From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 10:50:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C712610657E4 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EEC8FC14 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so4704314yhg.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:50:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=X4SH6bhi2lQx0yMQHPWzBWpgf4hvPcXo0CUcehlN5vc=; b=NGkUMfryBD2tn6iWMXWx2yZdMV2obbNurPzhYpy2T516yWts/2kSkZyvkOEv1jo+Nn t++y4C+EktjJ/LpBJ5yrW/7tD+Rrk8Lqb6Tc0zmwOsySlzX4UBf3LQPo68mGQMPE4IQm 4ql/Monqghu4qmI7uDg4JAB37DWiETGFunZDb+NeI2fzc2Msyv+srAR3/n15fhXNDjra FkBhvJEpgQ9pQPEehCy495tI8TTj9wdaFvQ9f/DXij+tTVwPELdzxk5V2Bny65B/Ujnr aS4uHy9zTGuWJ3OyPRKX8g24IS3fT1jt2dnqR3iXyCifEzrNCnvK0AKFewPnXRM8tqGf mNMQ== Received: by 10.236.76.35 with SMTP id a23mr18345731yhe.125.1336387844919; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:50:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.121.10 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 03:50:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:50:04 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2mThDzDSHcxyG_eo76ROmdSJAtE Message-ID: To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: XENHVM on 9-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:50:45 -0000 Hi, Is XENHVM usable on 9-STABLE amd64? I seem to recall some problems early in 9-current.