From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul  8 07:31:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCB41065688;
	Sun,  8 Jul 2012 07:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09F18FC16;
	Sun,  8 Jul 2012 07:31:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q687Pswx098857;
	Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:25:55 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:25:54 +0400 (MSK)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: ehaupt@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207081123190.18501@woozle.rinet.ru>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:25:55 +0400 (MSK)
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: net/rsync: WITH_FLAGS to be the default?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:31:33 -0000

Dear Emmanuel,

why is fileflags patch disabled by default in FreeBSD rsync port? 

Of course, I have this tweaked on my local package builder, but I do not see
any significant downsides on all supported (and even a bit obsolete, like 
6.*) branches of FreeBSD.  Or, did I missed something obvious?

Any comments? Thank you!

-- 
Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------