From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 30 14:18:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507DA2CD; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:18:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dt71@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3DE1FC6; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.80] ([84.2.254.103]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LjquD-1UMhj40JgH-00bsMd; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:18:23 +0200 Message-ID: <51D03E0D.3050106@gmx.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:17:49 +0200 From: dt71@gmx.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: "injunction" on the use of GA References: <51AF2DE4.3090103@gmx.com> <51CEEE8E.8010800@gmx.com> <20130629143032.GB10180@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <20130629143032.GB10180@glenbarber.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1f0uPP85SD3iWDBYkt6aUmlPa/l/6soHTFcuWINHd0bcuSV7Azh Pd7wxVR1TwXeUUftoYrZZwb6q+rEJQtxq+iqDuRPTvBhNjOUohR6l1fhGxrNZNc2GNX0dcy f11bTF22RUaZOpiermYc2rNOxRA3jYZivGt2aybt8KwpJEcZg4+bSKtwMbfPtE9s2/m5KXC g4kxK3M+l01EPEqpFuNzQ== Cc: webmaster@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:18:25 -0000 On 06/29/2013 16:30, Glen Barber wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:26:22PM +0200, dt71@gmx.com wrote: >> Tick, tock. > > Yes? - What has so far been gained through the use of GA? - Of these, which ones could not have been achieved otherwise, such as with a different tool? - Also of these, which ones are significant, and why? - What warrants the continued application of GA?