From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 1 10:08:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19442106566C for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=043805a212=ob@gruft.de) Received: from main.mx.e-gitt.net (service.rules.org [IPv6:2001:1560:2342::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B0A8FC08 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ob by main.mx.e-gitt.net with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SEHiC-000Jzl-0R for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 12:08:40 +0200 Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:08:39 +0200 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120401100839.GH65313@e-Gitt.NET> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20120330083830.GB65313@e-Gitt.NET> <4F761F4B.90409@p6m7g8.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F761F4B.90409@p6m7g8.com> X-Face: "TT~P'b_)-jKU_0^a=usXryz`YTz)z.[FZrI,A~PREI2U}frrZ`>_J&; ^t|^.dR/mqtC,Vb.Y>~u8(|aL)vAv(k">zY"]*m*y|b8S7:WK[/qP5i>HO#Ek; C[X:b|FP0*Ly_4Ni User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: 9-STABLE, ZFS, NFS, ggatec - suspected memory leak X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:08:42 -0000 --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:02:03PM +0000, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-March/239643.ht= ml >=20 > Same issue different thread. Different software. >=20 > Its not NFS, its ZFS. >=20 > I don't really have a place to try it on 8.2, but my hunch from things > I've done rather similarly which don't cause tell me its a new issue in > 9.0, though I won't swear by that. I'll see, if I can setup a machine running 8 to take some of the=20 partitions over - but chances aren't really great. Thanx for the hint to=20 you thread. Also I'll start graphing (or at least logging) some of the higher values=20 =66rom vmstat that seems suspicious and ever growing to me to see if I can= =20 match one of them to the growth rate I see for mir wired mem apart from=20 ARC and L2ARC headers. - Oliver --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ ob@sysadm.in | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk94KScACgkQiqtMdzjafylVpgCfZXOUhUGYZJ2AueZRNr1HTJ5l 1H8AoJu3BW/il+ai8gFX3Z3CwnVYhRh/ =FlpA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--