From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 03:12:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A877E44B for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6485D8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 16so11822940obc.41 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:12:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=p5JYNly2ii7rtlqA5Z+UVeOcnVNPIdrU+48JmYje1+Q=; b=DS52hRiqNg7IQVJmg9DYL1CYs3ChiFCD9dmnHLvoaGYcxvubfaeo7nBz7Ns/n57D+P gdSFut9kcz4cpgBXBoE/gxc+tYtgvDPztX6VOk+zWta1wOiGCWyzd/Czs3u+rysZPi0Q O1boAxjbT9nNfQWZ67wJ76ZnQ9Jkym0INl04fk8W7nfJqxzqxp9m0TXRaxTw/Nvz3/PV slf+AdSqNHJE62U7Xm2h9cDCirpopdDh28ID/hghzeoQ56VQKE8AQSrZRXi/o1Amk5Hw k+7gsR05jscCIjDQs2DYSs2CRTyVOK4bFoVOjmMfWMLb6br6XbWZK0aVkitG15zR6BaY Hkqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.77.230 with SMTP id v6mr11957254obw.66.1357009923595; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:12:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.143.33 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:12:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1905046872.1604317.1356954929867.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:12:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r244604 - head/usr.sbin/gssd From: Garrett Cooper To: Benjamin Kaduk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Rick Macklem , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 03:12:04 -0000 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: ... > src.conf(5) is (well, should be) authoritative for WITH_ and WITHOUT_ flags. Just to be clear because my reply was a bit ambiguous, I was referring to the C sourcecode, not the Makefiles :). Thanks, -Garrett