. --=20 Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 20:51:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4F81065674 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D12F8FC0C for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C575621C0D for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:51:53 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1F4621C05 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:51:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:51:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1DC867.4090700@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:51:51 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: help with swatch rc script X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:51:54 -0000 It seems that every time there is a solar flare, swatch status stops working. This means that service swatch stop won't work because it doesn't know its running, restart, nothing. I tracked it down, and it is the size of the swatch_x_flags line that causes the problem.. too small, and it won't work! example: simple swatch in rc: swatch_enable="YES" swatch_rules="1" swatch_1_flags="--config-file=/usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf --tail-file=/var/log/eventlog --tail-args=-F --daemon --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid" swatch_1_pidfile="/var/run/swatch_1.pid" swatch_1_chdir="/var/tmp" (with/without swatch_1_pidfile, with/without swatch_w_chdir..) does't matter. service swatch status swatch is not running. atrium-ru.hackertrap.net# ps -auxww | grep swatch root 22182 0.0 0.7 28080 13812 ?? Is 12:26AM 0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/swatch --config-file=/usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf --tail-file=/var/log/eventlog --tail-args=-F --daemon --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid (perl) root 22252 0.0 0.1 7884 1380 p1 S+ 12:31AM 0:00.00 grep swatch atrium-ru.hackertrap.net# cat /var/run/swatch_1.pid 22182 now, I can't blame the last person who touched files/swatch.in, because it was a previous pr I opened that added the procname to it. (before.. something happened..) it didn't work _without_ procname in rc script. The rc script itself is a little messy, and before I go to the maintainer with a pr, I would like to get it to work in all environments. (again, it ~seems~ to only work now if you have a very long swatch_flags line: doesn't matter if I use swatch_x_flags='ljljljlkjlk "ljljlkj " lk lj ' or " \" \" (doesn't matter if I use single or double quotes) multi line or single line. swatch_enable="YES" swatch_rules="1" swatch_1_flags='--config-file=/usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf --tail-file="/var/log/eventlog /var/log/messages" \ --tail-args=-Fn0 --daemon --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid' ps -auxww | grep swatch root 22383 0.0 0.7 28080 13816 ?? Is 12:39AM 0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/swatch --config-file=/usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf --tail-file=/var/log/eventlog /var/log/messages --tail-args=-Fn0 --daemon --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid (perl) its the length of the --tail-file, or the total length of the command line: THIS WORKS: swatch_enable="YES" swatch_rules="1" swatch_1_flags='--config-file=/usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf \ --tail-file="/var/log/eventlog /var/log/messages /var/log/test1 /var/log/test2 /var/log/test3 /var/log/test4_but_add_a_humungious_long_file_to_put_it_past_some_buffer_and_it_finally_works" \ --tail-args=-Fn0 --daemon --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid' service swatch status swatch is running as pid 22595. atrium-ru.hackertrap.net# ps -auxww | grep swatch root 22595 0.0 0.7 28080 13812 ?? Is 12:45AM 0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/perl //.swatch_script.22591 root 22620 0.0 0.1 7884 1380 p1 S+ 12:47AM 0:00.00 grep swatch 0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/perl //.swatch_script.22591 -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 21:22:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9B9106566B; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F0C8FC0A; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id XAA09688; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:22:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RpRLN-00004E-Oj; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:22:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:22:24 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Churanov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:22:28 -0000 on 23/01/2012 19:18 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > I have written this myself: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.48.diff > and I need testers for it. Baptiste, it seems that along with some removed patches the boost build lost the ability to use alternative CXX, the variable is not honored. Now boost-libs seems to always use g++. P.S. Maybe we could/should use the standard "boost build" way of specifying a build configuration instead of patching the code... Just a thought... http://www.boost.org/boost-build2/doc/html/bbv2/overview/configuration.html -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 21:25:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480171065676; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9B68FC21; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0NLPwAu061936; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:25:58 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0NLPvav061935; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:25:57 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:25:54 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20120123212554.GF72126@azathoth.lan> References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L2Brqb15TUChFOBK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Alexander Churanov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:25:58 -0000 --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:22:24PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/01/2012 19:18 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > I have written this myself: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.48.= diff > > and I need testers for it. >=20 > Baptiste, >=20 > it seems that along with some removed patches the boost build lost the ab= ility > to use alternative CXX, the variable is not honored. Now boost-libs seem= s to > always use g++. >=20 >=20 > P.S. Maybe we could/should use the standard "boost build" way of specifyi= ng a > build configuration instead of patching the code... Just a thought... > http://www.boost.org/boost-build2/doc/html/bbv2/overview/configuration.ht= ml >=20 I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we s= hould for have a closer look at it. regards, Bapt --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8d0GIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExzugCeMD4bf98z3lubeWeqSuCgLzvz /d8AoK+FiIZHv4rSv/xysZ3mWwjnSJxS =88wY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 01:13:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3259B1065670 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:13:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coco@executive-computing.de) Received: from mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1948FC1C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.moehre.org (unknown [195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBA18B141D for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:13:27 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.964 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.964 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, AWL=0.036, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mail.moehre.org ([195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M+9n5nyOeNja for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:13:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from s560x.c0c0.intra (p54B0D555.dip.t-dialin.net [84.176.213.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: coco@executive-computing.de) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2ADE8B141C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:13:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:13:22 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Steinbach X-X-Sender: coco@s560x.c0c0.intra To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: databases/mysql55-server and DISABLE_CONFLICTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:13:29 -0000 Hi, shouldn't I be able to fetch distfiles for conflicting ports, if DISABLE_CONFLICTS is set ? # cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-server # make -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS fetch ===> mysql-server-5.5.20 cannot install: MySQL versions mismatch: mysql51-client is installed and wanted version is mysql55-client. *** Error code 1 I didn't use this in a long time, and can't remember, if it ever worked for MySQL. This is on a recent 8.2-STABLE with freshly csuped ports. MfG CoCo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 06:55:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A3C1065674 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (alexdupre-1-pt.tunnel.tserv23.zrh1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:25:450::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD0B8FC16 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17503 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2012 06:55:45 -0000 Received: from atom.alexdupre.com (HELO ?192.168.178.12?) (sysadmin@alexdupre.com@192.168.178.12) by lab.alexdupre.com with ESMTPSA; 24 Jan 2012 06:55:45 -0000 Message-ID: <4F1E55ED.1050607@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:55:41 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20111221 Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marco Steinbach References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql55-server and DISABLE_CONFLICTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:55:47 -0000 Marco Steinbach ha scritto: > shouldn't I be able to fetch distfiles for conflicting ports, if > DISABLE_CONFLICTS is set ? Yes, but in this case you should also set -DNO_IGNORE -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 08:03:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EB71065670; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA30D8FC16; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA16935; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:03:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RpbM8-00035a-A9; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:03:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4F1E65E6.6080403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:03:50 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> <20120123212554.GF72126@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120123212554.GF72126@azathoth.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:03:57 -0000 on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we > should for have a closer look at it. Yeah. BTW, I can confirm that with this version of boost I can now build libreoffice with gcc 4.6. The only change I had to make was in desktop/unx/source/makefile.mk - I had to add this line near the end: APP1STDLIBS+= -lstdc++ -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 08:05:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639C41065670; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756558FC16; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA16957; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:05:55 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RpbO6-00035m-Rb; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:05:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4F1E6662.8050303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:05:54 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> <20120123212554.GF72126@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120123212554.GF72126@azathoth.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Churanov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:05:57 -0000 on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we > should for have a closer look at it. And, just in case, what I did was put the following line into tools/build/v2/user-config.jam: using gcc : 4.6 : g++46 ; But this is not flexible enough, it seems. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 08:08:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C57106566B; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coco@executive-computing.de) Received: from mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC3B8FC08; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.moehre.org (unknown [195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F1C8B141D; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:08:02 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.964 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.964 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, AWL=0.036, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mail.moehre.org ([195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N+-66CK4KpRn; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:07:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.100.30] (p54B0D555.dip.t-dialin.net [84.176.213.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: coco@executive-computing.de) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65A348B141C; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:07:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F1E66AB.2000503@executive-computing.de> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:07:07 +0100 From: Marco Steinbach User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dupre References: <4F1E55ED.1050607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F1E55ED.1050607@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql55-server and DISABLE_CONFLICTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:08:04 -0000 Alex Dupre wrote on 24.01.2012 07:55: > Marco Steinbach ha scritto: >> shouldn't I be able to fetch distfiles for conflicting ports, if >> DISABLE_CONFLICTS is set ? > > Yes, but in this case you should also set -DNO_IGNORE That did the trick -- thank you. MfG Coco From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 08:15:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F901065670; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:15:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A4C8FC14; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0O8Exre093177; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:14:59 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0O8ExES093176; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:14:59 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:14:55 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20120124081455.GI72126@azathoth.lan> References: <4F188891.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <20120119224423.GL4729@azathoth.lan> <4F1918B1.6000603@FreeBSD.org> <20120123171803.GC72126@azathoth.lan> <4F1DCF90.9040702@FreeBSD.org> <20120123212554.GF72126@azathoth.lan> <4F1E6662.8050303@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X0cz4bGbQuRbxrVl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1E6662.8050303@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Alexander Churanov , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: boost 1.48.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:15:00 -0000 --X0cz4bGbQuRbxrVl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:05:54AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, = we > > should for have a closer look at it. >=20 > And, just in case, what I did was put the following line into > tools/build/v2/user-config.jam: > using gcc : 4.6 : g++46 ; >=20 > But this is not flexible enough, it seems. =46rom what I've looked at this is the right solution: modifying user-confi= g.jam, we should just be able to do it a flexible way :) regards, Bapt --X0cz4bGbQuRbxrVl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8eaH8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyQZwCdF2sizWdMCQmSWNiI8l7YcH06 hBoAmwUTuSLT08u3a41U/14+zFPAhEab =dLuT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X0cz4bGbQuRbxrVl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 08:58:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2EA106566C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward13.mail.yandex.net (forward13.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AB88FC12 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (smtp11.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.67]) by forward13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 52C6F14144D; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:58:17 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 35F437E04C1; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:58:17 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 87.249.28.58.tel.ru (87.249.28.58.tel.ru [87.249.28.58]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id wGPWg6Zu-wGPWS9bd; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:58:17 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4F1E72A8.9050004@passap.ru> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:58:16 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120123 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gogo@cs.uni-sb.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: [patch] devel/py-lxml: compile at 10-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:58:19 -0000 Hi! There is an error while compiling devel/py-lxml at 10-CURRENT: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.10.20120114180333/py27-lxml-2.3.2.log I managed to compile the port with the following patch, but I'm sure there is a proper way to do it. Here is the patch: ----- --- src/lxml/lxml.etree.c.orig 2012-01-24 12:46:24.844235483 +0400 +++ src/lxml/lxml.etree.c 2012-01-24 12:45:28.653235337 +0400 @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ /* Generated by Cython 0.15.1 on Fri Nov 11 16:39:03 2011 */ +#include + #define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN #include "Python.h" #ifndef Py_PYTHON_H ----- -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 09:44:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A21106566B for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A788FC08 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 31DB1C21ABA; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:44:16 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1327398256; bh=73RfXyRUx9Ppi03P7PkWZJY52qX3VWVGgLJAF8tPrxA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=g9tY/iWH2IakkKscxW3I3k++JSBMYVtx6Hg1kX9OsYPuIVU8vGcV2WwIWq4Ox+A5x v+dtKriBx2Ml3Y12812P09NnWcFqL8Njsd5i4lYyZN8f0u/j3BL4HT3vJbg4tYtmCj wxvlSYqnvGtegrzY1DLHxM/fBehV2yP3mLUMuH/0= Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 04D60E403E1; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:44:16 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1327398256; bh=73RfXyRUx9Ppi03P7PkWZJY52qX3VWVGgLJAF8tPrxA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=g9tY/iWH2IakkKscxW3I3k++JSBMYVtx6Hg1kX9OsYPuIVU8vGcV2WwIWq4Ox+A5x v+dtKriBx2Ml3Y12812P09NnWcFqL8Njsd5i4lYyZN8f0u/j3BL4HT3vJbg4tYtmCj wxvlSYqnvGtegrzY1DLHxM/fBehV2yP3mLUMuH/0= Received: from unknown (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id iFLeJEqW-iFLqWMCE; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:44:15 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4F1E7D48.7050609@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:43:36 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120123 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <4F1E72A8.9050004@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <4F1E72A8.9050004@passap.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gogo@cs.uni-sb.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] devel/py-lxml: compile at 10-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:44:18 -0000 Hi, Boris! Boris Samorodov wrote on 24.01.2012 12:58: > Hi! > > There is an error while compiling devel/py-lxml at 10-CURRENT: > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.10.20120114180333/py27-lxml-2.3.2.log > > > I managed to compile the port with the following patch, but I'm sure > there is a proper way to do it. Here is the patch: > ----- > --- src/lxml/lxml.etree.c.orig 2012-01-24 12:46:24.844235483 +0400 > +++ src/lxml/lxml.etree.c 2012-01-24 12:45:28.653235337 +0400 > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ > /* Generated by Cython 0.15.1 on Fri Nov 11 16:39:03 2011 */ > > +#include > + > #define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN > #include "Python.h" > #ifndef Py_PYTHON_H > ----- Nice, i'll check it. It's better then patching both py-lxml and libxslt anyway. Btw, did you read this related thread by avg@: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/2012-January/003825.html May be you have some thoughts about proper way. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 14:19:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E7D1065672; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net (eastrmfepo101.cox.net [68.230.241.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ECF8FC14; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120124141912.EDKH24648.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:19:12 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo305.cox.net with bizsmtp id RSKB1i0051BeFqy02SKBJL; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:19:12 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4F1EBDE0.0099,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UTnd/fk6CCePovf+gzxRIqLTsJhlNaD/+XivpuoWZ3E= c=1 sm=1 a=x3aGGqJHSowA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=2XC0xUpuI5yxzK0qyocA:9 a=KjnaQVIHmes62OwosNYA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0OEJAO1004431; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:19:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:19:05 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Doug Barton Subject: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:19:19 -0000 The behavior of portmaster with "-o " (as the man page puts it), doesn't seem to be quite what one would expect. While endeavoring to upgrade the already installed lang/gcc44 to lang/gcc46 using the command: portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.20111108 (I had already built, but not installed, gcc46, and didn't want any cleaning done before or after, just in case something went wrong) I got some rather unexpected results -- namely that, besides installing gcc46, portmaster wanted to do a normal upgrade of lang/gcc44 within its own directory (from version 4.4.7.20111108 to 4.4.7.20120117). Only after adding the "-i" (interactive) option to the command line and answering the prompts did I get the desired operation, a direct upgrade of gcc44 to gcc46. I'm still in the process of acclimating myself to using portmaster, having used portupgrade for years (yes, I know, I'm a little late to the dance), so please bear with me if I'm coming across as a little dense, but... Is this the intended behavior? It strikes me as a little peculiar, portmaster's wanting to perform an entirely unnecessary (and unrequested) operation (the upgrade of the original port within its own directory). It seems to render the automated performance of this type of "third party" upgrade impossible. I'm really not grasping the logic of this arrangement. # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.20111108 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/lang/gcc46 ===>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports ===>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to gcc-4.4.7.20120117 lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one below, supposed to be indicating exactly? If it means what I think it does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting the intention of the "-o" option) ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/lang/gcc44 ===>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc44 from ports ===>>> Initial dependency check complete for lang/gcc44 lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 ===>>> Continuing initial dependency check for lang/gcc46 ===>>> Initial dependency check complete for lang/gcc46 ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Install lang/gcc46 Upgrade gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to gcc-4.4.7.20120117 ===>>> Proceed? y/n [y] (answered no here) ===>>> If you would like to upgrade or install some, but not all of the above try adding '-i' to the command line. Sign me "Confused". :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 14:21:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1C6106566B for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE4B8FC0A for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4248D23C2E for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:06 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07BB5D23C0D for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1EBE51.3050300@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:21:07 -0000 On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > what happens with: # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44 ? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 15:15:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F5A106564A for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net [68.230.241.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED6C8FC0C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo209.cox.net ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120124151503.IOJG28068.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo209.cox.net> for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:15:03 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo209.cox.net with bizsmtp id RTF21i00c1BeFqy02TF394; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:15:03 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.4F1ECAF7.00AC,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=hUCJ0Gz5LjRqF1xLPeCnm9rLnz3DdW5ICkn8EI10KF4= c=1 sm=1 a=EnZeqY4DioAA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=2yyA0XvX2nHWy3Tme5UA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0OFF22j043552 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:15:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:14:57 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120124091457.66d23583@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <4F1EBE51.3050300@freebsd.org> References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1EBE51.3050300@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:15:09 -0000 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500 Michael Scheidell wrote: > > On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > > > what happens with: > > # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44 > > ? Well, since gcc44 is no longer installed, I just tried: portmaster -o lang/gcc47 lang/gcc46 And the actions that started were much more along the lines of what I was expecting. The build of gcc47 is currently underway as I write this. So, it seems it's not a good idea to "mix and match" port origins with port names in the case of this particular option. Could this be considered a "bug"? It certainly seems to at least qualify as a "quirk", I would say. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 16:02:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFB8106566C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kubito@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB128FC0A for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhfs35 with SMTP id s35so1971996yhf.13 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:02:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=NmWZ4PHdeRycnrQl+phXtWn/zsvK4xB6sarHU7aV77I=; b=cHnuu1Nzfmi95Ck0W2obBqsyfsQXii4KAV54BroWJP/qQCGBhs4HrXFEVBKYCzVlsS WH8sOWIakdLAmjM3J1WwQvPDGzNKTpK+LrJdAFgqaxwrMtNIJbKYUWc1Vb8bbOdmoLW3 bhC+Mi3BhwprmD1iM5uENNCBsFaCE4B2vnffA= Received: by 10.236.116.9 with SMTP id f9mr19347840yhh.0.1327419540517; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:39:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rachacuca.gmail.com (li113-135.members.linode.com. [69.164.198.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v40sm27968651yhh.15.2012.01.24.07.38.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:38:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: Raphael Kubo da Costa From: Raphael Kubo da Costa To: _ In-Reply-To: (pancakeking79@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:27:10 +0100") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:39:45 -0200 Message-ID: <83wr8h6rem.fsf@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg_add -r kde - binary doesn't exist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:02:54 -0000 Redirecting the mail to ports@FreeBSD.org -- the KDE on FreeBSD team does not maintain KDE3 anymore, so you have better chances of success here :) _ writes: > Hi, > > Just wanted to inform you that I tried to install kde3 as a binary the > other day. > > Running both: > > # pkg_add -r kde > > and > > # pkg_add -r kde3 > > gives me an error message, saying that it doesn't exist on the FreeBSD ftp > server. > > I don't wanna install it from the ports, since this takes forever! > > Could somebody upload it again? > > Regards From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 16:19:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD41106566B for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0028FC0C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D427C621C3D; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:19:05 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D12621C0D; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:19:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:19:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1ED9F8.1090801@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:19:04 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: _ References: <83wr8h6rem.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <83wr8h6rem.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg_add -r kde - binary doesn't exist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:06 -0000 On 1/24/12 10:39 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Redirecting the mail to ports@FreeBSD.org -- the KDE on FreeBSD team > does not maintain KDE3 anymore, so you have better chances of success > here :) > > _ writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Just wanted to inform you that I tried to install kde3 as a binary the >> other day. maybe someone here has it in a tinderbox somewhere. what OS version, mach do you need? (output from uname -a) or, maybe someone with a tinderbox would compile it for you for beer credits. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 16:57:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF72C1065670 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A668FC16 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdr11 with SMTP id dr11so4557824wgb.31 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MiGjS7cskUkB8hrJWEpccSrPjmV5Zvu1B6DnlnL7uaM=; b=kl89S3XYGWnMBqRPXs28TtSDXLfhvAtB5xOlx3ALB5ms1qp5DlK8pZ0tVkpW+7YsnV d6SQn2IV24dpcUsQwhXBrY9oghYSHE4dY8tXceu0PmXCpMf4TGEd3X36xQdRBz4jc9bD Ins55bf5cIJqDm7IpSEFeMaEB4CnJpTaa2AyM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.106.130 with SMTP id gu2mr22135629wib.6.1327424234506; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.101.196 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120124091457.66d23583@cox.net> References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1EBE51.3050300@freebsd.org> <20120124091457.66d23583@cox.net> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:57:16 -0000 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote= : > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500 > Michael Scheidell wrote: >> >> On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> > # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.20111108 >> > >> what happens with: >> >> # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44 >> >> ? > > Well, since gcc44 is no longer installed, I just tried: > > portmaster -o lang/gcc47 lang/gcc46 > > And the actions that started were much more along the lines of what I > was expecting. =A0The build of gcc47 is currently underway as I write > this. > > So, it seems it's not a good idea to "mix and match" port origins with > port names in the case of this particular option. =A0Could this be > considered a "bug"? =A0It certainly seems to at least qualify as a > "quirk", I would say. =A0:-) > > -- > Conrad J. Sabatier > conrads@cox.net I wanted to note is that you installed lang/gcc46, the development version of the compiler. It gets updated very frequently and you may want this, but it is probably better for most people to install lang/gcc which is the stable version of gcc-4.6. It gets updated only when a new gcc-4.6 version is released, so it does not get updated nearly so often. Posts that depend on USE_FORTRAN or USE_GCC=3D4.6+ will both be happy with lang/gcc, though they will pull in the development version if no gcc-4.6 is installed. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 17:16:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A4F106564A for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net (eastrmfepo201.cox.net [68.230.241.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C328FC16 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120124171645.IXKK4752.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:16:45 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo305.cox.net with bizsmtp id RVGk1i0071BeFqy02VGkGz; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:16:44 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020B.4F1EE77C.0159,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UTnd/fk6CCePovf+gzxRIqLTsJhlNaD/+XivpuoWZ3E= c=1 sm=1 a=EnZeqY4DioAA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=DDq7R-G38bBZdIXk5O0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0OHGhtJ035808; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:16:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:16:38 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20120124111638.0e6eeb09@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1EBE51.3050300@freebsd.org> <20120124091457.66d23583@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:16:51 -0000 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier > wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:21:05 -0500 > > Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> > >> On 1/24/12 9:19 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > >> > # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > >> > > >> what happens with: > >> > >> # portmaster -CK -o lang/gcc46 lang/gcc44 > >> > >> ? > > > > Well, since gcc44 is no longer installed, I just tried: > > > > portmaster -o lang/gcc47 lang/gcc46 > > > > And the actions that started were much more along the lines of what > > I was expecting. =A0The build of gcc47 is currently underway as I > > write this. > > > > So, it seems it's not a good idea to "mix and match" port origins > > with port names in the case of this particular option. =A0Could this > > be considered a "bug"? =A0It certainly seems to at least qualify as a > > "quirk", I would say. =A0:-) > > > > -- > > Conrad J. Sabatier > > conrads@cox.net >=20 > I wanted to note is that you installed lang/gcc46, the development > version of the compiler. It gets updated very frequently and you may > want this, but it is probably better for most people to install > lang/gcc which is the stable version of gcc-4.6. It gets updated only > when a new gcc-4.6 version is released, so it does not get updated > nearly so often. Posts that depend on USE_FORTRAN or USE_GCC=3D4.6+ will > both be happy with lang/gcc, though they will pull in the development > version if no gcc-4.6 is installed. Yes, I do recall now a lot of talk about 4.6 being subject to frequent change. Slipped my mind there for a bit. :-) I think I will back off to the other version. I mainly was interested in getting up to the minimum version needed to truly support my AMD Phenom 9550 processor (-march=3Damdfam10) the same way Clang does. Thanks for that info. --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 17:58:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908FE106566B for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jankyj@unfs.us) Received: from morbid.purplehat.org (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7442D8FC0A for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) by morbid.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4948885B0A7 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:58:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from morbid.purplehat.org ([206.225.83.29]) by localhost (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28851-02 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (mx2.purplehat.org [174.51.182.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ek@purplehat.org) by morbid.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4000185B0A2 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:58:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F1EF151.3030605@unfs.us> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:58:41 -0700 From: Janketh Jay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Cc: Subject: Request port removal: sysutils/syscp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:58:44 -0000 Hi Team, I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor. Can someone please remove sysutils/syscp from the ports tree as it is old and potentially dangerous? Regards, Janky Jay, III From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 18:48:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F61065670 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54338FC0C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RplPL-00066E-6l for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:47:51 +0100 Received: from g231171154.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.171.154]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:47:51 +0100 Received: from rotkap by g231171154.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:47:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:47:26 +0100 Organization: yes Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <83wr8h6rem.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: g231171154.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:48:03 -0000 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Redirecting the mail to ports@FreeBSD.org -- the KDE on FreeBSD team > does not maintain KDE3 anymore, so you have better chances of success > here :) > > _ writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Just wanted to inform you that I tried to install kde3 as a binary the >> other day. >> >> Running both: >> >> # pkg_add -r kde >> >> and >> >> # pkg_add -r kde3 >> >> gives me an error message, saying that it doesn't exist on the FreeBSD ftp >> server. >> >> I don't wanna install it from the ports, since this takes forever! >> >> Could somebody upload it again? I think, I found some KDE Binaries here: ftp://ftp7.de.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/ Not the META-packages, but some kde stuff (3 and 4). export these variables in your /etc/profile: PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp7.de.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/Latest/ PKG_SITES=ftp://ftp7.de.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/ export PACKAGESITE PKG_SITES Heino From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 19:20:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD18D106564A for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC258FC08 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0OJK9lZ010697 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:20:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0OJK9PV010696; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:20:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:20:09 GMT Message-Id: <201201241920.q0OJK9PV010696@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: dfilter@FreeBSD.ORG (dfilter service) Cc: Subject: Re: ports/16440: commit references a PR X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dfilter service List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:20:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/16440; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dfilter@FreeBSD.ORG (dfilter service) To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/16440: commit references a PR Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:15:26 +0000 (UTC) scheidell 2012-01-24 19:15:15 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: audio/shoutcast Makefile distinfo pkg-plist audio/shoutcast/files pkg-message.in shoutcast.in Log: - Update to 2.0.0.29. - Bump from beta (build 14) to release (build 29) - Resolve oddities surrounding PLIST_SUB and SUB_LIST (thanks Michael and Gabor) - Update pkg-plist to reflect updated documentation - Support creation of both sc_serv.log and sc_w3c.log on startup PR: ports/16440 Approved by: gabor (mentor) Revision Changes Path 1.22 +11 -10 ports/audio/shoutcast/Makefile 1.9 +2 -2 ports/audio/shoutcast/distinfo 1.4 +1 -1 ports/audio/shoutcast/files/pkg-message.in 1.3 +15 -12 ports/audio/shoutcast/files/shoutcast.in 1.4 +3 -1 ports/audio/shoutcast/pkg-plist _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 20:27:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794B9106566C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460238FC08 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so10213893iag.13 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:27:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YcwEFOfBj2j1b1FB+Fvt5EqjIN8QfWvVxF3tJB6zgOg=; b=uiIK9Nwtkg5w/K7SK2XblIBTjfi7q9c6J4Fw3ySepMlQdrw5+FTPYnHaxEcdrop6TI l9NJRptODY1PsuB7IWwswlohQKeunmwB+OxtAeSmDhnFT2KWi/PRy6L7XKTW4XrqrU+M tmvJS/N0TE0oVqBa1sY18Z0/0/xiDytfQQuYw= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr15652907icv.8.1327436853251; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:27:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:27:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1EF151.3030605@unfs.us> References: <4F1EF151.3030605@unfs.us> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:27:02 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xBiLdXHNe9LUZ_aUYavzt05UmWk Message-ID: To: Janketh Jay Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request port removal: sysutils/syscp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:27:34 -0000 Hi Justin, On 24 January 2012 17:58, Janketh Jay wrote: > Hi Team, > > =A0 =A0I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long > ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor. Can someone please remove > sysutils/syscp from the ports tree as it is old and potentially dangerous= ? Done. Thanks! Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 20:32:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC5D1065673 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3661162412; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:31:54 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120119 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:32:10 -0000 On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports > ===>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to > gcc-4.4.7.20120117 > lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > > (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one > below, supposed to be indicating exactly? If it means what I think it > does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting the intention > of the "-o" option) No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency of 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when non-base gcc was in use, but have never had anyone track down the cause authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm assuming you already looked there. What you probably have to do is pkg_delete -f 4.4, then do the same portmaster -o command but with 'lang/gcc44' as the second argument. hth, Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 21:19:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8BB1065670; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net (eastrmfepo101.cox.net [68.230.241.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD418FC08; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120124211909.XMDY24648.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:09 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo305.cox.net with bizsmtp id RZJw1i00R1BeFqy02ZK38a; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:08 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.4F1F204C.010E,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UTnd/fk6CCePovf+gzxRIqLTsJhlNaD/+XivpuoWZ3E= c=1 sm=1 a=EnZeqY4DioAA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=8CEQTTFkZ7fcwKEIy6wA:9 a=zL9v1K4EWjPOFg8ON44A:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0OLIoEF000665; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:18:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:18:45 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120124151845.31ed1fd3@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:19:10 -0000 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:31:54 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports > > ===>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to > > gcc-4.4.7.20120117 > > lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > > > > (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one > > below, supposed to be indicating exactly? If it means what I think > > it does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting the > > intention of the "-o" option) > > No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency of > 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when non-base > gcc was in use, but have never had anyone track down the cause > authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm assuming > you already looked there. > > What you probably have to do is pkg_delete -f 4.4, then do the same > portmaster -o command but with 'lang/gcc44' as the second argument. Yes, using origin designators in both places worked. Is this an unwritten requirement in the case of the -o option? Anyway, moving merrily along... :-) Thanks! -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 21:23:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D881065672 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B7B14D8F1; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F1F213A.9030206@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:23:06 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120119 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> <20120124151845.31ed1fd3@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120124151845.31ed1fd3@cox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:23:07 -0000 On 01/24/2012 13:18, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Yes, using origin designators in both places worked. Is this an > unwritten requirement in the case of the -o option? No, usually it works with the package name as the second argument (or even a glob pattern as long as it resolves to a unique package name). Like I said, the way that the ports framework handles gcc seems to do things that confuse portmaster. I'm not saying that it's doing anything wrong, it's just different. Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 22:02:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12359106566B; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55EE8FC0A; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so137892iae.13 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:02:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5ozUdwN78NueVtt27VixTHwMmwVjH7aUIdk/b43qCSk=; b=N+o+bntDh1LnqGdtvLPQKJQY+76GhxGjQfxHM5bXN00bXFo6qSKHF8op3T4iwGY319 ISgFxylxtuMUW3unFmBgl8gBau2hQVSQpVVvcEpmLNw8/6q48X7YqBnraF9LfkFItcrQ vz7AHei/HZ9g2yWShK6bmVwXLF9lgEwioiqV0= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr15958434icv.8.1327442525277; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:02:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:01:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:01:33 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C0NmhFfb6PO6r7H1dP2blGGb5Jc Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Conrad J. Sabatier" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:02:06 -0000 On 24 January 2012 20:31, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to >> gcc-4.4.7.20120117 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 >> >> (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one >> below, supposed to be indicating exactly? =A0If it means what I think it >> does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting the intention >> of the "-o" option) > > No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency of > 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when non-base gcc > was in use, but have never had anyone track down the cause > authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm assuming you > already looked there. Often happens when people stick USE_something into make.conf :) (don't do that) Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 22:29:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437571065677 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jankyj@unfs.us) Received: from morbid.purplehat.org (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241BF8FC16 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) by morbid.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9739885B0A7 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from morbid.purplehat.org ([206.225.83.29]) by localhost (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31358-03 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:29:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (mx2.purplehat.org [174.51.182.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ek@purplehat.org) by morbid.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B9E085B0A2 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:29:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F1F30B1.2020303@unfs.us> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:29:05 -0700 From: Janketh Jay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F1EF151.3030605@unfs.us> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard Subject: Re: Request port removal: sysutils/syscp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:29:06 -0000 Thank you, sir! :) On 01/24/2012 01:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi Justin, > > On 24 January 2012 17:58, Janketh Jay wrote: >> Hi Team, >> >> I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long >> ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor. Can someone please remove >> sysutils/syscp from the ports tree as it is old and potentially dangerous? > Done. Thanks! > > Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 05:13:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419C8106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11F68FC0A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so1547631ggn.13 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:13:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition; bh=8Wd6wW3zliGaKYWuvag1xdfwT7uegtAeDQEhdF5YLRA=; b=FTfMqZt/+RBgcLsYb6ZNRSRxUSUHcuMurU/01fYMz+CeOM8kIwmatK+/0GHRnZKG0v fCG+0TbH3AvNprtWLA/MJDwQSAVrOt+Cy2/kL0iSLT39DcSGmeSrDAnvcfcGTWnwl1Ir vU9Ecq/1QhEG/k3kKX1TiYCm/+OPVnASG0ku8= Received: by 10.101.180.19 with SMTP id h19mr6742652anp.74.1327468392157; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:13:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-56-123-248.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.56.123.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p63sm31744545yhj.22.2012.01.24.21.13.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:13:10 -0800 (PST) Sender: Jason Hellenthal Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0P5D7ts032492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:13:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhell@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0P5D1Fr032491; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:13:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:13:01 -0500 From: Jason Hellenthal To: vanhu@netasq.com Message-ID: <20120125051300.GA84611@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: security/ipsec-tools files/patch8-utmp.diff X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:13:13 -0000 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The subject listed port attempts to apply the patch via its $CWD but if $CW= D is not in not within the $MASTERDIR then the patch fails to apply. Please= adjust the following... =2Eif ${OSVERSION} < 900007 EXTRA_PATCHES=3Dfiles/patch8-utmp.diff =2Eendif To: =2Eif ${OSVERSION} < 900007 EXTRA_PATCHES=3D${MASTERDIR}/files/patch8-utmp.diff =2Eendif Or: =2Eif ${OSVERSION} < 900007 EXTRA_PATCHES=3D${.CURDIR}/files/patch8-utmp.diff =2Eendif Thanks --=20 ;s =3D; --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPH49cAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+FggH/AxzpbIefBpfjvdErwzePGZz 0QkRiypzFVWrcmOZu7sO2h8Xzq689QXOCub6TP4NtxFW1OMkwhvN+UmNEle9gllH gnD/DCLbqsesrF+dAaKRYOyIsixE75akTEz+PF7EVSe5ulqEVdLlm0oOWDqUlWZO fKa8i7u09leY9K7c4R+KlFAYUvStoMFcPV27WzVkpAAw49PY+q0S55iaLZzOd2Zs D4CZXqC4S8+k6oGQty7q7AAd+91bZAyKCPW2UiGwB9VEbUOKKX6I4fyiHPpvcBoN RWD+mFb2qOas1tiuev9/cMmJCyPxg1pDPXmDKHRjGnA2tElyfYebfna/68XFHB8= =/NH7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 06:14:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED2A106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138EF8FC14 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadi14 with SMTP id i14so3925854dad.13 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:14:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.75.199 with SMTP id e7mr37897784pbw.128.1327472086634; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:14:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from dormouse.experts-exchange.com ([72.29.164.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4sm3803674pbg.12.2012.01.24.22.14.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:14:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: Jason Helfman Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:13:55 -0800 From: Jason Helfman To: Jason Hellenthal Message-ID: <20120125061355.GB94401@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <20120125051300.GA84611@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120125051300.GA84611@DataIX.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 Organization: The FreeBSD Project, http://www.freebsd.org X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! X-PGP-FingerPrint: 8E0D C457 9A0F C91C 23F3 0454 2059 9A63 4150 D3DC X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh/jgh.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk5/2uzMdbbS7F9UgnYuUpEkxwC59A5WQUjNitGOULJEy57BeNyLIltzFAlMVIgHzvZi1QE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Cc: ports@freebsd.org, vanhu@netasq.com Subject: Re: security/ipsec-tools files/patch8-utmp.diff X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:14:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:13:01AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal thus spake: > >The subject listed port attempts to apply the patch via its $CWD but if $CWD is not in not within the $MASTERDIR then the patch fails to apply. Please adjust the following... > >.if ${OSVERSION} < 900007 >EXTRA_PATCHES=files/patch8-utmp.diff >.endif > >To: > >.if ${OSVERSION} < 900007 >EXTRA_PATCHES=${MASTERDIR}/files/patch8-utmp.diff >.endif > >Or: > >.if ${OSVERSION} < 900007 >EXTRA_PATCHES=${.CURDIR}/files/patch8-utmp.diff >.endif > > >Thanks > >-- >;s =; Thanks. Committed! - -jgh - -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPH52jAAoJECBZmmNBUNPcjlkIAIHZ+SOfrBB9QQcgzjDkTKuB VQgpWKirFfU9vQJUp7OGGwxQm6/0swQwNQOitMYMK4DCLC+F7FSf05FYqvYU5HvW CWaMkm/Dc2zYVXgHcT3CN1GYK+gB0lRbxPtsZTW7nkWhw6dMdMzJeQb5LRjYMQvd 9Rh6clzM0DlAqSL3GV30kuxXBZw97kCUnDnQgCfPaq+df8QVVXFCYCxy1qlIFBF1 kVHqTCzhkQwlsV24yHVMiI3aPdNJMN4MfVR1Gi379KzWMeKC3fH0EpjKl0rFels8 IzP5PLRsJrXv8yWux4Uw5h6pLRNs4kZEZ74xaWT7jNVEW+Z1IwN4ZEHjUrTqgro= =XA5N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 11:01:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C25C1065672; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80FF8FC0A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A51846B06; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:01:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:01:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Michael Scheidell In-Reply-To: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: ports@freebsd.org, developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:01:47 -0000 On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I reached out to a high level sr engineer at VMware and told him there was a > lot of companies using FreeBSD on VMware, and a lot more that would, if just > VMware gave us some love (fixed, or helped us fix some device drivers). > > He asked "how many"? > > Well, I sure can't go back to him and tell him that there was only one > company who contacted me back who said that they used VMware in production > systems, with FreeBSD guest os. > > If there isn't anyone else with VMware problems, and I really want to be > clear: VMware is a 'for profit' company, so, small numbers won't impress > them, but if there are any companies (aside from the one that contacted me.. > you don't have to again, I have your email). > > If no one else, I'll call him back on the phone and apologize for bothering > him. > > I was really hoping to get some of the virtual nic issues, and hgfs issues > worked out, but, I guess there isn't enough commercial interest. Hi Michael: I can't speak to your specific experience, but I do know that some VMWare folk contacted the FreeBSD release engineering team late in the 9.0 cycle to ask whether the ISO images appearing on our FTP site were the final versions they should use for qualification work or not. We advised them to wait until the release announcement was out, just in case. Robert From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 11:06:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AB4106564A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BE28FC12; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D861B46B0C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:06:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:06:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Michael Scheidell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: ports@freebsd.org, developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:06:03 -0000 On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Robert Watson wrote: > I can't speak to your specific experience, but I do know that some VMWare > folk contacted the FreeBSD release engineering team late in the 9.0 cycle to > ask whether the ISO images appearing on our FTP site were the final versions > they should use for qualification work or not. We advised them to wait > until the release announcement was out, just in case. Oh, one other data point. Last I checked, NetApp used VMWare as a training/development platform with OnTap GX, which is FreeBSD-derived. I believe that may include shipping training VMs to customers, but you'd want to check their web site and confirm that before passing that on. I don't know if NetApp has shipped with VMWare in products; if that is the case, you might not want to bring up NetApp's work on bHyve :-). Robert From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 09:57:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1E7106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaretbartsch@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm20-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm20-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61FAF8FC0C for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.54] by nm20.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2012 09:44:39 -0000 Received: from [98.138.86.157] by tm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2012 09:44:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1015.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2012 09:44:39 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 252784.96660.bm@omp1015.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 63290 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jan 2012 09:44:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1327484678; bh=OnEx54Zr7OEetWKPPle0npf0f1bSB/bIdtvtq+M9PQw=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i2MMhCy3cb08/Y729T1KXaQZfFoHH5RJc5b0Fta70a/XUWMZRbp7YZuWwgzqbf0M/dN9CAcoMvtcemCjYevUlaZMLf5To13mY0isIwZ3Vvfledq+j03hyTJ0cCTxeNQSPjYJaAbsMeUNwzdVHajMApWAqmG2PnS3IHnNnXrRsWo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ACDEOWQQFj0n3ekjqeyN8V46fxrYEMhgfv6968bySIgYfS5+fgg1BWNajnL6E7qnPd8BFuWyPLDGPAfvc7ElK7V3+Dnd7SS47VtPKqITaTW5jRaL+a3US8OLDRDSjZ36TJXgY1Z7Jy+8VcvK7v0u9/nGNNdwnPHKS3Hwn63Zi4U=; X-YMail-OSG: 0jPeqGsVM1mEX4MsjQQL85oxtFPcE0hy09yE8L48jhaQAk. 9zX8dhtdrKUsCcP73DmiRbHDOKkmlreybVwOs7IibCVxYXD8URqFgGESg8hP kQhZ2yaF9IhtYuqyTZh8py2iuDbFroSRRA1P5QfhbNNn7MdGmkQc9Ia5sTRr .y6kUNiLFvg05n8v9m934LckGgWLnSkVG.YqFJmV0gnx10_6EQbQbllj2pTk miFLwZM0wtd3zRIuidyJEzQkpaMX8v0SZ1XTvVRudgS7Ri2DgF8a3LIwILnU gVKxB2Jhe30FjuxtzsNQYgPbeV1Jqok5wHDrwaL0AUZVXaTth4Va8_PSk5es n3TO24wirxQaa7utUd.p1DmWH0PmjawQKxaxSyU06XYMu6AgZzM3ZhePcyXY fmPi0zTK0_qm6mU4hcrcDXTFYImEWwwgBkYbZ7Wac2cE83o9WC.rLyGRpyo_ WbiIHWkKAG5WzEoZFnd8_ Received: from [70.77.108.234] by web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:38 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537 Message-ID: <1327484678.50614.YahooMailNeo@web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:38 -0800 (PST) From: Jaret Bartsch To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:07:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Port libSwiften Request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jaret Bartsch List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:57:39 -0000 Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port called libSwiften (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften or libSwiften. Is it possible the ports team could perhaps include this software in the ports collection? Regards, Jaret From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 13:27:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECBD106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:27:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F42C8FC16 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B385C55 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:39:45 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B24505C48 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:39:44 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F200238.9050109@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:23:04 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1327484678.50614.YahooMailNeo@web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1327484678.50614.YahooMailNeo@web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Port libSwiften Request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:27:13 -0000 On 01/25/12 19:44, Jaret Bartsch wrote: > Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port called libSwiften (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften or libSwiften. Is it possible the ports team could perhaps include this software in the ports collection? Would you be willing to have a crack at porting it yourself? I'm a newb myself at this, but it is possible- even if you don't fully understand makefiles :) Otherwise I'd be willing to help, but there are plenty here better qualified to answer any queries about how to do it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 15:12:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEA21065670 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:12:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D518FC0C for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCBC5C4A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:05:55 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F10525C48 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:05:54 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F20166B.7030707@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:49:15 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: port license framework X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:12:37 -0000 I'm just trying to get my head around the license framework. Is it supposed to be a means for a sysadmin to control what licensed software is installed? Or is it more than that? If it is more than that, why would one need to install a license from the framework if the software usually has it in the docs as copying or something else? Or am I way off? Cheers From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 15:42:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB01106566C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:42:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D16C8FC0A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1796D23C0D; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:42:48 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF0AD23C0C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:42:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:42:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4F2022F9.7010605@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:42:49 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gabor Kovesdan Subject: tripwire/and or packages PH will hate, and ask for -exp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:42:49 -0000 when you install tripwire (/usr/ports/security/tripwire), at some point in the install, it asks you, 'interactively' to 'accept' the GPL2 license. (yes, I know, I could probably use USE_LICENSE=GPL2, and patch install scripts). but, then it wants to generate a site key and site pass key. none of which PH will like (TB doesn't like it, PH will hate it) But, I am not the maintainer, and just trying to get this updated to latest source version, and by updating source tree, this is no worse that it was yesterday. (and I have some portlint's that I fixed) Now: I have MANUALLY verified pkg-plist adds/subtracts, and CAN get package to build if I set NO_DB_BUILD, and manually accept license, and generate keys (so it WILL build, and deinstall, just fine) so, how do I keep pav from sending me an email in two days telling me PH won't compile this? is this enough in the Makefile to do that? NO_PACKAGE= requires manual acceptance of license agreement IS_INTERACTIVE= yes -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 16:11:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9DE106566B; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D240B8FC1B; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so1989870iae.13 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:11:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Svd5RzI+8+NjkImU4kOeBKFD73cbo9v3E4IqxyGLuTM=; b=Gnpy9iHa8jwgTkcYTN4rrEIIv2SNVArB78qMOiEu1X9c91XPMc9CLBy2+vjxTNEQVM c4jbuA1PToCj2x9rQIFTS04pwpbqq3KqJHMiEITTwwVgCcg8Ej25tKM30Nq/ImS5u4UZ cElOJWVHyvkrdc8eynXz2u/2FNaXERlgs2xiU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.183.166 with SMTP id en6mr19307231igc.7.1327507901288; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:11:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:11:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:11:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F2022F9.7010605@freebsd.org> References: <4F2022F9.7010605@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:11:40 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan Subject: Re: tripwire/and or packages PH will hate, and ask for -exp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:11:42 -0000 On 25 Jan 2012 15:43, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > when you install tripwire (/usr/ports/security/tripwire), at some point in the install, it asks you, 'interactively' to 'accept' the GPL2 license. > (yes, I know, I could probably use USE_LICENSE=GPL2, and patch install scripts). > > but, then it wants to generate a site key and site pass key. > > none of which PH will like (TB doesn't like it, PH will hate it) > > But, I am not the maintainer, and just trying to get this updated to latest source version, and by updating source tree, this is no worse that it was yesterday. (and I have some portlint's that I fixed) > > > Now: I have MANUALLY verified pkg-plist adds/subtracts, and CAN get package to build if I set NO_DB_BUILD, and manually accept license, and generate keys (so it WILL build, and deinstall, just fine) > > so, how do I keep pav from sending me an email in two days telling me PH won't compile this? > > is this enough in the Makefile to do that? > > NO_PACKAGE= requires manual acceptance of license agreement > IS_INTERACTIVE= yes > PH won't touch those ports, therefore no packages and no Pavmail. Port test to check for leftover files will help. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 16:15:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0ED81065670; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4728FC0C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FD6621C46; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:15:21 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017D9621C3A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:15:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:15:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4F202A9A.3080502@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:15:22 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F2022F9.7010605@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan Subject: Re: tripwire/and or packages PH will hate, and ask for -exp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:15:22 -0000 On 1/25/12 11:11 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > > > > Now: I have MANUALLY verified pkg-plist adds/subtracts, and CAN get > package to build if I set NO_DB_BUILD, and manually accept license, > and generate keys (so it WILL build, and deinstall, just fine) > > > > PH won't touch those ports, therefore no packages and no Pavmail. > > Port test to check for leftover files will help. > yes, I did test it. ok, ill fire this away to the maintainer in a pr -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 16:52:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2750F106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86BE8FC13 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so6389685wer.13 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:52:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pC1rKKyZ5plt3dKh8n2PgemHAYWYf4xrYk+3p99lSAs=; b=GFllXr2cUP0pTyIIXm3h3MYyIBPTXwFaIT2PegD/U0zCCu+WBdmvgzXA2vt6rHtfHZ 321aiH6ueUeJAs4O3GQhhXjSy3DeRfG7o6ThIICdTdX1cxUeWrThTaD7yB0G9L3DHV1b eMrb2FK5vXRHg8e6OkltMhfpiYJl6Ww1+EELY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.137.210 with SMTP id y60mr3153468wei.14.1327508856995; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:27:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.62.8 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:27:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:27:36 +0100 Message-ID: From: Johan Hendriks To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: sound-juicer upgrade error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:52:52 -0000 Hello all. I try to update sound juicer, but got an error. xsltproc -o sound-juicer-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename sound-juicer --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.3//EN" --stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir "/usr/local/share/omf" --stringparam db2omf.help_dir "/usr/local/share/gnome/help" --stringparam db2omf.omf_in "/usr/ports/audio/sound-juicer/work/sound-juicer-2.32.0/help/sound-juicer/sound-juicer.omf.in" --stringparam db2omf.scrollkeeper_cl "`scrollkeeper-config --pkgdatadir`/Templates/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml" `/usr/local/bin/pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` C/sound-juicer.xml || { rm -f "sound-juicer-C.omf"; exit 1; } Bus error (core dumped) Also totem gives me an error, looks like the same thing xsltproc -o totem-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename totem --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN" --stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir "/usr/local/share/omf" --stringparam db2omf.help_dir "/usr/local/share/gnome/help" --stringparam db2omf.omf_in "/usr/ports/multimedia/totem/work/totem-2.32.0/help/totem.omf.in" --stringparam db2omf.scrollkeeper_cl "`scrollkeeper-config --pkgdatadir`/Templates/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml" `/usr/local/bin/pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` C/totem.xml || { rm -f "totem-C.omf"; exit 1; } Bus error (core dumped) things i did try reinstall libxslt, pkg-config, gnome-doc-utils, and all installed docpook ports. Can someone help me with this? regards Johan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 17:04:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E4F106566B; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net [68.230.241.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E598FC12; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo210.cox.net ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120125170440.SHMD28068.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo210.cox.net>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:04:40 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo210.cox.net with bizsmtp id Rt4S1i00M1BeFqy02t4Y4A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:04:39 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020209.4F203627.00F0,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=LJ9IO+3242BRBuyNVs8xk1samR36zHaHHsCDtW+WEMA= c=1 sm=1 a=EnZeqY4DioAA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=xIWn2VyaM7zYHat52bAA:9 a=PKZt845WebUd2xDhRvcA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0PH4Lsi010467; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:04:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:04:16 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120125110416.1e23c756@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Chris Rees , Doug Barton Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:04:59 -0000 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:01:33 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 24 January 2012 20:31, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports > >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to > >> gcc-4.4.7.20120117 > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 > >> > >> (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one > >> below, supposed to be indicating exactly? =A0If it means what I > >> think it does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting > >> the intention of the "-o" option) > > > > No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency > > of 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when > > non-base gcc was in use, but have never had anyone track down the > > cause authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm > > assuming you already looked there. >=20 > Often happens when people stick USE_something into make.conf :) >=20 > (don't do that) >=20 > Chris Hmmm, interesting. I do, in fact, have a USE_GCC=3D4.2+ line in /etc/make.conf, conditional on ${.CURDIR} for certain ports that just won't build with clang, which I'm using now as the default. Doug seems to think, though, that it's something else within the ports framework's handling of the gcc ports that's tripping up portmaster. Not sure I even want to begin to try to track that one down. :-) Anyway, thanks everybody for the feedback. --=20 Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 17:57:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2852106566C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m@klkvsk.ru) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256A98FC13; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdr11 with SMTP id dr11so5872172wgb.31 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:57:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.97.166 with SMTP id eb6mr30055373wib.5.1327512523427; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:28:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.105.1 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:28:43 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [89.178.37.50] Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:28:43 +0400 Message-ID: From: =?KOI8-R?B?7cnIwcnMIOvVzMHLz9fTy8nK?= To: thierry@FreeBSD.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWvgZMW3YUUn6VzRNA3B0FO58zTFcXVr5mEu2jjWt7z1uTrshXeIs7pn3pPjb9z92Pp1qI X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:45:21 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: tidy-lib-090315.c_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:58 -0000 Hi, Thierry. Since tidy-lib hadn't had any updates for over 3 years, there is a non-official patch to support new tags and correct doctype for HTML5. Is it possible to include it into the port? The patch itself: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Nov/0007.html There is also github repository you might want to look at - https://github.com/w3c/tidy-html5. Their readme says it contains not only the first patch, but additional changes. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 19:08:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB263106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from mx1a.lautre.net (eyra.lautre.net [80.67.160.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C098FC1A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [78.225.128.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thierry@pompo.net) by mx1a.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE095336757; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:53:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D821011439; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:53:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:53:02 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: ?????? ??????????? Message-ID: <20120125185302.GA17738@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: ?????? ??????????? , ports@FreeBSD.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: tidy-lib-090315.c_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:08:55 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mer 25 jan 12 =E0 18:28:43 +0100, ?????? ??????????? =E9crivait=A0: > Hi, Thierry. Hello, > Since tidy-lib hadn't had any updates for over 3 years, there is a > non-official patch to support new tags and correct doctype for HTML5. Is = it > possible to include it into the port? > The patch itself: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Nov/0007.html > There is also github repository you might want to look at - > https://github.com/w3c/tidy-html5. Their readme says it contains not only > the first patch, but additional changes. I'm subscribed to the tidy-develop@, and there have been some recent activity. Bjoern Hoehrmann has checked these patches, and one can expect an official release. Please just wait a little! Best regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8gT44ACgkQc95pjMcUBaIi0wCdH+jqliyh3o7Llra3a9Isll7K pCsAn3wL4wwqtcwO/iFWXZvRBqnoN9ZB =Y9xo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 19:32:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502D2106564A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from huffman.acsalaska.net (huffman.acsalaska.net [209.112.173.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5068FC0A for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mymail.acsalaska.net (polarbear.acsalaska.net [216.67.61.193]) by huffman.acsalaska.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0PJWXgV044100 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:32:33 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from 46.129.107.107 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rflynn@acsalaska.net) by mymail.acsalaska.net with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:32:34 -0900 (AKST) Message-ID: <4837.46.129.107.107.1327519954.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <1327484678.50614.YahooMailNeo@web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1327484678.50614.YahooMailNeo@web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:32:34 -0900 (AKST) From: rflynn@acsalaska.net To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (huffman.acsalaska.net [209.112.168.121]); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:32:34 -0900 (AKST) X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.67; SA 3.3.0; spamdefang 1.122 Subject: Re: Port libSwiften Request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:32:35 -0000 > Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port called libSwiften > (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften or libSwiften. Is it possible > the ports team could perhaps include this software in the ports collection? Do you mean http://swift.im ? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 00:24:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB48A106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lichray@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7835E8FC0A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so22970vcm.13 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:24:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fqxukvbay1CjW98RBvrDWC/OhZvAfycQiyeydcy1ZoE=; b=s+FWvVeIxV/yDD10VFtAJwAlwg7Ymk4UjE/9AveFL+Y2je6Mb6AWQkyNK6DLFCnvcz 01pT7t5TCFf/WXbWuBlvmQqQNMqHSDDs/XopYGGprlvultkSIK/eSvY7EXMFl0J3M5Sm R1pAYyDjOlbhivrYC2Q1vTybU+KIywK6loC+I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.34.167 with SMTP id a7mr10325239vdj.123.1327537490467; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:24:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <36ugu8-lt2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:24:50 -0600 Message-ID: From: Zhihao Yuan To: rotkap@gmx.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:24:51 -0000 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Michael Johnson wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, what does 'grep xcb-aux /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/*' >> show? > > Nothing. No Output. > > Heino > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I solved this problem by rebuilding libxfce4menu (to update the libtool profile). -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 00:38:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6692F106566B for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3D58FC14 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RqDM7-0008Mq-IK for ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:38:23 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:38:22 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: FreeBSD Ports User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:38:24 -0000 FreeBSD dfw0.psg.com 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012 root@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0 amd64 # portupgrade -N net/isc-dhcp42-server [Gathering depends for net/isc-dhcp42-server ..... done] ---> Installing 'isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2' from a port (net/isc-dhcp42-server) ---> Building '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server' ===> Cleaning for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License ISCL accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 ===> Extracting for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 => SHA256 Checksum OK for dhcp-4.2.3-P2.tar.gz. ===> Patching for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/files/extra-patch-bind__Makefile ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 ===> isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> Configuring for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d checking for gawk... gawk checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to zi@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 clang? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 00:45:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5141065670 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from sirius.xvoid.org (sirius.xvoid.org [IPv6:2001:470:28:4ba:20c:29ff:fe62:9a22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F5D8FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.xvoid.org (yuri@sirius.xvoid.org [IPv6:::1]) by sirius.xvoid.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0Q0jBrt016210; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:45:11 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: (from yuri@localhost) by sirius.xvoid.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0Q0jBPe016209; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:45:11 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: sirius.xvoid.org: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:45:11 +0400 From: Yuri Pankov To: Randy Bush Message-ID: <20120126004511.GB1070@sirius.xvoid.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:45:13 -0000 On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:38:22AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > FreeBSD dfw0.psg.com 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012 root@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0 amd64 > > # portupgrade -N net/isc-dhcp42-server > [Gathering depends for net/isc-dhcp42-server ..... done] > ---> Installing 'isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2' from a port (net/isc-dhcp42-server) > ---> Building '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server' > ===> Cleaning for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> License ISCL accepted by the user > ===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 > ===> Extracting for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for dhcp-4.2.3-P2.tar.gz. > ===> Patching for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 > ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/files/extra-patch-bind__Makefile > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 > ===> isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 depends on executable: gmake - found > ===> Configuring for isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2 > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d > checking for gawk... gawk > checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes > checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no > checking for gcc... cc > checking for C compiler default output file name... > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to zi@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the > "/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log" including > the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea > to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls > /var/db/pkg`). > *** Error code 1 > > clang? clang what? "checking for gcc... cc", doesn't look like clang. Providing the config.log, as the message suggests, would help here. Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:04:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3051065672 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD668FC15 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RqDll-0008PV-Lk; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:04:54 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:04:52 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> References: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:04:55 -0000 This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. It was created by DHCP configure 4.2.3-P2, which was generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61. Invocation command line was $ ./configure --localstatedir=/var --enable-paranoia --enable-early-chroot --enable-dhcpv6 --prefix=/usr/local --mandir=/usr/local/man --infodir=/usr/local/info/ --build=amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0 ## --------- ## ## Platform. ## ## --------- ## hostname = dfw0.psg.com uname -m = amd64 uname -r = 9.0-STABLE uname -s = FreeBSD uname -v = FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012 root@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0 /usr/bin/uname -p = amd64 /bin/uname -X = unknown /bin/arch = unknown /usr/bin/arch -k = unknown /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown /bin/machine = unknown /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown /bin/universe = unknown PATH: /bin PATH: /sbin PATH: /usr/bin PATH: /usr/sbin PATH: /usr/X11R6/bin PATH: /usr/local/bin PATH: /usr/local/sbin ## ----------- ## ## Core tests. ## ## ----------- ## configure:1838: checking for a BSD-compatible install configure:1894: result: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel configure:1905: checking whether build environment is sane configure:1948: result: yes configure:1976: checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p configure:2015: result: ./install-sh -c -d configure:2028: checking for gawk configure:2044: found /usr/local/bin/gawk configure:2055: result: gawk configure:2066: checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE) configure:2087: result: yes configure:2281: checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles configure:2290: result: no configure:2358: checking for gcc configure:2385: result: cc configure:2623: checking for C compiler version configure:2630: cc --version >&5 cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. configure:2633: $? = 0 configure:2640: cc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] configure:2643: $? = 0 configure:2650: cc -V >&5 cc: '-V' option must have argument configure:2653: $? = 1 configure:2676: checking for C compiler default output file name configure:2703: cc -O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_SCRIPT='"/usr/local/sbin/dhclient-script"' -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_CONF='"/usr/local/etc/dhclient.conf"' -D_PATH_DHCPD_CONF='"/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf"' conftest.c >&5 conftest.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set configure:2706: $? = 1 configure:2744: result: configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h. */ | #define PACKAGE_NAME "DHCP" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "dhcp" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "4.2.3-P2" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "DHCP 4.2.3-P2" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "dhcp-users@isc.org" | #define PACKAGE "dhcp" | #define VERSION "4.2.3-P2" | /* end confdefs.h. */ | | int | main () | { | | ; | return 0; | } configure:2750: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. ## ---------------- ## ## Cache variables. ## ## ---------------- ## ac_cv_env_CC_set=set ac_cv_env_CC_value=cc ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_set=set ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_value='-O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing' ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_set=set ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_value='-D_PATH_DHCLIENT_SCRIPT='\''"/usr/local/sbin/dhclient-script"'\'' -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_CONF='\''"/usr/local/etc/dhclient.conf"'\'' -D_PATH_DHCPD_CONF='\''"/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf"'\' ac_cv_env_CPP_set=set ac_cv_env_CPP_value=cpp ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_set=set ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_value='' ac_cv_env_LIBS_set='' ac_cv_env_LIBS_value='' ac_cv_env_build_alias_set=set ac_cv_env_build_alias_value=amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0 ac_cv_env_host_alias_set='' ac_cv_env_host_alias_value='' ac_cv_env_target_alias_set='' ac_cv_env_target_alias_value='' ac_cv_prog_AWK=gawk ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC=cc ac_cv_prog_make_gmake_set=yes lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=262144 ## ----------------- ## ## Output variables. ## ## ----------------- ## ACLOCAL='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing --run aclocal-1.10' AMDEPBACKSLASH='' AMDEP_FALSE='' AMDEP_TRUE='' AMTAR='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing --run tar' AUTOCONF='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing --run autoconf' AUTOHEADER='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing --run autoheader' AUTOMAKE='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing --run automake-1.10' AWK='gawk' CC='cc' CCDEPMODE='' CFLAGS='-O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing' CPP='cpp' CPPFLAGS='-D_PATH_DHCLIENT_SCRIPT='\''"/usr/local/sbin/dhclient-script"'\'' -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_CONF='\''"/usr/local/etc/dhclient.conf"'\'' -D_PATH_DHCPD_CONF='\''"/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf"'\''' CYGPATH_W='echo' DEFS='' DEPDIR='' ECHO_C='' ECHO_N='-n' ECHO_T='' EGREP='' EXEEXT='' GREP='' INSTALL_DATA='install -o root -g wheel -m 444' INSTALL_PROGRAM='install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555' INSTALL_SCRIPT='install -o root -g wheel -m 555' INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM='$(install_sh) -c -s' LDAP_CFLAGS='' LDFLAGS='' LIBOBJS='' LIBS='' LTLIBOBJS='' MAINT='#' MAINTAINER_MODE_FALSE='' MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE='#' MAKEINFO='${SHELL} /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/missing --run makeinfo' OBJEXT='' PACKAGE='dhcp' PACKAGE_BUGREPORT='dhcp-users@isc.org' PACKAGE_NAME='DHCP' PACKAGE_STRING='DHCP 4.2.3-P2' PACKAGE_TARNAME='dhcp' PACKAGE_VERSION='4.2.3-P2' PATH_SEPARATOR=':' RANLIB='' SET_MAKE='' SHELL='/bin/sh' STRIP='' VERSION='4.2.3-P2' ac_ct_CC='cc' ac_prefix_program='' am__fastdepCC_FALSE='' am__fastdepCC_TRUE='' am__include='' am__isrc='' am__leading_dot='.' am__quote='' am__tar='${AMTAR} chof - "$$tardir"' am__untar='${AMTAR} xf -' bindir='${exec_prefix}/bin' build_alias='amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0' byte_order='' datadir='${datarootdir}' datarootdir='${prefix}/share' docdir='${datarootdir}/doc/${PACKAGE_TARNAME}' dvidir='${docdir}' exec_prefix='NONE' host_alias='' htmldir='${docdir}' includedir='${prefix}/include' infodir='/usr/local/info/' install_sh='$(SHELL) /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/install-sh' libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib' libexecdir='${exec_prefix}/libexec' localedir='${datarootdir}/locale' localstatedir='/var' mandir='/usr/local/man' mkdir_p='$(top_builddir)/./install-sh -c -d' oldincludedir='/usr/include' pdfdir='${docdir}' prefix='/usr/local' program_transform_name='s,x,x,' psdir='${docdir}' sbindir='${exec_prefix}/sbin' sharedstatedir='${prefix}/com' sysconfdir='${prefix}/etc' target_alias='' ## ----------- ## ## confdefs.h. ## ## ----------- ## #define PACKAGE_NAME "DHCP" #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "dhcp" #define PACKAGE_VERSION "4.2.3-P2" #define PACKAGE_STRING "DHCP 4.2.3-P2" #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "dhcp-users@isc.org" #define PACKAGE "dhcp" #define VERSION "4.2.3-P2" configure: exit 77 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:07:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4943A106564A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E288FC14 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RqDny-0008Q5-UD; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:07:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:07:09 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> References: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:07:11 -0000 > a basic sanity check: > > echo 'int main() { return 0; }' > test.c > cc -o test test.c > ./test && echo 'OK' || echo 'bad' all the other ports made just fine, as did that test, of course. reported to isc randy From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:07:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40187106568F for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C588FC0C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32681D23C2E for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:07:17 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39853D23C2B for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:07:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:07:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4F20A742.1080509@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:07:14 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:07:18 -0000 On 1/25/12 7:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > FreeBSD dfw0.psg.com 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 25 21:56:55 UTC 2012root@dfw0.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW0 amd64 > > # portupgrade -N net/isc-dhcp42-server > [Gathering depends for net/isc-dhcp42-server ..... done] snip. > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > ---> Installing 'isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.3_2' from a port (net/isc-dhcp42-server) doublecheck your portstree. make sure it is up to date. (portsnap fetch update) do a 'portsclean -C' make sure you don't have odd things in your make.conf or option knobs. compiles fine here on amd64, 9.0. tinderbox. something is borked in your server. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:12:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E1D106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from sirius.xvoid.org (sirius.xvoid.org [IPv6:2001:470:28:4ba:20c:29ff:fe62:9a22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E7F8FC08 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.xvoid.org (yuri@sirius.xvoid.org [IPv6:::1]) by sirius.xvoid.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0Q1CiM2016841; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:12:44 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: (from yuri@localhost) by sirius.xvoid.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0Q1CiJi016840; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:12:44 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: sirius.xvoid.org: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:12:44 +0400 From: Yuri Pankov To: Randy Bush Message-ID: <20120126011244.GC1070@sirius.xvoid.org> References: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:12:47 -0000 On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:04:52AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: [...] > configure:2703: cc -O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing ^^^^^^^^^^^ That's why. Make sure you don't define it in /etc/make.conf. > conftest.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set [...] Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:13:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D2E1065670 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E5F8FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:13:58 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LYD005ASSQWFT60@asmtp023.mac.com> for ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:13:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7361,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-25_10:2012-01-26, 2012-01-25, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201250308 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:13:44 -0800 Message-id: <804D8B89-50DF-4817-9B37-1147DACDC9E0@mac.com> References: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> To: Randy Bush X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:13:59 -0000 Hi-- On Jan 25, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > all the other ports made just fine, as did that test, of course. > > reported to isc configure:2703: cc -O2 -pipe -march=i686 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_SCRIPT='"/usr/local/sbin/dhclient-script"' -D_PATH_DHCLIENT_CONF='"/usr/local/etc/dhclient.conf"' -D_PATH_DHCPD_CONF='"/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf"' conftest.c >&5 conftest.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set configure:2706: $? = 1 You've specified a 32-bit CPU architecture, but are running on a 64-bit (aka AMD64/EM64T) platform. Get rid of the -march flag from /etc/make.conf or where-ever it is coming from. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:18:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653ED106564A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C57D8FC0C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RqDzM-0008S6-5M; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:18:56 +0000 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:18:55 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <804D8B89-50DF-4817-9B37-1147DACDC9E0@mac.com> References: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> <804D8B89-50DF-4817-9B37-1147DACDC9E0@mac.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:18:57 -0000 > You've specified a 32-bit CPU architecture, but are running on a > 64-bit (aka AMD64/EM64T) platform. Get rid of the -march flag from > /etc/make.conf or where-ever it is coming from. had just rsynced it in. damn! thanks. randy From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:43:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B21B1065673 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net [68.230.241.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3EC8FC0C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo306.cox.net ([68.230.241.238]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120126014348.NWMW28068.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo306.cox.net>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:43:48 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo306.cox.net with bizsmtp id S1ji1i0011BeFqy021jljp; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:43:48 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.4F20AFD4.000C,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=QFd1i8EmGWXMF/FLlwwalaY9IE87M3wXCJnHJtyYFmw= c=1 sm=1 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=24hDic0urUqkKUD1MxcA:9 a=uR8_rSMjnjsi8hghp7wA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0Q1haUP071683; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:43:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:43:31 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Jaret Bartsch Message-ID: <20120125194331.1a9a15d9@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <1327484678.50614.YahooMailNeo@web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1327484678.50614.YahooMailNeo@web39802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Port libSwiften Request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:43:54 -0000 On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:38 -0800 (PST) Jaret Bartsch wrote: > Hi there. I have recently tried to compile a software, but a port > called libSwiften (on linux) is not available for FreeBSD as Swiften > or libSwiften. Is it possible the ports team could perhaps include > this software in the ports collection? > > Regards, > Jaret Well, if it's portable, then I'm sure somebody here could handle it. Do you have a URL for the source and/or project? What package are you trying to compile yourself? Do you need porting help with that, too? -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 01:44:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953571065680 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout021.mac.com (asmtpout021.mac.com [17.148.16.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9678FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:44:17 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0LYD00KQQRCVIM60@asmtp021.mac.com> for ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7361,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-25_10:2012-01-26, 2012-01-25, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201250299 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:43:43 -0800 Message-id: <62D0D166-A917-45CA-A65B-71992B1DD9C5@mac.com> References: To: Randy Bush X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: isc dhcp does not make X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:44:17 -0000 On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > checking for gcc... cc > checking for C compiler default output file name... > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to zi@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the > "/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log" including > the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea > to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls > /var/db/pkg`). > *** Error code 1 > > clang? The instructions given suggest looking at: /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.3-P2/config.log It's likely to be informative. Failing that, a basic sanity check: echo 'int main() { return 0; }' > test.c cc -o test test.c ./test && echo 'OK' || echo 'bad' Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 07:56:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1BD106566C; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFDF1A7533; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F21071D.3080805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:56:13 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120119 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:56:14 -0000 On the plus side, we have dozens of production FreeBSD VM's running on a mid-size vSphere 4 development. On the minus side this is down significantly from this time last year. We are migrating to FreeBSD-on-KVM as fast as we can because VMware's support for FreeBSD is as others have described (i.e. bad), and KVM is coming along nicely. This is especially egregious when you take into account their steadily increasing pricing models. OTOH it's worth taking a closer look at http://callfortesting.org/bhyve/ Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 08:22:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17AC1065679; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB8D1582E5; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F210D51.10605@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:22:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120119 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD ports list X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dinoex@FreeBSD.org Subject: Weird conflict between libungif and giflib X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:22:42 -0000 I'm seeing a weird "issue" with these 2 ports. I have the "check for mismatched checksums" enabled for periodic, which is how I first noticed this problem. Short version, whichever one I update last corrupts the files of the other one. Other than the mismatched checksums I haven't noticed any actual problems, so this is more of an "Is this a problem?" question. Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 08:40:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B671065673 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DEA28FC0C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47417 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2012 08:40:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 26 Jan 2012 08:40:53 -0000 Message-ID: <4F211195.2050106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:40:53 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20111227 Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4F210D51.10605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F210D51.10605@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dinoex@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Weird conflict between libungif and giflib X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:40:59 -0000 Doug Barton ha scritto: > Other than the mismatched checksums I haven't noticed any actual > problems, so this is more of an "Is this a problem?" question. AFAIK all ports should switch to giflib and libungif should be removed from the tree. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 10:06:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8AB1065675; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56EF150A93; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F2125B6.8040801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:06:46 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120119 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dupre References: <4F210D51.10605@FreeBSD.org> <4F211195.2050106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F211195.2050106@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dinoex@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Weird conflict between libungif and giflib X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:06:47 -0000 On 01/26/2012 00:40, Alex Dupre wrote: > Doug Barton ha scritto: >> Other than the mismatched checksums I haven't noticed any actual >> problems, so this is more of an "Is this a problem?" question. > > AFAIK all ports should switch to giflib and libungif should be removed > from the tree. Well 2 of the ports that I have on my desktop that were using it are mine, so if it's agreed that this is the right direction to go I'm happy to update. I just tested them and they seem to work fine. -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 10:13:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265141065670 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0QAD0uS092086 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:00 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q0QAD0i5092073 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:00 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:00 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201201261013.q0QAD0i5092073@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:00 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: froxlor-0.9.22_3: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/proftpd-mod_sql_mysql make_index: syscp-1.4.2.1_3: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/proftpd-mod_sql_mysql Committers on the hook: arved ashish dougb mm oliver Most recent CVS update was: U databases/couchdb/Makefile U databases/couchdb/files/couchdb.in U games/ember/Makefile U games/vegastrike/Makefile U graphics/cegui/Makefile U graphics/ogre3d/Makefile U graphics/ogre3d/distinfo U graphics/ogre3d/pkg-plist U security/p5-Digest-CRC/Makefile U security/p5-Digest-CRC/distinfo U security/p5-Digest-SHA-PurePerl/Makefile U security/p5-Digest-SHA-PurePerl/distinfo U security/pcsc-tools/Makefile U sysutils/froxlor/Makefile U sysutils/syscp/Makefile U x11-toolkits/gigi/Makefile From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 10:13:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC8B1065678 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FD908FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55305 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2012 10:13:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 26 Jan 2012 10:13:12 -0000 Message-ID: <4F212738.50709@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:13:12 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20111227 Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4F210D51.10605@FreeBSD.org> <4F211195.2050106@FreeBSD.org> <4F2125B6.8040801@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F2125B6.8040801@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dinoex@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Weird conflict between libungif and giflib X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:13:15 -0000 Doug Barton ha scritto: > Well 2 of the ports that I have on my desktop that were using it are > mine, so if it's agreed that this is the right direction to go I'm happy > to update. I just tested them and they seem to work fine. Do it, please. If I remember correctly danfe@ proposed himself to do it for all the ports depending on libungif a few weeks ago ;-) -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 11:08:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65671106564A; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320B68FC0A; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5DAD23C2E; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:32 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6CCD23C2B; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4F213433.8090505@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:35 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> <4F21071D.3080805@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F21071D.3080805@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:08:33 -0000 On 1/26/12 2:56 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > On the plus side, we have dozens of production FreeBSD VM's running on a > mid-size vSphere 4 development. > > On the minus side this is down significantly from this time last year. > We are migrating to FreeBSD-on-KVM as fast as we can because VMware's > support for FreeBSD is as others have described (i.e. bad), and KVM is > coming along nicely. This is especially egregious when you take into > account their steadily increasing pricing models. > > OTOH it's worth taking a closer look athttp://callfortesting.org/bhyve/ > precisely the 'kick in the pants' we want to give them. if they want FreeBSD based business, they need to give us some love. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 09:25:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014D4106567A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raymondv@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F5F48FC18 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2012 08:58:21 -0000 Received: from f053120234.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO Raymonds-iMac.local) [78.53.120.234] by mail.gmx.net (mp066) with SMTP; 26 Jan 2012 09:58:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #2633445 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/MyvNnMIfM+sFv+fvM5x5uYBa5OuX/b68MpA+cQf ycNbG94/zKhNih Message-ID: <4F2115A9.7020002@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:58:17 +0100 From: Raymond Vetter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:05:38 +0000 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:25:04 -0000 Hello, please update the port fusefs-ntfs. current is: ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15, released on January 22, 2012. regard, Raymond From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 13:08:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB539106566B for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1b.lautre.net (etna.lautre.net [80.67.160.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA518FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [78.225.128.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thierry@pompo.net) by mx1b.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7175D7F0A1; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:52:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id DBB4C11438; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:52:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.196.142.20 ([192.196.142.20]) by graf.pompo.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:52:39 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:52:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20120126135239.Horde.x-YgUsR-DvZPIUyXyYFBEM4@graf.pompo.net> From: thierry@FreeBSD.org To: ports@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.14) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: bobek@boxpl.com Subject: Message to bobek@boxpl.com about x11-fonts/code2000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:08:14 -0000 Hello, My answer to your message was considered as spam and rejected by your server. Then I guess that the better way for us to communicate is you to send a PR. Regards, -- Th. Thomas. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 13:18:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E781065673 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF218FC08 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so631010vbb.13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:18:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OeiPhvEthfx7KcBM7k9RdvEI8S6p5rer5xMagsO8JUM=; b=mRllwa5TleqgalLtCFkgr4+/xpXpD9dtwqbXO2ggZUdFSM8hglsNXQynBP+6It59WR pG6gFUzUekzLMW5KRLpPuzQ1tVtvHpPQvXMzoeNRQwODiriLKj9UFmI+VXPeVxkO3HXU yheN+hUTndOHuMAPeAJ93xRzGs4pC8lCoffkI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.240.242 with SMTP id wd18mr891553vdc.95.1327583901725; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.137 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:18:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <36ugu8-lt2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:18:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:18:22 -0000 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Michael Johnson wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, what does 'grep xcb-aux /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/*' > > show? > > Nothing. No Output. > I have the same problem, on two machines, with updated ports. Machine a: root@kg-v2# uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jul 16 02:07:14 CEST 2011 root@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@kg-v2# grep xcb-aux /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/* root@kg-v2# Machine b: root@kg-quiet# uname -a FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Sat Jan 7 14:05:57 CET 2012 root@kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@kg-quiet# grep xcb-aux /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/* root@kg-quiet# For comparison, here is output from another machine, where I haven't updated ports yet: root@kg-v7# uname -a FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #7: Sat Jul 9 23:00:31 CEST 2011 root@kg-v7.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@kg-v7# grep xcb-aux /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/* /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xcb-aux.pc:Libs: -L${libdir} -lxcb-aux root@kg-v7# pkg_info -W /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xcb-aux.pc /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xcb-aux.pc was installed by package xcb-util-0.3.6,1 Upgrading (portupgrade -R) xfce4-wm fails on both machine a and b, like this: gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm/work/xfwm4-4.8.3/po' Making all in settings-dialogs gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm/work/xfwm4-4.8.3/settings-dialogs' gmake all-am gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm/work/xfwm4-4.8.3/settings-dialogs' CC xfwm4_settings-xfwm4-settings.o CCLD xfwm4-settings CC xfwm4_tweaks_settings-tweaks-settings.o CCLD xfwm4-tweaks-settings CC xfwm4_workspace_settings-workspace-settings.o CCLD xfwm4-workspace-settings libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la' gmake[3]: *** [xfwm4-workspace-settings] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm/work/xfwm4-4.8.3/settings-dialogs' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm/work/xfwm4-4.8.3/settings-dialogs' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm/work/xfwm4-4.8.3' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20120126-14455-tviad6-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=xfce4-wm-4.8.2 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.8.2 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! x11-wm/xfce4-wm (xfce4-wm-4.8.2) (unknown build error) -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 13:21:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C281065670 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0QDLVZp041150 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:21:31 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q0QDLVO4041135 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:21:31 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:21:31 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201201261321.q0QDLVO4041135@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:21:32 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 13:23:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D472C106564A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865CE8FC0A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so636663vbb.13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:23:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IiASGt1fFXgi8ORbuMBImlQ/+BlWhh+rSPiFsLiOHkk=; b=Spnr8gq2yvs8hcVKVQFll/ETvX/eBhKMzPp3g/LT+Nhi0v8f+PFzM0T7OExPhKiBkr H5Y3HDhipZAoDQBnAKTQR6LhURzLXTNudiDiYSJr5L1VvdRsXv0pvfvI47eHmmRHl4dD 8wj4HxoBOamIPC+E30GviWr1FbcupEz26/lg0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.71.226 with SMTP id y2mr909860vdu.78.1327584224401; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:23:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.137 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:23:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <36ugu8-lt2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:23:44 +0100 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:23:47 -0000 Hello, On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Heino Tiedemann > wrote: > > Michael Johnson wrote: > > > >> Out of curiosity, what does 'grep xcb-aux > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/*' > >> show? > > > > Nothing. No Output. > > > > Heino > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I solved this problem by rebuilding libxfce4menu (to update the > libtool profile). > > I tried that, but it didn't help here. I used 'portupgrade -f libxfce4menu'. My machine runs: root@kg-v2# uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jul 16 02:07:14 CEST 2011 root@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and the ports tree was updated today (26.1.2012). I also tried rebuilding (using portupgrade -f) a few other packages, to see if xfce4-wm would upgrade afterwards: libxfce4gui libxfce4util xfce4-conf xfce4-desktop xfce4-settings But that didn't help either. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 14:41:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B81C1065674; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039B98FC0C; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:41:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=E5T67DjmsomY2SlUB0w0uB5oMJegWBN9KkUQENdkhJ4=; b=NrR/vuaCiDoVsNd2KCDUZ3Ilstcd9uTcPPDaLYtsJ/SQVoBzsNGkVy/+5c5WP0kxzFMM34rNIj4JoXNkM5YA2rIzKubxieyPKNXLi9F+4WQooYcVrDXMk9GKDWwhyoW5; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQVl-000FWQ-Dq; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:41:18 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1327588867-3242-3241/5/18; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:41:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: ports@freebsd.org, developers@freebsd.org References: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:41:07 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4F1B1C45.60902@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.60 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: so, FreeBSD on VMware is dead, right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:41:19 -0000 FreeBSD on ESX here. Unfortunately our boss wants us to move to Citrix Xen even though they don't* support VMotion type features on FreeBSD because we've spent upwards of $50,000 USD in support/licensing on VMWare over the last year and it's been over a year without a fix to our crash bug directly related to bad behavior in their I/O virtualization layer. (ESX 4.1) So besides the few VMs that crash ~weekly, it runs great, and we have a ton of FreeBSD VMs which will never be changed to another OS. FreeBSD needs more love from VMWare, but I don't think it's dead.. However, it's rather disappointing to hear their techs say. "FreeBDS?[sic] What is that, some kind of Linux?" * Citrix NetScaler product is based on a fork of FreeBSD 6.x and Citrix offers a VM appliance that runs on Xen and does support their VMotion equivalent. Why they won't port or give us the Xen Tools that exist on that appliance is a mystery. I've considered taking their trial appliance, dissecting it, and trying to make it run on stock FreeBSD with compat6x and what other hacks are necessary, but I'm sure they have kernel modules that definitely will not work on 8.x or 9.x without being recompiled.... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 15:39:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DDC106566B for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA838FC16 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD414D23C2B; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:39:22 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709C2D23C0D; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:39:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:39:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4F2173A8.5010803@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:39:20 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: what is maxcmdlen? $0 len? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:39:23 -0000 (followups set to ports@) I am trying to track down a persistent bug in swatch. swatch sets y $commandLineString = $0 . ' ' . join(' ', @ARGV); , and if the len of the cmdargs is > (x?), then ps gets borked, rc scripts can't find it (so service status won't work), service restart won' t kill old one, so it just keep adding new instances. perldoc says: http://perldoc.perl.org/perlvar.html "Note that there are platform-specific limitations on the maximum length of $0 . In the most extreme case it may be limited to the space occupied by the original $0 ." (but, I searched and could not find it) best I can tell, this number is 251. (possibly 255) (in swatch.rc, swatch_flags -gt 222 chars), so, swatch_flags, then len of command (/usr/local/bin/swatch), some spacing, the '(perl)' at end... and something else. other than putting something like this in rc file, is there a way to tell, on a platform by platform basis, what this number is? should I send patches to swatch upstream to prevent this from happening? notes: swatch_1_flags='-c /usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf --tail-file=/var/log/eventlog_this_is_an_incredable_log_file_that_should_cause_big_problems_yes_an_op_would_never_do_this_but_it_is_so_I_can_test_if_problem_is_log_file_arg_or_log_cmd_arg_or_a_lot_of_files_or_some_thing_in_between_and_or.log --tail-args=-Fn0 --daemon --script-dir=/tmp/ --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid' swatch_enable="YES" ps -auxww | grep swatch root 86920 0.0 0.7 7496 6960 ?? Is 9:33AM 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/perl /tmp//.swatch_script.86918 ./swatch status 329 swatch is not running. ./swatch status 223 swatch is not running. ./swatch status 222 swatch is running as pid 98668. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 15:56:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C45106564A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F358FC12 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88824621C3B for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:56:15 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C43621C05 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:56:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:56:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4F21779E.1070504@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:56:14 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Stop me before I violate DougBBSD rules for rc scripts: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:56:16 -0000 so, this hack is ugly. and I have been trying to track this down for YEARS. swatch will (every now and then, some patch, some os upgrade, some ARCH), will mash the $0 line and then rc.script can't status or stop it. Good: /swatch start Starting swatch. scanner.secnap.net# ps -auxww | grep swatch root 85713 0.0 0.7 7496 6952 ?? Ss 9:29AM 0:00.00 /usr/local/bin/swatch -c /usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf --tail-file=/var/log/eventlog --tail-args=-Fn0 --daemon --script-dir=/tmp/ --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid (perl) ./swatch status watch is running as pid 85713. bad: grep swatch /etc/rc.conf.local swatch_rules="1" swatch_1_flags='-c /usr/local/etc/swatch-hackertrap.conf --tail-file=/var/log/eventlog_this_is_an_incredable_log_file_that_should_cause_big_problems_yes_an_op_would_never_do_this_but_it_is_so_I_can_test_if_problem_is_log_file_arg_or_log_cmd_arg_or_a_lot_of_files_or_some_thing_in_between_and_or.log --tail-args=-Fn0 --daemon --script-dir=/tmp/ --pid-file=/var/run/swatch_1.pid' swatch_enable="YES" ./swatch start ./swatch status swatch is not running. ps -auxww | grep swatch root 86920 0.0 0.7 7496 6960 ?? Is 9:33AM 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/perl /tmp//.swatch_script.86918 I have tracked it down to the length of $0. if $0 > 222 bytes, 'bad' happens. this is the patch to rc script. note, various times and various pr's people have reported swatch status not working, and put in, and took out procname. (depending on if they had long _flags I suppose) Index: swatch.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/security/swatch/files/swatch.in,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 swatch.in --- swatch.in 14 Jan 2012 08:56:53 -0000 1.7 +++ swatch.in 26 Jan 2012 15:54:25 -0000 @@ -21,15 +21,20 @@ name=swatch rcvar=swatch_enable +# set some defaults +: ${swatch_enable="NO"} command=%%PREFIX%%/bin/swatch -procname=%%LOCALBASE%%/bin/perl load_rc_config ${name} if [ -n "${swatch_rules}" ]; then for i in ${swatch_rules}; do eval swatch_flags=\$swatch_${i}_flags + len=`echo $swatch_flags | wc -c` + if [ $len -gt 222 ];then + procname=%%LOCALBASE%%/bin/perl + fi eval swatch_user=\$swatch_${i}_user eval swatch_chdir=\$swatch_${i}_chdir eval pidfile=\$swatch_${i}_pidfile -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 17:20:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A45A1065677 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD698FC1E for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so921348wer.13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:20:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eoPzWcHIbazLzkOSfTUDOBWE6ms0fWJaATLCMOmwu+A=; b=Vh/xfx6+Pf6F6lK9a51lLG5CNHzYSMhjbBjenmBeMCasFPxoxQ7NpWzQriFsEcdQXR D3dWbSs6xyWRNGWsjV4OgwQyf7rs6mVE5lUYC/t+Va+Qf3N4OueZL/pwVn0od4+RuVar MFXOE5BJSt322yE7fcjJpDdcN4YrTVvCKwH60= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.39 with SMTP id r39mr1440374wei.50.1327598427899; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.101.196 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <36ugu8-lt2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:20:27 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Torfinn Ingolfsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:20:30 -0000 On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote= : > Hello, > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Heino Tiedemann >> wrote: >> > Michael Johnson wrote: >> > >> >> Out of curiosity, what does 'grep xcb-aux >> /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/*' >> >> show? >> > >> > Nothing. No Output. >> > >> > Heino >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >> >> I solved this problem by rebuilding libxfce4menu (to update the >> libtool profile). >> >> I tried that, but it didn't help here. I used 'portupgrade -f > libxfce4menu'. > My machine runs: > root@kg-v2# uname -a > FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jul 16 02:07:1= 4 > CEST 2011 =A0 =A0 root@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC =A0amd64 > and the ports tree was updated today (26.1.2012). > > I also tried rebuilding (using portupgrade -f) a few other packages, to s= ee > if xfce4-wm would upgrade afterwards: > libxfce4gui > libxfce4util > xfce4-conf > xfce4-desktop > xfce4-settings > > But that didn't help either. Have you run 'pkg-libchk -o | grep xcb-' from sysutils/bsdadminscripts? it should provide a list of ports that need to be re-built after the xcb-utils upgrade to 1.8. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 17:36:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D146A106566B for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from denali.acsalaska.net (denali.acsalaska.net [209.112.173.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA548FC14 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mymail.acsalaska.net (polarbear.acsalaska.net [216.67.61.193]) by denali.acsalaska.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0QHa92x001427 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:36:09 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from 46.129.107.107 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rflynn@acsalaska.net) by mymail.acsalaska.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:36:09 -0900 (AKST) Message-ID: <4352.46.129.107.107.1327599369.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F2173A8.5010803@freebsd.org> References: <4F2173A8.5010803@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:36:09 -0900 (AKST) From: rflynn@acsalaska.net To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (denali.acsalaska.net [209.112.168.121]); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:36:09 -0900 (AKST) X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.67; SA 3.3.0; spamdefang 1.122 Subject: Re: what is maxcmdlen? $0 len? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:36:10 -0000 > ps -auxww | grep swatch > root 86920 0.0 0.7 7496 6960 ?? Is 9:33AM 0:00.01 > /usr/local/bin/perl /tmp//.swatch_script.86918 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > ./swatch status > 329 > swatch is not running. Ruling out the obvious, command_interpreter is set? Also, it looks like swatch is creating a temporary script that is actually run, so the status command is not supposed to find it. It's a design issue upstream that you want them to find a better solution for. As a work around, you can write a wrapper script that catches SIGTERM and kills off $TMPDIR/.swatch_script.`cat /var/run/swatch.pid`. In your rc script you then specify this wrapper as the actual daemon. All in all it ain't pretty. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 17:41:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14C61065673 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8A38FC0C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B7B621C3C; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:41:25 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38830621C05; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:41:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:41:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4F219044.9030705@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:41:24 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F2173A8.5010803@freebsd.org> <4352.46.129.107.107.1327599369.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4352.46.129.107.107.1327599369.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is maxcmdlen? $0 len? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:41:26 -0000 On 1/26/12 12:36 PM, rflynn@acsalaska.net wrote: > Also, it looks like swatch is creating a temporary script that is > actually run, so the status command is not supposed to find it. > > It's a design issue upstream that you want them to find a better > solution for. > I am thinking: either do what SHOULD be done, and in swatch(). check for cmdlen > (x?) and what is x?) and let swatch die. I am experimenting with: if len > x ; then procname=/usr/local/bin/perl;fi (x being 222 so far). ugly, but it works for small (< 222) and large (>222).. wish I knew if x (222) changes for arch/perlversion/osversion -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 18:17:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A211065674 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8634C8FC1C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so1008665vbb.13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:17:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pOom+sncCmhiVJA1Rqof2FfwIVXnpZEo9rYOsv/g+Jw=; b=oz/9X3UPR3u2DVXbWNiYoJL6hMDpYfKAWI1GUUaUfh0r1c5ysFMquaiV1XCLCMEu9U e0aN7xF/ySPaIHRVLkmtILfTnDjdze47upBCE+VqhvR3nEAYhklnn+RNcag0dzkWfvVI aUF6OlPjcqWt1YkSCvEZUpIiz1WLcpsMdRNWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.71.226 with SMTP id y2mr1511121vdu.78.1327601826776; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:17:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.137 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:17:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <36ugu8-lt2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:17:07 -0000 Hello, On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Have you run 'pkg-libchk -o | grep xcb-' from > sysutils/bsdadminscripts? it should provide a list of ports that need > to be re-built after the xcb-utils upgrade to 1.8. > > Funny, I logged in just now to write about this posting from the forums: http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=163415&postcount=17 I've used pkg_linchk on one machine, and reinstalled all ports that depended on the missing libs. After that xfce4-wm upgraded easily. One machine fixed. One more machine to go... -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 18:22:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC103106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA6C8FC12 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1RqTxt-0004ax-Fv>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:22:29 +0100 Received: from e178005060.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.5.60] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1RqTxt-00010a-9v>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:22:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4F2199DE.1050504@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:22:22 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120119 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ports FreeBSD X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4F4BB0F761063A30EC6BB95A" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.5.60 Cc: Subject: x11/kde4-workspace: can not be build or upgraded in FreeBSD 10.0/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:22:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4F4BB0F761063A30EC6BB95A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have trouble with one of our boxes running FBSD 10.0/amd64 while updating ports with portmaster. The box in question refuses compiling/upgrading x11/kde4-workspace. I tried compiling with both legacy GCC and CLANG. What's going wrong and how can this repaired? Thanks in advance, Oliver [ 72%] Built target ksysguardlsofwidgets [ 72%] Building CXX object libs/ksysguard/processui/CMakeFiles/processui.dir/ProcessModel.o [ 73%] Built target plasmagenericshell [ 73%] Building CXX object libs/ksysguard/processui/CMakeFiles/processui.dir/ReniceDlg.o /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/kde-workspace-4.7.4/libs/ksysguard/pro= cessui/ProcessModel.cpp:424:40: error: redefinition of 'i' with a different type QMap::iterator i =3D mXResClientResources.lowerBound(-(qlonglong)(wid)); ^ /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/kde-workspace-4.7.4/libs/ksysguard/pro= cessui/ProcessModel.cpp:422:15: note: previous definition is here for (uint i=3D0; i < count; ++i) { ^ /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/kde-workspace-4.7.4/libs/ksysguard/pro= cessui/ProcessModel.cpp:425:17: error: 'operator _Bool' is a private member of 'QMap::iterator' if(i =3D=3D mXResClientResources.end()) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qmap.h:294:16: note: declared private here inline operator bool() const { return false; } ^ /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/kde-workspace-4.7.4/libs/ksysguard/pro= cessui/ProcessModel.cpp:428:15: error: member reference base type 'uint' (aka 'unsigned int') is not a structure or union if(-i.key() !=3D (qlonglong)(wid & ~i.value())) ~ ^ /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/kde-workspace-4.7.4/libs/ksysguard/pro= cessui/ProcessModel.cpp:428:45: error: member reference base type 'uint' (aka 'unsigned int') is not a structure or union if(-i.key() !=3D (qlonglong)(wid & ~i.value())) ~ ^ /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/kde-workspace-4.7.4/libs/ksysguard/pro= cessui/ProcessModel.cpp:441:36: error: no viable conversion from 'uint' (aka 'unsigned int') to 'QMap::iterator' mXResClientResources.erase(i); ^ /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qmap.h:230:11: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'uin= t' (aka 'unsigned int') to 'const QMap::iterator &' for 1st argument; class iterator ^ /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qmap.h:245:16: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from 'uint' (aka 'unsigned int') to 'QMapData::Node *' for 1st argument; inline iterator(QMapData::Node *node) : i(node) { } ^ /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qmap.h:378:29: note: passing argument to parameter 'it' here iterator erase(iterator it); ^ 5 errors generated. gmake[2]: *** [libs/ksysguard/processui/CMakeFiles/processui.dir/ProcessModel.o] Error = 1 gmake[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ 73%] Generating ksignalplotterwidgets.cpp [ 73%] Generating ksignalplotterwidgets.moc Scanning dependencies of target ksignalplotterwidgets gmake[1]: *** [libs/ksysguard/processui/CMakeFiles/processui.dir/all] Error 2 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ 73%] Building CXX object libs/ksysguard/signalplotter/CMakeFiles/ksignalplotterwidgets.dir/ksignal= plotterwidgets.o Linking CXX shared module ../../../lib/ksignalplotterwidgets.so [ 73%] Built target ksignalplotterwidgets gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kde4-workspace. --------------enig4F4BB0F761063A30EC6BB95A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPIZnkAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N81DkH/0UYj4wN3+QAmPwLFLvUKpht Revv95dEVqLgtc/1PwMhJ6l4bOkac3m+9QswrL+Ic9cp9Ed9SGi0dG1r7csanwdw 6ZExUCf/zU2aKwl3OcT1fLQeaTa/SF/Bzi0xK5Olcm2gRr0ur6DwKk6trFlYOYm+ Iu6bQCkp5Pd0G9SYjgvM5qroOwUH9AUVvNs34S4lZcvn1XuiVCn1T4zFcgSZdMez DYQXT8bw5uOXpUeWCo6oaAgi7IUSeo9ZHTMpjvoW4i0lVuvCvjDhHq/iODWNLMmg Yl4vSH4aAYZR3sx2Aq9EQFKPvgJVHIH5m9fIYS1A5XPBaPTjD6/uQ33nRrmYYaQ= =u34a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4F4BB0F761063A30EC6BB95A-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 19:19:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE321065670 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C478FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0QJJhB7073521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:19:44 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q0QJJhB7073521 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1327605584; bh=IG1Qip/nz3xr/4tbnHrJLGukcPKbglZ+Zyc8w0yhj/E=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=LQIF2zcqLwuNS/Wzqg2TA0T6yEJziTF6Fgngkp6blMYLLVylfbAXLf0HH+ZQjdTQX 8lsTRuax1Ht2LE5XPcMsRLuDXpUEUZKrofHtbpgnJv6PJwZrtu8rYxVxFBidF/k5I3 5cnVPXFO81qz/CpMjCE+UbK8qKVcHZ+sdgYuEW+0= Message-ID: <4F21A748.6010307@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:19:36 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F17DB1C.6080503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F193FD5.8070208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120121204614.GH4729@lonesome.com> <4F1BE7B4.6090702@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F1BE7B4.6090702@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9CDC4A00F9A907A2F8254622" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: NOT_FOR_ARCHS considered harmful [was: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:19:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9CDC4A00F9A907A2F8254622 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030703060201030600050905" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030703060201030600050905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/01/2012 10:40, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 21/01/2012 20:46, Mark Linimon wrote: >> tl;dr: I want to switch the default assumption we're making. >> >> IMHO when new ports come into the tree, we should make our default >> assumption that we will try to build them on amd64 and i386. For case= s >> that this does not hold, we consider this Bad and committer-must-fix. >> For the tier-2s, we shift the default assumption to "only set it to >> buildable once it has been shown to be so". So, the burden of proof >> shifts the other way: to a user of a tier-2 to claim "I tried this and= >> it works", rather than portmgr saying "we tried this and it doesn't wo= rk". >=20 > Doesn't your proposed change in semantics of the 'FOR_ARCHS' stuff mean= > that over time, as other architectures become more popular, most ports > will have to have an explicit 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' setting? If the default= > effectively becomes 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=3D i386 amd64' then as ports are sh= own > to work on different platforms they will need an ONLY_FOR_ARCHS line in= > their Makefiles listing where they are known to work? Or else the port= s > becomes effectively i386 / amd64 only? >=20 >> (Of course, for things like p5-* it doesn't really matter; if perl >> builds, to a first approximation they'll build as well. I'm talking >> about the things like biology/, deskutils/, games/, math/, science, >> x11*/, and so forth.) >> >> What do people think? >=20 > There are a lot of ports where the distinction between CPU architecture= s > is pretty much irrelevant. I can't see portmaster(8) (for example) > failing to work anywhere the base system works. >=20 > I was thinking about this a while back. Test the contents of packages > to see if they install any object code -- ports/129210 -- and mark the > ones that don't as arch-independent in some way (CATEGORIES+=3D arch-in= dep > perhaps?) So, apropos Mark's comments earlier, and after a few false starts and a lot of head-scratching here is a patch to address many of his points. It does basically three things: * Removes the NOT_FOR_ARCHS variable and associate functionality. * Creates a new BROKEN_OSARCHS variable. This is largely syntactic sugar, meaning that it is no longer necessary to use .include in order to test ${ARCH} or ${OSVERSION} * Creates a new SUPPORTED_OSARCHS variable. This allows maintainers to indicate which architectures they will support, and whether the package build cluster should routinely build packages for that port. A full patch removing NOT_FOR_ARCHS from the ports is at: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/not_for_archs.diff Comments? Critiques? Now for the more long-winded explanation bit.... NOT_FOR_ARCHS is frequently misused to indicate temporary build or installation failures on particular architectures. The _FOR_ARCHS stuff should be really only be used to indicate ports designed to work on specific CPU architectures. ONLY_FOR_ARCHS exists for this purpose. The problem with extending it to cover temporary failures is that the package build cluster will never retry building that port, so there's no way to tell if changes to the toolchain or updates to the port have subsequently fixed the problem. This is where the BROKEN_OSARCHS variable is useful. This is a list of achitecture-OS version pairs corresponding to the different environments used in the package build cluster. Thus you can easily mark a port as broken on sparc64-7, rather than having to use a construction like this: =2Einclude =2Eif ${ARCH} =3D=3D "sparc64" && ${OSVERSION} < 800000 BROKEN=3D compiler dumps core =2Eendif =2Einclude (Not using bsd.port.{pre,post}.mk so much should help a bit with index building times too.) It's also rather easier to grep for BROKEN_OSARCHS than it is for a construct like the above. As BROKEN_OSARCHS ultimately uses the pre-existing BROKEN variable, setting TRY_BROKEN will allow these ports to be retested. Finally there is SUPPORTED_OSARCHS, which can be used to indicate policy about where a port is known to usable. For regular users it doesn't do anything except print a warning message if an attempt is made to compile a port on an unsupported architecture/OS combination. For the ports build cluster, conditional on PACKAGE_BUILDING being set, it turns off building on unsupported environments by setting IGNORE. As the patch stands at the moment, every port will be using the default, which is to support these architecture/OS combinations: i386-7 i386-8 i386-9 amd64-7 amd64-8 amd64-9 but the defaults can be modified easily or port-specific settings can be added. There is also a TRY_UNSUPPORTED knob to turn on building packages on all architectures / OS versions. Finally, all this testing the CPU architecture and the OS version makes no sense at all for ports that don't install any compiled binaries, such as shell scripts. Those ports can define a variable ARCH_INDEP to opt out of the SUPPORTED_OSARCHS thing altogether. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------030703060201030600050905 Content-Type: text/plain; x-mac-type="0"; x-mac-creator="0"; name="bsd.port.mk.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bsd.port.mk.diff" Index: bsd.port.mk =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.703 diff -u -u -r1.703 bsd.port.mk --- bsd.port.mk 22 Jan 2012 15:41:33 -0000 1.703 +++ bsd.port.mk 26 Jan 2012 18:20:31 -0000 @@ -207,17 +207,69 @@ # # Set these if your port only makes sense to certain architectures. # They are lists containing names for them (e.g., "alpha i386"). -# (Defaults: not set.) +# (Defaults: unset) # # ONLY_FOR_ARCHS # - Only build ports if ${ARCH} matches one of these. -# NOT_FOR_ARCHS - Only build ports if ${ARCH} doesn't match one of these= =2E # ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON # ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON_${ARCH} # - Reason why it's only for ${ONLY_FOR_ARCHS}s -# NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON -# NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON_${ARCH} -# - Reason why it's not for ${NOT_FOR_ARCHS}s +# +# Show architecture and OS major version combinations where ported +# software is expected to operate correctly and for which packages +# should be built. Port maintainers are expected to address problems +# with ports on supported OS versions and architectures. Where +# physically feasible, all Tier-1 architectures and all OS versions +# under active support by the FreeBSD project must be supported. +# Architecture and OS combinations not listed as supported may or may +# not work, and maintainers need not feel obliged to address reported +# problems. +# +# OS version and architecture combinations are expressed as +# ${ARCH}-${OSMAJOR} (eg. amd64-9, i386-10). The wildcard 'ALL' may +# be used to indicate support for the default set of either +# component. Thus i386-ALL means supported on all active supported +# major OS versions for i386 architecture, whereas ALL-9 means +# supported on all Tier-1 architectures but only for FreeBSD 9.x. The +# default setting is ALL-ALL +# +# Ports that install no architecture dependent files (eg. shell +# scripts) can define ARCH_INDEP to opt-out of all supported OS +# version and architecure tests, implicitly declaring that they are +# supported on all platforms. +# +# ARCH_INDEP - Define this to declare that this port installs identic= al +# content irrespective of OS version and system architec= ture +# SUPPORTED_OSARCHS +# - List of supported architecture-OS combinations this +# port is supported for. Only build packages if +# ${ARCH}-${OSMAJOR} matches one of these. (Default: +# ALL-ALL) +# SUPPORTED_REASONS +# - List of reasons why architecture is or is not supporte= d +# on various platforms. The format is :"" +# The first match is selected, so order from most to lea= st +# specific. +# Example: +# ALL-7:"supported on standard architectures for FreeB= SD 7.x" +# ALL-8:"supported on standard architectures for FreeB= SD 8.x" +# ALL-ALL:"part of base system" +# (Default: unset) +# +# Set these if your port temporarily does not work on certain +# architectures and OS combinations due to programming errors or other +# unintentional problems. Values are lists of architecture-OS +# combinations as above. (Defaults: unset) +#=20 +# BROKEN_OSARCHS +# - List of architecture-OS combinatins where port is +# known not to work. See BROKEN above. +# BROKEN_REASONS +# - List of reasons why port is broken on +# ${ARCH}-${OSMAJOR}. The format is the same as for +# SUPPORTED_REASONS above. +# (Default: unset) +# # IA32_BINARY_PORT # - Set this instead of ONLY_FOR_ARCHS if the given port # fetches and installs compiled i386 binaries. @@ -1195,6 +1247,11 @@ .endif .endif =20 +# Get the operating system major version +.if !defined(OSMAJOR) +OSMAJOR=3D ${OSVERSION:C,.....$,,} +.endif + MASTERDIR?=3D ${.CURDIR} =20 .if ${MASTERDIR} !=3D ${.CURDIR} @@ -3126,21 +3183,8 @@ __ARCH_OK?=3D 1 .endif =20 -.if defined(NOT_FOR_ARCHS) -.for __NARCH in ${NOT_FOR_ARCHS} -.if ${ARCH:M${__NARCH}} !=3D "" -.undef __ARCH_OK -.endif -.endfor -.endif - .if !defined(__ARCH_OK) -.if defined(ONLY_FOR_ARCHS) -IGNORE=3D is only for ${ONLY_FOR_ARCHS}, -.else # defined(NOT_FOR_ARCHS) -IGNORE=3D does not run on ${NOT_FOR_ARCHS}, -.endif -IGNORE+=3D while you are running ${ARCH} +IGNORE=3D is only for ${ONLY_FOR_ARCHS}, while you are running ${ARCH} =20 .if defined(ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON_${ARCH}) IGNORE+=3D (reason: ${ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON_${ARCH}}) @@ -3148,12 +3192,143 @@ IGNORE+=3D (reason: ${ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON}) .endif =20 -.if defined(NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON_${ARCH}) -IGNORE+=3D (reason: ${NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON_${ARCH}}) -.elif defined(NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON) -IGNORE+=3D (reason: ${NOT_FOR_ARCHS_REASON}) .endif =20 +# Check the machine architectures. Assume ports are only supported on +# Tier-1 architectures unless maintainers commit to supporting other +# achitectures and they have been tested and shown to work there. Skip a= ll +# this for ports that install entirely architecture independent files. + +.if !defined(ARCH_INDEP) +SUPPORTED_OSARCHS?=3D ALL-ALL +SUPPORTED_REASONS?=3D ALL-ALL:"standard Tier-1 architecture and supporte= d OS" + +SUPPORTED_OSARCHS_DEFAULT=3D amd64-7 amd64-8 amd64-9 \ + i386-7 i386-8 i386-9 + +_ARCH_OS=3D ${ARCH}-${OSMAJOR} +_ARCH_WILD=3D ALL-${OSMAJOR} +_WILD_OS=3D ${ARCH}-ALL +_WILD_WILD=3D ALL-ALL + +# Id the current environment one that would be supported by default? +. for _osarch_def in ${SUPPORTED_OSARCHS_DEFAULT} +. if ${_ARCH_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch_def} +__DEFAULT_OSARCH=3D 1 +. endif +. endfor + +. for _osarch in ${SUPPORTED_OSARCHS} +. if !defined(__SUPPORTED) +. if ${_ARCH_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__SUPPORTED=3D ${_ARCH_OS} +. elif defined(__DEFAULT_OSARCH) +. if ${_WILD_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch}=20 +__SUPPORTED=3D ${_WILD_WILD} +. elif ${_ARCH_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__SUPPORTED=3D ${_ARCH_WILD} +. elif ${_WILD_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__SUPPORTED=3D ${_WILD_OS} +. endif +. endif +. endif +. endfor + +. for _supported_reason in ${SUPPORTED_REASONS} +. if !defined(__SUPPORTED_REASON) +_osarch=3D ${_supported_reason:C,:.*$,,} +_reason=3D ${_supported_reason:C,^[^:]+:",,:C,"$,,} + +. if ${_ARCH_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__SUPPORTED_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. elif defined(__DEFAULT_OSARCH) +. if ${_WILD_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch}=20 +__SUPPORTED_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. elif ${_ARCH_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__SUPPORTED_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. elif ${_WILD_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__SUPPORTED_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. endif +. endif +. endif +. endfor + +# Don't build packages for unsupported architectures +. if defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) && !defined(TRY_UNSUPPORTED) +. if !defined(__SUPPORTED) +IGNORE=3D unsupported: ${SUPPORTED_OSARCHS} does not match ${_ARCH_OS} +. if defined(__SUPPORTED_REASON) +IGNORE+=3D (reason: ${__SUPPORTED_REASON}) +. endif +. endif +. endif +.endif # !defined(ARCH_INDEP) + + +.if defined(BROKEN_OSARCHS) + +. for _osarch in ${BROKEN_OSARCHS} +. if !defined(__BROKEN) +. if ${_ARCH_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__BROKEN=3D ${_ARCH_OS} +. elif defined(__DEFAULT_OSARCH) +. if ${_WILD_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch}=20 +__BROKEN=3D ${_WILD_WILD} +. elif ${_ARCH_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__BROKEN=3D ${_ARCH_WILD} +. elif ${_WILD_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__BROKEN=3D ${_WILD_OS} +. endif +. endif +. endif +. endfor + +. for _broken_reason in ${BROKEN_REASONS} +. if !defined(__BROKEN_REASON) +_osarch=3D ${_broken_reason:C,:.*$,,} +_reason=3D ${_broken_reason:C,^[^:]+:",,:C,"$,,} + +. if ${_ARCH_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__BROKEN_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. elif defined(__DEFAULT_OSARCH) +. if ${_WILD_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch}=20 +__BROKEN_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. elif ${_ARCH_WILD} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__BROKEN_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. elif ${_WILD_OS} =3D=3D ${_osarch} +__BROKEN_REASON=3D ${_reason} +. endif +. endif +. endif +. endfor + +. if defined(__BROKEN) +BROKEN=3D on ${BROKEN_OSARCHS}; ${__BROKEN} matches ${_ARCH_OS} +. if defined(__BROKEN_REASON) +BROKEN+=3D (reason: ${__BROKEN_REASON}) +. endif +. endif + +.endif # defined(BROKEN_OSARCHS) + +.if !target(check-support) +check-support: +. if defined(ARCH_INDEP) + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> Supported anywhere: architecture-independent = content" +. else +. if defined(__SUPPORTED) +. if defined(__SUPPORTED_REASON) + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> Supported on ${_ARCH_OS}: ${__SUPPORTED_REASO= N}" +. endif +. else + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> WARNING: this port is not supported on ${_ARC= H_OS}" +. if defined(__SUPPORTED_REASON) + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> (reason: ${__SUPPORTED_REASON})" +. else + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> (reason: not properly tested and may or may n= ot work)" +. endif +. endif +. endif .endif =20 # Check the user interaction and legal issues @@ -4266,8 +4441,8 @@ _SANITY_SEQ=3D ${_CHROOT_SEQ} pre-everything check-makefile \ check-categories check-makevars check-desktop-entries \ check-depends identify-install-conflicts check-deprecated \ - check-vulnerable check-license buildanyway-message \ - options-message + check-vulnerable check-license check-support \ + buildanyway-message options-message _FETCH_DEP=3D check-sanity _FETCH_SEQ=3D fetch-depends pre-fetch pre-fetch-script \ do-fetch post-fetch post-fetch-script --------------030703060201030600050905-- --------------enig9CDC4A00F9A907A2F8254622 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8hp08ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwvPQCdFjx6F6pbSzm7SJogw3h3Ra1L ZxkAn2PspxQh0YPoKRNrmPUgFW3Ds4CH =ThUJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9CDC4A00F9A907A2F8254622-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 19:43:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE4D106566B for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:43:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7068FC12 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqVEE-0006LG-Tg for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:43:27 +0100 Received: from 201.82.194.83 ([201.82.194.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:43:26 +0100 Received: from rakuco by 201.82.194.83 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:43:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:43:08 -0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <87bopq6yib.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F2199DE.1050504@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.82.194.83 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eV4M/ROEk4kDPaHT/2YS/94lYis= Subject: Re: x11/kde4-workspace: can not be build or upgraded in FreeBSD 10.0/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:43:29 -0000 "O. Hartmann" writes: > I have trouble with one of our boxes running FBSD 10.0/amd64 while > updating ports with portmaster. The box in question refuses > compiling/upgrading x11/kde4-workspace. I tried compiling with both > legacy GCC and CLANG. > > What's going wrong and how can this repaired? Weird, these errors used to show up only with clang. I fixed them upstream [1] some time ago, but 4.7.4 was released before that. Are you using some special gcc flags to turn some warnings into errors or something like that? [1] http://commits.kde.org/kde-workspace/4c72106b5db6771e6a6b45580808a4c015682096 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 19:44:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18BE106570F; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D5D8FC16; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8479621C3C; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:44:27 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9D9621C3B; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:44:27 -0500 Message-ID: <4F21AD1A.40903@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:44:26 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , References: <4F2173A8.5010803@freebsd.org> <4352.46.129.107.107.1327599369.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> <4F219044.9030705@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F219044.9030705@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: what is maxcmdlen? $0 len? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: port@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:44:28 -0000 On 1/26/12 12:41 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 1/26/12 12:36 PM, rflynn@acsalaska.net wrote: >> Also, it looks like swatch is creating a temporary script that is >> actually run, so the status command is not supposed to find it. >> >> It's a design issue upstream that you want them to find a better >> solution for. >> > I am thinking: > either do what SHOULD be done, and in swatch(). check for cmdlen > > (x?) and what is x?) and let swatch die. > this actually makes more sense, as to the cmdbuflen size. len=`echo "0${command} ${swatch_flags} (perl)0" | wc -c` if [ $len -ge 255 ];then takes the command, swatch flags, the (perl) added to end, and two byte buffer (the 0). and if GE 255, then: either FAIL with err 1 swatch_${i}_flags too long or set procname = %%LOCALBASE/bin/perl. this seems to work in all cases.. start/stop/status, one file in tail-file, several files in tail-file, etc. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 19:55:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4319A106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc3-s26.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s26.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3C48FC15 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP283 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s26.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:55:54 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP283.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:55:52 -0800 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TYvBH56Ccz2CG4h; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:55:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:55:51 -0500 From: Carmel To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2012 19:55:53.0150 (UTC) FILETIME=[82850DE0:01CCDC64] Cc: Subject: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:55:55 -0000 FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 I am unable to build nautilus. The build ends with this error message: grep: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory sed: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory gnome-libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la' is not a valid libtool archive gmake[2]: *** [libeel-2.la] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1/eel' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus. The entire build log is located at: http://pastebin.com/MThHQAPs -- Carmel carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 21:18:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED842106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23888FC1E for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=QgV6GWuCAAO2MF0z5DIGAnx258YSeeytemCuYtcVV9g=; b=THrsp3X3N41qqBhpHiQClTdV6JPXBY9ojwmUgoigAt4mu3NDUFnpmuEdaKDG2l+Use8Sykiuudw4GqV9mT2tcnPlb+SySvP13agKD8WnQKcI8TejXvu5+XtEcsd8iY5X; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RqWiX-000Pm8-N1 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:18:50 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1327612723-3242-3241/5/20; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:18:43 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <36ugu8-lt2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:18:43 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.61 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: cannot build x11-wm/xfce4-wm after upgrade x11/xcb-util X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:18:51 -0000 On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:20:27 -0600, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Have you run 'pkg-libchk -o | grep xcb-' from > sysutils/bsdadminscripts? it should provide a list of ports that need > to be re-built after the xcb-utils upgrade to 1.8. What's strange is that this didn't work for me the first five times I tried it. I had to use the portmaster --check-depends to find a missing package that wasn't getting picked up by the broken things listed in pkg_libchk.... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 21:36:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC6A106564A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5278FC0A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1D3D23C0D; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:56 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F80D23C0C; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4F21C776.40904@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:54 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:36:58 -0000 On 1/26/12 2:55 PM, Carmel wrote: > FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 > > I am unable to build nautilus. The build ends with this error message: > > grep: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory > sed: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory > gnome-libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la' is not a valid libtool archive > gmake[2]: *** [libeel-2.la] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1/eel' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 1 > works here, amd64, 8.2 gmake[1]: Entering directory `/work/a/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1/libnautilus-extension' gmake[2]: Entering directory `/work/a/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1/libnautilus-extension' test -z "/usr/local/lib" || .././install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/lib" /bin/sh /work/a/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/gnome-libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel libnautilus-extension.la '/usr/local/lib' gnome-libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libnautilus-extension.so.1 /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.so.1 gnome-libtool: install: (cd /usr/local/lib&& { ln -s -f libnautilus-extension.so.1 libnautilus-extension.so || { rm -f libnautilus-extension.so&& ln -s libnautilus-extension.so.1 libnautilus-extension.so; }; }) gnome-libtool: install: (cd /usr/local/lib&& { ln -s -f libnautilus-extension.so.1 libnautilus-extension.so || { rm -f libnautilus-extension.so&& ln -s libnautilus-extension.so.1 libnautilus-extension.so; }; }) gnome-libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libnautilus-extension.lai /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.la gnome-libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libnautilus-extension.a /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.a gnome-libtool: install: chmod 644 /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.a gnome-libtool: install: ranlib /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.a test -z "/usr/local/share/gir-1.0/" || .././install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/share/gir-1.0/" clean your portstree, (portclean -C) make sure you don't have odd things in make.conf -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 22:18:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC17D1065673 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc3-s8.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s8.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FF48FC12 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP86 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s8.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:18:26 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP86.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:18:26 -0800 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TYyLm2LBNz2CG4h for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:18:24 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:18:23 -0500 From: Carmel To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4F21C776.40904@freebsd.org> References: <4F21C776.40904@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2012 22:18:26.0516 (UTC) FILETIME=[6CB92140:01CCDC78] Subject: Re: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:18:27 -0000 On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:54 -0500 Michael Scheidell articulated: > > > On 1/26/12 2:55 PM, Carmel wrote: > > FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 > > > > I am unable to build nautilus. The build ends with this error > > message: > > > > grep: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory > > sed: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory > > gnome-libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la' is not a valid > > libtool archive gmake[2]: *** [libeel-2.la] Error 1 > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1/eel' gmake[1]: > > *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1' gmake: *** > > [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 > > > works here, amd64, 8.2 > > gmake[1]: Entering directory > `/work/a/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1/libnautilus-extension' > gmake[2]: Entering directory > `/work/a/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1/libnautilus-extension' > test -z "/usr/local/lib" || .././install-sh -c -d > "/usr/local/lib" /bin/sh /work/a/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/gnome-libtool > --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel > libnautilus-extension.la '/usr/local/lib' gnome-libtool: > install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g > wheel .libs/libnautilus-extension.so.1 /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.so.1 > gnome-libtool: install: (cd /usr/local/lib&& { ln -s -f > libnautilus-extension.so.1 libnautilus-extension.so || { rm -f > libnautilus-extension.so&& ln -s libnautilus-extension.so.1 > libnautilus-extension.so; }; }) gnome-libtool: install: > (cd /usr/local/lib&& { ln -s -f libnautilus-extension.so.1 > libnautilus-extension.so || { rm -f libnautilus-extension.so&& ln -s > libnautilus-extension.so.1 libnautilus-extension.so; }; }) > gnome-libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g > wheel .libs/libnautilus-extension.lai /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.la > gnome-libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g > wheel .libs/libnautilus-extension.a /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.a > gnome-libtool: install: chmod > 644 /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.a gnome-libtool: install: > ranlib /usr/local/lib/libnautilus-extension.a test -z > "/usr/local/share/gir-1.0/" || .././install-sh -c -d > "/usr/local/share/gir-1.0/" > > > clean your portstree, (portclean -C) > > make sure you don't have odd things in make.conf {{Sorry -- posted to FreeBSD forum by mistake.}} I just ran "portclean -C" and then updated the ports tree, and deleted all old files in "/usr/ports/distfiles". I then attempted to build the port again. The exact same thing happened again. I checked, and the "/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la" file does not exist on this system and I have no idea where to find and install it. The system "make.conf" file is clean of any funkiness. -- Carmel carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 22:49:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4248106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from huffman.acsalaska.net (huffman.acsalaska.net [209.112.173.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718688FC08 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mymail.acsalaska.net (sheep.acsalaska.net [216.67.61.194]) by huffman.acsalaska.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0QMnhqj061551 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:43 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from 46.129.107.107 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rflynn@acsalaska.net) by mymail.acsalaska.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0900 (AKST) Message-ID: <1292.46.129.107.107.1327618184.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: References: <4F21C776.40904@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0900 (AKST) From: rflynn@acsalaska.net To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (huffman.acsalaska.net [209.112.168.121]); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0900 (AKST) X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.67; SA 3.3.0; spamdefang 1.122 Subject: Re: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:49:45 -0000 > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:54 -0500 > I just ran "portclean -C" and then updated the ports tree, and deleted > all old files in "/usr/ports/distfiles". I then attempted to build the > port again. The exact same thing happened again. I checked, and the > "/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la" file does not exist on this system and I > have no idea where to find and install it. The system "make.conf" file > is clean of any funkiness. % pkg_updating x11/xcb-util 20120116: AFFECTS: users of x11/xcb-util AUTHOR: garga@FreeBSD.org x11/xcb-util was updated to 0.3.8 and was split in new modules. Dependencies were adjusted but main port symbols were moved to a single library, xcb-util.so. For this reason, all dependent ports must be recompiled.If you use portmaster, run: # portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0 Or for portupgrade: # portupgrade -r xcb-util-0\* From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 23:16:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BF81065672 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCEB8FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP195 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:16:32 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP195.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:16:31 -0800 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TYzdp2tz4z2CG4h for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:16:30 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:16:29 -0500 From: Carmel To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1292.46.129.107.107.1327618184.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> References: <4F21C776.40904@freebsd.org> <1292.46.129.107.107.1327618184.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2012 23:16:31.0888 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A2AB100:01CCDC80] Subject: Re: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:34 -0000 On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0900 (AKST) rflynn@acsalaska.net articulated: > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:54 -0500 > > > I just ran "portclean -C" and then updated the ports tree, and > > deleted all old files in "/usr/ports/distfiles". I then attempted > > to build the port again. The exact same thing happened again. I > > checked, and the "/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la" file does not exist > > on this system and I have no idea where to find and install it. The > > system "make.conf" file is clean of any funkiness. > > % pkg_updating x11/xcb-util > 20120116: > AFFECTS: users of x11/xcb-util > AUTHOR: garga@FreeBSD.org > > x11/xcb-util was updated to 0.3.8 and was split in new modules. > Dependencies were adjusted but main port symbols were moved to a > single library, xcb-util.so. For this reason, all dependent ports > must be recompiled.If you use portmaster, run: > > # portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0 > > Or for portupgrade: > > # portupgrade -r xcb-util-0\* I did exactly that; however, the situation still persists. -- Carmel carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 00:05:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127A6106566C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from denali.acsalaska.net (denali.acsalaska.net [209.112.173.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D3B8FC1F for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mymail.acsalaska.net (polarbear.acsalaska.net [216.67.61.193]) by denali.acsalaska.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0R057p3031380 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:05:07 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from 46.129.107.107 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rflynn@acsalaska.net) by mymail.acsalaska.net with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:05:07 -0900 (AKST) Message-ID: <2394.46.129.107.107.1327622707.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: References: <4F21C776.40904@freebsd.org> <1292.46.129.107.107.1327618184.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:05:07 -0900 (AKST) From: rflynn@acsalaska.net To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (denali.acsalaska.net [209.112.168.121]); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:05:08 -0900 (AKST) X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.67; SA 3.3.0; spamdefang 1.122 Subject: Re: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:05:09 -0000 > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0900 (AKST) > rflynn@acsalaska.net articulated: > >> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:54 -0500 >> >> > I just ran "portclean -C" and then updated the ports tree, and >> > deleted all old files in "/usr/ports/distfiles". I then attempted >> > to build the port again. The exact same thing happened again. I >> > checked, and the "/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la" file does not exist >> > on this system and I have no idea where to find and install it. The >> > system "make.conf" file is clean of any funkiness. >> >> % pkg_updating x11/xcb-util >> 20120116: >> AFFECTS: users of x11/xcb-util >> AUTHOR: garga@FreeBSD.org >> >> x11/xcb-util was updated to 0.3.8 and was split in new modules. >> Dependencies were adjusted but main port symbols were moved to a >> single library, xcb-util.so. For this reason, all dependent ports >> must be recompiled.If you use portmaster, run: >> >> # portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0 >> >> Or for portupgrade: >> >> # portupgrade -r xcb-util-0\* > I did exactly that; however, the situation still persists. Run this: find /usr/local/lib -type f -exec grep 'xcb-aux' {} + If that shows files, then those ports need to be upgraded first. However, if this shows libraries in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg then delete those files. Libtool is being confused by outdated libraries and you need to figure out the culprit. A hint may be available in the lines above the failure message. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 06:46:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA0E106564A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE7A8FC13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so1563230wib.13 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:46:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RIQ1muxI2PLJZU4lpYpsS/neQUX5a2zVYiTTZQvhUnc=; b=AU+SPYubPSsIUzWmSiMjeqCevA0YSiSVJVimYMVW1tobqSvBfINOpwKVEJBgOjLF2s hyPPwwY7D1hax+J32IV9MrgoyvAuRr43eeDqeJH9E0lYCK8D20AqNcBOM6Qw7JMdZGW9 kofzXTzBQErBr1/pLleLZaCznMVxdYoBjF64A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.106.33 with SMTP id gr1mr8766738wib.6.1327646781588; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:46:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.101.196 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:46:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2394.46.129.107.107.1327622707.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> References: <4F21C776.40904@freebsd.org> <1292.46.129.107.107.1327618184.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> <2394.46.129.107.107.1327622707.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:46:21 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: rflynn@acsalaska.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:46:23 -0000 On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:05 PM, wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:49:44 -0900 (AKST) >> rflynn@acsalaska.net articulated: >> >>> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:36:54 -0500 >>> >>> > I just ran "portclean -C" and then updated the ports tree, and >>> > deleted all old files in "/usr/ports/distfiles". I then attempted >>> > to build the port again. The exact same thing happened again. I >>> > checked, and the "/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la" file does not exist >>> > on this system and I have no idea where to find and install it. The >>> > system "make.conf" file is clean of any funkiness. >>> >>> % pkg_updating x11/xcb-util >>> 20120116: >>> =A0 AFFECTS: users of x11/xcb-util >>> =A0 AUTHOR: garga@FreeBSD.org >>> >>> =A0 x11/xcb-util was updated to 0.3.8 and was split in new modules. >>> =A0 Dependencies were adjusted but main port symbols were moved to a >>> single library, xcb-util.so. =A0For this reason, all dependent ports >>> must be recompiled.If you use portmaster, run: >>> >>> =A0 # portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0 >>> >>> =A0 Or for portupgrade: >>> >>> =A0 # portupgrade -r xcb-util-0\* >> I did exactly that; however, the situation still persists. > > Run this: > find /usr/local/lib -type f -exec grep 'xcb-aux' {} + > > If that shows files, then those ports need to be upgraded first. > However, if this shows libraries in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg > then delete those files. Libtool is being confused by outdated > libraries and you need to figure out the culprit. A hint may > be available in the lines above the failure message. > > -- Mel While this works, I really continue to recommend Dominic Fandrey's pkg_libcheck. It runs much faster as it runs parallel checks on multiple files at the same time. Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts and run 'pkg_libchk -o | grep xcb-' and rebuild all the ports reported. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 08:20:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0893106564A; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it) Received: from outrelay02.libero.it (outrelay02.libero.it [212.52.84.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832408FC08; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:20:59 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0206.4F225E69.0164,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1821 Received: from wmail61 (172.31.0.58) by outrelay02.libero.it (8.5.140) (authenticated as barbara.xxx1975@libero.it) id 4F207DC0002AEA35; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:20:57 +0100 Message-ID: <13209017.5846091327652457629.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:20:57 +0100 (CET) From: Barbara To: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SenderIP: 79.33.210.212 Cc: Subject: R: nautilus build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbara List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:21:00 -0000 > >FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 > >I am unable to build nautilus. The build ends with this error message: > >grep: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory >sed: /usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la: No such file or directory >gnome-libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libxcb-aux.la' is not a valid libtool archive >gmake[2]: *** [libeel-2.la] Error 1 >gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus-2.32.2.1 /eel' >gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus/work/nautilus- 2.32.2.1' >gmake: *** [all] Error 2 >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus. > >The entire build log is located at: http://pastebin.com/MThHQAPs > Try following the 20120116 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Barbara From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 09:56:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062FC106566B for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:56:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.scheidell@secnap.com) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A598FC08 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162DED23C0D for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:56:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secnap.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:subject :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:date:date:message-id; s=dkim; t=1327658204; x=1329472604; bh=hDSmWChyFMc6C9zIOxPpxr3C 1yLzr2a+9qdu76K4f50=; b=pEwpOBhQQc+omWNnOLfHQ8qrbWdBFnVVUZNuZaHV 0ldKnQB7qwxpHaGodOA+hOPTV4B/ry+3YcfGA3OYdLYxTvR23553A9mvd8mbeRYL r5ikpxHRennijJ3BPgxcHJhOrum2MxrN7s6npliTaCyTlJTczyYRZGGn8WtgVEQt 0qs= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3DAD23C0C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:56:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:56:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4F2274E3.7090004@secnap.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:56:51 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: miwi MIA X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:56:47 -0000 Several ports miwi was holding on to that depended on other PRs, many of which have been committed. Other pr's depend on pr's miwi is holding. anyone seen miwi lately? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 * Best Intrusion Prevention Product * Hot Company Finalist 2011 * Best Email Security Product * Certified SNORT Integrator ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 10:23:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8873E1065670 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FA88FC17 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q0RANBwE019744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:23:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q0RANBko019743; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:23:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02126; Fri, 27 Jan 12 02:14:41 PST Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:14:05 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Message-Id: <4f22db5d.IHCfc41SdSK3Lk6c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F17DB1C.6080503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F193FD5.8070208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120121204614.GH4729@lonesome.com> <4F1BE7B4.6090702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F21A748.6010307@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F21A748.6010307@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOT_FOR_ARCHS considered harmful [was: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:23:12 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Finally, all this testing the CPU architecture and the OS version > makes no sense at all for ports that don't install any compiled > binaries, such as shell scripts. Unless said script runs something CPU- or OSversion-specific, e.g. to perform operations that are supported only in recent geom, or to report on the configuration of ACPI or the new USB subsystem. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 10:59:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F75106566B; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592DD8FC08; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so1794284wer.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:59:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qwOS8DuZY90pAcqP5QSBDE1ZPq1fv/RtEdCeh9n6VTw=; b=weP9NRL+/hc5GhbJT7KJO4n2X2xmkhzVHBWLuaN30Zxu0aGXUDyX7uSoNdACPQu/s9 3sUnT3EgYk4tYLwv+GiFjqjJjZV2Z5gJb6bk8LoQSsXNyXdYh8bx0a3BKTeBclEGq0Ix rP+IqG4+Kx1uy0cxGMP/9VyNQaT0L0mKj3xcw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.105.129 with SMTP id gm1mr6702436wib.1.1327660531746; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:35:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.103.227 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:35:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:35:31 -0500 Message-ID: From: grarpamp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: shaun@freebsd.org Subject: Bitcoin update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:59:03 -0000 Would it be a good time to request (or receive) an update to Bitcoin? The rationale (security, bugs, QT, etc) is included below. Thanks for consideration :) http://bitcoin.org/news.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 14:18:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1D01065670 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:18:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.freebsd@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212BA8FC12 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcc13 with SMTP id c13so2003757pbc.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:18:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TZ+OT6sveUNuszKf16axrEww2eAzr9f2WI5xALi3ZnM=; b=lYaI8sBxzEkpo3DO4EMq7rg0Ul4HlC4LCQH54NOMTXGMtaPwUvE6AMHkR19bd+1kMz TvlYAtUGMEqEwdgOKaM17/DDnGdJOOioMO4+lIeJMmOIReLLJ+ZgvWjWyzNXr1rGVCEo jh1AoZ4Wd6DBbGTIFk2hmoAsRJ7RhRpqgrZ3k= Received: by 10.68.208.228 with SMTP id mh4mr14599373pbc.13.1327672475742; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from miwifbsd.dyndns.org ([175.142.182.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm20144833pbq.13.2012.01.27.05.54.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:54:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: Martin Wilke Message-ID: <4F231CD1.60703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:53:21 +0000 From: Martin Wilke Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F2274E3.7090004@secnap.com> In-Reply-To: <4F2274E3.7090004@secnap.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: miwi MIA X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: miwi@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:18:10 -0000 On Fri Jan 27 09:56:51 2012, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Several ports miwi was holding on to that depended on other PRs, many > of which have been committed. Other pr's depend on pr's miwi is holding. > > > > > anyone seen miwi lately? > I was sick and in holiday :) so keep cool. -- +-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 14:20:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4469C106564A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@acm.org) Received: from fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AC68FC08 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.193]) by fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q0RCF9Pw004601 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:15:09 +1100 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-116-103.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.116.103]) by mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q0RCF4XQ028675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:15:06 +1100 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0RBvpsN042664; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:57:51 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id q0RBvoAX042663; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:57:50 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:57:50 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Rickie Kerndt Message-ID: <20120127115750.GD21720@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <000001ccd565$ba3ced30$2eb6c790$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001ccd565$ba3ced30$2eb6c790$@com> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mhonarc deprecated use of defined() X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:20:41 -0000 --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Jan-17 14:16:56 -0800, Rickie Kerndt wrote: >Mhonarc when run with perl 10.14.2 complains about its deprecated use of >defined(%a_hash). I've replaced these defined() where used (not many) as >shown in the attached patch files. Is there any interest in updating the >mhonarc port to fix this issue? "MAINTAINER=3Dports@FreeBSD.org" means no-one is maintaining that port. If you are interested in maintaining it, I suggest you submit a PR containing those patches and changing the maintainer to yourself. --=20 Peter Jeremy --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8ikT4ACgkQ/opHv/APuIc1AwCfd2Wf33NM34S/AXYzgDxkbabW EQUAnRFyzIWh50EhAmD3qyBXSMPSKj/S =AkRR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 16:05:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DFD106567C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575658FC17 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0RG5lk0098902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:05:47 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q0RG5lk0098902 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1327680347; bh=71YwGLDT1hLs6xu37p/OSXMZsUxiazaT8fcVMy0z/rg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Cc: In-Reply-To:References; b=vE5wiRVHyQh6HnOZt+U9XohtXEYQRf7UwFcqx/JutIoYPdRW9FxvXPg9XZs2CCGPc Zi7NuFPPo+YL7ntCk8h9AQwULD1in/VChuwjVXUUIcqljppjosMwNJQNjRJwrwDoZ6 9LLB1DwXwBSQmvwkjSnSSQWGVZvq52GMyrwg4/b4= Message-ID: <4F22CB51.6070507@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:05:37 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7FB8387BD1D0D244C3619B35" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: BSD make -- Malformed conditional X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:05:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7FB8387BD1D0D244C3619B35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, Posting this mostly for the archives, but it's probably relevant to some people here too. When hacking on Makefiles, should you wish to match an item in a list, you might write something like this: =2Efor item in ${LIST} =2Eif ${item} =3D=3D ${THING} # Ooops! THING_FOUND=3D 1 =2Eendif =2Eendfor This however is a snare and a delusion, and will lead to much weeping and wailing, and error messages like so: % make "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (foo =3D=3D ${THING}) "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (bar =3D=3D ${THING}) "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (baz =3D=3D ${THING}) "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (blurfl =3D=3D ${THING}) "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue Instead you should write your loops like this: =2Efor item in ${LIST} =2Eif ${THING} =3D=3D ${item} THING_FOUND=3D 1 =2Eendif =2Eendfor As the make(1) manual page says on the subject of string comparisons using =3D=3D or !=3D : An expression may also be a numeric or string comparison: in this ca= se, the left-hand side must be a variable expansion, whereas the right-h= and side can be a constant or a variable expansion. So it seems that despite appearing and behaving almost exactly like one, the iterator in a .for loop is not actually a variable as such. It also means that to match a constant string, you can't just write: =2Efor item in ${LIST} =2Eif ${item} =3D=3D "this" # Ooops THIS_FOUND=3D1 =2Eendif =2Eendfor but have to assign the text "this" to a variable somewhere, and use the second form. Yes, you can use ${LIST:Mthis} instead, but using this construct can be a bit tricky in itself... % cat Makefile LIST=3D foo bar baz blurfl THING=3D baz all: @echo "OK \$${LIST:Mfoo} =3D ${LIST:Mfoo}" @echo "Not OK \$${LIST:M\$${THING}} =3D ${LIST:M${THING}}" % make OK ${LIST:Mfoo} =3D foo Not OK ${LIST:M${THING}} =3D } Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7FB8387BD1D0D244C3619B35 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8iy1oACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw1EgCeNrwfvkTHm5L8q1bqKhSR4Swv wHIAninG/eNaxfBHO5ajQO8Gzbh1URl4 =bTiN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7FB8387BD1D0D244C3619B35-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 16:51:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA86106566B for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C9B8FC15 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so3987128iae.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:51:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5IjQdDFSJA3zT/LD33JB6/hrRM0tUSb+KbunMpWCWOw=; b=uHE7gzBmSjFQpgFhQDuStM92hk03iULZBIEDmXmQSSZDr4MOVr9t21QNmm8BHlL7Ty VmU5cJKRvN0KZXxotn2orF5VmLInQyUiQ6RfFqS5X5xCvRe8JyUHBrKu2o342d+MbJgs 3SRJNIXjZg0ektdZ8nqFZB1FPIozzcErprsxU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.146.202 with SMTP id k10mr5858030icv.13.1327683087350; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:51:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:51:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:51:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F22CB51.6070507@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4F22CB51.6070507@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:51:27 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: BSD make -- Malformed conditional X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:51:28 -0000 On 27 Jan 2012 16:06, "Matthew Seaman" wrote: > > > Dear all, > > Posting this mostly for the archives, but it's probably relevant to some > people here too. > > When hacking on Makefiles, should you wish to match an item in a list, > you might write something like this: > > .for item in ${LIST} > .if ${item} == ${THING} # Ooops! > THING_FOUND= 1 > .endif > .endfor > > This however is a snare and a delusion, and will lead to much weeping > and wailing, and error messages like so: > > % make > "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (foo == ${THING}) > "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif > "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (bar == ${THING}) > "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif > "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (baz == ${THING}) > "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif > "Makefile", line 7: Malformed conditional (blurfl == ${THING}) > "Makefile", line 9: if-less endif > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > Instead you should write your loops like this: > > .for item in ${LIST} > .if ${THING} == ${item} > THING_FOUND= 1 > .endif > .endfor > > As the make(1) manual page says on the subject of string comparisons > using == or != : > > An expression may also be a numeric or string comparison: in this case, > the left-hand side must be a variable expansion, whereas the right-hand > side can be a constant or a variable expansion. > > So it seems that despite appearing and behaving almost exactly like one, > the iterator in a .for loop is not actually a variable as such. It also > means that to match a constant string, you can't just write: > > .for item in ${LIST} > .if ${item} == "this" # Ooops You shouldn't use quotes either. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 17:08:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95528106566C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1698FC12 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so2241112wer.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:08:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z+O1jJW2xjnr2noYjFbS5ATyLgqJQQWg024q4ZajlkA=; b=TD9+O6EbVs6t3IvsNtSYk1JYoPNa6Iw1Byc/ICZKxbsvDThBwb1GH7+pPWQdXclGCs O2Mqyl7LWQQCf3XhkvYO9+XcUHw6l+4eJOhcLsDWbWAKm7q/owyAwtswC1P0Ld2kaEmc 8OUDZExIHWnRTaw1pO0aTNPeaMtRSMkmb+d9o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.135.214 with SMTP id u64mr3081441wei.58.1327684111012; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:08:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.101.196 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:08:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120127115750.GD21720@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <000001ccd565$ba3ced30$2eb6c790$@com> <20120127115750.GD21720@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:08:30 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Peter Jeremy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Rickie Kerndt Subject: Re: mhonarc deprecated use of defined() X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:08:32 -0000 On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Jan-17 14:16:56 -0800, Rickie Kerndt wrote: >>Mhonarc when run with perl 10.14.2 complains about its deprecated use of >>defined(%a_hash). I've replaced these defined() where used (not many) as >>shown in the attached patch files. Is there any interest in updating the >>mhonarc port to fix this issue? > > "MAINTAINER=ports@FreeBSD.org" means no-one is maintaining that port. > If you are interested in maintaining it, I suggest you submit a PR > containing those patches and changing the maintainer to yourself. And, even if you are not willing to take on maintainership of the port, please submit this as a ports PR so it will not get lost and someone in the portsmgr group may get it committed when time is available. Still, if you are at all open to maintaining the port, please try taking over as maintainer. (If nothing else, updates from maintainers who are not commiters happen MUCH more quickly.) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 17:45:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591E21065697 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDE08FC13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0RHjAUK049538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:10 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q0RHjAUK049538 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1327686310; bh=iM5X+3MyEDSOJajvjXym1qskE6+lL+KAK9x9e3HXWjE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Moq3sDbMoPHiXmxnJldNciCfHld0nlF1aQlFHI7/+PKg4ElrxgKPDsTSbE/DNr971 E3ET1epCyB8Tw0tdpUttrscp5iH8Zn+qCOrZGJRnzif3MDvwY9fXtcIfj/20tQQE0D T4qvz8qCFwHOXhL9OPhxSLQo3/H/x8TUQP0W4INU= Message-ID: <4F22E29F.8080602@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:03 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F22CB51.6070507@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE75FC7B7F7D247EA208E8CF1" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: BSD make -- Malformed conditional X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE75FC7B7F7D247EA208E8CF1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/01/2012 16:51, Chris Rees wrote: >> .for item in ${LIST} >> > .if ${item} =3D=3D "this" # Ooops > You shouldn't use quotes either. I think that not quoting might be better style, but it's not the typical usage in make(1). There are quite a few contrary examples in the ports: % < /tmp/ports-makefiles xargs grep '} =3D=3D "' | wc -l 1674 % < /tmp/ports-makefiles xargs grep '} =3D=3D [^"]' | wc -l 531 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE75FC7B7F7D247EA208E8CF1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8i4qUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxz5ACcC+80VP6N5/KN1bK4WtgwfWHo nSoAnRJ2TOkZIRtDY0bX/HacKwrqiGx/ =757C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE75FC7B7F7D247EA208E8CF1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 18:09:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DB81065673 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242968FC08 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so224336ggn.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:09:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b63sSgT0PsfASzrVlsHfSCvDWYfHzPq7RFgSaJSTqVE=; b=FE1cqrwRnYAVSDI7K9DZ6WwtcqISo9TYpnR9S7TQk64S6Hdu6TW8Y/DmpZJ5fe1uTx XJt0xsgOyE2CiCdf+aYg0KQVo/u16TKAN72Q1N5+hL2Yf2QkbRJDk8jvffljikBQXYlt Dr/mPG5rkK/z5rBd0a+n/BbZwf6a03mpQ2irQ= Received: by 10.50.10.226 with SMTP id l2mr7519159igb.20.1327687756266; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:09:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:08:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F22E29F.8080602@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4F22CB51.6070507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F22E29F.8080602@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:08:46 +0000 Message-ID: To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: BSD make -- Malformed conditional X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:09:17 -0000 On 27 January 2012 17:45, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 27/01/2012 16:51, Chris Rees wrote: >>> .for item in ${LIST} >>> > .if ${item} =3D=3D "this" =A0# Ooops > >> You shouldn't use quotes either. > > I think that not quoting might be better style, but it's not the typical > usage in make(1). =A0There are quite a few contrary examples in the ports= : > > % < /tmp/ports-makefiles xargs grep '} =3D=3D "' | wc -l > =A0 =A01674 > % < /tmp/ports-makefiles xargs grep '} =3D=3D [^"]' | wc -l > =A0 =A0 531 These counterexamples are wrong. Just because it works doesn't make it rig= ht. Quotes are way overused in Makefiles, just because in other languages they're necessary doesn't mean we should use them when unneccessary. Thought is required about which language you're writing in. Equally, no-one should be advocating things like: .if (${FOO} =3D=3D "bar") just because it works-- we're not writing in C :) We have the same problem with GNU test accepting "=3D=3D", for example. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 20:04:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3829A106564A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8998FC0C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so791620eek.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:04:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S/l3ynPQHfEbM7FruvJrBHOjF3oYEGNwomU/duV8g5s=; b=O4qKGfqXOCK/XRgTpP6NYnwDROJNhbxM0xklA/RKIOOQi4m/bURibHqpBuVJXPMu0X CpK4QlcCXiVGFjqrNQcmib7tbPLaPrrrMlkYDX08hKob3pjJ1RfzrOCPvuUUWnyi3sBn 7Vk18DwPntxJYMjZqFyvyKy1W4mZm4Elow0xQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.101.78 with SMTP id a54mr2570396eeg.86.1327693054787; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.95.13 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:37:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3925509.mLyFQoYdNu@bsd-tm.site> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:37:34 +0100 Message-ID: From: Thomas Zander To: Chris Rees , ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: q000te@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Port: multimedia/handbrake X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:04:09 -0000 Hi, just out of curiosity, whatever happened to this?: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 13:43, Chris Rees wrote: > On 29 November 2011 11:21, =A0 wrote: >> With the patches from http://www.bpsw.biz/handbrake-freebsd/ it is possi= ble >> to build the current version (0.9.5) on amd64 (8.1 and 8.2 tested). I as= sume >> that this also works on i386, but did not test it. > > I'll have a look later today, if no-one beats me to it. I think it would be great to have an up-to-date handbrake port. Are there any show stoppers left, now that the ports tree is open again? Best regards Riggs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 22:37:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099F81065677 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from villa.alberto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F77F8FC1D for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaa14 with SMTP id a14so828658eaa.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:37:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=BZwCKHp+z8UTHYCN8pHNEPL6NhsMP0tUGH4zwOelqMc=; b=ZMc3/HN7UjmbSxHBxSts28YaAAXg1PZ1qbOvPmEpQjF2fR0Se/BofWsYDMHdmLJZVm F9KQXHPC4gQ3gaHW/X2IRDsRK4GGcfth/DeSvc7clBgy0lgpvgyobQONNlJAE5Qwj0/P 1+HO/B1elGeKP/N/RVkMLzmn7BGBSBSgAdUSE= Received: by 10.213.2.77 with SMTP id 13mr1377642ebi.108.1327702313633; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:11:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from woodstock.peanuts (host147-73-dynamic.51-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [79.51.73.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e12sm34883734eea.5.2012.01.27.14.11.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:11:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alberto Villa From: Alberto Villa Organization: The FreeBSD Project To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:11:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RC2; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) References: <4F2199DE.1050504@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87bopq6yib.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <87bopq6yib.fsf@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3861764.ai1rAG9xGD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201272311.51473.avilla@freebsd.org> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Re: x11/kde4-workspace: can not be build or upgraded in FreeBSD 10.0/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:37:34 -0000 --nextPart3861764.ai1rAG9xGD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary-01=_nEyIPex6mhiFYUz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Boundary-01=_nEyIPex6mhiFYUz Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 26 January 2012 20:43:08 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Weird, these errors used to show up only with clang. I fixed them > upstream [1] some time ago, but 4.7.4 was released before that. You'll find the patch attached, put it in files/. > Are you using some special gcc flags to turn some warnings into errors > or something like that? I'd like to wait for the answer to this question to commit the patch. =2D-=20 Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla I WISH I HAD A KRYPTONITE CROSS, because then you could keep both=20 Dracula and Superman away. -- Jack Handey, "The New Mexican" (1988) --Boundary-01=_nEyIPex6mhiFYUz-- --nextPart3861764.ai1rAG9xGD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iJwEAAECAAYFAk8jIScACgkQ3xiC6kQ1CotoAwP/UE0zOlBSVONn6lHUbHi0kMu/ NaXN/AtmGraW6jd45JK6twcgGn9EstEgG1giVA/WnzZcS1xQfxirw0xbdWRFFj8U c4rolpWe5yf05TLK0y7J0rXcuURhn3ATP6evLMacVyr9SaDnji/lg1T1FjiU4uRt 6Mq3LOPb4uz2O7kT/1o= =Q2C0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3861764.ai1rAG9xGD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 23:32:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01371106566B for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62AE8FC17 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so4614750iae.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:32:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rZZjGd+1/TXCXdgUcUlvdMRZlIU85EK+sNYNBwIo4nw=; b=tFt7svX3NrybIAfV9HmUjWixiPljOkdirIR/cAc51u7OxYVLNTLbohCzx3JpBTVwT1 NrKVtgk/9cAMInIeBQpdJ5GlcVtForH6sPRQGcOCHb7pIRwScwFwdcDkTFNu4ocJLjhv MiqAt4lpWrFd1NzvUmtDgIcdeVEV/+1UCplpA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.173.98 with SMTP id bj2mr8705620igc.27.1327705360576; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:02:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.73.69 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:02:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:02:40 -0600 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: Jaap.Boender@pps.jussieu.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: security/ocaml-cryptokit: Move back in ${LOCALBASE}/lib/ocaml/. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:32:11 -0000 Can you move security/ocaml-cryptokit's files from lib/ocaml/site-lib/ back to lib/ocaml/? It's what default in the original Makefile. /work/cryptokit-1.3/Makefile: ------------------- [...] # Where to install the library. By default: OCaml's standard library directory. INSTALLDIR=`$(OCAMLC) -where` [...] OCAMLC=ocamlc -g [...] install: cp cryptokit.cmi cryptokit.cma cryptokit.mli $(INSTALLDIR) cp libcryptokit.a $(INSTALLDIR) [...] ------------------- # ocamlc -g -where /usr/local/lib/ocaml The reason why I am requesting you is that I had to hack a many files and I have two binaries (can't access to its source codes). Any of ports need to follow the original as much as possible or the rest of other libraries/applications have to be created many patches because of our port is lacking follow upstream. I can create a patch if you want me to. Thanks, Mezz -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 01:51:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AABE1065670 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128BF8FC0A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0S1RFhN082039 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:27:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4F234EF2.4060007@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:27:14 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: libthai-0.1.5: build is broken by failing self tests X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:51:21 -0000 Here is the failure log: PASS: test-thcoll.sh Testing with string: ���ʴդ�Ѻ �����繡�÷��ͺ����ͧ Total 8 cut points.Cut points list: 6, 10, 14, 18, 21, 23, 26, 29 Output string is ���ʴ���Ѻ�������������ͺ����ͧbump. Output string length is 71 *** End of thbrk self test ****** PASS: test_thbrk Testing thwchar... Input: tis-620-0 string of length 32: ���ʴդ�Ѻ �����繡�÷��ͺ����ͧ Output: Unicode string of length 32: Convert back to tis-620-0 string... Output: tis-620-0 string of length 32: ���ʴդ�Ѻ �����繡�÷��ͺ����ͧ Input = output, correct! Test thwchar OK. PASS: test_thwchar Testing with input string: ���ʴդ�Ѻ �����繡�÷��ͺ����ͧ Converting to Unicode... Calling th_wbrk()... Total 8 cut points.Cut points list: 6, 10, 14, 18, 21, 23, 26, 29 Calling th_wbrk_line() .... Return value from th_wbrk_line is 71 Output string length is 71 Compare with result from th_brk_line().. Error! Comparison of results from th_brk_line() and th_wbrk_line() failed. th_brk_line :"���ʴ���Ѻ�������������ͺ����ͧ8.0 lib version bump. " th_wbrk_line:"���ʴ���Ѻ�������������ͺ����ͧ" Test th_wbrk_line() failed... FAIL: test_thwbrk =================== 1 of 9 tests failed =================== gmake[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/libthai/work/libthai-0.1.5/tests' gmake[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/libthai/work/libthai-0.1.5/tests' gmake: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 02:03:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806FA1065673 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:03:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net (eastrmfepo101.cox.net [68.230.241.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2870C8FC13 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo110.cox.net ([68.230.241.223]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120128020332.QJTS24648.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo110.cox.net>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:03:32 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo110.cox.net with bizsmtp id Sq3X1i00T1BeFqy02q3XbD; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:03:32 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.4F235774.0020,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UJAwRnj6VfZxP3vT7W4vAg8D8vrJMSfrMxq2TR8CUCY= c=1 sm=1 a=-7U62oXoq4UA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=Q_VjEK26dYvBtqi2tj4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0S23U5R097433; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:03:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:03:25 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Jason Helfman Message-ID: <20120127200325.66f36090@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120112212905.GA78819@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <20111203173149.224a64e6@cox.net> <20111214004838.GK1593@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120112212905.GA78819@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: A new and better way to do "make readmes"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:03:38 -0000 I've been thinking for a long time that we need a better way to do "make readmes", one that would be properly integrated into our ports Mk infrastructure, to take advantage of make's ability to recognize which files are up-to-date and which really do need rebuilding. I like to make sure my README.html files are all up-to-date after my nightly ports tree update, but with the current scheme, that means either rebuilding *all* of the files in the tree, or (as I'm doing at present) using some sort of "kludgey" (kludgy?) workaround. I haven't actually started working on such an alternative method yet, because I didn't want to dedicate the time to such an effort without first checking to see how well it might be received by portmgr. I realize this might possibly entail a less-than-trivial change to our existing ports Mk infrastructure. Would the overhead incurred in terms of additional dependency lines mean the idea would most likely be nixed right out of the gate? I'd like to think that, if properly implemented, the impact would be negligible, and the potential benefits would make it well worthwhile. Thanks for any feedback, Conrad -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 02:05:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7067B106566C for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from ingra.acsalaska.net (ingra.acsalaska.net [209.112.173.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8478FC0A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mymail.acsalaska.net (polarbear.acsalaska.net [216.67.61.193]) by ingra.acsalaska.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0S25kNh051409; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:05:47 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from 46.129.107.107 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rflynn@acsalaska.net) by mymail.acsalaska.net with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:05:47 -0900 (AKST) Message-ID: <3356.46.129.107.107.1327716347.squirrel@mymail.acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F199672.8050008@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4F199672.8050008@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:05:47 -0900 (AKST) From: rflynn@acsalaska.net To: "Matthew Seaman" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (ingra.acsalaska.net [209.112.168.121]); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:05:47 -0900 (AKST) X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.67; SA 3.3.0; spamdefang 1.122 Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Doing SQL to the FreeBSD ports index X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:05:48 -0000 Hi, > Apropos nothing much at all, but congruent with some of the discussion > going on in this list at the moment, I've been playing around loading > ports index related data into a RDBMS and querying that to pull out > interesting factoids, or indeed a complete INDEX file. I didn't start > doing this with any idea other than my own edification but now it seems > it might be vaguely useful here and there, so I've stuck a copy on my > website: > > http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/portindexdb/ > > I'd be happy to hear from anyone using this, or receive bug reports / > feature requests. I haven't looked in detail - perl has to leave my head - but what I think is a good feature for a database to handle is to find outdated distfiles. Since the relationship between a portorigin and it's distfile(s) is not available otherwise. I realize portmaster uses /var/db/ports for it, yet if you share $PORTSDIR but not $PORT_DBDIR (different machines, different requirements) then this method gets ugly fast. Quick parse of distinfo should do the trick. Record the hash and you can get bonus points for indicating hash errors (incomplete aborted downloads or upstream changed distfile). -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 14:37:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5A81065677 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DE98FC14 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so3219487wib.13 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:37:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AxLfwmQgtZ4T9u04fqxqwDkp+13pwYAXuiIEjYfm+S4=; b=JyXJtTpbwDzDHAf+1dF2F5p86SwYCv4MA/MUw0iUWSJpCyo6bJrBmGyFv3NcnJhO0f lTGDEUx2JsO6G7oRhzY8vEa+DbW5c6ZBZMcN7bDvqgnVq5R+gSM2w/nekkp7EpPvCk9m bLijU+f9qv721wnFQkTQkwGvGz9DpEmea8eNU= Received: by 10.180.78.233 with SMTP id e9mr16716861wix.0.1327761458390; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:37:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fv6sm33471387wib.8.2012.01.28.06.37.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:37:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:37:34 +0000 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120128143734.6166f5fc@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20120127200325.66f36090@cox.net> References: <20111203173149.224a64e6@cox.net> <20111214004838.GK1593@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120112212905.GA78819@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120127200325.66f36090@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: A new and better way to do "make readmes"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:37:39 -0000 On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:03:25 -0600 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > I've been thinking for a long time that we need a better way to do > "make readmes", one that would be properly integrated into our > ports Mk infrastructure, to take advantage of make's ability to > recognize which files are up-to-date and which really do need > rebuilding. This wont help and I think there's a better way that will make it up to 700 times faster. When a make readmes is done at the top-level, the top-level and category READMEs are created by make targets and the per port READMEs are created by a perl script in one go from the INDEX- file. I once timed this and the 64 category READMEs took 2 hours, but the ~20,000 port READMEs only took about 9 seconds. Selective updating isn't going to help because 99.9% of the time is spent in the categories and it only takes a single port update to make a category file obsolete. I think the way to speed this up is to have the script generate the category files too. There's no point in bringing in the top-level README since that's already fast. I've been toying with the idea of doing this, but have never got around to it. If anyone wants to have a go I think it would be sensible to write it in awk, since perl is no longer in the base system and the existing perl script isn't really complex enough to be worth hanging-on to. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 16:28:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDAB106564A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net (eastrmfepo203.cox.net [68.230.241.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D628FC12 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120128162838.MYWW25070.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:28:38 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.55]) by eastrmimpo305.cox.net with bizsmtp id T4Ud1i00W1BeFqy024Ue5S; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:28:38 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.4F242236.0094,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=7YxdblQhh6tVU6ZVMrnfXyGefIif2LYgDHDYNRNiwDM= c=1 sm=1 a=ojH9cbcSZWsA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:17 a=mK_AVkanAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=z0iWqdLPz6cCUAxPLH4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=9xyTavCNlvEA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=fdHYxQQoAueMHNSmXppgDg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0SGSaB3001596; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:28:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:28:31 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: RW Message-ID: <20120128102831.51cf0f63@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120128143734.6166f5fc@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20111203173149.224a64e6@cox.net> <20111214004838.GK1593@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120112212905.GA78819@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120127200325.66f36090@cox.net> <20120128143734.6166f5fc@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A new and better way to do "make readmes"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:28:45 -0000 On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:37:34 +0000 RW wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:03:25 -0600 > Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > I've been thinking for a long time that we need a better way to do > > "make readmes", one that would be properly integrated into our > > ports Mk infrastructure, to take advantage of make's ability to > > recognize which files are up-to-date and which really do need > > rebuilding. > > This wont help and I think there's a better way that will make it up > to 700 times faster. > > When a make readmes is done at the top-level, the top-level and > category READMEs are created by make targets and the per port READMEs > are created by a perl script in one go from the INDEX- file. > > I once timed this and the 64 category READMEs took 2 hours, but the > ~20,000 port READMEs only took about 9 seconds. Am I understanding you correctly? Are you saying you built 20,000+ port READMEs in only 9 seconds?! How is that possible? Or do you mean 9 seconds for each one? > Selective updating isn't going to help because 99.9% of the time is > spent in the categories and it only takes a single port update to > make a category file obsolete. This is the part I find troubling. It would seem that it should be more work to create an individual port README, with its plucking the appropriate line out of the INDEX-* file and then parsing it into its respective pieces and filling in a template, than to simply string together a list of references to a bunch of already built port READMEs into a category README. What am I not getting here? > I think the way to speed this up is to have the script generate the > category files too. There's no point in bringing in the top-level > README since that's already fast. So what's making the category READMEs so slow then? > I've been toying with the idea of doing this, but have never got > around to it. If anyone wants to have a go I think it would be > sensible to write it in awk, since perl is no longer in the base > system and the existing perl script isn't really complex enough to be > worth hanging-on to. Oooo, awk! Been a while since I wrote any sizeable bit of code in it, but I do remember it was rather fun to work with. :-) I'm still not sure I read that paragraph above correctly, though (re: the times). :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 16:53:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A2F106564A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:53:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C613A8FC0C for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0SGrNe7037777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:53:23 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q0SGrNe7037777 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1327769603; bh=kyyKx84DOFWkT4C2hVeMqDyOkYLmo0oyF55MXvqktX4=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=qwD5RLG9upjr/wQCZkre8CMDokRfkCOC3mL0GJ30tPNnxRawvkFt75x42Oqw+pqs5 dIt/XQ26t4Q13RlJ3NsWT7EcJY/DQ9JRwLSQn3dceDdpfT/MrpCArwiF8RfZHBpwmo 01TkCUNDikHPomu9PlNK4BCd1pdGTL1NUBZQdwIU= Message-ID: <4F2427FD.2000900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:53:17 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111203173149.224a64e6@cox.net> <20111214004838.GK1593@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120112212905.GA78819@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120127200325.66f36090@cox.net> <20120128143734.6166f5fc@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120128102831.51cf0f63@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120128102831.51cf0f63@cox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig100ACD4695C1313CE5922E24" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: A new and better way to do "make readmes"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:53:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig100ACD4695C1313CE5922E24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/01/2012 16:28, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Am I understanding you correctly? Are you= > saying you built 20,000+ port READMEs in only 9 seconds?! How is that > possible? Or do you mean 9 seconds for each one? 9 seconds sounds quite reasonable for generating 23000 or so files. >> > Selective updating isn't going to help because 99.9% of the time is >> > spent in the categories and it only takes a single port update to >> > make a category file obsolete. > This is the part I find troubling. It would seem that it should be > more work to create an individual port README, with its plucking the > appropriate line out of the INDEX-* file and then parsing it into its > respective pieces and filling in a template, than to simply string > together a list of references to a bunch of already built port READMEs > into a category README. >=20 > What am I not getting here? No -- you're quite right. You could generate the category README.html files entirely from the data in the INDEX. It's not quite as easy as all that, because there aren't entries for each category separately, so you'll have to parse the structure out of all of the paths in the INDEX. >> > I think the way to speed this up is to have the script generate the >> > category files too. There's no point in bringing in the top-level >> > README since that's already fast. > So what's making the category READMEs so slow then? The big problem with performance in all this INDEX and README.html building is that it takes quite a long time relatively to run make(1) within any port or category directory. make(1) has to read in a lot of other files and stat(2) many more[*] -- all of which involves a lot of random-access disk IO, and that's always going to take quite a lot of time. Now, doing 'make readme' in a category directory doesn't just run make in that directory, but also in every port in that category. Popular categories can contain many hundreds of ports. Maybe I should add README.html generation to my FreeBSD::Portindex stuff. Should be pretty simple -- all the necessary bits are readily available and it is just a matter of formatting it as HTML and printing it out. Cheers, Matthew [*] Running 'make -dA' with maximum debug output is quite enlightening, as is running make under truss(1) --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig100ACD4695C1313CE5922E24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8kKAMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyOZACgiwPKLRRKSQKo1twnBrEFo8Yg lwYAni0yH6et5CwT4HQXSfXeHL5GSZxw =H6T6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig100ACD4695C1313CE5922E24-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 17:44:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDC1106567D for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4958FC08 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so3082746vcm.13 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:44:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sEyb0R0sNu0yt4FO8J1HzNxnk4+8vEO+ciBn3rtAbJc=; b=clItFb3p/qPp6thL5uUrcEJjXVRNfNClc9fhnZ8bGnzLg/pxWTqiRY6/3zrNAgIvSB lQbfFXA6/5CCmG+80uKL+Qlicy2jTHtvfLjJ9F6GX3HTBsPj/gQLxqO4fNHbBzEnNOAO SFu+hfOpOaa+jdYBR2lkOFmikB/bJray0wRMM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.76.196 with SMTP id m4mr5050160vdw.112.1327772688510; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.137 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:44:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120127200325.66f36090@cox.net> References: <20111203173149.224a64e6@cox.net> <20111214004838.GK1593@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120112212905.GA78819@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120127200325.66f36090@cox.net> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:44:48 +0100 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: A new and better way to do "make readmes"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:44:49 -0000 Hello, On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > I've been thinking for a long time that we need a better way to do > "make readmes", one that would be properly integrated into our > ports Mk infrastructure, to take advantage of make's ability to > recognize which files are up-to-date and which really do need > rebuilding. > > I like to make sure my README.html files are all up-to-date after my > nightly ports tree update, but with the current scheme, that means > either rebuilding *all* of the files in the tree, or (as I'm doing at > present) using some sort of "kludgey" (kludgy?) workaround. > > So people are actually using the readme files? Are many people using them? I ask because I *never* use them (unless they are used by 'make search'?), I always use freshports.org (BTW, thanks for an excellent service!) when I need to find out anything about a port. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 18:06:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0593C106564A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BE38FC14 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id q0SHmVZF063779 ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:48:31 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 164 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (sge91-2-82-227-32-26.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.32.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA2642235A; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:48:29 +0100 (CET) From: Michel Talon Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:48:29 +0100 Message-Id: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthew Seaman Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4F2434EF.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4F2434EF.001/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: A new and better way to do "make readmes"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:06:28 -0000 Matthew Seaman said The big problem with performance in all this INDEX and README.html building is that it takes quite a long time relatively to run make(1) within any port or category directory. make(1) has to read in a lot of other files and stat(2) many more[*] -- all of which involves a lot of random-access disk IO, and that's always going to take quite a lot of time. Now, doing 'make readme' in a category directory doesn't just run make in that directory, but also in every port in that category. Popular categories can contain many hundreds of ports. Maybe I should add README.html generation to my FreeBSD::Portindex stuff. Should be pretty simple -- all the necessary bits are readily available and it is just a matter of formatting it as HTML and printing it out. Indeed, the following python script http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/show_index.py parses the index in a few seconds and can display exactly the same = information as the readme.html on demand in a web browser, which is far cleaner than = polluting the ports tree with the readmes. Alternatively i have a fcgi version that can be = coupled to web servers supporting fcgi like lighttpd. http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/show_index.fcgi Already 5 years this was done ... -- Michel Talon talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 18:13:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EB2106564A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A2F8FC13 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0SIDQZk039375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:13:26 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q0SIDQZk039375 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1327774406; bh=iqiLOyf75qT60dTF7wpp1BaRJvAXH8LahAj1oTVFD50=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Cc: In-Reply-To:References; b=VpjXgfk8DMRzowl5Z1/PLJLX7lg2JSjgvnDljKNsnhqYUmbw/8PDpxGFr100Gq56e XPg5qT05nXRJGA2mRdkgc7AXZnhVqIC9sLhTB6nW5ebha74C/vB5Zd1vH9+VgL5NbB 34Ssb7ARGayUNuOJN935KGLADbUMO0i/aZGmPn2E= Message-ID: <4F243ABE.9080307@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:13:18 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5A16C616B634B0FDF8076161" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Distfiles with conflicting size/sha256 distinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:13:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5A16C616B634B0FDF8076161 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hmmm... Something is definitely wrong here. Ports are either referring to the same distfile, but the sha256 and size data are not the same in both distinfo files, or they are downloading distinct files with an unfortunate conflict of names and not using DIST_SUBDIR to prevent themselves stomping on the other port's distfile. distfile_path here is the path relative to /usr/ports/distfiles that the file would be downloaded to. distfile_path | distfile_size | distfile_sha256 -----------------------------------------------------+---------------+---= --------------------------------------------------------------- android-9-arm.tar.bz2 | 1924233 | 682cee5219f171a8bf4d0b35a33bc00d265a8c5a0b1d81ddd04389b402783190 android-9-arm.tar.bz2 | 1923856 | c27063b829b4b49ea604c1b524399c7672ecb0f869478b18d37b9d4d32841a6b eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar | 27828 | db7f2cd14b9e263d791631960a0cd5a9ff4c8257939b551a5b86dd2ac6d23345 eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar | 27827 | 3990293a31c98e079be5c24410fcaefb06f2770547879b27796651f8df092a0e pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz | 322411 | 1afeedc6b67be35b372ccedc717516eabe8a4850ab7ecc5e605a44d14d721036 pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz | 322410 | 396943299424066d23ef1307d02a044b2d7b45758a16e1dca5f47c907caa5606 (6 rows) port | distfile_path -------------------------+-----------------------------------------------= ------ lang/gnatdroid-binutils | android-9-arm.tar.bz2 lang/gnatdroid-sysroot | android-9-arm.tar.bz2 java/eclipse | eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar java/eclipse-devel | eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar finance/p5-PFProAPI | pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz finance/pfpro | pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz (6 rows) After checking the ports in question, it looks like the first case: incorrect size and sha256 data in at least one of those distfiles. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig5A16C616B634B0FDF8076161 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8kOsYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwPEgCgjmOe3eRsGKQlTU1d6vOhPikD 8pgAn1sU7Hs2bqhcBJI7zKvgcBYxD1sG =kGYI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5A16C616B634B0FDF8076161-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 18:16:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6BB106564A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enlil65@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0BE8FC08 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so3137470vbb.13 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:16:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3U1QqhEZNUtLxSL2OoqlY02u/QGbOKMQKDnfAeRt95s=; b=kInhZXEH2M8LCTcjTlirpSxX0KHY9G7+kz3jCgc3wM4FIIiz0CcdkTdv/XwrWp+lv6 BPU/yAGyGDW+u1JhoV3FoisCn/pifQGLs4JFInvLhO9NlVZgBIuNqew1bp2kfbCmKP1y DpC1yJYUf3mpor0aficjKGKitZoDoMp8nxT1w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.69.116 with SMTP id d20mr5164608vdu.24.1327773115705; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:51:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.113.19 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:51:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:51:55 -0600 Message-ID: From: Peggy Wilkins To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Portmaster quickly fails to update xcb-utils X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:16:50 -0000 When I try to follow the instructions in UPDATING for upgrading xcb-util, using portmaster it fails very early in the process: % portmaster -bDw -R -r xcb-util-0 ===>>> Working on: xcb-util-0.3.6,1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/x11/xcb-util ===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for x11/xcb-util in background ===>>> Gathering dependency list for x11/xcb-util from ports ===>>> Update failed ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for xcb-util-0.3.6,1 failed ===>>> Aborting update Terminated Terminated I am seeing this on FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p5 and FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3. I updated the ports tree again just now to be sure I have the latest version and there is no change after doing that. Any hints? I'm not having much luck figuring out the problem myself, since I don't know why a dependency check would fail here... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 21:04:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CC21065676 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7588FC18 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so6011404iae.13 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:04:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GBY1RWJ3Fdrc8of8SEQ6ifnmpi0AwimrM5bVFU9cHHY=; b=VkoJoXwTa0I9hiFmNc89rNrnVRQrIlVyww5IqgyS4g98gTPgl5u6YcvGkn8LylFE8M Ul9w4fzxmcX0foP5U0z8iK0fi/c13/LDNhf0bkPXvc7ynfL7RMGswJ6odEgnNf/joxrO /sSwfgyUstbQFKhNlNMSUcfLbjeXx/Hef27GA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.10.226 with SMTP id l2mr11918831igb.20.1327784674942; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:04:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:04:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.183.21 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:04:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F243ABE.9080307@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4F243ABE.9080307@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:04:34 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Distfiles with conflicting size/sha256 distinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:04:35 -0000 On 28 Jan 2012 18:13, "Matthew Seaman" wrote: > > > Hmmm... Something is definitely wrong here. Ports are either referring > to the same distfile, but the sha256 and size data are not the same in > both distinfo files, or they are downloading distinct files with an > unfortunate conflict of names and not using DIST_SUBDIR to prevent > themselves stomping on the other port's distfile. > > distfile_path here is the path relative to /usr/ports/distfiles that the > file would be downloaded to. > > distfile_path | distfile_size | > distfile_sha256 > -----------------------------------------------------+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------ > android-9-arm.tar.bz2 | 1924233 | > 682cee5219f171a8bf4d0b35a33bc00d265a8c5a0b1d81ddd04389b402783190 > android-9-arm.tar.bz2 | 1923856 | > c27063b829b4b49ea604c1b524399c7672ecb0f869478b18d37b9d4d32841a6b > eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar | 27828 | > db7f2cd14b9e263d791631960a0cd5a9ff4c8257939b551a5b86dd2ac6d23345 > eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar | 27827 | > 3990293a31c98e079be5c24410fcaefb06f2770547879b27796651f8df092a0e > pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz | 322411 | > 1afeedc6b67be35b372ccedc717516eabe8a4850ab7ecc5e605a44d14d721036 > pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz | 322410 | > 396943299424066d23ef1307d02a044b2d7b45758a16e1dca5f47c907caa5606 > (6 rows) > > port | distfile_path > > -------------------------+----------------------------------------------------- > lang/gnatdroid-binutils | android-9-arm.tar.bz2 > lang/gnatdroid-sysroot | android-9-arm.tar.bz2 > java/eclipse | > eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar > java/eclipse-devel | > eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar > finance/p5-PFProAPI | pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz > finance/pfpro | pfpro_freebsd.tar.gz > (6 rows) > > After checking the ports in question, it looks like the first case: > incorrect size and sha256 data in at least one of those distfiles. > Hm. It'd be awesome if you were to make a list of the offending ports, and email the maintainers. I'll work with you if needed, just CC me where necessary. Chris