From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  3 05:50:02 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: gnome@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0446A75D
 for <gnome@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sun,  3 Mar 2013 05:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71DE6E3
 for <gnome@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sun,  3 Mar 2013 05:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r235o1lk009005
 for <gnome@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 05:50:01 GMT
 (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r235o1I0008994;
 Sun, 3 Mar 2013 05:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 05:50:01 GMT
Message-Id: <201303030550.r235o1I0008994@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gnome@FreeBSD.org
From: John Hein <jhein@symmetricom.com>
Subject: Re: ports/176494: devel/py-gobject ignores port options and Re:
 ports/175276: [patch] devel/py-gobject OPTIONSFILE eval order
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: John Hein <jhein@symmetricom.com>
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
 <freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-gnome>,
 <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
 <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 05:50:02 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/175276; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: John Hein <jhein@symmetricom.com>
To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
Cc: john@saltant.com
Subject: Re: ports/176494: devel/py-gobject ignores port options   and  Re: ports/175276: [patch] devel/py-gobject OPTIONSFILE eval order
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 22:39:56 -0700

 See also http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175276 from 1/14
 for more details.
 
 python@ never bit on this discussion regarding the larger scope of
 this issue.
 
 John O'Brien... did you ever cook up a patch like the one for your "B"
 method in 175276?  I like that one too if it's feasible - to avoid
 doing this in every affected port.  Especially since you figured out
 how many ports are affected - thanks for that.  If you do decide to
 come up with something, I'll take a look (and cc python@).
 
 But for now, the initial issue for 175276 is now done so that can
 probably be closed, opening a new bug for a bsd.python.mk patch.
 I'm also okay with just leaving 175276 open and changing its scope
 (although I suspect we don't have the ability to change the title of a
 bug with gnats).
 
 
 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote at 09:00 GMT on Mar  2, 2013:
  > The following reply was made to PR ports/176494; it has been noted by GNATS.
  >
  > From: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
  > To: Sayetsky Anton <vsjcfm@gmail.com>
  > Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
  > Subject: Re: ports/176494: devel/py-gobject ignores port options
  > Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:56:55 +0400
  >
  >  Yes, this port lacks OPTIONSFILE variable. Here is the patch.
  >
  >  Index: Makefile
  >  ===================================================================
  >  --- Makefile	(revision 313218)
  >  +++ Makefile	(working copy)
  >  @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
  >   CONFLICTS=	py*-gtk-0*
  >   PLIST_SUB=	PYTHON_VER="${PYTHON_VER}"
  >
  >  +OPTIONSFILE=	${PORT_DBDIR}/py-${PORTNAME}/options
  >   OPTIONS_DEFINE=	LIBFFI
  >   LIBFFI_DESC=	Enable libffi support