From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 01:32:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AF2106564A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contropinion@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B238FC12 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so4376397wib.1 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:32:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WepiugoP3iEeYfythVvYYX+CrVJSdVF87SSEegypfG0=; b=jNZbYSPegdkw73yLzj2VQiFOWTde+QbKmhh/UN2MwMbzQx15qve7dtULIq/kK+HMhn IpdD/HyiI4JkE+OJr+JSN1M4mOoEcXiB3aZLaHYfF3XRMY1QpaOCP+5Ln7Tg38jsheqX T/Xv9ZIlAV55ffLXNlEhmHgLRVGunXerNxtu5VplMb0uFKOTViYtvOQzpRZnlHoNSq0l Y8C+ZdI+MVIqGbzGIcEZCwHyI+gIjsuAu4Igen7w2tHbEAptIUYbEBQdqXXyrLshOIIW lxec/tBYpau/E13BvMiHVPADx8/6MMq3vHRNT4KmSRP+19mqOVj3AQXY8uXqilBrKthD 1auw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.7.200 with SMTP id l8mr15269006wia.9.1345944776000; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.77.77 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:32:55 -0400 Message-ID: From: contro opinion To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to solve the problem to install R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:32:58 -0000 [root@sea ~]# cd /usr/ports/math/R [root@sea /usr/ports/math/R]# make install clean ===> R-2.15.1 is marked as broken: The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be used, because print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/R. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 03:12:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603FE106564A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4498FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB6E3CC48; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7Q3CQcO002206; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:12:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:12:26 +0200 From: Polytropon To: contro opinion Message-Id: <20120826051226.3f9566fa.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to solve the problem to install R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:12:34 -0000 On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:32:55 -0400, contro opinion wrote: > [root@sea ~]# cd /usr/ports/math/R > [root@sea /usr/ports/math/R]# make install clean > ===> R-2.15.1 is marked as broken: The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be used, > because print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/R. Enter the command # make configure and deselect the PDF_MANUALS option. (Not tested!) This should leave you with GNU info manuals if you keep that option selected. Then repeat the installation command. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 04:32:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F7C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D178FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CF327C87; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 06:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7Q4WRk1004657; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 06:32:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 06:32:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: contro opinion Message-Id: <20120826063227.0cb667fb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20120826051226.3f9566fa.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: how to solve the problem to install R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:32:35 -0000 { Re-including list, hope that's okay. } On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:14:37 -0400, contro opinion wrote: > # cd /usr/ports/math/R > [root@sea /usr/ports/math/R]# make configure > ===> R-2.15.1 is marked as broken: The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be used, > because print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/R. > > > how can i do now? I have the same port version here, and I can get to the configuration menu. First of all, make sure you have done # make rmconfig And then you should see no error message when doing # make configure And in the menu, do _not_ select PDF_MANUALS. Having examined the port's Makefile for the BROKEN variable and other options that might "trigger" it, it seems that the R port has significant problems regarding its documentation. +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Options for R 2.15.1 | | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | [ ] ATLAS Use ATLAS instead of BLAS/LAPACK | | | | [X] GHOSTSCRIPT [dev2]bitmap() graphics devices | | | | [X] ICU Use ICU for collation in multibyte locales | | => | | [X] INFO_MANUALS GNU info manuals | | | | [X] JPEG jpeg() graphics device | | | | [ ] LETTER_PAPER US Letter paper | | | | [X] LIBR R shared library and a dynamically-linked R | | | | [X] PANGOCAIRO cairo and pango graphics support | | | | [X] PCRE_PORT Use devel/pcre instead of the bundled PCRE | | => | | [ ] PDF_MANUALS PDF manuals (requires TeX) | | | | [X] PNG png() graphics device | | | | [X] TCLTK tcltk package | | | | [X] THREADS Threading support | | | | [X] X11 X11() graphics device | | | | | | +-+----------------------------------------------------------------+-+ | [ OK ] Cancel | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ Then you should be able to continue building (will possibly pull gcc 4.6.3, this is the point where I stopped testing it myself. If this doesn't work, again remove the configuration and re-enter it by "make configure": Then deselect INFO_MANUALS also. As I said, the port's Makefile shows: .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MINFO_MANUALS} && ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} ALL_TARGET+= info INFO= R-FAQ R-admin R-data R-exts R-intro R-lang .endif .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MPDF_MANUALS} && ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} BROKEN = The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be used, because\ print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base BUILD_DEPENDS += pdftex:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base \ texi2dvi:${PORTSDIR}/print/texinfo ALL_TARGET+= pdf CONFIGURE_ENV += INSTALL_INFO="${LOCALBASE}/bin/install-info" \ MAKEINFO="${LOCALBASE}/bin/makeinfo" INSTALL_TARGET+= install-pdf PLIST_SUB+= PDF_MANUAL="" .else PLIST_SUB+= PDF_MANUAL="@comment " .endif .endif # LIBR_SLAVEPORT .endif # !LIBRMATH_SLAVEPORT Keywords are MDOCS and MINFO_MANUALS here. So if the problem might be inherited from other ports (mdoc related?), you could do # make rmconfig-recursive followed by # make config-recursive to visit and carefully check all configuration screens that might have an option that "triggers" the BROKEN mechanism, possibly related to some info, texinfo, teTex or other dependency for the documentation of R. Finally, you could try to install R from package (via pkg_add -r). The Makefile doesn't define RDEPS (runtime dependencies), so that should be relatively easy. The LaTeX dependency seems to be a build dependency (see Makefile excerpt above). If you don't have success with any advice, maybe file a ports PR. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 12:41:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E88C106566B for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from contropinion@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (mail-wg0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737078FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbed3 with SMTP id ed3so1934501wgb.8 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GoYlFHocJpVgV8pAagE1+0srMg/cqKtLiUzcKjfnlq0=; b=AvoNriMYk1EbUdvybbMARnsoUMhVrfjXXcGN+Sexwu6YVZvFMlpmNfNFErrOKDoi8N g+r/Q/8Tuu42+hpyZSUBQgkZawwPrPoRT9gpitpZbhUXDDhZPxZYIr5gdzggl/WI1f8r yVDYTyQrzG3ArhndSFyEeTSwm55JuBnW+SHHC6rwYDDaW5Zis2x/w/actkUd6Q0g5rIj 8mQWOk9wPllgaFBEY5WQIdGnlDQrPtFowZdCxGS8OMpYOPX4Vy4Knii5VrRist3jIR6Z iO+GYgL1G2cSQqZ1qQ4nZmFx5kfqck/S5dp6tWEIY3WAYNY6YX+FfnF+TXjBBPKLRp/V yR4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.104.197 with SMTP id gg5mr18300272wib.9.1345984895178; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.77.77 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120826063227.0cb667fb.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120826051226.3f9566fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120826063227.0cb667fb.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:41:35 -0400 Message-ID: From: contro opinion To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: how to solve the problem to install R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:41:37 -0000 when i make configure ,there is a wrong output,how can i do now? Downloaded 689.8 kilobytes in 3:35 seconds. (3.19 KB/s) ===> Found saved configuration for png-1.5.12 => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libpng-1.5.12.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for libpng-1.5.12-apng.patch.gz. ===> Giving up on fetching files: libpng-1.5.12.tar.xz Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/graphics/png/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/R. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/R. 2012/8/26 Polytropon > { Re-including list, hope that's okay. } > > > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:14:37 -0400, contro opinion wrote: > > # cd /usr/ports/math/R > > [root@sea /usr/ports/math/R]# make configure > > ===> R-2.15.1 is marked as broken: The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be > used, > > because print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/R. > > > > > > how can i do now? > > I have the same port version here, and I can get to the > configuration menu. First of all, make sure you have done > > # make rmconfig > > And then you should see no error message when doing > > # make configure > > And in the menu, do _not_ select PDF_MANUALS. Having > examined the port's Makefile for the BROKEN variable > and other options that might "trigger" it, it seems > that the R port has significant problems regarding > its documentation. > > +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Options for R 2.15.1 | > | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | > | | [ ] ATLAS Use ATLAS instead of BLAS/LAPACK | | > | | [X] GHOSTSCRIPT [dev2]bitmap() graphics devices | | > | | [X] ICU Use ICU for collation in multibyte locales | | > => | | [X] INFO_MANUALS GNU info manuals | | > | | [X] JPEG jpeg() graphics device | | > | | [ ] LETTER_PAPER US Letter paper | | > | | [X] LIBR R shared library and a dynamically-linked R | | > | | [X] PANGOCAIRO cairo and pango graphics support | | > | | [X] PCRE_PORT Use devel/pcre instead of the bundled PCRE | | > => | | [ ] PDF_MANUALS PDF manuals (requires TeX) | | > | | [X] PNG png() graphics device | | > | | [X] TCLTK tcltk package | | > | | [X] THREADS Threading support | | > | | [X] X11 X11() graphics device | | > | | | | > +-+----------------------------------------------------------------+-+ > | [ OK ] Cancel | > +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > Then you should be able to continue building (will possibly pull > gcc 4.6.3, this is the point where I stopped testing it myself. > > If this doesn't work, again remove the configuration and re-enter > it by "make configure": Then deselect INFO_MANUALS also. As I > said, the port's Makefile shows: > > .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MINFO_MANUALS} && ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} > ALL_TARGET+= info > INFO= R-FAQ R-admin R-data R-exts R-intro R-lang > .endif > > .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MPDF_MANUALS} && ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} > BROKEN = The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be used, because\ > print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base > BUILD_DEPENDS += pdftex:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base \ > texi2dvi:${PORTSDIR}/print/texinfo > ALL_TARGET+= pdf > CONFIGURE_ENV += INSTALL_INFO="${LOCALBASE}/bin/install-info" \ > MAKEINFO="${LOCALBASE}/bin/makeinfo" > INSTALL_TARGET+= install-pdf > PLIST_SUB+= PDF_MANUAL="" > .else > PLIST_SUB+= PDF_MANUAL="@comment " > .endif > .endif # LIBR_SLAVEPORT > .endif # !LIBRMATH_SLAVEPORT > > Keywords are MDOCS and MINFO_MANUALS here. So if the problem > might be inherited from other ports (mdoc related?), you could > do > > # make rmconfig-recursive > > followed by > > # make config-recursive > > to visit and carefully check all configuration screens that might > have an option that "triggers" the BROKEN mechanism, possibly > related to some info, texinfo, teTex or other dependency for the > documentation of R. > > Finally, you could try to install R from package (via pkg_add -r). > The Makefile doesn't define RDEPS (runtime dependencies), so that > should be relatively easy. The LaTeX dependency seems to be a > build dependency (see Makefile excerpt above). > > If you don't have success with any advice, maybe file a ports PR. > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 12:54:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5132B106566C for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6318FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EAD27D9A; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:54:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7QCstxX006611; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:54:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:54:55 +0200 From: Polytropon To: contro opinion Message-Id: <20120826145455.1a3f1a57.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20120826051226.3f9566fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120826063227.0cb667fb.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: how to solve the problem to install R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:54:58 -0000 On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:41:35 -0400, contro opinion wrote: > when i make configure ,there is a wrong output,how can i do now? That's impossible. Are you sure your ports collection is properly updated and complete? The "screenshot" I've inserted has been directly copied from the terminal. As R has settable options, "make configure" (_after_ "make rmconfig" to limit the possibilities of mistakes) is supposed to bring up the configuration dialog I showed. Then you proceed to show messages from a "make" or "make install" command: > Downloaded 689.8 kilobytes in 3:35 seconds. (3.19 KB/s) > ===> Found saved configuration for png-1.5.12 > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for libpng-1.5.12.tar.xz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for libpng-1.5.12-apng.patch.gz. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: libpng-1.5.12.tar.xz > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/graphics/png/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/png. > *** Error code 1 Another problem with png (libpng is a dependency of R). Make sure your ports tree is up to date. Don't forget to # make clean prior to any new build attempt. As I said, I've partially checked things here on my system, and I get the configuration dialog and can even get around the BROKEN warning by deselecting PDF_MANUALS. Start in a clean environment. Follow the steps as described in the manuals (e. g. "man 7 ports") and The FreeBSD Handbook and you should be fine. In _worst_ case, try # pkg_add -r R to do a binary install. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 14:58:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1091D1065674 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E5A8FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7QEwnLq039283; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:58:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <503A39A7.4090908@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:58:47 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble References: <5035C6E8.3050108@dreamchaser.org> <20120823163839.e2cf7432.freebsd@edvax.de> <503664E3.8060808@dreamchaser.org> <50375FE5.7000809@bananmonarki.se> <50379A6B.7070206@dreamchaser.org> <5037E9F2.1040005@bananmonarki.se> <503858EA.90006@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:58:50 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: EXIF inspector X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:58:55 -0000 On 08/25/12 09:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: ... > I've always used /usr/ports/graphics/jhead which has seemed to me to show > the most information.... here is a basic comparison.. but the exiv2 is > cool, didn't realize it would work with RAW files.. thanks for that > information! The output I posted was from a .jpg, but it does work on raw also. What I found was there was a wide variation in what was reported depending on the tool, primarily because a number of important (to me) variables are contained only in vendor specific sections. In particular, I was looking for image stabilization info because I was having issues with a camera and lens and was trying to compare images shot with and without stabilization. What I didn't realize was that because the information was not standardized, it was reported using different labels by different tools, so when I used grep and the label I was looking for didn't show up, I assumed the field was being overlooked. That wasn't always the case. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 18:22:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D07106564A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671908FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7QILwCI041927 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:21:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7QILwUO041923 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:21:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:21:58 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:21:59 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Subject: iso image question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:22:05 -0000 I have a CD that was burned (but not labeled so well). Is is possible to tell if this is an i386 or amd64 image? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 18:24:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506AA106566C for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC088FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7QIOY39042652 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:24:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7QIOYas042649 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:24:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:24:34 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:24:34 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Subject: freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:24:35 -0000 In doing an update from 8.3 --> 9.0 I messed up the merge on /etc/ttys. This has interesting consequences BTW. Are there any docs on how to do this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 19:01:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC0C106566B for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B6E8FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67563 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2012 19:01:26 -0000 Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 26 Aug 2012 19:01:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=503a7286.xn--yuvv84g.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=gCN+947fyvg4/ScyITLswnI6W49ZFOKKunxztAT/20g=; b=XbpZeb/8/pfPYM9ZGonpMPptg1RmUPRGbVLUIUCIBwWFBx6rIgs642KW3uBy3Fga+EN3hsM1zS46vrKC+Z49eShuVXOu6rKJH+BJ/iQUoAaORjiQuw2fRmHRS3C0+u8I6PJ0fqLryVsBnhYWU0866evEihiT0SESRlGHqCdo24k= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 26 Aug 2012 19:01:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20120826190104.37538.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: doug@safeport.com Subject: Re: iso image question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:01:27 -0000 In article you write: >I have a CD that was burned (but not labeled so well). Is is possible to tell if >this is an i386 or amd64 image? Sure. Mount it, do a "file" on some of the programs in /bin and see whether they're i386 or x86-64 code. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 20:00:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BC3106564A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905E88FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T5j0T-0006NZ-5Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:00:25 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:00:25 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:00:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) Subject: Re: freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:00:26 -0000 On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:24:34 -0400, doug wrote: > In doing an update from 8.3 --> 9.0 I messed up the merge on /etc/ttys. > This has interesting consequences BTW. Are there any docs on how to do > this? Here's mine. Note: I changed ttyv8 from off to on as I am using xdm. console none unknown off secure # ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure # Virtual terminals ttyv1 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure ttyv2 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure ttyv3 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure ttyv4 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure ttyv5 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure ttyv6 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure ttyv7 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure # Serial terminals # The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc. ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure ttyu1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure ttyu2 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure ttyu3 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure # Dumb console dcons "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 off secure (END) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 20:49:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C261065688 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C218FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7QKnWIL082759; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:49:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7QKnW2x082756; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:49:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:49:32 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: Walter Hurry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:49:32 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:49:34 -0000 On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:24:34 -0400, doug wrote: > >> In doing an update from 8.3 --> 9.0 I messed up the merge on /etc/ttys. >> This has interesting consequences BTW. Are there any docs on how to do >> this? > > Here's mine. Note: I changed ttyv8 from off to on as I am using xdm. > > console none unknown off secure > # > ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > # Virtual terminals > ttyv1 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > ttyv2 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > ttyv3 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > ttyv4 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > ttyv5 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > ttyv6 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > ttyv7 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" xterm on secure > ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure > # Serial terminals > # The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc. > ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure > ttyu1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure > ttyu2 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure > ttyu3 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure > # Dumb console > dcons "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 off secure > (END) > So with something like: [the beginning of my file] <<<<<<< current version PATH=/etc:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin HOME=/var/log ======= PATH=/etc:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin >>>>>>> 8.0-RELEASE [the rest of my file] just delete the stuff after "=======" ?? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 00:25:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F14106566B for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdorfman@netdna.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790A18FC14 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so6551491pbb.13 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:25:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=sOa7arFfmc208sngEhLMKqG0xQagvE5eT5BNGyX3jbw=; b=ZqQ799yfkrARMDl1FCrU58QCizlhQMl63sJxJxfaUlQL1lKuIE3jp0ym2EH0JIe6zA QpXBpG/2oKwwUcaIyuv2gQGGE42HL7HotBqVtY+qCm/8zExGeHDSeiTlRcqQiIpzBEwg vfv4Gnnd6YvqTb88gG0DaoWh7WxW9VIsmfzvlgu6hQ55qSkiR4PHL6IvIxQG1xUl9vYa yRZ1dX+piwsz3Xm8ZD0hnaf1Fi7Mmyfy0tGBPTKq3jox8CLqFXHpai2dGEWnhev7qjIR sCAk8UycWWIDAfHFnfjg3jFNf8iDT5WUH02xLC26Kb/IOks40qZ9ZiCPdayKBgi7Kgx0 iR+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.136.67 with SMTP id py3mr29809296pbb.156.1346027142726; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.72.165 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:25:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Justin Dorfman To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFUkWxvb+97av/C3Yzr6auVEiTLeAjR9rgD/QqbtSFLVRH70QjpiKR8YdXMZ/VzLRy9R+z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Becoming a Mirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:25:43 -0000 Hello, I was wondering how our company can provide a mirror for the FreeBSD project? Thanks. Regards, Justin Dorfman NetDNA =99 The Science of Acceleration=99 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 02:02:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEB5106566B for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james4591@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s45.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s45.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.51.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AC98FC14 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT122-W49 ([65.55.90.199]) by snt0-omc4-s45.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:01:35 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [108.238.197.89] From: James Powell To: Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:01:34 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2012 02:01:35.0002 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2DEB7A0:01CD83F7] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: CMI8788 audio card/chip support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:02:42 -0000 Are any plans being made to start support for these audio cards? Currently = I'm using one in a system I would like to use with FreeBSD but it has no su= pport through the kernel and driver support from OSSv4 lands me with a syst= em that either freezes or won't boot properly. Jim = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 02:10:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFE1106564A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF628FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669993CB80; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 04:10:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7R2AvO4001908; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 04:10:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 04:10:57 +0200 From: Polytropon To: James Powell Message-Id: <20120827041057.c6dbbcae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CMI8788 audio card/chip support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:10:59 -0000 On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:01:34 +0000, James Powell wrote: >=20 > Are any plans being made to start support for these audio cards? > Currently I'm using one in a system I would like to use with > FreeBSD but it has no support through the kernel and driver > support from OSSv4 lands me with a system that either freezes > or won't boot properly. Interesting. I've been using a CMI-based sound card with FreeBSD 4, 5 and 7 already. See "man snd_cmi": HARDWARE The snd_cmi driver supports the following sound cards: =B7 CMedia CMI8338A =B7 CMedia CMI8338B =B7 CMedia CMI8738 =B7 CMedia CMI8738B It lists older CMI8788 as supported devices. Doesn't it provide sufficient compatibility? --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 08:11:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C1D106564A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F48E8FC19 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so9608919ial.13 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:11:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=F/Cdo7IBltJ8KpvP6ddrOke39nVn5IgZlVDVwwDd2b0=; b=PFsmqupDCu4KPpiGwKN+Exvg134CIFtXxoKNre7xitJUVd2OdtaU67uh2lEpVx+mxv N13R2NNqrcd715InBtb4Dviw6Va/GeugWHPb+hA36+/JLMm61/U/kNzlZI8NwVUtL0N3 GHkzuwSkBjsj3LuZHQFlNkISntlb/RIp3iNL73pMY/X/r0yTZ/+kjj5wwu9E3BP1orHO gq1GSvPsCUvwp0EsP2/4VdrBVq7q9nA7OCFwoX8J5D/Uv5Tk1qOBPT99acknLtNTqM9a oBzS2g/lasILoQMTp5li5ajAFfe8aT6wYay/zTzjtq+ipOD7STyGK3v38LFnZNmaoqR6 goXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.156.1 with SMTP id x1mr10114092icw.51.1346055081590; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.96.131 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 01:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:11:21 +0200 Message-ID: From: Damien Fleuriot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltghHqXADBpYxQf99RCkaP35I2qfq+1CE02jgIR4DvbCA7UsDSChufxXj8p6UZwz6cfXyk Subject: 8-STABLE base BIND version number typo ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:11:25 -0000 Hello list, We're currently running Nessus PCI DSS scans on our infrastructure to eliminate known vulnerabilities and problems. The scan reports that my version of BIND is vulnerable to exploits I *know* it isn't. The problem, to me, seems to be with the version number as reported by named -V : BIND 9.6.-ESV-R7-P2 built with '--prefix=/usr' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--enable-threads' '--enable-getifaddrs' '--disable-linux-caps' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random' '--without-idn' '--without-libxml2' (notice the .- notation) This is the base's BIND running on 8.3-STABLE 64 bits compiled and built on 22/08/12 : FreeBSD pf1-dmz-gs.[snip] 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #2: Wed Aug 22 10:41:47 CEST 2012 I have verified that building the exact same version from the ports, at /usr/ports/dns/bind96 yields the correct version number and the vulnerabilities are no longer reported by the scan, which uses BIND's version number as a reference. Has anyone else noticed the same oddity, that I might fill a PR ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 08:12:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1381065692 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g.todd@internet.co.nz) Received: from frigg.iconz.co.nz (etrn.iconz.co.nz [210.48.22.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BC18FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frigg.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409575C00E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:00:42 +1200 (NZST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigg.iconz.co.nz Received: from frigg.iconz.co.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frigg.iconz.co.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nUs7S+6F4HVA for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:00:40 +1200 (NZST) Received: from mail.internet.co.nz (mail.internet.co.nz [210.48.22.150]) by frigg.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with SMTP id CB7D75C001 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:00:40 +1200 (NZST) Received: (qmail 8255 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2012 20:00:40 +1200 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (210.185.18.105) by mail.internet.co.nz with SMTP; 27 Aug 2012 20:00:40 +1200 From: The Todds To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:01:28 +1200 Message-ID: <1346054488.1623.8.camel@Ruru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: LibreOffice 3.5.6 InteractiveAugmentedIOException run error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:12:00 -0000 I have 8.3 stable x86-64 system with the ports updated on 25 August 2012. Libreoffice 3.5.6 compiled without any errors however when I attempt to run it I get the following error messages: javaPathHelper: not found terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::ucb::InteractiveAugmentedIOException' I understand the the javaPathHelper is just a nuisance message. Attempting to run Libreoffice as root gives the following message. GConf warning: failure listing pairs in `/desktop/gnome/interface': Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: The connection is closed)GConf warning: failure listing pairs in `/system/proxy': Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: The connection is closed)GConf warning: failure listing pairs in `/system/http_proxy/host': Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: The connection is closed)GConf warning: failure listing pairs in `/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/mailto': Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: The connection is closed)terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::ucb::InteractiveAugmentedIOException' I rebuilt all the required libraries and dbus and gconf without success. Any help would be appreciated. Glenn New Zealand From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 10:24:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A06106566B for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0BC8FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7RAOU4g006174 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:24:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7RAOURd006173 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:24:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:24:30 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120827102430.GB6102@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120827041057.c6dbbcae.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120827041057.c6dbbcae.freebsd@edvax.de> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: CMI8788 audio card/chip support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:24:39 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [ Polytropon wrote on Mon 27.Aug'12 at 4:10:57 +0200 ] > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:01:34 +0000, James Powell wrote: > >=20 > > Are any plans being made to start support for these audio cards? > > Currently I'm using one in a system I would like to use with > > FreeBSD but it has no support through the kernel and driver > > support from OSSv4 lands me with a system that either freezes > > or won't boot properly. >=20 > Interesting. I've been using a CMI-based sound card with > FreeBSD 4, 5 and 7 already. See "man snd_cmi": >=20 > HARDWARE > The snd_cmi driver supports the following sound cards: >=20 > =B7 CMedia CMI8338A > =B7 CMedia CMI8338B > =B7 CMedia CMI8738 > =B7 CMedia CMI8738B >=20 > It lists older CMI8788 as supported devices. Doesn't it > provide sufficient compatibility? Have you tried loading the generic driver to see if your audio card is pick= ed up: # kldload snd_driver then try=20 # cat /dev/sndstat which will show more info about it? That's what's recommended in the handbo= ok. --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIRngYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIRjzCCEYsCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC DuIwggUfMIIEB6ADAgECAhB0kD49oFhImiM1TNmYDSf/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIGTMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxm b3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDE5MDcGA1UEAxMwQ09NT0RPIENsaWVu dCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMB4XDTEyMDgyNTAwMDAwMFoX DTEzMDgyNTIzNTk1OVowIDEeMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYPamFtaWVAa29kZTUubmV0MIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEArCcH9jqYDuhBs0LslWkupsEzY7j7D0okrqe9 k1eoafySH8/JL5x2Ly5XdQY+D//SRhaonnQO4vZxf/48I/ErXJnQ12Q7nv8x0OUbHUCsSDuM o+XdCHNhw6cabwP/lkn+yKQOucl8jL4DXZbUxvZdxkd5xajHi3/OOOkdxuz09gKY5kh5aTaV cg9KA5WzZ3oJ8LENEVbPnwj7AIbyALaE0N45/GN0rG7KKn5DZSjqwd40+XEMCSaw5qNYNiFz iS9S2ow0P+aQz3WUaUcFHUnTyo84CkTWRGtCS5FfWEjX7UjTZbvLAmxdndbqfahJVIL/ch+o d9WQAXIGwHBSOZtWXwIDAQABo4IB3zCCAdswHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUehNOAHRbxnhjZCfBL+Kg W7x5xXswHQYDVR0OBBYEFFzXVMl5Ia5RjMxe7WhQ66w5ceGXMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAM BgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgB hvhCAQEEBAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYd aHR0cHM6Ly9zZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwVwYDVR0fBFAwTjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDov L2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRTZWN1cmVF bWFpbENBLmNybDCBiAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEfDB6MFIGCCsGAQUFBzAChkZodHRwOi8vY3J0LmNv bW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0Eu Y3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20wGgYDVR0RBBMwEYEP amFtaWVAa29kZTUubmV0MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBl+DsCE7TM7c8SgKiqwE0DSxqU CfsPA/PtqSMIZYesr9Aelod/OzawPhjUmqsliqR3s9e0e+O0s7H+PSOaf10Nn9GVc6Ej6tqt ctFPr6AeU8NUvlyqhPK4kj4DZRcJM0ervslzva8TUHWk7mC2gahmPVJ0Zl8WR2TCVdLGXrWH jz4csIw03GxRqivg86PpTnm1R9uutVem6kNWfqSdYmKqwABJ71f0N1WWJWhGUlgf5kpoRXrp AyrjFIoeD1egIbuBwf+24ynID9MSuHSqRgPxf8WWtTmpbgpnRL2TKbF9vMojXOFJ0dEeRvlF +DTbmbLPrUBQSQELOIyY2+WV6V6wMIIFGjCCBAKgAwIBAgIQbRnqpxlPajMi5iIyeqpx3jAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQL ExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDAeFw0xMTA0MjgwMDAwMDBaFw0yMDA1MzAx MDQ4MzhaMIGTMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAw DgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDE5MDcGA1UEAxMw Q09NT0RPIENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAkoSEW0tXmNReL4uk4UDIo1NYX2Zl8TJO958y fVXQeExVt0KU4PkncQfFxmmkuTLE8UAakMwnVmJ/F7Vxaa7lIBvky2NeYMqiQfZq4aP/uN8f SG1lQ4wqLitjOHffsReswtqCAtbUMmrUZ28gE49cNfrlVICv2HEKHTcKAlBTbJUdqRAUtJmV WRIx/wmi0kzcUtve4kABW0ho3cVKtODtJB86r3FfB+OsvxQ7sCVxaD30D9YXWEYVgTxoi4uD D216IVfmNLDbMn7jSuGlUnJkJpFOpZIP/+CxYP0ab2hRmWONGoulzEKbm30iY9OpoPzOnpDf RBn0XFs1uhbzp5v/wQIDAQABo4IBSzCCAUcwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFHoTTgB0W8Z4Y2QnwS/ioFu8ecV7MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAS BgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMBEGA1UdIAQKMAgwBgYEVR0gADBYBgNVHR8EUTBPME2gS6BJ hkdodHRwOi8vY3JsLnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50 aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDB0BggrBgEFBQcBAQRoMGYwPQYIKwYBBQUHMAKGMWh0dHA6 Ly9jcnQudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9VVE5BZGRUcnVzdENsaWVudF9DQS5jcnQwJQYIKwYBBQUH MAGGGWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAIXWvnhX VW0zf0RS/kLVBqgBA4CK+w2y/Uq/9q9BSfUbWsXSrRtzbj7pJnzmTJjBMCjfy/tCPKElPgp1 1tA9OYZm0aGbtU2bb68obB2v5ep0WqjascDxdXovnrqTecr+4pEeVnSy+I3T4ENyG+2P/WA5 IEf7i686ZUg8mD2lJb+972DgSeUWyOs/Q4Pw4O4NwdPNM1+b0L1garM7/vrUyTo8H+2b/5tJ M75CKTmD7jNpLoKdRU2oadqAGx490hpdfEeZpZsIbRKZhtZdVwcbpzC+S0lEuJB+ytF5OOu0 M/qgOl0mWJ5hVRi0IdWZ1eBDQEIwvuql55TSsP7zdfl/bucwggSdMIIDhaADAgECAhA0Pekr rCc0/4/LNJT7zHBUMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMG8xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQKEwtB ZGRUcnVzdCBBQjEmMCQGA1UECxMdQWRkVHJ1c3QgRXh0ZXJuYWwgVFRQIE5ldHdvcmsxIjAg BgNVBAMTGUFkZFRydXN0IEV4dGVybmFsIENBIFJvb3QwHhcNMDUwNjA3MDgwOTEwWhcNMjAw NTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5TYWx0 IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50 IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfH TrSDZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4 vKJvq1lepS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i 5khhxkzzabGoLhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDre CqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOB9DCB 8TAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBStvZh6NLQm9/rEJlTvA73gJMtUGjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUiYJnfcSdJnAA S7RQSHzePa4Ebn0wDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wEQYDVR0gBAow CDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1UdHwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9B ZGRUcnVzdEV4dGVybmFsQ0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGG GWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAG8nONjKLDz MQHC33vdYqABnSMxD5ySc1NR6h9M+tafxMovZ354Mw90FrmRh5H1iib6ZHAA2B75CwRiUIeT gdTa9SPbNLuFVrRwNG54gzcehRzFERWSX4cXvaxq/fHC0cyJX7F88D5R8jXzfOxgmGs6K+Dv 37N9huu1G/Vb7KJ8mBPXAFC50S1z3gN4dOEFhTFey5q5nZTGuZQ3dXLcRPtn6PD6JR5Sp9ol 6UfgoMc8oE6xCjb7d0if75eK+7T+45QUqIO8XC0/0mBxYO7CcYIM6Yg249ogtKOgbKqWS7iA jnXKSQf2OxS639wF2Z/b4LLmTaB4JufnLW5/X8YeiBUxggKEMIICgAIBATCBqDCBkzELMAkG A1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9y ZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBDbGllbnQg QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQdJA+PaBYSJojNUzZmA0n/zAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIGxMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8X DTEyMDgyNzEwMjQzMFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFJvuk3UIBrmsTqJovrom8LkqJZnbMFIG CSqGSIb3DQEJDzFFMEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMC AgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAHJUGvF6gxAC msrxX7ls0WJGOhPYReBfz39Ug2wYwKHw5HxAQfENMiE5r6XAzzQDu2XJB+am+txKh9Tfe96x N58o8vQK7/0TCN2sF+8gxd4LemwGwk5gBY3aPoBnaaVqOwuD20WwxLwGliwpnMcQtw4Kz1pX EB7Q+rejDa7zgKkKFRbufaVsZ+Ac3vDTLQK92Y9vI+pl3MFkqyHeLomswoZllxW8lhYpoBnm rb895gA8TwvYWFZXBkgAtHQGR9GGeFrUVHtGKT4cdjoMFDg61ihrs1CaGsdmyDjfsfH94I9j TeX+OGnjly03AT083wYOpNPqksbx+nFQZYyRL/rW+wE= --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 12:25:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266821065674 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward2h.mail.yandex.net (forward2h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABD18FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (smtp1h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.144]) by forward2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3A8A7700CD9; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:25:41 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 03EBC13402EA; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:25:40 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 87.249.28.59.tel.ru (87.249.28.59.tel.ru [87.249.28.59]) by smtp1h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id PbROFns5-PbROJoOP; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:25:37 +0400 Message-ID: <503B6740.6080002@passap.ru> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:25:36 +0400 From: =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQodCw0LzQvtGA0L7QtNC+0LI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120728 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Todds References: <1346054488.1623.8.camel@Ruru> In-Reply-To: <1346054488.1623.8.camel@Ruru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibreOffice 3.5.6 InteractiveAugmentedIOException run error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:25:43 -0000 27.08.2012 12:01, The Todds пишет: > I have 8.3 stable x86-64 system with the ports updated on 25 August > 2012. Libreoffice 3.5.6 compiled without any errors however when I > attempt to run it I get the following error messages: > > javaPathHelper: not found > terminate called after throwing an instance of > 'com::sun::star::ucb::InteractiveAugmentedIOException' Seems that this error has been discussed at freebsd-office@ mail list. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 14:11:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BC410656B6 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce-4389-questions=freebsd.org@mbmsend.com) Received: from mta064.mbmsend.com (mta064.mbmsend.com [66.85.161.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C148FC64 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=sendmail; d=mbmsend.com; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:List-Unsubscribe:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Sender:Content-Type; i=killersportslive=3Daol.com@mbmsend.com; bh=mzHxkjFaQzZs3HnCnAVmlBQJMag=; b=qClnxrLnr0VaOEMxcO5FY8z2Agyh/2y2zPw8z1Ox2qDzxwHjzxEUh9LZtv9SvNMiaf4yxvOe4+pq XLBJROTrag== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=sendmail; d=mbmsend.com; b=mDoayCr32aDBzukVAP3P+dBxeofSDJ4qc+1FPtsHQq2lVTgOEYAudy9fxs5d0ez8TRuIroTyETOL PcyM7tfzyg==; Received: from mbmsend.com (127.0.0.1) by mta064.mbmsend.com id h7e02419uis6 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:11:31 -0400 (envelope-from ) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:11:18 -0400 To: "" From: "Chase Diamond" Message-ID: <874816d969ab5973f55b9c8d149b4d73-4389@mbmsend.com> X-Mailer: mybizmailer v1.0 (MyBizMailer.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://mybizmailer.com/abuse.aspx?aid=00a1i0h3&uid=7c2e21222aa2b240be7516b0d49401af&e=874816d969ab5973f55b9c8d149b4d73&b=1 Sender: "Chase Diamond" X-CampaignID: 874816d969ab5973f55b9c8d149b4d73 X-AccountID: 00a1i0h3 X-FBL: 874816d969ab5973f55b9c8d149b4d73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: $100.00 in free capper cash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chase Diamond List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:49 -0000 SIMPLY PUT GET 100.00 IN FREE HANDICAPPER CASH TO USE ON ANY HANDICAPPER AT LASVEGASLINECHANGERS.COM FOR FOOTBALL SEASON. GO TO WWW.LASVEGASLINECHANGERS.COM LOOK FOR A HANDICAPPER UD LIKE SIGHN UP FOR THERE FREE PICKS NEWSLETER SIMPLY BYE ENTERING UR EMAIL IN TOP LEFT OF WEBSITE AND (REPLY BACK TO THIS EMAIL SAYIN WHICH CAPPER UD LIKE UR FREE 100.00 PUT TOWARDS AND YOU WILL HAVE UR FREE TRIAL DONT WAIT FOOTBALL STARTS IN 3 DAYS!!!! BELOW IS A LIST OF HANDICAPPERS TO PICK FROM... Tony Corleone Vernon Croy Chase Diamond Chaz Diamond Matt Fargo Simon Green Tony Karpinski Ross King Steve Merril Stephen Nover TJ Pemberton RJ Robbins Carolina Sports Doc's Sports Kevin Thomas Craig Trapp Paul Wynns >>> Click here to read about our guarantee policy and loyalty program <<< TONY CORLEONE Tony's MLB Play of the Day!! Tony Corleone continues his great success with a strong 2nd half of the MLB season. He was 5-1 with his plays last night and is now 55-36 on the season with his MLB Plays of the Day. He has another one locked and loaded for today. Grab this guaranteed winner now and continue to cash in with Tony!! Tony's 10 Unit MLB Grand Slam!! (21-11 last 32) Tony continues to pick winners. He has been crushing the books all season long. He currently holds down the #1 MLB spot as well as the #1 overall spot. He has his 10 Unit MLB Grand Slam ready for today. Make sure to grab this winner now and absolutely shell your bookie with Tony!! Tony's 10 Unit Thursday NCAAF Enforcer!! Tony is locked and loaded with his 10 Unit Thursday NCAAF Enforcer between Vanderbilt and South Carolina. Last season Tony absolutely shelled the books in college football, as he managed to net his dime bettor cliets over $43,000. Grab this winner now and start the college football season off on a winning note with Tony!! Click here to see all of Tony Corleone's picks CHASE DIAMOND NCAFF KICK OFF 3 PACK 8/30 100/70/50 DIMER CHASE DIAMOND IS READY TO START THE NCAFF SEASON WITH A SWEEP AND HE HAS 3 WINNERS SET FOR THURSDAY 8/30 FOR JUST 29.99 YOU CAN CASH WITH YOUR BOOKS WITH EASE BE SHARP BUY CHASE DIAMONDS NCAFF PLAYS LAST SEASON HE CASHED OVER 64% IN NCAFF. 200 DIME NCAFF GAME OF THE WEEK 51-24 LIFFETIME THIS PLAY IS FOR 9/1 OPENING SATURDAY DONT MISS CHASE DIAMOND COLLEGE FOOTBALL GAME OF THE WEEK. CHASE DIAMOND HAS GOT HIS HANDS OF A GAME THAT WILL CASH WITH EASE. LAST YEAR CHASE DIAMOND CASHED OVER 60% ON HIS COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYS THIS YEAR CHASE LOOKS TO IMPROVE ON THAT NUMBER BE HERE OR BE SQUARE.(10.00 OFF NORMAL PRICE) 200 DIME NFL KICK OFF ULTIMATE WINNER 72% LIFETIME CHASE DIAMOND THE BIG PLAY KING HAS LOCKED AND LOADED ON HIS TAKE ON THE COWBOYS AT GIANTS AND YOU ALL KNOW HOW CHASE DOES WITH 200 DIMERS TRY 72% LIFETIME THIS GAME IS BACKED BY 4 SYSTEMS AND SHOULD BE HIT AND HIT HARD WIN BIG GAME 1 GUARANTEED. Click here to see all of Chase Diamond's picks CHAZ DIAMOND 50 DIME KILLER SPORTS KNOCK OUT WINNER CHAZ DIAMOND HAS BEEN VERY SELECTIVE LATELY AND HITTING HIS PLAYS DONT MISS THIS 50 DIME DOG WINNER TODAY AND FOR JUST 14.99 WHO CAN AFFORD NOT TO BE ON IT? Click here to see all of Chaz Diamond's picks MATT FARGO Fargo's MLB BIG BITE BEATDOWN (HUGE 59-35 LIFETIME Matt is coming off a Sunday split on the bases and brings in a POTENT 60% run in baseball into the new week! He comes back in a huge way on Monday with a Big Bite Beatdown and these reports have been OUTSTANDING, going a BLISTERING 59-35 (62.8%) lifetime in MLB! This large chalk UNLEASHES another MASSIVE DESTRUCTION! Hammer it! Do not even think about missing this! Fargo's 10* CFB THURSDAY TOTALS DOMINATOR (53-34) Matt is locked and loaded for a huge CFB year as he carries over what was an EXCEPTIONAL ending last year! He closed on a PERFECT 4-0 run and the numbers were OUTSTANDING going back further as he finished on a SCORCHING 53-34-1 (61%) run! He WINS Thursday with an opening night Totals Dominator that is a SHOOTOUT in the making! This one flies way over the total! Fargo's 10* CFB THURSDAY ENFORCER (53-34 CFB RUN) Matt closed the college football season on a PERFECT 4-0 run and the numbers were OUTSTANDING going back further as he finished on a SCORCHING 53-34-1 (61%) run! He gets things started right where he left off with a MASSIVE 10* Enforcer on opening night! Last year he went a COMMANDING 7-1 (87.5%) in Week One! More of the same! Do not even think about missing this! Click here to see all of Matt Fargo's picks STEVE MERRIL MLB Grand Slam - (PERFECT 5-0 MLB RUN)! Steve Merril has SWEPT his L5 MLB plays and he has uncovered a powerful MLB GRAND SLAM for Monday that is backed by solid winning angles - Grab this value play right now! Guaranteed Run Line that will WIN BIG! Click here to see all of Steve Merril's picks STEPHEN NOVER Stephen Nover's Underdog Play of the Month A wrong favorite is one of many factors making this matchup such a strong play that it rates as Vegas wiseguy Stephen Nover's August Underdog Play of the Month. Don't miss this sure winner and cash big. Read what makes this play so special. Click here to see all of Stephen Nover's picks KEVIN THOMAS KEVIN THURSDAY NITE KICKOFF THREE PACK OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL THIS THURSDAY NAILING OVER 62 PERCENT LIFETIME COLLEGE AND READY TO CASH Click here to see all of Kevin Thomas's picks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 14:11:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C2B10656E6 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce-4389-freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@mbmsend.com) Received: from mta044.mbmsend.com (mta044.mbmsend.com [66.85.161.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7978FC54 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=sendmail; d=mbmsend.com; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:List-Unsubscribe:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Sender:Content-Type; i=killersportslive=3Daol.com@mbmsend.com; bh=QpCwQ7lFP2iA+s8KmD1da8RhGd8=; b=lu/3W327k7fHaujOgudCblxf+bl3jfbTgMO14UfPUr//nOSJ4wNq5hfPxrHXgS6QbrVXC+/pow69 a5SJ/FoUPA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=sendmail; d=mbmsend.com; b=paPvva8oOHTiizOLXwArVJdeuwV9ETC4k+mO3K90YgC46IQd1f76fLgLXwsrLMN2vXqBT5/AhDH7 MHu1y/TtSg==; Received: from mbmsend.com (127.0.0.1) by mta044.mbmsend.com id h7e02619uis4 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:11:33 -0400 (envelope-from ) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:11:20 -0400 To: "" From: "Chase Diamond" Message-ID: <9f935856b6340ce6a4fdd6c427911823-4389@mbmsend.com> X-Mailer: mybizmailer v1.0 (MyBizMailer.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://mybizmailer.com/abuse.aspx?aid=00a1i0h3&uid=dd1ad5f94c830bc150a4f1dedd3ffb64&e=9f935856b6340ce6a4fdd6c427911823&b=1 Sender: "Chase Diamond" X-CampaignID: 9f935856b6340ce6a4fdd6c427911823 X-AccountID: 00a1i0h3 X-FBL: 9f935856b6340ce6a4fdd6c427911823 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: $100.00 in free capper cash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chase Diamond List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:11:51 -0000 SIMPLY PUT GET 100.00 IN FREE HANDICAPPER CASH TO USE ON ANY HANDICAPPER AT LASVEGASLINECHANGERS.COM FOR FOOTBALL SEASON. GO TO WWW.LASVEGASLINECHANGERS.COM LOOK FOR A HANDICAPPER UD LIKE SIGHN UP FOR THERE FREE PICKS NEWSLETER SIMPLY BYE ENTERING UR EMAIL IN TOP LEFT OF WEBSITE AND (REPLY BACK TO THIS EMAIL SAYIN WHICH CAPPER UD LIKE UR FREE 100.00 PUT TOWARDS AND YOU WILL HAVE UR FREE TRIAL DONT WAIT FOOTBALL STARTS IN 3 DAYS!!!! BELOW IS A LIST OF HANDICAPPERS TO PICK FROM... Tony Corleone Vernon Croy Chase Diamond Chaz Diamond Matt Fargo Simon Green Tony Karpinski Ross King Steve Merril Stephen Nover TJ Pemberton RJ Robbins Carolina Sports Doc's Sports Kevin Thomas Craig Trapp Paul Wynns >>> Click here to read about our guarantee policy and loyalty program <<< TONY CORLEONE Tony's MLB Play of the Day!! Tony Corleone continues his great success with a strong 2nd half of the MLB season. He was 5-1 with his plays last night and is now 55-36 on the season with his MLB Plays of the Day. He has another one locked and loaded for today. Grab this guaranteed winner now and continue to cash in with Tony!! Tony's 10 Unit MLB Grand Slam!! (21-11 last 32) Tony continues to pick winners. He has been crushing the books all season long. He currently holds down the #1 MLB spot as well as the #1 overall spot. He has his 10 Unit MLB Grand Slam ready for today. Make sure to grab this winner now and absolutely shell your bookie with Tony!! Tony's 10 Unit Thursday NCAAF Enforcer!! Tony is locked and loaded with his 10 Unit Thursday NCAAF Enforcer between Vanderbilt and South Carolina. Last season Tony absolutely shelled the books in college football, as he managed to net his dime bettor cliets over $43,000. Grab this winner now and start the college football season off on a winning note with Tony!! Click here to see all of Tony Corleone's picks CHASE DIAMOND NCAFF KICK OFF 3 PACK 8/30 100/70/50 DIMER CHASE DIAMOND IS READY TO START THE NCAFF SEASON WITH A SWEEP AND HE HAS 3 WINNERS SET FOR THURSDAY 8/30 FOR JUST 29.99 YOU CAN CASH WITH YOUR BOOKS WITH EASE BE SHARP BUY CHASE DIAMONDS NCAFF PLAYS LAST SEASON HE CASHED OVER 64% IN NCAFF. 200 DIME NCAFF GAME OF THE WEEK 51-24 LIFFETIME THIS PLAY IS FOR 9/1 OPENING SATURDAY DONT MISS CHASE DIAMOND COLLEGE FOOTBALL GAME OF THE WEEK. CHASE DIAMOND HAS GOT HIS HANDS OF A GAME THAT WILL CASH WITH EASE. LAST YEAR CHASE DIAMOND CASHED OVER 60% ON HIS COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYS THIS YEAR CHASE LOOKS TO IMPROVE ON THAT NUMBER BE HERE OR BE SQUARE.(10.00 OFF NORMAL PRICE) 200 DIME NFL KICK OFF ULTIMATE WINNER 72% LIFETIME CHASE DIAMOND THE BIG PLAY KING HAS LOCKED AND LOADED ON HIS TAKE ON THE COWBOYS AT GIANTS AND YOU ALL KNOW HOW CHASE DOES WITH 200 DIMERS TRY 72% LIFETIME THIS GAME IS BACKED BY 4 SYSTEMS AND SHOULD BE HIT AND HIT HARD WIN BIG GAME 1 GUARANTEED. Click here to see all of Chase Diamond's picks CHAZ DIAMOND 50 DIME KILLER SPORTS KNOCK OUT WINNER CHAZ DIAMOND HAS BEEN VERY SELECTIVE LATELY AND HITTING HIS PLAYS DONT MISS THIS 50 DIME DOG WINNER TODAY AND FOR JUST 14.99 WHO CAN AFFORD NOT TO BE ON IT? Click here to see all of Chaz Diamond's picks MATT FARGO Fargo's MLB BIG BITE BEATDOWN (HUGE 59-35 LIFETIME Matt is coming off a Sunday split on the bases and brings in a POTENT 60% run in baseball into the new week! He comes back in a huge way on Monday with a Big Bite Beatdown and these reports have been OUTSTANDING, going a BLISTERING 59-35 (62.8%) lifetime in MLB! This large chalk UNLEASHES another MASSIVE DESTRUCTION! Hammer it! Do not even think about missing this! Fargo's 10* CFB THURSDAY TOTALS DOMINATOR (53-34) Matt is locked and loaded for a huge CFB year as he carries over what was an EXCEPTIONAL ending last year! He closed on a PERFECT 4-0 run and the numbers were OUTSTANDING going back further as he finished on a SCORCHING 53-34-1 (61%) run! He WINS Thursday with an opening night Totals Dominator that is a SHOOTOUT in the making! This one flies way over the total! Fargo's 10* CFB THURSDAY ENFORCER (53-34 CFB RUN) Matt closed the college football season on a PERFECT 4-0 run and the numbers were OUTSTANDING going back further as he finished on a SCORCHING 53-34-1 (61%) run! He gets things started right where he left off with a MASSIVE 10* Enforcer on opening night! Last year he went a COMMANDING 7-1 (87.5%) in Week One! More of the same! Do not even think about missing this! Click here to see all of Matt Fargo's picks STEVE MERRIL MLB Grand Slam - (PERFECT 5-0 MLB RUN)! Steve Merril has SWEPT his L5 MLB plays and he has uncovered a powerful MLB GRAND SLAM for Monday that is backed by solid winning angles - Grab this value play right now! Guaranteed Run Line that will WIN BIG! Click here to see all of Steve Merril's picks STEPHEN NOVER Stephen Nover's Underdog Play of the Month A wrong favorite is one of many factors making this matchup such a strong play that it rates as Vegas wiseguy Stephen Nover's August Underdog Play of the Month. Don't miss this sure winner and cash big. Read what makes this play so special. Click here to see all of Stephen Nover's picks KEVIN THOMAS KEVIN THURSDAY NITE KICKOFF THREE PACK OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL THIS THURSDAY NAILING OVER 62 PERCENT LIFETIME COLLEGE AND READY TO CASH Click here to see all of Kevin Thomas's picks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 22:14:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40761065680 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C6C8FC1A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7RME7g8015989 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:14:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host 99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21] claimed to be [192.168.1.67] Message-ID: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:14:09 -0500 From: Jack Stone User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:14:08 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-10.00 required=4.50 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 4.5 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule | -10 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Subject: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:14:09 -0000 uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009 Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!) This is a production server. Been playing catchup on ports including perl as UPDATING recommends: portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* That has worked on other servers, but not this one. Anyone know what I need to do to clean this up?? But, can't get past this fatal error: mail# portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive specification: "WITHOUT_" "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive specification: "WITHOUT_" make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue ** Makefile possibly broken: lang/perl5.12: ** Please report this to the maintainer for lang/perl5.12 No closing parenthesis in archive specification No closing parenthesis in archive specification /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1560:in `get_pkgname': Makefile broken (MakefileBrokenError) from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:631:in `block (4 levels) in main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:615:in `each' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:615:in `block (3 levels) in main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:588:in `catch' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:588:in `block (2 levels) in main' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1404:in `call' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1404:in `block (2 levels) in parse_in_order' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1399:in `catch' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1399:in `block in parse_in_order' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1347:in `catch' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1347:in `parse_in_order' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1341:in `order!' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:1334:in `order' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:565:in `block in main' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9/optparse.rb:882:in `initialize' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:236:in `new' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:236:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2344:in `
' All the best, Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 03:21:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FD1106566C for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@webottimizzazione.com) Received: from webottimizzazione.com (ecos0080.atman.pl [213.189.52.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258308FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:21:31 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Seo-Web Contatti" Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:21:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20120828_032143_006423.info@webottimizzazione.com> X-Mailer: MAIL Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Ottimizzazione delle pagine Web X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:21:33 -0000 Buongiorno, se vi state chiedendo a cosa possa esservi utile l'ottimizzazione del Vostro sito internet, provate a porvi una delle domande di seguito elencate e se la risposta ad almeno una di esse sarà SÌ, allora vuol dire che l'ottimizzazione è per Voi più che necessaria! - ricevi poche visite al tuo sito internet. - il tuo sito non si riesce a trovare sui vari motori di ricerca - il tuo sito web non viene presentato correttamente sui motori di ricerca, - i clienti non riescono a trovare le informazioni loro necessarie ed abbandonano velocemente il Tuo sito, - i clienti acquistano dalla concorrenza e non da Te, - vuoi essere certo che il tuo sito web sia sicuro, - la concorrenza ha fatto dei passi avanti e Tu desideri superarla. Ecco alcuni dei più importanti vantaggi della ottimizzazione: - l'incremento delle visite e della visibilità del vostro sito, - l'acquisizione di una clientela ben definita, realmente interessata ai prodotti oppure ai servizi proposti, - un migliore posizionamento sui vari motori di ricerca, ad esempio google, - l'incremento delle vendite, - l'aumento della riconoscibilità Aziendale, ad un costo bassissimo, - l'aumento del prestigio Aziendale, grazie all'utilizzo di tecnologie avanzate, - la possibilità di competere con le migliori aziende e maggiormente conosciute del paese, - una migliore indicizzazione del sito web sui vari motori di ricerca, - l'assensa di abbonamento Ma soprattutto la consapevolezza che dopo sole due settimane, dal momento in cui avremo dato il via all'ottimizzazione del Vostro sito, Vi ritroverete nella prima pagina dei maggiori motori di ricerca. Sperando vogliate usufruire dei Nostri servizi, Vi invitiamo a visitare il nostro sito internet: http://www.web-ottimizzazione.com Cordiali saluti --- Web-Ottimizzazione SeoWeb ITALY --- http://www.web-ottimizzazione.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 09:13:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F87C1065670 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54038FC17 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so12959007ial.13 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:13:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=FKb1MNlzcaf65vM/HqPXI2VqdOj2ozze4+2kWBsOBwI=; b=RsaRVWLGOCaa5bUArUsuC382XRyjvoV+EFM7zQylSpjDAWWrQJ4vw5cDOwS6L2eGat B9s5n8OYD3DzAA66+C8OapXpHdY9NW/DB/Zz/1Ygb4UgvgLBBgm8J4AnRwYkr6rxBQXo 8MSYzupBzf1R3BVgZSpyxzRAaEp5Q9VU+dEPIhrHT8D3ByJ1+qQ6b+T8AtGK18JyDrvR udaAfoib5aTK/vtO4B29YtwL7lPmCzWepflfjs+WyY8UmSIaYIjEzzsVVhsNCcb4rrzW fuUeyL1c6WAj1O830nIOSQBTk7bGREcsCf8YInzwrmfKr0ri8gJxqOBjDOtcIbXu6G2Y K32A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.94.133 with SMTP id dc5mr12880860igb.16.1346145187359; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.96.131 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:13:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:13:07 +0200 Message-ID: From: Damien Fleuriot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn86Swb+H60Vb5PUHf25sTk7t5t1hvWFAjQpC8YB4K/aFgUM9mDRoTS+G3yNsnRyVrZwkl0 Subject: Re: 8-STABLE base BIND version number typo ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:13:08 -0000 On 27 August 2012 10:11, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Hello list, > > > > We're currently running Nessus PCI DSS scans on our infrastructure to > eliminate known vulnerabilities and problems. > > The scan reports that my version of BIND is vulnerable to exploits I > *know* it isn't. > > The problem, to me, seems to be with the version number as reported by > named -V : > BIND 9.6.-ESV-R7-P2 built with '--prefix=/usr' > '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' > '--enable-threads' '--enable-getifaddrs' '--disable-linux-caps' > '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random' '--without-idn' > '--without-libxml2' > > (notice the .- notation) > > > This is the base's BIND running on 8.3-STABLE 64 bits compiled and > built on 22/08/12 : > FreeBSD pf1-dmz-gs.[snip] 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #2: Wed Aug 22 > 10:41:47 CEST 2012 > > > I have verified that building the exact same version from the ports, > at /usr/ports/dns/bind96 yields the correct version number and the > vulnerabilities are no longer reported by the scan, which uses BIND's > version number as a reference. > > > > Has anyone else noticed the same oddity, that I might fill a PR ? Hello list, I seem to have seen no replies. Would anyone kindly confirm they've got the same problem so we can get a PR filled ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 10:08:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE30106564A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bw.mail.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7598FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so2481372bkc.13 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:08:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pJcHErFI8+7ZDPjccRNJKGfYrZ31eKCKGXhnOfoIGoU=; b=KlLyUMhwmbnSY05D+zFFH4HlBPMYQbGTUQeZ2grmrBL6zML6RnkikFpMgOIj4KsLiI VsJIsGxt7X/dSVcT4sM9SxQQBo0zUHsnMJj8Qf91Y9FG66DsvAE3ZL6fZKU/IiOqhBfE 0WnbnD5zH8QWbRAWLSo92D3mxrDVhT9KszD4+qvVqkNJ3GnCLy143L7ZXgRXCpxczQ/e VWgd0kuDCEslmDmcBYpxu90AZo0OZec8NYtovr3HHi7rUOI0ah/ZYfzBAf4uRp7x+gcQ SYvtNZ32gXAc7aWc/Skd6YKJJfTrTzxzB2+H3WmTl1WWXe2BoH/rO0LLvOSWYXbNFOgQ uJJA== Received: by 10.204.8.84 with SMTP id g20mr4682696bkg.126.1346148534122; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.4.45] ([86.125.217.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hs2sm12279974bkc.1.2012.08.28.03.08.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503C98B3.6060006@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:08:51 +0300 From: bw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 8-STABLE base BIND version number typo ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:08:55 -0000 > I seem to have seen no replies. > > Would anyone kindly confirm they've got the same problem so we can get > a PR filled ? # named -V BIND 9.6.-ESV-R5-P1 built with '--prefix=/usr' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--enable-threads' '--enable-getifaddrs' '--disable-linux-caps' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random' '--without-idn' '--without-libxml2' # uname -a FreeBSD xxx.xx 8.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 #0: Mon Jun 11 23:52:38 UTC 2012 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 14:22:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF86106564A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venkatduvvuru.ml@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A958FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so13852448obb.13 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:22:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6SRnhzvMmTTNHr5Y3/MNw0GpawnWXRp4gFWSxMSCtBo=; b=ZYukInP/GkONYx68AQe01a14T8Xsnu+2SAVI1n4DWXOj2id9vDs5bWjsTREYs23opb o/eKpfzxbbed2RmHLGHKGYp5LfojU/K9vsvCaNAQqXkwHxWJo9CwPtQG1E+MnXpJFk6/ ZerPGQHjl5CPyr2iMZ80YEiezZO7D0yAgM4TEwAK/9HnN4XUyppGQXhOve5PzCHmgGtM Fx2S50whiBJysdD/GjCtn1JiuHdbRcG2MsnCmqjSN4wzLNqKYfgtuBdsS6dbcxgdUDRI +dTXwrn+VshRWAoMG316/xmARPg1fmvWpxTudDT6/eZCvMUrFzm2CxEev6ymMPhzojBy tYuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.30.136 with SMTP id s8mr6076223oeh.22.1346163739079; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.138 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:52:19 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Duvvuru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Inbox driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:22:20 -0000 If a driver module misses the deadline to make it inbox , I think that it's gonna be part of the next Freebsd release. The sources show up in the svn repository, probably this is one confirmation that it's gonna be part of the next release..Is my understanding correct? Please clarify. /Venkat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 16:18:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9A4106564A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70148FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadr6 with SMTP id r6so3433481dad.13 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VX9ZnsYyP6tZE9CRU5aILD16+H5/wvAZ16e2ryqCxhc=; b=V5pVSSK/g9zKSNsY+MqAFI1E/N3yGaSCT02N7txKtr+RdRNz+1XE9gCrv81sOUpFUf yl4y68BuBG5lP4RtGYAy9y9XXMlIaJyYK28PPBS3Qun/kHKvotzyjTGOFj7rjBDIZMz3 sELbBDxr2estTiHLMycwqJ5vJYXKoYuOCk0GlXQ/MR6FKbfnN9z1CO2E5HEHXTg/e5p5 UdBOiS5lFJWlo5xL6rG9R3vJPI4+imhH0TyWM/PK0YtVLjU91TP4pmHDDifPmXvNPPta aehQtFK95DFCPKgg8/UfyXr+ZqZ4EuZgOL5HNYnHJFABosRrBSsZJnoTMg0rXNA94NNa 3HkA== Received: by 10.68.129.164 with SMTP id nx4mr32731622pbb.28.1346170697112; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.10.100 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:17:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: n j Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:17:56 +0200 Message-ID: To: Justin Dorfman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Becoming a Mirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:18:18 -0000 Hello Justin, On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Justin Dorfman wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering how our company can provide a mirror for the FreeBSD > project? > > Thanks. Have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/article.html. HTH, -- Nino From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 16:53:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F34106566B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE338FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2012 12:53:36 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BQS83390; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:53:33 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2012 12:53:33 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20540.63371.921420.355145@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:53:31 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: system build variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:53:39 -0000 I currently have # to get automatic SASL in sendmail SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include/ -DSASL=2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD+= -lsasl2 in make.conf. Would it be legal/better to put this in src.conf? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 18:48:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF07C106564A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail3.networktest.com (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4558FC17 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [69.55.234.104]) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00512560D4 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.networktest.com ([69.55.234.104]) by localhost (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76744-04 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp146.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [205.147.16.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7926D2560D3 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503D1259.9080801@networktest.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:47:53 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portaudit and automake14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:48:00 -0000 1. On a 8.0-RELEASE system, I'm having a problem with the automake14 port, where the portaudit port reports this vulnerability: http://portaudit.freebsd.org/10f38033-e006-11e1-9304-000000000000.html Refreshing the ports collection with 'portsnap fetch extract' and then running 'portmaster automake14' returned the same error as before: automake -- Insecure 'distcheck' recipe granted world-writable distdir I then tried to do 'make deinstall && make reinstall' for automake14, but that just deinstalled the port. The system returns the same error as above when trying to reinstall. How to resolve? 2. This system also has a couple of other automake ports installed: automake-1.12.3 automake-wrapper-20101119 How to determine if these are necessary in addition to automake14? Thanks dn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 18:53:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E401065673 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623208FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:53:35 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=YWUQcC qNi5f2GjwBp7eS1JXcyDFWP1zegxkgZ0v/8nPFddGls3z9CjuhXyMXWVZ1Mu4mFu km+SufapcE0MNyzTu7RdUi0i8yWl49F+i54FeTF5T5J8WTHQ0Mr5SJ/RKt6/4f08 oPp9Dqc3ASymPHUcb5raTHZwkz/VxEkuYNGfQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=YoWtNBhFW2ZD 3WmEy/Hi+ryyWcU3fcLMVJzwDY0f9OQ=; b=sp6SuyVl3G0HyptGJriFMIJiMxxi kSowDkEqnzZ/Z4F171PoihfnPP5FbO9kRns1q2vZ4b0fKSN4HyDfK56GnRLCWTqQ M8sp+bbUO5nj3irSDJkc7qf2TFB/qSuZ7Pwgtrq6E4LOEonjfsh2FaowiCGSswUW zDjJgV3ix+iAksc= Received: (qmail 93137 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2012 13:53:34 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.74?) (bryan@shatow.net@74.94.87.209) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 28 Aug 2012 13:53:34 -0500 Message-ID: <503D13AE.1010003@shatow.net> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:53:34 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Newman References: <503D1259.9080801@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <503D1259.9080801@networktest.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit and automake14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:53:36 -0000 On 8/28/2012 1:47 PM, David Newman wrote: > 1. On a 8.0-RELEASE system, I'm having a problem with the automake14 > port, where the portaudit port reports this vulnerability: > > http://portaudit.freebsd.org/10f38033-e006-11e1-9304-000000000000.html > > Refreshing the ports collection with 'portsnap fetch extract' and then > running 'portmaster automake14' returned the same error as before: > > automake -- Insecure 'distcheck' recipe granted world-writable distdir > > I then tried to do 'make deinstall && make reinstall' for automake14, > but that just deinstalled the port. The system returns the same error as > above when trying to reinstall. > > How to resolve? > > 2. This system also has a couple of other automake ports installed: > > automake-1.12.3 > automake-wrapper-20101119 > > How to determine if these are necessary in addition to automake14? automake14 is not vulnerable to this issue. The vuxml was recently updated to show that it only affects 1.5 and up. http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/36235c38-e0a8-11e1-9f4d-002354ed89bc.html Not sure when portaudit updates, but in the meantime you can ignore that error: env DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=1 portmaster ... You can also try deinstalling automake14 as it may not even be required on your system and the newer 1.12 may automatically be used instead. To be clear, automake14 is super old. automake-1.12.3 is current. > > Thanks > > dn > Bryan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:17:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41EC106564A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@chapman.edu) Received: from edric.chapman.edu (edric.chapman.edu [192.77.116.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831688FC1C for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CUV-EXHS02.chapman.edu (unknown [192.168.20.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by edric.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC14573EB for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CUP-EXMB01.chapman.edu ([fe80::e15b:acf4:ac6a:8369]) by CUV-EXHS02.chapman.edu ([192.168.20.242]) with mapi id 14.01.0379.000; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:09:40 -0700 From: "Robin, Michael" To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Thread-Topic: text editor Thread-Index: Ac2FadFkqKninGpoRQGi67lBnBRN3Q== Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:09:39 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.20.22] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 7AC14573EB.AAC1E X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: robin@chapman.edu MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1346796580.67469@F8jam0CGPrQr3MaQbse8+w X-Spam-Status: No Subject: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:17:02 -0000 Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system with following f= eatures: * Support 100 percent of hot keys * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved or del= eted without requiring any mouse lock. It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined with nav= igating key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. * Support special ASCII characters Please advise. Thank you. Michael Programmer Analyst =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:25:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBB91065673 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673D58FC1B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7SMOM65023822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:24:22 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.63) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:24:22 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Robin, Michael'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:24:47 -0700 Message-ID: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLOD27QfLxUNFyB2qaRGxi2iqKUwJVuuBSQ Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.63] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-08-28_07:2012-08-28, 2012-08-28, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Subject: RE: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:25:36 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > Subject: text editor > > Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system On FreeBSD? In the GUI? or on the CLI? > with following > features: > * Support 100 percent of hot keys How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that suffice? > * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved or deleted > without requiring any mouse lock. > It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined with navigating > key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. A challenge, no-doubt. > * Support special ASCII characters > Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters (the ones that don't are in the minority, imho). ... I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI). NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:25:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88898106566B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail3.networktest.com (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665508FC1D for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [69.55.234.104]) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CAC2560D5 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.networktest.com ([69.55.234.104]) by localhost (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21311-05 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp146.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [205.147.16.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8160D2560D3 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503D455E.6010407@networktest.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:25:34 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503D1259.9080801@networktest.com> <503D13AE.1010003@shatow.net> In-Reply-To: <503D13AE.1010003@shatow.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portaudit and automake14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:25:38 -0000 On 8/28/12 11:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/28/2012 1:47 PM, David Newman wrote: >> 1. On a 8.0-RELEASE system, I'm having a problem with the automake14 >> port, where the portaudit port reports this vulnerability: >> >> http://portaudit.freebsd.org/10f38033-e006-11e1-9304-000000000000.html >> >> Refreshing the ports collection with 'portsnap fetch extract' and then >> running 'portmaster automake14' returned the same error as before: >> >> automake -- Insecure 'distcheck' recipe granted world-writable distdir >> >> I then tried to do 'make deinstall && make reinstall' for automake14, >> but that just deinstalled the port. The system returns the same error as >> above when trying to reinstall. >> >> How to resolve? >> >> 2. This system also has a couple of other automake ports installed: >> >> automake-1.12.3 >> automake-wrapper-20101119 >> >> How to determine if these are necessary in addition to automake14? > > > automake14 is not vulnerable to this issue. The vuxml was recently > updated to show that it only affects 1.5 and up. > > http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/36235c38-e0a8-11e1-9f4d-002354ed89bc.html > > Not sure when portaudit updates, but in the meantime you can ignore that > error: > > env DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=1 portmaster ... > > You can also try deinstalling automake14 as it may not even be required > on your system and the newer 1.12 may automatically be used instead. > > To be clear, automake14 is super old. automake-1.12.3 is current. Thanks much for this. As noted, I've de-installed automake14 and haven't noticed any problems as a result. It can be reinstalled using that env flag you mentioned, but if it's not needed, then that's one less thing to go wrong. . . Thanks again. dn > > >> >> Thanks >> >> dn >> > > Bryan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:42:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFBE106566B; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@chapman.edu) Received: from edric.chapman.edu (edric.chapman.edu [192.77.116.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB348FC17; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CUV-EXHS01.chapman.edu (unknown [192.168.20.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by edric.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DE056A4B; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CUP-EXMB01.chapman.edu ([fe80::e15b:acf4:ac6a:8369]) by CUV-EXHS01.chapman.edu ([192.168.20.241]) with mapi id 14.01.0379.000; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:41:53 -0700 From: "Robin, Michael" To: "'dteske@freebsd.org'" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: text editor Thread-Index: Ac2FadFkqKninGpoRQGi67lBnBRN3QAPMlOAAA5OrfA= Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:41:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.20.22] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 48DE056A4B.AB126 X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: robin@chapman.edu MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1346798514.14716@V/U1fmVulJ6HNz6Rs7SnIA X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: RE: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:42:03 -0000 What is VIM? Where could it be downloaded? What is CLI? I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7= /8. The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even though i= t have a lot of hot keys. My top priority is setting start/end block optio= n which was available for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen an= y window-based text editor for this option. 16-bit DOS text editor program= will not run on 64-bit operating system. Please advise. Thank you. Michael Programmer Analyst =20 -----Original Message----- From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.teske@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of dteske@fr= eebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: text editor > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-=20 > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > Subject: text editor >=20 > Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system On FreeBSD? In the GUI? or on the CLI? > with following > features: > * Support 100 percent of hot keys How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that suffic= e? > * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved=20 > or deleted > without requiring any mouse lock. > It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined=20 > with navigating > key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. A challenge, no-doubt. > * Support special ASCII characters >=20 Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters (= the ones that don't are in the minority, imho). ... I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI). NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:43:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6245E1065673 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:43:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8468FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959263CE56; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:43:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7SMhpd3003777; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:43:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:43:51 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Robin, Michael" Message-Id: <20120829004351.5e735389.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:43:59 -0000 On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:09:39 +0000, Robin, Michael wrote: > Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system with > following features: > * Support 100 percent of hot keys Depends also on the terminal emulator used and if it's configured properly. Editors like the one belonging to the Midnight Commander (mcedit) can learn keys. > * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, > moved or deleted without requiring any mouse lock. That applies to most editors, like Joe's Own Editor (joe), mcedit (already mentioned) or vi / vim. > It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined > with navigating key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. I know that both mcedit and joe support this, i. e. editing inside an already selected region; joe also is able to handle the begin and the end of the selection independently (^KB and ^KK). > * Support special ASCII characters Also depends on terminal emulator and certain system settings, as well as your preferred input method. I've been succhessfully using chinese characters in mcedit running in xterm with the LC_* language setting to en_US.UTF-8. Use with non-UTF local characters is easlily possible even in text mode consoles, using e. g. ISO8859-1 on cons25l1 emulation. I'm quite sure that even the "basic editors" can support that. As a programmer, you should have no problems evaluating the family of editor you will use, and find the one that fits your needs best. Try for example vim and gvim, also give mcedit and joe a try. Make sure your system is properly configured (terminal emulation and language settings, keyboard settings) so you can benefit from what those editors can do. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:50:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6143B106566B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sts@tp1.rub.de) Received: from mx4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (mi.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.64.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C0BD8FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:50:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Queued: (qmail 26633 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2012 22:43:40 -0000 X-Queued: (qmail 26611 invoked by uid 109); 28 Aug 2012 22:43:40 -0000 X-Qmailscanner: from 134.147.240.78 by mx4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (envelope-from , uid 103) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (sophie: 3.05/3.32/4.78. Clear:RC:1(134.147.240.78):. Processed in 0.037877 secs); 28 Aug 2012 22:43:40 -0000 Received: from neo.tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (134.147.240.78) by mx4.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 28 Aug 2012 22:43:40 -0000 Received: from freebsd.localnet (ip-178-201-62-94.unitymediagroup.de [178.201.62.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by neo.tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7SMhdXC029719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:43:39 +0200 From: Stephan Schindel To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:43:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1631524.1NBtPO5guz@freebsd> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: GTK and black window content X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:50:23 -0000 Hey :), I have sometimes a problem with GTK applications such as Firefox, Thunderbird and some others too: The whole application window gets almost black and the only fix is to reboot the system. I am using KDE (disabled composite) as my Desktop and I have got a Nvidia card (propr. driver). Does this happen to you as well? Thank you, Stephan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:57:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB94106566B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C9A8FC1C for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891F93CD98; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7SMvU7U003857; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:57:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:57:30 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Robin, Michael" Message-Id: <20120829005730.889711ff.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:57:32 -0000 On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:41:52 +0000, Robin, Michael wrote: > What is VIM? VI = VI Improved, based on vi-like editor behaviour, which is often considered one of the MAIN editor environments among programmers. > Where could it be downloaded? You don't manually download things on FreeBSD. You install software by a system means. I suggest you make yourself familiar with the OS and how to install programs using The FreeBSD handbook and the FAQ, accessible from the project's main web page. In short, # pkg_add -r vim or # pkg_add -r gvim should install vim or gvim (the Gtk-enhanced vim editor) for you easily. > What is CLI? Command line interface, a common name for text mode applications (even when they run in a terminal emulator under X), so the term doesn't fit 100 percent here. A command line editor could be sed (the stream editor), which is a a non-interactive editor, programmed by its programming language and via command line arguments. But also text mode editors like joe or vim allow many command line arguments (see the respective manpages to learn more). To a Programmer Analyst that should be known, but don't bother. :-) > I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8. You should then consult a mailing list (or probably a web-based discussion forum) related to "Windows" topics. In worst case, install a FreeBSD image for a virtualisation environment (e. g. VirtualBSD) and use that for edititing. :-) > My top priority is setting start/end block option which was available > for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any window-based > text editor for this option. I'm sure there are ports of normal text editors also for "Windows". But this list -- FreeBSD questions -- is not the best place to ask for what they are or where to download them. > 16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on 64-bit operating system. That lack of compatibility is a significant problem on "Windows", don't you think? :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:59:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2501065677; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.224.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF7D8FC16; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AMD620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q7SMv8OQ020047; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:57:52 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:57:00 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: "Robin, Michael" Message-ID: <20120829055700.0c9e3870@AMD620.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: References: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'dteske@freebsd.org'" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:59:01 -0000 Hi, On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:41:52 +0000 "Robin, Michael" wrote: > What is VIM? Where could it be downloaded? > What is CLI? I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for > Windows 7/8. The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting > option even though it have a lot of hot keys. My top priority is > setting start/end block option which was available for old DOS-based > text editor, but I have not seen any window-based text editor for > this option. 16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on 64-bit > operating system. Please advise. Thank you. > > Michael > Programmer Analyst > Analyst? And you did not notice that you are on a FreeBSD mailing list? Erich > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.teske@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of > dteske@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM > To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: text editor > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM > > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > > Subject: text editor > > > > Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system > > On FreeBSD? > In the GUI? or on the CLI? > > > > with following > > features: > > * Support 100 percent of hot keys > > How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that > suffice? > > > > * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, > > moved or > deleted > > without requiring any mouse lock. > > It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined > > with > navigating > > key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. > > A challenge, no-doubt. > > > > * Support special ASCII characters > > > > Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII > characters (the ones that don't are in the minority, imho). > > ... > > I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI). > > NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here. > -- > Devin > > _____________ > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) > delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute > or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender > immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed > to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other > than the intended recipient. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 23:11:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC58106566C for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393BD8FC1E for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6313CD15; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:11:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7SNBl6v003955; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:11:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:11:47 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Stephan Schindel Message-Id: <20120829011147.942e6fff.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1631524.1NBtPO5guz@freebsd> References: <1631524.1NBtPO5guz@freebsd> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: GTK and black window content X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:11:49 -0000 On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:43:45 +0200, Stephan Schindel wrote: > Hey :), > > I have sometimes a problem with GTK applications such as Firefox, Thunderbird > and some others too: The whole application window gets almost black [...] ALMOST black? > [...] and the > only fix is to reboot the system. Does the program window stop responding? Have you tried killing X? Maybe that's not as drastic as rebooting (except of course the system completely refuses to respond, which you didn't mention). > I am using KDE (disabled composite) as my > Desktop and I have got a Nvidia card (propr. driver). Have you tried to temporarily use a different, more simpler window manager (simplest idea: twm) to see if this might be related to KDE? > Does this happen to you as well? I'm using several Gtk applications here on WindowMaker (so no full KDE desktop), and _sometimes_ I have Firefox freezing the whole system; it stops during drawing operations (!) and the only help is to power off the machine. But in my case, I'm quite confident it's related to a malfunctioning graphics card -- also nVidia card + proper driver. However, this does not happen to other Gtk applications (such as Sylpheed), only to Firefox (and games such as Doom 3 demo and Quake 4 demo, but not to OpenArena). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 23:27:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E8C106566C for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdunham@texas.net) Received: from nm6-vm0.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm6-vm0.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.44.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E508D8FC17 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.44.104] by nm6.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2012 23:27:30 -0000 Received: from [98.139.44.64] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2012 23:27:30 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Aug 2012 23:27:30 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 344450.80264.bm@omp1001.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 68673 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2012 23:27:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1346196449; bh=XGbovtzmEO6bDzRQcvd2YlNmpO2LtJ/bFHabcg0xwQ8=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:Reply-to:CC:Message-ID:X-Confirm-Reading-To:X-pmrqc:Priority:In-reply-to:References:X-mailer:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Content-description; b=pHh6fK62g2sapxSmCY5Nio30rJG9YcFWsi1Ql8MKlLMYoGmRG5G4vvigMv0XHkgk+GtzJya8X9BpDixfJZTon69pa/irG2fQSUu+vDCUEsm8HeHXSd/FplOuOOBjCzAxTLz1DHKK6GdHa3xNntGfsai/YOQkTrPUYudKwbCWp4g= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: y2jofIQVM1l1ckYZ1nuTEGQ_IXm1leDTX3nH3ApMUDu1dJI mtJbys05Y4DdP.4Jr020EngjlI.728badSKC_vtv55xYVzUmuO.ARniLY4yd cbad0l4U1UbPgOrBrv3HsPi2f9i0OWog.gyUtfr_2xuBJan44euj5VArw9ee zgu9VJi9E83MHC7zQepN3MzJHeTR_8kTA01S_oGVibL3p8GX0uzLhYCj_r.b eyHq4VHvZOp_I5L7.AObpEG7EFbliLPl27myjmVekfu2pFGnU1AUrSmwH2dd VmNGYDQEp2_QgzXT64Mp.ESm9wfH3Hp.uDXAS25h0HdXM3.UwBEBn_cELFsw sUmXlO86P9epba2a4u50i.BZK5DVfSyeVKVLY4cVBdjBYo5RoMZYRUKU3_L. W4AhfnpYjs.4hlAcntxZGdb6cN7HczWGlGNmXKT_Vpbb5WH0wHGEHPXxIIA. jhx1fVYx7uA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BXg4crCswBA3Yst0ukKcAsjzce_hQYKGmi4Wj6Ag Received: from [192.168.0.104] (jdunham@108.82.83.232 with login) by smtp109.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2012 16:27:29 -0700 PDT From: "Jerry Dunham" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:27:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <503D53DE.25328.F71B7BB@jdunham.texas.net> Priority: normal In-reply-to: References: , <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org>, X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Cc: "Robin, Michael" Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jdunham@texas.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:27:31 -0000 On 28 Aug 2012 at 22:41, Robin, Michael wrote: > What is VIM? Where could it be downloaded? > What is CLI? I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8. > The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even > though it have a lot of hot keys. My top priority is setting > start/end block option which was available for old DOS-based text > editor, but I have not seen any window-based text editor for this > option. 16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on 64-bit > operating system. "CLI" is "command line interface", what you're calling a command prompt. I came late to Windows, having run FreeBSD exclusively for quite a few years before trying out the Dark Side. As a result, my text editor of choice on Windows is gvim. I'm currently running 7.2, and it integrates with the right-click context menu. I believe it has all the functions you need. If you've never used anything in the vi family there's a steep initial learning curve, but once you get past that it should do the job well enough to satisfy all but the most dedicated emacs users. Check out: http://www.vim.org/ I hope this helps. -- Jerry Dunham Moderator, Texas Great Dane Rescue jdunham@texas.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 23:42:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFB51065673; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324CC8FC16; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7SNfjVV012602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:41:45 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.63) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:41:45 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Robin, Michael'" , References: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:42:06 -0700 Message-ID: <0aea01cd8576$be4a54f0$3adefed0$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLOD27QfLxUNFyB2qaRGxi2iqKUwAHk/+AWAID1gRyVW5lAQA== Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.63] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-08-28_07:2012-08-28, 2012-08-28, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: dteske@freebsd.org Subject: RE: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:42:55 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Robin, Michael [mailto:robin@chapman.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:42 PM > To: 'dteske@freebsd.org'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: text editor > > What is VIM? A _much_ improved version of "vi" (vi is the ubiquitous UNIX text editor written by Bill Joy in 1976), vim itself being born in 1991 by a man named Bram Moolenaar. > Where could it be downloaded? As Polytropon mentioned, FreeBSD has a built-in software acquisition system. Executing: pkg_add -r vim will install the VIM text editor (immediately after-which you can type "rehash" -- if using [t]csh -- and then "vim FILE" to start editing files). However, I recognize the need to sometimes "know where your food comes from," so below are some links. NOTE: You need to know what version of FreeBSD you're using... For recent versions of FreeBSD: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ For older versions of FreeBSD: ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ Then under there, you'll have to select "i386" for 32-bit builds, or "amd64" for 64-bit builds (etc.). Then under there, you'll have to select your appropriate version (e.g., "8.1-RELEASE"). Then under there, you'll navigate to "packages" then either "All" or a specific sub-category. In there, you'll find "vim-VERSION" (ending in either ".tgz", ".tbz", or ".txz", depending on your version of FreeBSD; mind you the suffix matters not to your ability to install the software). You'll also find "gvim-VERSION" there too. Please keep in-mind that this is _NOT_ the recommended way of electively installing software on FreeBSD. I'm merely explaining this so that you know where software for FreeBSD comes from (loosely; I'm leaving out a lot and choosing to focus on the consumer-side of things for the benefit of clarity). > What is CLI? Before Windows and Apple, computers were told what to do without a mouse. This interface was called "the command line." It has a very rich history and is still common-place in server environments. > I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8. I'd recommend getting to know something called "Cygwin". It will allow you to run software such as VIM on Windows. The main website for Cygwin is: http://cygwin.com/ You can even run gVIM (the graphical version of VIM designed to run in the GUI) on Windows. Surely, you can run special versions of VIM on Windows _without_ Cygwin (link below), but I recommend Cygwin if you're going to program on UNIX at all (conflating your Windows environment with a UNIX-compatible environment is a convenience that many find helpful in making work more efficient). [g]VIM for MS-DOS and/or MS-Windows: http://www.vim.org/download.php#pc NOTE: There are downloads for self-installing executables for added convenience. > The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even though it > have a lot of hot keys. My top priority is setting start/end block option which was > available for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any window-based > text editor for this option. 16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on 64-bit > operating system. Have you tried compatibility mode? Win7 has a compatibility mode that it can run executables in. I think it has a compat mode that will run 16-bit DOS programs, but I must admit that I've not tried. -- Devin > Please advise. > Thank you. > > Michael > Programmer Analyst > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.teske@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of > dteske@freebsd.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM > To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: text editor > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM > > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > > Subject: text editor > > > > Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system > > On FreeBSD? > In the GUI? or on the CLI? > > > > with following > > features: > > * Support 100 percent of hot keys > > How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that suffice? > > > > * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved > > or > deleted > > without requiring any mouse lock. > > It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined > > with > navigating > > key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. > > A challenge, no-doubt. > > > > * Support special ASCII characters > > > > Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters (the > ones that don't are in the minority, imho). > > ... > > I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI). > > NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here. > -- > Devin > > _____________ > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If > you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; > (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify > the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message > addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than > the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 00:27:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5615B106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from blue.seahorse.syndicate@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4398FC1A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so8372064vbm.13 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:27:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:date:to:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:organization:message-id:user-agent; bh=nYFjNiWHj/0ZWT9GEvMH93zf1ywrrWN42N+kxkFsxZw=; b=UWFFdYH2Rmc01SzbmjfLPzG1odmamtuzTldA5RWNWF0coSOfStSQz1fr+PH6X7I6SP ot4XtR54Y/CGSKH7UmxHW+TNWrQT/iTjnnWddOIQv2DQByCDndgDm0wh7huBm+QYIBkZ 1wBbhWPGeTNB4a/0s3KdzM4DGZ7MEKAM32+ll/bjTImrkmekOfR8zom5JOuIRlW1lwKg pa19c5/iw9UX4l0+TYUKrTK1ELkS+uZWkNZ+x53Qb+QC04jfOqTG2+SsY4WgcuRIXsnX nvySeYuJj/4zk2Rlu1U0d01xHV8uoejeyKl+MA+Ett8fMT7kN84PWhdxEanBE9l1v3Yw KOFQ== Received: by 10.220.116.6 with SMTP id k6mr16208939vcq.59.1346200022334; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (pool-72-73-106-142.ptldme.east.myfairpoint.net. [72.73.106.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id be4sm11028117vdc.20.2012.08.28.17.27.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:26:59 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Lynn Steven Killingsworth" Organization: Blue Seahorse Syndicate Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD) Subject: Partitioning with gpart X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:27:03 -0000 Dear FreeBSD - I have installed PC-BSD 9.1 RC1 last week. Very nice I must say. The default file system is zfs. I have one storage disk which is ufs and another which is on an mbr partition. I thought I would format the mbr disk with zfs and move everything from the ufs disk and then format the ufs disk with zfs. I have not tried the command line before so I just tried to create over the disk with: gpart create -s gpt ada2 The message is that ada2 already exists as a file system. Show indicates that it is not gpt but mbr. Then in order to start over I tried to delete and destroy by starting with: gpart delete -i 1 ada2s1 The message is that ada2s1 is an invalid argument. I cannot experiment on my backup as it has only one disk. Comment please? -- Steve Blue Seahorse Syndicate http://www.blueleafsyndicate.org Maine & New Hampshire Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 01:33:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DD2106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB268FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7T1XGiK082649; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:33:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7T1XGLY082646; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:33:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:33:16 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Lynn Steven Killingsworth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:33:16 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Partitioning with gpart X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:33:17 -0000 On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote: > I have installed PC-BSD 9.1 RC1 last week. Very nice I must say. > > The default file system is zfs. I have one storage disk which is ufs and > another which is on an mbr partition. I thought I would format the mbr disk > with zfs and move everything from the ufs disk and then format the ufs disk > with zfs. > > I have not tried the command line before so I just tried to create over the > disk with: gpart create -s gpt ada2 > > The message is that ada2 already exists as a file system. The exact message would help; gpart is not a filesystem tool. > Show indicates that it is not gpt but mbr. > > Then in order to start over I tried to delete and destroy by starting with: > > gpart delete -i 1 ada2s1 > > The message is that ada2s1 is an invalid argument. > > I cannot experiment on my backup as it has only one disk. gpart takes a -F option to destroy which makes it unnecessary to delete all the partitions first. Back up data first, and make certain that you and the computer agree on which drive is which. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 06:38:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F901106566B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from mail.neu.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:d300:216:3eff:fe54:f1c6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311438FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [199.48.129.194]) by mail.neu.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TAcDS2008899 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:38:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:38:13 -0400 (EDT) From: AN To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at my.mail.server X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.neu.net Subject: TLS config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:38:19 -0000 Following the directions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/openssl.html Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps # openssl dsaparam -rand -genkey -out myRSA.key 1024 # openssl gendsa -des3 -out myca.key myRSA.key # openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -key myca.key -out new.crt ]# ls -l /etc/certs/ total 10 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 963 Aug 29 05:39 cert.pem -rw------- 1 root wheel 804 Aug 29 05:50 myRSA.key -rw------- 1 root wheel 1264 Aug 29 05:51 myca.key -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1773 Aug 29 05:53 new.crt -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 603 Aug 29 05:39 req.pem After restarting sendmail I get the following in /var/log/mailog Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8574]: NOQUEUE: stopping daemon, reason=signal Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8618]: starting daemon (8.14.5): SMTP+queueing@00:30:00 Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8618]: STARTTLS=server, error: SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file(/etc/certs/myca.key) failed Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8618]: STARTTLS=server: 8618:error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:648:Expecting: X509 CRL Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8618]: STARTTLS=server: 8618:error:0906406D:PEM routines:PEM_def_callback:problems getting password:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:105: Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8618]: STARTTLS=server: 8618:error:0906A068:PEM routines:PEM_do_header:bad password read:/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:406: Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8618]: STARTTLS=server: 8618:error:140B0009:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file:PEM lib:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_rsa.c:669: Aug 29 05:39:55 mail sm-mta[8618]: started as: /usr/sbin/sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m Any help is appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 07:19:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA5B1065676 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:19:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from malaysiaprint@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53F68FC1D for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so648942pbb.13 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:19:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; bh=MVPMPMOA8aKxKvuSKs6kmpZsagWNe2kQvUL/2YMUNdg=; b=RKhyo+bYLBx1s8BqFTvjztOQH5FcFgomaXvufDUn6r6nZVrX4UUC/ok5Ljxn6dcpOG NL50lx/ZN0xEzvtYSxpp6yx0F2r9HjoriGzGLX8PXU9ElK+FEPW5b9OGQVzsQiAG/t5s 3r1ZQGTlAFPV7ze8bKLTlVIMT5On8QAy1kJsR1/lB2/1NAk6OmAUhpt4ywtzkvzWaBFq 32qL26pe27v/lSNXHu9XPZ7b/lkrMW7AqlLh65Wr9T5Hmc8rfzyA278c94CtiZYtmAzi l9owJON+RhHJIS2Qv7j00Hllz3+i+mwxFrn3jVjNw9FADedHSJ3Sack3fqondTkuqjGa ycYg== Received: by 10.68.129.164 with SMTP id nx4mr2620420pbb.28.1346224759290; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EveInspironRe ([175.139.227.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ka4sm18724571pbc.61.2012.08.29.00.19.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:19:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Malaysia Printing" To: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:14:54 +0800 Message-ID: <045201cd85b6$993c4b60$cbb4e220$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0453_01CD85F9.A76298A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac2FtXQr4EqcNXWcT4iHQziYFVcTYQ== Content-Language: en-my X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: PROMOTION - Ready Made / Custom Made Calendars 2013 / Notebooks (M'sia) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:19:20 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0453_01CD85F9.A76298A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Are You looking for printing READY MADE CALENDARS, CUSTOM MADE CALENDARS or NOTEBOOKS/NOTEPADS? Contact us to find out more. We have wide selections for you to choose from. Call 1800 88 8980 / 012-387 0303 / 016-311 9648 / 03-8945 8733. Visit us at www.asiaprintmart.com or Email to info@asiaprintmart.com . ------=_NextPart_000_0453_01CD85F9.A76298A0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 07:26:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC25106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp3.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349308FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:26:00 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=ZdgeqqWyEqdsZA/6sYCsNQDiVRGgkxbcAkDgcSgWq+E= c=1 sm=0 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=ETjOp2ARZXAA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=6TIEn8HHAAAA:8 a=Gi18JsenHlYSZqfsJ5MA:9 a=AcdsImxJPJ9Yo6Ye3TGm+Q==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.34.76 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.34.76] ([74.134.34.76:54961] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 14/99-04178-104CD305; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:25:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:25:53 -0400 Message-ID: <14.99.04178.104CD305@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: dteske@freebsd.org, "Robin, Michael" Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:26:01 -0000 On getting vim text editor ("vi improved") for FreeBSD, you can either pkg_add or use the ports system, where you build from source code with a convenient setup. You can check http://www.freebsd.org/ and check the documentation, including the handbook and ports system. I've heard of Cygwin but never run it because I don't have MS-Windows installed. From what I read, it creates a Unix-like environment under MS-Windows. I hear that MS is getting rid of 16-bit DOS compatibility, so you might not be able to run DOS software under Win 7. But you can go to http://www.dosbox.com/ DOSBox can run under current Unix-like OSes and also MS-Windows. You may be able to download a win32 installer, I just found it there, would that run on 64-bit Windows? I have run (Borland) Quattro Pro 5 for DOS under Linux, NetBSD and FreeBSD with DOSBox. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 07:45:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81FB106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871918FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7T7jLgn051231 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:45:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <503DC88F.6060806@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:45:19 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:45:21 -0600 (MDT) Subject: sendmail local-host-names questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:22 -0000 Sorry if this is a bit off topic; couldn't find an answer on the net anywhere and sendmail.org seems to be non-functional unless you're a commercial customer; or at least that's the way it looks to me, as it's redirected to sendmail.com and their "Ask the Experts" page has no way to ask anybody anything :-) Anyhoo... I was setting up a virtual domain and mistakenly set my local-host-names file to have trailing dots after the domain and host names. This caused mail sent to the domain(s) to be bounced with the message: 554 5.0.0 MX list for dreamchaser.org. points back to nightmare.dreamchase r.org 554 5.3.5 Local configuration error Which caused me to tear my hair out (what little I have left) trying to fix a non-existent DNS configuration error. The maillog shows a similar message: Aug 28 23:10:05 nightmare sm-mta[50394]: q7T59w8M050394: to=ah@dreamchaser.org, delay=00:00:07, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=62332, relay=dreamchaser.org., dsn=5.3.5, stat=Local configuration error Aug 28 23:10:05 nightmare sm-mta[50394]: q7T59w8M050394: q7T59w8N050394: return to sender: Local configuration error Aug 28 23:10:05 nightmare sm-mta[50394]: q7T59w8N050394: to=ah@dreamchaser.org, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=33356, relay=dreamchaser.org., dsn=5.3.5, stat=Local configuration error Aug 28 23:10:05 nightmare sm-mta[50394]: q7T59w8M050394: Losing ./qfq7T59w8M050394: savemail panic Aug 28 23:10:05 nightmare sm-mta[50394]: q7T59w8M050394: SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere Can anyone explain what's going on or point me to a better place to ask? It's now fixed but I'd like to understand why sendmail doesn't like a domain specified with a trailing dot, since I thought that was how one specified a fully qualified domain name. Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file, and it doesn't seem to cause errors; but neither does ';' or '%' so I'm guessing the lines are just being skipped because they don't parse properly. I'd like to know whether comments are allowed or not; and if so, what the proper syntax is. Thanks for any hints, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 07:55:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55337106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp1.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0100E8FC1D for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:55:30 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=ZdgeqqWyEqdsZA/6sYCsNQDiVRGgkxbcAkDgcSgWq+E= c=1 sm=0 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=xgybLb7VNC4A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=28bguoTQAAAA:8 a=_ctWjzdLAAAA:8 a=Fr8x0r-PAAAA:8 a=HKILQ1s0v1WPlU_H_LMA:9 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=AcdsImxJPJ9Yo6Ye3TGm+Q==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.34.76 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.34.76] ([74.134.34.76:56715] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 14/9E-04178-BEACD305; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:55:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:55:23 -0400 Message-ID: <14.9E.04178.BEACD305@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Cc: Lynn Steven Killingsworth Subject: Re: Partitioning with gpart X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:55:31 -0000 from "Lynn Steven Killingsworth" : > I have installed PC-BSD 9.1 RC1 last week. Very nice I must say. > The default file system is zfs. I have one storage disk which is ufs and > another which is on an mbr partition. I thought I would format the mbr > disk with zfs and move everything from the ufs disk and then format the > ufs disk with zfs. > I have not tried the command line before so I just tried to create over > the disk with: gpart create -s gpt ada2 > The message is that ada2 already exists as a file system. > Show indicates that it is not gpt but mbr. > Then in order to start over I tried to delete and destroy by starting with: > gpart delete -i 1 ada2s1 > The message is that ada2s1 is an invalid argument. > I cannot experiment on my backup as it has only one disk. > Comment please? Either gpt (included in FreeBSD prior to the switch to gpart) or gdisk (now at v0.8.5 and in FreeBSD ports) can migrate an MBR-partitioned disk to GPT without loss of data in many cases, though backing up is still advised. You can find information about gdisk at http://www.rodsbooks.com/gdisk/ gdisk is much more versatile than gpart, can be used to make partitions for Windows, Linux, NetBSD, etc. I don't think you can get gpt for FreeBSD, but if you're curious, you can go to http://www.netbsd.org/ and look for the documentation/man pages. It was gpt in NetBSD that I used to migrate an NTFS partition (MBR) spanning an entire 3 TB Western Digital My Book USB 3.0 hard drive to GPT, no data was lost. I subsequently booted Linux from the System Rescue CD (http://sysresccd.org/) and copied the software/data to a USB stick so I could free the USB 3.0 hard drive for better things. Maybe I could have done the repartitioning with gdisk, which is included on the System Rescue CD, this would be Linux. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 09:20:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4073A1065673 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE0D8FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.idefix.lan (ppp-93-104-85-5.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.85.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by anny.lostinspace.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7T9KkZ3087183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:20:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABEA6F679; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:20:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fechner.net Received: from server.idefix.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (server.idefix.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qSd6NTSQx6wY; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:20:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from matthias-fechners-macbook.local (ppp-93-104-85-5.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.85.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9B0F6F66F; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:20:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <503DDEE5.7000505@fechner.net> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:20:37 +0200 From: Matthias Fechner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: AN References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (anny.lostinspace.de [80.190.182.2]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:20:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on anny.lostinspace.de Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TLS config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:20:58 -0000 Am 29.08.12 12:38, schrieb AN: > Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps I use: cd /etc/mail/certs Create a CA: - Edit /etc/ssl/openssl.cfn -> default_days = 1825 - Generate CAcertificate -> /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -newca cp demoCA/cacert.pem . Create a key: /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -newreq Remove passphrase from key: openssl rsa -in newkey.pem -out key.pem Sign key: /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -sign Set permissions: chmod 0600 * Sendmail: define(`confCACERT_PATH',`/etc/mail/certs') define(`confCACERT',`/etc/mail/certs/cacert.pem') define(`confSERVER_CERT',`/etc/mail/certs/newcert.pem') define(`confSERVER_KEY',`/etc/mail/certs/key.pem') define(`confCLIENT_CERT',`/etc/mail/certs/newreq.pem') define(`confCLIENT_KEY',`/etc/mail/certs/key.pem') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl Bye, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 09:38:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2001065675 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thciobanu@nth.ro) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F708FC1B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so229256bkc.13 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:38:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nth.ro; s=ga; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fDdAGiyD51sQNZlkBQx4Vku6PdCvqynQTrEJ20efxWY=; b=kOqIbVrX2MzZBwBRhyNIzO5Vibkn+tb7LAgP3m/uRKTFssw8olBkXU5Y0qcqtngvL0 eDVmXnZ7BedapNFHC/2kHpWoDBDCl/Z3sfKG4Ci4hXs9MIFPbxdzqPDNLbXSnPxpEpZ+ T5Gt2HRI73cOZwSQpvODPh+O8gtG1lkGmqrig= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=fDdAGiyD51sQNZlkBQx4Vku6PdCvqynQTrEJ20efxWY=; b=GlzeecT1z0w3i5cjoT/azNB6hLlza3FhPKawd2krjK1VO6yVSxkkf9si29gyETzS2w 7AZW6K8IopdoMDcf2KqJ9fxLcVYGMpobefZ5Y+W6ONBUViQVmIPKaw/+7MqfbBqPoY9L VdYMj0gwnDeLQ/V2N1MMOI2vrVKKZBCL7IL4Tcr6BiYgWuQBMn/IJ8EYOe9UJ+bNLXOB +7uOP3Jz/VM++QHxItju87dEwruAGwLsUqHoyrhxGMEWB4fJwvLbbIGcYKIHw3HiGoKU o9Yg0/+8Tas8lMLzW9aMrd/FhOjF5WO/FUrdd1Ed3AmvPsLSkF8MOLmwgUgv+ED17A+M WYEQ== Received: by 10.205.136.3 with SMTP id ii3mr480152bkc.101.1346233106768; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown ([86.121.79.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id he8sm14595708bkc.3.2012.08.29.02.38.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:37:32 +0300 From: Theodor-Iulian Ciobanu To: "Robin, Michael" Message-ID: <20120829123732.00006e3c@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.8; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJZF2HxBCvufN2YTNVXfhnAjHybels3zXjaZYjp9tj52DAJGorYPRQpNVgrGbXxb5MQROo Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:38:29 -0000 On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:41:52 +0000 "Robin, Michael" wrote: > What is VIM? Where could it be downloaded? > What is CLI? I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for > Windows 7/8. The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting > option even though it have a lot of hot keys. You might want to check out SciTE as well (GUI editor). It's available from ports in editors/scite and the Windows version can be downloaded from: http://www.scintilla.org/SciTEDownload.html > My top priority is setting start/end block option which was available > for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any window-based > text editor for this option. 16-bit DOS text editor program will not > run on 64-bit operating system. Please advise. Thank you. None of the current 64bit versions of Windows include NTVDM (the DOS emulator). > Michael > Programmer Analyst > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.teske@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of > dteske@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM > To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: text editor > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM > > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > > Subject: text editor > > > > Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system > > On FreeBSD? > In the GUI? or on the CLI? > > > > with following > > features: > > * Support 100 percent of hot keys > > How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that > suffice? > > > > * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, > > moved or > deleted > > without requiring any mouse lock. > > It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined > > with > navigating > > key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. > > A challenge, no-doubt. > > > > * Support special ASCII characters > > > > Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII > characters (the ones that don't are in the minority, imho). > > ... > > I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI). > > NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 09:55:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0F6106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:55:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CDA8FC1B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7T9trj8088368 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:55:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7T9tr4L088367 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:55:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:55:53 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120829095552.GD81304@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503DC88F.6060806@dreamchaser.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <503DC88F.6060806@dreamchaser.org> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: sendmail local-host-names questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:55:56 -0000 [ Gary Aitken wrote on Wed 29.Aug'12 at 1:45:19 -0600 ] > > Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the > local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file, > and it doesn't seem to cause errors; but neither does ';' or '%' so I'm > guessing the lines are just being skipped because they don't parse properly. > I'd like to know whether comments are allowed or not; and if so, > what the proper syntax is. > > Thanks for any hints, > > Gary Hi Gary, you don't put dots at the end of the domain names in that file. In mine, i've just got: kontrol.kode5.net # the hostname of the machine; and kode5.net # my domain I haven't put those comments in it either, just the host and domain information. The Sendmail site does have quite a bit of information actually about configuration. I was setting up Sendmail on my machine just a week ago in fact and got most of the info from that site. Also the FreeBSD handbook. I also run a local DNS server (BIND/named) which I recommend you look into with a view to setting it up. It does make a difference, especially if you have several machines on your LAN. It's not as hard as it first appears. In fact the default installation is already configured for a local caching nameserver. I have added my own zone files as well which is all explained on the Handbook. Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 10:04:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27211065703 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4E08FC1E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TA4Qdi089232 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7TA4Qp7089231 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:26 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120829100426.GE81304@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503DDEE5.7000505@fechner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <503DDEE5.7000505@fechner.net> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: TLS config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:04:29 -0000 [ Matthias Fechner wrote on Wed 29.Aug'12 at 11:20:37 +0200 ] > Am 29.08.12 12:38, schrieb AN: > > Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps > > I use: > cd /etc/mail/certs > > > Create a CA: > > - Edit /etc/ssl/openssl.cfn -> default_days = 1825 > - Generate CAcertificate > -> /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -newca > cp demoCA/cacert.pem . > > Create a key: > > /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -newreq > > Remove passphrase from key: > > openssl rsa -in newkey.pem -out key.pem > > Sign key: > > /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -sign > > Set permissions: > > chmod 0600 * > > Sendmail: > > define(`confCACERT_PATH',`/etc/mail/certs') > define(`confCACERT',`/etc/mail/certs/cacert.pem') > define(`confSERVER_CERT',`/etc/mail/certs/newcert.pem') > define(`confSERVER_KEY',`/etc/mail/certs/key.pem') > define(`confCLIENT_CERT',`/etc/mail/certs/newreq.pem') > define(`confCLIENT_KEY',`/etc/mail/certs/key.pem') > > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl > > Bye, > Matthias That's very handy info, I am planning on setting up TLS for sendmail myself. So thanks to the OP for asking that question, although i'm sure there's loads of info on the net as well. I've only used Postfix before now, but since installing FBSD on this machine I thought i'd stick to using base MTA. Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 13:24:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12A61065673 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from blue.seahorse.syndicate@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928BF8FC1E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadc11 with SMTP id c11so3827172qad.13 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:24:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:organization:message-id:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=5/u5jDzxGp0N/WFwPC8eyN6lz7l45jBo/tAZOlNg8Sc=; b=sbI02hj2mr59qzincGFGAI42F02B4/qGZ3Rhq5VFTElpENG9qudlrZyAiEgyl5UaGI YthLrYSlDTBk6PyNz2/yo0VPBOTXXKDGPlisd7jAoqBD7NXpjA9ifjlFzxXYFeUcOXcu EUb0OwDhRoPS4MVSYvZ1oRRGgOu91UH4GrdYITBvmS9sDAkTejhM92eZonRn8exHUD0f Kr3GqAoCLBeyt+GrWbamoNR9CjXTg3SHmuVmf7AeQnHoapKXNWc77K868wiut6PFFIw6 hisPc/RWsPrfW4BXWSPhaw0uErfWyRjK36besfDcOdEVmYw+pTQ6Y3aXfq9ea/kDgtSQ 8DgA== Received: by 10.229.134.206 with SMTP id k14mr805809qct.25.1346246682249; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (pool-72-65-100-235.ptldme.east.myfairpoint.net. [72.65.100.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm18212264qap.16.2012.08.29.06.24.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Warren Block" References: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:24:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Lynn Steven Killingsworth" Organization: Blue Seahorse Syndicate Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Partitioning with gpart X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:24:49 -0000 On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:33:16 -0400, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote: > >> I have installed PC-BSD 9.1 RC1 last week. Very nice I must say. >> >> The default file system is zfs. I have one storage disk which is ufs >> and another which is on an mbr partition. I thought I would format the >> mbr disk with zfs and move everything from the ufs disk and then format >> the ufs disk with zfs. >> >> I have not tried the command line before so I just tried to create over >> the disk with: gpart create -s gpt ada2 >> >> The message is that ada2 already exists as a file system. > > The exact message would help; gpart is not a filesystem tool. > >> Show indicates that it is not gpt but mbr. >> >> Then in order to start over I tried to delete and destroy by starting >> with: >> >> gpart delete -i 1 ada2s1 >> >> The message is that ada2s1 is an invalid argument. >> >> I cannot experiment on my backup as it has only one disk. > > gpart takes a -F option to destroy which makes it unnecessary to delete > all the partitions first. Back up data first, and make certain that you > and the computer agree on which drive is which. Great. My storage disks are formatted with zfs and my files are moved. Thanks. -- Steve Blue Seahorse Syndicate http://www.blueleafsyndicate.org Maine & New Hampshire Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 13:28:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90A51065784 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E2C8FC23 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23888A71578 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:27:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22066 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2012 13:27:46 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 29077, pid: 20367, t: 0.1637s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Aug 2012 13:27:46 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AD08F33C24; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:27:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Jack Stone References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:27:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> (Jack Stone's message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:14:09 -0500") Message-ID: <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:28:32 -0000 Jack Stone writes: > uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD > 7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009 > > Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!) > This is a production server. > > > Been playing catchup on ports including perl as UPDATING recommends: > portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* > > That has worked on other servers, but not this one. Anyone know what I > need to do to clean this up?? > > But, can't get past this fatal error: > mail# portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive > specification: "WITHOUT_" > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive > specification: "WITHOUT_" > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > ** Makefile possibly broken: lang/perl5.12: You're almost four years past the end-of-life on the release you're running, so it's been left behind in terms of support. In this case it looks (based on a *very* quick look) that you may be running into changes in how make(1) actually works, in which case backporting the ports functionality will be more work than it's worth. If the machine "can't" be updated, and assuming it's secure (which hard to be sure about with old software on the Internet), you may be best off leaving it alone. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 13:31:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C551065675 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A848FC24 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.39]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D018A702D7 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:31:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 28839 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2012 13:31:55 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 23540, pid: 17964, t: 0.1492s scanners: clamav: m: Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Aug 2012 13:31:55 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2314533C25; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:31:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Venkat Duvvuru References: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:31:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Venkat Duvvuru's message of "Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:52:19 +0530") Message-ID: <44a9xd3juc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inbox driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:31:57 -0000 Venkat Duvvuru writes: > If a driver module misses the deadline to make it inbox , I think that it's > gonna be part of the next Freebsd release. The sources show up in the svn > repository, probably this is one confirmation that it's gonna be part of > the next release..Is my understanding correct? Please clarify. I don't know what you mean about "inbox," but basically you're right. It's a bit more complicated, though, because the svn repository has several "branches" -- and a feature introduced to 10.x, for example, may or not show up in 9.x. If a feature is introduced into HEAD, you can be pretty sure it will make it into some release eventually. Does that help? I tried to keep it brief... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 13:56:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E271065670 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5C28FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6ikc-0004ds-D3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:10 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6ikb-00050c-Sx for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:10 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TDu8MM055577 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7TDu7wO055575 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:07 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201208291356.q7TDu7wO055575@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: reduce priority of large port builds, e.g. firefox, gcc4x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:56:17 -0000 Is it possible to reduce priority of port building processes with something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)? Here's a typical scenario for a large build (actually building gcc-4.7 and firefox in parallel): last pid: 54736; load averages: 5.27, 5.38, 5.11 up 9+15:37:09 14:49:11 89 processes: 7 running, 79 sleeping, 2 zombie, 1 waiting CPU 0: 19.9% user, 46.3% nice, 33.8% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 1: 15.4% user, 39.7% nice, 44.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 1141M Active, 3853M Inact, 1097M Wired, 128K Cache, 823M Buf, 1914M Free Swap: 13G Total, 16K Used, 13G Free PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 54720 0 1 89 10 111M 102M RUN 1 0:04 24.07% cc1plus 11 0 16 -76 - 0K 512K WAIT 0 26:55 11.33% intr 54732 0 1 85 10 87976K 77872K RUN 0 0:01 11.28% cc1plus 3289 1001 10 20 0 515M 387M uwait 0 163:26 3.47% firefox-bin 54721 1001 1 20 0 13656K 11744K CPU0 0 0:00 0.10% top 54731 0 1 49 10 14440K 12064K wait 0 0:00 0.10% g++ 54736 0 1 52 0 11240K 9856K biowr 0 0:00 0.00% as 54734 0 1 42 0 12176K 10992K wait 0 0:00 0.00% c++ 54735 0 1 72 0 17696K 11336K CPU1 1 0:00 0.00% cc1plus At such loads the system is noticeably slower. I'm not sure if nice has the same effect on all child processes, or only on the parent process? I'd like to set the make process and all its child processes to run only when there is some idle CPU. Is it feasible? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 14:07:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FAC106566B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.224.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AADB8FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AMD620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q7TE7L5Z017478; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:07:27 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:07:21 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Message-ID: <20120829210721.141dcf18@AMD620.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <201208291356.q7TDu7wO055575@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201208291356.q7TDu7wO055575@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reduce priority of large port builds, e.g. firefox, gcc4x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:07:49 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:07 +0100 (BST) Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Is it possible to reduce priority > of port building processes with > something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)? > > Here's a typical scenario for a large build > (actually building gcc-4.7 and firefox in parallel): > > last pid: 54736; load averages: 5.27, 5.38, > 5.11 up 9+15:37:09 14:49:11 89 processes: 7 > running, 79 sleeping, 2 zombie, 1 waiting CPU 0: 19.9% user, 46.3% > nice, 33.8% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle CPU 1: 15.4% user, > 39.7% nice, 44.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 1141M > Active, 3853M Inact, 1097M Wired, 128K Cache, 823M Buf, 1914M Free > Swap: 13G Total, 16K Used, 13G Free > > PID UID THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU > COMMAND 54720 0 1 89 10 111M 102M RUN 1 0:04 > 24.07% cc1plus 11 0 16 -76 - 0K 512K WAIT 0 > 26:55 11.33% intr 54732 0 1 85 10 87976K 77872K RUN > 0 0:01 11.28% cc1plus 3289 1001 10 20 0 515M 387M > uwait 0 163:26 3.47% firefox-bin 54721 1001 1 20 0 > 13656K 11744K CPU0 0 0:00 0.10% top 54731 0 1 49 > 10 14440K 12064K wait 0 0:00 0.10% g++ 54736 0 1 > 52 0 11240K 9856K biowr 0 0:00 0.00% as 54734 0 1 > 42 0 12176K 10992K wait 0 0:00 0.00% c++ 54735 0 > 1 72 0 17696K 11336K CPU1 1 0:00 0.00% cc1plus > > At such loads the system is noticeably slower. > I'm not sure if nice has the same effect on > all child processes, or only on the parent > process? > > I'd like to set the make process > and all its child processes to run only > when there is some idle CPU. Is it feasible? > why should the command 'nice ...' not work. It worked for me when I have had a single CPU machine without problems. The only difference was that I packed it into a script. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 14:56:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7A6106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDBE8FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T6jge-00085z-A5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:56:08 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:56:08 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:56:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:55:57 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <201208291356.q7TDu7wO055575@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4E59BCAD24CE4A1FA6DBB4BF" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120213 Thunderbird/10.0 In-Reply-To: <201208291356.q7TDu7wO055575@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Subject: Re: reduce priority of large port builds, e.g. firefox, gcc4x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:11 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4E59BCAD24CE4A1FA6DBB4BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/08/2012 15:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Is it possible to reduce priority > of port building processes with > something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)? Sure, I do it all the time. You may even want to make a shell alias in your cshrc, i.e. alias make nice +19 make (or something like it) --------------enig4E59BCAD24CE4A1FA6DBB4BF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA+LX0ACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSw/cACffXTUnFyqSqkqjwNUf+rP3uDx ci8AnRUQdMqIneYOP28QH93UTD0JgZiU =XLJs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4E59BCAD24CE4A1FA6DBB4BF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 15:08:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2F106566C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D248FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TF8Ug4012395 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:08:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host 99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21] claimed to be [192.168.1.67] Message-ID: <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:08:33 -0500 From: Jack Stone User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:08:31 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-10.00 required=4.50 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 4.5 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule | -10 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Subject: Re: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:08:37 -0000 On 8/29/2012 8:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Jack Stone writes: > >> uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD >> 7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009 >> >> Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!) >> This is a production server. >> >> >> Been playing catchup on ports including perl as UPDATING recommends: >> portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* >> >> That has worked on other servers, but not this one. Anyone know what I >> need to do to clean this up?? >> >> But, can't get past this fatal error: >> mail# portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* >> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive >> specification: "WITHOUT_" >> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive >> specification: "WITHOUT_" >> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue >> ** Makefile possibly broken: lang/perl5.12: > You're almost four years past the end-of-life on the release you're > running, so it's been left behind in terms of support. In this case it > looks (based on a *very* quick look) that you may be running into > changes in how make(1) actually works, in which case backporting the > ports functionality will be more work than it's worth. > > If the machine "can't" be updated, and assuming it's secure (which hard > to be sure about with old software on the Internet), you may be best off > leaving it alone. > > Good luck. > > Thanks for the reply. Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12 installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in increments to get well past EOL. Wonder if I just deinstalled the old perl5-5.10 and then installed the perl5-12 would work. I can do that right from the port: make perl5-12 first to see if that works, then: # make deinstall (perl-5.10) then: make install clean What do you think? I've got to move up because an important perl program requires a minimum 5.12. -- -- All the best, Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 15:37:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36571065670 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7207E8FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7TFGU7C010873 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:16:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201208291516.q7TFGU7C010873@x.it.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <10871.1346253390.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:16:30 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Building a Headless FreeBSD Virtual System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:37:24 -0000 I am using Oracle's VirtualBox package for the Mac. It is free and I am not sure that Dollars would get past the issue I have, here. VirtualBox uses Microsoft's remote desktop as the one and only output channel to allow remote access to the virtual system one is creating and this is really bad design for computer users who are blind and use screen readers. Pictures of text just don't work. If you had some very complex system with OCR, it might sort of work, but such systems don't exist as a drop-in for a good old ASCII terminal so that's not an option. So far, I downloaded the bootonly ISO image of FreeBSD9.0, mounted it and added the following loader.conf: boot_multicons="YES" boot_serial="YES" comconsole_speed="115200" console="comconsole,vidconsole" vesa_load="YES" Next, I used VirtualBoxmanage to define the disk and create the machine with a virtual IDE controller that is pointed to the ISO image for FreeBSD9.0 with the serial console. Has anybody been able to use VirtualBox and a fake serial console to get around the remote desktop non solution? I will probably have to add a virtual serial port in the machine definition one puts in the original machine build, but I am not sure this doesn't just go to that remote desktop channel where it gets scrubbed of any usefulness except for eyeballs on screens. This whole thing looks very promising but there's got to be a way around that shoe which doesn't fit in the form of that GUI remote desk top. In my case, the machine build goes without error but I can't tell yet if it is even booting. Mac's, by the way, have a relatively good screen reader built in but VirtualBox doesn't work with it, something that is a problem with a number of third-party programs especially when they were originally developed for Windows. This, of course, does not pertain to the main topic of this list, but I say it here so that you know I am aware you are supposed to be able to use the GUI on the Mac to manage your new virtual system. Essentially, the local GUI and the remote desktop don't work for me for the same reasons. My hope is to get FreeBSD running as a guest system on a powerful Mac and retire an old Dell server with noisy fans and several BTU of heat output which is in the realm of 15 years old and will probably retire itself at some random date in the future. Thank you for any good suggestions. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 15:42:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7921065670 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devnullaccount@yahoo.se) Received: from nm13-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm13-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [77.238.189.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 231258FC20 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.234] by nm13.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Aug 2012 15:42:56 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.239] by tm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Aug 2012 15:42:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Aug 2012 15:42:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 829424.93196.bm@omp1004.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 68436 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Aug 2012 15:42:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.se; s=s1024; t=1346254976; bh=nNYJbTUMFELBuN7KkmwibDzciYlzBUbiJgu2Kkc+5oM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=euwo8xsUFFMz/23irMaFPZWkSAOd7ZVqtM+bRCcvjhYLFGVhO6hB90UrhLGViT/4Dw5B4+s6uTbUgPGihmBUyMrYWaEEhLETg5JhWjebCY1WcNTnWaoT3HyoFuZDZjEqIq/QAQxLw+T0cp+XPjAj9nbMTuQGA9bgprrDamrmqIo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.se; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mDkoxOQFI1g/EBebbtvF8vYwNGEGI4vYMrN2QG6ryNz5C7J4EP7CEhdCvflWJ4npiUzOa69mO/9GNsYvz4FE3fxHP9entVjrT3/7UQ0fmZgIjGOmDcW8NPurvIliG3AYfX/9BH0eNiT2+h6cB7JNoT4GJwoKVfZJV8XaEqZb5pE=; X-YMail-OSG: .6ERjkkVM1moR_sB7hEvRTCy7npc5ubHVkjni5obzh5_kHR 0tfpJ4Evp3Yr4pFQrBTzVv_I1k5WuBSSnYoU.Namma3fpnQorDFFWC6eISs2 t9.IBtZzioYpS44M7pck_4uRBxtN0nvJhYRCm9qKOefSj.VY4s4S3ftIOJwm YQKQ78j0KOeeQEZ9laBGs6YJV2xauVvX1rNW0HV6S.2WjTycTlxCQ82wFWOO uOOqFd1kmPjvBbxxzl8g02G72D3T6QhBX8ypAL34_WBVfWWTGNKEIV66UQTP Wv5CsL04d5d48xuiV_qk1HzvCaiImzLd6jYT6j27xHJx2uJihwpkStqAJwXI 740CVq47z.ykdbJGJgGkOs220dXMNzSjhp0NGPLpXSkXbiaArjc0JfF5SlIs fKtaYw_vzkXGnr19JTOXO6A05q5lXZ0ya9.n4JwuTPjtraoxdznxe1SmZPK6 JZsR8kmfSlmdam_pUAUZC5S1lxJ1.XQgUcJGGo7pU2hTphywMK574kz1NKZz JaLptRRaLivzHLO_KPhtexhPV8FVDdoZDsCD7wzJR_cssGRFqe7FxSZXrfwq LXY_NuhFUzzjKHEUeLOVlVAHZhJAP_fizr3qqVqxl4pjd1pYQFSu53UqApnZ vdZrCl5jr_wyQWl1EYhlvjpKmw2hp7Sixk4rczca1_119Qg-- Received: from [213.113.0.135] by web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:42:56 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416 Message-ID: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:42:56 +0100 (BST) From: Chris To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:42:58 -0000 Hi,=0A=0A=0AI've tried to search the lists but can't find anything, but ple= ase point me to an existing resource if available.=0A=0AI recently got a Le= novo ThinkPad Edge E530 (3259-9VG) laptop and would like to get the Wifi ca= rd running (fresh FreeBSD 9.0 install), but I'm failling as it has been at = least 5 years since I used with wifi under FreeBSD. The card is not automat= ically detected (interface not listed in ifconfig) so I'm assuming I have t= o either load a kernel module or go the NDIS path. It seems like on Windows= , the same driver is used for E430, E435, E530 and E535, so in case anyone = is using one of these models, please let me know if have things running.=0A= =0ASo some questions that might point me in the right direction:=0A=0A- How= can I find out which type of card this laptop actually has (can I read it = out of dmesg, some PCI listing or whatever)? =0A=A0 All I can find are prod= uct sheets saying that it has 11b/g/n, but doesn't help me to find a driver= . I=0A=A0 Is there some "meta-module" that loads all the native wifi driver= s that I can use that I can test?=0A- If I need to use NDIS emulation, does= anyone think it will work for this model/card? Windows drivers can be foun= d here http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/product-and-parts/default.page).=0A= =A0 The handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/config-netwo= rk-setup.html#CONFIG-NETWORK-NDIS) says I need Win XP drivers, is that old = text or do I need that? I can't find XP drivers on the lenovo page...=0A- I= f NDIS should be possible, how do I extract the .sys and .inf file from the= exe that I downloaded from the URL above (I don't have any Windows machine= right now).=0A=0ATIA,=0A=A0 Chris=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 15:52:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E751065686 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryanrfrederick@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ED88FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebc12 with SMTP id c12so329753ieb.13 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:52:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HHewZwJe2VjO5hTCurLY99lZzIgfoFtwlZYJtisriqs=; b=A0eLsNq1sWGw58D5eQIzX2YA7M6p7RNhyLbpUswoqwHzvLkMqzjaoqLl6KWcDVf0TK H80y7Z/n9tUYkmlBFVk78aq/GjfUtp5OObUg2DfjiGwf+ylWw+q2FsDBaiNJn5rnesUq LWK0upz413OW2rE+lK9Byu3yeiMVRzXqW9hM+MFg5qFKVTYkqOvhGjg0m5wdqMptVAhZ c8Yz9i65yuWYj3gvGwYWjNPZLeURxKspJbd9A84hlNwwMQ+ihIngzm3a79/+XzSOCplB GvLjWI/8lST6h8Q/WMUs4auoQ60spi1IALi6ykQgTcb1eUWdUI694dX0xEhBdoMjB6iG oOuA== Received: by 10.50.152.141 with SMTP id uy13mr2152877igb.64.1346255533087; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2610:1d8:a03:1:d267:e5ff:fe44:3b30? ([2610:1d8:a03:1:d267:e5ff:fe44:3b30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ua5sm7379864igb.10.2012.08.29.08.52.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503E3AAB.4020505@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:52:11 -0500 From: Ryan Frederick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201208291516.q7TFGU7C010873@x.it.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <201208291516.q7TFGU7C010873@x.it.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Building a Headless FreeBSD Virtual System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:52:14 -0000 When you define the virtual serial port in VirtualBox for the guest VM one of the options available for connection of the port to the host system is a named pipe (I believe it's called "Host Pipe" in the configuration). You can then specify whatever named pipe on the host system you wish to attach the VM's serial port to then use a utility such as `socat` to present the I/O from the named pipe as a PTY device. From there it's simply a matter of using a utility such as `cu` or `screen` to connect to the PTY. Ryan On 08/29/2012 10:16 AM, Martin McCormick wrote: > I am using Oracle's VirtualBox package for the Mac. It is free and I > am not sure that Dollars would get past the issue I have, here. > > VirtualBox uses Microsoft's remote desktop as the one > and only output channel to allow remote access to the virtual > system one is creating and this is really bad design for > computer users who are blind and use screen readers. Pictures of > text just don't work. If you had some very complex system with > OCR, it might sort of work, but such systems don't exist as a > drop-in for a good old ASCII terminal so that's not an option. > > So far, I downloaded the bootonly ISO image of > FreeBSD9.0, mounted it and added the following loader.conf: > > boot_multicons="YES" > boot_serial="YES" > comconsole_speed="115200" > console="comconsole,vidconsole" > vesa_load="YES" > > Next, I used VirtualBoxmanage to define the disk and > create the machine with a virtual IDE controller that is pointed > to the ISO image for FreeBSD9.0 with the serial console. > > Has anybody been able to use VirtualBox and a fake > serial console to get around the remote desktop non solution? > > I will probably have to add a virtual serial port in the > machine definition one puts in the original machine build, but I > am not sure this doesn't just go to that remote desktop channel > where it gets scrubbed of any usefulness except for eyeballs on > screens. > > This whole thing looks very promising but there's got to > be a way around that shoe which doesn't fit in the form of that > GUI remote desk top. > > In my case, the machine build goes without error but I > can't tell yet if it is even booting. > > Mac's, by the way, have a relatively good screen reader > built in but VirtualBox doesn't work with it, something that is > a problem with a number of third-party programs especially when > they were originally developed for Windows. This, of course, > does not pertain to the main topic of this list, but I say it > here so that you know I am aware you are supposed to be able to > use the GUI on the Mac to manage your new virtual system. > Essentially, the local GUI and the remote desktop don't work for > me for the same reasons. > > My hope is to get FreeBSD running as a guest system on > a powerful Mac and retire an old Dell server with noisy fans and > several BTU of heat output which is in the realm of 15 years old > and will probably retire itself at some random date in the > future. > > Thank you for any good suggestions. > > Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK > Systems Engineer > OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 16:05:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6DC106567A; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EDA8FC1D; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth2.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.94] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6klQ-0000NL-8E; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:05:22 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6klQ-0007aG-2K; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:05:08 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TG57Fl026191; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:05:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7TG570g026190; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:05:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:05:07 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201208291605.q7TG570g026190@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ivoras@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.3 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Subject: Re: reduce priority of large port builds, e.g. firefox, gcc4x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:05:29 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 29 16:52:53 2012 > Is it possible to reduce priority > of port building processes with > something like "nice +19 make" (tcsh syntax)? Sure, I do it all the time. ok, thanks. I'll try it next time. Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 16:14:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06151106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from oceanpt.safeport.com (oceanpt.safeport.com [65.122.17.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA588FC18 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oceanpt.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q7TGEHov008382 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:14:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:14:17 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (oceanpt.safeport.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:14:17 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Subject: 9.0 support for RealTek NIC - re0 driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:14:24 -0000 This card is on a Dell Inspiron. It works perfectly on 8.x. Dmesg on 8.2 reports it as: re0: pciconf: re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x04341028 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'Realtek 10/100/1000 PCI-E NIC Family all in one NDIS Driver v5.728.0604.2009 06/04/2009 (Rtl8023)' class = network subclass = ethernet On 9.0 I got it to work once or twice out of a couple of dozen tries. 9.0 dmesg reports: re0: RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S PCI ... The release docs imply the card is supported. I did not see a PR. Anyone else with similiar issues? _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 16:33:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4667106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@suki.ishpeck.net) Received: from suki.ishpeck.net (67-222-225-246.static.orml012.digis.net [67.222.225.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 622538FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8432 invoked by uid 1031); 29 Aug 2012 16:26:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:26:45 -0600 From: Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120829162645.GA27144@suki.ishpeck.net> References: <1631524.1NBtPO5guz@freebsd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1631524.1NBtPO5guz@freebsd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: GTK and black window content X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:33:27 -0000 On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:43:45AM +0200, Stephan Schindel wrote: > I have sometimes a problem with GTK applications such as Firefox, Thunderbird > and some others too: The whole application window gets almost black and the > only fix is to reboot the system. I am using KDE (disabled composite) as my > Desktop and I have got a Nvidia card (propr. driver). > > Does this happen to you as well? Sometimes pidgin stops drawing for me. The program still runs. I noticed that even tho' I can't see it, I can send IM's to my contacts. They get the text but the window stays blank (just the widget background color). Sometimes I've had to restart X. I've never had to reboot the computer to get this fixed. I'm using naked openbox (no desktop environment). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 16:51:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82F3106566B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FFF8FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx56 with SMTP id x56so645886wey.13 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:51:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=clBfqTjGEml1w0hj2I3h1QNtObXWsGAE1S1s5esV400=; b=Kdq4EFXWqEYnNPI3h86PHj9FlCOW2MBmcXHCJwttGbHDVKBcDcRz5ffWIjlQnDo6mX hmFaeKFbTyIk4J2nFQsfX3JNsrInf36LEzI7BE6sv5VWefJz1sLx/m4u2V5x8kUcj5tR GyUCOyLkshC1mzRiuQkTWq45wSpyPkUMrsRZTpWsZKS2mL4wCVweicpOf8cZOgBsmx5f kMSZmsEXhV6YaD3i7GCuVWgYap2POzqaNEnqt2+eE+oZ8XT9sqXbAafoB0JGUOVyG1jp s4NdQxBmcHkl5LIAlxXaLOuM4ywb9hql785vxyRjfHqWnxZLISBOeh0lIsolLFNRl9N7 86UA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.93.68 with SMTP id cs4mr41540806wib.14.1346259072092; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.153 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.153 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Chris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:51:13 -0000 On Aug 29, 2012 8:44 AM, "Chris" wrote: > > Hi, > > > I've tried to search the lists but can't find anything, but please point me to an existing resource if available. > > I recently got a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530 (3259-9VG) laptop and would like to get the Wifi card running (fresh FreeBSD 9.0 install), but I'm failling as it has been at least 5 years since I used with wifi under FreeBSD. The card is not automatically detected (interface not listed in ifconfig) so I'm assuming I have to either load a kernel module or go the NDIS path. It seems like on Windows, the same driver is used for E430, E435, E530 and E535, so in case anyone is using one of these models, please let me know if have things running. > > So some questions that might point me in the right direction: > > - How can I find out which type of card this laptop actually has (can I read it out of dmesg, some PCI listing or whatever)? > All I can find are product sheets saying that it has 11b/g/n, but doesn't help me to find a driver. I > Is there some "meta-module" that loads all the native wifi drivers that I can use that I can test? > - If I need to use NDIS emulation, does anyone think it will work for this model/card? Windows drivers can be found here http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/product-and-parts/default.page). > The handbook ( http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/config-network-setup.html#CONFIG-NETWORK-NDIS) says I need Win XP drivers, is that old text or do I need that? I can't find XP drivers on the lenovo page... > - If NDIS should be possible, how do I extract the .sys and .inf file from the exe that I downloaded from the URL above (I don't have any Windows machine right now). > > TIA, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" hi, you can usually find "replacement wifi cards" for your model on ebay, this can give you an idea of the chipset. also, you could always pull off the panel and look at the card. ndis can be tricky because it needs an "older" 32 bit driver, and you need to run a 32 bit version of FreeBSD. a good solution is to find a ralink or atheros card on ebay and swap it out, usually will cost less than 10 bucks USD. Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 17:59:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4640B106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail3.networktest.com (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2309E8FC1B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [69.55.234.104]) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A832560D4 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.networktest.com ([69.55.234.104]) by localhost (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62418-08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp146.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [205.147.16.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFAE52560D3 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503E5872.9050805@networktest.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:59:14 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> In-Reply-To: <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:59:18 -0000 On 8/29/12 8:08 AM, Jack Stone wrote: > On 8/29/2012 8:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Jack Stone writes: >> >>> uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD >>> 7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009 >>> >>> Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!) >>> This is a production server. >>> >>> >>> Been playing catchup on ports including perl as UPDATING recommends: >>> portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* >>> >>> That has worked on other servers, but not this one. Anyone know what I >>> need to do to clean this up?? >>> >>> But, can't get past this fatal error: >>> mail# portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* >>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive >>> specification: "WITHOUT_" >>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive >>> specification: "WITHOUT_" >>> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue >>> ** Makefile possibly broken: lang/perl5.12: >> You're almost four years past the end-of-life on the release you're >> running, so it's been left behind in terms of support. In this case it >> looks (based on a *very* quick look) that you may be running into >> changes in how make(1) actually works, in which case backporting the >> ports functionality will be more work than it's worth. >> >> If the machine "can't" be updated, and assuming it's secure (which hard >> to be sure about with old software on the Internet), you may be best off >> leaving it alone. >> >> Good luck. >> >> > Thanks for the reply. > > Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12 > installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in > increments to get well past EOL. > > Wonder if I just deinstalled the old perl5-5.10 and then installed the > perl5-12 would work. I can do that right from the port: make perl5-12 > first to see if that works, then: > # make deinstall (perl-5.10) then: make install clean If you're using portmaster, you should be able to do something like the following from /usr/ports: portmaster -o lang/perl5.16 lang/perl5.10 portmaster p5- and perl automagically will upgrade. This is from /usr/ports/UPDATING. You can also find instructions for portupgrade there. Don't know about dependencies with 7.0, though. dn > > What do you think? I've got to move up because an important perl program > requires a minimum 5.12. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 18:04:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65140106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:04:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail3.networktest.com (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC508FC18 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [69.55.234.104]) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12CF2560D4 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.networktest.com ([69.55.234.104]) by localhost (mail3.networktest.com [69.55.234.104]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71567-08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp146.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [205.147.16.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail3.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E85392560D3 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503E59AA.7060605@networktest.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:26 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> <503E5872.9050805@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <503E5872.9050805@networktest.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:04:37 -0000 On 8/29/12 10:59 AM, David Newman wrote: > On 8/29/12 8:08 AM, Jack Stone wrote: >> On 8/29/2012 8:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> Jack Stone writes: >>> >>>> uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD >>>> 7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009 >>>> >>>> Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!) >>>> This is a production server. >>>> >>>> >>>> Been playing catchup on ports including perl as UPDATING recommends: >>>> portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* >>>> >>>> That has worked on other servers, but not this one. Anyone know what I >>>> need to do to clean this up?? >>>> >>>> But, can't get past this fatal error: >>>> mail# portupgrade -o lang/perl5.12 -f perl-5.10.\* >>>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive >>>> specification: "WITHOUT_" >>>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk", line 231: Error in archive >>>> specification: "WITHOUT_" >>>> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue >>>> ** Makefile possibly broken: lang/perl5.12: >>> You're almost four years past the end-of-life on the release you're >>> running, so it's been left behind in terms of support. In this case it >>> looks (based on a *very* quick look) that you may be running into >>> changes in how make(1) actually works, in which case backporting the >>> ports functionality will be more work than it's worth. >>> >>> If the machine "can't" be updated, and assuming it's secure (which hard >>> to be sure about with old software on the Internet), you may be best off >>> leaving it alone. >>> >>> Good luck. >>> >>> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12 >> installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in >> increments to get well past EOL. >> >> Wonder if I just deinstalled the old perl5-5.10 and then installed the >> perl5-12 would work. I can do that right from the port: make perl5-12 >> first to see if that works, then: >> # make deinstall (perl-5.10) then: make install clean > > If you're using portmaster, you should be able to do something like the > following from /usr/ports: > > portmaster -o lang/perl5.16 lang/perl5.10 > portmaster p5- > > and perl automagically will upgrade. Sorry, I'd missed that you'd tried this and it isn't working. make has changed since the 7.0 days. I agree with Jack that you're better off leaving well enough alone. If you really need perl5.16+ capabilities you're much better off moving your program to a more recent version of FreeBSD. dn > > This is from /usr/ports/UPDATING. You can also find instructions for > portupgrade there. > > Don't know about dependencies with 7.0, though. > > dn > > >> >> What do you think? I've got to move up because an important perl program >> requires a minimum 5.12. > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 18:32:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D352F106566C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27CA8FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E769A7151B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:32:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 30640 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2012 18:32:02 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 2445, pid: 24259, t: 0.1699s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Aug 2012 18:32:01 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5523433C24; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:32:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Jack Stone References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:32:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> (Jack Stone's message of "Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:08:33 -0500") Message-ID: <44vcg11rdq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:32:04 -0000 Jack Stone writes: > Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12 > installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in > increments to get well past EOL. You're somewhat on your own, then; I can't test any of my ideas before suggesting them to you. > Wonder if I just deinstalled the old perl5-5.10 and then installed the > perl5-12 would work. I can do that right from the port: make perl5-12 > first to see if that works, then: > # make deinstall (perl-5.10) then: make install clean I would be surprised if the perl-5.12 port will build for you; I think you'll get the same error. If not, then yes, it should work. > What do you think? I've got to move up because an important perl > program requires a minimum 5.12. Well, it's also possible that there's a local problem on that machine. You indicated that you used portupgrade for similar updates on similarly-aged machines, but I'll guess that they were only roughly similar. I'll guess that you built your own INDEX file; if not, you probably should (and the associated database for portupgrade). Compare the infrastructure in ports/Mk (and maybe /usr/share/mk) with the similar machines that succeeded, and look at the Makefile in perl5.12 to make sure it sets options properly. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 19:04:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041361065673 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A728FC19 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TJ4Guj019802 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:04:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host 99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21] claimed to be [192.168.1.67] Message-ID: <503E67B4.3090104@sage-american.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:04:20 -0500 From: Jack Stone User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> <44vcg11rdq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44vcg11rdq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:04:17 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-10.00 required=4.50 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 4.5 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule | -10 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Subject: Re: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:04:18 -0000 On 8/29/2012 1:32 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Jack Stone writes: > >> Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12 >> installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in >> increments to get well past EOL. > You're somewhat on your own, then; I can't test any of my ideas before > suggesting them to you. > >> Wonder if I just deinstalled the old perl5-5.10 and then installed the >> perl5-12 would work. I can do that right from the port: make perl5-12 >> first to see if that works, then: >> # make deinstall (perl-5.10) then: make install clean > I would be surprised if the perl-5.12 port will build for you; I think > you'll get the same error. If not, then yes, it should work. > >> What do you think? I've got to move up because an important perl >> program requires a minimum 5.12. > Well, it's also possible that there's a local problem on that > machine. You indicated that you used portupgrade for similar updates on > similarly-aged machines, but I'll guess that they were only roughly > similar. I'll guess that you built your own INDEX file; if not, you > probably should (and the associated database for portupgrade). Compare > the infrastructure in ports/Mk (and maybe /usr/share/mk) with the > similar machines that succeeded, and look at the Makefile in perl5.12 to > make sure it sets options properly. > > Good luck. > > Hi Lowell and thanks for the good wishes! Yes, on the other servers which upgraded without issue are running the same freebsd-7.x, and the make files are identical for the perl-5.12. I just now ran a test on a test server of same vintage and it did build directly in the port just using "make" to see if it would work. It did. The trick is to DISABLE_CONFLICTS=YES in the /etc/make.conf. This still doesn't mean the important production server will cooperatebut will have to take a risk and try it. That server has a bootable clone that is run every day so I can rescue the server. I will just to make a fresh clone right before I try the perl upgradeso to minimize any loss of data. -- All the best, Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 19:19:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010921065670 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEADA8FC24 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T6nnE-0002pP-Fa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:19:12 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:19:12 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:19:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1) Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:19:15 -0000 Chris yahoo.se> writes: > ... > I recently got a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530 (3259-9VG) laptop and would like > to get the Wifi card running > (fresh FreeBSD 9.0 install) > ... http://support.lenovo.com/en_GB/product-and-parts/detail.page?DocID=PD024684 Communications Network ThinkPad 1x1 11b/g/n PCIe Half Mini Card ThinkPad 11b/g/n PCIe Half Mini Card 1x1 Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo adapter Intel Centrino® Wireless-N 2230 2x2 Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo adapter Bluetooth 4.0 wireless There is a product ref file: http://www.lenovo.com/psref/ http://www.lenovo.com/psref/pdf/edgebook.pdf search for E530 3259. These entries will be probably useless, but here they are: $ dmesg -a | less $ dmesg | grep -i wireless Example: $ pciconf -lv |grep -i wireless ... wpi0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10118086 chip=0x42278086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection' class = network ... Note: that wpi in top line is a driver name. $ lshal |grep -i wireless I searched Google but no luck. Get a recent Live CD or DVD from any Linux distro (Knoppix, Fedora, etc). jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 19:36:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC997106566B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D11A8FC24 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.magehandbook.com (mail.darkmindweb.net [192.168.1.100]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3X6cLK64XDzSR for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:27:53 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:27:53 -0400 From: Daniel Staal To: Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <8ba05ed130605577426fe95c7c9d036c@mail.magehandbook.com> X-Sender: DStaal@usa.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/RCMAIL_VERSION Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: DStaal@usa.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:36:40 -0000 On 2012-08-29 11:42, Chris wrote: > Hi, > > > I've tried to search the lists but can't find anything, but please > point me to an existing resource if available. > > I recently got a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530 (3259-9VG) laptop and > would like to get the Wifi card running (fresh FreeBSD 9.0 install), > but I'm failling as it has been at least 5 years since I used with > wifi under FreeBSD. The card is not automatically detected (interface > not listed in ifconfig) so I'm assuming I have to either load a > kernel > module or go the NDIS path. It seems like on Windows, the same driver > is used for E430, E435, E530 and E535, so in case anyone is using one > of these models, please let me know if have things running. > > So some questions that might point me in the right direction: > > - How can I find out which type of card this laptop actually has (can > I read it out of dmesg, some PCI listing or whatever)? >   All I can find are product sheets saying that it has 11b/g/n, but > doesn't help me to find a driver. I >   Is there some "meta-module" that loads all the native wifi drivers > that I can use that I can test? There's a couple of different Wifi options for that machine, so which one you have may make a difference. There looks to be some information on identifying which card you have here: http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Wireless_Network_Adapters (Though they don't have your model listed yet, I think it's a new model...) I'm guessing you probably have a 'Thinkpad' card, which recently has been Realtek, but you'd have to check that. Note that replacing it with a generic mini-PCI wireless card may not work: Lenovo has been known to have their BIOS only recognize 'official' replacement parts. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 19:55:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF9E1065676 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843708FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q7TJtjV5092389 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:55:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:55:45 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201208291955.q7TJtjV5092389@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <503DC88F.6060806@dreamchaser.org> Subject: Re: sendmail local-host-names questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:55:46 -0000 > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:45:19 -0600 > From: Gary Aitken > Subject: sendmail local-host-names questions > > > Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the > local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file, and > it doesn't seem to cause errors; but neither does ';' or '%' so I'm > guessing the lines are just being skipped because they don't parse > properly. I'd like to know whether comments are allowed or not; and if > so, what the proper syntax is. I don't know, off-hand, where it's documented, but '#' is what you want to use. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 20:01:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6953106566C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ports@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9AA8FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E115098D for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:57:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.44] (chimea.webrz.net [10.10.10.44]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 75AB65086B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:57:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <503E7495.7050306@webrz.net> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:59:17 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Cc: Subject: Empty logfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:01:48 -0000 Stupic question: I have a directory with 120 logfiles (extension *.log). Can someone tell me how I can empty these logfiles in one command? I thought 'echo > *.log' would work, but no way K-) thanks Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 20:11:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457C8106566B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21A08FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q7TKBhCJ092701; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:11:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:11:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201208292011.q7TKBhCJ092701@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: ports@webrz.net In-Reply-To: <503E7495.7050306@webrz.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Empty logfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:11:38 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 29 15:02:37 2012 > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:59:17 +0200 > From: Jos Chrispijn > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: Empty logfiles > > Stupic question: I have a directory with 120 logfiles (extension *.log). > Can someone tell me how I can empty these logfiles in one command? > I thought 'echo > *.log' would work, but no way K-) Assuming 'sh', or something 'syntactically equivalent': for file in *.log ; do ; echo "" >$file ; done From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 20:35:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EAD106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AF18FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TKZbnP063691; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:35:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7TKZbch063684; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:35:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:35:37 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: Gary Aitken In-Reply-To: <503DC88F.6060806@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <503DC88F.6060806@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:35:37 -0400 (EDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: sendmail local-host-names questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:35:46 -0000 On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Gary Aitken wrote: > Can anyone explain what's going on or point me to a better place to ask? > It's now fixed but I'd like to understand why sendmail doesn't like a domain > specified with a trailing dot, since I thought that was how one specified a > fully qualified domain name. The definitive source is /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf/README > Also... I can't find anything about how to put a comment in the > local-host-names file. I took a guess and used # as in the .mc file, > and it doesn't seem to cause errors; but neither does ';' or '%' so I'm > guessing the lines are just being skipped because they don't parse properly. > I'd like to know whether comments are allowed or not; and if so, > what the proper syntax is. I am not sure which table you are commenting but I think some of the tables like virtusertable do not allow comments at the end of the line. Lines starting with a '#' are fine in any table. Again the README is you source From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 21:20:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C221065674 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from mail.sagedata.net (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A887D8FC1D for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21]) by mail.sagedata.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TLKuY8030560 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:20:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sagedata.net: Host 99-111-143-21.lightspeed.crchtx.sbcglobal.net [99.111.143.21] claimed to be [192.168.1.67] Message-ID: <503E87BC.4000101@sage-american.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:21:00 -0500 From: Jack Stone User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> <44vcg11rdq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44vcg11rdq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:20:57 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-10.00 required=4.50 X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-10.0 points, 4.5 required) | | pts rule name description | ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule | -10 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | Subject: Re: Upgrading perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:20:59 -0000 On 8/29/2012 1:32 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Jack Stone writes: > >> Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12 >> installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in >> increments to get well past EOL. > You're somewhat on your own, then; I can't test any of my ideas before > suggesting them to you. > >> Wonder if I just deinstalled the old perl5-5.10 and then installed the >> perl5-12 would work. I can do that right from the port: make perl5-12 >> first to see if that works, then: >> # make deinstall (perl-5.10) then: make install clean > I would be surprised if the perl-5.12 port will build for you; I think > you'll get the same error. If not, then yes, it should work. > >> What do you think? I've got to move up because an important perl >> program requires a minimum 5.12. > Well, it's also possible that there's a local problem on that > machine. You indicated that you used portupgrade for similar updates on > similarly-aged machines, but I'll guess that they were only roughly > similar. I'll guess that you built your own INDEX file; if not, you > probably should (and the associated database for portupgrade). Compare > the infrastructure in ports/Mk (and maybe /usr/share/mk) with the > similar machines that succeeded, and look at the Makefile in perl5.12 to > make sure it sets options properly. > > Good luck. > > AHAH! This just came out in ports UPDATING and maybe helps: 20120820: AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel AUTHOR: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org Due to a bug introduced in 20120601, portupgrade is unable to upgrade itself on FreeBSD 7.x. This has been fixed in 20120820. ports-mgmt/portupgrade is not affected. To upgrade, execute the following: # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel && make deinstall install clean -- -- All the best, Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 21:27:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC10D106566B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ateve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD5D8FC16 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=rpi-1.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6piq-0004W2-8j for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:22:48 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by rpi-1.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6pnl-0007WQ-Os for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:27:53 +0100 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:27:14 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120829222714.78ac751d.ateve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <503E7495.7050306@webrz.net> References: <503E7495.7050306@webrz.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Subject: Re: Empty logfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:27:24 -0000 On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:59:17 +0200 Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Stupic question: I have a directory with 120 logfiles (extension *.log). > Can someone tell me how I can empty these logfiles in one command? > I thought 'echo > *.log' would work, but no way K-) find . -name \*.log -exec truncate {} \; man find and man truncate for the gory details. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 22:33:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9536106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0018FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7TMX1Lq048553 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:33:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7TMX1Ov048552 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:33:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:33:01 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120829223301.GH29957@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0ac101cd856b$ef1220f0$cd3662d0$@freebsd.org> <0aea01cd8576$be4a54f0$3adefed0$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0aea01cd8576$be4a54f0$3adefed0$@freebsd.org> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: text editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:33:04 -0000 [ dteske@freebsd.org wrote on Tue 28.Aug'12 at 16:42:06 -0700 ] > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robin, Michael [mailto:robin@chapman.edu] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:42 PM > > To: 'dteske@freebsd.org'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: RE: text editor > > > > What is VIM? > > A _much_ improved version of "vi" (vi is the ubiquitous UNIX text editor written > by Bill Joy in 1976), vim itself being born in 1991 by a man named Bram > Moolenaar. > > > > Where could it be downloaded? > > As Polytropon mentioned, FreeBSD has a built-in software acquisition system. > > Executing: > > pkg_add -r vim > > will install the VIM text editor (immediately after-which you can type "rehash" > -- if using [t]csh -- and then "vim FILE" to start editing files). > > However, I recognize the need to sometimes "know where your food comes from," so > below are some links. > > NOTE: You need to know what version of FreeBSD you're using... > > For recent versions of FreeBSD: > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ > > For older versions of FreeBSD: > ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ > > Then under there, you'll have to select "i386" for 32-bit builds, or "amd64" for > 64-bit builds (etc.). > > Then under there, you'll have to select your appropriate version (e.g., > "8.1-RELEASE"). > > Then under there, you'll navigate to "packages" then either "All" or a specific > sub-category. > > In there, you'll find "vim-VERSION" (ending in either ".tgz", ".tbz", or ".txz", > depending on your version of FreeBSD; mind you the suffix matters not to your > ability to install the software). > > You'll also find "gvim-VERSION" there too. > > Please keep in-mind that this is _NOT_ the recommended way of electively > installing software on FreeBSD. I'm merely explaining this so that you know > where software for FreeBSD comes from (loosely; I'm leaving out a lot and > choosing to focus on the consumer-side of things for the benefit of clarity). > > > > > What is CLI? > > Before Windows and Apple, computers were told what to do without a mouse. This > interface was called "the command line." It has a very rich history and is still > common-place in server environments. > > > > I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8. > > I'd recommend getting to know something called "Cygwin". It will allow you to > run software such as VIM on Windows. > > The main website for Cygwin is: > http://cygwin.com/ > > You can even run gVIM (the graphical version of VIM designed to run in the GUI) > on Windows. > > Surely, you can run special versions of VIM on Windows _without_ Cygwin (link > below), but I recommend Cygwin if you're going to program on UNIX at all > (conflating your Windows environment with a UNIX-compatible environment is a > convenience that many find helpful in making work more efficient). > > [g]VIM for MS-DOS and/or MS-Windows: > http://www.vim.org/download.php#pc > > NOTE: There are downloads for self-installing executables for added convenience. > > > > The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even though it > > have a lot of hot keys. My top priority is setting start/end block option > which was > > available for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any window-based > > text editor for this option. 16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on > 64-bit > > operating system. > > Have you tried compatibility mode? Win7 has a compatibility mode that it can run > executables in. I think it has a compat mode that will run 16-bit DOS programs, > but I must admit that I've not tried. > -- > Devin > > > > Please advise. > > Thank you. > > > > Michael > > Programmer Analyst > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.teske@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of > > dteske@freebsd.org > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM > > To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: RE: text editor > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM > > > To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' > > > Subject: text editor > > > > > > Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system > > > > On FreeBSD? > > In the GUI? or on the CLI? > > > > > > > with following > > > features: > > > * Support 100 percent of hot keys > > > > How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that suffice? > > > > > > > * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved > > > or > > deleted > > > without requiring any mouse lock. > > > It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined > > > with > > navigating > > > key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing. > > > > A challenge, no-doubt. > > > > > > > * Support special ASCII characters > > > > > > > Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters (the > > ones that don't are in the minority, imho). > > > > ... > > > > I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI). > > > > NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here. > > -- > > Devin > > > > _____________ > > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. > If > > you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all > copies; > > (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) > notify > > the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message > > addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other > than > > the intended recipient. Thank you. I simply just use the vi version installed in base. In fact, over the years i've come to prefer it to vim and similar clones of vi. It's a hardcore UNIX text editor and for me provides everything I need. On Windows systems, Microsoft has a subsystem available called Interix. It is preferrable to projects like Cygwin because of the way it interacts with the Windows Kernel. I've used it on XP and Windows 7. There is a site that provides downloads for software and a great deal of support but I forget now what it's called. Anyway, searching Google for Interix will bring up a load of stuff about it. Jamie. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 22:50:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21463106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:50:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james4591@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s47.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s47.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.51.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68B38FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT122-W8 ([65.55.90.199]) by snt0-omc4-s47.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:50:22 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [108.240.16.29] From: James Powell To: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:50:22 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20120827102430.GB6102@kontrol.kode5.net> References: , <20120827041057.c6dbbcae.freebsd@edvax.de>, <20120827102430.GB6102@kontrol.kode5.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2012 22:50:22.0979 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC402D30:01CD8638] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RE: CMI8788 audio card/chip support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:50:28 -0000 kldload snd_driver only detected my USB Headset and loaded theusb audio dri= ver. It did not detect my CMI8788 (ASUS Xonar DX PCIe)and snd_cmi does not = support it. cat /dev/sndstat generated this: FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64)Installed devices:pcm0= : (play/rec) default Which is my Logitech USB headset=2C not my PCIe sound card. The boot generated a message stating "Unsupported Sound Carddetected. Pleas= e contact lists@support.freebsd.org with soundcard make and model." > Date: Mon=2C 27 Aug 2012 11:24:30 +0100 > From: jamie@kode5.net > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: CMI8788 audio card/chip support >=20 > [ Polytropon wrote on Mon 27.Aug'12 at 4:10:57 +0200 ] >=20 > > On Mon=2C 27 Aug 2012 02:01:34 +0000=2C James Powell wrote: > > >=20 > > > Are any plans being made to start support for these audio cards? > > > Currently I'm using one in a system I would like to use with > > > FreeBSD but it has no support through the kernel and driver > > > support from OSSv4 lands me with a system that either freezes > > > or won't boot properly. > >=20 > > Interesting. I've been using a CMI-based sound card with > > FreeBSD 4=2C 5 and 7 already. See "man snd_cmi": > >=20 > > HARDWARE > > The snd_cmi driver supports the following sound cards: > >=20 > > =B7 CMedia CMI8338A > > =B7 CMedia CMI8338B > > =B7 CMedia CMI8738 > > =B7 CMedia CMI8738B > >=20 > > It lists older CMI8788 as supported devices. Doesn't it > > provide sufficient compatibility? >=20 > Have you tried loading the generic driver to see if your audio card is pi= cked up: >=20 > # kldload snd_driver >=20 > then try=20 >=20 > # cat /dev/sndstat >=20 > which will show more info about it? That's what's recommended in the hand= book. = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 23:01:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD21E106564A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:01:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james4591@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s14.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s14.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D27D8FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT122-W25 ([65.55.90.201]) by snt0-omc4-s14.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:01:31 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [108.240.16.29] From: James Powell To: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:01:31 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , , <20120827041057.c6dbbcae.freebsd@edvax.de>, , <20120827102430.GB6102@kontrol.kode5.net>, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2012 23:01:31.0836 (UTC) FILETIME=[3AEBA7C0:01CD863A] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RE: CMI8788 audio card/chip support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:01:37 -0000 This also was generated at startup: none3@pci0:5:4:0: class=3D0x040100 card=3D0x82751043 chip=3D0x878813f6 rev= =3D0x00 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'C-Media Electronics Inc' device = =3D 'CMI8788 [Oxygen HD Audio]' class =3D multimedia subclass = =3D audio > From: james4591@hotmail.com > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Wed=2C 29 Aug 2012 22:50:22 +0000 > Subject: RE: CMI8788 audio card/chip support >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > kldload snd_driver only detected my USB Headset and loaded theusb audio d= river. It did not detect my CMI8788 (ASUS Xonar DX PCIe)and snd_cmi does no= t support it. >=20 > cat /dev/sndstat generated this: > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64)Installed devices:pc= m0: (play/rec) default > Which is my Logitech USB headset=2C not my PCIe sound card. > The boot generated a message stating "Unsupported Sound Carddetected. Ple= ase contact lists@support.freebsd.org with soundcard make and model." >=20 >=20 > > Date: Mon=2C 27 Aug 2012 11:24:30 +0100 > > From: jamie@kode5.net > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: CMI8788 audio card/chip support > >=20 > > [ Polytropon wrote on Mon 27.Aug'12 at 4:10:57 +0200 ] > >=20 > > > On Mon=2C 27 Aug 2012 02:01:34 +0000=2C James Powell wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Are any plans being made to start support for these audio cards? > > > > Currently I'm using one in a system I would like to use with > > > > FreeBSD but it has no support through the kernel and driver > > > > support from OSSv4 lands me with a system that either freezes > > > > or won't boot properly. > > >=20 > > > Interesting. I've been using a CMI-based sound card with > > > FreeBSD 4=2C 5 and 7 already. See "man snd_cmi": > > >=20 > > > HARDWARE > > > The snd_cmi driver supports the following sound cards: > > >=20 > > > =B7 CMedia CMI8338A > > > =B7 CMedia CMI8338B > > > =B7 CMedia CMI8738 > > > =B7 CMedia CMI8738B > > >=20 > > > It lists older CMI8788 as supported devices. Doesn't it > > > provide sufficient compatibility? > >=20 > > Have you tried loading the generic driver to see if your audio card is = picked up: > >=20 > > # kldload snd_driver > >=20 > > then try=20 > >=20 > > # cat /dev/sndstat > >=20 > > which will show more info about it? That's what's recommended in the ha= ndbook. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 06:31:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E49106564A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BFB8FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D0324918; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q7U6V2Ja005654; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:31:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:31:02 +0200 From: Polytropon To: James Powell Message-Id: <20120830083102.7244ed67.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20120827041057.c6dbbcae.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120827102430.GB6102@kontrol.kode5.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CMI8788 audio card/chip support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:31:10 -0000 On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:50:22 +0000, James Powell wrote: > kldload snd_driver only detected my USB Headset and loaded > theusb audio driver. It did not detect my CMI8788 (ASUS Xonar > DX PCIe)and snd_cmi does not support it. > > cat /dev/sndstat generated this: > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64)Installed devices:pcm0: (play/rec) default > Which is my Logitech USB headset, not my PCIe sound card. > The boot generated a message stating "Unsupported Sound Carddetected. > Please contact lists@support.freebsd.org with soundcard make and model." That would be a good thing to do. On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:01:31 +0000, James Powell wrote: > > This also was generated at startup: > > none3@pci0:5:4:0: class=0x040100 card=0x82751043 chip=0x878813f6 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'C-Media Electronics Inc' > device = 'CMI8788 [Oxygen HD Audio]' > class = multimedia > subclass = audio That information could be useful for the person who maintains the cmi sound card driver. Maybe it's possible to take those IDs (card=0x82751043 chip=0x878813f6) and temporarily "patch" them into the cmi driver, to try if it then will recognize the device and handle it (maybe with limited functionality)? I know a similar approach has been possible to "magically activate" some incompatible USB hardware... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 07:40:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6810A106566C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13288FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFF6D537 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:40:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 430EBD534; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:40:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from dijkstra.cruwe.de (unknown [89.1.20.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBACAD531 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:40:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:40:14 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120830094014.77fe65b0@dijkstra.cruwe.de> In-Reply-To: <20120804123616.34980192@dijkstra.cruwe.de> References: <20120804123616.34980192@dijkstra.cruwe.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/4kHf/9rA2XddQU0ZUY.zsra"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Subject: [SOLVED] Re: cannot build any pkg depending on glibmm on poudriere X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:40:48 -0000 --Sig_/4kHf/9rA2XddQU0ZUY.zsra Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:36:16 +0200 "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > Currently, I am failing to compile the packages for my machines with > poudriere due to some error with glibmm, which I am unable to trace. > The problem seems to be (at least from my point of view), that a > dependancy to libsigc++ is not resolved corectly. >=20 > As no PR has been filed yet and the problem persists with my builds > for about two weeks, I expect the error is mine. Refraining from > spamming the list, I include a snippet from the build-logs which is > exemplary for all others which somehow depend on glibmm: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Returning to build of atkmm-2.22.5 > =3D=3D=3D> atkmm-2.22.5 depends on shared library: glibmm-2.4.1 - not > found =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for glibmm-2.4.1 > in /usr/ports/devel/glibmm =3D=3D=3D> Installing existing package > /usr/ports/packages/All/glibmm-2.28.2,1.txz=20 > Installing glibmm-2.28.2,1...Installing gamin-0.1.10_4...Installing > glib-2.28.8_4...Installing pcre-8.31\=20 > ... done > Installing perl-threaded-5.14.2_2...Removing stale symlinks from > /usr/bin...=20 > Skipping /usr/bin/perl > Skipping /usr/bin/perl5 > Done. > Creating various symlinks in /usr/bin... > Symlinking /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.2 to /usr/bin/perl > Symlinking /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.2 to /usr/bin/perl5 > Done. > Cleaning up /etc/make.conf... Done. > Spamming /etc/make.conf... Done. > done > Installing python27-2.7.3_3... done > No schema files found: doing nothing. > done > done > Installing gio-fam-backend-2.28.8_1... done > missing dependency libsigc++-2.2.10 > Failed to install the following 1 package(s): > /usr/ports/packages/All/glibmm-2.28.2,1.txz=20 >=20 >=20 > Does anybody have any idea on how to resolve that issue? >=20 > Cheers, Applying ports/170087: [Patch] ports-mgmt/poudriere: fix quoting for poudriere solved the problem. Cheers, --=20 Christopher J. Ruwe TZ: GMT + 2h --Sig_/4kHf/9rA2XddQU0ZUY.zsra Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQPxjuAAoJEJTIKW/o3iwUjAAQAIkFLJnzoJ2rhIPcI2DM0MQc EjEtKiq5fay+OWcbgCZH64mhKDbU7GeTOLyzRV62ynAl7ho8cc8OUUPSFxrVUcWy PFi1Je+rf6JWaT34aUdTHgjyx0cYDJicOZVE0oBYxcLgL9Mz+pLykT2XVkyXNM4x fS0dC8a57rpWIV9EI0KFp4zPY24AHfR7mQAXw4cQiiW91FlxMetThQMUEidbu1cO CQ2OOdIO2Nt2bdLABbHdn2r0Ql5My1g1lQ9gAm4nwQJnvnAxUzkzp9/NXFsdkBCO nOXnnX14g0JhinhU/q1Sus0iajHrRACl+TJcRgJQPnXbZSYjcUKF6O17qZarCRrG q9JvrLiP6P1Yjmm7TIRI+gUqNPCjJDrIRhuYnWb7MWsZCw+NMUL1FYhxa1hT7fHQ DaEQpgv+frYgbSZH84TV9Fe3KIGBdjQ3wPZeAlNHdxR6Qk4FgaYUDDiOA+h2ggOo NkYD+vi9FLAIPUbOjVQECabIWfnHyX4NQEbbX2iT/ai8RcobNhn1EOVdeAasNqD8 tup9tzrlpmVDrJxgaPVNLQidk00e6bhpMB6DGAoPB6H5sbBZtjlZKPSNFuEDmxTk eFBMc52FIGoYJnkbPh7chaUgtSDKT6EiTGLMrElv4AnKdp9sHuTfMjf4j59SjR5L HIX33gk9fXkRgfF43ZAL =BA3g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4kHf/9rA2XddQU0ZUY.zsra-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 08:55:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34842106567B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corebug@corebug.net) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F618FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2064318vbm.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:55:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=/b+i+8TuFcGq0Szat+9hype5Ea1uYIoB2soy5P0zlXA=; b=jMbb25nsWqZ87kk9ifbyl6Z2+/ct5uP7xqKCCechkdQRxr9C2dt8mKfOyaYQP3+mCs Xj2gnWLu5iP1K8HTNeFuS90L/6zA4tbVgRK5v3myZfNJjpV0ZHCmQwSt4aC4YmXFnY3Z yGGaz5ETlMQ0UUm11XTZE64FA5KgMNNuUYCAYZ6jO3uqYwWMbevGaXhCo5IDWPSErUcq 7LpEPAzuHylzniWNLdohhelnflm2PBpKr0007BxYYPMwXhAOKsiDlzlan8dwC/IKDc9N Ho/TlDHDcCDo0sOln6ay8j2JHNNX482zgwksw3NIDTYH9EvM4mnkvxL62pzUzmNkcJfc NoSA== Received: by 10.220.248.69 with SMTP id mf5mr2631122vcb.42.1346316919457; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:55:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.249.138 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:54:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [95.158.3.122] From: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQuNGC0LDQu9C40Lkg0KLRg9GA0L7QstC10YY=?= Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:54:58 +0300 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn1SehircDYI0fIylmkFIATGYrxXxkRKlaDH5lo559EHY0Yz0SFWb5XwH3gEZ0P9G+1rvLZ Subject: Force disk with old GPT label to be recognized as MBR one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:55:21 -0000 Hello there, people! I have a FreeBSD box with 9.1-RC3 i386 and an interesting HDD. It was patitioned with GPT and zfs some (long) time ago. After that the hdd has been completely repartitioned with MBR scheme and one single freebsd (165) partition and one slice there. It worked fine in 7.2, but now i have to get the data from that slice and when i connect the hdd to 9.1 box, it finds old corrupt GPT label (i suppose, it's backup GPT header somewhere in the end of actual disk) and does not recognize the MBR scheme there. It sees no freebsd partitions (and one exists there, for sure :) ). So my question is: how do i force the system to ignore old corrupt GPT header on this hdd, or how do i remove the header, or is there any workaround possible? This is what gpart says about this disk: [11:54][border][~] # gpart show ada1 => 34 1250263661 ada1 GPT (596G) [CORRUPT] 34 256 1 freebsd-boot (128k) 290 838860800 2 freebsd-zfs (400G) 838861090 411402605 - free - (196G) And this is what fdisk says: [11:54][border][~] # fdisk ada1 ******* Working on device /dev/ada1 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=1240341 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=1240341 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 1250258562 (610477 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 14/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: So fdisk sees everything fine. Thank you a lot guys! -- ~~~ WBR, Vitaliy Turovets Systems Administrator Corebug.Net +38(093)265-70-55 VITU-RIPE X-NCC-RegID: ua.tv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 09:10:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FF8106566C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C440A8FC19 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T70lL-0002HZ-1e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:07 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T70lK-0001c5-L4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:06 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7U9A6gV083060 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7U9A6J7083058 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:10:06 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201208300910.q7U9A6J7083058@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: where is all terminal output sent if the controlling terminal is closed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:10:09 -0000 I occasionally build ports with extra logs enabled. When I then launch such programs from, say xterm on the background (&), I get lots of output on the controlling terminal. If I then close the terminal, where does all the output goes? I presume it's still being sent to the PID of the parent xterm. But this process no longer exists, so what happens then? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 10:57:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BDC106564A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD668FC14 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicr5 with SMTP id r5so80457wic.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:57:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=vR5U/yX8EYXtejlTxZbFOyaNVdgUEQFClFU3/Rx5Kf8=; b=N5GbXmscsgAnGap9cnuUvUWPECga/an+P6iG1C4lzWKupCQXtGSX6p4nSj1V0ZtPJn BrpZYf9INfSM7cg8x+SzDbLF4yAQafxb2zvHOYqMnox/QzORIpYlckljbNl5O1HxGQhO skAwK3eUQCgSxQPHEf1WBxlCPkmPGo7V5PnKcmz1KmtvaMj3VmSEzLDSqNJW9c2JpWRp de3g4QY5BQpCLB1LhqQQ8nncNcYV4Ota5Of6f6T164Lo85iuuZW54//5rI62Ql3tvyyP JKo16+2XmD7rj0Te/xV8ehJY8D8uGsPSRMcnkTLKPmFM5j8oGfRK2wW1d0eKwRWm/hm7 3cHA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.82.230 with SMTP id l6mr184631wiy.21.1346324222312; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.160.9 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:57:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:57:02 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQuNGC0LDQu9C40Lkg0KLRg9GA0L7QstC10YY=?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUl8KKiclZ6iCgNwjVkwNSduWIEB73tPXVIfQQGLzh0Vl5TUIMOMP9k7vBLgsUamtZv7f/ Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Force disk with old GPT label to be recognized as MBR one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:57:03 -0000 On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:54 AM, =D0=92=D0=B8=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B9= =D0=A2=D1=83=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=86 wrote: >.... So > my question is: how do i force the system to ignore old corrupt GPT > header on this hdd, or how do i remove the header, or is there any > workaround possible? dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/ada1 bs=3D64k From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 11:18:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB84106564A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corebug@corebug.net) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8268FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2233849vbm.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:18:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=kuI/Am8YQSKOTN6U+K+lp7jxpgPLo+URGHtWZUA6iGk=; b=W3gWAziCzr9UiZg7pH2agAVRlQu+/hwA8RfnC4/JlxGUsfo7AONkECWzkUfewa3B96 LLF7G/J6SMQjdITw9Je7e6ZJfUWl7ZegclmgsCN+GAbEBe64izTb6YTNpUpDnXi587zl IXQAZx32ozNUCJua4INrTSr2Jxb7eRJB1batznL/140uKamyeb7vaZLNew/sEj9fU227 9swZCA9jXfZHfzb8Lc6G24kIkXU6TycHiAjojEPeMnABkRKhykni7wx567E08Me7jj9t OxaAtChdf4rrirczCejyM4uDQKiAdPRVh63tqfCHJBbSI2pnVj5Jb2sqsygyGdO2AQKr BQTw== Received: by 10.52.26.104 with SMTP id k8mr2342473vdg.79.1346325501759; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:18:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.249.138 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:18:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [95.158.3.122] In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQuNGC0LDQu9C40Lkg0KLRg9GA0L7QstC10YY=?= Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:18:01 +0300 Message-ID: To: Michael Sierchio Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkTnhG9W7aQHjgKyB71eNsYhKpJj8H2vFhS/9qMt4FBHXGn6hSOXj3K/rF4Z7PmhbeKSMfT Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Force disk with old GPT label to be recognized as MBR one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:18:30 -0000 2012/8/30 Michael Sierchio : > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:54 AM, =D0=92=D0=B8=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0= =B9 =D0=A2=D1=83=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=86 wrote: > >>.... So >> my question is: how do i force the system to ignore old corrupt GPT >> header on this hdd, or how do i remove the header, or is there any >> workaround possible? > > dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/ada1 bs=3D64k Well, i thought that my need to get files from hdd is easy enough to understand from my original message:) --=20 ~~~ WBR, Vitaliy Turovets Systems Administrator Corebug.Net +38(093)265-70-55 VITU-RIPE X-NCC-RegID: ua.tv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 13:29:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71291106566B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devnullaccount@yahoo.se) Received: from nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [77.238.189.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 875EB8FC1A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.230] by nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 13:29:34 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.241] by tm11.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 13:29:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1006.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 13:29:34 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 413058.63230.bm@omp1006.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53198 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Aug 2012 13:29:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.se; s=s1024; t=1346333374; bh=pRvA17T8DXSBk5wNhJdXhDRGIwMX/LIuSf2okvadvZc=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bZpq6twOpw/FHamSKWDWb4RrbplbG7RFa7ir+AiMHGJkVH+jQGDY2frVAt+VnsLqn95qy9XOcbZP+FDyAEiipukLU0oQW/6notKMrwKjGtDat8TZuHLhndPlOlRaoWQiQbNEstbu1rdJT3HRD/7F15QANGmryxMKfaJC0VvYi5A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.se; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vsMX6KtgjqB878Ws3nJF9H6mHVY680F3mE4mZ0l5+DLFyfeebOCab8sQByqRAL+EUHHKgx7bYEBVuo+dujOQg61IxHVG2wVQC8KpsROW3r0Vlg1P+5ff/b1uaqamf2hYOFliYPJWTn8JPLZIsQF9WwKX8u1QXoDnjd0GE6WJKzo=; X-YMail-OSG: Cz3ZB6UVM1nXPvy7BQ7vY8yvoLEn6KG9kMEvq1ActXkkfzg MTDXmfNITgx8E75hA3FNBYakfNP5AdSI12FtQ7CsOevxyCJN0RINYMZGU_n. u.XmxbZ6Ltj5LodiTXo.v2Vv0x7rp7SJdOpbbAwndHb.nEAPiwx7SNPeA5FO 6PQRyPAumq4G5TSIT_9h4XD3KBpcbH1g1eIDNcH3djrDIw7NOTLghYFSamEZ .kAp3jKpENa1IdEtimAFs0NglMQ29kDlFboR18Vp09eAyW3S0LI1WPDZCxr4 Vk5W6aJpQ.Je8TBj5g7J76iH7Lg3KWXAjJNqu6Df8.U88bKCLzOipf2xEKQo nbLjMZNDm5Jz.QeQNcg4pUzS.eIK1rTFbQ4l7kDuMsBC1OLgelM4HQt7Mb1k HPRpn5F4wiBV6xWSl1F.VppuX49dn8hT_Px5aTNjJbYW.rhx90L6K3wRZJDO 8NZOp1anOUU2DCE08YOA_kEFFA9InjWnDoU.gX8jZtHe9qXOXrBwl7mSwBSw JmC55R1z0SvZIdzkkAlnmC3z6OtdWU_NEPq5rsEkOjgasl5u0E4J0Kw-- Received: from [213.113.0.135] by web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:29:34 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416 References: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1346333374.37764.YahooMailNeo@web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:29:34 +0100 (BST) From: Chris To: Waitman Gobble In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:29:42 -0000 =0A>________________________________=0A> From: Waitman Gobble =0A>To: Chris =0A>Cc: "freebsd-questions@= freebsd.org" =0A>Sent: Wednesday, August 29= , 2012 6:51 PM=0A>Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop=0A> =0A>=0A>=0A>On Au= g 29, 2012 8:44 AM, "Chris" wrote:=0A>>=0A>> Hi,= =0A>>=0A>>=0A>> I've tried to search the lists but can't find anything, but= please point me to an existing resource if available.=0A>>=0A>> I recently= got a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530 (3259-9VG) laptop and would like to get th= e Wifi card running (fresh FreeBSD 9.0 install), but I'm failling as it has= been at least 5 years since I used with wifi under FreeBSD. The card is no= t automatically detected (interface not listed in ifconfig) so I'm assuming= I have to either load a kernel module or go the NDIS path. It seems like o= n Windows, the same driver is used for E430, E435, E530 and E535, so in cas= e anyone is using one of these models, please let me know if have things ru= nning.=0A>>=0A>> So some questions that might point me in the right directi= on:=0A>>=0A>> - How can I find out which type of card this laptop actually = has (can I read it out of dmesg, some PCI listing or whatever)?=0A>> =A0 Al= l I can find are product sheets saying that it has 11b/g/n, but doesn't hel= p me to find a driver. I=0A>> =A0 Is there some "meta-module" that loads al= l the native wifi drivers that I can use that I can test?=0A>> - If I need = to use NDIS emulation, does anyone think it will work for this model/card? = Windows drivers can be found here http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/product-a= nd-parts/default.page).=0A>> =A0 The handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/e= n/books/handbook/config-network-setup.html#CONFIG-NETWORK-NDIS) says I need= Win XP drivers, is that old text or do I need that? I can't find XP driver= s on the lenovo page...=0A>> - If NDIS should be possible, how do I extract= the .sys and .inf file from the exe that I downloaded from the URL above (= I don't have any Windows machine right now).=0A>>=0A>> TIA,=0A>> =A0 Chris= =0A>>=0A>> _______________________________________________=0A>> freebsd-que= stions@freebsd.org mailing list=0A>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi= nfo/freebsd-questions=0A>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questi= ons-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A>=0A>hi, you can usually find "replacement w= ifi cards" for your model on ebay, this can give you an idea of the chipset= . =0A>also, you could always pull off the panel and look at the card.=0A>nd= is can be tricky because it needs an "older" 32 bit driver, and you need to= run a 32 bit version of FreeBSD.=0A>a good solution is to find a ralink or= atheros card on ebay and swap it out, usually will cost less than 10 bucks= USD.=0A>Waitman Gobble=0A>San Jose California USA=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A=0AHi Walt= man, jb and Daniel,=0A(sorry for not replying to the latest email in the th= read, something is wrong with my email account)=0A=0AThanks very much for t= he help, it is really appreciated.=0AI called Lenovo support and the only i= nfo they had was that it was "an Intel card", so that's the same info as jb= had tracked down (and I also found myself).=0A=0AUsing pciconf as per jb's= hint tells me it is a broadcom I have:=0A=0Anone3@pci0:3:0:0: class= =3D0x028000 card=3D0x060814e4 chip=3D0x472714e4 rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00=0Aven= dor =3D 'Broadcom Corporation'=0Adevice =3D 'BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wi= reless LAN Controller'=0Aclass =3D network=0A=0A=0AAs per the release = notes for 9.0 (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/hardware.html#WLAN), th= e bwn(4) driver be the one to use.=0A=0AAdded the following to my /boot/loa= der.conf following the instructions in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/= handbook/network-wireless.html and rebooted.=0A=0Aif_bwn_load=3D"YES"=0Awla= n_wep_load=3D"YES"=0Awlan_ccmp_load=3D"YES"=0Awlan_tkip_load=3D"YES"=0A=0A= =0A(also tried the bwi(4) driver instead of bwn)=0A=0AI still don't get any= thing in dmesg or ifconfig. So either I have missed some step, or this spec= ific card isn't supported by the bwn/bwi drivers.=0AAnyone have any further= ideas?=0AIf not, I'll try to track down some USB WLAN card that is support= ed, as I've also heard the same thing as Daniel, i.e. that non-Lenovo cards= are blocked by the BIOS if you try to replace the default one.=0A=0ABR,=0A= =A0 Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 13:40:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F321065674 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E888FC14 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx56 with SMTP id x56so1357499wey.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:40:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=zvaQeNSsHm9aZHpnK93ymlcLRX6QUlcAifPIdzNoVzk=; b=o2galUmy0Lj+QRXaZBo0yWfWjWNdr4LETCkueBSmISft5q5muD9KUVuEtHMn91Yysz BSsLZKtmkUDdysqpkjF1oog+IaK+ZBzBppbC9ECvpWN5n0nciKngF4npfuEIRqEtDI5g /0JU+LNH0VK74p8oIQi06HAst3STsMkmW2CowKgY3EqxOAs1Wfr9fHRDF7VhBj0MZlG/ fIIjjndpXwK9zYsp1YSRESkcEsYLsQp/Ca5P5OO1R8Aoq2h3hXQmfUPvF5savn9Dy7nu Ff+vq7b/846V8O3sDZjEvAOMybxA2yuvPmdL1m0acB248fF48EMTDc7ZrnWwDdUQRsLD 5n4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.96.199 with SMTP id du7mr606870wib.21.1346334000171; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.160.9 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:40:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:40:00 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQuNGC0LDQu9C40Lkg0KLRg9GA0L7QstC10YY=?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk+0T8FlHOfFXqCgWhG5UvB0z5nqop8jwwpBAPz+8uPZm0n/JCjcVfJGnJVd7AyOSHAakv7 Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Force disk with old GPT label to be recognized as MBR one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:40:02 -0000 On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:18 AM, =F7=C9=D4=C1=CC=C9=CA =F4=D5=D2=CF=D7=C5= =C3 wrote: > Well, i thought that my need to get files from hdd is easy enough to > understand from my original message:) =E9=DA=D7=C9=CE=C9=D4=C5, =D0=CF=D6=C1=CC=D5=CA=D3=D4=C1! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 13:41:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E653F106566B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@hewbert.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9410B8FC1A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadc11 with SMTP id c11so183432qad.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:41:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=yxemNQ//QFVY/8ntBA1zrCo25+ETw9HyzAxNZynKKCE=; b=ABhg108PdwWq+Eapzshj6PgmdSwjIUoOmTu7QsoJrJVLDCY1frcE09I0yw1QCh+j0F CwDnVgeR2/EdtV4zytumfkW1EvGL7GdnfOIIpn1D3GtvTMMboW+rgRfiDr96wjBt7Cqf F3K0ApuY2gFGHWoTRcXu8ZsMoPL54c4f5SEqOxsiDse39p9s2kqk8QOrLcHx7AsIuZgz YL89b9iXKDlf40+4DeYiOc2tgm0N6eUJeIxDc4cwssGWDZS1Qf6t7DVkpbee5WPeCCxI PNuJvjWrejapE0EZj3BT1DNfnDLmO03y7JYu+AN7l+28dDn1oXzMrM0i83JOHz6S7U09 9sKA== Received: by 10.224.77.14 with SMTP id e14mr11025506qak.89.1346334089085; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id da18sm2608616qab.14.2012.08.30.06.41.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2458699vbm.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:41:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.221.11.71 with SMTP id pd7mr3262687vcb.45.1346334086861; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.202.72 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:41:26 -0600 Message-ID: From: Josh Beard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUpJyngPe1AvqLd0lvye15ihikB1xDQjq1z+OusD9Dl/rArggxJC64SNK8N9KkO9cyY7hF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: utx.log doesn't update for Samba unmounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:41:36 -0000 Hello, I'm running 9.1-PRERELEASE (built Aug 1) with Samba 3.6 from ports. I've noticed that the "last" command's output shows "still logged in" for all previous smb connections since the last shutdown. However, smbstatus seems accurate, showing only a handful of users connected. For instance, right now, 'last' shows 500 users "still logged in", when it's really only a few. I discovered this via a Nagios alert that I had a couple hundred users logged in. The last time I had active SMB/CIFS users was in May of this year, and I don't recall this happening then (judging from Nagios), but that was 9.0-RELEASE. Can anyone reproduce this or does anyone have any ideas? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 13:52:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FD8106566B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5D38FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7UDqhIU008394; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:52:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7UDqhRb008391; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:52:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:52:42 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: =?KOI8-R?B?98nUwczJyiD01dLP18XD?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:52:43 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Force disk with old GPT label to be recognized as MBR one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:52:52 -0000 On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, ??????? ??????? wrote: > Hello there, people! > I have a FreeBSD box with 9.1-RC3 i386 and an interesting HDD. > It was patitioned with GPT and zfs some (long) time ago. After that > the hdd has been completely repartitioned with MBR scheme and one > single freebsd (165) partition and one slice there. It worked fine in > 7.2, but now i have to get the data from that slice and when i connect > the hdd to 9.1 box, it finds old corrupt GPT label (i suppose, it's > backup GPT header somewhere in the end of actual disk) and does not > recognize the MBR scheme there. In case it has not been said: make a full backup of everything on that disk first using dd. Erasing the last 34 blocks or 17048 bytes of the disk will erase the backup GPT. It may be enough to erase just the very last block. # diskinfo -v /dev/ada1 /dev/ada1 512 # sectorsize 256060514304 # mediasize in bytes (238G) 500118192 # mediasize in sectors # : Not tested, could be off by one! # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ada1 bs=512 seek=500118191 Force a retaste with 'true > /dev/ada1', then see what gpart shows. If the drive is still seen as GPT, adjust the seek to begin at (mediasize in sectors) - 34. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 13:58:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B63106566B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620DD8FC1E for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7UDwXU0008430; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:58:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7UDwXN8008427; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:58:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:58:33 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Chris In-Reply-To: <1346333374.37764.YahooMailNeo@web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1346333374.37764.YahooMailNeo@web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:58:34 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:58:34 -0000 On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Chris wrote: > Using pciconf as per jb's hint tells me it is a broadcom I have: > > none3@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x060814e4 chip=0x472714e4 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller' > class = network > > > As per the release notes for 9.0 (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/hardware.html#WLAN), the bwn(4) driver be the one to use. > > Added the following to my /boot/loader.conf following the instructions in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-wireless.html and rebooted. > > if_bwn_load="YES" > wlan_wep_load="YES" > wlan_ccmp_load="YES" > wlan_tkip_load="YES" The last three are included in the GENERIC kernel. The bwi and bwn drivers need firmware, which is provided by the net/bwi-firmware-kmod and net/bwn-firmware-kmod ports. So install whichever is appropriate. I think the driver tries to load the right firmware automatically, but haven't tried a Broadcom in a while, and it might still be necessary to load the firmware module in /boot/loader.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 14:16:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C807B1065670 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devnullaccount@yahoo.se) Received: from nm19-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm19-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [77.238.189.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B8538FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.233] by nm19.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 14:16:27 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.247] by tm14.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 14:16:27 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1012.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 14:16:27 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 45716.78154.bm@omp1012.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 50478 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Aug 2012 14:16:27 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.se; s=s1024; t=1346336186; bh=ENrKZlgOTdds/fLVtePljJzj94RECgNZoBShugWO33A=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1IazRetWt33j8JuWtfZgU2W7AtBFqOeYQ/Hd/AAg4ZudXyVktZyoJqXIjpyDM8tbTydLCdkGi+yFcqTWqr5P0BuoC9rJrkXIcGSJD/TBt1Tlp2C1KCRP4a7Nb7Ucu/yaQXWbT+hlC/NU+PzVlq6+VCOFXf3CUOvKlF/CncacAAQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.se; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=23bgBFu/dXSG5oP8qU0tPpuCsv1cjlgcr/FhxxFglnCC5xwntXV2nKefIdJtMVaxB7z1zVP/dGjiFK3RZ4usxfod3pxxu4YDRu+OiJzZRqrXWdCR2uCU4i/vGMwNOHxsOpOzfGzqXQFCZnDf6JSA+y7qZ50qt7Gwa4mYcN1Sm7M=; X-YMail-OSG: mNiqkywVM1k0y6l6rSS2AdjIjjXbScOjDDQ5FgV0BxJ7IxH XWwM6eq7wK9KyFkLdGywtP_5HXe.hrB1Ev4jMd0mlJ2w5p00KMkHWTM_MrNW R8TxWe5IgSaB.Ak54rqbToTpmJX94SSqyC9Ylo0wVDkZFB3DRybIhbeU8eiR BkeuFaK5CY3GHdJJFb6KEY1AblgIim8AEtR5C_AfDMgBlE5izo8Bs1p1h0aw xlu4aO1Z23.WY9SMM0nXkWF3AwUBDX_KetZkLTp3eUD.8ibTvkYWtUkj8962 jKTO9uTHtzTmMwc3Ug9NOMJYgy2qIQGGJlgNl3GZpo6.NYGAc4mwq.ODjcxe SpRB1hrr5TKI9Z1Ice.4g1kgtJbPG9A5dO47ghhREqvAInFmFj90OVFKaGWd r8bVa.XX2rAeoNg9dO3smoVH_wwaeeJc5bYzNxULa0izXdyPlcOUJi8ISsJC TKzDNC7fDDjJIaYu7gemXxOSnTP8GXRy1hu75yDYAbLSf9h5eQ8BF8GuKYsJ fwK_VkWRv8EfLYT13YuvJkkv.8XiR84V2IwGcGvvbGsj2_TlzNjLb_qWEqFn ._zDgBw-- Received: from [213.113.0.135] by web171301.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:16:26 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416 References: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1346333374.37764.YahooMailNeo@web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1346336186.50254.YahooMailNeo@web171301.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:16:26 +0100 (BST) From: Chris To: Warren Block In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:16:29 -0000 =0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A> From: Warren Block =0A> To: Chris =0A> Cc: "freebsd-questions@free= bsd.org" ; Waitman Gobble =0A> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:58 PM=0A> Subject: Re: Wifi for L= enovo Laptop=0A> =0A> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Chris wrote:=0A> =0A>> Using pc= iconf as per jb's hint tells me it is a broadcom I have:=0A>> =0A>> none3@= pci0:3:0:0:=A0 =A0 =A0 class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x060814e4 chip=3D0x472714e= 4 =0A> rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00=0A>> vendor=A0 =A0 =3D 'Broadcom Corporation= '=0A>> device=A0 =A0 =3D 'BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller'=0A= >> class=A0 =A0 =A0 =3D network=0A>> =0A>> =0A>> As per the release notes= for 9.0 =0A> (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/hardware.html#WLAN), th= e bwn(4) driver be =0A> the one to use.=0A>> =0A>> Added the following to = my /boot/loader.conf following the instructions in =0A> http://www.freebsd.= org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-wireless.html and rebooted.=0A>> =0A>> i= f_bwn_load=3D"YES"=0A>> wlan_wep_load=3D"YES"=0A>> wlan_ccmp_load=3D"YES"= =0A>> wlan_tkip_load=3D"YES"=0A> =0A> The last three are included in the G= ENERIC kernel.=0A> =0A> The bwi and bwn drivers need firmware, which is pro= vided by the =0A> net/bwi-firmware-kmod and net/bwn-firmware-kmod ports.=A0= So install =0A> whichever is appropriate.=A0 I think the driver tries to l= oad the right=0A> firmware automatically, but haven't tried a Broadcom in a= while, and it =0A> might still be necessary to load the firmware module in= =0A> /boot/loader.conf.=0A> ______________________________________________= _=0A>=A0=0A=0AHi Warren,=0A=0A=0Athanks. Tried with the firmware as well bu= t no better luck. On closer inspection of the bwn manual, it seems like the= 4313 is not on the list of suppored versions.=0A=0AWhat I did find though = was that it is supposedly possible to get working using NDIS (even with amd= 64) as per this PC-BSD wiki page http://wiki.pcbsd.org/index.php/Wireless_T= esting=0A=0A=0AI might try the NDIS, but will first see if I can find a USB= card as the 'net seems to be full of talk about instability of the NDIS dr= iver for the 4313.=0A=0A=0AThanks to everyone for the help!=0A=0A=0ABR,=0A= =0A=A0 Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 15:38:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB69106564A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm23-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm23-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 271498FC0C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm23.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 15:35:37 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.21] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 15:35:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Aug 2012 15:35:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 904865.5624.bm@omp1021.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 79359 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Aug 2012 15:35:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1346340937; bh=R3i2td1oXGR5slntoRhrY9+FxNeHHBAUlbKy6vwltVE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JrBoD3f4Jj9NelQjegfvxweyeu2+oaxeuKq4htmj+/6WJvmmffGYWp7uSBiRtGK0SweI0LXth6fK65dudkwnTKo8ydL6X+/NEuf4gEY30SaUzJSDZjqdZrAEujM+WYVwvdYodylPDaDRYiAC/VPPTa5tibOYbDGs1lIm8N8L8+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=k2e+jurMjPh9qA+clbZeclsFGeYDGfUAKBwj4u2nMOHBL+3Qb0XQCrw60PnFxTCdS3OpkQtclbbCNcGK0O7OVpqwP/XTBiGkqIOe0mSv5Wu6YgVz69TDusFQlUjAheWSRHkF/jWcKj7q8ejxf0070R4gSsR3di1Kqwu2TSCNy3E=; X-YMail-OSG: Qdc8aSIVM1mFy8tQodDZL6vS7ek6oUgbqnIXKcBZd.026bk 4dLk_iiHgpA5EvwjTenXZ3RQczW4hXC4039NRFfYXSzyQrIkugxlxDNuIUWr PB5xemU5bVF9_944VKHSZZmNs9QsIRp.5L36Cmor88zd816QzHiqYoJj3TB9 dD762W7temmPJVR_QdEjuRFg81DSvBBr6xDr4MNPHmBJENx8UfxXTZ0I7Jch YsGONddZEFtcBoHD0q4tl0IAXwKlfkRqGmBsPyXOVFeQPJi.xImwnPH1ER2. uSY_SZy9qv_g5SnNEJlqwKXXlX1eF2xBX6sS1nrMKTevgRqMsnJ.i0_b6U2C FGQjbuhNbeSOd6ZC_zC9cD1xkwzbzCGjbvC.umVMrGq_Iz5Z9sU47ib3RvtA 8TrRO5nsplU5TnbcEeMR7nf8_l895rDDd8sc_MKaZVIyAdo0q2CylykZPY0D PwcR9hwEAiCpcpdumxQOJaAAkt9N1ciOWxZ_8aTGIplVw0xmHbiSpwdfhjmy 9EcU3SGiNylCIroKz7VQj0uGrpx7L1iXBWjautQQwjVV0L7YRibz_ezY- Received: from [66.92.43.99] by web111311.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:35:37 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416 Message-ID: <1346340937.49916.YahooMailClassic@web111311.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:35:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeffrey Bouquet To: Matt Burke In-Reply-To: <503F7C5A.4070001@icritical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:38:15 -0000 =0A=0A--- On Thu, 8/30/12, Matt Burke wrote:=0A= =0A> From: Matt Burke =0A> Subject: Re: pkgng que= stions=0A> To: "Mark Felder" =0A> Cc: ports@freebsd.org=0A> D= ate: Thursday, August 30, 2012, 7:44 AM=0A> On 08/30/12 13:01, Mark Felder= =0A> wrote:=0A> > I think you're very confused about what pkgng is for.=0A>= At this time, ports=0A> > are STILL the recommended way to install things = and=0A> keep them up to date.=0A> =0A> Really? I think the last time I comp= iled X or a web browser=0A> (until using=0A> poudriere) was about 10 years = ago.=0A> =0A=0AI mix packages and ports here, heavily using zsh;/var/db/pkg= /;pipes;portmaster and a thumbdrive(ftp) to other machines=0A=0A=0A> =0A> >= Pkgng is the first step required for us to get a better=0A> package manage= ment=0A> > system so we can shift the community towards primarily=0A> using= packages.=0A> =0A> I like packages - they save me compiling massive things= on=0A> my desktop and=0A> they let me keep my servers running exactly the = same=0A> software built from=0A> our CI setup.=A0 'make package' is so quic= k and easy,=0A> it'd be hard to beat.=0A> =0A> So I thought I'd get a grip = on pkgng before pkg_* disappears=0A> from base.=0A> =0A> I had a couple of = questions I wanted to answer -=0A> =0A> 1) How easy does it make keeping my= desktop (currently=0A> releng/9.1 built=0A> with dtrace) up-to-date=0A> 2)= How much easier will it be to maintain production and=0A> testing servers?= =0A> =0A> =0A> The answer has made me start downloading an OpenIndiana=0A> = iso.=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> >> 2. Is there a list of ports like nvidia-driver,= =0A> nspluginwrapper,=0A> >> linux-f10-flashplugin, sampleicc (dependency o= f=0A> libreoffice!) which aren't=0A> >> in pkgng?=0A> > =0A> > Everything c= an be built into the pkgng format except a=0A> few ports that need=0A> > wo= rkarounds. There's a list on the wiki.=0A> > =0A> > http://wiki.freebsd.org= /pkgng=0A> > =0A> > Go to the bottom "Known Failures" section.=0A> =0A> I d= on't see any of the examples I gave listed, apart from=0A> nvidia-driver=0A= > =0A> =0A> >> 3. How do I force pkg to install/upgrade a single=0A> packag= e, regardless of=0A> >> dependencies being out of date?=0A> > =0A> > You sh= ould never try to do this anyway; you'll end up=0A> with packages built=0A>= > against the wrong versions of libraries.=0A> =0A> You're suggesting that= I should upgrade an entire machine=0A> which may have=0A> proven itself ov= er a period of years to be perfectly stable,=0A> just because I=0A> need a = small utility which really doesn't care about the man=0A> page typo=0A> whi= ch caused gettext-0.1.2_3 to change to gettext-0.1.2_4?=0A> =0A=0ANotable h= ere, things which depend upon firefox; gcc46; ...=0A=0A> =0A> >> 4. How do = I get poudiere to build against a local=0A> src/obj tree, or a zfs=0A> >> s= napshot of a pre-built jail, instead of=0A> 9.0-RELEASE?=0A> > =0A> > The p= oudriere man page has all the instructions needed=0A> to create jails of=0A= > > any release version to be used for building packages.=0A> =0A> No, the = man page doesn't mention anything about specifying=0A> where to pull=0A> th= e distribution from, only what method of access to use.=0A> =0A> =0A> > You= don't do it this way. You build everything on your=0A> poudriere server an= d=0A> > push all of your packages to the client. You do this=0A> every sing= le time. If=0A> > you decide you want a new package on your client, you=0A>= build it on your=0A> > poudriere server and have your client request it. I= f=0A> you're using=0A> > poudriere/pkgng, your clients should NEVER be comp= iling=0A> ports or installing=0A> > packages outside of what your poudriere= server is=0A> providing. Poudriere is=0A> > giving you a "cleanroom" envir= onment where it can=0A> guarantee that all the=0A> > packages and their req= uired packages/libraries are=0A> sane.=0A> =0A> > Pkgng doesn't require ZFS= -- poudriere does. Your=0A> clients should never have=0A> > poudriere.=0A>= =0A> I am confused. If pkg_* are removed, how is a person with a=0A> singl= e desktop=0A> machine (worst case, a netbook) expected to operate if they= =0A> need a specific=0A> port build? Are they to spend a week compiling 100= 0+ ports=0A> themselves in a=0A> poudriere VM?=0A> =0A> Or is the flexibili= ty of FreeBSD ports just not deemed to be=0A> useful to the=0A> end user (o= r person unable to provide a dedicated any more?=0A> =0A=0AI am also perple= xed; (unconvinced; ignorant...).. Waiting for=0Aa more comprehensive compa= rison to what exists now. And I've =0Aread the documentation thoroughly, b= ut not enough times to=0Afully comprehend all the strata...=0A=0A=0A> =0A> = >> 8. Is there a pkgng equivalent of 'ls -lt=0A> /var/db/pkg' without firin= g up=0A> >> sqlite?=0A> > =0A> > Are you looking for the date column (not s= ure why=0A> that's useful as it can=0A> > change due to many things)? Doesn= 't "pkg info -a"=0A> suffice?=0A> =0A> 'ls -lt /var/db/pkg' will show me wh= at packages were=0A> installed sorted by=0A> day. It is very useful on serv= ers which aren't routinely=0A> upgraded to the=0A> latest and greatest unte= sted versions=0A> =0A> =0A=0A/var/db/pkg/ here is also indispensable, ( whi= ch I=0Adetailed precisely why in a message to the =0Afreebsd-current list, = this month... ) Until I'm forced to=0Aupgrade to /pkg/ instead (I've worka= rounds and=0Amaybe a PR or two (feature req.) thought out...), I see this a= s a fork of the package registration API to=0Asomething less useful to some= , more useful to others (those using less=0Aports than the number I've inst= alled, maybe. ) =0A=0A=0A=0A> >> 9. Why didn't pkg upgrade tell me it repl= aced my=0A> custom-built packages? I'd=0A> >> have liked for it to not brea= k stuff when=0A> /var/db/ports/*/options differed=0A> >> from the options I= can see pkgng keeps in its=0A> metadata...=0A> > =0A> > Your poudriere ser= ver can use you preferred options=0A> when it builds=0A> > packages. Check = the man page.=0A> =0A> pkg2ng doesn't tell you that you're about to need an= other=0A> machine=0A=0ASeconded.=0A=0A> =0A> $ man pkg2ng=0A> No manual ent= ry for pkg2ng=0A> =0A> =0A> > Long story short: poudriere is a tool for you= to build=0A> your OWN private=0A> > package repositories (which is really = handy!).=0A> =0A> It is handy IF you have the resources to maintain a=0A> p= oudriere machine.=0A> =0A> It is handy IF you really enjoy waiting for x.or= g and web=0A> browsers to compile=0A> =0A> It is NOT handy if you just want= to build one package to be=0A> built with=0A> different options. In fact i= t makes a mockery of FreeBSD's=0A> ease of use.=0A> =0A=0ASeconded. =0A=0A>= =0A> > Pkgng is just the first step towards a large goal of=0A> greatly im= proving=0A> > the enduser experience with FreeBSD.=0A> =0A> By "improving",= you mean "removing flexibility from"?=0A=0ASeconded. =0A=0A> =0A> =0A> > I= don't believe pkgng is default on any release yet, so=0A> you=0A> > should= n't be using public pkgng repositories for=0A> anything but testing. You=0A= > > should either be running your own poudriere server or=0A> you should ju= st be=0A> > using the new pkgng format with ports.=0A> =0A> Wait, you said = "If you're using poudriere/pkgng, your=0A> clients should NEVER=0A> be comp= iling ports or installing packages outside of what=0A> your poudriere=0A> s= erver is providing"=0A> =0A> So what is it?=0A> =0A> The information contai= ned in this message is confidential=0A> and intended for the addressee only= . If you have received=0A> this message in error, or there are any problems= with its=0A> content, please contact the sender. =0A> =0A> iCritical is a = trading name of Critical Software Ltd.=0A> Registered in England: 04909220.= =0A> Registered Office: IC2, Keele Science Park, Keele,=0A> Staffordshire, = ST5 5NH.=0A> =0A> This message has been scanned for security threats by=0A>= iCritical. www.icritical.com=0A> =0A> ____________________________________= ___________=0A> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org=0A> mailing list=0A> http://lists= .freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports=0A> To unsubscribe, send any ma= il to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A> =0A=0AI find this a very = difficult topic [2], sort of like debating =0Awhether FreeBSD should be for= ked to a FreeBSD-pc/bsd hybrid and=0Ano legacy version; complicated by the = many subtopics in the=0Aongoing discussion. It may be that I'd like the hy= brid result=0Abetter in the long run (more upstream repositories?) , but th= ose that are certain pkg will be=0Athe default in a future version have not= made obvious any =0Arecourse (or explanation [1]) for those (like myself) = who prefer to have the choice =0Aavailable, at least for the minority or ma= jority of FreeBSD users=0Awho mix packages and ports as a matter of course.= =0A[1] clearer examples of those who, for instance, should/should not=0Ains= tall other ports additionally to /pkg/, in the manner of a=0Aflowchart inco= rporating all/most use cases... (usb boot? pxe? ...)=0A[2] Newbie or someth= ing similar... =0A=0A=0AJ. Bouquet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 18:49:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD5D106564A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DF08FC14 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14so540285wib.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Rlv5flbRw1ApWsQgjp8/BAWu9PUXQLYt8BKxjWaHi/c=; b=DYzOYDJEyZmlNTrUFm0nw3VGPg+XRiqub+3C7xEISNI4a6suheAtI/AKThNWOiLnHT LdtCCZSGUNaTEOhCtzGOUgOojJDBokxJWMWbYL5XJN3TLhMXD0soSzBf//dj721dZLgj DIX2/vAlEr95+APkYunQSDzcXRsiy7Cf+mH3/Gj04kmXkno+KJl0mZkOMVtgWvHyAW5U TO+fdioSQH1dxFqafmON/pn7eeraq8MONGlPJHwNSSNYZobXQg1aygjlmpTSducW6lo9 25nhv4VyIzfw0tyN40Oex+MPdkXOgzuhrEvae4MsMqdn60F6Ai5unMi/aMtnmJhXK2y5 sKeg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.83.66 with SMTP id o2mr2410489wiy.14.1346352592481; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.153 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.153 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1346336186.50254.YahooMailNeo@web171301.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <1346254976.62356.YahooMailNeo@web171303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1346333374.37764.YahooMailNeo@web171302.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1346336186.50254.YahooMailNeo@web171301.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:49:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:49:54 -0000 On Aug 30, 2012 7:17 AM, "Chris" wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Warren Block > > To: Chris > > Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" ; Waitman Gobble > > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:58 PM > > Subject: Re: Wifi for Lenovo Laptop > > > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Chris wrote: > > > >> Using pciconf as per jb's hint tells me it is a broadcom I have: > >> > >> none3@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x060814e4 chip=0x472714e4 > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > >> vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > >> device = 'BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller' > >> class = network > >> > >> > >> As per the release notes for 9.0 > > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/hardware.html#WLAN), the bwn(4) driver be > > the one to use. > >> > >> Added the following to my /boot/loader.conf following the instructions in > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-wireless.html and rebooted. > >> > >> if_bwn_load="YES" > >> wlan_wep_load="YES" > >> wlan_ccmp_load="YES" > >> wlan_tkip_load="YES" > > > > The last three are included in the GENERIC kernel. > > > > The bwi and bwn drivers need firmware, which is provided by the > > net/bwi-firmware-kmod and net/bwn-firmware-kmod ports. So install > > whichever is appropriate. I think the driver tries to load the right > > firmware automatically, but haven't tried a Broadcom in a while, and it > > might still be necessary to load the firmware module in > > /boot/loader.conf. > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Hi Warren, > > > thanks. Tried with the firmware as well but no better luck. On closer inspection of the bwn manual, it seems like the 4313 is not on the list of suppored versions. > > What I did find though was that it is supposedly possible to get working using NDIS (even with amd64) as per this PC-BSD wiki page http://wiki.pcbsd.org/index.php/Wireless_Testing > > > I might try the NDIS, but will first see if I can find a USB card as the 'net seems to be full of talk about instability of the NDIS driver for the 4313. > > > Thanks to everyone for the help! > > > BR, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" it would be cool if the 4313 worked, i've got a couple of those sitting around here. ill check out that link, thanks. as far as usb goes, I recommend an ralink based device, like older d_link dongles. (i think anything new on the shelf is using atheros, usb support not working afaik) ... all the usb ralink devices I found on ebay work perfectly. (there are even some that have a boosted range of 3km lol) as far as the bios whitelist, I have an hp with that kind of problem. there are several ways around it, but they are all dirty/suspect. luckily I found an ralink that sailed through the detection. you should be able to find out what lenovo sells as replacement parts to get an idea of what they /approve/ Waitman Gobble San Jose California From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 19:06:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4697F1065673 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corebug@corebug.net) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79848FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3043833vbm.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:06:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=P/kwRRcsDABV0dPegI2enle2361MT8wjy0MKKmZlrgM=; b=blnaG0NhM1hl4TMRs+eAhTSle2SXFjPwM5LVwSwe6N7F7wemJk09E/HQ3owKxnjlqn A98msxItOQfLthan9tihknOu2WeTyRFR3q8YkNN/1P23OlHRn6m6jcTUBa6AlBzZJoVA FXDbsqP2E74i7gs36bIObd0lwgPDL3GdREfdKOWnP0duW/lzwcjtJMBrgPPWgcNMtHr8 843KF/fxiFa6AMqTwDakXUkyusvNZ8cE4xm4jh77IUuTVOrNWM6BVuOX6IwQTdtD9ULQ TEYFNNKwHoDjzVk9RD7ci5SJWACmNRD2L2kQaGptEZ37Eq/XzuDqizpkKdVKGCl/SDeT XYHQ== Received: by 10.220.248.69 with SMTP id mf5mr3926201vcb.42.1346353576066; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:06:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.249.138 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:05:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [176.113.162.13] In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQuNGC0LDQu9C40Lkg0KLRg9GA0L7QstC10YY=?= Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:05:55 +0300 Message-ID: To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkw0p6loLzhBoWhPGxmfnMXFLn1jN11rbSo2Ne+CvFvRCc9jyci4K82lf3WjTDoQXB3ganO Cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: Force disk with old GPT label to be recognized as MBR one X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:06:18 -0000 2012/8/30 Warren Block : > On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, ??????? ??????? wrote: > >> Hello there, people! >> I have a FreeBSD box with 9.1-RC3 i386 and an interesting HDD. >> It was patitioned with GPT and zfs some (long) time ago. After that >> the hdd has been completely repartitioned with MBR scheme and one >> single freebsd (165) partition and one slice there. It worked fine in >> 7.2, but now i have to get the data from that slice and when i connect >> the hdd to 9.1 box, it finds old corrupt GPT label (i suppose, it's >> backup GPT header somewhere in the end of actual disk) and does not >> recognize the MBR scheme there. > > > In case it has not been said: make a full backup of everything on that disk > first using dd. > > Erasing the last 34 blocks or 17048 bytes of the disk will erase the backup > GPT. It may be enough to erase just the very last block. > > # diskinfo -v /dev/ada1 > /dev/ada1 > 512 # sectorsize > 256060514304 # mediasize in bytes (238G) > 500118192 # mediasize in sectors > > # : Not tested, could be off by one! > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ada1 bs=512 seek=500118191 > > Force a retaste with 'true > /dev/ada1', then see what gpart shows. If the > drive is still seen as GPT, adjust the seek to begin at (mediasize in > sectors) - 34. Thank you a lot! It worked like a charm! -- ~~~ WBR, Vitaliy Turovets Systems Administrator Corebug.Net +38(093)265-70-55 VITU-RIPE X-NCC-RegID: ua.tv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 23:17:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA9D106566B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jurgen.weber@theiconic.com.au) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8038FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T7DzM-0001J1-N9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:17:28 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:17:28 -0700 (PDT) From: warchild To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1346368648706-5739453.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrading 9.1-BETA1 -> 9.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:17:29 -0000 Hi That is wrong, this worked for me on one of my servers since I did it straight away (as soon as I saw the release for rc1. FreeBSD warsol 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 04:25:06 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 that was beta1, and I used freebsd-update to upgrade it! Now, on another server i would like to do I have the same error as the OP. Go to: http://update3.freebsd.org/ Simple put, someone has deleted the whole BETA1 directory/brach!? WHY!? is there another way we can accept the key..... or is that data needed.. Can we get the branch restored? It does work. Rebuilding world is so painful. thanks -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Upgrading-9-1-BETA1-9-1-RC1-tp5737452p5739453.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 23:50:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5501065673; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (hydra.dawnsign.com [69.198.101.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BB38FC0A; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D72595D5A; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Draco.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [192.168.101.33]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1899895D32; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRACO.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729]) by Draco.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0379.000; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:42:54 -0700 From: Doug Sampson To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "'trasz@freebsd.org'" Thread-Topic: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting Thread-Index: Ac2HCSZAAjTVzuZmTtKA54+RytNrQw== Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:42:54 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.101.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:50:04 -0000 Hello all- I've set up ZFS on a FreeBSD 9.0 64-bit server recently. One of the things = I've had to learn relates to NFSv4 ACLs. I've developed two scripts to rese= t permissions- one for files and the other for folders. I've run into an is= sue with executing a script to set permissions on a bunch of folders. The root filesystem is /data. There are a bunch of subfolders followed by m= ore subfolders. Allow me to demonstrate as follows: dougs@dorado:/# getfacl ./data # file: ./data # owner: root # group: DSP-production group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group:DSP-marketing:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow owner@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow everyone@:r-x---a-R-c--s:------:allow dougs@dorado:/# cd data dougs@dorado:/data# ll total 45 drwxrwx---+ 5 root DSP-production 5 Aug 28 10:27 ADS-New drwxrwx---+ 60 root DSP-production 118 Aug 27 14:17 ADS-OLD [ .. snip .. ] drwxrwx---+ 12 root DSP-production 12 Aug 27 14:16 WorkinProgress dougs@dorado:/data# getfacl ./ADS-New/ # file: ./ADS-New/ # owner: root # group: DSP-production group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group:DSP-marketing:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow owner@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow everyone@:------a-R-c--s:------:allow dougs@dorado:/data# cd ./ADS-New/ dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New# ll total 9 drwxrwx---+ 5 root nobody 7 Aug 27 14:20 Artworks drwxrwx---+ 4 root nobody 4 Jul 17 12:12 ForDSP drwxrwx---+ 78 root nobody 78 Jul 23 13:17 ForMarketing dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New# /root/bin/reset-perms-prod-mkt-dirs.sh dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New# getfacl ./Artworks/ # file: ./Artworks/ # owner: root # group: nobody group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<----- group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<----- group:DSP-marketing:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow owner@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow everyone@:------a-R-c--s:------:allow dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New# cd Artworks/ dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New/Artworks# ll total 4234 drwxrwx---+ 2 root nobody 2 Jul 17 12:08 Ask JoeS drwxrwx---+ 2 root nobody 10 Jul 17 12:12 Cool - AD d-w-rwx---+ 2 DSP-alfredo nobody 2 Aug 27 14:20 Jaye Additi= onal Art -rwxrwx---+ 1 root DSP-production 3770445 Mar 11 2010 comingsoonI= ntNepal.pdf -rwxrwx---+ 1 root DSP-production 415338 Mar 11 2010 previewcopy= .pdf dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New/Artworks# cd Ask\ JoeS/ dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New/Artworks/Ask JoeS# cd .. dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New/Artworks# getfacl Ask\ JoeS/ # file: Ask JoeS/ # owner: root # group: nobody group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<----- group:DSP-marketing:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow owner@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow everyone@:------a-R-c--s:------:allow dougs@dorado:/data/ADS-New/Artworks# As you can see, the ADS-New folder where I executed the script shows duplic= ate entries of the DSP-production group whereas the "Ask Joe" subfolder und= erneath the ADS-New folder shows only one DSP-production group. If I run th= is script on the ADS-OLD folder, I see the same effect- only the first leve= l of subfolders get duplicate DSP-production entries while the rest of the = subfolders only contain one entry of the DSP-production group. Why is this = happening? The contents of the /root/bin/reset-perms-prod-mkt-dirs.sh is as follows: #!/bin/sh # run this script where you wish to effect the changes # reset perms to default find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b * # apply perms to files find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -m group@:full_set:fd:allow * find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -m owner@:full_set:fd:allow * find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -m g:dsp-marketing:full_set:fd:al= low * find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -m g:dsp-production:full_set:fd:a= llow * Um? Am I missing something? ~Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 07:49:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE31106566B; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:49:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from budiyt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B48FC17; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so1238462lbb.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:49:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VYmomPDJZLkJP9Kig//L9RAJiNAbMb4qV3ypAvOFdlw=; b=JBrXOD58OtHKOCg2+xgZWIbEGuJ0Qb7j3Xl6VZYEiViKP200zN9ZVNqk1QO1ZwPziX 7tyvCEv+1V16T0Inll66kfl2grg1Ckkl+MDsN1uuCXCgaXCskKPpNedDNK0c/QJt4TIV 6B11Ciw3Bt/XQD86EzHvWtDqGcGs4sXne0vhU96eVNNf+/tnBYYOSr4Ei1XhaE3rLrZd P+4XIjijU+J7sNoFL8JlWCqgBmF2q0ct2UPnOiGjYqq0g8WUHBIsLreKPh3RUA1dkXTC kX0mcrEwSLrH6zpW6UWl/hYD9fN67wiU7MlNUO7bfwkmtuBnCc5KeJLqPtp3EgXrxm1g rizA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.83.8 with SMTP id m8mr2257766lby.115.1346399375783; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.28.33 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:49:35 +0700 Message-ID: From: budsz To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PF RDR from LAN to LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:49:38 -0000 Hi folks, I've little questions about RDR using Packet Filter (PF), I used IPF (IPFILTER) before and success with this scenario. extif = outside interface intif = internal interface public_ip = 202.xxx.xxx.xxx client_create = 192.168.1.1, port = 6112 client_join = 192.168.1.2 for outside/internet rdr pass on $extif proto tcp from any to $public_ip port 6112 -> $client_create port 6112 That's rule success can forward from from internet to $client_create, now other plan how to forward $client_join to $client_create. I use this rule: rdr pass on $intif proto tcp from $client_join to $public_ip port 6112 -> $client_create port 6112 As far i know if $client_create created game host with port 6112 will be translate to $public_ip with port 6112 too. so I need to forward from LAN to $public_ip/6112 to actually who create game ($client_create/6112) pfctl -s state resulting: client_create 6112 <- public_ip 6112 <- client_join SYS-CLOSED Anyone help for this issue - Thank you -- budsz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 18:23:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA35F106564A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0E78FC16 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so1698202lbb.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4+a6VaC1H3WKgaIdDVF77XAsN4diUvYW2410U7TSoII=; b=ev4hIEsOzhFpOPoaB4A4nHbxQHq1vjZPc5dkcUMRo8jdecGaG2pjQQX3HKwWRBG+wV myuReuEm4pjA0m1DtKk6O57GQHS5BdoOPOET9NoUq1Y/l+OeVmcLijaP588yTS8aF0f/ CJWLX/rz7gppNybF4+SedspL6aqYLVXU29SnxItxvExq/OlvpO2cAoyXvm/dRmkHz63Y TtRNkaa2Huc+GSEeJpoJfRw0BdIFqJsOpOzU84raXWTVzA3R7RThECr7WJxA40+RMVSE ZnNyNcpEb6NmYvpUHQOrdhtvdivG3+Z2F83HS7IvQTp37jbFe/EM2EZpyRE2OsFwlfB2 pCTw== Received: by 10.112.44.167 with SMTP id f7mr2883111lbm.34.1346437419757; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jj5sm5416160lab.1.2012.08.31.11.23.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:23:38 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120803 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:23:41 -0000 I've found the two directories below on my system. I don't remember creating them. So I'd like to be able to find out what package(s) has/have created them, if possible. # ls -ld /root/bin/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 29 22:52 /root/bin/ # ls -Rl /root/bin/ total 0 # ls -dl /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Jul 8 22:32 /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 # ls -Rl /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 8 22:32 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Jul 8 22:32 lib /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0/bin: total 10816 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 604172 Jul 8 22:32 ar -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1036440 Jul 8 22:32 as -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 879860 Jul 8 22:32 ld -r-xr-xr-x 4 root wheel 879860 Jul 8 22:32 ld.bfd -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 3463684 Jul 8 22:32 ld.gold -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 587808 Jul 8 22:32 nm -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 733004 Jul 8 22:32 objcopy -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1098644 Jul 8 22:32 objdump -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 604172 Jul 8 22:32 ranlib -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 733004 Jul 8 22:32 strip /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0/lib: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Jul 8 22:32 ldscripts /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0/lib/ldscripts: total 228 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7375 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.x -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7158 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xbn -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7188 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7303 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xd -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7133 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xdc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7123 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xdw -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7375 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xn -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4658 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xr -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6897 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xs -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6727 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xsc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6717 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xsw -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4704 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xu -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7178 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386.xw -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7476 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.x -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7259 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xbn -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7289 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7404 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xd -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7234 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xdc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7224 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xdw -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7476 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xn -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4682 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xr -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6998 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xs -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6828 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xsc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6818 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xsw -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4728 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xu -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7279 Jul 8 22:32 elf_i386_fbsd.xw -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 838 Jul 8 22:32 i386bsd.x -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 849 Jul 8 22:32 i386bsd.xbn -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 843 Jul 8 22:32 i386bsd.xn -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 642 Jul 8 22:32 i386bsd.xr -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 682 Jul 8 22:32 i386bsd.xu Any pointers would be much appreciated. Alexander Kapshuk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 19:04:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEF5106566C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47FA8FC08 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14so1517346wib.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:04:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=wRxyjj1Fx3IygHRSElFJPHkF2vQrz1XIIYUzMAfHIxU=; b=bGaVcnF9kKW7+TBBJOiu/FCftbB1kC3/wap3MOAInxfyW7eZsiXANyJ9i133sIX2KK kMnxLSU/MLruifvfUJU6Zoq8BoQYui0uN5T1otFsu2GydeLSynTTN9UcSqidxXv7sIdT 5i9LR0W9pCf3BFQ9P4Bqrh4nDv60UgzdEoRZlK99cqxif0oWtFasqKDa7CNlxAuNEStS RJlhkQ+sfxn7b8YRLTFSkRaFP0YMVt+DhhPpdSD/7JWPczxi+YDwe8cEuZ8jyYvNopsf d+kZBRih2jKgzzItQ1XDWJAM9O+cbNU69hwn/uNgqhKij3CsVhzltuejV7B0BQy/rYJf OxaA== Received: by 10.180.106.137 with SMTP id gu9mr6455090wib.20.1346439869008; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (45.81.datacomsa.pl. [195.34.81.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t8sm2374779wiy.3.2012.08.31.12.04.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:04:25 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <60FD2657-0D3C-4E6C-ABD0-652DA424D9A2@freebsd.org> References: To: Doug Sampson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:04:31 -0000 Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Doug Sampson w dniu 31 sie 2012, o godz. = 01:42: [..] > group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow = <<<<<----- > group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow = <<<<<----- This itself looks like a bug in setfacl(1). I'll look into it. = However... [..] > #!/bin/sh > # run this script where you wish to effect the changes > # reset perms to default > find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b * Why the asterisk? Also, using "-m" with NFSv4 ACLs is not a very good idea - it's supposed to work, but with NFSv4 ACLs the ordering does = matter, and "-m" simply modifies the ACL entry in place, while the effect of the entry might depend e.g. on "deny" entries before it. Use "-a" instead. --=20 If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my = body? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 19:09:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D44E1065673 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B047C8FC1C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 19:09:36 -0000 Received: from d178071.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.178.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2012 21:09:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/1YVYPj9j1/Zwd8SvZwebVThmDlfJ37Rg1cM+7bs YDylPW+SS6Ktzd Message-ID: <50410BF2.7010806@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:09:38 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: warchild References: <1346368648706-5739453.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1346368648706-5739453.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading 9.1-BETA1 -> 9.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:09:38 -0000 On 08/31/12 01:17, warchild wrote: > Hi > > That is wrong, this worked for me on one of my servers since I did it > straight away (as soon as I saw the release for rc1. > > > FreeBSD warsol 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 04:25:06 UTC 2012 > root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > that was beta1, and I used freebsd-update to upgrade it! > > Now, on another server i would like to do I have the same error as the OP. > > Go to: http://update3.freebsd.org/ > > Simple put, someone has deleted the whole BETA1 directory/brach!? WHY!? > > is there another way we can accept the key..... or is that data needed.. Can > we get the branch restored? It does work. Rebuilding world is so painful. > > thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Upgrading-9-1-BETA1-9-1-RC1-tp5737452p5739453.html > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > There is a stupid way to upgrade FreeBSD: http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-1280.html % su # env UNAME_r=7.1-PRERELEASE freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.1 i use # env UNAME_r=8.2 freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC1 But it doesn't help me with "tool [", so i can't update with csup. :( Greetings From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 19:21:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFE8106566C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22C188FC1B for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 19:21:47 -0000 Received: from d178071.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.178.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2012 21:21:47 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//nH8jZrH/5GwBtbU2rUTkNWdH+SP6EMbfqHWnsA BL4sexdmcvFNNx Message-ID: <50410ECE.8020402@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:21:50 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: doug@safeport.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 9.0 support for RealTek NIC - re0 driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:21:49 -0000 On 08/29/12 18:14, doug@safeport.com wrote: > This card is on a Dell Inspiron. It works perfectly on 8.x. Dmesg on 8.2 > reports it as: > > re0: > > pciconf: > > re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x04341028 chip=0x813610ec > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' > device = 'Realtek 10/100/1000 PCI-E NIC Family all in one NDIS > Driver v5.728.0604.2009 06/04/2009 (Rtl8023)' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > On 9.0 I got it to work once or twice out of a couple of dozen tries. > > 9.0 dmesg reports: > > re0: RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S PCI ... > > The release docs imply the card is supported. I did not see a PR. > Anyone else with similiar issues? Is the MAC changing? Give dmesg some message about it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 19:26:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93801106566C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9FA88FC0A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 19:26:06 -0000 Received: from d178071.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.178.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2012 21:26:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX181pIldhZw15JcU6ILdUtEjdrhabfD6P62lXUUqtL QRARWA0z3C70WG Message-ID: <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:26:09 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kapshuk References: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:26:14 -0000 On 08/31/12 20:23, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > I've found the two directories below on my system. I don't remember > creating them. So I'd like to be able to find out what package(s) > has/have created them, if possible. > > # ls -ld /root/bin/ > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 29 22:52 /root/bin/ > # ls -Rl /root/bin/ > total 0 > > # ls -dl /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 > drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Jul 8 22:32 > /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 > > # ls -Rl /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 > total 8 Which program do you use to upgrade/ build ports? http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=21088 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 19:32:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C3E106564A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35688FC08 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so1742215lbb.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:32:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z7rwz6C6i/q6BOhr/UnWn/dKvQVfMbiN+KWqF2EcrZg=; b=RKDc7fkgdwwOKQW17X423LheM/VjzF5kjPrX/PAD93tmXQWn4otWnSxK8K20d01bOe uaRz3f3DkL4RtlmEH1/BCola5hkyA1CPqWhTu6kZlorllZT1O8c6a0+Xsdxtc8wjV7ff 1Lea45//3/DMy6u+eccHAuiybyKhmQxJhf8UAnFd+dCjaca2z5etsRiatDhF0RWg6Sit lF9zdSr6svI9INB+5efDdU370uepRHo4NnrG+B0miyzNnGIEyn19ufI6ieLe+QmMAFoy pKGycu4Zp9Z3Qe4eI1fuqV103XBNellwHGkvwtVRaY+VnyNfIDmyuRQ40ryaUA8geq3S HTyA== Received: by 10.152.147.130 with SMTP id tk2mr7337103lab.4.1346441558275; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fz8sm1475476lbb.9.2012.08.31.12.32.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50411154.9030201@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:32:36 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120831 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "lokadamus@gmx.de" References: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:32:40 -0000 On 08/31/12 22:26, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > Which program do you use to upgrade/ build ports? portupgrade. I had a look at the link you'd included in your previous email. I'm still unclear as to where the two directories came from. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 19:41:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EFD1065673 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E78858FC17 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 19:41:39 -0000 Received: from d178071.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.178.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2012 21:41:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX192GkRZLlx2LsnryuKRO3RIhMMJ9VQjj0HmY4JSf0 RzIPQk7y4rdyRr Message-ID: <50411371.50001@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:41:37 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kapshuk References: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> <50411154.9030201@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50411154.9030201@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:41:41 -0000 On 08/31/12 21:32, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On 08/31/12 22:26, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: >> Which program do you use to upgrade/ build ports? > portupgrade. > > I had a look at the link you'd included in your previous email. I'm > still unclear as to where the two directories came from. > > Thanks. > > I think it comes from portupgrade. I use portmaster, but when i look at google, i found some thinks with portupgrade and portbld. I think, portbld is building for some ports, but on different places. Kick it (or rename it), look that all ok and make a upgrade, if available. If one port need it, it will create it. greetings From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 19:43:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5D71065676 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD83E8FC1D for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12so3075974lag.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:43:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HNjDvxzLNEsYM5mqns8ELIDsaEgMV8x+PqMQ+ElOzjo=; b=BosHq/+o+LJx5CJr+ICjH5t9kp5NCrf8XWQscdnpKGCnaN+m47RzMskBHkOftF75HP F3Pwl4BeMiH+HdHK0S1jYBrfyaVxapoS6GFA2EySkDC02UtvoljczsrDt0jbofIEvHcB 43bmYtg1ouRY3bZBRkHObY90R3G15k6rmR0QosDtYh5hcO1cJXhy4YgVKf/eEMGvy/RB /pHeBmXu2ZH/3rJs8ooESXDczqf5eftUc+aTFwNFbFt2jNH+Mxh25aeHgpXhmWy4UKpQ koTkoefQgFjpjfXimRyjzMj1Pvq04SVFkdInNhKaIQenzRhHnfevpdfKgWe+3YkmqlYX Wggg== Received: by 10.112.104.3 with SMTP id ga3mr2955172lbb.77.1346442193359; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lv13sm5563212lab.8.2012.08.31.12.43.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <504113CF.5060407@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:43:11 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120831 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "lokadamus@gmx.de" References: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> <50411154.9030201@gmail.com> <50411371.50001@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <50411371.50001@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:43:16 -0000 On 08/31/12 22:41, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > I think it comes from portupgrade. > I use portmaster, but when i look at google, i found some thinks with > portupgrade and portbld. > I think, portbld is building for some ports, but on different places. > > Kick it (or rename it), look that all ok and make a upgrade, if > available. > If one port need it, it will create it. Understood. Thanks. Any ideas about /root/bin? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 20:10:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406191065674 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88C968FC1D for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 20:10:30 -0000 Received: from d178071.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.178.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2012 22:10:30 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+pAIpXDVipAO4rXZGCLX+96ilMkyom0DzsPk7F5p jdjwUKEPz686li Message-ID: <50411A38.2050700@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:10:32 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kapshuk References: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> <50411154.9030201@gmail.com> <50411371.50001@gmx.de> <504113CF.5060407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <504113CF.5060407@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:10:32 -0000 On 08/31/12 21:43, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On 08/31/12 22:41, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: >> I think it comes from portupgrade. >> I use portmaster, but when i look at google, i found some thinks with >> portupgrade and portbld. >> I think, portbld is building for some ports, but on different places. >> >> Kick it (or rename it), look that all ok and make a upgrade, if >> available. >> If one port need it, it will create it. > Understood. Thanks. > > Any ideas about /root/bin? Not really. It looks like an error like my "tool [". I get this after i would go to head (in february?) and get back this linking. No chance to get of it. Every new buildworld will look for it. :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 20:15:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228361065670 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC578FC08 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12so3095055lag.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:15:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mQkSnOkGKSGGZ6BC4HTpgdsDflRdy3SM73Q8yAvlwX0=; b=ftgIzQP7jUgXLmNIkYE4GHXJMBggP76N17CRAkiaq6phfUFhu1x9o9Kn44PbHvErLP FA3S+71kpYGvJYjfLrvq7fGUwV/Xim8LCHk+nTlEwEL14GG/wyFlSLW63G3dKtwD1yLk ygAviKKAVVzIUbwV9RD6/xlYPneKlmNlArNqBqmEhYccUyZSjV9bM4nfXdZostuZNKE2 cAlElTyi50HNkBoruazq1M3qsYLfq/pzF8vCk3EESeiJaGvSq/prI4yAamufxpOyiXA2 VWXQ8Ujwe48FStsTm/pm584hPhoYG59JSBuu3OupRrEBeUUzFR5Tkxi6bQiH40pO7lnY x13Q== Received: by 10.152.104.77 with SMTP id gc13mr7541844lab.31.1346444140073; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm1494788lbg.17.2012.08.31.13.15.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50411B6A.8030109@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:15:38 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "lokadamus@gmx.de" References: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> <50411154.9030201@gmail.com> <50411371.50001@gmx.de> <504113CF.5060407@gmail.com> <50411A38.2050700@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <50411A38.2050700@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:15:42 -0000 On 08/31/2012 11:10 PM, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > Not really. It looks like an error like my "tool [". > I get this after i would go to head (in february?) and get back this > linking. > > No chance to get of it. Every new buildworld will look for it. :( No worries. I didn't think it was there when I first installed the system. So I thought I'd ask. /root/bin/ does seem to be defined in the $PATH environment variable for the root user account in both .cshrc and .profile. Thanks for your prompt response. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 21:25:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363581065687 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from oceanpt.safeport.com (oceanpt.safeport.com [65.122.17.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E651E8FC16 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oceanpt.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q7VLPoCD067964; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:25:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:25:50 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: "lokadamus@gmx.de" In-Reply-To: <50410ECE.8020402@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <50410ECE.8020402@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (oceanpt.safeport.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:25:50 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 9.0 support for RealTek NIC - re0 driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:25:58 -0000 On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: > On 08/29/12 18:14, doug@safeport.com wrote: >> This card is on a Dell Inspiron. It works perfectly on 8.x. Dmesg on 8.2 >> reports it as: >> >> re0: >> >> pciconf: >> >> re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x04341028 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x02 >> hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' >> device = 'Realtek 10/100/1000 PCI-E NIC Family all in one NDIS >> Driver v5.728.0604.2009 06/04/2009 (Rtl8023)' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> >> On 9.0 I got it to work once or twice out of a couple of dozen tries. >> >> 9.0 dmesg reports: >> >> re0: RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S PCI ... >> >> The release docs imply the card is supported. I did not see a PR. Anyone >> else with similiar issues? > Is the MAC changing? > Give dmesg some message about it? Not currently in the same city as my Dell. I installed 8.2 to make sure I did not have a hardware issue. I will [re]install 9.0 Sunday and report back. _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 22:37:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD01E1065692 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wrelam@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FA38FC0A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so7206731ial.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:37:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OyVBeG6Hz4OO7TW+AOZbkGF08LhIRBSBY7/sGJHi8FI=; b=WK3sMftnXDyWHcSP/veJOyB0bL8PZTfXkM22mNiyyTlr3iMe0/6sbQAEApccO5Mi7c kyd+0lYMDlBCAgeHG9nhh7iGhHtaLP/XuCk5VzmhVZfXmNcOY/Kz1ZvPhQyqqYxjz3L0 fWymKrJYCGbmHaieKDCm1LuqxUQMguNwB3pchnK8ClNf55xMX+74zL68UDJm2jeV4kEi aSs+q7ixHsvDn0tBQxke6Mg6bNkRSAKkFYBHCHaWxkxT9/myrSzHDNr/Pui0t1Sgd9Zk eQKB1UrdQwVi9dtje1rN7btkIACeYDQWRmBwnt3ANEtGQ2osR1jx+HlmEiw1I48cAGNv kxbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.213.6 with SMTP id no6mr4509367igc.30.1346452664107; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.57.147 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:37:43 -0400 Message-ID: From: Walt Elam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Root password not working on console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:37:50 -0000 I recently *accidentally* removed myself from the wheel group, so I was no longer able to use su to root. To fix it, I hooked up a monitor and keyboard to my FreeBSD 8.2 box so I could login as root, but it kept rejecting my password. I restarted the machine in single-user mode, did the following: mount -u / mount -a passwd exit So it booted back in to multi-user mode. Once again, I tried to login as root, but got the same "Login incorrect" message. Puzzled, I repeated the previous steps using the password "pass" this time. However, I went ahead and added my user account to the wheel group while in single-user mode. Once in multi-user mode again, I still got "Login incorrect" (specifically, pam_acct_mgmt(): authentication error) when logging in as root. I SSH'd to the machine as my regular user, typed su, and entered "pass" which worked just fine. So, I have absolutely no clue why I am unable to login to my machine, on the console, as root with "pass", but it works when using su from a regular user account. I tried searching around but almost all of the hits are about resetting the root password in single-user mode. Does any one know what I'm doing incorrectly? Thanks for any help in advance, -Walt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 22:51:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA184106566C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeremy@stormy.smart-serv.net) Received: from mx01.lax.us.smart-serv.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:f0f1:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34318FC12 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.112] (S0106000d87073d15.nb.shawcable.net [70.74.72.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.lax.us.smart-serv.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8756218D067; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:51:50 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <50414003.9090400@stormy.smart-serv.net> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:51:47 -0700 From: Jeremy Johnston User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120721 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walt Elam References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root password not working on console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:51:52 -0000 On 08/31/2012 03:37 PM, Walt Elam wrote: > I recently *accidentally* removed myself from the wheel group, so I was no > longer able to use su to root. To fix it, I hooked up a monitor and > keyboard to my FreeBSD 8.2 box so I could login as root, but it kept > rejecting my password. I restarted the machine in single-user mode, did the > following: > > mount -u / > mount -a > passwd > exit > > So it booted back in to multi-user mode. Once again, I tried to login as > root, but got the same "Login incorrect" message. Puzzled, I repeated the > previous steps using the password "pass" this time. However, I went ahead > and added my user account to the wheel group while in single-user mode. > Once in multi-user mode again, I still got "Login incorrect" (specifically, > pam_acct_mgmt(): authentication error) when logging in as root. I SSH'd to > the machine as my regular user, typed su, and entered "pass" which worked > just fine. > > So, I have absolutely no clue why I am unable to login to my machine, on > the console, as root with "pass", but it works when using su from a regular > user account. I tried searching around but almost all of the hits are about > resetting the root password in single-user mode. Does any one know what I'm > doing incorrectly? > > Thanks for any help in advance, > > -Walt The only thing that comes to mind would be to check /etc/ttys and see if the console ttys are set to insecure, which would prevent root login. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 23:26:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BF6106566C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wrelam@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0F68FC16 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so7256329ial.13 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:26:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZqT4/tyxRDmoJBIlC3+cYpL076W79ZsU2fyQk2d5Qng=; b=dArFM3NUwcWpubIONiZTJTRCSDfbH+NsO3XyKgneal4WI4wuT+FOykWBg9x0c62wzv PEyBQuPLwQD5uuZQGc/oQW0AZ+mttCUHVv1BtJjwulBsrkgFN5kgkwQ/eQlYcCqrAGb+ 0lMEcCSd5d5jwVpgBZ9fV5SA5iGr5ZTpGWbLSBKiNkUicTVt16NruCz/oq0UH1pzUjte 7Ugi0MDupRRi01/Fj5fpAzjNBZRQYs5pDxFBqd+pQy3xA8M3kVWw/TJS9XuD/kklujZf 2Qg0eroc8iZqFDqM3uGo32IW1wzJ4rIr8cKkVsIQAdxDMsm664tVx4BtvNFnemdf7v1P 4TKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.209.99 with SMTP id ml3mr4726953igc.31.1346455610281; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.57.147 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:26:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50414003.9090400@stormy.smart-serv.net> References: <50414003.9090400@stormy.smart-serv.net> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:26:50 -0400 Message-ID: From: Walt Elam To: Jeremy Johnston Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Root password not working on console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:26:51 -0000 Jeremy, Nailed it on the head. I had forgotten that a few weeks ago I was messing around with that file. I changed this line: ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on insecure to this: ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure And now I am able to login to root from the console. Thanks for the quick help! I should've remembered that. -Walt On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jeremy Johnston < jeremy@stormy.smart-serv.net> wrote: > On 08/31/2012 03:37 PM, Walt Elam wrote: > >> I recently *accidentally* removed myself from the wheel group, so I was no >> longer able to use su to root. To fix it, I hooked up a monitor and >> keyboard to my FreeBSD 8.2 box so I could login as root, but it kept >> rejecting my password. I restarted the machine in single-user mode, did >> the >> following: >> >> mount -u / >> mount -a >> passwd >> exit >> >> So it booted back in to multi-user mode. Once again, I tried to login as >> root, but got the same "Login incorrect" message. Puzzled, I repeated the >> previous steps using the password "pass" this time. However, I went ahead >> and added my user account to the wheel group while in single-user mode. >> Once in multi-user mode again, I still got "Login incorrect" >> (specifically, >> pam_acct_mgmt(): authentication error) when logging in as root. I SSH'd to >> the machine as my regular user, typed su, and entered "pass" which worked >> just fine. >> >> So, I have absolutely no clue why I am unable to login to my machine, on >> the console, as root with "pass", but it works when using su from a >> regular >> user account. I tried searching around but almost all of the hits are >> about >> resetting the root password in single-user mode. Does any one know what >> I'm >> doing incorrectly? >> >> Thanks for any help in advance, >> >> -Walt >> > > The only thing that comes to mind would be to check /etc/ttys and see if > the console ttys are set to insecure, which would prevent root login. > >> ______________________________**_________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org " >> >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 15:09:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2CA1065670; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E458FC0A; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2906629wgb.31 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=w/QoEvBJQpAx8mJ4nE5qztlG9REhgktpBotA27EXimE=; b=FEyWCbnjkdF9Aqd291+1XTq0eURhvltNS6g7gPRiC1qMVK1YQnksfAWP5egz4DJyjn OilufAbX0SEhKvoJIeKt+nSG6JejcShcpArgOl8HTmHBC/PteMIeiQ4v6WLqWYHCZTLk 57EQwJVWhSb+1TxURgqqpUVWc5BfbvNa7DGPO/g1xTw8LB3qXQ2t3HnwZNvwkHdro0aY H+paHKiYpTryxsTTUX4o2osQw1H+Bf69jCUM5hZp3Yjf30jtpGSGa2/FEC+33ZFemqd2 889IO+L+L0ZgYNPv9kb3ZuYK8/vebRPmSAtVYwMNHDnYlJ2/lnT5udrR74d2n8bhQccu Xzng== Received: by 10.216.132.25 with SMTP id n25mr6302815wei.25.1346512193505; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-135-0-219.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.135.0.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k20sm7523150wiv.11.2012.09.01.08.09.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:09:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2737264.0YyBQPHRTa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209011709.46974.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.12 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:09:55 -0000 --nextPart2737264.0YyBQPHRTa Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.12 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. T= he=20 packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. =20 There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users= ). The patch [4] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.tbz) =3D=20 335ef444a2f6f375dd22cf932b651919 MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) =3D=20 e06673c4ab9a0bb82a7d48dad5b8877f MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) =3D=20 aafe06b15176f810c25cbf708c11aabb [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng [4] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh --nextPart2737264.0YyBQPHRTa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlBCJToACgkQUaaFgP9pFrJtJgCfY9kzc1084Y/l9jWW7sHYEuhu PS0An3BkS+spcuUin7ptECAGn55bkeDt =RmYp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2737264.0YyBQPHRTa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 21:49:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4EE106564A for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tamino@wolfhut.org) Received: from pendor.wolfhut.org (pendor.wolfhut.org [173.228.91.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FFE8FC15 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.42.100] (173-228-91-224.static.sonic.net [173.228.91.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pendor.wolfhut.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8D2DDBB1A for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 14:42:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Cottrell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2060AF10-560C-40E5-B402-412E51130A46@wolfhut.org> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 14:42:34 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486) Subject: Different take on old FAQ: multihoming and source-based routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 21:49:09 -0000 Hi everyone, I've been doing a lot of google searching recently for variants of "freebsd source-based routing" to look for how to get a dual-homed FreeBSD machine to send to the correct default gateway based on the source address of the packets it's expecting that gateway to pass along. You can't send a packet with a Comcast source address to the AT&T default gateway and expect it to actually make it out onto the public internet, etc. Universally, the posts I've been finding that discuss this always recommend creating multiple routing tables with "options = ROUTETABLES=3D..." which I wasn't willing to do, because my wild youthful = kernel-recompiling days are over -- these days I like the advantages that come with using a pure GENERIC kernel. :-) So, today I tried the following /etc/pf.conf: > if =3D "bge0" > v4_addr_1 =3D "173.228.91.225" > v4_net_1 =3D "173.228.91.0/24" > v4_gw_1 =3D "173.228.91.1" > v4_addr_2 =3D "50.193.24.82" > v4_net_2 =3D "50.193.24.80/28" > v4_gw_2 =3D "50.193.24.94" >=20 > pass out quick on $if route-to ($if $v4_gw_1) inet from $v4_addr_1 to = !$v4_net_1 no state > pass out quick on $if route-to ($if $v4_gw_2) inet from $v4_addr_2 to = !$v4_net_2 no state > #pass out quick on $if route-to ($if $v6_gw_1) inet6 from $v6_addr_1 = to !$v6_net_1 no state >=20 > pass all no state I guess my setup is a bit simpler than the norm because I only have one physical interface, that both networks are on. But... by Jove, it seems to be working! Is there something I'm missing? Is this going to break in some subtle edge case that I'm just not seeing? If it really is this simple, why does everyone keep recommending the "options ROUTETABLES" approach? Thanks, ~Ben=