From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 07:29:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08E41065673 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from mail.shire.net (mail.shire.net [209.41.94.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8230D8FC08 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-76-27-96-201.hsd1.ut.comcast.net ([76.27.96.201] helo=[192.168.99.216]) by mail.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1SJJtm-0005g2-HI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:29:26 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:29:25 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <61C8BD2B-9C1B-4494-A1BA-394752042F23@shire.net> References: To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.27.96.201 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:29:33 -0000 On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC = wrote: >=20 >> No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they = share the routing tables. It works. Try it. >=20 > You're clearly exploiting a bug in FreeBSD 6's jails. It was a documented behavior when I first started using jails ca. 2004 = in FreeBSD 5. Which is why I did it that way.