From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 04:47:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E4D5E9 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.info) Received: from mail-gg0-x235.google.com (gg-in-x0235.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28306998 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e5so376301ggh.26 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:47:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drenet.info; s=google; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=daeIlPcfnwXgCxIjwUDZrLGIDWngle7u2v5KSRM4on0=; b=K+nAmH4bfLiDq0yjPLlkKxgkkfgH1r5mk0iObc+fhArcNm3swv9BB94G3ixdsokM8N s+dRUCoQzAmJAZKyyK2T48GZ2GrZN2gLkYVTk74gY35NPmNNXY1MxuNIx2RY0umfCDDj 9lZNFOjumVIxR1pok66vkuZMVDNAJXQLF9f1c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=daeIlPcfnwXgCxIjwUDZrLGIDWngle7u2v5KSRM4on0=; b=L3gsDqp4fVGBHTOq+d8gnadnl9k/yzptyIb6nI4RrqaDguFsNBxr+cTbgGm+rKruVE cJ4EJxbR/1NlYnW8HoKRrhmohvPoUnmLdhrBXr8/YvqrDuzSsPkWrCJ68OCpU4qSf4Ce HD25DmBcbGzP6RUxw4qlhG46hsNbfUTHVK/VbyLbm1Pz4/eF76AFNqdfCr05YZR3ga0D FBP5KCCIBV6gWd3PY7kLcBKHlmTKlOt3HhG/ibsGl/tqDcOFNB6stOAI5YwOXMJaUfvz cGvkGzhpnlh+Qz0Ge2KFQAQBV0v8NtVNyhcug4QZLWrzF7JqAcJjhsceefsP3ZLRgn64 NbYw== X-Received: by 10.236.190.98 with SMTP id d62mr12627921yhn.8.1361075972332; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:39:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from desktop.drenet.local ([97.100.190.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u2sm12043530yhl.8.2013.02.16.20.39.31 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:39:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51205F01.5060105@drenet.info> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:39:29 -0500 From: Andre Goree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130202 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org Subject: Trouble with kleopatra X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9F69BD7B9BCEC63067AB67DA" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGMNO0HYoM2KNUNCG+SqDSgg1X1SBddWdA2ZAl39CWGkfloy7TMhzYbqgt/3GIrNTkxyED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:47:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9F69BD7B9BCEC63067AB67DA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also posting this to questions as it's regarding the building of a port and possibly modifying a makefile. So I'm having trouble getting Kleopatra to work correctly on my 8.3-STABLE/kde4.9.5 system. There are a three errors posted, the first of which is my main concern. Please see this [1] screenshot. Now, I've built gpgme w/GNUPG2 support, which -- as far as I can tell -- should also enable gpgsm by the looks of this section of the Makefile: =2Eif ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGNUPG2} BUILD_DEPENDS+=3D gpg2:${PORTSDIR}/security/gnupg RUN_DEPENDS+=3D gpg2:${PORTSDIR}/security/gnupg CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-gpg=3D${LOCALBASE}/bin/gpg2 \ --with-gpgconf=3D${LOCALBASE}/bin/gpgconf =2Eif exists(${LOCALBASE}/bin/gpgsm) CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-gpgsm=3D${LOCALBASE}/bin/gpgsm =2Eelse CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-gpgsm=3Dno =2Eendif =2Eendif So I can't understand why I'm receiving the error "A problem was detected with the gpgsm backend. It seems that the gpgme library was compiled without support for this backend...Replace the gpgme library with a version compiled with gpgsm support." Can/should I explicitly enable gpgsm by editing the Makefile? The binary doesn't appear to be generated after compiling the port: [agoree@desktop agoree]$ ll /usr/local/bin/gpgsm ls: /usr/local/bin/gpgsm: No such file or directory Though, there is "/usr/local/bin/gpgsm-gencert.sh" Just looking to be pointed in the right direction here, thanks everyone. The other errors we'll deal with if I cannot figure it out on my own :) [1]http://drenet.net/images/snapshot2.png EDIT: Just realized that section of the Makefile does NOT install gpgsm, it only enables gpgsm support if it already currently exists. Should I [somehow] build gpgsm from source (if possible), then retry building gpgme? Toeing a 'psearch gpgsm' returns no results, even with '-s' option, so I'm assuming this is my only recourse to get gpgsm installed... --=20 Andre Goree andre@drenet.info --------------enig9F69BD7B9BCEC63067AB67DA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRIF8CAAoJEJQrkaCSFIoRRU0H/1xPaAiZf8HgvnFlBLTGXIeK z7DxEWbNmjUYJATleDy3Ftj4yPUYO+Y4PHMrHbRWXl60DAUFAjgwB1CI+Cokq9tp NFyiLdTrIL6qL9ecsB3AYiLCbBA+S8h+7LEsIIYOxnjkc5kox21WqGnY+wsf5/rU Ud0baVGnfTn5nMppx+ImI+iIZqgAjxPk+COErVHdid/hI9Wr2OjSYpkQQDG51nrc TbeLBVqawuKC09nlSd0zw83hkIbMA8gk93rYtp+77EXTWoELxSzOBTuCCU+pJupT FKg70+hiv4Jm22BZABrXOf+qd6vjJvTHO1wJe8+nTn+3yzCU+UJ7K66M4CmIsgQ= =Z5EX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9F69BD7B9BCEC63067AB67DA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 09:27:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE4F3E5 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E1EF15 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 9so6258811iec.32 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:27:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:reply-to:sender:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=vierbmzBFT7SuT8us+bfPIStr/6Hhw5XpiRK6jvNFlA=; b=DRElvDqkiXPNdE6RBPt5oszvTYTiVWlH8usrmepTLCQ8V+sZ5mTUNSa/1JP/Vy4qVn mpe25vQQfNgGQlPpHTh1eFrJNv3VtrSg9ne6Qc7QHDEsanYZxNiqSYCaoiy844bnzWDR c2UMI7aqGBigt9jhmneSZZrzvZHfd/wW7RoWqcF9c5jRqD6jCM+YS6ILgAaEvcWDIOSZ ux9GD1Y/XeKVrm+j0CiPXySiUQALqWPhdTylluulEc/bjREVHv/5Vpc/uuyksY6aCSFM rmE4va1RWlqnz2Y4V3cNbGD2x30YUKCDaNVHXha3AtDky6rFPm7JDZymyNk74N6CFsOr IO/A== X-Received: by 10.50.47.202 with SMTP id f10mr767974ign.8.1361093234370; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:27:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.43.125.130 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:26:54 -0800 (PST) From: takCoder Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:56:54 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: H-4yFNMrheQ3Ww_SDxpWa7tM1cA Message-ID: Subject: bsd lost partition recovery To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:27:15 -0000 hi everyone, maybe this question is somehow off-topic but now i'm in an urgent need of any recommendations.. *here's the question:* how to restore lost data of a formatted bsd partition?! *and here's what has happened to me:* i was trying to install windows xp sp2 on a HD on my system to move it to another hardware after that for some reasons, but i had my main HD attached to may system as well.. all of a sudden i made the worst misktake ever and formatted my main HD's bsd partition instead!!! would someone please tell me how can i restore it?? i'm really in need of my data there and have no idea right now.. Best Regards, t.a.k P.S. i'm asking this question here cause i thought it may need a special tool to recover freebsd formatted lost data.. i had no time for googling it till now..i'm going to do that now.. sorry for taking your time.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 11:01:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8F1D25 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59345154 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:01:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=WqikYm29pX4V7B0EIcoUIZCWCw8PPgGOC3FJI0kRAWs=; b=NBgPZyW/kaNKITsnto8ySG3ACFv+l8a0Jyv2pkUkF3mnP/qwrSWDbYK9AzmXJpvJLzLTVcdXDIzmMPZZUbLObI8Ilf1+NTBnY/wJ1ExPJM6JUtKuwI3uKICoHGawxJi9; Received: from [122.129.203.50] (port=49511 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U71zj-002Ing-W8; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:01:20 -0700 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:01:16 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: bsd lost partition recovery Message-ID: <20130217180116.63bc8052@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:01:27 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:56:54 +0330 takCoder wrote: > *here's the question:* > how to restore lost data of a formatted bsd partition?! > restore it from a backup? > *and here's what has happened to me:* > i was trying to install windows xp sp2 on a HD on my system to move > it to another hardware after that for some reasons, but i had my main > HD attached to may system as well.. > > all of a sudden i made the worst misktake ever and formatted my main > HD's bsd partition instead!!! If you want to read the data from that partition it will depend very much on how far the Windows installation really went. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 11:13:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC71F97 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1AB1B2 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so2539978wib.0 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:13:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to:x-gm-message-state; bh=NkgdKlOsUwcrHEc0s6LLrWWnm/9Cazn36KLuATYWWOM=; b=BtZwUXNne7sa/yLTsoaOCs3ZsJbocDaU2f/Tkg3Ho23Ot6EzeP1RAl8EfzhIZys27f QJVuo5Tlf7gX0XRvpOIOPhGjjQQM9F1mEaSKnU327QxSA7+SRXn9w6EC6gvOQgRQAjOI ikFEJEXPxC/egtxguwfPQlkfWmy+VuSqYTnv6rMv+mQEgFRcfpWw7eFjY9QCWplCZDdz XM2THoMkRmXgfnyZZsQV9GyipEk0IscmME5T7sY4N0Z/3RyyGSy0DUB9bPTaXAJAvnDp 7zLtBXudvlsQQdDGJD6QJItOv2C9j0/sCx3mJRTDl6RCrFLHlO0S1nskRE8pZkXG7QMU KTHA== X-Received: by 10.194.158.165 with SMTP id wv5mr13063357wjb.45.1361099598357; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:13:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.105.63.251] ([92.90.16.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bj9sm14126667wib.4.2013.02.17.03.13.16 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:13:17 -0800 (PST) References: <511FAC10.9060806@mail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <511FAC10.9060806@mail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4D08169B-0CA9-4BF0-BD22-0E6674D0894F@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B144) From: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: Ports & Packages [Stable] in sync Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:13:08 +0100 To: Jeff Tipton X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkeqja9HDV2+Q/MPJOZzsow17kwp1IutwN+wMEfCRHVDzf9L33crwR17kIve4E6hDVabdqT Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:13:26 -0000 On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are= no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at t= he RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default optio= ns or when there are no packages. Would it be possible to get the ports snap= shot that was used to compile the 9-STABLE packages? I think I could use sub= version but then I need to know the revision number of that snapshot. What d= o you suggest? >=20 > Thanks, > Jeff >=20 Hi Jeff, I think you might be confused here. It is my understanding that there are ports for: - HEAD - x.y-RELEASE I don't think you're going to be able to get a snapshot from 9-STABLE, becau= se -STABLE is a continuing work. What version do you consider to be 9-STABLE ? Every time there's a new commit you get a "new" 9-STABLE.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 11:21:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B622114 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x236.google.com (ia-in-x0236.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E381D8 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w33so4472420iag.13 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:21:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:cc:content-type; bh=uiQEXSl/oUmpdvuZFzqM9X3NdGEI3kcATXZuJfyq9sM=; b=rvm7Qa0A+qArle8z+Xtfjm4ESwadIZntqdrzBAzuHZtca51sp5wQRAEl9wXJ0oJF9S d/n7VC/7cGoQrrQysorvIWPRSNDF9kkjOzRDUx9d/i2SaDIR3/aWvmtRR+DqhoPMk7mG qIcqtMi3JabDaoR8tuKrQduotBccA3pbQz8Wz4pdGEUYEYhDJjF5mxZAiBm+XhVd6eHh cFVYdwU8WDqqYextR5YIytZInkEiF0ITmx9pDx4PGH+eRj8c1dEUFR0gZwYZ6dMgSw1w U4nWZtwp5SKqI5XvZk1uQv+hknA8PrBDZkhBOTOX1D3cHLokVN1Y79wFSO/7uCIyUOCz q85Q== X-Received: by 10.43.111.201 with SMTP id ep9mr4374789icc.43.1361100077518; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:21:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.43.125.130 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:20:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130217180116.63bc8052@X220.ovitrap.com> References: <20130217180116.63bc8052@X220.ovitrap.com> From: takCoder Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:50:57 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9JvgIj_Lu16-GA-jfI_pt3BTZ3U Message-ID: Subject: Re: bsd lost partition recovery Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:21:18 -0000 Thank you for your reply.. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Erich Dollansky < erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > >On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:56:54 +0330 > >takCoder wrote: > > >> *here's the question:* > >> how to restore lost data of a formatted bsd partition?! > >> > >restore it from a backup? > no, from the formatted hard drive.. if only i had a backup.. > > >> *and here's what has happened to me:* > >> i was trying to install windows xp sp2 on a HD on my system to move > >> it to another hardware after that for some reasons, but i had my main > >> HD attached to may system as well.. > >> > >> all of a sudden i made the worst misktake ever and formatted my main > >> HD's bsd partition instead!!! > > If you want to read the data from that partition it will depend very > much on how far the Windows installation really went. > > i just deleted the partition and then found out what i just did, then i stopped the installation process and start looking ways for recovery.. till now, somewhere in the web i saw that R-Studio supports ufs recovery but it's a windows application.. i'm preparing a system for checking it right now.. Best Regards, t.a.k On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Erich Dollansky < erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:56:54 +0330 > takCoder wrote: > > > *here's the question:* > > how to restore lost data of a formatted bsd partition?! > > > restore it from a backup? > > > *and here's what has happened to me:* > > i was trying to install windows xp sp2 on a HD on my system to move > > it to another hardware after that for some reasons, but i had my main > > HD attached to may system as well.. > > > > all of a sudden i made the worst misktake ever and formatted my main > > HD's bsd partition instead!!! > > If you want to read the data from that partition it will depend very > much on how far the Windows installation really went. > > Erich > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 11:30:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6DA394 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B42229 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:30:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=SZTXRe/oY75tYaOZEhO8nVVt7db9aNMzu2cBJ5uB5gA=; b=NvXFLjnht/POeU8Od1sFE2Pjg28cc4S8zC4tX3R+E/NTzf1ERcjs8TawYnyZp0StEPpd2XCqhwuhYgUmvsA6Xpr/cCyYStbfBvccgj1lUvKWrSBwfxeoloCuJOtLsThm; Received: from [122.129.203.50] (port=35417 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U72S6-002Qlh-EB; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:30:39 -0700 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:30:28 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: bsd lost partition recovery Message-ID: <20130217183028.2ea961a1@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20130217180116.63bc8052@X220.ovitrap.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:30:45 -0000 Hi, On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:50:57 +0330 takCoder wrote: > Thank you for your reply.. you are welcome. > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Erich Dollansky < > erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote: > > > >On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:56:54 +0330 > > >takCoder wrote: > > > > >> *here's the question:* > > >> how to restore lost data of a formatted bsd partition?! > > >> > > >restore it from a backup? > > > > no, from the formatted hard drive.. if only i had a backup.. > You did it the hard way. > > > > > >> *and here's what has happened to me:* > > >> i was trying to install windows xp sp2 on a HD on my system to > > >> move it to another hardware after that for some reasons, but i > > >> had my main HD attached to may system as well.. > > >> > > >> all of a sudden i made the worst misktake ever and formatted my > > >> main HD's bsd partition instead!!! > > > > If you want to read the data from that partition it will depend very > > much on how far the Windows installation really went. > > > > i just deleted the partition and then found out what i just did, > > then i > stopped the installation process and start looking ways for recovery.. > > till now, somewhere in the web i saw that R-Studio supports ufs > recovery but it's a windows application.. i'm preparing a system for > checking it right now.. > Just try it. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 13:35:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212BA812 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C063E89D for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:35:23 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=0NJkuBbZY5VCdgJ+v5fl0w==:17 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=sIt-5M63AAAA:8 a=nDBoeLT0E8UA:10 a=2mCIpQd4or9Ns12q5iQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=0NJkuBbZY5VCdgJ+v5fl0w==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.84.183 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.84.183] ([209.6.84.183:15790] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTP id B8/AF-28101-39CD0215; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:35:15 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20768.56466.778249.416668@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:35:14 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: choosing ACLs X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:35:24 -0000 "man tunefs" mentions two types of ACLs: POSIX.1e and NFSv4. Am I correct in assuming an unqualified "ACL" in general usage defaults to the former, not the latter? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 14:20:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E718AF13 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE3C9BA for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B96C5E475; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.165, BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ISzhVWgQFIjT; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:50 +0100 (CET) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (unknown [195.216.53.111]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF49A5E41E; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5120E432.8030803@eskk.nu> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:46 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130129 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: bsd lost partition recovery References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:20:07 -0000 2013-02-17 10:26, takCoder skrev: > hi everyone, > > maybe this question is somehow off-topic but now i'm in an urgent need of > any recommendations.. > > *here's the question:* > how to restore lost data of a formatted bsd partition?! > > *and here's what has happened to me:* > i was trying to install windows xp sp2 on a HD on my system to move it to > another hardware after that for some reasons, but i had my main HD attached > to may system as well.. > > all of a sudden i made the worst misktake ever and formatted my main HD's > bsd partition instead!!! > > would someone please tell me how can i restore it?? i'm really in need of > my data there and have no idea right now.. > > Best Regards, > t.a.k > > P.S. i'm asking this question here cause i thought it may need a special > tool to recover freebsd formatted lost data.. i had no time for googling it > till now..i'm going to do that now.. sorry for taking your time.. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Sorry to inform you but I think you have lost your partition! If you go to the archives and look for "My freebsd partition changed by Windows chkdsk" Nov 1 2012 You'll see that I have had the same problem and the partition was not recoverable in any way. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 14:44:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4F9712 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [74.208.4.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7408A4E for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.49]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Mexa9-1UVV9h1oAj-00OZA6 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:44:20 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2013 14:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.rw.local) [78.84.97.244] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2013 09:44:19 -0500 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19hwKhPvsFhTEAq9ZW/3P/vyVdnoUDyfc9zR/4ZMl dTT5SmMn8Sjlff Message-ID: <5120ECE6.7090602@mail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:44:54 +0200 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports & Packages [Stable] in sync References: <511FAC10.9060806@mail.com> <4D08169B-0CA9-4BF0-BD22-0E6674D0894F@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4D08169B-0CA9-4BF0-BD22-0E6674D0894F@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:27 -0000 On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible to get the ports snapshot that was used to compile the 9-STABLE packages? I think I could use subversion but then I need to know the revision number of that snapshot. What do you suggest? >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> > Hi Jeff, > > I think you might be confused here. > > It is my understanding that there are ports for: > - HEAD > - x.y-RELEASE > > I don't think you're going to be able to get a snapshot from 9-STABLE, because -STABLE is a continuing work. > > What version do you consider to be 9-STABLE ? > Every time there's a new commit you get a "new" 9-STABLE. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thank you, Damien, for the reply. AFAIK, STABLE gets updated every 2 weeks but not every day, and it seems to be that because of the intrusion, it has not been updated for long. The versions of the ports that come with the 9.1-RELEASE are even slightly newer than those of 9-STABLE packages. I think if I don't get the revision number from which the 9-STABLE was updated last time I'll use the ports tree that comes with 9.1-RELEASE. I hope it won't cause much version incompatibilities. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 16:42:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7E7C33 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:42:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32EFE77 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (graphics [62.49.197.51]) by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1365C119C2B for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:26:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51210882.4060801@vizion2000.net> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:42:42 -0800 From: David Southwell Organization: Vision Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Openfire weird start up problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:42:43 -0000 I am having trouble with openfire I found after starting I could not connect to the server Getting error WARNING: no shebang line in COPYRIGHT Here is the test sequence that shows the error: # service openfire start Starting openfire #service openfire status openfire is running as pid 9205 NOTE At this point it appears that openfire starts BUT immediately afterwards it must stop because a repeat status call gives: #service openfire status /usr/local/etc/rc.d/openfire: WARNING no shebang line in COPYRIGHT openfire not running? (check /var/run/openfire.pid Many thanks for any guidance I have reported problem to maintainer but so far no response. Thanks David -- David Southwell ARPS AFIAP Photographic Arts Trained & experienced competition judge, mentor, trainer, lecturer, Advanced digital techniques, international project photography From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 20:58:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82C54BF for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56333862 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C882B24C92; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:58:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1HKw6vx002159; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:58:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:58:06 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: bsd lost partition recovery Message-Id: <20130217215806.79e28107.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130217183028.2ea961a1@X220.ovitrap.com> References: <20130217180116.63bc8052@X220.ovitrap.com> <20130217183028.2ea961a1@X220.ovitrap.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:58:11 -0000 On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:30:28 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Erich Dollansky < > > erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote: > > > > > >On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:56:54 +0330 > > > >takCoder wrote: > > > > > > >> *here's the question:* > > > >> how to restore lost data of a formatted bsd partition?! > > > >> > > > >restore it from a backup? > > > > > > > no, from the formatted hard drive.. if only i had a backup.. > > > You did it the hard way. > > > > > > > > >> *and here's what has happened to me:* > > > >> i was trying to install windows xp sp2 on a HD on my system to > > > >> move it to another hardware after that for some reasons, but i > > > >> had my main HD attached to may system as well.. > > > >> > > > >> all of a sudden i made the worst misktake ever and formatted my > > > >> main HD's bsd partition instead!!! > > > > > > If you want to read the data from that partition it will depend very > > > much on how far the Windows installation really went. > > > > > > i just deleted the partition and then found out what i just did, > > > then i > > stopped the installation process and start looking ways for recovery.. > > > > till now, somewhere in the web i saw that R-Studio supports ufs > > recovery but it's a windows application.. i'm preparing a system for > > checking it right now.. > > > Just try it. You can try R-Studio Emergency, a live CD, to _check_ if there is anything to restore. This step is for free, as you don't need to buy it. Also there's no need for installing anything on some "Windows". However, there are tools that can be used on FreeBSD (if you can put the disk into another system). Note: Do not write to that disk! If possible, make a dd image of the disk and work with the image, do not _alter_ the original disk in any way. Every little wrong step can decrease your chances for recovery. I came to this list many years ago with a recovery problem, and have learned a lot since that time (as I also had no backup and still got my files back). So I'll try to give some suggestions. But remember that it depends on your _specific_ setting on what will possibly work and what won't. As it has been questioned already, "formatting" can have several meanings, especially in "Windows" land. The more actual content of the disk got overwritten, the worse it gets. So if you've stopped the installation at some point, it's still possible that your data can be located. Allow me to introduce a few tools to you (my meanwhile "famous list of data recovery tools" which I've posted some times on this list): A worst-case tool to recover data (not file names, but file content) is testdisk; in ports: sysutils/testdisk. It's also on some diagnostics and recovery CDs like UBCD. You can also try this: fetch -rR Also recoverdisk could be useful. The ports collection contains further programs that might be worth investigating; just in case they haven't been mentioned yet: ddrescue dd_rescue <- use this to make an image of the disk! magicrescue testdisk <- restores content recoverjpeg foremost photorec Then also ffs2recov scan_ffs should be mentioned. It's possible that the disk contains some information to restore the initial UFS file systems. And finally, the "cure to everything" is found in The Sleuth Kit: fls dls ils autopsy In worst case. Just in worst case. Keep in mind: Read the manpages before using the programs. It's very important to do so. You need to know what you're dealing with, or you'll probably fail. There is no magical tetroplyrodon to click ^Z and get everything back. :-) Proprietary (and expensive) tools like "R-Studio" or "UFS Explorer" can still be considered worth a try. Their trial versions are for free. "UFS Explorer" even works using wine (I've tried it). If you have one or two spare disks, initialize them in FreeBSD. Make a dd image of your disk to the 1st disk. Use recovery tools to write their results on the 2nd disk. Disks are cheap, at least your data is worth more than two disks. And you're going to need the disks anyway. :-) I wish you best luck to get your data back. I can fully understand how frustrating such a situation can be. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 22:57:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B17BE2 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcigar@ulb.ac.be) Received: from relaygateway01.edpnet.net (relaygateway01.edpnet.net [212.71.1.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE81D3F for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:57:08 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBADVfIVHV25ey/2dsb2JhbAANN8AdgReDEgEBAQQ4QBELGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBF7NriSOJDo1dgWEWgyoDl0mRDYE2 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,683,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="145827296" Received: from 213.219.151.178.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net (HELO [192.168.0.10]) ([213.219.151.178]) by relaygateway01.edpnet.net with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2013 23:55:56 +0100 Message-ID: <51215FFD.4060200@ulb.ac.be> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:55:57 +0100 From: Julien Cigar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130209 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.2: database replication on demand - easy way (Bucardo in ports not available) References: <511F7AED.6070106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <511F7AED.6070106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:57:09 -0000 On 02/16/2013 13:26, O. Hartmann wrote: > Dear Sirs. > > I send my question to this list in the hope someone has the same > problems and already found a solution. I will start explaining the > background and my difficulties with recent solutions. > > We/I have a FreeBSD 10 box running a PostgreSQL 9.2 server containing > literature references via RefDB, some sort of bugtracking via Bugzilla, > several astronomical databases of the IAU (minor planet objects) and > others. Those databases are kept and maintained on one single box at the > department. > > Since a lot of the data is needed in my home office or at a lab with > non-permanent internet connection, I desperately need to synchronize the > databases kept on the "master" with some backup database systems acting > as "master/slave" when they are online. The latter definition is fuzzy, > since what I need is an automated synchronization of the "real" master > with a sporadically upcoming "slave" at home or at field sites for my > science where, as said, the internet connectivity isn't provided 24/7. > > I feel realy uncomfortable with the built-in streaming replication of > PostgreSQL 9.2 since I never managed it to make a successful > replication. As far as I understand, the streaming mechanism of > PostgreSQL 9.X expects the "slaves" to be always online, to which the > replication. > > I was said that Bucardo (http://bucardo.org/) would be the tool of > choice, but FreeBSD ports seem not not have this tool. SLONY also is a > way to complicated for my for just this task - or I'm to dumb to perform > a solution that fits easily. > > Is someone out here who might have the same problems and already figured > out how to solve this? I do not want to go into this crap "pg_dump", > since I tried this many times and it failed due to some issues I never > figured out why in PostgreSQL 9.2. Sorry being unspecific here, it is a > long time since I tried this frustrating task and it boiled always down > to some confusing "postgres/template1" issues when dumping the master > and trying to update the "slave". Even following the textbook's > suggestions ended up in a mess. > > Well, I appreaciate some hints and concepts (working, not hypothetical > "could be's", those are floating enough around the FreeBSD related net). > > Thanks in advance and thanks for the patience, > > Oliver > perhaps you could do WAL shipping .. ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 08:06:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E338583 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack.mclauren@yahoo.com) Received: from nm35-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm35-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.238.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F39220 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.215.141] by nm35.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2013 08:05:53 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.193] by tm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2013 08:05:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2013 08:05:53 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 329545.16842.bm@omp1002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 65427 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Feb 2013 08:05:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1361174753; bh=7U0HdB0hP3/uyaMkUqEtvj0Jb2Gmgi4WzldNSbcUQ9c=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=I+2LAIymc8nJfkV6DwWzVW7sKGqEfQg8W9Shji2xCbTa3cmYQuhOmq64Rhnag48lEX04V5siWk0cZ11sl/sEEWnpFxp7QSY7dT6VrlfPARK38gdQv7UF+aKcIedGKvd/p1igPPdLME0v2lFQSVaU0JCXbj9vB7Vqqii2AfFNLUs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ag6yN/sUMaaiey0pkuI4ntSZTqYc1R/iAzeL2MQv4DXxa1cYLid+V+botn9o5SqVgSF+vZmXw2oOfEdlbLaMoNh3nQcAWC5+aSdV7ea9bcKQyIRjqES0HPAbOnmiaK6PVinBSIettlftTssCsNv/6TVYUgLYA1Qljo9km0x5/XA=; X-YMail-OSG: 4al8404VM1n2eojRkvhmbSJ.g0eXHnisEqgH4ZMBRqShRvo gdCeZh0vlCzMtlhCKC2ASgREZJ41Pq71BZ3QxXYmGHBkIukeVRm.3wlQJ611 OiagCKd_i5CFaNTwpYvpz3gLElaR_LY6ckw04iYxaAPvL6H1vUNGPUttkRxp 2wojj_Kd8mOj5.vQk9TjYLHqucGJwMM7aeOwEDwLOvIyRf8VvqCVBgd0JlHc LEp1LKnBKTLYt0_mW9V32r50UbHRnorB.as0bjYzOzhbdLNkDV4ozELHuGH7 eOIx7iJ_m2zfSsCUTM2dIIN.kZcQM8GU3CvOAUp3mWUv9gVimNdo.jv6YnTr ViEgfv4tTpEVEvSk54uMWtkfBZsSfxjEbDYNkkf7iTEF_bNuo6EtIOVoBQNr GlHwdJ0GFa2boQ2lWq.f09el.WR5hOA.A3Vo4jQnVumOmuNHGlaNewQHKFw- - Received: from [178.131.58.126] by web160104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:05:53 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, SGkgZmVsbGFzCgpJcyBpdCBwb3NzaWJsZSB0byBhc3NpZ24gSVAgYWRkcmVzcyB0byBuZyBpbnRlcmZhY2VzIHdpdGhvdXQgZGVzdGluYXRpb24gYWRkcmVzcyA_CklzIGl0IHBvc3NpYmxlIHRvIGFzc2lnbiB0aGUgZGVzdGluYXRpb24gYWRkcmVzcyBsYXRlciA_CgpUaGFua3MgaW4gYWR2YW5jZSAuLi4KATABAQEB X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.133.508 Message-ID: <1361174753.57665.YahooMailNeo@web160104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:05:53 -0800 (PST) From: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: assign IP address to ng interface without destination address To: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:41:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Mc Lauren List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:06:01 -0000 Hi fellas Is it possible to assign IP address to ng interfaces without destination address ? Is it possible to assign the destination address later ? Thanks in advance ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 14:12:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8846CCC6 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonni@egarden.fi) Received: from egarden.fi (egarden.fi [78.47.154.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494A5EDE for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.48] (itmill.masterplanet.fi [194.100.97.79]) by egarden.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10AA71C129 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:06:19 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <5122355E.3040506@egarden.fi> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:06:22 +0200 From: Jonni Nakari User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: ZFS pool data recovery Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:12:00 -0000 It seems, that while testing suspend to RAM on my machine by running "acpiconf -s 3" I managed to break a RaidZ zpool. The machine went to sleep fine, but after waking up commands (e.g. reboot) reported I/O error. When booting after a hard reset the machine fails to mount the root filesystem: Trying to mount root from zfs:/vault/root []... Mounting from zfs:/vault/root failed with error 5. I booted the system from FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img and tried to import the zpool in the shell: # zpool import -f vault cannot import 'vault': I/O error Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. Command "zpool import -nfF vault" from the memstick system gives no output. (I thought it should always give some output?) What should I try next to repair the zpool or recover the data? I started "zpool import -nfFX vault" but it seems to take quite long. Some more information about my system: zpool vault consists of 5 block devices: whole disks: ada1, ada2, ada3 cache: ada0s1e log: ada0s1d The system boots from a UFS filesystem ada0s1a. The zpool and rest of the system was created with FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE. -- Jonni Nakari jonni@egarden.fi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 16:20:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8B5A1B for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7E17D3 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u54so4977872wey.16 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:20:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=t3yjNJSk8PgvYHIvT2Fqzw9vHhc97BfxnTLad8a3u6k=; b=JPlfo4Y+LKuKpnaeaEPjHJQuN4Q9sdD95z2MgC0tDMVnwo3gkJ+5rqmN012rRNwRAg vDhViaViBI+olrYCE4GIzoLkARNMJ7CQYpG7sdiF6IAY+cXurMMjSiADernQiw5RcLE4 lPfwSVz3/9JhGr14agDwLT0z1rwLQmCUaZXEjxi/3/FpQlop+mIAeWLGXWifezcZHLjD VeOck6Gu03q+QyXaQMhpZEGL3Qqpb2zkdeHIH+LiLZrVq+jo83fGnVtiGtFvJK0ZZITE 5jjBK5J+pKv0f4L3KV4yw5z5676cMTBay4RoDuuQ34wCqCpfrJuzr5Nr7sbrCIhp8YRj ReAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.197 with SMTP id t5mr21220525wia.27.1361204055659; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.60.147 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:14:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <511FC24F.5080007@a1poweruser.com> References: <511FC24F.5080007@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:14:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.1 kernel src only From: David Demelier To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:20:02 -0000 You can do svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src Note that you need to install subversion before Cheers 2013/2/16 Fbsd8 > Before the install media format changed at 9.0, sysinstall had option to > only install kernel source. > > Can I use 9.1 svn to just checkout the kernel src necessary to compile a > custom kernel? > > If so, how would I code the svn command to make it happen? > > > Thanks > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 19:30:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B46B7E for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@example.com) Received: from yavin.vindaloo.com (yavin.vindaloo.com [72.52.97.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F88169 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from geonosis.vindaloo.com (ool-44c34eb3.dyn.optonline.net [68.195.78.179]) by yavin.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D7E51845 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:23:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from naboo.example.com (unknown [107.36.209.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by geonosis.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFCBBB836; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:23:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by naboo.example.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 96D887301F; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:23:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:23:35 -0500 From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Using svn to checkout a deprecated port. Message-ID: <20130218192335.GA7566@naboo.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:30:37 -0000 Hi, I need to use svn to checkout the old "security/cfs" port so I can do a one-time transfer of some data off of a USB drive. At the end of the day, I just need the one port so if the cvs repository is available I could also get it that way. In either case, I'm trying to do the equivalent of: $ cvs co -r '2011/10/01' $FreeBSDportsRepo security/cvs in English, I want to checkout security/cvs from ports as it existed on October 1st, 2011 (the port was deprecated on November 1st 2011. Anything I do with svn seems to want to checkout the entire tree. While desirable for a different project, that's not really in scope right now. Further, I'm temporarily at the end of a metered pipe so the difference between getting all of the ports tree and just the directory that I want is significant. -- -- Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There will be an answer, Let it be." e: chris -at- vindaloo -dot- com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:01:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C458B5A7 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay01.alfahosting-server.de (relay01.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B5D2B0 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay01.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 32CE932E2918; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:01:03 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay04.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE41132E290C for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:00:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from pc.martinlaabs.de (p54B34931.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.73.49]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0085515D3E2 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:00:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5122885F.9000305@martinlaabs.de> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:00:31 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Input subsystem comparable to linux planned X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/16694/Mon Feb 18 18:35:45 2013 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:01:30 -0000 Hi, maybe you know the input subsystem of linux that is very flexible in terms of various input data interpretations. Are there plans to implement something comparable into the freebsd system? The background is, that I currently write a joystick driver supporting USB joysticks for FreeBSD. At the moment it supports the joystick api from linux which makes it easy to port i.e. plib to use it. I however would also like to support the input subsystem API which is some what more complicated. So - before writing some emulating code for the linuxulator I wanna ask if it is planned to put something equal into the freebsd kernel. Thank you, Martin Laabs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:03:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C626565D for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645172D3 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com ([10.1.101.215]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LcEEV-1UZCir37Ez-00jXSm for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:03:29 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2013 20:03:23 -0000 Received: from 77.49.91.105.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr (EHLO [127.0.0.1]) [77.49.91.105] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu015) with SMTP; 18 Feb 2013 21:03:23 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ys3EvpiByyy1fPLSDL/5dDRI1J4Qsk9E3M261mx RwyvqYeByINajz Message-ID: <51228903.40803@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:03:15 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: Re: assign IP address to ng interface without destination address References: <1361174753.57665.YahooMailNeo@web160104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1361174753.57665.YahooMailNeo@web160104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:03:30 -0000 On 18/2/2013 10:05 πμ, Jack Mc Lauren wrote: > Hi fellas > > Is it possible to assign IP address to ng interfaces without destination address ? > Is it possible to assign the destination address later ? > Hi, I suspect that you are interested in an ng iface in point-to-point mode and point-to-point mode requires a destination address... But you can make up an address to use and almost none will notice. Please give more info about what you are trying to achieve. Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:35:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99111CF for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9472269F for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:35:09 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MIF0099DL12A0I0@mail-out.apple.com> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:34:53 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7f546d000005e2f-9c-5122825d7020 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.209.4.71]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id A2.8A.24111.D5282215; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:34:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Using svn to checkout a deprecated port. From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20130218192335.GA7566@naboo.example.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:34:52 -0800 Message-id: References: <20130218192335.GA7566@naboo.example.com> To: Christopher Sean Hilton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUieJHFXTe2SSnQYONnQYufO6cwWXSf7GZ2 YPKY8Wk+i8ejpnWMAUxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBm9c9pYCtrZKtZfWcncwHiXpYuRk0NCwERi 5c9fULaYxIV769m6GLk4hARmMUlMWzORFSQhLGAq8ej1OmYQm1fAUOLW5blsIDazgJbEjX8v mUBsNgEVicWz/gPVcHBwCphJ3DqXDRJmEVCVaFjyDqpcUmLh+3Vgu4QEXCTufVvNBBGXl9j+ dg7UeCuJxsap7BA1phL9NxvBThARMJBY0XuKDeJOWYmdd06zTGAUmIXkollILpqFZOwCRuZV jIJFqTmJlYYmeokFBTmpesn5uZsYQcHYUGiyg/HgT/5DjAIcjEo8vN4uSoFCrIllxZW5hxgl OJiVRHjb7ygGCvGmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2KU5mBREuddFQ9ULZCeWJKanZpakFoEk2Xi4JRq YJwQ/OjvfT5RRVVtRX+56lVvAgrZtx9d0vQ/c+YD3Y/eucUXli2J2xng++nH8sWOe9puPTko ZxwvL8a3z2auqUdUMJNO2sI1kZ9iV+8Q3P/LfFLtx+jMy9WGZ5b8Nn26YG9MJnPsk23SmjUi H98ryO/0en31edkphs2iGy6uePWxda+MSpCynZ0SS3FGoqEWc1FxIgAGmr5AQgIAAA== Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ML" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:35:09 -0000 Hi-- On Feb 18, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > I need to use svn to checkout the old "security/cfs" port so I can do > a one-time transfer of some data off of a USB drive. At the end of the > day, I just need the one port so if the cvs repository is available I > could also get it that way. In either case, I'm trying to do the > equivalent of: > > $ cvs co -r '2011/10/01' $FreeBSDportsRepo security/cvs > > in English, I want to checkout security/cvs from ports as it existed > on October 1st, 2011 (the port was deprecated on November 1st 2011. Try following the suggestion for "Partial Checkout" here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer#line-62 Regards, -- -Chuck PS: Reply-To set to freebsd-ports@ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 21:03:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A398D74E for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: from lena.kiev.ua (lena.kiev.ua [82.146.52.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505A47B0 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:03:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lena.kiev.ua; s=3; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=RJLA4B1Cs74eTpzlqn3oyLoB6FJMCTOaH2o0MU4mrAU=; b=EC+1rjUtLYLG3X8ccwV5hwkui/oFMQe2n5rVifhWjdMidXE2u/lzlwoqsM1zH1nxj9gyFUZ8Z+Qfrv4+Pqe9kW2fpjmc8oiufxda/WF3sGRMpvjlTSSFggAcn4d8x+lOXNK7a1vFgpZbOzBJTANeHSptqmhDtp7cn1jXqpItShM=; Received: from ip-384c.rusanovka-net.kiev.ua ([94.244.56.76] helo=bedside.lena.kiev.ua) by lena.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U7Xrz-000P7d-PP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:29 +0200 Received: from bedside.lena.kiev.ua (localhost.lena.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1IL34JW008383; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: (from lena@localhost) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.6/8.14.5/Submit) id r1IL33Op008382; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:03 +0200 From: Lena@lena.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Christopher Sean Hilton Subject: Re: Using svn to checkout a deprecated port. Message-ID: <20130218210303.GB922@lena.kiev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:03:29 -0000 Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > I need to use svn to checkout the old "security/cfs" port > as it existed > on October 1st, 2011 (the port was deprecated on November 1st 2011 You can download one file at a time from http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/cfs/Attic/ and http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/cfs/files/Attic/ I tried to find how to do that with svnweb or svn but failed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 21:21:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE48BC9F for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF91F855 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:21:12 -0800 Message-ID: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:21:11 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2013 21:21:12.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0579640:01CE0E1D] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:21:11 -0000 The handbook does not cover how to add zfs support. How is it done? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 21:57:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7345D4FD for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480CE995 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:57:16 -0800 Message-ID: <5122A3BA.2000907@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:57:14 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? References: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2013 21:57:16.0180 (UTC) FILETIME=[EA3BFD40:01CE0E22] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:57:17 -0000 Fbsd8 wrote: > The handbook does not cover how to add zfs support. > > How is it done? Let me reword. If zfs is in the base system why does it not show up when I look for it this way? if config -x $( sysctl -n kern.bootfile ) | grep -q '^[[:space:]]*options[[:space:]]\{1,\}ZFS\>'; then echo "yes zfs is in the kernel" fi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 21:57:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5099553 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F770996 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701AC3CD86; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:57:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1ILvIYD001942; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:57:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:57:18 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? Message-Id: <20130218225718.581b04cb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> References: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:57:23 -0000 On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:21:11 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > The handbook does not cover how to add zfs support. Does the Handbook's section 21.2 fail to contain something specific you're searching for? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/filesystems-zfs.html > How is it done? By adding zfs_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf and issuing the command "service zfs start" the ZFS subsystem should be up and running. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 22:00:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7090E72F for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ges+lists@wingfoot.org) Received: from wingfoot.org (caduceus.wingfoot.org [64.19.172.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46ED19C8 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from caduceus.wingfoot.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wingfoot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D045D39DC26; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:54:12 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wingfoot.org Received: from wingfoot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by caduceus.wingfoot.org (wingfoot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10042) with ESMTP id lKSeKBmuP0Z0; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:54:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from Sandal.local (ool-ad030fe6.dyn.optonline.net [173.3.15.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by wingfoot.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 352B739DC1E; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:54:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5122A2FC.5010205@wingfoot.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:54:04 -0500 From: Glenn Sieb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? References: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:00:32 -0000 On 2/18/13 4:21 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > The handbook does not cover how to add zfs support. > > How is it done? Does this help you? https://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS Best, --Glenn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 00:56:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF45BC9 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBF0CF for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056B627729; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:55:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1J0u0sm002415; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:56:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:56:00 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? Message-Id: <20130219015600.68050fb2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5122A3BA.2000907@a1poweruser.com> References: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> <5122A3BA.2000907@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:56:04 -0000 On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:57:14 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Fbsd8 wrote: > > The handbook does not cover how to add zfs support. > > > > How is it done? > > > Let me reword. If zfs is in the base system why does it not show up > when I look for it this way? > > if config -x $( sysctl -n kern.bootfile ) | grep -q > '^[[:space:]]*options[[:space:]]\{1,\}ZFS\>'; then > echo "yes zfs is in the kernel" > fi Without the ability to check this, I strongly assume that if you enable ZFS as described in the Handbook, the module /boot/kernel/zfs.ko (part of the default system) will be loaded. That's why it won't show up in a sysctl query aimed at the _kernel_ itself -- because it isn't in the kernel. Also, "sysctl -n kern.bootfile" will return the actual kernel file, /boot/kernel/kernel, which is a binary. If the exact config list (from the kernel _configuration_ file) is not plain-text part of that file, grep will not find the text you're grepping for. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 01:13:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B8FEEA for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787C716B for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2013 11:43:05 +1030 Message-ID: <5122D19F.2040804@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:43:03 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Sean Hilton Subject: Re: Using svn to checkout a deprecated port. References: <20130218192335.GA7566@naboo.example.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218192335.GA7566@naboo.example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:13:20 -0000 On 19/02/2013 05:53, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > Hi, > > I need to use svn to checkout the old "security/cfs" port so I can > do a one-time transfer of some data off of a USB drive. At the end of > the day, I just need the one port so if the cvs repository is > available I could also get it that way. In either case, I'm trying to > do the equivalent of: > > $ cvs co -r '2011/10/01' $FreeBSDportsRepo security/cvs > > in English, I want to checkout security/cvs from ports as it existed > on October 1st, 2011 (the port was deprecated on November 1st 2011. > It appears that checking out a deleted path doesn't work even if you specify a rev that it exists in. But checking out the parent works. I'd check it out to another dir then copy the specific files over. svn co -r 282000 svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head/security/ You can change the svn.freebsd.org to svn0.us-east.FreeBSD.org or svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org For reference I went to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports and clicked the revision number at the top (above the sticky revision box) then tried jumping to a few different rev numbers till I got close to a commit date just before 2011/10/01. Once you have the rev you want you can go back up to ports (link at top of page) and enter a sticky revision. Then you can go to security/cfs and view the files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 01:41:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033B72DE for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C405525A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:41:36 -0800 Message-ID: <5122D83F.6090107@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:41:19 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? References: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> <5122A3BA.2000907@a1poweruser.com> <20130219015600.68050fb2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130219015600.68050fb2.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2013 01:41:36.0990 (UTC) FILETIME=[418097E0:01CE0E42] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:41:38 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:57:14 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Fbsd8 wrote: >>> The handbook does not cover how to add zfs support. >>> >>> How is it done? >> >> Let me reword. If zfs is in the base system why does it not show up >> when I look for it this way? >> >> if config -x $( sysctl -n kern.bootfile ) | grep -q >> '^[[:space:]]*options[[:space:]]\{1,\}ZFS\>'; then >> echo "yes zfs is in the kernel" >> fi > > Without the ability to check this, I strongly assume that > if you enable ZFS as described in the Handbook, the module > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko (part of the default system) will be > loaded. That's why it won't show up in a sysctl query > aimed at the _kernel_ itself -- because it isn't in the > kernel. > > Also, "sysctl -n kern.bootfile" will return the actual > kernel file, /boot/kernel/kernel, which is a binary. If > the exact config list (from the kernel _configuration_ > file) is not plain-text part of that file, grep will not > find the text you're grepping for. > So the next question is there any sh script code I can use to check if zfs has been enabled by the rc.conf zfs_enable statement. I need to determine if zfs is enabled on the host. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 02:34:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AC3A46 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC0F6B0 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1J2Y2Dg013717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:34:02 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT06.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.17]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:34:01 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Fbsd8 , Polytropon Subject: RE: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? Thread-Topic: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? Thread-Index: AQHODh3l9GcWtM8phkiuPGHY+9FEzZiAjisAgAAx8gCAAAypgP//qEgD Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:34:01 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAACAE@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> <5122A3BA.2000907@a1poweruser.com> <20130219015600.68050fb2.freebsd@edvax.de>, <5122D83F.6090107@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <5122D83F.6090107@a1poweruser.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-18_05:2013-02-18,2013-02-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: FreeBSD questions , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:34:16 -0000 The tool for checking rc.conf(5) is my sysrc(8). It will eventually be part of base (it's already checked into HEAD at usr.s= bin/sysrc -- but not installed by default unless WITH_BSDCONFIG is enabled = when performing a build(7) or release(7) process). Currently, also available via ports in sysutils/sysrc I definitely recommend giving it a shot. There's essentially two ways to use it for your needs: 1. sysrc -n zfs_enable Returns YES for example. or... 2. For better performance, use the includes... #!/bin/sh . /usr/local/share/sysrc/sysrc.subr f_sysrc_get zfs_enable Returns YES for example. --=20 Devin ________________________________________ From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.= org] on behalf of Fbsd8 [fbsd8@a1poweruser.com] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:41 PM To: Polytropon Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:57:14 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Fbsd8 wrote: >>> The handbook does not cover how to add zfs support. >>> >>> How is it done? >> >> Let me reword. If zfs is in the base system why does it not show up >> when I look for it this way? >> >> if config -x $( sysctl -n kern.bootfile ) | grep -q >> '^[[:space:]]*options[[:space:]]\{1,\}ZFS\>'; then >> echo "yes zfs is in the kernel" >> fi > > Without the ability to check this, I strongly assume that > if you enable ZFS as described in the Handbook, the module > /boot/kernel/zfs.ko (part of the default system) will be > loaded. That's why it won't show up in a sysctl query > aimed at the _kernel_ itself -- because it isn't in the > kernel. > > Also, "sysctl -n kern.bootfile" will return the actual > kernel file, /boot/kernel/kernel, which is a binary. If > the exact config list (from the kernel _configuration_ > file) is not plain-text part of that file, grep will not > find the text you're grepping for. > So the next question is there any sh script code I can use to check if zfs has been enabled by the rc.conf zfs_enable statement. I need to determine if zfs is enabled on the host. Thanks _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 03:22:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C300A10 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:22:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1992F8DF for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4827127729; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:22:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1J3MRSd003103; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:22:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:22:27 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD? Message-Id: <20130219042227.7bcc3477.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5122D83F.6090107@a1poweruser.com> References: <51229B47.4070605@a1poweruser.com> <5122A3BA.2000907@a1poweruser.com> <20130219015600.68050fb2.freebsd@edvax.de> <5122D83F.6090107@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:22:26 -0000 On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:41:19 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > So the next question is there any sh script code I can use to > check if zfs has been enabled by the rc.conf zfs_enable statement. > > I need to determine if zfs is enabled on the host. Even though the statement zfs_enable="YES" may be part of /etc/rc.conf, it's still possible that the ZFS subsystem is _currently_ not running. So in my opinion you should check with something that relies on ZFS actually running. So there could be a difference between "is enabled" and "is running". Regarding "is enabled", you can easily check if the corresponding line in /etc/rc.conf is present. This could result in a false-positive answer regarding "is running". For example, if I add zfs_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf and check its presence (e. g. using grep), but I don't do anything else; I'll get this: % zfs internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library Here's an example from a system not running ZFS: /sbin/zfs > /dev/null 2>&1 if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "ZFS is currently running." else echo "ZFS is currently _not_ running." fi Check on a system running ZFS. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 04:23:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4764F1B4 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@example.com) Received: from yavin.vindaloo.com (yavin.vindaloo.com [72.52.97.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13236A97 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from geonosis.vindaloo.com (ool-44c34eb3.dyn.optonline.net [68.195.78.179]) by yavin.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD2D51845; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:23:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from naboo.example.com (c-67-180-254-210.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.254.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by geonosis.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8E11B836; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:23:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by naboo.example.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 314827301F; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:23:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:23:09 -0500 From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: Shane Ambler Subject: Re: Using svn to checkout a deprecated port. Message-ID: <20130219042309.GA7901@naboo.example.com> References: <20130218192335.GA7566@naboo.example.com> <5122D19F.2040804@ShaneWare.Biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5122D19F.2040804@ShaneWare.Biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:23:13 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:43:03AM +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 19/02/2013 05:53, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to use svn to checkout the old "security/cfs" port so I can > > do a one-time transfer of some data off of a USB drive. At the end of > > the day, I just need the one port so if the cvs repository is > > available I could also get it that way. In either case, I'm trying to > > do the equivalent of: > > > > $ cvs co -r '2011/10/01' $FreeBSDportsRepo security/cvs > > > > in English, I want to checkout security/cvs from ports as it existed > > on October 1st, 2011 (the port was deprecated on November 1st 2011. > > > > It appears that checking out a deleted path doesn't work even if you > specify a rev that it exists in. But checking out the parent works. > I'd check it out to another dir then copy the specific files over. > > svn co -r 282000 svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head/security/ > > You can change the svn.freebsd.org to svn0.us-east.FreeBSD.org or > svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org > > For reference I went to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports and clicked the > revision number at the top (above the sticky revision box) then tried# > jumping to a few different rev numbers till I got close to a commit date > just before 2011/10/01. Once you have the rev you want you can go back > up to ports (link at top of page) and enter a sticky revision. Then you > can go to security/cfs and view the files. > Thanks for the quick answers everyone, the trick seems to be three steps: # prime the tree with a guess as to the revision that you need. svn co -r --depth immediates svn:///security # refine the guess using the svn logs. cd security/cfs && svn log # checkout the revision that you wanted. ( updating didn't work...) cd ../.. && rm -rf security && svn co -r svn -- Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There will be an answer, Let it be." e: chris -at- vindaloo -dot- com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 05:06:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE3A5C9 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EE2C04 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by p3plsmtpa11-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id 25491l0014XeM0101549Pf; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:04:09 -0700 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:04:05 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: clicking on URL'S in mutt. Message-ID: <20130219050405.GA12541@ethic.thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:06:45 -0000 guys, for some reason, kmail is busted and I need a way of getting mutt to spawn firefox. Anybody? gary ps: this is from a linujx desktop running kde... ps ive got urlview [??] but it lists dozens of http links:: lost. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 05:39:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0DCA4F for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB992D6D for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DFB3CC8C; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:39:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1J5djis003491; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:39:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:39:45 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: clicking on URL'S in mutt. Message-Id: <20130219063945.0a2c2b50.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130219050405.GA12541@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130219050405.GA12541@ethic.thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:39:44 -0000 On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:04:05 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > for some reason, kmail is busted and I need a way of getting > mutt to spawn firefox. Anybody? I can only suggest the most basic method (which should work with any text mode MUA, even those without any mouse support). It requires that you already have a Firefox running, e. g. on a 2nd workspace. First select the URL in the mail message with the left mouse button, then switch over to the Firefox window and click the middle mouse button (or press down the mouse wheel if you don't have a normal 3 button mouse). If the URL is encapsulated in spaces, a double-click would select it, so you don't need to manually select it from its beginning to its end (or vice versa). > ps: this is from a linujx desktop running kde... If your mail storage is intact, can't you (temporarily) use Thunderbird to access it? If I remember correctly, KMail and Thunderbird are using the same storage format (mbox, I think)... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 07:22:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E2793E for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from p3plsmtpa11-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa11-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B40C100 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by p3plsmtpa11-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id 27L81l00D4XeM01017L8yc; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:20:09 -0700 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:20:04 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Subject: Re: clicking on URL'S in mutt. Message-ID: <20130219072004.GA24247@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130219050405.GA12541@ethic.thought.org> <20130219063945.0a2c2b50.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130219063945.0a2c2b50.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:22:45 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:39:45AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:04:05 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > for some reason, kmail is busted and I need a way of getting > > mutt to spawn firefox. Anybody? > > I can only suggest the most basic method (which should work > with any text mode MUA, even those without any mouse support). > It requires that you already have a Firefox running, e. g. on > a 2nd workspace. First select the URL in the mail message with > the left mouse button, then switch over to the Firefox window > and click the middle mouse button (or press down the mouse > wheel if you don't have a normal 3 button mouse). If the URL > is encapsulated in spaces, a double-click would select it, > so you don't need to manually select it from its beginning > to its end (or vice versa). > > > > > ps: this is from a linujx desktop running kde... > > If your mail storage is intact, can't you (temporarily) use > Thunderbird to access it? If I remember correctly, KMail and > Thunderbird are using the same storage format (mbox, I think)... > I think youre rt about t'bird. I tried to install it and got waaaay lost. ince kde is the same <>, I'm including the ancillary file that is giving kmail fits. maybe someone omlist will spot the trouble straight away---considering that this is the sharpest list anywhere. in the meantime, im using the rightmost button with mutt and getting some of the http urls. thank, everybody, # trouble report:: Akonadi Server Self-Test Report =============================== Test 1: SUCCESS -------- Database driver found. Details: The QtSQL driver 'QMYSQL' is required by your current Akonadi server configuration and was found on your system. File content of '/home/kline/.config/akonadi/akonadiserverrc': [%General] Driver=QMYSQL [QMYSQL] Name=akonadi Host= Options="UNIX_SOCKET=/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/socket-tao/mysql.socket" ServerPath=/usr/sbin/mysqld-akonadi StartServer=true [Debug] Tracer=null Test 2: SUCCESS -------- Akonadi is not running as root Details: Akonadi is not running as a root/administrator user, which is the recommended setup for a secure system. Test 3: SUCCESS -------- MySQL server found. Details: You have currently configured Akonadi to use the MySQL server '/usr/sbin/mysqld-akonadi'. Make sure you have the MySQL server installed, set the correct path and ensure you have the necessary read and execution rights on the server executable. The server executable is typically called 'mysqld'; its location varies depending on the distribution. Test 4: SUCCESS -------- MySQL server is executable. Details: MySQL server found: /usr/sbin/mysqld Ver 5.5.29-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 for debian-linux-gnu on x86_64 ((Ubuntu)) Test 5: ERROR -------- MySQL server log contains errors. Details: The MySQL server error log file '/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err' contains errors. File content of '/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err': 130217 17:12:31 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled. 130217 17:12:31 InnoDB: The InnoDB memory heap is disabled 130217 17:12:31 InnoDB: Mutexes and rw_locks use GCC atomic builtins 130217 17:12:31 InnoDB: Compressed tables use zlib 1.2.3.4 130217 17:12:31 InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, size = 8.0M 130217 17:12:31 InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool InnoDB: Error: log file ./ib_logfile0 is of different size 0 8064000 bytes InnoDB: than specified in the .cnf file 0 2097152 bytes! 130217 17:12:31 [ERROR] Plugin 'InnoDB' init function returned error. 130217 17:12:31 [ERROR] Plugin 'InnoDB' registration as a STORAGE ENGINE failed. 130217 17:12:31 [ERROR] Unknown/unsupported storage engine: innodb 130217 17:12:31 [ERROR] Aborting 130217 17:12:31 [Note] /usr/sbin/mysqld: Shutdown complete ##### I just dont get this, above. Test 6: SUCCESS -------- MySQL server default configuration found. Details: The default configuration for the MySQL server was found and is readable at /etc/akonadi/mysql-global.conf. File content of '/etc/akonadi/mysql-global.conf': # # Global Akonadi MySQL server settings, # These settings can be adjusted using $HOME/.config/akonadi/mysql-local.conf # # Based on advice by Kris Köhntopp # [mysqld] # strict query parsing/interpretation # TODO: make Akonadi work with those settings enabled # sql_mode=strict_trans_tables,strict_all_tables,strict_error_for_division_by_zero,no_auto_create_user,no_auto_value_on_zero,no_engine_substitution,no_zero_date,no_zero_in_date,only_full_group_by,pipes_as_concat # sql_mode=strict_trans_tables # DEBUGGING: # log all queries, useful for debugging but generates an enormous amount of data # log=mysql.full # log queries slower than n seconds, log file name relative to datadir (for debugging only) # log_slow_queries=mysql.slow # long_query_time=1 # log queries not using indices, debug only, disable for production use # log_queries_not_using_indexes=1 # # mesure database size and adjust innodb_buffer_pool_size # SELECT sum(data_length) as bla, sum(index_length) as blub FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema not in ("mysql", "information_schema"); # NOTES: # Keep Innob_log_waits and keep Innodb_buffer_pool_wait_free small (see show global status like "inno%", show global variables) #expire_logs_days=3 #sync_bin_log=0 # Use UTF-8 encoding for tables character_set_server=utf8 collation_server=utf8_general_ci # use InnoDB for transactions and better crash recovery default_storage_engine=innodb # memory pool InnoDB uses to store data dictionary information and other internal data structures (default:1M) innodb_additional_mem_pool_size=1M # memory buffer InnoDB uses to cache data and indexes of its tables (default:128M) # Larger values means less I/O innodb_buffer_pool_size=80M # Create a .ibd file for each table (default:0) innodb_file_per_table=1 # Write out the log buffer to the log file at each commit (default:1) innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=2 # Buffer size used to write to the log files on disk (default:1M for builtin, 8M for plugin) # larger values means less I/O innodb_log_buffer_size=1M # Size of each log file in a log group (default:5M) larger means less I/O but more time for recovery. innodb_log_file_size=64M # # error log file name, relative to datadir (default:hostname.err) log_error=mysql.err # print warnings and connection errors (default:1) log_warnings=2 # Convert table named to lowercase lower_case_table_names=1 # Maximum size of one packet or any generated/intermediate string. (default:1M) max_allowed_packet=32M # Maximum simultaneous connections allowed (default:100) max_connections=256 # The two options below make no sense with prepared statements and/or transactions # (make sense when having the same query multiple times) # Memory allocated for caching query results (default:0 (disabled)) query_cache_size=0 # Do not cache results (default:1) query_cache_type=0 # Do not use the privileges mechanisms skip_grant_tables # Do not listen for TCP/IP connections at all skip_networking # The number of open tables for all threads. (default:64) table_cache=200 # How many threads the server should cache for reuse (default:0) thread_cache_size=3 # wait 365d before dropping the DB connection (default:8h) wait_timeout=31536000 [client] default-character-set=utf8 Test 7: SKIP -------- MySQL server custom configuration not available. Details: The custom configuration for the MySQL server was not found but is optional. Test 8: SUCCESS -------- MySQL server configuration is usable. Details: The MySQL server configuration was found at /home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.conf and is readable. File content of '/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.conf': # # Global Akonadi MySQL server settings, # These settings can be adjusted using $HOME/.config/akonadi/mysql-local.conf # # Based on advice by Kris Köhntopp # [mysqld] # strict query parsing/interpretation # TODO: make Akonadi work with those settings enabled # sql_mode=strict_trans_tables,strict_all_tables,strict_error_for_division_by_zero,no_auto_create_user,no_auto_value_on_zero,no_engine_substitution,no_zero_date,no_zero_in_date,only_full_group_by,pipes_as_concat # sql_mode=strict_trans_tables # DEBUGGING: # log all queries, useful for debugging but generates an enormous amount of data # log=mysql.full # log queries slower than n seconds, log file name relative to datadir (for debugging only) # log_slow_queries=mysql.slow # long_query_time=1 # log queries not using indices, debug only, disable for production use # log_queries_not_using_indexes=1 # # mesure database size and adjust innodb_buffer_pool_size # SELECT sum(data_length) as bla, sum(index_length) as blub FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema not in ("mysql", "information_schema"); # NOTES: # Keep Innob_log_waits and keep Innodb_buffer_pool_wait_free small (see show global status like "inno%", show global variables) #expire_logs_days=3 #sync_bin_log=0 # Use UTF-8 encoding for tables character_set_server=utf8 collation_server=utf8_general_ci # use InnoDB for transactions and better crash recovery default_storage_engine=innodb # memory pool InnoDB uses to store data dictionary information and other internal data structures (default:1M) innodb_additional_mem_pool_size=1M # memory buffer InnoDB uses to cache data and indexes of its tables (default:128M) # Larger values means less I/O innodb_buffer_pool_size=8M # Create a .ibd file for each table (default:0) innodb_file_per_table=1 # Write out the log buffer to the log file at each commit (default:1) innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=2 # Buffer size used to write to the log files on disk (default:1M for builtin, 8M for plugin) # larger values means less I/O innodb_log_buffer_size=1M # Size of each log file in a log group (default:5M) larger means less I/O but more time for recovery. innodb_log_file_size=2M # # error log file name, relative to datadir (default:hostname.err) log_error=mysql.err # print warnings and connection errors (default:1) log_warnings=2 # Convert table named to lowercase lower_case_table_names=1 # Maximum size of one packet or any generated/intermediate string. (default:1M) max_allowed_packet=32M # Maximum simultaneous connections allowed (default:100) max_connections=256 # The two options below make no sense with prepared statements and/or transactions # (make sense when having the same query multiple times) # Memory allocated for caching query results (default:0 (disabled)) query_cache_size=0 # Do not cache results (default:1) query_cache_type=0 # Do not use the privileges mechanisms skip_grant_tables # Do not listen for TCP/IP connections at all skip_networking # The number of open tables for all threads. (default:64) table_cache=200 # How many threads the server should cache for reuse (default:0) thread_cache_size=3 # wait 365d before dropping the DB connection (default:8h) wait_timeout=31536000 [client] default-character-set=utf8 Test 9: SUCCESS -------- akonadictl found and usable Details: The program '/usr/bin/akonadictl' to control the Akonadi server was found and could be executed successfully. Result: Akonadi 1.7.2 Test 10: ERROR -------- Akonadi control process not registered at D-Bus. Details: The Akonadi control process is not registered at D-Bus which typically means it was not started or encountered a fatal error during startup. Test 11: ERROR -------- Akonadi server process not registered at D-Bus. Details: The Akonadi server process is not registered at D-Bus which typically means it was not started or encountered a fatal error during startup. Test 12: ERROR -------- Nepomuk search service not registered at D-Bus. Details: The Nepomuk search service is not registered at D-Bus which typically means it was not started or encountered a fatal error during startup. Test 13: SKIP -------- Protocol version check not possible. Details: Without a connection to the server it is not possible to check if the protocol version meets the requirements. Test 14: ERROR -------- No resource agents found. Details: No resource agents have been found, Akonadi is not usable without at least one. This usually means that no resource agents are installed or that there is a setup problem. The following paths have been searched: '/usr/share/akonadi/agents'. The XDG_DATA_DIRS environment variable is set to '/usr/share/kde-plasma:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/'; make sure this includes all paths where Akonadi agents are installed. Directory listing of '/usr/share/akonadi/agents': akonadinepomukfeederagent.desktop akonotesresource.desktop birthdaysresource.desktop calendarsearchagent.desktop contactsresource.desktop davgroupwareresource.desktop gcalresource.desktop googledataresource.desktop icalresource.desktop imapresource.desktop invitationsagent.desktop kabcresource.desktop kalarmdirresource.desktop kalarmresource.desktop kcalresource.desktop kdeaccountsresource.desktop knutresource.desktop kolabproxyresource.desktop localbookmarksresource.desktop maildirresource.desktop maildispatcheragent.desktop mailfilteragent.desktop mboxresource.desktop microblog.desktop mixedmaildirresource.desktop mtdummyresource.desktop nepomuktagresource.desktop nntpresource.desktop notesresource.desktop openxchangeresource.desktop pop3resource.desktop vcarddirresource.desktop vcardresource.desktop Environment variable XDG_DATA_DIRS is set to '/usr/share/kde-plasma:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/' Test 15: ERROR -------- Current Akonadi server error log found. Details: The Akonadi server reported errors during its current startup. The log can be found in /home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/akonadiserver.error. File content of '/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/akonadiserver.error': Database process exited unexpectedly during initial connection! executable: "/usr/sbin/mysqld-akonadi" arguments: ("--defaults-file=/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.conf", "--datadir=/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/", "--socket=/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/socket-tao/mysql.socket") stdout: "" stderr: "" exit code: 1 process error: "Unknown error" "[ 0: akonadiserver() [0x419875] 1: akonadiserver() [0x419b3c] 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x364a0) [0x7fed425124a0] 3: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35) [0x7fed42512425] 4: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x17b) [0x7fed42515b8b] 5: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(_Z17qt_message_output9QtMsgTypePKc+0x11b) [0x7fed43fe050b] 6: akonadiserver() [0x41bc82] 7: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN9QIODevice5writeEPKcx+0xaf) [0x7fed4407ccaf] 8: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(+0x119272) [0x7fed44088272] 9: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN11QTextStreamD1Ev+0x39) [0x7fed44091109] 10: akonadiserver() [0x412e96] 11: akonadiserver() [0x4a0d33] 12: akonadiserver() [0x41ca21] 13: akonadiserver() [0x41e1e5] 14: akonadiserver() [0x41f8e7] 15: akonadiserver() [0x4123f2] 16: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x7fed424fd76d] 17: akonadiserver() [0x412d21] ] " Test 16: ERROR -------- Previous Akonadi server error log found. Details: The Akonadi server reported errors during its previous startup. The log can be found in /home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/akonadiserver.error.old. File content of '/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/akonadiserver.error.old': Database process exited unexpectedly during initial connection! executable: "/usr/sbin/mysqld-akonadi" arguments: ("--defaults-file=/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.conf", "--datadir=/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/", "--socket=/home/kline/.local/share/akonadi/socket-tao/mysql.socket") stdout: "" stderr: "" exit code: 1 process error: "Unknown error" "[ 0: akonadiserver() [0x419875] 1: akonadiserver() [0x419b3c] 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x364a0) [0x7feecffa14a0] 3: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35) [0x7feecffa1425] 4: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x17b) [0x7feecffa4b8b] 5: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(_Z17qt_message_output9QtMsgTypePKc+0x11b) [0x7feed1a6f50b] 6: akonadiserver() [0x41bc82] 7: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN9QIODevice5writeEPKcx+0xaf) [0x7feed1b0bcaf] 8: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(+0x119272) [0x7feed1b17272] 9: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN11QTextStreamD1Ev+0x39) [0x7feed1b20109] 10: akonadiserver() [0x412e96] 11: akonadiserver() [0x4a0d33] 12: akonadiserver() [0x41ca21] 13: akonadiserver() [0x41e1e5] 14: akonadiserver() [0x41f8e7] 15: akonadiserver() [0x4123f2] 16: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x7feecff8c76d] 17: akonadiserver() [0x412d21] ] " ##### AARRRGHHHH! lost. Test 17: SUCCESS -------- No current Akonadi control error log found. Details: The Akonadi control process did not report any errors during its current startup. Test 18: SUCCESS -------- No previous Akonadi control error log found. Details: The Akonadi control process did not report any errors during its previous startup. > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 07:26:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94D8A15 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 3IykjURYJAJAGyvC2Dy.Cy8xyFy5896y7D06u25.w86@maestro.bounces.google.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x246.google.com (mail-ie0-x246.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F9A124 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f198.google.com with SMTP id 17so31393547iea.9 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:26:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:message-id:date:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2SedYvBKCODOVsJPce2QSTGhxNCebAoR7vZfyNfGPn8=; b=rJ2Zm/3VGvaD6oY+6AmPtWcHxGH6Ihh5Vh4K86iG0ZmxgXuodK3BSQf1j2bnpl2dc3 EmzezPQ9i4cZU9bjy/2GF1Pu9AvvkNydwPfwOrcMwtsWzQiYSCxMu38kyT2Y/2EK2Pbi gHAyMe4hpGoZda7Zx1+OB5zl5DCgZqUl137PwL5cFu7XmTQXA4BeYySMz3GlBcpiebhC 4tHNU0YDOfq9AK/JQnD5l910qL9PcNWwjApS1aIdZkGaWjyT79n/As5AgyNYeFsmGHNy K0HX2zNnE81m4ic1gjc8K96HA1X0ab/vVGwhAI6SjMB7EhVVrB8SO4k3BYFHshzVabcb IUwg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.181.234 with SMTP id dz10mr12835163igc.5.1361258787436; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:26:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14dae9340d8f78fd5404d60ec218@google.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:26:27 +0000 Subject: Organic SEO for Freebsddiary.org From: "Diana J. Blevins" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:26:28 -0000 DQoNCg0KCQ0KCQ0KCQ0KCTxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBpbiI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9 IiMwMDAwZmYiPkZyZWVic2RkaWFyeS5vcmcgIA0KPGZvbnQ+PGZvbnQ+VGVhbSw8L2ZvbnQ+PC9m b250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowaW4iPjxmb250IGNvbG9y PSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udD48Zm9udD5JDQp0aG91Z2h0IHlvdSBtaWdodCBsaWtlIHRvIGtub3cg c29tZSBvZiB0aGUgcmVhc29ucyB3aHkgeW91IGFyZSBub3QNCmdldHRpbmcgZW5vdWdoIFNvY2lh bCBNZWRpYSBhbmQgT3JnYW5pYyBzZWFyY2ggZW5naW5lIHRyYWZmaWMgZm9yIDxzcGFuICANCnN0 eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWwiPkZyZWVic2RkaWFyeS5vcmc8L3NwYW4+PGI+DQo8L2I+ PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+DQo8L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowaW4i Pjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj4xLllvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSAgDQpGcmVlYnNkZGlhcnkub3Jn IGlzIG5vdCByYW5raW5nIHRvcCBpbiBHb29nbGUgb3JnYW5pYyBzZWFyY2ggZm9yIG1hbnkgIA0K Y29tcGV0aXRpdmUga2V5d29yZCBwaHJhc2VzLjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2lu LWJvdHRvbTowaW4iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj4yLiBZb3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgcHJvZmls ZSAgDQppcyBub3QgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGluIG1vc3Qgb2YgdGhlIFNvY2lhbCBNZWRpYSBXZWJzaXRl cy48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGluIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0i IzAwMDBmZiI+My4gWW91ciBzaXRlIGhhcyAxMTkgIA0KR29vZ2xlIGJhY2sgbGlua3MsIHRoaXMg Y2FuIGJlIGltcHJvdmVkIGZ1cnRoZXIuPC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90 dG9tOjBpbiI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250Pjxmb250PlRoZXJlDQphcmUgbWFu eSBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGltcHJvdmVtZW50cyB0aGF0IGNvdWxkIGJlIG1hZGUgdG8geW91ciB3ZWJz aXRlLA0KYW5kIGlmIHlvdSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGxlYXJuIGFib3V0IHRoZW0sIGFuZCBhcmUg Y3VyaW91cyB0byBrbm93DQp3aGF0IG91ciB3b3JraW5nIHRvZ2V0aGVyIHdvdWxkIGludm9sdmUs IHRoZW4gSSB3b3VsZCBiZSBnbGFkIHRvDQpwcm92aWRlIHlvdSB3aXRoIGEgZGV0YWlsZWQgYW5h bHlzaXMgaW4gdGhlIGZvcm0gb2YgYSA8Yj5XRUJTSVRFDQpBVURJVCBSRVBPUlQgZm9yIEZSRUU8 L2I+LjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBp biI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250Pjxmb250Pk91cg0KY2xpZW50cyBjb25zaXN0 ZW50bHkgdGVsbCB1cyB0aGF0IHRoZWlyIGN1c3RvbWVycyBmaW5kIHRoZW0gYmVjYXVzZQ0KdGhl eSBhcmUgYXQgdGhlIHRvcCBvZiB0aGUgR29vZ2xlIHNlYXJjaCByYW5raW5ncy4gIEJlaW5nIGF0 IHRoZSB0b3ANCmxlZnQgb2YgR29vZ2xlICgjMS0gIzMgb3JnYW5pYyBwb3NpdGlvbnMpIGlzIHRo ZSBiZXN0IHRoaW5nIHlvdSBjYW4NCmRvIGZvciB5b3VyIGNvbXBhbnkmIzM5O3Mgd2Vic2l0ZSB0 cmFmZmljIGFuZCBvbmxpbmUgcmVwdXRhdGlvbi4gIA0KPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+DQo8 L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowaW4iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48 Zm9udD48Zm9udD5JDQpmb3VuZCB5b3VyIHNpdGUgaW4gdGhlIEdvb2dsZSBzZWFyY2ggYW5kIGFm dGVyIGhhdmluZyBhIGxvb2sgb3Zlcg0KeW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlIEkgdGhpbmsgeW91IHNob3VsZCBn byBmb3IgYW4gU0VPIGNhbXBhaWduIHRvIGJvb3N0IHlvdXINCm1hcmtldGluZyBzdHJhdGVneS48 L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowaW4iPjxm b250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udD48Zm9udD5Tb3VuZHMNCmludGVyZXN0aW5nPyBGZWVs IGZyZWUgdG8gZW1haWwgdXMgb3IgYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmVseSB5b3UgY2FuIHByb3ZpZGUNCm1lIHdp dGggeW91ciBwaG9uZSBudW1iZXIgYW5kIHRoZSBiZXN0IHRpbWUgdG8gY2FsbCAgDQp5b3UuPC9m b250PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGluIj48Zm9u dCAgDQpjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQ+PGZvbnQ+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tPFdCUj4tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08V0JSPi0tLS0tDQo8L2Zv bnQ+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD4NCjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBpbiI+PGZv bnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250Pjxmb250PkJlc3QNClJlZ2FyZHMsPGJyPjxiPkRpYW5h IEouIEJsZXZpbnM8L2I+PGJyPjxiPlNFTyBDb25zdWx0YW50PC9iPjxicj4oMzAxKSAgDQo4NTkt NDkwMzwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBp biI+PGZvbnQgIA0KY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250Pjxmb250Pi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLTxXQlI+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPFdCUj4tLS0t LS0NCjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250Pg0KPC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206 MGluIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQ+PGZvbnQ+PGI+UFMxPC9iPjoNClRoaXMg aXMgb25ldGltZSBlbWFpbCBhbmQgeW91IG1heSBhc2sgdXMgdG8gk1JFTU9WRZQgeW91IGZyb20g b3VyDQptYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QuIDwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250Pg0KPC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9 Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGluIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQ+PGZvbnQ+PGI+ UFMyPC9iPjoNCkkgZm91bmQgeW91ciBzaXRlIGZyb20gb25saW5lIGFkdmVydGlzaW5nIGJ1dCBk aWQgbm90IGNsaWNrLiAgDQo8L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD4NCjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJt YXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBpbiI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250Pjxmb250PjxiPlBT MzwvYj46DQpXZSBvcGVyYXRlIDI0IHg3LiBJIHdpbGwgYmUgaGFwcHkgdG8gc2VuZCB5b3UgbGlu a3MgdG8gcHJpY2UNCmxpc3QscmVmdW5kIHBvbGljeSwgY2xpZW50IHJhbmtpbmdzLCBjbGllbnQg dGVzdGltb25pYWxzLCCTSG93DQp3ZSBhcmUgZGlmZmVyZW50IGZyb20gb3RoZXJzP5QsIGFuZCCT V2h5IHNob3VsZCB5b3UgY2hvb3NlIHVzP5QNCm9uIHJlY2VpdmluZyBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGZyb20g eW91LjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD48cCAgDQpzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTow aW4iPg0KDQoNCgkNCgkNCgkNCgkNCg0KPC9wPg0KPHA+PC9wPjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90 dG9tOjBpbiI+DQoNCg0KCQ0KCQ0KCQ0KCQ0KDQo8L3A+DQoNCg0KPHA+PC9wPg0KPHA+PC9wPg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 08:01:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D42778; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@tormail.org) Received: from outgoing.tormail.org (outgoing.tormail.org [82.221.96.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFA628B; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=internal.tormail.org) by outgoing.tormail.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7i8F-00015w-V3; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:00:56 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tormail.org; s=tm; h=Message-Id:X-TorMail-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=wZRfL3KVKNygvYEereu+0NQ4cudkEv2SEKiMfDOVgmo=; b=Af3uPILL9z3RXAn/qqaEftvRyZ4vj9EetjTM38ea0tonwwPOobHD6FdeJjHtWbOFxY8UbCSfnpUJjmXuc27IjXHrIAkQeSlSXHbBOQPBmq0b0Gd2yzkAatpRKiN9lw6Wl/GK8aXXlZT0VBVmlPCZ7UV4pZTJrva40zof5wfbig0=; Received: from jbeich by internal.tormail.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1U7i5o-0001Ls-7Y; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:58:25 +0000 From: Jan Beich To: Martin Laabs Subject: Re: Input subsystem comparable to linux planned In-Reply-To: <5122885F.9000305@martinlaabs.de> (Martin Laabs's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:00:31 +0100") Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:52:51 -0600 References: <5122885F.9000305@martinlaabs.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TorMail-User: jbeich Message-Id: <1U7i5o-0001Ls-7Y@internal.tormail.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Maxim Zhuravlev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:01:01 -0000 Martin Laabs writes: > Hi, > > maybe you know the input subsystem of linux that is very flexible in terms > of various input data interpretations. > Are there plans to implement something comparable into the freebsd system? > The background is, that I currently write a joystick driver supporting USB > joysticks for FreeBSD. > At the moment it supports the joystick api from linux which makes it easy > to port i.e. plib to use it. > I however would also like to support the input subsystem API which is some > what more complicated. So - before writing some emulating code for the > linuxulator I wanna ask if it is planned to put something equal into the > freebsd kernel. webcamd already provides support for linux input API for at least one type of input devices - wacom tablets. There is also preliminary support for joydev (ulinux@r2494). But a lot of devices including usb joysticks and non-wacom tablets use hid-core.c rather than their own driver... http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013553.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2013-January/011816.html And if you mean the approach that can be used by the console driver there was GSoC 2007, not sure what happened thereafter. https://wiki.freebsd.org/GenericInputDeviceLayer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 08:16:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD63DF89 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.org) Received: from qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3811396 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 28EX1l0011bwxycA68Gk83; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:44 +0000 Received: from koitsu.strangled.net ([67.180.84.87]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 28Gj1l0071t3BNj8e8GjCs; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:43 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 21B5573A1C; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:16:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:16:43 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD Message-ID: <20130219081643.GA27867@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1361261804; bh=J/y67NluuFUiluohXFJjR+AOhvvI56oWHj2Ct5ipIWo=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=l+UDjAOOJruCXPfRWa6ucnS/DsVHKpN/iVgLwIOWhzjK4IkCBIeD1nko/usfIbeEA /9Kiz9soSgtpYjJNK6hr10lNbqQ6xaFVSZiWZB68tMbk3nnlIKP1IWys5d4dikU+zL nfqWngdF5GoOHxfIQxKedTqqqdVKe4qFIei5LYm9zYWTre9YhGtVSiRKFmrg9fTrts zIcqvxrU1v3yq4nALJtEhCu1ZM0dQYiEJ870ttnyu3Li/jZSUF1N8Sa6GyGKdUF40T EWy/yhOEcNkes1XV7x3z08KmuR8DyFtsEeO1FS16PwK7aL5xsy3cC9yoHeiil9EHf4 5Qu6+dAZApkIw== Cc: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com, freebsd@edvax.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:16:44 -0000 Regarding all the recommendations on "how to determine if ZFS is available on the system": Do not run commands like /sbin/zfs or /sbin/zpool right off the bat. This will result in the underlying kld bits dynamically loading zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko on the fly -- even if there aren't any ZFS filesystems used -- which takes up kernel memory. This also generates crap on the console, and I can assure you an SA running some script is not expecting this. (An example is a system I admin which does not use ZFS, but I often forget that fact and type "zpool status" as root by accident, which loads ZFS, etc. -- I ended up using WITHOUT_CDDL on that system just to keep that from happening ;-) ). The OP needs to define what he means by "enabled on the host". This could mean: a) The host actually has ZFS compiled or not (e.g. WITHOUT_ZFS and/or WITHOUT_CDDL and/or WITHOUT_CTF are not defined in src.conf), b) The host is capable of using ZFS (e.g. kernel modules are built and installed but are not loaded), c) The host has the kernel modules loaded but are not actually in use (e.g. zfs_enable="yes" in rc.conf but no ZFS filesystems defined), d) The host has the kernel modules loaded and actively has ZFS filesystems in use. Recommendations (meaning you get to use a combination of these to create proper logic depending on what you want -- please keep in mind what I just said about using /sbin/zpool and so on however): 1) Check for the existence of /sbin/zfs (e.g. if [ -x ... ]). If it exists, the system was built without WITHOUT_{ZFS,CDDL,CTF} set. (Sorry for the double negative). 2) Use "sysctl -n vfs.zfs.version.zpl" and check exit code. If 1, the kernel modules are not loaded, else they are. 3) Run "/sbin/zpool list -H" and see if there's any output. If there is, there are pools defined, which means in some way or another ZFS is being used by the system. (Note that I recommend using /sbin/zpool not /sbin/zfs, because zpool (for me anyway) takes less time and if there's a pool there is going to be a filesystem (even if -omountpoint=none) that shows up /sbin/zfs). Note that this WILL result in the kernel modules being loaded. Depending on what the OP wants, you could use "/sbin/mount | grep zfs" instead, but that won't catch one situation: where all ZFS filesystems are mountpoint=none. Footnote: do not do silly things like grep /etc/src.conf for WITHOUT_xxx features, or /etc/rc.conf for whatever; an admin may have set these in advance for the next {build,install}{world,kernel} which have yet to be run. Parsing/checking config files is not going to suffice. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org | | UNIX Systems Administrator http://jdc.koitsu.org/ | | Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 09:09:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6601A113 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E872A38 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1J998cX011921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:09:08 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT06.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.17]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:09:07 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Jeremy Chadwick , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD Thread-Topic: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD Thread-Index: AQHODnl70VvatFXV1UuZZCaqIGMOCZiA5G2B Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:09:07 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAAEA2@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <20130219081643.GA27867@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20130219081643.GA27867@icarus.home.lan> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-18_07:2013-02-18,2013-02-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: "fbsd8@a1poweruser.com" , "freebsd@edvax.de" , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:09:15 -0000 4. lsvfs output? --=20 Devin ________________________________________ From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.= org] on behalf of Jeremy Chadwick [jdc@koitsu.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:16 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com; freebsd@edvax.de Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD Regarding all the recommendations on "how to determine if ZFS is available on the system": Do not run commands like /sbin/zfs or /sbin/zpool right off the bat. This will result in the underlying kld bits dynamically loading zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko on the fly -- even if there aren't any ZFS filesystems used -- which takes up kernel memory. This also generates crap on the console, and I can assure you an SA running some script is not expecting this. (An example is a system I admin which does not use ZFS, but I often forget that fact and type "zpool status" as root by accident, which loads ZFS, etc. -- I ended up using WITHOUT_CDDL on that system just to keep that from happening ;-) ). The OP needs to define what he means by "enabled on the host". This could mean: a) The host actually has ZFS compiled or not (e.g. WITHOUT_ZFS and/or WITHOUT_CDDL and/or WITHOUT_CTF are not defined in src.conf), b) The host is capable of using ZFS (e.g. kernel modules are built and installed but are not loaded), c) The host has the kernel modules loaded but are not actually in use (e.g. zfs_enable=3D"yes" in rc.conf but no ZFS filesystems defined), d) The host has the kernel modules loaded and actively has ZFS filesystems in use. Recommendations (meaning you get to use a combination of these to create proper logic depending on what you want -- please keep in mind what I just said about using /sbin/zpool and so on however): 1) Check for the existence of /sbin/zfs (e.g. if [ -x ... ]). If it exists, the system was built without WITHOUT_{ZFS,CDDL,CTF} set. (Sorry for the double negative). 2) Use "sysctl -n vfs.zfs.version.zpl" and check exit code. If 1, the kernel modules are not loaded, else they are. 3) Run "/sbin/zpool list -H" and see if there's any output. If there is, there are pools defined, which means in some way or another ZFS is being used by the system. (Note that I recommend using /sbin/zpool not /sbin/zfs, because zpool (for me anyway) takes less time and if there's a pool there is going to be a filesystem (even if -omountpoint=3Dnone) that shows up /sbin/zfs). Note that this WILL result in the kernel modules being loaded. Depending on what the OP wants, you could use "/sbin/mount | grep zfs" instead, but that won't catch one situation: where all ZFS filesystems are mountpoint=3Dnone. Footnote: do not do silly things like grep /etc/src.conf for WITHOUT_xxx features, or /etc/rc.conf for whatever; an admin may have set these in advance for the next {build,install}{world,kernel} which have yet to be run. Parsing/checking config files is not going to suffice. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org | | UNIX Systems Administrator http://jdc.koitsu.org/ | | Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 11:18:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6C3F7F for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (we-in-x0229.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267096A8 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so5627272wey.14 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:18:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4xBHPNqWavCpvvk4hJS4meCC9UEqemzYawbndP6f468=; b=iTO769q5f69RbKyuRLpbt86ZL9gv9fdPNVB+sufbyGoMx+SfRFz3372amqncWSSSdd i8MdcauzrkFxJ+78Mz1TuSigbkfV5OX8du6jIOAZtIe68nmjebT9YLVC7kqQ8DvAauLd P/RhQrooeCZlayr7SUS3gEqlUmDdOb5sSwub+ocV1xi1EXdkDF2D0LE3ypt5g/yx2h2E aRVqu6QSElYmcxMxIEVg0FhD3v4beaqm6EcUTsaOU17YfZrNKbS1BRZ1UuLT+9zQEdA+ URxA0wCs7EdtE5BPcPWnndSzqnE8wjy8tVLNhyHhQtCZXpTsyWEzoT0mNxR7S2W5qvHx eh9w== X-Received: by 10.180.89.101 with SMTP id bn5mr26201228wib.14.1361272677290; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:17:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from viper.homeunix.com (188-222-164-87.zone13.bethere.co.uk. [188.222.164.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fg6sm27102658wib.10.2013.02.19.03.17.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:17:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:17:54 +0000 From: David Collins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: building libtorrent error: 'u_int16_t' does not name a type Message-ID: <51235f62.tSX2fGrd2jyaPQ8q%davidcollins001@gmail.com> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidcollins001@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:18:07 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to build libtorrent/rtorrent using gcc 4.8. The reason I'm using gcc 4.8 rather than the version in base is because there is apparently a bug in gcc 4.2 - http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/ticket/926 I installed gcc 4.8 based on these instructions http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html, replacing 44 for 48 where neccessary. While building I get the errors below. Have I missed something while installing gcc 4.8? Or does anyone have an ideas about how to fix this? Thanks David build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> make build ===> Building for libtorrent-0.13.2_1 make all-recursive Making all in src Making all in torrent Making all in data Making all in download Making all in peer Making all in utils /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++48 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I. -I./.. -I./../.. -I../../.. -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -fvisibility=hidden -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -MT option_strings.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/option_strings.Tpo -c -o option_strings.lo option_strings.cc libtool: compile: g++48 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I. -I./.. -I./../.. -I../../.. -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -fvisibility=hidden -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -MT option_strings.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/option_strings.Tpo -c option_strings.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/option_strings.o In file included from ./../../torrent/connection_manager.h:45:0, from option_strings.cc:43: /usr/include/netinet/in_systm.h:49:9: error: 'u_int16_t' does not name a type typedef u_int16_t n_short; /* short as received from the net */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/in_systm.h:50:9: error: 'u_int32_t' does not name a type typedef u_int32_t n_long; /* long as received from the net */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/in_systm.h:52:9: error: 'u_int32_t' does not name a type typedef u_int32_t n_time; /* ms since 00:00 GMT, byte rev */ ^ In file included from ./../../torrent/connection_manager.h:46:0, from option_strings.cc:43: /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:51:2: error: 'u_int' does not name a type u_int ip_hl:4, /* header length */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:58:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ip_tos; /* type of service */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:59:2: error: 'u_short' does not name a type u_short ip_len; /* total length */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:60:2: error: 'u_short' does not name a type u_short ip_id; /* identification */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:61:2: error: 'u_short' does not name a type u_short ip_off; /* fragment offset field */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:66:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ip_ttl; /* time to live */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:67:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ip_p; /* protocol */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:68:2: error: 'u_short' does not name a type u_short ip_sum; /* checksum */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:166:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ipt_code; /* IPOPT_TS */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:167:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ipt_len; /* size of structure (variable) */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:168:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ipt_ptr; /* index of current entry */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:170:2: error: 'u_int' does not name a type u_int ipt_flg:4, /* flags, see below */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:217:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ippseudo_pad; /* pad, must be zero */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:218:2: error: 'u_char' does not name a type u_char ippseudo_p; /* protocol */ ^ /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:219:2: error: 'u_short' does not name a type u_short ippseudo_len; /* protocol length */ ^ *** Error code 1 Stop in /.write/usr-local/build/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent/work/libtorrent-0.13.2/src/torrent/utils. *** Error code 1 Stop in /.write/usr-local/build/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent/work/libtorrent-0.13.2/src/torrent. *** Error code 1 Stop in /.write/usr-local/build/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent/work/libtorrent-0.13.2/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /.write/usr-local/build/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent/work/libtorrent-0.13.2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /.write/usr-local/build/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent/work/libtorrent-0.13.2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent. build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> gcc48 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc48 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/.write/usr-local/bin/../libexec/gcc48/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd8.3/4.8.0/lto-wrapper Target: i386-portbld-freebsd8.3 Configured with: ./../gcc-4.8-20130113/configure --disable-nls --libdir=/usr/local/lib/gcc48 --libexecdir=/usr/local/libexec/gcc48 --program-suffix=48 --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/local/lib/gcc48/include/c++/ --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local --with-pkgversion='FreeBSD Ports Collection' --with-system-zlib --disable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran --prefix=/usr/local --mandir=/usr/local/man --infodir=/usr/local/info/gcc48 --build=i386-portbld-freebsd8.3 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20130113 (experimental) (FreeBSD Ports Collection) build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> g++48 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++48 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/.write/usr-local/bin/../libexec/gcc48/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd8.3/4.8.0/lto-wrapper Target: i386-portbld-freebsd8.3 Configured with: ./../gcc-4.8-20130113/configure --disable-nls --libdir=/usr/local/lib/gcc48 --libexecdir=/usr/local/libexec/gcc48 --program-suffix=48 --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/local/lib/gcc48/include/c++/ --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr/local --with-pkgversion='FreeBSD Ports Collection' --with-system-zlib --disable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran --prefix=/usr/local --mandir=/usr/local/man --infodir=/usr/local/info/gcc48 --build=i386-portbld-freebsd8.3 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20130113 (experimental) (FreeBSD Ports Collection) build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> uname -a FreeBSD build.homeunix.com 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #14 r245848: Sun Feb 10 14:16:47 GMT 2013 root@viper.homeunix.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VIPER i386 build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> cat /etc/make.conf PACKAGES=/usr/local/packages DISTDIR=/usr/local/packages/distfiles WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/local/build #BATCH=yes # linux base OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4 # added by use.perl 2012-10-08 20:21:44 PERL_VERSION=5.14.2 .if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*) && exists(/usr/local/bin/gcc48) CC=gcc48 CXX=g++48 CPP=cpp48 .endif build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> cat /etc/src.conf build.jail:/usr/ports/net-p2p/libtorrent> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 15:57:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF31F7D3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5E3F14 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F4133C1E; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:57:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CE6FE39829; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:57:10 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Robert Huff Subject: Re: choosing ACLs References: <20768.56466.778249.416668@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:57:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20768.56466.778249.416668@jerusalem.litteratus.org> (Robert Huff's message of "Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:35:14 -0500") Message-ID: <444nh89u09.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:57:23 -0000 Robert Huff writes: > "man tunefs" mentions two types of ACLs: POSIX.1e and NFSv4. > Am I correct in assuming an unqualified "ACL" in general usage > defaults to the former, not the latter? Nearly all ACL functionality is implemented in a single module, with NFS ACLs being one of several "extensions" to the POSIX kind. I'd estimate that most unqualified references actually apply to any ACLs at all, but your assumption probably won't steer you all that far wrong. I apologize for being a little non-commital here; I'm working on a small screen and looking at code is inconvenient here. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 16:19:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE489250 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967A7123 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07DD33C1D; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:19:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E74C439829; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:19:22 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Jeff Tipton Subject: Re: Ports & Packages [Stable] in sync References: <511FAC10.9060806@mail.com> <4D08169B-0CA9-4BF0-BD22-0E6674D0894F@my.gd> <5120ECE6.7090602@mail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:19:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5120ECE6.7090602@mail.com> (Jeff Tipton's message of "Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:44:54 +0200") Message-ID: <44zjz08eet.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:19:29 -0000 Jeff Tipton writes: > Thank you, Damien, for the reply. AFAIK, STABLE gets updated every 2 > weeks but not every day, and it seems to be that because of the > intrusion, it has not been updated for long. The versions of the ports > that come with the 9.1-RELEASE are even slightly newer than those of > 9-STABLE packages. I think if I don't get the revision number from > which the 9-STABLE was updated last time I'll use the ports tree that > comes with 9.1-RELEASE. I hope it won't cause much version > incompatibilities. Um, not really. Or at least, not specific enough to be sure whether it is correct or not. The ports tree is not branched, and is intended to work with all supported branches and releases. In other words, regardless of whether you're running 9.1-RELEASE, 9-STABLE (in svn/cvs terms, RELENG_9), or 10.x (HEAD), you can (and, unless you have specific reasons otherwise, usually corporate security dictates) should use a ports tree checked out from HEAD. This is unrelated to whether packages are available for the ports on a particular branch or tag. Package availability is unusually limited at the moment, but that's because the build cluster has very limited capacity right now for a variety of reasons. That situation will improve over time, but until computers are infinitely fast, the package collection will lag somewhat behind the ports tree. Packages need to be built for a particular base system (or "close enough": generally all base-system versions in the same major-number release can run the packages for any other within that same series, most notably the -STABLE version). Additionally, -STABLE base system is "updated" by definition every time a developer checks into the relevant branch (currently RELENG_9). For ports, as I said earlier, there is no equivalent; updates go to HEAD, period. When packages get built for a particular base system is a matter of policy on the build cluster. I don't use downloaded packages for ports updates, but I would expect that to evolve as the new build cluster does. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 16:26:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1D18DA for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DF01E7 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so5672952wgi.27 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:26:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=NRlEI9Xl7E6Bv0B63z/nQAymz03z/nwX77ZYL7fqs9s=; b=Nasle+7tVjDkaO+Xs8v/oHlbIpibiul+3FOcDzKeQfPDsP5rxzuOwPqepqqkxbFVYA 0nyNzuAlegQBi95olQ7JTMpTpmQYsQZUx1QRAv5CAxq+kBZlXZ5DzRbp0yNFbDt+vzKn 1eufEVmgzFnr+ZIDm3TeJ/RFU7xDjYorC6d00HnGAhHO/vQeSXLFDRMNqnvw8d+PjvvW EcZV9SNrkGEf/JShI5zmMs8K98ke1qEN8vZx0l2t/XDy6sIJ3YZLLgV6SpUbnCAQYecI frYW19MRUe5xJNXFF2Idqe0heZNOB7KQd/jABNL7lpgjr0+sF2/SuLI43CQexLBcgDyg uPiQ== X-Received: by 10.181.11.164 with SMTP id ej4mr12484791wid.29.1361291206123; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:26:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm26389250wix.7.2013.02.19.08.26.44 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:26:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Ports & Packages [Stable] in sync From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <5120ECE6.7090602@mail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:26:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8E67ED55-3CC7-4AE8-BDA0-413A87B4DD0E@my.gd> References: <511FAC10.9060806@mail.com> <4D08169B-0CA9-4BF0-BD22-0E6674D0894F@my.gd> <5120ECE6.7090602@mail.com> To: Jeff Tipton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYocH0byuc7LdPn+BMs07l6JcCmLNDK7l58FKTUblH5UTmOGL5dBzYWLPq1UgUzw/ke3Hv Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:26:47 -0000 On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Jeff Tipton wrote: > On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that = there are no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and = packages at the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need = non-default options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible = to get the ports snapshot that was used to compile the 9-STABLE = packages? I think I could use subversion but then I need to know the = revision number of that snapshot. What do you suggest? >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>> Jeff >>>=20 >> Hi Jeff, >>=20 >> I think you might be confused here. >>=20 >> It is my understanding that there are ports for: >> - HEAD >> - x.y-RELEASE >>=20 >> I don't think you're going to be able to get a snapshot from = 9-STABLE, because -STABLE is a continuing work. >>=20 >> What version do you consider to be 9-STABLE ? >> Every time there's a new commit you get a "new" 9-STABLE. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thank you, Damien, for the reply. AFAIK, STABLE gets updated every 2 = weeks but not every day, and it seems to be that because of the = intrusion, it has not been updated for long. The versions of the ports = that come with the 9.1-RELEASE are even slightly newer than those of = 9-STABLE packages. I think if I don't get the revision number from which = the 9-STABLE was updated last time I'll use the ports tree that comes = with 9.1-RELEASE. I hope it won't cause much version incompatibilities. I'm not sure where you're getting your 9-STABLE ports from, Jeff. In the SVN repository I only see release tags and HEAD: http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/ I also second Gilbert's advice about using HEAD for your ports tree, we = do this here in production with over 50 boxes and have had no problems = so far. If you still want to use the branch from 9.1-RELEASE, it's here: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/tags/RELEASE_9_1_0/ Note that, unless I'm wrong, you will not be getting *ANY* update to the = ports tree then, it's frozen. This means no security updates and all, AFAICT. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 17:37:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A45F5A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.org) Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA9388E for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2HUF1l00f1GXsucA1HdPHy; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:37:23 +0000 Received: from koitsu.strangled.net ([67.180.84.87]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2HdM1l00S1t3BNj8UHdNUH; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:37:22 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AAB6A73A1C; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:37:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:37:21 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: "Teske, Devin" Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD Message-ID: <20130219173721.GA37110@icarus.home.lan> References: <20130219081643.GA27867@icarus.home.lan> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAAEA2@ltcfiswmsgmb21> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAAEA2@ltcfiswmsgmb21> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1361295443; bh=OORk+VojEyUbzzhDXC72SHdYP68cgWOhNuJDAPtYSD8=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SNB2SRBAz8y67RSIT7+A4WiejgifeCwr8eQYvq+9bGpHcfnGu2bNHxA53xrQSsBTJ dOQhXnFMUvjZWkTUeeeOSIwgV92K8ApoFbqYkVAZiJA+/FZrQg6QLxjxT5cvm/186S JgwDCou4c1tVLScDWqqHbiKBMyRFJiFWs0maQkUBys/77BMqIf2BSLF4VmQrSWXnwh i9U+o2SW1zR7SFKdzYTlpDMKN8IX23ZWQISf1GZD6nMF3Wpe1iAt2JMh0gYcr6XJRB 4jV6vsvWg8NiWvdH0hqmB9WuBekTRcweOJjaAKwCNsKoiBqpQMlRhgE5S39l5/2zY7 WElaCrptxBHEw== Cc: "fbsd8@a1poweruser.com" , "freebsd@edvax.de" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:37:23 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:09:07AM +0000, Teske, Devin wrote: > 4. lsvfs output? > -- > Devin > > ________________________________________ > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] on behalf of Jeremy Chadwick [jdc@koitsu.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:16 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com; freebsd@edvax.de > Subject: Re: How to add zfs support to FreeBSD > > Regarding all the recommendations on "how to determine if ZFS is > available on the system": > > Do not run commands like /sbin/zfs or /sbin/zpool right off the bat. > This will result in the underlying kld bits dynamically loading zfs.ko > and opensolaris.ko on the fly -- even if there aren't any ZFS > filesystems used -- which takes up kernel memory. This also generates > crap on the console, and I can assure you an SA running some script is > not expecting this. (An example is a system I admin which does not use > ZFS, but I often forget that fact and type "zpool status" as root by > accident, which loads ZFS, etc. -- I ended up using WITHOUT_CDDL on that > system just to keep that from happening ;-) ). > > The OP needs to define what he means by "enabled on the host". This > could mean: > > a) The host actually has ZFS compiled or not (e.g. WITHOUT_ZFS and/or > WITHOUT_CDDL and/or WITHOUT_CTF are not defined in src.conf), > > b) The host is capable of using ZFS (e.g. kernel modules are built and > installed but are not loaded), > > c) The host has the kernel modules loaded but are not actually in use > (e.g. zfs_enable="yes" in rc.conf but no ZFS filesystems defined), > > d) The host has the kernel modules loaded and actively has ZFS > filesystems in use. > > > Recommendations (meaning you get to use a combination of these to create > proper logic depending on what you want -- please keep in mind what I > just said about using /sbin/zpool and so on however): > > 1) Check for the existence of /sbin/zfs (e.g. if [ -x ... ]). If it > exists, the system was built without WITHOUT_{ZFS,CDDL,CTF} set. (Sorry > for the double negative). > > 2) Use "sysctl -n vfs.zfs.version.zpl" and check exit code. If 1, the > kernel modules are not loaded, else they are. > > 3) Run "/sbin/zpool list -H" and see if there's any output. If there > is, there are pools defined, which means in some way or another ZFS is > being used by the system. (Note that I recommend using /sbin/zpool not > /sbin/zfs, because zpool (for me anyway) takes less time and if there's > a pool there is going to be a filesystem (even if -omountpoint=none) > that shows up /sbin/zfs). > > Note that this WILL result in the kernel modules being loaded. > Depending on what the OP wants, you could use "/sbin/mount | grep zfs" > instead, but that won't catch one situation: where all ZFS filesystems > are mountpoint=none. > > Footnote: do not do silly things like grep /etc/src.conf for WITHOUT_xxx > features, or /etc/rc.conf for whatever; an admin may have set these in > advance for the next {build,install}{world,kernel} which have yet to be > run. Parsing/checking config files is not going to suffice. That's a pretty awesome command, one which I've never heard of -- probably because it's only mentioned in these, and only these: df(1) find(1) mount(2) nmount(2) umount(2) jail(8) Not even in mount(8), VFS(9), extattr(9), or any other man page one might think be relevant. Strange, considering it's existed since FreeBSD 2.0 (!). -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org | | UNIX Systems Administrator http://jdc.koitsu.org/ | | Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 18:33:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81F6DD1 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgt279@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f176.google.com (mail-gh0-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764F2D0D for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f176.google.com with SMTP id f16so851919ghb.35 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:33:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=H4LvBxqAXoSRqtqQvWyo3SaKpD/5eft2Hfqhjet7+Rc=; b=Vqr3uI2P0Sx7D66iXtUpf4kPc/vvbXoakCUerT9wy07x/+4iFAZrWBHc6rMwE4ncIk 1Jl/1fmmUOmG3Ucs+9RKzG4FdUXiOsH172eRxFVoxbQqnnJdopYDR7e9cGlDrEWvIgdq VQhaLEx88VqEfnc3MWZT+ucw5kD3/OwGSti8EvhNbpnhQgmhAwyDt+XGnquaw5ibEHf3 tq5g2t4dnyCaq5iQwufeg8Df+gsdYl3ZPA5D6C6IfG1v55Qh5lzHLDRT//dXHXqArB5N 4c4t3Or7kSwq2kjoAHsMbCpm+jgfcdoGodyuJXHBrtdrxZaNXSVgf6kbrA638XLTXzIR UNjg== X-Received: by 10.101.165.18 with SMTP id s18mr9069184ano.49.1361298390456; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (cpe-72-177-64-83.austin.res.rr.com. [72.177.64.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u2sm34185530yhl.8.2013.02.19.10.26.29 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:26:29 -0800 (PST) From: Denzel Turner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: FreeBSD 9.1 Update? Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:26:18 -0600 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:33:57 -0000 Hello Folks, = /*************************************************************************= *****/ When the FreeBSD 9.1 Update functionality gets rebuilt and back on- line so that fetch freebsd-update will get updates for FreeBSD 9.1, how = will=20 users be notified? I am unsure of which Mailing List would cover this = info. Any info you can share would be appreciated and you have a great day!!!= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:43:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ACED22 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252C320B for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7t6a-0004HC-AM; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:43:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U7t6J-000Piv-Mn; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:43:39 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:43:06 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Denzel Turner Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Update? Message-Id: <20130219194306.f5c8ce651ef2eb1d96112fc1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:43:43 -0000 On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:26:18 -0600 Denzel Turner wrote: > Hello Folks, > > /******************************************************************************/ > > When the FreeBSD 9.1 Update functionality gets rebuilt and back on- > > line so that fetch freebsd-update will get updates for FreeBSD 9.1, how > will > > users be notified? I am unsure of which Mailing List would cover this > info. I don't think freebsd-update has been down, at least not for any significant length of time. It's certainly working now, earlier today I updated my 9.1 installations using it. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:46:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195F4DE1 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DDE227 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j8so2030932qah.14 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:45:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sopn1zSy++5cPFyzIqpVx6RT0BicVBlHC6jTN26dBNM=; b=aFUE1c8ssEf4//pGj9xbvcILXJkrMBIwQbJyylzL5rdxxYmO2D1/EMcinsznmY8W9h xtHDxYXTWo44qvwjC5piCaTGapML2fiKYWs70kn0wbKaAk2CHwQHRxdQ1zXaKwtlEfBX 8S2odiGCIHi6AZjOxQGaRVP8xF5NhMm5C4GR+hmjskoxTVu9xMOFxLPE7BLBpOZZZ1Xa D4kUCLHCC10dLtJcJEfTBQwwYBi53SaIsOZhXAgR3b4dkfbLlsTQ8BmuWPMVGWOFkN7F FaD3EAdpP0v22gEKie5cf2uIkPARf8Wf2ZwkwEFtZDq0E7b0c93a33v2HqpnXlFTe7Oi 7q4g== X-Received: by 10.229.171.33 with SMTP id f33mr1682547qcz.63.1361303159164; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z17sm27876434qem.4.2013.02.19.11.45.57 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:45:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5123D672.7010802@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:45:54 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130206 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Update? References: <20130219194306.f5c8ce651ef2eb1d96112fc1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20130219194306.f5c8ce651ef2eb1d96112fc1@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Denzel Turner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:46:00 -0000 On 02/19/13 13:43, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:26:18 -0600 > Denzel Turner wrote: > >> Hello Folks, >> >> /******************************************************************************/ >> >> When the FreeBSD 9.1 Update functionality gets rebuilt and back on- >> >> line so that fetch freebsd-update will get updates for FreeBSD 9.1, how >> will >> >> users be notified? I am unsure of which Mailing List would cover this >> info. > > I don't think freebsd-update has been down, at least not for any > significant length of time. It's certainly working now, earlier today I > updated my 9.1 installations using it. > Same here. An announcement came through from freebsd-security letting us know of the update with instructions on how to apply. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 20:04:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E6E4E2 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgt279@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-f169.google.com (mail-ve0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133AF31C for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 15so6356693vea.0 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:03:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cMHhkT4iEQOIApOHVlfW4AgRFjGAnoq426WjkjXnk6s=; b=KNolKEX4CP572Jh7gsJo5qANNbYhwBiYKmY30X5O8nhfOHrBFzKntPbl8FZCchsOsF jrGwTPpbbmbQKoj0B3HnYRpb4miqfs0MbWvyCE38v2lWH61lS+Q1l+yW4GrxDUFW+gw5 Vy7cEoCvkp2oawXkBtE+awCZbwDj5WFDwS5ZP1iHZLX31528JaRWdj1dbmKMVWAkyuXN bSqrc/VmLCC2GVTR+PzKE8UhjJAwyDwhiWpeKYTQeDtv5rkN5DsKVGNZh5Iqu/YhK78H 6RQrkPijF1Mt5s16LdA9CSmHZneOv7q7vzCJY0cba1QCeuwZFUEJjvLn57mTD44NgtLE go4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.154.148 with SMTP id o20mr22326088vcw.54.1361304236229; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:03:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.178.71 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:03:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5123D672.7010802@gmail.com> References: <20130219194306.f5c8ce651ef2eb1d96112fc1@sohara.org> <5123D672.7010802@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:03:56 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Update? From: Denzel Turner To: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Steve O'Hara-Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:04:03 -0000 Hello Gentlemen and thank you for the prompt response. I thought freegsd-update for FreeBSD 9.1 only updated with FreeBSD 9.0 Packages as the Update Functionality Infrastructure was being rebuilt. I might be wrong about this but I thought this was put out in the FreeBSD 9.1 Announcement. I am learning about FreeBSD after not using it for several years. My first FreeBSD was 5.4 i386 version. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > On 02/19/13 13:43, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:26:18 -0600 >> Denzel Turner wrote: >> >> Hello Folks, >>> >>> /*************************************************************** >>> *******************/ >>> >>> When the FreeBSD 9.1 Update functionality gets rebuilt and back on- >>> >>> line so that fetch freebsd-update will get updates for FreeBSD 9.1, how >>> will >>> >>> users be notified? I am unsure of which Mailing List would cover this >>> info. >>> >> >> I don't think freebsd-update has been down, at least not for any >> significant length of time. It's certainly working now, earlier today I >> updated my 9.1 installations using it. >> >> > Same here. An announcement came through from freebsd-security letting us > know of the update with instructions on how to apply. > > -- > Yours in Christ, > > Joseph A Nagy Jr > "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction > is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 > Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. > Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/* > *owl/license.txt > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 20:05:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3C9715 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f46.google.com (mail-qe0-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7168E33C for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 1so3252283qec.19 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:05:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=70m3PsBvWI/LkCnolKbDYodpxlV/nCDDR2kgCQt6sgQ=; b=j+lsFa8xCz3mjt2n8zUS2F3MaNdhnZJ94c6oMBKbiD20kZq+rOXv03QoWlar+v1xOP T6C3rEMggNN4hOmEfI0WrdiRQPP+a4/uGgpfkjwJOAMcnFTAKVq0HtVJytYGrRvgaaoQ h/lI7Nu+xP2giN/qZvDyh1QeIVvpRrvAJNb7on9nG76v2V8qEhHFGiN0eAMUBxfp4LWo i51OtdA65Sgw305pvjloILGHTNNel4zu3CdtzoxraLcg4E/yCnFpBs43sBO3Q4ombu+D fDNmqif/G8W9Wi66nrEYZXPmOWhjUVVlVbPVXDmAofK/Yt4lthc4LtSGNx6n5tn2806V vR7A== X-Received: by 10.224.222.15 with SMTP id ie15mr8361136qab.75.1361304326503; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fr4sm1451809qab.3.2013.02.19.12.05.24 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:05:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5123DB03.4060005@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:05:23 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130206 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denzel Turner Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Update? References: <20130219194306.f5c8ce651ef2eb1d96112fc1@sohara.org> <5123D672.7010802@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steve O'Hara-Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:32 -0000 On 02/19/13 14:03, Denzel Turner wrote: > Hello Gentlemen and thank you for the prompt response. I thought > freegsd-update for FreeBSD 9.1 only updated with FreeBSD 9.0 Packages as > the Update Functionality Infrastructure was being rebuilt. I might be > wrong about this but I thought this was put out in the FreeBSD 9.1 > Announcement. I am learning about FreeBSD after not using it for several > years. My first FreeBSD was 5.4 i386 version. I'll forward you the announcement I received this morning and you can decide for yourself. (: -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 20:56:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE62376A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A633178A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089F233C1D; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:56:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D661439829; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:56:22 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: davidcollins001@gmail.com Subject: Re: building libtorrent error: 'u_int16_t' does not name a type References: <51235f62.tSX2fGrd2jyaPQ8q%davidcollins001@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:56:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <51235f62.tSX2fGrd2jyaPQ8q%davidcollins001@gmail.com> (David Collins's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:17:54 +0000") Message-ID: <44d2vwm39l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:56:29 -0000 David Collins writes: > I'm trying to build libtorrent/rtorrent using gcc 4.8. The reason I'm > using gcc 4.8 rather than the version in base is because there is > apparently a bug in gcc 4.2 - http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/ticket/926 You do realize that the bug was worked around in the libtorrent sources as well, right? So that the using the port without tinkering with its compiler usage will work just fine, and has done for many years? > I installed gcc 4.8 based on these instructions > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html, > replacing 44 for 48 where neccessary. While building I get the > errors below. > > Have I missed something while installing gcc 4.8? Or does anyone have an ideas > about how to fix this? Well, the errors look like stdint.h isn't getting included properly. Or that's what I'd say in a C file; C++ has some differences in this area, although I think most implementations support the C-style types. This could well be a major porting exercise. My advice would be: don't do that -- it's what ports are for in the first place. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 22:23:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7705F3F7 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31827B4C for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7vau-0005xd-8f; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:23:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U7vae-0000P7-7z; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:23:08 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:22:37 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Denzel Turner Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 Update? Message-Id: <20130219222237.250a6b36c1fc32b29a15ea28@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20130219194306.f5c8ce651ef2eb1d96112fc1@sohara.org> <5123D672.7010802@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:23:10 -0000 On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:03:56 -0600 Denzel Turner wrote: > Hello Gentlemen and thank you for the prompt response. I thought > freegsd-update for FreeBSD 9.1 only updated with FreeBSD 9.0 Packages as > the Update Functionality Infrastructure was being rebuilt. I might be > wrong about this but I thought this was put out in the FreeBSD 9.1 > Announcement. Ah I see the confusion. The package building infrastructure is indeed still being rebuilt and so there are no packages for 9.1 and the only packages on the distribution sites are now quite old. However the base system updates used by freebsd-update are still being produced. > I am learning about FreeBSD after not using it for several > years. My first FreeBSD was 5.4 i386 version. Hmm that release occurred during my break from FreeBSD between 4.x and 9.0. My first FreeBSD install was 1.1. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 22:27:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698DE56D for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302CEB90 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA931603E5 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:20:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.8.0 (20120630) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QKW5J5rSw4Ba for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:20:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5AAA1603DA for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:20:39 +0100 (CET) From: "bsd@todoo.biz" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: ZFS + iSCSI architecture Message-Id: <93B2D1C4-8887-45F9-9939-A099AC5E3DA0@todoo.biz> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:20:41 +0100 To: Liste FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:27:02 -0000 Hello, I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can grow = up to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features = to have turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle if I go = for FreeNAS). Since I want to move on quite fast I might decide to use = FreeNAS in it's latest version.=20 The idea behind all that was to grant 5 or six critical servers access = to the NAS so that they can take advantage of :=20 1. space available on the NAS 2. ability of the NAS to use ZFS and of clients to support this file = system (including snapshots)=20 3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially = planned).=20 4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like = /usr/local/ or other parts of the system).=20 The server accessing the data will be of two types :=20 1. 2 x Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS=20 2. 4 x FreeBSD (mainly 8 and 9) with jail configured=20 I have started reading about iSCSI and potential problems with FreeBSD.=20= So my main questions would be :=20 =95 Should I go for iSCSI ?=20 =95 Should I rather choose / prefer NFS ?=20 =95 Should I export a Volume as UFS rather than ZFS (is ZFS supported as = a target) ? The main idea is stability, redundancy of data and ease of maintenance = (in a headless FreeBSD / Linux world) before anything else !=20 That's the big pictures, if you have any pointers, advise, they are all = welcome.=20 It is quite late where I leave, so I will reply to posts in 8 to 10 = hours, but I hope to have enough answer(s) to start an interesting = thread (as I think this question is very interesting and not so clearly = explained (at least in my mind))=85=20 Thx very much for your infos and feedback.=20 ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 22:34:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A44783 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bw.mail.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E0FC2B for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ro8so2483997pbb.18 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:34:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=D4J0JoHYZjTbBZfVkh0+9zm93t8XPSOUdFpUArSgiRs=; b=vTevzsX+OCsTWJXt0lizmQ1kL/uRmsyfDP8wvdqyYIGfXRWix8ChoxZbqtaT24CZc/ fZeW3+X535fPsLOdwCZXfMN0hQHTE1BwW30OyqeeJRmEhjlnJ7lnWHlCiXRXqm6fKmDP o5r8aghiFM/Kr3UH954AYCzmNkgFSJc75PYt6TnRrlvPF6BMbib7JZfy850W5fuWsuJs t5JzcdSmJa9+c33JugMZh8/cpZRN9x72NB6LLfu8Qqpft2s33FIZG8F6PUZi1JeI1B8X GK38xeUuQD2/pEm1Ib2olJX55QYZmullgkdC285g4wLadaFGPv7m9Yd2AFh4KHMg4x9h K7aQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.0.129 with SMTP id 1mr44532375pbe.63.1361313261256; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:34:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.75.202 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:34:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:34:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: convert date and time to epoch in awk From: b w To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:34:22 -0000 I want to write a script that parses the last, say, 10 minutes of a log file looking for a certain string, like 'error', or failed', and returns how many times it shows up. The script would be run by Nagios and if it returns > 0 an alert is raised. Each line of the log file starts with a date like 'Feb 19 23:45:32'. One way to do it I guess would be to read each line in a while loop, extract the date, convert it into epoch using the date command, if it's within 10 minutes remember the line somewhere, then grep the result. I was thinking this might be too slow, or there may be too many lines at some point, but it might actually be acceptable if I tail the last few thousands lines. Anyway... Another way would be to use gawk, which has date/time functions like systime() and mktime(). This works fine, but someone like myself at some point will forget to install gawk on a new server and might not realize it untill something happens. So, is there a way to compare two dates in FreeBSD's awk or convert a date to epoch? Or some other fast way to select the last 10 minutes from a log file? An example would be appreciated, if possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 22:54:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF5BDBE for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ait.mlist@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECADD7B for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id j14so5387255lbo.24 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:54:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent; bh=c0qWygJOMsp9hnCegZlFVgaBe74hIfl6dh5QFzS18lw=; b=iEgRuzm7Dtq5/9gtNs2wg0LIhb3KaG0r4GhE5ksbsxB/zaIo9ZV6msEP0L7K2nh97R bD/WAgWc8vwbD0FNU60ssiJTyg3OJHUI+QLb2RvKuAciiS04D779vQaKQSV5xueKi5pz XgKNY3vufOJqmUVJUbYU65FFgph+umpWRYPeFIVlT41V7PkB4qT3sha9hCZQ/Deug/Qy waGH4x2ZvAak0Shuq9R7f92QIFwXLJGqraOZVwdXFCRzoWaWo8k2VycFwiFIl0DXrgYh BPGLW4G7n+PqECs77fE+I2zO2kxFi8S/egiSiNjXMamBiAZyMBguTx+RMDFS1i6onqAu s3zA== X-Received: by 10.152.104.18 with SMTP id ga18mr15820667lab.33.1361314491404; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from a3500l ([188.114.62.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pk1sm37894219lab.0.2013.02.19.14.54.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by a3500l (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:54:47 +0400 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:54:47 +0400 From: Dmitry Sarkisov To: "bsd@todoo.biz" Subject: Re: ZFS + iSCSI architecture Message-ID: <20130219225447.GA11566@aperturescience.org> References: <93B2D1C4-8887-45F9-9939-A099AC5E3DA0@todoo.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <93B2D1C4-8887-45F9-9939-A099AC5E3DA0@todoo.biz> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:54:53 -0000 On 19-02-2013, Tue [23:20:41], bsd@todoo.biz wrote: > Hello, > > > I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can grow up to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features to have turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle if I go for FreeNAS). Since I want to move on quite fast I might decide to use FreeNAS in it's latest version. > > > The idea behind all that was to grant 5 or six critical servers access to the NAS so that they can take advantage of : > > 1. space available on the NAS > > 2. ability of the NAS to use ZFS and of clients to support this file system (including snapshots) > > 3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially planned). > > 4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like /usr/local/ or other parts of the system). > > > > The server accessing the data will be of two types : > > 1. 2 x Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS > > 2. 4 x FreeBSD (mainly 8 and 9) with jail configured > > > I have started reading about iSCSI and potential problems with FreeBSD. > > So my main questions would be : > > > • Should I go for iSCSI ? > > • Should I rather choose / prefer NFS ? > > • Should I export a Volume as UFS rather than ZFS (is ZFS supported as a target) ? > > > The main idea is stability, redundancy of data and ease of maintenance (in a headless FreeBSD / Linux world) before anything else ! > > > > That's the big pictures, if you have any pointers, advise, they are all welcome. > > > It is quite late where I leave, so I will reply to posts in 8 to 10 hours, but I hope to have enough answer(s) to start an interesting thread (as I think this question is very interesting and not so clearly explained (at least in my mind))… > > > Thx very much for your infos and feedback. > > Hello, If I needed a NFS+iSCSI solution I'd go for Solaris 11. Docs are abundant and the system is very stable and feature-rich. Tried recently the integration in Windows Domain and iSCSI features, all works wery good. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for FreeBSD ;) but in this particular case I'd choose Solaris. -- D.S. <-\ Powered by <-------------------o <-/ FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 00:11:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46B7E5B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779E8257 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1K0BIr6029309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:11:18 -0600 Received: from dtwin (10.242.182.124) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:11:18 -0600 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'b w'" , References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: convert date and time to epoch in awk Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:11:08 -0800 Message-ID: <00df01ce0efe$c98f8030$5cae8090$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQDzhcHqE/NYPOA2SVwjtNoCVdVak5o272cQ Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.242.182.124] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-19_05:2013-02-19,2013-02-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:11:20 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of b w > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:34 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: convert date and time to epoch in awk > > I want to write a script that parses the last, say, 10 minutes of a log > file looking for a certain string, like 'error', or failed', and returns > how many times it shows up. The script would be run by Nagios and if it > returns > 0 an alert is raised. Each line of the log file starts with a > date like 'Feb 19 23:45:32'. > > One way to do it I guess would be to read each line in a while loop, > extract the date, convert it into epoch using the date command, if it's > within 10 minutes remember the line somewhere, then grep the result. I was > thinking this might be too slow, or there may be too many lines at some > point, but it might actually be acceptable if I tail the last few thousands > lines. Anyway... > > Another way would be to use gawk, which has date/time functions like > systime() and mktime(). This works fine, but someone like myself at some > point will forget to install gawk on a new server and might not realize it > untill something happens. > > So, is there a way to compare two dates in FreeBSD's awk or convert a date > to epoch? Or some other fast way to select the last 10 minutes from a log > file? An example would be appreciated, if possible. Converting a date to an epoch is easy with date(1) (note: awk can make a system call and read back the stdout into a variable). For example, if I want to convert the date: Fri 01 Feb 2013 into an epoch using: date -j -f "%a %d %b %Y" "Fri 01 Feb 2013" +%s The output of which is the following epoch: 1359763497 Doing this all from awk: echo "Fri 01 Feb 2013" | awk ' { mydate = $0 "date -j -f \"%a %d %b %Y\" \"" mydate "\" +%s" | getline myepoch print mydate " = " myepoch }' Hope this helps. -- Devin P.S. Be careful that log files often (a) rotate and (b) contain "last message repeated N times" which can throw off your counts. Things I have solved before and am willing to share if you're interested. _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 00:49:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A734404 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EAF3DF for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1K0nOQv024168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:49:24 -0600 Received: from dtwin (10.242.182.124) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:49:23 -0600 From: Devin Teske To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: ZFS Question Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:49:13 -0800 Message-ID: <010501ce0f04$1bdae820$5390b860$@fisglobal.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac4PA59ILYOcMi/BQEmAq3AZ+/1KTg== Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.242.182.124] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-19_05:2013-02-19,2013-02-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: devin.teske@fisglobal.com, "Robison, Dave" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:49:25 -0000 Hi, What's the difference between: zpool create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME disk_device and zpool create -m none POOL_NAME disk_device zfs create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME/foo We would prefer the former, but see more uses of the latter. The whole point is that we want to "keep things simple" and having only a single mount-point makes things simpler, but I'm curious about any possible fallbacks to using just the pool on the mount point with zero filesystems created underneath. In other words... does "zfs create" actually buy us anything versus just using the pool mounted on the desired location? -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 01:14:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D51A92 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (we-in-x022f.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0627D748 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x8so6225348wey.20 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:14:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=cHkBH8S89NdYsS1ucikitz+GJIrWMKro7hwnR8d7Kdo=; b=Jfddj7RMGcZYAiN17evS1EK964VJtTDolR2M34Lh7qeCB0T8a76HYO8M4JlkgtjBWv bAdmxHFzcF0YuxIX2oh3YJDkiSnb1a0r6sGkd13TiTTSj2etJrVFMDD6qB5ZUUDXIkPO zzYEDxp3wK2d+hnJ+M9fWERgLodCiTCWH8vUeALGtKWQ/RXgrPbRM2F/ynE6wcFd0M+b Wdt5s+yDOwL68CWF1xvaxLibRg6GdFYj+eQdpdDcQeVA4fs3OHxnNbS2ZnV595lNfYnN RZ7naAl+kWEZbo8ksqEqL9qGmgyK0LkR1xMWaa1yi/eoIoBqv/shHKJFS3eeTU/gDuNE Zs2g== X-Received: by 10.194.158.100 with SMTP id wt4mr30140484wjb.37.1361322890570; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:14:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm28566426wix.7.2013.02.19.17.14.47 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:14:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: ZFS + iSCSI architecture From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <93B2D1C4-8887-45F9-9939-A099AC5E3DA0@todoo.biz> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:14:47 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <93B2D1C4-8887-45F9-9939-A099AC5E3DA0@todoo.biz> To: "bsd@todoo.biz" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmd4jfxlPvmUT7W6aEyrjs9Y1X6TB4WuJbNsgWjZgYef9DM6kUKoBFYmG5Wjt2TeVYfQ+aF Cc: Liste FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:14:52 -0000 On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "bsd@todoo.biz" wrote: > Hello, >=20 >=20 > I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can = grow up to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy = features to have turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle = if I go for FreeNAS). Since I want to move on quite fast I might decide = to use FreeNAS in it's latest version.=20 >=20 >=20 > The idea behind all that was to grant 5 or six critical servers access = to the NAS so that they can take advantage of :=20 >=20 > 1. space available on the NAS >=20 > 2. ability of the NAS to use ZFS and of clients to support this file = system (including snapshots)=20 >=20 > 3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially = planned).=20 >=20 > 4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like = /usr/local/ or other parts of the system).=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The server accessing the data will be of two types :=20 >=20 > 1. 2 x Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS=20 >=20 > 2. 4 x FreeBSD (mainly 8 and 9) with jail configured=20 >=20 >=20 > I have started reading about iSCSI and potential problems with = FreeBSD.=20 >=20 What problems do you mean ? > So my main questions would be :=20 >=20 >=20 > =95 Should I go for iSCSI ?=20 >=20 Well in all use cases, iscsi should perform faster than NFS. > =95 Should I rather choose / prefer NFS ?=20 >=20 > =95 Should I export a Volume as UFS rather than ZFS (is ZFS supported = as a target) ? >=20 I'm not sure what you mean here, when you export a zvol over ISCSI: - your SAN is the target and presents a block device (the zvol) - your client is the initiator - your client attaches to the ISCSI drive and formats it using = filesystem XYZ, be it ext3, ufs or ntfs >=20 > The main idea is stability, redundancy of data and ease of maintenance = (in a headless FreeBSD / Linux world) before anything else !=20 >=20 ISCSI is a bit harder to setup IMO, however I think it''s more reliable = than NFS, what with its auto retries if it loses the network link to a = device. >=20 >=20 > That's the big pictures, if you have any pointers, advise, they are = all welcome.=20 >=20 >=20 > It is quite late where I leave, so I will reply to posts in 8 to 10 = hours, but I hope to have enough answer(s) to start an interesting = thread (as I think this question is very interesting and not so clearly = explained (at least in my mind))=85=20 >=20 This is idd a very interesting topic and I hope to see more :) >=20 > Thx very much for your infos and feedback.=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 01:42:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF82FF1E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iamatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3A483D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm14so5586934wib.15 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:42:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0RhLrcVM5ftjeI1m8jWejTJLG8xadvAScFpL6p1oZeM=; b=gryiKDzU1PuqHrAA9pjdLPnb7Zq8MLcCYAtjyQtyQ84KjXCu6RPlGmO966OBT+f5UM iybRRpBF/28R590e8kCwrLL2MYIB4D/m0iPKJ3um9+JGdsyJdAjXt2lmdVft+U5/47gd BjuFBIRZKSg/lb5TWHQYYrEHk323C//T4E4ClqyqMYPRmXzIgc1kpDb3ebWGW6jDChyY SSzGH3tujcDDsE9L5+eNGbYjEuMR/oleJ0602s4NnO6TV6qs1/Hdc/xu6ZnNq4lHcUb8 5zgaP+iNBzUWRhK/M5ZOeKMbUnJVFaH5eA8hHE8nxtctVC4osuD/Imu/QYP9hsJU1PP4 ANZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.174.196 with SMTP id bu4mr30185317wjc.35.1361324569008; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.59.146 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:42:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.59.146 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:42:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <93B2D1C4-8887-45F9-9939-A099AC5E3DA0@todoo.biz> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:42:48 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS + iSCSI architecture From: iamatt To: Fleuriot Damien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:42:50 -0000 Sounds like a major headache. I'd just deploy NetApp with OnTap 8.X or isilon, both BSD based now. On Feb 19, 2013 7:15 PM, "Fleuriot Damien" wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "bsd@todoo.biz" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can gro= w > up to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy features t= o > have turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle if I go for > FreeNAS). Since I want to move on quite fast I might decide to use FreeNA= S > in it's latest version. > > > > > > The idea behind all that was to grant 5 or six critical servers access > to the NAS so that they can take advantage of : > > > > 1. space available on the NAS > > > > 2. ability of the NAS to use ZFS and of clients to support this file > system (including snapshots) > > > > 3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially > planned). > > > > 4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like > /usr/local/ or other parts of the system). > > > > > > > > The server accessing the data will be of two types : > > > > 1. 2 x Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS > > > > 2. 4 x FreeBSD (mainly 8 and 9) with jail configured > > > > > > I have started reading about iSCSI and potential problems with FreeBSD. > > > > What problems do you mean ? > > > > > So my main questions would be : > > > > > > =E2=80=A2 Should I go for iSCSI ? > > > > Well in all use cases, iscsi should perform faster than NFS. > > > > > =E2=80=A2 Should I rather choose / prefer NFS ? > > > > =E2=80=A2 Should I export a Volume as UFS rather than ZFS (is ZFS suppo= rted as a > target) ? > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here, when you export a zvol over ISCSI: > - your SAN is the target and presents a block device (the zvol) > - your client is the initiator > - your client attaches to the ISCSI drive and formats it using filesystem > XYZ, be it ext3, ufs or ntfs > > > > > > > > The main idea is stability, redundancy of data and ease of maintenance > (in a headless FreeBSD / Linux world) before anything else ! > > > > ISCSI is a bit harder to setup IMO, however I think it''s more reliable > than NFS, what with its auto retries if it loses the network link to a > device. > > > > > > > > > That's the big pictures, if you have any pointers, advise, they are all > welcome. > > > > > > It is quite late where I leave, so I will reply to posts in 8 to 10 > hours, but I hope to have enough answer(s) to start an interesting thread > (as I think this question is very interesting and not so clearly explaine= d > (at least in my mind))=E2=80=A6 > > > > This is idd a very interesting topic and I hope to see more :) > > > > > > > Thx very much for your infos and feedback. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 01:42:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AB0F1F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vogelke@hcst.net) Received: from beta.hcst.com (beta.hcst.com [192.52.183.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8374B83E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.hcst.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beta.hcst.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r1K1glTu004487 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:42:47 -0500 Received: (from vogelke@localhost) by beta.hcst.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id r1K1gkUp004486; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:42:46 -0500 Received: by kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil (Postfix, from userid 32768) id 4D8D0BF63; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:41:32 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from b w on Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:34:21 +0100) Subject: Re: convert date and time to epoch in awk Organization: Array Infotech X-Disclaimer: I don't speak for the USAF or Array Infotech. X-GPG-ID: 1024D/711752A0 2006-06-27 Karl Vogel X-GPG-Fingerprint: 56EB 6DBF 4224 C953 F417 CC99 4C7C 7D46 7117 52A0 References: Message-Id: <20130220014133.4D8D0BF63@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:41:32 -0500 (EST) From: vogelke+unix@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: vogelke+unix@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:42:54 -0000 >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:34:21 +0100, >> b w said: b> I want to write a script that parses the last, say, 10 minutes of a log b> file looking for a certain string, like 'error', or failed', and returns b> how many times it shows up. The script would be run by Nagios and if it b> returns > 0 an alert is raised. Each line of the log file starts with a b> date like 'Feb 19 23:45:32'. Instead of looking for 'error' or 'failed', I'd recommend weeding out benign log entries and returning everything else. Some examples: http://www.hcst.net/~vogelke/src/logfiles/ Some relevant links for Nagios: http://serverfault.com/questions/172875/ Is Nagios capable of covering the functionality of Logwatch? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2373212/ How do I use Nagios to monitor a log file http://serverfault.com/questions/44/ What tool do you use to monitor your servers? -- Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company John, this smells worse than your uncle's codpiece (which I wish you would stop wearing to work), and in reviewing it I can deduce that your parents were never formally introduced. --Slashdot suggestion for inspecting poorly-written code From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 02:35:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BA7A71 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bw.mail.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (we-in-x0232.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3204BA07 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x48so6056570wey.23 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:35:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=asYQ+LhcGVvx29LZtSBDQsORPZRXquQwvS4HsdEgoIE=; b=bOUYijgBXzBGEaiaZPV4ytNcVO7C53fdmM6IFDxPB5yNfZg5ZEWWyOHMAVBhGJqUOc S4Q07sqhlqkFVUo2Xn86sgeik3LvKe5i92lIwFbefwXpvclR0mJa2J0LJfAG3zucbtH1 rX8VzvTW6Z8vv4gf6jUaQgj8BydMbabG/DBwV6NjkhPcRE1KKOnltG9AitIXJ5MmIWxf tnorbU5UQfmgjoyWg2S0UC1D7hfBmK0kkuZQytHjC3SKlq2fFQF6LFb/YvEHiXZtmp2+ JhspJ4hA4t6qsETopDBNX/zM8MQtMwfE4o6PzY/tF5qwWfzADecsi/hXpA3/wWGfGJjN I/JQ== X-Received: by 10.194.110.69 with SMTP id hy5mr30606653wjb.1.1361327721468; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:35:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.128] (dhcp-089-099-199-083.chello.nl. [89.99.199.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id er3sm1976490wib.1.2013.02.19.18.35.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:35:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51243666.5000408@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:35:18 +0200 From: "bw.mail.lists" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: convert date and time to epoch in awk References: <00df01ce0efe$c98f8030$5cae8090$@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <00df01ce0efe$c98f8030$5cae8090$@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:35:22 -0000 >> So, is there a way to compare two dates in FreeBSD's awk or convert a date >> to epoch? Or some other fast way to select the last 10 minutes from a log >> file? An example would be appreciated, if possible. > > > Converting a date to an epoch is easy with date(1) (note: awk can make a system > call and read back the stdout into a variable). > > For example, if I want to convert the date: > > Fri 01 Feb 2013 > > into an epoch using: > > date -j -f "%a %d %b %Y" "Fri 01 Feb 2013" +%s > > The output of which is the following epoch: > > 1359763497 > > Doing this all from awk: > > echo "Fri 01 Feb 2013" | awk ' > { > mydate = $0 > "date -j -f \"%a %d %b %Y\" \"" mydate "\" +%s" | getline myepoch > print mydate " = " myepoch > }' > > Hope this helps. > It does, exactly what I was looking for, many thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 03:12:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EBF1DA for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bw.mail.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95130C20 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x10so6352259wey.17 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:12:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ufjYBlrKg3rkjgVuo3OXqn5Qi/s9eXFBKcepXsmCZUA=; b=Uy7vPBzZjktRImoQch6z5/YuyZ8LB0vFgDFmoaiAq6gCf8ENXynEGss1RqXq9ofi64 JJiBeSI4gry3GSOIXD591vcI1QY+HNzpGlZoh9w1Dbv+faKIzkCz+oC3QRnlla2DAawn arn9Wm/Uy5r1CWfyVjwidraIYUscsTKUHIK+amlST1bR46Xp3loKPGPm8QXKXOcJ7Pk6 ofThfrjKW4vVE2bJssKeSb6mhhwxMF7/3jYhdF0ZOYccBwsrPwKLCU5x3eimKD9fXkfO N+usoChC2t0/mLNGJeT6rIIhQZsDPCP3aDNjjsSVVV0cpC4I53SUz6WAYbhA7Wc0x9r8 8rLA== X-Received: by 10.194.24.197 with SMTP id w5mr25912307wjf.9.1361329973003; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:12:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.128] (dhcp-089-099-199-083.chello.nl. [89.99.199.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s8sm28868203wif.9.2013.02.19.19.12.50 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:12:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51243F31.3050109@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:12:49 +0200 From: "bw.mail.lists" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: convert date and time to epoch in awk References: <20130220014133.4D8D0BF63@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> In-Reply-To: <20130220014133.4D8D0BF63@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:12:55 -0000 > > b> I want to write a script that parses the last, say, 10 minutes of a log > b> file looking for a certain string, like 'error', or failed', and returns > b> how many times it shows up. The script would be run by Nagios and if it > b> returns > 0 an alert is raised. Each line of the log file starts with a > b> date like 'Feb 19 23:45:32'. > > Instead of looking for 'error' or 'failed', I'd recommend weeding out > benign log entries and returning everything else. Well, that was just an example, my needs are a bit more specific, but I found some new stuff for later in those links, thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 04:03:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC00EB85 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@clari.net.au) Received: from fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559CAE46 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail35.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail35.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.51]) by fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1K43TaU009629 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:03:29 +1100 Received: from [192.168.100.102] (c114-76-1-137.eburwd4.vic.optusnet.com.au [114.76.1.137]) by mail35.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1K43Eat004732 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:03:20 +1100 Message-ID: <51244AEE.5090005@clari.net.au> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:02:54 +1100 From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: amd64 and COMPAT_AOUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=KZ6KKnkD c=1 sm=1 a=x4mveiYJ1mQA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ejE0-8HIAAAA:8 a=c951qbSctMsA:10 a=YGs6PPEg-tnIyvwqprcA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=+rVrtY7z3DVyADW7HUk29Q==:117 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:03:36 -0000 I'm migrating a lot of services to a new server running 9.1 amd64. I have a VMWare FreeBSD 3.3 server I want to decommission, which is running a client's website with a shopping cart system in an a.out binary (source code lost long ago). I have just tried to build a new kernel on the 9.1/amd64 machine with COMPAT_AOUT added to /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/NEWKERNEL but ... root@corella:/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf # config NEWKERNEL NEWKERNEL: unknown option "COMPAT_AOUT" COMPAT_AOUT is recognised in i386/conf The funny thing is that in amd64/conf/NOTES is device gzip #Exec gzipped a.out's. REQUIRES COMPAT_AOUT! Is it possible to get 9.1/amd64 to run i386 a.out binaries? What might I be missing? Thanks, Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 04:29:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2517F57 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (mtumishi.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A280F29 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B13911C1D3; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:20:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5123ECBA.6030902@cyberleo.net> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:20:58 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonni Nakari Subject: Re: ZFS pool data recovery References: <5122355E.3040506@egarden.fi> In-Reply-To: <5122355E.3040506@egarden.fi> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:29:02 -0000 On 02/18/2013 08:06 AM, Jonni Nakari wrote: > It seems, that while testing suspend to RAM on my machine by running > "acpiconf -s 3" I managed to break a RaidZ zpool. The machine went to > sleep fine, but after waking up commands (e.g. reboot) reported I/O > error. When booting after a hard reset the machine fails to mount the > root filesystem: > > Trying to mount root from zfs:/vault/root []... > Mounting from zfs:/vault/root failed with error 5. > > I booted the system from FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img and > tried to import the zpool in the shell: > # zpool import -f vault > cannot import 'vault': I/O error > Destroy and re-create the pool from > a backup source. > > Command "zpool import -nfF vault" from the memstick system gives no > output. (I thought it should always give some output?) > > What should I try next to repair the zpool or recover the data? I > started "zpool import -nfFX vault" but it seems to take quite long. > > Some more information about my system: > zpool vault consists of 5 block devices: > whole disks: ada1, ada2, ada3 > cache: ada0s1e > log: ada0s1d > > The system boots from a UFS filesystem ada0s1a. The zpool and rest of > the system was created with FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE. Does dmesg or syslog show anything with regards to the supposed I/O errors? Do the disks pass a read-only scan or 'long' SMART test? While unlikely, it is possible that one of the devices picked that precise moment to fail. It's also possible a disk did not appreciate being put to sleep; I've had several SSDs that simply stopped responding under such conditions, prompting warranty replacement. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 04:59:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3954A3 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD36EB7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A914C1602BD for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:59:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.8.0 (20120630) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([213.251.152.9]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [213.251.152.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id F_UbYJl9yaij for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:59:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47FBB1602B7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:59:33 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: ZFS + iSCSI architecture From: "bsd@todoo.biz" In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:59:35 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5A70C76B-4331-4BCA-82D3-3A6E6ADF7032@todoo.biz> References: <93B2D1C4-8887-45F9-9939-A099AC5E3DA0@todoo.biz> To: Liste FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:59:35 -0000 Le 20 f=E9vr. 2013 =E0 02:14, Fleuriot Damien a =E9crit : >=20 > On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "bsd@todoo.biz" wrote: >=20 >> Hello, >>=20 >>=20 >> I am about to start deploying a large system (about 18 To which can = grow up to 36 To) based on a big Intel platform with lot's of fancy = features to have turbo boosted platform (ZIL on SSD + system on dongle = if I go for FreeNAS). Since I want to move on quite fast I might decide = to use FreeNAS in it's latest version.=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The idea behind all that was to grant 5 or six critical servers = access to the NAS so that they can take advantage of :=20 >>=20 >> 1. space available on the NAS >>=20 >> 2. ability of the NAS to use ZFS and of clients to support this file = system (including snapshots)=20 >>=20 >> 3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially = planned).=20 >>=20 >> 4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like = /usr/local/ or other parts of the system).=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The server accessing the data will be of two types :=20 >>=20 >> 1. 2 x Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS=20 >>=20 >> 2. 4 x FreeBSD (mainly 8 and 9) with jail configured=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> I have started reading about iSCSI and potential problems with = FreeBSD.=20 >>=20 >=20 > What problems do you mean ? For example :=20 - Can my client (the initiator) directly mount a ZFS volume on freeBSD = using iSCSI or should I go back to formatting It to UFS ? - Is the iSCSI stack in FreeBSD stable an mature enough to be used in a = production environment ? =3D=3D> It is out of scope to have kernel panic because of an unstable = iSCSI related problem.=20 >=20 >> So my main questions would be :=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> =95 Should I go for iSCSI ?=20 >>=20 >=20 > Well in all use cases, iscsi should perform faster than NFS. Fast is good - stable is necessary in this case !=20 And this is what I am tring to evaluate=85=20 >=20 >> =95 Should I rather choose / prefer NFS ?=20 >>=20 >> =95 Should I export a Volume as UFS rather than ZFS (is ZFS supported = as a target) ? >>=20 >=20 > I'm not sure what you mean here, when you export a zvol over ISCSI: > - your SAN is the target and presents a block device (the zvol) > - your client is the initiator > - your client attaches to the ISCSI drive and formats it using = filesystem XYZ, be it ext3, ufs or ntfs >=20 Thanks for this reminder about vocabulary for iSCSI, I'll try to stick = to It ;-)=20 >=20 >>=20 >> The main idea is stability, redundancy of data and ease of = maintenance (in a headless FreeBSD / Linux world) before anything else !=20= >>=20 >=20 > ISCSI is a bit harder to setup IMO, however I think it''s more = reliable than NFS, what with its auto retries if it loses the network = link to a device. >=20 Have you deployed this in production and what are your concerns and = recommendations ?=20 >=20 >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> That's the big pictures, if you have any pointers, advise, they are = all welcome.=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> It is quite late where I leave, so I will reply to posts in 8 to 10 = hours, but I hope to have enough answer(s) to start an interesting = thread (as I think this question is very interesting and not so clearly = explained (at least in my mind))=85=20 >>=20 >=20 > This is idd a very interesting topic and I hope to see more :) >=20 There is also an interesting (and fresh) post here :=20 = http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/solaris/ZFSFreeBSDvsIllumos?showco= mments#comments >=20 >>=20 >> Thx very much for your infos and feedback.=20 >=20 >=20 ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 07:39:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB4724C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F4B813 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1K7cmlN090681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:38:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r1K7cmEf090678; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:38:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:38:48 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: ZFS Question In-Reply-To: <010501ce0f04$1bdae820$5390b860$@fisglobal.com> Message-ID: References: <010501ce0f04$1bdae820$5390b860$@fisglobal.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-2105069180-1361345928=:95994" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: FreeBSD Questions , "Robison, Dave" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:39:00 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-2105069180-1361345928=:95994 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:49-0800, Devin Teske wrote: > Hi, > > What's the difference between: > > zpool create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME disk_device > > and > > zpool create -m none POOL_NAME disk_device > zfs create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME/foo > > We would prefer the former, but see more uses of the latter. > > The whole point is that we want to "keep things simple" and having only a single > mount-point makes things simpler, but I'm curious about any possible fallbacks > to using just the pool on the mount point with zero filesystems created > underneath. > > In other words... does "zfs create" actually buy us anything versus just using > the pool mounted on the desired location? It depends on your needs. Maybe you want to adjust the recordsize property, or apply compression, or have added redundancy i.e. tuning the copies property for some precious files. I wrote a few words on this matter nearly a year ago: http://ximalas.info/2012/05/04/when-to-create-a-zfs-filesystem/ Maybe none, some, or all applies to you. Just my $0.02. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-2105069180-1361345928=:95994-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 09:28:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB7FFFF for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FFFE68 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U85yB-0004p5-0i for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:07 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U85yA-0005Tw-Ou for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:06 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1K9S6VJ029472 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:06 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1K9S64p029471 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:06 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:06 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302200928.r1K9S64p029471@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:28:14 -0000 I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, with ip address assigned via DHCP. The laptop has neither a static ip address, nor a domain. I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. However, /etc/hosts is just the default: # ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain # Is it the lack of a domain that prevents me from getting ssh access? I try to ssh with just a dynamic ip address, for which ping seems to work fine. Or is the problem somewhere else? I'm not even sure I'm asking the right questions. Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 09:31:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6487D264 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F351FEC2 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hm6so5922986wib.8 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:31:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=gMnqiaxDGdTQ12eqsanj6+T7we1Ioy6Jc89UKh6SsBA=; b=MfhwYD5Q2R7wHX7u+/6Ts/SLUHecovRtYjxKhqKWc8TQtZlsFAKLokP3Y/zzSP+ykC V2jvXyQdh/M9cpwbHYWcPiSx1xUEnKw9TjWjE/PRSBMow9ppE0QkvVsAiIHm0qObKN5z B6J8tlrtQK27F1kvD/LsocdrBebxacEelQVZLopiI4SfLIFalqAd/4IXXJAE6miQxffQ ugGP5gMudtiEUxTMXmrKS9+U3uJo+cJNTXKFKZzZlg4K0sMbjqpBGt7z4q8fcJG1SAIk 1YqpZV6x1D1JhxkHorvwNixUTJXZ2sKYXTnp1EYFQ8HLL4rXJKSGM0d56yuLYhksMzpy uKKQ== X-Received: by 10.180.83.10 with SMTP id m10mr32940854wiy.5.1361352683695; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:31:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek4sm30057016wib.11.2013.02.20.01.31.22 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:31:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <201302200928.r1K9S64p029471@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <96231D6F-D725-46F8-A9EC-23DBD7FC523E@my.gd> References: <201302200928.r1K9S64p029471@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWrK4mJnnergoyltEvaGbs+32llHhPsnTts9x+kYFgSw7LiqkmYWEb/+jvgPS5s9xp933a Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:31:25 -0000 On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht = wrote: > I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, > with ip address assigned via DHCP. > The laptop has neither a static ip address, > nor a domain. >=20 > I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot > ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config > seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. > However, /etc/hosts is just the default: >=20 > # > ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain > # >=20 > Is it the lack of a domain that prevents > me from getting ssh access? > I try to ssh with just a dynamic ip address, > for which ping seems to work fine. > Or is the problem somewhere else? >=20 > I'm not even sure I'm asking the right > questions. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Anton First, check what ports SSH listens on: sockstat | grep ssh Then, assuming SSH indeed listens on *:22 , check if you have a firewall = running that could be preventing packets from reaching your box. By the way, do you get a login prompt at all, over SSH, or just a plain = timeout or connection reset ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 09:46:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C13762 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A6BF92 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U86FN-0003Jo-9j; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:46:02 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U86FM-0000al-Iw; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:45:52 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1K9jq7P029537; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:45:52 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1K9jpq7029535; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:45:52 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:45:52 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302200945.r1K9jpq7029535@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, ml@my.gd Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address In-Reply-To: <96231D6F-D725-46F8-A9EC-23DBD7FC523E@my.gd> X-Spam-Score: -3.8 X-Spam-Level: --- Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:46:03 -0000 From: Fleuriot Damien To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, > with ip address assigned via DHCP. > The laptop has neither a static ip address, > nor a domain. > > I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot > ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config > seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. > However, /etc/hosts is just the default: > > # > ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain > # > > Is it the lack of a domain that prevents > me from getting ssh access? > I try to ssh with just a dynamic ip address, > for which ping seems to work fine. > Or is the problem somewhere else? > > I'm not even sure I'm asking the right > questions. > > Thanks > > Anton First, check what ports SSH listens on: sockstat | grep ssh root@zzz:~ # sockstat | grep ssh mexas ssh 16193 3 tcp4 172.21.220.12:20541 137.222.187.241:22 root sshd 1091 3 tcp6 *:22 *:* root sshd 1091 4 tcp4 *:22 *:* root@zzz:~ # I also see: /var/log/auth.log:Feb 18 11:54:25 zzz sshd[1091]: Server listening on :: port 22 . /var/log/auth.log:Feb 18 11:54:25 zzz sshd[1091]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 po rt 22. Is 0.0.0.0 expected? Anything else I should check in the logs? Then, assuming SSH indeed listens on *:22 , check if you have a firewall running that could be preventing packets from reaching your box. I don't think so. There's nothing in the kernel config By the way, do you get a login prompt at all, over SSH, or just a plain timeout or connection reset ? Just a timeout: root@zzz:~ # ifconfig wlan0 wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:21:5c:50:68:c3 inet 172.21.220.12 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 nd6 options=29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g status: associated ssid eduroam channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid 00:3a:98:62:cd:a0 country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS wme roaming MANUAL root@zzz:~ # TZAV> ping 172.21.220.12 PING 172.21.220.12 (172.21.220.12): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 172.21.220.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=2.056 ms 64 bytes from 172.21.220.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=1.766 ms ^C TZAV> ssh 172.21.220.12 ssh: connect to host 172.21.220.12 port 22: Operation timed out TZAV> Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 10:00:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E820376 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC793151 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fm10so6136729wgb.33 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:00:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=BZP9dqsRcxIBn7mdYdGR97q0WVz7Cj8OnHVmfmiseIY=; b=ZfyeRHCZUzzW1c7uevHK4hXYJyyCF14jwGBLT++d4gWE2aoptEXQkepGG5R1FU9wnL vh6W3C1WYv6Oyml6Ddx0K/uJ9mg3JXIqRqttOIyypen4FmucJ/zpI8vEZRtY1k3qH0jw Jof09D9MmhBbxoPiSaKLO9ogoHaCgbU2N8ySu7hCMXfGHHQqXLetFOOghT8s+keyb7R4 l7+O6/cuRtOhR33TgFOiTq8dEUM6jWbfqlC8+KPa6zFn1qPZHtt3l9CbQ0dPDL4lbJe/ 1E7iWxyHJ1ZM8EMx92WwUvTQVnceXMpLbP+tTWv7GK540RlWyr9U30pK+4KPcdzmcWGI kYuA== X-Received: by 10.180.95.66 with SMTP id di2mr33024379wib.18.1361354427621; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:00:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bs6sm32802161wib.4.2013.02.20.02.00.26 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:00:26 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <201302200945.r1K9jpq7029535@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:00:24 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9A8F9CCD-C90B-4033-992F-0458D6128005@my.gd> References: <201302200945.r1K9jpq7029535@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkbDQvncK2I6rwnlA9mjzvG/6KgSwPRBQG7ffB4cP+QNOyBsQ2RRMi43tFvvCulmeN20GzB Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:00:37 -0000 On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Anton Shterenlikht = wrote: > From: Fleuriot Damien > To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk > Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100 > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >=20 > On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht = wrote: >=20 > > I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, > > with ip address assigned via DHCP. > > The laptop has neither a static ip address, > > nor a domain. > >=20 > > I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot > > ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config > > seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. > > However, /etc/hosts is just the default: > >=20 > > # > > ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain > > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain > > # > >=20 > > Is it the lack of a domain that prevents > > me from getting ssh access? > > I try to ssh with just a dynamic ip address, > > for which ping seems to work fine. > > Or is the problem somewhere else? > >=20 > > I'm not even sure I'm asking the right > > questions. > >=20 > > Thanks > >=20 > > Anton >=20 >=20 > First, check what ports SSH listens on: > sockstat | grep ssh >=20 > root@zzz:~ # sockstat | grep ssh > mexas ssh 16193 3 tcp4 172.21.220.12:20541 = 137.222.187.241:22 > root sshd 1091 3 tcp6 *:22 *:* > root sshd 1091 4 tcp4 *:22 *:* > root@zzz:~ # >=20 > I also see: >=20 > /var/log/auth.log:Feb 18 11:54:25 zzz sshd[1091]: Server listening on = :: port 22 > . > /var/log/auth.log:Feb 18 11:54:25 zzz sshd[1091]: Server listening on = 0.0.0.0 po > rt 22. >=20 > Is 0.0.0.0 expected? >=20 0.0.0.0 =3D * =3D all IPs / interfaces > Anything else I should check in the logs? >=20 Not that I'm aware of >=20 > Then, assuming SSH indeed listens on *:22 , > check if you have a firewall running that > could be preventing packets from reaching your box. >=20 > I don't think so. > There's nothing in the kernel config >=20 > By the way, do you get a login prompt at all, > over SSH, or just a plain timeout or connection reset ? >=20 > Just a timeout: >=20 > root@zzz:~ # ifconfig wlan0 > wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 1500 > ether 00:21:5c:50:68:c3 > inet 172.21.220.12 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 > nd6 options=3D29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g > status: associated > ssid eduroam channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid 00:3a:98:62:cd:a0 > country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 = scanvalid 450 > bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 > protmode CTS wme roaming MANUAL > root@zzz:~ # >=20 > TZAV> ping 172.21.220.12 > PING 172.21.220.12 (172.21.220.12): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 172.21.220.12: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D60 time=3D2.056 ms > 64 bytes from 172.21.220.12: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D60 time=3D1.766 ms > ^C >=20 > TZAV> ssh 172.21.220.12 > ssh: connect to host 172.21.220.12 port 22: Operation timed out > TZAV> >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Anton >=20 Run this on your server: tcpdump -ni wlan0 ip and port 22 Then try to ssh to the box, see if SYN packets arrive, see if your box = sends SYN/ACK back. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 10:21:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8EEA77 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1512026B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U86nZ-0001pK-9m; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:18 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U86nZ-0002I3-1w; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:13 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KALC5V057660; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:12 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KALCOR057657; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:12 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:12 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302201021.r1KALCOR057657@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, ml@my.gd Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address In-Reply-To: <9A8F9CCD-C90B-4033-992F-0458D6128005@my.gd> X-Spam-Score: -1.6 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:21:19 -0000 From ml@my.gd Wed Feb 20 10:11:12 2013 Run this on your server: tcpdump -ni wlan0 ip and port 22 Then try to ssh to the box, see if SYN packets arrive, see if your box sends SYN/ACK back. 172.21.220.12 is the ssh server 137.222.187.241 is the ssh client (where I login from) There's lots of output on the server: 10:13:40.396933 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [P.], seq 528 :576, ack 897, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166697722 ecr 2764601194], leng th 48 10:13:40.400142 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.20541: Flags [P.], seq 897 :945, ack 576, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2764601829 ecr 166697722], leng th 48 10:13:40.499768 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [.], ack 945, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166697825 ecr 2764601829], length 0 10:13:41.126804 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [P.], seq 576 :624, ack 945, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166698452 ecr 2764601829], leng th 48 10:13:41.129465 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.20541: Flags [P.], seq 945 :993, ack 624, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2764602558 ecr 166698452], leng th 48 10:13:41.229792 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [.], ack 993, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166698555 ecr 2764602558], length 0 10:14:06.042148 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 691 166491:691166555, ack 2147595671, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121228740 e cr 166423364], length 64 10:14:06.043854 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [P.], seq 1:3 3, ack 64, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166723368 ecr 2121228740], length 3 2 10:14:06.144924 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [.], ack 33, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121228843 ecr 166723368], length 0 10:15:02.017361 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 159 04:16240, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284715 ecr 166779337], length 336 10:15:02.017969 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 162 40:16576, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr 166779337], length 336 10:15:02.018079 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [.], ack 1657 6, win 1035, options [nop,nop,TS val 166779343 ecr 2121284715], length 0 10:15:02.018319 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 165 76:16896, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr 166779337], length 320 10:15:02.018510 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 168 96:17232, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr 166779337], length 336 10:15:02.018626 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [.], ack 1723 2, win 1030, options [nop,nop,TS val 166779344 ecr 2121284716], length 0 10:15:02.019583 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 172 32:17568, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr 166779337], length 336 10:15:02.019840 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 175 68:17840, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284717 ecr 166779337], length 272 10:15:02.019927 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [.], ack 1784 0, win 1036, options [nop,nop,TS val 166779345 ecr 2121284716], length 0 Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 10:27:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747C6C0B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (we-in-x0230.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E492E0 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s43so6614216wey.35 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:27:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=A9qbj0/dfQ6AAHIBzzQSPkFJeuVebxt27QmB9XquLRg=; b=KZimWjex+BZae5MJ/3yYS2iXJMraPNKNER1xLkbMiEfHTxbJLyvVZIvj8fPKCxYK4X ZaqoOgaZdpXTYw5pizxLCWi8NrxCgOggrOSRAkVq/U7xKGvbNhjS2kWDVMRrNErNOdvp 8MMRn5KGp7/sqW2TIe4tkfHx7g1PBYALMl9VR3uqfZcEjfPySca2ZIga0f35jNClVcB4 ziZI4exYYWcpEgLtfHzfKY+9tCWFDJ/IJ0lBARaEPo0M0OL/oWjMbAIjjoYfI7s04teW a+tYTe8raV13yo3IIxrSt6AiUcqtH5CbaxyPK2riJQ9kvGDQxFVAGts2l34BV3JS7uIU LLbQ== X-Received: by 10.194.76.137 with SMTP id k9mr32550847wjw.29.1361356057791; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:27:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fg6sm32932609wib.10.2013.02.20.02.27.16 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:27:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <201302201021.r1KALCOR057657@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:27:15 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201302201021.r1KALCOR057657@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnCRa1pzYdbeF7ji9XkV3A1mkRQ61BGQNnU0xyflbusa8QGln3Jk6CPvL2zb/OjlfS4MPge Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:39 -0000 Ok I think you've got a DNS resolution problem here, so when you try to = establish the connection, SSHD tries to resolve your client's hostname. It fails and times out, however your ssh login gracetime is already = over. You have several options here: 1/ increase the login grace time in sshd_config 2/ set usedns no (or do both, btw) 3/ fix DNS resolution ;) I would definitely recommend turning off hostname resolution for sshd, = it is of marginal value (to me at least). On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Anton Shterenlikht = wrote: > =46rom ml@my.gd Wed Feb 20 10:11:12 2013 >=20 > Run this on your server: >=20 > tcpdump -ni wlan0 ip and port 22 >=20 > Then try to ssh to the box, > see if SYN packets arrive, > see if your box sends SYN/ACK back. >=20 > 172.21.220.12 is the ssh server > 137.222.187.241 is the ssh client (where I login from) >=20 > There's lots of output on the server: >=20 > 10:13:40.396933 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [P.], seq 528 > :576, ack 897, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166697722 ecr = 2764601194], leng > th 48 > 10:13:40.400142 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.20541: Flags = [P.], seq 897 > :945, ack 576, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2764601829 ecr = 166697722], leng > th 48 > 10:13:40.499768 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [.], ack 945, > win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166697825 ecr 2764601829], length 0 > 10:13:41.126804 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [P.], seq 576 > :624, ack 945, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166698452 ecr = 2764601829], leng > th 48 > 10:13:41.129465 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.20541: Flags = [P.], seq 945 > :993, ack 624, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2764602558 ecr = 166698452], leng > th 48 > 10:13:41.229792 IP 172.21.220.12.20541 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [.], ack 993, > win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166698555 ecr 2764602558], length 0 > 10:14:06.042148 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [P.], seq 691 > 166491:691166555, ack 2147595671, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val = 2121228740 e > cr 166423364], length 64 > 10:14:06.043854 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [P.], seq 1:3 > 3, ack 64, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 166723368 ecr = 2121228740], length 3 > 2 > 10:14:06.144924 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [.], ack 33, > win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121228843 ecr 166723368], length 0 >=20 > 10:15:02.017361 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [P.], seq 159 > 04:16240, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284715 ecr = 166779337], > length 336 > 10:15:02.017969 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [P.], seq 162 > 40:16576, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr = 166779337], > length 336 > 10:15:02.018079 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [.], ack 1657 > 6, win 1035, options [nop,nop,TS val 166779343 ecr 2121284715], length = 0 > 10:15:02.018319 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [P.], seq 165 > 76:16896, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr = 166779337], > length 320 > 10:15:02.018510 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [P.], seq 168 > 96:17232, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr = 166779337], > length 336 > 10:15:02.018626 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [.], ack 1723 > 2, win 1030, options [nop,nop,TS val 166779344 ecr 2121284716], length = 0 > 10:15:02.019583 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [P.], seq 172 > 32:17568, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284716 ecr = 166779337], > length 336 > 10:15:02.019840 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags = [P.], seq 175 > 68:17840, ack 7169, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2121284717 ecr = 166779337], > length 272 > 10:15:02.019927 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags = [.], ack 1784 > 0, win 1036, options [nop,nop,TS val 166779345 ecr 2121284716], length = 0 >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 10:29:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D09ECBB for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranormal@isgroup.com.ua) Received: from isgroup.com.ua (mail.isgroup.com.ua [46.229.54.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998702FB for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.5] (unused-213.111.70.194.bilink.ua [213.111.70.194] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by isgroup.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KASjR0050317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:28:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from paranormal@isgroup.com.ua) Subject: nvidia bugs freebsd-gfx-bugs@nvidia.com From: paranormal To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:28:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1361356123.26250.14.camel@eva02> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on isgroup.com.ua X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:29:00 -0000 Half a hear ago, I sent a bug report to freebsd-gfx-bugs@nvidia.com (using x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-.../obj/nvidia-bug-report.sh), and had no answer nor bug fix. Now with 310.32 driver, I have new bug, and probably it would be a waste of time to communicate with nvidia. Does nvidia ignore only me? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 10:57:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8FE98B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B136B1 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from irix.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.39] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U87M9-00053U-VY; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:57:00 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U87M9-00046s-N3; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:56:57 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KAuvO6062407; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:56:57 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KAuvlZ062406; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:56:57 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:56:57 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302201056.r1KAuvlZ062406@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, ml@my.gd Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.8 X-Spam-Level: --- Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:57:02 -0000 From ml@my.gd Wed Feb 20 10:28:54 2013 Ok I think you've got a DNS resolution problem here, so when you try to establish the connection, SSHD tries to resolve your client's hostname. It fails and times out, however your ssh login gracetime is already over. You have several options here: 1/ increase the login grace time in sshd_config ok: LoginGraceTime 3m 2/ set usedns no (or do both, btw) ok: UseDNS no 3/ fix DNS resolution ;) Well, I'm waiting for the IT support guys to do this, but they are very slow. I would definitely recommend turning off hostname resolution for sshd, it is of marginal value (to me at least). Following the sshd man page, I'm also trying this: *quote* -u0 may also be used to prevent sshd from making DNS requests unless the authentication mechanism or configuration requires it. Authentication mechanisms that may require DNS include RhostsRSAAuthentication, HostbasedAuthentication, and using a from="pattern-list" option in a key file. Configuration options that require DNS include using a USER@HOST pattern in AllowUsers or DenyUsers. *end quote* I set in /etc/ssh/sshd_config: RhostsRSAAuthentication no HostbasedAuthentication no AllowUsers mexas and I don't have DenyUsers at all. I then restart sshd as /usr/sbin/sshd -u0 However, I still see the same (I think) output from tcpdump and still get ssh timeout: 10:55:32.503085 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [P.], seq 535 20:53568, ack 64033, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 169209828 ecr 2123714526] , length 48 10:55:32.604376 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [.], ack 5356 8, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2123715301 ecr 169209828], length 0 10:55:32.668861 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [P.], seq 535 68:53616, ack 64033, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 169209994 ecr 2123715301] , length 48 10:55:32.671995 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 640 33:64161, ack 53616, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2123715368 ecr 169209994] , length 128 10:55:32.672501 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 641 61:64209, ack 53616, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2123715368 ecr 169209994] , length 48 10:55:32.672763 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [.], ack 6420 9, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 169209998 ecr 2123715368], length 0 10:55:33.394762 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [P.], seq 536 16:53664, ack 64209, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 169210720 ecr 2123715368] , length 48 10:55:33.396877 IP 137.222.187.241.22 > 172.21.220.12.46009: Flags [P.], seq 642 09:64257, ack 53664, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 2123716093 ecr 169210720] , length 48 10:55:33.496782 IP 172.21.220.12.46009 > 137.222.187.241.22: Flags [.], ack 6425 7, win 1040, options [nop,nop,TS val 169210822 ecr 2123716093], length 0 Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 11:02:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6DBD0B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (wg-in-x022a.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED7472E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 12so4440440wgh.1 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:02:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bmne2VpWNhF4EB4FKC0Ec6mM4DkKqOQckxeDT5GdON0=; b=zL7h4zuYp7Aj/syEqcoQBUxqDc68BMOxXj2neGtQG+ef4vwva4j7pdld59bZdkpwSe eXPTlH1J+v7FuUwA1tScUZqcM8fFon3rbWB3gIDk9rhRokHRP1pZzoHuZiP4lY/7QHFJ RiGeZUWL3iNjzXGStqg8S9oZ+1YJjmohWUX4wAHpqxaQv5Po5DkIajfaEuT1kvCEJh7u Df+vfZRKFLAcIKc6ksrwssOZxIg5ix63Ibu5YzgewBLXWdrM72vUCXjMmHpfubyrqqfs U9bH8pnsVsOgbNWkKvGbncBPeqPe2fN88i0fNUKxkw5lPlasRNBVgcfyBlOjN8Rf9AFA fQdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.74 with SMTP id p10mr31576802wix.19.1361358113645; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:01:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.60.147 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:01:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1361356123.26250.14.camel@eva02> References: <1361356123.26250.14.camel@eva02> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:01:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: nvidia bugs freebsd-gfx-bugs@nvidia.com From: David Demelier To: paranormal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:02:02 -0000 No they also ignored me, my Xorg got stuck at 100% with an error like mi overflowing or similar and they never answered me. 2013/2/20 paranormal > Half a hear ago, I sent a bug report to freebsd-gfx-bugs@nvidia.com > (using > x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-.../obj/nvidia-bug-report.sh), and > had no answer nor bug fix. > > Now with 310.32 driver, I have new bug, and probably it would be a waste > of time to communicate with nvidia. > > Does nvidia ignore only me? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 11:03:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C0BDC9 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA40750 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r5so6295154wey.4 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:03:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YktCuL39cdjS49Baw2k0GX+2yeVNeeJoo63Lnnal+90=; b=l70Z8rxMqpIBoJNYUqy92lmkId7OtmdTb7aMTBB0Mxq7sqU39ztfbRLtkaDqmEnDqi 7pGuC5paThfTXE8gi/uRg/06uQYN8RtckS57LSAOIWVMZtUq/QbZgtC7K4CgGv23kjCO jdfJGLQC7blKsSXM7dhzleFEHgmENSBJL/K6jxsldD9apqhCSYlt7I/CZHg/+e+WwLvY fRHdbd4qTc5+qp192HVwo6BTOxMJcVtN8QODlrji0qt8FotAoAkGNaPmblOCQV8kkAeu ZKWYIVbdqbokBoz2yQt73cf2yuws8nyFPIt25IxUS+gxJhlXOiLe4T4XlRJjYGYKpMmO ZbtQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.74 with SMTP id p10mr31589482wix.19.1361358214263; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.60.147 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:03:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130215110327.4b718a95deb5dd9b521b3c23@yahoo.es> References: <20130215110327.4b718a95deb5dd9b521b3c23@yahoo.es> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:03:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg_add problems after upgrading to 9.1-RELEASE and a fix From: David Demelier To: Eduardo Morras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:03:40 -0000 The problem is the November compromise, search for that in the mailing list. There are still no packages available for 9.1-RELEASE. Cheers 2013/2/15 Eduardo Morras > > Hi all, yesterday i updated my server to 9.1-RELEASE from 8.3. After that, > while recompiling the ports and packages i get a lot off errors trying to > get 9.1-RELESASE packages and all recompiled from ports. > > The problem is that there's no 9.1-RELEASE directory in ftp.freebsd.orgserver. I solved it after changing the path to fetch from 9-STABLE instead. > A better fix i think it's to add that directory or make a ln to stable. > > The url where add the fault directory is: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/ > > the fault directoy is : > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/ > > An example of the error is: > > root@camibar:/usr/ports/www # pkg_add -r zen-cart > Error: Unable to get > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/zen-cart.tbz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch ' > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/zen-cart.tbz' > by URL > > I made the recompilation of ports with portmaster as noted in 'man > portmaster' with this options (from memory, it's not a c&p) > > #portmaster -P -R -D `cat /root/installed_ports_list` > > Thanks In Advance > > --- --- > Eduardo Morras > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 11:20:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C2FC15 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranormal@isgroup.com.ua) Received: from isgroup.com.ua (mail.isgroup.com.ua [46.229.54.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A656D8CB for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.5] (unused-213.111.70.194.bilink.ua [213.111.70.194] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by isgroup.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KBKBxZ050788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:20:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from paranormal@isgroup.com.ua) Subject: Re: pkg_add problems after upgrading to 9.1-RELEASE and a fix From: paranormal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20130215110327.4b718a95deb5dd9b521b3c23@yahoo.es> References: <20130215110327.4b718a95deb5dd9b521b3c23@yahoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:20:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1361359207.70385.9.camel@eva02> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on isgroup.com.ua X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:20:19 -0000 And there was an unofficial pkg repository, I can't find where, it was mentioned recently. On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:03 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: > Hi all, yesterday i updated my server to 9.1-RELEASE from 8.3. After that, while recompiling the ports and packages i get a lot off errors trying to get 9.1-RELESASE packages and all recompiled from ports. > > The problem is that there's no 9.1-RELEASE directory in ftp.freebsd.org server. I solved it after changing the path to fetch from 9-STABLE instead. A better fix i think it's to add that directory or make a ln to stable. > > The url where add the fault directory is: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/ > > the fault directoy is : > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/ > > An example of the error is: > > root@camibar:/usr/ports/www # pkg_add -r zen-cart > Error: Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/zen-cart.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/zen-cart.tbz' by URL > > I made the recompilation of ports with portmaster as noted in 'man portmaster' with this options (from memory, it's not a c&p) > > #portmaster -P -R -D `cat /root/installed_ports_list` > > Thanks In Advance > > --- --- > Eduardo Morras > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 12:34:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A67A49 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBC9E7E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:34:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:24:20 +0100 Message-ID: <5124C073.1070407@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:24:19 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add problems after upgrading to 9.1-RELEASE and a fix References: <20130215110327.4b718a95deb5dd9b521b3c23@yahoo.es> <1361359207.70385.9.camel@eva02> In-Reply-To: <1361359207.70385.9.camel@eva02> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:34:30 -0000 On 02/20/2013 12:20 PM, paranormal wrote: > And there was an unofficial pkg repository, I can't find where, it was > mentioned recently. There was a message on the stable list http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072037.html > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:03 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: >> Hi all, yesterday i updated my server to 9.1-RELEASE from 8.3. After that, while recompiling the ports and packages i get a lot off errors trying to get 9.1-RELESASE packages and all recompiled from ports. >> >> The problem is that there's no 9.1-RELEASE directory in ftp.freebsd.org server. I solved it after changing the path to fetch from 9-STABLE instead. A better fix i think it's to add that directory or make a ln to stable. >> >> The url where add the fault directory is: >> >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/ >> >> the fault directoy is : >> >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/ >> >> An example of the error is: >> >> root@camibar:/usr/ports/www # pkg_add -r zen-cart >> Error: Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/zen-cart.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >> pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/zen-cart.tbz' by URL >> >> I made the recompilation of ports with portmaster as noted in 'man portmaster' with this options (from memory, it's not a c&p) >> >> #portmaster -P -R -D `cat /root/installed_ports_list` >> >> Thanks In Advance >> >> --- --- >> Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 12:40:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC0FCBA for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4936FEF3 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:40:10 -0800 Message-ID: <5124C428.1080909@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:40:08 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: sh script & files Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2013 12:40:10.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[6BDD33B0:01CE0F67] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:40:14 -0000 I noticed that when power fails I loose the contents of some files I am using in a sh script. I read and write the file this way file="/usr/local/etc/filename" # read file . "${file}" # write to file > "${file}" I'm thinking the file is never closed so on power failure I loose the contents of the file. How would I code a command to close the file? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 12:46:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847A8F34 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4B0F4D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1552B24826; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:46:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1KCkbHo009109; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:46:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:46:37 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: sh script & files Message-Id: <20130220134637.58d8a913.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5124C428.1080909@a1poweruser.com> References: <5124C428.1080909@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:46:41 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:40:08 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > # write to file > > "${file}" > > I'm thinking the file is never closed so on power failure I loose the > contents of the file. > > How would I code a command to close the file? The file is closed when the write operation has been finished. You can use the "sync" command to flush pending writes to the file (as writing is handled asynchronously by the system). When the program that writes to the file exits, it will close the file it's writing to. This depends on the command you're using infront of >, as the command you've shown will simply generate a null file (file with no actual content). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 13:00:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A76746C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09821ED for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.202.176]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:00:46 -0800 Message-ID: <5124C8FB.9070605@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:00:43 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: sh script & files References: <5124C428.1080909@a1poweruser.com> <20130220134637.58d8a913.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130220134637.58d8a913.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2013 13:00:46.0553 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C8C3490:01CE0F6A] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:00:49 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:40:08 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> # write to file >> > "${file}" >> >> I'm thinking the file is never closed so on power failure I loose the >> contents of the file. >> >> How would I code a command to close the file? > > The file is closed when the write operation has been > finished. You can use the "sync" command to flush > pending writes to the file (as writing is handled > asynchronously by the system). When the program > that writes to the file exits, it will close the > file it's writing to. This depends on the command > you're using infront of >, as the command you've > shown will simply generate a null file (file with > no actual content). > > The problem is there may be a great time lag between reading the file and the writing to the file, IE: days or months depending on how long between host reboots. I would just like to close the file right after the file gets read. Is there a way to code that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 13:55:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49603CB6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F78E35D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8A8b-000521-VU; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:10 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8A8b-0003Zm-8E; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:09 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KDt8ft063092; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:08 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KDt8Lt063091; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:08 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:08 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302201355.r1KDt8Lt063091@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: feenberg@nber.org, mexas@bristol.ac.uk Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address In-Reply-To: Cc: ml@my.gd, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:55:11 -0000 From feenberg@nber.org Wed Feb 20 13:39:28 2013 > From: Fleuriot Damien > To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk > Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100 > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, > > with ip address assigned via DHCP. > > The laptop has neither a static ip address, > > nor a domain. > > > > I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot > > ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config > > seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. > > However, /etc/hosts is just the default: While on the problem machine, can you ssh to localhost? ssh to the IP address? yes to both I would suspect the problem is in /etc/hosts.allow or /etc/hosts.deny, The first non-comment line in /etc/hosts.allow is ALL : ALL : allow and I don't have /etc/hosts.deny: root@zzz:~ # ls /etc/hosts* /etc/hosts /etc/hosts.equiv /etc/hosts.allow /etc/hosts.lpd root@zzz:~ # or perhaps the subnet mask is incorrect. Well.. what should it be? I have on the problem box (ssh server): wlan0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1 500 ether 00:21:5c:50:68:c3 inet 172.21.220.12 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 nd6 options=29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g status: associated ssid eduroam channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid 00:3a:98:62:cd:a0 country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS wme roaming MANUAL I'm trying to ssh from 137.222.187.241. I wonder, perhaps it somehow built into the Eduroam wireless, provided by the University, that the devices connected to it cannot be accessible. They can only initiate outgoing connections, but all incoming connections are somehow blocked? Given that the majority of the devices will be unsecured MS boxes, maybe the university thought that this is wise idea for safety. Perhaps I can investigate this with my IT guys. Or I might be talking complete nonsense here, not my area at all. Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 13:59:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2603EAA for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [66.251.72.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B083D2 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nber6 (nber6.nber.org [66.251.72.76]) by mail2.nber.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1KDd8kR043234; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:39:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:26:31 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Feenberg X-X-Sender: feenberg@nber6 To: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address In-Reply-To: <201302200945.r1K9jpq7029535@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <201302200945.r1K9jpq7029535@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.39/RELEASE, bases: 20130220 #9487183, check: 20130220 clean Cc: ml@my.gd, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:59:43 -0000 > From: Fleuriot Damien > To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk > Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100 > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, > > with ip address assigned via DHCP. > > The laptop has neither a static ip address, > > nor a domain. > > > > I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot > > ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config > > seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. > > However, /etc/hosts is just the default: While on the problem machine, can you ssh to localhost? ssh to the IP address? I would suspect the problem is in /etc/hosts.allow or /etc/hosts.deny, or perhaps the subnet mask is incorrect. The lack of a domain should not be a problem. daniel feenberg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 14:19:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061F3708 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987AF735 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so6229157wie.14 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:18:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=24BTvO94gqxSb78+K0N1XSAgfjBviTmHzEHHXkjz/NY=; b=KDVJp6cVv6QmNnbxiV3xM6kHOdcl/CcwBhyOIiAjC5xqOpAm4kZ1S7OkHQ8wfoLS4k vjZ/09nJ/EpcPssQfV99Cc3v8SPsHPExzm4ed9vPBEvWCcgXUKYDPxM3UT68Bf3oi1OU 4wXhytHuR3tlu70m9mRVnL/+sEguumoKzvrpmSabL2mpGU7Fhjo9EStckiV69kdm31qm njzlc6H5P6hkRepcRJAjtznRceQpBnVmNIwIUILGcz8au1zftcBnUWfQoGpEoiNoOnAw aGV2sJ7qS1AJiTkpldW4okroTE9vV/wmJv20RtmhrFA8gSCXRC7e60l8ffS1dKFQ9Ofz Sy7Q== X-Received: by 10.194.86.38 with SMTP id m6mr34258080wjz.13.1361369931541; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:18:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm34165058wib.11.2013.02.20.06.18.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:18:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <201302201355.r1KDt8Lt063091@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:18:47 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <685C610D-D19A-46FE-851F-3A00EACF3AE3@my.gd> References: <201302201355.r1KDt8Lt063091@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnoOY18NJcsONOvQlMi7bH8LsFn9jczmfs4fELQPQVUHpmmWFFXga46C2kwlZHgZURA+ZPV Cc: feenberg@nber.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:19:03 -0000 On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:55 PM, Anton Shterenlikht = wrote: > =46rom feenberg@nber.org Wed Feb 20 13:39:28 2013 >=20 > > From: Fleuriot Damien > > To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk > > Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP = address > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100 > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht = wrote: > > > > > I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, > > > with ip address assigned via DHCP. > > > The laptop has neither a static ip address, > > > nor a domain. > > > > > > I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot > > > ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config > > > seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. > > > However, /etc/hosts is just the default: >=20 > While on the problem machine, can you ssh to localhost? ssh to = the IP=20 > address? >=20 > yes to both >=20 > I would suspect the problem is in /etc/hosts.allow > or /etc/hosts.deny, >=20 > The first non-comment line in /etc/hosts.allow is > ALL : ALL : allow >=20 > and I don't have /etc/hosts.deny: >=20 > root@zzz:~ # ls /etc/hosts* > /etc/hosts /etc/hosts.equiv > /etc/hosts.allow /etc/hosts.lpd > root@zzz:~ # >=20 > or perhaps the subnet mask is incorrect. >=20 > Well.. what should it be? > I have on the problem box (ssh server): >=20 > wlan0: flags=3D8943 = metric 0 mtu 1 > 500 > ether 00:21:5c:50:68:c3 > inet 172.21.220.12 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 > nd6 options=3D29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g > status: associated > ssid eduroam channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid 00:3a:98:62:cd:a0 > country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 = scanvalid 450 > bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 > protmode CTS wme roaming MANUAL >=20 > I'm trying to ssh from 137.222.187.241. >=20 > I wonder, perhaps it somehow built into the > Eduroam wireless, provided by the University, > that the devices connected to it cannot be > accessible. They can only initiate outgoing > connections, but all incoming connections are > somehow blocked? Given that the majority of > the devices will be unsecured MS boxes, maybe > the university thought that this is wise idea > for safety. Perhaps I can investigate this > with my IT guys.=20 >=20 > Or I might be talking complete nonsense here, not my area at all. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Anton >=20 Any luck with Daniel's suggestion to try it directly on the problematic = host ? ssh 127.0.0.1 ssh localhost ssh 172.21.220.12 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 14:42:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8520953C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1518AB for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Asd-0000y0-AF; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:43 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Asa-00071Q-MC; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:41 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KEge0t063211; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:40 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KEgeC9063210; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:40 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:40 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302201442.r1KEgeC9063210@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, ml@my.gd Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address In-Reply-To: <685C610D-D19A-46FE-851F-3A00EACF3AE3@my.gd> Cc: feenberg@nber.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:44 -0000 From ml@my.gd Wed Feb 20 14:39:34 2013 On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:55 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From feenberg@nber.org Wed Feb 20 13:39:28 2013 > > > From: Fleuriot Damien > > To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk > > Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:31:22 +0100 > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > > I have a laptop with FreeBSD -current, > > > with ip address assigned via DHCP. > > > The laptop has neither a static ip address, > > > nor a domain. > > > > > > I can ping the laptop fine, but cannot > > > ssh into it. The sshd is running, /etc/ssh/ssd_config > > > seems fine, /etc/hosts.allow is fine. > > > However, /etc/hosts is just the default: > > While on the problem machine, can you ssh to localhost? ssh to the IP > address? > > yes to both > > I would suspect the problem is in /etc/hosts.allow > or /etc/hosts.deny, > > The first non-comment line in /etc/hosts.allow is > ALL : ALL : allow > > and I don't have /etc/hosts.deny: > > root@zzz:~ # ls /etc/hosts* > /etc/hosts /etc/hosts.equiv > /etc/hosts.allow /etc/hosts.lpd > root@zzz:~ # > > or perhaps the subnet mask is incorrect. > > Well.. what should it be? > I have on the problem box (ssh server): > > wlan0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1 > 500 > ether 00:21:5c:50:68:c3 > inet 172.21.220.12 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 > nd6 options=29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g > status: associated > ssid eduroam channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid 00:3a:98:62:cd:a0 > country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 > bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 > protmode CTS wme roaming MANUAL > > I'm trying to ssh from 137.222.187.241. > > I wonder, perhaps it somehow built into the > Eduroam wireless, provided by the University, > that the devices connected to it cannot be > accessible. They can only initiate outgoing > connections, but all incoming connections are > somehow blocked? Given that the majority of > the devices will be unsecured MS boxes, maybe > the university thought that this is wise idea > for safety. Perhaps I can investigate this > with my IT guys. > > Or I might be talking complete nonsense here, not my area at all. > > Thanks > > Anton > Any luck with Daniel's suggestion to try it directly on the problematic host ? ssh 127.0.0.1 ssh localhost ssh 172.21.220.12 yes to all (I replied already above). Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 14:43:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF955EF for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA058C5 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.154.128] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Atf-0000ex-G3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:47 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1KEhi3b009319 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r1KEhipJ009318 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:43 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address Message-ID: <20130220144343.GA9073@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <201302201355.r1KDt8Lt063091@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <685C610D-D19A-46FE-851F-3A00EACF3AE3@my.gd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <685C610D-D19A-46FE-851F-3A00EACF3AE3@my.gd> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.154.128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:43:56 -0000 El día Wednesday, February 20, 2013 a las 03:18:47PM +0100, Fleuriot Damien escribió: > > Well.. what should it be? > > I have on the problem box (ssh server): > > > > wlan0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1 > > 500 > > ether 00:21:5c:50:68:c3 > > inet 172.21.220.12 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 > > nd6 options=29 > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g > > status: associated > > ssid eduroam channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid 00:3a:98:62:cd:a0 > > country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > > AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 > > bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 > > protmode CTS wme roaming MANUAL > > > > I'm trying to ssh from 137.222.187.241. The class B network 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255 is not routed in Internet (see RFC1918). This is a so called "private addr" you get from your Access Point. It is hided by the AP (or by some other router more far away) behind a real IP addr. You can check what this addr is by going to the page http://myip.nl/ And you can not SSH to the addr shown there, at least normally it would not be NAT'ed to your addr you got by DHCP. No way. matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:01:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD83F95B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF3E97E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.154.128] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8BAa-0005xZ-7L for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:01:17 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1KF1DN9009834 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:01:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r1KF1Dor009833 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:01:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:01:12 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address Message-ID: <20130220150111.GA9725@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <201302201355.r1KDt8Lt063091@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <685C610D-D19A-46FE-851F-3A00EACF3AE3@my.gd> <20130220144343.GA9073@tiny.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130220144343.GA9073@tiny.Sisis.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.154.128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:01:19 -0000 El día Wednesday, February 20, 2013 a las 03:43:43PM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > El día Wednesday, February 20, 2013 a las 03:18:47PM +0100, Fleuriot Damien escribió: > > > > Well.. what should it be? > > > I have on the problem box (ssh server): > > > > > > wlan0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1 > > > 500 > > > ether 00:21:5c:50:68:c3 > > > inet 172.21.220.12 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 > > > nd6 options=29 > > > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g > > > status: associated > > > ssid eduroam channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid 00:3a:98:62:cd:a0 > > > country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > > > AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 > > > bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 > > > protmode CTS wme roaming MANUAL > > > > > > I'm trying to ssh from 137.222.187.241. On thing more: the IP addr you are ssh'ing from is reachable via Internet: $ telnet 137.222.187.241 22 Trying 137.222.187.241... Connected to mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. Escape character is '^]'. SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20120901 If this is your intention (and not a fault) you should know what you are doing and have hardened the access, for example only RSA auth via SSH. HIH matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:06:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45421BF2 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:06:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonni@egarden.fi) Received: from egarden.fi (egarden.fi [78.47.154.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9DB9E2 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.48] (itmill.masterplanet.fi [194.100.97.79]) by egarden.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F153D1C129 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:06:21 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <5124E673.8090904@egarden.fi> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:06:27 +0200 From: Jonni Nakari User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS pool data recovery References: <5122355E.3040506@egarden.fi> In-Reply-To: <5122355E.3040506@egarden.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:06:33 -0000 On 18.02.2013 16:06, Jonni Nakari wrote: > I started "zpool import -nfFX vault" but it seems to take quite long. > > Some more information about my system: > zpool vault consists of 5 block devices: > whole disks: ada1, ada2, ada3 > cache: ada0s1e > log: ada0s1d > > The system boots from a UFS filesystem ada0s1a. The command root@:/root # zpool import -nfFX vault returned after few hours: Would be able to return vault to its state as of Sun Feb 17 03:07:36 2013. Would discard approximately 20 minutes of transactions. So I ran root@:/root # zpool import -fFX vault and few hours later returned: Pool vault returned to its state as of Sun Feb 17 03:07:36 2013. Discarded approximately 20 minutes of transactions. After that I could import the pool in the memstick environment. I unmounted all ZFS file systems and exported the zpool and rebooted. However when the system boots from the UFS root it fails to mount root from ZFS: Trying to mount root from zfs:vault/root []... Mounting from zfs:vault/root failed with error 2. To get the system booting from ZFS root I tried several things including: - recreating the /boot/zfs/zpool.cache, - cloning the vault/root file system to vault/new_root, - setting the mountpoint of the root file system to / and legacy, - removed the cache and log devices from the zpool. I finally gave up and copied the contents of the vault/root file system to a UFS file system at ada0s1d and changed the system to mount root from there. /tmp, /usr and /var are mounted fine from the ZFS. I really would like to back using the ZFS root file system. I documented the commands I used in the memstick environment and dmesgs of the failing ZFS boots and made them available here: http://upload.egarden.fi/ultra40_zfs_fail Maybe someone can figure out what I'm doing wrong? Before the suspend to RAM incident the system booted up just fine. I used the following trick to get the dmesgs: when the system booted up and failed to mount the ZFS root I entered ufs:da0 to the mountroot> prompt to get in to the memstick environment. -- Jonni Nakari jonni@egarden.fi +358 50 4411 784 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:08:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A61CA9 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689A2A04 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.154.128] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8BHD-0007oj-41 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:08:07 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1KF8494010036 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:08:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r1KF84U6010035 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:08:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:08:03 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot ssh into a box with DHCP assigned IP address Message-ID: <20130220150803.GA9858@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20130220144343.GA9073@tiny.Sisis.de> <201302201503.r1KF3L5v063274@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201302201503.r1KF3L5v063274@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.154.128 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:08:09 -0000 El día Wednesday, February 20, 2013 a las 03:03:21PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht escribió: > The class B network 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255 is not routed in > Internet (see RFC1918). This is a so called "private addr" you get from > your Access Point. It is hided by the AP (or by some other router more > far away) behind a real IP addr. You can check what this addr is by > going to the page http://myip.nl/ > > And you can not SSH to the addr shown there, at least normally it would not > be NAT'ed to your addr you got by DHCP. > > No way. > > fuck.. This is the first thing I should've checked. > Sorry for wasting everybody's time. > The irony is that I know very little about > networking, but the three private IP ranges > is something I actually knew about. > > Thanks > > Anton > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" And why you Cc freebsd-ports, when the thread was in freebsd-questions? matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:37:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30460AB4 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunci@hunci.sk) Received: from mail-ia0-x22b.google.com (mail-ia0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0845CC27 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z13so7295017iaz.16 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:37:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=cB5plHkGxOSJCLKAxjqWz3nTGgKGDL1XYWfUmOxrntI=; b=aDofQfbdRFSbae4YYb062CBDFQ+xzklOFNYyrYhuO+aIZqybClYKmkEL9BHIF/eOf3 NaVNsX5w+x9XmDyFGAnfpffdeCIxpkN7uGiQDZNTppHO64pdkDdQJQ30s+Yz3+yE/hJ9 7b6nh+M/mTJISrIqhgQdMUM7LY2TlE067qKeLzMCdCfj2twQwS5kaaqcQGh076LECfDG dD1pS2JsC+1Ie3UXJ4hOhhbWi3EY7anxjGCdCwFzWl19tW2OhsVtQH9rfMjGiaz0ds38 Wn9gqqYNfMLjOnI4yeGvFDzzhKYxZwfxxi4fciPGNmrMwj/UusIgx2746Tnh2CYcIn+z e1nA== X-Received: by 10.50.217.230 with SMTP id pb6mr11507642igc.43.1361374623508; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:37:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.12.229 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:36:43 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [15.195.185.77] From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ZXIgSHVuxI3DoXI=?= Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:36:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD 9.1 igb flow controll To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmn6N54UIaMBhu0pHUbsRBT1SVJC7DwWgJ0xIiyVPYc0n6Hzuav4iFGFW8tFtwhMZtrUQkf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:37:04 -0000 Hello How can I enable/disable flow control on igb NIC? Thanks igb7: flags=8c02 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=401bb capabilities=505bb ether b4:b5:2f:5f:5b:35 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier supported media: media autoselect media 1000baseT media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex media 100baseTX media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex media 10baseT/UTP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 16:24:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A460D105 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754EAF62 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KGNTe5020110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:23:50 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT03.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.31]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:23:45 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Bernt Hansson , FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: jail and networking Thread-Topic: jail and networking Thread-Index: AQHOD4SVocHfXKmkP0qgJ0SlOgMpJ5iC7bDL Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:23:44 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-20_06:2013-02-20,2013-02-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:24:00 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > Hello list! >=20 > I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >=20 > These I've tried; >=20 > ftp, fetch, telnet >=20 > They time out. >=20 > Ssh sort of work. >=20 > 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 > ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or directory > Host key verification failed. >=20 > jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >=20 > host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >=20 > I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I find tha= t tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in the jail via = "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh into the jail (via = the jail'd ssh process of course). Does that seem to be the case in your situation? --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 18:07:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F41A5D1 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [74.208.4.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA928B4 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.49]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MOOdF-1UBEsS2woX-005mOK for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:07:01 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2013 18:07:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.rw.local) [78.84.97.244] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 13:07:01 -0500 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+6QitUKK+67oPFhGJM5r5RWg5B//ddAYXuzUGy05 fNb5MsYz5uuwEi Message-ID: <512510ED.6080807@mail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:07:41 +0200 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:07:07 -0000 On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: > On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> >>> Hello list! >>> >>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >>> >>> These I've tried; >>> >>> ftp, fetch, telnet >>> >>> They time out. >>> >>> Ssh sort of work. >>> >>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 >>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or >>> directory >>> Host key verification failed. >>> >>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >>> >>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >>> >>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. >> >> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I >> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in >> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh >> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). >> >> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? > > If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd > > Then no. > > %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation timed > out > > I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. > Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to > the jail. > > testbox# jexec 1 tcsh > jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument > > Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID most likely has changed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 18:38:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198578E8 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjg@ucsc.edu) Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (ie-in-x0236.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA791AB6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k14so10355595iea.27 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:38:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hhBJlaBe9Hi+JN6jpWQSyfTKe5fp2RLYw0Td5Voh4+8=; b=YpBKSFcjB4hZnI9xsE9TE9O/axZmLBWZz/dco9spO5sTQjM0yB/MvM8p9HPc4kMw8x FblvNPo32F8lOqpsse+NuKaURRESxSs0BI4c0B8wWz8vtYMX4GxsIwo7NriMiLgwfE8a 95cK7V1ojQpEG8WNDpoVOuc2rl7PvJqEdH9Ec= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=hhBJlaBe9Hi+JN6jpWQSyfTKe5fp2RLYw0Td5Voh4+8=; b=n7BFBIdEN6UOEXOtur1Bdpu84+yiidJDLbyXw9jgsUxWsLxmv8D8frK1Pej9rhouIJ AfLpGKntkJ7YoWCDIOuA9E9IjyyOy1OzI0+w1p9Dzd/mktI0PF1jrC6mUV/LvhRgS0Ja kmpjq6AV/eDgio0jZmr4Axremiia5YZPrz085/UQWGyxiDDqLPl7kzHf0SqgjVzpbwbH gSJe8ABTlMt5BR1GDiDfvEFMn6alkPZsa+WEKV1lgR39BC8YceoxILdbF4BfcNB6+nqo D2qulQC0YkHwmUWiH2g/7DqG3PHsgaWsupN3s3Iz2ZOKtGMWb9O44yoBWi4z4BXav1ru NSZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.134.8 with SMTP id ia8mr9504867icc.42.1361385527492; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:38:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.18.71 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:38:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:38:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: mpd5 vs lt2pd vs sl2tps From: Tim Gustafson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmT37wKJdUSb9eHWFD9VOXh6MSpUnvA/LPunOaSAKjuD20g1+sYbAZ8K7HnMqIH+kNInTmN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:38:48 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to get a FreeBSD box set up as an L2TP server. I've been tinkering with mpd5 and had some success, but I was wondering if anyone has been using l2tpd or sl2tps and what their experiences might have been. Are either of these easier to set up? More reliable? Especially for a configuration where LDAP authentication is preferred, or at least RADIUS if not LDAP? -- Tim Gustafson tjg@ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 18:43:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB49FC54 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Received: from mailout.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [64.68.200.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E8FB07 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062B5E19A; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:43:32 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailout.easydns.com Received: from mailout.easydns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailout.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMo3QvYNnDV8; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:43:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from ares.hayers.org (cpc1-tilb7-2-0-cust218.basl.cable.virginmedia.com [94.168.104.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B9AEE202; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:43:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from ares.hayers.org (mx1.hayers.org [127.0.0.1]) by ares.hayers.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DF8701FDB; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:22 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: HCF running on mx1.hayers.org Received: from ares.hayers.org ([127.0.0.1]) by ares.hayers.org (mx1.hayers.org [127.0.0.1]) (HCF-Sophos-Sweep, port 10024) with ESMTP id eruTy9Dd1o8i; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.8.2] (zeus.hayers.org [192.168.8.2]) (Authenticated sender: gary) by ares.hayers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 38D54701F4C; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:08 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <51251937.6040406@hayers.org> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:03 +0000 From: Gary Hayers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:40 -0000 On 20/02/2013 18:23, Bernt Hansson wrote: > The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. > > But still, sshd isn't running in the jail > > 32bit# ps ax > PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND > 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for > /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s > 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh > 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax > > testbox# ps ax | grep J > 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for > /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s > 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J > > testbox is the host. I assume you setup the /etc/resolv.conf? I have found that my network does not start until I have this setup. -- Regards, Gary J. Hayers gary@hayers.org PGP Signature http://www.hayers.org/pgp From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 18:56:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B88FE82 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB71C0F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KIuLuJ013964 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:56:21 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT04.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:56:21 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Bernt Hansson Subject: RE: jail and networking Thread-Topic: jail and networking Thread-Index: AQHOD4SVocHfXKmkP0qgJ0SlOgMpJ5iC7bDLgAB7SgD//66Sbw== Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:56:20 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC0D@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21>, <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-20_06:2013-02-20,2013-02-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:56:24 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > > > >> Hello list! > >> > >> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. > >> > >> These I've tried; > >> > >> ftp, fetch, telnet > >> > >> They time out. > >> > >> Ssh sort of work. > >> > >> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 > >> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or directo= ry > >> Host key verification failed. > >> > >> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC > >> > >> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC > >> > >> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. > > > > Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I find= that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in the jail = via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh into the jail (= via the jail'd ssh process of course). > > > > Does that seem to be the case in your situation? >=20 > If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd >=20 > Then no. >=20 > %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation timed out >=20 > I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. > Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to the > jail. >=20 > testbox# jexec 1 tcsh > jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument >=20 > Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. When you restart a jail it's jid (the first argument to jexec) changes. Ins= tead of using the jid you can use the jail name (example below): jexec NAME tcsh Otherwise, you're going to have to do "jls" to get the new jid after restar= ting the jail. --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 18:59:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C17284 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91266CB7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KIxv5A019908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:59:57 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT04.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:59:57 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Bernt Hansson , Jeff Tipton Subject: RE: jail and networking Thread-Topic: jail and networking Thread-Index: AQHOD4SVocHfXKmkP0qgJ0SlOgMpJ5iC7bDLgAB7SgCAAAbqgIAABF0A//+lAL0= Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:59:56 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>,<51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-20_06:2013-02-20,2013-02-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:59:59 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote: > > On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: > >>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello list! > >>>> > >>>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. > >>>> > >>>> These I've tried; > >>>> > >>>> ftp, fetch, telnet > >>>> > >>>> They time out. > >>>> > >>>> Ssh sort of work. > >>>> > >>>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 > >>>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or > >>>> directory > >>>> Host key verification failed. > >>>> > >>>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC > >>>> > >>>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC > >>>> > >>>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. > >>> > >>> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I > >>> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in > >>> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh > >>> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). > >>> > >>> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? > >> > >> If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd > >> > >> Then no. > >> > >> %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation timed > >> out > >> > >> I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. > >> Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to > >> the jail. > >> > >> testbox# jexec 1 tcsh > >> jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument > >> > >> Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. >=20 > > What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID > > most likely has changed. >=20 > The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. >=20 > But still, sshd isn't running in the jail >=20 > 32bit# ps ax > PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND > 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for > /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s > 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh > 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax >=20 > testbox# ps ax | grep J > 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for > /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s > 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J >=20 > testbox is the host. A stab in the dark, but... Did you add sshd_enable=3D"YES" to the jail's rc.conf(5)? --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 19:09:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A366EC71 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [74.208.4.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593E1D56 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.94]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Ltr8L-1Up6Dr1OR3-011DxM for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:09:50 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2013 19:09:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.rw.local) [78.84.97.244] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us011) with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 14:09:49 -0500 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19shUBBQDdsKSnEV449jXWr2IlU64YAkfTt/W49h0 IuXN0axpiP6bUl Message-ID: <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:10:29 +0200 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:09:56 -0000 On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote: >>> On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>> On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello list! >>>>>> >>>>>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >>>>>> >>>>>> These I've tried; >>>>>> >>>>>> ftp, fetch, telnet >>>>>> >>>>>> They time out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ssh sort of work. >>>>>> >>>>>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 >>>>>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or >>>>>> directory >>>>>> Host key verification failed. >>>>>> >>>>>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >>>>>> >>>>>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. >>>>> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I >>>>> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in >>>>> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh >>>>> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). >>>>> >>>>> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? >>>> If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd >>>> >>>> Then no. >>>> >>>> %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation timed >>>> out >>>> >>>> I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. >>>> Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to >>>> the jail. >>>> >>>> testbox# jexec 1 tcsh >>>> jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument >>>> >>>> Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. >>> What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID >>> most likely has changed. >> The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. >> >> But still, sshd isn't running in the jail >> >> 32bit# ps ax >> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >> 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh >> 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax >> >> testbox# ps ax | grep J >> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >> 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J >> >> testbox is the host. > A stab in the dark, but... > > Did you add sshd_enable="YES" to the jail's rc.conf(5)? Or, from within the jail, what does service sshd status say? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 19:33:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075E463F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from riaank@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f47.google.com (mail-qe0-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD82EA6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 2so3829967qea.20 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:33:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+JeW1WGBPfO5xj4InOc7jSoT/cV6f+5QCyMQVBIb2j8=; b=K+JRBvyvDQIWrggJAOlM7RN0C4wdypoSBymjIvvMFkJI0/V2LRmYkWQcSc+lzc/KK1 p/rsVmhzwyP8wyx3JKlaxt0FCb8urxFrQ8BNbAK8uci2QEVaqSmWvYFqHQYNoTb+UBqR 8m+vwl/clIp2xqcSbnaP5wdi3ddPELqBzI16ze6o7vVW/qOg3MDp7kItLkKV28v3s41E kR+lSj1wMCyRwFRDQUbZZ04xwXHgDqXPnfLbziRmI8Tq2+Vu+VZaxOm1WQrsDVDhENVu UcYIUSeChBaRLlcbI9pkabPrg2cM01pdcmpotms25JuWjoCq/StSERGfUqlR9rOA3ifo so7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.39.210 with SMTP id h18mr10122776qae.15.1361388798987; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:33:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.60.2 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:33:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:33:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Where can I find freebsd-update-server From: Riaan Kruger To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:33:26 -0000 The article "Build Your Own FreeBSD Update Server" at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/freebsd-update-server/index.htmlrefers to the freebsd-update-server located at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/projects/freebsd-update-server which does not exist. Does this project still exist, Is it derepcated, where can I find it ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 19:46:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1197CC20 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F0FF6A for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id j34so3210613qco.37 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:46:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M8WEVNFBsM9ByGFprB9P0+Ty+kz3BxFh49VbY3miH/U=; b=GogB5S9NE4sEEqhl9L4dggP4awaMrGjhlY3ts5uy0cJaQ5fev74e+YjiOWFcpQnJP8 nX4w1NJVOf54/bayzgBNvFjW5UPrA+nJYXCDOvESnCZcK/V29zndIYJyaTetbCuDB8f9 Q1HzsQKvoB5vDJEz20ay2TIbG2jKCD2aR8kWXkr7iqEHJswhlYwUrVSnFOrt7bIVuPzh mp0JAVZWbXTflZaSmRPlawU/un9eljw+cVd6DsrhoMEdEQS24wuWsujm6evsReOvlwZJ FaabbMaJ+WSEWKdzOZgE1WMafrE4t64J4JakZsEEhjbFm5dQr2AXgssx6bqC1d6l9Ftl R9SA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.105.73 with SMTP id gk9mr10833380qeb.40.1361389596833; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:46:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:46:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:46:36 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WAEfn6TFj1GgpKuVC__-9zHRrxs Message-ID: Subject: bluray disk record failes From: CeDeROM To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:46:38 -0000 Hey, I have damaged two bluray disks with growisofs. It seems to recognise disk, preformat it, but then closing session fails at the end and disk seems to carry only 4.7GB of data :-( Anyone managed to write bluray disk with success on FreeBSD (9.1 AMD64)? any hints welcome!! :-) Tomek % growisofs --help * growisofs by , version 7.1, (..) % mkisofs --version mkisofs 3.00 (amd64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1993-1997 Eric Youngdale (C) 1997-2010 J=EF=BF=BDrg Schilling % pkg_info -x cdrtools Information for cdrtools-3.00_2: Comment: CD/DVD/BluRay and ISO-9660 image creation and extraction tools Required by: dvd+rw-tools-7.1 kdenlive-0.9.2_1 lives-1.6.3 virtualbox-ose-4.2.6 % growisofs -Z/dev/cd2 -R -J -UDF * (..) 0.41% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 19:51:38 2013 0.62% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 19:51:38 2013 /dev/pass4: pre-formatting blank BD-R for 24.8GB... /dev/pass4: "Current Write Speed" is 8.2x4390KBps. 0.83% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:19:48 2013 1.04% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:17:23 2013 1.24% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:15:47 2013 1.45% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:13:29 2013 1.66% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:12:46 2013 1.86% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:12:12 2013 2.07% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:11:45 2013 2.28% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:11:23 2013 2.48% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:10:25 2013 2.69% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:10:13 2013 2.90% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:10:02 2013 3.10% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:09:53 2013 3.31% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:09:14 2013 3.52% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:09:09 2013 3.73% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:09:04 2013 3.93% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:08:35 2013 4.14% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:08:32 2013 4.35% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:08:07 2013 4.55% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:08:06 2013 4.76% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:08:05 2013 4.97% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:44 2013 5.17% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:44 2013 5.38% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:44 2013 5.59% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:26 2013 5.79% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:27 2013 6.00% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:11 2013 6.21% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:12 2013 6.42% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:13 2013 6.62% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:59 2013 6.83% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:00 2013 7.04% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:07:01 2013 7.24% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:49 2013 7.45% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:50 2013 7.66% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:52 2013 7.86% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:40 2013 8.07% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:42 2013 8.28% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:31 2013 8.49% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:33 2013 8.69% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:35 2013 8.90% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:25 2013 9.11% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:27 2013 9.31% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:18 2013 9.52% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:20 2013 9.73% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:11 2013 9.93% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:13 2013 10.14% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:15 2013 10.35% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:07 2013 10.55% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:09 2013 10.76% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:02 2013 10.97% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:04 2013 11.18% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:05 2013 11.38% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:58 2013 11.59% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:00 2013 11.80% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:06:02 2013 12.00% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:56 2013 12.21% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:57 2013 12.42% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:59 2013 12.62% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:53 2013 12.83% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:55 2013 13.04% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:49 2013 13.25% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:51 2013 13.45% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:52 2013 13.66% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:47 2013 13.87% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:49 2013 14.07% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:43 2013 14.28% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:45 2013 14.49% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:47 2013 14.69% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:41 2013 14.90% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:43 2013 15.11% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:45 2013 15.31% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:40 2013 15.52% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:42 2013 15.73% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:43 2013 15.94% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:38 2013 16.14% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:40 2013 16.35% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:35 2013 16.56% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:37 2013 16.76% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:39 2013 16.97% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:34 2013 17.18% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:36 2013 17.38% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:32 2013 17.59% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:33 2013 17.80% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:35 2013 18.00% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:31 2013 18.21% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:32 2013 18.42% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:34 2013 18.63% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:30 2013 18.83% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:31 2013 19.04% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:27 2013 19.25% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:29 2013 19.45% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:30 2013 19.66% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:27 2013 19.87% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:28 2013 20.07% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:29 2013 20.28% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:26 2013 20.49% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:27 2013 20.70% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:24 2013 20.90% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:25 2013 21.11% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:27 2013 21.32% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:23 2013 21.52% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:25 2013 21.73% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:21 2013 21.94% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:23 2013 22.14% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:24 2013 22.35% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:21 2013 22.56% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:22 2013 22.77% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:19 2013 22.97% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:20 2013 23.18% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:22 2013 23.39% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:19 2013 23.59% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:20 2013 23.80% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:17 2013 24.01% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:18 2013 24.21% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:15 2013 24.42% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:16 2013 24.63% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:18 2013 24.83% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:15 2013 25.04% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:16 2013 25.25% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:13 2013 25.46% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:15 2013 25.66% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:12 2013 25.87% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:13 2013 26.08% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:14 2013 26.28% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:12 2013 26.49% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:13 2013 26.70% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:10 2013 26.90% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:12 2013 27.11% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:09 2013 27.32% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:10 2013 27.52% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:11 2013 27.73% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:09 2013 27.94% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:10 2013 28.15% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:08 2013 28.35% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:09 2013 28.56% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:06 2013 28.77% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:07 2013 28.97% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:09 2013 29.18% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:06 2013 29.39% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:07 2013 29.59% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:05 2013 29.80% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:06 2013 30.01% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:07 2013 30.21% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:05 2013 30.42% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:06 2013 30.63% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:07 2013 30.84% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:05 2013 31.04% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:06 2013 31.25% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:04 2013 31.46% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:05 2013 31.66% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:06 2013 31.87% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:04 2013 32.08% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:05 2013 32.28% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:03 2013 32.49% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:04 2013 32.70% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:05 2013 32.91% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:03 2013 33.11% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:04 2013 33.32% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:02 2013 33.53% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:03 2013 33.73% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:04 2013 33.94% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:02 2013 34.15% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:03 2013 34.35% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 34.56% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:02 2013 34.77% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 34.97% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 35.18% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:02 2013 35.39% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 35.60% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 35.80% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 36.01% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 36.22% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 36.42% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 36.63% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 36.84% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 37.04% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 37.25% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 37.46% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 37.67% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 37.87% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 38.08% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 38.29% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 38.49% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 38.70% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 38.91% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 39.11% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 39.32% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 39.53% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 39.73% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 39.94% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 40.15% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 40.36% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 40.56% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 40.77% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 40.98% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 41.18% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 41.39% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 41.60% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 41.80% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 42.01% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 42.22% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 42.43% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 42.63% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 42.84% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 43.05% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 43.25% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 43.46% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 43.67% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 43.87% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 44.08% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 44.29% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 44.49% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 44.70% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 44.91% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 45.12% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 45.32% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 45.53% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 45.74% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 45.94% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 46.15% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 46.36% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 46.56% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 46.77% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 46.98% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 47.18% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 47.39% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 47.60% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 47.81% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 48.01% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 48.22% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 48.43% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 48.63% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 48.84% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 49.05% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 49.25% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 49.46% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 49.67% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 49.88% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 50.08% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 50.29% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 50.50% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 50.70% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 50.91% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 51.12% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 51.32% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 51.53% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 51.74% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 51.94% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 52.15% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 52.36% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 52.57% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 52.77% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 52.98% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 53.19% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 53.39% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 53.60% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 53.81% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 54.01% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 54.22% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 54.43% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 54.63% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 54.84% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 55.05% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 55.26% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 55.46% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 55.67% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 55.88% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 56.08% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 56.29% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 56.50% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 56.70% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 56.91% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 57.12% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 57.33% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 57.53% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 57.74% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 57.95% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 58.15% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 58.36% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 58.57% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 58.77% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 58.98% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 59.19% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 59.39% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 59.60% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 59.81% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 60.02% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 60.22% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 60.43% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 60.64% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 60.84% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 61.05% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 61.26% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 61.46% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 61.67% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 61.88% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 62.09% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 62.29% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:02 2013 62.50% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 62.71% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 62.91% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:02 2013 63.12% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 63.33% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 63.53% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:02 2013 63.74% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 63.95% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 64.15% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 64.36% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 64.57% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 64.78% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 64.98% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 65.19% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 65.40% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 65.60% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 65.81% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 66.02% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 66.22% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 66.43% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 66.64% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 66.85% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 67.05% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 67.26% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 67.47% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:01 2013 67.67% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 67.88% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 68.09% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 68.29% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 68.50% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 68.71% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 68.91% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 69.12% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 69.33% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 69.54% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 69.74% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 69.95% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 70.16% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 70.36% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 70.57% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 70.78% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 70.98% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 71.19% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:05:00 2013 71.40% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 71.60% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 71.81% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 72.02% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 72.23% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 72.43% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 72.64% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:59 2013 72.85% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 73.05% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 73.26% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 73.47% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 73.67% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 73.88% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 74.09% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 74.29% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 74.50% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 74.71% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 74.92% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 75.12% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 75.33% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 75.54% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 75.74% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 75.95% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 76.16% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 76.36% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:58 2013 76.57% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 76.78% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 76.99% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 77.19% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 77.40% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 77.61% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 77.81% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 78.02% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 78.23% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 78.43% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 78.64% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 78.85% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:57 2013 79.05% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 79.26% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 79.47% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 79.68% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:56 2013 79.88% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 80.09% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 80.30% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 80.50% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 80.71% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 80.92% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 81.12% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 81.33% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 81.54% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 81.75% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 81.95% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 82.16% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:55 2013 82.37% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 82.57% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 82.78% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 82.99% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 83.19% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 83.40% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 83.61% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 83.81% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 84.02% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 84.23% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 84.44% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 84.64% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:54 2013 84.85% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 85.06% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 85.26% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 85.47% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 85.68% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 85.88% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 86.09% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 86.30% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 86.51% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 86.71% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 86.92% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 87.13% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 87.33% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 87.54% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:53 2013 87.75% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 87.95% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 88.16% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 88.37% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 88.57% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 88.78% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 88.99% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 89.20% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 89.40% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 89.61% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 89.82% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 90.02% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:52 2013 90.23% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 90.44% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 90.64% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 90.85% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 91.06% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 91.27% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 91.47% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 91.68% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 91.89% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 92.09% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 92.30% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 92.51% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 92.71% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 92.92% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:51 2013 93.13% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 93.33% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 93.54% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 93.75% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 93.96% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 94.16% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 94.37% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 94.58% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 94.78% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 94.99% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 95.20% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 95.40% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 95.61% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 95.82% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:50 2013 96.02% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 96.23% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 96.44% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 96.65% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 96.85% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 97.06% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 97.27% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 97.47% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 97.68% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 97.89% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 98.09% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:49 2013 98.30% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 98.51% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 98.72% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 98.92% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 99.13% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 99.34% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 99.54% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 99.75% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:47 2013 99.96% done, estimate finish Wed Feb 20 20:04:48 2013 Total translation table size: 0 Total rockridge attributes bytes: 653554 Total directory bytes: 1437696 Path table size(bytes): 6476 Max brk space used 0 2416046 extents written (4718 MB) builtin_dd: 2416048*2KB out @ average 1.4x4390KBps /dev/pass4: flushing cache /dev/pass4: closing track /dev/pass4: closing session :-[ CLOSE SESSION failed with SK=3D5h/INVALID FIELD IN CDB]: Input/output e= rror cederom@hexagon:/mnt/stuff1200ufs/bkp/mh/20130219/dane % dev/pass4: pre-formatting blank BD-R for 24.8GB... dev/pass4:: Too many arguments. cederom@hexagon:/mnt/stuff1200ufs/bkp/mh/20130219/dane % /dev/pass4: "Current Write Speed" is 8.2x4390KBps. /dev/pass4:: Too many arguments. % dmesg|grep cd re0: Ethernet address: f4:6d:04:cd:f2:6f orm0: at iomem 0xcd800-0xcffff on isa0 cd2 at ata0 bus 0 scbus6 target 1 lun 0 cd2: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd2: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA, UDMA5, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 8192bytes) cd2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed cd0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed cd1 at ata2 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd1: 16.700MB/s transfers (WDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed --=20 CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 20:55:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57B8FD6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cms@balius.com) Received: from in.mx.balius.com (68-189-209-140.static.ftwo.tx.charter.com [68.189.209.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881AC63D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.82] (68-189-209-142.static.ftwo.tx.charter.com [68.189.209.142]) by in.mx.balius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B4DF78887; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:54:55 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: HAST - detect failure and restore avoiding an outage? From: Chad M Stewart X-Mac: It Just Works! Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:54:54 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:55:01 -0000 I built a 2 node cluster for testing HAST out. Each node is an older HP = server with 6 scsi disks. Each disk is configured as RAID 0 in the raid = controller, I wanted a JBOD to be presented to FreeBSD 9.1 x86. I = allocated a single disk for the OS, and the other 5 disks for HAST. node2# zpool status pool: scsi-san state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h27m with 0 errors on Tue Feb 19 17:38:55 = 2013 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM scsi-san ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 hast/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0 hast/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0 hast/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0 hast/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0 hast/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0 pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 gpt/disk0 ONLINE 0 0 0 Yesterday I physically pulled disk2 (from node1) out to simulate a = failure. ZFS didn't see anything wrong, expected. hastd did see the = problem, expected. 'hastctl status' didn't show me anything unusual or = indicate any problem that I could see on either node. I saw hastd = reporting problems in the logs, otherwise everything looked fine. Is = there a way to detect a failed disk from hastd besides the log? = camcontrol showed the disk had failed and obviously I'll be monitoring = using it as well. For recovery I installed a new disk in the same slot. To protect the = data reliability the safest way I can think of to recover is to do the = following: 1 - node1 - stop the apps 2 - node1 - export pool 3 - node1 - hastctl create disk2 4 - node1 - for D in 1 2 3 4 5; do hastctl role secondary;done 5 - node2 - for D in 1 2 3 4 5; do hastctl role primary;done 6 - node2 - import pool 7 - node2 - start the apps At step 5 the hastd will start to resynchronize node2:disk2 -> = node1:disk2. I've been trying to think of a way to re-establish the = mirror without having to restart/move the pool _and_ not pose additional = risk of data loss. To avoid an application outage I suppose the following would work: 1 - insert new disk in node1 2 - hastctl role init disk2 3 - hastctl create disk2 4 - hastctl role primary disk2 At that point ZFS would have seen a disk failure and then started = resilvering the pool. No application outage, but now only 4 disks = contain the data (assuming changing bits on the pool, not static = content). Using the previous steps application outage, but a healthy = pool is maintained always. Is there another scenario I'm thinking of where both data health and no = application outage could be achieved? Regards, Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 21:29:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B60E253 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lconrad@go2france.com) Received: from omx1.hctc.net (omx1.hctc.net [69.4.62.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B674828 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hctc.net (unknown [69.4.62.44]) by omx1.hctc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AD711430 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:22:38 -0600 (CST) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=69.4.54.186; From: lconrad@go2france.com To: Subject: PERL problem installing SQLgrey Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:22:37 -0600 Message-ID: <51253e9d.901a.28c09d00.5088e293@go2france.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 69.4.54.186 X-Mailer: SurgeWeb - Ajax Webmail Client X-Authenticated-User: lconrad@go2france.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:29:20 -0000 freebsd 9.0 portsnap fetch update ... completed successfully cd /usr/ports/mail/sqlgrey make install ===> Installing for sqlgrey-1.8.0 ===> sqlgrey-1.8.0 depends on package: p5-Net-Server>=0 - found ===> sqlgrey-1.8.0 depends on package: p5-IO-Multiplex>=0 - found ===> sqlgrey-1.8.0 depends on package: p5-Pod-Parser>=0 - found ===> sqlgrey-1.8.0 depends on package: p5-DBD-mysql>=0 - found ===> sqlgrey-1.8.0 depends on package: p5-Date-Calc>=0 - not found ===> Verifying install for p5-Date-Calc>=0 in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Date-Calc ===> p5-Date-Calc-6.3 depends on package: p5-Bit-Vector>=7.1 - not found ===> Verifying install for p5-Bit-Vector>=7.1 in /usr/ports/math/p5-Bit-Vector ===> Extracting for p5-Bit-Vector-7.2_2 => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz. and it can't find it anywhere else. bombs out with: fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 135586, actual 137817 => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/p5-Bit-Vector. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/p5-Bit-Vector. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Date-Calc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/sqlgrey. *** Error code 1 but: cpanm Date::Calc Date::Calc is up to date. (6.3) cpanm Bit::Vector Bit::Vector is up to date. (7.2) thanks Len From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 21:29:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C78254 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD369829 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KLHIUf087490 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:17:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r1KLHIma087486 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:17:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:17:18 -0500 (EST) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail and networking In-Reply-To: <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> Message-ID: References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:17:19 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:29:21 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jeff Tipton wrote: > On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> >>> On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote: >>>> On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>> On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello list! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These I've tried; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ftp, fetch, telnet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They time out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ssh sort of work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 >>>>>>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or >>>>>>> directory >>>>>>> Host key verification failed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. >>>>>> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I >>>>>> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in >>>>>> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh >>>>>> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). >>>>>> >>>>>> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? >>>>> If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd >>>>> >>>>> Then no. >>>>> >>>>> %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation timed >>>>> out >>>>> >>>>> I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. >>>>> Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to >>>>> the jail. >>>>> >>>>> testbox# jexec 1 tcsh >>>>> jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument >>>>> >>>>> Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. >>>> What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID >>>> most likely has changed. >>> The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. >>> >>> But still, sshd isn't running in the jail >>> >>> 32bit# ps ax >>> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>> 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh >>> 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax >>> >>> testbox# ps ax | grep J >>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>> 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J >>> >>> testbox is the host. >> A stab in the dark, but... >> >> Did you add sshd_enable="YES" to the jail's rc.conf(5)? > Or, from within the jail, what does > > service sshd status > > say? > Or from the host: sockstat | grep :22. You should see something like root sshd 2016 3 tcp4 192.168.17.15:22 *:* for each jail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 21:39:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072D67AB for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:39:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC028B4 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KLdFt7077561; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:39:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <51254281.3090104@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:39:13 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Gustafson Subject: Re: mpd5 vs lt2pd vs sl2tps References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:39:16 -0000 On 2/20/2013 1:38 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get a FreeBSD box set up as an L2TP server. I've been > tinkering with mpd5 and had some success, but I was wondering if > anyone has been using l2tpd or sl2tps and what their experiences might > have been. Are either of these easier to set up? More reliable? > Especially for a configuration where LDAP authentication is preferred, > or at least RADIUS if not LDAP? I have only used mpd5 from the ports, but I find it very reliable and efficient. We have LNS boxes that handle close to 700 endpoints at a time with ~ 300Mb of traffic. We use FreeRADIUS for backend authentication. The config and CLI are not my favorite, but generally I dont find myself making many changes. ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:08:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1E11F3 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armandopalaxsolutions@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-x22c.google.com (gg-in-x022c.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F29A6B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f172.google.com with SMTP id f4so1084516ggn.17 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:08:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=4xrczDrHJMQoyDhhx+ssV4XxCUa6yzCSeXVOQnVLEp8=; b=cIbeQAwNC/pq8V5GE4SUi30mSoIiwACCfYMyP93UHKaQsviWD0rZFLJUIwdq6LHWp0 OHKSetMHO2G8EEii/xcec5/LV+CVLM7cRutiAUfWrIaFamudzvtni4wIiMsNCGPfTt5D cGDvSoBd4TOdskvNRryy10tJqVL3dYgC/5t865j/WRUc3rXjA+P2i3ugGPV959ERWEuL xJY+t6qnteb8DUmyTaWx5BMzsNxJl1zR/xUREcx6R481HvMZRGptxR95W478i7cgTlo5 GjNwmEDDXadOiD0pYp5i5yr3ZtGHJisd9/DADNGWOces1EwNcyoHFiINHREsoCf5yBgb zJXw== X-Received: by 10.236.141.97 with SMTP id f61mr39380300yhj.69.1361398128669; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:08:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([190.149.11.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm55588460ani.13.2013.02.20.14.08.47 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:08:48 -0800 (PST) From: Armando Palax Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: http://localhost/phpmyadmin Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:08:45 -0600 Message-Id: <9FE92144-9888-4848-A2EF-11704C28120D@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:08:49 -0000 disculpen como puedo ingresar a mi localhost de mi phpmyadmin, lo que = pasa es que necesito crear una base de datos y no puedo porque al = ingresar a http://localhost/phpmyadmin tira erro.. me ayudarian gracias= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:09:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EF3293 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armandopalaxsolutions@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-x22b.google.com (gg-in-x022b.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E515DA80 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f171.google.com with SMTP id j1so1117175ggn.30 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:09:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=T+wy1jGfRHWk1to68HfVO+rf15JEWB5z0lc40tV/ELY=; b=usxceDxeYpEf+QhZYUJv/rC5vi53mvWemR4ZNphj8tQ6knsKW32fvznNXustanzEAA kQeTl2HeWoaY45p8P49DG93hB6FW9XFGk76rU7yjLrGyQcn4yu0uQvPDv8JdgaNfgaDJ C/IsooFbyMEUCax1hIUk2eCvHdmNQ4EYBgfRZTUBvExlvZAQHHmwxWvuCV8c85E46Ws9 nwlwqw64veyUez1XLQ5amockQf0MM37ZIsngJnAcgoE/hKU/5YzjDDCrfQ8kbwPt+kRx 7e3t60O+JHgL0Renhnttdn0ATH53lfFsw6UY3qZsQY5X0ltJsHh2I09g4OmJo3i0Xy9l 6CBA== X-Received: by 10.100.227.16 with SMTP id z16mr12009108ang.34.1361398173426; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([190.149.11.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm55588460ani.13.2013.02.20.14.09.32 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:09:33 -0800 (PST) From: Armando Palax Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: http://localhost/phpmyadmin Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:09:32 -0600 Message-Id: <02A8A902-9C5B-409F-AEFA-B091159E01C1@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:09:34 -0000 sorry as I can access my localhost from my phpmyadmin, what happens is = that I need to create a database and I can not enter because the strip = http://localhost/phpmyadmin error. would help me thanks= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:27:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F88B02 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpet@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56E0D52 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slappy.nohost (dsl-187-150-112-90-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [187.150.112.90] (may be forged)) (authenticated (0 bits)) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KMAqhQ014664 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:10:53 GMT Message-ID: <51255858.3080401@sdf.org> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:12:24 -0600 From: Chris Petrik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130212 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin References: <02A8A902-9C5B-409F-AEFA-B091159E01C1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <02A8A902-9C5B-409F-AEFA-B091159E01C1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:27:17 -0000 On 02/20/13 16:09, Armando Palax wrote: > sorry as I can access my localhost from my phpmyadmin, what happens is that I need to create a database and I can not enter because the strip http://localhost/phpmyadmin error. > would help me thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" you need to suply us the error you get. but i think it's due to lack of a web server listening on port 80 of localhost. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:29:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53650BD0 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@clari.net.au) Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD0ED98 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.102] (c114-76-1-137.eburwd4.vic.optusnet.com.au [114.76.1.137]) by mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1KMSqFI017023 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:28:53 +1100 Message-ID: <51254E0D.2070403@clari.net.au> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:28:29 +1100 From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin References: <02A8A902-9C5B-409F-AEFA-B091159E01C1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <02A8A902-9C5B-409F-AEFA-B091159E01C1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Zty1sKHG c=1 sm=1 a=x4mveiYJ1mQA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ejE0-8HIAAAA:8 a=jx4zolcLAPcA:10 a=Pf445vE1Zp8vu-hksPwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=+rVrtY7z3DVyADW7HUk29Q==:117 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:29:01 -0000 On 21/02/2013 9:09 AM, Armando Palax wrote: > sorry as I can access my localhost from my phpmyadmin, what happens is that I need to create a database and I can not enter because the strip http://localhost/phpmyadmin error. > would help me thanks > More information is needed. What error do you get? Is httpd running? Do you get the phpmyadmin login page? Have you looked in the httpd error log? What do you get if you visit http://localhost/ Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:49:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847BDA9F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E818EF67 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1KMnjU1097113; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:49:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <512552FF.5090206@bananmonarki.se> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:49:35 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Teske, Devin" Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Tipton , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:49:53 -0000 2013-02-20 19:59, Teske, Devin skrev: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote: >>> On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>> On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello list! >>>>>> >>>>>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >>>>>> >>>>>> These I've tried; >>>>>> >>>>>> ftp, fetch, telnet >>>>>> >>>>>> They time out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ssh sort of work. >>>>>> >>>>>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 >>>>>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or >>>>>> directory >>>>>> Host key verification failed. >>>>>> >>>>>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >>>>>> >>>>>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. >>>>> >>>>> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I >>>>> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in >>>>> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh >>>>> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). >>>>> >>>>> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? >>>> >>>> If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd >>>> >>>> Then no. >>>> >>>> %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation timed >>>> out >>>> >>>> I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. >>>> Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to >>>> the jail. >>>> >>>> testbox# jexec 1 tcsh >>>> jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument >>>> >>>> Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. >> >>> What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID >>> most likely has changed. >> >> The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. >> >> But still, sshd isn't running in the jail >> >> 32bit# ps ax >> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >> 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh >> 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax >> >> testbox# ps ax | grep J >> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >> 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J >> >> testbox is the host. > > A stab in the dark, but... > > Did you add sshd_enable="YES" to the jail's rc.conf(5)? > Yes, yes I did. rc.conf from the jail #ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" #defaultrouter="10.0.0.3" sendmail_enable="NO" #inetd_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" #ntpdate_enable="YES" #ntpdate_flags="time1.stupi.se" # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Jan 21 01:22:37 2013 keymap="swedish.iso" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:51:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D63BB98 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CADF87 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1KMpen9097159; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:51:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <51255372.8070804@bananmonarki.se> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:51:30 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Tipton Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> In-Reply-To: <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:51:44 -0000 2013-02-20 20:10, Jeff Tipton skrev: > On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> >>> On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote: >>>> On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>> On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello list! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These I've tried; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ftp, fetch, telnet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They time out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ssh sort of work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 >>>>>>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or >>>>>>> directory >>>>>>> Host key verification failed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. >>>>>> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I >>>>>> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when you're in >>>>>> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh >>>>>> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). >>>>>> >>>>>> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? >>>>> If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd >>>>> >>>>> Then no. >>>>> >>>>> %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation timed >>>>> out >>>>> >>>>> I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. >>>>> Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to >>>>> the jail. >>>>> >>>>> testbox# jexec 1 tcsh >>>>> jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument >>>>> >>>>> Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. >>>> What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID >>>> most likely has changed. >>> The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. >>> >>> But still, sshd isn't running in the jail >>> >>> 32bit# ps ax >>> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>> 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh >>> 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax >>> >>> testbox# ps ax | grep J >>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>> 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J >>> >>> testbox is the host. >> A stab in the dark, but... >> >> Did you add sshd_enable="YES" to the jail's rc.conf(5)? > Or, from within the jail, what does > > service sshd status > > say? 32bit# service sshd status sshd is not running. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:57:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EA312C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDBCFF3 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1KMvLNl097327; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:57:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:57:10 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: doug@safeport.com Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doug , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:57:30 -0000 2013-02-20 22:17, doug skrev: > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jeff Tipton wrote: > >> On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote: >>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>> >>>> On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote: >>>>> On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>>> On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello list! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These I've tried; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ftp, fetch, telnet >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They time out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ssh sort of work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 >>>>>>>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or >>>>>>>> directory >>>>>>>> Host key verification failed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. >>>>>>> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I >>>>>>> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when >>>>>>> you're in >>>>>>> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh >>>>>>> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? >>>>>> If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd >>>>>> >>>>>> Then no. >>>>>> >>>>>> %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation >>>>>> timed >>>>>> out >>>>>> >>>>>> I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. >>>>>> Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to >>>>>> the jail. >>>>>> >>>>>> testbox# jexec 1 tcsh >>>>>> jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument >>>>>> >>>>>> Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. >>>>> What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID >>>>> most likely has changed. >>>> The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. >>>> >>>> But still, sshd isn't running in the jail >>>> >>>> 32bit# ps ax >>>> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >>>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>>> 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh >>>> 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax >>>> >>>> testbox# ps ax | grep J >>>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>>> 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J >>>> >>>> testbox is the host. > Or from the host: sockstat | grep :22. You should see something like > > root sshd 2016 3 tcp4 192.168.17.15:22 *:* > > for each jail testbox# sockstat | grep :22 bernt sshd 3541 3 tcp4 10.0.0.3:22 80.x.x.x:25605 root sshd 3539 3 tcp4 10.0.0.3:22 80.x.x.x:25605 root sshd 1296 3 tcp6 *:22 *:* root sshd 1296 4 tcp4 *:22 *:* The jail has ip 10.0.0.10. There is only one jail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 23:52:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC72A16 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F7637F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7893AC8B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:52:39 -0800 (PST) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: cdrecord: Please report. Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:52:39 -0800 Message-ID: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:52:50 -0000 I am not a happy camper. Now that I've ``upgraded'' from 8.3-RELEASE to 9.1-RELEASE it appears that good old burncd no longer works, apparently because the CD/DVD drive is now exclusively handled as an ATAPICAM device. So I try to use cdrecord and I get this: # cdrecord dev=0,0,0 driveropts=burnfree FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso cdrecord: No write mode specified. cdrecord: Assuming -sao mode. cdrecord: If your drive does not accept -sao, try -tao. cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent defaults. Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.00 (amd64-unknown-freebsd9.1) Copyright (C) 1995-2010 J�rg Schilling scsidev: '0,0,0' scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0 Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. Device type : Removable CD-ROM Version : 0 Response Format: 2 Capabilities : Vendor_info : '_NEC ' Identifikation : 'DVD_RW ND-3550A ' Revision : '1.05' Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW/DVD-RAM. Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). Driver flags : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96R RAW/R96R cdrecord: Warning: Cannot read drive buffer. cdrecord: Warning: The DMA speed test has been skipped. Starting to write CD/DVD/BD at speed 48 in real SAO mode for single session. Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150 cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error CDB: 2A 00 00 00 02 80 00 00 20 00 status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) Sense Bytes: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 21 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Sense Key: 0x5 Illegal Request, Segment 0 Sense Code: 0x21 Qual 0x02 (invalid address for write) Fru 0x0 Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) resid: 65536 cmd finished after 4.257s timeout 200s write track data: error after 1310720 bytes cdrecord: The current problem looks like a buffer underrun. cdrecord: It looks like 'driveropts=burnfree' does not work for this drive. cdrecord: Please report. cdrecord: Make sure that you are root, enable DMA and check your HW/OS set up. So, um, WTF? To whom am supposed to "report" this failure? And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 23:54:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A999ACD for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from oceanpt.safeport.com (oceanpt.safeport.com [65.122.17.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45F23A4 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oceanpt.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r1KNhtWr086917; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:55 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: jail and networking In-Reply-To: <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> Message-ID: References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (oceanpt.safeport.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:43:55 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:54:38 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2013-02-20 22:17, doug skrev: >> >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jeff Tipton wrote: >> >>> On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote: >>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote: >>>>>> On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>>>> On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello list! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I dont seem to get net working in a test jail. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> These I've tried; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ftp, fetch, telnet >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They time out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ssh sort of work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3 >>>>>>>>> ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or >>>>>>>>> directory >>>>>>>>> Host key verification failed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> jail is 8.3-STABLE i386 GENERIC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> host is FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE amd64 GENERIC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm sure you want more info so just tell me what info. >>>>>>>> Commonly the problem is that you are "jexec'd" into the jail and I >>>>>>>> find that tools like ssh, ftp, telnet, etc. don't work when >>>>>>>> you're in >>>>>>>> the jail via "jexec" but instead what works way better is if you ssh >>>>>>>> into the jail (via the jail'd ssh process of course). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does that seem to be the case in your situation? >>>>>>> If you mean this sshd IsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/sshd >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then no. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> %ssh 10.0.0.10 ssh: connect to host 10.0.0.10 port 22: Operation >>>>>>> timed >>>>>>> out >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did have an alias on the host to the jail's ip. >>>>>>> Tried to restart the jail it went fine, but now I can't jexec in to >>>>>>> the jail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> testbox# jexec 1 tcsh >>>>>>> jexec: jail_attach(1): Invalid argument >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sooo... I'm kind of out of ideas. >>>>>> What does "jls" command say? If you have restarted your jail, it's ID >>>>>> most likely has changed. >>>>> The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you. >>>>> >>>>> But still, sshd isn't running in the jail >>>>> >>>>> 32bit# ps ax >>>>> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >>>>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>>>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>>>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>>>> 2464 0 SJ 0:00,01 tcsh >>>>> 2482 0 R+J 0:00,00 ps ax >>>>> >>>>> testbox# ps ax | grep J >>>>> 2385 ?? IsJ 0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>>>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>>>> 2391 ?? SsJ 0:00,00 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>>>> 2488 0 S+ 0:00,00 grep J >>>>> >>>>> testbox is the host. > >> Or from the host: sockstat | grep :22. You should see something like >> >> root sshd 2016 3 tcp4 192.168.17.15:22 *:* >> >> for each jail > > testbox# sockstat | grep :22 > > bernt sshd 3541 3 tcp4 10.0.0.3:22 80.x.x.x:25605 > root sshd 3539 3 tcp4 10.0.0.3:22 80.x.x.x:25605 > root sshd 1296 3 tcp6 *:22 *:* > root sshd 1296 4 tcp4 *:22 *:* > > The jail has ip 10.0.0.10. There is only one jail. > I could not see anything you are doing wrong, so here are the relevant parts of a host/jail we use for testing. I got all this by following the jail man page and/or hacking things that are working. Ihope this helps. This is all on an 8.2 system. Host config rc.conf --------------------- hostname="bcr.boltsys.com" ifconfig_em0="DHCP" sshd_enable="YES" : #jail base settings inetd_flags="-wW -a 10.1.10.110" rpcbind_enable="NO" # Jail general settings ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 10.1.10.111 netmask 255.255.255.255" jail_set_hostname_allow="NO" jail_enable="YES" jail_interface="em0" jail_devfs_enable="YES" jail_procfs_enable="YES" jail_list="webmail" jail_webmail_rootdir="/usr/home/webmail" jail_webmail_hostname="webmail.boltsys.com" jail_webmail_ip="10.1.10.111" ifconfig (host) ---------------- inet 10.1.10.111 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 10.1.10.111 inet 10.1.10.110 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.10.255 Jail config rc.conf --------------------- network_interfaces="" hostname="webmail.boltsys.com" sshd_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="YES" inetd_flags="-wW -a 10.1.10.111" inetd_enable="NO" rpcbind_enable="NO" _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 02:56:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B693CAF for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6440D86 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2013 13:26:45 +1030 Message-ID: <51258CEA.1050006@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:26:42 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: doug@safeport.com Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bernt Hansson X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:56:48 -0000 It's been a while since I experimented with jails but I'm pretty sure it is the reason I changed my sshd_config When you start sshd on the base system by default it binds against 0.0.0.0 and :: which is every ip4 and ip6 address configured on the base system, which includes the aliased ip's for your jails. This is represented by the *:22 from sockstat. When you start the jail it can't start sshd because the base already has that address/port in use. In /etc/ssh/sshd_config comment out the ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 and ListenAddress :: then add ListenAddress 10.0.0.3 service sshd restart start your jail and try again The jail config is fine as the jail only sees the one ip address assigned to it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 03:58:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F164A806 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDF5FA1 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2013 14:28:05 +1030 Message-ID: <51259B4A.1040701@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:28:02 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:58:07 -0000 On 21/02/2013 10:22, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Now that I've ``upgraded'' from 8.3-RELEASE to 9.1-RELEASE it appears > that good old burncd no longer works, apparently because the CD/DVD > drive is now exclusively handled as an ATAPICAM device. > There are a few problem reports for cdrecord already - it sounds like the issue is from package installed versions of cdrtools, the solution seems to be compile from ports instead of installing from a pre-built package. I can say I have compiled from ports and don't have an issue burning dvd's - I have just upgraded to 9.1 from 9.0. I was going to say I have atapicam enabled but it appears that it isn't able to load on my system. Apparently ATA_CAM is a default part of 9.x and atapicam isn't needed, even though the module is still compiled. > So, um, WTF? To whom am supposed to "report" this failure? While you can email the port maintainer it is generally best to report through the freebsd website. Under support you can start with Bug reports to search if someone else has already reported it, then either Submit Followup (bottom of page) to an existing report with more information or Submit Bug-report if you need to create a new report. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 04:10:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC198A80 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from basarevych@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com (mail-pb0-f48.google.com [209.85.160.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0515BA for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id wy12so3270697pbc.35 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:10:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=la6UyDvX10cYCzI1bKNyljTQ4uHR9ja62Wf4TY/89Ro=; b=mYlJ0DJlP6djfMnpxh+qd9eF/ec7uS9Tqj5+JGxFZN2ezxaqdTdmOtVgbbHfXo21oP G+3c3xot3Fk96OwxNQ5bYT9oZDHq4SnE1RjMO+S6LqPqZM9KojwF6I9kwqJ2SAXrFxhO pV1nmBAi2aKr2otieevjwxgR4ceJI1rjiJTIdz07UurdTIKB3epA7O7ig7JInpQrMHGj oJN37Pa7D6eyB2yrdNd7G1uZ+dlbdYC4ET48CR8mcCm3iTlpxcSd9mUbgWNkEZjPASlp n6IeHj0QDwkA6uLXmNsSR3pQCI23IE+hQJt2Q+mKQMraNHghVMwHFkAH+sFMnQr9xb5C 7AwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.155.33 with SMTP id vt1mr6128699pab.103.1361419853457; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.252.132 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:10:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:10:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Does your 9.1-STABLE still hang on reboot? From: Ross To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:10:59 -0000 Hi. I am talking about this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172952&cat=%20jb It should be fixed in STABLE, but I want to make sure it's safe to upgrade my 9.0 systems to 9.1-STABLE now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 05:44:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E52BA0 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [74.208.4.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D651082 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.50]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M738T-1V28P92YUP-00wmrf for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:44:02 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2013 05:44:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.rw.local) [78.84.97.244] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us010) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2013 00:44:01 -0500 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18RQ1ZHNL8RK/ngHCBy8ipB4ysKOlfwDCWJTpcaKL Y5VRK2KJWUEdBQ Message-ID: <5125B44A.4050609@mail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:44:42 +0200 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:44:04 -0000 On 02/21/2013 01:52, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > I am not a happy camper. > > Now that I've ``upgraded'' from 8.3-RELEASE to 9.1-RELEASE it appears that > good old burncd no longer works, apparently because the CD/DVD drive is > now exclusively handled as an ATAPICAM device. > > So I try to use cdrecord and I get this: > > # cdrecord dev=0,0,0 driveropts=burnfree FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > cdrecord: Assuming -sao mode. > cdrecord: If your drive does not accept -sao, try -tao. > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent defaults. > Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.00 (amd64-unknown-freebsd9.1) Copyright (C) 1995-2010 J�rg Schilling > scsidev: '0,0,0' > scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0 > Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. > Device type : Removable CD-ROM > Version : 0 > Response Format: 2 > Capabilities : > Vendor_info : '_NEC ' > Identifikation : 'DVD_RW ND-3550A ' > Revision : '1.05' > Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW/DVD-RAM. > Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). > Driver flags : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE > Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96R RAW/R96R > cdrecord: Warning: Cannot read drive buffer. > cdrecord: Warning: The DMA speed test has been skipped. > Starting to write CD/DVD/BD at speed 48 in real SAO mode for single session. > Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. > cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150 > cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error > CDB: 2A 00 00 00 02 80 00 00 20 00 > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) > Sense Bytes: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 21 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Sense Key: 0x5 Illegal Request, Segment 0 > Sense Code: 0x21 Qual 0x02 (invalid address for write) Fru 0x0 > Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) > resid: 65536 > cmd finished after 4.257s timeout 200s > write track data: error after 1310720 bytes > cdrecord: The current problem looks like a buffer underrun. > cdrecord: It looks like 'driveropts=burnfree' does not work for this drive. > cdrecord: Please report. > cdrecord: Make sure that you are root, enable DMA and check your HW/OS set up. > > > So, um, WTF? To whom am supposed to "report" this failure? > > And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" How did you install cdrecord? I had a similar problem year ago when I installed it from a 9.0-RELEASE package that turned out to have been compiled against an earlier base. So compiling from ports solved the problem. I actually had to compile other cd-related progs, too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 08:22:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7B8298 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C95E1A61 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1L8LkWn007597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:22:01 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.4 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r1L8LkWn007597 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r1L8LkWn007597; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com Message-ID: <5125D919.8080400@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:21:45 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130220 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERL problem installing SQLgrey References: <51253e9d.901a.28c09d00.5088e293@go2france.com> In-Reply-To: <51253e9d.901a.28c09d00.5088e293@go2france.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:22:14 -0000 On 20/02/2013 21:22, lconrad@go2france.com wrote: > ===> p5-Date-Calc-6.3 depends on package: p5-Bit-Vector>=7.1 - not found > ===> Verifying install for p5-Bit-Vector>=7.1 in > /usr/ports/math/p5-Bit-Vector > ===> Extracting for p5-Bit-Vector-7.2_2 > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz. > > > and it can't find it anywhere else. > > bombs out with: > > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz: > size mismatch: expected 135586, actual 137817 > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. > *** Error code 1 Did you try updating your ports to the latest and: cd /usr/ports/math/p5-Bit-Vector make distclean and then try and install sqlgrey again? If you get the same error repeatably, then it's possibly a bug in the p5-Bit-Vector port -- perhaps the distfile was changed, in which case the port maintainer would have to update the distinfo to match. In any case, if you're still having problems, please ask again on freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 12:18:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D950D1BC4 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAB16BC for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.128.143.54]) by hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20130221095018591.LCBM20076@hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com> for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:50:18 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=UN5f7Vjy c=1 sm=0 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:17 a=xCuMbNp8hPoA:10 a=Um0UhwxLtkkA:10 a=R5FhY6rjjCMA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=CARxtBS3168A:10 a=OF9kq7NdAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=eNcD7ojaAAAA:8 a=blEZChy4MxxfSiW3MgUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=Cbj8qjZAOdAA:10 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 204.210.114.114 Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:59673] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id F8/B2-20480-D9DE5215; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:49:18 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 829615D13; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:49:31 -1000 (HST) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:49:31 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: lconrad@go2france.com Subject: math/p5-Bit-Vector size error (was PERL problem installing SQLgrey) Message-ID: <20130221094931.GB47965@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: lconrad@go2france.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <51253e9d.901a.28c09d00.5088e293@go2france.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51253e9d.901a.28c09d00.5088e293@go2france.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:18:51 -0000 in message <51253e9d.901a.28c09d00.5088e293@go2france.com>, wrote lconrad@go2france.com thusly... > > > freebsd 9.0 > > portsnap fetch update ... > ===> Installing for sqlgrey-1.8.0 ... > ===> sqlgrey-1.8.0 depends on package: p5-Date-Calc>=0 - not found > ===> Verifying install for p5-Date-Calc>=0 in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Date-Calc > ===> p5-Date-Calc-6.3 depends on package: p5-Bit-Vector>=7.1 - not found > ===> Verifying install for p5-Bit-Vector>=7.1 in /usr/ports/math/p5-Bit-Vector > ===> Extracting for p5-Bit-Vector-7.2_2 > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz. > > > and it can't find it anywhere else. > > bombs out with: > > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz: > size mismatch: expected 135586, actual 137817 No error of that sort here (on FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE/i386 in Hawaii, USA). > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. > *** Error code 1 ... Here source was fetched from ... ftp://ftp.cpan.org/pub/CPAN/modules/by-module/Bit/Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz ... and port was built without fatal errors (lots of "warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size" though). -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 05:14:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCDC8CD for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from muhammad.junaid@cubexsweatherly.com) Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BB42AD for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail125-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.249) by TX2EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.9.40.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:38 +0000 Received: from mail125-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail125-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F394A017D for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.249.37; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:AMSPRD0311HT005.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 1 X-BigFish: PS1(zzc85dhzz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275bh18c673hz32i2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1155h) Received: from mail125-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail125-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1361423676170569_30405; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.250]) by mail125-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D5A3A006B for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AMSPRD0311HT005.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.249.37) by TX2EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (10.9.99.115) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:34 +0000 Received: from AMSPRD0311MB425.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.226]) by AMSPRD0311HT005.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.61.168]) with mapi id 14.16.0263.000; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:32 +0000 From: Muhammad Junaid To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: SAS Driver Support Thread-Topic: SAS Driver Support Thread-Index: Ac4P8d5t64sI3TtbTdaEr0WQ6653Mg== Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:32 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [202.63.215.38] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: cubexsweatherly.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:22:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:14:49 -0000 Dear Team FreeBSD can support HP D2600 disk enclosure or not? FreeBSD can support SAS controller card (P800\P812) driver or not? Regard's Muhammad Junaid From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 12:36:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD420911 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1FFB5C for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hi8so7420924wib.13 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:36:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Cej7Cpw/m1CgS1Tknu/MZ0Jb/hHPQt16GSqybzAu+1E=; b=fWkAmNKBBmt40XAl7N8N7LeHeZaVDSVr7OBdKdXZLIN6jJ6uy51f/rHhrywhl0Yaq2 RbsmuEkgH+rVV5el0KTxCtZ8t0KJ8NvmnRLjaAdPTNM4wQJ+7JX/rUsEoVHb6KA2ryEO 4naHL4c/xAxHkaNw5ateGBQ5HaquJmYaK3wR69VD2kW6EKxK0WkU3VWloXQeP6/66drS O/OE8zwYSjzaBp1eTsuhnp3fSMJ0LhpFi6leSFlp9gh4HSkp91MjFYcTU8U1HtahOHCk N8rqlWXFR3sSEde3kXU+2J5iB1Onyj9qZynRdrV5UZU6hfzC9MqIrnSBLWclp02AUIEf uW4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.197 with SMTP id t5mr40623730wia.27.1361446377390; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.60.147 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:32:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51259B4A.1040701@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> <51259B4A.1040701@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:32:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. From: David Demelier To: Shane Ambler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:09 -0000 2013/2/21 Shane Ambler > On 21/02/2013 10:22, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Now that I've ``upgraded'' from 8.3-RELEASE to 9.1-RELEASE it appears >> that good old burncd no longer works, apparently because the CD/DVD >> drive is now exclusively handled as an ATAPICAM device. >> >> > There are a few problem reports for cdrecord already - it sounds like > the issue is from package installed versions of cdrtools, the solution > seems to be compile from ports instead of installing from a pre-built > package. > > I can say I have compiled from ports and don't have an issue burning > dvd's - I have just upgraded to 9.1 from 9.0. I was going to say I have > atapicam enabled but it appears that it isn't able to load on my system. > Apparently ATA_CAM is a default part of 9.x and atapicam isn't needed, > even though the module is still compiled. I've never understood the difference between ATA_CAM and atapicam, what are the difference between them? > So, um, WTF? To whom am supposed to "report" this failure? >> > > While you can email the port maintainer it is generally best to report > through the freebsd website. Under support you can start with Bug > reports to search if someone else has already reported it, then either > Submit Followup (bottom of page) to an existing report with more > information or Submit Bug-report if you need to create a new report. > -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 14:22:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8619FBE1 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E816E833 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1LEMtAR018582; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:22:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <51262DB4.9070303@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:22:44 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:22:59 -0000 2013-02-21 00:52, Ronald F. Guilmette skrev: > > > I am not a happy camper. > > Now that I've ``upgraded'' from 8.3-RELEASE to 9.1-RELEASE it appears that > good old burncd no longer works, apparently because the CD/DVD drive is > now exclusively handled as an ATAPICAM device. > > So I try to use cdrecord and I get this: > > # cdrecord dev=0,0,0 driveropts=burnfree FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > cdrecord: Assuming -sao mode. > cdrecord: If your drive does not accept -sao, try -tao. > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent defaults. > Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.00 (amd64-unknown-freebsd9.1) Copyright (C) 1995-2010 J�rg Schilling > scsidev: '0,0,0' > scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0 > Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. > Device type : Removable CD-ROM > Version : 0 > Response Format: 2 > Capabilities : > Vendor_info : '_NEC ' > Identifikation : 'DVD_RW ND-3550A ' > Revision : '1.05' > Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW/DVD-RAM. > Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). > Driver flags : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE > Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96R RAW/R96R > cdrecord: Warning: Cannot read drive buffer. > cdrecord: Warning: The DMA speed test has been skipped. > Starting to write CD/DVD/BD at speed 48 in real SAO mode for single session. > Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. > cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150 > cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error > CDB: 2A 00 00 00 02 80 00 00 20 00 > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) > Sense Bytes: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 21 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Sense Key: 0x5 Illegal Request, Segment 0 > Sense Code: 0x21 Qual 0x02 (invalid address for write) Fru 0x0 > Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) > resid: 65536 > cmd finished after 4.257s timeout 200s > write track data: error after 1310720 bytes > cdrecord: The current problem looks like a buffer underrun. > cdrecord: It looks like 'driveropts=burnfree' does not work for this drive. > cdrecord: Please report. > cdrecord: Make sure that you are root, enable DMA and check your HW/OS set up. > > > So, um, WTF? To whom am supposed to "report" this failure? > > And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? > Try http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ its in ports as sysutils/dvd+rw-tools From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 14:28:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A758ECEE for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAD788E for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:57:51 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin From: Mikel King In-Reply-To: <02A8A902-9C5B-409F-AEFA-B091159E01C1@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:57:52 -0500 Message-Id: References: <02A8A902-9C5B-409F-AEFA-B091159E01C1@gmail.com> To: Armando Palax X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:28:01 -0000 Armando, Are you able to access anything on your web server? Try = substituting the local IP address in place of localhost. Cheers, Mikel King BSD News mikel.king@olivent.com @mikelking | +mikelking | in::mk | &mikelking On Feb 20, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Armando Palax = wrote: > sorry as I can access my localhost from my phpmyadmin, what happens is = that I need to create a database and I can not enter because the strip = http://localhost/phpmyadmin error. > would help me thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 14:35:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104F6FB7 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771A8908 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1LEZ7KY018843 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:35:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:34:57 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions FreeBSD Subject: I made a mess. libc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:35:13 -0000 Hello list! It's me again. I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on. Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7 so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there. I did remove the chflag and all was well I tought, but no. Copy it to the jail, someone screamed, ok I'll do that Well the problem is I copied it to the host amd64 and jail is i386. the host locked up hard and after a reboot I get libc.so.7 invalid file format. How do I get it back. I can not burn a cd with livefs, wich should be on memorystick anyway. Thanks for any help and it's needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 14:43:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D394216 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E8A986 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id dr13so7258440wgb.26 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:43:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=Xo7TrpgoB5nvTlLeXw/b0bb8oMjM1qD+wSbyyhntIKg=; b=GIjw7ItOAK3k6fbiFw53ikmp2iJWg6a3wu0yEjAt+gZC6UAoN0LrudIyjDuqahhHSr 08In+Ez6euXPkYb0irFfmZDRiD20Ae3cg8SMJ09F4w90yPkZHcWEPIDxnrXXne0f8old Hf4jyXGmbQgTW9McW9BdQxZKv+IMOb1man38UxRxxPnzi7l2IdxQFNEHewPGtG8yb6XA jF+nrofun/B1UyMu8JiZeSLrv209MeRzfsAwFzGBp3/V6uLLZGLdnaCwHIgCncSQKUID rovP9oC6iUimn7NuTvXXyFSzh05kBZWbfratBrjXfVfQ9zTAJWsvFnkQ+9QmRK2saamu fDwA== X-Received: by 10.180.84.162 with SMTP id a2mr40167031wiz.14.1361457805519; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:43:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm40583864wib.11.2013.02.21.06.43.17 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:43:24 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:43:16 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd> References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> To: Bernt Hansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkKBEWPSe99d2plmQucswh3FHccRWbQfOm0hIoMX25yOEDhPzsgzwXldiBd8/tCEqzVqRie Cc: questions FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:43:32 -0000 On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > Hello list! >=20 > It's me again. >=20 > I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on. >=20 > Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7 > so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there. >=20 > I did remove the chflag and all was well I tought, but no. >=20 > Copy it to the jail, someone screamed, ok I'll do that >=20 > Well the problem is I copied it to the host amd64 and jail is i386. >=20 > the host locked up hard and after a reboot I get >=20 > libc.so.7 invalid file format. How do I get it back. >=20 > I can not burn a cd with livefs, wich should be on memorystick > anyway. >=20 > Thanks for any help and it's needed. This is my libc.so.7 from the 19th, for 8-stable amd64, after the patch = for the security advisory. root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # ls -l /lib/libc.so.7 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1399225 Feb 19 15:27 /lib/libc.so.7 root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # md5 /lib/libc.so.7 MD5 (/lib/libc.so.7) =3D 9e4b09aa6dbc731bf56593b736e9fef1 root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # shasum /lib/libc.so.7 19e856f287586f52611aca9a4aa8a4104b65fb4e /lib/libc.so.7 root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # uname -a FreeBSD pf1.backbone.dev 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6 r247008M: Tue = Feb 19 20:14:57 UTC 2013 = root@pf1.backbone.dev:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNIVERSAL amd64 I can host the file over HTTP if you want. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 14:47:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BCA322 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595D29BB for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1LEl7Pq090801; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:47:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r1LEl77v090797; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:47:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:47:07 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. In-Reply-To: <51262DB4.9070303@bananmonarki.se> Message-ID: References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> <51262DB4.9070303@bananmonarki.se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:47:07 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:47:16 -0000 On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2013-02-21 00:52, Ronald F. Guilmette skrev: >> >> And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? >> > Try http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ its in ports as > sysutils/dvd+rw-tools But growisofs from dvd+rw-tools only writes DVDs. cdrecord from cdrtools-3.00_2 worked for me yesterday, burning a CD on an external USB drive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 14:53:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A67F6EF for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7628A36 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c13so4941350eek.28 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:53:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=RhXq76WA3CHxA1ZgRCxW/Fnl1NkyRw6LtAyNYC4K7PA=; b=oDJr6nxyicGeZtMcVDiPPntmn8RnnbGCUvpqLjM31Ow+k8hsD3zdcMV8Z5IKHG6lPt lcs2LfCOqIN/5wVMSC85GaC492Dafdl3oOrxDxeWMe+OVyPB5KHxh0hAsvTuxy9lx9MH v8AlxuiGfYTz7aZhqRX5gkRQpFuFxuI3idagtlRypCbAVfR/INZWEcB9HG/OH7KCts7Q G9ZeDjsTwi1rqDwhzYXp+4Nr08wVJMnZ6c6EKU0BLc9lJlIGbPmwP6SYglXq7kuV9Pnt VfkBXqb+i81RCZ/vqPLl5qujdMg1qiy2tTHWJIbk5UvmP/YDO+dTPSQhQBoSCaK/pxQg KGeg== X-Received: by 10.14.207.200 with SMTP id n48mr81968685eeo.4.1361458405616; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:53:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([78.165.54.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q42sm106200098eem.14.2013.02.21.06.53.23 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:53:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:53:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-9?Q?G=F6k=FEin?= Akdeniz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. Message-Id: <20130221165316.df83662c30f5554251ee5ec0@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2013_16_53_16_+0200_ASSfNMvgXJ6VAvaI" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:53:27 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2013_16_53_16_+0200_ASSfNMvgXJ6VAvaI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:52:39 -0800 tarihinde "Ronald F. Guilmette" yazm=FD=FE: =20 >=20 > I am not a happy camper. >=20 > Now that I've ``upgraded'' from 8.3-RELEASE to 9.1-RELEASE it appears > that good old burncd no longer works, apparently because the CD/DVD > drive is now exclusively handled as an ATAPICAM device. ... >=20 > And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? Did you try "cdrecord --scanbus"=20 It will tell you which drive to use for burning CD.=20 --=20 G=F6k=FEin Akdeniz --Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2013_16_53_16_+0200_ASSfNMvgXJ6VAvaI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRJjTgAAoJEBDAvVQzTymiL+YP/iUFUECd1kEWPGZwy3iLe0NM j9vPiomorVkNnmmaOJxQ8rcGGH1aEDby4FHoPIi7trqbhzFqDah7bdMGFPdCRFFP nxNy+ir+HBdojVmz1zUe1H9psREqhi+NYap5JHkPX5oHQGmfZM33EK9OdnGTKmJo GdTLQA1k008R0Kj7Lg4dcnwidBLyla9ljLfjVw8yRzaHEC9HPP0MTJHmcw55pTGD GivhV8ZfhkH1r+sMcq6jZTYx6qbblCyJN5m6Gjdglp4JG2EEXoMajx9YfR6Ic2Y6 IMNCcw+c2/AVzuNjdySf5ynJCsFry7gkHljMcUirQSSkJjsyp5EVqcZvpcEHVXaV bbeuV/RHDJH0fuFa58LrPp0EmpxQEQm6OjuRP5Px7twldqBLY4OApMzduumlPBh/ YPkBcsIcGQRDKQTi7lT3BnDt37KNHxnlYQV1Hj8NyTy6otz6QlI8bU7VhqpGU25b lKy4VSCXmm/ckP50Rcm5E4NXuUu26/svbpD7CVBM9SolULd1EDwX6cCSmN3kszPg BrbwEDq20hRnlAtBd7MGWUWpqBEMrRAiVwtwnsdDCSVIfl0/pkDuzG48+Mg0sjlT frNhPXmNDH5W5DqiU054S28NSjijBbJbdxoBr+390PZLpAMGrhyGFdciZY3U42wI G9xiOUOxr4hhfdBP/38S =+uTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__21_Feb_2013_16_53_16_+0200_ASSfNMvgXJ6VAvaI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 15:46:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC15AA8 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:46:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B05EED for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1LFkg00020396; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:46:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <51264157.7020608@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:46:31 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> <51262DB4.9070303@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:46:48 -0000 2013-02-21 15:47, Warren Block skrev: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> 2013-02-21 00:52, Ronald F. Guilmette skrev: >>> >>> And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? >>> >> Try http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ its in ports as >> sysutils/dvd+rw-tools > > But growisofs from dvd+rw-tools only writes DVDs. cdrecord from > cdrtools-3.00_2 worked for me yesterday, burning a CD on an external USB > drive. growisofs writes cd's, no matter what they are called. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 15:52:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428635D9 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB76DFB8 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1LFpxd5020503; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:52:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:51:49 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fleuriot Damien Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:52:03 -0000 2013-02-21 15:43, Fleuriot Damien skrev: > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> Hello list! >> >> It's me again. >> >> I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on. >> >> Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7 >> so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there. >> >> I did remove the chflag and all was well I tought, but no. >> >> Copy it to the jail, someone screamed, ok I'll do that >> >> Well the problem is I copied it to the host amd64 and jail is i386. >> >> the host locked up hard and after a reboot I get >> >> libc.so.7 invalid file format. How do I get it back. >> >> I can not burn a cd with livefs, wich should be on memorystick >> anyway. >> >> Thanks for any help and it's needed. > > > > This is my libc.so.7 from the 19th, for 8-stable amd64, after the patch for the security advisory. > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # ls -l /lib/libc.so.7 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1399225 Feb 19 15:27 /lib/libc.so.7 > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # md5 /lib/libc.so.7 > MD5 (/lib/libc.so.7) = 9e4b09aa6dbc731bf56593b736e9fef1 > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # shasum /lib/libc.so.7 > 19e856f287586f52611aca9a4aa8a4104b65fb4e /lib/libc.so.7 > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # uname -a > FreeBSD pf1.backbone.dev 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6 r247008M: Tue Feb 19 20:14:57 UTC 2013 root@pf1.backbone.dev:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNIVERSAL amd64 > > > I can host the file over HTTP if you want. > That was very nice of you, but how do I get the file into my machine? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 16:35:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E1A4C2 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp-fo.knology.synacor.com [64.8.71.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7D42EC for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:35:42 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=e4qEuNV/ c=1 sm=0 a=38Y8UczQxcwRmfYDsgMJww==:17 a=ZxN8qah7hV8A:10 a=D7F08Lj2zVwA:10 a=G3Lp4l_EmE8A:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=s1O25tkdAAAA:8 a=-ImC8EpqN6QA:10 a=GnHyx9mdAAAA:8 a=aWWKaWx4bHiohH0E4SgA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=38Y8UczQxcwRmfYDsgMJww==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.knology.synacor.com smtp.mail=wblock@wonkity.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.knology.synacor.com header.from=wblock@wonkity.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.knology.synacor.com smtp.user=wblock@rushmore.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.knology.synacor.com: 67.158.26.137 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of wonkity.com) Received: from [67.158.26.137] ([67.158.26.137:10523] helo=wonkity.com) by smtp.knlogy.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.47 r(39787)) with ESMTPA id 97/C1-13976-EDC46215; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:35:42 -0500 Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1LGZfno087656; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:35:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r1LGZdD9087653; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:35:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:35:39 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. In-Reply-To: <51264157.7020608@bananmonarki.se> Message-ID: References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> <51262DB4.9070303@bananmonarki.se> <51264157.7020608@bananmonarki.se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:35:41 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:35:43 -0000 On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2013-02-21 15:47, Warren Block skrev: >> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>> 2013-02-21 00:52, Ronald F. Guilmette skrev: >>>> >>>> And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? >>>> >>> Try http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ its in ports as >>> sysutils/dvd+rw-tools >> >> But growisofs from dvd+rw-tools only writes DVDs. cdrecord from >> cdrtools-3.00_2 worked for me yesterday, burning a CD on an external USB >> drive. > > growisofs writes cd's, no matter what they are called. Not for me. With a CD-R: :-( /dev/cd0: media is not recognized as recordable DVD: 9 The other difference is that growisofs is based on mkisofs, and takes a list of files to write. I don't know if it has a way of writing an ISO image directly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 16:45:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D4587C for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB760381 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa06.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1LGjLJW019232 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:45:24 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT04.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:45:23 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Muhammad Junaid , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: RE: SAS Driver Support Thread-Topic: SAS Driver Support Thread-Index: Ac4P8d5t64sI3TtbTdaEr0WQ6653MgAX5a/a Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:45:23 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC3F3@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-21_06:2013-02-21,2013-02-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:45:32 -0000 I did a write-up on hardware integration procedures some time back. Might help... http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-June/241956.html In addition, I'll add that you don't necessarily have to boot FreeBSD... wh= at I'll often do is boot DruidBSD and run the "Hardware Detection Tool" or = "HDT" by Ewan Velu: http://sourceforge.net/projects/druidbsd/files/Druid-0.0.iso/download That will allow me to get the vendor/device hex values that identify the ca= rd you want to support. Once you have the 4-digit hex values for "vendor id= " and "device id" then it's just a matter of grep'ing the FreeBSD source co= de to find out which module(s) work with that hardware. --=20 Devin ________________________________________ From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.= org] on behalf of Muhammad Junaid [muhammad.junaid@cubexsweatherly.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:14 PM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: SAS Driver Support Dear Team FreeBSD can support HP D2600 disk enclosure or not? FreeBSD can support SAS controller card (P800\P812) driver or not? Regard's Muhammad Junaid _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 17:01:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B730A3BA for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867C270F for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1LH0rpp008402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:01:24 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT06.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.17]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:01:02 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Bernt Hansson , Fleuriot Damien Subject: RE: I made a mess. libc Thread-Topic: I made a mess. libc Thread-Index: AQHOEECuNs5vgWT6fkOEPkWySY7Dq5iEx6QAgAATJ4D//6szhg== Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:01:02 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-21_06:2013-02-21,2013-02-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: questions FreeBSD , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:01:30 -0000 Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... My latest version of Druid has a very sophisticated "Interactive Disk Repai= r" script that will assemble your system "humpty-dumpty style" while booted= from a CD or Thumb drive (you said you couldn't burn a CD, but it wasn't c= lear whether you could master a thumb drive). http://sourceforge.net/projects/druidbsd/files/FreeBSD-8.3_Druid-1.0b60.iso= /download When you run the "Interactive Disk Repair (IDR) Shell" option, it presents = you with a few questions (like, "I've found a saved network interface in rc= .conf(5) -- would you like me to activate it for you?"), and ultimately mou= nts your system to present a working shell to fix your problems. Important: when it asks you if you want to chroot into the mounted filesyst= em, say NO (you're libc isn't working, so that would be a bad idea) -- rath= er, run from the LiveFS environment where /mnt is your mounted system. Ther= e's even a copy of libc in the LiveFS environment that you can copy over yo= ur old one... cp /cdrom/freebsd/rescue/lib/libc.so.7 /mnt/lib/libc.so.7 (if I recall correctly) --=20 Devin ________________________________________ From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.= org] on behalf of Bernt Hansson [bah@bananmonarki.se] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:51 AM To: Fleuriot Damien Cc: questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc 2013-02-21 15:43, Fleuriot Damien skrev: > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> Hello list! >> >> It's me again. >> >> I was happily upgrading my jail make build* and so on. >> >> Make installworld failed with som chflag set on libc.so.7 >> so i left jail and went to the host and tought I fixit from there. >> >> I did remove the chflag and all was well I tought, but no. >> >> Copy it to the jail, someone screamed, ok I'll do that >> >> Well the problem is I copied it to the host amd64 and jail is i386. >> >> the host locked up hard and after a reboot I get >> >> libc.so.7 invalid file format. How do I get it back. >> >> I can not burn a cd with livefs, wich should be on memorystick >> anyway. >> >> Thanks for any help and it's needed. > > > > This is my libc.so.7 from the 19th, for 8-stable amd64, after the patch f= or the security advisory. > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # ls -l /lib/libc.so.7 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1399225 Feb 19 15:27 /lib/libc.so.7 > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # md5 /lib/libc.so.7 > MD5 (/lib/libc.so.7) =3D 9e4b09aa6dbc731bf56593b736e9fef1 > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # shasum /lib/libc.so.7 > 19e856f287586f52611aca9a4aa8a4104b65fb4e /lib/libc.so.7 > > root@pf1:/usr/ports/emulators/fuse # uname -a > FreeBSD pf1.backbone.dev 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6 r247008M: Tue F= eb 19 20:14:57 UTC 2013 root@pf1.backbone.dev:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNIV= ERSAL amd64 > > > I can host the file over HTTP if you want. > That was very nice of you, but how do I get the file into my machine? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 17:23:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD64F69 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4728B8 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1LHMvKj022657; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:22:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:22:47 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Teske, Devin" Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fleuriot Damien , questions FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:23:12 -0000 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev: > Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format I do not want to reinstall, have 4 encrypted disks. > My latest version of Druid has a very sophisticated "Interactive Disk Repair" script that will assemble your system "humpty-dumpty style" while booted from a CD or Thumb drive (you said you couldn't burn a CD, but it wasn't clear whether you could master a thumb drive). > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/druidbsd/files/FreeBSD-8.3_Druid-1.0b60.iso/download > > When you run the "Interactive Disk Repair (IDR) Shell" option, it presents you with a few questions (like, "I've found a saved network interface in rc.conf(5) -- would you like me to activate it for you?"), and ultimately mounts your system to present a working shell to fix your problems. > > Important: when it asks you if you want to chroot into the mounted filesystem, say NO (you're libc isn't working, so that would be a bad idea) -- rather, run from the LiveFS environment where /mnt is your mounted system. There's even a copy of libc in the LiveFS environment that you can copy over your old one... > > cp /cdrom/freebsd/rescue/lib/libc.so.7 /mnt/lib/libc.so.7 > > (if I recall correctly) > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 17:27:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF90D2EC for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (we-in-x022a.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893EA919 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z53so8197450wey.1 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:27:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=wdlsOKeDl6oHob4KcFlEFhAth0WTwviCvJJZUir1cYY=; b=YKMlOe4BKrqxcNPj3JeKBL6pcvZnNp+PiUTVJ5HLH2zJl9lFrNC5KrPw9VFwaryL2m lb90WMVF+92OxlzJIMShInm8rj77S7n53WUsPcxNnDiW22/TMquI+15HZoBz2ItbxOxH PmWDxE3r/5LLTbIJbNjZgMwXrbaa+Z5Ujpn2u2Rehjx1CCNdqJR9f7prElkr/kxsCvmt BK4o9y1n8SEtVTLw/9p+modfS1eg8qS2yT1OZ1W1Cp02YrDdl+pljvm4tJUU1/SCxupe 4uxAhvJe1D34alrtkPK8YrJT+s8gB9ODr7747hxWY8H3nUkPXcGanu/z6+4royE4znui lPRA== X-Received: by 10.194.239.202 with SMTP id vu10mr32614754wjc.49.1361467676459; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:27:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bs6sm41484105wib.4.2013.02.21.09.27.54 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:27:55 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:27:53 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <39666D18-7E13-4A02-911A-D64F4525E73B@my.gd> References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> To: Bernt Hansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSGAisbbb5aUgkEFoPG3UCbmzRjbymH9SNC0MK3PmcE6t/AbxsPCVf3uD0fRG8no/1pvut Cc: "Teske, Devin" , questions FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:27:58 -0000 On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev: >> Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... >=20 > That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in = to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh >=20 > > libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format >=20 > I do not want to reinstall, have 4 encrypted disks. And you have absolutely no way to boot I don't know, PXE, USB ? Do you have remote console access, anything ? I'll tell you what, I'll still scp the file to a www and give you the = link, if you should find a way to access your file system, you can = always copy it over. http://my.gd/libc.so.7 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 17:38:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923C757E for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8F69BC for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8a6t-0004SC-C7; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:39:07 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U8a6d-000OMS-Ne; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:38:51 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:38:21 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc Message-Id: <20130221173821.ef7973c6f8498fc93444f425@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd> <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: Fleuriot Damien , "Teske, Devin" , questions FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:38:58 -0000 On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:22:47 +0100 Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev: > > Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... > > That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in > to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh > > > libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format IIRC you get an option at this point to enter a full path to the shell, enter /rescue/sh which will get you a statically linked shell. You should then be able to use the tools in /rescue to replace libc provided you can somehow get a copy of it where you can read it. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 17:46:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F79A987 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E255A51 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa06.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1LHkXqg023737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:46:33 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT04.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.15]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:46:33 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Bernt Hansson Subject: RE: I made a mess. libc Thread-Topic: I made a mess. libc Thread-Index: AQHOEECuNs5vgWT6fkOEPkWySY7Dq5iEx6QAgAATJ4D//6szhoAAbjiA//+hu9w= Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:46:33 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC4FD@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21>, <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-21_08:2013-02-21,2013-02-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Fleuriot Damien , questions FreeBSD , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:46:37 -0000 Can you specify perhaps "/rescue/sh" as the single-user shell? That should get you in. Then you have to stick to static executables like /rescue/rcp to remotely t= ransfer files. Perhaps someone can host a file on a machine that can be reached via /rescu= e/rcp for you. --=20 Devin ________________________________________ From: Bernt Hansson [bah@bananmonarki.se] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:22 AM To: Teske, Devin Cc: Fleuriot Damien; questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev: > Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format I do not want to reinstall, have 4 encrypted disks. > My latest version of Druid has a very sophisticated "Interactive Disk Rep= air" script that will assemble your system "humpty-dumpty style" while boot= ed from a CD or Thumb drive (you said you couldn't burn a CD, but it wasn't= clear whether you could master a thumb drive). > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=3Dhttp://sourceforge.net/proje= cts/druidbsd/files/FreeBSD-8.3_Druid-1.0b60.iso/download&k=3D%2FbkpAUdJWZui= TILCq%2FFnQg%3D%3D%0A&r=3DLTzUWWrRnz2iN3PtHDubWRSAh9itVJ%2BMUcNBCQ4tyeo%3D%= 0A&m=3D07piZUd2tTTVmRt2abbbhXwBr9OUC7olyXwRy6BdjoM%3D%0A&s=3Da0b244b57abd48= f38a1cd817513b96950f4c6f2f035b3d33ddee2a27938b2f04 > > When you run the "Interactive Disk Repair (IDR) Shell" option, it present= s you with a few questions (like, "I've found a saved network interface in = rc.conf(5) -- would you like me to activate it for you?"), and ultimately m= ounts your system to present a working shell to fix your problems. > > Important: when it asks you if you want to chroot into the mounted filesy= stem, say NO (you're libc isn't working, so that would be a bad idea) -- ra= ther, run from the LiveFS environment where /mnt is your mounted system. Th= ere's even a copy of libc in the LiveFS environment that you can copy over = your old one... > > cp /cdrom/freebsd/rescue/lib/libc.so.7 /mnt/lib/libc.so.7 > > (if I recall correctly) > _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 18:25:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF3EC8A for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D173ED4 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so7909355wid.11 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:25:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=7thHNGnbVWjHEun0m79HWkdmfoISR2WEUBQr5rF+yAc=; b=VY1d0nuHS3z5gdw3AQ4y/H3x46U7onQIybsPdUZLiSVhF8G3/5l1DsO34ZF8A2sOqn KcqfX9LB83q+6zJxK7oEUiAM9Kz34nbnlxQXLbyMUH96hPWoaP7mCdfPbIKyXqhHylw5 kW/805YR205AF/7NuZhnODkppkj3ESDfOceamv9b3JnHe8aKmLZtdLVzmAd4quIu/iNn 0bnJ1FOhI5mA1lNW0ccWs3RPXT6r1V8zhkRuCkZqjkG7IXhPkHzn/X0UWDhAKCwGqwPN 3hLU7mIk2ZzPTPtqT2quiLlvBk403uabdt+n0KizDIc7l46xgmmvgHl9hLuX+P84erRR am0Q== X-Received: by 10.180.88.168 with SMTP id bh8mr27757117wib.15.1361471132095; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:25:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13sm5041179wie.0.2013.02.21.10.25.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:25:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc From: Fleuriot Damien In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC4FD@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:25:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8F43928B-7313-48C3-9C1B-FA89577D0CDE@my.gd> References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21>, <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC4FD@ltcfiswmsgmb21> To: Bernt Hansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/TtriaU4hIWxCfA5TYOTqHDdkvQL1Hzw59PTy2JeDhocXY1ZM58HyT1s5ZJVtKPK8KUnY Cc: questions FreeBSD , Devin Teske X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:25:39 -0000 As per Devin's suggestion, I just set up a RCP server from which you'll = be able to grab libc.so.7 using /rescue/rcp I'm gonna need, in private, your IP address so I can add you both to = .rhosts and firewall rules. I'm leaving work now so I may not answer again before 2-3 hours. On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:46 PM, "Teske, Devin" = wrote: > Can you specify perhaps "/rescue/sh" as the single-user shell? >=20 > That should get you in. >=20 > Then you have to stick to static executables like /rescue/rcp to = remotely transfer files. >=20 > Perhaps someone can host a file on a machine that can be reached via = /rescue/rcp for you. > --=20 > Devin >=20 >=20 > ________________________________________ > From: Bernt Hansson [bah@bananmonarki.se] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:22 AM > To: Teske, Devin > Cc: Fleuriot Damien; questions FreeBSD > Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc >=20 > 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev: >> Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... >=20 > That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in > to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh >=20 > > libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format >=20 > I do not want to reinstall, have 4 encrypted disks. >=20 >=20 >> My latest version of Druid has a very sophisticated "Interactive Disk = Repair" script that will assemble your system "humpty-dumpty style" = while booted from a CD or Thumb drive (you said you couldn't burn a CD, = but it wasn't clear whether you could master a thumb drive). >>=20 >> = https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=3Dhttp://sourceforge.net/projec= ts/druidbsd/files/FreeBSD-8.3_Druid-1.0b60.iso/download&k=3D%2FbkpAUdJWZui= TILCq%2FFnQg%3D%3D%0A&r=3DLTzUWWrRnz2iN3PtHDubWRSAh9itVJ%2BMUcNBCQ4tyeo%3D= %0A&m=3D07piZUd2tTTVmRt2abbbhXwBr9OUC7olyXwRy6BdjoM%3D%0A&s=3Da0b244b57abd= 48f38a1cd817513b96950f4c6f2f035b3d33ddee2a27938b2f04 >>=20 >> When you run the "Interactive Disk Repair (IDR) Shell" option, it = presents you with a few questions (like, "I've found a saved network = interface in rc.conf(5) -- would you like me to activate it for you?"), = and ultimately mounts your system to present a working shell to fix your = problems. >>=20 >> Important: when it asks you if you want to chroot into the mounted = filesystem, say NO (you're libc isn't working, so that would be a bad = idea) -- rather, run from the LiveFS environment where /mnt is your = mounted system. There's even a copy of libc in the LiveFS environment = that you can copy over your old one... >>=20 >> cp /cdrom/freebsd/rescue/lib/libc.so.7 /mnt/lib/libc.so.7 >>=20 >> (if I recall correctly) >>=20 >=20 > _____________ > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or = confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete = the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the = message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In = addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is = subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended = recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 19:00:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236CFD16 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F251B2 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1LJ0Imx047502; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:00:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r1LJ0Hgh047498; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:00:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:00:17 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com X-X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org To: Shane Ambler Subject: Re: jail and networking In-Reply-To: <51258CEA.1050006@ShaneWare.Biz> Message-ID: References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> <51258CEA.1050006@ShaneWare.Biz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:00:19 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bernt Hansson X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:00:22 -0000 On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Shane Ambler wrote: > It's been a while since I experimented with jails but I'm pretty sure it is > the reason I changed my sshd_config > > When you start sshd on the base system by default it binds against 0.0.0.0 > and :: which is every ip4 and ip6 address configured on the base system, > which includes the aliased ip's for your jails. This is represented by the > *:22 from sockstat. When you start the jail it can't start sshd because the > base already has that address/port in use. > > In /etc/ssh/sshd_config comment out the ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 and > ListenAddress :: then add ListenAddress 10.0.0.3 > > service sshd restart > > start your jail and try again > > The jail config is fine as the jail only sees the one ip address assigned to > it. This is what fixed the problem. From the jail man page, "... The following frequently deployed services must have their individual configuration files modified to limit the application to listening to a specific IP address ...". It then specifically mentions ssh and send mail. The system I looked at runs seven jails fine without my having made that change. I am not sure why I am getting away with this, but I also thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 19:22:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D324888 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3E3300 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.17]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1LJM6q3030322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:22:06 -0600 Received: from dtwin (10.242.182.124) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:22:05 -0600 From: Devin Teske To: , "'Shane Ambler'" References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> <51258CEA.1050006@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: jail and networking Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:22:00 -0800 Message-ID: <031701ce1068$baa82cf0$2ff886d0$@fisglobal.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIvW9eow+qT+JSedtJtBg3UpaiRIAMX5rQjAd6qPPcBQ567NwFg2x6BAhgWOowBz1b+dQIbzLQ8AoJvtRABHo3F4QHqo1vVAeKQKVeXGbQOEA== Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.242.182.124] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-21_08:2013-02-21,2013-02-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: devin.teske@fisglobal.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Bernt Hansson' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:22:10 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of doug@safeport.com > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:00 AM > To: Shane Ambler > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Bernt Hansson > Subject: Re: jail and networking > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Shane Ambler wrote: > > > It's been a while since I experimented with jails but I'm pretty sure it is > > the reason I changed my sshd_config > > > > When you start sshd on the base system by default it binds against 0.0.0.0 > > and :: which is every ip4 and ip6 address configured on the base system, > > which includes the aliased ip's for your jails. This is represented by the > > *:22 from sockstat. When you start the jail it can't start sshd because the > > base already has that address/port in use. > > > > In /etc/ssh/sshd_config comment out the ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 and > > ListenAddress :: then add ListenAddress 10.0.0.3 > > > > service sshd restart > > > > start your jail and try again > > > > The jail config is fine as the jail only sees the one ip address assigned to > > it. > > This is what fixed the problem. From the jail man page, "... The following > frequently deployed services must have their individual configuration files > modified to limit the application to listening to a specific IP address ...". It > then specifically mentions ssh and send mail. > > The system I looked at runs seven jails fine without my having made that change. > I am not sure why I am getting away with this, but I also thank you > What I find strange is that: 1. I knew about ListenAddress w/respect to jails, but... 2. We are not changing it (sshd_config has no ListenAddress -- leading to default values used), yet... 3. Base machine and jails both work fine Not sure when it's required versus not, because we're running fine without that change here with over a dozen jails. The only thing I've ever noticed is that we tend to use jail_NAME_ip="iface|addr" while most everybody else seems to be using jail_NAME_ip="addr". -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 21:03:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9410C758 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70737B0D for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F7C3B9DD; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:03:30 -0800 (PST) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: David Demelier Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:03:30 -0800 Message-ID: <7003.1361480610@server1.tristatelogic.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:03:40 -0000 In message David Demelier wrote: >I've never understood the difference between ATA_CAM and atapicam, what are >the difference between them? I'm sorry if I confused anyone or anything. When I said "atapicam" I probably should have said "ATA_CAM". But as far as I know, both of those terms refer to the same thing, i.e. the "CAM" subsystem and how it interacts with ATA/ATAPI devices to make thme look more like SCSI devices. Regards, rfg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 21:10:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0849AB10 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACDFB8B for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 10so11863673ied.2 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:10:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GyZEEykPPLPGMBc2XHaEe1BnH/edymqdizJBp9dKQlE=; b=F6Jeng3SJ7yRg+ejJneP72oj8//MZqXMGoHDqHfzZNKP1cKP2Y+5FQ4AEVD6utHmYj kw0xHVCUnFCrXt8ad+pKT3TERbe+k63uP7o8TvNEUfFGn6I2Tv2CJh3I7z5NNegXLwho R+r9sBB5RSJyiMzy7BPFZiS0jkhPiiHHKYIZk9GWvfE7AnIhSALgqtvIqLDQL0CHRjrS R02dG1QhYBmepQQw8fBI5V+BHImQfyR6wzn4WXBBQ2azBnfKyPOOJEhcRi5I+Lj7sbPb QrJfD3YbfsHhw9YsrXJScgsOci2+XEEHoWvii/NLYlSbTT6C4srRyRXuChQXmPRBE6cy 33Ew== X-Received: by 10.43.65.195 with SMTP id xn3mr1432345icb.5.1361481053420; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-98-212-197-211.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.212.197.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xe9sm486963igb.7.2013.02.21.13.10.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:10:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51268D52.5000906@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:10:42 -0600 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:10:54 -0000 On 2/21/2013 11:22 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev: >> Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... > > That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in > to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh > > > libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format > > I do not want to reinstall, have 4 encrypted disks. > > If you get the PC-BSD memstick, it boots FreeBSD with a GUI. You'll want the USB Live probably. The PC-BSD versions match the FreeBSD versions. If you're running 8.3, get the 8.3 memstick for instance. You could be safe just copying the libc from PC-BSD to your host, and then just reinstall for sanity's sake. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 21:22:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2292106 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9405CCE2 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7D73B9DD for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:22:50 -0800 (PST) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:22:50 -0800 Message-ID: <7111.1361481770@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:22:50 -0000 First let me say "Thank you!" to everyone who responded. Several people asked if I got my cdrecord from ports or packages. It was/is freshly built from ports. (I don't use packages anymore, because I always want the latest and greatest for all my ports.) Anyway, after I posted here, I did dutifully report the problem/issue I encountered to both the FreeBSD package maintainer and also to the guy who seems (based on the content of the web site mentioned in the FreeBSD port Makefile) to be the actual author of cdrecord. After that, I did solve my problem. Thankfully, I had a rather newer CD/DVD writer drive lying around... newer than the one on which I had experienced the cdrecord failure... so I took down the machine in question and swaped that one in and then tried again. And sure enough, now I can record CDs just fine. Sigh. I guess it serves me right for being a cheapskate and always trying to get by with older equipment. But still, the original drive on which I experienced the failure is not really THAT old. I'm looking at it now and it says right on the top "MANUFACTURED February 2006". OK, so it _is_ PATA, rather than SATA (like the one I have now replaced it with) but still, I mean geeeezzzz. The thing is only 7 years old. If it had been from the prior century, then I could understand it not being supported. Well, I suppose that I can't bitch and/or moan too awful much. I see that a local retailer is having a sale and I can now pick up a brand new LG CD/DVD burner... with MDISK capability even... not that I'm at all likely to ever use that... for only $14.99. So out with the old and in with the new... I guess. Regards, rfg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 22:00:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0621D93F; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com (mail-ee0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E21F22; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b47so5437eek.15 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:00:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Z2ImSEKpK0R2wz/CvsGGkhjKN00K7LhHxJzOqCD1XHs=; b=KGJTyevA+Gp8t12+RiXOJ75ZbtfvNRtUfDQkrx2k4NdxaHV9A/7/r3/1D0u9RPmAMm DZmqSjh1N9SY/7U+zMhoxWP6msfKf7FLWiPbrBij2/oOl/0WjSz9Pf7WOJSSHrVL+giK I4jHdW6lqdPY7DEOFxrmyYS6Gwjx/nra6QIYHC3xbWlQPmGV+FkCa8F6k4srVRp0KGVK QWUUXubxzQOL9r45Yey2S+VcjjETZxbLU05R1NXuGp/aLtqEMlgeU/i7NQEEJEFqzSq4 j3Wa3/Hgdi03y0BftqUkW9H8FB1j5zc1fsoctYM79fqKBPgHOqgEhCH6uB8MCCzT9Brd bsLw== X-Received: by 10.14.204.3 with SMTP id g3mr85404371eeo.27.1361484047192; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:00:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([178.150.115.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m46sm36353eeo.16.2013.02.21.14.00.45 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:00:46 -0800 (PST) Sender: Mikolaj Golub Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:43 +0200 From: Mikolaj Golub To: Chad M Stewart Subject: Re: HAST - detect failure and restore avoiding an outage? Message-ID: <20130221220042.GA2900@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:00:49 -0000 On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:54:54PM -0600, Chad M Stewart wrote: > > I built a 2 node cluster for testing HAST out. Each node is an older HP server with 6 scsi disks. Each disk is configured as RAID 0 in the raid controller, I wanted a JBOD to be presented to FreeBSD 9.1 x86. I allocated a single disk for the OS, and the other 5 disks for HAST. > > node2# zpool status > pool: scsi-san > state: ONLINE > scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h27m with 0 errors on Tue Feb 19 17:38:55 2013 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > scsi-san ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > hast/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > hast/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > hast/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > hast/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0 > hast/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 > gpt/disk0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > > Yesterday I physically pulled disk2 (from node1) out to simulate a > failure. ZFS didn't see anything wrong, expected. hastd did see > the problem, expected. 'hastctl status' didn't show me anything > unusual or indicate any problem that I could see on either node. I > saw hastd reporting problems in the logs, otherwise everything > looked fine. Is there a way to detect a failed disk from hastd > besides the log? camcontrol showed the disk had failed and > obviously I'll be monitoring using it as well. It looks currently logs are only way to detect errors from hastd side. Here is a patch that adds local i/o error statistics, accessable avia hastctl: http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/hast.stat_error.1.patch hastctl output: role: secondary provname: test localpath: /dev/md102 extentsize: 2097152 (2.0MB) keepdirty: 0 remoteaddr: kopusha:7771 replication: memsync status: complete dirty: 0 (0B) statistics: reads: 0 writes: 366 deletes: 0 flushes: 0 activemap updates: 0 local i/o errors: 269 Pawel, what do you think about this patch? > For recovery I installed a new disk in the same slot. To protect > the data reliability the safest way I can think of to recover is to > do the following: > > 1 - node1 - stop the apps > 2 - node1 - export pool > 3 - node1 - hastctl create disk2 > 4 - node1 - for D in 1 2 3 4 5; do hastctl role secondary;done > 5 - node2 - for D in 1 2 3 4 5; do hastctl role primary;done > 6 - node2 - import pool > 7 - node2 - start the apps > At step 5 the hastd will start to resynchronize node2:disk2 -> > node1:disk2. I've been trying to think of a way to re-establish the > mirror without having to restart/move the pool _and_ not pose > additional risk of data loss. > > To avoid an application outage I suppose the following would work: > > 1 - insert new disk in node1 > 2 - hastctl role init disk2 > 3 - hastctl create disk2 > 4 - hastctl role primary disk2 > > At that point ZFS would have seen a disk failure and then started > resilvering the pool. No application outage, but now only 4 disks > contain the data (assuming changing bits on the pool, not static > content). Using the previous steps application outage, but a > healthy pool is maintained always. > Is there another scenario I'm thinking of where both data health and > no application outage could be achieved? > -- Mikolaj Golub From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 23:18:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A552DCC8 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7BC3E1 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1LNIdIc030626; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:18:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <5126AB44.7020202@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:18:28 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> <51262DB4.9070303@bananmonarki.se> <51264157.7020608@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:18:48 -0000 2013-02-21 17:35, Warren Block skrev: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: > >> 2013-02-21 15:47, Warren Block skrev: >>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>>> 2013-02-21 00:52, Ronald F. Guilmette skrev: >>>>> >>>>> And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? >>>>> >>>> Try http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ its in ports as >>>> sysutils/dvd+rw-tools >>> >>> But growisofs from dvd+rw-tools only writes DVDs. cdrecord from >>> cdrtools-3.00_2 worked for me yesterday, burning a CD on an external USB >>> drive. >> >> growisofs writes cd's, no matter what they are called. > > Not for me. With a CD-R: > > :-( /dev/cd0: media is not recognized as recordable DVD: 9 > > The other difference is that growisofs is based on mkisofs, and takes a > list of files to write. I don't know if it has a way of writing an ISO > image directly. From the handbook; http://www.se.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-dvds.html To burn a pre-mastered image, such as imagefile.iso, use: # growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0=imagefile.iso From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 23:37:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CDE3D3 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD846E7 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1LNbn1f030993; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:37:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <5126AFC3.8010802@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:37:39 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Isom Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> <51268D52.5000906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51268D52.5000906@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:37:52 -0000 2013-02-21 22:10, Joshua Isom skrev: > On 2/21/2013 11:22 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> 2013-02-21 18:01, Teske, Devin skrev: >>> Is it the base machine that won't boot? I got this ... >> >> That is correct. So no cd burning no nothing...Well it want to drop in >> to a single shell bla bla bla press enter for /bin/sh >> >> >> libexec* libc.so.7: invalid file format >> >> I do not want to reinstall, have 4 encrypted disks. >> >> > > If you get the PC-BSD memstick, it boots FreeBSD with a GUI. You'll > want the USB Live probably. The PC-BSD versions match the FreeBSD > versions. If you're running 8.3, get the 8.3 memstick for instance. You > could be safe just copying the libc from PC-BSD to your host, and then > just reinstall for sanity's sake. Yes that is an idea. Since Damien was kind to host the file I downloaded it and will try later today (friday) The problem is I can't burn or otherwise get in to the machine. libc.so.7: invalid file format From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 02:30:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3490B94 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B16E13 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334E02777F; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:30:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1M2U6Pq002055; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:30:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:30:06 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: cdrecord: Please report. Message-Id: <20130222033006.3bea76b7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> References: <12037.1361404359@server1.tristatelogic.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:30:10 -0000 On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:52:39 -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > I am not a happy camper. > > Now that I've ``upgraded'' from 8.3-RELEASE to 9.1-RELEASE it appears that > good old burncd no longer works, apparently because the CD/DVD drive is > now exclusively handled as an ATAPICAM device. That was to be expected. > So I try to use cdrecord and I get this: > > # cdrecord dev=0,0,0 driveropts=burnfree FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso Try instead: # cdrecord dev=0,0,0 speed=12 -v -eject -tao -data Some drives get crazy when you don't provide a slow burning speed. Add other options (burnfree) if needed. Just for comparison: If you want to burn a music CD: # cdrecord dev=0,0,0 speed=12 -v -eject -dao -audio You can see the obvious difference -data vs. -audio, but also -tao (track at once) vs -dao (disk at once). > cdrecord: The current problem looks like a buffer underrun. Is your drive faster than your disk which "hands in" the data? Try to reduce the writing speed. > cdrecord: It looks like 'driveropts=burnfree' does not work for this drive. A clear message. You can use the -prcap option to find out what your recorder will support; see "man cdrecord" for details. > So, um, WTF? To whom am supposed to "report" this failure? To your superior. :-) > And more to the point, how can I burn a simple damn CD now? Try the command mentioned above. I've left burncd somewhere in FreeBSD 5 and I'm now using cdrecord exclusively. When run as a !root user, make sure permissions to access the recorder are set properly. Maybe add an alias for your dialog shell. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 05:38:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8121FB for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40FA7EC for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2013 16:08:08 +1030 Message-ID: <5127043C.8020306@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:08:04 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: jail and networking References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> <51258CEA.1050006@ShaneWare.Biz> <031701ce1068$baa82cf0$2ff886d0$@fisglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <031701ce1068$baa82cf0$2ff886d0$@fisglobal.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doug@safeport.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Bernt Hansson' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:38:11 -0000 On 22/02/2013 05:52, Devin Teske wrote: > What I find strange is that: > > 1. I knew about ListenAddress w/respect to jails, but... > > 2. We are not changing it (sshd_config has no ListenAddress -- leading to > default values used), yet... > > 3. Base machine and jails both work fine > > Not sure when it's required versus not, because we're running fine without that > change here with over a dozen jails. > > The only thing I've ever noticed is that we tend to use > jail_NAME_ip="iface|addr" while most everybody else seems to be using > jail_NAME_ip="addr". > We may need to expand out from that. I use jail_NAME_ip="addr" but also ipv4_addrs_re0="10.0.0.254/24 10.0.0.1-5/24" route_jaillan0="-net 10.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.254" static_routes="jaillan0" Don't recall where I got that from but think it was an easy way to alias a number of ip's whereas ifconfig__alias0 sets one ip at a time and is also deprecated. If you use jail_NAME_ip="iface|addr" does this mean you don't have ip addresses aliased to the iface on startup and they get aliased as the jail starts? That would be why sshd isn't bound to the address before. man rc.conf for jail__ip says "... Additionally each address can be prefixed by the name of an interface followed by a pipe to overwrite" does that mean it clears the ip from the base system and re-creates it for the jail? I also see jail__interface "...When set, sets the interface to use when setting IP address alias. Note that the alias is created at jail startup and removed at jail shutdown." Which is what sounds like the solution to not have ip's available when sshd starts so it isn't bound to them. Also what sys version were these options added? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 05:45:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2077F30E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F6B839 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2013 16:14:59 +1030 Message-ID: <512705BB.1020801@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:14:27 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> <51268D52.5000906@gmail.com> <5126AFC3.8010802@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <5126AFC3.8010802@bananmonarki.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joshua Isom , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:45:29 -0000 On 22/02/2013 10:07, Bernt Hansson wrote: > Yes that is an idea. Since Damien was kind to host the file I downloaded > it and will try later today (friday) > > The problem is I can't burn or otherwise get in to the machine. > > libc.so.7: invalid file format > You missed the earlier suggestion - at the single user prompt for a shell don't just hit enter - type in /rescue/sh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 06:10:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6980E681 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318538E4 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa06.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1M6AkZJ000614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:10:46 -0600 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([10.132.99.23]) by LTCFISWMSGHT05.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.16]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:10:45 -0600 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Shane Ambler Subject: RE: jail and networking Thread-Topic: jail and networking Thread-Index: AQHOD4SVocHfXKmkP0qgJ0SlOgMpJ5iC7bDLgAB7SgCAAAbqgIAABF0A//+lAL2AAGgvgIAAI28AgAAb5wCAAA0QgIAANd0AgAENOICAAAYSAIAArCAA//+igb0= Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:10:44 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC9AE@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <5124F505.4040906@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABA71@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51250B20.4000308@bananmonarki.se> <512510ED.6080807@mail.com>, <51251496.4050701@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EABC1F@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51251FA5.6030903@mail.com> <512554C6.3070306@bananmonarki.se> <51258CEA.1050006@ShaneWare.Biz> <031701ce1068$baa82cf0$2ff886d0$@fisglobal.com>, <5127043C.8020306@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <5127043C.8020306@ShaneWare.Biz> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.120] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-22_03:2013-02-22,2013-02-22,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: "doug@safeport.com" , "Teske, Devin" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , 'Bernt Hansson' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:10:49 -0000 On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 22/02/2013 05:52, Devin Teske wrote: >=20 > > What I find strange is that: > > > > 1. I knew about ListenAddress w/respect to jails, but... > > > > 2. We are not changing it (sshd_config has no ListenAddress -- leading = to > > default values used), yet... > > > > 3. Base machine and jails both work fine > > > > Not sure when it's required versus not, because we're running fine with= out that > > change here with over a dozen jails. > > > > The only thing I've ever noticed is that we tend to use > > jail_NAME_ip=3D"iface|addr" while most everybody else seems to be using > > jail_NAME_ip=3D"addr". > > >=20 > We may need to expand out from that. I use jail_NAME_ip=3D"addr" but also >=20 > ipv4_addrs_re0=3D"10.0.0.254/24 10.0.0.1-5/24" > route_jaillan0=3D"-net 10.0.0.0/24 10.0.0.254" > static_routes=3D"jaillan0" >=20 > Don't recall where I got that from but think it was an easy way to alias > a number of ip's whereas ifconfig__alias0 sets one ip at a time > and is also deprecated. >=20 > If you use jail_NAME_ip=3D"iface|addr" does this mean you don't have ip > addresses aliased to the iface on startup and they get aliased as the > jail starts? That would be why sshd isn't bound to the address before. Correct, and this was my leading theory. > man rc.conf for jail__ip says "... Additionally each address can > be prefixed by the name of an interface followed by a pipe to overwrite" > does that mean it clears the ip from the base system and re-creates it > for the jail? Dunno -- I first learned about "iface|addr" from reading the code. It did w= hat I wanted _and_ improved the clarity/readability of rc.conf(5) in the ca= se of multiple jails utilizing separate interfaces on similar subnets. Thus= , it was embraced. > I also see jail__interface "...When set, sets the interface to > use when setting IP address alias. Note that the alias is created at > jail startup and removed at jail shutdown." Never used that setting before. > Which is what sounds like the solution to not have ip's available when > sshd starts so it isn't bound to them. Right-o. > Also what sys version were these options added? I would guess 8.x as we're using iface|addr in 8.1 (as previously mentioned= , not using jail__interface -- dunno about that one). The following URLs might be of assistance in tracking down the origins of v= arious options: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/jail http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/etc/rc.d/jail --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 08:19:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0EFDD2 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@clari.net.au) Received: from fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ACEE43 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail36.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail36.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.76]) by fallbackmx08.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1M8JF11021680 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:19:15 +1100 Received: from [192.168.100.102] (c114-76-1-137.eburwd4.vic.optusnet.com.au [114.76.1.137]) by mail36.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1M8J3Wh024624 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:19:05 +1100 Message-ID: <512729F6.10007@clari.net.au> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:19:02 +1100 From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> <2E4C6324-D93A-46EF-82C4-D7C8F9D06894@my.gd>, <51264295.1040902@bananmonarki.se> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201EAC464@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <512657E7.90404@bananmonarki.se> <51268D52.5000906@gmail.com> <5126AFC3.8010802@bananmonarki.se> <512705BB.1020801@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <512705BB.1020801@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Auu2R5BP c=1 sm=1 a=_WFI8pCH4AAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ejE0-8HIAAAA:8 a=ucYbncp4-jQA:10 a=p-XEBO4hddXPUqK3QA4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=+rVrtY7z3DVyADW7HUk29Q==:117 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:19:24 -0000 On 22/02/2013 4:44 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: > You missed the earlier suggestion - at the single user prompt for a > shell don't just hit enter - type in /rescue/sh This suggestion was gold for me, but in a different way. I have for years lamented the passing of static binaries in /bin and /sbin. I forget who mentioned that /rescue/* are statically linked - I had never known that. Today I have just built a 5.4-RELEASE jail on a 9.1-STABLE system, and being able to include a statically linked 9.1-STABLE 'ps' is very useful. The 5.4 version of ps is useless in this jail. And just in case the significance is lost on Bernt, /rescue/sh does not rely on libc, so it won't care if libc is broken. Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 10:28:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE7AC7C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF263C6 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:28:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:28:32 +0100 Message-ID: <5127484C.2050208@ose.nl> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:28:28 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Copyright notice in 9.1-RELEASE-p1 is 1992-2012 instead of 1992-2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:28:43 -0000 I just upgraded to systems from 7.4-STABLE to 9.1-RELEASE-p1 and noticed that the copyright shows 1992-2012 instead of 1992-2013 Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE #0 r247092: Thu Feb 21 11:22:38 CET 2013 Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p1 #1: Fri Feb 22 11:14:03 CET 2013 In CURRENT it is OK Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #2 r246823: Mon Feb 18 08:04:55 CET 2013 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 10:33:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9AED62 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ukaszg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com (mail-qc0-f173.google.com [209.85.216.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37695400 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id b12so205940qca.18 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:33:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FX72oA0zlsXe1X16czREERQZ4W7aPWsYgHamZZUSE/0=; b=jmmXTQV9ZTl8R7Z8zrV6/gtbnESCik8mpJmRXr7SO8VJq5KKOh7zSu/ZpTabnlvRQZ 9m3omHTqv5OFlwMb5keVmRCUp0x8KcxPhuuuIH86QffeKVxgJt58vrONHI4knU8m9Owq wLvamYN0wXvYbIg/0A7wibuxUNgc+yc8HjFQcBz/xJO9gLu/kx43VBgIIMvx79wxDniX mKn4y0Evvx7FU1DwJrBjzJW3zAV/FSSabHKDhM2Ggxdl7QVYbSS17LLwRLK5GE0OgBvy oIzdpO7HoWzP0yRq+HoM9ITbNUUGhqcKUqTYyg5th26MmEayZ4tPpUBubCQxE7M5mn0F 92UQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.175.198 with SMTP id bb6mr772087qab.96.1361529211434; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:33:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.26.169 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:33:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:33:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Root on zfs (stable9) - how to make it bootable From: uki To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:33:32 -0000 Hi, I want to install freebsd9 (stable) on zfs root, unfortunately my bios is unable to recognize GPT discs. I'm using MBR disc, with BSD slice (on mbr index 4) containing freebsd-zfs filesystem. I've no idea how to make it bootable, I've tried using: zpool export sys dd if=3D/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/ada0s4 count=3D1 dd if=3D/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/ada0s4a skip=3D1 seek=3D1024 zpool import sys When I select F4 (slice with zfs) whilst booting the computer just turns of= f. How do I make it boot? Do I need freebsd-boot slice? I have set bootfs property on pool, and added vfs.root.mountfrom to loader.= conf. Cheers, =C5=81ukasz Gruner From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 10:54:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137533B4 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF92720 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t44so404700wey.26 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:54:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9WbVK6oZdGV74KR9YxDXs4/BfH/HbT3WMrx+Aub/o5o=; b=yqIZ2pvi6xE7PBuTcaddEqPWsG6TSHjyeyxTNkMlhdviNZA78ErRzm3mboJd3EVI7i YTqFdCrcXvpfmNUII543Yo7tUB/rGYzZcMdG4m/K5xBDJhK/vpC0TkOiIQ7Ar1Sm0BuT XRvfx2oRbsjyvmEY0RbX8Alw8U2EYCPJNCjcFjj2c8m8kGpdEXZyC4mRFLfaMqPQAtYd Labw21MCRujCP6JiSVVucAJZ/ozyosGvOZkxeLnyRqdKlKXhDWDGsgSwvhoxXhKI0vJ/ 4dio9w7kPAmWRvb473LqJHLBtbI468aRy/USgka5buZMeePqK5W14Y2GHdF8MnyeSOOU x33g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.83.135 with SMTP id q7mr2426730wiy.19.1361530436021; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.60.147 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:53:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:53:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Root on zfs (stable9) - how to make it bootable From: David Demelier To: uki Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:54:02 -0000 There are a lot of example in gpart(8) man page. You should use it I think you should do something like gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr ada0 gpart bootcode -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada0 (The second assume that you have a freebsd-boot as first index in ada0) Cheers, 2013/2/22 uki > Hi, > > I want to install freebsd9 (stable) on zfs root, unfortunately my bios > is unable to recognize GPT discs. > I'm using MBR disc, with BSD slice (on mbr index 4) containing > freebsd-zfs filesystem. > > I've no idea how to make it bootable, I've tried using: > > zpool export sys > dd if=3D/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/ada0s4 count=3D1 > dd if=3D/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/ada0s4a skip=3D1 seek=3D1024 > zpool import sys > > > When I select F4 (slice with zfs) whilst booting the computer just turns > off. > How do I make it boot? Do I need freebsd-boot slice? > > I have set bootfs property on pool, and added vfs.root.mountfrom to > loader.conf. > > > Cheers, > =C5=81ukasz Gruner > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 10:55:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465948C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3402274D for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l13so1930769wie.0 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:55:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N4IuagjH28KLF9wXxnaRRGGr8A1zVJcp2FcregeUiCU=; b=F2VIa4prDkFPnmJUq7FxADNfiSl4M+oOQgG415qbocOiJxTZoBMFAQEQ9DpbHLeASj KFb18oFrnESycFWRvwtT5M9T27P7P5jtWEWJT3ckXZ9h2WU/VC5mGX1h7KvZ57L91x0A y2q10VWABKDhgWcq2qwO2/TW/obfftggsOTOUoA9W6eGON9KsADLoH9z+GC0h77dzQ5e pUehYqoYdeL5LbKT4ke24Kp6nOuqJvO0fI/QKXhGmeIsgOmrQZ7jwU4N5kl3lBObZUcf slfbg8j8p5woARCEDuIuYsNt3SsYj0v0Ic/053d1TbgW0RGbbnt4z6j9idrctX0fnhHc htVQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.156.196 with SMTP id wg4mr2516584wjb.22.1361530553356; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:55:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.60.147 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:55:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:55:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Root on zfs (stable9) - how to make it bootable From: David Demelier To: uki Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:55:54 -0000 Sorry didn't read that you have a MBR slice instead of GPT then you should take a look at that one https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition 2013/2/22 David Demelier > There are a lot of example in gpart(8) man page. You should use it > > I think you should do something like > > gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr ada0 > gpart bootcode -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ada0 > > (The second assume that you have a freebsd-boot as first index in ada0) > > Cheers, > > > > 2013/2/22 uki > >> Hi, >> >> I want to install freebsd9 (stable) on zfs root, unfortunately my bios >> is unable to recognize GPT discs. >> I'm using MBR disc, with BSD slice (on mbr index 4) containing >> freebsd-zfs filesystem. >> >> I've no idea how to make it bootable, I've tried using: >> >> zpool export sys >> dd if=3D/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/ada0s4 count=3D1 >> dd if=3D/boot/zfsboot of=3D/dev/ada0s4a skip=3D1 seek=3D1024 >> zpool import sys >> >> >> When I select F4 (slice with zfs) whilst booting the computer just turns >> off. >> How do I make it boot? Do I need freebsd-boot slice? >> >> I have set bootfs property on pool, and added vfs.root.mountfrom to >> loader.conf. >> >> >> Cheers, >> =C5=81ukasz Gruner >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > -- > Demelier David > --=20 Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 12:04:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8E5697 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ukaszg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9771FA3C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j8so353100qah.13 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:04:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CguOTvyqYduKhrqtWYDAb8LjsZzU5M7+83fWx3rVrTk=; b=qCPEPWXc11jPMySFUAl+GzXIYKqfio1z1FNziFClOl/SUPJV8n3ROO9Fb4InorUys3 nC+/fKhM9KRN3pUgxCmoqtrrU93krTgRFwNlRvPfhiwTlLd7Y+489kHD7YJDCULCcYmR +t4jKa/yHBBTG2YMzRLWiVrKzZPRYjeLsW1A9zkuZSMeeuyTojJ3+iAbOa9QR1Ahba30 HTj/CmWIqM8eHl8g5K5xGAz76u/l/s6+bNLYnaNyvFZ3Y/MVJ3WeUZVO6opdOZz2j26H zULCoyzB+OEMgdBiXZbJwY/+GveVoqgzLSggEYtQDV5e1MXjkbiKV03iwu4cM9mD9nBg 2B3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.76.198 with SMTP id d6mr937870qak.30.1361534649837; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:04:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.26.169 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:04:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:04:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Root on zfs (stable9) - how to make it bootable From: uki To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:04:16 -0000 2013/2/22 David Demelier : > Sorry didn't read that you have a MBR slice instead of GPT > > then you should take a look at that one > https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition I have used that one, unfortunately I was unable to boot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 12:59:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A1D3E2 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@noos.larseighner.com) Received: from emailserver2.asdf456.com (emailserver2.asdf456.com [72.18.207.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0E67D7B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17709 invoked by uid 0); 22 Feb 2013 12:52:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO noos.larseighner.com) (71.20.75.102) by emailserver2.asdf456.com with SMTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:52:55 -0800 Received: by noos.larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@noos.larseighner.com; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:56:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:55:59 -0600 (CST) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@noos.larseighnerhome.com To: Bas Smeelen Subject: Re: Copyright notice in 9.1-RELEASE-p1 is 1992-2012 instead of 1992-2013 In-Reply-To: <5127484C.2050208@ose.nl> Message-ID: References: <5127484C.2050208@ose.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:59:40 -0000 On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Bas Smeelen wrote: > I just upgraded to systems from 7.4-STABLE to 9.1-RELEASE-p1 and noticed that > the copyright shows 1992-2012 instead of 1992-2013 While it would be good for this to be fixed, under the terms of the Berne Convention and US copyright law, the notice is not absolutely necessary (this is the "You knew it wasn't yours!" answer your mom gave to "I did not know whose it was") and defects in the notice are not fatal to the copyright. Some fairly feeble remedies (such as amending the notice on undistributes copies, even after an infringement has been detected) are sufficient to protect the work. (I am not a lawyer, but I live from intellectual property.) -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 19:32:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4134BFD for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2809D73A for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (usenet4all.se [82.182.32.53]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r1MJWIqF058120 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:32:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <5127C7B8.5060605@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:32:08 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: I made a mess. libc References: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <51263091.1080507@bananmonarki.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:32:27 -0000 Thank you all for your input. Went to the office very dark in my mind. I found a cd with amd64 8.0-R and I could copy libc.so.7 I Thank you ALL....now i'm crying so I leave you now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 23:56:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CF73F3 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.info) Received: from mail-gh0-f175.google.com (mail-gh0-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9602B7 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f175.google.com with SMTP id g18so230906ghb.34 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:56:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drenet.info; s=google; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=zBXEChnoyXzaXkE5RgQtdRfdRkm3fGkSdVRz2MzliTM=; b=SfulJqoCiVsQVcBfXKfir+cgSEeSEf8MFFxHlrnQzsBf5ffJfxRXPP0rD4m86kZNr1 IMMlAReTJuPcQbHfchXx7ocNW1/zWaCvBnX/L2YXhAlleZPRmenX8FnuJt6d4YMF6sH9 bj8JjX0CQQBqqfLV7byYzwBvncgGxiO80kU8M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=zBXEChnoyXzaXkE5RgQtdRfdRkm3fGkSdVRz2MzliTM=; b=Do0wEBwcbflPWEDFCc9WMHQB/2ZovnFho5WNVeJXFmSnrDYX4eoENBcu98EaXAe4A4 fDI5+oFYK0g2d9LUEAOGcwzpuuadVj7lBaJz95MA7jvgxO78o1iYgwlWjQ8CAym5SQv4 sHOtStpFxeGsGgtyPi2Qcf01OlXEkHwcHmqgi/gkud3fE/HicHDSrkiYOQdckCJdussa e20Mg8gorZMogkBARMHMdq1COnyE15X3cHYUzy2cdzfg1/t+bnAmww/qLi8ak0wVCf77 16H73db4XjD7pWWPst9d0nxA6SiCDqFhWDptfJsRLCTMHvKm7NzbZyKcrLmO80+jxl5m vySg== X-Received: by 10.101.40.2 with SMTP id s2mr2250199anj.88.1361577380311; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:56:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from desktop.drenet.local ([97.100.190.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm5295420ani.4.2013.02.22.15.56.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:56:19 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Goree To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Can't build kernel Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:56:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1891100.Xa0R7QjnRb@desktop.drenet.local> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (FreeBSD/8.3-STABLE; KDE/4.9.5; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcU+kVRDtHfc4V/YlYJOpw5+Emp0hEO1rzEeUk9wJqC6wUPv/1uGTTWaOU+QVeZk+sGUX2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:56:27 -0000 I'm running 8.3-STABLE (not sure if I should've posted this to freebsd-stable, please correct me if so). I'm able to successfully buildworld after an svn up of /usr/src, however when I try to build my customer kernel, the build stops at the following: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno- strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs - Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys - I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 -- param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel - mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow - msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector - Werror /usr/src/sys/x86/x86/local_apic.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/sys/x86/x86/local_apic.c:166: warning: 'lapic_resume' declared 'static' but never defined *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Here is my kernel configuration [1]. Any suggestions on how to get this built properly or otherwise troubleshoot? I've also tried with GENERIC, which fails at the same exact spot. Building without ccache also fails at the same exact spot :( Thanks in advance for any guidance you can provide. [1]http://www.drenet.net/images/BUILD011313.txt -- Andre Goree andre@drenet.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 15:08:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ACE75C for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D130AFC for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.33]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LcV56-1UbDT42Rok-00jnnw for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:08:32 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2013 15:08:32 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-235-155.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO magni.rostock.home) [88.72.235.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 23 Feb 2013 16:08:32 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1545395 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+9/xkeD469LwniQN2JZOtNwa0lxkN1WXUNwFFcba V9QKqa57zIwjq1 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:07:56 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 9.1 on Dell Vostro Desktop 470 MT Message-Id: <20130223160756.6d90a56786459a2df1dc0e35@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__23_Feb_2013_16_07_56_+0100_+MU84J+qZ1u4Tr7x" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:08:34 -0000 --Signature=_Sat__23_Feb_2013_16_07_56_+0100_+MU84J+qZ1u4Tr7x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, we are considering a desktop from dell (vostro 470 mt) and I would like to know if someone has experience with freebsd (9.1) and this machine. Regards, Jens --=20 23. Hornung 2013, 16:05 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de Mount St. Helens should have used earth control. --Signature=_Sat__23_Feb_2013_16_07_56_+0100_+MU84J+qZ1u4Tr7x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJRKNtuAAoJED2+SXzzbciG7lINAK0YJffcehjbq+s4kJRjtZx9 N+EjLMKrj+QEebjIhjoYIxyJVY33quh/POf1T5pP2cSTtTCdRYNLo4e/lxR5Tii3 b19lr1ZfXAxumv3CElKkNpAcFa/rdKifa5lS8QOTmRtimreVk03Gsw6hInxbCcVP ZAMa8qMxIcHn8CFfuj2PoZQ6FPdNFSTo8Lxq5i0VOTSwbN6m+WX03PusNdjiQE1d tS1EpW+QKq4crxmX3yhs5GlkAUhwbJBQmqdkBWiQfrOCtZ6DEsjbE5Qrn7n4I3Hc /c4EDAf4RKjoRfnd2mezpDZqoTXWocs+cNiYJpmt1ceV/sDX7VcMvm9nQhPEmZi5 Ct4fgqY5a0nEadQKf6MmmNA/HBQoWCeo5JYiFkY4cNVYTkPjYooWrBqg94+knhir I3A8jxahL78ouC7jkIMY/HUBz1gJCMTu+6JFnVFvccO2sQjJ/Ev0yPqyTUbTV9sV h4Yt3nL/oIcZy2UF9bjFta6b7yHIM9qGw7+efsD+QqlErIQqHYLHdVggXA9bvuRR DCwzy6nyZNwmVrIfDTTr =UhnS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__23_Feb_2013_16_07_56_+0100_+MU84J+qZ1u4Tr7x-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 16:04:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFF3B08 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (smtpo.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9227D2E2 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100 From: vermaden Subject: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: interia.pl/pf09 X-Originating-IP: 77.115.65.107 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1361634431; bh=NtedmlhJA//bgTQRf2wKgMh9lPD+tlF5qDgdNkEyGII=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:Message-Id: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NppTXgjgqnxkRtq98ToW5Ys/50NUnhIDvmK19UDmMbWu+G41qRyVHQnmPQwjFvZsR ZBFNFsao1JLa6zxDu0witgHWrjFD1h2KzAgjuOS3GY/y8sw1OWbu/24IP2OvyDsLmu onNuknV+xFvyaxb46p1a8HAbrL/kkddK96IhuuOA= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:04:49 -0000 Why not simplify that: | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 | The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. | (...) ... into that: | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. | Copyright (c) 1979-1994 The Regents of the University of California. | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. | (...) Regards, vermaden From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 16:11:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D90E51 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DFD354 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63434276EC; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1NGBoBb002165; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100 From: Polytropon To: vermaden Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? Message-Id: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:11:53 -0000 On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote: > Why not simplify that: > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > | The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > | (...) > > ... into that: > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > | Copyright (c) 1979-1994 The Regents of the University of California. > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > | (...) Because you need to exclude 1981, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987 and 1990 which are missing in list of years. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 17:14:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FD66C0 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (smtpo.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EC3997 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:14:48 +0100 From: vermaden Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? To: Polytropon X-Mailer: interia.pl/pf09 In-Reply-To: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Originating-IP: 77.115.65.107 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1361639688; bh=A1WRpD0tV2ItUtdhLso+3LOwPYcQgK2qrzjl+CkL7sk=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References: X-Originating-IP:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mcaeZ5A7oDbBR5F8wmKMiurMOrjoo7Lc2hVAEADwIjKuBdCRuh4eOwsLBNp4D+rtf Yo0GgEwbWjNsfF/aBjudMgCUWtKN/baLO0pLGur3cC1Gl0X2RJ2CwKLnT1T5k0XtxT 0wvEt2GoRYdgP3yxto4o031+Pj1k+mfjU7gKhzlY= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:14:50 -0000 Od: "Polytropon" Do: "vermaden" ;=20 Wys=C5=82ane: 17:11 Sobota 2013-02-23 Temat: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote: > > Why not simplify that: > >=20 > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > > | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1= 994 > > | The Regents of the University of California. All rights reser= ved. > > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > | (...) > > =20 > > ... into that: > >=20 > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > > | Copyright (c) 1979-1994 The Regents of the University of California. > > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > | (...) >=20 > Because you need to exclude 1981, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987 and 1990 > which are missing in list of years. :-) It may sound like ignorance, but why we need to exclude them? We do not exclude any years for FreeBSD Project ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 17:20:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96E0867 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740F99C5 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.250]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87213CD89; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:19:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r1NHJwje002682; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:19:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:19:58 +0100 From: Polytropon To: vermaden Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? Message-Id: <20130223181958.d546a952.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:20:02 -0000 On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:14:48 +0100, vermaden wrote: > > > Od: "Polytropon" > Do: "vermaden" ; > WysÅ‚ane: 17:11 Sobota 2013-02-23 > Temat: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? > > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote: > > > Why not simplify that: > > > > > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > > > | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > > > | The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > > | (...) > > > > > > ... into that: > > > > > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > > > | Copyright (c) 1979-1994 The Regents of the University of California. > > > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > > | (...) > > > > Because you need to exclude 1981, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987 and 1990 > > which are missing in list of years. :-) > > It may sound like ignorance, but why we need to exclude them? To be honest: I have no idea. It's just that I noticed this at first sight. I would assume there is some specific legal sense behind this naming and counting convention; "two lawyers, three opinions" might apply. :-) > We do not exclude any years for FreeBSD Project ;) But "The FreeBSD Project" as a copyright holder covers a different time frame than "The Regents of the University of California", so this seems to be some specific difference causing two lines of copyright information. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 18:33:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F476B8 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12D2CC8 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9JuS-00081S-Ef; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:33:20 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U9JuD-000CAv-9w; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:33:05 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:32:34 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? Message-Id: <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: Polytropon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:33:14 -0000 On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote: > > Why not simplify that: > > > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > > | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, > > | 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > | (...) > > > > ... into that: > > > > | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. > > | Copyright (c) 1979-1994 The Regents of the University of California. > > | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > > | (...) > > Because you need to exclude 1981, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987 and 1990 > which are missing in list of years. :-) There's that, also that copyright message belongs to the Regents of the University of California and unless I misremember one of the license conditions is retaining their copyright notice - altering it would probably be a license violation. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 19:10:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8575CE17 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-x231.google.com (gg-in-x0231.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3CEDE0 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q1so320700gge.22 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:10:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wjcpp+YJFqZxa9KCMHFu/25PPaEugCd/PWE/0io89Jo=; b=j0H4fJIcTaSXWyUFc9ovwRQFke9tz+OhRjs5lK5FdRMX8AMQQaO3ovTCVv/q8l1LVw 3ybsxBG/oeCLOcGDQGrlaiPel/eajMIYDWPfZRm9ZwM7mHMSfM5xcQJCnTZfZ0gPwbSo pSqUYdwxARemb16KVggGebWb21kN+GXG922tsKTn+G0SjPIjp0HBHp/DetNuAw6scZB9 S8icb19jqwBTfYOGYikoJkehEfANysPCDCDbZANPBQiLZwcRXkw9doS7X53TH5i1lh6P QUOtur6i03cPn7QN6iBw9Tr2JkigIzMFaCX+Bf8nhdJbKBLJK2ZrVJeWx8QfRRPKpei3 gWQA== X-Received: by 10.236.146.137 with SMTP id r9mr11868202yhj.98.1361646611840; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (24-183-225-51.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com. [24.183.225.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v11sm8823459anq.2.2013.02.23.11.10.07 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:10:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5129140B.6050106@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:10:03 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:10:12 -0000 On 02/23/13 12:32, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100 > Polytropon wrote: > >> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote: >>> Why not simplify that: >>> >>> | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. >>> | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, >>> | 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. >>> | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >>> | (...) >>> >>> ... into that: >>> >>> | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. >>> | Copyright (c) 1979-1994 The Regents of the University of California. >>> | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >>> | (...) >> >> Because you need to exclude 1981, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987 and 1990 >> which are missing in list of years. :-) > > There's that, also that copyright message belongs to the Regents of > the University of California and unless I misremember one of the license > conditions is retaining their copyright notice - altering it would probably > be a license violation. > It seems the regents copyright claims end in 1994. Perhaps some underlying piece of code is still in FreeBSD requiring this notice? -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 20:45:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64E4AE4 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@example.com) Received: from yavin.vindaloo.com (yavin.vindaloo.com [72.52.97.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C15236 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from geonosis.vindaloo.com (ool-44c34eb3.dyn.optonline.net [68.195.78.179]) by yavin.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614AC51845 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:45:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from naboo.example.com (unknown [12.130.123.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by geonosis.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1984BC60; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:45:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by naboo.example.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ADE687301F; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:45:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:45:04 -0500 From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using svn to checkout a deprecated port. Message-ID: <20130223204504.GA1844@naboo.example.com> References: <20130218192335.GA7566@naboo.example.com> <5122D19F.2040804@ShaneWare.Biz> <20130219042309.GA7901@naboo.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130219042309.GA7901@naboo.example.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:45:16 -0000 On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:23:09PM -0500, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:43:03AM +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: > > On 19/02/2013 05:53, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I need to use svn to checkout the old "security/cfs" port so I can > > > do a one-time transfer of some data off of a USB drive. At the end of > > > the day, I just need the one port so if the cvs repository is > > > available I could also get it that way. In either case, I'm trying to > > > do the equivalent of: > > > > > > $ cvs co -r '2011/10/01' $FreeBSDportsRepo security/cvs > > > > > > in English, I want to checkout security/cvs from ports as it existed > > > on October 1st, 2011 (the port was deprecated on November 1st 2011. > > > > > > > It appears that checking out a deleted path doesn't work even if you > > specify a rev that it exists in. But checking out the parent works. > > I'd check it out to another dir then copy the specific files over. > > > > svn co -r 282000 svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head/security/ > > > > You can change the svn.freebsd.org to svn0.us-east.FreeBSD.org or > > svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org > > > > For reference I went to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports and clicked the > > revision number at the top (above the sticky revision box) then tried# > > jumping to a few different rev numbers till I got close to a commit date > > just before 2011/10/01. Once you have the rev you want you can go back > > up to ports (link at top of page) and enter a sticky revision. Then you > > can go to security/cfs and view the files. > > > > Thanks for the quick answers everyone, the trick seems to be three steps: > > # prime the tree with a guess as to the revision that you need. > > svn co -r --depth immediates svn:///security > > # refine the guess using the svn logs. > > cd security/cfs && svn log > > # checkout the revision that you wanted. ( updating didn't work...) > > cd ../.. && rm -rf security && svn co -r svn > In the case of cfs, this also worked: $ svn co -r 282000 --depth immediates svn:///security $ (cd security/cfs && svn log) | less ## the log revealed that the last revision was 281170 $ cd security $ svn up -r 281170 cfs $ cd cfs && su $ make; make install; make package clean Thanks again for the help. -- Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There will be an answer, Let it be." e: chris -at- vindaloo -dot- com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 20:49:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3A9D96; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawel@dawidek.net) Received: from mail.dawidek.net (garage.dawidek.net [91.121.88.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF9C2A2; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (89-73-195-149.dynamic.chello.pl [89.73.195.149]) by mail.dawidek.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D46278AF; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:46:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:51:03 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Mikolaj Golub Subject: Re: HAST - detect failure and restore avoiding an outage? Message-ID: <20130223205103.GN1377@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20130221220042.GA2900@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jh06fhy6YTawvwPV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130221220042.GA2900@gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Chad M Stewart , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:49:55 -0000 --jh06fhy6YTawvwPV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:00:43AM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > It looks currently logs are only way to detect errors from hastd side. > Here is a patch that adds local i/o error statistics, accessable avia > hastctl: >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/hast.stat_error.1.patch >=20 > hastctl output: >=20 > role: secondary > provname: test > localpath: /dev/md102 > extentsize: 2097152 (2.0MB) > keepdirty: 0 > remoteaddr: kopusha:7771 > replication: memsync > status: complete > dirty: 0 (0B) > statistics: > reads: 0 > writes: 366 > deletes: 0 > flushes: 0 > activemap updates: 0 > local i/o errors: 269 >=20 > Pawel, what do you think about this patch? I'm fine with the patchi except for missing breaks in switch added to hastd/primary.c. I'm also wondering... You count all those errors separately just to print them as one number. If we do that already let's print them separately, eg. local i/o errors: read(0), write(3), delete(5), flush(9) BTW. Why not to count activemap update errors as write and flush errors? --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://tupytaj.pl --jh06fhy6YTawvwPV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlEpK7cACgkQForvXbEpPzRiWwCfadfw1ncKUdyvM7J/6ObjAbJO FYgAoItNIzmXP3U0FRWi0ynG+hSEijKI =sw5K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jh06fhy6YTawvwPV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 21:34:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33416B6 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C9B67D for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id v19so1605149obq.7 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:33:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b58z2IwtSlp7UqqMDs7hPYJXy2gy29bnXLfCpZL/s6M=; b=mDrMJKlBKE39LjVQYo1PUvz3V8EBxUmsMi+wyPJqWuDEnKN/jiK9teIPlde/bZkPHr 8wAnarTvipOajy5F6ZD8h59RxCvnHazLs+FEkKBtFF5olQSkF8njI43v8eWj8i04cGWt gv2CbxjDmrtUBVbxD3e01SlRwhdwfAvXASLJPUo0T8T+aX3v0/cwzTpFYjyGpfoUUSQR aJEkvMtVhbb8jwmu0FuhnHBGr3nDh9GQA2Hsjswj5ziscINvGMXvaA8s5dLgh3Uh10oe xevaO41yP+yeJRK6Hbin5w/neQx7L2+pa06PYnEbJYrhzfHKpODMajliB0liwIl3Varw hpLw== X-Received: by 10.60.18.167 with SMTP id x7mr3123330oed.95.1361655235847; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-98-212-197-211.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.212.197.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm3036986obb.6.2013.02.23.13.33.54 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:33:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512935B7.7070008@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:33:43 -0600 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> <5129140B.6050106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5129140B.6050106@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:34:02 -0000 On 2/23/2013 1:10 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > On 02/23/13 12:32, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100 >> Polytropon wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote: >>>> Why not simplify that: >>>> >>>> | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. >>>> | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, >>>> | 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights >>>> reserved. >>>> | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >>>> | (...) >>>> >>>> ... into that: >>>> >>>> | Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project. >>>> | Copyright (c) 1979-1994 The Regents of the University of California. >>>> | FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. >>>> | (...) >>> >>> Because you need to exclude 1981, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987 and 1990 >>> which are missing in list of years. :-) Copyright counts for published years. Look at the copyright on a book that's not a first edition, try classic children's books. They'll list several years decades apart. If nothing was published in 1983, there's no new copyright for that year. In 2077, what was released in 1982 will be public domain, and nothing more until 2079. >> There's that, also that copyright message belongs to the Regents of >> the University of California and unless I misremember one of the license >> conditions is retaining their copyright notice - altering it would >> probably >> be a license violation. >> > > It seems the regents copyright claims end in 1994. Perhaps some > underlying piece of code is still in FreeBSD requiring this notice? > Perhaps the creation of FreeBSD and the release of 4.4BSD? Nothing from Berkley's been added, so no new copyright. There's little need to incorporate later patches to 4.4BSD because divergences between the 4.4BSD and FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 21:56:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC82166 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ye0-f179.google.com (mail-ye0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0FB74E for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ye0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m4so338484yen.38 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:56:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WYWD1kuABTVawiXF+G0Rn+9RVExzGYJz2+UW/WPO6+E=; b=Y5QeEV8tl8oqbjumC1Rr5cY+IdZVgPMVSGzJHy5VIirAhxELN4VDgyxsiaQ2gSk4ru Sl9vLSFX0yfm5Q2rmJMPq1bs55BotrsysMWBzJZzTGRa8Y/ywHY0V+x8ewnlIVDHJ/hV wFlhq0XAxodNt4PTgWqjnAMzooYQy9yBf+B0LJeU3iuhDPB9zSDUVsyRDNo/mBOPBwvY AZrPaf9O68c0M6WsYzuHvaWA6v6BryivVG6gSdiHbWi4bJVgLPFHBugpd77cOlHGSXmY +h+LcQ0vlj2yQEO3wVSLQrbgZceEYKClf+CrsX3BP/7Q+++F7lmmotupzrbTfl7lK9/6 ZMOA== X-Received: by 10.236.132.169 with SMTP id o29mr12475076yhi.88.1361656613220; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:56:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (24-183-225-51.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com. [24.183.225.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j13sm9173297ani.19.2013.02.23.13.56.50 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:56:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51293B1E.8010103@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:56:46 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Isom Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> <5129140B.6050106@gmail.com> <512935B7.7070008@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <512935B7.7070008@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:56:54 -0000 On 02/23/13 15:33, Joshua Isom wrote: > On 2/23/2013 1:10 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: >> It seems the regents copyright claims end in 1994. Perhaps some >> underlying piece of code is still in FreeBSD requiring this notice? >> > > Perhaps the creation of FreeBSD and the release of 4.4BSD? Nothing from > Berkley's been added, so no new copyright. There's little need to > incorporate later patches to 4.4BSD because divergences between the > 4.4BSD and FreeBSD. Not that I find it an issue, but could whatever is left over be removed? Just a thought, not a concern. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 22:09:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647E84D8 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (smtpo.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFB67BD for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:09:32 +0100 From: vermaden Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: interia.pl/pf09 In-Reply-To: <20130223181958.d546a952.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130223181958.d546a952.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Originating-IP: 77.114.7.18 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1361657372; bh=I7ShdHDk4sDnsjjKQy7KQKW4PbLyHz8yJ9wVFQHyYjE=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References: X-Originating-IP:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y6zdlHSxywy4bgRGcGW8pS8mi2dTPJGTtebfyiD9TbwD1pnsmFJIL2Q16s3Sh3dlu wEzCKon9SebYpvUbEn7/3uxL4DwxtqGnISFNpLMnrCaaDhEPck/pnBGDjE/qI7H6/b 5mySj3+4EG8Yn5+c7NKt40FJmn1owjdHOP2q57u4= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:09:34 -0000 Thank You all for explanations, it seems logical now ;) Regards, vermaden From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 22:24:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAD5887 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E694E817 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9NW3-0007e7-LH; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:24:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U9NVn-000D7C-Nv; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:24:07 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:23:37 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? Message-Id: <20130223222337.f68865d83a3051c429b81dd1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <51293B1E.8010103@gmail.com> References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> <5129140B.6050106@gmail.com> <512935B7.7070008@gmail.com> <51293B1E.8010103@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: Joshua Isom , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:24:13 -0000 On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:56:46 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote: > On 02/23/13 15:33, Joshua Isom wrote: > > On 2/23/2013 1:10 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > > >> It seems the regents copyright claims end in 1994. Perhaps some > >> underlying piece of code is still in FreeBSD requiring this notice? > >> > > > > Perhaps the creation of FreeBSD and the release of 4.4BSD? Nothing from > > Berkley's been added, so no new copyright. There's little need to > > incorporate later patches to 4.4BSD because divergences between the > > 4.4BSD and FreeBSD. It's even simpler than that 4.4 BSD Lite2 was the final release from Berkeley CSRG in 1994. There have been no later patches to 4.4BSD from Berkeley, that was the last release of any kind from CSRG. FreeBSD 2.0 was based on 4.4-Lite, the updates in Lite2 were merged in pretty quickly IIRC. > Not that I find it an issue, but could whatever is left over be removed? > Just a thought, not a concern. I can't think why anyone would want to, and I expect there's a *lot* left over, certainly their copyright notice appears in many files in /usr/src. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 23:17:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67802703 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EF19B6 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so1730647oag.26 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:17:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9NAqQppeMl9xf/tegoRijcONi8t/hh8Qesi7Q1/WgA4=; b=n93IGWtX2MOjfQjkgitn7twHGyLfSYKPmBYWceA5Vo9heoLv1+CWhwg+du+aM9ZRfj M7LeKz/teOa+QusrqRj6WWbsYd/OFUlbF7sSZNdj7tbhHKK/Gm3745pvGC+PHn0lrPu2 R8eH+wvHUFmScMxwMJyXobvsVZX4cW4qN5cl7Y7iFSd2Om2VOrM3D2CxkkeK/Uu7LESH uNS5dVmT9hO15MfJ4SeuvlgBGQ38YY6ILs5W3CMo3j218vQP3T7/ZYUZEmAORU8oKn8M ud0VsJffjL43BOXNnUmuZBg8g10TA05ojCIg+xHJiW5OGofjz8P84UpdAx7PeQWsitH/ 8yFA== X-Received: by 10.182.23.101 with SMTP id l5mr3231234obf.16.1361661469842; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:17:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-98-212-197-211.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.212.197.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm3520617obb.6.2013.02.23.15.17.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:17:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51294E12.3040906@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:17:38 -0600 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> <5129140B.6050106@gmail.com> <512935B7.7070008@gmail.com> <51293B1E.8010103@gmail.com> <20130223222337.f68865d83a3051c429b81dd1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20130223222337.f68865d83a3051c429b81dd1@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:17:57 -0000 On 2/23/2013 4:23 PM, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:56:46 -0600 > "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote: > >> On 02/23/13 15:33, Joshua Isom wrote: >>> On 2/23/2013 1:10 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: >> >>>> It seems the regents copyright claims end in 1994. Perhaps some >>>> underlying piece of code is still in FreeBSD requiring this notice? >>>> >>> >>> Perhaps the creation of FreeBSD and the release of 4.4BSD? Nothing from >>> Berkley's been added, so no new copyright. There's little need to >>> incorporate later patches to 4.4BSD because divergences between the >>> 4.4BSD and FreeBSD. > > It's even simpler than that 4.4 BSD Lite2 was the final release > from Berkeley CSRG in 1994. There have been no later patches to 4.4BSD from > Berkeley, that was the last release of any kind from CSRG. FreeBSD 2.0 was > based on 4.4-Lite, the updates in Lite2 were merged in pretty quickly IIRC. It would matter when it was released, not merged. If it was merged in 1996 but the code was released in 1994, the copyright's still 1994. >> Not that I find it an issue, but could whatever is left over be removed? >> Just a thought, not a concern. > > I can't think why anyone would want to, and I expect there's a *lot* > left over, certainly their copyright notice appears in many files > in /usr/src. > That also ties in with NIH syndrome. Gnu does that a lot just to make sure they can change to GPLv4 without problems, while Linux is still GPLv2. It's also not just Berkeley, but other people and organizations hold copyrights. From a quick glance, netatalk is by the University of Michigan. Mounting a cd using cd9660, which is still listed as Berkeley, is probably so tested and proven by now, that there would be no benefit to rewriting it other than to change the copyright. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 23:43:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A20D98 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61C4A53 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD96E661E; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:49:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=S7yww3sOrNTO rb1BI930VeJHBLU=; b=NslTZOcGzmx9u1in5nmAKiIpPt/lQ9SeTNRIlP0JNUUK r65xYFPsX0rssPIHHl2MGOjaUUxMWXU7s2lIL7s1RaNPRZtYOQABHgUJLBDjoOG/ eHogLDZXxficVuldzdiYnJR/wdWRvUlQtorrc5fGoUsXHWnUFK0BgQQl5Mqxp7Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=spPn1r M2njuWiTVZ4oGNFySSjuZ67E8fiKUL5AFaU9EiII8FFwJXNxYap/FKE3jsRWPEwD SbSPx1YXV2tjYp1Q9wZ4ql0nR4xB28B6fk1yvD2W08t4KeH8PYV72iaLetg3PRaC xjuK8wumW/3a7NHPOQ7vHtCkxii9/SR6Kn298= Received: from Bruces-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:301:2:19c6:30db:dcc7:226d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19253E65FF; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:49:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <51295417.1070102@cran.org.uk> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:43:19 +0000 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Isom Subject: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg? References: <20130223171150.eeb88206.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130223183234.cf559a552f31f9b19cf67bd6@sohara.org> <5129140B.6050106@gmail.com> <512935B7.7070008@gmail.com> <51293B1E.8010103@gmail.com> <20130223222337.f68865d83a3051c429b81dd1@sohara.org> <51294E12.3040906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51294E12.3040906@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:43:31 -0000 On 23/02/2013 23:17, Joshua Isom wrote: > That also ties in with NIH syndrome. Gnu does that a lot just to make > sure they can change to GPLv4 without problems, while Linux is still > GPLv2. It's also not just Berkeley, but other people and > organizations hold copyrights. From a quick glance, netatalk is by > the University of Michigan. Mounting a cd using cd9660, which is > still listed as Berkeley, is probably so tested and proven by now, > that there would be no benefit to rewriting it other than to change > the copyright. Other open source projects require contributors to sign copyright assignment agreements so all the code is under a single owner. -- Bruce Cran