From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 23 09:44:01 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDACD2F;
 Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net)
Received: from swip.net (mailfe08.c2i.net [212.247.154.226])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCFD8FC19;
 Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:43:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
Received: from [176.74.213.204] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO
 laptop015.hselasky.homeunix.org)
 by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4)
 with ESMTPA id 362541490; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:38:50 +0100
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: usb/173666: [USB,
 LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different between GNU/Linux and FreeBSD
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:40:25 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; )
References: <201211162247.qAGMlTm2057387@red.freebsd.org>
 <201212210838.32260.hselasky@c2i.net>
 <CAGjSPUCuDUTMTn427v=GWdLqm3LcSM7OR1nFpVoyXgba+tX3dQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGjSPUCuDUTMTn427v=GWdLqm3LcSM7OR1nFpVoyXgba+tX3dQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Face: 'mmZ:T{)),Oru^0c+/}w'`gU1$ubmG?lp!=R4Wy\ELYo2)@'UZ24N@d2+AyewRX}mAm; Yp
 |U[@, _z/([?1bCfM{_"B<.J>mICJCHAzzGHI{y7{%JVz%R~yJHIji`y>Y}k1C4TfysrsUI
 -%GU9V5]iUZF&nRn9mJ'?&>O
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201212231040.25892.hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.org>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB <freebsd-usb.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-usb>,
 <mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
 <mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:44:01 -0000

On Saturday 22 December 2012 11:17:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> 
wrote:
> > If you look in the old libusb-0.1 code you'll see something different I
> > think. Could you check that?
> 
> Not much differences in reality. I believe it is a document bug for the
> libusb-0.1.
> 
> Both old libusb-0.1 code and libusb-1.0 use the same IOCTL under Linux
> and the behavior should be similar.
> 
> Please refer to the following code listing and take note even though
> the name of the IOCTL is different but they are the same if you
> look at the defines.

Can you create a thread for this at the libusb lists?

--HPS