From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  1 06:42:31 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105EAC70;
 Sun,  1 Sep 2013 06:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3A129F5;
 Sun,  1 Sep 2013 06:42:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.100])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA02144;
 Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:42:28 +0300 (EEST)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
 by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
 id 1VG1Mh-000HgK-Vk; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:42:28 +0300
Message-ID: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:41:32 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance
References: <CALRn2n_2tUc0vPCFpgmAjYRm1=7KB5sA3A+xQqcc=ye-S1-0LA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmom970ZBLPLWWTomkKtX1w-Fi3cj5qva1_ODcx22nqEXfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALRn2n9G1+BS8KVUc_RFZj-snM3FVJvsEEcnWqv-GF82=CqS6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmomWMhQNU1w0eWdwrKYz2fuZ5xZimgxQWUEkPqaQcgYkjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALRn2n_e2Uu4Y2aHUSP=6_aQDPeCk_OkrCxiFWaD0BxmbgP4-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmokesYVnYJUnNgULKwL-wqb_-SqqYi=3KUSCGbHNVgOOUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokesYVnYJUnNgULKwL-wqb_-SqqYi=3KUSCGbHNVgOOUw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>,
 FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>,
 Mike Harding <mvharding@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 06:42:31 -0000

on 01/09/2013 02:40 Adrian Chadd said the following:
> 
> 
> 
> On 31 August 2013 10:35, Mike Harding <mvharding@gmail.com
> <mailto:mvharding@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I've tracked this down to a single line, details in
>     http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632.  Basically, the code is
>     now doing a 'sti, hlt' vs. a 'sti' in some code that is only supposed to run
>     if idle is disabled.  Given that 'hlt' is the idle instruction, this doesn't
>     seem right.
> 
> 
> Wow, nice!
> 
> Avg - can we get this fixed? Or just revert this!

Thank you for trying to be helpful.  But let's not jump to conclusions.
BTW, I am following up on the problem in the PR.

-- 
Andriy Gapon