From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 22 11:06:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CAA449 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 599622498 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6MB6iLf053680 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:06:44 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r6MB6hs4053678 for freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:06:43 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:06:43 GMT Message-Id: <201307221106.r6MB6hs4053678@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:06:44 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/179889 geom [geli] geli stopped work after updating RELEASE 9.* so o kern/178684 geom gpart(8) cannot get my GEOM tree o kern/178359 geom [geom] [patch] geom_eli: support external metadata o kern/176744 geom [geom] [patch] BIO_FLUSH not recorded by devstats o kern/170038 geom [geom] geom_mirror always starts degraded after reboot o kern/169539 geom [geom] [patch] fix ability to run gmirror on MSI MegaR a bin/169077 geom bsdinstall(8) does not use partition labels in /etc/fs f kern/165745 geom [geom] geom_multipath page fault on removed drive o kern/165428 geom [glabel][patch] Add xfs support to glabel o kern/164254 geom [geom] gjournal not stopping on GPT partitions o kern/164252 geom [geom] gjournal overflow o kern/164143 geom [geom] Partition table not recognized after upgrade R8 a kern/163020 geom [geli] [patch] enable the Camellia-XTS on GEOM ELI o kern/162690 geom [geom] gpart label changes only take effect after a re o kern/162010 geom [geli] panic: Provider's error should be set (error=0) o kern/161979 geom [geom] glabel doesn't update after newfs, and glabel s o bin/161807 geom [patch] add option for explicitly specifying metadata o kern/161752 geom [geom] glabel(8) doesn't get gpt label change o bin/161677 geom gpart(8) Probably bug in gptboot o kern/160409 geom [geli] failed to attach provider f kern/159595 geom [geom] [panic] panic on gmirror unload in vbox [regres f kern/159414 geom [isp] isp(4)+gmultipath(8) : removing active fiber pat p kern/158398 geom [headers] [patch] includes o kern/158197 geom [geom] geom_cache with size>1000 leads to panics o kern/157879 geom [libgeom] [regression] ABI change without version bump o kern/157863 geom [geli] kbdmux prevents geli passwords from being enter o kern/157739 geom [geom] GPT labels with geom_multipath o kern/157724 geom [geom] gpart(8) 'add' command must preserve gap for sc o kern/157723 geom [geom] GEOM should not process 'c' (raw) partitions fo o kern/157108 geom [gjournal] dumpon(8) fails on gjournal providers o kern/155994 geom [geom] Long "Suspend time" when reading large files fr o bin/154570 geom [patch] gvinum(8) can't be built as part of the kernel o kern/154226 geom [geom] GEOM label does not change when you modify them o kern/150858 geom [geom] [geom_label] [patch] glabel(8) is not compatibl o kern/150626 geom [geom] [gjournal] gjournal(8) destroys label o kern/150555 geom [geom] gjournal unusable on GPT partitions o kern/150334 geom [geom] [udf] [patch] geom label does not support UDF o kern/149762 geom volume labels with rogue characters o bin/149215 geom [panic] [geom_part] gpart(8): Delete linux's slice via o kern/147667 geom [gmirror] Booting with one component of a gmirror, the o kern/145818 geom [geom] geom_stat_open showing cached information for n o kern/145042 geom [geom] System stops booting after printing message "GE o kern/143455 geom gstripe(8) in RELENG_8 (31st Jan 2010) broken o kern/142563 geom [geom] [hang] ioctl freeze in zpool o kern/141740 geom [geom] gjournal(8): g_journal_destroy concurrent error o kern/140352 geom [geom] gjournal + glabel not working o kern/135898 geom [geom] Severe filesystem corruption - large files or l o kern/134113 geom [geli] Problem setting secondary GELI key o kern/133931 geom [geli] [request] intentionally wrong password to destr o bin/132845 geom [geom] [patch] ggated(8) does not close files opened a o bin/131415 geom [geli] keystrokes are unregulary sent to Geli when typ o kern/131353 geom [geom] gjournal(8) kernel lock o kern/129674 geom [geom] gjournal root did not mount on boot o kern/129645 geom gjournal(8): GEOM_JOURNAL causes system to fail to boo o kern/129245 geom [geom] gcache is more suitable for suffix based provid o kern/127420 geom [geom] [gjournal] [panic] Journal overflow on gmirrore o kern/124973 geom [gjournal] [patch] boot order affects geom_journal con o kern/124969 geom gvinum(8): gvinum raid5 plex does not detect missing s o kern/123962 geom [panic] [gjournal] gjournal (455Gb data, 8Gb journal), o kern/123122 geom [geom] GEOM / gjournal kernel lock o kern/122738 geom [geom] gmirror list "losts consumers" after gmirror de o kern/122067 geom [geom] [panic] Geom crashed during boot o kern/121364 geom [gmirror] Removing all providers create a "zombie" mir o kern/120091 geom [geom] [geli] [gjournal] geli does not prompt for pass o kern/115856 geom [geli] ZFS thought it was degraded when it should have o kern/115547 geom [geom] [patch] [request] let GEOM Eli get password fro o kern/113837 geom [geom] unable to access 1024 sector size storage o kern/113419 geom [geom] geom fox multipathing not failing back o kern/107707 geom [geom] [patch] [request] add new class geom_xbox360 to o kern/94632 geom [geom] Kernel output resets input while GELI asks for o kern/90582 geom [geom] [panic] Restore cause panic string (ffs_blkfree o bin/90093 geom fdisk(8) incapable of altering in-core geometry o kern/87544 geom [gbde] mmaping large files on a gbde filesystem deadlo o bin/86388 geom [geom] [geom_part] periodic(8) daily should backup gpa o kern/84556 geom [geom] [panic] GBDE-encrypted swap causes panic at shu o kern/79251 geom [2TB] newfs fails on 2.6TB gbde device o kern/79035 geom [vinum] gvinum unable to create a striped set of mirro o bin/78131 geom gbde(8) "destroy" not working. 78 problems total. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 22 11:36:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4522663 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorrasg@yahoo.es) Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [77.238.189.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1ACB327D8 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.49] by nm3.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jul 2013 11:36:52 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.66] by tm2.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jul 2013 11:36:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jul 2013 11:36:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s1024; t=1374493012; bh=smvXBDE4YBaz0ymI4RzH0wuJsDSdfwWb6fHEcHpRJrM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=w5/O8JXYmya4UxUybyDJHGTiLqDxv29rlghwQbncd4n78zAJTQd9201va/Yvk6Wp8NYL808a39nJEgjT1+OjPL4YSfhTON7ToE8C2B74Ek596CK7NyyNZTQLu0KLrDgJHF3QxENMnVeZbUNeWvabofvzUkPI3XVMQeeDoUpWUjE= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 412887.83101.bm@smtp103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Doj7GaYVM1k3ykdnMS6Hw18ulCy.ETzQmuViHl5rf5QegjM ZoNBWtGRCpFEm_OxCCDvXQ3TrNUE3uRVDPgm3UM_bBbWd.ygpEHxvXwMUB1P LpatAf2HyiUaTM4GSMPWgM23WgQFNR0Ny.Qb9lV8mgZ8tS1cFtpliTjcSmnM 8v6a8SNy3xmKu2_Vqjju6QtkEVkusFdm80s5fyJjV0U1GRxQoO2rtglap7ws AJU8_VdL11SCJBQ3Ww6iZNnU3kMNYuhRAVzYB7k5LgIHkWB7eisNTZMC5Wyk qv3WXEOCjG_bdWAYLiztOBsVMbp9BG572fE1AdpPAlWw1Afn1OhX.j4VaOpW AxuGYmMkbW0mYsJZJfX8fF97JfxZul1edQbgAf2NxHQDHWxPnnoc8H6VNTF. P_HRqiOEa3BWzPU16H18xn5ZBbRNZAgvZ7UXcK6UfmIpY6mY5CCtqrdTChp_ rAr5MrWvZTQq0RSIyP5OSeSDdHn0b X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR X-Rocket-Received: from camibar.emorras.eu (emorrasg@85.219.45.142 with ) by smtp103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2013 11:36:52 +0000 UTC Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:36:51 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Does geom_raid1e support raid10e? Message-Id: <20130722133651.a0b2f7a97433fb1ac90e2d2c@yahoo.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:36:54 -0000 Hello, I ask this question on -questions list last week and get no answer, I post it here then. Hello, I want to know if geom_raid1e support raid10e level too. The difference between them is that 1e duplicates the 32-64-128-whatever block data size in all n disks in the raid1e but raid10e only between n/2 and n(1) (a try to show it below), making raid10e bigger and more flexible than plains raid1/raid1e or raid10 respectively. In raid1e: Disk D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Block a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 Block a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 Block a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 In raid10e: Disk D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Block a1 a1 a1 a2 a2 Block a2 a3 a3 a3 a4 Block a4 a4 a5 a5 a5 In these examples, with block size of 128KB, raid1e will survive to fail of 4 disks and stores 128*3 = 384 KB; raid10e will survive to fail of 2 disks and stores 128*5 = 640 KB. (1)In some literature, raid10e duplicates between 2 and n disks. --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 22 12:49:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1155DF25 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF38E2C46 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6MCnaDm046851; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:49:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r6MCna8S046848; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:49:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:49:36 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Eduardo Morras Subject: Re: Does geom_raid1e support raid10e? In-Reply-To: <20130722133651.a0b2f7a97433fb1ac90e2d2c@yahoo.es> Message-ID: References: <20130722133651.a0b2f7a97433fb1ac90e2d2c@yahoo.es> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:49:36 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:49:39 -0000 On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Eduardo Morras wrote: > Hello, I ask this question on -questions list last week and get no answer, I post it here then. > > Hello, I want to know if geom_raid1e support raid10e level too. There is no geom_raid1e, just geom_raid. Support for RAID1E is listed for some metadata formats, but RAID10E is not shown at all. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 23 09:47:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2DCBF2 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorrasg@yahoo.es) Received: from nm11.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm11.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [77.238.189.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75144239A for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.234] by nm11.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2013 09:47:09 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.108] by tm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2013 09:47:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp145.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jul 2013 09:47:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s1024; t=1374572829; bh=IdaBfjsuJQjs30VYWyncDQqykkLQFqpEjhrfhZ4AI9Y=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tNLD9+imLRpPC8Y2y54qZp/G3+R5EKJq/sKtkBzv3HbNayFSL72Hi7UxjlbvYp5VshtnPBoSK+1FEjgr5tM55x1iPLHxQGOxbgu0ejsbJU7q4f06orwSBlLIYxr9nzrPx5HbK+scj+huMUGPsMs1OQ9bOtFwf7LsugvDsvyQfcc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 674634.93846.bm@smtp145.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: taK4eWMVM1m.AQ1tWLSChHArr7dffQHYrUykJ_el7vEG_qk y_Enrbmtv9Qb0tpi.UGiNEPLKR_0YM.hnk2E5Tne3Du_ZX2q5yc_zl4DQ3lv jMetMffOIn374BSzmR9Or0gJWr1Czu3p.2ebagc5RdbT67j5USdHO1LAkHnQ IA7Z6ybaKJ0WtEi6_nFNkOgsPiUT3L5uhmrVuzeb869cI23NrBFtbPFCOvR. jY12uhm6WXbrctZ21hAj3K_EYxRZXRsVpyzaeERNHP.ylVWXkaXZTb6T507C 5uXZi8VcK7kokQNhEqgQDwvB1e7MBiaKDBDwBkFpye3eGYe0ZdSegqfM7Lpe ihZ1csaOsp7lzcFULr6xQPqnJdLrGJ_i6YeDTTr0aquu85NPMdQZsAqCIZ_R TzGl0lTzrFJ3eEe7PCMqe6N46ZGj2jBO73v5860n8k9w.w7wphVCVl8R4Krr yumAESBbrDWjSFUXuKdBVJ8qZrBieFZmj X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR X-Rocket-Received: from camibar.emorras.eu (emorrasg@85.219.45.142 with ) by smtp145.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2013 09:47:09 +0000 UTC Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:47:10 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does geom_raid1e support raid10e? Message-Id: <20130723114710.d861682670c9be1b28c140a4@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: References: <20130722133651.a0b2f7a97433fb1ac90e2d2c@yahoo.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:47:19 -0000 On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:49:36 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Eduardo Morras wrote: > > > Hello, I ask this question on -questions list last week and get no answer, I post it here then. > > > > Hello, I want to know if geom_raid1e support raid10e level too. > > There is no geom_raid1e, just geom_raid. Support for RAID1E is listed > for some metadata formats, but RAID10E is not shown at all. ... So /usr/src/sys/geom/raid/tr_raid1e.c doesn't implement a full raid1e? What's it then for? Only for interface some raid cards? I thought that Alexander Motin worked on full software raid1e support and not an interface for raid cards that support it. Thanks for clarify this point. --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 23 09:58:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF8322A for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FE7243A for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:ad72:2c3d:f785:a64c]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8980E4AC57; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:58:35 +0400 (MSK) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:58:32 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <12910568375.20130723135832@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Eduardo Morras Subject: Re: Does geom_raid1e support raid10e? In-Reply-To: <20130723114710.d861682670c9be1b28c140a4@yahoo.es> References: <20130722133651.a0b2f7a97433fb1ac90e2d2c@yahoo.es> <20130723114710.d861682670c9be1b28c140a4@yahoo.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:58:43 -0000 Hello, Eduardo. You wrote 23 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BB=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 13:47:10: EM> ... So /usr/src/sys/geom/raid/tr_raid1e.c doesn't implement a full EM> raid1e? What's it then for? Only for interface some raid cards? I It implements RAID1E, in software, yes. I'm not sure, does it impelemnts RAID10E or not. You better ask Aexander :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 07:27:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD36B2ED for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emorrasg@yahoo.es) Received: from nm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [77.238.189.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10FD42E23 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.50] by nm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jul 2013 07:27:18 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.93] by tm3.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jul 2013 07:27:18 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp130.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jul 2013 07:27:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s1024; t=1374650838; bh=HOKG0I5NEk2KtVzL64a3UJuLz8ncQhALZ5MLH/JDwTw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nsEGdY/g15B8QErql5LrRhSMAKwrapJH5ejnDWjLv6ryAv3zBPlg1DDErkFcK7YW56SDbiNedwIG6qSssMx0yaVYRd6pYbsmYADMPzP+7VmVIADo9mdnNC5qa9mUN9CBopnihUiX/QvxFCal/+DrbZFDi8inxFaR6qYL6Q9jOh0= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 298871.13113.bm@smtp130.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: RCmoTCkVM1mq6tvl7q8fLXDlVWFGLOyC1_qxyWAJnRo1Hu1 OOrWgd5TTxhYl6Mv9S1aN8xORqk6Jw5sikBc2kHLq2tGL_1z.wX4obCQy_fD TvLGPmnKAJSAEFHsJcDzxumccj9_WE4dmpeVS0R9NwSuWG3SVba7AB7BCy0y _YD2EKbSHTnXxXRnwcMwULznz97OOg.ccBU26fzAVRgEpdfuNT4Ad2sB.5Yl xd3KT344vMEI1aC8Fb8DG5qSEqh.TXUT7LneD5hCI7biuAHe5KogcAkOg_H0 Ofz.e_YCn0LfOoS52gUpFUaJlOOc.2r3MxPSighJUE78Da6cFMEG9V3IvU9j 0u23Gr1gMiM6TKeMSOLADQV.DW7qXZglT3heQqqn43_UutlFxpzbWQ9BPdvR c0NmQsjHgMtX238uo_eaa3Z3YnovEgZgPydQM5g9DhU1fM9RfRU4nNM6vXqw KhNDOAzW1jLB0xE2zXNNfksB8dg9i X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR X-Rocket-Received: from camibar.emorras.eu (emorrasg@85.219.45.142 with ) by smtp130.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2013 07:27:18 +0000 UTC Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:27:07 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does geom_raid1e support raid10e? Message-Id: <20130724092707.14a13fb3be6739a06adcdfad@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <12910568375.20130723135832@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <20130722133651.a0b2f7a97433fb1ac90e2d2c@yahoo.es> <20130723114710.d861682670c9be1b28c140a4@yahoo.es> <12910568375.20130723135832@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: lev@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:27:26 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:58:32 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Eduardo. > You wrote 23 июля 2013 г., 13:47:10: > > EM> ... So /usr/src/sys/geom/raid/tr_raid1e.c doesn't implement a full > EM> raid1e? What's it then for? Only for interface some raid cards? I > It implements RAID1E, in software, yes. I'm not sure, does it impelemnts > RAID10E or not. You better ask Aexander :) I'll ask him then. Will wait a few days, perhaps he's suscribed to this list. > -- > // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 08:08:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB23CEC for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A825200E for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id r6O88UhQ000448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:08:31 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:08:30 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: TRIM or no TRIM? Message-ID: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:08:36 -0000 Hi, I've got a 9.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64 system, on a SuperMicro board with: ahci0: port 0xf070-0xf077,0xf060-0xf063,0xf050-0xf057,0xf040-0xf043,0xf000-0xf01f mem 0xdfa22000-0xdfa227ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 I'm using a graid RAID1 array comprising of two INTEL SSDSA2CW160G3's with a couple of file systems on it. I've used 'fsck_ffs -E' on the filesystems, rebooted as single user and done 'tunefs -t enable' for both file systems. On a subsequent reboot I get: " WARNING: /: TRIM flag on fs but disk does not confirm that it supports TRIM WARNING: /usr3: TRIM flag on fs but disk does not confirm that it supports TRIM " Is TRIM supported on this configuration? - Is there any way of telling if it's actually working? Thanks, -Karl From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 10:07:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494765A3 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F942722 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50005125151.msg for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:07:13 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:07:13 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Karl Pielorz" , References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:07:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:07:24 -0000 9.1 is a bit old, 9.2-BETA1 or 9/stable will be able to tell you if indeed your SSD is reporting TRIM via: camcontrol identify Regards Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Pielorz" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:08 AM Subject: TRIM or no TRIM? > > Hi, > > I've got a 9.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64 system, on a SuperMicro board with: > > ahci0: port > 0xf070-0xf077,0xf060-0xf063,0xf050-0xf057,0xf040-0xf043,0xf000-0xf01f mem > 0xdfa22000-0xdfa227ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 > > I'm using a graid RAID1 array comprising of two INTEL SSDSA2CW160G3's with > a couple of file systems on it. > > I've used 'fsck_ffs -E' on the filesystems, rebooted as single user and > done 'tunefs -t enable' for both file systems. > > On a subsequent reboot I get: > > " > WARNING: /: TRIM flag on fs but disk does not confirm that it supports TRIM > WARNING: /usr3: TRIM flag on fs but disk does not confirm that it supports > TRIM > " > > Is TRIM supported on this configuration? - Is there any way of telling if > it's actually working? > > Thanks, > > -Karl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-geom@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-geom-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 10:43:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3C97B7 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6596D28E8 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id r6OAhNrH012925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:43:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:43:25 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Steven Hartland , freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:43:25 -0000 --On 24 July 2013 11:07 +0100 Steven Hartland wrote: > 9.1 is a bit old, 9.2-BETA1 or 9/stable will be able to tell you if > indeed your SSD is reporting TRIM via: > camcontrol identify 'bit old'? - if only freebsd-update handled updating to 'stable' (unless it does?). Anyway, the camcontrol runs on this ancient 9.1 system ;) and shows: " data set management (TRIM) yes " So it is supported by the drive - remembering the file system is mounted from '/dev/raid/r0' - i.e. not the actual underlying drive). But everything I've seen about geom etc. indicates on this version is should support 'trim' - it may well even be using it, but with the warning logged about 'disk does not confirm that it supports trim' - I'd rather be sure... -Karl From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 11:09:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAB8A7 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50B8029F7 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50005125710.msg for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:09:46 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:09:46 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Karl Pielorz" , References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:10:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:09:49 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Pielorz" > --On 24 July 2013 11:07 +0100 Steven Hartland > wrote: > >> 9.1 is a bit old, 9.2-BETA1 or 9/stable will be able to tell you if >> indeed your SSD is reporting TRIM via: >> camcontrol identify > > 'bit old'? - if only freebsd-update handled updating to 'stable' (unless it > does?). > > Anyway, the camcontrol runs on this ancient 9.1 system ;) and shows: > > " > data set management (TRIM) yes > " > > So it is supported by the drive - remembering the file system is mounted > from '/dev/raid/r0' - i.e. not the actual underlying drive). But everything > I've seen about geom etc. indicates on this version is should support > 'trim' - it may well even be using it, but with the warning logged about > 'disk does not confirm that it supports trim' - I'd rather be sure... I'm guessing that the software raid your using doesn't support TRIM then Have you considered switching to ZFS based install, which does support TRIM in 9.2, 9/stable and 8/stable? Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 14:19:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD3670F for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:19:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B6D2221 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id r6OEJewQ029737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:19:41 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:19:40 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Steven Hartland , freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Message-ID: <43FCB2933BDA7D36CA1719CD@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:19:48 -0000 --On 24 July 2013 12:10 +0100 Steven Hartland wrote: > I'm guessing that the software raid your using doesn't support TRIM then So the question has to change to 'Does GEOM GRAID support, or allow TRIM' :) > Have you considered switching to ZFS based install, which does support > TRIM in 9.2, 9/stable and 8/stable? These are MySQL hosts - until we've got some experience running MySQL on top of ZFS we'll stick with UFS for now - nice idea though (and we already have other boxes using ZFS). -Karl From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 15:12:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98934DA5 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38B0124B9 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50005127388.msg for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:12:30 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:12:30 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Karl Pielorz" , References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> <43FCB2933BDA7D36CA1719CD@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:13:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:12:34 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Pielorz" > --On 24 July 2013 12:10 +0100 Steven Hartland > wrote: > >> I'm guessing that the software raid your using doesn't support TRIM then > > So the question has to change to 'Does GEOM GRAID support, or allow TRIM' :) > >> Have you considered switching to ZFS based install, which does support >> TRIM in 9.2, 9/stable and 8/stable? > > These are MySQL hosts - until we've got some experience running MySQL on > top of ZFS we'll stick with UFS for now - nice idea though (and we already > have other boxes using ZFS). gmirror may be another alternative that may correctly work with TRIM. For reference correctly setup MySQL performance on ZFS works well for use. Of particular interest is some of our data is highly compressible making ZFS compression of particular benefit for our work load. Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 15:27:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C657E1 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@freebsd.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4C428FC for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id B783521564 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:27:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:27:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=glDZbMzuv4c9ZkabJFhlEkH7guk=; b=orK CvXGvYkyH4PsAoX4C3m6ibszf1SliqSPJtpXIviJakcCIv39yOuMZg24XlooAObE wAUcwVO+dgSRsgLUfpoLQ/pv8/dslchKhc/sfjG2sebopivHz+cvEPPDSXGbtQ/R JStsIx7UkK9raFCKztr7IZurE7al0rn//eB7AVsc= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id C2F9BB01C74; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:27:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1374679655.8934.9223372036856590361.535ACEE3@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: OOnW9vYZ60X81MEMO0OGqjXzLi/Qw29lgCqRCeuTK528 1374679655 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-7c8d3e73 In-Reply-To: References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> <43FCB2933BDA7D36CA1719CD@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:27:35 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:27:39 -0000 On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 10:13, Steven Hartland wrote: > > gmirror may be another alternative that may correctly work with TRIM. > > For reference correctly setup MySQL performance on ZFS works well for > use. Of particular interest is some of our data is highly compressible > making ZFS compression of particular benefit for our work load. > There are known interactivity issues with ZFS compression, so keep that in mind. Also, you will want to make sure MySQL is on its own zfs filesystem and you may want to set primarycache=metadata so the database chooses what to keep in memory, not the filesystem. I ran a decent sized Postgres database of my own with compression and it was OK, but I didn't hit it very hard. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 16:08:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161113BE; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8566C2ACD; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50005127921.msg; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:08:01 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:08:01 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Mark Felder" , References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> <43FCB2933BDA7D36CA1719CD@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <1374679655.8934.9223372036856590361.535ACEE3@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:08:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:08:05 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Felder" > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 10:13, Steven Hartland wrote: >> >> gmirror may be another alternative that may correctly work with TRIM. >> >> For reference correctly setup MySQL performance on ZFS works well for >> use. Of particular interest is some of our data is highly compressible >> making ZFS compression of particular benefit for our work load. >> > > There are known interactivity issues with ZFS compression, so keep that > in mind. Some people have said that, we've never seen it here, quite the opposite in fact. > Also, you will want to make sure MySQL is on its own zfs filesystem and > you may want to set primarycache=metadata so the database chooses what > to keep in memory, not the filesystem. I ran a decent sized Postgres > database of my own with compression and it was OK, but I didn't hit it > very hard. Depends on the setup, workload and available memory tbh I would use that as a hard and fast rule. Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 16:13:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43027474 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@freebsd.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1450E2B0C for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0496520B42; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:13:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:13:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=miLtxS6uExrzpL4zqhIUHcogwoE=; b=m5UJD BAGBZc0917LQsnT1nCgUvGIGQOlV9geKg1nQLQJnBYdAnxELn/8oeA2GWkTKv+74 0t0PIxTFv5a2TN4+R1TqNuoo9z3RLnPV9lj2h2QPgI5+yhiUTbtEwmirTNm8io/S 6K8bOHDD6zf/rTxSddktTyrQi6oramvsAFhjdQ= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id D3DACB01C77; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:13:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1374682388.24165.9223372036856608989.3CD1F525@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: KRZaTl11M4oqCGed+FAlQ+qfZnppl9KXZc54IXO4BJXc 1374682388 From: Mark Felder To: Steven Hartland , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-7c8d3e73 Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:13:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> <43FCB2933BDA7D36CA1719CD@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <1374679655.8934.9223372036856590361.535ACEE3@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:13:10 -0000 On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 11:08, Steven Hartland wrote: > > Some people have said that, we've never seen it here, quite the opposite > in fact. > It's well documented. Here's a link to take you down the rabbit hole. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072171.html From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 16:37:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F580AEA; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7DC2C4D; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50005128155.msg; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:37:50 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:37:50 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=1917699425=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Mark Felder" , References: <512DC7C043034F891F1012DA@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <066EB1F973D44AAC951D4D47C577266F@multiplay.co.uk> <43FCB2933BDA7D36CA1719CD@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <1374679655.8934.9223372036856590361.535ACEE3@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1374682388.24165.9223372036856608989.3CD1F525@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: TRIM or no TRIM? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:38:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:37:54 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Felder" > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 11:08, Steven Hartland wrote: >> >> Some people have said that, we've never seen it here, quite the opposite >> in fact. >> > > It's well documented. Here's a link to take you down the rabbit hole. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072171.html I've seen that thread before, but it provides very little actual evidence which would mean it effects all usages. I even just tried the very test listed in Jeremy's post and I'm unable to reproduce even the slightest sutter, let alone a total I/O stall. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-October/012752.html Just to be clear I'm not saying there's no issue, just we've never experienced it and we use compression on a heavily used MySQL DB, our RRD processing machine and hundreds of game servers (which are highly latency sensitive). Clearly if your performing an additional translation of the data theirs going to be an CPU overhead for doing so but if said overhead is smaller that the gain in the reduction of data written or read from the device then your still going to end up with better performance with compression than without. Maybe we're lucky and our data matches the magic pattern or perhaps others are exadurating the negative effect, possibly a combination of the two I don't know ;-) Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 25 15:25:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA876B5 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@wallago.co.uk) Received: from wallago.co.uk (mail.wallago.co.uk [91.213.195.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4ED32EE0 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [178.78.126.226] (helo=Tims-MacBook-Pro.local) by wallago.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1V2NNN-0000Rs-V2 for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:22:45 +0100 Message-ID: <51F142C7.9090401@wallago.co.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:22:47 +0100 From: TIm User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Missing mfid0 after restore Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:25:13 -0000 Hi guys, I have just restored a backup to one of my servers via dump and restore and now i am unable to see the mfid0 disk when i boot up. I am getting this error: ROOT MOUNT ERROR When i press ? i do not see my mfid0. I have tried booting in Single User Mode and Safe mode with no luck. I can mount the drive from a FreeBSD 9.1 live CD and edit files but cannot get the OS to boot. Any ideas guys? TJ