From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 02:44:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655E81065670 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+73574-0602-freebsd-xen=freebsd.org@sendgrid.me) Received: from o7.shared.sendgrid.net (o7.shared.sendgrid.net [74.63.235.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1067F8FC12 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:44:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=MfmZ4qbCI58zhhYjrR8QKY CrquE=; b=i2TgDzBAeFjqtPBTUFgS2yKqxNagOh23Ya1G6qK2FtZ9gaBHcKV08m T6z7qK6PVKGtK9dwB1EyVtYQEFZWzsGiEQy2XGcjy0GsxwXcIbhKltNmEJZHgB+R 1in3l+plOs7hP/roSx4/OdGDhQ4WU2qOHZ4tpXRIz22Qv0pESY/Ic= Received: by 10.41.149.114 with SMTP id f04-11.13600.4F138EF15 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.41.149.212]) by i04-02 (SG) with ESMTP id 4f13918c.3f49.1e93a6e for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57788 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2012 02:42:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.tarsnap.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2012 02:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 78006 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2012 02:42:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2012 02:42:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4F138E80.4060508@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:42:08 -0800 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111112 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sendgrid-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/IxnB/Ebb78E9arUqRlqqy0SU0DuCNJOIERd2F8f6bhG+ojP+7ec0mq2kkTMSKPsjfJ8NdBDSVW/8c/dfqkXps5TkOaMBU66bGLIu1zeDq/VfR7feIXZozrXav4a8DH47iA= Subject: i386/XENHVM now works X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:44:12 -0000 Hi all, i386/XENHVM now works on HEAD. I'll MFC to stable/9 in a week or two. -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 07:41:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782CA106564A for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vase@selfip.ru) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B188FC1C for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so1942156lah.13 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:41:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=selfip.ru; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L0uE5ASqk3gRHS6Hrdq7Vw6tITifALYo1rTtXlGMm8o=; b=K0SE/nlCtSE1oYmzkhVRJivNmlUD0Tt29x4ahDAQ2Pu5O7Me2nqyXqxpSLofIM9Cnx 2Mhef3aqciybdjHPyfTjn6/6Dy40SywXIs+wLr4EnH/PcY3EWW2JM/3isdk57wFhWLZq dxN8EhOiJhLdShvmQtCryP3Qdex0sdxmkKxEM= Received: by 10.112.86.135 with SMTP id p7mr2607894lbz.86.1326698384238; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:19:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vase@selfip.ru Received: by 10.112.83.36 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:19:28 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [85.143.161.18] In-Reply-To: <4F138E80.4060508@freebsd.org> References: <4F138E80.4060508@freebsd.org> From: Vasiliy Tolstov Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:19:28 +0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bkgWbPnijE_7GrFbwiG2fsB2HUw Message-ID: To: Colin Percival Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386/XENHVM now works X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:41:35 -0000 2012/1/16 Colin Percival : > Hi all, > > i386/XENHVM now works on HEAD. =C2=A0I'll MFC to stable/9 in a week or tw= o. > Greate! How about smp working in paravirt mode ? --=20 Vasiliy Tolstov, Clodo.ru e-mail: v.tolstov@selfip.ru jabber: vase@selfip.ru From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 10:58:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62161065672 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krichy@tvnetwork.hu) Received: from smtp-a.tvnetwork.hu (smtp-a.tvnetwork.hu [109.61.0.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10E288FC13 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25572 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Jan 2012 11:58:53 +0100 Received: from 109.61.101.194 by smtp-a.tvnetwork.hu (envelope-from , uid 64011) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88.1/1396. spamassassin: 3.0.3. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(109.61.101.194):SA:0(-1.0/5.0):. Processed in 5.694494 secs); 16 Jan 2012 10:58:53 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp-a.tvnetwork.hu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Envelope-From: krichy@tvnetwork.hu Received: from unknown (HELO krichy.tvnetwork.hu) (109.61.101.194) by smtp-a.tvnetwork.hu with SMTP; 16 Jan 2012 11:58:47 +0100 Received: by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD16E7344; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:58:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40818AC; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:58:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:58:47 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Kojedzinszky To: Sean Bruno In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1325606428.6073.2615.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325608141.6073.2646.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325620827.6073.2853.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 8.2 releng X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:58:56 -0000 Dear Sean, I've investigated the problem, and found the following: When starting with # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" memory=464 The kernel boots up, but when adding only one more MB to it, as: # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" memory=465 it does crash. The config is the simple one I've attached previously, with pf and pflog disabled. But again, if I enable pf and pflog, the domain starts with 512MB ram well. Regards, Kojedzinszky Richard Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: > Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:55:53 +0100 (CET) > From: Richard Kojedzinszky > To: Sean Bruno > Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" > Subject: Re: 8.2 releng > > Dear Sean, > > Have you found something regarding my issue? > > Thanks in advance, > > > Kojedzinszky Richard > Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:04:40 +0100 (CET) >> From: Richard Kojedzinszky >> To: Sean Bruno >> Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" >> Subject: Re: 8.2 releng >> >> Dear Sean, >> >> Many thanks for your help. >> >> My intention was to make a kernel with as less functionality as needed, >> that is why I stripped it. But the first problem arise when compilation >> failed, only succeeded with WERROR= to make. Maybe that could be a clue. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Kojedzinszky Richard >> Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. >> >> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Sean Bruno wrote: >> >>> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:00:27 -0800 >>> From: Sean Bruno >>> To: Richard Kojedzinszky >>> Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" >>> Subject: Re: 8.2 releng >>> >>> On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:55 -0800, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: >>>> bootloader = "/usr/lib/xen-4.0/bin/pygrub" >>> >>> Ok, let me see if I can get a Xen 4 Dom0 working in the cluster today. >>> I don't think that I've seen any issues with a Xen 3.4.3 Dom0. >>> >>> Sean >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 11:07:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25944106568B for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6BA8FC17 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0GB7HpJ057851 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:17 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0GB7HO2057849 for freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:17 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:17 GMT Message-Id: <201201161107.q0GB7HO2057849@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:07:18 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/162677 xen [xen] FreeBSD not compatible with "Current Stable Xen" o kern/161318 xen [xen] sysinstall crashes with floating point exception o kern/155468 xen [xen] Xen PV i386 multi-kernel CPU system is not worki o kern/155353 xen [xen] [patch] put "nudging TOD" message under boot_ver o kern/154833 xen [xen]: xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.2RC3 i386, XEN kernel. o kern/154473 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386, XEN kernel. Not o kern/154472 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386 xen kernel reboot o kern/154428 xen [xen] xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performan o kern/153674 xen [xen] i386/XEN idle thread shows wrong percentages o kern/153672 xen [xen] [panic] i386/XEN panics under heavy fork load o kern/153620 xen [xen] Xen guest system clock drifts in AWS EC2 (FreeBS o kern/153477 xen [xen] XEN pmap code abuses vm page queue lock o kern/153150 xen [xen] xen/ec2: disable checksum offloading on interfac o kern/152228 xen [xen] [panic] Xen/PV panic with machdep.idle_mwait=1 o kern/144629 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143398 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143340 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor f kern/143069 xen [xen] [panic] Xen Kernel Panic - Memory modified after f kern/135667 xen ufs filesystem corruption on XEN DomU system f kern/135421 xen [xen] FreeBSD Xen PVM DomU network failure - netfronc. f kern/135178 xen [xen] Xen domU outgoing data transfer stall when TSO i p kern/135069 xen [xen] FreeBSD-current/Xen SMP doesn't function at all f i386/124516 xen [xen] FreeBSD-CURRENT Xen Kernel Segfaults when config o kern/118734 xen [xen] FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 and FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 4 fail to b 24 problems total. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 16:56:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4B91065672; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352838FC14; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (proxy7.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.98]) by mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q0GGuRFk023518; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:56:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1326732988; bh=Ovwlk50uKwWgKLDnxVyvhP0++818xxo2ZhjUH3n+xFo=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dDV1ce6Lk88XaJsi24rtq3iplNqnOuh9G5+S3MI39nCSOlO7CuWlNh3KihmbSvgph GeguW0D1erNO/da+fPeqU5lqzJFUo4xcuFrOwH4UNAQHPdXHTinqjTIUoH9sN2Y4KQ 8exNSU0fgWaDWjAasiYEnGmVLavfLpouLfXx3Okw= From: Sean Bruno To: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <4F138E80.4060508@freebsd.org> References: <4F138E80.4060508@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:56:27 -0800 Message-ID: <1326732987.23249.15.camel@powernoodle-l7> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: i386/XENHVM now works X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:56:45 -0000 On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 18:42 -0800, Colin Percival wrote: > Hi all, > > i386/XENHVM now works on HEAD. I'll MFC to stable/9 in a week or two. > +1 beer Sean From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 17:00:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC1E106566C; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA2D8FC0C; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (proxy7.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.98]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q0GGnkqR006669; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:49:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1326732586; bh=js4yVJv8YPuwHXUdpF2g9mjhdAt6N6KPLFG2NwTRp74=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=snVV4mIK31FK7NfN6quvg9cf3Wutl6x4MnvwsvlxgxJ2EmpEqEcS3E/M339s3R2RQ 8oPtOIGxE1nK2iMknsFzviSQbokTViO0OMINVMyw4Z+38dXFM/fpYdm6G4r6HE8/uv jxM0lPsGXqWRZS5cXy029o7AHPm29nHEH2I9b4BA= From: Sean Bruno To: Richard Kojedzinszky In-Reply-To: References: <1325606428.6073.2615.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325608141.6073.2646.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325620827.6073.2853.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:49:45 -0800 Message-ID: <1326732585.23249.14.camel@powernoodle-l7> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 8.2 releng X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:00:14 -0000 On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 02:58 -0800, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: > Dear Sean, > > I've investigated the problem, and found the following: > > When starting with > # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" > memory=464 > > The kernel boots up, but when adding only one more MB to it, as: > # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" > memory=465 > > it does crash. > > The config is the simple one I've attached previously, with pf and pflog > disabled. But again, if I enable pf and pflog, the domain starts with > 512MB ram well. > > Regards, Ah, this one! Alan has resolved these issues in xen on -current at the moment. I suspect an MFC is coming soon: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/i386/xen/?view=log If you want to try r229007, r228935, r228923, r228747, r228746 and r228522 on stable/8 we'd appreciate the testing. Sean From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 22:55:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C740106566B for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+73574-0602-freebsd-xen=freebsd.org@sendgrid.me) Received: from o7.shared.sendgrid.net (o7.shared.sendgrid.net [74.63.235.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB2E08FC0A for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=eoo3FLv6edUg7w5oXZnQyt un2vs=; b=SqL78rlprDRocwsrZQ7aMcPWi3ImYVhfTsSIl/XP6fJa0gvBx0nCrV WN+fnyJSw0aas7FZsO5fSu9p4DKLsg6xut1dzrQKOTpP++dBlt4yzPzWfm+ij7rb /BYrO5DIJNhQfOkkRtpRQE8o5JAAaYYIA/yVFhb+18RhtUbXO/LZ8= Received: by 10.41.149.108 with SMTP id f04-05.5169.4F14AADA1 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.41.149.212]) by i04-01 (SG) with ESMTP id 4f14a946.5ec9.297ae0b for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67771 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2012 22:53:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.tarsnap.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2012 22:53:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 2773 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2012 22:53:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2012 22:53:20 -0000 Message-ID: <4F14AA60.1090507@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:53:20 -0800 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111112 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sendgrid-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/IyjOsJcSff/UdVOBB1Z7zOaZC85lwM3iqPrIueI6GawjtQ/hcUKR6kigOUB2WJPUvGXng58WSiaVrw8Nb7Dhcpif/iYlvrbSNBqv1N4F9YZcJOkwk3fbG5+6pfUimdx/Mo= Subject: FreeBSD now available on all EC2 instance types X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:55:26 -0000 Details at http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2012-01-16-FreeBSD-now-on-all-EC2-instance-types.html -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 11:34:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE2B106566B for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeroen@dckd.nl) Received: from zaphod.dckd.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:6a1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6523D8FC12 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from doc.dckd.nl (doc.dckd.nl [145.99.151.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zaphod.dckd.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A96613F436 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:34:35 +0100 (CET) From: Jeroen van der Ham Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:34:35 +0100 Message-Id: <4B4F990F-437F-4A64-8575-601F30572C69@dckd.nl> To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Subject: fpudna: fpcurthread == curthread XXXX times X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:34:42 -0000 Hello, I've been trying to compile a kernel for my FreeBSD9 XEN guest system = using the provided XENHVM config. I found that that configuration works = fine, unless you use a specific make.conf file. When I used that make.conf file, booting from that kernel it spams the = console with consecutive messages of: "fpudna: fpcurthread =3D=3D = curthread XXXX times" The make.conf file that I used is an adapted version of = /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf: % diff /etc/make.conf /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf 47c47 < CPUTYPE=3Dopteron --- > #CPUTYPE?=3Dpentium3 61c61 < CFLAGS=3D -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe --- > #CFLAGS=3D -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe 68c68 < CXXFLAGS+=3D -fconserve-space --- > #CXXFLAGS+=3D -fconserve-space 185,190c185,190 < SUP=3D /usr/bin/csup < SUPFLAGS=3D -L 2 < SUPHOST=3D cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org < SUPFILE=3D /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile < PORTSSUPFILE=3D /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile < DOCSUPFILE=3D /usr/share/examples/cvsup/doc-supfile --- > #SUP=3D /usr/bin/csup > #SUPFLAGS=3D -L 2 > #SUPHOST=3D cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org > #SUPFILE=3D /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile > #PORTSSUPFILE=3D /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile > #DOCSUPFILE=3D /usr/share/examples/cvsup/doc-supfile 287,289d286 < # added by use.perl 2012-01-16 21:35:36 < PERL_VERSION=3D5.12.4 < WITHOUT_X11=3DYES Does anyone know what might cause this problem, and why it would not be = caught earlier? Jeroen.= From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 21:33:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80A1106564A for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ch@sysconfig.org.uk) Received: from mx2.virtastic.com (mx2.virtastic.com [95.154.227.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7FE8FC0C for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.virtastic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.virtastic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21E6ED0441; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.2.2.20] (unknown [10.2.2.20]) by mx2.virtastic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B766ED043F; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Carsten Heesch In-Reply-To: <4F14AA60.1090507@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:06:06 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0E8D94F8-8A77-43CF-AE2A-E761C9EE74E4@sysconfig.org.uk> References: <4F14AA60.1090507@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD now available on all EC2 instance types X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:33:04 -0000 >=20 > Details at > = http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2012-01-16-FreeBSD-now-on-all-EC2-instance= -types.html That's fantastic news! Really great stuff, Colin, especially the support = for m1.small instances! Just two questions if I may, with regards to the m1.small AMI in = particular:- There's a folder ec2-bits in the root directory, which contains a bunch = of patches. =46rom your blog post I gather that they will not (much = longer) be required if one was to build their own kernel? On the same subject: The kernel running in that AMI is apparently = i386/XENHVM: FreeBSD ip-10-30-30-11 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan 16 = 18:25:55 UTC 2012 = root@ip-10-17-42-118:/usr/obj/i386.i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 The csup'ed source tree does not contain such configuration. It does for = amd64. And there's a XEN configuration for i386. But no XENHVM = configuration for i386. # find /usr/src/sys -name 'XEN*' /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/XENHVM /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/XEN The AMI you provided runs just fine, but there'll be a time when an = update may be required... :) Thanks again!=20 Cheers C. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 22:18:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB381065674 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+73574-0602-freebsd-xen=freebsd.org@sendgrid.me) Received: from o7.shared.sendgrid.net (o7.shared.sendgrid.net [74.63.235.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35DF18FC26 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:18:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=XJ5Pvds6pbWbTXRS8/bMU+XCM3k=; b=oJ4NyovceW5PnpMgOxWTIroY8jfB wNyKtAq/u1cfQe3Q5Lb+9Vp/UjFt3tfovw9tHbC3rDwZGU4ph1/nrR4wndcF0plK zY6nCG4ZqY/YSU+5JTWra/R16fXrjDQY/VStcGWXKZwky1xudndaJ4I9zHGjNxsU 6a4JmOi+XPWeC3Q= Received: by 10.41.149.109 with SMTP id f04-06.22779.4F15F3BA3 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.41.149.212]) by i04-04 (SG) with ESMTP id 4f15f1ad.3ac2.2bd6de7 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79556 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2012 22:17:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.tarsnap.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2012 22:17:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 8177 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2012 22:16:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2012 22:16:43 -0000 Message-ID: <4F15F34B.3050801@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:16:43 -0800 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111112 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carsten Heesch References: <4F14AA60.1090507@freebsd.org> <0E8D94F8-8A77-43CF-AE2A-E761C9EE74E4@sysconfig.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <0E8D94F8-8A77-43CF-AE2A-E761C9EE74E4@sysconfig.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sendgrid-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/IyOGyf5yepNanBOdTJmceD5joOh+2klIE0w1xHooGqRFEh3hW/nV0EAjZ7Y3bKxDgWuRzFLwwVM6sfVtuPq04KB5qYuCLcZrcFbWF10fcFRcrWhEgCsUxEmkT7woZWxlAE= Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD now available on all EC2 instance types X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:18:52 -0000 On 01/17/12 13:06, Carsten Heesch wrote: > There's a folder ec2-bits in the root directory, which contains a bunch of patches. From your blog post I gather that they will not (much longer) be required if one was to build their own kernel? What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory are the differences between the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and the one I used to build the AMI. > On the same subject: The kernel running in that AMI is apparently i386/XENHVM: > > FreeBSD ip-10-30-30-11 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan 16 18:25:55 UTC 2012 root@ip-10-17-42-118:/usr/obj/i386.i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > > The csup'ed source tree does not contain such configuration. It does for amd64. And there's a XEN configuration for i386. But no XENHVM configuration for i386. Yep, that's why there's a patch in /root/ec2-bits which adds XENHVM. :-) -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 22:49:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B8E106564A; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ch@sysconfig.org.uk) Received: from mx2.virtastic.com (mx2.virtastic.com [95.154.227.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B3E8FC08; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.virtastic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.virtastic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D21ED0441; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:49:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.2.2.20] (unknown [10.2.2.20]) by mx2.virtastic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE40ED043F; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:49:19 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Carsten Heesch In-Reply-To: <4F15F34B.3050801@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:49:55 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6851B793-C4D4-410E-82DD-58704AE3FB5E@sysconfig.org.uk> References: <4F14AA60.1090507@freebsd.org> <0E8D94F8-8A77-43CF-AE2A-E761C9EE74E4@sysconfig.org.uk> <4F15F34B.3050801@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD now available on all EC2 instance types X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:49:58 -0000 > What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory are the = differences > between the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and the one I used to build the = AMI. Oh, must have been wishful thinking then that it might go into FreeBSD = and not remain a bunch of separate patches... :) >> The csup'ed source tree does not contain such configuration. It does = for amd64. And there's a XEN configuration for i386. But no XENHVM = configuration for i386. >=20 > Yep, that's why there's a patch in /root/ec2-bits which adds XENHVM. = :-) Doh! Makes perfect sense. Less coffee and more actual sleep for me! :) Thanks for the clarification! Cheers C. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 23:01:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420C5106566C for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krichy@tvnetwork.hu) Received: from smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu (smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu [109.61.0.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 800AB8FC16 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16232 invoked by uid 1001); 18 Jan 2012 00:01:30 +0100 Received: from 109.61.101.194 by smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu (envelope-from , uid 64011) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88.1/1396. spamassassin: 3.0.3. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(109.61.101.194):SA:0(-2.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.619476 secs); 17 Jan 2012 23:01:30 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Envelope-From: krichy@tvnetwork.hu Received: from unknown (HELO krichy.tvnetwork.hu) (109.61.101.194) by smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu with SMTP; 18 Jan 2012 00:01:27 +0100 Received: by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87BCA3FD5; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:01:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828DA4F; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:01:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:01:27 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Kojedzinszky To: Sean Bruno In-Reply-To: <1326732585.23249.14.camel@powernoodle-l7> Message-ID: References: <1325606428.6073.2615.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325608141.6073.2646.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325620827.6073.2853.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1326732585.23249.14.camel@powernoodle-l7> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 8.2 releng X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:01:33 -0000 Dear Sean, I've applied the patches to 8.2/releng, but as I am not an xen/i386 expert, some patches may got applied wrong. Although the kernel did compile, it did not boot, just crashed. regards, Kojedzinszky Richard Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Sean Bruno wrote: > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:49:45 -0800 > From: Sean Bruno > To: Richard Kojedzinszky > Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" > Subject: Re: 8.2 releng > > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 02:58 -0800, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: >> Dear Sean, >> >> I've investigated the problem, and found the following: >> >> When starting with >> # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" >> memory=464 >> >> The kernel boots up, but when adding only one more MB to it, as: >> # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" >> memory=465 >> >> it does crash. >> >> The config is the simple one I've attached previously, with pf and pflog >> disabled. But again, if I enable pf and pflog, the domain starts with >> 512MB ram well. >> >> Regards, > > > > Ah, this one! Alan has resolved these issues in xen on -current at the > moment. I suspect an MFC is coming soon: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/i386/xen/?view=log > > If you want to try r229007, r228935, r228923, r228747, r228746 and > r228522 on stable/8 we'd appreciate the testing. > > Sean > From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 23:36:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67BA1065672 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:36:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+73574-0602-freebsd-xen=freebsd.org@sendgrid.me) Received: from o7.shared.sendgrid.net (o7.shared.sendgrid.net [74.63.235.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 818658FC0C for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:36:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=yi3i4KAGiagd2q8cRgAuU5tuBHI=; b=fsNMdnAkGDQ0WMe2V/FPMcTO9gxQ Nw5khos+jMu1NsIsgbscZkQQpYfSTcsIKTh6UbfcfFFFN27OfGf5xk+ZpyTLNy3H wHYt35ircqvgX+IPpzGximXcsqdV5E4kWTUdUWsx/zsZvIG0A+jDx4oN0qkV0cv1 rGeI5yGwtv+ebdg= Received: by 10.36.109.181 with SMTP id mf49.15513.4F1605F63 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:36:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.9.180.5]) by mi12 (SG) with ESMTP id 4f1605f6.3192.2db87e5 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:36:22 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 80223 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2012 23:34:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.tarsnap.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2012 23:34:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 8346 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2012 23:34:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2012 23:34:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4F160576.5070701@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:34:14 -0800 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111112 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carsten Heesch References: <4F14AA60.1090507@freebsd.org> <0E8D94F8-8A77-43CF-AE2A-E761C9EE74E4@sysconfig.org.uk> <4F15F34B.3050801@freebsd.org> <6851B793-C4D4-410E-82DD-58704AE3FB5E@sysconfig.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <6851B793-C4D4-410E-82DD-58704AE3FB5E@sysconfig.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sendgrid-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/IzC2WoPP3g6pDWKZIanULFXdraP2Yzvhc3FK/69RvT79siFXR36gKNBMRG8NECD1jndmyKIoAevoyojex3jLHvYxni8Y+uTicLouXZOzcV/wnWHt9Zkef98p+gmyG2CrvA= Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD now available on all EC2 instance types X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:36:24 -0000 On 01/17/12 14:49, Carsten Heesch wrote: >> What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory are the differences >> between the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and the one I used to build the AMI. > > Oh, must have been wishful thinking then that it might go into FreeBSD and not remain a bunch of separate patches... :) Working on it. :-) The files rXXXXXX.patch are commits I've already made to HEAD but which weren't in 9.0-RELEASE. The others I hope to merge into FreeBSD in some form: * blkfront.patch makes us compatible with the multi-page request ring protocol used by Amazon's blkback and I'm waiting to confirm that I reverse-engineered that protocol correctly; * uart.patch is a workaround for a bug in the version of Xen which Amazon is using, but it's a really ugly hack so I'm hoping some more talented device driver hackers can improve it; * tcp_mbuf_chain_limit.patch limits the length of mbuf chains sent via TCP TSO due to limits in the linux netback driver, but currently it unconditionally limits all TCP connections -- I need to talk to network stack people about how the max-chain-length value should be passed from the network interface up the stack to the TCP code; * ec2.patch is just tweaking some configuration files, so that doesn't need to be merged and isn't really a patch anyway. There's also some new rc.d scripts which get installed and more configuration files; I'm not sure if it makes sense to bring those rc.d scripts into FreeBSD proper since they're only relevant to the EC2 environment. -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 15:38:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8B1106566B for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krichy@tvnetwork.hu) Received: from smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu (smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu [109.61.0.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 838308FC1B for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7858 invoked by uid 1001); 18 Jan 2012 16:38:34 +0100 Received: from 109.61.101.194 by smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu (envelope-from , uid 64011) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88.1/1396. spamassassin: 3.0.3. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(109.61.101.194):SA:0(-2.9/5.0):. Processed in 6.866156 secs); 18 Jan 2012 15:38:34 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Envelope-From: krichy@tvnetwork.hu Received: from unknown (HELO krichy.tvnetwork.hu) (109.61.101.194) by smtp-b.tvnetwork.hu with SMTP; 18 Jan 2012 16:38:27 +0100 Received: by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B54B57368; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:38:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0783FE6; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:38:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:38:26 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Kojedzinszky To: Sean Bruno In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1325606428.6073.2615.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325608141.6073.2646.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1325620827.6073.2853.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1326732585.23249.14.camel@powernoodle-l7> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1030603365-456453849-1326901106=:15768" Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 8.2 releng X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:38:38 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1030603365-456453849-1326901106=:15768 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Dear Sean, For now, I have very strange results, and unfortunately I dont know where to go. So from the beginning, I am using releng 8.2. My /etc/make.conf looks as: $ cat /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE=core2 # added by use.perl 2012-01-18 10:00:39 PERL_VERSION=5.12.4 I've attached my base kernel config, and I start this kernel with this command: # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" memory=512 With these, the kernel does crash. Giving it 256M still crashes, with 128M it boots up. With 192M it stucks, it eats up its vcpu. Now, I've disabled pf, pflog, crypto, and IPSEC. With 512M, it boots well. Unfortunately, I dont understand the patches you wrote me, so I could only apply them, and make the code compile, but with no success. How could I get further with this problem? Will the MFC you mentioned affect 8.2? Or just 9.0? Thanks in advance, Kojedzinszky Richard Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:01:27 +0100 (CET) > From: Richard Kojedzinszky > To: Sean Bruno > Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" > Subject: Re: 8.2 releng > > Dear Sean, > > I've applied the patches to 8.2/releng, but as I am not an xen/i386 expert, > some patches may got applied wrong. Although the kernel did compile, it did > not boot, just crashed. > > regards, > > > Kojedzinszky Richard > Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Sean Bruno wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:49:45 -0800 >> From: Sean Bruno >> To: Richard Kojedzinszky >> Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" >> Subject: Re: 8.2 releng >> >> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 02:58 -0800, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: >>> Dear Sean, >>> >>> I've investigated the problem, and found the following: >>> >>> When starting with >>> # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" >>> memory=464 >>> >>> The kernel boots up, but when adding only one more MB to it, as: >>> # xm create -c /dev/null kernel=/home/krichy/kernel extra="kern.hz=100" >>> memory=465 >>> >>> it does crash. >>> >>> The config is the simple one I've attached previously, with pf and pflog >>> disabled. But again, if I enable pf and pflog, the domain starts with >>> 512MB ram well. >>> >>> Regards, >> >> >> >> Ah, this one! Alan has resolved these issues in xen on -current at the >> moment. I suspect an MFC is coming soon: >> >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/i386/xen/?view=log >> >> If you want to try r229007, r228935, r228923, r228747, r228746 and >> r228522 on stable/8 we'd appreciate the testing. >> >> Sean >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --1030603365-456453849-1326901106=:15768 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=DB Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=DB Iw0KIyBYRU4gLS0gS2VybmVsIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gZm9yIGkzODYgWEVO IERvbVUNCiMNCiMgJEZyZWVCU0Q6IHNyYy9zeXMvaTM4Ni9jb25mL1hFTix2 IDEuOS4yLjIuMi4xIDIwMTAvMTIvMjEgMTc6MDk6MjUga2Vuc21pdGggRXhw ICQNCg0KY3B1CQlJNjg2X0NQVQ0KaWRlbnQJCURCDQoNCiNtYWtlb3B0aW9u cwlERUJVRz0tZwkJIyBCdWlsZCBrZXJuZWwgd2l0aCBnZGIoMSkgZGVidWcg c3ltYm9scw0KbWFrZW9wdGlvbnMJTU9EVUxFU19PVkVSUklERT0iIg0KDQoj b3B0aW9ucyAJU0NIRURfNEJTRAkJIA0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJU0NIRURfVUxFCQkj IFVMRSBzY2hlZHVsZXINCiNvcHRpb25zIAlQUkVFTVBUSU9OCQkjIEVuYWJs ZSBrZXJuZWwgdGhyZWFkIHByZWVtcHRpb24NCg0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJSU5FVAkJ CSMgSW50ZXJORVR3b3JraW5nDQpvcHRpb25zIAlJTkVUNgkJCSMgSVB2NiBj b21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucyBwcm90b2NvbHMNCm9wdGlvbnMJCUFDQ0VQVF9GSUxU RVJfSFRUUA0Kb3B0aW9ucwkJQUNDRVBUX0ZJTFRFUl9EQVRBDQpvcHRpb25z CQlBQ0NFUFRfRklMVEVSX0ROUw0KI29wdGlvbnMgCVNDVFAJCQkjIFN0cmVh bSBDb250cm9sIFRyYW5zbWlzc2lvbiBQcm90b2NvbA0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJRkZT CQkJIyBCZXJrZWxleSBGYXN0IEZpbGVzeXN0ZW0NCm9wdGlvbnMgCVNPRlRV UERBVEVTCQkjIEVuYWJsZSBGRlMgc29mdCB1cGRhdGVzIHN1cHBvcnQNCiNv cHRpb25zIAlVRlNfQUNMCQkJIyBTdXBwb3J0IGZvciBhY2Nlc3MgY29udHJv bCBsaXN0cw0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJVUZTX0RJUkhBU0gJCSMgSW1wcm92ZSBwZXJm b3JtYW5jZSBvbiBiaWcgZGlyZWN0b3JpZXMNCm9wdGlvbnMJCU5VTExGUw0K I29wdGlvbnMgCVVGU19HSk9VUk5BTAkJIyBFbmFibGUgZ2pvdXJuYWwtYmFz ZWQgVUZTIGpvdXJuYWxpbmcNCiNvcHRpb25zIAlORlNDTElFTlQJCSMgTmV0 d29yayBGaWxlc3lzdGVtIENsaWVudA0KI29wdGlvbnMgCU5GU1NFUlZFUgkJ IyBOZXR3b3JrIEZpbGVzeXN0ZW0gU2VydmVyDQojb3B0aW9ucyAJTkZTTE9D S0QJCSMgTmV0d29yayBMb2NrIE1hbmFnZXINCiNvcHRpb25zIAlORlNfUk9P VAkJIyBORlMgdXNhYmxlIGFzIC8sIHJlcXVpcmVzIE5GU0NMSUVOVA0KI29w dGlvbnMgCU1TRE9TRlMJCQkjIE1TRE9TIEZpbGVzeXN0ZW0NCiNvcHRpb25z IAlDRDk2NjAJCQkjIElTTyA5NjYwIEZpbGVzeXN0ZW0NCm9wdGlvbnMgCVBS T0NGUwkJCSMgUHJvY2VzcyBmaWxlc3lzdGVtIChyZXF1aXJlcyBQU0VVRE9G UykNCm9wdGlvbnMgCVBTRVVET0ZTCQkjIFBzZXVkby1maWxlc3lzdGVtIGZy YW1ld29yaw0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJR0VPTV9QQVJUX0dQVAkJIyBHVUlEIFBhcnRp dGlvbiBUYWJsZXMuDQpvcHRpb25zIAlHRU9NX0xBQkVMCQkjIFByb3ZpZGVz IGxhYmVsaXphdGlvbg0KI29wdGlvbnMgCUNPTVBBVF80M1RUWQkJIyBCU0Qg NC4zIFRUWSBjb21wYXQgKHNndHR5KQ0KI29wdGlvbnMgCUNPTVBBVF9GUkVF QlNENAkJIyBDb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggRnJlZUJTRDQNCiNvcHRpb25zIAlD T01QQVRfRlJFRUJTRDUJCSMgQ29tcGF0aWJsZSB3aXRoIEZyZWVCU0Q1DQoj b3B0aW9ucyAJQ09NUEFUX0ZSRUVCU0Q2CQkjIENvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBG cmVlQlNENg0KI29wdGlvbnMgCUNPTVBBVF9GUkVFQlNENwkJIyBDb21wYXRp YmxlIHdpdGggRnJlZUJTRDcNCiNvcHRpb25zIAlLVFJBQ0UJCQkjIGt0cmFj ZSgxKSBzdXBwb3J0DQojb3B0aW9ucyAJU1RBQ0sJCQkjIHN0YWNrKDkpIHN1 cHBvcnQNCm9wdGlvbnMgCVNZU1ZTSE0JCQkjIFNZU1Ytc3R5bGUgc2hhcmVk IG1lbW9yeQ0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJU1lTVk1TRwkJCSMgU1lTVi1zdHlsZSBtZXNz YWdlIHF1ZXVlcw0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJU1lTVlNFTQkJCSMgU1lTVi1zdHlsZSBz ZW1hcGhvcmVzDQpvcHRpb25zIAlfS1BPU0lYX1BSSU9SSVRZX1NDSEVEVUxJ TkcgIyBQT1NJWCBQMTAwM18xQiByZWFsLXRpbWUgZXh0ZW5zaW9ucw0Kb3B0 aW9ucyAJS0JEX0lOU1RBTExfQ0RFVgkjIGluc3RhbGwgYSBDREVWIGVudHJ5 IGluIC9kZXYNCm9wdGlvbnMgCUFVRElUCQkJIyBTZWN1cml0eSBldmVudCBh dWRpdGluZw0KDQojIERlYnVnZ2luZyBmb3IgdXNlIGluIC1jdXJyZW50DQoj b3B0aW9ucyAJS0RCCQkJIyBFbmFibGUga2VybmVsIGRlYnVnZ2VyIHN1cHBv cnQuDQojb3B0aW9ucyAJRERCCQkJIyBTdXBwb3J0IEREQi4NCiNvcHRpb25z IAlHREIJCQkjIFN1cHBvcnQgcmVtb3RlIEdEQi4NCm9wdGlvbnMgCUlOVkFS SUFOVFMJCSMgRW5hYmxlIGNhbGxzIG9mIGV4dHJhIHNhbml0eSBjaGVja2lu Zw0Kb3B0aW9ucyAJSU5WQVJJQU5UX1NVUFBPUlQJIyBFeHRyYSBzYW5pdHkg Y2hlY2tzIG9mIGludGVybmFsIHN0cnVjdHVyZXMsIHJlcXVpcmVkIGJ5IElO VkFSSUFOVFMNCiNvcHRpb25zIAlXSVRORVNTCQkJIyBFbmFibGUgY2hlY2tz IHRvIGRldGVjdCBkZWFkbG9ja3MgYW5kIGN5Y2xlcw0KI29wdGlvbnMgCVdJ VE5FU1NfU0tJUFNQSU4JIyBEb24ndCBydW4gd2l0bmVzcyBvbiBzcGlubG9j a3MgZm9yIHNwZWVkDQoNCm9wdGlvbnMgCVBBRQ0Kbm9vcHRpb24JTkFUSVZF DQpvcHRpb24JCVhFTg0Kbm9kZXZpY2UJYXRwaWMNCm5vZGV2aWNlCWlzYQ0K b3B0aW9ucyAJTUNMU0hJRlQ9MTINCg0KIyBUbyBtYWtlIGFuIFNNUCBrZXJu ZWwsIHRoZSBuZXh0IHR3byBsaW5lcyBhcmUgbmVlZGVkDQojb3B0aW9ucyAJ U01QCQkJIyBTeW1tZXRyaWMgTXVsdGlQcm9jZXNzb3IgS2VybmVsDQojZGV2 aWNlCQlhcGljCQkJIyBJL08gQVBJQw0KDQpkZXZpY2UJCXBjaQ0KDQojIFBz ZXVkbyBkZXZpY2VzLg0KZGV2aWNlCQlsb29wCQkjIE5ldHdvcmsgbG9vcGJh Y2sNCmRldmljZQkJcmFuZG9tCQkjIEVudHJvcHkgZGV2aWNlDQpkZXZpY2UJ CWV0aGVyCQkjIEV0aGVybmV0IHN1cHBvcnQNCiNkZXZpY2UJCXR1bgkJIyBQ YWNrZXQgdHVubmVsLg0KZGV2aWNlCQlwdHkJCSMgUHNldWRvLXR0eXMgKHRl bG5ldCBldGMpDQpkZXZpY2UJCW1kCQkjIE1lbW9yeSAiZGlza3MiDQojZGV2 aWNlCQlnaWYJCSMgSVB2NiBhbmQgSVB2NCB0dW5uZWxpbmcNCiNkZXZpY2UJ CWZhaXRoCQkjIElQdjYtdG8tSVB2NCByZWxheWluZyAodHJhbnNsYXRpb24p DQoNCiMgVGhlIGBicGYnIGRldmljZSBlbmFibGVzIHRoZSBCZXJrZWxleSBQ YWNrZXQgRmlsdGVyLg0KIyBCZSBhd2FyZSBvZiB0aGUgYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRp dmUgY29uc2VxdWVuY2VzIG9mIGVuYWJsaW5nIHRoaXMhDQojIE5vdGUgdGhh dCAnYnBmJyBpcyByZXF1aXJlZCBmb3IgREhDUC4NCiNkZXZpY2UJCWJwZgkJ IyBCZXJrZWxleSBwYWNrZXQgZmlsdGVyDQoNCmRldmljZQkJcGYNCmRldmlj ZQkJcGZsb2cNCg0KI29wdGlvbnMJTUFDDQojb3B0aW9ucwlNQUNfQklCQQ0K I29wdGlvbnMJTUFDX01MUw0KI29wdGlvbnMJTUFDX1NFRU9USEVSVUlEUw0K DQpvcHRpb25zCQlJUFNFQw0KZGV2aWNlCQljcnlwdG8NCg== --1030603365-456453849-1326901106=:15768-- From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 21:15:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD2C106564A for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:400:216:3eff:fe2d:5c32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9A28FC16 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nsayer-osx.silverspringnet.com (soi.silverspringnet.com [74.121.22.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by quack.kfu.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0JLFKZH010747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:15:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.2 quack.kfu.com q0JLFKZH010747 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kfu.com; s=KFU; t=1327007728; bh=C2lWxqvbMKwuPM17prxcoBhVQBf1Gl/mvye9x6pUvEo=; h=From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Date: Message-Id:To:Mime-Version; b=82VHUMXiS3nZ0x+hFiwdqiO4AalcJ51boOtZLVWzGkhsxzXNdOTnJFTVZQ2NY2PlU /p+orwCXxUI+7ni5DGzm29+56KtXdlGaEz6ND4E7MKMyIHxZAC0QcP3Hh+NCDw8W4n V05IR3mDVtEaA4HvUaQv2kgM1zSBUHeJWMuJnQsY= From: Nick Sayer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:15:20 -0800 Message-Id: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: 9.0-RELEASE success X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:15:29 -0000 I have a VPS at rootbsd.net, and have been running 8.2-RELEASE with a = XENHVM kernel with a patch to fix the 'do something smart' panic in = if_xn. I fetched the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and built a kernel to try = and it worked without any muss or fuss. I did the rest of the upgrade = and it's working just fine, so far as I can tell. And there was much rejoicing.= From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 21:42:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E20106564A for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@xerq.net) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [67.52.126.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829728FC12 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (unknown [127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D41C40B12 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from cartman.xerq.net ([127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [127.52.126.46]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXatCleOUX1C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from www1.xerq.net (localhost [127.52.126.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0567D40AF7 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:51 -0800 From: Matt Connor To: In-Reply-To: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> References: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: bsd@xerq.net User-Agent: XERQ Webmail/0.7.1 Subject: Re: 9.0-RELEASE success X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:42:03 -0000 On 19.01.2012 13:15, Nick Sayer wrote: > I have a VPS at rootbsd.net, and have been running 8.2-RELEASE with a > XENHVM kernel with a patch to fix the 'do something smart' panic in > if_xn. I fetched the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and built a kernel to > try > and it worked without any muss or fuss. I did the rest of the upgrade > and it's working just fine, so far as I can tell. > > And there was much > rejoicing._______________________________________________ Same here at ssdnodes.com - we pulled the new source tree, rebuilt with our modified XENHVM and haven't had any issues so far. We had many tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf to improve throughput for the 8.2-RELEASE, the 9.0-RELEASE systems still remained snappy after the tweaks were removed. -Matt From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 23:19:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5011A1065670 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353DA8FC16 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from delta.delphij.net (drawbridge.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C088ACB5A; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:19:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1327015156; bh=VMWBYoB4CjsZpUPDRPtoms4tgvbwbbSBaBU+/dvZ7Ck=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wUr4yFXEyB65oZaq+SmddIVwpw/75pLS9w3hhlyw3KNnlPE2986QnNnkzJsBhuJZB 5aHW1B6rfj30m0K9DSSHsR6k+BRp2qNLwn0xDaTqagG6GlAEt9YZn0Rc6c/ouqoCvA T5uHNEthHESn6+JZ+Ie5/5bXc22bsRvAuago863M= Message-ID: <4F18A4F2.7040205@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:19:14 -0800 From: Xin Li Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Connor References: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: 9.0-RELEASE success X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:19:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/12 13:22, Matt Connor wrote: > On 19.01.2012 13:15, Nick Sayer wrote: >> I have a VPS at rootbsd.net, and have been running 8.2-RELEASE >> with a XENHVM kernel with a patch to fix the 'do something smart' >> panic in if_xn. I fetched the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and built a >> kernel to try and it worked without any muss or fuss. I did the >> rest of the upgrade and it's working just fine, so far as I can >> tell. >> >> And there was much >> rejoicing._______________________________________________ > > Same here at ssdnodes.com - we pulled the new source tree, rebuilt > with our modified XENHVM and haven't had any issues so far. > > We had many tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf to improve throughput for > the 8.2-RELEASE, the 9.0-RELEASE systems still remained snappy > after the tweaks were removed. What kinds of tweaks are needed? (i.e. should we make them the defaults?) Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8YpPIACgkQOfuToMruuMAMGwCggFpnZAu9u9gRq9yxlKgkKQBx 4y8AmwZAHCxAz9e5x72zGzJCGSS/tPMp =dxSG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 02:06:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC5B106566C for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@xerq.net) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [67.52.126.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD278FC08 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (unknown [127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70949404A9; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:06:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from cartman.xerq.net ([127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [127.52.126.46]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eyvh3HxpUmvz; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from www1.xerq.net (localhost [127.52.126.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65A5640489; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:06:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:06:51 -0800 From: Matt Connor To: In-Reply-To: <4F18A4F2.7040205@delphij.net> References: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> <4F18A4F2.7040205@delphij.net> Message-ID: <65d33d61a2d7c4ccc167658407f5b189@www1.xerq.net> X-Sender: bsd@xerq.net User-Agent: XERQ Webmail/0.7.1 Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.0-RELEASE success X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:06:57 -0000 On 2012-01-19 15:19, Xin Li wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/19/12 13:22, Matt Connor wrote: >> On 19.01.2012 13:15, Nick Sayer wrote: >>> I have a VPS at rootbsd.net, and have been running 8.2-RELEASE >>> with a XENHVM kernel with a patch to fix the 'do something smart' >>> panic in if_xn. I fetched the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and built a >>> kernel to try and it worked without any muss or fuss. I did the >>> rest of the upgrade and it's working just fine, so far as I can >>> tell. >>> >>> And there was much >>> rejoicing._______________________________________________ >> >> Same here at ssdnodes.com - we pulled the new source tree, rebuilt >> with our modified XENHVM and haven't had any issues so far. >> >> We had many tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf to improve throughput for >> the 8.2-RELEASE, the 9.0-RELEASE systems still remained snappy >> after the tweaks were removed. > > What kinds of tweaks are needed? (i.e. should we make them the > defaults?) The tweaks were only "needed" because we were trying to achieve a specific network throughput in our particular workload (read: turning the knob all the way until it broke off). These values are no longer in production on version 9.0-RELEASE, I highly recommend these never become default. For your amusement, I've included the values below: -/boot/loader.conf # ZFS tuning parameters # We're running on top of a hardware battery-backed RAID controller, therefore disable cache flush vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable=1 vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1 # Recommends not setting a kmem limit and increasing arc # http://www.listshow.net/201005/freebsd-fs/9744-very-bad-zfs-performance-on-fresh-freebsd-8-installation.html vfs.zfs.arc_min="512M" vfs.zfs.arc_max="3584M" # Drive tweaks vfs.zfs.vdev.min_pending=2 vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending=30 vfs.zfs.txg.timeout=5 -/etc/sysctl.conf # not having this will cause the system to be very sluggish during file I/O as well as hanging during the nightly cron jobs vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem=64777216 vfs.write_behind=0 vfs.lorunningspace=1048576 vfs.hirunningspace=8388608 # Kernel Tuning kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 # Experimental kern.maxfilesperproc=64768 kern.maxvnodes=800000 net.local.stream.recvspace=65536 kern.maxfiles=65536 net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344 net.inet.tcp.mssdflt=1460 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=67108864 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=67108864 net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144 net.inet.tcp.sack.enable=1 net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=1 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_auto=1 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=16384 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_auto=1 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=524288 net.inet.tcp.hostcache.expire=1 From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 02:40:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA582106564A for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikemacleod@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8327F8FC15 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so286759iag.13 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:40:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=d807b3J0i1CacUJiEJ5XfB7Tc6DM1hdL3ZVAUlx61GY=; b=hLvY3iuIIus9OSwMdw+kZ3YwYmJ3eKZcPhekOsR2Od+ug3M+TKTBcLB3d6ZqwN4CVL AkXICgK7f2ZwucAlJXySIFysZtAIU66607JUxcYH9c/9veslWBeJcbic7OYsXH38J02E F+/271iPlcvMvnHXqkggGPoaIMNoiLF8JPhY8= Received: by 10.43.48.132 with SMTP id uw4mr14596221icb.17.1327025907352; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:18:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.172.8 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:18:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <65d33d61a2d7c4ccc167658407f5b189@www1.xerq.net> References: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> <4F18A4F2.7040205@delphij.net> <65d33d61a2d7c4ccc167658407f5b189@www1.xerq.net> From: Michael MacLeod Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:18:06 -0500 Message-ID: To: Matt Connor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: 9.0-RELEASE success X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:40:38 -0000 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Matt Connor wrote: > On 2012-01-19 15:19, Xin Li wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 01/19/12 13:22, Matt Connor wrote: >> >>> On 19.01.2012 13:15, Nick Sayer wrote: >>> >>>> I have a VPS at rootbsd.net, and have been running 8.2-RELEASE >>>> with a XENHVM kernel with a patch to fix the 'do something smart' >>>> panic in if_xn. I fetched the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and built a >>>> kernel to try and it worked without any muss or fuss. I did the >>>> rest of the upgrade and it's working just fine, so far as I can >>>> tell. >>>> >>>> And there was much >>>> rejoicing.____________________**___________________________ >>>> >>> >>> Same here at ssdnodes.com - we pulled the new source tree, rebuilt >>> with our modified XENHVM and haven't had any issues so far. >>> >>> We had many tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf to improve throughput for >>> the 8.2-RELEASE, the 9.0-RELEASE systems still remained snappy >>> after the tweaks were removed. >>> >> >> What kinds of tweaks are needed? (i.e. should we make them the defaults?) >> > > > The tweaks were only "needed" because we were trying to achieve a specific > network throughput in our particular workload (read: turning the knob all > the way until it broke off). These values are no longer in production on > version 9.0-RELEASE, I highly recommend these never become default. > > For your amusement, I've included the values below: > > > -/boot/loader.conf > # ZFS tuning parameters > # We're running on top of a hardware battery-backed RAID controller, > therefore disable cache flush > vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable=1 > vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1 > # Recommends not setting a kmem limit and increasing arc > # http://www.listshow.net/**201005/freebsd-fs/9744-very-** > bad-zfs-performance-on-fresh-**freebsd-8-installation.html > vfs.zfs.arc_min="512M" > vfs.zfs.arc_max="3584M" > # Drive tweaks > vfs.zfs.vdev.min_pending=2 > vfs.zfs.vdev.max_pending=30 > vfs.zfs.txg.timeout=5 > > > -/etc/sysctl.conf > # not having this will cause the system to be very sluggish during file > I/O as well as hanging during the nightly cron jobs > vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem=**64777216 > > vfs.write_behind=0 > vfs.lorunningspace=1048576 > vfs.hirunningspace=8388608 > > # Kernel Tuning > kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216 > net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 > kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 > > # Experimental > kern.maxfilesperproc=64768 > kern.maxvnodes=800000 > net.local.stream.recvspace=**65536 > kern.maxfiles=65536 > net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344 > net.inet.tcp.mssdflt=1460 > net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=**67108864 > net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=**67108864 > net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144 > net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144 > net.inet.udp.recvspace=262144 > net.inet.tcp.sack.enable=1 > net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_**discovery=1 > net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_auto=1 > net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=16384 > net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_auto=1 > net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=**524288 > net.inet.tcp.hostcache.expire=**1 Any of these recommended for those of us who aren't rushing to leave 8.2 yet? From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 23:55:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF06106566B for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@xerq.net) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [67.52.126.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BDA8FC12 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (unknown [127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BE94095C; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:55:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from cartman.xerq.net ([127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [127.52.126.46]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r9M55Jf7xh3G; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:55:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from www1.xerq.net (localhost [127.52.126.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FE8240939; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:55:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:55:33 -0800 From: Matt Connor To: Michael MacLeod In-Reply-To: References: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> <4F18A4F2.7040205@delphij.net> <65d33d61a2d7c4ccc167658407f5b189@www1.xerq.net> Message-ID: X-Sender: bsd@xerq.net User-Agent: XERQ Webmail/0.7.1 Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: 9.0-RELEASE success X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:55:40 -0000 On 2012-01-19 18:18, Michael MacLeod wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Matt Connor > wrote: > >> On 2012-01-19 15 [3]:19, Xin Li wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 01/19/12 13:22, Matt Connor wrote: >>> >>>> On 19.01.2012 13:15, Nick Sayer wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have a VPS at rootbsd.net [1], and have been running >>>>> 8.2-RELEASE >>>>> with a XENHVM kernel with a patch to fix the do something >>>>> smart >>>>> panic in if_xn. I fetched the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and >>>>> built a >>>>> kernel to try and it worked without any muss or fuss. I did >>>>> the >>>>> rest of the upgrade and its working just fine, so far as I >>>>> can >>>>> tell. >>>>> >>>>> And there was much >>>>> rejoicing._______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> Same here at ssdnodes.com [2] - we pulled the new source tree, >>>> rebuilt >>>> with our modified XENHVM and havent had any issues so far. >>>> >>>> We had many tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf to improve throughput >>>> for >>>> the 8.2-RELEASE, the 9.0-RELEASE systems still remained snappy >>>> after the tweaks were removed. >>> >>> What kinds of tweaks are needed?  (i.e. should we make them the >>> defaults?) >> >> The tweaks were only "needed" because we were trying to achieve a >> specific network throughput in our particular workload (read: >> turning the knob all the way until it broke off). These values are >> no longer in production on version 9.0-RELEASE, I highly recommend >> these never become default. >> >> For your amusement, Ive included the values below: >> >> <<<...SNIP...>>> > > Any of these recommended for those of us who arent rushing to leave > 8.2 yet? > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://rootbsd.net > [2] http://ssdnodes.com It honestly depends on what you're trying to accomplish, I can't give any blanket advice that will cover all the various workloads. Ours in particular was serving a combination of many small image files and a few large files that were being constantly hit between 150-300Mbps. After a month or two of benchmarking, we found these values to help considerably. If your workload is similar (or you're feeling particularly sadistic today), I would suggest doing rigorous benchmarks on your current system, then changing the sysctl values one-by-one and making note of the changes in performance. Unfortunately you cannot do the same with the /boot/loader.conf values (these actually require a reboot).