From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 9 02:27:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC02121 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 02:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x236.google.com (mail-qa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D431804 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 02:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f11so2221746qae.6 for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:27:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OlTQP48t2DU87MhXzi7NQI3PjPqJh58PvRocbjoPq+0=; b=k5wgutfvvSrRJeXGDVKp1yxUFLoOjCdqKHEBAKynMEcxh8uhnwvOLQjbLZ8ftWv0Ig Yj5EVGAtydQAeNkf4+otr5A0AjhIFtRuLAgiK0GFvUnUxBgIrmY0aSDh5yOj6UBe/MNE uETKMg/eaMIFX8zW/TibKsnAjvyJA9LvD6fqI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OlTQP48t2DU87MhXzi7NQI3PjPqJh58PvRocbjoPq+0=; b=DG6Fwlphsc/gNPaxE2fjwfzFdxCGdjmmd6zNuR41tLnQQ49ZnqEVpc10pLmqmjUFAy LesHMgdcex5Ws/NNhJaH5XuIynRiNC2XDwFDsKxaTy/qM/pQ+3nhOffUorsQbb3ev3jB 2xfl3FvI46RPfeNR3pkO+DTzeZCXdanUPnB/mhb+mVol+01KEJu+wQ69zKyAxu6sxvdV 1mn8BVVSLdh8s0JjPLdjHQkzCYMgyktdSfe2K4blX/cB9S5Y9mOsJRnDMP0/t4rPrfVp mEbQ4vJ4fBZUpWTImtxuU18fqEduwH462a+LtEt3VN2k2gQkee2mgythua5q3NP5vpwj s9sg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqieqcVMkYf/HNs1d/UMJEr1GFR3ZrzdhSgFidxGo3Q9YnYNIfJut+56Bz+6cF4xgZpWET X-Received: by 10.229.195.195 with SMTP id ed3mr29008078qcb.3.1386556044851; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:27:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.86.42 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:26:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130205103509.GB28045@saturn> References: <20130205103509.GB28045@saturn> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:26:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: c99 project To: Giorgos Keramidas , FreeBSD Standards Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 02:27:26 -0000 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2013-02-04 21:48, Eitan Adler wrote: >> Is the following page still useful? >> Would there be any objection to me removing it? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > > I think this is useful until we have full C99 support in at least one > compiler toolchain. To the best of my knowledge this is not entirely > true for either GCC or LLVM. > > So we should keep the page alive, until the project is done or canceled. Reviving an old thread here: The C99 compliance page was last updated in 2011 and it currently shows a large amount of outdated information. I see this page being used in many discussion forums, on IRC, etc. to show FreeBSD in a negative light. We need to either (A) move this to the wiki (b) update it on a routine basis or (c) delete it. Can I please have a volunteer go through the page and tell me what to change? I am more than happy to act as the 'doc proxy' but someone needs to commit to monitoring changes. -- Eitan Adler