From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 00:07:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92A9106566C for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1360db8843=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3B38FC16 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:07:15 +0000 (UTC) X-MDAV-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:56:51 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:56:51 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail1.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=6.0 tests=USER_IN_WHITELIST shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from r2d2 ([188.220.16.49]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50017558733.msg for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:56:51 +0000 X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49 X-Return-Path: prvs=1360db8843=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Jeremiah Gowdy" , References: <9728B37F7A4EBE45A2FD4B18883BAED6D02612@SN2PRD0802MB111.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:56:51 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: Subject: Re: HPN-SSH question X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:07:16 -0000 On a similar note I'm actually quite concerned by the inclusion of these patches by default in the OS version of ssh as we've seen several cases of it causing noticeable performance degradation instead of improvement. I've not tested on 9, but this was certainly the case on 8.2. Regards Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:30 PM Subject: HPN-SSH question Since it doesn't seem that the HPN-SSH patches are going to be merged upstream to OpenSSH (please correct me if I'm wrong), and since the HPN-SSH project seems to be very low on resources, is the inclusion of these patches in FreeBSD 9 a commitment by FreeBSD to maintain these patches against stock OpenSSH in the future? Is there any indication that the OpenSSH project will be more willing to consider merging if the patches survive a -STABLE generation in FreeBSD? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.