From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 25 06:39:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB3B9A6 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 06:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlh@FreeBSD.org) Received: from caravan.chchile.org (caravan.chchile.org [178.32.125.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 744DB2B3D for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 06:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by caravan.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 77EE7C0191; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 06:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 08:39:31 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: weekly periodic security status Message-ID: <20130825063931.GH24767@caravan.chchile.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eitan Adler , FreeBSD Hackers References: <20130822204958.GC24767@caravan.chchile.org> <20130824204725.GF24767@caravan.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Hackers X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 06:39:33 -0000 On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 06:03:37PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:41:56AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > >> > Well, whatever, if you have any concerns, objections or comments, please > >> > speak now :). > >> > >> This LGTM but please include a comment above the warning with a date / > >> release number when this compatibility can be removed. > > > > If the old variable names are deprecated in releng/10, they can be > > removed in releng/11, can't they? > > Yes, and this should be indicated in a comment. When I see > "deprecated" or "old hack" or similar terms in code it takes some > archaeology to figure out when it was added and when it could be > removed. It would be nice to help the future reader a bit. The purpose of my question was to know what to put in the comment ;-). Thanks for pointing this out. -- Jeremie Le Hen Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons. They forgot to mention Morons.