Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:15:06 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction. Message-ID: <20120325001506.GA24159@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net> <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > > Hey Doug, > > > > Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening > > ? > > Yes, see below. > > > If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use > > bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) > > I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. > That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but > to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for > WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. > Jeeze that was simpler than I thought it was going to be... Thanks! Doug > > hth, > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection -- ;s =;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120325001506.GA24159>