From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 07:11:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A21AEE for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 07:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [IPv6:2001:470:f0fd:0:2e0:81ff:fe2b:acbc]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3887C8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 07:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jill.exit.com (jill.exit.com [IPv6:2001:470:f0fd:0:2e0:81ff:febc:fdcc]) by tinker.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r017BQ4e029798 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:11:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=exit.com; s=tinker; t=1357024286; bh=ktjpfiqxWLe6Upby7bE8WYZ2M7CQWLyLnI+YYVSO6nM=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=VC2fguH6eKPD4dJuDl5YuTl831Gf6fFojJSJq2byJbf89yGuTlaKX/yIFz32eJqtt i23bU+1JtuKdW5A9RVJWDsEQ2DQQiellVhEWm3Kumy4vn6tSjTshZhK+v3zmHkQI/m h/2pEjfrNlKp23Z4YZiQTM56Pr+azKlhaUHjOViA= Received: from jill.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jill.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r017B43c026507 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:11:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by jill.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r017B4ir026506 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:11:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) X-Authentication-Warning: jill.exit.com: frank set sender to frank@exit.com using -f Subject: psm0: unable to allocate IRQ From: Frank Mayhar To: freebsd-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: Exit Consulting Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:11:04 -0800 Message-ID: <1357024264.13744.5.camel@jill.exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 07:11:27 -0000 Hi, guys. I'm trying to set up a new laptop and have run into a couple of problems. This one is the message in the subject line. I've managed to get X working but it can't talk to the mouse; after investigation and a verbose boot, this is why. I'm kind of stumped as to what steps to take; I've tried booting without acpi, same problem. Why would this happen? And better yet, how do I go about fixing it? Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. (And please CC replies to the list, email to this address is not quite 100% reliable at the moment.) Oh, the dmesg in question is available at https://docs.google.com/open?id=3D0B1d6rhpx_wBIeFJmNVJqVVQ1Xzg --=20 Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 05:30:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AB2917 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.115.135.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41228FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id r025Uart025830 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:30:36 GMT (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.2.143] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id 8f7bap6ny9kngcqasawm8ynwre; for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 05:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) From: Tim Kientzle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Every 20 minutes (less 4 seconds)? Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 21:30:35 -0800 Message-Id: To: freebsd-hackers Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 05:30:38 -0000 I'm trying to understand why the transmitter for the CPSW ethernet driver just stops sometimes. I just found a very perplexing clue: It happens every 1196 seconds. I added a debug message with an HH:MM:SS timestamp whenever the watchdog sees the transmitter stop and this is what it printed out: 20:30:20 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 20:50:16 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 21:10:12 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 21:30:09 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 21:50:04 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 22:10:01 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 22:29:56 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 22:49:52 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 23:09:49 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 23:29:45 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 23:49:41 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 00:29:33 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 00:49:29 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 01:29:21 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 02:29:09 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 03:28:57 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 04:28:45 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver 05:28:31 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver (Note: Some 20-minute intervals did seem to get skipped. There was no hang at 01:09, 01:49, 02:09, 02:49, etc. Maybe because the system was less busy then? The network and processor load varied quite a bit over this 9 hour period.) Based on this, it would appear that "something" happens every 1196 seconds and if "something else" happens at that time the transmitter will hang. Does anyone recognize that particular period? Tim P.S. Cron isn't running, nor is there any other particularly periodic process. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 05:38:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB00A84; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8B68FC0A; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id dt10so6385206wgb.27 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:38:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0n9gAizgai/jJQAzureSnh12X+zRaX6dwgECyzMhYtk=; b=wHZD4X1hqx2kqPnucOFF9Ja5Nn/63A4us80J9oHEbWNxBs33x0OqKDjKL3v5SVsHWM w9JvT9DUNoETpy3r4HzlcJf/xXv5Dl5fD+lcLYvEvSkmIdk6ewhclfTWDlpfhBAo1BFv i9pUuypD1NF/xXIVW9aHPl3Mc+nLh91e8eZzPzeyAr53Nt7guwTw5ArYuM9y5CQV3ziT 5sIKhknGo+fccONfetMXv7hnQV4xxlIgKte91rVWl4++LIpYykw5I+Ff/djldZF+57dh +YPZQzSrRftrlPatbFD+Fy3DIvuhV7Vz8B5mnGXyBwDZGDm3wj4Yax9erCZh9lE0q/A9 3VhA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.93.40 with SMTP id cr8mr71492926wjb.16.1357105084562; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:38:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 21:38:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 21:38:04 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3Wo7gf41ixw7quE4ZtleCWlFIr4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Every 20 minutes (less 4 seconds)? From: Adrian Chadd To: Tim Kientzle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 05:38:11 -0000 .. run a tcpdump, see if it's sending an individual frame or two and getting the TX watchdog confused? Try a different switch? Adrian On 1 January 2013 21:30, Tim Kientzle wrote: > I'm trying to understand why the transmitter for the > CPSW ethernet driver just stops sometimes. > > I just found a very perplexing clue: It happens > every 1196 seconds. > > I added a debug message with an HH:MM:SS > timestamp whenever the watchdog sees the > transmitter stop and this is what it printed out: > > 20:30:20 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 20:50:16 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 21:10:12 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 21:30:09 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 21:50:04 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 22:10:01 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 22:29:56 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 22:49:52 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 23:09:49 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 23:29:45 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 23:49:41 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 00:29:33 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 00:49:29 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 01:29:21 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 02:29:09 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 03:28:57 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 04:28:45 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > 05:28:31 cpsw_tx_watchdog Watchdog resetting driver > > (Note: Some 20-minute intervals did seem to get skipped. > There was no hang at 01:09, 01:49, 02:09, 02:49, etc. > Maybe because the system was less busy then? The > network and processor load varied quite a bit over > this 9 hour period.) > > Based on this, it would appear that "something" > happens every 1196 seconds and if "something else" > happens at that time the transmitter will hang. > > Does anyone recognize that particular period? > > Tim > > P.S. Cron isn't running, nor is there any other particularly > periodic process. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:01:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F18207 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com (mail-bk0-f45.google.com [209.85.214.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2CE19A5 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id jk13so6159747bkc.4 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:01:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer; bh=KjNvBCRQQ6upPFGSUOKoBiZ3s9olEqTsfAaKTW7CXzY=; b=icryDNQcokcFLnD0w0dbkWtf6VW0AphrFPtpmMk6e13EDp4NtkUJLCv6oY0+wSxERI +rAwT9S8MZb6S8TpmvTxR39KARoFr+7YFH0NDdp+7GzIXSPG2Fvy49AWaGh3/fvVSyPf yNjPw9TVozA2mjOOoJVeRzIGeUYL9TmvtWNtrRWgZekEnO04apnbdfTgxvacjucfJrdO XeDdVJhWEcFDolZAICzE843KOYdPA1VQcfnFe8ctlslsFnoHZOK6q84c1YCbiSqLygt4 kFV+ErCVt8x70Kdm/3xfU/Sn/PWfgT22U3yvAOJTB4M6QRfylkZlY88bZWvTcr1+CmER 8ieA== X-Received: by 10.204.11.142 with SMTP id t14mr22957799bkt.9.1357149355952; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from DOMYPC ([82.193.208.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f24sm32038433bkv.7.2013.01.02.09.55.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:55:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:55:58 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:01:31 -0000 For example:=0D=0A# pkg_info -W = /usr/local/bin/lynx=0D=0A/usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package = lynx-2.8.7.2,1=0D=0A=0D=0A# pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1=0D=0A=0D=0A# = pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx=0D=0Apkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file = cannot be found=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AAs you can figure it out, I want a = reverse method, that is ...=0D=0AIf I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' = installed, which port origin(s), would install = it?=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj Smol=E8i=E6 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:29:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C495FEF1 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583D91C3B for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r02IStNF069241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:28:55 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r02IStNF069241 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1357151335; bh=oXXriNLg2J41h+0rCrjWQoGP1vQnAZ3cE2N6gniKXpE=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Wed,=2002=20Jan=202013=2018:28:47=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20rank1seeker@gm ail.com|CC:=20hackers@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Vice=20versa=20 of=20'pkg_info=20-W'|References:=20<20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> |In-Reply-To:=20<20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC>; b=SuYYM2mbBDhWr5hlwGKdyFsq2qwKiicnJM+AldGU2O/6tuiuoa0bTwTqaqrGVX15V l0VrjCg4yUS9YcSuU5O2I7/q0YbCcKo3RBkNrg9YrJXn70d6V0lw1yQjQzIlqpRWUV iQgiZccaauGTqIwQbgh5Aq1UdMPs4pavgeYgC5lk= Message-ID: <50E47C5F.2080508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:28:47 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rank1seeker@gmail.com Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> In-Reply-To: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6A902127E7A5D669A6CE02D4" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL,URI_OBFU_WWW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:29:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6A902127E7A5D669A6CE02D4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/01/2013 17:55, rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > For example: > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > /usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 >=20 > # pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 >=20 > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found >=20 >=20 > As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... > If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port origin(s)= , would install it? Well, in the case of lynx, where the filename of the executable matches the package name, it's fairly simple: lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:% cd /usr/ports lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:% make search name=3Dlynx Port: ja-lynx-2.8.7.r1 Path: /usr/ports/japanese/lynx Info: A terminal-based World-Wide Web Client with multi-byte modification= Maint: ports@FreeBSD.org B-deps: libiconv-1.14 R-deps: libiconv-1.14 WWW: http://lynx.isc.org/current/ Port: ja-lynx-2.8.8.d3 Path: /usr/ports/japanese/lynx-current Info: A terminal-based World-Wide Web Client with multi-byte modification (development version) Maint: ports@FreeBSD.org B-deps: libiconv-1.14 R-deps: libiconv-1.14 WWW: http://lynx.isc.org/current/ Port: lynx-2.8.7.2,1 Path: /usr/ports/www/lynx Info: A non-graphical, text-based World-Wide Web client Maint: jharris@widomaker.com B-deps: gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 openssl-1.0.1_4 R-deps: gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 openssl-1.0.1_4 WWW: http://lynx.isc.org/ Port: lynx-2.8.8d12_1 Path: /usr/ports/www/lynx-current Info: A non-graphical, text-based World-Wide Web client Maint: johans@FreeBSD.org B-deps: gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 libidn-1.25 openssl-1.0.1_4 pkgconf-0.8.9 R-deps: gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 libidn-1.25 mime-support-3.52.2 openssl-1.0.1_4 pkgconf-0.8.9 WWW: http://lynx.isc.org/current/ However, in the general case, there isn't (as far as I know) a database of all of the files installed by all of the packages that can be generated from the ports. I believe bapt@ had plans to gather this sort of data on the yet-to-be-commisioned pkgng build cluster. As that's currently out of action as a consequence of the security incident, and the whole package building system is being revised, I don't know if that's still on the cards or likely to be implemented any time soon. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --------------enig6A902127E7A5D669A6CE02D4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDkfGcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyi8wCfYeJisMghedAuTj/0+jzbuVWs mycAn0MYl/jX0Tqo6Tbj7TG4XAEnQQul =/sQM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6A902127E7A5D669A6CE02D4-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:42:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2163882 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: from mail-ye0-f172.google.com (mail-ye0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5BF1CFA for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ye0-f172.google.com with SMTP id m10so2254882yen.31 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:42:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:date:to :message-id:x-gm-message-state; bh=/liKopKQx2c0NEYInUrGRq/oBNdkbLsJChfBFOzItnE=; b=iTq645NpixMRfuFq2+uG3NK1GiEY4KdgLUB06kVZDjN9k8f6m9Kq5Qig4+ojQ6d9vo jNVswsg3yh/cxjdR0Nm5twkxO0HI58QxxSBopEseiBU0ZK9lqX8H/z/0jFE+Wfn2q3SL W1LeeuGVMbNO6CdZdAnP75buFhapxTPnOq4ur/uXF7DOB+o86JTP1HZTCI+wh596EonF Iy2TWpqdc0iGJdcpfIeQHtYsA/mw+fSlEWC8rcUWO6BdUeH9qJaXX5rYX7cIYys8zAT2 D+WamfLQyyvB2hcYAgqXe1pdnGTT/9uHkSGgp4kf94H0AMQPXjeYj62xVUVSigbEJmGh mE8A== X-Received: by 10.100.242.6 with SMTP id p6mr13392109anh.12.1357150354524; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:12:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.195.184] (ip72-200-195-210.ok.ok.cox.net. [72.200.195.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n20sm40413947anl.19.2013.01.02.10.12.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:12:33 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' From: Mike Meyer Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:12:44 -0600 To: rank1seeker@gmail.com,hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmNbCOKjH5b5U1BRI1sNMCZGS92EThATRNmdElHi0l3OlzBJAfU1VMLr491s31WPfnuPB2x X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:42:22 -0000 rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: >For example: ># pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx >/usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > ># pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > ># pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx >pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found > > >As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... >If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port >origin(s), would install it? The portsearch port will do that. -- Sent from my Android phone. Please excuse my swyping. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 22:33:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C13B7D9 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 22:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E3583E for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 22:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so13615851oag.9 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:33:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Zgr2g+mbcNLPmhbYSds532l/X0cGpEw4SFwyI2Z3r8E=; b=jX2Kx5lwsBvMz8vZZ05tNx2FpQMrEzXIdRSYmpo6oC5LDUS6lYYLGzJS4PyMD7x73r upkV5KGQReD+v2Bu8yni4O99GP6Xp+JHnuF5xz5MWXnZbsumPGwP6s79urI8TFvbfD2N 4jsKfKVNSEuVo3wNAapKBlkxqE7DKSuFzFXUGrGIvmmvIfbQ61FDGgRSMwVWpNNvMAc8 1U6vf/2BU3D9U8ddHPhT4iHbfh4fB5Nb691IiwMaFVXmyjVnxuzytVLd55QIzGpbhQ1t xbAh0ToLWNXi8csjeiXcOYpesLJhni0fWIvQvB6NjrWURZaZkLVJvmsmADJxq2ut2I37 olEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.43.104 with SMTP id v8mr37705422obl.98.1357165990395; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.214.67 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:33:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:33:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: OT: getting named to answer differently based on requester's IP From: Aryeh Friedman To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:33:17 -0000 I have a local machine (say "foo.example.com") that is behind a very dumb firewall (it will not honor dmz/port forwarding if the connection originates from inside the firewall [192.168.2.X]).... specifically if I connect to the public IP from *OUTSIDE* of the lan it works but not from inside... I have a number of web services that depend on a specific DNS being set (specifically www/tomcat7 and the alike)... i.e. if I am at home I need to use "localhost" (changing it in /etc/hosts has no effect) if I am away I need to use "ack.example.com")... what I want to do is make it so I can use "ack.example.com" for all references... this means I need to make it so local requests to ack.example.com answer 192.168.2.2 and remote ones answer the public IP.. how do I configure named to do this (I have full control of all the nameservers in question) From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 22:57:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792F5E16 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 22:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com (mail-la0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E66900 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 22:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fj20so6820469lab.24 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:57:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KwlLhEfnsSkJzT1EGTEfe/gNnwQIicca9K03bdvTXNo=; b=wnnAmUVmpNYH5D7+oi2UxPOzMuXylqToOcgvzRUUwn9jbSJyuJQQRzhzJjBCOQ5K9B T3Wh+B93zjvhna0VwWpbOtpBiezzIha3ZiaBi9yr8nOhKS+1RZ/oJCFRCfttwV6Hj161 uPn7M6CKArIm4pTdbQ7JpUfqCcRVl7fyoJHs/NiY/oSeTqJHpyVB1KWUPfE+3Xl7q3Wg qvxn1s38E058J54xsZgN61f2cwIMob0CubB1/rQXcdBNHy8gnB7bc5qUMu/p/nLAg4qs Ko0jIHwBo0W5FTUY3XBVZSSHDzEG0OyomsJ8Qs12gvoq3gQfq7kJyRE4oNHhojI9f+/q h+lA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.44.161 with SMTP id f1mr18877255lbm.29.1357167467384; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:57:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.81.40 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:57:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:57:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: getting named to answer differently based on requester's IP From: Freddie Cash To: Aryeh Friedman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:57:54 -0000 You want to set up views and IP-based ACLs. There's lots of documentation online about configuring views. Basically, they work exactly how you want: - clients with IPs in 192.168.2.x subnet get 192.168.2.x replies - all other clients get public IP replies On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > I have a local machine (say "foo.example.com") that is behind a very > dumb firewall (it will not honor dmz/port forwarding if the connection > originates from inside the firewall [192.168.2.X]).... specifically if > I connect to the public IP from *OUTSIDE* of the lan it works but not > from inside... I have a number of web services that depend on a > specific DNS being set (specifically www/tomcat7 and the alike)... > i.e. if I am at home I need to use "localhost" (changing it in > /etc/hosts has no effect) if I am away I need to use > "ack.example.com")... what I want to do is make it so I can use > "ack.example.com" for all references... this means I need to make it > so local requests to ack.example.com answer 192.168.2.2 and remote > ones answer the public IP.. how do I configure named to do this (I > have full control of all the nameservers in question) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 23:11:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE87EF9A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reichert@numachi.com) Received: from away.numachi.com (away.numachi.com [66.228.38.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E10B958 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20956 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2013 23:04:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO meisai.numachi.com) (71.181.44.212) by away.numachi.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2013 23:04:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 76031 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Jan 2013 22:41:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:41:02 -0500 From: Brian Reichert To: Freddie Cash Subject: Re: OT: getting named to answer differently based on requester's IP Message-ID: <20130102224102.GH76973@numachi.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Aryeh Friedman X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:11:11 -0000 On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:57:47PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > You want to set up views and IP-based ACLs. There's lots of documentation > online about configuring views. Basically, they work exactly how you want: > - clients with IPs in 192.168.2.x subnet get 192.168.2.x replies > - all other clients get public IP replies I think the term of art is 'split horizon' DNS. (I'm likely dating myself there.) http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-bind9-named-configure-views/ -- Brian Reichert BSD admin/developer at large From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 23:45:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1666EBE9 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@energistic.com) Received: from energistic.com (mail.energistic.com [216.54.148.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2ECA78 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (h96-60-220-153.lndnin.dsl.dynamic.tds.net [96.60.220.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by energistic.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r02NUh25001195; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:30:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from steve@energistic.com) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:30:34 -0500 Subject: RE: OT: getting named to answer differently based on requester's IP Message-ID: Importance: normal From: steve To: aryeh.friedman@gmail.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_MISC_IP, HTML_MESSAGE,KHOP_DYNAMIC,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on energistic.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: steve List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:45:31 -0000 VmVyeSBkb2FibGUgdXNpbmcgYmluZDkuIEdvb2dsZSB1cCAnYmluZCBzcGxpdCBob3Jpem9uJy4g QWxzbyBsb29rIHVwIG5hdCByZWZsZWN0aW9uIGZvciB5b3VyIGZpcmV3YWxsLiBJdCBtYXkganVz dCBuZWVkIHRpIGJlIGVuYWJsZWQuwqAKCgoKLS0tLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgbWVzc2FnZSAtLS0t LS0tLQpGcm9tOiBBcnllaCBGcmllZG1hbiA8YXJ5ZWguZnJpZWRtYW5AZ21haWwuY29tPiAKRGF0 ZTogIApUbzogRnJlZUJTRCBNYWlsaW5nIExpc3QgPGZyZWVic2QtaGFja2Vyc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9y Zz4gClN1YmplY3Q6IE9UOiBnZXR0aW5nIG5hbWVkIHRvIGFuc3dlciBkaWZmZXJlbnRseSBiYXNl ZCBvbiByZXF1ZXN0ZXIncyBJUCAKIApJIGhhdmUgYSBsb2NhbCBtYWNoaW5lIChzYXkgImZvby5l eGFtcGxlLmNvbSIpIHRoYXQgaXMgYmVoaW5kIGEgdmVyeQpkdW1iIGZpcmV3YWxsIChpdCB3aWxs IG5vdCBob25vciBkbXovcG9ydCBmb3J3YXJkaW5nIGlmIHRoZSBjb25uZWN0aW9uCm9yaWdpbmF0 ZXMgZnJvbSBpbnNpZGUgdGhlIGZpcmV3YWxsIFsxOTIuMTY4LjIuWF0pLi4uLiBzcGVjaWZpY2Fs bHkgaWYKSSBjb25uZWN0IHRvIHRoZSBwdWJsaWMgSVAgZnJvbSAqT1VUU0lERSogb2YgdGhlIGxh biBpdCB3b3JrcyBidXQgbm90CmZyb20gaW5zaWRlLi4uIEkgaGF2ZSBhIG51bWJlciBvZiB3ZWIg c2VydmljZXMgdGhhdCBkZXBlbmQgb24gYQpzcGVjaWZpYyBETlMgYmVpbmcgc2V0IChzcGVjaWZp Y2FsbHkgd3d3L3RvbWNhdDcgYW5kIHRoZSBhbGlrZSkuLi4KaS5lLiBpZiBJIGFtIGF0IGhvbWUg SSBuZWVkIHRvIHVzZSAibG9jYWxob3N0IiAoY2hhbmdpbmcgaXQgaW4KL2V0Yy9ob3N0cyBoYXMg bm8gZWZmZWN0KSBpZiBJIGFtIGF3YXkgSSBuZWVkIHRvIHVzZQoiYWNrLmV4YW1wbGUuY29tIiku Li4gd2hhdCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gZG8gaXMgbWFrZSBpdCBzbyBJIGNhbiB1c2UKImFjay5leGFtcGxl LmNvbSIgZm9yIGFsbCByZWZlcmVuY2VzLi4uIHRoaXMgbWVhbnMgSSBuZWVkIHRvIG1ha2UgaXQK c28gbG9jYWwgcmVxdWVzdHMgdG8gYWNrLmV4YW1wbGUuY29tIGFuc3dlciAxOTIuMTY4LjIuMiBh bmQgcmVtb3RlCm9uZXMgYW5zd2VyIHRoZSBwdWJsaWMgSVAuLiBob3cgZG8gSSBjb25maWd1cmUg bmFtZWQgdG8gZG8gdGhpcyAoSQpoYXZlIGZ1bGwgY29udHJvbCBvZiBhbGwgdGhlIG5hbWVzZXJ2 ZXJzIGluIHF1ZXN0aW9uKQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXwpmcmVlYnNkLWhhY2tlcnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cmh0dHA6Ly9s aXN0cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2QtaGFja2VycwpUbyB1bnN1 YnNjcmliZSwgc2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0byAiZnJlZWJzZC1oYWNrZXJzLXVuc3Vic2NyaWJlQGZy ZWVic2Qub3JnIgo= From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 01:26:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4693ADE2 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@musl.org) Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FF5DE9 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a14so6197077eaa.13 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:26:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=RVmPr2CUvup0UBKfQSFvh3MrqWHE/uFWgSXFUF0yNys=; b=owYQQzKgwk2A0wJQOhx6Ln49N+DyUi1hCIxTVc1yt7fcxJ0du19Zr3B+so73JJHGEB M+hOAiVBaTZQwef+U8Y23Kel3lihh45CmgsEalGWRqttW8d583Favu0ymKZb4Bo1eNzk IMiggnWVX6hJQGTUIJumOKr4W3QLD/4neqMNhSw5SKtNoAtTj0woCSbD6wKn2S6ljciQ 0LgsmlTR7rHRUxAy25ibKMOPhrxlyb5oUKKLRABMTRh05pdWbwM0VQ75FbxXMhDLBR3c 6+UClup5tfiQ6zhXR8jgxSPy84DlsHGclx24PDXvQX0H2f1cm9ZlB4od9/2dgQ6MyN5z cN6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.214.132 with SMTP id c4mr129535050eep.18.1357176396156; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:26:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.182.137 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:26:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:26:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: ixgbe ALTQ support on 9.1-RELEASE From: Mike Hix To: freebsd-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZ5fK8MJs8ehDZVQOCrFHo6dYFv/GaS9cLSbEzBeHR78OWeCs9yVdzt6vEXxje9ASLOMh/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:26:44 -0000 Should ixgbe 2.4.8 (supplied with 9.1-RELEASE) or newer support altq? altq(4) lists ixgbe under the SUPPORTED DEVICES section. I've successfully built a kernel with altq support and altq works with 1Gb nics and corresponding drivers on the same system. When attempting to load a pf rule set that includes queueing for my 10Gb NIC, it fails with the following message: pfctl: ix0: driver does not support altq Note that 'load a pf rule set' means 'pfctl -vf /etc/pf.conf'. When using the flags '-vnf' to check my rule set pfctl does not produce the above error, prints out the complete rule set, and exits with status 0. I'd expect it to check the driver for support when '-n' is supplied, but it doesn't appear that it does. My card: ix0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa12c8086 chip=0x150b8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82598EB 10-Gigabit AT2 Server Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet If ixgbe does support altq, why does pfctl report otherwise? If not, why does the man page state otherwise? -- Mike Hix From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 02:26:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA8F2BE; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:26:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:f0fd:0:2e0:81ff:fe2b:acbc]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA175F0E; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jill.exit.com (jill.exit.com [IPv6:2001:470:f0fd:0:2e0:81ff:febc:fdcc]) by tinker.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r032QiV6080241; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:26:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=exit.com; s=tinker; t=1357180004; bh=2smmm86XmH4+9OE+6x+opbBqI5bzcC1yu8/4/L7o9/0=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=YLG5K7RE6Q8iV0nEmxyWOkVK6MfOmKvmiQzHafL8jAC8PBGTsI2WRCj6psUq3bidf 12TmCFkwrsglZWQW2gWvWVymiIe0gpRk5L80l7zJRwRHM0iPTVxzHTuNQlmDBjBdwn fqJAlarqTMIxp6+3uWjcX0P+8FmZyVOelkXaSc18= Received: from jill.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jill.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r032QLi9040040; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:26:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by jill.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r032QLx7040039; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:26:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) X-Authentication-Warning: jill.exit.com: frank set sender to frank@exit.com using -f Subject: Re: psm0: unable to allocate IRQ From: Frank Mayhar To: freebsd-hackers In-Reply-To: <1357024264.13744.5.camel@jill.exit.com> References: <1357024264.13744.5.camel@jill.exit.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: Exit Consulting Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:26:21 -0800 Message-ID: <1357179981.13744.20.camel@jill.exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-mobile X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:26:46 -0000 On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 23:11 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote: > Hi, guys. I'm trying to set up a new laptop and have run into a couple > of problems. This one is the message in the subject line. I've managed > to get X working but it can't talk to the mouse; after investigation and > a verbose boot, this is why. I'm kind of stumped as to what steps to > take; I've tried booting without acpi, same problem. Why would this > happen? And better yet, how do I go about fixing it? >=20 > Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. (And > please CC replies to the list, email to this address is not quite 100% > reliable at the moment.) >=20 > Oh, the dmesg in question is available at > https://docs.google.com/open?id=3D0B1d6rhpx_wBIeFJmNVJqVVQ1Xzg Adding freebsd-mobile in case anyone there has encountered (and, hopefully, solved) this. --=20 Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 14:45:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E59A5EA for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (wg-in-x0229.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A971CC1A for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ds1so6510553wgb.4 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:45:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer; bh=2MbjGB81DswnjLq3MOYGtC97VQdnpw0rqKD1NtGvync=; b=phaScRDOYLaSa0dN7IasPgtaKYedUy0v1cVNT387KlOq0UlOqFAfoFVg0wajsp1xQR UAIfKTo1LO6mvs3dbY7fOvS4/CfjmvH7uIRS6BylOjLxB862TbDu5ktdM5CTDcE/tAJ9 iO10PxusFnO/ntUemrIDFOapauwPApyPesr+gYWmta9TDY7tYu/c26JKDMP9kgh8r64V NACHNfLQKbkQqMyvtMPfCcw7N92PfawzCKozTdYaYTTYMJJCbJQ/D2hAQPd1zmVfv9W4 46qJf84oC3EXwZkPIVibkcXFoZyH0U5yF0x2ZDNtcjgvCY7vcHEE9Ti06io3Y7hwFPOW OUmg== X-Received: by 10.180.103.136 with SMTP id fw8mr68400561wib.27.1357224307777; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:45:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from DOMYPC ([82.193.208.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm85693802wiw.4.2013.01.03.06.45.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:45:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20130103.144510.650.7@DOMY-PC> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: "Mike Meyer" , "Matthew Seaman" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:45:10 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:45:10 -0000 > rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote:=0D=0A> =0D=0A> >For example:=0D=0A> ># = pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx=0D=0A> >/usr/local/bin/lynx was installed = by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> ># pkg_deinstall = lynx-2.8.7.2,1=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> ># pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx=0D=0A> = >pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> = >=0D=0A> >As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is = ...=0D=0A> >If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which = port=0D=0A> >origin(s), would install it?=0D=0A> =0D=0A> The portsearch = port will do that.=0D=0A> =0D=0A=0D=0AWell, it works prety much = as:=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A> Well, in the case of lynx, where the filename of = the executable matches=0D=0A> the package name, it's fairly = simple:=0D=0A> =0D=0A> lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:% cd /usr/ports=0D=0A> = lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:% make search name=3Dlynx=0D=0A> Port: = ja-lynx-2.8.7.r1=0D=0A> Path: /usr/ports/japanese/lynx=0D=0A> Info: A = terminal-based World-Wide Web Client with multi-byte modification=0D=0A> = Maint: ports@FreeBSD.org=0D=0A> B-deps: libiconv-1.14=0D=0A> R-deps: = libiconv-1.14=0D=0A> WWW: http://lynx.isc.org/current/=0D=0A> =0D=0A> = Port: ja-lynx-2.8.8.d3=0D=0A> Path: = /usr/ports/japanese/lynx-current=0D=0A> Info: A terminal-based World-Wide = Web Client with multi-byte=0D=0A> modification (development = version)=0D=0A> Maint: ports@FreeBSD.org=0D=0A> B-deps: = libiconv-1.14=0D=0A> R-deps: libiconv-1.14=0D=0A> WWW: = http://lynx.isc.org/current/=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Port: lynx-2.8.7.2,1=0D=0A> = Path: /usr/ports/www/lynx=0D=0A> Info: A non-graphical, text-based = World-Wide Web client=0D=0A> Maint: jharris@widomaker.com=0D=0A> B-deps: = gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 openssl-1.0.1_4=0D=0A> R-deps: = gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 openssl-1.0.1_4=0D=0A> WWW: = http://lynx.isc.org/=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Port: lynx-2.8.8d12_1=0D=0A> Path: = /usr/ports/www/lynx-current=0D=0A> Info: A non-graphical, text-based = World-Wide Web client=0D=0A> Maint: johans@FreeBSD.org=0D=0A> B-deps: = gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 libidn-1.25 openssl-1.0.1_4=0D=0A> = pkgconf-0.8.9=0D=0A> R-deps: gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.14 libidn-1.25 = mime-support-3.52.2=0D=0A> openssl-1.0.1_4 pkgconf-0.8.9=0D=0A> WWW: = http://lynx.isc.org/current/=0D=0A> =0D=0A=0D=0AI slightly hopped '-p = path' flag of a portsearch would to the trick, but it counts for = '/usr/ports/*' path.=0D=0ANot to the path of a binary.=0D=0A=0D=0A> = =0D=0A> However, in the general case, there isn't (as far as I know) a = database=0D=0A> of all of the files installed by all of the packages that = can be=0D=0A> generated from the = ports.=0D=0A=0D=0AUnfortunately.=0D=0AI've attempted to grep = '/usr/ports/*/*/pkg-plist' for 'bin/lynx' and shot myself in a foot! = :P=0D=0AEven if it did returned "sane" amount of matches, speed was = atrocious.=0D=0A=0D=0A> I believe bapt@ had plans to gather this sort of = data on the=0D=0A> yet-to-be-commisioned pkgng build cluster. As that's = currently out of=0D=0A> action as a consequence of the security incident, = and the whole package=0D=0A> building system is being revised, I don't = know if that's still on the=0D=0A> cards or likely to be implemented any = time soon.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Cheers,=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Matthew=0D=0A=0D=0AI = see. But for this to work, DB is mandatory.=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj = Smol=E8i=E6 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 07:57:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40108CEF for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars.engels@0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2302FA for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 0x20.net (0x20.net [217.69.76.212]) (Authenticated sender: lala) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8A356A6008 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:57:57 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:57:57 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Subject: Re: Vice versa of =?UTF-8?Q?=27pkg=5Finfo=20-W=27?= In-Reply-To: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> Message-ID: <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> X-Sender: lars.engels@0x20.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:31:58 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:57:59 -0000 Am 02.01.2013 18:55, schrieb rank1seeker@gmail.com: > For example: > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > /usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > > # pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found > > > As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... > If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port > origin(s), would install it? > I use porgle for that: http://www.secnetix.de/tools/porgle/porgle.py From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 15:35:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02771C51 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d4n1h4ck@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f176.google.com (mail-ia0-f176.google.com [209.85.210.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8DEF0B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y26so12773233iab.35 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:35:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=050bTaI4avtqeTcT9g3iVG/L+RNzMo53cM2KPtzniWY=; b=Ovm9dVvWqHbrEZVsM6ysKi98AkSJP6ekl1WuSwDip5Fg2oyO6bLNyC6LoW3nBjzbm5 6GNhrnKWPcwWLbPXQ1GASAFaBw+w3f78M/c2WVy26DCHDpvV0qEt21JByXOrGuc5SZpz G1EyAchSbWs9sruXv4fAuSdtBrr3zLxJcx/EupLq0vR/j5i1DsHAxBDgNKMslg/GsGQ8 82mkPb5SZ6be2y7PLjW/7X+Z/HYGva2Vz/wh52rxa3Oey59zSwBuOsbPmwMsoiN2Ey+T qnjGcQaDZ0ugyaZlrjnvy4L/25e8q3/OvlUM+DCCMBafaXzzW/rbSOibMUPGnEPBDfrC m6cw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.106.227 with SMTP id gx3mr43331367igb.10.1357227354025; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:35:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.92.35 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:35:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:35:53 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Suport Atheros AR9485 From: d4n1 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:35:55 -0000 Someone on the list already managed to install and configure the network card Atheros AR9485? I'm using FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE >From already thank you. -- Daniel Melo (d4n1 3:) From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 17:28:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFC0CB5 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685496A4 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id r03HN52u009030; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:23:06 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:23:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:23:05 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Lars Engels Subject: Re: Vice versa of =?UTF-8?Q?=27pkg=5Finfo=20-W=27?= In-Reply-To: <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> Message-ID: References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:28:06 -0000 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Lars Engels wrote: > Am 02.01.2013 18:55, schrieb rank1seeker@gmail.com: >> For example: >> # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx >> /usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 >> >> # pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 >> >> # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx >> pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found >> >> >> As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... >> If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port >> origin(s), would install it? > > > I use porgle for that: > > http://www.secnetix.de/tools/porgle/porgle.py For non-pkgng, what's wrong with pkgdb and pkg_which (portupgrade)? # pkgdb -o `pkg_which /usr/local/bin/foo` And for pkgng: # pkg which -o /usr/local/bin/foo Or am I missing something? -- DE From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 17:39:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0733E9; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A6474E; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ej20so8166564lab.7 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:39:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bRDP5rFKkjfV5WchZltVAHHdDs1aGEhyUuUqwKn0FTg=; b=tuJQKRVv9THUDbzZoHWdxRFeyZP4D0ubgHm/5rXST65MXxW3Q0A3gwmt9aFDEx+yAk ef22s5+P1IemfhbTR0PNuBcZ/u+VYcmOJL1Y4v6hcHgL9EWeQ64CQ/BPdgwsGCpxEuyH D4txH3Iecq84A9ToLpDtXIVF+A2/lkbojDWtcFQhk/AMU/GYbMTcJ+hL0vyzyeWftFSq IyVcY9n3a8+bXcFy0Sxfog82Q/ciIgjWle50KTU7iqRieP5Grmi1KwtgMljZf1GuElUa xagmkKOfiZf+fK2YkyZ/yNHWolTxI3pLsFvsUWkplb/BSSSHxgzfKmHEFp4t4ypJ1X0o papg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.145.8 with SMTP id sq8mr46951553lab.21.1357234760146; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:39:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.81.40 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:39:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:39:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' From: Freddie Cash To: Daniel Eischen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , Lars Engels X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:39:22 -0000 That tells you which installed port owns /usr/local/bin/foo. It doesn't tell you which NOT-installed port would install /usr/local/bin/foo, which is what the OP is wanting. On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Lars Engels wrote: > > Am 02.01.2013 18:55, schrieb rank1seeker@gmail.com: >> >>> For example: >>> # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx >>> /usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 >>> >>> # pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 >>> >>> # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx >>> pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found >>> >>> >>> As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... >>> If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port >>> origin(s), would install it? >>> >> >> >> I use porgle for that: >> >> http://www.secnetix.de/tools/**porgle/porgle.py >> > > For non-pkgng, what's wrong with pkgdb and pkg_which (portupgrade)? > > # pkgdb -o `pkg_which /usr/local/bin/foo` > > And for pkgng: > > # pkg which -o /usr/local/bin/foo > > Or am I missing something? > > -- > DE > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@** > freebsd.org " > -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 17:47:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E05F81B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:47:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com (mail-bk0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF0C7B1 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ik5so6879423bkc.38 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:47:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer; bh=2BE0zKK0XjYQQP15ON8bDuCs6nOSwSPnhZduCEOr/VY=; b=n7uQeWDjSLgeD06+3wgQsCRx9EziHISSp3Um1s5JmCnnmoB3q+huM20SnstdA0TD+s 2Sp1Jo4L9YbdbIV8b0OBdKyPiQ9itpWBFf7836dvApyxXCUsCc7yEsSSH2VhWSJd0qvd hiC/OiorBQ59jYYBZvkTZmsCPTNlWY3RMuJfjjgCi5dZANWfgQ3IlazkVEmTYcxTSRBd 62cWHfLj1Zv5+b0mAJUUbVQda/voQdOnLz6FzC25OkuGeC/8SMVm8slOyB2Vq+24nV+J DWCUNl2eYUE/gcC+LSb/UtkZ6xAjYL+wCWb21QdQLcmmhZKh82EpwCWFzRVxYs9t+QdV jqeg== X-Received: by 10.204.147.22 with SMTP id j22mr24047079bkv.66.1357235270172; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:47:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from DOMYPC ([82.193.208.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f24sm34745589bkv.7.2013.01.03.09.47.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:47:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20130103.174753.788.8@DOMY-PC> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: "Lars Engels" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:47:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:47:52 -0000 > Am 02.01.2013 18:55, schrieb rank1seeker@gmail.com: > > For example: > > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > > /usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > > > > # pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > > > > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > > pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found > > > > > > As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... > > If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port > > origin(s), would install it? > > > > > I use porgle for that: > > http://www.secnetix.de/tools/porgle/porgle.py > Search in: => checked all boxes 0 results for: "/usr/local/bin/lynx" 0 results for: "bin/lynx" No matching ports found. It doesn't work. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 17:51:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F453B2F; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com (mail-bk0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D9D7F9; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jm19so6775395bkc.8 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:51:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer; bh=GDJkb/dmZF6zjFgEVVT4l1gj9GOgkgV+uzDsVynTCC4=; b=hmps8HyrIqAD6o8WQdSroy3A45lMS1cvwFJkw/615ow8PCDcmOk6atoroKkANGeH0p fx6vgMwlXN0aVAAU7QlWlp1bivXzzlKKVOW1tos93uLm19ctSmIT4a+r7m3GXGp3zh9A 8ruCfD1o0ATl626AeyAuRstsAqOLS97aO7q/wAo/97GUWfOhEP2+H/H8IzXgwhQHBnOt rwX+bzLBI/RlqAF/4E0OjcGLq2DGKPoiqbDx7VRyXiad1KVhKKvqrAtku1bVqHm8CBvf MC6cP5uO2M/Hgtb3tILNsR3ay1aqjEqGoVQIzBczCUGR6ULGdLboZa4z+iZYiOzEIuyi WwPg== X-Received: by 10.204.7.92 with SMTP id c28mr23978734bkc.86.1357235500488; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from DOMYPC ([82.193.208.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d16sm34739002bkw.2.2013.01.03.09.51.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:51:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20130103.175144.060.9@DOMY-PC> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: "FreeBSD Hackers" , "Lars Engels" , "Freddie Cash" , "Daniel Eischen" Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:51:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:51:47 -0000 > >>> For example: > >>> # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > >>> /usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > >>> > >>> # pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > >>> > >>> # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > >>> pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found > >>> > >>> > >>> As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... > >>> If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port > >>> origin(s), would install it? > >>> > >> > >> > >> I use porgle for that: > >> > >> http://www.secnetix.de/tools/**porgle/porgle.py > >> > > > > For non-pkgng, what's wrong with pkgdb and pkg_which (portupgrade)? > > > > # pkgdb -o `pkg_which /usr/local/bin/foo` > > > > And for pkgng: > > > > # pkg which -o /usr/local/bin/foo > > > > Or am I missing something? > > > > -- > > DE > > ______________________________**_________________ > > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**hackers > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@** > > freebsd.org " > > > > > That tells you which installed port owns /usr/local/bin/foo. > > It doesn't tell you which NOT-installed port would install > /usr/local/bin/foo, which is what the OP is wanting. > > > > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Exactly! ;) Domagoj From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 18:01:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9C5F0E for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f48.google.com (mail-bk0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2715884 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id jc3so6772249bkc.21 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:01:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer; bh=Kv5rRz1+B97ht0pfTNHzaAt2uvtFX9ynsypZorITANo=; b=JFbaiTczXT8MEfGGVh3IIQKjsV3WS7mAOgK4v31xbpRWEUeO8wZeG3weVp6fjw9H2W dbTEnWwwOvffXE//P83Tt3CboUx8GsTS/OPKPTe9LPJU0byVjbi0yfSaDUYoKNmHzPfa R+rbLIkU+e6xEPW3WK/7MaqdtkU1NjIE+7WXkGJ+nCg+PSGguzgkVdeSBae8pC+6Zw0F Up5tth8XszK5BygRedTFDfZnmr7bcWZicGU2iu6p04ZT8UOcOHnZx0rZQPGCDNBzXINu IQfNHSUS5Zj9gQusetTxkZeZvWoHl/M+OLeJzhfL5ltmJ9WSA7do27FHTtIYm1tcoh53 dPRQ== X-Received: by 10.204.5.133 with SMTP id 5mr24163088bkv.68.1357236069567; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:01:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from DOMYPC ([82.193.208.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l17sm34815684bkw.12.2013.01.03.10.01.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:01:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20130103.180112.883.10@DOMY-PC> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org, d4n1h4ck@gmail.com Subject: Re: Suport Atheros AR9485 Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:01:12 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:01:11 -0000 > Someone on the list already managed to install and configure the = network=0D=0A> card Atheros AR9485?=0D=0A> =0D=0A> I'm using FreeBSD = 9.1-RELEASE=0D=0A> =0D=0A> From already thank you.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> -- = =0D=0A> Daniel Melo (d4n1 3:)=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AFreeBSD doesn't have = implemented driver for that chip.=0D=0A=0D=0AOnce plugged in:=0D=0A# = kldload if_ath_pci=0D=0A=0D=0AIf kernel has nothing to say (main = concole), then it is true.=0D=0A=0D=0AAR93xx, AR94xx, AR95xx - Those = require boot-strapping chip support from the ath9k/reference code; but it = first requires some changes to the driver (DMA, interrupt handling, = descriptor handling.)=0D=0A=0D=0ASell it and get one = of:=0D=0Ahttp://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath_hal(4)/HardwareSupport=0D=0A=0D=0AOr = wait until/if they get supported.=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj = Smol=E8i=E6 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 18:06:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E2C188 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77858CB for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id r03I6p5b052230; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:06:51 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:06:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:06:51 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Freddie Cash Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , Lars Engels X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:06:55 -0000 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Freddie Cash wrote: > That tells you which installed port owns /usr/local/bin/foo. > > It doesn't tell you which NOT-installed port would install > /usr/local/bin/foo, which is what the OP is wanting. Ahh, Bach. -- DE From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 19:46:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A3A85D for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:46:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DC2E66 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:792d:baf8:7614:8f34]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4391D4AC2D; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:46:18 +0400 (MSK) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:46:13 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <526799331.20130103234613@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: d4n1 Subject: Re: Suport Atheros AR9485 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:46:19 -0000 Hello, d4n1. You wrote 3 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 19:35:53: d> Someone on the list already managed to install and configure the network d> card Atheros AR9485? Adrian Chadd (Adrian Chadd ) works really hard to support all newest Atheros WiFi chips on FreeBSD. Proper place to ask about status is freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, I think. In any case, all new work and all new support are in -CURRENT only and will not be backported to 9-STABLW, as far as I understand (but I may be wrong) due to massive and not backward-compatible changes in 802.11 code in general. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 19:52:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C521BAD2 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (mail-ia0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1628EC2 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id k27so13126908iad.16 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:52:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YxYR6LeP7Zq+J49KJYbFlBJZPslJgdxZr6nno11Kmgg=; b=lKMScYS7QqFppR+L4sCxvUfBjPeJj6ln+Ljr8TZwDpMUdpaiNxb9MUg7f6Iw6MQhHt hD4LH4JhpCMWKkqekm7FR31QZVUMcZP/kHSN0ygS34G94bw5LQMHIF7mUMdbBSJ8a4Dn E89jKS25RXk9C1etWfpzBJ5+taOCLAK9f5YljND0VtRdv/XtgxdOBwRASIswEUOk7htZ XATDyxwDn6bfniijN1O5es58ygQM/DdTX5n3Wqc7XkF1WNlHHwyXzK9zYmx6ITNJ0RXf ap0fqDd3WujIhvBpTt4+8trOGgYKT5swV3wz2gVv9lt3LhoUXWWKQlQfjrupsOyn4i1W 8CqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.7.135 with SMTP id j7mr40093575iga.82.1357242730982; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.107.196 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:52:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:52:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' From: Dieter BSD To: hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:52:11 -0000 Domagoj writes: > I've attempted to grep '/usr/ports/*/*/pkg-plist' for 'bin/lynx' > and shot myself in a foot! :P > Even if it did returned "sane" amount of matches, speed was atrocious. time find /usr/ports/ -name pkg-plist | xargs grep bin/lynx$ /usr/ports/finance/ledgersmb/pkg-plist:@dirrm ledger-smb/bin/lynx /usr/ports/finance/sql-ledger/pkg-plist:@dirrm sql-ledger/bin/lynx /usr/ports/japanese/lynx/pkg-plist:bin/lynx /usr/ports/japanese/lynx-current/pkg-plist:bin/lynx /usr/ports/www/lynx/pkg-plist:bin/lynx /usr/ports/www/lynx-current/pkg-plist:bin/lynx real 0m2.065s user 0m0.379s sys 0m1.338s Not bad for a system that has been repeatedly insulted on this list recently. (I'm assuming that 6 matches is a "sane" amount.) From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 19:59:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF538E44 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D62F28 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:792d:baf8:7614:8f34]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6414B4AC32; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:59:36 +0400 (MSK) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:59:32 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <674347177.20130103235932@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Dieter BSD Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:59:38 -0000 Hello, Dieter. You wrote 3 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 23:52:10: DB> time find /usr/ports/ -name pkg-plist | xargs grep bin/lynx$ DB> Not bad for a system that has been repeatedly insulted on this DB> list recently. The problem is, this is not a solution for OP's question, because many ports have pkg-plist which is not full and is created/updated/appended in build/install time :( --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 04:39:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9DB9E9; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [IPv6:2001:470:f0fd:0:2e0:81ff:fe2b:acbc]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA43902; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jill.exit.com (jill.exit.com [IPv6:2001:470:f0fd:0:2e0:81ff:febc:fdcc]) by tinker.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r044djt1092001; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:39:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=exit.com; s=tinker; t=1357274385; bh=7xOzgzuKetGRcForleFJAOfxHlkzSlFZY3cX1KcJ45E=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=iaIOlzR0eIwkky6DoUejBGchuUfTphHLwm8N7KelzDjvq7nwGfTJ2PAAx0Iwd2kzQ ON2btS/BlvF+8gGADQnaFd8rXdi47RsnaUyLe3wZ1RQ8/HInmpCGMGcOL1QtWZs53D lpXYj2+71KbZej0t7LmX/di3l4Tx7TkkHm/oGVBk= Received: from jill.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jill.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r044dMRt050629; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:39:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by jill.exit.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r044dMrZ050628; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:39:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) X-Authentication-Warning: jill.exit.com: frank set sender to frank@exit.com using -f Subject: Re: psm0: unable to allocate IRQ From: Frank Mayhar To: freebsd-hackers In-Reply-To: <1357179981.13744.20.camel@jill.exit.com> References: <1357024264.13744.5.camel@jill.exit.com> <1357179981.13744.20.camel@jill.exit.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: Exit Consulting Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:39:22 -0800 Message-ID: <1357274362.13744.22.camel@jill.exit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-mobile X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 04:39:47 -0000 On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 18:26 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 23:11 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote: > > Hi, guys. I'm trying to set up a new laptop and have run into a couple > > of problems. This one is the message in the subject line. I've manage= d > > to get X working but it can't talk to the mouse; after investigation an= d > > a verbose boot, this is why. I'm kind of stumped as to what steps to > > take; I've tried booting without acpi, same problem. Why would this > > happen? And better yet, how do I go about fixing it? > >=20 > > Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. (And > > please CC replies to the list, email to this address is not quite 100% > > reliable at the moment.) > >=20 > > Oh, the dmesg in question is available at > > https://docs.google.com/open?id=3D0B1d6rhpx_wBIeFJmNVJqVVQ1Xzg >=20 > Adding freebsd-mobile in case anyone there has encountered (and, > hopefully, solved) this. Sigh. I'm an idiot (again). I managed to lose the "device acpi" line from my config. Added it back, problem solved. Sorry for the noise. --=20 Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 12:29:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0363D628 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EE8F86 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54DB6A6004; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:29:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r04CTOUr049822; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:29:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r04CTOGh048895; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:29:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:29:24 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: rank1seeker@gmail.com Subject: Re: Vice versa of 'pkg_info -W' Message-ID: <20130104122924.GV53056@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20130102.175558.373.6@DOMY-PC> <4c7fa9aab51f5b62f6b2b35e6e8c03c9@mail.0x20.net> <20130103.174753.788.8@DOMY-PC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pkBzO0lo80FoaZii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130103.174753.788.8@DOMY-PC> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:25:54 +0000 Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:29:27 -0000 --pkBzO0lo80FoaZii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:47:53PM +0100, rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > > Am 02.01.2013 18:55, schrieb rank1seeker@gmail.com: > > > For example: > > > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > > > /usr/local/bin/lynx was installed by package lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > > > > > > # pkg_deinstall lynx-2.8.7.2,1 > > > > > > # pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/lynx > > > pkg_info: /usr/local/bin/lynx: file cannot be found > > > > > > > > > As you can figure it out, I want a reverse method, that is ... > > > If I want to have '/usr/local/bin/lynx' installed, which port > > > origin(s), would install it? > > > > >=20 > >=20 > > I use porgle for that: > >=20 > > http://www.secnetix.de/tools/porgle/porgle.py > > >=20 > Search in: =3D> checked all boxes >=20 > 0 results for: "/usr/local/bin/lynx" > 0 results for: "bin/lynx" >=20 > No matching ports found. >=20 > It doesn't work. >=20 It does. Just use the filename, not the path: http://www.secnetix.de/tools/porgle/porgle.py?plst=3D1&q=3Dtvbrowser&Search= =3DSearch --pkBzO0lo80FoaZii Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEUEARECAAYFAlDmyyQACgkQKc512sD3afjFwwCUCHulKALKUlFBjbltEV4Ek8+j 9gCdEqzgQtcl4azvm+X9RrDwdUGKOAY= =z95M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pkBzO0lo80FoaZii-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 18:28:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E32F0B for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vasanth.raonaik@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com (mail-la0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A49A142 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fn20so10002256lab.26 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:27:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9cfSfNU1xBV8sijl47PkCSJ80WRwaPFSyt2DIGh/U5c=; b=tmM9/suIpL+S9iJOoXKDQpUVzwNtWktSPxN2Dw/dn7UQDZZvsQ5I3dQ7maTvxZb2gx 7BAwPdsvxZMsqrmCazT3TrqM4QdTjocn42tYgiVbrBGfY1whsMgrVFLyWmcy8i3jfeg7 TZZUzkTdLERoADpWATV9a7JZNtLqQwBh4C6JUXTChriJ3w1ZKKiJQTbIcJ3CrdxytOCv ar2FriDhCW8DrFyeDyw+ijz4KKRD4wRCtG0vGF2Qk0ORIGwYHR383togjRhSkXZgN6O5 x8tsJz/cGioXg57A/NyRmxGX7XzZjaVgulWshLomm+WQoRwcNgymYGD63qHd2AK7iRB0 TUwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.148.129 with SMTP id ts1mr51105764lab.19.1357324076375; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:27:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.100.163 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:27:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:27:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Dtrace: stack() does not print function names from modules From: vasanth rao naik sabavat To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:28:03 -0000 Hi, I have enabled and verified that CTF data is present in the module .ko. however, I don't see function names getting printed instead I see addresses in the back trace for stack() output. Is there anything needed to be done apart from having CTF data in the module -- Thanks, Vasanth From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 20:00:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D101324E for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 20:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6C368D for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 20:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id h2so15337207oag.21 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:00:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wrYwzCP/fAc2l2YhvNTPNFPZhCl66+B1fqe/CbL6vz8=; b=i7vTqiYhakkIeoMsGLRb97jiggMji/wPkGm03txF05PpfmFGFsWXF39mX1rAGQdGrA ydTAeXTW2/uOE5p2iDhhsq49dhnjb3Eqv3S+uxk912a6ofMO1xR7sTGNeRYzJsUwiImW kdwIYHn51tTkYmmcJQIBgtUqrsQG+KlhYD76y/kZqFlk5phbAywcoKMnkNJbdEv5o3TS sIbd7ki39N7N2u3wPlHl50RS6UB6V0UiHRM3eMHzuMZjPjJ4kP2ZKr2zjNMY5MASrgeJ R8oTfROnogHxLVCIi9V5KELWe7vbIm29dHYzlf/iFBp+XNl/H8RSv+HQSYTHWvVjaC9S UXQg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.92.70 with SMTP id ck6mr40186560obb.46.1357329635535; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:00:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.128.68 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:00:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:00:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dtrace: stack() does not print function names from modules From: Ryan Stone To: vasanth rao naik sabavat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:00:41 -0000 On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:27 PM, vasanth rao naik sabavat < vasanth.raonaik@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have enabled and verified that CTF data is present in the module .ko. > however, I don't see function names getting printed instead I see addresses > in the back trace for stack() output. > > Is there anything needed to be done apart from having CTF data in the > module > > Which FreeBSD version are you using? This was a problem with 8.0-RELEASE through 8.2-RELEASE, but it was fixed for stable/8 in r223601. Oh, but it looks like it never made it to stable/9? Yuck. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 15:38:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DCD3C7 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nukama@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f50.google.com (mail-bk0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA8A1BA for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id jf3so7756760bkc.37 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:38:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ttNRYAhWyp7Pdefz0olMjJNKXA36IOHQ6ePDJdQEjF0=; b=E8GI8aLjFnJnTR4f+i64TAUEFMZUKLVbsAAXnnBRjRpzCmBGcMvUJPCeVsPdhUBg+W lZQFT/fNz1C0IYDqvsx6zkfaYeDrrI+i3oRu2/P/5CAwDO0PGd++D3cbYpN3ICStg7VL njsYa/AEM1xK5blxatNsVolwBh/2kerSsVJtTplsM/9nNuP/UUtWyh5aUbCjJ3Pc7W8P ZZBYSxRzykoJdNwfDFnfmD2yIfVF5vF8dQq4VZTbXVVGbRqZ/lXP6HOVe2b6bqUIc/d+ bmzFVXGDHDMfSwawusMRnwR4TGiY092GN0iwmjbFlWzkf6ivuzLJlLKo9y20wjNyuppL NHWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.147.25 with SMTP id j25mr27103787bkv.36.1357400302113; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.237.10 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:38:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:38:21 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: L1 cache thrashing affects performance of HIMENO benchmark From: Hakisho Nukama To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:44:08 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:38:24 -0000 Hi, FreeBSD (PCBSD) is slower compared to Linux and kFreeBSD in this benchmark of HIMENO: http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1202215-BY-FREEBSD9683/88ac7a01c6cb355d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d Also DragonFly BSD compares worse to kFreeBSD and Linux: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=dragonfly_linux_32&num=3 http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1206255-SU-DRAGONFLY55/88ac7a01c6cb355d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d Matt, Venkatesh and Alex investigated this performance problem and came to these results: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2013-01/msg00011.html Best Regards, Hakisho Nukama From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 20:48:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FF553E; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 20:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5605216; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 20:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 12so8627014wgh.7 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:47:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MSfYL1taI9rpqOnW8s7oZviBUHEDkqonM694p53e2ss=; b=CWGVSEskKv2+FOh0m34XDf9LyHFlAc1YqWEdapsLmk9D+8MpFKegsm/c7VL9apK+ZO uXwnErWaRsr4P97B982QA4SPUXrdotaRVTcS6YI3Ca2Bik4TvAmzTcJ/7p60j8Oe7rUN 8TaipQYjQTTIPQxvy21ef+jL6Isli+6IOugiEnOLugwdNw8dMekGUrE5Defd2TdQyDXK gJj6LRB+sJ3Tm62JLpFovYjyZ0uz/JvxRVFj89GM4IpHobyuOb7FByeo+90evhUk2630 Qu6bWW4VihJTSkWRnAV5d4EqTS2Pb6clu1SQ5yda/iatdaymW/isxmb0X+yYiEH5WWGs 2zAg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.93.133 with SMTP id cu5mr3046504wib.32.1357418872388; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:47:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:47:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:47:52 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ONohT-lvtfDspYvOlGj6uhoWIaQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: L1 cache thrashing affects performance of HIMENO benchmark From: Adrian Chadd To: Hakisho Nukama Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jason Evans X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:48:00 -0000 I've CC'ed jasone on this as it's an interesting side-effect of memory allocation logic. Jason - any comments? Adrian On 5 January 2013 07:38, Hakisho Nukama wrote: > Hi, > > FreeBSD (PCBSD) is slower compared to Linux and kFreeBSD in this > benchmark of HIMENO: > http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1202215-BY-FREEBSD9683/88ac7a01c6cb355d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d > Also DragonFly BSD compares worse to kFreeBSD and Linux: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=dragonfly_linux_32&num=3 > http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1206255-SU-DRAGONFLY55/88ac7a01c6cb355d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d > > Matt, Venkatesh and Alex investigated this performance problem and > came to these results: > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2013-01/msg00011.html > > Best Regards, > Hakisho Nukama > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 22:02:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC2F827; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 22:02:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasone@freebsd.org) Received: from canonware.com (canonware.com [204.109.63.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548A082D; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 22:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.168.12] (70-91-206-178-BusName-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.91.206.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by canonware.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C7EE28431; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:54:03 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: L1 cache thrashing affects performance of HIMENO benchmark From: Jason Evans In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:54:02 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Hakisho Nukama X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:02:24 -0000 On Jan 5, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 5 January 2013 07:38, Hakisho Nukama wrote: >> FreeBSD (PCBSD) is slower compared to Linux and kFreeBSD in this >> benchmark of HIMENO: >> = http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1202215-BY-FREEBSD9683/88ac7a01c6cb35= 5d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d >> Also DragonFly BSD compares worse to kFreeBSD and Linux: >> = http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Ddragonfly_linux_32&= num=3D3 >> = http://openbenchmarking.org/prospect/1206255-SU-DRAGONFLY55/88ac7a01c6cb35= 5d7e7603224b2ee1e5a4cb881d >>=20 >> Matt, Venkatesh and Alex investigated this performance problem and >> came to these results: >> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2013-01/msg00011.html >=20 > I've CC'ed jasone on this as it's an interesting side-effect of memory > allocation logic. >=20 > Jason - any comments? There are many variations on this class of performance problem, and the = short of it is that only the application can have adequate understanding = of data structure layout and access patterns to reliably make optimal = use of the cache. However, it is possible for the allocator to lay out = memory in a more haphazard fashion than jemalloc, phkmalloc, etc. do, = such that the application can be cache-oblivious and (usually) not = suffer worst case consequences as happened in this case. Extent-based = allocators like dlmalloc often get this "for free" for a significant = range of allocation sizes. jemalloc could be modified to this end, but = a full solution would necessarily increase internal fragmentation. It = might be worth experimenting with nonetheless. Thanks, Jason=