From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 7 01:11:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92329A11; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 01:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.115.135.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728DCA4C; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 01:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id r371AKqt084429; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 01:10:20 GMT (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.2.123] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id fmg9x7mvpusydyew8kt3juwjcn; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: "Beyond Buildworld" (was Re: RFC: "Crochet" build tool) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <50CC112D-2B90-4E66-9D5F-829274D041D7@bsdimp.com> Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 18:10:17 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <94846836-83B2-483C-8003-466563F50D17@freebsd.org> References: <5DFA61DB-70E4-4C3D-ACA0-995A175706C8@neville-neil.com> <5151B454.9090402@ceetonetechnology.com> <1CBF1416-3237-4DCE-8D61-7E998265C887@neville-neil.com> <1364311809.36972.27.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5151D045.80305@thieprojects.ch> <5151D9DB.7050001@thieprojects.ch> <167CF57D-01E3-4857-BF0E-C40B00FED226@netgate.com> <515ADB81.7090908@freebsd.org> <515DF177.9060907@freebsd.org> <4DC4C47C-D503-4155-8FAF-6D5C88D8F67C@freebsd.org> <8FCD7391-B9E3-478A-86E8-4414F750804D@freebsd.org> <50CC112D-2B90-4E66-9D5F-829274D041D7@bsdimp.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:11:39 -0000 On Apr 6, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > Most boards have a perfectly good boot loader already, but > some like the popular RPi don't. Neither does the BeagleBone, Pandaboard, nor I suspect many of the other "hobbyist" boards that people would really want pre-built images for. > Thankfully, the images for the boot loaders tend to be separable > from the main image that people load on them and run/boot. All of the boards mentioned above require a boot partition and boot loader chain as part of the main image. I believe this is common to most of the new hobbyist boards. Tim