From owner-svn-doc-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 22:11:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFBBBB6; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEA28FC12; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pakbsde14.localnet (unknown [38.105.238.108]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6FCEB91E; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:11:01 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: svn commit: r40000 - projects/pkgng/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:24:01 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p22; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201211151440.qAFEeLYN099713@svn.freebsd.org> <20121115181349.GB1354@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <20121115181349.GB1354@glenbarber.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212121124.01664.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:11:01 -0500 (EST) Cc: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Benjamin Kaduk X-BeenThere: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for doc projects trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:11:02 -0000 On Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:13:49 pm Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > Isn't the actual application just "pkg"? It's unclear to what extent we > > really need to be talking about pkgng using the string "pkgng". > > > > The name of the application is pkgng. The name of the command is pkg. This is not a very future proof name. Do we get pkgngng next, or will it be pkgds9? I think pkgng is fine for a WIP name, but once it moves to production status it should really just be called 'pkg'. -- John Baldwin