From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 02:44:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C989459 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 02:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek.krejca@starnet.cz) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8956C for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 02:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d%15]) with mapi; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 03:44:35 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 03:44:35 +0100 Subject: zfs sharenfs still not support multiple networks for one zfs "partition"? Thread-Topic: zfs sharenfs still not support multiple networks for one zfs "partition"? Thread-Index: Ac4BuGmdtFwmBijNSy6Pel6bg4BZaw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 02:44:45 -0000 Hello, 3 version of freebsd I have to patch zfs with this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/147881 It looks that in 9.1 still isnt this possibility. Am I right or not? If I a= m wrong how can do it? Thank you Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 03:30:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D509FF for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 03:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCDA26F for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 03:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 15so3794897wgd.28 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:30:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YKebWpWELlUfIYxDNmJ1lkz+xr+oUTw372BYjGfPchw=; b=S0fkt+GGnPmaYeOo21rcbeE4tJofmbW+53aAOOkR5thUkgPXap2tkF4s5UxqxiDSGp xpZD7iUx06wWISg5l13LrdzGPdavy+vzbY6JtC//0TDiAMd/Tu3HF5pd1tDZ0l6VpYBz c1Budvlio+VfQyP8O8GHi4QzpnrS/9izAaDIU+C7dxKoikgj5Aewpq67qX1UvH50+5GG 6klYbcGcxEdA/T6vwoTrppi4/QntE5H51X23LnNRV4DaSfHSngfheVf1qqINSLz831Dq 8ud/TBH2+KKh9daERLlYJdMIb8PZCtIs+8QABu2d0hWo5h8Fos/cTu0FOuCW4y0FmJRI 532w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.108.136 with SMTP id hk8mr28752327wjb.30.1359862214878; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:30:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.86.131 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 19:30:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <510D360E.7090100@mansionfamily.plus.com> References: <5105BEE4.4030402@mansionfamily.plus.com> <5105D611.4000506@ShaneWare.Biz> <7D460604-8F6B-454F-B717-678F64A75062@kraus-haus.org> <510D360E.7090100@mansionfamily.plus.com> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 21:30:14 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS - whole disk or partition or BSD slice? From: Adam Vande More To: james@mansionfamily.plus.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Paul Kraus , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:30:23 -0000 On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:51 AM, james wrote: > On 28/01/2013 16:10, Paul Kraus wrote: > >> I have been using ZFS with GPT partitions with no issues. I have >> NOT compared performance between whole disk and partitioned, which is where >> the difference in Solaris arises (ZFS makes better use of the physical >> drive's write cache). >> > > Well, it is the write cache manipulation and flushing that I'd like to > have turned on. Anyone know what the score is with FreeBSD? It is on. Whether it's a raw drive or partition, the device is under control of GEOM. ZFS talks fine with either. Just make sure partitions are 4k aligned if necessary. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 09:17:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8967C42 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.marsh@btinternet.com) Received: from nm4-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm4-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [212.82.108.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0B4E57 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.82.108.228] by nm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2013 09:17:19 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.121] by tm1.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2013 09:17:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp826.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2013 09:17:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1359883039; bh=AX3o7FL+kWIlPC5exe4ASESXqR3VIp4N0EB276IODjE=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Content-Type:Date:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Message-ID:User-Agent; b=L9JA9UEEQ7kHmOO7BQKM8OumJlqVfLxI5qLtlk6Gqk6dT20A53atuV5zyZZiMeKVBC9p4UetyNyMmVfiUAP4eqNeG2NwBImZ8Dtczi+PSPgxaSfgCcJr89dEdLy42uTDtREopqmOs9yfxLDdcsWc/UToI/4pymJux7FYfDTg1K8= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 501593.87387.bm@smtp826.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: dOl9kA0VM1k2.8mC.GyKGIjLB81GKjKRuwnJc1hDlghwKcM U4.LfuuheN1q6CbxozQuPccCrLnQCun1S9RFwbKizUW0PWn8WCDRp.CT2Jz3 wIU3_NltObdOf4iz.GpXoyKH_KZ2w4MkIXYb94zpCAXbeLIFUwN5Y0FYjgYb wBx8JJm0OUTVkfIJCj9ZJf0y826Wyy87aBmgSkf9mDLi5BuxrPkjpi4XRjIx 4tUugmrLjGgOw174.KIwJYepcp52UK_6vpCL9D2qOsZHwrcZZhZkXHjbYWEQ YgYKAyxZo18togMvQ0PO4_mWJY1j3UYsZ19KBcRFAwGINgJElkRGsF5qwuy5 mr1JHJAzHnf3SnpzBALqi8ArFPoDgTwmsdYQGbuY44gpCN5.PrYG5LkKBnDT PrfMciZFCHaRuyHTgiNUF37.McMQATB.Pu3.be49XDHkqcYp.jo8ZADvXww7 gbo2gbaIkL4uK8w-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 3fobtyqswBC5QZSCTGPECG6oW9QlmfTpCxWu370kIHCVg7Q63rTQ Received: from du.home (roger.marsh@87.112.30.242 with login) by smtp826.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Feb 2013 01:17:19 -0800 PST Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:23:31 -0000 Subject: Mouse stopped working on quit fvwm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Roger Marsh" Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.12 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:17:28 -0000 The problem was encountered when upgrading to FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE and a 18 January 2013 portsnap. Steps were: Upgrade to FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE pkg_delete -a rm -r /usr/local/* Install ports using portmaster Turn on the ttyv8 xdm and reboot Login via the xdm dialog using the user .xsession file containing just /usr/local/bin/fvwm2 Do whatever and quit from fvwm back to the xdm dialogue Usually, but not always, the pointer does not move in response to pointer device. But it is still possible to login and get the fvwm display back, but pointless because the pointer still does not move. Only recovery option found was reboot. For me the most convenient work around is turn xdm off and login at a terminal and use the command 'startx && exit'. It was quite a while before it occurred to me that the absence of xorg.conf from all the usual locations might be the problem. It is not a surprise now if X just works without any manual configuration. The Xorg -configure and X -config /root/xorg.conf.new dance gives a black screen on the hardware. For both reasons I did not bother with the dance when doing the upgrade. After generating and copying xorg.conf.new to /etc/X11/xorg.conf the pointer was mobile after quitting from fvwm. Although it works I did not quite trust the generated xorg.conf because of the black screen and wondered if any of the information in the file was needed. So I deleted it and replaced it by 'touch /etc/X11/xorg.conf'. The pointer is mobile after quitting from fvwm. Maybe the problem was my sloppy configuration management in losing, I assume, an existing xorg.conf file. But maybe it is a bug because it is not a surprise if X just works without any manual configuration and the problem occurs possibly after hours of successful and varied use of applications via fvwm. Roger Marsh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 10:33:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2E2FC4 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57305128 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1wsf-0000RD-NX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:33:06 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1wse-0000Wp-MF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:33:00 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r13AX0k3088937 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:33:00 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r13AX0Dx088925 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:33:00 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:33:00 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:33:13 -0000 I'm considering buying this Thinkpad T61p laptop: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321063105251 It lists this graphics card: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M I'm not sure what driver, if any, will support it. There seems to be the official Nvidia FreeBSD driver provided for it: http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd_100.14.09.html but this apparently has to be installed outside of the ports tree. xf86-video-nv drivers list several other Quadro cards, but not specifically 570M. Maybe somebody has used this card, so can give a definite reply? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 13:06:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30B230C; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alonsoschaich@fastmail.fm) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F1373F; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9B320E23; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:06:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from web2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.212]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:06:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh= oAcjRvm+es4Ot/NWOcSvzqiZ9Bc=; b=fykkFqHWSinr8WlHH0CGNTKp7UOa8FAa ruKo249tAXGUARsbM2GJ2NcuCzELwZQTfNkt5SdF4NC9ZafxPB872eE9WjJrwwTc 4R/blde4eM1ezwBZtA5MONCKUykgdpLQGwa5jYNmdhTxiU22GFPeswcTrG+Jszd2 sDegZ41vVGo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=oAcjRvm+es4Ot/NWOcSvzqiZ9Bc=; b=Y+4 DAbE4wyuwMP7Iw8Gei7Xw8+mbj56OR6uKRfT/eOreTQoZ4OeQAGNUL7h7xDFGD5G 1lo3ozqO803/v86MVty8lwWJQ478CPloum8rIAfSpuA17CAnsgpY27MHzR5VJn9I tBDdFzv/Sqfz7Esbjg0hCPorYgFMhb70O4GqwX+Q= Received: by web2.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id A573081244; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:06:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1359896784.8510.140661186191169.24EAC5DA@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: zuNKUXpMDbO3aeHBp2+aCmWZDgGwDmq2sgJhXFoRSjha 1359896784 From: Schaich Alonso To: Andre Goree , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-1ec1891e In-Reply-To: <510D35F8.8010004@drenet.info> References: <510D35F8.8010004@drenet.info> Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] tmux and konsole characters Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:06:24 -0800 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:06:32 -0000 On 2013-02-03, 07:51, Andre Goree wrote: > I'm having an issue with tmux on certain ssh connections. When I > connect to my freebsd server's tmux session that has multiple panes in > one window, everything looks fine. However, when I connect to my linux > box, I get this weird character [1] instead of a line as I would expect. > > Any ideas on how I can fix this? Really just an annoyance rather than a > real issue, but I'm sure someone has come across this before and fixed > it. Googling wasn't much help -- though I did find some solutions, they > did not work for me. > > [1]http://www.drenet.net/images/snapshot2.png > > This looks like a character encoding issue. Are the SSH client terminal and the Shell on the server side using the same encodings (i.e. do the suffices of the output of "locale" match on both systems)? If they don't, the konsole can be configured to use the host's encoding by selecting it in konsole menu -> view -> set encoding. Alonso From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 13:23:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095C748B for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76B17AD for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:23:58 -0800 Message-ID: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:23:57 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: surge3@gmail.com Subject: Re: zoneedit.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2013 13:23:58.0402 (UTC) FILETIME=[B921C220:01CE0211] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:23:58 -0000 Nick K wrote: > I am posting here hoping that a "Dan" from ZoneEdit.com still monitors this > mailing list. > I am in a very bad situation and my mail forwarding has been down for over > a week -- no response from ZoneEdit support. > > I found references to people getting help from "Dan" here: > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2011-01/msg00504.html > > My issue(s): > > 1.) I can't login to zoneedit.com's "new" interface. I used to be able to > log in to the "legacy" interface -- but apparently I'm in the same boat as > Mr. Jack L. Stone was -- in that you can no longer manage zones from the > legacy interface. > The legacy interface tells me my account is active at the new interface, > but the new interface tells me my account does not even exist. > > 2.) My mail forwarding service provided by zoneedit.com stopped working > approximately last week monday. It has been working fine since 2002. > Don't you just love it when this stuff happens. > > 3.) I can't change my DNS / mail forwarding service, because the email I > used for my domain registration at my registrar is one of the emails that > gets forwarded (and the forwarding is not working). > > If Jack L. Stone or "Dan" from ZoneEdit can get in contact with me I would > be very grateful. > I don't know what else to do at this point. > The company that currently owns ZoneEdit (Dotster) won't help me -- they > say they don't have the ability to provide support for ZoneEdit customers. > > This is my last hope pretty much. Dan or Jack if you're out there, please > get back to me. > surge3@gmail.com > Have you tried to create a new account on the new interface and try to access your domains from there? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 13:26:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC6C533 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surge3@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com [209.85.217.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFB27C1 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q12so5808722lbc.25 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:26:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bqEKTi81lVgsBvcBrLuPJnnFdKvG3WRpKjWjlZhyIK4=; b=iGotZkWBsRuNr3wubdy+lSYseTZHimw5aPUKxONuDe2t+EqPpiplnqok+S/t5J4g7n 9o73XXWEDScM01w1yTOClaXeflsmloLYBtmb+zJzceEKek7QyfgsVR3BqiPwXfGwMjcb Wth7XSKqQqKGfwSCtQ54dMU3O32EVONdptQd4MgyiHe/I4ar2+eU6V3LVxvhL80WkzTA gIiiqf3qfVqiVd0mOeqJrwqUaBiivkZ2COm/YNBGXzOeAAQ4ooNNnuBzOc/bwIzCkUpx LIWV133an+fipZC61njf/tOhkUk/Ymb41lWMSbZ+kSvZmBmEFJ3q+BGcPD6i6e1eLocO mhxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.114.42 with SMTP id jd10mr16406397lab.31.1359897998404; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:26:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: surge3@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.52.135 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:26:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:26:38 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Qd5yLKvO5jxvCkOujiFikN87deM Message-ID: Subject: Re: zoneedit.com From: Nick K To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nick@srgnet.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:26:40 -0000 There doesn't seem to be a way to create a new account at the "new" interface - as far as I can tell there is no "sign up" method at zoneedit.com. On Sunday, February 3, 2013, Fbsd8 wrote: > Nick K wrote: >> >> I am posting here hoping that a "Dan" from ZoneEdit.com still monitors this >> mailing list. >> I am in a very bad situation and my mail forwarding has been down for over >> a week -- no response from ZoneEdit support. >> >> I found references to people getting help from "Dan" here: >> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2011-01/msg00504.html >> >> My issue(s): >> >> 1.) I can't login to zoneedit.com's "new" interface. I used to be able to >> log in to the "legacy" interface -- but apparently I'm in the same boat as >> Mr. Jack L. Stone was -- in that you can no longer manage zones from the >> legacy interface. >> The legacy interface tells me my account is active at the new interface, >> but the new interface tells me my account does not even exist. >> >> 2.) My mail forwarding service provided by zoneedit.com stopped working >> approximately last week monday. It has been working fine since 2002. >> Don't you just love it when this stuff happens. >> >> 3.) I can't change my DNS / mail forwarding service, because the email I >> used for my domain registration at my registrar is one of the emails that >> gets forwarded (and the forwarding is not working). >> >> If Jack L. Stone or "Dan" from ZoneEdit can get in contact with me I would >> be very grateful. >> I don't know what else to do at this point. >> The company that currently owns ZoneEdit (Dotster) won't help me -- they >> say they don't have the ability to provide support for ZoneEdit customers. >> >> This is my last hope pretty much. Dan or Jack if you're out there, please >> get back to me. >> surge3@gmail.com >> > > Have you tried to create a new account on the new interface and try to access your domains from there? > -- ~ Nick K. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 15:54:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6906E136 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365B6D74 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r13Frnuc023395; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:53:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:53:49 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:53:50 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:54:09 -0000 On 02/03/13 03:33, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm considering buying this Thinkpad T61p laptop: > http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321063105251 > > It lists this graphics card: > > NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M > > I'm not sure what driver, if any, will support it. > > There seems to be the official Nvidia FreeBSD driver > provided for it: > > http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd_100.14.09.html > > but this apparently has to be installed outside of > the ports tree. > > xf86-video-nv drivers list several other Quadro cards, > but not specifically 570M. > > Maybe somebody has used this card, so can give a > definite reply? I can't specifically address that issue, but according to this page: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/compiz-fusion/nvidia-setup.html recent nvidia cards should be supported by the x11/nvidia-driver port The nvidia legacy driver page does not list that card, so it may be supported with the current x11/nvidia-driver port http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html I have a GT-610 and it is also not listed. I am in the process of upgrading to 9.1 as well, but am fighting a bad SSD and have to reconfigure. Don't know if this helps or not... Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 16:38:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F299E7 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0573DF2D for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r13Gc7jH023542; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:38:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:38:07 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:38:08 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:38:12 -0000 On 02/03/13 08:53, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 02/03/13 03:33, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> I'm considering buying this Thinkpad T61p laptop: >> http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321063105251 >> >> It lists this graphics card: >> >> NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M >> >> I'm not sure what driver, if any, will support it. >> >> There seems to be the official Nvidia FreeBSD driver >> provided for it: >> >> http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd_100.14.09.html >> >> but this apparently has to be installed outside of >> the ports tree. >> >> xf86-video-nv drivers list several other Quadro cards, >> but not specifically 570M. >> >> Maybe somebody has used this card, so can give a >> definite reply? > > I can't specifically address that issue, but according to this page: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/compiz-fusion/nvidia-setup.html > recent nvidia cards should be supported by the > x11/nvidia-driver port Ugh, I just tried to build that and it is marked as IGNORE > The nvidia legacy driver page does not list that card, so it may be > supported with the current x11/nvidia-driver port > http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html > > I have a GT-610 and it is also not listed. > I am in the process of upgrading to 9.1 as well, > but am fighting a bad SSD and have to reconfigure. The most recent nvidia port I can find is NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-304.64.tar.gz It builds fine, but on installing it craps out with the following message: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers No such file or directory On 9.0, where I am using the 304.60 version, X11R6 is a pointer to /usr/local. But my install of 9.1 has an actual /usr/X11R6, and that means things are scattered all over, some in /usr/local/lib/xorg and some in /usr/X11R6. This may be a glitch on my end; not sure yet. I had to restart my ports build because I screwed up and didn't do a fetch before building x11/xorg, and that may have created some bad directories. Can anyone verify if /usr/X11R6 under 9.1 is supposed to be a symlink to /usr/local? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 16:53:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC664F6 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6F180 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-191.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.191]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9643924607; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:53:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r13GroMl001938; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:53:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:53:50 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? Message-Id: <20130203175350.3c5fc740.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:53:56 -0000 On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:53:49 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 02/03/13 03:33, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I'm considering buying this Thinkpad T61p laptop: > > http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321063105251 > > > > It lists this graphics card: > > > > NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M > > > > I'm not sure what driver, if any, will support it. > > > > There seems to be the official Nvidia FreeBSD driver > > provided for it: > > > > http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd_100.14.09.html > > > > but this apparently has to be installed outside of > > the ports tree. > > > > xf86-video-nv drivers list several other Quadro cards, > > but not specifically 570M. > > > > Maybe somebody has used this card, so can give a > > definite reply? > > I can't specifically address that issue, but according to this page: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/compiz-fusion/nvidia-setup.html This is how I got my nVidia card working. It's worth mentioning that the alternatives -- the "nv" driver (from X.org) and the "nouveau" driver -- did work, but had poor 3D performance. The proprietary driver by nVidia can be easily installed according to the article you've mentioned. > recent nvidia cards should be supported by the > x11/nvidia-driver port This is currently the most advanced driver for that brand. However, I had trouble with it when installing the 64 bit OS and I went "back" to 32 bit, so I can't tell if this has been improved. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 17:01:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326792D6 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.info) Received: from mail-gh0-f178.google.com (mail-gh0-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A3ED4 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f178.google.com with SMTP id g24so1372410ghb.23 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:01:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drenet.info; s=google; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=FbhoDm+duZ3YO9iCsfkRqOVFB8iJugOMYc2IIpIYcyc=; b=Heexqpz5+T47oBr889z/soPv79P9EOpb8J5RG0r/xVX9DVpgV+vcjohSkjamCDVzHF GtUkRkd+zNVX80yo0fz4wgmUJJpGCNh7LG0G+eNZmi4sq8XX06sjMm7JuYZqlJjad+LS Re4F6c5QreUOP+Fn8kMePz08RtlI/7d4lqIRg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=FbhoDm+duZ3YO9iCsfkRqOVFB8iJugOMYc2IIpIYcyc=; b=AhFipcV3n63kX08P3tBtl1PO6EuIcqkYIzG12NaW+6sq1fbNW/oTwmG8Y7p68jSx/I 2r50aaJtlmkmRaZYN/iPEI/R2zVm5a4gLenxtPa3x1DvLyDzAXu7C15N26mCCt8wV2iQ l0du9Or0QakdDGsNFuTfMhGnmh4c/QoPOPKPEPc4x6aiSWFgax8OBwR37TnI2gVTkQeK BYs+135Hn4tseEBUyGq8e8inIXLPbZ2jFzuJP/MGiCoWVlvHitvgdeIjmAOfWO80fO3V OdcAJKWYHqLUWZfsFoYo9PB8ewrX6uuxwaspZ6X8RzPIS9oSY+WcA8udRkO2igKPY88W O22Q== X-Received: by 10.236.79.9 with SMTP id h9mr10055284yhe.83.1359910459050; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from desktop.drenet.local ([97.100.190.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x8sm14533163yhn.12.2013.02.03.08.54.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:54:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510E9638.5010305@drenet.info> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:54:16 -0500 From: Andre Goree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130202 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Schaich Alonso Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] tmux and konsole characters References: <510D35F8.8010004@drenet.info> <1359896784.8510.140661186191169.24EAC5DA@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1359896784.8510.140661186191169.24EAC5DA@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9E3CA420E12C18DB52180136" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnD0iSA5z6LWZ/uSEo0rO+DyXiFXpWh/Af6xoSemIyVZ8hSFOKsSkKh/KYDU44lZX6e2fFH Cc: kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:01:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9E3CA420E12C18DB52180136 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/03/13 08:06, Schaich Alonso wrote: > On 2013-02-03, 07:51, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm having an issue with tmux on certain ssh connections. When I >> connect to my freebsd server's tmux session that has multiple panes in= >> one window, everything looks fine. However, when I connect to my linu= x >> box, I get this weird character [1] instead of a line as I would expec= t. >> >> Any ideas on how I can fix this? Really just an annoyance rather than= a >> real issue, but I'm sure someone has come across this before and fixed= >> it. Googling wasn't much help -- though I did find some solutions, th= ey >> did not work for me. >> >> [1]http://www.drenet.net/images/snapshot2.png >> >> >=20 > This looks like a character encoding issue. Are the SSH client terminal= > and the Shell on the server side using the same encodings (i.e. do the > suffices of the output of "locale" match on both systems)? >=20 > If they don't, the konsole can be configured to use the host's encoding= > by selecting it in konsole menu -> view -> set encoding. >=20 > Alonso >=20 Thanks! That was it...I opened a new konsole window, set the encoding to UTF-8 (which my arch linux box is using) and the lines show up fine. On a related note, I guess I can set LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8 in my .bashrc and= have that as my default, no? Any nuances on en_US.UTF-8 vs. ISO8859? I've never really ever needed to deal with locales before, but I believe UTF-8 offers more characters, no? --=20 Andre Goree andre@drenet.info --------------enig9E3CA420E12C18DB52180136 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRDpY5AAoJEJQrkaCSFIoRCVUH/2XKCbmx+mceeRI/OQBjcd7u wrkjJlN0ETGvksHf5Va3uV9ODNa3tcZLky2VbJdef9ZND+BWCt8FXBPEwOys4OaE HMWT751B1xfRCcdXkl5h/OuDaJWyZyygr5szDUNoSDUHLPbMP8BmV2glPiIgifIi pF1A37ZwbLGLcGnQow3xpvworNK14Pqx7EEYYn/RSKZfeBag/58SXwf9TJq5xErN MO+QOlKrc8sZC0Jlf/pokdnPd/GwmF0YBM6tlaZQdlebPw6/7vPe6O3vwZIdNG+i SUZn3ze9K4q+D2MUys8U5MCBSjICmGpli7pH2kZblygraVF/xHmXUiz1b8pIyVc= =wQ2X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9E3CA420E12C18DB52180136-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 17:02:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FC347A for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969A7FA for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-191.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.191]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B5723FA0; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:02:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r13H2Fir001984; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:02:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:02:15 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? Message-Id: <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:02:14 -0000 On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:38:07 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 02/03/13 08:53, Gary Aitken wrote: > > On 02/03/13 03:33, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> I'm considering buying this Thinkpad T61p laptop: > >> http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321063105251 > >> > >> It lists this graphics card: > >> > >> NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M > >> > >> I'm not sure what driver, if any, will support it. > >> > >> There seems to be the official Nvidia FreeBSD driver > >> provided for it: > >> > >> http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd_100.14.09.html > >> > >> but this apparently has to be installed outside of > >> the ports tree. > >> > >> xf86-video-nv drivers list several other Quadro cards, > >> but not specifically 570M. > >> > >> Maybe somebody has used this card, so can give a > >> definite reply? > > > > I can't specifically address that issue, but according to this page: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/compiz-fusion/nvidia-setup.html > > recent nvidia cards should be supported by the > > x11/nvidia-driver port > > Ugh, I just tried to build that and it is marked as IGNORE Is the reason still "requires fairly recent FreeBSD-STABLE, or FreeBSD-CURRENT"? See /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/Makefile for details. I've been successfully installing 270.41.19 in 8-STABLE some time ago. > > The nvidia legacy driver page does not list that card, so it may be > > supported with the current x11/nvidia-driver port > > http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html > > > > I have a GT-610 and it is also not listed. > > I am in the process of upgrading to 9.1 as well, > > but am fighting a bad SSD and have to reconfigure. > > The most recent nvidia port I can find is > NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-304.64.tar.gz > It builds fine, but on installing it craps out with the following message: > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers No such file or directory Very strange. > On 9.0, where I am using the 304.60 version, X11R6 is a pointer to /usr/local. That's the default for some time now. Even FreeBSD v8 already has that symlink, maybe it has already been part of v7 (not sure). lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 2011-08-21 22:32:05 /usr/X11R6@ -> /usr/local > But my install of 9.1 has an actual /usr/X11R6, and that means things are > scattered all over, some in /usr/local/lib/xorg and some in /usr/X11R6. Where did you get the real X11R6/ directory entry from? Is this some legacy of "continuous updating" the system beginning at a version that actually had X11R6/ as a directory? > This may be a glitch on my end; not sure yet. I think it is. The port expects something that actually is in /usr/local, which would have been the same as in /usr/X11R6, but in your case, it's not. > I had to restart my ports > build because I screwed up and didn't do a fetch before building x11/xorg, > and that may have created some bad directories. In worst case, maybe you can remove your ports and recreate the reqired directory structures using the mtree templates BSD.local.dist (and maybe BSD.x11.dist or BSD.x11-4.dist), or maybe the xorg port will install the symlink automatically? If you're not sure, create the symlink yourself and continue as if nothing had happened. :-) > Can anyone verify if /usr/X11R6 under 9.1 is supposed to be a symlink to > /usr/local? I stronly assume it is (no v9 OS at hand to check). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 17:14:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3006CF; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15189171; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-191.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.191]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27615248A9; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:14:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r13HEUlf002027; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:14:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:14:30 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Andre Goree Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] tmux and konsole characters Message-Id: <20130203181430.53e88178.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <510E9638.5010305@drenet.info> References: <510D35F8.8010004@drenet.info> <1359896784.8510.140661186191169.24EAC5DA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <510E9638.5010305@drenet.info> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Schaich Alonso , kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:14:29 -0000 On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:54:16 -0500, Andre Goree wrote: > On a related note, I guess I can set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 in my .bashrc and > have that as my default, no? As far as I remember, login.conf is the file to set this, but you can basically set environmental variables wherever you want. For example, I have a system where I set them globally in the C-Shell configuration, so all shells (even non-csh-shells like bash) inherit the settings. Example from /etc/csh.cshrc: setenv LC_ALL en_US.UTF-8 setenv LC_MESSAGES en_US.UTF-8 setenv LC_COLLATE de_DE.UTF-8 setenv LC_CTYPE de_DE.UTF-8 setenv LC_MONETARY de_DE.UTF-8 setenv LC_NUMERIC de_DE.UTF-8 setenv LC_TIME de_DE.UTF-8 setenv LANG de_DE.UTF-8 Note that this creates a "settings conglomerate" from english and german settings which looks stupid, but works (and is therefor intended, or at least accepted as being established). :-) Note the correct language prefix: en_US (as there's also en_GB). > Any nuances on en_US.UTF-8 vs. ISO8859? As soon as you have "non-standard" characters (like german umlauts) encoded in ISO8859-1 (the default for this region) they won't show up properly in UTF-8 (just as UTF-8 encoded umlauts will not show up properly in a ISO8859-1 terminal session). > I've never really ever needed to deal with locales before, but I believe > UTF-8 offers more characters, no? It offers many more, and especially if you're dealing with "inter- national documents", it seems to be the best way to go at the moment. For example, I had to work on a document containing german umlauts and chinese characters, so UTF-8 was the solution to have all of them properly displayed and editable. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 17:25:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCF1F4B for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ateve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528DE1FC for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U23JZ-0001ae-Ch for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:25:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U23JC-0000Ss-PL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:24:50 +0000 Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:24:19 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] tmux and konsole characters Message-Id: <20130203172419.3b3e89c01fea351d03fc4b7a@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <510E9638.5010305@drenet.info> References: <510D35F8.8010004@drenet.info> <1359896784.8510.140661186191169.24EAC5DA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <510E9638.5010305@drenet.info> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:25:01 -0000 On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:54:16 -0500 Andre Goree wrote: > Thanks! That was it...I opened a new konsole window, set the encoding > to UTF-8 (which my arch linux box is using) and the lines show up fine. > > On a related note, I guess I can set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 in my .bashrc and > have that as my default, no? Any nuances on en_US.UTF-8 vs. ISO8859? > I've never really ever needed to deal with locales before, but I believe > UTF-8 offers more characters, no? The iso8859 encodings are 256 character maps, the UTF-8 encoding covers the entire million character range of unicode (or iso10646 which amounts to the same thing) how well it displays depends on the font being used. This one has pretty good coverage. -misc-fixed-medium-*-*-*-*-140-*-*-*-*-iso10646-* There's a wonderful file around called UTF-9-demo.txt produced by Markus Kuhn which shows off the capability of UTF-8 pretty well, and tests your font support unmercifully (the font above can cope with the whole document, and an up to date urxvt handles the alignment correctly). There is a great deal to be said for adopting unicode by default, and generally in the form of UTF-8. I regard the iso8859 encodings as basically obsolete. Unicode has it's faults, but it is the best general purpose encoding system available. There are also tools for unicode that can handle problems such as correctly sorting text for different languages which is not as easy as you might think. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 17:42:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E3E4DB for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64D92A7 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r13Hgpcr005814; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:42:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r13Hgpui005811; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:42:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:42:51 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? In-Reply-To: <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:42:51 -0700 (MST) Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:42:58 -0000 On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: > Can anyone verify if /usr/X11R6 under 9.1 is supposed to be a symlink to > /usr/local? Yes, or rather, there is no /usr/X11R6 at all, on either of the two 9-stable systems I checked. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 17:55:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AA397D for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2452332C for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r13HtIe4023781; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:55:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:55:18 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon , wblock@wonkity.com Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:55:19 -0700 (MST) Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:55:36 -0000 >>> The nvidia legacy driver page does not list that card, so it may be >>> supported with the current x11/nvidia-driver port >>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html >>> >>> I have a GT-610 and it is also not listed. >>> I am in the process of upgrading to 9.1 as well, >>> but am fighting a bad SSD and have to reconfigure. >> >> The most recent nvidia port I can find is >> NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-304.64.tar.gz >> It builds fine, but on installing it craps out with the following message: >> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers No such file or directory ... >> On 9.0, where I am using the 304.60 version, X11R6 is a pointer to /usr/local. > > That's the default for some time now. Even FreeBSD v8 already > has that symlink, maybe it has already been part of v7 (not sure). > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 2011-08-21 22:32:05 /usr/X11R6@ -> /usr/local > >> But my install of 9.1 has an actual /usr/X11R6, and that means things are >> scattered all over, some in /usr/local/lib/xorg and some in /usr/X11R6. > > Where did you get the real X11R6/ directory entry from? Is this > some legacy of "continuous updating" the system beginning at a > version that actually had X11R6/ as a directory? That's what I'd like to know :-) I suspect it is from building the nvidia driver, as those Makefiles use X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 >> This may be a glitch on my end; not sure yet. > > I think it is. The port expects something that actually is in > /usr/local, which would have been the same as in /usr/X11R6, > but in your case, it's not. > >> I had to restart my ports >> build because I screwed up and didn't do a fetch before building x11/xorg, >> and that may have created some bad directories. > > In worst case, maybe you can remove your ports and recreate the > reqired directory structures using the mtree templates > BSD.local.dist (and maybe BSD.x11.dist or BSD.x11-4.dist), > or maybe the xorg port will install the symlink automatically? > If you're not sure, create the symlink yourself and continue > as if nothing had happened. :-) I think manually creating the symlink and rebuilding x and the nvidia port may be what I'll try next. >> Can anyone verify if /usr/X11R6 under 9.1 is supposed to be a symlink to >> /usr/local? > > I stronly assume it is (no v9 OS at hand to check). On 02/03/13 10:42, Warren Block wrote: > Yes, or rather, there is no /usr/X11R6 at all, on either of the two 9-stable systems I checked. Hmmm, there is on my 9.0 with an nvidia driver installed. Are you running an nvidia driver? If not, that would hint that the X11R6 dir/link is a result of the nvidia driver install process From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 18:29:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68062B8 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89425632 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r13ITUAl006096; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:29:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r13ITUZr006093; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:29:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:29:30 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? In-Reply-To: <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:29:31 -0700 (MST) Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:29:38 -0000 On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: > I suspect it is from building the nvidia driver, > as those Makefiles use > X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 Last I heard from the ports guys, that is obsolete. > On 02/03/13 10:42, Warren Block wrote: > >> Yes, or rather, there is no /usr/X11R6 at all, on either of the two 9-stable systems I checked. > > Hmmm, there is on my 9.0 with an nvidia driver installed. > Are you running an nvidia driver? > If not, that would hint that the X11R6 dir/link is a result of the nvidia driver > install process No Nvidia cards here at all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 18:32:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D19D38F for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F342A658 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-191.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.191]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CC03EB5A; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:32:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r13IWPW0003930; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:32:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:32:25 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? Message-Id: <20130203193225.c71f06ae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon , Gary Aitken , mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:32:31 -0000 On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:29:30 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: > > > I suspect it is from building the nvidia driver, > > as those Makefiles use > > X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 > > Last I heard from the ports guys, that is obsolete. If I remember correctly, X11BASE equals LOCALBASE, which is /usr/local, so any Makefile which uses X11BASE will be directed to /usr/local. It's not clear to me why a Makefile defines a location that has been obsolated... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 18:36:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FC2454 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD93687 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k10so4966963iea.33 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:36:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o5nlNGWRzWq4VZH4Oeo+FE331mKy8Shp8P0FU5jdeOE=; b=cTuuXQ4PB8LU55kZG8c/KNOrjI0kdEw8z16cKQtFnxFWnDNodNnNezbmQp2FMC+Lg/ fdaLFwuPK702emdD2IdvzXuHjezOzw3042BmHwk9/K4jjzVQZrXtcvqOVIgRJo6uCOg6 depm+VoPOlO24iXDQrIiOHgQmOJZyFtpMZvU5mxkTYwl3xTLUw7+Rf13SypJ4zkvo8AC 2pnI7eSnadz5TLJPMv9FlUOxfD/LGWPSdsDfzZGkofeTes1P3VQa38zlITVejYHv6yYl OZKgOcJwu4ZO4I2uR6BZwvxfXg4aTzMRaxjZlIDgJ8jDLwO3zZStsDgvutXIsmMNmYeh 0RmA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.140.104 with SMTP id rf8mr3381725igb.21.1359916591629; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:36:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.5.70 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:36:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:36:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mouse stopped working on quit fvwm From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Roger Marsh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:36:32 -0000 On 3 February 2013 04:23, Roger Marsh wrote: > The problem was encountered when upgrading to FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE and a 18 > January 2013 portsnap. > > Steps were: > > Upgrade to FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE > pkg_delete -a > rm -r /usr/local/* > Install ports using portmaster > Turn on the ttyv8 xdm and reboot > Login via the xdm dialog using the user .xsession file containing just > /usr/local/bin/fvwm2 > Do whatever and quit from fvwm back to the xdm dialogue > > Usually, but not always, the pointer does not move in response to pointer > device. But it is still possible to login and get the fvwm display back, > but pointless because the pointer still does not move. > > Only recovery option found was reboot. For me the most convenient work > around is turn xdm off and login at a terminal and use the command 'startx > && exit'. > > It was quite a while before it occurred to me that the absence of xorg.conf > from all the usual locations might be the problem. > > It is not a surprise now if X just works without any manual configuration. > > The Xorg -configure and X -config /root/xorg.conf.new dance gives a black > screen on the hardware. > > For both reasons I did not bother with the dance when doing the upgrade. > > After generating and copying xorg.conf.new to /etc/X11/xorg.conf the pointer > was mobile after quitting from fvwm. > > Although it works I did not quite trust the generated xorg.conf because of > the black screen and wondered if any of the information in the file was > needed. So I deleted it and replaced it by 'touch /etc/X11/xorg.conf'. The > pointer is mobile after quitting from fvwm. > > Maybe the problem was my sloppy configuration management in losing, I > assume, an existing xorg.conf file. > > But maybe it is a bug because it is not a surprise if X just works without > any manual configuration and the problem occurs possibly after hours of > successful and varied use of applications via fvwm. > Is your Xorg built with HAL support? You might have to kick HAL. I've not had problems using moused (& Xorg with HAL disabled) & an old-fashioned xorg.conf. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 18:50:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D23D984 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530E26E8 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wc18so5740630obb.36 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:50:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RgEaZzN99pit4O8JNEnYgv1tbCxQKSoW3RcIUQ2rhzc=; b=IDIJDHKMhGLFPlVfTyZRBmNkfYVoeuUaF9r95LXuW4Z/d52G63YFaFfsPTxZhANo2+ zbShvmLA6fSB+kggXGAIoVU5TvcX6vCBjWKPbW16qBJ679iim3f4fU/pmtN7EDrKdeA+ p9gJAZFX5IGvFw/JqR8JGN8c55imi/vKMbyTwK1MjseWwgsfSOcEeH+cMFF1leaeSRQP ZYw10Dp6TKGUIOWtktP50nu/FCs7gwjl4PHb314gehG12kU3KFbhcA+sh2A6YZN04GwS EZWLv3pcES1xJ9EQZF8BFQZZ1UbVONtoXa0tC2fzRywfMIOuh9LSS+a4KWzsJOdkDQGN ifRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.32.5 with SMTP id e5mr14440059oei.49.1359917446447; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:50:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:50:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:50:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: vfs.root.mountfrom with geli From: mhca12 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:50:47 -0000 Hi, I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the label I gave to the root partition. I also tried with /dev/ada0p3.eli without success. Tried the following two /boot/loader.config variations: 1: geom_eli_load=3D"YES" vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=94ufs:/dev/gpt/enc.eli=94 2: geom_eli_load=3D"YES" vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=94ufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=94 I can geli attach /dev/gpt/enc or /dev/ada0p3 successfully from the livecd. Can you advise me what I might have done wrong or what I should try? https://www.dan.me.uk/blog/2012/05/05/full-disk-encryption-in-freebsd-9-x-w= ell-almost/ http://namor.userpage.fu-berlin.de/howto_fbsd9_encrypted_ufs.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 18:52:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52637A20 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220FD6F5 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r13IqZb6023934; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:52:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <510EB1F2.7090104@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:52:34 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> <20130203193225.c71f06ae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130203193225.c71f06ae.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:52:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:52:44 -0000 On 02/03/13 11:32, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:29:30 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: >> >>> I suspect it is from building the nvidia driver, >>> as those Makefiles use >>> X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 >> >> Last I heard from the ports guys, that is obsolete. > > If I remember correctly, X11BASE equals LOCALBASE, which > is /usr/local, so any Makefile which uses X11BASE will > be directed to /usr/local. It's not clear to me why a > Makefile defines a location that has been obsolated... It's surrounded by .if !defined(X11BASE) X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 .endif Which would protect it if it was defined; but I don't see where X11BASE is defined anywhere in /usr/ports/Mk /usr/share/mk If it's been obsoleted, that would be the problem. However, I don't see LOCALBASE defined anywhere except in terms of itself, either. Where is it initially set? Not being a make dude, I'm out of my element here From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 20:05:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B209282E for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A149685D for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:04:59 -0800 Message-ID: <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:04:58 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nick@srgnet.org Subject: Re: zoneedit.com References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2013 20:04:59.0979 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEF309B0:01CE0249] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 20:05:04 -0000 Nick K wrote: > There doesn't seem to be a way to create a new account at the "new" > interface - as far as I can tell there is no "sign up" method at > zoneedit.com. > > On Sunday, February 3, 2013, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Nick K wrote: >>> I am posting here hoping that a "Dan" from ZoneEdit.com still monitors > this >>> mailing list. >>> I am in a very bad situation and my mail forwarding has been down for > over >>> a week -- no response from ZoneEdit support. >>> >>> I found references to people getting help from "Dan" here: >>> > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2011-01/msg00504.html >>> My issue(s): >>> >>> 1.) I can't login to zoneedit.com's "new" interface. I used to be able > to >>> log in to the "legacy" interface -- but apparently I'm in the same boat > as >>> Mr. Jack L. Stone was -- in that you can no longer manage zones from the >>> legacy interface. >>> The legacy interface tells me my account is active at the new interface, >>> but the new interface tells me my account does not even exist. >>> >>> 2.) My mail forwarding service provided by zoneedit.com stopped working >>> approximately last week monday. It has been working fine since 2002. >>> Don't you just love it when this stuff happens. >>> >>> 3.) I can't change my DNS / mail forwarding service, because the email I >>> used for my domain registration at my registrar is one of the emails that >>> gets forwarded (and the forwarding is not working). >>> >>> If Jack L. Stone or "Dan" from ZoneEdit can get in contact with me I > would >>> be very grateful. >>> I don't know what else to do at this point. >>> The company that currently owns ZoneEdit (Dotster) won't help me -- they >>> say they don't have the ability to provide support for ZoneEdit > customers. >>> This is my last hope pretty much. Dan or Jack if you're out there, > please >>> get back to me. >>> surge3@gmail.com >>> >> Have you tried to create a new account on the new interface and try to > access your domains from there? > After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer free and there now in the domain register business. Time to return to the register where your domain name is hosted and change the dns servers your using from zoneedit back to your register's dns servers. If your register does not provide the dns services you were using at zoneedit then time to look at other registers. I use http://www.enom.com and godaddy.com will have ads during the super bowl game on tonight. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 20:34:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBE0810 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF6695F for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r13KYh7S006733; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:34:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r13KYgwf006730; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:34:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:34:42 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? In-Reply-To: <510EB1F2.7090104@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> <20130203193225.c71f06ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EB1F2.7090104@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:34:43 -0700 (MST) Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 20:34:51 -0000 On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 02/03/13 11:32, Polytropon wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:29:30 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: >>> >>>> I suspect it is from building the nvidia driver, >>>> as those Makefiles use >>>> X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 >>> >>> Last I heard from the ports guys, that is obsolete. >> >> If I remember correctly, X11BASE equals LOCALBASE, which >> is /usr/local, so any Makefile which uses X11BASE will >> be directed to /usr/local. It's not clear to me why a >> Makefile defines a location that has been obsolated... > > It's surrounded by > > .if !defined(X11BASE) > X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 > .endif > > Which would protect it if it was defined; > but I don't see where X11BASE is defined anywhere in > /usr/ports/Mk > /usr/share/mk > > If it's been obsoleted, that would be the problem. > > However, I don't see LOCALBASE defined anywhere except in terms of itself, either. > Where is it initially set? > Not being a make dude, I'm out of my element here Do you have it defined in /etc/make.conf? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 20:50:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C597FEE2 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644679DC for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r13Ko79B024278; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:50:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <510ECD7F.6010709@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:50:07 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block , mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> <20130203193225.c71f06ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EB1F2.7090104@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:50:07 -0700 (MST) Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 20:50:22 -0000 On 02/03/13 13:34, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: >> On 02/03/13 11:32, Polytropon wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:29:30 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: >>>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: >>>> >>>>> I suspect it is from building the nvidia driver, >>>>> as those Makefiles use >>>>> X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 >>>> >>>> Last I heard from the ports guys, that is obsolete. >>> >>> If I remember correctly, X11BASE equals LOCALBASE, which >>> is /usr/local, so any Makefile which uses X11BASE will >>> be directed to /usr/local. It's not clear to me why a >>> Makefile defines a location that has been obsolated... >> >> It's surrounded by >> >> .if !defined(X11BASE) >> X11BASE= /usr/X11R6 >> .endif >> >> Which would protect it if it was defined; >> but I don't see where X11BASE is defined anywhere in >> /usr/ports/Mk >> /usr/share/mk >> >> If it's been obsoleted, that would be the problem. >> >> However, I don't see LOCALBASE defined anywhere except in terms of itself, either. >> Where is it initially set? >> Not being a make dude, I'm out of my element here > > Do you have it defined in /etc/make.conf? No; the only thing defined in /etc/make.conf is PERL_VERSION For the OP, I (just now) got the nvidia driver and x to compile and run under 9.1 as follows: 1. make and install the x11/xorg port 2. create the symlink /usr/X11R6 to point to /usr/local if /usr/X11R6 already exists as a regular directory and has stuff in it, move it aside or delete it. I found mine only had stuff from previous attempts to build the nvidia driver in it (a "bin" plain file(!), and a "lib" containing files from the nvidia driver build), so I deleted it. 3. download and unpack the nvidia driver; I used NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-304.64.tar.gz but note that that file is specific to my architecture, which is amd64; you'll need the appropriate one for your architecture. 4. make the nvidia driver 5. make sure step #4 added the line nvidia_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf 6. add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf if not already present # Enable hald and dbus for X to work with kbd and mouse hald_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 21:28:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAA1A0E for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 21:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x230.google.com (mail-ia0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2343EAE7 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 21:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so7343639iac.35 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:28:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=TRJdKQP3uX45tEC0vpGpkduE0DMyd8sQACExPEr/paY=; b=bqHFpmQLlIcqgYoJMoKuuFrUtfkb9Rvdh9plw9VVFzrHqWwAsLL08xDLBO0iOT3CdO OwdhQpd5ikSgS3NO1yH/ZLrVNwZglVk120FqAkVRrlNTtKhx3RF2YoEvwVbhZnha8gYY ZZOe3lTg/k9Hx9vI0NaVhKX2vCJz8bc/tb8DF9h1P3ZxKXBV995DWVztl94ENlbfb0D0 NONBeA3Yr8+FNXkOF9EIWxwqpXqn/p9H3ER7IxkWkyQQfzFtxTevURKBE0eliY5THua3 DXN+99Jr2T5D06/MjLQ0Oe4Hp0rrRFEiPqc36Z6maQaLGlfKTMWN79WKts4ZACiz12oA mICQ== X-Received: by 10.50.57.200 with SMTP id k8mr3655198igq.29.1359926916367; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:28:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fb10sm12610607igb.1.2013.02.03.13.28.34 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:28:35 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@kde.org Subject: ports, area51 Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:28:17 -0600 Message-ID: <1786490.o3nI8lZISl@luna.wi.rr.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.9.5; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:28:37 -0000 Hi! I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51. I am not sure how is working: I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last time I saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which "update" KDE 4.9.5 ports and so on. Does anyone knows when KDE 4.9.5 will be out in ports? They said after FreeBSD 9.1 but when should be the date for "after"? Thank you. Mitja ---------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 22:26:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E903D168 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA174D68 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:26:53 -0800 Message-ID: <510EE42C.6010909@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:26:52 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: svn for 9.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2013 22:26:54.0050 (UTC) FILETIME=[91BB2C20:01CE025D] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:26:54 -0000 What is the category / port name to install svn? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 22:32:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C1F231 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31F3D91 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (unknown [92.195.8.191]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9708243AC; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:32:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r13MVUxb006123; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:31:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:31:30 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: svn for 9.1 Message-Id: <20130203233130.fa7a3f82.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <510EE42C.6010909@a1poweruser.com> References: <510EE42C.6010909@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:32:10 -0000 On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:26:52 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > What is the category / port name to install svn? It's in devel/subversion. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 22:47:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDEB70E for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@gid0.org) Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (mail-ee0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18CADFC for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id e49so2992796eek.33 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:47:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=xCa2V+aPzgF+bwtLpvpvh0Nxh+WeweGQV1fD6mCzO1Y=; b=U4WQBWODE92sW5ixSgsF8sIEXkSJHfId3pCKeNIXzYlqHPlH0B3gd4gSu/VKnK/WWX 2WFMKv0lxcunVB6a/CCn+deg0kFmOWlyvr1uuUprfz8b6EdvB5YTqjB7hwoBMOweXNMC dfs6mVe7DGUlBv6SJCHm2oOrH5XEi9i7zIWsvsS0RR5FjlDSaawAMmFF4H+W2XZZsEVR y3TdotLw1BfN0e1R11up2cPL6VliP4SzKXT1TcBY/JlO33qu5iusQlAH/EubU4ZhsveG tfU6jUuI7NkSCHDIx9Lg6CJUP7ulZhe4vSAZxuN9XABl4giDY097IFYpobLUgKXf7phh C2Pw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.14.220.1 with SMTP id n1mr64635600eep.16.1359931246789; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.189.5 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:40:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1786490.o3nI8lZISl@luna.wi.rr.com> References: <1786490.o3nI8lZISl@luna.wi.rr.com> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:40:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] ports, area51 From: Olivier Smedts To: ajtiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDERKRFJ3WCQXJzdcWeRJrb1l5sL/B/QxgFh3ZhAhuRoGIPDFsxSRfCLn0PMvYDHxWeo5t Cc: kde-freebsd@kde.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:47:26 -0000 Hi, 2013/2/3 ajtiM : > Hi! > > I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51. > I am not sure how is working: > I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last time I > saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which "update" KDE 4.9.5 ports and so on. > Does anyone knows when KDE 4.9.5 will be out in ports? They said after FreeBSD > 9.1 but when should be the date for "after"? I think the answer is "now" : http://www.freshports.org/commit.php?category=astro&port=marble&files=yes&message_id=201302032010.r13KAdMh024301@svn.freebsd.org Cheers -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier@gid0.org - against HTML email & vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 22:55:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9264812 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x22f.google.com (ia-in-x022f.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBEAE2C for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r4so7302033iaj.6 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:55:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=fh6g+O1pAgm0oYqT2ySqo5OACfLopF7WslDEZCivV9s=; b=Ah9NhHc+bd6wosPhuScRlGpy1OKNCMI2r6oXLUamsBrc0ORS3n4+KnNKePbPX/ijPd razBkmHPPV3r1xIrwD6i/Ra/J9sCy/rwoZIFR9p1nlEDeDAYU6jMFlH/rUIWkB/HnKAO QgUrWTMSR1JLpM8ZGm68iy5gp6zwuF67JhCia3IuRUG4V40Z9VwV8vTbnUynq9xzlB+1 2lKxUkWfBCHNyph002CoTKZDOP7tYQKHCTji4aaxXwsEl9lhmh+yw5orEiXsoPHSVoRz CrNs3Bq4PDOspVs+e+I4p01iCNKTet5eDoVs2Dq/jtYeq8cCGERGB7aWPVUKn/oaiiE2 bV3g== X-Received: by 10.50.45.200 with SMTP id p8mr3618780igm.104.1359932107099; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x7sm12888081igk.8.2013.02.03.14.55.05 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:55:06 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: Olivier Smedts Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] ports, area51 Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:54:55 -0600 Message-ID: <2433421.VYjJ23iY9S@luna.wi.rr.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.9.5; i386; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1786490.o3nI8lZISl@luna.wi.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: kde-freebsd@kde.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:55:07 -0000 On Sunday 03 February 2013 23:40:46 Olivier Smedts wrote: > Hi, > > 2013/2/3 ajtiM : > > Hi! > > > > I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51. > > I am not sure how is working: > > I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last > > time I saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which "update" KDE 4.9.5 ports and > > so on. Does anyone knows when KDE 4.9.5 will be out in ports? They said > > after FreeBSD 9.1 but when should be the date for "after"? > > I think the answer is "now" : > > http://www.freshports.org/commit.php?category=astro&port=marble&files=yes&me > ssage_id=201302032010.r13KAdMh024301@svn.freebsd.org > > Cheers Thank you. Mitja ---------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 23:00:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6378D1 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ahmed@aossama.net) Received: from smtp.aossama.net (smtp.master-zone.net [196.218.210.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EC4E4B for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (pluto.aossama.net [192.168.0.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ahmed) by smtp.aossama.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F24D03EB4 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:51:13 +0200 (GMT-2) Message-ID: <510EE9E2.1050506@aossama.net> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:51:14 +0200 From: Ahmed Ossama User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120707 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zoneedit.com References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:00:51 -0000 Try logging in to http://www.mydomain.com/controlpanel. Because they seem to have migrated some portions of their accounts to this new platform. On 02/03/13 22:04, Fbsd8 wrote: > Nick K wrote: >> There doesn't seem to be a way to create a new account at the "new" >> interface - as far as I can tell there is no "sign up" method at >> zoneedit.com. >> >> On Sunday, February 3, 2013, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> Nick K wrote: >>>> I am posting here hoping that a "Dan" from ZoneEdit.com still monitors >> this >>>> mailing list. >>>> I am in a very bad situation and my mail forwarding has been down for >> over >>>> a week -- no response from ZoneEdit support. >>>> >>>> I found references to people getting help from "Dan" here: >>>> >> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2011-01/msg00504.html >> >>>> My issue(s): >>>> >>>> 1.) I can't login to zoneedit.com's "new" interface. I used to be >>>> able >> to >>>> log in to the "legacy" interface -- but apparently I'm in the same >>>> boat >> as >>>> Mr. Jack L. Stone was -- in that you can no longer manage zones >>>> from the >>>> legacy interface. >>>> The legacy interface tells me my account is active at the new >>>> interface, >>>> but the new interface tells me my account does not even exist. >>>> >>>> 2.) My mail forwarding service provided by zoneedit.com stopped >>>> working >>>> approximately last week monday. It has been working fine since 2002. >>>> Don't you just love it when this stuff happens. >>>> >>>> 3.) I can't change my DNS / mail forwarding service, because the >>>> email I >>>> used for my domain registration at my registrar is one of the >>>> emails that >>>> gets forwarded (and the forwarding is not working). >>>> >>>> If Jack L. Stone or "Dan" from ZoneEdit can get in contact with me I >> would >>>> be very grateful. >>>> I don't know what else to do at this point. >>>> The company that currently owns ZoneEdit (Dotster) won't help me -- >>>> they >>>> say they don't have the ability to provide support for ZoneEdit >> customers. >>>> This is my last hope pretty much. Dan or Jack if you're out there, >> please >>>> get back to me. >>>> surge3@gmail.com >>>> >>> Have you tried to create a new account on the new interface and try to >> access your domains from there? >> > > After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer > free and there now in the domain register business. Time to return to > the register where your domain name is hosted and change the dns > servers your using from zoneedit back to your register's dns servers. > If your register does not provide the dns services you were using at > zoneedit then time to look at other registers. > I use http://www.enom.com and godaddy.com will have ads during the > super bowl game on tonight. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Best Regards, Ahmed Ossama From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 23:07:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334309AB for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C53FE79 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:07:03 -0800 Message-ID: <510EED96.9090505@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:07:02 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: new committed port > svn or portsnap Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2013 23:07:04.0022 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E2FB760:01CE0263] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:07:03 -0000 When a port gets committed where is it really being committed to? Why is there such a delay before svn.freebsd.org/ports/head gets updated with the newly committed port? How often is the portsnap file updated? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 23:11:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CABA5D for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172FFE98 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r13NBd7t007519; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:11:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r13NBcGC007516; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:11:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:11:38 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? In-Reply-To: <510ECD7F.6010709@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> <20130203193225.c71f06ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EB1F2.7090104@dreamchaser.org> <510ECD7F.6010709@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:11:39 -0700 (MST) Cc: Polytropon , mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:11:49 -0000 On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: > > For the OP, I (just now) got the nvidia driver and x to compile and run > under 9.1 as follows: > > 1. make and install the x11/xorg port > 2. create the symlink /usr/X11R6 to point to /usr/local > if /usr/X11R6 already exists as a regular directory and has stuff in it, > move it aside or delete it. I found mine only had stuff from previous > attempts to build the nvidia driver in it (a "bin" plain file(!), and a > "lib" containing files from the nvidia driver build), so I deleted it. > 3. download and unpack the nvidia driver; > I used > NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-304.64.tar.gz > but note that that file is specific to my architecture, which is amd64; > you'll need the appropriate one for your architecture. > 4. make the nvidia driver > 5. make sure step #4 added the line > nvidia_load="YES" > to /boot/loader.conf > 6. add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf if not already present > # Enable hald and dbus for X to work with kbd and mouse > hald_enable="YES" > dbus_enable="YES" Why not just use the port? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 23:12:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB1BAF7 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obaro4jesus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-f179.google.com (mail-ve0-f179.google.com [209.85.128.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FBBEA4 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 23:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f179.google.com with SMTP id da11so3223515veb.10 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rY9PW3nuTrzjpq+9oIl97KHcrmij/XN9jxfiWtE4ZXU=; b=yPU5AKRzR38fjroJXcD5BQqHquDoi1CnU05Vwq0hE4VXkdncHUWaazl8MtAhFFh7fy HAzBumwNUY6duBhV3q6+0EFCJimpU0Cd0h815bi6kclQTCXGNWZGv0u2kQAIAV9yAW8l XX7aVnnN65HA3mLQlqjS607lafl9+2fD+NtCMiygj63znMSruoVuXlbqUaUSC7wP41Mq PQdOW4kSf2xAvbn2N/C9T1lBmbbbXodohnYnetZsaxK21C8fbpHCCO0384ecp27CBR/p 5hpmVlCR7jJTJrqzkUwG5Rzi4AKn88o+zspsEcZv1/BQGvrDkXqtbtuMT9mNlXMl81yO +HyA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.19.65 with SMTP id c1mr4847227vde.36.1359933135121; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.28.173 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:12:15 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: http://localhost/phpmyadmin From: ogidiagba obaroene To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:12:22 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 00:48:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69BBCAD for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AA61C3 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r140m100024920; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:48:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <510F0541.1090102@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:48:01 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <510E880D.7090203@dreamchaser.org> <510E926F.7060201@dreamchaser.org> <20130203180215.3aca2c57.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EA486.7000908@dreamchaser.org> <20130203193225.c71f06ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <510EB1F2.7090104@dreamchaser.org> <510ECD7F.6010709@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:48:02 -0700 (MST) Cc: Polytropon , mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:48:22 -0000 On 02/03/13 16:11, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: >> >> For the OP, I (just now) got the nvidia driver and x to compile and run >> under 9.1 as follows: >> >> 1. make and install the x11/xorg port >> 2. create the symlink /usr/X11R6 to point to /usr/local >> if /usr/X11R6 already exists as a regular directory and has stuff in it, >> move it aside or delete it. I found mine only had stuff from previous >> attempts to build the nvidia driver in it (a "bin" plain file(!), and a >> "lib" containing files from the nvidia driver build), so I deleted it. >> 3. download and unpack the nvidia driver; >> I used >> NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86_64-304.64.tar.gz >> but note that that file is specific to my architecture, which is amd64; >> you'll need the appropriate one for your architecture. >> 4. make the nvidia driver >> 5. make sure step #4 added the line >> nvidia_load="YES" >> to /boot/loader.conf >> 6. add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf if not already present >> # Enable hald and dbus for X to work with kbd and mouse >> hald_enable="YES" >> dbus_enable="YES" > > Why not just use the port? When I tried that I got some message (can't remember what it was) saying the port was obsolete or something like that implying it shouldn't be used. I thought the msg was in one of the posts I made but I can't find it. I just looked at the Makefile for the port and it looks like it is using the same version of the driver so maybe it will work fine. The message may also have been the result of the port build being messed up because of the extraneous /usr/X11R6 directory I had at the time. If I end up rebuilding I will try it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 02:08:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1F3412 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909F7715 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id kq12so190613pab.29 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:08:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=E6hiEFloLadLgcv3bkUb1PohNiM2NbTMloJIxGSUiv8=; b=dgVajqJ5QabMwTE5fgFZ4kCzV27f4o6WNnh+riUN+ByciCD9C8isRiv/G3UiqW64OU eOFC44BJ5JGg3CBBsyUr5eSpeCj1sGDOMZlWrsc7zGApIeHR2CrD4gHYrRhui26TclU3 r6j8+/PQRsG34rnz4CcBh865D8Ulluw5c9OHQ+Q10R5IpVEJDgM72ry3Qv982i83q0tK j7hxjEmW8KpAFs9ErGsT3GnFvf8qImEN+D2nxNjzhi4xuaU2m1EvzvwfsUbgN50J7P+e bCOlgxjPT7Mq9qDMDtZ7i4eRK8yAhec4MEzN1v5WtNtuXSQNH2sjeySjckV7xO3FiO0r cT7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.136.163 with SMTP id qb3mr50484643pbb.129.1359943304606; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.4.169 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:01:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 21:01:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zoneedit.com From: Alejandro Imass To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlP/W/ShAseOWD9Gs4hec23TZ3kkfrlf3f4DUIdTcWlYqrXZ+fwBpfNmX1wWFsUpfnNAXN7 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , nick@srgnet.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:08:39 -0000 On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > Nick K wrote: >> >> There doesn't seem to be a way to create a new account at the "new" >> interface - as far as I can tell there is no "sign up" method at >> zoneedit.com. >> [...] > After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer free and > there now in the domain register business. Time to return to the register > where your domain name is hosted and change the dns servers your using from > zoneedit back to your register's dns servers. If your register does not > provide the dns services you were using at zoneedit then time to look at > other registers. > I use http://www.enom.com and godaddy.com will have ads during the super > bowl game on tonight. > Just a thought, but why not just switch to another friendly DNS solution like freedns.afraid.org which is BTW powered by FreeBSD! Cheers, -- Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 10:29:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E034EE3 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC31AA0B for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r14ATaks070018; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:29:37 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:29:36 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Nick K Subject: Re: zoneedit.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20130204210946.E87033@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:29:41 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 452, Issue 11, Message: 9 On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:45:05 -0500 Nick K wrote: > I am posting here hoping that a "Dan" from ZoneEdit.com still monitors this > mailing list. > I am in a very bad situation and my mail forwarding has been down for over > a week -- no response from ZoneEdit support. > > I found references to people getting help from "Dan" here: > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2011-01/msg00504.html > > My issue(s): > > 1.) I can't login to zoneedit.com's "new" interface. I used to be able to > log in to the "legacy" interface -- but apparently I'm in the same boat as > Mr. Jack L. Stone was -- in that you can no longer manage zones from the > legacy interface. > The legacy interface tells me my account is active at the new interface, > but the new interface tells me my account does not even exist. > > 2.) My mail forwarding service provided by zoneedit.com stopped working > approximately last week monday. It has been working fine since 2002. > Don't you just love it when this stuff happens. > > 3.) I can't change my DNS / mail forwarding service, because the email I > used for my domain registration at my registrar is one of the emails that > gets forwarded (and the forwarding is not working). > > If Jack L. Stone or "Dan" from ZoneEdit can get in contact with me I would > be very grateful. > I don't know what else to do at this point. > The company that currently owns ZoneEdit (Dotster) won't help me -- they > say they don't have the ability to provide support for ZoneEdit customers. > > This is my last hope pretty much. Dan or Jack if you're out there, please > get back to me. Nick, we've had some rouble with zoneedit recently also. Someone who's clearly using zoneedit.com's mail services registered on a forum we run, but the auto registration response bounced and continued to bounce for 2 days, with the following response (edited to protect $poor_innocent): ======= Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:22:44 +1100 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem To: www-data@folks.nimfm.org Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours The original message was received at Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:15:45 +1100 from www-data@localhost [127.0.0.1] ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mail.zoneedit.com.: >>> DATA <<< 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [220.233.175.114] ... Deferred: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [220.233.175.114] <<< 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until message is 2 days old Reporting-MTA: dns; folks.nimfm.org Arrival-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:15:45 +1100 Final-Recipient: RFC822; xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.com Action: delayed Status: 4.7.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.zoneedit.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [220.233.175.114] Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:16:25 +1100 ======= I forwarded the above (plus dig results proving there was nothing wrong with our reverse DNS on some big nameservers) to postmaster@zoneedit.com but have received no response, and of course we have no way to contact $poor_innocent. Not a good look. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 12:13:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412FCCD3 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060901762 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.156.109] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1U2KpC-0004JU-Uv; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:07:03 +0100 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:06:35 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: mhca12 Subject: Re: vfs.root.mountfrom with geli Message-ID: <20130204130635.3a66d412@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/3YjbrmWg6GujJBL3=EdPokU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:13:38 -0000 --Sig_/3YjbrmWg6GujJBL3=EdPokU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mhca12 wrote: > I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 > but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the > passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the > label I gave to the root partition. I also tried with /dev/ada0p3.eli > without success. >=20 > Tried the following two /boot/loader.config variations: > 1: > geom_eli_load=3D"YES" > vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=E2=80=9Dufs:/dev/gpt/enc.eli=E2=80=9D > 2: > geom_eli_load=3D"YES" > vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=E2=80=9Dufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=E2=80=9D >=20 > I can geli attach /dev/gpt/enc or /dev/ada0p3 successfully from > the livecd. >=20 > Can you advise me what I might have done wrong or what I > should try? >=20 > https://www.dan.me.uk/blog/2012/05/05/full-disk-encryption-in-freebsd-9-x= -well-almost/ This guide doesn't seem to match your configuration. It uses ada0p3.eli for swapping and additionally uses keyfiles. Without knowing your actual configuration it's impossible to give proper advice. You could check with "geli list ada0p3" if the boot flag is set, but that's obviously just a wild guess ... Fabian --Sig_/3YjbrmWg6GujJBL3=EdPokU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlEPpE4ACgkQBYqIVf93VJ21OQCgzK7iatTiBdYbIydZDjpwvJrt oPAAn0QCd5okmRdzueputDzbLOlBu49E =gopK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3YjbrmWg6GujJBL3=EdPokU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 12:16:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B964EDB9 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-ye0-f182.google.com (mail-ye0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5141798 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ye0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q5so1474415yen.41 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:16:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=22gQtlwMTW0vAkqeNXoSnDOavips4jUNueIlhXDp17s=; b=jNIdjukSsEGiQSaTpWlczGSS6fYEBtOAWRHCmaUTXBTn6WsgkeTz5Jb8+6A7p2t6Sy 1b4IHQJnp/nd0RHSJzn8C5UFMZZrhrfmMMR6hBpXFbjzCZCGeYv9dubHs+bnYZHEb63Y U2aShMsYS3iWose5AXOH/igFGK5ceflb/VXXc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=22gQtlwMTW0vAkqeNXoSnDOavips4jUNueIlhXDp17s=; b=obOKG6PV42boscZ3k9pe3ustQBpwb3NHvEc6jsrGh9F52G5s4iBD2nuIUfMqnrN9OR Yby8XA4PYIm6FJsIWaW9x2iLLaRTQYwLOyc1gCdmYjowB7OgnINChdb6eSE8GuDAh70E 1RG/0GyzbI5nUROtfDxAiwE/R/WGwu5jwxS4en3/DiGm5h0lepuAyhD2dfbrEAE2uX8o 3BdAxDWdIAhRA+1ww9QKzMLJ+pJjTfy/52g8YwTrwqmcNDlZ/vcae6FFXBshYjHZPfUn AqTFKWVHypJ9LXzcYdGJuLRIOO6WSq7NNJSZ2eKDlWPEI08G22CGVEA+CGzauhGUZgIL 92YQ== X-Received: by 10.236.69.71 with SMTP id m47mr26204771yhd.30.1359980164759; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f29sm15428125anj.17.2013.02.04.04.16.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Z07Df2qz2z2CG5Z for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:16:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:16:01 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin Message-ID: <20130204071601.441f8058@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzpJTfxOiqwbtnZDHcL0mBl80J4KHS6jKhT+sIK+T3dzVdN8/vgaCkBXUVmuYWji1+1kVg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:16:10 -0000 On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:12:15 -0600 ogidiagba obaroene articulated: Seriously dude, the crystal ball is hung over from watching the Super Bowl yesterday. You are going to have to do it the old fashioned way and actually write your question out in long hand. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 12:20:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE25EAB for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06EA17C3 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id va7so6203442obc.27 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:20:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fgJlaa+ch2+tYWxmh/dva5CQTHRm/5siOHASrB7pU3Q=; b=aFkSAQFXdnK3/TjKf9iUG0XxpfxeITOtUcYaLcqw4sKjYbI0aUFER3ZvFwIP9CiYx8 VrbRmozXBTIw+yUBUzUfxF5kdeeI7oy3b7uYqCTAvKz8nDotw7PcYOAk1KbTDvMV5sNx YJhew7Zfz0/sXmdNJKzSmPUY+JsRbaCl+oZqJosgwNeaoelic2h69Rt33tp0TsdqLsw7 aRuaonRQuLCmh3Wi3VjkZStOofkTRFIc4vAazT8/M71fe5aJaZ+TzaGjBDRHGi6zIxEo b2sJRQmyR09qslZXAKF1oZiwdGX3uwfPznQF1oODxnjzaMnWPlUkdF1y7mMLfvdT3Oq9 CqAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.169.10 with SMTP id aa10mr16801391oec.105.1359980418188; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:20:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 04:20:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130204130635.3a66d412@fabiankeil.de> References: <20130204130635.3a66d412@fabiankeil.de> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:20:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vfs.root.mountfrom with geli From: mhca12 To: Fabian Keil Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:20:19 -0000 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: > mhca12 wrote: > >> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 >> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the >> passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the >> label I gave to the root partition. I also tried with /dev/ada0p3.eli >> without success. >> >> Tried the following two /boot/loader.config variations: >> 1: >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=94ufs:/dev/gpt/enc.eli=94 >> 2: >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=94ufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=94 >> >> I can geli attach /dev/gpt/enc or /dev/ada0p3 successfully from >> the livecd. >> >> Can you advise me what I might have done wrong or what I >> should try? >> >> https://www.dan.me.uk/blog/2012/05/05/full-disk-encryption-in-freebsd-9-= x-well-almost/ > > This guide doesn't seem to match your configuration. > It uses ada0p3.eli for swapping and additionally uses keyfiles. > > Without knowing your actual configuration it's impossible to > give proper advice. You could check with "geli list ada0p3" if > the boot flag is set, but that's obviously just a wild guess ... Forgot to list my simpler setup: ada0p1 freebsd-boot ada0p2 freebsd-ufs label boot /boot ada0p3 geli freebsd-ufs label enc / Do I have to set the boot flag for any of them? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 13:43:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BDE956 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1175B1CC9 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm14so2892582wib.9 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:42:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ufLzJBB9iyl3qOI/L47UwnCPUIrGfD91HnDUspEFgnA=; b=ou3oao/piorRejLH1jJgdsPhcW53DXPoEO1MoYHlit1lbRXS/Hsw5K+1DinHtfaR2u sLy+fUH2DBtWd98tLnB9rkpvxPVtZPdW+45RRIFunnAOtHfk4ypNIpOulFKb9zYvtaSM Y8TKcIKgva12MOd2Pd6MkyNxWPKPTvaONYv5TTpSVzxeobEn0XhhC0DHYAxSiSmtdoWe Un5iffe3PFYaw9sOb8jZvofI89J3qWLC90g56SthWu05/6uZQ5F+DkVaa0yIHoCr3mhp duQsLI2amPcNtID5TMd4aq63f+e836uuQaxJ6WADhR0O4eMMSnuij+aeIdijeLymW9rC aXZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.99.227 with SMTP id et3mr10620039wib.6.1359985371778; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:42:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.94.133 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:42:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130204071601.441f8058@scorpio> References: <20130204071601.441f8058@scorpio> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:42:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin From: David Demelier To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:43:05 -0000 I think it's just a spam, and I would not recommend to answer that mails 2013/2/4 Jerry > On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:12:15 -0600 > ogidiagba obaroene articulated: > > Seriously dude, the crystal ball is hung over from watching the Super > Bowl yesterday. You are going to have to do it the old fashioned way > and actually write your question out in long hand. > > -- > Jerry =E2=99=94 > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 14:29:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70ED749 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@suki.ishpeck.net) Received: from suki.ishpeck.net (67-222-225-246.static.orml012.digis.net [67.222.225.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9677E1EA6 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2919 invoked by uid 1031); 3 Feb 2013 22:29:15 -0000 Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:29:15 -0700 From: Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn for 9.1 Message-ID: <20130203222915.GA12309@suki.ishpeck.net> References: <510EE42C.6010909@a1poweruser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <510EE42C.6010909@a1poweruser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:29:17 -0000 Whoops. Initially sent a message to the poster directly. On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:26:52PM -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > What is the category / port name to install svn? /usr/ports/devel/subversion I assum you meant that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 14:39:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AB4BFA for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [IPv6:2001:470:1d:8da::100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543A01F43 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (sentry.24cl.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:3fa::1]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Z0BQ350dbz1DSr for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:39:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from BigBloat (bigbloat.24cl.home [10.20.1.4]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A6F130CE for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:39:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:39:20 -0500 From: "Mike." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zoneedit.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:39:25 -0000 On 2/3/2013 at 3:04 PM Fbsd8 wrote: | [snip] | |After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer free |and there now in the domain register business.... ============= Zoneedit was purchased by Dotster a while ago (few months? couple of years?) If you look at an legacy zoneedit page, you'll see at the bottom: (http://legacy.zoneedit.com/contact.html) Zone Edit, LLC is a Dotster, Inc.-owned company. I have noticed zoneedit's quality of service declining since the purchase. I switched to tunnelbroker.net's FreeDNS serivce and haven't looked back. The registration company I used, 000domains.com, was also purchased by Dotster, and I had to leave 000doamins.com due to customer service issues after the purchase. I went to namecheap.com, and have been very satisfied. YMMV. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 14:48:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB27F16 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2291FC9 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o1so2995106wic.11 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 06:48:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=83yhhmcbm7MATdMVzIMm1eHL1n7udg8BrbTwyo6OTag=; b=GrmOUdWfGhBgpC9a60GlYDMLeJVEx2t/qa0Mx4awFULP7xWPQSN8SBwiTuGG3q9jZX f7Ef/ArzLRKMkms3m4X91tqnI/HeohTXVkY+Mo6pRKpxlfmtRzCk8Ks/m1M/rZQo085i pT/OiONSIt2Ip+OkC/L86vRZ0vPp8W7JM5tUEo3d/SeIKhxsJZIrxfUFhwATz2kUmHrR W4An2XQrPnTRmwl5295+ndrBcw1rwQpMLdQKNShoNE6IpHf1eezC9zGRABmhJiE5V9ln KhGoPSas/Lohk37wk3HQDHLKRgh5Zd/EkS9IycXlW6wiW6RwA7FGR6s6gNxSaMhPmHcV hgbg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.82.41 with SMTP id f9mr10961967wiy.25.1359989286858; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 06:48:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: pldrouin@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.34.197 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 06:48:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:48:06 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZvWkXkp_j2HwPn6J8WQSSvbv4V8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zoneedit.com From: Pierre-Luc Drouin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:48:15 -0000 Hi, I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by Zoneedit. Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails for my domain. Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. I need my router to be able to update the DNS information for my dynamic IP address though... On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mike. wrote: > > On 2/3/2013 at 3:04 PM Fbsd8 wrote: > | [snip] > | > |After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer > free > |and there now in the domain register business.... > ============= > > > Zoneedit was purchased by Dotster a while ago (few months? couple of > years?) > > If you look at an legacy zoneedit page, you'll see at the bottom: > (http://legacy.zoneedit.com/contact.html) > > Zone Edit, LLC is a Dotster, Inc.-owned company. > > I have noticed zoneedit's quality of service declining since the > purchase. I switched to tunnelbroker.net's FreeDNS serivce and haven't > looked back. > > The registration company I used, 000domains.com, was also purchased by > Dotster, and I had to leave 000doamins.com due to customer service > issues after the purchase. I went to namecheap.com, and have been very > satisfied. > > YMMV. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 15:07:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6201F4FE for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-ye0-f172.google.com (mail-ye0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E223C125 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ye0-f172.google.com with SMTP id m10so1548944yen.31 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:07:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WahS4EYyuWP4OaoADdruBe0gMQvKwadv39rEz6B8ZRo=; b=U/Kt5HQqnPiXzjJ/B04ZCcKOYldq/1YvppUL8yIK4nnjK/AkteY79jkEDzPbZ79AaP S+0CSsCS3QTktSSBmpZxcAUcK70V27toxkaVnEm1PqPyQdGjyTXs5lK/vq0knxsIHr0N DPqhsJEoGYhOqgcKrGVHyhdefRXJBAnuHOzjM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=WahS4EYyuWP4OaoADdruBe0gMQvKwadv39rEz6B8ZRo=; b=dXEM7HTuaSWp5NSZRrSSD70Fejh3Cc33hAMldYlY/ZcsJua9zr4Xz+xCGdN1KHkq00 WLMvUQ/lLfU4Rn54BCB1PYJH7A96T+9koZZvHsiAeyZ864eaSmCtjDK2TMViirVZZbD/ dZUyL8f7hkE3eK9ltaqETUxlIUyejh4KxxPBCE/bW7LqvdmCYl+jsxOvaUV+DklI3Woe nrKLTxLobhylFgYS/PMpmDf2PKwiXGZW9sKaWjBcaocenFBtyw/C80DNisyQa/RtjcxO 82h81AS4/0KfnlmZgTDqmy9b1/rJ9QmJAZRpZdt/WhHPPyTrHLzWGiowIuWL0Xo26oem Zi5A== X-Received: by 10.236.166.226 with SMTP id g62mr26156465yhl.74.1359990470122; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d80sm1514711yhg.4.2013.02.04.07.07.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Z0C2r28k1z2CG5Z for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:07:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:07:47 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: zoneedit.com Message-ID: <20130204100747.42ca1277@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxd3s/TAxbxFZXPgy8n5xqLNa+4GHZpHG+Jem06CfD9fEa/0fL5OowIG9Dexq0e+lApPyV X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:07:57 -0000 On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:48:06 -0500 Pierre-Luc Drouin articulated: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mike. wrote: > > > > > On 2/3/2013 at 3:04 PM Fbsd8 wrote: > > | [snip] > > | > > |After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer > > free > > |and there now in the domain register business.... > > ============= > > > > > > Zoneedit was purchased by Dotster a while ago (few months? couple > > of years?) > > > > If you look at an legacy zoneedit page, you'll see at the bottom: > > (http://legacy.zoneedit.com/contact.html) > > > > Zone Edit, LLC is a Dotster, Inc.-owned company. > > > > I have noticed zoneedit's quality of service declining since the > > purchase. I switched to tunnelbroker.net's FreeDNS serivce and > > haven't looked back. > > > > The registration company I used, 000domains.com, was also purchased > > by Dotster, and I had to leave 000doamins.com due to customer > > service issues after the purchase. I went to namecheap.com, and > > have been very satisfied. > I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by > Zoneedit. Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails > for my domain. Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. > I need my router to be able to update the DNS information for my > dynamic IP address though... "http://dyn.com/dns/" can do that and "ddclient" needed to update the DNS is available in the ports system. I have set up several PC's with just this system and they work quite well. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 15:10:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71496787 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (we-in-x0231.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C06C14E for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id d7so4875389wer.36 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:10:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GAU/y9K+kJvX1HE6CDzlX8FEoPzZZ3db/8yZqQNuUa4=; b=QTpEPCU3OpF/lfFXWXh0bm+MomZPiBb28/pbvX+DgGkQpYcEebNnHfkKdNQaMRcaZ8 q0R1S+fvIFnqaTPcgcNcg86SeKO278vrP9eiirvfmFQuMDN4kNrn1kcKwQQcQNobXG+F vaxS3PgUeNuxf9erYkHX/mux3v6uNLoP5olp9+N2/ptqDew14X5quUYgjfWr+GgECvrY hHPfbwpLrr4nUrp1JmWcY8xTzXgvrf8Rt67d49lpjiiNgOvRvJenOTiJmxG1QVPjCCU4 th3fvQEFCFc1i3MQzYdQII7d5skqeU7Y0WCidyFwY6OjBwyarSA8eCW+w7grfZoM1Rku 9bWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.82.41 with SMTP id f9mr11103324wiy.25.1359990610086; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:10:10 -0800 (PST) Sender: pldrouin@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.34.197 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:10:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130204100747.42ca1277@scorpio> References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> <20130204100747.42ca1277@scorpio> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:10:09 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MclY1SJptF3dcgNqFSYP2GZLt_g Message-ID: Subject: Re: zoneedit.com From: Pierre-Luc Drouin To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:10:20 -0000 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:48:06 -0500 > Pierre-Luc Drouin articulated: > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mike. wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/3/2013 at 3:04 PM Fbsd8 wrote: > > > | [snip] > > > | > > > |After reviewing zoneedit new website looks like they are no longer > > > free > > > |and there now in the domain register business.... > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > > > > > Zoneedit was purchased by Dotster a while ago (few months? couple > > > of years?) > > > > > > If you look at an legacy zoneedit page, you'll see at the bottom: > > > (http://legacy.zoneedit.com/contact.html) > > > > > > Zone Edit, LLC is a Dotster, Inc.-owned company. > > > > > > I have noticed zoneedit's quality of service declining since the > > > purchase. I switched to tunnelbroker.net's FreeDNS serivce and > > > haven't looked back. > > > > > > The registration company I used, 000domains.com, was also purchased > > > by Dotster, and I had to leave 000doamins.com due to customer > > > service issues after the purchase. I went to namecheap.com, and > > > have been very satisfied. > > > I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by > > Zoneedit. Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails > > for my domain. Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. > > I need my router to be able to update the DNS information for my > > dynamic IP address though... > > "http://dyn.com/dns/" can do that and "ddclient" needed to update the > DNS is available in the ports system. I have set up several PC's with > just this system and they work quite well. > > -- > Jerry =E2=99=94 > Thanks, I will take a look. I got Zoneedit for free though.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 15:29:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC180BE6 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [IPv6:2001:470:1d:8da::100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9784C21E for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (sentry.24cl.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:3fa::1]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Z0CWX6vjXz1DNy; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:29:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from BigBloat (bigbloat.24cl.home [10.20.1.4]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACA7130CE; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:29:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <201302041029100664.00513553@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:29:10 -0500 From: "Mike." To: "Pierre-Luc Drouin" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zoneedit.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:29:13 -0000 On 2/4/2013 at 9:48 AM Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: |Hi, | |I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by Zoneedit. |Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails for my domain. |Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. I need my router to |be able to update the DNS information for my dynamic IP address though... ============= fwiw... the tunnelbroker.net freedns service supports dynamic updates. https://dns.he.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 15:50:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4D94A8 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgiessel@mac.com) Received: from nk11p04mm-asmtp002.mac.com (nk11p04mm-asmtp002.mac.com [17.158.236.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DBA357 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:50:30 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [192.168.0.194] ([24.237.133.115]) by nk11p04mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-26.01(7.0.4.26.0) 64bit (built Jul 13 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MHP00D97AJVDC10@nk11p04mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:50:20 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-04_11:2013-02-04,2013-02-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1302040082 Subject: Re: zoneedit.com From: "Peter A. Giessel" In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:50:18 -0900 Message-id: References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> To: Pierre-Luc Drouin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:50:30 -0000 On 2013, Feb 4, at 5:48, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > Hi, > > I had a similar issue about my emails not getting forwarded by Zoneedit. > Now I am using the Google SMTP server to collect the emails for my domain. > Maybe I should also switch the DNS to another service. I need my router to > be able to update the DNS information for my dynamic IP address though... http://dyn.com/dns/ Dyn.com can have a FreeBSD box update the DNS information for a dynamic IP address. I have been a user for a long time and am quite happy with their DNS service. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 16:06:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444BBC3C for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:06:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gg0-x229.google.com (mail-gg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC1C68A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f169.google.com with SMTP id j5so203281ggn.0 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:06:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nLgFPGZ1Y+8oA27+g+PcIeSn9wEPQLH2GJUFXamuKuM=; b=AC7400aNoZZw+cFrd3zOPh4Y/w76d5+6z00Qs3FTcyqnxiRiTYUWyh2tFzstgArklp VKJJintAtJICW/TLHC3WEcq4zCrrWqsdMc/FdUwXonsBrxhJz4lh938fAuvWHGBdoHV6 EyvgHbhaRI8cgL8x4UqLig2sX/JFiu5ZHdg6s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=nLgFPGZ1Y+8oA27+g+PcIeSn9wEPQLH2GJUFXamuKuM=; b=eVY9cHuFiPDaQy+XxuI5yNrQcl2a/uZ2XvPCCY/7wncflObFLuDnqljlqQ6Lxbqybi gD8r7O4nL/V2xPP1VfphI0Bd1loyJ+3nygIHhau+RBI6ch1qNjv1iheJDYc+jaHEClwR Z2kkU3W5VDadMDMxjUOiKl+z5P6VC0Zix2lP4Azf8OkNxT5ley5IoI/2NpYpHd6yGGjg DZcpz6RFk9qodwmeHNjz9NdR8rMwfUhPNBhNdEW57LpJbhVPN9APWGc9wAq44h+W5YW5 k8Wo7HW/3ZFfd7Q0RtQ5Ei9/HLgkqFvRaZ4mWQVaTM6GFrVWilAjfcx/WZbbZ9+soR4J r2pg== X-Received: by 10.236.113.180 with SMTP id a40mr7259853yhh.35.1359993992228; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:06:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w2sm29779143yhh.7.2013.02.04.08.06.31 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Z0DLZ1CmWz2CG5Z for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:06:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:06:29 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: zoneedit.com Message-ID: <20130204110629.0e049d3d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> <510EC2EA.505@a1poweruser.com> <201302040939200858.00239665@sentry.24cl.com> <20130204100747.42ca1277@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmY7qYHs5HfciS+u3NieqF0dQacCCSJ2oGhgbHJ6CLluqM5npjFhvPHiIJlELcwNCTXac3o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:06:33 -0000 On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:10:09 -0500 Pierre-Luc Drouin articulated: > Thanks, I will take a look. I got Zoneedit for free though.. As always, you get what you pay for. I have had a few instances when I had to contact the technical support team at DynDNSs and was quite impressed. They got back to me very quickly and answered my questions. I think they now have live support and telephone support, but all I ever used was plain email. Again, YMMV. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 16:21:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DCD291 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@kraus-haus.org) Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com (mail-ve0-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8633F72D for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oz10so4885486veb.4 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:21:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=MTOH9bpXOjotkL9pWNTeGP53sNhF/U2Umq493r2XRxw=; b=jEby/5pbxPSkeV2t+k5cpJ8lq9KzfbLl9W7lyyi8xl3rBEjAZTmat0U8cVUuC3hGPu AB89wFpIWnWwu7U5fMgIM450JVJEQVq0WhHl0HdcRNaIqMq4RCVRzWIuJ9+dGlwQ++zj 8qosKp1Svunid5i5GnM6R0BI/c7F4zoGOltQP+yM7wH/rWqhA9Fjxl36cgS9m/3no+Ge HvwsT/ib7L3gsNhOTRVhqGVs9Y4gbQOd8l90mvsVjuG0hnnybqc6QX0zUVyRLg1v99KI CBdhF/jbOPkB/b1Gbwh1jiSigkahSV1OKrqH0VmtEgcO/AXOaCN89kjyhr+J9GFmlYUz hoVA== X-Received: by 10.220.226.70 with SMTP id iv6mr23080889vcb.9.1359994877578; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mini1.kraus-haus.org ([96.236.21.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sk8sm22362797vdb.13.2013.02.04.08.21.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:21:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + NFS + FreeBSD with performance prob Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Kraus In-Reply-To: <20130131221627.GA91823@pcjas.obspm.fr> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:21:12 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <509EB11C-E279-44C5-91C2-3A93249919F5@kraus-haus.org> References: <20130131221627.GA91823@pcjas.obspm.fr> To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLJHMqA/2e1DNKsDeqtup7yIQXdR9E2jGcdFwNiveEB4oWBYe3fC3cw9O1t49h4ZXKVonL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:21:23 -0000 On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote: > Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on differents > disks) zfs pool with 36 disk. >=20 > The performance is very very good on the server. >=20 > I've one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 and the performance over NFS = is > very good :=20 >=20 > For example : Read from the client and write over NFS to ZFS: >=20 > [root@ .tmp]# time tar xf /tmp/linux-3.7.5.tar=20 >=20 > real 1m7.244s > user 0m0.921s > sys 0m8.990s >=20 > this client is on 1Gbits/s network cable and same network switch as = the > server. >=20 > I've a second NFS client running FreeBSD 9.1-Stable, and on this = second > client the performance is catastrophic. After 1 hour the tar isn't = finish. > OK this second client is connect with 100Mbit/s and not on the same = switch. > But well from 2 min --> ~ 90 min ...:-( >=20 > I've try for this second client to change on the ZFS-NFS server the >=20 > zfs set sync=3Ddisabled=20 >=20 > and that change nothing. I have been using FreeBSD 9 with ZFS and NFS to a couple Mac OS X = (10.6.8 Snow Leopard) boxes and I get between 40 and 50 MB/sec = throughput on a Gigabit ethernet link. Since you have already ruled out = the known sync issue with ZFS and no SSD-based write cache, then perhaps = you are running into an NFS 3 vs. NFS 4 issue. I am not sure if Mac OS X = is using NFS 3 or NFS 4. -- Paul Kraus Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 16:52:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A66FD87 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA25F953 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r14GMgVr080886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:22:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:22:42 -0600 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Can anyone direct me to some information about what =?UTF-8?Q?WITHOUT=5FPROFILE=3D=22YES=22=20actually=20means=2E?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: <2bc4849a42d23d8e469e04afa3b27fdf@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:52:52 -0000 I have ran into a recent issue, after a lot of trouble shooting I have narrowed it down to something in my /etc/src.conf the full file just has: WITHOUT_BIND="YES" WITHOUT_NTP="YES" WITHOUT_FLOPPY="YES" WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="YES" WITHOUT_PROFILE="YES" Of course bind and ntp are added in by ports after the system is built, everything compiles, I have a very specific issue with one thing not working on an installed port, with no apparent error. To make a long story short though one of my build attempts, I forgot to copy the /etc/src.conf file to the new system. And well the problem was gone, when I discovered that's what I did differently, I commented out all lines on a different system rebuilt and installed, sure enough it worked. Looking at the src.conf options that I was using, I can't see how any option other than the WITHOUT_PROFILE could possibly be causing the problem. Though I am in the process of building systems with different options removed in an attempt to find out for sure. The WITHOUT_PROFILE was added from a help document I read some time ago about upgrading from source, and hasn't caused any problems before now. I know it instructs the build process to avoid compiling profiled libraries. But my searching hasn't been able to lead me to what the difference is between a profiled and non-profiled library is. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 17:25:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF08C7E for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EFFCC4 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.156.109] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1U2PnE-0007Rh-2X; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:25:20 +0100 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:23:03 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: mhca12 Subject: Re: vfs.root.mountfrom with geli Message-ID: <20130204182303.59c9ac72@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130204130635.3a66d412@fabiankeil.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/JO4oX.lbv/XvZoDQXUi3vUr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:25:28 -0000 --Sig_/JO4oX.lbv/XvZoDQXUi3vUr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mhca12 wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: > > mhca12 wrote: > > > >> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 > >> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the > >> passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the > >> label I gave to the root partition. I also tried with /dev/ada0p3.eli > >> without success. > >> > >> Tried the following two /boot/loader.config variations: > >> 1: > >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" > >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=E2=80=9Dufs:/dev/gpt/enc.eli=E2=80=9D > >> 2: > >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" > >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=E2=80=9Dufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=E2=80=9D > >> > >> I can geli attach /dev/gpt/enc or /dev/ada0p3 successfully from > >> the livecd. > >> > >> Can you advise me what I might have done wrong or what I > >> should try? > >> > >> https://www.dan.me.uk/blog/2012/05/05/full-disk-encryption-in-freebsd-= 9-x-well-almost/ > > > > This guide doesn't seem to match your configuration. > > It uses ada0p3.eli for swapping and additionally uses keyfiles. > > > > Without knowing your actual configuration it's impossible to > > give proper advice. You could check with "geli list ada0p3" if > > the boot flag is set, but that's obviously just a wild guess ... >=20 > Forgot to list my simpler setup: > ada0p1 freebsd-boot > ada0p2 freebsd-ufs label boot /boot > ada0p3 geli freebsd-ufs label enc / >=20 > Do I have to set the boot flag for any of them? The geli passphrase is only requested at boot time for providers that have the geli boot flag set (for details see geli(8)). If it isn't set on ada0p3 it would explain the described behaviour. Fabian --Sig_/JO4oX.lbv/XvZoDQXUi3vUr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlEP7pIACgkQBYqIVf93VJ3clwCglJMPbIBX1IMN3vbUmBcPS6CX S8sAoMw1GHLIZtiHgCiMFZeg04j/sC69 =SsGs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JO4oX.lbv/XvZoDQXUi3vUr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 18:29:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AEF559 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (mail-oa0-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7784210 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id h1so4368859oag.31 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:29:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gw69KP4PgTZuEDVXWMZ/ETBs9M4TkoOhkGlMkkI3t9A=; b=tr76l796OwMtHwosacMH6bYskLPpi2fMLTbnS0I3/WAGvtTRZAYJ1+RerOGqZi6TLX u6MdOcJaZPnmucHmp6VHBAZH+ZxxYjzKIih9jXNFgeOrwuGDFY2jzGaf8u3AZnPm73/O NXcp9up3vdHh3HnL5oF3nm7EidNjm58FjNRD0KfP4Kf0OmtFXK4ebSvxf0o5/H3G+SoG 5sIu+HM6MvFLRn4FZE1E5ZHVlShLyn1NXLWkaANNbEimuVkn84hfSd0dNcjsFiIfiCyZ kepv0kVQsK679xlrN5us5Gdk9mhV/BrHmEvukD1W5f4iEti3R1Pt6TVJ2DeEn+bFBloK i70Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.8.70 with SMTP id p6mr15891596oba.90.1360002576661; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:29:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:29:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130204182303.59c9ac72@fabiankeil.de> References: <20130204130635.3a66d412@fabiankeil.de> <20130204182303.59c9ac72@fabiankeil.de> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:29:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vfs.root.mountfrom with geli From: mhca12 To: Fabian Keil Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:29:42 -0000 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: > mhca12 wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: >> > mhca12 wrote: >> > >> >> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 >> >> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the >> >> passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the >> >> label I gave to the root partition. I also tried with /dev/ada0p3.eli >> >> without success. >> >> >> >> Tried the following two /boot/loader.config variations: >> >> 1: >> >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" >> >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=94ufs:/dev/gpt/enc.eli=94 >> >> 2: >> >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" >> >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=94ufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=94 >> >> >> >> I can geli attach /dev/gpt/enc or /dev/ada0p3 successfully from >> >> the livecd. >> >> >> >> Can you advise me what I might have done wrong or what I >> >> should try? >> >> >> >> https://www.dan.me.uk/blog/2012/05/05/full-disk-encryption-in-freebsd= -9-x-well-almost/ >> > >> > This guide doesn't seem to match your configuration. >> > It uses ada0p3.eli for swapping and additionally uses keyfiles. >> > >> > Without knowing your actual configuration it's impossible to >> > give proper advice. You could check with "geli list ada0p3" if >> > the boot flag is set, but that's obviously just a wild guess ... >> >> Forgot to list my simpler setup: >> ada0p1 freebsd-boot >> ada0p2 freebsd-ufs label boot /boot >> ada0p3 geli freebsd-ufs label enc / >> >> Do I have to set the boot flag for any of them? > > The geli passphrase is only requested at boot time for providers that > have the geli boot flag set (for details see geli(8)). If it isn't set > on ada0p3 it would explain the described behaviour. Fabian thanks a lot. Maybe I forgot -b during geli init but a geli configure -b /dev/ada0p3.eli fixed it. FreeBSD is so well structured and logical in this regard and hopefully in many others as I heard. In vfs.root.mountfrom only =94ufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=94 works and the /dev/gpt/enc.eli doesn't. Is it supposed to? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 18:32:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E1C6FC for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA83253 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id v19so6642728obq.21 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:31:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uLs9vu8RzYweGkiXMVo32V19kqKy/OsjkW/P1jObCBg=; b=wXUBkRAt0jBOArrNynRocSS+3ctsHhylAdEXxmpXjdqRml9SVK5zUkXzgCeH+DlIJz R/xnnM3g1Pj7v67hm47SFO08gRWOuq4GSZiIuN3gc/ULTOL2ZS+s12IPtEwY9KB0T/lc qZlvHVFvPpgMiAxEzEbVI6L8LHPWTXq1HkA1OEwBwMwfd9hXTB+4FCZKTw3bwRK/gfMv Af1D+jNy0zyyhg2w5kuPsY6t32XUUNvkksa15aqtKft3I85o0RkUonhw0ejKuZsP4ZZ5 xQUW8wE2cQwa4XKoe6dscuBfC9xKKBJPZQsRc+RECkArmPP9pDiM/UqbI9ozipGJO6B4 kESw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.172.131 with SMTP id bc3mr17618833oec.79.1360002715697; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:31:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:31:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: which pkg repository with 9.1 From: mhca12 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:32:01 -0000 I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r? Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's no i386 pkgng repository. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 18:49:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30163C65 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF10037E for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wc20so6735143obb.1 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:48:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qdsdSeLIguX336tYNPkRm/eF9wRidMQROIjlD5bkchU=; b=Q22XAmbSS3X4CuZhN00uemXqz7cN74eaJl6++N0FbVPrAS2OGv73Wn+8ZM2jKdWH1W ub47porXh1szHVKl04V/vBSNDJ/nvk0PlCDREp/1NbJGWS8GdcvqMW+V521TDyNdW7Ds l9l5s9IV3h3fvwU9pDbCw5YB3n5MCDGU7L9sz5mX1nfjmo7dpr5dUvksAmVTDClyZWle ZVYPFc0ISBGauavlqeBijgBP68n+oaifglYHRXBYbe6XBX/SDG546ha3Szih5gA0v+Ui eZ4qk7rNLTgVCS3u3EHPfq1s/jwHlo7/chxPI3UDDFZxbx++ZopbBxigxTk9yvrm1TPU LvOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.24.225 with SMTP id x1mr8784990oef.30.1360003737539; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:48:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:48:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 From: mhca12 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:49:04 -0000 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote: > I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted > to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there > a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r? > > Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's > no i386 pkgng repository. I ran pkg and it fetched and setup pkgng. That was easy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 18:53:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C5AFC6 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756513F8 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k1so6902314oag.19 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:53:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MkhQcJbCiSOSBHWPKqK2VNcgpLaD5WVcFqo8OTe4z20=; b=bCDtexAombgmPw29AIPwkKx4IdKQnCQJdRQVcCiKkSvfuGd06Q0s3iiOgmOXBL95bL BnBLry8IPq4uU/nu+BzTuerjTQ0yrhhK9utJtlb3+YIl+UWQCrMdXc4Ut9cMbW5FajFe Tt/TX3jV7bzt63CyPz2xsZr4bgj+UXFiHaDYsm0CQMjPr3Qh4Lpmi3m7hwML2sp3YAuR 0aj0QqrMTG7wfyu+T1zTq0D3GWjC5/o0K47it8odZwm2IbCGgmTevefH34b1/ZF8SCu2 LexVi0DPEi2FlXdzpyaGfEK60wWBK6ng+xskolBXSrmBoVS8WVC3t80whZIJ4a1uE8vE Dhbg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.177.72 with SMTP id co8mr16203859obc.53.1360004020283; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:53:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:53:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:53:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 From: mhca12 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:53:41 -0000 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote: >> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted >> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there >> a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r? >> >> Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's >> no i386 pkgng repository. > > I ran pkg and it fetched and setup pkgng. That was easy. Is it possible that the November 2012 security incident means there's still no installable packaged via pkg-install? I was going to install rsync. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 18:54:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122C819A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:54:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com (mail-ve0-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3E6633 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oz10so5111064veb.32 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:54:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=l4Zbtmu9Ra4c8yrgQDnv+B2msLy69dnTvslg6ZtTIXI=; b=TSlW6c7wIw4kw5LVSql9lK9MFznfUICNfpK36DKxojyP/5ItmsWhcERrcP2jRO5Pka r/dtAadNdsFTOwRyMWVywAtiYWunVODAM48bNj1YEqriKr3UVAYtNxrXVzyB/uwpzoix gQky4sl0FdCur8DrDidfZzvrIKtjmPypVDupLqyixfc6pKARRtWciCx+NJ1SQoutbgzZ zFdrRqQPZOZhrbXSKVZ5PrbHXn6tHeRzU0owA9obkqk4ifSMhbX4hoPrJKoymzGrq0kl ydbTHTnSXKEU13nb95lfNm3CX2UK7uPfnrIBfg6MZetJk/JMC6Ob3VpdNplgQKE2PAoK TJNg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.230.135 with SMTP id jm7mr23791401vcb.32.1360004093079; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.90.4 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:54:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:24:52 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Booting issue with 9.1-RELEASE and net4801 From: Alberto Mijares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:54:54 -0000 Hi list, I'm finally playing with my net4801 and nanobsd. SanDisk CF is recognized. At my first try I had to disable DMA in ATA because it hanged out. Now it hangs when trying to mount root filesystem and mountroot> prompt appears. However, if a stop in loader prompt and type ls, files and dirs are displayed on disk0s1a. Any suggestion? Verbose boot log next: OK boot -v log SMAP type=01 base=0000000000000000 len=000000000009fc00 SMAP type=02 base=000000000009fc00 len=0000000000000400 SMAP type=02 base=00000000000f0000 len=0000000000010000 SMAP type=01 base=0000000000100000 len=0000000007f00000 SMAP type=02 base=00000000fff00000 len=0000000000100000 Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 4 12:44:44 VET 2013 root@nano:/usr/obj/nanobsd.atm1c/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc13d5000. Calibrating TSC clock ... TSC clock: 266647858 Hz CPU: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi (586-class CPU) Origin = "Geode by NSC" Id = 0x540 Family = 5 Model = 4 Stepping = 0 Features=0x808131 real memory = 134217728 (128 MB) Physical memory chunk(s): 0x0000000000001000 - 0x000000000009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages) 0x0000000000100000 - 0x00000000003fffff, 3145728 bytes (768 pages) 0x0000000001426000 - 0x0000000007d6dfff, 110395392 bytes (26952 pages) avail memory = 112066560 (106 MB) INTR: Adding local APIC 0 as a target bios32: Found BIOS32 Service Directory header at 0xc00f7800 bios32: Entry = 0xf7840 (c00f7840) Rev = 0 Len = 1 pcibios: PCI BIOS entry at 0xf0000+0x7861 Other BIOS signatures found: ULE: setup cpu 0 wlan: <802.11 Link Layer> snd_unit_init() u=0x00ff8000 [512] d=0x00007c00 [32] c=0x000003ff [1024] feeder_register: snd_unit=-1 snd_maxautovchans=16 latency=5 feeder_rate_min=1 fe5 kbd: new array size 4 kbd1 at kbdmux0 nfslock: pseudo-device mem: module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vesa, 0xc0dc3570, 0) error 19 io: null: random: hptrr: RocketRAID 17xx/2xxx SATA controller driver v1.2 ctl: CAM Target Layer loaded ACPI Error: A valid RSDP was not found (20110527/tbxfroot-237) ACPI: Table initialisation failed: AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI: Try disabling either ACPI or apic support. pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x00000000 pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=00011078) pcibios: BIOS version 2.01 pcib0 pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci0: domain=0, physical bus=0 found-> vendor=0x1078, dev=0x0001, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=0, slot=0, func=0 class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0107, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) found-> vendor=0x100b, dev=0x0020, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=0, slot=6, func=0 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0107, statreg=0x0290, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x3f (1890 ns), mingnt=0x0b (2750 ns), maxlat=0x34 (13000 ns) intpin=a, irq=10 powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xe100, size 8, enabled map[14]: type Memory, range 32, base 0xa0000000, size 12, enabled found-> vendor=0x100b, dev=0x0020, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=0, slot=7, func=0 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0107, statreg=0x0290, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x3f (1890 ns), mingnt=0x0b (2750 ns), maxlat=0x34 (13000 ns) intpin=a, irq=10 powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xe200, size 8, enabled map[14]: type Memory, range 32, base 0xa0001000, size 12, enabled found-> vendor=0x100b, dev=0x0020, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=0, slot=8, func=0 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0107, statreg=0x0290, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x3f (1890 ns), mingnt=0x0b (2750 ns), maxlat=0x34 (13000 ns) intpin=a, irq=10 powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xe300, size 8, enabled map[14]: type Memory, range 32, base 0xa0002000, size 12, enabled found-> vendor=0x100b, dev=0x0510, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=0, slot=18, func=0 class=06-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 cmdreg=0x001f, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=8 (dwords) lattimer=0x3f (1890 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x6100, size 6, enabled map[14]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x6200, size 6, enabled found-> vendor=0x100b, dev=0x0511, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=0, slot=18, func=1 class=06-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0001, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x6300, size 8, enabled found-> vendor=0x100b, dev=0x0502, revid=0x01 domain=0, bus=0, slot=18, func=2 class=01-01-80, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0005, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) map[20]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xe000, size 4, enabled found-> vendor=0x100b, dev=0x0515, revid=0x00 domain=0, bus=0, slot=18, func=5 class=06-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0003, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x6500, size 6, enabled found-> vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xa0f8, revid=0x08 domain=0, bus=0, slot=19, func=0 class=0c-03-10, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0117, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=8 (dwords) lattimer=0x38 (1680 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x50 (20000 ns) intpin=d, irq=11 map[10]: type Memory, range 32, base 0xa0003000, size 12, enabled sis0: port 0xe100-0xe1ff mem 0xa0000000-0xa0000 sis0: Silicon Revision: DP83816A miibus0: on sis0 nsphyter0: PHY 0 on miibus0 nsphyter0: OUI 0x1000e8, model 0x0002, rev. 1 nsphyter0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto sis0: bpf attached sis0: Ethernet address: 00:00:24:c1:36:c4 sis1: port 0xe200-0xe2ff mem 0xa0001000-0xa0000 sis1: Silicon Revision: DP83816A miibus1: on sis1 nsphyter1: PHY 0 on miibus1 nsphyter1: OUI 0x1000e8, model 0x0002, rev. 1 nsphyter1: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto sis1: bpf attached sis1: Ethernet address: 00:00:24:c1:36:c5 sis2: port 0xe300-0xe3ff mem 0xa0002000-0xa0000 sis2: Silicon Revision: DP83816A miibus2: on sis2 nsphyter2: PHY 0 on miibus2 nsphyter2: OUI 0x1000e8, model 0x0002, rev. 1 nsphyter2: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto sis2: bpf attached sis2: Ethernet address: 00:00:24:c1:36:c6 isab0: port 0x6100-0x613f,0x6200-0x623f at device 18.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 18.1 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-00 ata0: at channel 0 on atapci0 ata1: at channel 1 on atapci0 pci0: at device 18.5 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xa0003000-0xa0003fff irq 11 at devic0 ohci0: (New OHCI DeviceId=0xa0f80e11) usbus0 on ohci0 usbus0: bpf attached ohci0: usbpf: Attached cpu0 on motherboard ex_isa_identify() ahc_isa_probe 0: ioport 0xc00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 1: ioport 0x1c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 2: ioport 0x2c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 3: ioport 0x3c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 4: ioport 0x4c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 5: ioport 0x5c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 6: ioport 0x6c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 7: ioport 0x7c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 8: ioport 0x8c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 9: ioport 0x9c00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 10: ioport 0xac00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 11: ioport 0xbc00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 12: ioport 0xcc00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 13: ioport 0xdc00 alloc failed ahc_isa_probe 14: ioport 0xec00 alloc failed pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 203 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 243 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 283 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 2c3 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 303 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 343 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 383 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 3c3 PNP Identify complete isa_probe_children: disabling PnP devices pmtimer0 on isa0 ata: ata0 already exists; skipping it ata: ata1 already exists; skipping it sc: sc0 already exists; skipping it isa_probe_children: probing non-PnP devices orm0: at iomem 0xc8000-0xd0fff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 sc0: no video adapter found. sc0 failed to probe on isa0 vga0 failed to probe on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 kbd0: atkbd0, generic (0), config:0x0, flags:0x1f0000 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: unable to allocate IRQ atrtc0: at port 0x70 irq 8 on isa0 atrtc0: registered as a time-of-day clock (resolution 1000000us, adjustment 0.50) Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0 attimer0: at port 0x40 on isa0 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100 fdc0 failed to probe at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. ppc0 failed to probe at irq 7 on isa0 uart0: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 uart0: fast interrupt uart0: console (9600,n,8,1) uart1: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 uart1: fast interrupt wbwd0 failed to probe on isa0 isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices cfcs_init: ctl_frontend_register() failed with error 12! Device configuration finished. procfs registered Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec vlan: initialized, using hash tables with chaining lo0: bpf attached hptrr: no controller detected. usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 ugen0.1: <0x0e11> at usbus0 uhub0: <0x0e11 OHCI root HUB, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1> on usbus0 ata0: stat0=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata0: stat1=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata0: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1 ata1: reset tp1 mask=00 ostat0=ff ostat1=ff pass0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: CFA-0 device pass0: Serial Number BOZ111711234413 pass0: 16.700MB/s transfers (PIO4, PIO 512bytes) ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: CFA-0 device ada0: Serial Number BOZ111711234413 ada0: 16.700MB/s transfers (PIO4, PIO 512bytes) ada0: 3815MB (7813120 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 7751C) ada0: Previously was known as ad0 GEOM: new disk ada0 GEOM_PART: partition 2 has end offset beyond last LBA: 7999487 > 7813119 GEOM_PART: partition 3 has start offset beyond last LBA: 7999488 > 7813119 GEOM_PART: partition 3 has end offset beyond last LBA: 8002511 > 7813119 GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, MBR) uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ada0s1a [ro]... mountroot: waiting for device /dev/ada0s1a ... Mounting from ufs:/dev/ada0s1a failed with error 19. Loader variables: vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ada0s1a vfs.root.mountfrom.options=ro Manual root filesystem specification: : [options] Mount using filesystem and with the specified (optional) option list. eg. ufs:/dev/da0s1a zfs:tank cd9660:/dev/acd0 ro (which is equivalent to: mount -t cd9660 -o ro /dev/acd0 /) ? List valid disk boot devices . Yield 1 second (for background tasks) Abort manual input mountroot> Regards Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 19:03:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21C95C9 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8336F1 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2RKr-0002rG-19 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:04:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U2RKU-000CfP-QZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:03:46 +0000 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:03:15 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 Message-Id: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:03:56 -0000 On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:53:40 +0100 mhca12 wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote: > >> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted > >> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there > >> a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r? > >> > >> Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's > >> no i386 pkgng repository. > > > > I ran pkg and it fetched and setup pkgng. That was easy. > > Is it possible that the November 2012 security incident means > there's still no installable packaged via pkg-install? > I was going to install rsync. I believe it is still the case that there is no official package repository. I've gone to using poudriere to maintain a local pkgng repository. Once set up (not too hard) it's remarkably painless. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 19:09:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54A2976 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7613775D for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so6099077oag.12 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:09:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=I6QJnaKaVY6E30cx15QZTEouSimn9smilljQO+gtB6M=; b=K3rBxRg5gB1a4WcV9r+HFvZQCjN5QyRIXnMTv1IMC59qUCT2J03dMhwlGl9C7tjJKj FjS30iyoUdX2SVCgvzMhbH5MpyWnL5b/qcgAiAXAHbYol85zJJPt3bpuCdwvkKqk5L/7 RPniPQyjW8NZ6TUtbcjqxKJ5w7pf06sJ0RWmS6CoWIRwF3aeKvnwewVOMKYvNlzmNa51 q2w+CGsBpHV3XYPAcTLIY3vIOihVCbLivZZvTy5Dj6grmTcZCDKNIabIiBNhAil4vdqn TTme035GuMN9qqmU4Shhw1xkohoEc1tJLBJynSBLWNpfqchSTaCemk/II1RYYOPY4Huy Y/Fg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.177.72 with SMTP id co8mr16243507obc.53.1360004971877; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:09:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:09:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> References: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:09:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 From: mhca12 To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:09:32 -0000 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:53:40 +0100 > mhca12 wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote: >> >> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted >> >> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there >> >> a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r? >> >> >> >> Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's >> >> no i386 pkgng repository. >> > >> > I ran pkg and it fetched and setup pkgng. That was easy. >> >> Is it possible that the November 2012 security incident means >> there's still no installable packaged via pkg-install? >> I was going to install rsync. > > I believe it is still the case that there is no official package > repository. I've gone to using poudriere to maintain a local pkgng > repository. Once set up (not too hard) it's remarkably painless. To get started for the moment can't I also use pkg_add -r rsync? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 19:45:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA911F6 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [188.252.31.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F4590F for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r14Jiq8f048248 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:44:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r14Jiqtm048245 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:44:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:44:52 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: where is 1GB of RAM Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:44:53 +0100 (CET) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:45:08 -0000 new dell server: Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #2: Sat Feb 2 22:54:21 CET 2013 root@s1.3miasto.net.pl:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/s1 amd64 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (3392.37-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x306a9 Family = 0x6 Model = 0x3a Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x7fbae3ff AMD Features=0x28100800 AMD Features2=0x1 Standard Extended Features=0x281 TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB) avail memory = 33167446016 (31630 MB) where did 1GB of memory go? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 19:51:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0312E2 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@exonetric.com) Received: from relay.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [178.250.72.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD17394F for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (186.211.187.81.in-addr.arpa [81.187.211.186]) by relay.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E5822C8EC; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:51:28 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) From: Mark Blackman In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:51:27 +0000 Message-Id: <5595C3FC-F9FB-43C6-A440-280AFA362A91@exonetric.com> References: To: mhca12 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:51:30 -0000 On 4 Feb 2013, at 18:53, mhca12 wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote: >>> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted >>> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there >>> a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r? >>>=20 >>> Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's >>> no i386 pkgng repository. >>=20 >> I ran pkg and it fetched and setup pkgng. That was easy. >=20 > Is it possible that the November 2012 security incident means > there's still no installable packaged via pkg-install? > I was going to install rsync. If you're interested, we've set up an unofficial but public pkgng format = repository at http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng To use these packages, just set your PACKAGESITE variable in = /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf like so,=20 PACKAGESITE : = http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng/${ABI}/latest These have FreeBSD 8 and 9, i386 and amd64 kernel pkgng format packages = for the whole ports tree, build failures notwithstanding. You'll have to explicitly make the decision to trust or not these builds, of course, but all are welcome to use them until the official ones are available. - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 20:39:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEFDFD7 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F4FCC1 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l6so4287599vcl.3 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:39:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YLVUewnaHIDK1qkFWnCv2nP6s+Q+etFRALQ5do/TavQ=; b=ro+N9GwOEG3s28H/udVu69pGQvmfrEUBlvlpFegbz/KgTmAQy/+2W5JsRmaXuNXHYg sZqAHUgxM4QSPDFlOcjUpbguad2lKrdI1i+7+1AWzVM3LO5arogDt/bmq3CdJOQhHa/b zs+8W3t5Hlr6cuvJbs8qduP9BgdNEbhhtQaluPgtkNddpFNJothIckrjJ3CvUOglqJx4 YpbTJEKjWjybUUPR70elLmQtwBShRtt+z9uL9PQFNYlGPQe2d5TiotLk+dEXBrcilSjD gpp071cATOuW4VCjChtWUtOSyirKCOYVLl5ZRKu0UUwvVQDEDNpmfTyCCkEicF58QU1E ygvw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.239.71 with SMTP id kv7mr24234981vcb.46.1360010392681; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.90.4 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:39:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:09:50 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Booting issue with 9.1-RELEASE and net4801 From: Alberto Mijares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:39:58 -0000 > ada0: Previously was known as ad0 > GEOM: new disk ada0 > GEOM_PART: partition 2 has end offset beyond last LBA: 7999487 > 7813119 > GEOM_PART: partition 3 has start offset beyond last LBA: 7999488 > 7813119 > GEOM_PART: partition 3 has end offset beyond last LBA: 8002511 > 7813119 > GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, MBR) Hmmm... I think this is the problem. I'll check my nano config again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 20:42:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2535C197 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE454CED for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r14Kfx9s028443; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:41:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <51101D17.1090202@dreamchaser.org> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:41:59 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alberto Mijares Subject: Re: Booting issue with 9.1-RELEASE and net4801 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:41:59 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:42:12 -0000 On 02/04/13 11:54, Alberto Mijares wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm finally playing with my net4801 and nanobsd. SanDisk CF is recognized. > > At my first try I had to disable DMA in ATA because it hanged out. Now > it hangs when trying to mount root filesystem and mountroot> prompt > appears. However, if a stop in loader prompt and type ls, files and > dirs are displayed on disk0s1a. > > Any suggestion? > > Verbose boot log next: > > OK boot -v log > ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 > ada0: CFA-0 device > ada0: Serial Number BOZ111711234413 > ada0: 16.700MB/s transfers (PIO4, PIO 512bytes) > ada0: 3815MB (7813120 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 7751C) > ada0: Previously was known as ad0 > GEOM: new disk ada0 > GEOM_PART: partition 2 has end offset beyond last LBA: 7999487 > 7813119 > GEOM_PART: partition 3 has start offset beyond last LBA: 7999488 > 7813119 > GEOM_PART: partition 3 has end offset beyond last LBA: 8002511 > 7813119 > GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, MBR) > uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ada0s1a [ro]... > mountroot: waiting for device /dev/ada0s1a ... > Mounting from ufs:/dev/ada0s1a failed with error 19. > > Loader variables: > vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ada0s1a > vfs.root.mountfrom.options=ro > > Manual root filesystem specification: > : [options] > Mount using filesystem > and with the specified (optional) option list. > > eg. ufs:/dev/da0s1a > zfs:tank > cd9660:/dev/acd0 ro > (which is equivalent to: mount -t cd9660 -o ro /dev/acd0 /) > > ? List valid disk boot devices > . Yield 1 second (for background tasks) > Abort manual input > > mountroot> I believe I got this error when the root boot block is written properly, but the first partition on the disk does not have the proper gpart boot code in it. Try listing the gpt partition scheme: # gpart show -l ada1 => 34 156301421 ada1 GPT (74G) 34 1024 1 gptboot (512k) 1058 6 - free - (3.0k) 1064 4194304 2 hdd-80G-root (2.0G) 4195368 4194304 3 hdd-80G-swap (2.0G) 8389672 4194304 4 hdd-80G-var (2.0G) 12583976 4194304 5 hdd-80G-tmp (2.0G) 16778280 139523168 6 hdd-80G-usr (66G) 156301448 7 - free - (3.5k) Notice in the above partition 1, labeled gptboot (a label I gave it) That's the boot code, which can be written as follows: gpart bootcode -p /boot/gptboot -i 1 ada1 assuming the system you're running on has /boot/gptboot on it. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 20:55:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C60AED for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B20E03 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U2T51-0008Qv-6k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:55:55 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:55:55 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:55:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: where is 1GB of RAM Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130109 Firefox/10.0.12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:55:41 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes: > > new dell server: ... > real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB) > avail memory = 33167446016 (31630 MB) > > where did 1GB of memory go? - new BIOS firmware available ? - BIOS - preallocation - graphics card ? - $ sysctl -a |grep -i mem jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 20:56:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967E5D42 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C327E23 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id va7so6738764obc.41 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:56:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iFq2WcNoikEEws4+anIcAiURlLsDUZcDe1WkWiX8wwM=; b=NtLyLQ2yUqKmrrBpzt60mhmxuXGFLohLpcM8jGyXdTmG2D6s0mYpASO4mNZD5WnMk/ 6/79mICk0Zu2BBXTCCbJf8NsVve1VNK0rVvhCU/o+m09z4CO4i1ekUyFuGzuJTnJU+NH fBUnLcv5FYmntlRy8Gs5mgRXMs8buy7IzO4rpBIR4Ge7zoHfe6mNpEuhb3opUyYHVEoP Ka4zWHDYtUk52VCZ4BsRD/PMpMUrMjEhUL+BhuTe07TDjszK4eCVb5/p9bRilV5SR3lb xREwv1rnrnA5Wac3mMrRjjVifRJCoRE3F/fK8W7/P9xEQF3a7Yd+9H04/vHJX+1A7TcH IavQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.217.10 with SMTP id ou10mr13048412obc.30.1360011407843; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:56:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:56:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: geli overhead? From: mhca12 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:56:48 -0000 Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as described earlier? $ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ada0p3.eli 127G 6.9G 119G 5% / devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev /dev/gpt/boot 991M 339M 642M 35% /bootdir $ gpart show => 34 312581741 ada0 GPT (149G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 2097152 2 freebsd-ufs (1.0G) 2097314 310484461 3 freebsd-ufs (148G) Where did 21G from the 148G go? As suggested in dan.me.uk geli install guide I used geli init -a HMAC/SHA256 and also ran dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/gpt/enc.eli across the eli volume. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 21:04:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4C72E6 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD578ED7 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r14L3vqu008068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:03:57 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.4 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r14L3vqu008068 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r14L3vqu008068; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <51102237.8010601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:03:51 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar Subject: Re: where is 1GB of RAM References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2KMLAVFRNGLCCBDWILDOD" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:04:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2KMLAVFRNGLCCBDWILDOD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/02/2013 19:44, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > real memory =3D 34359738368 (32768 MB) > avail memory =3D 33167446016 (31630 MB) >=20 >=20 >=20 > where did 1GB of memory go? Used by the kernel. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey ------enig2KMLAVFRNGLCCBDWILDOD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlEQIj0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxwVwCeMm9R0CoSkjK23RKuc0iW/0u7 lKAAmQFACL2q+u7LpkcSLnPV8BvXO7qa =BSuo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2KMLAVFRNGLCCBDWILDOD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 21:19:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CB6CB6 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46D8FFA for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r14LJNEY088863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:19:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:19:23 -0600 From: dweimer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geli =?UTF-8?Q?overhead=3F?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:19:25 -0000 On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote: > Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as > described earlier? > > $ df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ada0p3.eli 127G 6.9G 119G 5% / > devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev > /dev/gpt/boot 991M 339M 642M 35% /bootdir > $ gpart show > => 34 312581741 ada0 GPT (149G) > 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) > 162 2097152 2 freebsd-ufs (1.0G) > 2097314 310484461 3 freebsd-ufs (148G) > > Where did 21G from the 148G go? > > As suggested in dan.me.uk geli install guide I used geli init -a > HMAC/SHA256 > and also ran dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/gpt/enc.eli across the eli > volume. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Did you use the -a option when doing the geli init? -a aalgo Enable data integrity verification (authenti- cation) using the given algorithm. This will reduce size of available storage and also reduce speed. For example, when using 4096 bytes sector and HMAC/SHA256 algorithm, 89% of the original provider storage will be avail- able for use. Currently supported algorithms are: HMAC/MD5, HMAC/SHA1, HMAC/RIPEMD160, HMAC/SHA256, HMAC/SHA384 and HMAC/SHA512. If the option is not given, there will be no authentication, only encryption. The recom- mended algorithm is HMAC/SHA256. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 21:25:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FB3179 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (mail-ob0-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3694E0 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id dn14so6725137obc.4 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:25:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=92QAGfSN9QQlwdxt4Ywlk5xohdyLgxxBcRhRfEEzwJM=; b=JE1kV/iSJHakEM6nSRaoNBZvIegvj8FKa5nezeustzvQlixp/WHAvqgy9uylZYncq+ XIhkKjfA4nYWOjhjpJ2DUWQc6p5uJcD3PCdMUuj4gdIKv+YB3ypowNoPJbrZ5p4F/jKB s6lylGqruAta0ErmJNxdOQQVWeDNyrxXIEKbPaEwpG/kEFhaKvXJP6O30WKllPsmQKtO MtkEaGL3SwEXIHFyZY+NI5M7BeQz5VSeK4ZRtCJ1gOLxF4OxSKVbWc82Xp+Ucm5gPz+L sQASJFG3QPGYuOBxs8Cu3A/dMy+3r9KPF5trxwg/s/D84WtfvapNAjYVWKOSXlp1v5a1 pi/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.13.65 with SMTP id f1mr2251939oec.87.1360013134016; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:25:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:25:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: geli overhead? From: mhca12 To: dweimer@dweimer.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:25:35 -0000 On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:19 PM, dweimer wrote: > On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote: >> >> Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as >> described earlier? >> >> $ df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/ada0p3.eli 127G 6.9G 119G 5% / >> devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev >> /dev/gpt/boot 991M 339M 642M 35% /bootdir >> $ gpart show >> => 34 312581741 ada0 GPT (149G) >> 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) >> 162 2097152 2 freebsd-ufs (1.0G) >> 2097314 310484461 3 freebsd-ufs (148G) >> >> Where did 21G from the 148G go? >> >> As suggested in dan.me.uk geli install guide I used geli init -a >> HMAC/SHA256 >> and also ran dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/gpt/enc.eli across the eli volume. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Did you use the -a option when doing the geli init? > > > -a aalgo Enable data integrity verification (authenti- > cation) using the given algorithm. This > will > reduce size of available storage and also > reduce speed. For example, when using 4096 > bytes sector and HMAC/SHA256 algorithm, 89% > of > the original provider storage will be avail- > able for use. Currently supported > algorithms > are: HMAC/MD5, HMAC/SHA1, HMAC/RIPEMD160, > HMAC/SHA256, HMAC/SHA384 and HMAC/SHA512. > If > the option is not given, there will be no > authentication, only encryption. The recom- > mended algorithm is HMAC/SHA256. Yes I did (see above). Do I have to init the volume again to skip authentication? Does skipping authentication also remove the requirement of zeroing the whole eli disk for the checksums? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 21:25:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08EC214 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24BBE8 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U2TY9-0000l6-6K for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:26:01 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.84.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:26:01 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:26:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: Can anyone direct me to some information about what WITHOUT_PROFILE="YES" actually means. Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:25:30 -0500 Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: <2bc4849a42d23d8e469e04afa3b27fdf@dweimer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:25:48 -0000 dweimer wrote: > > I have ran into a recent issue, after a lot of trouble shooting I have > narrowed it down to something in my /etc/src.conf > > the full file just has: > WITHOUT_BIND="YES" > WITHOUT_NTP="YES" > WITHOUT_FLOPPY="YES" > WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="YES" > WITHOUT_PROFILE="YES" > > Of course bind and ntp are added in by ports after the system is built, > everything compiles, I have a very specific issue with one thing not > working on an installed port, with no apparent error. To make a long > story short though one of my build attempts, I forgot to copy the > /etc/src.conf file to the new system. And well the problem was gone, > when I discovered that's what I did differently, I commented out all > lines on a different system rebuilt and installed, sure enough it > worked. Looking at the src.conf options that I was using, I can't see > how any option other than the WITHOUT_PROFILE could possibly be causing > the problem. Though I am in the process of building systems with > different options removed in an attempt to find out for sure. > > The WITHOUT_PROFILE was added from a help document I read some time ago > about upgrading from source, and hasn't caused any problems before now. > I know it instructs the build process to avoid compiling profiled > libraries. But my searching hasn't been able to lead me to what the > difference is between a profiled and non-profiled library is. > I'm not a code hacker, so take with pinch of salt. In the man page for src.conf it declares that variable values would be ignored, and of course I missed that. While I have WITHOUT_PROFILE= true in my src.conf, the correct use is simply WITHOUT_PROFILE by itself. Since I have never experienced any form of difficulty perhaps the difference here is the quotation marks. Maybe something is malfunctioning from the "". See if removing these helps? Also, from what I understand what's in src.conf should only apply to building the system, e.g code located under /usr/src. I've always taken this to mean it should not apply to building anything in ports. My limited understanding is that when you build profiled code you are inserting a little extra debug code which is utilized to measure the time spent within internal structures, such as functions and other sub-routines. Not that I even know how such info would get extracted at runtime, programmers use this to look for areas within their code that hog resources time-wise and zero in on those to concentrate on makeing more efficient/faster. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 22:13:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6490DA5F for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48272390 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF565081A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:05:52 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: parallel/simultaneous portinstall ? Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:05:52 -0800 Message-ID: <69362.1360015552@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:13:17 -0000 One question about portupgrade has been nagging me, in the back of my mind, for some time now. Assume for the moment that on some given system, the root user has two terminal sessions open, i.e. either two instances of xterm or else two console sessions. Also assume that there exist three ports, `A', `B', and `C' such that both port `A' and port `B' both depend on port `C'. Assume further that port `C' has not yet been installed. My question is just this: Is it possible that Something Bad might happen if, in one terminal session, the root user does "portinstall A" and if, which that instance of portinstall is still running, he then immediately switches to his other terminal session and then does "portinstall B" ? Another way of stating my question is this: Might anything bad ever happen if there are two simultaneous, or nearly simultaneous attempts to build & install any given single package (e.g. port `C' in my example above) ? (I am concerned about the possibility that the two simultaneous attempts to build and install the same single package might possibly trip over one another, resulting either in a mangled build tree or else a mangled installed port, or possibly both.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 22:32:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C979F9C for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864EE68D for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15165081A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:32:36 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mapping Perl module names to corresponding FreeBSD port names Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:32:36 -0800 Message-ID: <69527.1360017156@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:32:37 -0000 I am, at long last, moving my main system over onto a new drive where I have just installed a fresh copy of 9.1-RELEASE, and where I have built and installed essentially all of the ports I had on my old (8.3-RELEASE) system... at least the ones that I am actually still actively using. A problem arises however in the case of the various p5-* (Perl) ports that I have installed on my old 8.3 system. How can I know which of these I really need to install on my new 9.1 system, you know, in order to make sure that all of my existing/old Perl scripts will continue to function? pkg_info says that I currently have 84 different p5-* ports installed on my old 8.3 system. The list of these is attached below. (I suspect that many/most of these I installed temporarily, just for some one-off task, and that I no longer need to have them installed, e.g. on my new system.) I keep all of my personal scripts and compiled programs in a directory I call /usr/local/rfg/bin. I have gone into that directory and done: grep '^use ' | sort -u in order to find all the the Perl module names that my various personal Perl scripts are using. The result is the following (which has been trimmed a bit to remove irrelevant fluff): use CGI::Lite; use Cwd; use Email::MIME; use Encode; use HTML::TreeBuilder; use IO::Handle; use LWP::Simple; use List::Util qw(min max); use Net::CIDR::Lite; use Net::DNS; use Time::localtime; use URI::Escape; So basically, on my new system, I need to install all of the p5-* FreeBSD ports that correspond to the above set of Perl modules. In order to do this, I need to somehow derive the corresponding FreeBSD p5-* port names from the Perl module names listed above. In some cases, the mapping is both straightforward and obvious, e.g.: CGI::Lite => p5-CGI-Lite Email::MIME => p5-Email-MIME Net::DNS => p5-Net-DNS however in many other cases the correct mapping is not immediately obvious. So, I need to ask: Is there some simple automated way to map each of the above Perl module names into a corresponding FreeBSD p5-* port name? If not, is there a map published somewhere that I could just refer to in order to find the name of the specific FreeBSD port that corresponds to any given (CPAN-published) Perl module? List of currently installed p5-* packages ========================================================================= p5-AnyEvent p5-Authen-NTLM p5-CGI-Lite p5-CPAN-Meta p5-CPAN-Meta-Requirements p5-CPAN-Meta-YAML p5-Cairo p5-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib p5-Convert-BinHex p5-Digest-HMAC p5-Email-Address p5-Email-Date-Format p5-Email-MIME p5-Email-MIME-ContentType p5-Email-MIME-Encodings p5-Email-MessageID p5-Email-Simple p5-Encode-Locale p5-Event p5-Event-ExecFlow p5-Event-RPC p5-ExtUtils-CBuilder p5-ExtUtils-Depends p5-ExtUtils-ParseXS p5-ExtUtils-PkgConfig p5-File-Listing p5-Font-AFM p5-Glib2 p5-Gtk2 p5-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory p5-Gtk2-Ex-Simple-List p5-HTML-Form p5-HTML-Format p5-HTML-Parser p5-HTML-Tagset p5-HTML-Tree p5-HTTP-Cookies p5-HTTP-Daemon p5-HTTP-Date p5-HTTP-Message p5-HTTP-Negotiate p5-HTTP-Server-Simple p5-IO-Compress p5-IO-Socket-INET6 p5-IO-Socket-SSL p5-IO-stringy p5-JSON-PP p5-LWP-MediaTypes p5-Lchown p5-Locale-gettext p5-Locale-libintl p5-MIME-Base64 p5-MIME-Tools p5-MIME-Types p5-Mail-Tools p5-Module-Build p5-Module-Metadata p5-Net-CIDR-Lite p5-Net-DNS p5-Net-HTTP p5-Net-IP p5-Net-LibIDN p5-Net-SSLeay p5-Pango p5-Parse-CPAN-Meta p5-Perl-OSType p5-Socket6 p5-Storable p5-TimeDate p5-URI p5-Unicode-Map8 p5-Unicode-String p5-WWW-Mechanize p5-WWW-RobotRules p5-XML-NamespaceSupport p5-XML-Parser p5-XML-SAX p5-XML-SAX-Base p5-XML-SAX-Expat p5-XML-Simple p5-libwww p5-type1inst p5-version From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 22:46:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51634625 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1600D72C for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r14Mkaij091806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:46:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:46:36 -0600 From: dweimer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can anyone direct me to some information about what =?UTF-8?Q?WITHOUT=5FPROFILE=3D=22YES=22=20actually=20means=2E?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: <2bc4849a42d23d8e469e04afa3b27fdf@dweimer.net> Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:46:38 -0000 On 02/04/2013 3:25 pm, Michael Powell wrote: > dweimer wrote: > >> >> I have ran into a recent issue, after a lot of trouble shooting I >> have >> narrowed it down to something in my /etc/src.conf >> >> the full file just has: >> WITHOUT_BIND="YES" >> WITHOUT_NTP="YES" >> WITHOUT_FLOPPY="YES" >> WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE="YES" >> WITHOUT_PROFILE="YES" >> >> Of course bind and ntp are added in by ports after the system is >> built, >> everything compiles, I have a very specific issue with one thing not >> working on an installed port, with no apparent error. To make a long >> story short though one of my build attempts, I forgot to copy the >> /etc/src.conf file to the new system. And well the problem was gone, >> when I discovered that's what I did differently, I commented out all >> lines on a different system rebuilt and installed, sure enough it >> worked. Looking at the src.conf options that I was using, I can't >> see >> how any option other than the WITHOUT_PROFILE could possibly be >> causing >> the problem. Though I am in the process of building systems with >> different options removed in an attempt to find out for sure. >> >> The WITHOUT_PROFILE was added from a help document I read some time >> ago >> about upgrading from source, and hasn't caused any problems before >> now. >> I know it instructs the build process to avoid compiling profiled >> libraries. But my searching hasn't been able to lead me to what the >> difference is between a profiled and non-profiled library is. >> > > I'm not a code hacker, so take with pinch of salt. In the man page for > src.conf it declares that variable values would be ignored, and of > course I > missed that. While I have WITHOUT_PROFILE= true in my src.conf, the > correct > use is simply WITHOUT_PROFILE by itself. Since I have never > experienced any > form of difficulty perhaps the difference here is the quotation marks. > Maybe > something is malfunctioning from the "". See if removing these helps? > > Also, from what I understand what's in src.conf should only apply to > building the system, e.g code located under /usr/src. I've always > taken this > to mean it should not apply to building anything in ports. > > My limited understanding is that when you build profiled code you are > inserting a little extra debug code which is utilized to measure the > time > spent within internal structures, such as functions and other > sub-routines. > Not that I even know how such info would get extracted at runtime, > programmers use this to look for areas within their code that hog > resources > time-wise and zero in on those to concentrate on makeing more > efficient/faster. > > -Mike > if I remember right, from information about src.conf, I believe that WITHOUT_PROFILE WITHOUT_PROFILE= WITHOUT_PROFILE=true WITHOUT_PROFILE="YES" ... are all functionally equivalent as it does ignore the rest, though I could be wrong and this could be my problem. I do know for sure that the WIHTOUT_BIND, WITHOUT_NTP, are working correctly as they are gone form the system, prior to me installing the versions from ports after the build/install world. Yes this does apply only to system. With the above options buildworld / buildkernel / install kernel / install world/ mergemaster / reinstall all ports, I have my problem. Remove all options, repeat no problem. Remove just WITHOUT_PROFILE repeat again, problem is back. So I was wrong as to that line being the cause, at least by itself. I did a lot of initial testing with port option changes, and changes to make.conf on my system, thought maybe it was clang, etc. Didn't get anywhere, the system is running on a ZFS boot partition, and as a last effort I tried on UFS. It worked, but I also realized I forgot the src.conf settings. I copied my ZFS systems boot environment and rebuilt without src.conf, it now works as well. Currently doing a fresh install on ZFS to build from ground up with the same process used originally, except without the src.conf and confirm I can repeat its success. Then I can do some more testing with adding options back into the src.conf to try and narrow down which of those options is causing the problem. If I can figure out which one, or combination of them is the cause, then I will hopefully have something that can lead to someone with more knowledge than I have being able to discover why its having the problem. The port doesn't fail to compile it installs fine, and 99.5% of it runs perfect, just one little thing that I need to work hangs up for about 5 minutes, before timing out, but doesn't log an error, even with insanely verbose debugging, it acts as if it completed but it didn't. I posted another message about the specific problem several days ago, before I had it figured out to be caused somehow by something in the src.conf file. I am trying to run Squid (version 3.2.6 is the current port) in reverse proxy, the problem is only when doing a post via HTTPS above a certain size, somewhere between 2k and 3.2k is where it begins. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 22:47:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BF26C4 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B19739 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2013 17:47:18 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BXN15408; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:47:17 -0500 Received: from 209-6-84-183.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.84.183]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2013 17:47:17 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20752.14965.157944.96485@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:47:17 -0500 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: parallel/simultaneous portinstall ? In-Reply-To: <69362.1360015552@tristatelogic.com> References: <69362.1360015552@tristatelogic.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:47:19 -0000 Ronald F. Guilmette writes: > My question is just this: Is it possible that Something Bad might > happen if, in one terminal session, the root user does > "portinstall A" and if, which that instance of portinstall is > still running, he then immediately switches to his other terminal > session and then does "portinstall B" ? It's possible; I will leave the details as an exercise for the reader. On the other hand: the worst that happens is that one loses the time invested (so far) in both builds. (Well, if you discount tail cases like running out of disk space.) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 02:34:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65650129 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 02:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28D2F39 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 02:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z22so1743589ghb.3 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:34:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fm0e5u1MVdSXUIrvnTO8QOFFXmFYXLxbgwxyileEDAw=; b=onSSCyAK/lBGDrTia+cPmZi/8pJO7NrGvnfA3XsGgju/wgvTJvXH9+/2LwDivoWvyI Ox6WJso9jhKpmTu65lmb6nv/y4l0qCcDguvFFHNbBkkAHjFNB4wSiEe7P93nNY+69EVs wSub8BgUDnpjZpm8bVSVU1VUomPXGr7YRnTLEdFF72c355kWntLoCJkB456nO4zTqIyS z4iErzyxXp0vwFlU9tn1Vc7qMGZBSrNerwEXkdqUu3R18eyw2maBIHMYGJM+s4gTBuLL NdhxkJWsCDoPysd+pXjNXQA6TWzTyQYL9rHRUPg3obf8oU9gn5g2pSDyH3uxX30M2ddT 1jmQ== X-Received: by 10.236.141.74 with SMTP id f50mr29302158yhj.73.1360031678871; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:34:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x16sm32780377yhj.6.2013.02.04.18.34.36 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:34:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51106FBB.30907@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:34:35 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130129 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 References: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:34:46 -0000 On 02/04/13 13:03, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:53:40 +0100 > mhca12 wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:48 PM, mhca12 wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:31 PM, mhca12 wrote: >>>> I have just installed 9.1 amd64 on a test machine and wanted >>>> to install rsync. Is pkgng the right choice and if so is there >>>> a handy guide how to get started or should I use pkg_add -r? >>>> >>>> Is this any different for i386? It used to be that there's >>>> no i386 pkgng repository. >>> >>> I ran pkg and it fetched and setup pkgng. That was easy. >> >> Is it possible that the November 2012 security incident means >> there's still no installable packaged via pkg-install? >> I was going to install rsync. > > I believe it is still the case that there is no official package > repository. I've gone to using poudriere to maintain a local pkgng > repository. Once set up (not too hard) it's remarkably painless. > I really think a message needs to go out on the announce list (as well as ports@ and questions@, others as appropriate) about the fact there is no official pkg repo at the moment. I'm constantly seeing emails about this on this list. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 02:55:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE17918 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 02:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F047F for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 02:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j1so5999699oag.7 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:55:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SpGMFaHc1w4IK9qKdVa7k5e3HaYa8UO+/Nt1weCviMQ=; b=ZwcFu78MHoNreS0c7biovSF56f3LzmbUI+Y0GkioTorLMMMNu2NNUGu7qd3MspowcR MSIsccKz52FzQoDYiBSa5jOu/MSTzCDoH2r6h0E/6bDFgLXRC2oS8W2uFnhMEdVDsLf5 fsve6xmxn6Xs2ltVBCMlfDaZBZNWQT+cg6wGVXaOLwhKbHTlnhUsOnHohe80WjLdZZAW XdL6TuAFkOVK/pZnll+4Fp8a1DjoZmmFmqCgPFcYoqKnllkK5rXpOgV/Zgv9V/149cAk /HqwGyd05o3UHScKlkpDDrLzuGpXGU1dmS2CzHJ9BjEYTPcBno41xH03CIMVjyUzjuSS /Mkw== X-Received: by 10.60.28.8 with SMTP id x8mr7666001oeg.40.1360032936495; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:55:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-98-212-197-211.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.212.197.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o3sm23504942obk.13.2013.02.04.18.55.35 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:55:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <511074A0.5080306@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:55:28 -0600 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 References: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> <51106FBB.30907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51106FBB.30907@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:55:37 -0000 On 2/4/2013 8:34 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > > I really think a message needs to go out on the announce list (as well > as ports@ and questions@, others as appropriate) about the fact there is > no official pkg repo at the moment. I'm constantly seeing emails about > this on this list. I changed to pkgng a couple weeks ago before realizing the "Security Incident" was holding up binary ports. I used to install from source most of the time, and updates seemed to be required to be from source. But now it's just from source or nothing. I want pkgng to help deal with some of the cruft that ends up occurring when installing ports that have a lot of dependencies. What's really annoying to me is that a clean install cluster, so presumably secure, could probably rebuild the whole ports tree in the time it's taken to get something available. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 03:11:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9147221F for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 03:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-x233.google.com (mail-yh0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ECE1CE for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 03:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q1so258162yhf.10 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nkja/XJhc/2kBnPcP+5G9bXcQYfhnMhPhY77FxrWoFY=; b=GDVqCDfqfqazRDfLtlf2BZzrHc66e4S5uar2uY0A/RV2W1Y1w+1Wk8De3PJdIvQnkw 7JAHupSNSPICeV4dIUCbyS8+fcU/n+DMuxa/1IS0IQr8jtq3Lt/0zwYBM42SN+hGj4P6 N2boapk68dX9cr1YVg8hveVUgb3rmAzk+5cIN1Lhbz9bWZs3kZtgN50/6UWw2IeJo6Yh /IslCF+KLQoXGdA2PXTP+5eJeNGoIVMnWQiHjEJZiKqcmOGt5SYRhfsuKupATzZYDjVE GqwCgCvvMNsangtAX97mty1CC87l3doNDAGEjhKm72AscFebubceWjBoDfaWhWSrqFsR zRVA== X-Received: by 10.236.134.136 with SMTP id s8mr29469378yhi.13.1360033484129; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16sm17763425ann.9.2013.02.04.19.04.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:04:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <511076C8.9080207@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:04:40 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130129 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Isom Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 References: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> <51106FBB.30907@gmail.com> <511074A0.5080306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <511074A0.5080306@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 03:11:20 -0000 On 02/04/13 20:55, Joshua Isom wrote: > On 2/4/2013 8:34 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: >> >> I really think a message needs to go out on the announce list (as well >> as ports@ and questions@, others as appropriate) about the fact there is >> no official pkg repo at the moment. I'm constantly seeing emails about >> this on this list. > > I changed to pkgng a couple weeks ago before realizing the "Security > Incident" was holding up binary ports. I used to install from source > most of the time, and updates seemed to be required to be from source. > But now it's just from source or nothing. I want pkgng to help deal > with some of the cruft that ends up occurring when installing ports that > have a lot of dependencies. > > What's really annoying to me is that a clean install cluster, so > presumably secure, could probably rebuild the whole ports tree in the > time it's taken to get something available. I've almost always built from source since I switched to FreeBSD (I sometimes, during the initial installation, used pkgs), it's longer but more reliable. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 03:22:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F9C8A1 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 03:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D55326A for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 03:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AA12782F; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 04:22:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r153Mqew003792; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 04:22:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 04:22:52 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 Message-Id: <20130205042252.60a97fd1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <511076C8.9080207@gmail.com> References: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> <51106FBB.30907@gmail.com> <511074A0.5080306@gmail.com> <511076C8.9080207@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 03:22:58 -0000 On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:04:40 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > I've almost always built from source since I switched to FreeBSD (I > sometimes, during the initial installation, used pkgs), it's longer but > more reliable. I'm also doing this since I have sufficient CPU and RAM. :-) However, for systems that are low on capacity, using precompiled packages is a really comfortable way to initially install software. The traditional "pkg_add -r " was possible for most of the available software with two exceptions: 1. software that needed compile-time options to make them work as intended (e. g. mplayer with mencoder and all codecs), 2. software that had no packages (e. g. german OpenOffice which had a "pkg_add -r de-openoffice" way in the past). With pkgng and the new "pkg" command set, not just installing would be possible (as known from pkg_add), but also updating (like with freebsd-update, but for ports). At the moment, this functionality is not provided, but it should become possible in the future, obsoleting the traditional pkg_* tools, while the use of ports, either with the "bare" make framework (make update, relying on SVN instead of CVS, make install, make deinstall and so on) or by the use of a port management tool (like portmaster) will of course still be possible. I know even pkgng can't deal with the two exceptions mentioned above, but it will add the binary updating and therefor make system _and_ software updates easier, especially when you're low on resources. It's also a welcome means if you need to perform an offline installation, i. e. you don't have Internet connection to obtain binary packages or sources, but you can install from optical media instead. The only problem I see (or which I hope not to see) is the upcoming Linuxism of repositories. Plural: many of them. By the use of the traditional pkg_* tools and the make framework for ports, you don't have to deal with selecting repositories. The correct files will be served. I hope there won't be a situation in the future where arbitrary or contradicting repositories "free" and "non-free", "vendor-provided", "private", "development", different in priority and content, will be required to be chosen by the user just to make basic things work (again). For those who have ever tried to explain "repositories" to a novice user in regards of a Linux distributions: You probably know what I'm talking about. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 07:36:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EEEA14 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 07:36:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68806B35 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 07:35:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:35:52 +0100 Message-ID: <5110B658.7010904@ose.nl> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:35:52 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130202 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which pkg repository with 9.1 References: <20130204190315.e7a64819c502038e2e2cd605@sohara.org> <51106FBB.30907@gmail.com> <511074A0.5080306@gmail.com> <511076C8.9080207@gmail.com> <20130205042252.60a97fd1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130205042252.60a97fd1.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:36:00 -0000 On 02/05/13 04:22, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:04:40 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: >> I've almost always built from source since I switched to FreeBSD (I >> sometimes, during the initial installation, used pkgs), it's longer but >> more reliable. There was a message on the stable list http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072037.html I use poudriere at the moment which works very well From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 09:24:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12988AD6 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.marsh@btinternet.com) Received: from nm1-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm1-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [212.82.108.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD84206 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.82.108.230] by nm1.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2013 09:24:35 -0000 Received: from [217.146.188.236] by tm3.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2013 09:24:35 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp821.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2013 09:24:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1360056275; bh=8O12/q8cY6yCm3k0JfPsFDJIH3A+LDF7KQ/B+uaWvig=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Content-Type:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=Yr1jObu41NWbksUphhM2Vp2PD4AWrPIUDlnidv9sQVD2WjPYWwOlYb2oIq6DBRPfbw8u3iXX+UfMazhTrzqRiMZ2JQCxOL7GVY76GGhx1VxI/AM2VNFHDh4DEewTs/yYN1PjYUZUcp4/rPjMGJP7MdN2NMGW70Pxewq9dRh4j04= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 861427.32432.bm@smtp821.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 6aQGnJcVM1lqgQC4g_vY1Z2kZDyvt8GnPaTxQZejq14WHKy kqFzBzZ1J296JsnO18w3PpYlvHgCAWeNQYAUkej6wQwJgG1D4yu2gO7ZShWo zwm14TcD9ErgfZwiD_JWfr7hl6uQ4RQyWw04FmJDtMwLeXxVUnQvjWZghHu7 fv8HTe73zlEmHyLWZuYlttpOJG4.lZlEaZjodhvxYWu_BNtxPci81j2XS02u hBNUmpc5UJ4XroG6YFyDW4G6ZF5DBWZLnzPyzpp09awbYtf4V76Ar8IpVpYe Dn6WHeSaHwxFLTlXAxCWclMzBBc5G6tAzmf1cFBUFUkGmPjvtQrpFrqM0o6I gXF8UodPEcA5sKXCBwSk7E7LE_0732yhnaPKQ8AEOr1AJQKm9V5PwhjBbp5h 5EWaY1WcuJzukcRztLF7eaWxSvVjaLgw5QxaW49IBy32M0EK40RysfoFhOgG 7CNA9ojhB X-Yahoo-SMTP: 3fobtyqswBC5QZSCTGPECG6oW9QlmfTpCxWu370kIHCVg7Q63rTQ Received: from du.home (roger.marsh@87.115.34.8 with login) by smtp821.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Feb 2013 09:24:35 +0000 UTC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "illoai@gmail.com" Subject: Re: Mouse stopped working on quit fvwm References: Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:30:47 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Roger Marsh" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.12 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:24:44 -0000 On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:36:31 -0000, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 3 February 2013 04:23, Roger Marsh wrote: >> The problem was encountered when upgrading to FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE and a >> 18 >> January 2013 portsnap. >> >> Steps were: >> >> Upgrade to FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE >> pkg_delete -a >> rm -r /usr/local/* >> Install ports using portmaster >> Turn on the ttyv8 xdm and reboot >> Login via the xdm dialog using the user .xsession file containing just >> /usr/local/bin/fvwm2 >> Do whatever and quit from fvwm back to the xdm dialogue >> >> Usually, but not always, the pointer does not move in response to >> pointer >> device. But it is still possible to login and get the fvwm display >> back, >> but pointless because the pointer still does not move. >> >> Only recovery option found was reboot. For me the most convenient work >> around is turn xdm off and login at a terminal and use the command >> 'startx >> && exit'. >> >> It was quite a while before it occurred to me that the absence of >> xorg.conf >> from all the usual locations might be the problem. >> >> It is not a surprise now if X just works without any manual >> configuration. >> >> The Xorg -configure and X -config /root/xorg.conf.new dance gives a >> black >> screen on the hardware. >> >> For both reasons I did not bother with the dance when doing the upgrade. >> >> After generating and copying xorg.conf.new to /etc/X11/xorg.conf the >> pointer >> was mobile after quitting from fvwm. >> >> Although it works I did not quite trust the generated xorg.conf because >> of >> the black screen and wondered if any of the information in the file was >> needed. So I deleted it and replaced it by 'touch >> /etc/X11/xorg.conf'. The >> pointer is mobile after quitting from fvwm. >> >> Maybe the problem was my sloppy configuration management in losing, I >> assume, an existing xorg.conf file. >> >> But maybe it is a bug because it is not a surprise if X just works >> without >> any manual configuration and the problem occurs possibly after hours of >> successful and varied use of applications via fvwm. >> > > Is your Xorg built with HAL support? You might have to kick > HAL. I've not had problems using moused (& Xorg with HAL > disabled) & an old-fashioned xorg.conf. > I rebuilt with HAL support on current oldest hardware. No problems. My notes say I tried this when upgrading to FreeBSD 7.2 and the problems led to builds being done without HAL support since then. Thanks for the kick. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 10:21:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE412D5C for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com (mail-qe0-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A25BB27 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b4so3325335qen.32 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:21:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ePW+Dtkei5yBisYovpWi0+OIYnJ3g/9JOY6noMxHU0A=; b=vXaMsfuMem04hylpD9RpS7ntILLl4SSat6HjZZm4OpJzoxyExuQQFg+iQTsze51N26 5bImWyrmA6doZ9bDvfrzb4frOBKUMoUzumMxzAeKDhBuR4jzlQVwohVg66WpuRhgLLOe L/NK2VUMA7nLS3s+J2Fyh0lm3VEOb8xPor4mDm7Sv46P3ZrENlrzoKL2x8sIbflgUq0x XnyhPtlQkhv+SnjR9PqGzm7eDJ0lBru77/fQObcuLnVM981l6bE5ti7oj3d5S15Y+CdV pJ8FY0RlIGG5u3uqllZt+2YG2OzJqTXWizyG+EiN/KjREuXDyfZEFl1nnV9lnrJCdp+c 5qhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.72.136 with SMTP id d8mr22744732qev.62.1360059247265; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:14:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 02:14:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:14:07 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UcTNTTP6lSFqnI21m0CKMRv03g8 Message-ID: Subject: devd wlan wpa From: CeDeROM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:21:31 -0000 Hello :-) I want to setup wpa_supplicant to start after wlan0 interface gets up. The rc.conf ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" does the job only at boot. When I get the interface down I need to start everything by hand, which is a bit annoying when I test a lot and need to switch between Ethernet and WiFi interfaces very often. I have tried to write devd rule: notify 0 { match "system" "IFNET"; match "subsystem" "wlan[0-9]+"; match "type" "LINK_UP"; media-type "802.11"; match "device-name" "wlan[0-9]+"; action "/usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant -i $device-name -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -B"; }; But there goes the chicken-egg problem - I want to run wpa_supplicant on LINK_UP event that occurs when Media Status is "connected", but to get that "connected" status I need to run wpa_supplicant first, so capabilities of devd are not enough in this case, or I miss something? Is there any distinction between LINK_UP and IF_UP? Any hints appreciated :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 10:48:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877514DA for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FC9D5F for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id va7so7429305obc.13 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:48:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0YRB8UNoKNwiPOuTLu1mlvP0iSu+fxmT+ODZnYH4tHs=; b=I2axyzSQTwxrndP6+o6Q5G3b3FO8axA1LZZkHrdVPz89/pkRohxG0T/1JSeBPQDuR7 OSFQo5oWSREU03m8QdZ5SkevKHYwqRTrp0dJ5lPyflkFui3wo53b526wXzau5CW2vHuc cvAWed1m7j2h/BHzZQZxHnAJw042MnsuU/k1q4DQYtovwW7kahSV1WSPV5xyqXWoMK2s HgspZjxgWknDRyN30SRjqaTZvrs4HdJG/C4UKlDWidKJP9bqDKmQkLAUhVh4baIdSnRe USNK5rKNeBn0XLEqTVJDE97kg0RULt9k/dBbbLwWb5GYcWpRyORofDIoQvCtEMelMxMR PrVQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.8.70 with SMTP id p6mr17598596oba.90.1360061328654; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:48:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 02:48:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130204234451.GA82043@neutralgood.org> References: <20130204234451.GA82043@neutralgood.org> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:48:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: geli overhead? From: mhca12 To: kpneal@pobox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:48:49 -0000 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:44 AM, wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:25:33PM +0100, mhca12 wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:19 PM, dweimer wrote: >> > On 02/04/2013 2:56 pm, mhca12 wrote: >> >> >> >> Is there some overhead associated with the geli setup as >> >> described earlier? > >> >> Where did 21G from the 148G go? >> >> >> >> As suggested in dan.me.uk geli install guide I used geli init -a >> >> HMAC/SHA256 >> >> and also ran dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/gpt/enc.eli across the eli volume. > >> > Did you use the -a option when doing the geli init? >> > >> > >> > -a aalgo Enable data integrity verification (authenti- >> > cation) using the given algorithm. This >> > will >> > reduce size of available storage and also >> > reduce speed. For example, when using 4096 >> > bytes sector and HMAC/SHA256 algorithm, 89% >> > of >> > the original provider storage will be avail- >> > able for use. Currently supported >> > algorithms >> > are: HMAC/MD5, HMAC/SHA1, HMAC/RIPEMD160, >> > HMAC/SHA256, HMAC/SHA384 and HMAC/SHA512. >> > If >> > the option is not given, there will be no >> > authentication, only encryption. The recom- >> > mended algorithm is HMAC/SHA256. >> >> Yes I did (see above). >> >> Do I have to init the volume again to skip authentication? > > Probably yes. > >> Does skipping authentication also remove the requirement of >> zeroing the whole eli disk for the checksums? > > Yes. Thanks I'll reinstall the machine then. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 10:59:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9CD6D4 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C3BDE7 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.132.50] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1U2g3L-0003or-EU; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:47:03 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:17:20 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: mhca12 Subject: Re: vfs.root.mountfrom with geli Message-ID: <20130205111720.024ec14a@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130204130635.3a66d412@fabiankeil.de> <20130204182303.59c9ac72@fabiankeil.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/koj5fZ3XIJq_Mq8czgdN9KF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:59:15 -0000 --Sig_/koj5fZ3XIJq_Mq8czgdN9KF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mhca12 wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: > > mhca12 wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: > >> > mhca12 wrote: > >> > > >> >> I followed the guide on dan.me.uk to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 > >> >> but I get always stuck because the kernel doesn't ask me for the > >> >> passphrase and doesn't find the /dev/gpt/enc.eli where enc is the > >> >> label I gave to the root partition. I also tried with /dev/ada0p3.e= li > >> >> without success. > >> >> > >> >> Tried the following two /boot/loader.config variations: > >> >> 1: > >> >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" > >> >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=E2=80=9Dufs:/dev/gpt/enc.eli=E2=80=9D > >> >> 2: > >> >> geom_eli_load=3D"YES" > >> >> vfs.root.mountfrom=3D=E2=80=9Dufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=E2=80=9D > >> >> > >> >> I can geli attach /dev/gpt/enc or /dev/ada0p3 successfully from > >> >> the livecd. > >> >> > >> >> Can you advise me what I might have done wrong or what I > >> >> should try? > >> >> > >> >> https://www.dan.me.uk/blog/2012/05/05/full-disk-encryption-in-freeb= sd-9-x-well-almost/ > >> > > >> > This guide doesn't seem to match your configuration. > >> > It uses ada0p3.eli for swapping and additionally uses keyfiles. > >> > > >> > Without knowing your actual configuration it's impossible to > >> > give proper advice. You could check with "geli list ada0p3" if > >> > the boot flag is set, but that's obviously just a wild guess ... > >> > >> Forgot to list my simpler setup: > >> ada0p1 freebsd-boot > >> ada0p2 freebsd-ufs label boot /boot > >> ada0p3 geli freebsd-ufs label enc / > >> > >> Do I have to set the boot flag for any of them? > > > > The geli passphrase is only requested at boot time for providers that > > have the geli boot flag set (for details see geli(8)). If it isn't set > > on ada0p3 it would explain the described behaviour. >=20 > Fabian thanks a lot. Maybe I forgot -b during geli init but a > geli configure -b /dev/ada0p3.eli fixed it. FreeBSD is so > well structured and logical in this regard and hopefully > in many others as I heard. >=20 > In vfs.root.mountfrom only =E2=80=9Dufs:/dev/ada0p3.eli=E2=80=9D works and > the /dev/gpt/enc.eli doesn't. Is it supposed to? "doesn't" isn't a particular helpful problem description. Probably geli tastes ada0p3 before gpt/enc and once ada0p3 has been attached gpt/enc is hidden and thus can't be attached anymore. gpt labels aren't intentionally designed not to work with geli, but tasting races at boot time are a known limitation and also affect other geom classes. As a workaround you could use glabel labels instead. I use them for external disks to be able to geli attach them automatically using a known name, but for internal disks whose names don't frequently change I usually don't bother. Fabian --Sig_/koj5fZ3XIJq_Mq8czgdN9KF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlEQ3DgACgkQBYqIVf93VJ0vzwCgpAx54xTq6ielQP9MGTj0EMGV 4f8AoJ7dC/2nmSYIC0OPKSheKgvCZ+Zl =YypM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/koj5fZ3XIJq_Mq8czgdN9KF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 12:27:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D663D356 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm14-vm4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm14-vm4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.218.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98B513DE for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.137.12.191] by nm14.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2013 12:24:31 -0000 Received: from [98.136.185.44] by tm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2013 12:24:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp105.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2013 12:24:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1360067071; bh=3VrkpWMaW1e43zoBuJvwQlaHf1pA+bqsMfKurIy3LG0=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:X-Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=I9ONTEMrKErXr66DBbda79igJeVcjA+yOfWmTv4brdWudbvlYHYxmMwjL5zvveanQBQoYlofKx+epU/TS6PW93Ceb5qTuEBoiVPyQyv89iI1RLGzQd2tIuvlLoAP9ppi5AL7UQb0hUIbb8BV6SJ+tvWISKjtCvmdFLMBoVRz06k= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 218053.21337.bm@smtp105.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: LNx8fIwVM1mL2v0hpXJVi1KLluoaVV2OSdF9LZgjkV2i6c_ pCTPQjqCO0JbcBtOvPd.Jn7sTCyKSApGYyaVY4HF.ymOgcEeZhKuqC13VAZn 0KWrgfQSGsmX5hbQAnqp8LPG921tI3dJt3_NIt7IpGTBsrGhKemYI_6W29oC JTA0SR.mHc2Nmu0lSMJme_Ms3dcOTm.SftVP2T.Ck3_9w7NoORvm2wy8yCx4 acnxazYd.GVKt1ZdZ.yP5Adq1KGOWthbGtqJadwh_OdWS2PmDjn6L5jsKmWB vLAId.TOCVt4LXzg5t.2SJyLxaC6SKG0UyHBpepa1tirYmbmJ9yfydJYRqIm CzzCwn2skhYFKo2Vz37UoVWHDmo0gUCJnguRu2h9WXafeY0CDwweZDGfIpjp IWnhqnvwgMfqzBLf6EQLFWXTQ6t196b_7xLhqqAtUqvqgTmpCeDZUgEpKAPA JD3GR3o711_EX1HHfIZ7Or6_1xyU99WEVdz6.D7srUmtQsL5mfqI- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-ve0-f177.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.128.177 with plain) by smtp105.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Feb 2013 04:24:31 -0800 PST Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m1so59541ves.36 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 04:24:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.95.37 with SMTP id dh5mr24340657vdb.26.1360067070226; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 04:24:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.207.65 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 04:24:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alexandre Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:24:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: devd wlan wpa To: CeDeROM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:27:59 -0000 Hi, There is this entry for the network aggregation in the Handbook http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html You will be able to switch from wired to wifi card (and vice versa). Regards, Alexandre On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:14 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello :-) > > I want to setup wpa_supplicant to start after wlan0 interface gets up. > The rc.conf ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" does the job only at boot. When > I get the interface down I need to start everything by hand, which is > a bit annoying when I test a lot and need to switch between Ethernet > and WiFi interfaces very often. I have tried to write devd rule: > > notify 0 { > match "system" "IFNET"; > match "subsystem" "wlan[0-9]+"; > match "type" "LINK_UP"; > media-type "802.11"; > match "device-name" "wlan[0-9]+"; > action "/usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant -i $device-name -c > /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -B"; > }; > > But there goes the chicken-egg problem - I want to run wpa_supplicant > on LINK_UP event that occurs when Media Status is "connected", but to > get that "connected" status I need to run wpa_supplicant first, so > capabilities of devd are not enough in this case, or I miss something? > Is there any distinction between LINK_UP and IF_UP? > > Any hints appreciated :-) > Tomek > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 12:33:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F8944D for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com (mail-qc0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD210622 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so32031qca.1 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 04:33:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=n9TM2OQPW/QcBMM7QALb+lBJOLtHWcsR7R9XKPQ7etA=; b=xtI7HK+56GvqWEWNc7PeTXHBtML84SYAuSvRlerFczboFTjDfBlUsULqGQu4W19a86 9N+9lufrWMLRVPWYxvyFo5bR7cJi2pMhtGASznvCnUGnYzOev1+2Taw6V427rM+HXg5o 2ZM9D9PpYGKQPaM6bufkqmXQC4UTt46H0EXySqmiDezHNxaZPead94yoW/UM5ClMMQWs thU3r/2uLL8AGLyY86l9h2PGUYq2/7ANcy1v/HiLj+usd5t2/1Lp8pNPNhup5h10iOTd xoYpXkJqWnvMKFlvw8X4KGo7fNh57jmAeWx2RvH2tC91OvqYLNWtld0TEr9MBwFPMo3k vU+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.186.81 with SMTP id cr17mr19312173qab.99.1360067586471; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 04:33:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 04:33:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:33:06 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gPWbhgjMT9xVHVbbmYRyiePMDDI Message-ID: Subject: Re: devd wlan wpa From: CeDeROM To: Alexandre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:33:13 -0000 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Alexandre wrote: > There is this entry for the network aggregation in the Handbook Thank you Alexandre! This is not exactly what I am looking for as I would like to have wpa running after interface is up, but I will use provided solution in another place, thank you again :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 13:07:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E225F15 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com (mail-qe0-f53.google.com [209.85.128.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CF1801 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 1so53285qee.12 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 05:07:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Tf0mrKy6RMWHQMxwrdp+THziCZvBtFE5yZaowqNbCEo=; b=ouawJKU1hCMRyoQfvREI0qWRu4hPdz8nVF9BI34KPJsZEJbmleaufV2sLy1+guLOH/ P1OOHHHUD8RgD58hPVh0huxWJQJ/+1W66gR8sXuAktn+sjQMMqnWfJ19H57QPXUv+FAI XJiDSR4NPeisEeba5S4u29KJOEfM1ufEnQBH/VAc5GQgB5zHzwuRfircqTW4tet5FYmX R8+6XKj0zgczKXNgsw1o3okBd8o+B1y4aOabf6ViNjyXxU9elvwZBabRv2GVC/hlD96L aXh97+Bs7F2Dsc+G+DPLcquHsEMUEhwDQ0x6n2ACqiO/K/+B0rePrRS9ttGvSv7SGJ8A ZFqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.197.226 with SMTP id el34mr4772319qcb.62.1360069653695; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 05:07:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 05:07:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:07:33 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 05OuvvUd5LVrVSx2F2OHTYFgQ-o Message-ID: Subject: Re: devd wlan wpa From: CeDeROM To: Alexandre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:07:34 -0000 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:33 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Alexandre wrote: >> There is this entry for the network aggregation in the Handbook Also this failover is also prone to the wlan0+wpa issue, as bringing up the wlan0 interface does not bring up the link, so I need to have devd configured anyway... :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 15:08:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FF2572 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71763F2B for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r15EjDkQ024443 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:45:14 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <51111AF9.2090006@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:45:13 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: FreeBSD on Acer C7 Chromebook? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:08:15 -0000 [I'm not sure whether this would be better on -hackers@ or -hardware@ but -questions@ seems like a good place to start.] Is anyone considering getting FBSD to run on the Acer C7 Chromebook? The pros are that it's a cheap, small and relatively lightweight 64 bit Intel portable using integrated Intel graphics. The cons are that it's a Chromebook, so has a completely non-standard BIOS and boot sequence. However, Ubuntu has been hacked to boot on it (Google for "ChrUbuntu") so it's not totally locked down. This would make a very useful little system, but the programming needed is beyond my skill set I'm afraid. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 15:16:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4694A7AA for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from smtp-int-m.obspm.fr (smtp-int-m.obspm.fr [145.238.187.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3395FAD for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by smtp-int-m.obspm.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/SIO Observatoire de Paris - 07/2009) with ESMTP id r15FFvIU008579 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:15:58 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:15:57 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Paul Kraus Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs + NFS + FreeBSD with performance prob Message-ID: <20130205151557.GA95062@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20130131221627.GA91823@pcjas.obspm.fr> <509EB11C-E279-44C5-91C2-3A93249919F5@kraus-haus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <509EB11C-E279-44C5-91C2-3A93249919F5@kraus-haus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Miltered: at smtp-int-m.obspm.fr with ID 5111222D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5111222D.000/145.238.184.233/pcjas.obspm.fr/pcjas.obspm.fr/ Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:16:11 -0000 Le 04/02/2013 ? 11:21:12-0500, Paul Kraus a écrit > On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote: > > > Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on > > differents disks) zfs pool with 36 disk. > > > > The performance is very very good on the server. > > > > I've one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 and the performance over NFS > > is very good : > > > > For example : Read from the client and write over NFS to ZFS: > > > > [root@ .tmp]# time tar xf /tmp/linux-3.7.5.tar > > > > real 1m7.244s user 0m0.921s sys 0m8.990s > > > > this client is on 1Gbits/s network cable and same network switch as > > the server. > > > > I've a second NFS client running FreeBSD 9.1-Stable, and on this > > second client the performance is catastrophic. After 1 hour the tar > > isn't finish. OK this second client is connect with 100Mbit/s and > > not on the same switch. But well from 2 min --> ~ 90 min ...:-( > > > > I've try for this second client to change on the ZFS-NFS server the > > > > zfs set sync=disabled > > > > and that change nothing. > > I have been using FreeBSD 9 with ZFS and NFS to a couple Mac OS X > (10.6.8 Snow Leopard) boxes and I get between 40 and 50 MB/sec Thanks for your answer. Can you give me the average ping time between you'r client and NFS server ? Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mar 5 fév 2013 16:15:11 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 22:42:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E921A4 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C37D24 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 9so1013096iec.18 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:42:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=lvJ5Tal+RZqlg6eBHHOgDyd/JQgntfcuJKXaexRbywE=; b=GuOdWLWLZ38KdeBxDWZ0vnXxVs3PXTZcnXSbaKPw89BTuI6roSjPgKxiYAwWLjXssn THQm5I+vYpusmy9Z0rVoGwgwIRXAQ7TiiXnxlRRo9Gc0/5Xdpq8HP+OwLPeyz3yh6qyF AJX4OI22OGutPI633i4IsTzecYF/qytD2dWKHafxjWbeKdKIdyWKn+l9lzBh1ehNOK1o abcDIbjIJ5YfNA2HwMoaAZfM0FqQi1CaDSVh4s4lreKuUSxEUfImlt8SnmYcvlKY9X9c hdzqz4gSqEXLXBC40L/sJXnxTcLzR1UPIBli1dP0RlhL1xvddurdJ2iFN2Tsnp/snXXj Li6A== X-Received: by 10.50.40.229 with SMTP id a5mr1432735igl.59.1360104142850; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:42:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uj6sm24943256igb.4.2013.02.05.14.42.21 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:42:21 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: kde-freebsd@kde.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-carddeck-kde4 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:42:08 -0600 Message-ID: <2787772.aeRI6FfapP@luna.wi.rr.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.9.5; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:42:23 -0000 Now that games/freebsd-carddeck-kde4 is DEPRECATED, would it make sense to remove the FREEBSD option from games/kdegames4? I installed KDE 4.9.5 from are51, today I run portmaster -a and it stopped because games/freebsd-carddeck-kde4 is DEPRECATED. How could I solved this problem, please? I didn't find any pkg freebsd- carddeck-kde4 and pkg delete didn't find... Thanks in advance. Mitja ---------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 22:50:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2322DE for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284BFD7A for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id c13so999561ieb.23 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:50:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=y2IgFZ4aDLnk6qY16rTHyfhnvdQAFGuaejeiCNp3yBo=; b=BX+cc0Jo8Y/94fLOxbzJaI5mAatOvyMc9ro+7klJVxoIwahXJp5ShE+L/uMYxnfYLX kL/U/jk6tooboCbjU96r8fgdQ3dI+4O7qDNIEoN/ssSNeIZFR1qxyqhZ4EFPkdqNkVqx 8Y3NqzSK/zYEEnVSSAt7E8tBsXeAsVcO9KjUaBLHHZJY5HvKYi+BG+JKavzw3sWMZRKx 9KRJ/wUkjIZr0+Sq9LswdTj1G+RGNmY/b4Os7bwYx5brFccRYd0HlM7o32e0QnjrQZFV WlE/Y7Ndb7tQzeXhs++OE5VQrbETjkF3dddvYxjOsyQzTDpStJUTRTE0aLQyho3+WM2B F2kg== X-Received: by 10.50.152.198 with SMTP id va6mr1553023igb.42.1360104650778; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:50:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4sm24982910igw.6.2013.02.05.14.50.49 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:50:49 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: kde-freebsd@kde.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-carddeck-kde4 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:50:37 -0600 Message-ID: <2098016.TpserWDzlR@luna.wi.rr.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.9.5; i386; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2787772.aeRI6FfapP@luna.wi.rr.com> References: <2787772.aeRI6FfapP@luna.wi.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:50:51 -0000 On Tuesday 05 February 2013 16:42:08 ajtiM wrote: > Now that games/freebsd-carddeck-kde4 is DEPRECATED, would it make sense > to remove the FREEBSD option from games/kdegames4? > > I installed KDE 4.9.5 from are51, today I run portmaster -a and it stopped > because games/freebsd-carddeck-kde4 is DEPRECATED. > How could I solved this problem, please? I didn't find any pkg freebsd- > carddeck-kde4 and pkg delete didn't find... > > Thanks in advance. I am sorry for the panick...the name is kde4-freebsd-carddeck Thanks. Mitja ---------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 23:13:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6573181A for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 23:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A586E35 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 23:13:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <51118FCF.90102@intersonic.se> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:03:43 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121015 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: why is bacula-client looking for libz.so.5 on 9-STABLE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 23:13:25 -0000 Hi, Upgraded a system from 8.3 to 9-STABLE and did make delete-old-libs afterwards. System has around thirty ports installed and all except bacula-client upgraded gracefully. Why does it want libz.so.5 when libz.so.6 is present? I'm pretty sure I'm missing the obvious here... Linking bacula-fd ... /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client/work/bacula-5.2.12/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link /usr/bin/c++ -L/usr/local/lib -L../lib -L../findlib -o bacula-fd filed.o authenticate.o acl.o backup.o estimate.o fd_plugins.o accurate.o filed_conf.o heartbeat.o job.o pythonfd.o restore.o status.o verify.o verify_vol.o xattr.o -lz -lbacfind -lbacpy -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lintl -lwrap /usr/local/lib/libintl.so /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib /usr/bin/ld: warning: libz.so.5, needed by /usr/local/lib/libbac.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) -- Intersonic AB Registered in Solna, Sweden SE556539368201 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 01:24:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714A6EB2 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranormal@isgroup.com.ua) Received: from isgroup.com.ua (mail.isgroup.com.ua [46.229.54.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EF72D5 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.5] (unused-213.111.70.194.bilink.ua [213.111.70.194] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by isgroup.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r15NpsJu018411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:51:55 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from paranormal@isgroup.com.ua) Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? From: paranormal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:23:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1360113820.90099.11.camel@eva02> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on isgroup.com.ua X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:24:07 -0000 I have t61p with mentioned card. x11/nvidia-driver works well for me (at least quake, doom, compiz work). On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 10:33 +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm considering buying this Thinkpad T61p laptop: > http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321063105251 > > It lists this graphics card: > > NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M > > I'm not sure what driver, if any, will support it. > > There seems to be the official Nvidia FreeBSD driver > provided for it: > > http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd_100.14.09.html > > but this apparently has to be installed outside of > the ports tree. > > xf86-video-nv drivers list several other Quadro cards, > but not specifically 570M. > > Maybe somebody has used this card, so can give a > definite reply? > > Thanks > > Anton > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 01:39:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6EB2EB for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f178.google.com (mail-gh0-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A287C37E for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f178.google.com with SMTP id g24so253860ghb.23 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:39:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :disposition-notification-to:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=efjRidQ4cJXq8FZ/dkYJq0ZOtAZBEid+pRt+hH9ipt8=; b=OMYhZOR+dQl+ioWxRrc4XH7Yyv58Fmhpw/pQ9Y/Vdb0hdzLAxiXziRTBLYMxZm1q0z Xew+K8EhrZL/WPhmcGLDgFsv4Q1MyieHKZHVMa5fxDEhQGoV4HhuXDF6APovQkHN/qun QhJBfHXVfNpOpVNPc2w5oywbhVN37c0FiG86xXF8EfSoC2wZFg/IiKyclYRMXLDgLnuM eUP+lF6CV9ubRNxTy2Huvde2ZYbNcmemfzxhmbuzOqVwyLX7UCsr88BHYahM+OuTfHD5 s3JzkQ+hWn35EnPUnGKtSLGYUvFvVxojVXT802iS+DUTMp7RTF9kvbj1ofILbKWBoebA ig5w== X-Received: by 10.236.75.229 with SMTP id z65mr33258819yhd.16.1360114747779; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:39:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([189.123.200.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k24sm38428339yhd.5.2013.02.05.17.39.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:39:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Acer C7 Chromebook? From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: Arthur Chance In-Reply-To: <51111AF9.2090006@qeng-ho.org> References: <51111AF9.2090006@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 23:39:03 -0200 Message-ID: <1360114743.80620.38.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:39:15 -0000 Em Ter, 2013-02-05 às 14:45 +0000, Arthur Chance escreveu: > [I'm not sure whether this would be better on -hackers@ or -hardware@ > but -questions@ seems like a good place to start.] > > Is anyone considering getting FBSD to run on the Acer C7 Chromebook? The > pros are that it's a cheap, small and relatively lightweight 64 bit > Intel portable using integrated Intel graphics. The cons are that it's a > Chromebook, so has a completely non-standard BIOS and boot sequence. > However, Ubuntu has been hacked to boot on it (Google for "ChrUbuntu") > so it's not totally locked down. > > This would make a very useful little system, but the programming needed > is beyond my skill set I'm afraid. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" A long time ago I swear NEVER ever buy ACER product, the bios is no standard, and they do not care about the clients. I bought sevral notebooks very cheap that are built around the AMD vision, Lenovo 845 here costs about US$400 payed in 10 parts of US$40... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 03:04:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52373439 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 03:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from moku60.aloha50.net (moku60.aloha50.net [66.180.132.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFCF8E2 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 03:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mohawk7.intra.net (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by moku60.aloha50.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5782117010; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:56:28 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <5111C65B.4000504@hdk5.net> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:56:27 -1000 From: Al Plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: zoneedit.com References: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <510E64ED.3010306@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, surge3@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: noc@hdk5.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:04:11 -0000 Fbsd8 wrote: > Nick K wrote: >> I am posting here hoping that a "Dan" from ZoneEdit.com still monitors >> this >> mailing list. >> I am in a very bad situation and my mail forwarding has been down for >> over >> a week -- no response from ZoneEdit support. >> >> I found references to people getting help from "Dan" here: >> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2011-01/msg00504.html >> >> >> My issue(s): >> >> 1.) I can't login to zoneedit.com's "new" interface. I used to be >> able to >> log in to the "legacy" interface -- but apparently I'm in the same >> boat as >> Mr. Jack L. Stone was -- in that you can no longer manage zones from the >> legacy interface. >> The legacy interface tells me my account is active at the new interface, >> but the new interface tells me my account does not even exist. >> >> 2.) My mail forwarding service provided by zoneedit.com stopped working >> approximately last week monday. It has been working fine since 2002. >> Don't you just love it when this stuff happens. >> >> 3.) I can't change my DNS / mail forwarding service, because the email I >> used for my domain registration at my registrar is one of the emails that >> gets forwarded (and the forwarding is not working). >> >> If Jack L. Stone or "Dan" from ZoneEdit can get in contact with me I >> would >> be very grateful. >> I don't know what else to do at this point. >> The company that currently owns ZoneEdit (Dotster) won't help me -- they >> say they don't have the ability to provide support for ZoneEdit >> customers. >> >> This is my last hope pretty much. Dan or Jack if you're out there, >> please >> get back to me. >> surge3@gmail.com >> > > Have you tried to create a new account on the new interface and try to > access your domains from there? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Aloha! ZONE EDIT USERS..... I had to make some adjustments to my 2 accounts Monday and did so successfully. The only problem I had was that the "Log In" box for accounts wasnt showing on my monitor properly top left. It was wrapped. I was able to log in and click the tab and it worked OK. Some of the page was cropped however. I dont know if My FreeBSD box is at fault as the browser is old. It appears that all the accounts have been moved to the new site. ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9* + < email: noc@hdk5.net > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 05:35:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95C3F14 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 05:35:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965E5E0F for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 05:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172A63CC18; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:35:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r165ZedM001974; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:35:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:35:40 +0100 From: Polytropon To: paranormal Subject: Re: which X driver for NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M? Message-Id: <20130206063540.20d07110.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1360113820.90099.11.camel@eva02> References: <201302031033.r13AX0Dx088925@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <1360113820.90099.11.camel@eva02> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:35:45 -0000 On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:23:40 +0200, paranormal wrote: > I have t61p with mentioned card. > x11/nvidia-driver works well for me (at least quake, doom, compiz work). I can confirm this for my (broken) nVidia GeForce 7600 GS (G73); the nvidia driver (with kernel module) provides good 3D performance, while the nv and nouveau drivers only work for "normal" desktop graphics. Tested with Quake 4 demo, Doom 3 demo, "xlock -nolock -mode lament", "xlock -nolock -mode gears", "xlock -nolock -mode fire" (port: xlockmore) and of course "glxgears" (port: mesa-demos). :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 06:14:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40F5533 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C46F2F for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bs12so505048qab.18 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:14:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rjXRxp+sDMjqIn88dyuSnbKqiqFtzSKhj9m1dQINgIc=; b=G17oz7CmxN0X/WxKjagpeMpfZKghkMK0Ig+P90ylO1pcUpPvXJKS6lKoeYXX0+qTSV dQ1FdCLHfoZOWd0laQ93Zg0qDe2ja0rYuySy4Kl+g3BEA943WphJBwyvotLe2lyx03P/ HlaiXE4EnHxl+xzIaRPsPJcWonbgiOAwWpTgUYcNxeAUXtCrxynO88+wn8mUdpUQAOU1 iuR/gEzBJs3wcH9EYT9npxia0/4CAX8KBjUbwFopSQkV4IYq67uTIA0glwUxRhGrT7/r auVnL4mVCS8maPeWfFCUdCCWFL2ZsqyBdSygRuNdgaDvnomKTt0kMhoF1CFD6zrH/yo1 BCPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.133.195 with SMTP id pe3mr23826143qeb.58.1360131277377; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:14:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.58.240 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:14:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:44:37 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: backspace shows ^? in serial communications From: s m To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:14:38 -0000 hi all i have a problem with backspace in serial communications. i have a freebsd8.2 box with a serial card on it. when i connect to other freebsd box via serial port backspace does not act as i expected. backspace shows ^? on screen. i searched alot and find out that stty has two parameters -erase and erase2- to identify erase characters in terminal and they should be set correctly. i set erase and erase2 to ^? by "stty erase \^?" and "stty erase2 \^?" commands but nothing happened. please let me know how i can fix it. i know it is simple issue but i really do not know how to do that. regards SAM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 06:50:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B56CFBD for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C927D13B for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6A63CD20; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:50:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r166ooUa002232; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:50:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:50:50 +0100 From: Polytropon To: s m Subject: Re: backspace shows ^? in serial communications Message-Id: <20130206075050.b4e5b48e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:50:51 -0000 On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:44:37 +0330, s m wrote: > hi all > > i have a problem with backspace in serial communications. i have a > freebsd8.2 box with a serial card on it. when i connect to other freebsd > box via serial port backspace does not act as i expected. backspace shows > ^? on screen. i searched alot and find out that stty has two parameters > -erase and erase2- to identify erase characters in terminal and they should > be set correctly. i set erase and erase2 to ^? by "stty erase \^?" and > "stty erase2 \^?" commands but nothing happened. > please let me know how i can fix it. i know it is simple issue but i really > do not know how to do that. If I remember correctly, ^? is delete, ^H is backspace. You should check your terminal emulator if it outputs ^? instead of ^H when you press the backspace key. FreeBSD's default configuration handles keys correctly (if you have the proper terminal emulation set, e. g. vt100 or vt220 for your serial line), so there's probably something wrong with the settings of the terminal program you're using. For comparison: % echo $TERM xterm % stty -a speed 9600 baud; 24 rows; 80 columns; lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe echok echoke -echonl echoctl -echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho -pendin -nokerninfo -extproc iflags: -istrip icrnl -inlcr -igncr ixon -ixoff -ixany -imaxbel -ignbrk -brkint -inpck -ignpar -parmrk oflags: opost onlcr -ocrnl tab3 -onocr -onlret cflags: cread cs8 parenb -parodd hupcl -clocal -cstopb -crtscts -dsrflow -dtrflow -mdmbuf cchars: discard = ^O; dsusp = ^Y; eof = ^D; eol = ; eol2 = ; erase = ^H; erase2 = ^H; intr = ^C; kill = ^U; lnext = ^V; min = 1; quit = ^\; reprint = ^R; start = ^Q; status = ^T; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; time = 0; werase = ^W; And: % echo $TERM cons25l1 % stty -a speed 9600 baud; 25 rows; 80 columns; lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe -echok echoke -echonl echoctl -echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho -pendin -nokerninfo -extproc iflags: -istrip icrnl -inlcr -igncr ixon -ixoff ixany imaxbel -ignbrk brkint -inpck -ignpar -parmrk oflags: opost onlcr -ocrnl tab0 -onocr -onlret cflags: cread cs8 -parenb -parodd hupcl -clocal -cstopb -crtscts -dsrflow -dtrflow -mdmbuf cchars: discard = ^O; dsusp = ^Y; eof = ^D; eol = ; eol2 = ; erase = ^H; erase2 = ^H; intr = ^C; kill = ^U; lnext = ^V; min = 1; quit = ^\; reprint = ^R; start = ^Q; status = ^T; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; time = 0; werase = ^W; If you want the system's C shell to treat ^? (delete) as it should be treated (perform delete instead of backspace or "nothing"), add those to your .cshrc: bindkey ^? delete-char # for console bindkey ^[[3~ delete-char # for xterm Note that this only affects the C shell. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 08:11:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20588C79 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD126A9 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n8so957695lbj.3 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:10:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pf2HMHSQRFZezGO6/6eQLx8JvDV5mZpdFouq7BfWiT4=; b=IfBxD2BpG3EGfx/rfzFh8RoXOE7TmKZOsKIJeQJTfhRnfXuD1QIFy4pa56xWDrjT9g 9S7boRfDx1ZbY6jMH+cwfyWJZEJn6SWAM4474k8x+DpI0CxIXTM4cDAav5ew0X3CUSey 82oa8UQX97s1QFLUz10x+ruGW9fXqOaCiEVYzUgtiFOt37eGM6qpJk8UaEGufkOKOWAl uO3chvd6w2CNzkZqwZYdae4v0ypLXQlQynFwVhBFLMvi0vy51iieGIuPuv6pnpXWQlT/ HhEpvKNohovp1d9Lo6wIxdtaDKGOSjqgWlp8uAo7Pzkb069WZRdEoYJYrRA1sL2O8a3B 9RPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.144.4 with SMTP id si4mr25427027lab.10.1360138257884; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.143.201 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:10:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130206075050.b4e5b48e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130206075050.b4e5b48e.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:40:57 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: Re: backspace shows ^? in serial communications From: s m To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:11:06 -0000 thanks for your answer. you know, i have a freebsd box (something like router) which i connect to it by putty or other terminal programs (cu,...). this router has a serial card and i have a c program to open and manage serial ports. now when i run this c program and connect to the third freebsd box, backspace shows ^?. now i don't know where is problem and for which system terminal settings should be checked. from you explanation i think that i should check serial settings in c program in the router box. am i right? please let me know what should i do to this program (c program in router box) show backspace correctly when i connect by different serial programs to router box and run it. thanks On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:44:37 +0330, s m wrote: > > hi all > > > > i have a problem with backspace in serial communications. i have a > > freebsd8.2 box with a serial card on it. when i connect to other freebsd > > box via serial port backspace does not act as i expected. backspace shows > > ^? on screen. i searched alot and find out that stty has two parameters > > -erase and erase2- to identify erase characters in terminal and they > should > > be set correctly. i set erase and erase2 to ^? by "stty erase \^?" and > > "stty erase2 \^?" commands but nothing happened. > > please let me know how i can fix it. i know it is simple issue but i > really > > do not know how to do that. > > If I remember correctly, ^? is delete, ^H is backspace. You > should check your terminal emulator if it outputs ^? instead > of ^H when you press the backspace key. > > FreeBSD's default configuration handles keys correctly (if > you have the proper terminal emulation set, e. g. vt100 or > vt220 for your serial line), so there's probably something > wrong with the settings of the terminal program you're using. > > For comparison: > > % echo $TERM > xterm > % stty -a > speed 9600 baud; 24 rows; 80 columns; > lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe echok echoke -echonl echoctl > -echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho -pendin -nokerninfo > -extproc > iflags: -istrip icrnl -inlcr -igncr ixon -ixoff -ixany -imaxbel -ignbrk > -brkint -inpck -ignpar -parmrk > oflags: opost onlcr -ocrnl tab3 -onocr -onlret > cflags: cread cs8 parenb -parodd hupcl -clocal -cstopb -crtscts -dsrflow > -dtrflow -mdmbuf > cchars: discard = ^O; dsusp = ^Y; eof = ^D; eol = ; > eol2 = ; erase = ^H; erase2 = ^H; intr = ^C; kill = ^U; > lnext = ^V; min = 1; quit = ^\; reprint = ^R; start = ^Q; > status = ^T; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; time = 0; werase = ^W; > > And: > > % echo $TERM > cons25l1 > % stty -a > speed 9600 baud; 25 rows; 80 columns; > lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe -echok echoke -echonl echoctl > -echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho -pendin -nokerninfo > -extproc > iflags: -istrip icrnl -inlcr -igncr ixon -ixoff ixany imaxbel -ignbrk > brkint -inpck -ignpar -parmrk > oflags: opost onlcr -ocrnl tab0 -onocr -onlret > cflags: cread cs8 -parenb -parodd hupcl -clocal -cstopb -crtscts -dsrflow > -dtrflow -mdmbuf > cchars: discard = ^O; dsusp = ^Y; eof = ^D; eol = ; > eol2 = ; erase = ^H; erase2 = ^H; intr = ^C; kill = ^U; > lnext = ^V; min = 1; quit = ^\; reprint = ^R; start = ^Q; > status = ^T; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; time = 0; werase = ^W; > > If you want the system's C shell to treat ^? (delete) as > it should be treated (perform delete instead of backspace > or "nothing"), add those to your .cshrc: > > bindkey ^? delete-char # for console > bindkey ^[[3~ delete-char # for xterm > > Note that this only affects the C shell. > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 11:39:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE4F926 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF9C25C for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id r16Bhnx2016113; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 05:43:49 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 05:43:49 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201302061143.r16Bhnx2016113@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, sam.gh1986@gmail.com Subject: Re: backspace shows ^? in serial communications In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:40:00 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 6 00:19:04 2013 > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:44:37 +0330 > Subject: backspace shows ^? in serial communications > From: s m > To: freebsd-questions > > hi all > > i have a problem with backspace in serial communications. i have a > freebsd8.2 box with a serial card on it. when i connect to other freebsd > box via serial port backspace does not act as i expected. backspace shows > ^? on screen. i searched alot and find out that stty has two parameters > -erase and erase2- to identify erase characters in terminal and they should > be set correctly. i set erase and erase2 to ^? by "stty erase \^?" and > "stty erase2 \^?" commands but nothing happened. > please let me know how i can fix it. i know it is simple issue but i really > do not know how to do that. stty erase {press the backspace key} Then hit the enter/return key From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 13:02:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74581147 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hskuhra@eumx.net) Received: from eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F56887 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:02:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:message-id; s=default; bh=EFN4GQaxXrS3+S dMU2KAmTCm24Y=; b=ZFk3FaxLDzaD+UzdARIyZ4k3wgblkZSgA9N2basz0fW4z5 VFl2LAmGeQo+TB/8ftw9rQPhWbXvLaEcipIdV6aHBOzHi/9pOWhuejCPCnymoamZ vbQP6EMLREHXMTsmlge+8bM89b5XkjkUtdPNsma8NXtFGYEZmygoWTRmENBAE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eumx.net; h=mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=x6ZyTbuW zGnW/R+MJClh8khR+0WOhGyvIZ01fpybBTHpX1gg9XO2rUSDbjUQdNzc8X9wMU5J d38Xtd51wOzwZjR1/A+e1tk7QNfhmgFh+sEsYdL/PcJ2Dva958J2L5rQl3u8IMHG +M9VnKei7Bu8WjGuIX3YQMlJxG7HgZMIUq0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:02:42 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: Subject: Re: why is bacula-client looking for libz.so.5 on 9-STABLE In-Reply-To: <51118FCF.90102@intersonic.se> References: <51118FCF.90102@intersonic.se> Message-ID: <9d89b5cd3c4f027cfdb5d95748918421@eumx.net> X-Sender: hskuhra@eumx.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:02:44 -0000 Den 06.02.2013 00:03, skrev Per olof Ljungmark: > Hi, > > Upgraded a system from 8.3 to 9-STABLE and did make delete-old-libs > afterwards. System has around thirty ports installed and all except > bacula-client upgraded gracefully. > > Why does it want libz.so.5 when libz.so.6 is present? I'm pretty sure > I'm missing the obvious here... > > > > Linking bacula-fd ... > /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client/work/bacula-5.2.12/libtool --silent > --tag=CXX --mode=link /usr/bin/c++ -L/usr/local/lib -L../lib > -L../findlib -o bacula-fd filed.o authenticate.o acl.o backup.o > estimate.o fd_plugins.o accurate.o filed_conf.o heartbeat.o job.o > pythonfd.o restore.o status.o verify.o verify_vol.o xattr.o -lz > -lbacfind -lbacpy -lbaccfg -lbac -lm -lpthread -lintl -lwrap > /usr/local/lib/libintl.so /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath > -Wl,/usr/local/lib > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libz.so.5, needed by /usr/local/lib/libbac.so, > not > found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) 'libbac.so' is installed by bacula-server; try to rebuild this port first! Use 'sysutils/libchk' or pkg_libchk (from bsdadminscripts) to find other broken ports. -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 14:03:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A2E35C for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C31EBDB for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id o13so658090qaj.8 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:03:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8rJ9lZlf6ohOAnw2/KukvTt7lZAh0JbTugIRwmXArQQ=; b=0pPumQH8ji+839DCabv+UqYLTRSNR09oTfqMBO28gz/Lu8Oqzj/yRb/cG0lzvTpmcC kGxfc4fPlq2tP6uJp9C9oAwYiDiA9ISQ00XxwuUX5ZNPRVZ8y1YQ22GdCGNlQ8sLEMzy WM6e2ElL0qTlFstjqRSnOb8YWDXLB3ucKhfOMizMNDxCwOB4JYafBHtKWufIyzeMgf49 tksConr/f/p3B7tLYltQIrzpjmiSPP/k08uL0xBZKh6hB90pndBLOajuPHqmeVxzRTGg 6RC/snQnJqYZyTCXVxUh9zgPDKsew6th1S6ZM8mNKm/7CRXxbkfQ3vyPbgtY/AtYn0GE xu8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.209.193 with SMTP id gh1mr21301967qab.86.1360159416699; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:03:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:03:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:03:36 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: h5PgXoKiOUsFHrKKp8aGxTCOOME Message-ID: Subject: VirtualBox 4.1.22 and Bridged Network problems From: CeDeROM To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:03:42 -0000 Hello :-) I cannot get Bridged Network setup in VBox 4.1.22 on my 9.1RC3 AMD64 - I get no traffic to the host interface at all. Did anyone noticed this or related problems? I have tried to watch the host interface with WireShark. I have disabled local firewall. I have set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1. Still can't get the bridged connection working :-( Any hints appreciated :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 14:18:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CB69EF for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F76BD9D for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x48so1218010wey.9 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:18:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=cb/ziE8RBtF24+LWQLFWZmckz1IIknATjmcycX/jjmY=; b=SEfdZC3Z3ukVQwEDHpcjDd8b3UmqMBk63RicueAMXXUx3MrVLo0PttZpKmcfOwhQFC DMRjFBI6o72KHq3wgU3A38VS84t9rGpt2srLaDykhhUiwGVZgqvNt5PEqVsb0lez+x3s Tnvlt0srCucf2vTDnG6OqvO9fGTI/Kkj2XNwnHw8F05QYHgEfjlIcyeOxC9QMP2Omnyp jdkgwW0hDWn+pAICGlQ69JMwzzgChC11rUcQatKCbczS3YccoF1EeMs/OCv7nzHcvJLX BCf7pfHWYG28AC4XP+ymTOFGXXJZhiic+MowqsrZ/rLq2ZnHGA2JZnzPxkZDT6uf8bxx 7uaw== X-Received: by 10.180.97.68 with SMTP id dy4mr5244705wib.7.1360160285393; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2sm3241992wiy.6.2013.02.06.06.18.04 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:18:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: VirtualBox 4.1.22 and Bridged Network problems From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:18:03 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: CeDeROM X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWpgXkdRU80dLHRXFvGVB/PIgai+vduhh/wc+df/Ct4FxR0SrKm8Srpq7XlJjotyTLZdV7 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:18:07 -0000 This was brought up a few weeks/months ago and I seem to recall that = setting the interface in *promiscuous* mode (monitoring) in the Host = configuration (read, in your hypervisor) was mandatory. See if that helps. On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:03 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello :-) >=20 > I cannot get Bridged Network setup in VBox 4.1.22 on my 9.1RC3 AMD64 - > I get no traffic to the host interface at all. Did anyone noticed this > or related problems? >=20 > I have tried to watch the host interface with WireShark. I have > disabled local firewall. I have set net.inet.ip.forwarding=3D1. Still > can't get the bridged connection working :-( >=20 > Any hints appreciated :-) > Tomek >=20 > --=20 > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 14:48:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58805E83 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:48:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yavuz.maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from pop3.ihlas.net.tr (pop3.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C980AF85 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65623 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2013 16:42:01 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO com2007) (yavuz.maslak@ihlas.net.tr@213.238.150.220) by pop3.ihlas.net.tr with SMTP; 6 Feb 2013 16:42:00 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-9?Q?Yavuz_Ma=FElak?= To: Subject: about pfctl Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:42:07 +0200 Message-ID: <102201ce0478$23453d90$69cfb8b0$@ihlas.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac4Ed1/Vf0YY6hUoQ4aG93vZiStKGA== Content-Language: tr X-Disclaimer: ihlas.net.tr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:48:43 -0000 I have a freebsd box and pf Works on it. I wish to see use of data for each ip address. When i execute "pfctl -t tablename -vT show" I can see usages of these ips. Pfctl lists all of ips. But how can i filter it for each ip address ? because i want to insert these data for each ip into a mysql table. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 14:58:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1B04C4 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:58:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E4686 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr129166.localdomain (mr129166.cri.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.129.166]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6648FA790; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:50:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mr129166 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mr129166.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D27627B; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:50:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:50:51 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: VirtualBox 4.1.22 and Bridged Network problems Message-ID: <20130206155051.5e952703@mr129166> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:58:45 -0000 Le Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:03:36 +0100, CeDeROM a écrit : Hello, > I cannot get Bridged Network setup in VBox 4.1.22 on my 9.1RC3 AMD64 - > I get no traffic to the host interface at all. Did anyone noticed this > or related problems? Works fine here (9.1-STABLE/amd64, virtual box 4.2.6). Be sure that the virbualbox kernel modules are in sync with your kernel (ie rebuilt virtualbox-ose-kmod). Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 15:02:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A041C5AE for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B306BD for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:02:06 -0800 Message-ID: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:02:03 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2013 15:02:06.0347 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDDC1DB0:01CE047A] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:02:10 -0000 Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? security.jail.param.allow.mount.zfs: 0 security.jail.param.allow.mount.procfs: 0 security.jail.param.allow.mount.nullfs: 0 security.jail.param.allow.mount.devfs: 0 security.jail.param.allow.mount.: 0 security.jail.param.allow.socket_af: 0 security.jail.param.allow.quotas: 0 security.jail.param.allow.chflags: 0 security.jail.param.allow.raw_sockets: 0 security.jail.param.allow.sysvipc: 0 security.jail.param.allow.set_hostname: 0 security.jail.param.ip6.saddrsel: 0 security.jail.param.ip6.: 0 security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: 0 security.jail.param.ip4.: 0 security.jail.param.cpuset.id: 0 security.jail.param.host.hostid: 0 security.jail.param.host.hostuuid: 64 security.jail.param.host.domainname: 256 security.jail.param.host.hostname: 256 security.jail.param.host.: 0 security.jail.param.children.max: 0 security.jail.param.children.cur: 0 security.jail.param.dying: 0 security.jail.param.persist: 0 security.jail.param.devfs_ruleset: 0 security.jail.param.enforce_statfs: 0 security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 security.jail.param.path: 1024 security.jail.param.name: 256 security.jail.param.parent: 0 security.jail.param.jid: 0 security.jail.devfs_ruleset: 0 security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 security.jail.jailed: 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 15:05:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0237F679 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (we-in-x022c.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93988E6 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x10so1213024wey.3 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:05:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=Hg5oOAl4F9qfkkfDaCuYU6jAjbMcRlF6lga6nOm5qoY=; b=TFgZhXsGy4pzH60bz0roXjn+q7aZ/SLAkmSxUmqMZyLS33/QWswCWk920mHnFQhkV6 VfmdYb3wBbvtI/H22Rug/FobskkFyvZACKNftJKMzHiHl8hUzJUJEpz8gF0KEN9/HhZy NOmiAqL1vxR9tZV8rUuJ7zgk1P80zJHeDvp6oVv66TomI7L9grbJVCt8u5bm2ra1bUIo 9liTlwcSJgplpSZnUV1SXj6P88qz/3cUTK95THsEFsd4VtK2WE1nG9UocXy2qyHujsLE ehlxdpjHYQdIItilLPu0PxuTND//6FhssCotmgsIAEkYS2uWBnjLdkN++3VECiJUZHWm /Q4w== X-Received: by 10.195.13.200 with SMTP id fa8mr50331845wjd.15.1360163115136; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:05:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm3805669wiz.1.2013.02.06.07.05.13 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:05:14 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:05:13 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <141EB0C7-B8D8-4413-86EE-F06066AD7633@my.gd> References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> To: Fbsd8 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkr4J7ko+zTJsX88WCMd+DEpZHZGyBLkTLuVae1cvMPwfFzJSTr97WNj/PhdRSku53wq3Mu Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:05:17 -0000 # sysctl -d security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: Processes in jail are limited to = creating UNIX/IP/route sockets only On Feb 6, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? >=20 >=20 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.zfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.procfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.nullfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.devfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.socket_af: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.quotas: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.chflags: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.raw_sockets: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.sysvipc: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.set_hostname: 0 > security.jail.param.ip6.saddrsel: 0 > security.jail.param.ip6.: 0 > security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: 0 > security.jail.param.ip4.: 0 > security.jail.param.cpuset.id: 0 > security.jail.param.host.hostid: 0 > security.jail.param.host.hostuuid: 64 > security.jail.param.host.domainname: 256 > security.jail.param.host.hostname: 256 > security.jail.param.host.: 0 > security.jail.param.children.max: 0 > security.jail.param.children.cur: 0 > security.jail.param.dying: 0 > security.jail.param.persist: 0 > security.jail.param.devfs_ruleset: 0 > security.jail.param.enforce_statfs: 0 > security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 > security.jail.param.path: 1024 > security.jail.param.name: 256 > security.jail.param.parent: 0 > security.jail.param.jid: 0 > security.jail.devfs_ruleset: 0 > security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 > security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 > security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 > security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 > security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 > security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 > security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 > security.jail.jailed: 0 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 15:09:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E239C6 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com (mail-bk0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AD4139 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w11so691202bku.8 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:09:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1cCOYTSEIjcaTOhrW9gep0lUpxMFjT8ckWZTQwZTRQc=; b=So56jtnyNYNjCSMr3O/nnfrpch3RQc/i7WOwNzvf7YbpPBEzslVu344goSmMOuK911 tBmyHhkyRu6+Rt4zAWUsWlOCPZcDQ2ZsyBJ/tVulEnNzFegHsmIuZ7NyRCxRvma1C2B5 h1qrvu9gcA9hpn+ehwQahJVetKdHrHNeg8BakHRBBeBu2Nn1f7OP6/7yRZUszvepL+VB koQBZy9clzTlqRVcwAufFPtUnIf9qEm6YD+WJ21Uszt1FD0cKeMA1ZgA1MijpVdbTaKR pXPjHHJgBMijIvrwEtoX113FZCxhJgo5cpNSCoad2FlFUfjT1kfL+kJHxISmrFUDfbi7 wPqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.4.146 with SMTP id 18mr7839355bkr.9.1360163372998; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.76.198 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.76.198 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:09:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:09:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions From: Waitman Gobble To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:09:40 -0000 On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: > > Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? > > > security.jail.param.allow.mount.zfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.procfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.nullfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.devfs: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.mount.: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.socket_af: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.quotas: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.chflags: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.raw_sockets: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.sysvipc: 0 > security.jail.param.allow.set_hostname: 0 > security.jail.param.ip6.saddrsel: 0 > security.jail.param.ip6.: 0 > security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: 0 > security.jail.param.ip4.: 0 > security.jail.param.cpuset.id: 0 > security.jail.param.host.hostid: 0 > security.jail.param.host.hostuuid: 64 > security.jail.param.host.domainname: 256 > security.jail.param.host.hostname: 256 > security.jail.param.host.: 0 > security.jail.param.children.max: 0 > security.jail.param.children.cur: 0 > security.jail.param.dying: 0 > security.jail.param.persist: 0 > security.jail.param.devfs_ruleset: 0 > security.jail.param.enforce_statfs: 0 > security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 > security.jail.param.path: 1024 > security.jail.param.name: 256 > security.jail.param.parent: 0 > security.jail.param.jid: 0 > security.jail.devfs_ruleset: 0 > security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 > security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 > security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 > security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 > security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 > security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 > security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 > security.jail.jailed: 0 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Did you try the man page? Also there is often interesting comments in /usr/src Hope that helps. Waitman Gobble San Jose California From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 15:17:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E0CC24 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84911A3 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:17:13 -0800 Message-ID: <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:17:10 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2013 15:17:13.0226 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A66DEA0:01CE047D] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:17:12 -0000 Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? >> >> >> security.jail.param.allow.mount.zfs: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.mount.procfs: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.mount.nullfs: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.mount.devfs: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.mount.: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.socket_af: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.quotas: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.chflags: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.raw_sockets: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.sysvipc: 0 >> security.jail.param.allow.set_hostname: 0 >> security.jail.param.ip6.saddrsel: 0 >> security.jail.param.ip6.: 0 >> security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: 0 >> security.jail.param.ip4.: 0 >> security.jail.param.cpuset.id: 0 >> security.jail.param.host.hostid: 0 >> security.jail.param.host.hostuuid: 64 >> security.jail.param.host.domainname: 256 >> security.jail.param.host.hostname: 256 >> security.jail.param.host.: 0 >> security.jail.param.children.max: 0 >> security.jail.param.children.cur: 0 >> security.jail.param.dying: 0 >> security.jail.param.persist: 0 >> security.jail.param.devfs_ruleset: 0 >> security.jail.param.enforce_statfs: 0 >> security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 >> security.jail.param.path: 1024 >> security.jail.param.name: 256 >> security.jail.param.parent: 0 >> security.jail.param.jid: 0 >> security.jail.devfs_ruleset: 0 >> security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 >> security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 >> security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 >> security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 >> security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 >> security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 >> security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 >> security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 >> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 >> security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 >> security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 >> security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 >> security.jail.jailed: 0 >> > > > Did you try the man page? Also there is often interesting comments in > /usr/src > > Hope that helps. > > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California > > There are no man pages for any MIBs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 15:23:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99700263 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com (mail-bk0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273E123D for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jk7so694645bkc.29 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:23:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=py5/Or4Bbf53ZVKzq2tyNK4SMWXhBT38Ao1V4HX6UPQ=; b=YVUr15H4qU8nWh72x0pO6NBVVOk9D0PUkalwM9yZZdoKJ+RbwMF9WvvMrfG85h3HGF JeSNLReTse7G5vr4UGGwKY28USTOLkXuBXwra2zf3EdLsmE4uItAOsaTlqoaQUE9PydT 1d9uV0L7n1ov/qRkHDf6Jkial5BsJTpbJJOkemOeQJ7ijox3S0RGNykc+Fvx1GrsNodl Y22eMf1jVv6syamKbidQqHxkCHDw2F4CKM1Bob5osn5FfRZXaFIGbbHZ5cJ6beOdUO/r nT2ds/Ar/Cel4O3DNus/mMjeKEpzFK+cM86VhdYvLEvIfa2xzBq68DE+LlFE6bkSaFc7 N8RQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.127.14 with SMTP id e14mr3770973bks.95.1360164208748; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.76.198 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.76.198 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:23:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:23:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions From: Waitman Gobble To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:23:36 -0000 On Feb 6, 2013 7:17 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: > > Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >>> >>> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? >>> >>> >>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.zfs: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.procfs: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.nullfs: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.devfs: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.socket_af: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.quotas: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.chflags: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.raw_sockets: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.sysvipc: 0 >>> security.jail.param.allow.set_hostname: 0 >>> security.jail.param.ip6.saddrsel: 0 >>> security.jail.param.ip6.: 0 >>> security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: 0 >>> security.jail.param.ip4.: 0 >>> security.jail.param.cpuset.id: 0 >>> security.jail.param.host.hostid: 0 >>> security.jail.param.host.hostuuid: 64 >>> security.jail.param.host.domainname: 256 >>> security.jail.param.host.hostname: 256 >>> security.jail.param.host.: 0 >>> security.jail.param.children.max: 0 >>> security.jail.param.children.cur: 0 >>> security.jail.param.dying: 0 >>> security.jail.param.persist: 0 >>> security.jail.param.devfs_ruleset: 0 >>> security.jail.param.enforce_statfs: 0 >>> security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 >>> security.jail.param.path: 1024 >>> security.jail.param.name: 256 >>> security.jail.param.parent: 0 >>> security.jail.param.jid: 0 >>> security.jail.devfs_ruleset: 0 >>> security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 >>> security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 >>> security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 >>> security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 >>> security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 >>> security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 >>> security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 >>> security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 >>> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 >>> security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 >>> security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 >>> security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 >>> security.jail.jailed: 0 >>> >> >> >> Did you try the man page? Also there is often interesting comments in >> /usr/src >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> Waitman Gobble >> San Jose California >> >> > > There are no man pages for any MIBs > Sorry, but im not at a computer now to check, but I believe it would be in the =ABjail=BB man page. Hopefully that's the right 411. Waitman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 16:32:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4130FBC for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7679D79E for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:32:22 -0800 Message-ID: <51128593.3080406@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:32:19 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2013 16:32:22.0965 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A6A6E50:01CE0487] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:32:22 -0000 Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Feb 6, 2013 7:17 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >> Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >>>> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? >>>> >>>> >>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.zfs: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.procfs: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.nullfs: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.devfs: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.socket_af: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.quotas: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.chflags: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.raw_sockets: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.sysvipc: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.allow.set_hostname: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.ip6.saddrsel: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.ip6.: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.ip4.: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.cpuset.id: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.host.hostid: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.host.hostuuid: 64 >>>> security.jail.param.host.domainname: 256 >>>> security.jail.param.host.hostname: 256 >>>> security.jail.param.host.: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.children.max: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.children.cur: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.dying: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.persist: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.devfs_ruleset: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.enforce_statfs: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.path: 1024 >>>> security.jail.param.name: 256 >>>> security.jail.param.parent: 0 >>>> security.jail.param.jid: 0 >>>> security.jail.devfs_ruleset: 0 >>>> security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 >>>> security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 >>>> security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 >>>> security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 >>>> security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 >>>> security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 >>>> security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 >>>> security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 >>>> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 >>>> security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 >>>> security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 >>>> security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 >>>> security.jail.jailed: 0 >>>> >>> >>> Did you try the man page? Also there is often interesting comments in >>> /usr/src >>> >>> Hope that helps. >>> >>> Waitman Gobble >>> San Jose California >>> >>> >> There are no man pages for any MIBs >> > > Sorry, but im not at a computer now to check, but I believe it would be in > the «jail» man page. Hopefully that's the right 411. > > Waitman > > man jail only talks about these few MIBs security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 security.jail.jailed: 0 which are set from the host only. What about the other security.jail.param.* MIBs where are they documented at? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 16:39:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF94258E for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08D8826 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:39:43 -0800 Message-ID: <5112874D.30500@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:39:41 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: setting MIBs on a per jail bases Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2013 16:39:44.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[914BCB50:01CE0488] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:39:42 -0000 Is there a way to set these MIBs on a per jail bases? allow.mount.nullfs allow.raw_sockets cpuset.id securelevel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 16:42:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E020476D for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (we-in-x022d.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753F2867 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r5so1295284wey.18 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:42:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=IT6Rjbw7Ln+zvATJiAqKKXifJIQQDzi0lAG/xba1xOk=; b=hLisd09hN7jLyF5M5MlZi7ICXA0WxdgVvkswmPV741Xcw6BhA1mBIt6RIApy0CXVzC bzRv8hlDec7DPqLyBne9TTlafZhe4u+HqF7pVIXm2nVAYe7dTkFpN3/qa5om20U9vdLu yCe4I+mtaHPQOK2LKSpshRxWRag7g0mIX6mffxtt9ebI9oVsaHOdJ9n/d9i0Zuoc+s7V Ra208BkC968bpNLina7/7/iXsLeZNDihrl0nWweOBEe/OQ6hET+MXmwlrdCgKQ5J/L75 35jsLKw32gC/F3ZFY8Z6KyPlt/EnEL7L6VM6WZ3Y18qz82f+xybWPssf9quXO7PbFDtR dMAA== X-Received: by 10.180.83.227 with SMTP id t3mr6395663wiy.2.1360168966646; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3sm4324199wiy.8.2013.02.06.08.42.45 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:42:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: setting MIBs on a per jail bases From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <5112874D.30500@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:42:44 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3A0296FA-E6E1-41AD-8077-7648E6E57511@my.gd> References: <5112874D.30500@a1poweruser.com> To: Fbsd8 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmcRZ1eCZUsrDLGXAhhKRDD/mifOisIIVqmwGo14MzQTbakkZXpa/dfnKpdGsk3feEtOOIV Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:42:52 -0000 Running 8.3 here and the answer is no. On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > Is there a way to set these MIBs > on a per jail bases? >=20 > allow.mount.nullfs > allow.raw_sockets > cpuset.id > securelevel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 16:57:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993E9145 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FD2983 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:57:35 -0800 Message-ID: <51128B7C.4090801@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:57:32 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fleuriot Damien Subject: Re: setting MIBs on a per jail bases References: <5112874D.30500@a1poweruser.com> <3A0296FA-E6E1-41AD-8077-7648E6E57511@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <3A0296FA-E6E1-41AD-8077-7648E6E57511@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2013 16:57:36.0059 (UTC) FILETIME=[104A40B0:01CE048B] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:57:34 -0000 Fleuriot Damien wrote: > Running 8.3 here and the answer is no. > > > On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Is there a way to set these MIBs >> on a per jail bases? >> >> allow.mount.nullfs >> allow.raw_sockets >> cpuset.id >> securelevel > > > Rereading the "man jail" for 9.1 talks about securelevel as a jail parammeter. So correct me if I an wrong. All the security.jail.param.* MIBs are set in rc.conf or /etc/jail.conf file on a per jail bases by changing the word "parm" to the jailname? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 16:59:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C378D34A for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC269DF for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:59:09 -0800 Message-ID: <51128BDA.2080605@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:59:06 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> <51128593.3080406@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <51128593.3080406@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2013 16:59:09.0154 (UTC) FILETIME=[47C76C20:01CE048B] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:59:08 -0000 Fbsd8 wrote: > Waitman Gobble wrote: >> On Feb 6, 2013 7:17 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >>> Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >>>>> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.zfs: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.procfs: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.nullfs: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.devfs: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.mount.: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.socket_af: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.quotas: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.chflags: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.raw_sockets: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.sysvipc: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.allow.set_hostname: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.ip6.saddrsel: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.ip6.: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.ip4.saddrsel: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.ip4.: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.cpuset.id: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.host.hostid: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.host.hostuuid: 64 >>>>> security.jail.param.host.domainname: 256 >>>>> security.jail.param.host.hostname: 256 >>>>> security.jail.param.host.: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.children.max: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.children.cur: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.dying: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.persist: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.devfs_ruleset: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.enforce_statfs: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.path: 1024 >>>>> security.jail.param.name: 256 >>>>> security.jail.param.parent: 0 >>>>> security.jail.param.jid: 0 >>>>> security.jail.devfs_ruleset: 0 >>>>> security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2 >>>>> security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 >>>>> security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 >>>>> security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 >>>>> security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 >>>>> security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 >>>>> security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 >>>>> security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 >>>>> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 >>>>> security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 >>>>> security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 >>>>> security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 >>>>> security.jail.jailed: 0 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Did you try the man page? Also there is often interesting comments in >>>> /usr/src >>>> >>>> Hope that helps. >>>> >>>> Waitman Gobble >>>> San Jose California >>>> >>>> >>> There are no man pages for any MIBs >>> >> >> Sorry, but im not at a computer now to check, but I believe it would >> be in >> the «jail» man page. Hopefully that's the right 411. >> >> Waitman >> >> > > > man jail only talks about these few MIBs security.jail.mount_zfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_procfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_nullfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_devfs_allowed: 0 > security.jail.mount_allowed: 0 > security.jail.chflags_allowed: 0 > security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 0 > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: 0 > security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1 > security.jail.set_hostname_allowed: 1 > security.jail.jail_max_af_ips: 255 > security.jail.jailed: 0 > > which are set from the host only. > > What about the other security.jail.param.* MIBs > where are they documented at? > Rereading the "man jail" for 9.1 talks about securelevel as a jail parammeter. So correct me if I an wrong. All the security.jail.param.* MIBs are set in rc.conf or /etc/jail.conf file on a per jail bases by changing the word "parm" to the jailname? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 16:59:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ECD532 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD797A19 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id dq12so1278193wgb.12 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:59:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=mQ+kQj8/ybRC8Fi4eqeGCJH39Er7hmzlEno+oZ9HAo8=; b=QuPeE/4o+6mYiaHEDzIksWSB2lPnGyOCe5IZip3LSfArVs4O9vrzCR9F0SpqwvXmvm Pvx3YFGwe8duUDL9CNAHf6EdXGa4t4YYq/D3E6faQiDh9s1v+HKPbVSg01VuE9BeBd1d jPbpPJkl9Po6OPtKQvG6I0m7/5bCB8jizMlXmC0BcqKUbyvyOpMiZRiSYf6LLTMpKWkC grgmrUlHcjyy2587gJ+c/l86JU2iV09D67xSeH7AppdAmet0ltd5oEmqVOUJpqTTK4s3 bDStS0eS3jtxeE0iahL4i09eTr/eXq9Yj4KqZN9PO3nW/3OTT64yB88tm2pjA4myNW2X q5sQ== X-Received: by 10.180.85.97 with SMTP id g1mr6387807wiz.29.1360169984583; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id be1sm4417162wib.10.2013.02.06.08.59.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:59:43 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: setting MIBs on a per jail bases From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <51128B7C.4090801@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:59:41 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8C990E24-5EDC-47C9-A062-59DA47BB1102@my.gd> References: <5112874D.30500@a1poweruser.com> <3A0296FA-E6E1-41AD-8077-7648E6E57511@my.gd> <51128B7C.4090801@a1poweruser.com> To: Fbsd8 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl5OSB29ytcqPt98TWaHOg1SnYoHDvDROkaR9Xxb1nUw+zYnwFbq+a9HTzQMEuyQBh1ZsYE Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:59:57 -0000 On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > Fleuriot Damien wrote: >> Running 8.3 here and the answer is no. >> On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> Is there a way to set these MIBs >>> on a per jail bases? >>>=20 >>> allow.mount.nullfs >>> allow.raw_sockets >>> cpuset.id >>> securelevel >=20 > Rereading the "man jail" for 9.1 talks about securelevel as a jail = parammeter. So correct me if I an wrong. All the security.jail.param.* = MIBs are set in rc.conf or /etc/jail.conf file on a per jail bases by > changing the word "parm" to the jailname? >=20 I'm afraid I wouldn't know, I don't have a single 9.x box here. Does the man mention the secure level as a PER JAIL parameter, or as a = systemwide parameter applied only to jails ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 17:21:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D7BC20 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B34CBDD for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id a22so612722qcs.26 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fpHm5bYD7CqJb8xp16LkaKCx7RFjNlL2I06DYVOZyeI=; b=lglyag5pjEiNdDwXVdzgFvVy1Bn3UKcrCSBB5kM4u+bxKliXnIrnlHnZPFdUUvDp/H 0kvuS/KRgapu/qs9htFqRx+MR409NMsxvZf4cAmPRiJPzY6gHRDBKNoopDjFvpBvNVwY NKiwIAxRCOllSlslbE2toeTr+u+BH5w8UARmc/R/JXoHHHcHlwW3S9aSLOyGxEL7i6vw BnIoMWiqVzamhLB640IfM7NdsJ4qwbEVA3HMRRUBmla9ktdLYRC635tClmMtjJujBy2w qZuHQTpoo8NjDgcktDuzynrSb9JMJcT+R3DqLT1/6y4kp4Cg8yl2IbzCEyZbeGDxn8sc lk5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.177.8 with SMTP id bg8mr3793728qab.87.1360171254748; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130206155051.5e952703@mr129166> References: <20130206155051.5e952703@mr129166> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:20:54 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yfs5SXXqb2LBcuQYomU3zB9xi-0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VirtualBox 4.1.22 and Bridged Network problems From: CeDeROM To: Patrick Lamaiziere , ml@my.gd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:21:01 -0000 I have built 4.2.6 and its working again! Thank you! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 17:26:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD777E1B for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:26:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjg@ucsc.edu) Received: from mail-ia0-x22a.google.com (mail-ia0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51171C1E for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k20so1898197iak.29 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:26:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VZFqPQ7HwtULxB2gippSi/N7AiR/hXoOyMX9LtsDKJI=; b=grz2Mj4eVBYxA+XmzCryH1tTYumebligZAljn8U1GN4KcgfPK57u8AyZM5I95kMPHW iIUhLlThgnSC3j8K/5lBzXTNGTa/q0aIbFy15/dv45F8ptV++u6inUYZx46yTQe94F63 hd2bNHGtG0QppaU8su3rGLca9Hys2mweJ8HHg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=VZFqPQ7HwtULxB2gippSi/N7AiR/hXoOyMX9LtsDKJI=; b=YIROGyCxM4N1SbfSEuTByCMXK459fGS3YbGOgCsWsAZSlVA8+bLZHNlxrVq9bSP6JP SWM07uD7FdtKxXc/Po1ne2//kbs9bkI9zIA7KAewGiR1SL1VHzWtIB+LxiAz4Fizr1lF ah9QSR/HO/z9G7JUnsFeCXKwv8MiwAWJOzj622ReDtyVOgJYOvpNlLmsEs9QcUsCR202 bvngzfSSBWqfw9pe1GIj5Q6/P7PXgOU430LMtEULQ2t/ZR2qXLgnJKJd7dgSFubcFlT6 hUV/FCj4ppL4jeG6zxY9rhRguUkfGnkk9oTvMVONGjue+/bxwkZIT1pd77lTvW02M55e Mndg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.237.5 with SMTP id uy5mr8002569igc.12.1360171577608; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:26:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.241.73 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:26:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:26:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Restricting Periodic Scripts From: Tim Gustafson To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn3+MLhPOFZENTzPEN4v5UByjsOrQVlPJ6kLOEOTD3TfWKDnNx0p2+sllbR/YDyCW2hyjKT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:26:18 -0000 I have a FreeBSD ZFS file server with tens of millions of files stored on it. But, the daily periodic scripts like /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm and /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate take hours iterating through those folders, and I just don't need them to be scanned. I see that I can edit /etc/locate.rc to fix the behavior for /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate but I don't see a way to exclude folders from other scripts like /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm from scanning them. Is there any way to prune out folders that I don't want scanned, or should I just disable those jobs? -- Tim Gustafson tjg@ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 17:59:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D05D53 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=742911f0f=pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from ip-002.utdallas.edu (ip-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC36DE20 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:59:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtUEAJ6ZElGBbgogVmdsb2JhbABFwGADASICJCeCXgKBYxoTiBEMmwiYIYkKkHhhA4hmoSo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,617,1355119200"; d="scan'208";a="114188130" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Feb 2013 11:58:59 -0600 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:58:56 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: How to add unused space to an existing install Message-ID: <47D0E9AD1EEAC6058A534838@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=2495 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:59:06 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 8.3 RELEASE box that we recently discovered only has part of the "disk" being used. This box has four 1TB drives in RAID 5, and df only shows 500MB of disk available. fdisk shows this: # fdisk -p # /dev/mfid0 g c364602 h255 s63 p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771 a 1 When I run the fdisk editor in sysinstall I see this: Disk name: mfid0 FDISK Partition Editor DISK Geometry: 364602 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 5857331130 sectors (2860024MB) Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype Flags 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 63 1562363771 1562363833 mfid0s1 8 freebsd 165 1562363834 4294981702 5857345535 - 12 unused 0 I want to capture all that unused space and add it to the server. fstab has this: # cat /etc/fstab # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/mfid0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/mfid0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/mfid0s1e /home ufs rw 2 2 /dev/mfid0s1d /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/mfid0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/mfid0s1g /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. If I move to the label editor, I get this: FreeBSD Disklabel Editor Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- mfid0s1a 2000MB * mfid0s1d 65536MB * mfid0s1e 4096MB * mfid0s1b swap 65536MB SWAP mfid0s1f 10240MB * mfid0s1g 601GB * As you can see mfid0s1g is 601GB, and according to fstab that's /var. Yet df -h shows: # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/mfid0s1a 1.9G 726M 1.0G 41% / devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev /dev/mfid0s1e 3.9G 38M 3.5G 1% /home /dev/mfid0s1d 62G 6.6M 57G 0% /tmp /dev/mfid0s1f 9.7G 7.5G 1.4G 84% /usr /dev/mfid0s1g 582G 39G 496G 7% /var So apparently I'm not creating this new slice? It should be /dev/mfid0s1h, correct? How to I "recapture" the remaining 2+TB of space that's not being used? -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/infosecurity/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 18:00:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1675BE02 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB53BE3B for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E0B3CB73; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:00:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r16I0b0I002658; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:00:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:00:37 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Tim Gustafson Subject: Re: Restricting Periodic Scripts Message-Id: <20130206190037.b72b64f5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:00:37 -0000 On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:26:17 -0800, Tim Gustafson wrote: > I have a FreeBSD ZFS file server with tens of millions of files stored on it. > > But, the daily periodic scripts like > /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm and > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate take hours iterating through those > folders, and I just don't need them to be scanned. > > I see that I can edit /etc/locate.rc to fix the behavior for > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate but I don't see a way to exclude > folders from other scripts like /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm > from scanning them. Is there any way to prune out folders that I > don't want scanned, or should I just disable those jobs? You can disable them per /etc/periodic.conf (see examples in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf). To keep the functionality, but restrict it to a smaller amount of files, you could use the system's scripts as templates, make your own "derivates" (wich inclusion or exclusion rules) and place them in /usr/local/etc/periodic for the system to call them (which it will if they are present). You can add your custom configuration flags to /etc/periodic.conf and have your scripts source that file (like the system's scripts do). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 18:00:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80502E05 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (mail1.sourcehosting.net [74.205.51.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB00E3D for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 24-181-237-39.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([24.181.237.39] helo=Gregory-Larkins-iMac.local) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U39IQ-000P8c-3I; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:00:36 -0500 Received: from Gregory-Larkins-iMac.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Gregory-Larkins-iMac.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91E1519D5B63; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:00:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <51129A40.1050606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:00:32 -0500 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Gustafson References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.181.237.39 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glarkin@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.sourcehosting.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_MILLIONSOF,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Subject: Re: Restricting Periodic Scripts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.sourcehosting.net) Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:00:42 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/6/13 12:26 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote: > I have a FreeBSD ZFS file server with tens of millions of files > stored on it. > > But, the daily periodic scripts like > /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm and > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate take hours iterating through those > folders, and I just don't need them to be scanned. > > I see that I can edit /etc/locate.rc to fix the behavior for > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate but I don't see a way to exclude > folders from other scripts like > /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm from scanning them. Is there > any way to prune out folders that I don't want scanned, or should I > just disable those jobs? > Hi Tim, Have a look at this posting from 2012: http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-31846.html There is a patch for the script in there, but I didn't check to see if the author ever filed a PR. There's also a workaround that involves using the nosuid mount option, if that is acceptable in your environment. Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlESmkAACgkQ0sRouByUApB2kgCfalTZRa5GQlAZjcNXq5qxfA3e 2rwAoLCMoscJYLVuevYLjZGj9qYiIjZD =3yUC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 18:10:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE9B398 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AA5ED9 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B683CA57; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:10:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r16IAOpq002707; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:10:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:10:24 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: How to add unused space to an existing install Message-Id: <20130206191024.e556d840.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <47D0E9AD1EEAC6058A534838@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> References: <47D0E9AD1EEAC6058A534838@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:10:22 -0000 On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:58:56 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: > When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. If > I move to the label editor, I get this: > > FreeBSD Disklabel Editor > > Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) > > Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs > ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- > mfid0s1a 2000MB * > mfid0s1d 65536MB * > mfid0s1e 4096MB * > mfid0s1b swap 65536MB SWAP > mfid0s1f 10240MB * > mfid0s1g 601GB * > > As you can see mfid0s1g is 601GB, and according to fstab that's /var. > > Yet df -h shows: > > # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/mfid0s1a 1.9G 726M 1.0G 41% / > devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev > /dev/mfid0s1e 3.9G 38M 3.5G 1% /home > /dev/mfid0s1d 62G 6.6M 57G 0% /tmp > /dev/mfid0s1f 9.7G 7.5G 1.4G 84% /usr > /dev/mfid0s1g 582G 39G 496G 7% /var > > So apparently I'm not creating this new slice? It should be /dev/mfid0s1h, > correct? If you're creating a new slice, that would be mfid0s2, because mfid0s1 is the 1st slice ("DOS primary partition") carrying the partitions a, swap, d, e, f, g. If I remember correctly, h is the last partition letter that can be assigned, so this one should be available. Problem: The 1st slice mfid0s1 is already of fixed size, so you cannot add a new partition here without growint that slice first. Attention, that step isn't free of danger and should be done with a backup at hand, just in case, and because you _always_ need a backup. :-) This problem is not a problem if you create a 2nd slice mfid0s2 to use it separately. If you can _really_ create mfid0s2 as a slice, you only need to format it, e. g. "newfs -U /dev/mfid0s2" which creates mfid0s2c which in turn is called mfid0s2). You can then assign that new partition (the one covering the whole slice) to a new mountpoint, e. g. /data, /stuff or whatever you want. There are also means to "merge" this partition into some mountpoint that is already occupied, e. g. /home, maybe via "mount -o union" including all possibly negative consequences). > How to I "recapture" the remaining 2+TB of space that's not being used? Without wiping the whole disk(s)? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 19:09:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB751F21 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yavuz.maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from pop3.ihlas.net.tr (pop3.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12188232 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14962 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2013 21:09:00 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO com2007) (yavuz.maslak@ihlas.net.tr@213.238.150.220) by pop3.ihlas.net.tr with SMTP; 6 Feb 2013 21:09:00 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Yavuz_Ma=C5=9Flak?= To: References: <102201ce0478$23453d90$69cfb8b0$@ihlas.net.tr> <44mwvh5lfn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44mwvh5lfn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Subject: RE: about pfctl Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:09:01 +0200 Message-ID: <10a201ce049d$6c4375a0$44ca60e0$@ihlas.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIbLtbCOoJnpXUFyQfCc2GuVoZDaQGMf7/8l8Z4/BA= Content-Language: tr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:09:02 -0000 > I have a freebsd box and pf Works on it. > I wish to see use of data for each ip address. > > When i execute "pfctl -t tablename -vT show" I can see usages of = these > ips. Pfctl lists all of ips. > > But how can i filter it for each ip address ? because i want to=20 > insert these data for each ip into a mysql table. >Sounds like a job for sed(1)... Could you give me an example related to that ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 21:33:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A383557D for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C582B47 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r16LXjMA036440; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:33:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r16LXjWT036437; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:33:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:33:45 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon Subject: Re: How to add unused space to an existing install In-Reply-To: <20130206191024.e556d840.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <47D0E9AD1EEAC6058A534838@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> <20130206191024.e556d840.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:33:45 -0700 (MST) Cc: Paul Schmehl , FreeBSD Questions List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:33:51 -0000 On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:58:56 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. If >> I move to the label editor, I get this: >> >> FreeBSD Disklabel Editor >> >> Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) >> >> Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs >> ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- >> mfid0s1a 2000MB * >> mfid0s1d 65536MB * >> mfid0s1e 4096MB * >> mfid0s1b swap 65536MB SWAP >> mfid0s1f 10240MB * >> mfid0s1g 601GB * >> >> As you can see mfid0s1g is 601GB, and according to fstab that's /var. >> >> Yet df -h shows: >> >> # df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/mfid0s1a 1.9G 726M 1.0G 41% / >> devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev >> /dev/mfid0s1e 3.9G 38M 3.5G 1% /home >> /dev/mfid0s1d 62G 6.6M 57G 0% /tmp >> /dev/mfid0s1f 9.7G 7.5G 1.4G 84% /usr >> /dev/mfid0s1g 582G 39G 496G 7% /var >> >> So apparently I'm not creating this new slice? It should be /dev/mfid0s1h, >> correct? > > If you're creating a new slice, that would be mfid0s2, because > mfid0s1 is the 1st slice ("DOS primary partition") carrying the > partitions a, swap, d, e, f, g. If I remember correctly, h is > the last partition letter that can be assigned, so this one > should be available. > > Problem: The 1st slice mfid0s1 is already of fixed size, so > you cannot add a new partition here without growint that > slice first. Attention, that step isn't free of danger and > should be done with a backup at hand, just in case, and > because you _always_ need a backup. :-) > > This problem is not a problem if you create a 2nd slice > mfid0s2 to use it separately. > > If you can _really_ create mfid0s2 as a slice, you only need > to format it, e. g. "newfs -U /dev/mfid0s2" which creates > mfid0s2c which in turn is called mfid0s2). You can then assign > that new partition (the one covering the whole slice) to > a new mountpoint, e. g. /data, /stuff or whatever you want. Yes, but creating FreeBSD partitions inside that slice allows them to be aligned. That may not be a problem on these 1T drives, some 1T drives have 512-byte blocks. Or the slow misaligned speed might be disguised by the slow RAID5 speed... fdisk and bsdlabel always align to fictional CHS values. gpart can align FreeBSD partitions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 23:21:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A09997; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:21:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF462A0; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r16NLPR5001926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:21:25 -0600 Received: from dtwin (10.242.182.124) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:21:24 -0600 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Paul Schmehl'" , "'FreeBSD Questions List'" References: <47D0E9AD1EEAC6058A534838@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <47D0E9AD1EEAC6058A534838@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> Subject: RE: How to add unused space to an existing install Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:21:39 -0800 Message-ID: <02d101ce04c0$b8d609f0$2a821dd0$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQMBMY0ki6zZlJS3+N3PNmycCug64JYG0sDA Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.242.182.124] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-06_06:2013-02-06,2013-02-06,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Devin Teske X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:21:35 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:59 AM > To: FreeBSD Questions List > Subject: How to add unused space to an existing install > > I have a FreeBSD 8.3 RELEASE box that we recently discovered only has part > of the "disk" being used. This box has four 1TB drives in RAID 5, and df > only shows 500MB of disk available. > > fdisk shows this: > # fdisk -p > # /dev/mfid0 > g c364602 h255 s63 > p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771 > a 1 > > When I run the fdisk editor in sysinstall I see this: > > Disk name: mfid0 FDISK Partition > Editor > DISK Geometry: 364602 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 5857331130 sectors > (2860024MB) > > Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype > Flags > > 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 > 63 1562363771 1562363833 mfid0s1 8 freebsd 165 > 1562363834 4294981702 5857345535 - 12 unused 0 > > I want to capture all that unused space and add it to the server. > > fstab has this: > # cat /etc/fstab > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump > Pass# > /dev/mfid0s1b none swap sw 0 0 > /dev/mfid0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 > /dev/mfid0s1e /home ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/mfid0s1d /tmp ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/mfid0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/mfid0s1g /var ufs rw 2 2 > /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > > When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. Did you try something like: echo "p 2 165 * *" | sudo fdisk -f- /dev/mfid0 ?? Afterward "fdisk -p" should show something like... # /dev/mfid0 g c364602 h255 s63 p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771 p 2 0xa5 a 1 And then you'll have /dev/mfid0s2 which you can do-with what you like (directly newfs the slice or create BSD partitions underneath that to further sub-divide into as many as 8 smaller units, /dev/mfid0s2[a-h]). > If I move to the label editor, I get this: > > FreeBSD Disklabel Editor > > Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) > > Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs > ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- > mfid0s1a 2000MB * > mfid0s1d 65536MB * > mfid0s1e 4096MB * > mfid0s1b swap 65536MB SWAP > mfid0s1f 10240MB * > mfid0s1g 601GB * > > As you can see mfid0s1g is 601GB, and according to fstab that's /var. > > Yet df -h shows: > > # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/mfid0s1a 1.9G 726M 1.0G 41% / > devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev > /dev/mfid0s1e 3.9G 38M 3.5G 1% /home > /dev/mfid0s1d 62G 6.6M 57G 0% /tmp > /dev/mfid0s1f 9.7G 7.5G 1.4G 84% /usr > /dev/mfid0s1g 582G 39G 496G 7% /var > > So apparently I'm not creating this new slice? It should be /dev/mfid0s1h, > correct? > Let's not confuse slices (DOS partitions) with disklabels (BSD partitions). DOS partitions are (maximum 4 per disk): mfid0s1 mfid0s2 mfid0s3 mfid0s4 (according to your "fdisk -p" output, you're mfid0 disk is currently only using mfid0s1) BSD partitions are (maximum 8 per "slice" aka DOS partition): mfid0s1a mfid0s1b mfid0s1c mfid0s1d mfid0s1e mfid0s1f mfid0s1g mfid0s1h (according to your sysinstall output, you're mfid0s1 slice has 5 BSD partitions -- a, e, d, f, and g) > How to I "recapture" the remaining 2+TB of space that's not being used? > The easiest way to use your extra space is to not adjust one of those 5 BSD partitions, but instead create a new DOS partition (mfid0s2 as previously discussed above). However, if you *really* want to "grow" an existing BSD partition, this can be done (very carefully). First, you'll want to save the output of "disklabel -r mfid0s1" to a text file. Next, you'll have to re-fdisk mfid0 so that the first slice covers the entire disk. Of course, re-mastering the slices does not affect the data, but it _will_ wipe out the BSD partition map (the disklabels; in other words, after using fdisk to adjust the slice size of the first DOS partition, "disklabel -r mfid0s1" will no longer return what it had before -- you'll have no disklabels after), so the previous step of backing up the output of "disklabel -r ..." is paramount. Next, you'll have to restore the disklabel (using "disklabel -e mfid0s1" and cross-referencing your backup text file) with one slight adjustment... You're going to use the *exact* values you backed up _EXCEPT_ you're going to make the last label (position-wise -- taking care to note the byte ranges of each disklabel -- ignoring "c" which of course is a pseudo label for "whole slice") bigger while keeping the same offset (only the size of the last label should change). In your case, given the output you provided from sysinstall, this would likely be your "g" label (but I'd have to see your "disklabel -r" output to know for sure -- again, taking care to analyze the byte ranges). Once you've re-written the disklabels (making sure to change nothing from your previous backup except the size of the last label to cover the new unused space), you're now at a position where you can "grow" the label with: growfs /dev/mfid0s1g NOTE: Should be done from a LiveFS (read: not while booted from said filesystem). That will zero out the unused inodes and make the new space available. Upon your next boot you'll now have the new storage space available to your "g" label (/var from the looks of it). NOTE: If you wanted to change "g" to your "/usr" partition, rsync is your friend -- while booted from a LiveFS like DruidBSD or mfsBSD etc.). -- Cheers, Devin P.S. I take no responsibility for lost data -- caveat emptor. _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 23:30:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E33CB4 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjg@ucsc.edu) Received: from mail-ia0-x230.google.com (mail-ia0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DC030F for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so2305615iac.21 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:30:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rRXNzzjTHs2GfO/LzsbKFsAuVoQCHlTRgY6zfE5b+hM=; b=We6LXHx7aTwE8mSy2sEHPyDpg145agGv3GbCQ2DgV+Uzrqddvauoxnsh8zl4cPbGB/ T6XXtB0XwFp7fGWJEtlFYW4rGriO8sXfbNwNjoDLTEO2qO/acLOZbicrkeVlBeSPTNuH T49GyJjBMf2YKFyEQT4l9NNHI7s+4WoXzeqhU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=rRXNzzjTHs2GfO/LzsbKFsAuVoQCHlTRgY6zfE5b+hM=; b=R+FObjcTNKoabOvO5WNjfM8tJy5S39ynmhUrv/Wg5dSmtPMWkdSEt6s3ZUJyb02R2r Jm2Zx8asHv3DXem7HT9NfqmupJTtzs7P4CECPsWA6kmO4upHmhWkISRLfXJgiTk13Lk8 a/mJc6h1EklQG3SPAEBzIahPqaxpVlvBNyiPmjBKkj4eQw/rVlou7l3D+0FU8EeDhV06 bYekNlwyaRvriv3MXIncEwL1nFeIXkwV/VBnD5lktWLm2dtOzwrCszwOT5EpYd+PEnhV v7GGdEvmqZ6mgGxOAXQZt2fO7brH6KVopN03cIBR1uW8lcZHzwrGTRsNEuE9dQ0wa8Rn QcDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.16.144 with SMTP id g16mr10392277igd.2.1360193449325; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.241.73 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:30:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51129A40.1050606@FreeBSD.org> References: <51129A40.1050606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:30:49 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Restricting Periodic Scripts From: Tim Gustafson To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQky+ho+dW89adLqxbigDplUi0hzW53oAiX5BvB+8gfVAiRkGa8IEMhHJL4unaQ19pUiEDc6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:30:50 -0000 > I have a FreeBSD ZFS file server with tens of millions of files > stored on it. > > But, the daily periodic scripts like > /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm and > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate take hours iterating through those > folders, and I just don't need them to be scanned. > > I see that I can edit /etc/locate.rc to fix the behavior for > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate but I don't see a way to exclude > folders from other scripts like > /etc/periodic/security/110.neggrpperm from scanning them. Is there > any way to prune out folders that I don't want scanned, or should I > just disable those jobs? Thanks to everyone who replied. I got some helpful suggestions from a few people, which all amounted to either "disable the jobs" or "create your own custom version of those jobs". So for now, I'm just disabling them. I appreciate all the help. Thanks! -- Tim Gustafson tjg@ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 03:20:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F9AA96 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 03:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from m2.gritton.org (gritton.org [199.192.164.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644D4E3F for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 03:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glorfindel.gritton.org (c-174-52-130-157.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.130.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by m2.gritton.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r173GTJv080588; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:16:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <51131C8C.10605@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:16:28 -0700 From: Jamie Gritton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> <51128593.3080406@a1poweruser.com> <51128BDA.2080605@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <51128BDA.2080605@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fbsd8 , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:20:47 -0000 On 02/06/13 09:59, Fbsd8 wrote: > Fbsd8 wrote: >> Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:17 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >>>> Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >>>>>> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? ... >>>>>> security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 >>>>>> security.jail.param.path: 1024 >>>>>> security.jail.param.name: 256 >>>>>> security.jail.param.parent: 0 >>>>>> security.jail.param.jid: 0 ... >> >> What about the other security.jail.param.* MIBs >> where are they documented at? In the jail(8) main page, there's the following tidbit: | Jails have a set a core parameters, and kernel modules can add their | own jail parameters. The current set of available parameters can be | retrieved via ``sysctl -d security.jail.param''. Any parameters not | set will be given default values, often based on the current | environment. The sysctls do not themselves have values. Their useful parts are the associated types and descriptions (as well as their very existence). The descriptions are good for the above-mentioned "sysctl -d", and the types are used by jail(8) to know how to set a particular parameter. > Rereading the "man jail" for 9.1 talks about securelevel as a jail > parammeter. So correct me if I an wrong. All the > security.jail.param.* MIBs are set in rc.conf or /etc/jail.conf file > on a per jail bases by changing the word "parm" to the jailname? There's not always a direct connection between the jail parameters and the current rc.conf values. The jail parameters are what you'd use in a jail.conf(5) file, or in the "jail_jailname_parameters" rc variable. - Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 10:49:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CED68A for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trrevv@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f186.google.com (mail-vc0-f186.google.com [209.85.220.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FAE646; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f186.google.com with SMTP id d16so869426vcd.13 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:49:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.81.72 with SMTP id y8mr50662qex.42.1360234148336; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:49:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Doc-Id: 8696f94be12155b X-Google-Web-Client: true Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 02:49:07 -0800 (PST) From: trrevv@gmail.com To: ml-freebsd-questions@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <51111AF9.2090006@qeng-ho.org> References: <51111AF9.2090006@qeng-ho.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Acer C7 Chromebook? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_661_20354829.1360234147760" X-Google-IP: 75.101.48.127 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , freebsd@qeng-ho.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:49:15 -0000 ------=_Part_661_20354829.1360234147760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes. I plan to try to get FreeBSD booting on a Chromebox (not the same but close enough- both use the 2nd generation core boot firmware described here http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-information-for-chrome-os-devices/custom-firmware). Don't hold your breath. It's not clear this can be done without some programming. The boot codes for Chrome OS devices aren't so much "non standard BIOS" as completely their own thing. Nothing wrong with that, but it makes booting anything other than your own linux kernel very difficult. If anyone beats me to it, PLEASE, post to the Chrome OS mailing list with how you do it! Or somehow make it known.... Trever On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 6:45:13 AM UTC-8, Arthur Chance wrote: > > [I'm not sure whether this would be better on -hackers@ or -hardware@ > but -questions@ seems like a good place to start.] > > Is anyone considering getting FBSD to run on the Acer C7 Chromebook? The > pros are that it's a cheap, small and relatively lightweight 64 bit > Intel portable using integrated Intel graphics. The cons are that it's a > Chromebook, so has a completely non-standard BIOS and boot sequence. > However, Ubuntu has been hacked to boot on it (Google for "ChrUbuntu") > so it's not totally locked down. > > This would make a very useful little system, but the programming needed > is beyond my skill set I'm afraid. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > ------=_Part_661_20354829.1360234147760-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 12:55:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDB1C7D; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2DBC04; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 04:55:56 -0800 Message-ID: <5113A426.8080207@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:55:02 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jamie Gritton Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> <51128593.3080406@a1poweruser.com> <51128BDA.2080605@a1poweruser.com> <51131C8C.10605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51131C8C.10605@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2013 12:55:56.0244 (UTC) FILETIME=[7823D140:01CE0532] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:55:58 -0000 Jamie Gritton wrote: > On 02/06/13 09:59, Fbsd8 wrote: > > Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Waitman Gobble wrote: > >>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:17 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: > >>>> Waitman Gobble wrote: > >>>>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: > >>>>>> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? > ... > >>>>>> security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 > >>>>>> security.jail.param.path: 1024 > >>>>>> security.jail.param.name: 256 > >>>>>> security.jail.param.parent: 0 > >>>>>> security.jail.param.jid: 0 > ... > >> > >> What about the other security.jail.param.* MIBs > >> where are they documented at? > > In the jail(8) main page, there's the following tidbit: > > | Jails have a set a core parameters, and kernel modules can add their > | own jail parameters. The current set of available parameters can be > | retrieved via ``sysctl -d security.jail.param''. Any parameters not > | set will be given default values, often based on the current > | environment. > > The sysctls do not themselves have values. Their useful parts are the > associated types and descriptions (as well as their very existence). The > descriptions are good for the above-mentioned "sysctl -d", and the types > are used by jail(8) to know how to set a particular parameter. > >> Rereading the "man jail" for 9.1 talks about securelevel as a jail >> parammeter. So correct me if I an wrong. All the >> security.jail.param.* MIBs are set in rc.conf or /etc/jail.conf file >> on a per jail bases by changing the word "parm" to the jailname? > > There's not always a direct connection between the jail parameters and > the current rc.conf values. The jail parameters are what you'd use in a > jail.conf(5) file, or in the "jail_jailname_parameters" rc variable. > > - Jamie > Yes I read man jail and issued the "sysctl -d" to get the list of MIBs I posted. So I am still left with no explanation of HOW to code these new jail MIBs in 9.X to enable them on a per jail bases. Any thoughts on how to do that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 13:39:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447CD9F for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from m2.gritton.org (gritton.org [199.192.164.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BB9ECB for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glorfindel.gritton.org (c-174-52-130-157.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.130.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by m2.gritton.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r17Ddf9q088840; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:39:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <5113AE9B.4030201@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:39:39 -0700 From: Jamie Gritton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: sysctl security.jail.* descriptions References: <5112706B.8080707@a1poweruser.com> <511273F6.7010801@a1poweruser.com> <51128593.3080406@a1poweruser.com> <51128BDA.2080605@a1poweruser.com> <51131C8C.10605@FreeBSD.org> <5113A426.8080207@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <5113A426.8080207@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:39:44 -0000 On 02/07/13 05:55, Fbsd8 wrote: > Jamie Gritton wrote: >> On 02/06/13 09:59, Fbsd8 wrote: >> > Fbsd8 wrote: >> >> Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:17 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >> >>>> Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >>>>> On Feb 6, 2013 7:02 AM, "Fbsd8" wrote: >> >>>>>> Where do I find the descriptions of what these jail MIBs do? >> ... >> >>>>>> security.jail.param.securelevel: 0 >> >>>>>> security.jail.param.path: 1024 >> >>>>>> security.jail.param.name: 256 >> >>>>>> security.jail.param.parent: 0 >> >>>>>> security.jail.param.jid: 0 >> ... >> >> >> >> What about the other security.jail.param.* MIBs >> >> where are they documented at? >> >> In the jail(8) main page, there's the following tidbit: >> >> | Jails have a set a core parameters, and kernel modules can add their >> | own jail parameters. The current set of available parameters can be >> | retrieved via ``sysctl -d security.jail.param''. Any parameters not >> | set will be given default values, often based on the current >> | environment. >> >> The sysctls do not themselves have values. Their useful parts are the >> associated types and descriptions (as well as their very existence). The >> descriptions are good for the above-mentioned "sysctl -d", and the types >> are used by jail(8) to know how to set a particular parameter. >> >>> Rereading the "man jail" for 9.1 talks about securelevel as a jail >>> parammeter. So correct me if I an wrong. All the >>> security.jail.param.* MIBs are set in rc.conf or /etc/jail.conf file >>> on a per jail bases by changing the word "parm" to the jailname? >> >> There's not always a direct connection between the jail parameters and >> the current rc.conf values. The jail parameters are what you'd use in a >> jail.conf(5) file, or in the "jail_jailname_parameters" rc variable. >> >> - Jamie >> > > Yes I read man jail and issued the "sysctl -d" to get the list of MIBs I > posted. So I am still left with no explanation of HOW to code these new > jail MIBs in 9.X to enable them on a per jail bases. > > Any thoughts on how to do that? Well the jail(8) man page is all about setting these parameters. You might also want to take a look at jail.conf(5) which I mentioned. But don't think of them as MIBs anymore - the "-d" is the only thing you'll have to do directly with the sysctls. - Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 13:46:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4846B for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amijaresp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com (mail-vb0-f46.google.com [209.85.212.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA20F3F for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b13so1624450vby.33 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:46:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5M5y4hXNlsBF1MGBSnzCNvum0ZVwnVh4H+Kq/TRwCFA=; b=UTUArMsk57Z66zbnBcZPe1UdbNDm4nVOHJzK3a/PvmXdjg9KbNUK4xoKcf5lcB+fKk I8KsG3IqDLcnhdxWyX8HMt8biefrYGrEgltRckgEoNQSNhYGgFp++ope/fPXwY/gum1Y 2pcMu1IfJfUfASTJYxEv2TC6f/ptAqvAPEIwOpbRm3VnqaIDCb+pdZk0lvODrli+6n28 TxwoWDk1Zg/dmb31qcf3IR/21AlbIBdGlHnV+1vPx+Ur4AhYrKh05u2dtq9Kf8vw2MOr Z4ZDijV9wWRwDJd+6e5OtXGlPjjyqjw2zZEGKm9ooI6SaeWKSBudrdjlnpo4JIZNOOe+ eHYw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.12.200 with SMTP id a8mr1578272vec.52.1360244774263; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.90.4 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 05:46:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:16:14 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: GPIO in 9.1-RELEASE From: Alberto Mijares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:46:15 -0000 I'm moving this thread from hardware@, I think this ain't the rigth list, is it? Hi list, I have a net4801 Soekris board. It has 12-pin GPIO interface. An almost GENERIC kernel doesn't show any /dev/gpio* device. I tried including device gpio and I see the module with # kldstat -v | grep gpio but still no /dev/gpio* device. Could anyone point me to the steps to follow in order to enable such interface? And taking the opportunity for a second shot, any recommendation for a Perl module to work with? Thanks in advance Regards. Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 15:14:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52649208; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=743ded090=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-002.utdallas.edu (ip-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0479757; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:14:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtYEAKPDE1GBbgogTmdsb2JhbABFwHwDAQEjS4IfAQEEOQI/BQcPEQQBAShKAwkOE4gLBqQ6mlONCxQLg1FhA4hmoSyBSA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,622,1355119200"; d="scan'208";a="114219614" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Feb 2013 09:14:27 -0600 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:14:26 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: 'FreeBSD Questions List' Subject: RE: How to add unused space to an existing install Message-ID: <6C52D891D96E0ACEBF1531DD@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=7119 Cc: dteske@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:14:29 -0000 --On February 6, 2013 5:21:39 PM -0600 dteske@freebsd.org wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >> questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl >> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:59 AM >> To: FreeBSD Questions List >> Subject: How to add unused space to an existing install >> >> I have a FreeBSD 8.3 RELEASE box that we recently discovered only has >> part of the "disk" being used. This box has four 1TB drives in RAID 5, >> and df only shows 500MB of disk available. >> >> fdisk shows this: >> # fdisk -p >> # /dev/mfid0 >> g c364602 h255 s63 >> p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771 >> a 1 >> >> When I run the fdisk editor in sysinstall I see this: >> >> Disk name: mfid0 FDISK Partition >> Editor >> DISK Geometry: 364602 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 5857331130 sectors >> (2860024MB) >> >> Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype >> Flags >> >> 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 >> 63 1562363771 1562363833 mfid0s1 8 freebsd 165 >> 1562363834 4294981702 5857345535 - 12 unused 0 >> >> I want to capture all that unused space and add it to the server. >> >> fstab has this: >> # cat /etc/fstab >> # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump >> Pass# >> /dev/mfid0s1b none swap sw 0 0 >> /dev/mfid0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 >> /dev/mfid0s1e /home ufs rw 2 2 >> /dev/mfid0s1d /tmp ufs rw 2 2 >> /dev/mfid0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 >> /dev/mfid0s1g /var ufs rw 2 2 >> /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 >> >> When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. > > Did you try something like: > > echo "p 2 165 * *" | sudo fdisk -f- /dev/mfid0 > > ?? Thank you for your detailed and informative answer. I did not. I'm a neophyte in the disk world. I've always used sysinstall to setup partitions and mount points. > > Afterward "fdisk -p" should show something like... > ># /dev/mfid0 > g c364602 h255 s63 > p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771 > p 2 0xa5 > a 1 > > And then you'll have /dev/mfid0s2 which you can do-with what you like > (directly newfs the slice or create BSD partitions underneath that to > further sub-divide into as many as 8 smaller units, /dev/mfid0s2[a-h]). > I've been doing some more research on this problem, and I've discovered that bsdlabel has a 2 to the 32nd limit on disk size. It appears I have to use gpart instead. Is that not correct? > >> If I move to the label editor, I get this: >> >> FreeBSD Disklabel Editor >> >> Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) >> >> Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Newfs >> ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- >> mfid0s1a 2000MB * >> mfid0s1d 65536MB * >> mfid0s1e 4096MB * >> mfid0s1b swap 65536MB SWAP >> mfid0s1f 10240MB * >> mfid0s1g 601GB * >> >> As you can see mfid0s1g is 601GB, and according to fstab that's /var. >> >> Yet df -h shows: >> >> # df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/mfid0s1a 1.9G 726M 1.0G 41% / >> devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev >> /dev/mfid0s1e 3.9G 38M 3.5G 1% /home >> /dev/mfid0s1d 62G 6.6M 57G 0% /tmp >> /dev/mfid0s1f 9.7G 7.5G 1.4G 84% /usr >> /dev/mfid0s1g 582G 39G 496G 7% /var >> >> So apparently I'm not creating this new slice? It should be >> /dev/mfid0s1h, correct? >> > > Let's not confuse slices (DOS partitions) with disklabels (BSD > partitions). OK. I've clearly done that. As I say, I'm a neophyte in the disk geometry and configuration field. > > DOS partitions are (maximum 4 per disk): > > mfid0s1 > mfid0s2 > mfid0s3 > mfid0s4 > > (according to your "fdisk -p" output, you're mfid0 disk is currently only > using mfid0s1) > > BSD partitions are (maximum 8 per "slice" aka DOS partition): > > mfid0s1a > mfid0s1b > mfid0s1c > mfid0s1d > mfid0s1e > mfid0s1f > mfid0s1g > mfid0s1h > > (according to your sysinstall output, you're mfid0s1 slice has 5 BSD > partitions -- a, e, d, f, and g) > I see. > >> How to I "recapture" the remaining 2+TB of space that's not being used? >> > > The easiest way to use your extra space is to not adjust one of those 5 > BSD partitions, but instead create a new DOS partition (mfid0s2 as > previously discussed above). However, if you *really* want to "grow" an > existing BSD partition, this can be done (very carefully). > I'm all for taking the easy way out. :-) > First, you'll want to save the output of "disklabel -r mfid0s1" to a text > file. > > Next, you'll have to re-fdisk mfid0 so that the first slice covers the > entire disk. Of course, re-mastering the slices does not affect the data, > but it _will_ wipe out the BSD partition map (the disklabels; in other > words, after using fdisk to adjust the slice size of the first DOS > partition, "disklabel -r mfid0s1" will no longer return what it had > before -- you'll have no disklabels after), so the previous step of > backing up the output of "disklabel -r ..." is paramount. > > Next, you'll have to restore the disklabel (using "disklabel -e mfid0s1" > and cross-referencing your backup text file) with one slight adjustment... > > You're going to use the *exact* values you backed up _EXCEPT_ you're > going to make the last label (position-wise -- taking care to note the > byte ranges of each disklabel -- ignoring "c" which of course is a pseudo > label for "whole slice") bigger while keeping the same offset (only the > size of the last label should change). > > In your case, given the output you provided from sysinstall, this would > likely be your "g" label (but I'd have to see your "disklabel -r" output > to know for sure -- again, taking care to analyze the byte ranges). > > Once you've re-written the disklabels (making sure to change nothing from > your previous backup except the size of the last label to cover the new > unused space), you're now at a position where you can "grow" the label > with: > > growfs /dev/mfid0s1g > > NOTE: Should be done from a LiveFS (read: not while booted from said > filesystem). > > That will zero out the unused inodes and make the new space available. > Upon your next boot you'll now have the new storage space available to > your "g" label (/var from the looks of it). > > NOTE: If you wanted to change "g" to your "/usr" partition, rsync is your > friend -- while booted from a LiveFS like DruidBSD or mfsBSD etc.). Excellent information. Thank you. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 17:42:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082CFCF8; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0440C0; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r17HgVsP004906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:42:31 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT03.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.31]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:42:31 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Paul Schmehl , "'FreeBSD Questions List'" Subject: RE: How to add unused space to an existing install Thread-Topic: How to add unused space to an existing install Thread-Index: AQHOBUXRCeSOJZN/YUWH6gH5g8ROf5hupmrI Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:42:30 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EA5CDF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <6C52D891D96E0ACEBF1531DD@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <6C52D891D96E0ACEBF1531DD@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-07_06:2013-02-07,2013-02-07,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: "dteske@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:42:33 -0000 On 7 Feb 2013, Paul Schmehl wrote: >=20 > --On February 6, 2013 5:21:39 PM -0600 dteske@freebsd.org wrote: >=20 > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > >> questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:59 AM > >> To: FreeBSD Questions List > >> Subject: How to add unused space to an existing install > >> > >> I have a FreeBSD 8.3 RELEASE box that we recently discovered only has > >> part of the "disk" being used. This box has four 1TB drives in RAID 5, > >> and df only shows 500MB of disk available. > >> > >> fdisk shows this: > >> # fdisk -p > >> # /dev/mfid0 > >> g c364602 h255 s63 > >> p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771 > >> a 1 > >> > >> When I run the fdisk editor in sysinstall I see this: > >> > >> Disk name: mfid0 FDISK Partition > >> Editor > >> DISK Geometry: 364602 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors =3D 5857331130 sectors > >> (2860024MB) > >> > >> Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype > >> Flags > >> > >> 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 > >> 63 1562363771 1562363833 mfid0s1 8 freebsd 165 > >> 1562363834 4294981702 5857345535 - 12 unused 0 > >> > >> I want to capture all that unused space and add it to the server. > >> > >> fstab has this: > >> # cat /etc/fstab > >> # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump > >> Pass# > >> /dev/mfid0s1b none swap sw 0= 0 > >> /dev/mfid0s1a / ufs rw 1= 1 > >> /dev/mfid0s1e /home ufs rw 2= 2 > >> /dev/mfid0s1d /tmp ufs rw 2= 2 > >> /dev/mfid0s1f /usr ufs rw 2= 2 > >> /dev/mfid0s1g /var ufs rw 2= 2 > >> /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > >> > >> When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. > > > > Did you try something like: > > > > echo "p 2 165 * *" | sudo fdisk -f- /dev/mfid0 > > > > ?? >=20 > Thank you for your detailed and informative answer. >=20 > I did not. I'm a neophyte in the disk world. I've always used sysinstall > to setup partitions and mount points. >=20 > > > > Afterward "fdisk -p" should show something like... > > > ># /dev/mfid0 > > g c364602 h255 s63 > > p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771 > > p 2 0xa5 > > a 1 > > > > And then you'll have /dev/mfid0s2 which you can do-with what you like > > (directly newfs the slice or create BSD partitions underneath that to > > further sub-divide into as many as 8 smaller units, /dev/mfid0s2[a-h]). > > >=20 > I've been doing some more research on this problem, and I've discovered > that bsdlabel has a 2 to the 32nd limit on disk size. It appears I have = to > use gpart instead. Is that not correct? >=20 Only if your disk is larger than 2TB (or 2048GB). If you try to partition a= >2TB disk with fdisk the most you can hope to access is 2TB (the rest will= be forever unused). I was noticing that that the total size for all your partitions is about 74= 4.95GB -- far short of the maximum addressable of 2TB. So you *could* gain = access to more space with the tricks discussed here, but yes... You will be required to use gpart to address more than 2TB of storage on a = single discrete disk. gpart creates a GPT layout versus fdisk which creates= an MBR layout. GPT uses length identifiers double that of MBR so you shoul= d be able to address up to 16 million terabytes on any single discrete disk= with gpart. That ought to be enough for a while (the largest storage array= known to exist today is in the Petabytes ... thousands of terabytes -- nob= ody has yet produced a single storage device of contiguous addressable spac= e matching-or-exceeding 1024 petabytes or 1M terabytes; so we have a ways t= o go before anybody reaches the limit of 2^64). > > > >> If I move to the label editor, I get this: > >> > >> FreeBSD Disklabel Editor > >> > >> Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB) > >> > >> Part Mount Size Newfs Part Mount Size Ne= wfs > >> ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ---- --= --- > >> mfid0s1a 2000MB * > >> mfid0s1d 65536MB * > >> mfid0s1e 4096MB * > >> mfid0s1b swap 65536MB SWAP > >> mfid0s1f 10240MB * > >> mfid0s1g 601GB * > >> > >> As you can see mfid0s1g is 601GB, and according to fstab that's /var. > >> > >> Yet df -h shows: > >> > >> # df -h > >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > >> /dev/mfid0s1a 1.9G 726M 1.0G 41% / > >> devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev > >> /dev/mfid0s1e 3.9G 38M 3.5G 1% /home > >> /dev/mfid0s1d 62G 6.6M 57G 0% /tmp > >> /dev/mfid0s1f 9.7G 7.5G 1.4G 84% /usr > >> /dev/mfid0s1g 582G 39G 496G 7% /var > >> > >> So apparently I'm not creating this new slice? It should be > >> /dev/mfid0s1h, correct? > >> > > > > Let's not confuse slices (DOS partitions) with disklabels (BSD > > partitions). >=20 > OK. I've clearly done that. As I say, I'm a neophyte in the disk geomet= ry > and configuration field. >=20 > > > > DOS partitions are (maximum 4 per disk): > > > > mfid0s1 > > mfid0s2 > > mfid0s3 > > mfid0s4 > > > > (according to your "fdisk -p" output, you're mfid0 disk is currently on= ly > > using mfid0s1) > > > > BSD partitions are (maximum 8 per "slice" aka DOS partition): > > > > mfid0s1a > > mfid0s1b > > mfid0s1c > > mfid0s1d > > mfid0s1e > > mfid0s1f > > mfid0s1g > > mfid0s1h > > > > (according to your sysinstall output, you're mfid0s1 slice has 5 BSD > > partitions -- a, e, d, f, and g) > > >=20 > I see. >=20 > > > >> How to I "recapture" the remaining 2+TB of space that's not being used? > >> > > > > The easiest way to use your extra space is to not adjust one of those 5 > > BSD partitions, but instead create a new DOS partition (mfid0s2 as > > previously discussed above). However, if you *really* want to "grow" an > > existing BSD partition, this can be done (very carefully). > > >=20 > I'm all for taking the easy way out. :-) >=20 ^_^ >=20 > > First, you'll want to save the output of "disklabel -r mfid0s1" to a te= xt > > file. > > > > Next, you'll have to re-fdisk mfid0 so that the first slice covers the > > entire disk. Of course, re-mastering the slices does not affect the dat= a, > > but it _will_ wipe out the BSD partition map (the disklabels; in other > > words, after using fdisk to adjust the slice size of the first DOS > > partition, "disklabel -r mfid0s1" will no longer return what it had > > before -- you'll have no disklabels after), so the previous step of > > backing up the output of "disklabel -r ..." is paramount. > > > > Next, you'll have to restore the disklabel (using "disklabel -e mfid0s1" > > and cross-referencing your backup text file) with one slight adjustment= ... > > > > You're going to use the *exact* values you backed up _EXCEPT_ you're > > going to make the last label (position-wise -- taking care to note the > > byte ranges of each disklabel -- ignoring "c" which of course is a pseu= do > > label for "whole slice") bigger while keeping the same offset (only the > > size of the last label should change). > > > > In your case, given the output you provided from sysinstall, this would > > likely be your "g" label (but I'd have to see your "disklabel -r" output > > to know for sure -- again, taking care to analyze the byte ranges). > > > > Once you've re-written the disklabels (making sure to change nothing fr= om > > your previous backup except the size of the last label to cover the new > > unused space), you're now at a position where you can "grow" the label > > with: > > > > growfs /dev/mfid0s1g > > > > NOTE: Should be done from a LiveFS (read: not while booted from said > > filesystem). > > > > That will zero out the unused inodes and make the new space available. > > Upon your next boot you'll now have the new storage space available to > > your "g" label (/var from the looks of it). > > > > NOTE: If you wanted to change "g" to your "/usr" partition, rsync is yo= ur > > friend -- while booted from a LiveFS like DruidBSD or mfsBSD etc.). >=20 > Excellent information. Thank you. >=20 No problem, glad to help. --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 19:51:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48096C9 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B87B9C9 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so7871wid.11 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:51:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s9jX1C8Pi6DRMCbvGOmQBY8Fh1qX8rv9i3E2rhrpro8=; b=OYPS74UUdLbZs3zwvqaJ34w2n0aMYRGUPCGZ8i3radUhOSMcZW6Pw4n9G4+6444UQv JkmFPAgsNaQODcf2/Ydj51/PO+2/mTYMMMR1bKeQVpHbzqep9yqCxFAKLwNM0AyaUNFI Nm6JYDllHatF1TcyZ+i/WM2iuUbBw++hDVg2YTVmgXdCciPQISgoxEPmND0Cu9XGum4U kulUOtVYVgJdWUmIUpmAFK8l/OvMbUVgAto5fAqJtBJlikogR9UvEeviRK0PBuVVNSrR kNqWIsjv1onxA75GH+Ot3iyyfMYH0Y/5UoGrNzbAc/vDhbw4uHHdtZZoLEpgyvER6FVg JOfg== X-Received: by 10.194.171.198 with SMTP id aw6mr5336074wjc.3.1360266690333; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:51:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm10652737wif.11.2013.02.07.11.51.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:51:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:51:27 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geli overhead? Message-ID: <20130207195127.43dd1ae3@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:51:31 -0000 On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:25:33 +0100 mhca12 wrote: > Does skipping authentication also remove the requirement of > zeroing the whole eli disk for the checksums? It's not needed from that perspective, but it makes it a bit more secure if you do that or fill the device from /dev/random before the init. If you don't do either an attacker may be able infer information about the layout of files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 23:39:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBDAE64 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 23:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from m1plsmtpa01-06.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (m1plsmtpa01-06.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541EC766 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 23:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by m1plsmtpa01-06.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with id xbcR1k00B4XeM0101bcSUL; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:36:26 -0700 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:36:25 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: off-topic.... Message-ID: <20130207233625.GA3319@ethic.thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:39:02 -0000 guys, ihad better make this fast; this desktop [dell duo] has been crashing at random for the past couple month. no clue. but ive ordered a refurb with a three-year warranty. I hope, I hope. my question is: how to set up an account for code on google-code. I'v found a 'cheat sheet' site and others that should help me with svn. I have used cvs [late 90's]; I use rcs daily and figure I'll learn subversion in time. but what else do I have to do to get my "vbc" code over on google? their explaination is written in hieroglyphics. enough. gary ps: I t is worth noting that my vbc wworks on freebsd so long as youve got espeak and the gtk stuff. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 02:01:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711EC903 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 02:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@paz.bz) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [207.34.147.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC08DB4 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 02:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 100-236-53-209.qcislands.net ([209.53.236.100] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U3dBe-0003AK-1t; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:55:39 -0800 Message-ID: <51145B01.7080401@paz.bz> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:55:13 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NcFTPd on 9.1 64-bit References: <5105F76F.6080500@paz.bz> In-Reply-To: <5105F76F.6080500@paz.bz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (100) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:01:22 -0000 Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-01-27 7:58 PM: > I have found that on the two machines which I installed 9.1 on, NcFTPd > fails system logins for non-root attempts with "Password wrong for user > XXXX from 192.168.1.51" > > These are logins which previously on 9.0 worked as expected, and now > fail on 9.1. > > Has anyone else experienced this? Any suggestions? Thanks! No one has answered on this question, and support@ncftp.com is also silent. I *do* see an error go by during boot, which states "unable to open /etc/auth.conf" FreeBSD 9.1 does not HAVE auth.conf (9.0 DOES) failing getting NcFTPd working, what is the next ftpd recommended ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 03:11:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E2CA7E for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471EFE7 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:11:27 -0800 Message-ID: <51146CDC.70905@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:11:24 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Pazarena Subject: Re: NcFTPd on 9.1 64-bit References: <5105F76F.6080500@paz.bz> <51145B01.7080401@paz.bz> In-Reply-To: <51145B01.7080401@paz.bz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2013 03:11:27.0190 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBC49760:01CE05A9] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:11:26 -0000 Jim Pazarena wrote: > Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-01-27 7:58 PM: >> I have found that on the two machines which I installed 9.1 on, NcFTPd >> fails system logins for non-root attempts with "Password wrong for user >> XXXX from 192.168.1.51" >> >> These are logins which previously on 9.0 worked as expected, and now >> fail on 9.1. >> >> Has anyone else experienced this? Any suggestions? Thanks! > > No one has answered on this question, and support@ncftp.com > is also silent. > > I *do* see an error go by during boot, which states > "unable to open /etc/auth.conf" > > FreeBSD 9.1 does not HAVE auth.conf (9.0 DOES) > > failing getting NcFTPd working, what is the next ftpd recommended ? > Did you try moving the 9.0 /etc/auth.conf to your 9.1 system? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 03:46:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F018CF24; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795121F2; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r183k4b7060366; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:46:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r183k45u060363; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:46:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:46:04 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: "Teske, Devin" Subject: RE: How to add unused space to an existing install In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EA5CDF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Message-ID: References: <6C52D891D96E0ACEBF1531DD@utd71538.campus.ad.utdallas.edu> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EA5CDF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:46:04 -0700 (MST) Cc: Paul Schmehl , "dteske@freebsd.org" , 'FreeBSD Questions List' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:46:08 -0000 On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Teske, Devin wrote: > On 7 Feb 2013, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> I've been doing some more research on this problem, and I've discovered >> that bsdlabel has a 2 to the 32nd limit on disk size. It appears I have to >> use gpart instead. Is that not correct? >> > > Only if your disk is larger than 2TB (or 2048GB). If you try to partition a >2TB disk with fdisk the most you can hope to access is 2TB (the rest will be forever unused). > > I was noticing that that the total size for all your partitions is about 744.95GB -- far short of the maximum addressable of 2TB. So you *could* gain access to more space with the tricks discussed here, but yes... > > You will be required to use gpart to address more than 2TB of storage on a single discrete disk. gpart creates a GPT layout versus fdisk which creates an MBR layout. GPT uses length identifiers double that of MBR so you should be able to address up to 16 million terabytes on any single discrete disk with gpart. That ought to be enough for a while (the largest storage array known to exist today is in the Petabytes ... thousands of terabytes -- nobody has yet produced a single storage device of contiguous addressable space matching-or-exceeding 1024 petabytes or 1M terabytes; so we have a ways to go before anybody reaches the limit of 2^64). To be exact: fdisk can only deal with MBR partitioning. bsdlabel only deals with FreeBSD partitions. Both align partitions to CHS values, which don't apply to disks made in the last couple of decades. This means that partitions created by these two tools will almost certainly be misaligned when created on an Advanced Format (4K) hard drive or an SSD. gpart(8) can do GPT *and* MBR *and* bsdlabel and other partition schemes. It does all the things that fdisk and bsdlabel do, and more. For examples of creating both GPT and MBR/bsdlabel partitioning with gpart: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 03:47:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5510FC8 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruletko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50045207 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id gw10so3369123lab.13 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:47:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; bh=d9uBwVZOSdpPTfS2WOgy5VZjTfbmsmIiDd489NWuKZo=; b=Z4eDh4/20x3l7TdHTDAS0EVBUZVxasHYSUB/q2oy31xcmtc2nW6ClOtm42sdGZbNvl /Q+Py6xgeveTY0iKnc9odTORKLCJINN50Uetjil3MUKb9Km3S5T+OXMHfQsxEKjZBYU7 hsQpddDuHOFNR3pl2XtW9j4jza8rsgTYkeGaQkN9ixN65hKcGHH1so38dJQ/2iZXJUP3 vy7+SVOmaH9hEPMfFxdB1997iTUti2K96N5YuLluAV1bAcWID6T39G4Kgb3HmQasRF+K 0NCwBnYUyms8O+D8GRbmOi73mNg2Bh/QnzGcht+CsVixbeil9oq2j3pC7PU04jatlUX9 F1jQ== X-Received: by 10.112.49.66 with SMTP id s2mr1682543lbn.16.1360295234329; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-24-127-8-244.hsd1.va.comcast.net. [24.127.8.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tm10sm15923743lab.10.2013.02.07.19.47.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:47:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51147541.ca93980a.4614.ffffffd9@mx.google.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:47:07 +0100 From: Кирилл Ðндреевич To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Content-Type: text/plain; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 03:47:15 -0000 http://www.pixfoto.it/6qydll.php?s=ot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 04:58:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAC5810 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 04:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@paz.bz) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [207.34.147.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA6E379 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 04:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 100-236-53-209.qcislands.net ([209.53.236.100] helo=[192.168.1.6]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U3g2n-000E7n-Iv; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:58:45 -0800 Message-ID: <511485F6.9050001@paz.bz> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:58:30 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NcFTPd on 9.1 64-bit References: <5105F76F.6080500@paz.bz> <51145B01.7080401@paz.bz> In-Reply-To: <51145B01.7080401@paz.bz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (100) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 04:58:46 -0000 On 2013-02-07 5:55 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote: > Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-01-27 7:58 PM: >> I have found that on the two machines which I installed 9.1 on, NcFTPd >> fails system logins for non-root attempts with "Password wrong for user >> XXXX from 192.168.1.51" >> >> These are logins which previously on 9.0 worked as expected, and now >> fail on 9.1. >> >> Has anyone else experienced this? Any suggestions? Thanks! > > No one has answered on this question, and support@ncftp.com > is also silent. > > I *do* see an error go by during boot, which states > "unable to open /etc/auth.conf" > > FreeBSD 9.1 does not HAVE auth.conf (9.0 DOES) The creator of NcFTPd (Mike Gleason) provided me a 9.1 version, and it works as expected. Kudos to Mike. -- Jim Pazarena fquest@paz.bz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 07:47:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65065DF for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theorem21@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (la-in-x0235.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2809E9 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fr10so3430961lab.40 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:47:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; bh=28QM0DEPZJPaBZWsAf7NNk1dEtbEN4H7clD9fKTyx1Q=; b=GphuBHeb4gnQS1Mqnw2wL8Ei4Vs4D2V9Q/Jdvdlu1F5E/AWsXzWWywG+Tw3uBvpdSp vZVIsBYLSePUY7UJjhrVKPOUn8GVvWcC0nZshxn9tQw5GSPzpfOQDM2fyvZMOM3McOwW yd+9gofMJK7kMZbulmPD30FYGkJTQ7OZJn5yNEw51dAggUenXHEhybZAgxPwipO4qezj vRhg92NHEVAQ8tV4+SRbn3tAZkXnOXLG3NcVrIORav4woqkkKJGvPmr2u6vMpdr0dLsm ZiYfcjRWlscfGnsVW8+hjt1DHfrl6JsZI2oRnC6jPFNlTcpoyy8ZTLpqWX3qnmnyg3Zt 2GDA== X-Received: by 10.112.84.168 with SMTP id a8mr1800099lbz.75.1360309628889; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:47:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (99-129-129-200.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [99.129.129.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v7sm5251964lbg.13.2013.02.07.23.47.05 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:47:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5114ad7b.c71b700a.03b9.18d8@mx.google.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:47:00 +0100 From: B E To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Content-Type: text/plain; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:47:10 -0000 http://www.cinzianumviaggi.com/6c9cxj.php?s=ot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 11:01:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE78441 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1BAC25 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r18AoLUp087648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 02:50:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) From: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Unusual TCP/IP Packet Size Message-Id: <28DC0F1E-EF32-4C77-9E09-27CC103265A4@lafn.org> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 02:50:21 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:01:49 -0000 Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the = following interface: msk0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 = options=3Dc011b ether 00:11:2f:2a:c7:03 inet 10.0.1.199 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 inet6 fe80::211:2fff:fe2a:c703%msk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1=20 nd6 options=3D29 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX = ) status: active It sent the following packet: (data content abbreviated) 02:14:42.081617 IP 10.0.1.199.443 > 10.0.1.2.61258: Flags [P.], seq = 930:4876, ack 846, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 401838072 ecr = 920110183], length 3946 0x0000: 4500 0f9e ea89 4000 4006 2a08 0a00 01c7 = E.....@.@.*..... 0x0010: 0a00 0102 01bb ef4a ece1 680b ae37 1bbc = .......J..h..7.. 0x0020: 8018 0410 3407 0000 0101 080a 17f3 8ff8 ....4...=85=85. The indicated packet length is 3946 and the load of data shown is that = size. The MTU on both interfaces is 1500. The receiving system = received 3 packets. There is a router and switch between them. One of = them fragmented that packet. This is part of a SSL/TLS exchange and one = side or the other is hanging on this and just dropping the connection. = I suspect the packet size is the issue. ssldump complains about the = packet too and stops monitoring. Could this possibly be related to the = hardware checksums? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 11:08:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5C8908 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FBBCF6 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.113.98.34] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3loU-0001OC-5B for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:08:14 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r18B8CES066190 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:08:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r18B8B39066189 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:08:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:08:11 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: warnings is rkhunter(8) about ports usage Message-ID: <20130208110810.GA66174@tiny.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.98.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:08:22 -0000 Hello, I run rkhunter from time to time and have warnings about the diff between sockstat and netstat like this: [11:33:31] Warning: Differences found between sockstat and netstat output: [11:33:31] Sockstat output (ports in use): 0 1124 22 25 514 587 [11:33:31] Netstat output (ports in use): 22 25 514 587 the diff ports in sockstat are: $ sockstat | fgrep ' 0 ' root ipmon 695 0 dgram -> /var/run/logpriv $ sockstat | fgrep 1124 guru ssh-agent 1125 3 stream /tmp/ssh-KldJtKCKwQMi/agent.1124 Why is rkhunter complaining about them? Thx matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 12:01:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F184F3E; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D2A2F; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3meF-000674-Gl; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:01:52 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3meF-00014X-Bu; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:01:43 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r18C1fjT034687; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:01:42 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r18C1fuK034685; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:01:41 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:01:41 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302081201.r18C1fuK034685@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument X-Spam-Score: -1.3 X-Spam-Level: - X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:01:59 -0000 I need to transfer some files from sparc64 -current box onto amd64 9.1-RELEASE laptop. The amd64 laptop has no network connection yet, so I'm trying to achive this with a USB flash drive. The problem is that I always end up with # mount /dev/da0p1 /mnt/ mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument # If I do newfs on the sparc64 box, then I can't mount it on the amd64 box, and vice versa. I tried just "newfs /dev/da0", and using gpart, e.g.: # gpart show /dev/da0 => 34 4029373 da0 GPT (1.9G) 34 2048 1 freebsd-ufs (1.0M) 2082 4027325 - free - (1.9G) # and then "newfs /dev/da0p1", or similar, but no luck. I tried sparc64 VTOC8 partition scheme too - no help. I can mount the device and use it as expected, i.e. copy files to/from it on either box, but the other box doesn't seem to understand the file system. I tried loading various modules in desperation, e.g. on the sparc64 side: # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 9 0xc0000000 a80e58 kernel 2 1 0x101bca000 104000 geom_part_mbr.ko 3 1 0x101cce000 110000 geom_label.ko 4 1 0x101dde000 108000 geom_part_gpt.ko # but still no use. Am I missing something simple? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 12:14:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA41325; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D223125; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r18CEWZI046147; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:14:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.4 kib.kiev.ua r18CEWZI046147 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r18CEWFM046146; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:14:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:14:32 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument Message-ID: <20130208121432.GV2522@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201302081201.r18C1fuK034685@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4PjXPRN4SCmYnrHw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201302081201.r18C1fuK034685@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tom.home Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:14:41 -0000 --4PjXPRN4SCmYnrHw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:01:41PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I need to transfer some files from sparc64 -current > box onto amd64 9.1-RELEASE laptop. > The amd64 laptop has no network connection yet, > so I'm trying to achive this with a USB flash drive.=20 >=20 > The problem is that I always end up with >=20 > # mount /dev/da0p1 /mnt/ > mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument > #=20 >=20 > If I do newfs on the sparc64 box, then I can't > mount it on the amd64 box, and vice versa. >=20 > I tried just "newfs /dev/da0", and using gpart, > e.g.: >=20 > # gpart show /dev/da0 > =3D> 34 4029373 da0 GPT (1.9G) > 34 2048 1 freebsd-ufs (1.0M) > 2082 4027325 - free - (1.9G) >=20 > # >=20 > and then "newfs /dev/da0p1", or similar, > but no luck. >=20 > I tried sparc64 VTOC8 partition scheme too - no help. >=20 > I can mount the device and use it as expected, > i.e. copy files to/from it on either box, but > the other box doesn't seem to understand the file > system. >=20 > I tried loading various modules in desperation, > e.g. on the sparc64 side: >=20 > # kldstat=20 > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 9 0xc0000000 a80e58 kernel > 2 1 0x101bca000 104000 geom_part_mbr.ko > 3 1 0x101cce000 110000 geom_label.ko > 4 1 0x101dde000 108000 geom_part_gpt.ko > #=20 >=20 > but still no use.=20 >=20 > Am I missing something simple? UFS on FreeBSD is not endian-agnostic. It uses the host byte order for multibyte values. As result, you can share UFS volumes only between hosts with the same endianess, like i386/amd64/ia64 little endian or sparc64/mips big endian. AFAIK, NetBSD has such support. --4PjXPRN4SCmYnrHw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRFOwoAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1BoTAP/ittIZAN06eVRcXoQo7TD9yu R5WU+ihk9/nCNBsAsXWvMBnBpn9C59A4vUeHXDiVluX4Rgk9xtjvNGdn9I4eJ3gw kDxHm+U9Jo+IaAmenN5Z1FTMQJV+jX2FczZXwztXP2RkPPCtK6BxYV5MmVrFDCNE 1W8CJjtcOzC3WB4d5t9M5+G2kpY7DqqjtMkam/6xI3YH7eKkxJAsZCDAv1/Nis7d AjomDVglxiuLzlMwcVfg/D7opt9Lp+kcu0nUOY6xSzlnA3szoflXvYQ2m0xodoqb X95oBCD+F7cFxug6/B6Oaxi+G9gbgQMGA/p7Mxfvm0LKzn7YoiksUxLVM+Pit84q Ka/k+pwv4RjwAtuByOkdZvtX3H+WXvIdoi08oX5pr4MChnxR0U+j+Uw1PfScZx/a pGokWLcWwbYLfyqx96XUz6odpGRHG6KAA4HExYqPIHPbPoXIrxBMEEsMy0M4yFhM bL59W6fDlD5SBx4Tv1gx+Ai0izpJ3PziRAiyItb0YuHGi/KzDkQe/svLq2w36gAL mFxoTbTsLDZfVL55vVzCuuvfActBvQDOQbiBOu2iDOZzqvZZIIVNiWrJFYyre98x r9kBjsxz03OuTqm8CMgF2i93VXqNav09VS2Vlu/TgfRFWVCSYYaCT7pKU6jTPYXR a9W3ki7Qp4+28ajQsV2H =1kUB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4PjXPRN4SCmYnrHw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 12:31:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469786BC; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23271EB; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3n6T-0006wi-DO; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:30:53 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3n6S-00075r-Pk; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:30:53 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r18CUpTn034752; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:30:51 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r18CUpkL034751; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:30:51 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:30:51 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: kostikbel@gmail.com, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument In-Reply-To: <20130208121432.GV2522@kib.kiev.ua> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:31:00 -0000 From kostikbel@gmail.com Fri Feb 8 12:25:21 2013 On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:01:41PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I need to transfer some files from sparc64 -current > box onto amd64 9.1-RELEASE laptop. > The amd64 laptop has no network connection yet, > so I'm trying to achive this with a USB flash drive.=20 >=20 > The problem is that I always end up with >=20 > # mount /dev/da0p1 /mnt/ > mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument > #=20 >=20 > If I do newfs on the sparc64 box, then I can't > mount it on the amd64 box, and vice versa. >=20 > I tried just "newfs /dev/da0", and using gpart, > e.g.: >=20 > # gpart show /dev/da0 > =3D> 34 4029373 da0 GPT (1.9G) > 34 2048 1 freebsd-ufs (1.0M) > 2082 4027325 - free - (1.9G) >=20 > # >=20 > and then "newfs /dev/da0p1", or similar, > but no luck. >=20 > I tried sparc64 VTOC8 partition scheme too - no help. >=20 > I can mount the device and use it as expected, > i.e. copy files to/from it on either box, but > the other box doesn't seem to understand the file > system. >=20 > I tried loading various modules in desperation, > e.g. on the sparc64 side: >=20 > # kldstat=20 > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 9 0xc0000000 a80e58 kernel > 2 1 0x101bca000 104000 geom_part_mbr.ko > 3 1 0x101cce000 110000 geom_label.ko > 4 1 0x101dde000 108000 geom_part_gpt.ko > #=20 >=20 > but still no use.=20 >=20 > Am I missing something simple? UFS on FreeBSD is not endian-agnostic. It uses the host byte order for multibyte values. As result, you can share UFS volumes only between hosts with the same endianess, like i386/amd64/ia64 little endian or sparc64/mips big endian. AFAIK, NetBSD has such support. Wow... I didn't realise that. I thought UFS (1 or 2) takes all care of endian-ness. Do you mean that even I had say a SCSI internal disk with UFS2, I couldn't move it between a little and a big endian freebsd boxes? So what is the advice for transferring data via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition I could use? In the end I burned a CD with the files in question, but it's a bit of a waste, as I only need to move over several KB of data (wireless setup). Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 12:45:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABB59B3; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:45:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11BF293; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id r18CjAG5075962; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:45:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r18CjA8q075961; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:45:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:45:10 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument Message-ID: <20130208124510.GA75868@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20130208121432.GV2522@kib.kiev.ua> <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: kostikbel@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:45:20 -0000 On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:30:51PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From kostikbel@gmail.com Fri Feb 8 12:25:21 2013 > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:01:41PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I need to transfer some files from sparc64 -current > > box onto amd64 9.1-RELEASE laptop. > > The amd64 laptop has no network connection yet, > > so I'm trying to achive this with a USB flash drive.=20 > >=20 > > The problem is that I always end up with > >=20 > > # mount /dev/da0p1 /mnt/ > > mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument > > #=20 > >=20 > > If I do newfs on the sparc64 box, then I can't > > mount it on the amd64 box, and vice versa. > >=20 > > I tried just "newfs /dev/da0", and using gpart, > > e.g.: > >=20 > > # gpart show /dev/da0 > > =3D> 34 4029373 da0 GPT (1.9G) > > 34 2048 1 freebsd-ufs (1.0M) > > 2082 4027325 - free - (1.9G) > >=20 > > # > >=20 > > and then "newfs /dev/da0p1", or similar, > > but no luck. > >=20 > > I tried sparc64 VTOC8 partition scheme too - no help. > >=20 > > I can mount the device and use it as expected, > > i.e. copy files to/from it on either box, but > > the other box doesn't seem to understand the file > > system. > >=20 > > I tried loading various modules in desperation, > > e.g. on the sparc64 side: > >=20 > > # kldstat=20 > > Id Refs Address Size Name > > 1 9 0xc0000000 a80e58 kernel > > 2 1 0x101bca000 104000 geom_part_mbr.ko > > 3 1 0x101cce000 110000 geom_label.ko > > 4 1 0x101dde000 108000 geom_part_gpt.ko > > #=20 > >=20 > > but still no use.=20 > >=20 > > Am I missing something simple? > > UFS on FreeBSD is not endian-agnostic. It uses the host byte order > for multibyte values. > > As result, you can share UFS volumes only between hosts with the same > endianess, like i386/amd64/ia64 little endian or sparc64/mips big endian. > AFAIK, NetBSD has such support. > > Wow... I didn't realise that. > I thought UFS (1 or 2) takes all care > of endian-ness. Do you mean that even > I had say a SCSI internal disk with UFS2, > I couldn't move it between a little and > a big endian freebsd boxes? > > So what is the advice for transferring data > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > I could use? > FAT should work and ZFS is also endian-agnostic. I don't know how well these code paths of the latter are tested though and we seem to have grown bugs in this regard at least in the area of intra- ZFS-version compatibility (which due to lack of understanding of the ZFS internals I'm not able to fix) since the split from (Open) Solaris. Marius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 13:18:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DF7436; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855E8405; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id r18DMgVi060782; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:22:42 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:22:42 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201302081322.r18DMgVi060782@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument In-Reply-To: <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:18:36 -0000 > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:30:51 GMT > From: Anton Shterenlikht > Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument > > From kostikbel@gmail.com Fri Feb 8 12:25:21 2013 > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:01:41PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I need to transfer some files from sparc64 -current > > box onto amd64 9.1-RELEASE laptop. > > The amd64 laptop has no network connection yet, > > so I'm trying to achive this with a USB flash drive.=20 > >=20 > > The problem is that I always end up with > >=20 > > # mount /dev/da0p1 /mnt/ > > mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument > > #=20 > >=20 > > If I do newfs on the sparc64 box, then I can't > > mount it on the amd64 box, and vice versa. > >=20 > > I tried just "newfs /dev/da0", and using gpart, > > e.g.: > >=20 > > # gpart show /dev/da0 > > =3D> 34 4029373 da0 GPT (1.9G) > > 34 2048 1 freebsd-ufs (1.0M) > > 2082 4027325 - free - (1.9G) > >=20 > > # > >=20 > > and then "newfs /dev/da0p1", or similar, > > but no luck. > >=20 > > I tried sparc64 VTOC8 partition scheme too - no help. > >=20 > > I can mount the device and use it as expected, > > i.e. copy files to/from it on either box, but > > the other box doesn't seem to understand the file > > system. > >=20 > > I tried loading various modules in desperation, > > e.g. on the sparc64 side: > >=20 > > # kldstat=20 > > Id Refs Address Size Name > > 1 9 0xc0000000 a80e58 kernel > > 2 1 0x101bca000 104000 geom_part_mbr.ko > > 3 1 0x101cce000 110000 geom_label.ko > > 4 1 0x101dde000 108000 geom_part_gpt.ko > > #=20 > >=20 > > but still no use.=20 > >=20 > > Am I missing something simple? > > UFS on FreeBSD is not endian-agnostic. It uses the host byte order > for multibyte values. > > As result, you can share UFS volumes only between hosts with the same > endianess, like i386/amd64/ia64 little endian or sparc64/mips big endian. > AFAIK, NetBSD has such support. > > Wow... I didn't realise that. > I thought UFS (1 or 2) takes all care > of endian-ness. Do you mean that even > I had say a SCSI internal disk with UFS2, > I couldn't move it between a little and > a big endian freebsd boxes? > > So what is the advice for transferring data > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > I could use? you could use zfs. easier is to use the media as src/dest for tar/gtar/bsdtar/etc. tar is endian-agnostic, although there may be endian-ness issues with binary data in files inside the tarball. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 13:31:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449E8A73; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BF56A4; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r18D7CRJ067578; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:07:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:07:12 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument In-Reply-To: <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: kostikbel@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:31:35 -0000 On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: [ snip ] > So what is the advice for transferring data > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > I could use? I've always used FAT32 for thumb drives and the like. I don't know if the SPARC would be able to use it, but FAT32 seems like it's most likely to be usable by the largest number of different platforms. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 13:38:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777F2C43; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8536FB; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3o9h-00034V-7M; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:38:24 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3o9g-0005Cv-PW; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:38:16 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r18DcGKK034983; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:38:16 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r18DcGa5034982; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:38:16 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:38:16 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302081338.r18DcGa5034982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: chris@monochrome.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.6 X-Spam-Level: --- Cc: kostikbel@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:38:25 -0000 From chris@monochrome.org Fri Feb 8 13:27:48 2013 On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: [ snip ] > So what is the advice for transferring data > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > I could use? I've always used FAT32 for thumb drives and the like. I don't know if the SPARC would be able to use it, but FAT32 seems like it's most likely to be usable by the largest number of different platforms. But how do I create FAT32 partitions on FreeBSD? The gpart doesn't seem to support it. Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 13:53:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B409B92; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:53:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682DA79E; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3oOE-0005bs-8U; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:53:44 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3oOD-0005lZ-M9; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:53:17 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r18DrHkB035062; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:53:17 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r18DrHRW035061; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:53:17 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:53:17 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302081353.r18DrHRW035061@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument In-Reply-To: <201302081322.r18DMgVi060782@mail.r-bonomi.com> X-Spam-Score: -3.4 X-Spam-Level: --- X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:53:45 -0000 From bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com Fri Feb 8 13:27:49 2013 > From: Anton Shterenlikht > Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument > > From kostikbel@gmail.com Fri Feb 8 12:25:21 2013 > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:01:41PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I need to transfer some files from sparc64 -current > > box onto amd64 9.1-RELEASE laptop. > > The amd64 laptop has no network connection yet, > > so I'm trying to achive this with a USB flash drive.=20 > >=20 > > The problem is that I always end up with > >=20 > > # mount /dev/da0p1 /mnt/ > > mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument > > #=20 > >=20 > > If I do newfs on the sparc64 box, then I can't > > mount it on the amd64 box, and vice versa. > >=20 > > I tried just "newfs /dev/da0", and using gpart, > > e.g.: > >=20 > > # gpart show /dev/da0 > > =3D> 34 4029373 da0 GPT (1.9G) > > 34 2048 1 freebsd-ufs (1.0M) > > 2082 4027325 - free - (1.9G) > >=20 > > # > >=20 > > and then "newfs /dev/da0p1", or similar, > > but no luck. > >=20 > > I tried sparc64 VTOC8 partition scheme too - no help. > >=20 > > I can mount the device and use it as expected, > > i.e. copy files to/from it on either box, but > > the other box doesn't seem to understand the file > > system. > >=20 > > I tried loading various modules in desperation, > > e.g. on the sparc64 side: > >=20 > > # kldstat=20 > > Id Refs Address Size Name > > 1 9 0xc0000000 a80e58 kernel > > 2 1 0x101bca000 104000 geom_part_mbr.ko > > 3 1 0x101cce000 110000 geom_label.ko > > 4 1 0x101dde000 108000 geom_part_gpt.ko > > #=20 > >=20 > > but still no use.=20 > >=20 > > Am I missing something simple? > > UFS on FreeBSD is not endian-agnostic. It uses the host byte order > for multibyte values. > > As result, you can share UFS volumes only between hosts with the same > endianess, like i386/amd64/ia64 little endian or sparc64/mips big endian. > AFAIK, NetBSD has such support. > > Wow... I didn't realise that. > I thought UFS (1 or 2) takes all care > of endian-ness. Do you mean that even > I had say a SCSI internal disk with UFS2, > I couldn't move it between a little and > a big endian freebsd boxes? > > So what is the advice for transferring data > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > I could use? you could use zfs. easier is to use the media as src/dest for tar/gtar/bsdtar/etc. tar is endian-agnostic, although there may be endian-ness issues with binary data in files inside the tarball. Yes, tar works, e.g. on sparc64 side: # tar -cf - /home/mexas/ftree.gv | dd of=/dev/da0 tar: Removing leading '/' from member names 20+0 records in 20+0 records out 10240 bytes transferred in 0.214031 secs (47844 bytes/sec) # Then on amd64 side: #dd if=/dev/da0 | tar -xf - I've got my file. The only problem is that the last command never stopped. I had to terminate it with CTRL/C. Is that the right syntax at all? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 14:47:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BB2DAA; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f169.google.com (mail-gh0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7189DB; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r18so881834ghr.28 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:47:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=V5dkVkBovqIV/f2HLG4Lk+su79S3U/oHoi1R49cVo7M=; b=zn99cHVYxsGCDiY7T8iN4PMlVTYsozJd0dQCyKZGuTtReI7deXMgxf+grWYeBgNCBs U9LfRGTX6fG0VKq7BdKIJa89MGVcnW03xFCKNu/YXd6atCpjGemv9ooVQMg9KaFSuUz3 Pk5NJheLu/RBB5IDlnheVSWr0NdRPUa7fWO8vY+wNxp/6UpUHyvYy9tpvjVWpA3kmTyv km9weCXO0w50H/Lbz1RIcvGfLT+D5OHnJZ7KAdEpBJSUSY04xhUfzoyin+qTapF+IUwZ jvnM8uB264si+xsOTjveor4IH6sjL6ODw5JLcMjshhD+y2I32/Fwx1EU8j84h/R6rDAb qABQ== X-Received: by 10.236.124.36 with SMTP id w24mr6288595yhh.19.1360334834139; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h38sm28640647ani.7.2013.02.08.06.47.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:47:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51150FED.1050606@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:47:09 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130206 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument References: <201302081338.r18DcGa5034982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201302081338.r18DcGa5034982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kostikbel@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:47:20 -0000 On 02/08/13 07:38, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From chris@monochrome.org Fri Feb 8 13:27:48 2013 > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > [ snip ] > > > So what is the advice for transferring data > > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > > I could use? > > I've always used FAT32 for thumb drives and the like. I don't know if > the SPARC would be able to use it, but FAT32 seems like it's most likely > to be usable by the largest number of different platforms. > > But how do I create FAT32 partitions on FreeBSD? > The gpart doesn't seem to support it. > > Anton for a new fat32 fs I used: newfs_msdos -F 32 -L travelsize /dev/da0 (FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 over here, for what it's worth) -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 16:16:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01B3883; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EA0EDA; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r18GGHoi084340; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:16:17 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <511524D1.9010809@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:16:17 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130112 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument References: <201302081338.r18DcGa5034982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <51150FED.1050606@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51150FED.1050606@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:16:26 -0000 On 02/08/13 14:47, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > On 02/08/13 07:38, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> From chris@monochrome.org Fri Feb 8 13:27:48 2013 >> >> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> >> [ snip ] >> >> > So what is the advice for transferring data >> > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition >> > I could use? >> >> I've always used FAT32 for thumb drives and the like. I don't know if >> the SPARC would be able to use it, but FAT32 seems like it's most >> likely >> to be usable by the largest number of different platforms. >> >> But how do I create FAT32 partitions on FreeBSD? >> The gpart doesn't seem to support it. >> >> Anton > > for a new fat32 fs I used: > > newfs_msdos -F 32 -L travelsize /dev/da0 > > (FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 over here, for what it's worth) Joseph is right in saying newfs_msdos -F 32 is how to format a FAT32 file system, but it occurs to me that Anton might be asking what type to specify to the gpart add command. Looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table#Partition_type_GUIDs and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_data_partition I think you probably want to use the type code for a Windows Basic data partition, which would be gpart add -t !EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7 other_gpart_args [depending on your shell you may have to escape that '!']. According to the second Wikipedia page "According to Microsoft, the basic data partition is the equivalent to partition types 0x06, 0x07, and 0x0B (FAT16, NTFS, FAT32) in the traditional MBR partition table." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 14:51:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9FC313; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B65A3B; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pIm-0007lx-NW; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:51:44 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3pIl-00013M-Vz; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:51:44 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r18Ephnq035396; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:51:43 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r18EphXa035395; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:51:43 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:51:43 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302081451.r18EphXa035395@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: jnagyjr1978@gmail.com, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument In-Reply-To: <51150FED.1050606@gmail.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:21:59 +0000 Cc: kostikbel@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:51:46 -0000 From jnagyjr1978@gmail.com Fri Feb 8 14:47:22 2013 On 02/08/13 07:38, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From chris@monochrome.org Fri Feb 8 13:27:48 2013 > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > [ snip ] > > > So what is the advice for transferring data > > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > > I could use? > > I've always used FAT32 for thumb drives and the like. I don't know if > the SPARC would be able to use it, but FAT32 seems like it's most likely > to be usable by the largest number of different platforms. > > But how do I create FAT32 partitions on FreeBSD? > The gpart doesn't seem to support it. > > Anton for a new fat32 fs I used: newfs_msdos -F 32 -L travelsize /dev/da0 (FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 over here, for what it's worth) got it, thanks. Seems it works on sparc64 too. Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 16:54:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B102A4; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de) Received: from host.omnilan.net (s1.omnilan.net [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F58E11C; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from titan.inop.wdn.omnilan.net (titan.inop.wdn.omnilan.net [172.21.3.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by host.omnilan.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r18GxNG5094435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 17:59:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de) Message-ID: <51152DB8.4060703@omnilan.de> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:54:16 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniLAN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100906 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: multiple ACEs with the same ACL qualifier X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig196DCE617D00358E8030002E" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:54:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig196DCE617D00358E8030002E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I'd like to duplicate the following ACL: # file: /data/shared/ # owner: harry # group: harry group:1stgroup:r-x---a-R-c--s:fd----:allow group:2ndgroup:rwxp--a-R-c--s:-d----:allow group:2ndgroup:----D---------:-d----:deny group:2ndgroup:r-----a-R-c--s:f-i---:allow owner@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group@:r-xp--a-R-c--s:fd----:allow everyone@:--------------:fd----:allow So there are two "group:2ndgroup:::allow" entries. While it's annoying that I can't modify one specific of these with "-m" (both get altered without warning/confirmation reques), I also can't use "-M" to apply it read from file. Are there any workarrounds? Intention is to make sure newly created files can only be deleted/altered by owner, while two other groups need to access files and directories read-only, but one of them also needs write access. But must'nt delete foreign files/directories. Never had so many problems applying real-world needs... Done such setup hundred times without effort, but on other FS... Thanks, -Harry --------------enig196DCE617D00358E8030002E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlEVLbgACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8hvCACfQyczYTUj2t3lnamlHrgwMhIq nb0An3B9OsOW6mr1gDdJ9q7hSsIKKdKH =lBoY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig196DCE617D00358E8030002E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 17:50:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFA4E64; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 17:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com (mail-ea0-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233A3348; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 17:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 1so1782649eaa.5 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:50:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=22uDRZOM2arZZtaj+um4QCfy45OTo5vJBX9c9uRYJgI=; b=p125DmYpY1fZr4cqOdC0I1VJBCz42Fz+SjA/yDPl73BnYH/BVuSrnCJ3ARV32Y4Sfx 7kt8yqnhfOsvWKFj7lizvW0/xkQUBcqButFKrQfEpt4K3ob2i29/CFl5gHqhpnMdwnng TfovCDu/I5iAOcSrjbpZM9kGiGAGrjmEmGCriuT1WTNJJrUiyVM7axo6YpJRzidh/vnE 0RZq+oO7NlP3WPoLInSuSI6Qf/DvoIJkQQ9W4GBMZ0J0Kd+MlcTisBC6fa9kVqLpBn8V Yevki/I+mgCmAimDFh4/32HTNNhajhJjJ9bSAF2qO6AA6p2R39iF32biA5JBoCcMsLmU gvpQ== X-Received: by 10.14.182.5 with SMTP id n5mr17823044eem.9.1360345836189; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (45.81.datacomsa.pl. [195.34.81.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h5sm48492044eem.1.2013.02.08.09.50.35 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:50:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Subject: Re: multiple ACEs with the same ACL qualifier Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= In-Reply-To: <51152DB8.4060703@omnilan.de> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:50:33 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <578FD1DA-8D68-446F-9443-4D8E0220BD31@FreeBSD.org> References: <51152DB8.4060703@omnilan.de> To: Harald Schmalzbauer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:50:38 -0000 Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o = godz. 17:54: > Hello, >=20 > I'd like to duplicate the following ACL: > # file: /data/shared/ > # owner: harry > # group: harry > group:1stgroup:r-x---a-R-c--s:fd----:allow > group:2ndgroup:rwxp--a-R-c--s:-d----:allow > group:2ndgroup:----D---------:-d----:deny > group:2ndgroup:r-----a-R-c--s:f-i---:allow > owner@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow > group@:r-xp--a-R-c--s:fd----:allow > everyone@:--------------:fd----:allow >=20 > So there are two "group:2ndgroup:::allow" entries. > While it's annoying that I can't modify one specific of these with = "-m" > (both get altered without warning/confirmation reques), I also can't = use > "-M" to apply it read from file. >=20 > Are there any workarrounds? Please use "-a" and "-x" instead. The "-m" was fine for POSIX.1e ACLs, where you never have more than one entry per principal and the ordering doesn't matter. --=20 If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my = body? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 18:40:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107ED746; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58A7852; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r18IeZV7068290; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:40:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r18IeYLo068287; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:40:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:40:34 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Arthur Chance Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument In-Reply-To: <511524D1.9010809@qeng-ho.org> Message-ID: References: <201302081338.r18DcGa5034982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <51150FED.1050606@gmail.com> <511524D1.9010809@qeng-ho.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:40:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:40:39 -0000 On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Arthur Chance wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_data_partition > > I think you probably want to use the type code for a Windows Basic data > partition, which would be > > gpart add -t !EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7 other_gpart_args > > [depending on your shell you may have to escape that '!']. According to the > second Wikipedia page > > "According to Microsoft, the basic data partition is the equivalent to > partition types 0x06, 0x07, and 0x0B (FAT16, NTFS, FAT32) in the traditional > MBR partition table." I just use type 12: # gpart add -t \!12 ... It would be kind of nice if gpart had some keywords for those types, though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 00:20:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16488A0D for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A53B44 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:20:57 -0800 Message-ID: <51159667.4050000@a1poweruser.com> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:20:55 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: file-descriptor file system? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2013 00:20:57.0443 (UTC) FILETIME=[54C6D330:01CE065B] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 00:20:57 -0000 What is a fdescfs file-descriptor file system? Is it still a normal part of 9.1? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 00:46:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31F5368 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x233.google.com (ia-in-x0233.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78E2D70 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x24so4791443iak.38 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:46:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EVYggFmwMkTPCf0kE405IJMX+0FhET8/QEdGe3450eM=; b=dmiOQjrRK8C6y1Nr+URTvHNN3oGs1M8OprO5oKPAXlYdjeumBnoYLo4jaHvlHQkpZ8 d+eFKg1J3+2ntDme1wY/3FVZ80FwIR7QO4h6rsNaWORPksc368TUpm//gxWMCUltNwu2 v17Y5umyNXE25m31lhRXxEPc2+jNl44GBAkW9MtbgXL6sYQwb0VIEYRHMk/bzi4E/Vca K/wVLeW37uBfaZ8BSQkdPcY0elIUtuYGSDKQPRl52KSLUdjkJzDzi9/ZyN6rR8ePc4jh DV4wOL7eQALUx9nzb6YP6TkeX1jiv6nVTRVY5FQxaRa5kT2qRg8F1yCDuTPu92+melo4 K4Dw== X-Received: by 10.50.194.167 with SMTP id hx7mr6314681igc.99.1360370770567; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-98-212-197-211.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.212.197.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uj6sm17808985igb.4.2013.02.08.16.46.09 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:46:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51159C4E.7070309@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:46:06 -0600 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Linux's "magic" sysrq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 00:46:11 -0000 I was reading the comments on a slashdot article about moving kernel console to userland. One thing that came up with Linux's sysrq support, documented at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key to see the abilities. I'd never heard of this, and I doubt FreeBSD has anything similar, but have I just never heard of it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 05:00:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB9A849 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from smtp1.sbb.rs (smtp1.sbb.rs [89.216.2.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3C983A for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mycenae.localdomain (cable-178-148-96-120.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.96.120]) by smtp1.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r1950EfR023441 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 06:00:19 +0100 Received: by mycenae.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EC934301A4; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:59:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:59:57 +0100 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb hub as kvm switch Message-ID: <20130209045957.GA1005@mycenae.sbb.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 05:00:22 -0000 Typo in original post. Should be: is it possible to use usb hub to handle usb keyboard and usb mouse for two nodes, of whick one is freebsd 9.1 amd64 box. Zoran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 05:00:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354A98D8 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from smtp1.sbb.rs (smtp1.sbb.rs [89.216.2.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2EE83F for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mycenae.localdomain (cable-178-148-96-120.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.96.120]) by smtp1.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r194v5Yg022872 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:57:11 +0100 Received: by mycenae.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 55D18301B6; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:56:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 05:56:50 +0100 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: usb hub as kvm switch Message-ID: <20130209045649.GB960@mycenae.sbb.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 05:00:39 -0000 I have two nodes side by side. There is none of kvm switches for usb only. I plan to connect usb keyboard and usb mouse and let monitor with two adapters to do the rest. Is it possible to use plain kvm switch for this task. One of nodes would be freebsd 9.1 amd64. Best regards Zoran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 10:45:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B2589D for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:45:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0519A29D for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id yAl31k002516WCc01Al4Jr; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:45:04 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H5sFNZki c=1 sm=1 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=Fu_n5yJQHbEA:10 a=6FLy7Twh09AA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=jjxzLNt3GQoA:10 a=FWYXXO2aYjmRX-QgtO0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1U47vZ-000KtU-Vi for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:45:03 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:45:00 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201302091045.00860.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Subject: Portmaster runs make config three times for some ports Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:45:14 -0000 I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and left it to get on with it. The next morning I discovered that things had progressed as far as starting to build en-apache-openoffice but it was sitting there with the config screen again despite having already gone through make config earlier. I clicked on OK and left it to get on with the compilation while I went away to get on with other things with just occasional checks to make sure it was still running. About 6 hours later when I checked it had completed the compilation and had started to install en-apache-openoffice but was waiting yet again with the config screen. Once again I clicked on OK and left things to continue. The job was still running last night and I expected to find it completed by this morning but on checking at 9:30 this morning I discovered that it had done the same thing with py27-gobject and had been sitting there with the config screen since shortly after midnight. Both openoffice and py27-gobject had gone through make config in the initial stage (I've checked the log file) but for some reason make config was repeated immediately before the compile and install stages. I invoked portmaster with: portmaster -r libffi -r boost-libs -r gnutls -r libtasn1 and these are the only options set in /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc # Never search for stale distfiles to delete (-D) DONT_SCRUB_DISTFILES=Dopt # # Do not prompt the user for failed backup package creation PM_IGNORE_FAILED_BACKUP_PACKAGE=pm_ignore_failed_backup_package Any ideas how I can avoid this happening. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 12:08:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF2E571; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0C96E7; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7399227620; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:08:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r19C8UBC001935; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:08:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:08:30 +0100 From: Polytropon To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument Message-Id: <20130209130830.762096cb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20130208121432.GV2522@kib.kiev.ua> <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kostikbel@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 12:08:36 -0000 On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:30:51 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > So what is the advice for transferring data > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > I could use? Use "the most universal file system" which isn't even a file system: tar. First, create a tar archive (not a _file_!) to the USB media as if it was a tape. On the sparc machine: # tar cvf /dev/da0 You can add compression flags like z and j if you need. To list what you've got, use "tar t" accordingly. Then uncompress directly from the media on the non-sparc machine: # tar xvf /dev/da0 See "man tar" for other options you might want to add. Also note that in this case, no file system is involved, so you can't mount anything here. > In the end I burned a CD with the files in question, > but it's a bit of a waste, as I only need to > move over several KB of data (wireless setup). That's true. Don't you have any floppies at hand? ;-) (Note: The tar approach also works on floppies, and even across OS borders, e. g. between Solaris and Linux.) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 12:11:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D6268C; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E643771F; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87BC27620; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:11:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r19CBtdP001952; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:11:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:11:55 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Hill Subject: Re: mount: /dev/da0p1: Invalid argument Message-Id: <20130209131155.7eea2fa8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201302081230.r18CUpkL034751@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kostikbel@gmail.com, Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 12:11:54 -0000 On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:07:12 -0500 (EST), Chris Hill wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > [ snip ] > > > So what is the advice for transferring data > > via USB in such cases? Any other gpart partition > > I could use? > > I've always used FAT32 for thumb drives and the like. I don't know if > the SPARC would be able to use it, but FAT32 seems like it's most likely > to be usable by the largest number of different platforms. While this may work for "ordinary purposes", it can cause trouble due to limitations of file name length, possibly also characters in file names, and maximum file sizes. If those factors are not triggered, it seems to be okay. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 15:57:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E74708 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AD1B4 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 07:57:48 -0800 Message-ID: <511671FA.3050801@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 10:57:46 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: vnet without epair Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2013 15:57:48.0442 (UTC) FILETIME=[352497A0:01CE06DE] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:57:47 -0000 Has any one been able to get RELEASE 9.1 to enable jail vnet without having to use epair? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 16:01:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A428D1 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024CEE7 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 08:01:36 -0800 Message-ID: <511672DE.3060708@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:01:34 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: jails running xorg desktop, is it possible? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2013 16:01:36.0620 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD25CAC0:01CE06DE] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:01:35 -0000 Has anyone been able to get a xorg desktop to run inside of a jail? All information and links to howto's welcome. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 16:28:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32939DDE for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23EA195 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r19GSEEW013824 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:28:14 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT05.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.16]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:28:13 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Fbsd8 , FreeBSD questions Subject: RE: vnet without epair Thread-Topic: vnet without epair Thread-Index: AQHOBt464Fa8DUsL5kqOlKb89O3Sd5hxtxsw Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:28:13 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EA6901@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <511671FA.3050801@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <511671FA.3050801@a1poweruser.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-09_03:2013-02-08,2013-02-09,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:28:22 -0000 Have you tried using netgraph? --=20 Devin ________________________________________ From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.= org] on behalf of Fbsd8 [fbsd8@a1poweruser.com] Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:57 AM To: FreeBSD questions Subject: vnet without epair Has any one been able to get RELEASE 9.1 to enable jail vnet without having to use epair? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 16:53:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B228396 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noreply+27kou6@twoomail.com) Received: from cmx5.massivemedia.eu (cmx5.massivemedia.eu [77.73.180.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86FB253 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:53:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=twoomail.com; s=twoo; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@twoomail.com; t=1360427574; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=dil/K0mQNOnlk30y/K6MXaAr0lP04Il+MgOmssV6V1U=; b=ARrDq801WfdI6SX1D7IneZVUHCrMvcezT7H19uP8fZGKT+LxFgDZCaep3cRUbrCQ 1/WvtWce3DVIui+PaDNBglJ3B/heqyFTFkuzP2G5ZKuo0je221dPJCsumUBCYN9D 5HtSn7unV2yZR2I045vmptuH/n8L/fOdbfmva0Q71U4=; Received: from [192.168.10.34] ([192.168.10.34:41883] helo=web) by mx19.netlogmail.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.1.37854 r(Momo-dev:3.5.1.0)) with ESMTP id F5/16-08802-63A76115; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:32:54 +0000 From: "Lyjeanewr via Twoo" Message-ID: To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Sender: noreply+27kou6@twoomail.com Subject: Reminder: Lyjeanewr added you as a contact on Twoo and wants to connect Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:32:54 +0000 X-MM-ID: -6aWQ9Mjdrb3U2LG1taWQ9YzYtMjdrb3U2LTdsb2xqNXg4LWMzNCxhcHBpZD0yLHQ9NDYscz0xLHY9MjgsdT0sZj01OTE0ODUxLGQ9MTM2MDQyNzU3NCxtPXA= X-rpcampaign: Twoo0460010280 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "noreply+27kou6@twoomail.com" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:53:31 -0000 I found an exclusive and fun way to meet new people online: Twoo.com. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lyjeanewr added you as a contact on Twoo and wants to connect. Connect on Twoo Copy/paste the following link into your web browser: http://mail.twoo.com/m/zSPbNyLg Twoo is the most fun way to meet new people in your area Join over 10 million people Twoo is the fastest growing network for meeting new people. Find out why over 10 million people have already joined Twoo. Chat now The first thing you want to do when you see a nice profile is start a conversation, right? On Twoo we promise you lots of people who are eager to have a chat. The best bit: it's free! Mobile Check out what is happening around you with the iPhone and Android apps. Take Twoo with you wherever you go. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Don't want to receive these mails? Follow this link: http://mail.twoo.com/m/l6YepKL6 TWOO NV/SA, Grainsborough House, 81 Oxford Street, W1D 2EU London, United Kingdom info-en@twoo.com BE0834322338. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 17:00:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0302609 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [74.208.4.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B92D294 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([172.19.198.48]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MO7eK-1Tyk8m3Lim-005VFk for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:00:44 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Feb 2013 17:00:44 -0000 Received: from 188.4.187.198.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr (EHLO [192.168.1.64]) [188.4.187.198] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us008) with SMTP; 09 Feb 2013 12:00:44 -0500 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19D/mlzyzxDXmyWiFgayUv2FQe3ZdKl3Txesk8Jzg YSEwy2hlcjyW4g Message-ID: <511680AD.1040209@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:00:29 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 , FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: vnet without epair References: <511671FA.3050801@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <511671FA.3050801@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:00:46 -0000 On 2/9/2013 5:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > Has any one been able to get RELEASE 9.1 to enable jail vnet without > having to use epair? Yes, you can use vnet-enabled jails with several types of interfaces. Physical ones like em0 etc, virtual ones like vlan0 etc, netgraph ethernet-like interfaces like ngeth etc and if_epair interfaces. What all these have in common is that they all are ethernet-like. You don't mention what kind of use and more or less most interfaces are usable in a vnet jail. Could you share more on what you are trying to achieve? Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 20:49:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA04D6 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BD672D for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 11:32:36 -0800 Message-ID: <5116A452.6030104@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:32:34 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikos Vassiliadis Subject: Re: vnet without epair References: <511671FA.3050801@a1poweruser.com> <511680AD.1040209@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <511680AD.1040209@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2013 19:32:36.0976 (UTC) FILETIME=[374ECF00:01CE06FC] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:49:41 -0000 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On 2/9/2013 5:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Has any one been able to get RELEASE 9.1 to enable jail vnet without >> having to use epair? > > Yes, you can use vnet-enabled jails with several types of interfaces. > Physical ones like em0 etc, virtual ones like vlan0 etc, netgraph > ethernet-like interfaces like ngeth etc and if_epair interfaces. > What all these have in common is that they all are ethernet-like. > > You don't mention what kind of use and more or less most interfaces > are usable in a vnet jail. Could you share more on what you are > trying to achieve? > > Nikos > > Thanks for your reply and interest. What I am doing is writing documentation that describes the new 9.1 jail extensions for jail.conf and the rc.conf jail statements. I am going to submit changes to /etc/defaults/rc.conf and as long as I was on the jail subject thought I may as well include vnet because it was missing from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. I did google search and could only find 9.0 vnet jails using epair. It was my understanding that epair was not necessary to use vnet and thanks to you, you confirmed it. As part of this self-appointed project I plan to also update "man jail" and the handbook jail section which is really way out of date. I plan to include vnet in all aspects of this project. I must point out this is not just a writing project. I have been using rc.conf jail statements to configure jails for some time now, and have a test bed to test things I write about so I can verify what I write is true and valid. I am working with the author of the jail environment and already have discovered bugs which are being addressed. I have never played with vimage as it's labeled as experimental because it is not scp aware. IE: can not use more than a single cpu. One of the 9.1 jail extensions deals with being able to use quotas inside of jails. I am excited to begin testing this new function. During my jail research I have come across posts where people have to use a kernel patch to get xorg desktops to work inside of a jail. I have a separate post to questions list trying to mine some info on that subject. I am always open to input. If you have the background to support my efforts in this project its welcomed. Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 20:51:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34228756; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D954755; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so4151997wey.28 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 12:51:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=rZidq50qEGAYzMiZDtXPz7xy2IuffzzYpFIrCKaVF+o=; b=Wo0UPNAM8FzEgeY9481nueXDIoULy8u70ErAjYUx3xnzCzxj3c39U60Tg1sk7JZhRq 7v4ataJxRAcgdbtXLRyg678tzFE9y7e7MgN6SijjY0zQRFCy6byuFXucEvCIh4vc22Fj szCwFx2kffmH1AXJAq7sP1pAEK9+DRb+3V7Qo8+6hRHk19q7e8+B2DM7+FBTtE7FY9eI NRhbrUrDpY/w3BmeGLJULFgeSGYclDGC35B+CW/79qxcMGYVwXdWl5g+ALOUt+wGx+99 khYpH0zUiZG4UFiba0DmKb2KswJyklDwrvy/W29inRZxLU2Qb4heO3QXDAugMfYKi8Uj +FAg== X-Received: by 10.194.83.97 with SMTP id p1mr15907762wjy.17.1360432761944; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:59:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg ([197.87.102.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b10sm20634202wix.7.2013.02.09.09.59.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:59:20 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.23 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:59:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.9.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3312249.nQNvK0Iz25"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302091959.15628.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:51:39 -0000 --nextPart3312249.nQNvK0Iz25 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.23 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. T= he=20 packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. =20 Please read the installation messages, if you use the nVidia graphics drive= r,=20 for further information. =20 =46AQ =2D-- Q: Wine crashing when launching some 3D programs (aka games) A: This appears to be some clash with software however I have not been able= to=20 isolate where the problem is occurring (wine, ports, world, kernel, i386,=20 amd64). A possible solution in to try upgrading, or downgrading, software= =20 used however I have not been able to fix the problem with my attempts. If = you=20 find a solution please email me, or post the solution on the mailing list. Q: wine: failed to initialize: / usr/local/lib32/wine/ntdll.dll.so: Undefin= ed symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" A: This problem is specific to FreeBSD-9.0, please either stick with=20 wine-1.5.10 or update to a newer version of FreeBSD (-STABLE or 9.1). =20 Apologies for the inconvenience. =20 Q: Creating pkgng packages for FreeBSD-9 A: When there is no demand for FreeBSD-8 packages I'll create additional pk= gng=20 packages for FreeBSD-9. Since it is possible to install the existing pkg=20 packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a high priority. = =20 Q: Wine doesn't run (properly) with a clang built world A: Clang was compiling i386 on a 16-byte boundary while gcc was using a 4-b= yte=20 boundary. To fix, recompile world after ensuring your sources include=20 http://beta.freshbsd.org/commit/freebsd/r242835 or the relevant MFC. =20 Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.23,1.tbz) =3D=20 f70260cc6f50184348321cc33451c6a0 MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.23.1.txz) =3D=20 c9a75ab1b26852d89acebfaf1945c93a MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.23,1.txz) =3D=20 2f91dc746978990bb2c2953300539b36 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng --nextPart3312249.nQNvK0Iz25 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlEWjnMACgkQUaaFgP9pFrJ5ywCfUZAUlSuzC7RsGqC1/GdmoZfK CMkAn17icWcOsWHYlmbppuZzJolp2ODr =j6N+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3312249.nQNvK0Iz25-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 22:06:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA1D7DA for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D845A31 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:06:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=gYQ7FeqztrANl+qcWPiKuJJiJ79iimBDVeOIOithTLM=; b=MJBreNK66hxyO0q9pReetMqxaRkuW4qZ0C3wA5scjPPIsZLLjnUgMyHYMiUNVU0wsphp+pQH7fST13ArXRhHwF2L89VuICBAfsQ2cWENXo/ACCg5cMnBlJacZ+K4bLF0; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U4EgD-000NFs-E7; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:57:37 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1360432651-71519-44968/5/1; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:57:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Joshua Isom Subject: Re: Linux's "magic" sysrq References: <51159C4E.7070309@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 11:57:31 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <51159C4E.7070309@gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.13 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:06:21 -0000 On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:46:06 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote: > I was reading the comments on a slashdot article about moving kernel > console to userland. One thing that came up with Linux's sysrq support, > documented at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key to see the > abilities. I'd never heard of this, and I doubt FreeBSD has anything > similar, but have I just never heard of it? > It's one of the few things I actually miss from Linux. Server hose? Alt+SysRq+RSEIUB (raising skinny elephants is utterly beautiful) and you have killed all processes, synced data to disk, unmounted drives, and rebooted the server. They're going to lose a lot more than the Magic SysRq if they move to userland... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 23:12:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7265509 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7448AD07 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r19NCE5K026217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:12:14 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT04.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:12:14 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Fbsd8 , Nikos Vassiliadis Subject: RE: vnet without epair Thread-Topic: vnet without epair Thread-Index: AQHOBt464Fa8DUsL5kqOlKb89O3Sd5hyJMWAgAAqfgD//8hg5w== Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:12:13 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EA6A3F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <511671FA.3050801@a1poweruser.com> <511680AD.1040209@gmx.com>,<5116A452.6030104@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <5116A452.6030104@a1poweruser.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-09_03:2013-02-08,2013-02-09,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:12:21 -0000 On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Fbsd8 wrote: > Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > On 2/9/2013 5:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Has any one been able to get RELEASE 9.1 to enable jail vnet without > >> having to use epair? > > > > Yes, you can use vnet-enabled jails with several types of interfaces. > > Physical ones like em0 etc, virtual ones like vlan0 etc, netgraph > > ethernet-like interfaces like ngeth etc and if_epair interfaces. > > What all these have in common is that they all are ethernet-like. > > > > You don't mention what kind of use and more or less most interfaces > > are usable in a vnet jail. Could you share more on what you are > > trying to achieve? > > > > Nikos > > > > >=20 >=20 > Thanks for your reply and interest. >=20 > What I am doing is writing documentation that describes the new 9.1 jail > extensions for jail.conf and the rc.conf jail statements. I am going to > submit changes to /etc/defaults/rc.conf and as long as I was on the jail > subject thought I may as well include vnet because it was missing from > /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Thanks for taking this on. > I did google search and could only find 9.0 vnet jails using epair. I'm surprised you didn't find my own page on vnet jails using netgraph: http://druidbsd.sf.net/vimage.shtml What I did was dup' the old rc.d/jail script one day and modify it to suppo= rt vnet jails (read: it doesn't use jail.conf it uses the "old" style of rc= .conf(5) parameters) with the built-in ability to do bridging with netgraph= (if you enable the right kernel options and/or have the right modules load= ed). It also supports shoving any whole interfaces into the vnet jails (be = they real or pseudo interfaces, the only restriction is that it has to be a= valid parameter in "ifconfig vnet ". ASIDE: The nice thing about using netgraph to do the bridging on the back-e= nd is that "ngctl dot | dot -Tsvg -o netgraph.svg" creates nice pictures of= your network layout (aside from being very versatile). > It was my understanding that epair was not necessary > to use vnet and thanks to you, you confirmed it. >=20 > As part of this self-appointed project I plan to also update "man jail" > and the handbook jail section which is really way out of date. I plan to > include vnet in all aspects of this project. I must point out this is > not just a writing project. I have been using rc.conf jail statements to > configure jails for some time now, I hope you'll look at my vimage package (we've been using it for a little o= ver 12 months now). $work has been very happy with it to say the least. > and have a test bed to test things I > write about so I can verify what I write is true and valid. I am working > with the author of the jail environment and already have discovered bugs > which are being addressed. I have never played with vimage as it's > labeled as experimental because it is not scp aware. I think you mean it conflicts with SCTP (network protocol like UDP and TCP). > IE: can not use more than a single cpu. I'm not so sure about that. > One of the 9.1 jail extensions deals with being able to use quotas > inside of jails. I am excited to begin testing this new function. Very cool -- looking forward to reading updates on that. > During my jail research I have come across posts where people have to > use a kernel patch to get xorg desktops to work inside of a jail. I have > a separate post to questions list trying to mine some info on that subjec= t. Excellent! > I am always open to input. If you have the background to support my > efforts in this project its welcomed. Yeah, we use vimages a lot at $work. For example, just yesterday, I had a n= eed to move a machine into the server room but it wasn't in a rack-mountabl= e case -- so I rsync'd the OS (minus /dev and /proc of course) to a directo= ry on the vimage server, spent a minute or two copy/pasting in /etc/rc.conf= , changing a couple values (like which em* interface to bridge to), and the= n I said "service vimage start [thename]" obsoleting the once-physical mach= ine for a new vimage. In this case, the server needed to run samba on a private network. Worked g= reat. Freed up some workstation hardware for an actual workstation and a se= rver that should have been in the rack is now running on server equipment a= s it should. It was a win for everybody and it took less than an hour (incl= uding the time to rsync). Now only if I could find a graceful solution to rsync dying with out of mem= ory errors on massive amounts of files and/or hard-links (rsync-3.0.7), I'd= be all set! --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.