From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 08:14:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470AE106566B for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meowthink@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179058FC12 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbta17 with SMTP id ta17so5444685obb.13 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:14:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wxunaaZOVAYXch7zuKNsRV/vHfsflTW7lXg5Kb6J2s8=; b=lHgrtPV+9pvCbaLLuPGv6p8+a1OVaCua10jdQZ39l8MObRhXA/X7+6LvfJv6ob3Ukl 4fx8D2/vjS62mbhuYKhberIkkBfgC6/hNZcSGmWhANcmUV6iU2QhCWdCghhtAw+tyAG/ Ci3VzfdlGYLEHXL+qc2Giwl3oyjUrW+Mimx5c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.42.37 with SMTP id k5mr6794631obl.40.1326615283280; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.57.132 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:14:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:14:43 +0800 Message-ID: From: Meowthink To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Intel GPU patch 13.0 for stable/9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:14:44 -0000 Hello all, Here's Intel GPU patch 13.0 for stable/9: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxbPi2OX4_B-NWY3NWU3MzEtNDBjYy00NTljLThlZGItMWFlYjIyYjI4Yjk3 Recently, the patch against stable/9 became very similar to kib's original patch, which is against current, since kib's device_pager & mdf's bool/true/false patches are MFCed to stable/9. When making this one, the only 2 rejects are at: 1. sys/dev/drm/i915_suspend.c of which reason is explained on freebsd's wiki 2. sys/vm/vm_phys.h due to r226928[1] not MFCed(but didn't influence the patch to work until now). ... but warning: This is NOT for releng/9.0, as it is released before those MFCs. Cheers, Meowthink [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=226928