From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 02:08:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B69106566C for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E748FC0A for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q8G28oXh023379 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:08:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:08:50 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201209160208.q8G28oXh023379@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: legal question on licence terms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:08:26 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Sep 14 10:32:41 2012 > From: Martyn Jansen > To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" > Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:16:32 +0000 > Subject: legal question on licence terms > > Sirs, > > I'm looking at your licence terms and conditions and particularly the > section on "redistribution restriction" on a number of ports. > > The restriction is stated as being applicable to "redistribution on mass > media". Could you please elaborate on what this means - clearly a number > of leading solutions use FreeBSD so I'm trying to properly understand > when and how the redistribution restrictions apply. > > In our own case we would be using FreeBSD as a component of managed > services that we would be providing to our customers. The software would > remain on our own server and would not be separately available to our > customers. We assume therefore that this in any case does not constitute > "redistribution". For buiness purposes, it is _critical_ that you consult -- on a *paid*, professional basis --with a competent legal profesional in your jurisdiction -- one with expertise and experience in 'IP' (intellectual property) matters. That way, if the advice/opinion you get, and 'rely on', turns out to be incorrect, you have recourse against their malpractice insurance. That said, there is one set of rules that applies to the FreeBSD 'base system' -- which is owned, maintined, and distributed by the FreeBSD Foundation -- which allows essentially unlimited use for any reason as long as the copyright notices and source attribution are maintained. The 'ports collection' operates under *different* rules -- with potentially different rules for _each_and_every_ package in the collection. These packages are owned and maintained by various 'third parties', who THEMSELVES decide on the licensing requirements/restrictions they impose. You, or your legal counsel/solicitor/barrister, will have to review the licensing terms of _each_and_every_ such 'third party' package that you intend to make available to your users -- to see if/how/under what conditions you can do that. There are some packages where the rights owner allows FreeBSD to distribute their package to directly to 'end users', but does *not* allow someone who gets the package from FreeBSD to redistribute it to others. It is *YOUR* responsibility to review the license terms in each piece of software in the ports collection to determine what is/is not allowed by the licence terms on that piece of software, if it is for other than 'personal' use.