From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 00:59:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA7B14E for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 00:59:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpjones@icloud.com) Received: from st11p01mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p01mm-asmtp002.mac.com [17.172.204.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E932D03 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 00:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (c-69-253-47-46.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [69.253.47.46]) by st11p01mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MVA00FC3VYADY90@st11p01mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 23:58:59 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-10-26_02:2013-10-26,2013-10-26,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1310260205 From: Christopher Jones Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7EB887D0-9F82-4273-8D13-C02D53606AA9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Subject: Symon and mbuf stats. Message-id: <3AE5CCC3-9CBF-42B4-905B-327B3E1ECDC9@icloud.com> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 19:58:57 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 00:59:31 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_7EB887D0-9F82-4273-8D13-C02D53606AA9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Hi all, I run a Tor exit relay and finally managed to get Symon up and running = with a web page. Royal PITA that was. I=92ve got graphs of cpu = utilization, disk io, network interface io, memory usage, and pf = throughput, and the Tor processes stats. My mbuf graph is showing zeros = all around. I telneted to port 2100 to look at the output stream from = symon to symux. Mbuf measurements are all zero =97 which is slightly = disappointing. Is there something I=92m missing in terms of configuration or does Symon = just not do mbuf reports with FreeBSD 9.2?=20 Thanks, Chris --Apple-Mail=_7EB887D0-9F82-4273-8D13-C02D53606AA9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSbFdBAAoJECVwJipVfdWHaB0P/3JOPhBvSdI9ZjvsuY8wmYVl s6LzVQ2h4EFR7NnrS812kjbEIGP31/lPkAaukGqIg8DW+v0RPKN+poZu6TVk8jRA zAj3Zx3swBKkdTDZya/V91ZteZcrIA0xlc2FiYTffOebkUt9G0Z9qf6QiJ4v2RoN UxTal2LErbXDll7Os53q343uOCKQ5mUMdPTcGhZZuoszF5feNUDOnmvlPx2HOmoK LUzaBVCzPnKQt5d0i8PsUznfE3+B/fknXA+lINoy4dlgH/EkgYZL7dD8rSUrswSQ /K7/FYKCWEaf/K1ur6Bjr82efYear0FJOe3T67IKS5TckteLtT0/i2v0MOyGXu2e 5CCnT8aC4D0dfJpvoNsJRJ66EvCkXmD8qTnfdPvJ7LqKI4DCbeHl+qpDA5nCQtRE 8LLyTnN3QWTKd3iuqhGreHjBy/rzgs4ex+QDqHVielzTjvdWZG3lLF/RkMRbNrZV l/fTQABJKawgIEbECL4MtMxE8VU7Y+/73eru7S7jBFRegtB15e0SCueePi6Ssx5l dzH5oIquaCkQIdJbAGhfG1OUgQcLvZKe8SXr45fZPwLnOpFXbHA/c9aQsuX6fhKn Vq/WXOEcojtNRdDhj4urofhzBCCkVtO6JNncbpb+MNSMlxCq9wR1ex/X6gwgf+6U /TANJojOpegk2HkzPfPR =36H9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_7EB887D0-9F82-4273-8D13-C02D53606AA9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 05:45:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0306691D for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C69278B for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9R5bmcF073662; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:37:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BE69F12384; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:37:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:37:48 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: David Newman Subject: Re: (de)centralized ports management with portsnap Message-ID: <20131027053748.GA53174@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <526AC748.6010805@networktest.com> <526AE110.9030105@networktest.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <526AE110.9030105@networktest.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:45:03 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:22:24PM -0700, David Newman wrote: > On 10/25/13 2:18 PM, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > On 25 October 2013 15:32, David Newman wrote: > >> I'm setting up a group of FreeBSD servers that use 'portsnap fetch' and > >> then 'portsnap update' to refresh their ports trees. > >> > >> Can I set up a local master to avoid pulling updates multiple times? If > >> portsnap isn't the right tool for this, what is? > >> > >> Apologies if this has been asked before; this seems like a standard > >> problem, but I didn't see an answer in a web search, the portsnap > >> manpage, or in the Michael W. Lucas FreeBSD book. > >=20 > > It's probably simplest to simply pull with one machine & then use > > rsync or some such to push the updates out to the client machines > > which would then run "portsnap update" as needed. >=20 > Thanks. What directories would get rsync'd over for the updates? Is it > really as simple as just copying over /usr/ports to each machine? If you are fine with having the same software on all machines and assuming they all use the same platform and compatible releases, I'd use portsnap and portmaster to update one master machine. Then distribute /usr/local to all other machines via rsync. You can still configure each machine's /etc/rc.conf to decide which services to run. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlJspqwACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXL0QCeMvr7anXBvQfZNxIHzCqcTgGc yosAn0nseOQMdw29m2vtjxAJwA1obGiJ =FVWe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 07:44:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A372A94B for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from nm44-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm44-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A1F2BB5 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.149] by nm44.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 07:42:51 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.220] by tm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 07:42:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1029.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 07:42:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 810218.13049.bm@omp1029.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 21708 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Oct 2013 07:42:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1382859771; bh=FS2EOoWQ89WdnQpBBDrG5TRxT0zYoJ8Iy/ubLnSvaXQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=biv2TGVvzBxhOgIHnRbw0FVPNKZzobo2kbyPrCbti/RIf+9Xky/bubZBWCHB7mhimfRrlLPbgqe7YQe1gZhBaVM12cae3/jMaY0SBuNAatf4NY9Wq1FK3b2aBjVkw5D+o7yAGo8L0A2gtUHWCB1kpEw9ktXzDopYKWweJ7QAOEY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dneTAma73staL0CXtrJb30nWoJhEKWsLWzMgI6+AeWu55+9A8X5ghAvPP3TtxNTm/7uP6/c+yuHqOUlrmiy01dwLfPc7SKYdoK+NP7yQp/jzJkpS3I+uH+gLhHec9ZjlHtPorz+dKaHQOlbs/k7jMzeTNUOgl/E4FsaI2ZOAldk=; X-YMail-OSG: kCNtdHkVM1nS2VY_LnncVm9VHH58xSaECb7w3nZqhLcXt_i t7JqbwBuO7m_N6OJMU8kXl9JUwS11nOIQQh2RqD3pJkQCua1dkgsRgFJiNJv hmExg_ODeOJyJXWdXG31j.ZSEhvktnIh1zaiR9_NN22hdjKbGp3xhgqNjzbN jhSx4Je6GlVnS08g8qg_y3kjy4lKKxS1kP3MGjX6s23IB6mnIxrPnEJeUazS 8H.wo8U6V63ZMISta0G3kB8Ya0Vl3XFRMrn6hrpistnVLnKW2OEwYBxpgLCM sIetvVjnfOcZpD7VDy2pB4M7fZzH2JuMiblk.xOUXCn4HTMxF3_xddd55dRw .c5hKZ2wmTJuKDnrWws2MtKzU.ybrilWkERdauUux.MxfxlSZGir8MTUgw1o DC4YRcBQyc2lPVgN81Fi57oWhW2pJWcc9v1T0faLVZb3QnC.85akhKh02Vz9 iEv4ED7cWByCNIJxEGeHT1uCuacib0t8449K66VCOJfdvMJiQJ5SJaWyuEEK Vd_MONUGVN18bRL_aoZ8gV7IwGIeM.Mrogfd8DddCVM8Fr.8xb6HttYn_OiI KsN_mS3OnQaaurBpF8d0pb.2Mx2S5KhR9b2ZSCQYBwSI5vI6HMpNNYb9Shhp sQBQhDmkeM4QPZZJdY5JQzA-- Received: from [80.98.102.209] by web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 00:42:51 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SSBydW4gYSBGaXJlZmx5IHNlcnZlciBvbiBteSBGcmVlQlNEIG1hY2hpbmUuCkluIGNhc2UgSSBkaXNhYmxlIHBmIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcgd29ya3MgZmluZS4gQXMgSSBlbmFibGUgaXQgSSBjYW4gbm90IGNvbm5lY3QvSSBjYW4ndCBzZWUgdGhlIHNlcnZlciBpbiBpVHVuZXMsIGV2ZW4gaWYgSSBwdXQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBsaW5lIGludG8gcGYuY29uZgoKCnBhc3MgaW4gcXVpY2sgb24gJGV4dF9pZiBpbmV0IHByb3RvIHsgdGNwLCB1ZHAgfSBmcm9tIDE5Mi4xNjguMS4wLzI0IHRvICgkZXh0X2lmKSBwb3IBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 Message-ID: <1382859771.17026.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 00:42:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Laszlo Danielisz Subject: daap and pf To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Laszlo Danielisz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:44:47 -0000 I run a Firefly server on my FreeBSD machine. In case I disable pf everything works fine. As I enable it I can not connect/I can't see the server in iTunes, even if I put the following line into pf.conf pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from 192.168.1.0/24 to ($ext_if) port 1:65000 Do you any idea what should I check? Laci From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 09:01:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0093133F for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (mtumishi.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28C42E80 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04A917A85; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 04:52:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <526CD432.5090306@cyberleo.net> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 03:52:02 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130908 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Newman Subject: Re: (de)centralized ports management with portsnap References: <526AC748.6010805@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <526AC748.6010805@networktest.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:01:18 -0000 On 10/25/2013 02:32 PM, David Newman wrote: > I'm setting up a group of FreeBSD servers that use 'portsnap fetch' and > then 'portsnap update' to refresh their ports trees. > > Can I set up a local master to avoid pulling updates multiple times? If > portsnap isn't the right tool for this, what is? > > Apologies if this has been asked before; this seems like a standard > problem, but I didn't see an answer in a web search, the portsnap > manpage, or in the Michael W. Lucas FreeBSD book. ports/171681 I do the same; additionally, I maintain some private ports that are not very useful outside of my organization. The patch in ports/171681 allows me to use 'make update' in /usr/ports to synchronize via rsync from a central server. Recently, I have been using poudriere and portmaster for semi-embedded and jail installs that have common software needs, which eliminates the need for a local ports tree entirely. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 13:06:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656C597E for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392EA2753 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C10220BB0 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:06:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:06:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=1oxbew4FArzEJFxucr3tRwX4/a4=; b=ipPdo k9zEs5BKWOqy1WT6J0SKaQSDE2UGVw4PokZqUE3EuAFu4YCjhtRb6cDi4lC3cYNH UM80Kbx7Mja7MurIjwhAzUhbmUmXweCyokDBsi9CNjssBg45tKEbsNbPQSDswObB Kws9hAlTo3wLxut+Usac5+zKZfTRW3n2/9kAqI= Received: by web4.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id D3E2910303C; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:06:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1382879197.20073.39265573.5C199811@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: mScur0lqY4DZ1PzPSPehw5rcoVDEmE1X7Nocdiyr5Jca 1382879197 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-25c9bdb0 Subject: Re: daap and pf Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:06:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1382859771.17026.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1382859771.17026.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:06:40 -0000 On Sun, Oct 27, 2013, at 2:42, Laszlo Danielisz wrote: > I run a Firefly server on my FreeBSD machine. > In case I disable pf everything works fine. As I enable it I can not > connect/I can't see the server in iTunes, even if I put the following > line into pf.conf > > > pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from 192.168.1.0/24 to > ($ext_if) port 1:65000 > > What if you try a rule like this: pass in quick on $ext_if inet from 192.168.1.0/24 to self From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 13:51:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC19E141 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from nm25-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm25-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804292919 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.196.81.173] by nm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 13:48:04 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.203] by tm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 13:48:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1012.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 13:48:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 756019.53030.bm@omp1012.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 33974 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Oct 2013 13:48:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1382881684; bh=zoDxjHvuLNEZTE0zwI5onrO3LCLEDUaNRw0C1m+IDiM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=U0r5ppn/hCcbGXjltt5COCVhufvyjACUZliri9dX65Eekq/VmFTY/xE5oYmYSoGLmcHgKWRCrx0SqD/PP4aZ1xUgXZQJ4QovoMcEpRrjTTM7oi5gjUrEecY8hHT54KMne/KBeotn6wW1zGdLMBo6UAAx5/ZAt5RTdNHxtH+CC6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VSGzFOASdbLRvODzFP/bWBi/XiXYNhvz6zvSGzXhgMbD5oCtZWpxUaJYnLq9ZRHwaUvA0LMpY/nueE2X5bJuLWu81cQqeJS1t9Ds0CEFSXHxGHCKEaUDmLcbbdSaJofVxOo5xsBKoff9yfukYdRK4yrvwrradlua9g6gUffpjjo=; X-YMail-OSG: yngDmWoVM1mr1pr.s69c0Ost9DrYzdipeDbiGU9gkUZstyV cNFe3pJ1EQpcnJMo8o9KD2.i6Xd2dcCmt.jihsx05V.3SNvVxt28Z3_hhx03 GDLWAaVZEHkI_yCz0sc4YZRgJ5kg6K56_f9joXcxa1hwuT6.v2vTPAuhPrPM 8FSBsMC4nP2dYiye7pLf.dCyGGROMEKCH3fNKGPcTAgiC600CnFZNrWAzgd5 AttYJxsnQoq5_20csk8to8I.5O84CJ09r9TqdMX9HTD7e8Uxiqwr5SOFf1Ch DXUHki.0FpvabhTltjpUCFGwtgSI04S_GOSDoxr6kFVpjatUN_LMRGVHQ.Q4 cnkBU3zhmfOOnO.aKTRgD9H9.oucgDZgsMAKoUECEn11rGvHuqj1sNPDuEu2 2ae0Gm9_X_UP_XAeIRZE0MFAMmJY4fY.qZdPLock0Y4eIzBYcWf9GdV7fRTG cdkR9Uwy3_EUt7c2rRbSeTnH1nIOXx8yJgSFVQ309spBMa9wXEZw3uPBzb7T PFdsCYF7Uj1iHoMRVWArl.OaAJ40ykQ4ga1UdusmEMp5oHF6yEF2mPW9ziOF UwZF0CgvndVMuZyuRWh6_Q6ROLodFEmaSBXTvSRM2Cm1mSQ0HSgnt7t0JI_M pehPxPcUtHHB5c8A5GGheU3S1IOYymPONFxxYwPwm3Rm5 Received: from [80.98.102.209] by web160501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:48:04 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SSBqdXN0IGZpeGVkIQoKV2hhdCBpcyB3ZWlyZCBJJ3ZlIGRvbmUgbm90aGluZyBlbHNlIGJ1dCBhIHJlYm9vdCwgdGhlIGxpbmUgbG9va3MgbGlrZSB0aGlzOgpwYXNzIGluIHF1aWNrIG9uICRleHRfaWYgaW5ldCBwcm90byB7IHRjcCwgdWRwIH0gZnJvbcKgMTkyLjE2OC4xLjAvMjTCoHRvICgkZXh0X2lmKSBwb3J0IMKgeyAzNjg5LCA1MzUzLCAxNTkwNSwgNTg5MTAgfQoKCk1lYW53aGlsZSBJIHJ1biBpbnRvIGFub3RoZXIgZXJyb3IsIGJ1ciBiZWNhdXNlIGlzIGRpZmZlcmVudCB0b3BpYyBpdCdsbCBiZSABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 References: <1382859771.17026.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1382879197.20073.39265573.5C199811@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <1382881684.32594.YahooMailNeo@web160501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 06:48:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Laszlo Danielisz Subject: Re: daap and pf To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <1382879197.20073.39265573.5C199811@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Laszlo Danielisz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:51:07 -0000 I just fixed!=0A=0AWhat is weird I've done nothing else but a reboot, the l= ine looks like this:=0Apass in quick on $ext_if inet proto { tcp, udp } fro= m=A0192.168.1.0/24=A0to ($ext_if) port =A0{ 3689, 5353, 15905, 58910 }=0A= =0A=0AMeanwhile I run into another error, bur because is different topic it= 'll be another e-mail.=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:06 PM, Mark= Felder wrote:=0A =0AOn Sun, Oct 27, 2013, at 2:42, Lasz= lo Danielisz wrote:=0A> I run a Firefly server on my FreeBSD machine.=0A> I= n case I disable pf everything works fine. As I enable it I can not=0A> con= nect/I can't see the server in iTunes, even if I put the following=0A> line= into pf.conf=0A> =0A> =0A> pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto { tcp, udp = } from 192.168.1.0/24 to=0A> ($ext_if) port 1:65000=0A> =0A> =0A=0AWhat if = you try a rule like this:=0A=0Apass in quick on $ext_if inet from 192.168.1= .0/24 to self=0A=0A_______________________________________________=0Afreebs= d-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=0Ahttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis= tinfo/freebsd-questions=0ATo unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questio= ns-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 14:16:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8C5701 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFFD129EE for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id y10so5996206pdj.10 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+gfUuDjBB/VewyKrUpbCkrwaYAtuGWPvUjdeDgGUPxo=; b=I80PJC4sXpA/cDks4N5RtlxPp3pIxicnWVqoYSjBqsHbfArJqBEBzv3VT8JYYxVJH8 0S8vipquzlm1/9iSQ+YVzz9YdJx0LXsmUP2ODj/j4EQbKWjG8LV3p4PwnobKUZ4etGIp nHhtAEeNexqT0rsUrjZ1HljK681oNPooRiykODeMPtCYxI29VVFzS7fHVL272QE5Glfz KExGSI8R5VTwZqptfii7sWgUL3+pY8iWNuDKkBHG4SM1uIuqd/8OFm2e0uYMGim3Vofj 2g3v847YYrgHZhEj5ZA9kwxUtL6PZAw46zYX1Ylh88Q8YlHsezikfhqxl5QmihUv8u+W vbWA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWUmDUELO9y4MNmdySUGkq05hWTIYEfI2OyoPAmxK4l/Ro23yfuoZw2+YI92wn8+0qsNcY MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.229.167 with SMTP id sr7mr851410pbc.159.1382883360243; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.152.3 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.175.252] Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:16:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? From: "C. P. Ghost" To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:16:07 -0000 Hello, up until now, I'm used to run FreeBSD on SuperMicro servers with ZFS-over-GELI. Works like a charm, and I'm comfortable with it w.r.t. administration and so on. Now I'm wondering what's the difference to FreeNAS. Does FreeBSD endorse FreeNAS (there's no port to FreeNAS in the ports tree, that's why I ask), or is it a completely different and independent project of unknown quality and reputation? Would you advise to keep using FreeBSD or should I give FreeNAS a try? I know this belongs more to a FreeNAS mailing list, but I'd like to know what FreeBSD users think and recommend. TIA, cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 15:07:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E44D185 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0865D2BD3 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id uz6so2708692obc.0 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:06:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YiyH0G+MZkonIHXm4OTwvWhxM6suqYPOIyHffOa1hvs=; b=FACzgldADhoCXgKZ8Im+eABSi3xW3PuoHLGVInCdt3fgPSniY2K/sWc7U7LKF8rcdr iTiAYB503PWLn/6PznPx8AAtzGuPnc8f89CdNMSTbb5QTbQLq6hFU6ER/bZJ7WHqYBbm VVUGADIVhDQxJT8Glat4A1rZQgqBnAtmSKuRZOUFxHoKxDNUjxQLQHrTokdKKpWOVK/j Gekb1Yswia3kdZr2kOhfoPCwv7EzrXB2uDmZ8gSoajXBvk6OgladkxJwYa06/BLKepyU gjxPpwAtTH6etpEyJGHCYTwwNFydcQI/AIoOT14iVB9S4INnJ8Qgv2RTZQnX1sf4DmY4 3JRA== X-Received: by 10.182.49.166 with SMTP id v6mr10849732obn.13.1382886419311; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xx9sm20096389obc.6.2013.10.27.08.06.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:06:55 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2E844211-12CC-4C78-91F6-8C5991860898@gmail.com> References: To: C. P. Ghost X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:07:00 -0000 Hi, I'm evaling both as well as other ZFS centric distros. If you want GUI management for ZFS, then FreeNAS is the ticket. Even = compared to Nappit, FreeNAS is the winner in my opinion. FreeBSD/NAS are largely the same. There 9.1.1 rel is more like FreeBSD = 9.2. But if you are fine with CLI ZFS admin, then why switch? There documentation is amazing, hats off to there team for sure. - aurf On Oct 27, 2013, at 7:16 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > Hello, >=20 > up until now, I'm used to run FreeBSD on SuperMicro servers > with ZFS-over-GELI. Works like a charm, and I'm comfortable > with it w.r.t. administration and so on. >=20 > Now I'm wondering what's the difference to FreeNAS. >=20 > Does FreeBSD endorse FreeNAS (there's no port to FreeNAS > in the ports tree, that's why I ask), or is it a completely > different and independent project of unknown quality > and reputation? Would you advise to keep using FreeBSD > or should I give FreeNAS a try? >=20 > I know this belongs more to a FreeNAS mailing list, but I'd > like to know what FreeBSD users think and recommend. >=20 > TIA, > cpghost. >=20 > --=20 > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 15:26:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7D76E2 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-5.eutelia.it [62.94.10.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB0F2C96 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 3E5C6166AE4 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:54:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-161-224.41-151.net24.it [151.41.224.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9REslwW053831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:54:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-161-224.41-151.net24.it [151.41.224.161] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9REsgvp065948 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:54:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <526D2932.2040305@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:54:42 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:54:50 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:26:49 -0000 On 10/27/13 15:16, C. P. Ghost wrote: > Hello, > > up until now, I'm used to run FreeBSD on SuperMicro servers > with ZFS-over-GELI. Works like a charm, and I'm comfortable > with it w.r.t. administration and so on. > > Now I'm wondering what's the difference to FreeNAS. > > Does FreeBSD endorse FreeNAS (there's no port to FreeNAS > in the ports tree, that's why I ask), or is it a completely > different and independent project of unknown quality > and reputation? Would you advise to keep using FreeBSD > or should I give FreeNAS a try? > > I know this belongs more to a FreeNAS mailing list, but I'd > like to know what FreeBSD users think and recommend. Just my 2c... I've had only one experience with FreeNAS, when I was called upon a box where files could not be deleted or moved: turned out its default settings for Samba and filesystem were arguable at the least and ACLs would prevent what could be expected to be normal behaviour. No way to fix this through FreeNAS web interface, I had to ssh into the box and do everything the FreeBSD way (chflags, chown, ecc...). So much for easy web administration. For myself, being able to use simple shell commands, I see no point over plain (and standard) FreeBSD; it might have a point for inexperienced people who are not willing to learn, but before that, it should at least work. (Disclaimer: it was an already old FreeNAS release). bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 15:37:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8702EBBE for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1122D38 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD4C3C6A8; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:37:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r9RFbOF9002220; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:37:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:37:24 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "C. P. Ghost" Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? Message-Id: <20131027163724.3c99002f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:37:40 -0000 On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:16:00 +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote: > Hello, > > up until now, I'm used to run FreeBSD on SuperMicro servers > with ZFS-over-GELI. Works like a charm, and I'm comfortable > with it w.r.t. administration and so on. > > Now I'm wondering what's the difference to FreeNAS. The _primary_ difference, in my opinion, is the addition and integration of web-based management tools. If this kind of interface is a requirement for you, using FreeNAS usually is the better solution. It's properly tested and well docu- mented. (Still, it's FreeBSD "under the hoos", so you can relapse to your FreeBSD operations knowledge in worst case scenarios.) It's easy to install and to use, that's why it appeals also to beginners. A personal note: I prefer "bare" FreeBSD. This is primarily because avoiding the web interface gives you the chance to automate tasks more easily. I don't like to do manual work, that's what computers are _made for_. With a normal FreeBSD installation, you can use all your scripting and remoting skills without having the need to pay attention to possible side effects to the additional parts that FreeNAS introduces, for example damages of the web interface. Also some pre- configured defaults or "hardcoded settings" might not fit particular needs, and it's often easier to access and change those with the known CLI tools, instead of investing time to find out the corresponding settings in the web GUI (maybe even with the result of acknowledging that there is no way to tweak that _specific_ setting through the web interface). If low-power devices as "storage applicances" are your goal, probably FreeBSD is easier to strip of any unneccessary over- head than trying to remove things like e. g. the web server and the web admin GUI from FreeNAS, with the imaginable result of making it unusable... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 15:49:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B0F66 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:49:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x234.google.com (mail-oa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1542DD7 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n10so2635824oag.25 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:49:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qJ6r1/t4dnsoYLRvlGZz3e43SDBIlP40znbP6ILLsX8=; b=Ud+BfTVNCm7gIEKhtV/06th9pGK08OVPKDCxlikP6CCdT6Q0bpkiZUBYwJ4Pom0CHh zWVsZMup0ick4SO9D8SxcrVbhml+qcc79VkWD/kDVQDdMMsIzIYC9bE/Qgudr32GEVDw A+v/3a99mx2/GvVdH9Ua+LUTrqZGCbBWufQqjtRSc1JzUh7qztCY6FL2rtA0mFo93X46 xdHC2HXofUNGT1hwZfuCyfVqVGIjYZ5zhT68Vezpf7tdqPcgpLJpl0hDlsdSItRP08Qg YIigAN/RG8GpeVPACT7hKFMayf3iut3WCD04K7KAH0mfsT7lDFA4ol+UnEvo05TFAto9 h4mA== X-Received: by 10.60.44.239 with SMTP id h15mr11168543oem.22.1382888947862; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm20239562obi.14.2013.10.27.08.49.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: <526D2932.2040305@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:49:04 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <42B44E6B-FC4D-420A-9478-38F813ED77AF@gmail.com> References: <526D2932.2040305@netfence.it> To: Andrea Venturoli X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:49:08 -0000 On Oct 27, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 10/27/13 15:16, C. P. Ghost wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> up until now, I'm used to run FreeBSD on SuperMicro servers >> with ZFS-over-GELI. Works like a charm, and I'm comfortable >> with it w.r.t. administration and so on. >>=20 >> Now I'm wondering what's the difference to FreeNAS. >>=20 >> Does FreeBSD endorse FreeNAS (there's no port to FreeNAS >> in the ports tree, that's why I ask), or is it a completely >> different and independent project of unknown quality >> and reputation? Would you advise to keep using FreeBSD >> or should I give FreeNAS a try? >>=20 >> I know this belongs more to a FreeNAS mailing list, but I'd >> like to know what FreeBSD users think and recommend. >=20 > Just my 2c... >=20 > I've had only one experience with FreeNAS, when I was called upon a = box where files could not be deleted or moved: turned out its default = settings for Samba and filesystem were arguable at the least and ACLs = would prevent what could be expected to be normal behaviour. >=20 > No way to fix this through FreeNAS web interface, I had to ssh into = the box and do everything the FreeBSD way (chflags, chown, ecc...). > So much for easy web administration. >=20 > For myself, being able to use simple shell commands, I see no point = over plain (and standard) FreeBSD; it might have a point for = inexperienced people I disagree. I think its more for ppl who want a GUI for ZFS/NAS = management regardless of skill level and ability to learn (this is such = an old and unsophisticated argument). One can look at FreeNAS as a FreeBSD box with a nice shiny ZFS/NAS GUI = to boot. For example, I do drop into CLI 1/2 the time for specific/special tasks = and spend the other half in GUI land on my FreeNAS box. - aurf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 16:13:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AD9674 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x22b.google.com (mail-oa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E6F2EFC for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id m1so2691285oag.2 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:13:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PGae3+R2zvmDCoK5jb9dWAhuMYaXcrmLEudJXD3d5YI=; b=0Hrp3TxVU6c/io/IFNBO3UrVayA3TqOgcBo7CwdQZQ3zI/oyB/ykbisUTtsXeClFT7 L+C7HKlA6jihulCHEXDQP5bjsUx3ovMUanWMKxw4XNfRGOAwia/WLT4j51dq9OCZ3rj4 7NPRqYypeChf+1LrD9vSDNCQ1G1zBcSLqHK6fiIP3FR4CyX3B9zfBh8dOgD0LU5t3sTL U+ueWm/VtgjRnvbMvwaDuOeVxJiJHn7xYNQlJYi86VUFgd1ixd5EQcxjTXRVBx/ApMyd KPhVgAtqWM030HR+EbUNCXIb0yudb6yfgFm5ORCu+vU2BxB+QBB5FhMO8QumC7x2VmRF VoZQ== X-Received: by 10.60.155.166 with SMTP id vx6mr11427473oeb.28.1382890422231; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm25396340oeu.6.2013.10.27.09.13.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:13:39 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44326394-E318-41B2-B85D-EA17E50B9230@gmail.com> References: To: C. P. Ghost X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:13:43 -0000 Forgot to mention THE most important part; FreeNAS took an imbedded approach of sorts as the OS is run entirely = from USB or CDROM. So you ask "Hey, what about swap?", well a lil swap is created on all = your ZFS drives. I've tested with and w/o swap on a ZFS data set and have seen no = degradation in ZFS performance. Any changes made can be backed up to a file and restored on a fresh = install etc... which is simply either the ability to resort to defaults = and reboot or a fresh USB key. Also there jail implementation is EZ PZ. So for example if you want to install tools like FIO, zfs-mon etc, you = simply setup a jail which will have FreeBSD 9.1 in it and pkg_add -r at = will. And to clarify, there 9.1 rel was more like the FreeBSD 9.2 rel in terms = of ZFS features as it had LZ4 and TRIM support. So its more then just a GUI. However they do not have a well defined or a defined for that matter, = roadmap. FreeBSD has a superb roadmap so all in all I am still undecided on = direction, plus I have Solaris and Nexenta in test phase now as well. = Already ran through ZoL. - aurf On Oct 27, 2013, at 7:16 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > Hello, >=20 > up until now, I'm used to run FreeBSD on SuperMicro servers > with ZFS-over-GELI. Works like a charm, and I'm comfortable > with it w.r.t. administration and so on. >=20 > Now I'm wondering what's the difference to FreeNAS. >=20 > Does FreeBSD endorse FreeNAS (there's no port to FreeNAS > in the ports tree, that's why I ask), or is it a completely > different and independent project of unknown quality > and reputation? Would you advise to keep using FreeBSD > or should I give FreeNAS a try? >=20 > I know this belongs more to a FreeNAS mailing list, but I'd > like to know what FreeBSD users think and recommend. >=20 > TIA, > cpghost. >=20 > --=20 > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 17:16:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCD7B0E for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@m5.chicago.il.us) Received: from nm17-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm17-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.62.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92C152195 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.39.60.173] by nm17.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 17:12:55 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.243] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 17:12:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 17:12:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 641205.99597.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ljYJ6ZIVM1k4SHFitr0XQ7Nl2mHdVY8qX05AeBUqh3WfMfn DNgqkP07gpqmzOZFjwfRfCBJajLyAG57L7cVHdLlF7rkVZmbPsfrWOxWmC4h 3wib0rx8FY7OISqjeu3C7lyzH71zYRWWF5K6Ja8kLmkr61FAdN3mmB3hoAnI FHBbgKAyW.PGds3mX0tu9VlnEYZDHmEkunS5w6UIxRVEAkt3N7XDkbNMMd2w R6bGMUBGkdxjPDT6xo3CsgxeQH0hF0WnHlcJdKPUnv43xEnYlbb2MTXjTUTe RWFIDGAXBckXiFU1CWJCV5RNlzP6n81DcMOsw8eklS0R0VnAEsGjTovrj5_1 YESNcRJnVEQtirQqlnMlTfoTUUhvAgYbA8fnNSk33CdN2Ot_CY5i8z76Xo0f oQ.nJWTCwhU92qVpMdDRH6r6DfU3jpVzfrPbOJX3Loq9mHbZT84zxz.JA.bb ZpmY_TB3H78q2mqbYIKD2Wb6l7rEbds0jHH0jRJwin5428oCJOqxrkTkTLe5 1MskQ5qaeXnwipMWbr1rQV0chqldcI8KOmltFRW3Ky70dqWLJZ4.Wagj2Imc V_ZLDS4SxXFmvEWUzpL3igms1RZsTUw36UqZv_vDL5uEvUKJpF8bTih6I19a TzKxKoTJH.n2NWgo- X-Yahoo-SMTP: sNr.AXyswBDMNk7QzHw5LoYQJILmmIHR.bFonxwDUILepNbCS7k- X-Rocket-Received: from m5.chicago.il.us (jay@76.193.177.38 with ) by smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2013 17:12:55 +0000 UTC Received: from m5 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m5.chicago.il.us (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DE5F120674 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:13:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from m5 ([127.0.0.1] helo=m5) by ASSP.nospam; 27 Oct 2013 12:13:42 -0500 From: "Jay F Shachter" To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Has FreeBSD 10 Dropped Support For XFS? Message-ID: <526d49c6.1y8/SIWobUILUYoV%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:13:42 -0600 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24a4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: jay@m5.chicago.il.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:16:08 -0000 My FreeBSD 10.0 system is failing to recognize my XFS filesystem, and "kldload xfs" fails. Behold: [root@landru ~]# uname -a FreeBSD landru 10.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 10.0-BETA1 #0 r256420: Sun Oct 13 03:46:18 UTC 2013 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 [root@landru ~]# mount -r -t xfs /dev/linux_lvm/landruvg-ubuntu /ubuntu mount: /dev/linux_lvm/landruvg-ubuntu: Operation not supported by device [root@landru ~]# kldload xfs kldload: can't load xfs: No such file or directory [root@landru ~]# echo /boot/kernel/*xfs* /boot/kernel/*xfs* Yes, I did build and install the sysutils/xfsprogs port. Thank you in advance for any and all replies. Jay F. Shachter 6424 N Whipple St Chicago IL 60645-4111 (1-773)7613784 landline (1-410)9964737 GoogleVoice jay@m5.chicago.il.us http://m5.chicago.il.us "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 17:25:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51459D23 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (mail-pb0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A55121FE for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jt11so5492558pbb.29 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iKOBBoM3LSzEHh7121UujIz9o0vR3VpWu2HC7ESuupQ=; b=l1dHiZuVGhQagGE3xKBCY3HA1uUDqA8QGVg267yqzYKKcWNf7Jx7kjs275PVTi9nbM Wk2We0bYv0/VAqXolRk5qNr5Q9vvGlJfim06bg5krp4gc7Chy45ESAjZ4P3WtEDZL3AV 24S3yGUTNkx8mi9rKyokiO+34owCOrBeEZIdV36fqWbHkcdDS4e0Oh8nQo0o4mhT7CO4 0s62hog8hmmkfcERB6hutM6wPQpRPK4HGxwJWUjL4uZaUdAP7zYl5D44Qdc6UlZYTQgA /Dw9BMx8MUJ7vYUem03N81/fklK9WXJzTZSjicQL8Kjfbm0zDGhGt7ffuYPwv4vUFZdn SrMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlCEi10VPM1sh+f5BVn4jWOcuxU5pxk4yTfb8RVgwOmfx6Y5dxunJpgOhYzGEndSzzrgvID MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.67.22.38 with SMTP id hp6mr21389519pad.53.1382894718324; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.152.3 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.175.252] In-Reply-To: <44326394-E318-41B2-B85D-EA17E50B9230@gmail.com> References: <44326394-E318-41B2-B85D-EA17E50B9230@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:25:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? From: "C. P. Ghost" To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:25:19 -0000 On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:13 PM, aurfalien wrote: > I've tested with and w/o swap on a ZFS data set and have seen no > degradation in ZFS performance. > That's interesting. Are you using a box with AES-NI instructions or just plain ZFS (without encryption)? That's one of the reasons I'm still undecided. With FreeBSD, I could set up swap on a dedicated slice/mirror without going through ZFS/GELI; which is important on older CPUs that don't have AES-NI instructions. I'm quite afraid of the performance hit if swap is on ZFS/GELI. Any changes made can be backed up to a file and restored on a fresh install > etc... which is simply either the ability to resort to defaults and reboot > or a fresh USB key. > That's a very useful feature indeed. I just booted a server with a USB key containing the FreeNAS image, and it works like a charm. Maybe something similar would be possible with plain vanilla FreeBSD; will have to investigate. > So its more then just a GUI. > Indeed. > However they do not have a well defined or a defined for that matter, > roadmap. > Yup, that's the other concern I have with FreeNAS. The most important question would be: would FreeNAS ZFS/GELI volumes be importable into a regular FreeBSD system, should I decide to switch back to FreeBSD (e.g. if FreeNAS ceases to be supported/updated sometimes)? I suppose yes, provided the keys are properly backed up, but without testing, I wouldn't bet the farm on it. Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 17:27:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0250EFF for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3F52216 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r10so6084911pdi.32 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=37t2/G4MZSy0dz8eNc0CN9m4QUz7vINWHMbYiAoMFgA=; b=UeAkLO9p1WYTTmIWijLvoVYLCVckE51WrwAexrjlG1QqK0oimrTtcczZgdlEXQDKwe /kLsbR8of7yqocTPx4dEM3B7tIsAP4QzQEKt3qO8DXepD7k3Ajzord4F3uEGHzhWADRf 3o6MwmWVZIZt+RQtiuFk9HNqN/9EEmihJUTyj3gr3CzJJxeNmXGmkpNVWCjlxFKG1GWU IOOVDnus5FlkgrYJQEoxT65lY/qHpNDJZXXw9asoS3twHQeEm0ahIDiH1B09H/QVdyGM 2Fi9a4P6MdgV2VIkG2I9D1WxELbjXBs9JUlZCHniUXTqWnIAdsDwP/zUuYFTsN1AzXze vRrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.58.137 with SMTP id r9mr2052681pbq.148.1382894843349; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <526d49c6.1y8/SIWobUILUYoV%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> References: <526d49c6.1y8/SIWobUILUYoV%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:27:23 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Has FreeBSD 10 Dropped Support For XFS? From: Adam Vande More To: jay@m5.chicago.il.us Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:27:23 -0000 On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Jay F Shachter wrote: > My FreeBSD 10.0 system is failing to recognize my XFS filesystem, > and "kldload xfs" fails. Behold: > There is no more in-kernel support for that and several other FS's. Maybe something exists with fuse. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 22:51:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BCD123 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5719022A3 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wp4so2846938obc.26 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:51:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=kTjWtBR8ULVy9o708XZAOxt50uVvi8k8gAxUsSv/sFU=; b=M+mt1BXaguN7ab6pB8R9Ndvjq16hfzgfdoez9e2UhiEXKByBIhPTuySJcsl1OymIJ2 kOmsdGlWHsy7yLYEHKaXuoljowESk/A6ntuJMrTog5bp9VDV4iBWZ3CzUcreze/vD/9G Pqy4Fd2b8um/bQYtK1c64Sjc3Jt1HwqY88HdcjjljcUt7wHFhe1/B3xTaAuLA6ofwRNU k0hTv98aMM7c3EgfahEgHXQ5QiYXgtPpV4JYyJKK1GoEezdAre4tgJ2vHILlJ2L1HA3H fUCBe7BRIpKE9d0kF9J2VGhQZDj5z1qd6TkIvor0Xj1VY+bOru0JoKzIPGHA5VyGXVdf IR1w== X-Received: by 10.182.73.231 with SMTP id o7mr12416555obv.34.1382914310225; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wd7sm22335935obc.3.2013.10.27.15.51.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:51:47 -0700 Message-Id: <2660B128-75E7-40C0-93DB-1BD2FD28B17C@gmail.com> References: <44326394-E318-41B2-B85D-EA17E50B9230@gmail.com> To: C. P. Ghost X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:51:51 -0000 On Oct 27, 2013, at 10:25 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:13 PM, aurfalien = wrote: > I've tested with and w/o swap on a ZFS data set and have seen no = degradation in ZFS performance. >=20 > That's interesting. Are you using a box with AES-NI instructions or = just > plain ZFS (without encryption)? No encrypt on my ZFS data partitions but FreeNAS encrypts the swap. In terms of the CPU, I'm using the intel E5 2400 class hexacore proc. Unsure if its AES-NI capable or not. I suppose that I could look :) > That's one of the reasons I'm still undecided. With FreeBSD, I could = set up > swap on a dedicated slice/mirror without going through ZFS/GELI; which > is important on older CPUs that don't have AES-NI instructions. I'm = quite > afraid of the performance hit if swap is on ZFS/GELI. >=20 > Any changes made can be backed up to a file and restored on a fresh = install etc... which is simply either the ability to resort to defaults = and reboot or a fresh USB key. >=20 > That's a very useful feature indeed. I just booted a server with a USB > key containing the FreeNAS image, and it works like a charm. Maybe > something similar would be possible with plain vanilla FreeBSD; will > have to investigate. > =20 > So its more then just a GUI. >=20 > Indeed. > =20 > However they do not have a well defined or a defined for that matter, = roadmap. >=20 > Yup, that's the other concern I have with FreeNAS. >=20 > The most important question would be: would FreeNAS ZFS/GELI volumes > be importable into a regular FreeBSD system, should I decide to switch = back > to FreeBSD (e.g. if FreeNAS ceases to be supported/updated sometimes)? > I suppose yes, provided the keys are properly backed up, but without = testing, > I wouldn't bet the farm on it. That would be a good test if you have time. I assume yes but assume has a funny word in it :) - aurf= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 27 23:36:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7178AC7 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 23:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@m5.chicago.il.us) Received: from nm23-vm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm23-vm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 783B024A3 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 23:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.39.60.168] by nm23.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 23:32:41 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.242] by tm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 23:32:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Oct 2013 23:32:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 803703.91436.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: bmu_Zb8VM1nvk4i0ivEZuZNHR8Nb4fMSbMZSKfmCwkvsb2v u1LEszB8BMV77J5sWYDplAv6wrEil_vjuwOKHTzzgvvy1n5F_7EceO9ST3Bf KiHtUebBwZJuWVDj9Ip_m5PAlq9OruVXCCBFWrBAZCa8QE7RYQS9QwkvtyZ7 .a6OyTAkwQQIKSH3DgeeJsLHGf1Bo5xVX_IlgsDBmzY3pkmHF_JlPW4dsImr Sjyg5QSyBk6yFIjT_LYByxXx9KTtFeA_RhCVVWWQmUELqnSzc0kGHPcFwUBB pCOAdOmR8ylJYgkBvPXHTiRkwDIiNZoBtnXrEKda06DgOV0hZRoG4c2Lv62W _9RHdCNyweBDlPZN9161fDqUy1tAXnOZ66E4tLe9qpfqApoXNLccIt.ZO4lf 1VcWwYp2YWjCv5u9QxepL9OfphF9zQq3rYmlY_hejqk28hghXZCFyFAMtidh ahOMOWb3iJ1an.lME0_el76PoPLt.FDB0KsVw.JgC0Zq_HIJjk1DbA37qrss ZNxO9R_fRNTCDMCvf6qI6FylbSbUYJwqgvu4Dx2Qh1gGsmSKg.RsOmyw70jQ WqDU1djUgucZ_pRjnyGe05xEOc7IPc5I_NbYPHWG8ot3kNcYbjQh6fv3aQcP HEbaJO1FzZ77xtaX37kJA2653fLgNMlaGCgJ8xqh.fXeOpvWpStzpCso9RU5 BvKHdQEnBPlvZhMo- X-Yahoo-SMTP: sNr.AXyswBDMNk7QzHw5LoYQJILmmIHR.bFonxwDUILepNbCS7k- X-Rocket-Received: from m5.chicago.il.us (jay@76.193.177.38 with ) by smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2013 23:32:41 +0000 UTC Received: from m5 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m5.chicago.il.us (Postfix) with SMTP id EAF82120674 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:33:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from m5 ([127.0.0.1] helo=m5) by ASSP.nospam; 27 Oct 2013 18:33:25 -0500 From: "Jay F Shachter" To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Cannot build security/nss on 9.0-RELEASE-p3 Message-ID: <526da2c4.LR/kurkiWs4zrTJ/%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:33:24 -0600 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24a4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: jay@m5.chicago.il.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 23:36:30 -0000 I cannot build, or cannot figure out how to build, security/nss on 9.0-RELEASE-p3. Behold: [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# uname -a FreeBSD norman 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Jun 12 01:47:53 UTC 2012 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# make install clean ===> nss-3.15.2 improper use of USE_PERL5. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/nss. [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# gmake -v GNU Make 3.82 Built for i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# gmake install clean Makefile:42: *** missing separator. Stop. [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# sed -n 42,47p Makefile .if !defined(WITH_DEBUG) MAKE_ENV+= BUILD_OPT=1 BINS= ${DIST}/${OPSYS}${OSREL}_OPT.OBJ .else BINS= ${DIST}/${OPSYS}${OSREL}_DBG.OBJ .endif The security/nss port is needed by firefox (unless there is a configuration option that allows firefox to be built without it), which is why I want it; currently my only graphical browser on that system is chrome. Thank you in advance for any and all replies. Jay F. Shachter 6424 N Whipple St Chicago IL 60645-4111 (1-773)7613784 landline (1-410)9964737 GoogleVoice jay@m5.chicago.il.us http://m5.chicago.il.us "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 00:57:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320D564B for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAC86278D for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id gq1so2972101obb.17 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:57:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=DEe5IR0tCXzAKpBaHgQ9gbznZ0cfnOUPYZk4ribh7UE=; b=rUPI4CT+edUUJUHL7+c81M4sO5sXEtGgx8dS2kzeCQDnk/Yjf/eQt3nMv7AzVGAwOU lTH+fV12D7rB0TPSJLK6kL/pDzXV9XLJsctPIvarhUAarp9wXuNhxbEJ21LJQqU9UNQQ hEmUFnfnFRWiMlICg2RzGRsEdUvP/A9sxbYQJgr0BG6tf4tUKponkjQfDlcH46Zj4LDJ rD410KMVp3I1rCH5V1OZUR3rEyMkRvUA1QbsG7BVZpDkI++QGSUNa7rw/sdFx6mvybye WN7ISurDPBb5xPp9/TmRM+zmHuvScsodXu8Ux4o30lwmzwBkiWrFYkem6iCQahqjsGCj LpPQ== X-Received: by 10.60.134.230 with SMTP id pn6mr146109oeb.52.1382921841152; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rr6sm28602753oeb.0.2013.10.27.17.57.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs. FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:57:17 -0700 Message-Id: References: <44326394-E318-41B2-B85D-EA17E50B9230@gmail.com> To: C. P. Ghost X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:57:22 -0000 One last thing I forgot to mention is ashift. FreeNAS auto partitions to allow an ashift of 12. This was key for me due to my drives (Seagate ES.2) are 4K but report = back as 512 byte. So in FreeBSD my vdevs had an ashift of 9. In FreeNAS the partitions = were such that my vdevs were 12. Now in FreeBSD one can use the gnop hack to get 12, or simply partition = in such a way like starting the partition on 1M block which will allow = 12 as well. No one auto 12's your vdevs other then FreeNAS since its partitioning = for you. In ZoL, Solaris, FreeBSD, one must consciously force the 12. = I'll bet Nexenta also defaults to 9 and will check this week. - aurf On Oct 27, 2013, at 10:25 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:13 PM, aurfalien = wrote: > I've tested with and w/o swap on a ZFS data set and have seen no = degradation in ZFS performance. >=20 > That's interesting. Are you using a box with AES-NI instructions or = just > plain ZFS (without encryption)? >=20 > That's one of the reasons I'm still undecided. With FreeBSD, I could = set up > swap on a dedicated slice/mirror without going through ZFS/GELI; which > is important on older CPUs that don't have AES-NI instructions. I'm = quite > afraid of the performance hit if swap is on ZFS/GELI. >=20 > Any changes made can be backed up to a file and restored on a fresh = install etc... which is simply either the ability to resort to defaults = and reboot or a fresh USB key. >=20 > That's a very useful feature indeed. I just booted a server with a USB > key containing the FreeNAS image, and it works like a charm. Maybe > something similar would be possible with plain vanilla FreeBSD; will > have to investigate. > =20 > So its more then just a GUI. >=20 > Indeed. > =20 > However they do not have a well defined or a defined for that matter, = roadmap. >=20 > Yup, that's the other concern I have with FreeNAS. >=20 > The most important question would be: would FreeNAS ZFS/GELI volumes > be importable into a regular FreeBSD system, should I decide to switch = back > to FreeBSD (e.g. if FreeNAS ceases to be supported/updated sometimes)? > I suppose yes, provided the keys are properly backed up, but without = testing, > I wouldn't bet the farm on it. > =20 > Thanks, > -cpghost. >=20 > --=20 > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 04:04:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37E250D for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 04:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce-mc.us7_19583847.290453-freebsd-questions=FreeBSD.org@mail93.us4.mcsv.net) Received: from mail93.us4.mcsv.net (mail93.us4.mcsv.net [205.201.128.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8002F15 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 04:04:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mail93.us4.mcsv.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=sales=3Dbulwarkcctv.com@mail93.us4.mcsv.net; bh=Fcyn/MYjviqkCn600XP56UiOf7I=; b=bjeHXhIIs9foBDZlTOXBboSNUTEPjMBrpIguVaeE36gQ7qdtyEgvYnMcdrU4/g8v+0wjUBUEpBHc ayveCCuH8ibmFceqF5uaNn7ctHUugb6T233UbdXiWnBSjK20izkDzYV5nzS28nPsTYQeyXkBCBdd jSj29xayNrlsQeCnBx4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mail93.us4.mcsv.net; b=1ck8ds/SgR0NjIsKOmTXSmmdKGsemEptY9pSHa0MhSvNAE03DgysayzS2gAgrktLntuMM3Oy8GXr 7gn2JHM+Huq2fehcyJQtdW7dsPoGS6FVHTed329YaxFgyVI4tuxdy3HJqbUvpkfF5r8kfDfpYXjj 1RWUhjMxoYgFqRwEyoA=; Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mail93.us4.mcsv.net id hdnh66174lgt for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 03:49:44 +0000 (envelope-from ) Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Bulwark=20New=20IP=20camera=20super=20Low=20price?= From: =?utf-8?Q?Bulwark=20cctv?= To: =?utf-8?Q??= Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 03:49:44 +0000 Message-ID: <0c54702ce81de7a4e4685da8af372702e42.20131028034936@mail93.us4.mcsv.net> X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID697f19fd75f372702e42** X-Campaign: mailchimp0c54702ce81de7a4e4685da8a.697f19fd75 X-campaignid: mailchimp0c54702ce81de7a4e4685da8a.697f19fd75 X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=0c54702ce81de7a4e4685da8a&id=697f19fd75&e=f372702e42 X-MC-User: 0c54702ce81de7a4e4685da8a x-accounttype: pd Sender: "Bulwark cctv" x-mcda: FALSE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="fixed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Bulwark=20cctv?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 04:04:52 -0000 This email from Bulwark security. View this email in your browser (http://us7.campaign-archive2.com/?u=3D0c5= 4702ce81de7a4e4685da8a&id=3D697f19fd75&e=3Df372702e42) ** 1.0 Megapixel IP Camera ------------------------------------------------------------ ** Bulwark BW-601E8 ------------------------------------------------------------ 720P/1.0 Megapixel IP bullet camera Progressive Scan CMOS sensor Standard 6mm fixed lens optional 36*F5 LEDs=2C 20m IR view Item no. BW-601E8 Image Sensor 1.0 Megapixel Progressive Scan CMOS sensor Lens Standard 6mm fixed lens LEDs & IR distance 36*F5 LEDs=2C 20m IR view Min. Illumination 3300mV/Lux-sec; 0Lux@ IR on OS Embedded RTOS design=2C dual core DSP 32bit. Video Codec H.264 Analog Video Output 1CH BNC output=2C support CVBS standard Video Resolution Main stream: 720P@25FPS Sub stream: 640*360=2C 480*270=2C 352*192@25FPS Video Frame Rate 25FPS=2C support adjustable 1-25fps Streaming Level 2 adjustable Bit Rate 50k-8Mbps Network Port 10-100M Ethernet RJ45 port Network Protocol TCP/IP/HTTP/RTSP/FTP/PPPOE/DDNS/NTP/UPnP POE Support built-in 802.3af Compliant POE Software Free Client software and charged Intelligent Video CM= S software IVS software support mobile phone view. Symbian=2C Android and iPhone mobi= le. ONVIF ONVIF 2.0 compliant Working Temperature -10=C2=B0 C~+50=C2=B0 C Power input DC 12V +5% ** BW-602E9 1080P Bullet waterproof IP camera ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Standard H.264 compression 2. 2.0 Megapixel CMOS sensor 3. 1080P@25FPS video frame rate. 4. Multiple adjustable resolutions with self-adapting technology 5. Supporting dual streaming level 6. Protocol- TCP/IP/HTTP/RTSP/FTP/PPPOE/DDNS/NTP/UPnP etc. 7. Remote view and management by IE and client software (CMS with 25CH). 8. Various recording modes- motion detection recording=2C alarm recording= =2C schedule recording and manual recording. 9. USB memory optional (Only for original Kingston) 10. Support ONVIF 2.0 11. Wide Dynamic Range=2C Max. 100db Item no. BW-602E9 Image Sensor 2.0 Megapixel Progressive Scan CMOS sensor Lens 6mm/4-9mm lens optional LEDs & IR distance 42*F5 LEDs=2C 20-25m IR view Min. Illumination 1.9V/Lux-sec; 0Lux@IR on OS Embedded RTOS design=2C dual core DSP 32bit. Video Codec H.264 Analog Video Output 1CH BNC output=2C support CVBS standard Video Resolution Main stream: 1080P=2C960P=2C 720P@25FPS Sub stream: 640*360=2C 480*270=2C 352*192@25FPS Video Frame Rate 25FPS=2C support adjustable 1-25fps Streaming Level 2 adjustable Bit Rate 50k-8Mbps Network Port 10-100M Ethernet RJ45 port Network Protocol TCP/IP/HTTP/RTSP/FTP/PPPOE/DDNS/NTP/UPnP POE Support built-in 802.3af Compliant POE SD card Optional Software Free Client software and charged Intelligent Video CM= S software IVS software support mobile phone view. Symbian=2C Android and IPhone mobi= le. ONVIF ONVIF 2.0 compliant Working Temperature temperature -10 ~ +50 C Power input DC 12V +5% Bulwark Tech ltd Professional Video Surveillance Solution Supplier Mail: sales@bulwark-security.com (mailto:sales@bulwark-security.com) Web:www.bulwark-security.com =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ** unsubscribe from this list (http://bulwarkcctv.us7.list-manage2.com/uns= ubscribe?u=3D0c54702ce81de7a4e4685da8a&id=3D22d2d77847&e=3Df372702e42&c=3D69= 7f19fd75) ** update subscription preferences (http://bulwarkcctv.us7.list-manage.com= /profile?u=3D0c54702ce81de7a4e4685da8a&id=3D22d2d77847&e=3Df372702e42) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 05:18:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD37C209 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946062221 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97D4627361 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:11:58 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <526DF21E.8000205@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:11:58 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130516 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CQ60 Presario, running FBSD 9.2, problem configuring X References: <6D24E720-78A3-41AF-A369-E95A65DA0915@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <6D24E720-78A3-41AF-A369-E95A65DA0915@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:18:03 -0000 On 10/25/13 14:40, Jules Gilbert wrote: > I've enabled DBUS and HALD in /etc/rc.conf > > You have an arbiter problem - 2 cards in one m/c (like mine - C62). Hopefully this will be fixed in 10.x... Meanwhile, you'll have to manually create a xorg.conf and disable one of the cards. HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 05:29:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F06E5C5 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D52E22B6 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r9S5TdLp039576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:29:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Dumpdates From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <2CD12742-C62F-464F-AB4D-3B2949A490F9@lafn.org> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:29:38 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2CD12742-C62F-464F-AB4D-3B2949A490F9@lafn.org> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:29:47 -0000 On 25 October 2013, at 03:11, Doug Hardie wrote: > Is there an issue with dump updating dumpdates on 9.1 and 9.2. Both = of those systems are writing /etc/dumpdates, but are using the time of 0 = so the output from dump looks like: >=20 > Fri Oct 25 00:45:00 PDT 2013 > DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: the epoch > DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch > DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/ada0p2 (/) to = /usr2/backups/zool-root.tdump > DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files] > DUMP: Cache 16 MB, blocksize =3D 65536 > DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories] > DUMP: estimated 8487220 tape blocks. > DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories] > DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files] > DUMP: 16.36% done, finished in 0:25 at Fri Oct 25 01:16:02 2013 > DUMP: 36.55% done, finished in 0:17 at Fri Oct 25 01:12:50 2013 > DUMP: 59.63% done, finished in 0:10 at Fri Oct 25 01:10:38 2013 > DUMP: 91.21% done, finished in 0:01 at Fri Oct 25 01:07:24 2013 > DUMP: DUMP: 8492396 tape blocks on 1 volume > DUMP: finished in 1289 seconds, throughput 6588 KBytes/sec > DUMP: level 0 dump on the epoch > DUMP: Closing /usr2/backups/zool-root.tdump > DUMP: DUMP IS DONE >=20 > The first line is from the date command. Dumpdates always show a 1969 = (the epoch) date. After much digging around I have isolated the problem. The -R = (rsync-friendly) option causes dump to force all dates in the dump file = to the epoch. Thats reasonable. However, the dumpdates file does not = need to be that. It can hold the real time. The following patch fixes = the problem: --- sbin/dump/itime.c.orig 2013-10-27 22:21:20.000000000 -0700 +++ sbin/dump/itime.c 2013-10-27 22:23:01.000000000 -0700 @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ found: (void) strncpy(dtwalk->dd_name, fname, sizeof = (dtwalk->dd_name)); dtwalk->dd_level =3D level; - dtwalk->dd_ddate =3D _time64_to_time(spcl.c_date); + dtwalk->dd_ddate =3D time(0); ITITERATE(i, dtwalk) { dumprecout(df, dtwalk); Basically this patch sets the current time after the dump is completed = just before the dumpdates file is written. It does not change the = handling of the previous and current dump dates when dump is started so = they will always show the epoch. Perhaps that could be improved also, = but at least the dumpdates files now show the time the dump completed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 06:00:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA90D9D for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from nm33-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm33-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6572427 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.196.81.170] by nm33.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2013 05:57:52 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.197] by tm16.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2013 05:57:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2013 05:57:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 142572.41633.bm@omp1006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32912 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Oct 2013 05:57:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1382939871; bh=QvLWSo5joNU0K2mvxSRV4x464gxZR+HHxnXpAaHx2+M=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ediu65KmSNo3UgbSLuOTUQU/VPtCYj8JB6vJEhzIh+Z0mXdM083Z6GprLkWSRkYVlpJfnfJkQdw9qP7bweqfiB13zCVO2nRi+mGgg/A3dJhPrcREl4g8iHd7/vq4OpQaVrDcIfhNuFR1/RCcwaZ9HdYK7s8k+vrSUucCDbppuT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=R9M398QuER7eiaWPi+OLaXtLtDJfiKV1L7uIELjq4QjvXakoaYyLygxmpBNqo6J5guA9zJUCMVOIebfPfvmhyQ4ns0bFD4R0+74+psY5J5qsecEMdqctymyTjhNrlCGRgsZndF5oit/y0PqOPnYd3i44vn1BUp3mfXPL8DYNgcE=; X-YMail-OSG: IPOZq.gVM1k75mbi0Njib3SJ1uabYI68Sm3BKpKviiz_wDT DC92qguK7uUTckYoeY1vynRyhbTzAiwPvZ4bOyVcl4aR.dplc8FO.B5aOxcL 520a4aWh6fqypBQvZCy0iOwwOJLUEKwtABbMaWb8mAiIAK5mTBrVsH8dhEzM bXBMDlVWKNY6L21hoPCQ4SRNaY2mqWL0ZGBjH6cdVHPThijbq9TuBbuRlV3C 2rmUtR6fiYcBkj3T_XyFrXbITNuMzeI.QunoQ.10qSkcNJ5ZLwcsp9oeEFin ljb5yztrMBKs2zLc.z_xHbQMs.1b0Uqzlp.4rDzFaJk7EXGX9GOfshw9HJy7 r_STVl0ceDu7Hn89vWW6J6XdwJcNKSRKBV3v1PsDXr6xCRJuiAdR120XsPLm yAVfjAZbAWuTcpwZkwJeKGC5dMC.8pu6pz_csjaCxjQInjsZLjFtl8HQkJ5S 5LbWJL3Y1JkdVo_eZBBjX9NENKwjbVl37ZC1AFkrdA3xxex97wBB1Qrlsl0z Nbx9xZ.cpZ98IjVcDHhFnlgElMUsSzK1MtRIdYnCKV6yOvE90gyGQnAzGJdW 7SCQ2qpGXlkx24zjwrq30eWsN Received: from [80.98.102.209] by web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:57:51 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGksCgpZZXN0ZXJkYXkgSSBzcGVudCBxdWl0ZSBtYW55IGhvdXJzIGZpZ3VyaW5nIG91dCB3aGF0IGlzIHdyb25nLgoKRXZlcnkgdGltZSBteSBmYnNkIDkuMiBib290cyB1cCBJIGhhdmUgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBlcnJvcjoKCk1vdW50aW5nIGxhdGUgZmlsZSBzeXN0ZW06IHNtYl9jb19sb2NrOiByZWN1cnNpdmUgbG9jayBmb3Igb2JqZWN0IDEKbW91bnRfc21iZnM6IHVuYWJsZSB0byBvcGVuIGNvbm5lY3Rpb246IHN5c2VyciA9IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGVycm9yCgpJbiBmc3RhYiBJIGhhdmUgdGhlIGYBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 Message-ID: <1382939871.20721.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:57:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Laszlo Danielisz Subject: mount smbfs on boot To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Laszlo Danielisz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:00:42 -0000 Hi, Yesterday I spent quite many hours figuring out what is wrong. Every time my fbsd 9.2 boots up I have the following error: Mounting late file system: smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1 mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error In fstab I have the following line for samba: //laci@UBUNTU/LACI/mnt/smbfssmbfsrw,late,-N,-I192.168.1.2300 And /etc/nsmb.conf looks like this, I also tried moving under /root/.nsmbrc and everybody can read it. [UBUNTU:laci] addr=192.168.1.23 password=******* Of course I checked the password couple time, I have the correct password in the configuration file. Do you have any idea what should I check? Thx! Laci From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 09:17:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFA62F9 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbirch@jbirch.net) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39372D66 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n12so3216713oag.26 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:17:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=j5ouKEldTV/LEfTGnjLkqW4T4VrRYBQI6XQFftrJcxU=; b=QHkpnFrhwMIcrc/2LUsYbjEIuSAwIcXLhde3Sd0/NsxrT0SlO5SRFmo5hgs8OQOJox PyyQuL9MEOL8t3frF0rGXIpUPVpEJDP6SEao5LWg9sfxmKzq20VS1R0ncVQsiiwEhrDe hdOzQ+R2iYk6b8oKvJbjqhzDOfUiojeReWI5qr9eP3/370ViKVIVC3BWxS/NBfjygrWJ 0R/1IUTTVSQx4u/IvTPm+rP4shEa8d8t7WCC+HziqPojvHyy7Y9KUsvsea6L/NlaPNj8 k0S7/hMXBHazWBXWTCL7Ou83eCpKCpMPGmFx72DRl5bXvjJY4fN5ldMc2AftAnD1jE5n 2Mvg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklCvC/9seW4dPCgOJobCC+b22aQMVzFZJnPbxlszK6DplnTWNgRRttpXqfhdlVCMcbsYSb MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.125.161 with SMTP id mr1mr32399obb.75.1382951852489; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.185.71 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:17:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [49.180.138.218] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:17:32 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kernel/World/Ports compilation within jails; targeting many platforms. From: Jason Birch To: "illoai@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:38 -0000 Thanks for your response, illoai. I think you're getting at what I really need -- jails aren't needed because I'm not really worried about isolation of services or processes, I just want to logically separate some code such that compilations are repeatable and performed similarly. Whether I do this in chroots that make all compilations look the same, or just keep separate source trees for each of my builds, is then just a matter of taste, I guess. On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:45 AM, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 26 October 2013 06:53, Jason Birch wrote: > > Is it considered 'good form' to do compilation for other machines, > > architectures, and FreeBSD versions within jails? > > > > As a concrete example, my 'main' system is a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64 > > system, and I would like to compile FreeBSD 11-CURRENT for my BeagleBone > > Black (ARMv7). Does it make more sense to create a jail environment on my > > 9.1-RELEASE machine to do all compilation and 'staging' for the > BeagleBlack? > > > > Originally I had just compiled gcc targeting arm and checked out sources > > into a location that wasn't /usr/src/. This is simple enough for one > > different target, but I'm wondering if I'll be a little bit more sane if > > I've got a jail for each individual target I'm compiling for. Each jail > can > > then be set up with one, consistent compiler and source tree in the same > > location -- even if the compiler (GCC/Clang) and source (X-RELEASE vs > > Y-STABLE vs CURRENT) differ between targets? > > > > Are this a sane thing to be doing? For those of you that have several > > FreeBSD targets but do most of your set up on a single machine, how do > you > > logically separate your 'worlds'? > > Your system sounds a bit involved. FreeBSD is designed to be > cross compiled fairly easily. > > For building wine on amd64, I just created an i386 chroot. > A jail is targeted at running services within a chroot-like > environment, I suppose it could be used to cross compile. > > You can cross build with: > # make buildworld TARGET=arm (you may need to specify TARGET_ARCH= > as well with ARM, I don't know) > > You might have to specify CC= CXX= & CPP= > > In the case of TARGET=i386 it places the object files under > /usr/obj/i386.i386/, I'd assume something similar for ARM. > > You'll also have to build a kernel. You'll have to do other stuff, too. > > There's stuff here: > https://wiki.freebsd.org/A_Brief_Guide_To_Cross_Compiling_FreeBSD > > -- > -- > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 09:28:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA6818 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbirch@jbirch.net) Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (mail-oa0-f43.google.com [209.85.219.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3C92E34 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id m1so3301699oag.16 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:28:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Z0ZrPCc5PJatc6RnrcEToN1Gcjww5dTNAKA0lHEPsk4=; b=N7TT5jjVQVEfq8Moa6+bH3SWT+sTkHcPj+ZbPhqCzwTzg/OUycgdR4QS+mumyKVLWn G/Ziw7ySw8TjOvha1tN8yQSfJGgrTcKMN3kb1JHZlni7yWXmZf+Q/L2LEQbiRZ5hQZVd CBItYug6JxOib91xvvo61ms3Jnj+TGZsFDMHJ1u0rxG20jpZ3Wf1Xik7GWZYJX2Z/YcO TZYTnFetK9kMyj2ATFy0v9PGicasugxaFoaq/TVvAHQK/nhnNAYtsIhRyg4l60m3bccJ gm1ekC9BRjM1dOVK70ii/964ELZfFR7Sgwlbqk4XbqL5DXUnyseDwyJw2unZdQNFIi2R 0CoA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHgPDsdXlgQ3IBJNt9eZeAheDs6649+qlDoUnFPbpMNe8sxgxIErvFv17ZAYG0qhlMwc34 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.49.166 with SMTP id v6mr13936750obn.13.1382952135884; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.185.71 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:22:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [49.180.138.218] In-Reply-To: <526C3716.4000802@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <526C3716.4000802@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:22:15 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kernel/World/Ports compilation within jails; targeting many platforms. From: Jason Birch To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:28:24 -0000 > For your case, 11-CURRENT/armv7 isn't going to work on > 9.1-RELEASE/amd64. Your best bet would be some sort of VM where you > could emulate an armv7 CPU, if such a thing exists and is usable for > your intended purpose. > I wouldn't be attempting to run these compiled armv7 ports in the jail, however. Simply cross-compiling them for transplanting into another system. I'd like to be able to do this for convenience, but I think I may settle into building things on each system -- it may be slower, but it'll allow me to help contribute to weeding out problems with completely self-hosted systems -- the time spent compiling is the least I can do to contribute. Thanks for the detailed response -- I appreciate the insight into the limitations of jails and why it's probably not appropriate for what I'm trying to accomplish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 12:55:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B3288D for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747B82CA0 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so2830712lbj.31 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:55:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C88h8EeY8Rq+0FpiAlhMpKSSpGUALXGQ0YhXi1YjA2k=; b=zm/AST4kDKbqN6E4Wu9PWdiDYvCMeElKaqkERjaauUN2t8Il7Kg060JyQj4t1DgjRo ghu0YF7ZS6Ea0FY0KjSODeSv3MwqJCDt0JRQWPvCc3eegzUJZzocWLhwJ1Os/Iw+AggZ N1OdYw8tg+olQmt73EbZQNbHEsDXoUp3MR3RU4HC2RLlacY1QYUew54RBycCVIwkq7t7 rLJ7QDlQ/T8o6uOJvxW8OadFBO0jQHA6K0owenzQGjoQGwMC4eAdkg9ZJQKJykIbijZd g0vim0y2OYNmxBrM9TJzBEh0LmkqUsW4bVAvGnSVXXwIZiw4nKG53u8O8wArw6uedZ+S ojKQ== X-Received: by 10.152.120.5 with SMTP id ky5mr14984108lab.18.1382964900545; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.129] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm21153354lah.6.2013.10.28.05.54.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <526E5EA1.2050906@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:54:57 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Jones , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Symon and mbuf stats. References: <3AE5CCC3-9CBF-42B4-905B-327B3E1ECDC9@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <3AE5CCC3-9CBF-42B4-905B-327B3E1ECDC9@icloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:55:03 -0000 27.10.2013 02:58, Christopher Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > I run a Tor exit relay and finally managed to get Symon up and running with a web page. Royal PITA that was. I’ve got graphs of cpu utilization, disk io, network interface io, memory usage, and pf throughput, and the Tor processes stats. My mbuf graph is showing zeros all around. I telneted to port 2100 to look at the output stream from symon to symux. Mbuf measurements are all zero — which is slightly disappointing. > > Is there something I’m missing in terms of configuration or does Symon just not do mbuf reports with FreeBSD 9.2? There's no working mbuf support currently... -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 16:56:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAA4DD8; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:56:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24342D39; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBCCBC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.203.204.188]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9SGucqU031814; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:56:39 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9SGuUdi024087; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:56:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9SGuIwU067536; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:56:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201310281656.r9SGuIwU067536@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Soumendra Ganguly Subject: Re: Drivers for my PC From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:02:10 +0530." Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:56:18 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:56:47 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Soumendra Ganguly > Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:02:10 +0530 Soumendra Ganguly wrote: > Dear driver developers, > I recently bought a notebook (hp > pavilion 15-e006tu) which came with FreeDOS. I installed FreeBSD 9.2 > (amd64) on it (using dvd1.iso *), removing FreeDOS and later noticed > that the Wi-Fi is not working. Then I checked the list of hardwares > supported by FreeBSD 9.2 (which I should have done prior to installing > the OS) and found out that some of the components of my PC are not in > the list. For example the Wi-Fi adapter (RalinkTech VQF-RT3290), the > Bluetooth adapter (same model name as the Wi-Fi adapter, Ralink > VQF-RT3290), and I do not even know if the Ethernet interface is > supported. Later I realized that since the Wi-Fi adapter is not > recognized, the FreeBSD installation said something like - 'no > configurable NIC found' (or something similar, I hope you know what I > mean). I really want to use FreeBSD. My other computer has Windows and > Ubuntu on it. I want to port some of my code to FreeBSD. What to do? > Please help! I do not know how to write drivers (I would love to be > able to though) ! Help, please! > > * I converted the iso to a usb installation medium to install FreeBSD. > I have created an image of the flash drive using dd(1) on ubuntu and > saved it to my external hard drive for future use. > > Thank you. I will be really grateful if someone helps. Hi Soumendra Ganguly, You will get more support from questions@ that I added to CC, I suggest some later responder to this thread drops drivers@ from CC. In future please break your post into seperate postings with different subjects & more detail to tempt people more to answer just one question. It'll make it easier for them, & get you better reponse. drivers@ is mostly for busy driver developers@, few if any of whom will likely be interested in sorting a magic box of drivers for your particular PC, at least not without a lot more info from you &/or cash to motivate work for a manufacturer's specific PC ;-) Few know or care what a manufacturer's model contains, as they come & go rapidly, it's chip sets that get people's interest. There is a laptop list though, http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/ see Also http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-July/063261.html Provide more IC info. Download & boot a USB .img (which can run from stick, you dont even need to install, though easier if you do) & Or look up manufacturers spec & find Chips =ICs listed there. I did that for each laptop I have had. ALos created web pages of dmesg etc. Also untered them on the laptop indices. eg I have an HP Pavilion that does support ethernet: http://berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/hp/pavilion/dm3-1155ea Try yours & report detail. Capture the dmesg & pciconf outputs to a 2nd USB stick so you can publish them. For each device of interest look at & report parts of dmesg man pciconf ; pciconf -lv Also you can buy a WLAN USB stick for 10 Euro that's just 3mm long that supports FreeBSD-10 (Not 9!) urtwn0: (but maybe get a bigger stick for more reliable support) A link to threads on that here: http://berklix.com/~jhs/txt/driver_search There's also NDIS to support other WLAN chips (but NDIS is due to be removed later, subject to warm debate on other lists) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 20:04:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA51256 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B072A1C for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w61so7095373wes.24 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:04:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lb0QISS5CreHsb8r6MfMXdrZab3w2tsRRNsbllbPfm4=; b=1BZmlsBQs8rV/40KGFXmltmBly2mj1MtsSXKISWV6qAsvZo/jG7yFr25EKd49spZMR rhu0yA5Y3U11OOyA6tc89pGCiVSOqBl8Ry0QHa7mD+0JsS6bVs9598QdDl1mowP8m3+7 jVC/0E9uoST8X+Rh9OpkeN6XOBZznyL7WVpDAZMloh3E1T9zKQIViOLgdFE4F4JGp80y vKdd55uxW40m3bfBzOEdk0ZPCwyP+eTeuIvd/MVkH75HP2TT3Szu3CgtaKbeMwzLm8mD B8vZ7emAD/DI97wYADpsp63uHlZrHSe6FeTujGNj6NFSTR87JQ55QSn4AQx3daP647xY azPQ== X-Received: by 10.180.12.198 with SMTP id a6mr5392734wic.38.1382990668401; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (139.33.91.91.rev.sfr.net. [91.91.33.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm1806245wie.11.2013.10.28.13.04.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <526EC348.4070002@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:04:24 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot build security/nss on 9.0-RELEASE-p3 References: <526da2c4.LR/kurkiWs4zrTJ/%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> In-Reply-To: <526da2c4.LR/kurkiWs4zrTJ/%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:04:30 -0000 On 28.10.2013 01:33, Jay F Shachter wrote: > I cannot build, or cannot figure out how to build, security/nss on > 9.0-RELEASE-p3. Behold: > > > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# uname -a > FreeBSD norman 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Jun 12 01:47:53 UTC 2012 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# make install clean > ===> nss-3.15.2 improper use of USE_PERL5. > *** Error code 1 > Can you please update your ports tree? Maybe this has been fixed. > Stop in /usr/ports/security/nss. > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# gmake -v > GNU Make 3.82 > Built for i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# gmake install clean > Makefile:42: *** missing separator. Stop. The ports tree only works with BSD style makefiles, don't use gmake. > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# sed -n 42,47p Makefile > .if !defined(WITH_DEBUG) > MAKE_ENV+= BUILD_OPT=1 > BINS= ${DIST}/${OPSYS}${OSREL}_OPT.OBJ > .else > BINS= ${DIST}/${OPSYS}${OSREL}_DBG.OBJ > .endif > > Cheers, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 20:04:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2A02E8 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vhoffman@names.co.uk) Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240762A26 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [85.233.185.162] (helo=vincemacbook.unsane.co.uk) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Vaqjw-00019v-HF for FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:36:32 +0000 Message-ID: <526EA09F.2080805@names.co.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:36:31 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman-Kazlauskas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org" Subject: mounting CIFS (port 445) on freebsd X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:04:47 -0000 Hi all, Whats the recommended way to mount a windows share that been firewalled down to just CIFS/microsoft-ds (port 445) ? I can mount old style netbios-ssn (port 139) shares using mount_smb but not everyone wants to run netbios over tcp. I know smb isnt a first class citizen on freebsd but is there any way to do this? Cheers, Vince From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 01:52:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0616C7C2 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+612829-b51e-questions=freebsd.org@sendgrid.info) Received: from o3.bn.sendgrid.net (o3.bn.sendgrid.net [198.21.6.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C80192EF7 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:52:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=/Yc9IJA1UvCU4Nwv8GJP9m+MKkI=; b=AjlqsFewTNEIsk2c+XNNSl5uz8dFd FRLXLvv86SrqBFA/hMsImPoeQjHeVOw1D1koj2gsr15NZjGMR68GLH/CallOfUzH eBT+Lq6ll0JDXP+kGq06zY21kaxVhElHELDHyvjSMgpO+aI/lXU7+CO+5CQuIos1 kJxJ4P5theza8k= Received: by mf78.sendgrid.net with SMTP id mf78.20142.526F129C4 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:42:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from (ool-18e49183.dyn.optonline.net [24.228.145.131]) by mi15 (SG) with ESMTP id 14201e0b23b.3f9f.550048 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:42:52 +0000 (UTC) From: TheUrbanShopper To: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:42:51 -0400 Subject: In this Issue: Halloween SHOUT OUT to Africa's Master Mask Makers, Scary Dinner Recipes, Classic Costumes X-Mailer: TOL Mailer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_0_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ Message-ID: <1383010972.3759874582685375@mf78.sendgrid.net> X-SG-EID: kupi+C8b7X4XcIgkd08EEI9U+3nO0snAQOkGcdEKlYqJZwV7/lBHnKNM+ECV8yLvF383/FdvygQYiAUfwd4/dQyrzOxW0dpMarJYHOech9Z3dWKi/HilljQUsTewu8rA1hdBbBDiXsVYA7V+aR2qc8MkSFFj7XBUbnTXaWA2CiU= X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:52:15 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_0_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=_1_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ --_1_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Untitled Document
Having trouble reading this email? Click Here to go direct to TheUrbanShopper.com.
To ensure delivery, please add us@theurbanshopper.com to your Safe Sender List or Address Book.

You have received this update as a subscriber to TheUrbanShopper.com. Ensure inbox delivery by adding us@theurbanshopper.com to your SAFE SENDER or email CONTACTS list. If you'd like to unsubscribe . For more information, please read our Privacy Policy . ©2013 All Rights Reserved
--_1_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_-- --_0_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 08:58:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5CD7DD for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@skillpages-mailer.com) Received: from mtaout-243-pao.email7.skillpagesmail.com (mtaout-243-pao.email7.skillpagesmail.com [216.146.32.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6352520 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:58:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=MTA2; d=skillpagesmail.com; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Date:List-Unsubscribe:Subject:Message-Id; i=no-reply@skillpagesmail.com; bh=7Q+MMeiQFPEo+A9Fd8grBzD/xUM=; b=2dGJRxQBJIyFc2l/SN6Yd8VUJCexBJ7NDODsAorTEvIkIBsjbKVBz1/vPbwUavf36L12z/ZOyzzJ bUc2GWM/MtzsEt1m+srpya2ewCvMRF+OR/08n7Zqp19nArMkRVrs DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=MTA2; d=skillpagesmail.com; b=tn5GY38mPb/jfCJhiholAKlMhPwEmfF0ykGc4Gli2+uhz+knjDeGBMeKk5WUjWwqMxBLxn1bC8+H sBfhEuQWzNydbbMMaEqg7NvudIgq6imlg8JnxtL/UGU8D6OiZD6x; From: Bob Alaong via SkillPages Team To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: Bob Alaong via SkillPages Team Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:54:04 X-Mailer: www.skillpages.com_PY X-EmailId: 7pCO4V0NR2OnMm8EIyhH3A== Subject: Your invitation from Bob Alaong is about to expire X-DynectEmail-Msg-Key: <20131029085406.72CA2D100063@mail6-09-pao> Message-Id: <20131029085405.DF97D201E7@mail6-09-pao.dyndns.com> X-DynectEmail-Msg-Hash: EpeN7mhMsgl/e6sWPfurnNpUFwgnRsHGmJw/EW9rOzDrzL0H+vVikPEz78qNYMRSvIio7r9Wh0ehEnXZ/MYKlgSXCAntMJadH46k5T3y0s8A1us0+lTHqQ== X-DynectEmail-X-Headers: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Alaong via SkillPages Team List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:58:08 -0000 [1]SkillPages Hi, Bob is waiting for you to accept this pending invitation. [2][bob.alaong?picture=SIZE90] [3]Bob Alaong Invite sent: October 22, 2013 [4]Continue Thie email was sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. Please add 'no-reply@skillpages.com' to your contacts or safe senders list to ensure you keep receiving notifications in the future. If you do not want to receive these emails, you can [5]unsubscribe here. © 2013 SkillPages, Blackrock Business Park, Dublin, Ireland and 228 Hamilton Avenue, 3rd Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94301. [open-rate-v1.gif?emailMessageId=ee908ee1-5d0d-4763-a732-6f04232847dc&e mailType=InviteFirstReminder&sdate=201310290854&utm_source=EmailInviteF irstReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE] References 1. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=Atim2TLK7Aj-jzNjond2YsXBSNyYS7cP5FLkzOjo2zE=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzMDM2ODQ1LCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=ee908ee1-5d0d-4763-a732-6f04232847dc&emailType=InviteFirstReminder&sdate=201310290854&utm_source=EmailInviteFirstReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=Logo 2. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=Atim2TLK7Aj-jzNjond2YsXBSNyYS7cP5FLkzOjo2zE=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzMDM2ODQ1LCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=ee908ee1-5d0d-4763-a732-6f04232847dc&emailType=InviteFirstReminder&sdate=201310290854&utm_source=EmailInviteFirstReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=ProfileThumb 3. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=Atim2TLK7Aj-jzNjond2YsXBSNyYS7cP5FLkzOjo2zE=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzMDM2ODQ1LCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=ee908ee1-5d0d-4763-a732-6f04232847dc&emailType=InviteFirstReminder&sdate=201310290854&utm_source=EmailInviteFirstReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=ProfileName 4. http://www.skillpages.com/i/landing/emailinvitelanding?signedParameters=Atim2TLK7Aj-jzNjond2YsXBSNyYS7cP5FLkzOjo2zE=.eyJmcm9tIjogImVjOGE4NDNhLTRjM2ItZTMxMS1hMzI5LWM5MjcxYjUxZTJkYiIsICJwIjogMywgInRvIjogImJlYjI3Y2ViLTUzNWEtNWQ5OC1iOGFmLTEwZmU0MjAwOTQ5MSIsICJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzMDM2ODQ1LCAidmVyIjogIjEiLCAiZW1haWwiOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ==&emailMessageId=ee908ee1-5d0d-4763-a732-6f04232847dc&emailType=InviteFirstReminder&sdate=201310290854&utm_source=EmailInviteFirstReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=MainCallToAction 5. http://www.skillpages.com/i/account/unsubscribe?signedParameters=kYWNgwxmYpqv_RpdAEx1TQdNDcjkggkyOxxPZzjiYLc=.eyJpc3N1ZWRfYXQiOiAxMzgzMDM2ODQ1LCAicCI6IDAsICJ2ZXIiOiAiMSIsICJlbWFpbCI6ICJmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyJ9&emailMessageId=ee908ee1-5d0d-4763-a732-6f04232847dc&emailType=InviteFirstReminder&sdate=201310290854&utm_source=EmailInviteFirstReminder&utm_medium=Email&sendercc=IE&emailLinkType=Unsubscribe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 11:40:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D208EA8F for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837752EAC for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k15so2812149qaq.5 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XvWEXD02n/we/eBRDRA7HGomFQDO7k/H47o3oc8VyLU=; b=q8qN3kBihfJZ3rT4JvjE5jyD3LgcX8dWdulEu0IStoJKulF+McXBbDIMZOLOqyOkLC DJvtkFJVstJLETjiKB1DNZhjyeiwwCL5SqJIN1OAcQHzcVUI16BasdX31czhqIjScmBj 7ZAnLmhO7jY/PCTx5bq/E/SjngcwWrr0bCRwc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XvWEXD02n/we/eBRDRA7HGomFQDO7k/H47o3oc8VyLU=; b=cShxea4RYuj92pQftBs5smkxJgR5Di8DWb78UNZ8I6o33ZhdzUA0/K5HXQ5HGFOxL9 o+B3Y2BdG3Ux1v3l3r/idJbuz8yk47QeABwBSVdo1AyvrBM+cda20JHld2nW38Cg3O9M 21ugqxJMXJ+8P9MabGnBXagnnbd9pXg8xA1Zlst4Fi0ZUJuQSL2meSzg8iBMwbcpFYFU kWhFq+RD9YUf2z5CHMKWghvMmEMuqHbXP4MKetLCAn8goDHFmkaXmpIT9A9OW7+oYP16 FL7p7yak2asB+YdjdEPEvL48fv3TyQHF0teoHYE7ZrUEfgIj5UWXMxjqkE+gqEUsZvcz JyQA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJEVuZ6qUSAol/F8motg5b8kbzrEXbkq1GqW2DpF9gHix9q2Iav8FpuhJWxxuDkNu/RZfU X-Received: by 10.224.29.208 with SMTP id r16mr36923999qac.25.1383046824699; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h9sm64228689qaq.9.2013.10.29.04.40.23 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3d89pD2fxWz2CG4y for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:40:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:40:19 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Check to see if share is mounted Message-ID: <20131029074019.5a7a75b9@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:40:26 -0000 I have several Bash scripts that backup data to a Windows drive. I am looking for a one or two line snippet of code that I can use to determine if the share is all ready mounted. I tried trapping the exit code of the "mount_smbfs" command, but it always returns "0". Is there another way to get info on the share? -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 11:43:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB46C66 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abbeydixson8@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x24e.google.com (mail-pd0-x24e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::24e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1952F00 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f206.google.com with SMTP id v10so139507pde.5 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:43:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WBT7dxGBeT4kf4/+N7szZvoNv+0pSfP6iBTrEPV8GTw=; b=ku2Z4p8LJb/QrRnZTA8qytYbrYt/hWMmDFdJ2ZJ0uSDrMsYyMCdRqo3L/utA8FI6hf rPqy4ZDJrX8X4+kHLYix++pLB1w0ntvBodpmsBOT3qs49oqF9rq/QYy/dzx4s3iKUAXG QiM/giSTKnFa1hseq4074UdF9cdJWhUL/1qFW0IxPB4v77hjivORC1M4JsYQMpYgjNfe s1qV90e/0QUlcgiyAsqK84g6ousRg6lgBadw9/B8uxUUJcGOK+zYFiZpzAxMAESH9jlJ XHztj2Lix2IDG48MuQUAklM2nJwumz9p9P9ErUnZai54xdNSXS/KW+2GBqEKbEI6sDFQ 3sgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.144.41 with SMTP id sj9mr12022200pab.23.1383046983561; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <047d7b6dca5229ba5204e9dfb856@google.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:43:03 +0000 Subject: www.freebsd.org From: Abbey Dixson To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:43:04 -0000 PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+PGRpdiAgDQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEzLjMzMzMzMzk2OTExNjIx MXB4O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxwICANCmNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi IHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjEycHQiPkhpLDwvcD48L2Rpdj48ZGl2ICANCnN0eWxlPSJm b250LXNpemU6MTMuMzMzMzMzOTY5MTE2MjExcHg7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsc2Fucy1zZXJp ZiI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5JIGNhbWUgYWNyb3NzIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBhbmQg d2FudGVkIHRvIHNlbmQgeW91IGEgIA0KcXVpY2sgbm90ZS4gV2l0aCBhIGZldyBzaW1wbGUgY2hh bmdlcyB0byBtYWtlIHlvdXIgc2l0ZSBtb3JlIFNFTy1mcmllbmRseSAgDQpJkm0gc3VyZSB5b3Ug Y2FuIGNvbnZlcnQgbW9yZSB2aXNpdG9ycyBpbnRvIGxlYWRzIGFuZCBnZXQgaXQgcGxhY2VkIGhp Z2hlciAgDQppbiB0aGUgb3JnYW5pYyBzZWFyY2ggcmVzdWx0cywgZm9yIGtleXdvcmRzIHRoYXQg bWF0dGVyIHRvIHlvdSB0aGUgbW9zdC48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj48ZGl2ICANCnN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNp emU6MTMuMzMzMzMzOTY5MTE2MjExcHg7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PHAg IA0KY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+oDwvcD48L2Rpdj48ZGl2ICANCnN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 MTMuMzMzMzMzOTY5MTE2MjExcHg7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWwsc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PHAgIA0K Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+V2WScmUgYW4gQXVzdHJhbGlhbiBiYXNlZCBjb21wYW55IHdpdGgg YSBncmVhdCBpbi1ob3VzZSAgDQp0ZWNobmljYWwgdGVhbSB3aG8gcmVhbGx5IGtub3cgdGhlaXIg c3R1ZmYgYWJvdXQgc2VhcmNoIGVuZ2luZSAgDQpvcHRpbWl6YXRpb24uoDwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pjxk aXYgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMy4zMzMzMzM5NjkxMTYyMTFweDtmb250LWZhbWlseTph cmlhbCxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48cCAgDQpjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj6gPC9wPjwvZGl2PjxkaXYg IA0Kc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMy4zMzMzMzM5NjkxMTYyMTFweDtmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlh bCxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48cCAgDQpjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5Xb3VsZCB5b3UgbGlrZSBhIGJp dCBtb3JlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGFib3V0IGhvdyB0byBnaXZlICANCnlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBhIGJv b3N0IHdpdGggYmV0dGVyIFNFTz8gUGxlYXNlIGZlZWwgZnJlZSB0byBkcm9wIG1lIGFuIGVtYWls ICANCm9yIHlvdSBjYW4gY29udGFjdCBtZSB2aWEgb3VyIHdlYnNpdGUuPC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+PGRp diAgDQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEzLjMzMzMzMzk2OTExNjIxMXB4O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFy aWFsLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxwICANCmNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPqA8L3A+PC9kaXY+PGRpdiAg DQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEzLjMzMzMzMzk2OTExNjIxMXB4O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFs LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxwICANCmNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkczwvcD4NCjwv ZGl2PjxkaXYgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMy4zMzMzMzM5NjkxMTYyMTFweDtmb250LWZh bWlseTphcmlhbCxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48cCAgDQpjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5BYmJleSBEaXhz b248L3A+PC9kaXY+PGRpdiAgDQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEzLjMzMzMzMzk2OTExNjIxMXB4 O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxicj48L2Rpdj48cCAgDQpjbGFzcz0iTXNv Tm9ybWFsIiAgDQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEzLjMzMzMzMzk2OTExNjIxMXB4O2ZvbnQtZmFt aWx5OmFyaWFsLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPg0KPGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTo3LjVwdDtj b2xvcjpyZ2IoNjEsMTMzLDE5OCkiPkFVUyAgDQpIZWFkcXVhcnRlcjxicj48L3NwYW4+PC9iPjxz cGFuICANCnN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6Ny41cHQ7Y29sb3I6cmdiKDYxLDEzMywxOTgpIj5BdXN0 cmFsaWFuIFRlY2hub2xvZ3kgUGFyaywgIA0KTG9jb21vdGl2ZSBTdHJlZXQsIEV2ZWxlaWdooDxi cj5OU1cgMjAxNTxicj48Yj48YnI+SW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbCAgDQpIZWFkcXVhcnRlcjxicj4NCjwv Yj41MDEgMTl0aCBTdHJlZXQsIE4uVy4sIFdhc2hpbmd0b24sIEQuQy4gMjA0MzE8L3NwYW4+PC9w PjxkaXYgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMy4zMzMzMzM5NjkxMTYyMTFweDtmb250LWZhbWls eTphcmlhbCxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48cCAgDQpjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiAgDQpzdHls ZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjcuNXB0O2NvbG9yOnJnYig2MSwxMzMsMTk4KSI+T2ZmaWNlIFBob25lOiAg DQoyMDYtMjAyLTI5MDc8L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+DQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 11:49:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4B3ED5 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:49:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FE32F79 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.113.121.95] (helo=tiny-r255948) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vb7nC-000703-KW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:49:03 +0100 Received: from tiny-r255948 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny-r255948 (8.14.7/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9TBn05X001804 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:49:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny-r255948 (8.14.7/8.14.3/Submit) id r9TBmx7K001803 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:48:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny-r255948: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:48:59 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Check to see if share is mounted Message-ID: <20131029114859.GA1796@tiny-r255948> References: <20131029074019.5a7a75b9@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20131029074019.5a7a75b9@scorpio> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r235646 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.121.95 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:49:11 -0000 El día Tuesday, October 29, 2013 a las 07:40:19AM -0400, Jerry escribió: > I have several Bash scripts that backup data to a Windows drive. I am > looking for a one or two line snippet of code that I can use to > determine if the share is all ready mounted. I tried trapping the exit > code of the "mount_smbfs" command, but it always returns "0". Is there > another way to get info on the share? test -f /mnt/..... || { echo PANIC exit } -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz, , http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211 UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 11:55:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5414F13C for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A9C2FF0 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E433C3A2 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:55:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r9TBt80X005207 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:55:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:55:08 +0100 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Check to see if share is mounted Message-Id: <20131029125508.a7525980.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20131029074019.5a7a75b9@scorpio> References: <20131029074019.5a7a75b9@scorpio> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:55:25 -0000 On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:40:19 -0400, Jerry wrote: > I have several Bash scripts that backup data to a Windows drive. I am > looking for a one or two line snippet of code that I can use to > determine if the share is all ready mounted. I tried trapping the exit > code of the "mount_smbfs" command, but it always returns "0". Is there > another way to get info on the share? That's quite easy. Just query "df" and grep for the name of the mountpoint or the CIFS name ("device field" as it appears in /etc/fstab). Here's an example: if [ df | grep "/home/bob/stuff" ]; then ... do stuff when share is mounted ... else echo "CIFS share not availble." exit 1 fi Here, /home/bob/stuff would be the mountpoint. You could also use the CIFS name, but it's probably more work to get that name into a correct grep search pattern. Just make sure the result of grep is _unique_. Of course, use variables to make the thing more configurable. :-) Of course, you could also query the mount command itself and grep the results. Similarly - depending on your coding preferences -, you could also do something like this: mount | grep "on /home/bob/stuff (" > /dev/null 2>&1 [ $? -eq 1 ] && exit 1 ... and here continuing with the share mounted ... The use of "on ... (" helps to avoid false-positive results. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 13:25:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F2A1CA for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fmail@safaricom.co.ke) Received: from outbound-04.safaricombusiness.co.ke (outbound-04.safaricombusiness.co.ke [41.203.208.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE1B26E4 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:25:02 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvYaAEy2b1Ipy9CLZ2dsb2JhbABZgXEGTHyqRT0bToMqhDqMNh+BCBYODQoMGyiCClQBAxgjHQphEg8lBwUQDASFKII8D5ddhwKac4gEhXqBWA6EFgOJOYUaRoRPmVM5MYEE X-IPAS-Result: AvYaAEy2b1Ipy9CLZ2dsb2JhbABZgXEGTHyqRT0bToMqhDqMNh+BCBYODQoMGyiCClQBAxgjHQphEg8lBwUQDASFKII8D5ddhwKac4gEhXqBWA6EFgOJOYUaRoRPmVM5MYEE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,593,1378846800"; d="scan'208,217";a="323058726" Received: from 3g-relay-02.safaricombusiness.co.ke ([41.203.208.139]) by smtp02.safaricombusiness.co.ke with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2013 16:24:58 +0300 Message-ID: <03114f66-41576-19466838828704@user-pc> From: "CISSAP Kenya" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Professional Document Templates Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:24:47 +0300 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: CISSAP Kenya List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:25:04 -0000 Companies use documents to communicate, transact business and analyze productivity. Since documents provide proof of an organizations dealings and may be referred to for years to come, it is important that they be well written. We provide you with business documents templates of almost every kind. With over 1200 business documents that are well written, you will find them very useful. To view the complete list of document templates that we have go to [1]http://www.cissap.com/document-list.htm The cost of all the 1200 business documents templates is Kshs 2,000.00 For payments please go to [2]http://www.cissap.com/purchase.htm Our business document templates contains a wide selection of business contract templates, agreements, forms, policies, statements and letters. Find document templates for almost every kind of business such as purchase orders, partnership agreements, loan agreements, applications, bill of sale etc. For the price of a single document, you get hundreds business documents templates, 24/7. Professionally drafted and simple to use and edit, these business contracts and legal templates are an essential, quality and affordable resource for any business or organization. Note:- Though this is not an automated email, we keep on sending out these emails to all those people whom we find eligible of using our services. To unsubscribe from future mails (i.e., to ensure that we do not contact you again for this matter), please go to [3]http://www.cissap.com/unsubscribe.htm Regards, Moses Ndivo 0721-351344 References 1. http://www.cissap.com/document-list.htm 2. http://www.cissap.com/purchase.htm 3. http://www.cissap.com/unsubscribe.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 14:02:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817D83AF for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503FE2905 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9TE2aiK034859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:02:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:02:36 -0500 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Intel Core 2 DUO Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:02:44 -0000 I am looking at replacing an old mini tower PC running with a 900Watt power supply (simply old parts left over from PC upgrades) with a small form factor PC to run backups to eSATA with Bacula. Main goal is to cut down on the UPS load, hate having that beast of a power supply running 24/7 to only be used about 10 hours a week. I have been searching eBay, and there are a ton of Dell and HP small form factor PCs with the Intel core 2 DUO CPUs a few of which have 4G ram, for cheap. Assuming I can find one that I can put two internal drives in to run zfs mirror for FreeBSD install, does anyone have any experience on performance, will the Intel core 2 DUO, be able to handle GELI and ZFS on the eSATA disk with decent throughput? Currently running with an old AMD Athlon(tm) 7750 Dual-Core Processor (2700.06-MHz K8-class CPU), which keeps up just fine, eSATA disk drive is the slowest part on the current system. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 14:51:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3B1ED3 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:51:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qc0-x232.google.com (mail-qc0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02C32C3C for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x19so4755739qcw.9 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:51:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gaqNuHi6rF8tbsbA//YUW40m5BjCCxDJ+JgtDYOYenU=; b=VE42X3g5bTnxJaTKApP29/24W05sErEEd+U0Vnzn9O5avBmS14V/rYFaoqKkxCZrgi 8u9xIOId5ytBuOuqjqREFV9ASFragI9b4afPWAabjN5XYQe0ZxYONVTjsxIR5+iVp+Uw fwn1GDJMDRm3zEZmT6OPsSVSFpHkM6QSfsdY4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gaqNuHi6rF8tbsbA//YUW40m5BjCCxDJ+JgtDYOYenU=; b=UxjY2PUFpgLIPbOzvahwCsm7btYK/sCPzFNEfuNvQm2HKf8xV0WttZBm07MNrr/W3G hOW4lI3LJ/0dvGi9kectuQgjyNv4CUMXmoH1BHIz4L3Z7JDiQqSnhW5TKEbohclLWn5n CbXdY7dIPDAuQeppvSvvSZangxUp65nze663N6o6J3uyqH1nNF4fobFTuoSh2gFPp4z/ cwu4IsddJLLDdjSXNDB4FO689OtpScGRB1RDabikak/koUlSLOoVUjfYoo+qpitgrWU8 hE3arFy+m+SgZU13zCmHtVTwdiipgCGuhwF5c4CEug1SzLoQAa0er9bEzUCdpHFMk11S U7+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5FDogWY/u7XYL+wEI67Sgh/Qku11kFPhNA5tM54DUWjWzH2Gcamm15aYB3WDM8Kwhht5e X-Received: by 10.49.40.133 with SMTP id x5mr10809qek.52.1383058288831; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm54732425qej.4.2013.10.29.07.51.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3d8G2k5TmKz2CG4w for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:51:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:51:26 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Check to see if share is mounted Message-ID: <20131029105126.0858ba0d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20131029125508.a7525980.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20131029074019.5a7a75b9@scorpio> <20131029125508.a7525980.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:51:30 -0000 On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:55:08 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > That's quite easy. Just query "df" and grep for the name of > the mountpoint or the CIFS name ("device field" as it appears > in /etc/fstab). Here's an example: > > if [ df | grep "/home/bob/stuff" ]; then > ... do stuff when share is mounted ... > else > echo "CIFS share not availble." > exit 1 > fi That doesn't work under Bash. I modified it and now it works fine. if ( df | grep 'Path_To_Mount' &>\dev\null ); then echo "It is mounted" else echo "Not mounted" fi -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 15:41:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E57A4B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando@siscom.eti.br) Received: from ns1.steltenpool.com.br (ns1.steltenpool.com.br [200.159.63.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13C462FE3 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30310 invoked by uid 1008); 29 Oct 2013 15:41:07 -0000 Received: from 187-57-43-239.dsl.telesp.net.br (HELO FERNANDO) (187.57.43.239) by ns1.steltenpool.com.br with SMTP; 29 Oct 2013 15:41:07 -0000 From: "FERNANDO" To: Subject: Installation freebsd Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:41:35 -0200 Message-ID: <6E40EB0998574F53B9B4E72496E1C99F@FERNANDO> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac7UJCCATGMrNxYuRdqApUXdzDHZOQAmQ6nw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:41:47 -0000 Good morning, The HP SMART ARRAY B120i is compatible with the freebsd 9.2 or 10.0? I am trying to install the freebsd 10.0 in server HP PROLIANT 310E G8 and I am not getting. After the installation the server doesn't get the operating system installed feebsd. Thank you, Fernando. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 16:16:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA7B2FD for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando@siscom.eti.br) Received: from ns1.steltenpool.com.br (ns1.steltenpool.com.br [200.159.63.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D16A321EB for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31083 invoked by uid 1008); 29 Oct 2013 16:14:09 -0000 Received: from 187-57-43-239.dsl.telesp.net.br (HELO FERNANDO) (187.57.43.239) by ns1.steltenpool.com.br with SMTP; 29 Oct 2013 16:14:09 -0000 From: "FERNANDO" To: Subject: HP SMART ARRAY B120i Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:14:39 -0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac7UJCCATGMrNxYuRdqApUXdzDHZOQAmQ6nwAAEqvsA= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:16:02 -0000 Good morning, The HP SMART ARRAY B120i is compatible with the freebsd 9.2 or 10.0? I am trying to install the freebsd 10.0 in server HP PROLIANT 310E G8 and I am not getting. After the installation the server doesn't get the operating system installed feebsd. Thank you, Fernando. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 18:05:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32F9F07 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57B5329B6 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9TI48g4070376; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:04:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r9TI48FQ070373; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:04:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:04:07 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: dweimer Subject: Re: Intel Core 2 DUO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:04:08 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:05:33 -0000 On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, dweimer wrote: > I am looking at replacing an old mini tower PC running with a 900Watt power > supply (simply old parts left over from PC upgrades) with a small form factor > PC to run backups to eSATA with Bacula. Main goal is to cut down on the UPS > load, hate having that beast of a power supply running 24/7 to only be used > about 10 hours a week. I have been searching eBay, and there are a ton of > Dell and HP small form factor PCs with the Intel core 2 DUO CPUs a few of > which have 4G ram, for cheap. Assuming I can find one that I can put two > internal drives in to run zfs mirror for FreeBSD install, does anyone have > any experience on performance, will the Intel core 2 DUO, be able to handle > GELI and ZFS on the eSATA disk with decent throughput? Core 2 Duo works fine, but don't expect GELI to be fast. Be wary of small form-factor machines. Airflow and heat are problems with many of the smaller cases, and older ones often have failed capacitors. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 18:38:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA6C3EE for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 00000142057c10e1-c4eb0159-4f29-4e4a-bdda-56336fc6f254-000000@amazonses.com) Received: from a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677A12C89 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:38:19 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--SMTPSPACER:08B4F284--" Subject: educational resource update To: Webmaster From: Lindsey Weiss Message-ID: <00000142057c10e1-c4eb0159-4f29-4e4a-bdda-56336fc6f254-000000@email.amazonses.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:31:26 +0000 X-SES-Outgoing: 2013.10.29-54.240.8.31 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lindsey Weiss List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:38:19 -0000 Multipart Container/Builder ----SMTPSPACER:08B4F284-- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I=E2=80=99m so glad I found your site today - so many educational resources! I=E2=80=99m in the middle of creating an article about the emergence of virtual classrooms & educational software in the K-12 area - and may have bit off more than I can chew. There are so many slapdash =E2=80=9Ceducational=E2=80=9D resources out there, so finding your site was kind of a relief. I figured you=E2=80=99d like to know that one of your links is broken (on this page: http://adsn.vstyle.co.il/fr/gallery/cgallery.html). It looks like Funschool changed hands with Kaboose and eventually Disney. The Disney site, unfortunately, has no educational merit evident: http://games.disney.com/ In light of this, I thought I=E2=80=99d recommend some of the more inventive and resourceful sites I=E2=80=99ve come across, perhaps as welcome replacements to the Funschool link.=20 MIT=E2=80=99s Scratch: Computer Programming & Coding Games for Children http://scratch.mit.edu/ 20 iPad Apps for Play-Based Learning=20 http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/trends/20-apps-games-for-play-based-learning/ Developmental Games for Children with Autism Spectrum http://www.whizkidgames.com/ Free Educational Software for Children, Teachers & Schools http://www.sheppardsoftware.com/ Interactive Biology for Kids: The Life Cycle of a Flower http://www.proflowers.com/guide/interactive-plant-biology-kids-guide-life-cycle-flower I figured all of these resources would be great additions to your site and hope you=E2=80=99ll agree! Would you be interested in reading my article once it=E2=80=99s published? I=E2=80=99d be happy to send a link your way.=20 Best, Lindsey Lindsey Weiss lindsey@outbounding.com=20 =20 P.S. If you=E2=80=99d rather not receive emails from me in the future about educational research, not a problem. Just let me know by replying - lindsey@outbounding.com=20 2054 Kildaire Farm Rd. #204 | Cary, NC | 27518 ----SMTPSPACER:08B4F284---- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 19:25:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0332E26C for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B782F2E for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n12so328294wgh.17 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:24:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=Js0Wi4AavifwZvZsv2SHqww/LFdcqkJrCCspfdxwEeA=; b=W3cd40ZKtqi2kJRZ692r1KSmQBOQL6/njA8wJGo0j3iccVYVE8dCoxyOGTtGH7/i37 zgd8+uExc7zZoiTfVzwOeJQGF25YM0bjiVl+IdJTOpCHhUURD7xE/41WZJOzwBxuPGSL xoQoNALaShJi3rHWo7YvPZYSNrhnN5xiD0bbJ4O/tJ7yk6kYroK0Hi9eJjCe7rbbe/55 7kTn45RapTPoZN96l3EKGnBwPOyigipDXf9MkVA0gkVtGo4FWumiZAjoe0ZufV1naFOt kvALPpui0Tme5mzF+jvzWQZ6dzxPQCqNRHgL/lz9MrcNrfB9rMp+Dchh8s5xYyuscC/j 9tpQ== X-Received: by 10.180.106.133 with SMTP id gu5mr14463862wib.0.1383074699900; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (client-86-23-79-58.brhm.adsl.virginm.net. [86.23.79.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y11sm7946269wie.7.2013.10.29.12.24.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:36:47 +0000 From: Peter Harrison Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:36:47 +0000 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Chromium rendering problem Message-ID: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:25:02 -0000 Hello list. I'm encountering a rendering problem in Chromium on 9.2-RELEASE. I updated my machine recently from 9.2-R from 9.1-R, and then ran a port update which pulled in several updates - including bringing Chromium up to 30.0.1599.101 from 30.0.1599.69, among other things. I now have a rendering problem in Chromium. On some sights, it will render the page initially before the render is complete however the page blanks to white - no content visible at all. This happens consistently for example on www.theguardian.com/uk and play.google.com Other (presumably simpler) sites render fine - eg. www.freebsd.org. Any ideas where to look for a fix? I've tried disabling my only extension (Vimium) to no effect. I've tried install a flashblocker (no difference). I don't have flash installed This is on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60 with 9.2-R i386 and a GENERIC kernel using the intel xorg driver: xorg-7.7 X.Org complete distribution metaport xorg-server-1.7.7_10,1 X.Org X server and related programs xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_5 Driver for Intel integrated graphics chipsets Thanks for your help, Peter Harrison. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 19:58:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919BD417 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casey@phantombsd.org) Received: from scottmail.org (scottmail.org [209.206.250.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FFF21C0 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scottmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B15324A7CF for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:58:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at scottmail.org Received: from scottmail.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scottmail.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kcwbdHCd3pAX for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scottmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8353224A7CE for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:57:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at scottmail.org Received: from scottmail.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scottmail.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sbX2iGgFyycQ for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scottmail.org (bearcat.phantombsd.org [192.168.1.20]) by scottmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDF124A7CA for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:57:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Casey Scott To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <789665157.296.1383076677766.JavaMail.root@phantombsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1799676610.295.1383076646507.JavaMail.root@phantombsd.org> Subject: NAT/ipfw blocking internal traffic MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [208.95.100.4] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.2_GA_5569 (ZimbraWebClient - GC30 (Win)/8.0.2_GA_5569) Thread-Topic: NAT/ipfw blocking internal traffic Thread-Index: 3cKgm/6ptMG8WNLL2tuh53HBurosRg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Casey Scott List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:58:03 -0000 Hello, My NAT and ipfw ruleset follow almost exactly what is given at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html The problem I'm encountering is that a portion of my outbound internal traffic is being blocked by ipfw. This is a fresh Freebsd installaion, so I'm kind of at a loss since the config matches the handbook. Any suggestions are appreciated. uname -a *********************************************** FreeBSD hostname 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #6 r256447: Fri Oct 18 20:06:53 PDT 2013 root@hostname:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/hostname amd64 *********************************************** /var/log/security: *********************************************** Oct 29 10:14:46 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 65.126.84.81:80 192.168.1.6:61681 in via fxp0 Oct 29 10:14:47 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 65.126.84.81:80 192.168.1.6:61681 in via fxp0 Oct 29 10:14:47 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 65.126.84.81:80 192.168.1.6:61681 in via fxp0 Oct 29 10:14:54 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 192.168.1.6:61915 174.129.210.177:80 out via fxp0 Oct 29 10:17:55 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 192.168.1.6:61876 65.126.84.88:80 out via fxp0 Oct 29 10:17:55 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 192.168.1.6:61877 65.126.84.88:80 out via fxp0 Oct 29 10:17:58 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 192.168.1.6:61921 208.85.40.45:80 out via fxp0 Oct 29 10:17:58 hostname kernel: ipfw: 450 Deny TCP 192.168.1.6:61921 208.85.40.45:80 out via fxp0 *********************************************** firewall script: *********************************************** #!/bin/sh cmd="ipfw -q add" skip="skipto 500" pif=fxp0 ks="keep-state" good_tcpo="22,25,37,43,53,80,443" ipfw -q -f flush $cmd 002 allow all from any to any via em0 # exclude LAN traffic $cmd 003 allow all from any to any via lo0 # exclude loopback traffic $cmd 100 divert natd ip from any to any in via $pif $cmd 101 check-state # Authorized outbound packets $cmd 136 $skip udp from any to any 53 out via $pif $ks $cmd 150 $skip tcp from any to any $good_tcpo out via $pif setup $ks $cmd 151 $skip icmp from any to any out via $pif $ks $cmd 152 $skip udp from any to any 123 out via $pif $ks # Deny all inbound traffic from non-routable reserved address spaces $cmd 300 deny all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via $pif #RFC 1918 private IP $cmd 301 deny all from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via $pif #RFC 1918 private IP $cmd 302 deny all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via $pif #RFC 1918 private IP $cmd 303 deny all from 127.0.0.0/8 to any in via $pif #loopback $cmd 304 deny all from 0.0.0.0/8 to any in via $pif #loopback $cmd 305 deny all from 169.254.0.0/16 to any in via $pif #DHCP auto-config $cmd 306 deny all from 192.0.2.0/24 to any in via $pif #reserved for docs $cmd 307 deny all from 204.152.64.0/23 to any in via $pif #Sun cluster $cmd 308 deny all from 224.0.0.0/3 to any in via $pif #Class D & E multicast # Authorized inbound packets $cmd 400 allow tcp from any to me 76 in via $pif setup limit src-addr 2 $cmd 402 allow ip from any to me 53 in via $pif setup limit src-addr 2 $cmd 420 allow tcp from any to me 80 in via $pif setup limit src-addr 2 $cmd 421 allow tcp from any to me 80 in via $pif setup limit src-addr 2 $cmd 450 deny log ip from any to any # This is skipto location for outbound stateful rules $cmd 500 divert natd ip from any to any out via $pif *********************************************** natd run options: *********************************************** /sbin/natd -dynamic -m -n fxp0 *********************************************** -Casey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 20:31:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E4A617 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from terje@elde.net) Received: from keepquiet.net (keepquiet.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:84c1::deaf:babe]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED0DC2480 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.150.232.150] (2.150.52.91.tmi.telenormobil.no [2.150.52.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by keepquiet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68BE42E06E; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:31:52 +0100 (CET) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <5CBAA29F-765F-4AC5-90AE-36FD8C8E37B1@elde.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Terje Elde Subject: Re: Intel Core 2 DUO Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:31:47 +0100 To: "dweimer@dweimer.net" Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:31:55 -0000 On 29. okt. 2013, at 15:02, dweimer wrote: > will the Intel core 2 DUO, be able to handle GELI and ZFS on the eSATA dis= k with decent throughput? Decent means so many differen things, to so many people.=20 I've got a core2duo running with zfs raidz over geli, and (iirc) it does in t= he ballpark of around 100MB/sec or so (sequential). For my typical workload= s I'm fairly sure seek time of the spinning rust is more of an issue than ge= li.=20 Terje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 21:05:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F134E70B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from blackswan@ltcddata.plus.com) Received: from www.davids-website.com (ltcddata.plus.com [212.159.87.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B04D276C for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avatar.davids-website.com (avatar.davids-website.com [10.0.0.1]) by www.davids-website.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DF02294F for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:56:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:56:03 +0000 From: LtCdData To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Chromium rendering problem Message-ID: <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> In-Reply-To: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> References: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; i386-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:05:38 -0000 On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:36:47 +0000 Peter Harrison wrote: > Hello list. > > I'm encountering a rendering problem in Chromium on 9.2-RELEASE. > > I updated my machine recently from 9.2-R from 9.1-R, and then ran a port update which pulled in several updates - including bringing Chromium up to 30.0.1599.101 from 30.0.1599.69, among other things. > > I now have a rendering problem in Chromium. On some sights, it will render the page initially before the render is complete however the page blanks to white - no content visible at all. This happens consistently for example on www.theguardian.com/uk and play.google.com > > Other (presumably simpler) sites render fine - eg. www.freebsd.org. > > Any ideas where to look for a fix? I've tried disabling my only extension (Vimium) to no effect. I've tried install a flashblocker (no difference). I don't have flash installed > > This is on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60 with 9.2-R i386 and a GENERIC kernel using the intel xorg driver: > > xorg-7.7 X.Org complete distribution metaport > xorg-server-1.7.7_10,1 X.Org X server and related programs > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_5 Driver for Intel integrated graphics chipsets > > > Thanks for your help, > > > > Peter Harrison. not sure if this is the same issue i had but...... http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=15163 /etc/sysctl.conf kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 /etc/rc.d/sysctl restart > fixed it for me... _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 22:52:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E30850F for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x234.google.com (mail-qe0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23922E52 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id w7so380097qeb.11 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:52:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xQT1/VboIt39ankd3S94q1DuJeS0HdOVLH2TgiaxpP4=; b=Yx2WjjWU+TFFQ+RfDsJWxIA1Q78xtdNL6ypPPFu43NbzxetE4fM0Vj0psRhIdZ/rWv Xagdueesmi2mnt7tjxuuZh71AedmEs+XhlG7JKM+xg5xiRmxkVj2WDrPW3AcZ7lk7wwn WNwGnQKOR4jjBDxqjkydBhXP2GK9lJRevKPZviCfLmGfsKAdd7D5Dv2rUYJJ5cBlFE8u wdjjWXkmZd9EmnNHmigBNRJgSM4tszwrgJN+Sn9NAfpBabtH/HDkqsumgMtrcOyeTXUf M8pad5GWuK3VQpbba9yJy20VYu9vKtR5Hk4UZsqRMDtrth6T3LXPkc6SE2xECkft9eMz BR3A== X-Received: by 10.224.11.68 with SMTP id s4mr4157474qas.88.1383087135921; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumiwa.farms.net (pool-72-87-59-52.ptldme.east.myfairpoint.net. [72.87.59.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jw9sm58543081qeb.2.2013.10.29.15.52.14 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:52:06 -0400 From: Ajtim To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: google-earth Message-ID: <20131029185206.6c9747dd@lumiwa.farms.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:52:17 -0000 Hi! I installed google-earth on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 #0 r257166: Sat Oct 26 19:23:22 UTC 2013 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 with KDE 4.11.2. When I start application it opened but when I ty to locate a city I got: Invalid HTTP request I don't have a problem with Internet, Skype... Thanks in advance, Mitja --- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 00:24:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F64E3B for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3022338 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VbJad-0003aO-5O for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:24:51 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:24:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1383092691159-5856479.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: compile: why not max-out resources? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:24:52 -0000 I have two questions re compiling vs CPU + HDD throughput. CPU is Athlon-II, HDD is sata-3 + ZFS 1. When compiling world and some ports, neither CPU usage, nor HDD throughput (from gstat) is maximized (threads are defined in make.conf) and in many instances usage is very low. Is there a third parameter limiting the speed of the first two? 2. I have noticed that when compiling world resource usage fluctuates greatly, but that 10 and 11 both take considerably longer compared to 9 and that ccache is ineffective. Is this normal? PS. buildworld for both 10 and 11 halted at libiconv phase when ccache was enabled in make.conf. Proceeded without ccache. ----- FreeBSD-9.2-stable_amd64_root-on-zfs_clang-only-world -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/compile-why-not-max-out-resources-tp5856479.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 00:38:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA8B2B1 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74B7223DB for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa1so137107pad.27 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:38:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rredz5att4jScBY7ZjbJ7eUcH4U3cTsgHV8etKsyprI=; b=LPylBcK1iGBk6tY2IX6JwZ8tSH+6SrMceGSKIW9gElzBchzKsrdkjH4B/o9F0i4U0+ g+HXc0Fs3mFjWy41odSyCyDuUOmDDgFWkWjCO3hwbgY6Bae124jA2GegFkEJqxYpeKg0 0f9TxjFCPovxuh1BbFsVoyaE+qx4uB1e5Nls7ruz0uz6ehyBNv9OTBBuYEL0D2XJXEf4 QmnsbHw/m2FpTHY7DaKY5bKq4geQ8TfxgPBOoWSWBOfwMN16Tty2n+aMjw7d4V7Bpc6g BkXIdDoRnFNiNKLjcLGRz86aY7TAPfb1LyFU0tEnk55FHwehuXAIN2EumL10oV2IWf/r DGrw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.251.1 with SMTP id zg1mr272930pac.160.1383093514153; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:38:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <526da2c4.LR/kurkiWs4zrTJ/%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> References: <526da2c4.LR/kurkiWs4zrTJ/%jay@m5.chicago.il.us> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:38:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cannot build security/nss on 9.0-RELEASE-p3 From: Adam Vande More To: jay@m5.chicago.il.us Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:38:34 -0000 On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jay F Shachter wrote: > I cannot build, or cannot figure out how to build, security/nss on > 9.0-RELEASE-p3. Behold: > > > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# uname -a > FreeBSD norman 9.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Jun 12 > 01:47:53 UTC 2012 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > i386 > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# make install clean > ===> nss-3.15.2 improper use of USE_PERL5. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/nss. > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# gmake -v > GNU Make 3.82 > Built for i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# gmake install clean > Makefile:42: *** missing separator. Stop. > [root@norman /usr/ports/security/nss]# sed -n 42,47p Makefile > .if !defined(WITH_DEBUG) > MAKE_ENV+= BUILD_OPT=1 > BINS= ${DIST}/${OPSYS}${OSREL}_OPT.OBJ > .else > BINS= ${DIST}/${OPSYS}${OSREL}_DBG.OBJ > .endif > > > The security/nss port is needed by firefox (unless there is a > configuration option that allows firefox to be built without it), > which is why I want it; currently my only graphical browser on that > system is chrome. > > Thank you in advance for any and all replies. > Update your ports tree, check /etc/make.conf, and use a port managment tool, eg portmaster. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 01:27:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7209CFF for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@modersmal.skolverket.se) Received: from modersmal.skolverket.se (dns.skolverket.se [62.13.78.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3072698 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by modersmal.skolverket.se (Postfix, from userid 33) id CC4BDCD532; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:10:22 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Assalam X-PHP-Originating-Script: 33:247@abu.php From: Mohamad Hassan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20131030011659.CC4BDCD532@modersmal.skolverket.se> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:10:22 +0100 (CET) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mohamad_hassan@rediffmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:27:05 -0000 Assalamalaikum Wr Wb I hope in the name of ALLAH that I have the right person who will assist me. I got your contact through a web directory. I want to transfer my family's money into your country/ business for investment purposes and to secure the future of my 3 children because we are uncertain of the future of this country; as such I would like to make contact with you residing in that country for assistance. Note these funds are already in a security company which has branches around the world for safe keeping. I would have done this myself but my present health condition will not warrant me to do so. Kindly help with this because I cannot travel out of libya at the moment due to some certain conditions and great difficulties added to the fact that am disabled on a wheel chair due to a bombing that occurred in Benghazi I will explain more to you when I am certain that I can trust you. The fall of Muammar Gaddafi came with a lot of destruction / Hell to our great country Libya and everything is practically difficult now and opportunities are closing up, the new government is trying to frustrate our life. Please if you accept this offer of assistance you are required to give me your Name, age, occupation, address also enclosing your telephone fax numbers. What I now need from you are as follows: 1. You will help me receive and secure the funds from the security company on my family's behalf and open a Bank account for my children in your country with the credentials i will give you. 2. You will be entitled to 30% of the total sum involved for your assistance. 3. As soon as you confirm to me by e-mail your readiness to assist with this, I will give you more details as regards claiming the funds from the security company. 4. Please note that this project is 100% risk free but you must keep it very secret and confidential with strong assurance that you will not let me down at all. Regards, Mohamad Hassan al-Rida From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 03:00:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77E3CCB for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier2553@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675332CB8 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x55so698290wes.36 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:00:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dqRNQNwSj06EHamSW0oOQkqJ07U0f9+g/JQ3P/bWdMU=; b=OhHDiFt2nj6DOwSKJB6S/clrk1DRzYXgEOHTAvs60dUkzpTGLBcqEMEkg3sbY7Eekl ijH+P/H0WO8b4UBUM7p0g20UM2PMJDJgCAmKat1fwiqNJk3l9UJvqhwbv8agW4FEXvWp /B9pdTqf417ZeGfM1Dn8hQmCFrt3zJNUHRqvAlq31cYkx4d0D3jnsxu0Sr6LjIgqc3Ag crEInPYpU8qieBeFDLkjBQ4NGSJJsb+W1+qIT/Rc9UmQEGG1xfumAFjghYGxRahcpity 2ZTVVyFocYL6HRSutkqVE23lZSPGoQdDV8NfTOMW5iSLC+qSG9UCbvtXOYSXat3CRL4K +zYw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.37.162 with SMTP id z2mr648370wij.58.1383102027693; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: olivier2553@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.112.132 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:00:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:00:27 +0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mJNTK01OM9PTIrrlEJkqmNb3i4g Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel Core 2 DUO From: Olivier Nicole To: dweimer@dweimer.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:00:29 -0000 Dean, On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:02 PM, dweimer wrote: > I am looking at replacing an old mini tower PC running with a 900Watt power > supply (simply old parts left over from PC upgrades) with a small form > factor PC to run backups to eSATA with Bacula. Main goal is to cut down on > the UPS load, hate having that beast of a power supply running 24/7 to only > be used about 10 hours a week. I have been searching eBay, and there are a > ton of Dell and HP small form factor PCs with the Intel core 2 DUO CPUs a > few of which have 4G ram, for cheap. Assuming I can find one that I can put > two internal drives in to run zfs mirror for FreeBSD install, does anyone > have any experience on performance, will the Intel core 2 DUO, be able to > handle GELI and ZFS on the eSATA disk with decent throughput? I have no experience of Bacula (I use Amanda), but I would not go RAID on a back-up machine. I prefer to rely on duplicate copies on different drives: if something ever happens to my backup system, the single drives will be readable from just any other machine, so I can access the backup data. >From experience with Amanda, network, then CPU and RAM are the critical resources. Compressing a 500GB dump takes a lot of calculation. Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 03:08:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F42E58A for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 032952DD0 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62AF73C6C4; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:08:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r9U38lma002996; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:08:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:08:47 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Olivier Nicole Subject: Re: Intel Core 2 DUO Message-Id: <20131030040847.24bd76e5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:08:59 -0000 On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:00:27 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Compressing a 500GB dump takes a lot of > calculation. I'm not sure in how far the following theoretic speculation applies to real-world usage, but I'd like to mention it anyways. If you add compression to an archive, this compression might remove redundancy of data. For example, a minimal corruption of a compressed file could have a massive impact on the data, even up to losing the ability to uncompress it, whereas an uncompressed archive could use the built-in redundancy to handle the problem and still deliver the content properly. The _kind of data_ stored may also be considered regarding the question of compression adding any advantage (requiring less storage space). Depending on what you backup, simply omitting compression could reduce the processing load for that backup, resulting in less requirements regarding CPU and RAM (at the cost of maybe more storage space). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 04:03:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B06D36B for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: from nm13-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm13-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD92620A2 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.101.130] by nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 04:03:38 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.249] by tm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 04:03:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1041.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 04:03:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 920202.43360.bm@omp1041.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 37012 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Oct 2013 04:03:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1383105817; bh=Gp4H3X8TSLfvXYfQHsmmkA+cUv0WBtJ+Roz4dOCmehQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oKZujgGG5eBdFWUN3LKmwvNkb33jvqyJBGYO6RryUzNfqTNN5bJvUlX/f7wrAYVMV3D1sRum1J/pQdjyYB/jOQSY2VIAvJfjguclzQtPG26LEVtjwpFaPnYvbbeozb2ddDyN9jKCGLSYoz/9Td/+1vyC37mgERcwefmdq71uJUs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mmJiPPwCId5DOOb0VepSut/xqwzX+DYkKOH/dGdfvOrFglJM6UhItQJHn6AQ63saPhgjAeCx4isB6Aso0fJYPns9ow25VXjMxwGY8tlbSnn0qI25V+2w2xqVOghrZhPkbKSfrLg0iyaqZ1RNlrpUQpR6uyXv4P/eixRh1sq3rko=; X-YMail-OSG: c6zVkqgVM1leBzf37LDtZQAVwjAnnpYSAlkJludRaB47bZV 2hF_4amPhId9c_Ms787yiFEluP.Y.z58HHvMDExCgFDCX_ydOmf0QKNEPBOW 7ht_afIKLSRbLs2Cja2kkZdEWFCZsJ_CF9KSCAONfVMmvMZtgrWSdQNupPOf dIJvo.ipOV4bD0LFmT6frJwk8UEeNBnORdSVeAlPxLMuFErZImOQzZOvW0uu uH6Zi2jstngoEqBC7X45uxL7c20CNsoNABWTCxlebMXL30fzop9XO9AcJ9Ar Nrxaf8MltSPZDO.YspXbKjQF1CqqME15KV2YGIhzzUoPD6usSaEIIcH7R05z 6HXGfAzKL9_hB.mu49ZVnMGAsCX_Z5tBZEpchfG8mOm5EFY9XBT4sZt8ymLj _7uUAI7V.X2fgoygCAehcQ6pQT3.bHL6GC0UAP3WnyYGAGCThI5HjSnESLbH Klk6SjK0zdv16X_kgtp8HI5hqWDUkSu.gsbbo.VBwIJnXk41hKlV3pzaSgtc Ex6ElkLTSXQ2SuBJNGCfJQKTcv0HZ7Q5g3fnN7p2IKWKvCM4uIe8O5gIjPz2 dg1He_SpjE6ETVT6eyBVpVfmGFO49_Mq8.dDjOo.JGNO4nUBwRBz3F9JsSgi Be76Vns3aOIaMK4Ug_n0hgcI4a4zW4WIe5WDPLfYd08vK44.cO5MvX6KTKzK jg.0P5pW84rn_YlE7kf00Gxeq Received: from [66.129.241.11] by web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:03:37 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, aGkgYWxsOgrCoAppIGNhbid0IGdldCBtcnRnIGNvbXBpbGVkIHVubGVzcyBpIHR1cm5lZCBvZmYgaXB2NiBzdXBwb3J0LiBpIGtlcHQgZ2V0dGluZyBlcnJvcnMgb24gb25lIHBhY2thZ2U6CsKgCm93bHMjIGNkIC4uL3A1LVNvY2tldDYKb3dscyMgbWFrZSBhbGwKb3dscyMgbWFrZSByZWluc3RhbGwKPT09PsKgIEJ1aWxkaW5nIHBhY2thZ2UgZm9yIHA1LVNvY2tldDYtMC4yMwpDcmVhdGluZyBwYWNrYWdlIC91c3IvcG9ydHMvbmV0L3A1LVNvY2tldDYvd29yay9wNS1Tb2NrZXQ2LTAuMjMudGJ6ClJlZ2lzdGUBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 Message-ID: <1383105817.36947.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:03:37 -0700 (PDT) From: gahn Subject: freebsd 8.3, mrtg-2.17.4_4,1 and ipv6 To: freebsd general questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: gahn List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:03:46 -0000 hi all:=0A=A0=0Ai can't get mrtg compiled unless i turned off ipv6 support.= i kept getting errors on one package:=0A=A0=0Aowls# cd ../p5-Socket6=0Aowl= s# make all=0Aowls# make reinstall=0A=3D=3D=3D>=A0 Building package for p5-= Socket6-0.23=0ACreating package /usr/ports/net/p5-Socket6/work/p5-Socket6-0= .23.tbz=0ARegistering depends: perl-5.12.4_4.=0ACreating bzip'd tar ball in= '/usr/ports/net/p5-Socket6/work/p5-Socket6-0.23.tbz'=0Atar: lib/perl5/site= _perl/5.12/mach/Socket6.pm: Cannot stat: No such file or directory=0Atar: l= ib/perl5/site_perl/5.12/mach/auto/Socket6/.packlist: Cannot stat: No such f= ile or directory=0Atar: lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12/mach/auto/Socket6/Socket6.= bs: Cannot stat: No such file or directory=0Atar: lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12/= mach/auto/Socket6/Socket6.so: Cannot stat: No such file or directory=0Atar:= Error exit delayed from previous errors.=0Apkg_create: make_dist: tar comm= and failed with code 256=0A*** Error code 1=0AStop in /usr/ports/net/p5-Soc= ket6.=0A*** Error code 1=0AStop in /usr/ports/net/p5-Socket6.=0A=A0=0Adoes = it mean it is broken?=0A=A0=0Athanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 04:54:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA7CE70 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0EC22F7 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9U4sVMM053469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:54:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:54:31 -0500 From: dweimer To: Olivier Nicole Subject: Re: Intel Core 2 DUO Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <275465d87c58930586414cdef6345ecb@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , olivier2553@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:54:40 -0000 On 10/29/2013 10:00 pm, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Dean, > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:02 PM, dweimer wrote: >> I am looking at replacing an old mini tower PC running with a 900Watt >> power >> supply (simply old parts left over from PC upgrades) with a small form >> factor PC to run backups to eSATA with Bacula. Main goal is to cut >> down on >> the UPS load, hate having that beast of a power supply running 24/7 to >> only >> be used about 10 hours a week. I have been searching eBay, and there >> are a >> ton of Dell and HP small form factor PCs with the Intel core 2 DUO >> CPUs a >> few of which have 4G ram, for cheap. Assuming I can find one that I >> can put >> two internal drives in to run zfs mirror for FreeBSD install, does >> anyone >> have any experience on performance, will the Intel core 2 DUO, be able >> to >> handle GELI and ZFS on the eSATA disk with decent throughput? > > I have no experience of Bacula (I use Amanda), but I would not go RAID > on a back-up machine. I prefer to rely on duplicate copies on > different drives: if something ever happens to my backup system, the > single drives will be readable from just any other machine, so I can > access the backup data. > > From experience with Amanda, network, then CPU and RAM are the > critical resources. Compressing a 500GB dump takes a lot of > calculation. > > Best regards, > > Olivier Raid, was only intended for the O/S install, and backup database just a mirror to help out in case of disk failure. Backups are written to single 1TB Western Digital Green Drive in eSATA dock, with a 4 disk rotation, swapped out on weekly basis, full backups on Monday night, after disk swap with next one stored in my desk at work, then daily incremental backups. result is current weeks backups at home, past three weeks history at the office. Drives are Geli encrypted, with zfs dataset, I do use LZO compression on the backup jobs, but that CPU load is handled on the client side. The only data I have that isn't stored with either hardware or software raid is the backup disks. The stats, from my file server backup, server O/S is windows Home Server 2011, running under ESX 5.5 (free version) on top of a raid 5 data set, backed by an LSI Megaraid 8708EM2 controller. FD Files Written: 180,435 SD Files Written: 180,435 FD Bytes Written: 480,244,148,041 (480.2 GB) SD Bytes Written: 480,284,933,158 (480.2 GB) Rate: 30209.7 KB/s Software Compression: 8.0 % I have 2 other backup jobs starting at the same time, my workstation (windows 8) and Webserver (FreeBSD) both of which finished earlier, the workstation maintained 22500KB/s with 56% compression, the web server was very slow, with 65% compression, however sluggishness is due to nature of data, less than 10G, after the compression, but 650,000+ files. With the Geli overhead, on the eSATA disk I can hit about 72MB doing a dd from /dev/zero to the disk using 4k block size, under current setup, so the speed of the backup system and disk is not my limiting factor as of now. However I did discover today, that my rc.conf file was missing the "mtu 9000" setting on my Bacula server, so it may run faster next Monday, as I have jumbo frames enabled on everything else. As someone else mentioned heat concerns, with the small form factor PCs, and my current setup is working well, perhaps I should just stick with it. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 06:17:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDDF756 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from nm35-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm35-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.238.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3DB266C for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.215.142] by nm35.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 06:15:46 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.207] by tm13.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 06:15:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2013 06:15:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 266966.90495.bm@omp1016.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 20094 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Oct 2013 06:15:46 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1383113746; bh=aHG/pY1aDVaAi1VCyit3530fbXq76HVJUkz8xYMVoCg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lYgRlmijZVoXSKkU48ZYWDzKXboJKgIWaJkuaA2HP6wFUrGWd23WvIf/SyiHQeCJzNlzr1fXwhKNc1PvqHP/UTbmAKocFgZPcWP3gzKgvoFirURIoyneOv2hfMXhVaERsShp2ZkKOzo55t4QxHBlowFPRsB26//bKQA7bCw4AVo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aZqIVe7XKhWmhRFqEgOYOZg0uHTeDVerpjdAhYPBaL3RF9YNXl5DFZhL9t2r7hzWcS1WDEgxEnU9LJWrn9rq8TDOR2wrfPLy6Sp8qP4F/a5v4RP6DF8K5y+sI4Fov53KBxV/oKCVTbuer6mgY6Gz/irbrlVmHvsBWIOapYzpqNI=; X-YMail-OSG: ZtQTEI8VM1lZslTCqtbDo2OreLQ0amxnZU.xJ4iz9Vzqhou ou.CSNmI4C5uFQMAZDUZqKwaOeTKcBNJQmtjmuVrjAKb9_TKZIDkJbEKe_5m 18oekaTntzF2gxIUXqzCfrTrTlKDTcrZjy.sltuIQAKsTG19TQD7X_.HxXJC rroXDtf2B72awr4AXPsZvCpVhce55icL1oZi.LvXVUP80521VTcTtCoTrzlE mLrt3v8C6QE15P9.iXH3AU3P8lgZ.3sZmR.WkMyqPI6ekB8yRs9RWdFwvWoy EO5OCRDOtwC0Up9YIzFc3hBIY.uFM9javzk_Pg0gFiZJ4R47zofbWjfJRq0b tOQaLXyKRRm5isVq3IrkFR3nliZpQY0u06vmROKfSX1drGWR9JgSybKTsfzh tb8XryguANp9NJiEokKqYINLzOjPKkYvP8iBC.HcKxr60wHGwBCJcmf.dPqH 0W3HFCg8qdngz882PoalQGy5h5AkTZTQVQvEr5eXCgjHCgjVouM4dbY9UirU 2nSTS1cZWULWCTlNXd_ccPz7fhVOnWBycGvn3TwTO1XKxBhzRPsgkoFCLELd wC.pKzb61zeD0dX54hvA1jJ36TXrN4MKNF0XkV1d3Db469Q-- Received: from [80.98.102.209] by web160503.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:15:46 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SSBzb2x2ZWQgdGhlIGlzc3Vlcy4KSSBoYWQgdG8gYWRkIHdvcmtncm91cCB0byBjb25maWcgZmlsZSBhbmQgdXNlIC9ldGMvbnNtYi5jb25mLgpUaGlzIGlzIGhvdyBpdCBsb29rczoKCndvcmtncm91cD1XT1JLR1JPVVAKW1VCVU5UVV0KYWRkcj0xOTIuMTY4LjEuMjMKW1VCVU5UVTpMQUNJXQoKcGFzc3dvcmQ9KioqKioKCkZvciB0aGUgcmVjb3JkIGhlcmUgaXMgdGhlIGZzdGFiIGVudHJ5OgovL2xhY2lAVUJVTlRVL0xBQ0kvbW50L3NtYmZzc21iZnNydywtTiwtSTE5Mi4xNjguMS4yMzAwCgoKCgpPbiBNb24BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 References: <1382939871.20721.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1383113746.18829.YahooMailNeo@web160503.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:15:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Laszlo Danielisz Subject: Re: mount smbfs on boot To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <1382939871.20721.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Laszlo Danielisz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:17:49 -0000 I solved the issues. I had to add workgroup to config file and use /etc/nsmb.conf. This is how it looks: workgroup=WORKGROUP [UBUNTU] addr=192.168.1.23 [UBUNTU:LACI] password=***** For the record here is the fstab entry: //laci@UBUNTU/LACI/mnt/smbfssmbfsrw,-N,-I192.168.1.2300 On Monday, October 28, 2013 7:00 AM, Laszlo Danielisz wrote: Hi, Yesterday I spent quite many hours figuring out what is wrong. Every time my fbsd 9.2 boots up I have the following error: Mounting late file system: smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1 mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error In fstab I have the following line for samba: //laci@UBUNTU/LACI/mnt/smbfssmbfsrw,late,-N,-I192.168.1.2300 And /etc/nsmb.conf looks like this, I also tried moving under /root/.nsmbrc and everybody can read it. [UBUNTU:laci] addr=192.168.1.23 password=******* Of course I checked the password couple time, I have the correct password in the configuration file. Do you have any idea what should I check? Thx! Laci _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 07:31:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F85FC79 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF1222A2D for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id wm4so1053847obc.6 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:31:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z8JyRl+2Lw+lj+zURKGjWgpbwP4PoaDDJ3F/Xs7BuIA=; b=Qq9kxNvl6swuHbMWzr4L4Mqqf4ZwBNb+CBqcrvyZwosK+SzgzX25SUk5rWs00Rughz DqRVHkMjVFiYAZJ5+4p+NGZJPSHoajRe0phr4Ygsd2oBkioAEzWt8dHFDh3MxvRULDAK 4LppITvcO+vIbZRuWmIHjCZ0DPcarOab1aDKaakvZw6dqa41VtAePIhBEYbGPDCSTnkm c1K+JeSft6wREanTf1TFNvqj5oC8ZHwaPLH/WUCkiZUZ0BZNPczWZYphsHAweNl8zyoe X2sSNzN66vE4kD5DXgZRgzTvt7F2htQ/LmjMCbRTQ4k2rSEwAOKKfL4wxJZs+4iAiQYf gCGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5u4+HI4Bl5Zgk2oO0Q/AnPCZG6XxrGl/xxuZMwA2yhyaCHEl5ri9gYRFLpRbIUDFvqIGF X-Received: by 10.182.55.65 with SMTP id q1mr3144086obp.2.1383118295644; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:31:35 -0700 (PDT) References: <6E40EB0998574F53B9B4E72496E1C99F@FERNANDO> From: Frank BONNET Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <6E40EB0998574F53B9B4E72496E1C99F@FERNANDO> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:31:33 +0100 Message-ID: <-546206591721789599@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Installation freebsd To: FERNANDO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:31:37 -0000 I have DL 360 running 9.2 with that controller , never tested 10.0 Envoy=C3=A9 de mon iPhone. Le 29 oct. 2013 =C3=A0 16:41, FERNANDO a =C3=A9cri= t : > Good morning, > > > > The HP SMART ARRAY B120i is compatible with the freebsd 9.2 or 10.0? > > > > I am trying to install the freebsd 10.0 in server HP PROLIANT 310E G8 and= I > am not getting. > > > > After the installation the server doesn't get the operating system > installed feebsd. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Fernando. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 09:28:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87194B7 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:28:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maurizio.vairani@cloverinformatica.it) Received: from smtpdg12.aruba.it (smtpdg4.aruba.it [62.149.158.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01A6207A for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloverinformatica.it ([188.10.129.202]) by smtpcmd04.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id jMTE1m0194N8xN401MTE9X; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:27:15 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.81] (ASUS-TERMINATOR [192.168.0.81]) by cloverinformatica.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1924627 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:27:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5270D0F2.8060805@cloverinformatica.it> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:27:14 +0100 From: Maurizio Vairani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: New laptop for FreeBSD: HP 650 H5V58EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:28:29 -0000 Hi list, I would like to replace my old laptop with a new HP 650 H5V58EA. Has someone has used it ? Thanks Maurizio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 10:01:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E5AEB1 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Received: from pukruppa.de (pd95cabe3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.92.171.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD1D22FD for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pukruppa.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pukruppa.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9U8TuIH025234 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:29:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Message-ID: <5270C384.9040502@pukruppa.de> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:29:56 +0100 From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: How to set up unbound on FreeBSD 10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:01:36 -0000 Hi, as I can see there is a new default dns server shipping with FreeBSD 10: unbound. When I try to set it up as described in http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ by typing # echo local_unbound_enable=yes >>/etc/rc.conf # service local_unbound start I am locked out of my internet connection and nobody is served any dns . So I guess something must be missing. For example: Do I have to mount any devfs ? My machine has got two nics: one unconfigured to dial in to an ADSL connection via DSL bridge and one with IP 192.168.10.1 to my LAN. With old named/bind all I need to set is named_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.10.1;}; in /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf Thanks for your help Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 10:04:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA651EF for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F3BC232D for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7BAE6E39 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:04:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=MoinDCgSWs032Z6P0/crwGS0Y QM=; b=fa/ejEl4W1/MReRN8f+4Bki8kvgA+fagqjcEhnDR4j2n2f0if/TlCZb2S EBYUiqtoTHkGxC18C4qdp/kit9kd0jk4r66di1Rn6nvfhVfo+fpBSuSeLL+fDB2y MWWn8aSP8fQFoFRsL4GCHsQz3UyBHTI/Sgmr/0wuarJDmnNV3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=wHydixINDMuPEA9mHI7 8LTwDEumVgd8mu/KKc2JSVFWr0Ih+T1ezqcC2D62dCiaAHX3QdER1adhzP9fDHx+ pLN5BFKo1m37OVgcQOCrivkffaZMTW4zBf0sjso/ZpnG+hZFavKaQbSIP7deu0cL jFz+X287yaEcbwwwvSe0Tsqw= Received: from [192.168.2.50] (unknown [93.89.81.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 530AAE6DDF for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:04:13 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <5270D99C.6070901@cran.org.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:04:12 +0000 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Code segfaults with clang -O1, works with gcc49 and clang -O2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:04:24 -0000 The following code works (on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT) with gcc49 or clang -O2 or higher, but segfaults in do_cpuid() with clang -O1 or lower. Is there a bug in the asm statement, or is clang doing something wrong? #include static inline void do_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx) { asm volatile("cpuid" : "=a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "=r" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx) : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx) : "memory"); } int main(int argc, char **argv) { unsigned int a = 0, b = 0, c = 0, d = 0; do_cpuid(&a, &b, &c, &d); printf("%d %d %d %d\n", a, b, c, d); return 0; } -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 13:19:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E31F2A2 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Received: from pukruppa.de (pd95cabe3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.92.171.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0980F201C for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pukruppa.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pukruppa.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9UCYwYo001694; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:35:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Message-ID: <5270FCF2.1030209@pukruppa.de> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:34:58 +0100 From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wei Guo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to set up unbound on FreeBSD 10 References: <5270C384.9040502@pukruppa.de> <5270DDC0.2050603@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5270DDC0.2050603@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:19:37 -0000 On 10/30/13 11:21, Wei Guo wrote: > > 于 10/30/13, 4:29 PM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa 写é“: >> Hi, >> >> as I can see there is a new default dns server shipping with FreeBSD 10: >> unbound. >> >> When I try to set it up as described in >> >> http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ >> >> by typing >> >> # echo local_unbound_enable=yes >>/etc/rc.conf >> # service local_unbound start >> >> I am locked out of my internet connection and nobody is served any dns . >> So I guess something must be missing. >> For example: Do I have to mount any devfs ? > I guess you must have the following line in your ppp.conf: > > disable dns > > in order to stop ppp(8) from rewriting your /etc/resolv.conf. And you > to can edit /var/unbound/forward.conf and /var/unbound/unbound.conf > to meet your demands. Thanks, that is a good hint - but it doesn't solve the problem. As soon as I activate unbound I no dns requests from my machine (neither from any other) will be answered. Greetings Peter > > >> >> My machine has got two nics: one unconfigured to dial in to an ADSL >> connection via DSL bridge and one with IP 192.168.10.1 to my LAN. >> >> With old named/bind all I need to set is >> >> named_enable="YES" >> in /etc/rc.conf and >> >> listen-on { 127.0.0.1; >> 192.168.10.1;}; >> in /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf >> >> >> >> Thanks for your help >> >> Peter >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 13:33:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCC3B78 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0F4218C for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:33:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al8GAKwJcVJbs47V/2dsb2JhbABZgwe9WYMAgSQXdIIlAQEFOhwjEAsYCSUPKh4GiB4BunSPTweELAOYCZIKgyc7 Received: from 213.142-179-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.179.142.213]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2013 14:33:04 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9UDX3qP019856; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:33:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:33:01 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Bruce Cran Subject: Re: Code segfaults with clang -O1, works with gcc49 and clang -O2 Message-ID: <20131030143301.623be910@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <5270D99C.6070901@cran.org.uk> References: <5270D99C.6070901@cran.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:33:12 -0000 On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:04:12 +0000 Bruce Cran wrote: > The following code works (on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT) with gcc49 or clang -O2 > or higher, but segfaults in do_cpuid() with clang -O1 or lower. Is there > a bug in the asm statement, or is clang doing something wrong? > > #include > > static inline void do_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, > unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx) > { > asm volatile("cpuid" > : "=a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "=r" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx) Should be: "=c" (*ecx) But you can also use the '+' modifier and remove the input operands: : "+a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "+c" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx) : : "memory" > : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx) > : "memory"); > } > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > unsigned int a = 0, b = 0, c = 0, d = 0; > do_cpuid(&a, &b, &c, &d); > printf("%d %d %d %d\n", a, b, c, d); > return 0; > } > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 16:21:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F086F818 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19AB2E88 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11697E6E3B; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:21:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=fZxNYNOxhtJL n5X6iJKzHp1Ayys=; b=PrN5VcaUJrK4liaLalejoZi69kJzKVf+MMg6/UHA9Js4 /wNplMtLC0xa7871MZNlrcOz/nYJumqSTsbe9eNSqG6qrSTj82C9eP8ZTqyul6xc 8U1V1p3MkJ9N1UX554WuKfQVuEn683LyE+TkUxwNiL35sbabSs+RH19ooqzbvl8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=VtBvEd Mmv5P65df39ThR41JzQH37m4tIt2E6HUxZ6RDBQ4fUV22gY1hjCAOzJ4lPlYZv+i MRrEMbGsruVgl88sD5UNVUNAtHGm0eClQUd7ggSN6Bqgks8kNH6nf2v430GErIft kmR9d8sPTZk/WfBc+ZvIJENi6pd7pBnyjEzUY= Received: from [192.168.2.50] (unknown [93.89.81.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9F7AE6E36; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:21:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <52713200.3000005@cran.org.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:21:20 +0000 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: Code segfaults with clang -O1, works with gcc49 and clang -O2 References: <5270D99C.6070901@cran.org.uk> <20131030143301.623be910@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20131030143301.623be910@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:21:23 -0000 On 10/30/2013 1:33 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Should be: "=c" (*ecx) > > But you can also use the '+' modifier and remove the input operands: > > : "+a" (*eax), "=b" (*ebx), "+c" (*ecx), "=d" (*edx) > : > : "memory" That fixed it - thanks! -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 20:50:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F28B3A7 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-reply@bt.com) Received: from smtp01.safaricombusiness.co.ke (mx1.safaricombusiness.co.ke [41.203.208.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99672268 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:50:15 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkwRAGbMblIpy9CKdWdsb2JhbABZgz+pd4EmBIFDgWOBfpAhFg4BDAoMBxQobYEdDglZQG0QDyULEQwEhSgBgh4NAw2WaocCkGENiWuICYRcgSeBZoQWA4gzgQaCEIpWjjuIYDmBNQ X-IPAS-Result: AkwRAGbMblIpy9CKdWdsb2JhbABZgz+pd4EmBIFDgWOBfpAhFg4BDAoMBxQobYEdDglZQG0QDyULEQwEhSgBgh4NAw2WaocCkGENiWuICYRcgSeBZoQWA4gzgQaCEIpWjjuIYDmBNQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,588,1378846800"; d="scan'208";a="415046745" Received: from 3g-relay-01.safaricombusiness.co.ke ([41.203.208.138]) by smtp01.safaricombusiness.co.ke with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2013 23:49:41 +0300 Message-ID: <03221a25-41575-cb059927197454@user-pc> From: "7days .co.ke offer" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 7days Offer on .co.ke domain registration ( Kshs. 1,800/yr) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:49:31 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "7days .co.ke offer" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:50:17 -0000 7 days offer on domain registration - .co.ke kshs 1,800/yr - .me.ke kshs 899/yr - .ac.ke kshs 1,499/yr - .com kshs 999/yr - .net kshs 999/yr - .org kshs 999/yr For more details email us on 7days.co.ke@gmail.com Note:- Though this is not an automated email, we keep on sending out these emails to all those people whom we find eligible of using our services. To unsubscribe from future mails (i.e., to ensure that we do not contact you again for this matter), please email 7days.co.ke@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 21:56:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AED9494 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-5.eutelia.it [62.94.10.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79E526D5 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 2E0711685EE for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:56:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9ULuDjJ016135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:56:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9ULu8AE079079 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:56:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:56:08 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:56:16 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:56:31 -0000 Hello. Has anyone tried connecting OS X 10.9's Mail.app to sendmail with SSL? Server side all I get is: > sm-mta[53510]: STARTTLS=server, error: accept failed=0, reason=unknown, > SSL_error=5, errno=0, retry=-1, relay=... Client side, the SMTP server is marked as offline, with no other explanation. Of course it all worked flawlessly until the customer decided to upgrade from 10.8... I couldn't come a to a conlusion myself, but I'm seeing a lot of threads about this out on the net; however, no solution is proposed. My guess is either a bug on the client side (as someone goes on to suggest) or some exotic variation of the protocol... perhaps I need some OpenSSL tweak? Some specific settings in sendmail's config? I tried both base's and ports' OpenSSL, but nothing seems to change. Any hint is appreciated. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 23:12:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7662A8 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC592BBB for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa1so1649156pad.41 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; bh=ExTDED45e5yRuOS1fTpVLxPlx/EMnkSEmwOq+ENp6I0=; b=hLJ5bUSOZHHUwoy+rOffL+QkiRGxDW/gtc1l3nnVazOjxJN5vRP0j2adDzShuHNlJX 31ihVkwNqSiv1CFQrAEXn/sYiU0mg8NgxnUQYI5g/p4oJXhOVUrIwfWINonaaNVSSiPk ZOxnVhy7utS/gidxrlJ0PlakN6USTSdnQn/rZr5hfUVmITJ0gQ1yT75g8mPmuKYRC4QX RRG8+CxvNaAEG3mlc+tNr8CZRIKIUO+39yeWJAymfMxRx+f82Rg04fNU124lYI5BiCMM yHEHKcrb/E49ieNJhcEP68Auj65kXWOX0p0Nf9purDELGrotGD4etU3gvcOXScbIm8zO e9vg== X-Received: by 10.66.216.234 with SMTP id ot10mr880106pac.122.1383174729201; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ik1sm357444pbc.9.2013.10.30.16.12.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:08 -0700 (PDT) From: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: CPU Turbo mode Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:07 -0700 Message-Id: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:12:09 -0000 Hi all, I've powerd enabled and see this message often when running powerd -v; current freq 2201 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 4402 MHz Were is the 4402 value gotten from, is it a turbo value and if so, why = is it not boosting? My CPUs are 2.20GHz. - aurf= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 30 23:30:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0313F654; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [216.70.247.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB50A2C7A; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363AE2E450; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Draco.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [192.168.101.33]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3212E442; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRACO.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729]) by Draco.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729%10]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:22:56 -0700 From: Doug Sampson To: "sunpoet@freebsd.org" Subject: Problem w/ building p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 Thread-Topic: Problem w/ building p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 Thread-Index: Ac7VxvN8d/Pe/Pe9RcSvziDYbD9boA== Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:22:54 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.101.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:30:02 -0000 Hello- I appear to be having a problem building the p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 por= t on a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE machine. Error message below: # cd /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib # make install clean =3D=3D=3D> Building package for p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 Creating package /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib/work/p5-Compress= -Raw-Zlib-2.062.tbz Registering depends: perl5-5.16.3_2. Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib/work= /p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062.tbz' tar: lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/Zlib.bs: Cannot s= tat: No such file or directory tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. pkg_create: make_dist: tar command failed with code 256 *** [do-package] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib. # It appears that the issue is with an incorrect pathname? # find / | g Zlib.bs /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/Zlib.bs # Here, the Zlib.bs file is found in /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.16/mach/auto/Comp= ress/Raw/Zlib/ but the build is trying to find the Zlib.bs file at lib/perl= 5/site_perl/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/=20 Is this an issue? ~Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 01:46:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D090658F for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F92623C2 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9V1kFOQ085487; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:46:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r9V1kFOn085484; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:46:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:46:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: aurfalien Subject: Re: CPU Turbo mode In-Reply-To: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:46:15 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:46:16 -0000 On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, aurfalien wrote: > Hi all, > > I've powerd enabled and see this message often when running powerd -v; > > current freq 2201 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 4402 MHz > > Were is the 4402 value gotten from, is it a turbo value and if so, why is it not boosting? > > My CPUs are 2.20GHz. 2201 is the turbo speed. powerd would ramp up higher if it could, but that's as high as the processor can go. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 02:10:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D50B283 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C92E253B for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9V2AYRu083724 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:10:34 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9V2AYom083723 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:10:34 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 24374 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2013 21:10:31 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 30 Oct 2013 21:10:31 -0500 Message-ID: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:10:25 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:02:05 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:10:34 -0000 We are pleased to announce that official binary packages are now available for pkg, the next generation package management tool for FreeBSD. Pkg allows you to either use ports with portmaster/portupgrade or to have binary remote packages without ports. We have binary packages available for i386 and amd64 on 8.3,8.4,9.1,9.2,10.0 and 11 (head). Pkg will be the default starting in FreeBSD 10. The pkg_install suite of tools pkg_create(1), pkg_add(1), and pkg_info(1) (which ports also use), are deprecated and will be discontinued in roughly 6 months. A communication regarding the deprecation of the pkg_install suite of tools will be sent separately in the future. If you are currently not using pkg and wish to, run the following as root. Be sure not to add WITH_PKGNG=yes to your make.conf until after pkg is installed. # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg && make install clean # echo WITH_PKGNG=yes >> /etc/make.conf # pkg2ng You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as before or switch to using binary packages only. To use binary packages: 1. Ensure your pkg(8) is up-to-date. 'pkg -v' should say at least 1.1.4_8. If it does not, first upgrade from ports. 2. Remove any repository-specific configuration from /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf, such as PACKAGESITE, MIRROR_TYPE, PUBKEY. If this leaves your pkg.conf empty, just remove it. 3. mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos 4. Create the file /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf with: FreeBSD: { url: "http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", mirror_type: "srv", enabled: "yes" } * Note that pkg.FreeBSD.org does not have a browsable web page on it and does not have a DNS A record. This is intended as it is an SRV host. pkg(8) knows how to properly use it. You can use 'pkg search' to browse the available packages in the repository. Mirrors you may use instead of the global pkg.FreeBSD.org: pkg.eu.FreeBSD.org pkg.us-east.FreeBSD.org pkg.us-west.FreeBSD.org Your system is now ready to use packages! Refer to the handbook section on pkgng for usage at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pkgng-intro.html. Also see 'man pkg' for examples or 'pkg help'. Packages are built weekly from a snapshot of the Ports Collection every Wednesday morning 01:00 UTC. They typically will be available in the repository after a few days. Pkg 1.2 will be released in the coming month which will bring many improvements including officially signed packages. FreeBSD 10's pkg bootstrap now also supports signed pkg(8) installation. Regards, Bryan Drewery on behalf of portmgr@ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 04:00:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23A85E2 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail5.networktest.com (mail5.networktest.com [204.109.60.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7872C4C for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D1D2FCCA0 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail5.networktest.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail5.networktest.com [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76080-08 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tejay.local (cpe-172-249-28-59.socal.res.rr.com [172.249.28.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 356122FCC96 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:54 -0700 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:00:02 -0000 On 10/30/13 7:10 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as > before or switch to using binary packages only. Is this really an "or" or is it an "and"? For example, can a system use binary packages for most things, but use portmaster or portupgrade on those ports where some special config options are needed? thanks dn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 04:12:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB86950 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:12:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E5A2CF5 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8E324C45; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:12:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r9V4BrUD005122; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:11:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:11:53 +0100 From: Polytropon To: David Newman Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng Message-Id: <20131031051153.e0ca0cf8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:12:11 -0000 On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:54 -0700, David Newman wrote: > > > On 10/30/13 7:10 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as > > before or switch to using binary packages only. > > Is this really an "or" or is it an "and"? > > For example, can a system use binary packages for most things, but use > portmaster or portupgrade on those ports where some special config > options are needed? To extend the question, does the traditional method of using ports (without portmaster et al.) also seem to stop working? I'd like to emphasize that the constellation you mentioned isn't that uncommon. Take mplayer, for example; in order to make it work properly (i. e., all codecs plus mencoder), it's still required to compile it. My idea would be that I can use pkg to install everything that's needed as a runtime dependency, and only have a "make install" run for mplayer with a custom Makefile.local (or going through "make configure" for that matter). Localized ports (e. g. LibreOffice with german language) could also fall into the category of "still needs compiling"... To be honest, there may be only a few things that need a manual "make install" run, but those could actually be essential. How does this interact with a system that uses pkg for all other needs? The old pkg_* tools worked well in such a constellation, even though it might be required to recompile some dependent ports (according to the non- default options that have been chosen), but in general, that was no big deal. Will it start being a problem now? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 04:31:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A42DA2 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:31:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier2553@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49A4F2DDB for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so6854084wgh.2 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:31:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:cc:content-type; bh=MDOgGruSii1UFIEOuT5dl1tRU40rwxwSyl3CXlJ/Awk=; b=PysxsE78G54cQIR35VB3i4Zte9MnFdiBNiXNg2j6EKvHu+ID46s+590/0PCn26B3aE X811SsOPgchoPA1wMvwXR/j0sHidnsh5q9E+5tj37XU9tfQRL+dd7HMz1HSOby7Hx0qF +cCWQZI0Wz4UVIKKUR0cvnZ+IQtDP8NuzAnSROairAfPRHATzCYJXcUwK7BBcI1a0GTC riXxQMRICsduPcQO13upq0SXJB7VTRbU0E1WZZ0jQETnpWdWDxcqK3loJkmv1TXDbMg8 S9+QFCqxRSuLH8oQv50po0kPFWRiW5JKPin3e92lKFh0GxhfKu/9DfXTVZqWVP8V4A/E nSQQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.84.101 with SMTP id x5mr1444115wiy.58.1383193874164; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: olivier2553@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.112.132 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:31:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:31:14 +0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WLVIQ5ZFHq98n7KlNXmqL16FBpE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng From: Olivier Nicole Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:31:17 -0000 Hi, >> You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as >> before or switch to using binary packages only. I strongly expect that ports will remain a standard feature in the later releases of FreeBSD. Packages may be nice for the home/desktop user, but when it comes to production servers, one wants to be able to tweak what he is installing. FreeBSd is certainly my choice of an OS when I need to install a server, but if it ends up looking like Microsoft, I will have to reconsider. The cost of recompiling a port is way worth the flexibility it offers. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 07:18:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57192EB9 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E65D9254A for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id z12so2339881wgg.12 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HlW62A5ROoO8vLvKz6IyTHoyJKSNwf/jqsUzn25/sX4=; b=w20aaak8ytaXyUskHZLgfq0DYWEJE7Qp+Zf3mq6zS++rtbb2Ts9NOoeJ7iOkmGSWOG d5ngKwG/mLzV0bbN3oww6XnjEqxgJ2swfj4EBsrxfBtrYUkve9SxicXUpMtSZ/W7nGGX JkuykCaXaQb+ktHK4MAffIHBgR60Thd1AfWFSoEyNY6DRWcRPGHVaZovNz4Am0L2mBtO PGyohMekPHBdyDWWOVU99tG5UzqsiI01nOBQsOv9x9T0UzfSFsVuuFiwKb4OxuDF4ga7 Kek79pCzgyql0S1yk8aIe54XEssPRGELt45tvF6wA0zEMZwCSaY58asGPfQkXthPiMxf 8lLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.88.225 with SMTP id bj1mr1359390wjb.50.1383203891413; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.3.5 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.3.5 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:18:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:18:11 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Olivier Nicole Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:18:13 -0000 El 31/10/2013 05:31, "Olivier Nicole" escribi=F3: > > Hi, > > >> You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as > >> before or switch to using binary packages only. > > I strongly expect that ports will remain a standard feature in the > later releases of FreeBSD. They will. Ports are not going anywhere. But from now on, the package created as the last step in the port compilation (make) will be in pkg's format (much more flexible, and fast than the old pkg_* commands). > > Packages may be nice for the home/desktop user, but when it comes to > production servers, one wants to be able to tweak what he is > installing. > > FreeBSd is certainly my choice of an OS when I need to install a > server, but if it ends up looking like Microsoft, I will have to > reconsider. > > The cost of recompiling a port is way worth the flexibility it offers. > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 07:41:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305433B7 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1E02671 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9V7fFqE025498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:41:15 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r9V7fFqE025498 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r9V7fFqE025498; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <5272099A.6030704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:41:14 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> <20131031051153.e0ca0cf8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20131031051153.e0ca0cf8.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nIklHmtxaEPiFFop1iJlqCp8wlG2qsrid" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:41:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nIklHmtxaEPiFFop1iJlqCp8wlG2qsrid Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 31/10/2013 04:11, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:54 -0700, David Newman wrote: >> >> >> On 10/30/13 7:10 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> >>> You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade,= as >>> before or switch to using binary packages only. >> >> Is this really an "or" or is it an "and"? >> >> For example, can a system use binary packages for most things, but use= >> portmaster or portupgrade on those ports where some special config >> options are needed? >=20 > To extend the question, does the traditional method of using > ports (without portmaster et al.) also seem to stop working? > I'd like to emphasize that the constellation you mentioned > isn't that uncommon. Take mplayer, for example; in order to > make it work properly (i. e., all codecs plus mencoder), it's > still required to compile it. My idea would be that I can > use pkg to install everything that's needed as a runtime > dependency, and only have a "make install" run for mplayer > with a custom Makefile.local (or going through "make configure" > for that matter). Localized ports (e. g. LibreOffice with > german language) could also fall into the category of "still > needs compiling"... >=20 > To be honest, there may be only a few things that need a > manual "make install" run, but those could actually be > essential. How does this interact with a system that uses > pkg for all other needs? The old pkg_* tools worked well > in such a constellation, even though it might be required > to recompile some dependent ports (according to the non- > default options that have been chosen), but in general, > that was no big deal. >=20 > Will it start being a problem now? No, mixing binary packages from pkg.freebsd.org with locally compiled customized versions should work, so long as reasonable care is taken to use a local ports tree of similar age to the ports tree used for building the official packages. You can do this with portmaster(8)/portupgrade(8) or by setting up your own instance of poudriere(8) or even just 'cd /usr/ports/foo/bar ; make all install' Making this sort of mix of local customized and official packages work really well is one of our (pkg(8) developers) top aims. The integration at the moment should be a bit better than using the old pkg_tools packages in this way, but there are even more improvements yet to come. There are also changes afoot which will have the effect of reducing the number of options on individual packages but compensating by increasing the number of packages to cover the different options settings. This is what sub-packages is all about: many options do little more than add a few extra files to the pkg-plist: those can easily be hived off into a separate sub-package. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --nIklHmtxaEPiFFop1iJlqCp8wlG2qsrid Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJScgmbXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATKTMP/iCsQ+mbNn2Mt5f76Z/T0Fco JtRvQeEL4znpc5fPtL+nG3N9PE39JdmBJCpwLrjxIAqUDlp5Uao1mkWoc8gFbbNo 7I93pRt5KrXR3FSalmU7nMQB8tT+aitmOJz6gmNj/ZfkmU1/qXC2OlYgDYJtTLFE JO44PfhpfrOLrE9782NqcR+mxC4VWVwZpfkOju4CrJmhet1AGf38oHxG4R3VltW9 bRrXs2zxnP24ZUZRueqSNRdZ9slpKdMa60RQmZ3MwQM/i6aQz6njuiaIAl79aT41 QqXGzkPhh73q4Z8FNp8xb/qSX5MJsfDQGFK1xEqzyFldGpGPo+OGgyTXXLjyMJov Oi4BA602+Ydudjd7/DDx7kuAWs9+wttmSnqGOFvLo/J8RMcsPdC0ykqwbCYcysg/ ZYIzCONPe2DVvjX7W4sLO8vlJOgFU13tuBPwkSdGsCcOlACW/reb5TNeQcxPDYDn fva7pyBHcrs6It0qsib/PgRqQwgHl9+mebHWO75k+iQsibUqIk2GQMR2MyfAiEi3 UXONj2CoObeK2GQYP+AHdnH7h9GHcLoXPT3O9m7EnIILqVZZ/Ru44441VnuQt1zJ N8en6cBHD/Zpyom+r0IXLzuJ6hUXI7S4THbNh/OFhQvldGZKecLwxsG09UNA8GSV gAEsPwatQnVP+VTLfHxu =zTCv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nIklHmtxaEPiFFop1iJlqCp8wlG2qsrid-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 08:02:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EFBD3D; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368852779; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5E7223FF4; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:02:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r9V827p4005832; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:02:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:02:07 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng Message-Id: <20131031090207.5e623d8e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5272099A.6030704@FreeBSD.org> References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> <20131031051153.e0ca0cf8.freebsd@edvax.de> <5272099A.6030704@FreeBSD.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:02:18 -0000 On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:41:14 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 31/10/2013 04:11, Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:59:54 -0700, David Newman wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 10/30/13 7:10 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> > >>> You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as > >>> before or switch to using binary packages only. > >> > >> Is this really an "or" or is it an "and"? > >> > >> For example, can a system use binary packages for most things, but use > >> portmaster or portupgrade on those ports where some special config > >> options are needed? > > > > To extend the question, does the traditional method of using > > ports (without portmaster et al.) also seem to stop working? > > I'd like to emphasize that the constellation you mentioned > > isn't that uncommon. Take mplayer, for example; in order to > > make it work properly (i. e., all codecs plus mencoder), it's > > still required to compile it. My idea would be that I can > > use pkg to install everything that's needed as a runtime > > dependency, and only have a "make install" run for mplayer > > with a custom Makefile.local (or going through "make configure" > > for that matter). Localized ports (e. g. LibreOffice with > > german language) could also fall into the category of "still > > needs compiling"... > > > > To be honest, there may be only a few things that need a > > manual "make install" run, but those could actually be > > essential. How does this interact with a system that uses > > pkg for all other needs? The old pkg_* tools worked well > > in such a constellation, even though it might be required > > to recompile some dependent ports (according to the non- > > default options that have been chosen), but in general, > > that was no big deal. > > > > Will it start being a problem now? > > No, mixing binary packages from pkg.freebsd.org with locally compiled > customized versions should work, so long as reasonable care is taken to > use a local ports tree of similar age to the ports tree used for > building the official packages. I've done that in the past, either by using RELEASE packages and a RELEASE ports tree (usually from the installation CD), or Latest/ packages and an updated ports tree. > You can do this with > portmaster(8)/portupgrade(8) or by setting up your own instance of > poudriere(8) or even just 'cd /usr/ports/foo/bar ; make all install' Correct, that constellation has been working. Of course it was important to use "pkgdb -aF" (portupgrade) whenever pkg_add or "make install" has been called. Even portmaster with the -P and -PP switches worked. As you said, being careful on _how_ to properly do this is essential. > Making this sort of mix of local customized and official packages work > really well is one of our (pkg(8) developers) top aims. The integration > at the moment should be a bit better than using the old pkg_tools > packages in this way, but there are even more improvements yet to come. I'm _very_ happy to hear that. Thanks! :-) > There are also changes afoot which will have the effect of reducing the > number of options on individual packages but compensating by increasing > the number of packages to cover the different options settings. This is > what sub-packages is all about: many options do little more than add a > few extra files to the pkg-plist: those can easily be hived off into a > separate sub-package. That's true. Especially for things like mplayer there is a remarkable slew of dialogs when you "make config-recursive" to make sure everything has been selected as required to gain the "full functionality". Of course it will not be possible to offer every imaginable combination of options for all packages, but it would be a very helpful thing if one could use pkg for everything except the few programs that one _really_ needs and intends to compile, be it because of codecs or because of applying non-default optimization flags (again, mplayer on older machines is such a candidate). Again, many thanks for your explanations. I can't wait to actually try the constellation I've described on my old 500 MHz K6 "service laptop". :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 08:09:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5010D161 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008EA27D1 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E462227357 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:09:37 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <52721041.7040705@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:09:37 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130516 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NAT/ipfw blocking internal traffic References: <789665157.296.1383076677766.JavaMail.root@phantombsd.org> In-Reply-To: <789665157.296.1383076677766.JavaMail.root@phantombsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:09:47 -0000 On 10/30/13 05:57, Casey Scott wrote: > Hello, > > My NAT and ipfw ruleset follow almost exactly what is given at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html > > The problem I'm encountering is that a portion of my outbound internal traffic is being blocked by ipfw. This is a fresh Freebsd installaion, so I'm kind of at a loss since the config matches the handbook. Any suggestions are appreciated. > From what I have gathered the handbook is getting out of date - particularly in this area. Try the IPFW list (they're very helpful and rather quick to respond), but try checking the scripts in /etc first. Man should be up to date too. You should find some generic settings such as OPEN, SECURE, etc in the scripts /etc. Just set the rc.conf to use those, and season to taste ;) HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 08:13:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E96312 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D92652823 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ar20so4466385iec.12 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Z5jE0CNpa7Z+IqM8PXOz5J/giV3VEfkmKcrIFrThDlU=; b=MUj3M/B9qoNTfm2JRZHUsPf6OjImOXIyPis7V1yS/Hy4X8o1Ph6/7pPfsDWbi9OPRN Wv4pTCK3ylnTWvQb2fkbMu37+L2NAyX50ttHprvFVifB9DjaoQGctO0uQd0tLVXrOqDG 0yG98ZTZ+4gkhVYnaEtnXuYSRHYQq1hMttbbK9bb0Y7fUcLIoSGq/QoXTC9oUjNQMfIZ 8ePvAjk2xVhxuUDIJbx8tx/K36d8JKbpWOcUowICfxWqIaEePki8EL1CJzYPr0/WP28t U3oW7xGG4M7bngubWbKB/GdEk1DHjwFRMO7T91ELfuihiU7AhA0O9G5+4IcWFlJ+7pR2 4v8Q== X-Received: by 10.50.30.9 with SMTP id o9mr1636663igh.0.1383207182095; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:13:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.8.70 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:12:41 -0700 (PDT) From: takCoder Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:42:41 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: f1NlGcXqGVaQM-uuQHhBESZj_jA Message-ID: Subject: rcorder issue To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:13:03 -0000 Hi all, My question is: May it cause a problem, for rcorder or else, to have a sub-folder in rc.d/ path ? Pardon me, but i guessed you are the ones who can help me on this.. I've faced a doubt around this rcorder process.. I think i have heard that we should not have sub-folders in "rc.d"s' as it may cause rcorder a problem.. this one is apart from the fact that rc.d should only contain shells which are to be run automatically on startup.. But now I can't be sure about it as i can't remember it clearly or find it.. One of my mates created a sub-folder in his system's rc.d folder, so he can run his preferred scripts there in his required order, using /etc/rc. Would you please tell me whether there is any such problem or i am wrong? Thank you all in advance, for any tips you may offer on this. :) Best Regards, takCoder From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 08:29:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C300D99D for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87DC12958 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED094277A7; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:29:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r9V8TMPV006495; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:29:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:29:22 +0100 From: Polytropon To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: rcorder issue Message-Id: <20131031092922.bd60f4bd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:29:33 -0000 On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:42:41 +0330, takCoder wrote: > Hi all, > > My question is: May it cause a problem, for rcorder or else, to have a > sub-folder in rc.d/ path ? First, the things you are refering to are directories and subdirectories. "Folder" is technically wrong. The correct term is directory. A "folder" is the name of a visual representation (usually an icon) that represents a directory within a GUI concept. The relations that reflect that difference are "is a" vs. "represents a". :-) > I've faced a doubt around this rcorder process.. I think i have heard that > we should not have sub-folders in "rc.d"s' as it may cause rcorder a > problem.. this one is apart from the fact that rc.d should only contain > shells which are to be run automatically on startup.. That's correct. From /etc/rc, you can see: files=`rcorder ${skip} /etc/rc.d/* 2>/dev/null` It's about _files_, so * will usually be resolved by the shell to any entry found in the specified directory. In case that a subdirectory is found, any future operation will be done on _that subdirectory_ instead of a file (that is maybe contained in that subdirectory). That's why it's suggested to put the rc.d scripts without any "deeper nesting" into /etc/rc.d and /usr/local/etc/rc.d respectively. Similarly, non-OS scripts are processed from the /usr/local/etc/rc.d directory (and other directories the user might have added). > But now I can't be sure about it as i can't remember it clearly or find > it.. One of my mates created a sub-folder in his system's rc.d folder, so > he can run his preferred scripts there in his required order, using > /etc/rc. It would also be possible to add a custom /opt/rc.d directory and add this to the local_startup vairable in /etc/rc.conf, for example: local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d /opt/rc.d" This will cause additional directories to be sourced. Note that I'm an optimist and therefore often (ab)use the Solaris-ism (Solarism?) of /opt. :-) Of course, it would also be valid to do something like this (even though I haven't tested that specific case): local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bob" In this example, /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bob contains further rc.d-style scripts. > Thank you all in advance, for any tips you may offer on this. :) Use the correct terminology for all the things. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 08:47:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170BEDAF for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:47:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5D52A63 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id aq17so4530294iec.10 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:47:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=DP7pKVVtytN8N/dh0UZ4jAc9/zqCq6+xtCvKrcjY1U0=; b=FlenFK1o0TJEWx2WC1Fz3/OgpXUbFGs+Sy2zQPch1Oz75OdBx5ZfShASLeNP2avS6P 6molqH3dDAQ/HHgGc81jVlbKvrVgc7XUdbrQ2FIWV+RSM9L3aSNfci5pOhc9qJ07Iwl0 yGGTvAx37otj2RQ8+CpA//0oGWUv1UHuzcQvJu+UemZWSdOvOQi0akx9psjbmbnqv7FU jnrKd3GDAGC/QUxlS5JR1dBCdUBc5hpF4lIIycr0l8jJkJVC69h48Oomja6x2FtcZeJh vIXJn3pXRDfMbYMwywaIM0pMXN3/id6ebXYroyf8K+BrspcmVQ5qABD3ihdoxPzQQ6TG E4Sg== X-Received: by 10.50.1.102 with SMTP id 6mr5996588igl.0.1383209273107; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:47:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.8.70 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:47:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20131031092922.bd60f4bd.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20131031092922.bd60f4bd.freebsd@edvax.de> From: takCoder Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:17:33 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -USA_G2mIRYk1aLiZwloB9xggl8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rcorder issue To: Polytropon , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:47:54 -0000 Thank you for your quick and complete reply :) On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:42:41 +0330, takCoder wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > My question is: May it cause a problem, for rcorder or else, to have a > > sub-folder in rc.d/ path ? > > First, the things you are refering to are directories and > subdirectories. "Folder" is technically wrong. The correct > term is directory. A "folder" is the name of a visual > representation (usually an icon) that represents a directory > within a GUI concept. The relations that reflect that > difference are "is a" vs. "represents a". :-) > Excuse me for that miss-use of "folder" term, and thanks for your clarification. I'll try to keep that in mind ;) > > > I've faced a doubt around this rcorder process.. I think i have heard > that > > we should not have sub-folders in "rc.d"s' as it may cause rcorder a > > problem.. this one is apart from the fact that rc.d should only contain > > shells which are to be run automatically on startup.. > > That's correct. From /etc/rc, you can see: > > files=`rcorder ${skip} /etc/rc.d/* 2>/dev/null` > > It's about _files_, so * will usually be resolved by the > shell to any entry found in the specified directory. In > case that a subdirectory is found, any future operation > will be done on _that subdirectory_ instead of a file > (that is maybe contained in that subdirectory). That's > why it's suggested to put the rc.d scripts without any > "deeper nesting" into /etc/rc.d and /usr/local/etc/rc.d > respectively. Similarly, non-OS scripts are processed > from the /usr/local/etc/rc.d directory (and other directories > the user might have added). > Yes I guess that's the point! It is then where rc do not expect a directory in rc.d and things happen.. > > But now I can't be sure about it as i can't remember it clearly or find > > it.. One of my mates created a sub-folder in his system's rc.d folder, so > > he can run his preferred scripts there in his required order, using > > /etc/rc. > > It would also be possible to add a custom /opt/rc.d > directory and add this to the local_startup vairable > in /etc/rc.conf, for example: > > local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d /opt/rc.d" > > This will cause additional directories to be sourced. > Note that I'm an optimist and therefore often (ab)use > the Solaris-ism (Solarism?) of /opt. :-) > Just keep being an optimist! That's what's right .. :) > > Of course, it would also be valid to do something like > this (even though I haven't tested that specific case): > > local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bob" > > In this example, /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bob contains further > rc.d-style scripts. > > > Thank you all in advance, for any tips you may offer on this. :) > > Use the correct terminology for all the things. ;-) Again, Thank you for your explanations. And I'll try to keep that in mind ;) Best Regards, takCoder From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 09:43:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30B92D3 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49232DC1 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbomd-0006DY-JH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:43:19 -0700 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 02:43:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1383212599591-5856933.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: [grub2 + ZFS] /usr/lib/libzfs.so and grub/trunk mismatch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:43:20 -0000 I am trying to compile grub2 from the bazaar repo of gnu/grub (http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/grub/) The reason I am trying to do this, is because I was advised on the grub-devel mail list that: "Also grub 2.00 is not enough for version 5000. You need current trunk" discussion here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2013-09/msg00102.html So, trying to compile, after ./autogen and ./configure, I get this: GRUB2 will be compiled with following components: Platform: i386-pc With devmapper support: No (need libdevmapper header) With memory debugging: No With disk cache statistics: No With boot time statistics: No efiemu runtime: No (cannot compile with -m64 -mcmodel=large -mno-red-zone -nostdlib) grub-mkfont: Yes grub-mount: No (need FUSE library) starfield theme: No (No DejaVu found) *With libzfs support: No (need zfs library)* Build-time grub-mkfont: No (no fonts) Without unifont (no build-time grub-mkfont) With liblzma from -llzma (support for XZ-compressed mips images) When I asked about libzfs support, I was advised to look through the configure.log for that section. Here's what that log has to say: configure:26929: checking for libzfs_init in -lzfs configure:26954: gcc -o conftest -I/usr/local/include conftest.c -lzfs -lgeom >&5 /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_pool_create' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_numnodes' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_destroy' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_remove' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_pool_create' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_find' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_destroy' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_error' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_add' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_first' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_node_init' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_first' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_pool_destroy' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_insert_before' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_first' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_next' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_destroy_nodes' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_teardown' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_create' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_insert_after' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_insert' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_create' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_create' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_pool_destroy' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_next' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_destroy' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_find' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_remove' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_avl_teardown' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_walk' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_last' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `avl_find' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_insert' /usr/lib/libzfs.so: undefined reference to `uu_list_prev' configure:26954: $? = 1 I don't know what the significance of the failed output above means. Does it mean grub2 will not work and cannot boot 5/5000 zpool on FreeBSD, or does it mean that certain functions will not be available for grub (which is not a serious problem). separately, there is a textproc/flex issue as well - ./autogen gives: > as_fn_error $? "flex is too old. GRUB requires 2.5.35 or above" On my system (FreeBSD-9.2-stable_amd64): flex --version => flex version 2.5.4, PORTVERSION= 2.5.37 When I asked on the grub-devel mail list, I was informed: >> I had to disable line 6014 in config, because it gives incorrect error re >> flex version > (answer): And what is incorrect here? Flex version 2.5.4 is less than > 2.3.35. I don't understand how 2.5.4 is < 2.3.35, but sure enough, when trying to compile (gmake) I get: $ gmake flex -o grub_script.yy.c --header-file=grub_script.yy.h ./grub-core/script/yylex.l flex: can't open grub_script.yy.c gmake: *** [grub_script.yy.h] Error 1 Regards. ----- FreeBSD-9.2-stable_amd64_root-on-zfs_clang-only-world -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/grub2-ZFS-usr-lib-libzfs-so-and-grub-trunk-mismatch-tp5856933.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 10:22:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874429C for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685552FE9 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VbpO3-0008VZ-Ih for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:21:59 -0700 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:21:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1383214919573-5856941.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1383212599591-5856933.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1383212599591-5856933.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: [grub2 + ZFS] /usr/lib/libzfs.so and grub/trunk mismatch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:22:00 -0000 The flex problem was solved thanks to reply from johans@freebsd.org: "FreeBSD includes an older version of Flex in the base system. You will need that the compilation should use the version installed in /usr/local/bin instead. Either by putting this directory in your $PATH earlier than /usr/bin or by specifying the location on the command line." It was fixed by placing /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin at the very beginning of set "path = " in ~/.cshrc Thanks ----- FreeBSD-9.2-stable_amd64_root-on-zfs_clang-only-world -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/grub2-ZFS-usr-lib-libzfs-so-and-grub-trunk-mismatch-tp5856933p5856941.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 10:33:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B65A3D4 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D017F20DD for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ii20so4412709qab.18 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:33:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AhHgpxmaf2r6Wsp7VbQ3G+hKz+DHlwIo12PocC3AM1M=; b=EEXR9i42dYHi9hXVzlzymL0bBDeF//VwddNPTF53O8pe3ep4/HcBmjohGi1zPSNEua Gd7MCbxgNzkxmPuNgACffxeUEetq61fb/uhOJ4zYtwokkXaexzsRLwIytOw7ifdx9rSL 3zQi108mqOoRNCGrb8sXsih90/Wm2YP8a5gxizYQACRKJ+Su1o7dSkUo5HO+yx7hwl5G jEJfD0PRyDSixFYaRct+7seo3+drFadC7ltqOzkIVW0wgt39ivQGkxuPb4ROB5tlp2F9 juOUuPzicvJ/dtaXhXbtiChjUxpo2xRl7jJxDXSA6d/Ll3pP0ZSGjMaJUa0PGr/ESyIl DQeA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.120.6 with SMTP id b6mr3961450qar.11.1383215637976; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.55.77 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:33:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5270FCF2.1030209@pukruppa.de> References: <5270C384.9040502@pukruppa.de> <5270DDC0.2050603@gmail.com> <5270FCF2.1030209@pukruppa.de> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:33:57 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to set up unbound on FreeBSD 10 From: krad To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Wei Guo , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:33:59 -0000 have you edited the config files eg # specify the interfaces to answer queries from by ip-address. # The default is to listen to localhost (127.0.0.1 and ::1). # specify 0.0.0.0 and ::0 to bind to all available interfaces. # specify every interface on a new 'interface:' labelled line. # The listen interfaces are not changed on reload, only on restart. # interface: 0.0.0.0 # interface: ::0 # interface: 192.0.2.153 # interface: 192.0.2.154 # interface: 2001:DB8::5 # # for dns over tls and raw dns over port 80 # interface: 0.0.0.0@443 # interface: ::0@443 # interface: 0.0.0.0@80 # interface: ::0@80 # enable this feature to copy the source address of queries to reply. # Socket options are not supported on all platforms. experimental. On 30 October 2013 12:34, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > > > On 10/30/13 11:21, Wei Guo wrote: > > > > =E4=BA=8E 10/30/13, 4:29 PM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > >> Hi, > >> > >> as I can see there is a new default dns server shipping with FreeBSD 1= 0: > >> unbound. > >> > >> When I try to set it up as described in > >> > >> http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ > >> > >> by typing > >> > >> # echo local_unbound_enable=3Dyes >>/etc/rc.conf > >> # service local_unbound start > >> > >> I am locked out of my internet connection and nobody is served any dns= . > >> So I guess something must be missing. > >> For example: Do I have to mount any devfs ? > > I guess you must have the following line in your ppp.conf: > > > > disable dns > > > > in order to stop ppp(8) from rewriting your /etc/resolv.conf. And you > > to can edit /var/unbound/forward.conf and /var/unbound/unbound.conf > > to meet your demands. > Thanks, that is a good hint - but it doesn't solve the problem. > As soon as I activate unbound I no dns requests from my machine (neither > from any other) will be answered. > > Greetings > > Peter > > > > > >> > >> My machine has got two nics: one unconfigured to dial in to an ADSL > >> connection via DSL bridge and one with IP 192.168.10.1 to my LAN. > >> > >> With old named/bind all I need to set is > >> > >> named_enable=3D"YES" > >> in /etc/rc.conf and > >> > >> listen-on { 127.0.0.1; > >> 192.168.10.1;}; > >> in /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks for your help > >> > >> Peter > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 10:57:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289BD938 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954922256 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([92.226.23.35]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MKcdH-1Vcecb3oxD-001xnh for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:57:35 +0100 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:56:48 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd questions Subject: 9.2 latest llvm upgrade does not compile Message-Id: <20131031115648.ccfc405591a80749f1fb74c8@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__31_Oct_2013_11_56_48_+0100_MTBE1.ioSHnXj5w9" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:jop8YWTbfkdrnESRDEg3IUKvmVAeGDHfEaEe3rIJgtWgKv5ts56 tjvifY6l2ou3Lf0I9rV0XP8k6LkMpW4BXglc1L9BqZNLXEXof6jUQ4W0RkxTMvCw/voNMvR etnKStx1BkpdoTpwwa2qFFrW3V4Xw+DdiKexEe1iDd0UQp7ZqQgwAKcykD9rs6egefjvw5k GaruxW+qpt9m+73Rcf6tA== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:57:38 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__31_Oct_2013_11_56_48_+0100_MTBE1.ioSHnXj5w9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, the recent update for clang and llvm (3.3) does not compile on my main machine. I'm using 9.2 (updated from 9.1) and ports/portmaster. Error message: gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/proj= ects/sample/tools' File "/usr/local/bin/sphinx-build", line 5, in from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File "build/bdist.freebsd-9.2-RELEASE-amd64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line 2= 805, in File "build/bdist.freebsd-9.2-RELEASE-amd64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line 6= 96, in require File "build/bdist.freebsd-9.2-RELEASE-amd64/egg/pkg_resources.py", line 5= 94, in resolve pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: markupsafe gmake: *** [man] Error 1 *** [post-build] Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/llvm33. *** [build] Error code 1 # cat /etc/make.conf WITH_PKGNG=3Dyes DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Druby=3D2.0 python=3D2.7 python2=3D2.7 python3=3D3.3 perl= 5=3D5.16 # TeX TEX_DEFAULT=3Dtexlive # QT QT4_OPTIONS=3DCUPS QGTKSTYLE On my second machine (also 9.2 bsd, except older hardware) the update compi= les just fine. :-? Any ideas? Regards, Jens --=20 31. Gilbhart 2013, 11:52 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de Seems this guy showed up at a party, and all of his friends jumped for Joy. But she sidestepped, and they missed. --Signature=_Thu__31_Oct_2013_11_56_48_+0100_MTBE1.ioSHnXj5w9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJScjedAAoJED2+SXzzbciGFucM/j/zPSS4GQYUFwZDnLT98URz /E2aHRWg988o917FKXGDzzlY5iVdp+p595fsW577PaCAvfmOHdzdQj8fn1zN2LOI lABoVBH9cw1Lsi+FTI22ItjG9jlrv9exhE7wqJ9RQOa03BYTmXKFqDK1aAakAo/U kNFxxulWyVHQlxLzE00eF/2wn6T/2nDpVhHN4d+wTgK2WJRCgdTdaJqDxd+BjTeV 2fGLsKyB6KAgyxmgkk0WiGWaqoxqOgNZyTFMGgZ5h7/jLW1ZCIoBoI+IFCdHp1Xf 74RHmhHuIVNfMWp+ogXI5q3dbM9DJ/qPeBU7GdRfvaSTKhynCg/6ENkEmxv0jgUp LeWhu/msLp6FV3QYECHWoIEvdwXbvWZyHDfSccnSwNzO+k8qnV/S7OmEwWXcjuJk ckBS92h/lyjOIcPYwwbyr2N/mB8XUaYs7REOA++hlRqRCEFGLq4UFNjXAkF+VmyM eXWfVTw7FeUOSv+Fr9BqM5Saq0z6/7GyjKye8gtw/QrDkOQIBXkqTZ//meh9eiin LLrJz3UuTQK0k3sQSXu2 =Bwvg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__31_Oct_2013_11_56_48_+0100_MTBE1.ioSHnXj5w9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 11:23:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597DB589 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nhgson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6B62433 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so2551032wgh.13 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:23:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jllE7eO+Lwhc95eKGB16nZi85YdqsbYzVNPjmalxnpQ=; b=ufrh8jyKdVgisd/7+x+Sv1j2lNlTBeoY54fV693dWrgyZIb2PO1mDNlSKqv6QuHitS PYLLEUddZtiCtYuzEzjdWL3WpghL9vfFnRUTm4dQys6zypjhNU9yNIU/7Y9zkowODJo6 KFs23EXklqA/7/mV8InzpiRLq6wEweB7jchGgjlaZ10TaWTSYMGsTS/1lyRmsJpoa1TS d9vH0Uh15EuNrHxwqfapWU/0zpoYgrZHMIwmapxsQLVU1tReLNbSLNUorBuju2XYZzJ0 vq4zlEAUaDvEbPky/g/SBUfnfFOrhcpatDDcTs6WNlUKVxt4eraJsKekj/G8sI3UQWt9 06zA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.77.41 with SMTP id p9mr1833419wjw.66.1383218594271; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.21.208 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:23:14 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Install software on FreeBSD Jail From: Hung Son Nguyen To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:23:16 -0000 Hi guys, Can I install software on Jail without entering the Jail? Because I plan to write a shell script that can automatically create jail with java and sql installed. Through documentation on the internet, I see some instructions about installing software on FreeBSD Jail but I have to enter Jail. I expected to listen your supports as soon as possible. Thanks, --=20 * Nguy=E1=BB=85n H=C3=B9ng S=C6=A1n* --- University of Information Technology - VNU HCMC --- Phone: (+84) 1689 975 376 --- Yahoo: nguyensonuit --- Skype: nguyensonuit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 11:59:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B4F880 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:59:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@sunpoet.net) Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C24742682 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w6so2251090lbh.24 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:59:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=v1N0k/om4ry2nWvtnN1p7XicBADKeSoWeLjsG0ecNn0=; b=ewqntO6iX687mSvFpVsYvJ8TEmzNmJHHcl3mDDQro6y/264tD8yAylrz7HrSzoijVd nRTH4g27ICnIxdgGXGKJefLm/13FLhLDGTQtG9MlEmZLtadLB7QfbJik+JmveGIKpz8E wpDr5xp6WXWQkeA0k3FBr0ZD/wSvN4Q0VrtPwWzAtiH+kOxAbN03T+KHIZ/Wigmb3FZj 358JjM6M6/CkI71sopKoS2UeL0jRPd7XtmSStIYJVGldDDZmYenDXRte+ZKwZxMw8DaN AhbfpTZhzJ7l2z7t1kzmGY/HsaIuhcjobbUcHkKcown7A1KWu6bO+146j72ZBqy4aw2p z6JQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndkrTeNixCUJ6KQJUk0uxD50yYOU5En3dACKfJQrjd2rh0FsKKB1KpKnSsoQe1ncsn7owB X-Received: by 10.112.52.33 with SMTP id q1mr2083577lbo.30.1383220762621; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:59:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sunpoet@sunpoet.net Received: by 10.112.212.102 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:59:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:59:02 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _eRokv3YPt_uoM0hxBpT4z88bv0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem w/ building p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 To: Doug Sampson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:59:31 -0000 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Doug Sampson wrote: > Hello- > > I appear to be having a problem building the p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 > port on a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE machine. Error message below: > > # cd /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib > # make install clean > ===> Building package for p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 > Creating package > /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib/work/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062.tbz > Registering depends: perl5-5.16.3_2. > Creating bzip'd tar ball in > '/usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib/work/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062.tbz' > tar: lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/Zlib.bs: Cannot > stat: No such file or directory > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. > pkg_create: make_dist: tar command failed with code 256 > *** [do-package] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib. > # > > > It appears that the issue is with an incorrect pathname? > > # find / | g Zlib.bs > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/Zlib.bs > # > > Here, the Zlib.bs file is found in > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/ but the build is > trying to find the Zlib.bs file at > lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/ > > Is this an issue? > > ~Doug > > > FYI, read ports/183436 for further information. Regards, sunpoet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 13:39:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6026F5F for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x22f.google.com (mail-qa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D772DF6 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k15so4515024qaq.20 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 06:39:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UpNB0xgSftpkrvMiKXUZBfK5DRgjCEKwT5/P7tsWE0A=; b=aMKGMhetMN9FsYJidVj3yAVxoHI50UuAwTn2X2o9TH7Kt/NCRZtngpyLI4c3WeSP/Z GTQ2XbmvOLg9IhtVlqA4I8SNnwzPGHxituQuJCaiRUQV5YaUZ/LT+bnizQu6CpASIri2 araWAzMQIU7etvGkVsHP/kHxw4hKveXfSLQXw4SvT+3rLr+YXt67j8ae+7i8OslFUsGJ sgRtzer2veQpkLE3b1yUmwfSdU03tnpQ21WnMZalCScdZdTTC3lz5GPDPU5wJwHWtxok KvgEfuV9iUZfeooVfERw78PibkFUlGPjuuBTPzjEW+HFnGZJfu3b6do3dOivgDDx4uBe F5TQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.35.144 with SMTP id h16mr4101820qej.35.1383226765720; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 06:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.55.77 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 06:39:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:39:25 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Install software on FreeBSD Jail From: krad To: Hung Son Nguyen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:39:26 -0000 sort of yes, use jexec to issues the commands within the jail that will install you packages or you can set DESTDIR enviroment variable in some cases On 31 October 2013 11:23, Hung Son Nguyen wrote: > Hi guys, > > Can I install software on Jail without entering the Jail? > Because I plan to write a shell script that can automatically create jail > with java and sql installed. Through documentation on the internet, I see > some instructions about installing software on FreeBSD Jail but I have to > enter Jail. > > I expected to listen your supports as soon as possible. > > Thanks, > > -- > * Nguy=E1=BB=85n H=C3=B9ng S=C6=A1n* > --- University of Information Technology - VNU HCMC > --- Phone: (+84) 1689 975 376 > --- Yahoo: nguyensonuit > --- Skype: nguyensonuit > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 14:26:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1748F2AE for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nabil.rahiman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x231.google.com (mail-oa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9034221E for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j10so3071814oah.8 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5mgC+z+BiNrgwa0U0hY59/hey6eBpOUUb8Olj96kNlc=; b=FGzSHW76XMTFqcGk0SHwZqDQRYGXJbjU/dKwg4Kae3lUAhZPgw3PNYsKpRnHPOF7Rb Pz27v0ACPFumonCrVpFyr8KUhl+FSUMa4kqyVeyBC7Z7f5TkbZzIGwYK5b56UUzJ1B10 1kxUpWPD0aN8gPAXfaB+YVoNcoQ1ef2XGZWwXX2zarTu2BD3Dg2Q1oq8Ehbpfc10uRAV DxjQWToB0ZwNCPS2AK2NbmwuCnTFtgyoeOWYOK0ZjznGgfV14eS4sOTxDQsBBH6fDRss Xt7/ziOC8q0Vs6vT1lUeR8Um2W8Gcl8kemVXzYNPgG3gGKa5EjiAdnZV7uX4HOi0s+w2 x0vA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.53.138 with SMTP id b10mr2451546obp.66.1383229564009; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.84.74 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:56:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: inconsistent utx.active? From: Nabil Rahiman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nabil.rahiman@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:26:05 -0000 freebsd 10: inconsistent entry in utx.active Steps: 1. Telnet to the server. 2; type ctrl+] quit 3:Telnet again to same the server. 4 . run w ~]$ telnet Trying Connected to Escape character is '^]'. Trying SRA secure login: User (nabil): regress Password: [ SRA accepts you ] FreeBSD/i386 () (pts/0) Last login: Thu Oct 31 05:53:43 from % % w 7:10AM up 3 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.59, 0.51, 0.24 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT regress pts/0 server1 7:10AM - w % telnet> quit []$ telnet Trying 10.209.9.43... Connected to Escape character is '^]'. Trying SRA secure login: User (nabil): regress Password: [ SRA accepts you ] FreeBSD/i386 () (pts/0) Last login: Thu Oct 31 07:10:41 from % % w 7:14AM up 7 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.52, 0.38, 0.23 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT regress pts/0 server1 7:10AM - w regress pts/0 server1 7:14AM - w From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 15:40:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B713349C for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 787D6286B for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [172.17.17.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9VFbvb9096212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:37:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r9VFbvdZ037823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:37:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9VFbvPe037822; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:37:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:37:57 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: aurfalien Subject: Re: CPU Turbo mode Message-ID: <20131031153757.GG63947@dan.emsphone.com> References: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70EC0F10-FAD0-4EA6-8C1F-A95B1C786B7B@gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (email2.allantgroup.com [172.17.19.78]); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:37:57 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on email2.allantgroup.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:40:26 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 30), aurfalien said: > Hi all, > > I've powerd enabled and see this message often when running powerd -v; > > current freq 2201 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 4402 MHz > > Were is the 4402 value gotten from, is it a turbo value and if so, why is > it not boosting? Depending on your settings, powerd will try and raise the clock rate at different rates based on system load. 4402 is simply double the current clock rate, which probably means your system is busy and powerd is trying to quickly raise the clock rate. It doesn't bother capping the target value at the maximum, though, since it'll find out a bit later in the code when it actually tries to set a new clockrate and realizes that it's already at max. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 19:09:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C661189 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C80296C for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hm4so171548wib.14 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:09:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/SJ9MKc4+pLfJ4GLgBKSgzENfqL+X/LltwBcKu57d0Q=; b=YI40f+dgSF64yl7OSiKMX4Ir7V8SKX123fIfpYSw4xLpTWgZ/qAW4n8KgkjanpHll6 F9rdnd5f9J0OjjJ5/vLJxFLqWw1F0ZPWPQ3zHsTUAxctb/4w8LaVzt7FbhzuMBPjB7Lw w/P2qNEsWGdb61SmJtPusOdEIs8Jtaw74Ep8lQpVl+o7DUz6ziGIfOojLjv1+odjpkzh n/DcO52hxDa4j4eUpDK7sRthMtwqcXUUHcF3x3Zgn4bzce6fEMPU/SshF5MxVny+2NVm 5CZQ1SuCu5nsCLiTDWO/QY9FwOZflYL+YpAgXLiY+dGImTAR3OvNR2iMzPrQ4FkzX71Y Z28Q== X-Received: by 10.180.11.37 with SMTP id n5mr719228wib.25.1383246553508; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (client-86-23-118-68.brhm.adsl.virginm.net. [86.23.118.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gg20sm211403wic.1.2013.10.31.12.09.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:21:02 +0000 From: Peter Harrison Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:21:01 +0000 To: LtCdData Subject: Re: Chromium rendering problem Message-ID: <20131031201101.GA3456@thinkpad.piggybox> References: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:09:15 -0000 Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 20:56:03 +0000, LtCdData said: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:36:47 +0000 > Peter Harrison wrote: > > > Hello list. > > > > I'm encountering a rendering problem in Chromium on 9.2-RELEASE. > > > > I updated my machine recently from 9.2-R from 9.1-R, and then ran a port update which pulled in several updates - including bringing Chromium up to 30.0.1599.101 from 30.0.1599.69, among other things. > > > > I now have a rendering problem in Chromium. On some sights, it will render the page initially before the render is complete however the page blanks to white - no content visible at all. This happens consistently for example on www.theguardian.com/uk and play.google.com > > > > Other (presumably simpler) sites render fine - eg. www.freebsd.org. > > > > Any ideas where to look for a fix? I've tried disabling my only extension (Vimium) to no effect. I've tried install a flashblocker (no difference). I don't have flash installed > > > > This is on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60 with 9.2-R i386 and a GENERIC kernel using the intel xorg driver: > > > > xorg-7.7 X.Org complete distribution metaport > > xorg-server-1.7.7_10,1 X.Org X server and related programs > > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_5 Driver for Intel integrated graphics chipsets > > > > > > Thanks for your help, > > > > > > > > Peter Harrison. > > not sure if this is the same issue i had but...... > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=15163 > /etc/sysctl.conf > kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 > /etc/rc.d/sysctl restart > > fixed it for me... _______________________________________________ Thanks... But it's not that. I have kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set to 1 Without that, nothing works. With it some sites work (eg. www.freebsd.org), but some don't (www.theguardian.com). I've now deleted and the installed again all my ports using the process in the portmaster manpage, just in case it was something that got disconnected in the update to the latest chromium. Is anyone else seeing this? Peter. > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 19:43:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B010D756 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from no-reply@att.com) Received: from outbound-01.safaricombusiness.co.ke (outbound-01.safaricombusiness.co.ke [41.203.208.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DAF2C8E for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:43:02 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkQ2AJq9blIpy9CKdWdsb2JhbABWA44NnyWBJoE7gRlWHYFhh2qINhYOAQwKDAcUKIIKgTCBDAUrEQqFLoIsAw2Wd4cCmlOICYRcgSeBYQWDIXUDiTmCDgKKXI41iGA5gTU X-IPAS-Result: AkQ2AJq9blIpy9CKdWdsb2JhbABWA44NnyWBJoE7gRlWHYFhh2qINhYOAQwKDAcUKIIKgTCBDAUrEQqFLoIsAw2Wd4cCmlOICYRcgSeBYQWDIXUDiTmCDgKKXI41iGA5gTU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,587,1378846800"; d="scan'208";a="322641964" Received: from 3g-relay-01.safaricombusiness.co.ke ([41.203.208.138]) by smtp02.safaricombusiness.co.ke with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2013 22:41:26 +0300 Message-ID: <031e2523-41575-fcb39453214005@user-pc> From: "Mashariki Credit Ltd" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Instant Cash Loans in kenya Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:41:15 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mashariki Credit Ltd List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:43:03 -0000 Need a little push till the end of the month ? Something just came up ? School fees is due ? You need a cash advance ? Mashariki Credit Ltd is the premier provider of same-day cash advances in Kenya. Our fast, convenient services have helped thousands of Kenyans bridge the gap between paydays from the comfort and privacy of home or office. Mashariki Credit Ltd Kenya provides you with the peace of mind you can only get from the most secure and adequate funding solutions. We provide the following services; - Overnight Lending - Business Loans - Financial services - Financial projects - Short term loans Loan application requirements (at least one of these is required) - Vehicle log books - Running business - Post dated cheque - laptops You will receive an approval by 3 pm Monday through Saturday and receive your money the same day at no extra charge For more details contacts us on; Mashariki Credit Ltd Yala Towers, 4th Floor, Biashara Street, Opp Kianda Hse (Koinange Street) P.O Box 16589-00620 Nairobi. Tel: 0720 767 643, 0713 516 505, 0722 793 030 Email: mashariki.credit@yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 21:07:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52B0BC7 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x230.google.com (mail-ee0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CBFD2333 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id d49so1612051eek.7 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:07:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YhRWiXavXeA3aAUYPzdqp+KIqjHYGYU0GMLkC+vpqkQ=; b=1DeKR0fgTeJRwhgOBmCXZXa38mhHJiImt/QCcjgMhn2/i5zFocmk0lMDoNNRnTdIa7 vQ/sxAlCar+LEq0xhEUd1PKvhslOg6onnCxbkcJdJxQGeCGDla9tt70+iuKm1OTCBkMB I9NApWnRd45XpPFaL79v+SGB5l4s39cDw2twNjyI0bQFI3zUbIt+KpMCGFIunCqVGTiA qzqsN9wiPkdwmAOmLComaEAakWdwFulQ5nT/5xkw72r0+xAIOo/HpDrs36rgL/tG7VSv nWgFSempQmhAx2isrNbp8Vnkj/8Q7nxA3tso1L2yuysVEilku+okIvkLnmzOTliJ14cM cHcw== X-Received: by 10.14.213.133 with SMTP id a5mr1083188eep.133.1383253647632; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (174.33.91.91.rev.sfr.net. [91.91.33.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm13980822eeg.0.2013.10.31.14.07.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5272C68D.1070105@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:07:25 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New laptop for FreeBSD: HP 650 H5V58EA References: <5270D0F2.8060805@cloverinformatica.it> In-Reply-To: <5270D0F2.8060805@cloverinformatica.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:07:29 -0000 On 30.10.2013 10:27, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > Hi list, > > I would like to replace my old laptop with a new HP 650 H5V58EA. > Has someone has used it ? > > Thanks > Maurizio > Hi, I don't have this one but I already have lot of HP laptop before. What I can tell is that HP is usually good with their laptop and work almost perfectly. The only issue I have is that I can't adjust the brightness directly through my fn keys (but with sysctl it works fine). This is primarly due to their HP Quick Launch drivers (I hope this has changed). General ACPI, webcam, USB, wireless, and such usually work well though :-). Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 22:03:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C1376A for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E05226E4 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9VM3R0J032732 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:03:27 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9VM3Rux032731 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:03:27 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 90797 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2013 17:03:25 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 31 Oct 2013 17:03:25 -0500 Message-ID: <5272D3A5.7010308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:03:17 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v7BVQxuq9oqOhTpH0e8qdnl2dbdTdAVRs" Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:03:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --v7BVQxuq9oqOhTpH0e8qdnl2dbdTdAVRs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/30/2013 11:31 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, >=20 >>> You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade,= as >>> before or switch to using binary packages only. >=20 > I strongly expect that ports will remain a standard feature in the > later releases of FreeBSD. >=20 > Packages may be nice for the home/desktop user, but when it comes to > production servers, one wants to be able to tweak what he is > installing. >=20 > FreeBSd is certainly my choice of an OS when I need to install a > server, but if it ends up looking like Microsoft, I will have to > reconsider. >=20 > The cost of recompiling a port is way worth the flexibility it offers. >=20 > Olivier Completely agreed. However, you should not be compiling anything on your production machines! It is dangerous because of shlib bumping; you may have a broken system. It is dangerous due to dependencies being updated before other ports are, possibly breaking those. It also adversely affects your performance and load. The list goes on. Building on production is a big risk of downtime. I recommend setting up ports-mgmt/poudriere on a good non-production-facing box and building packages to your own liking with your own OPTIONS on there. Then you can serve out your own pkg repository to your production machines. Poudriere is exactly what the FreeBSD project is using to build packages as well. https://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/doc/trunk/doc/pkgng_repos.wiki --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --v7BVQxuq9oqOhTpH0e8qdnl2dbdTdAVRs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSctOlAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPmtUIAMbgNreiCVDwh5ytZsu793De 0KVxEsn40gzM+/gzZS97sBjQVqIzAzT/mpJoxpOdd5szbIy7fXyHcNOryho3C0mQ MLMs4NdCkygHOqV3WwNSaHrBrtlHG/2BVo6UuCnheZvDSLThjl1QGy3RNUK06O05 VF7I4lscgYfcnhJJbxWKq2pq+7UX+CbdA9Ml2YpDp7tTHUGdh1woaAj0TYOWDtcn mtSiVogKfX8YYiF7Qq9pD6NVc4c8JTuSe2tso6LFKBC8Dn+YBBoxnYlx4V2joco8 9muNluDRO8pflIf5iepbm4MLlknhFTQrQWIKsWY7UlA1ubM9FKZfq3kVotPcppA= =CP0Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v7BVQxuq9oqOhTpH0e8qdnl2dbdTdAVRs-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 02:22:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887E238F; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier2553@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DED23B3; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w61so3387811wes.24 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:22:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=o51OQ9CSg3YPviKkcx75eqHz6g5x1XX4bvF9kfDT0/E=; b=WYte3d/CK87KZQx6qHcpZf8mg+ATBSZft3Z09st+wqTphwflTmw5AR6j7ZZZnHx0k3 tUx6FrxywahtXXB93GpKi/JP8gDhbQ1ddxoFNyLf7RuKuERVFIkd4/+Lx6uzD64GQfUC AKslYEwKWcKzasrRZbUloTrvgn6ftQC7WAaOUTHuIAL7ac6LGStRELYOPxYqDeWYUUqb LlkPMDEiHucTKzmzX1z5VJk49KzNkkjdgevCuJIqoOXKu2+BCMiRunY+COeA9okKqFsH DFxUaB/S8T2cJcMa6BfiLARkN3gVzPr7RdZW2jHzSJxYf5Xi1fma29PwhBwdGY4SY/To y/FQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.105 with SMTP id q9mr740092wix.18.1383272526317; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.112.132 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:22:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5272D3A5.7010308@FreeBSD.org> References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> <5272D3A5.7010308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:22:06 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng From: Olivier Nicole To: Bryan Drewery Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Olivier Nicole , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 02:22:08 -0000 Bryan, > However, you should not be compiling anything on your > production machines! It is dangerous because of shlib bumping; you may > [...] > > I recommend setting up ports-mgmt/poudriere on a good > non-production-facing box and building packages to your own liking with > [...] That's when virtual machines come handy, to clone a production machine and upgrade it without fear. Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 03:21:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7369AE for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C647272D for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165CA3CBAA; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:21:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA13LPkK003130; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:21:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:21:25 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Olivier Nicole Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng Message-Id: <20131101042125.631da559.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> <5271D5BA.9060004@networktest.com> <5272D3A5.7010308@FreeBSD.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 03:21:43 -0000 On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:22:06 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Bryan, > > > However, you should not be compiling anything on your > > production machines! It is dangerous because of shlib bumping; you may > > [...] > > > > I recommend setting up ports-mgmt/poudriere on a good > > non-production-facing box and building packages to your own liking with > > [...] > > That's when virtual machines come handy, to clone a production machine > and upgrade it without fear. In worst case, FS snapshots and BE's can be helpful; less exceptional trouble than restoring from a backup. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 03:24:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C206BB6 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236622753 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA12u1jx009134 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:56:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201311010256.rA12u1jx009134@x.it.okstate.edu> From: Martin McCormick To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Inputs and outputs in the right order MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9132.1383274561.1@x.it.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:56:01 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 03:24:06 -0000 One of the beauties of unix is the ability to open a shell such as omshell or even the Bourne or C shells and feed commands to the shell from a script. One can capture the output of the shell to generate log entries or status messages for the benefit of the operator of the application. If you do that, however, there is an interesting problem. If one was to manually enter commands to the shell, the output looks like: some_command shell_output for one or more lines and then some_other_command shell_response. When an automated script is entering commands, what appears to happen is that standard input sucks in gobs of lines as fast as it can and then the shell runs them sequentially if possible so it all happens very fast on a modern system. The problem is that if one is capturing the session, the shell usually doesn't echo each command as executed. If you use a special application such as script, one sees all the commands fed in as a block followed by the results of the sequential execution of the block of commands coming out as a block. It is sometimes hard to tell exactly what happened to make the job fail because one does not have the command string followed by the results. I know that expect does a great job of logging a session but I am wondering if there is an easier way to get the shell input echoed interwoven with all the output. In shorter words, what is the easiest way to produce a session log that reads like what actually happened when it happened? Thanks for any and all constructive ideas. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 03:30:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E31E04 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A1927B4 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D6023CBB4; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:30:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA13UAvA003164; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:30:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:30:10 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Inputs and outputs in the right order Message-Id: <20131101043010.c1cc84e3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201311010256.rA12u1jx009134@x.it.okstate.edu> References: <201311010256.rA12u1jx009134@x.it.okstate.edu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 03:30:21 -0000 On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:56:01 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote: > I know that expect does a great job of logging a session > but I am wondering if there is an easier way to get the shell > input echoed interwoven with all the output. In shorter words, > what is the easiest way to produce a session log that reads like > what actually happened when it happened? Without knowing anything about the design of the script and its input, I'd guess that something like | tee or maybe even /usr/bin/script could work? It highly depends on what is being echoed / printed to stdout and stderr and how the script deals with the inputs... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 05:16:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219DF8CF for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 05:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26E72D25 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 05:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9E83CA64; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:16:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rA15GVIl003688; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:16:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:16:31 +0100 From: Polytropon To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: rcorder issue Message-Id: <20131101061631.2a9adb81.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20131031092922.bd60f4bd.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 05:16:44 -0000 On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:17:33 +0330, takCoder wrote: > Thank you for your quick and complete reply :) I'm happy to be a helpful support drone. :-) > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:42:41 +0330, takCoder wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > My question is: May it cause a problem, for rcorder or else, to have a > > > sub-folder in rc.d/ path ? > > > > First, the things you are refering to are directories and > > subdirectories. "Folder" is technically wrong. The correct > > term is directory. A "folder" is the name of a visual > > representation (usually an icon) that represents a directory > > within a GUI concept. The relations that reflect that > > difference are "is a" vs. "represents a". :-) > > > > Excuse me for that miss-use of "folder" term, and thanks for your > clarification. I'll try to keep that in mind ;) Certain environments encourage non-standard "creations" instead established terminology. It's important to differentiate here. I have to admit that I'm very pedantic with the paperwork. :-) > > It's about _files_, so * will usually be resolved by the > > shell to any entry found in the specified directory. In > > case that a subdirectory is found, any future operation > > will be done on _that subdirectory_ instead of a file > > (that is maybe contained in that subdirectory). That's > > why it's suggested to put the rc.d scripts without any > > "deeper nesting" into /etc/rc.d and /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > respectively. Similarly, non-OS scripts are processed > > from the /usr/local/etc/rc.d directory (and other directories > > the user might have added). > > > > Yes I guess that's the point! It is then where rc do not expect a directory > in rc.d and things happen.. If you have a look at /etc/rc.subr's functions find_local_scripts_old() and find_local_scripts_new() (where "old" and "new" corresponds to the syntax of the rc.d files), you can see that it works in a similar manner: the shell resolves /* and expects * to be resolved to files in order to call them. If a _directory_ is found, doing things that are supposed to be done with files (e. g. grep, test for +x and call it in a subshell) just doesn't work. The idea of supplying an additional directory where rc can search for rc.d-style files is the most convenient way to deal with this. > > > But now I can't be sure about it as i can't remember it clearly or find > > > it.. One of my mates created a sub-folder in his system's rc.d folder, so > > > he can run his preferred scripts there in his required order, using > > > /etc/rc. > > > > It would also be possible to add a custom /opt/rc.d > > directory and add this to the local_startup vairable > > in /etc/rc.conf, for example: > > > > local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d /opt/rc.d" > > > > This will cause additional directories to be sourced. > > Note that I'm an optimist and therefore often (ab)use > > the Solaris-ism (Solarism?) of /opt. :-) > > > > Just keep being an optimist! That's what's right .. :) My intention of /opt is that I use it to keep things that are not managed by the system in any way, e. g. system-wide user scripts, manually installed programs or local ports. In this specific case, /opt contains a subtree structure similar to what the system uses (e. g. /opt/bin which is also in $PATH, /opt/libexec for handmade printer filters or /opt/src for local sources). I don't say that this is the _correct_ way to handle things, but it works so long that "never touch a running system" might be indicated. :-) The difference, by the way, of not using /usr/local for such things is that this subtree is reserved for software installed from ports or packages (read: system means), and many other directories are reserved for the OS itself, so putting random stuff in there simply doesn't sound right. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 06:48:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B608D942 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:48:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3372278 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA16mJM4028993 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 06:48:19 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk rA16mJM4028993 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/rA16mJM4028993; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <52734EB2.9010207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:48:18 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inputs and outputs in the right order References: <201311010256.rA12u1jx009134@x.it.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <201311010256.rA12u1jx009134@x.it.okstate.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9IsjK8UeB7xXCH2NIowIQ4nQSqeMVADVk" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 06:48:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --9IsjK8UeB7xXCH2NIowIQ4nQSqeMVADVk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/11/2013 02:56, Martin McCormick wrote: > One of the beauties of unix is the ability to open a > shell such as omshell or even the Bourne or C shells and feed > commands to the shell from a script. One can capture the output > of the shell to generate log entries or status messages for the > benefit of the operator of the application. >=20 > If you do that, however, there is an interesting > problem. If one was to manually enter commands to the shell, the > output looks like: >=20 > some_command > shell_output for one or more lines and then > some_other_command > shell_response. >=20 > When an automated script is entering commands, what > appears to happen is that standard input sucks in gobs of lines > as fast as it can and then the shell runs them sequentially if > possible so it all happens very fast on a modern system. >=20 > The problem is that if one is capturing the session, the > shell usually doesn't echo each command as executed. If you use > a special application such as script, one sees all the commands > fed in as a block followed by the results of the sequential > execution of the block of commands coming out as a block. It is > sometimes hard to tell exactly what happened to make the job > fail because one does not have the command string followed by > the results. >=20 > I know that expect does a great job of logging a session > but I am wondering if there is an easier way to get the shell > input echoed interwoven with all the output. In shorter words, > what is the easiest way to produce a session log that reads like > what actually happened when it happened? >=20 > Thanks for any and all constructive ideas. When a process -- any process, which includes shells -- is reading from a tty, then the input is set to line bufferred. The reading process see a chunk of input as soon as you hit return. However, when the input comes from a pipe or just by reading a file, then the input is set to block buffered, so a chunk of text 4kB in size is read each time. Now, with most programming languages you can control the buffering of their input (eg. perl has the '$|' variable). As far as I can see, there isn't a way to do that from *within* a shell script, but you can force the shell to behave interactively by invoking it as '/bin/sh -i' Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --9IsjK8UeB7xXCH2NIowIQ4nQSqeMVADVk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSc06yXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATvNoP/RtCRnegw0gVp9zsRP9aNPDW WsUKzX4T6EeelZPKKuk41zGKgL+ImucJHzg01i6FXZSu0jNt3KwlimE6voDFgOFg DfenFh60StnFhSFH0CMJFfnzs2Ffp+YMv752MEPtojkJu3uk2/eTqkenNcIm99fz BCLAxOCKYrU6C8E7MtJJfbngwRQrAod0CXGWt4T4s602WvIGdlNt6A0n6ia6uLa7 1iiVWoVOO/QBJCBhLpdAncG2jDfkZreRw9sU1vEDWHAt71GFMzZEvxNVGxnFhAzU agZzBxvqHC2l5q39SngRqwbnnyexZuPdedbgOj+2wOCLbTwMJnY73sxZsvqMkxpX +uZkVDlazz3q9wLBHk27XmkdDlzGVBW0ytNHhT7zSV/eHs6IDyb28fl+NFBalCtS t72p3ZznOQ4469Pu+sOoAhLgBOLTPfa1m1gWdGJQE/XAzwKySxjnUtJdVXnBVYWo CWf8TtszHy/ZLjFoC7K9L03N5VTdjvXOJRLRTuZXyieUXtgG3ALPeRtKL5cGQ5ti kRl/bBjQvNuxe1RJeaP9Eb1tK/18kJzHzXrT0tAax+KGPe3Hv9YLHmS5zP2zAyeO YhkKfQ43W3o7VlMsWAgcfreGkU9gtDGVdGzzNsMYeqYyED90ZIaQkFZwAXhvGPku 3LOGl8AjOxtLnMDNCRFA =UbGs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9IsjK8UeB7xXCH2NIowIQ4nQSqeMVADVk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 08:45:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5B27BF; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:45:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsjcfm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x22f.google.com (mail-vb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA12289D; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m10so2660078vbh.34 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:44:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=1bL4AojQabtk3/dWxxS0iQsO1dItbGzmfuuVLjZm0yM=; b=VsW+ZEAM16PwVRTOzHl3ubdLwJmA9Hu2q4c37e+cbBvYB36THGXX8P2sMBIpXU6AQz ohb1mmQWoFdSrt8M0dKTEfZ0CI5YfmcaDaX7WCVjeiUek+VCIZFCU8yUuLyY3vO20upl UOZhvPZxRL0I0xBdYv2X9wdHjqOZ33wa0U0iRbX6rJ2o9AcyBAXwu75XY6RpLPxdIqpK SZciO7UG4QYhQKjJXfn4vEQUOVdmax9O+CBeyvnpoDWsWB6XJnqs8UUk6xLpBvDCqQAU AQ8gy3oAShl1MUtujvVgjb3+SqB0IqyvUXGtkkRt9AkEe50rQTWYJ/Kus4x9ACMG1s0Q I1tA== X-Received: by 10.52.171.79 with SMTP id as15mr989219vdc.1.1383295499549; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:44:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.107.74 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 01:44:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> References: <5271BC11.1010303@FreeBSD.org> From: Anton Sayetsky Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:44:39 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng To: bdrewery@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:45:01 -0000 Hello, I have a few questions. 2013/10/31 Bryan Drewery : > The pkg_install suite of tools pkg_create(1), pkg_add(1), and > pkg_info(1) (which ports also use), are deprecated and will be > discontinued in roughly 6 months. A communication regarding the > deprecation of the pkg_install suite of tools will be sent separately in > the future. 1. Will this change touch already released FreeBSD versions, especially like 9? Or one can use pkg_* as long as staying on 9.x? 2. What is a correct way for a freshly-built system (and which one will work :) 2.a. Set WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS=. buildworld, installworld, install ports-mgmt/pkg, profit. 2.b. buildworld, installworld, set WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS, delete-old, install ports-mgmt/pkg, profit. 3. As I can see, head/ now contains bootstrap for pkg. Will be ports-mgmt/pkg ever merged to head/ and then MFC'd to stable/10? To stable/9? Or pkg will remain in ports for many years like portmaster/portupgrade? 4. Can I use sqlite from ports instead of bundled one with pkg or this not expected? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 09:22:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BEC4E1 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@rgbaz.eu) Received: from mx2.titan.secsrv.net (mx2.titan.secsrv.net [69.175.78.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA512B38 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-089-098-113-201.chello.nl ([89.98.113.201]:58923 helo=[10.0.1.110]) by titan.secsrv.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VcAEX-0006lQ-5Y; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 03:37:33 -0500 Subject: Re: NAT/ipfw blocking internal traffic Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) From: FBSD UG In-Reply-To: <52721041.7040705@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:37:31 +0100 Message-Id: References: <789665157.296.1383076677766.JavaMail.root@phantombsd.org> <52721041.7040705@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: Da Rock X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - titan.secsrv.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - rgbaz.eu X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: titan.secsrv.net: authenticated_id: arno@rgbaz.eu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:22:57 -0000 On 31 okt 2013, at 09:09, Da Rock wrote: > On 10/30/13 05:57, Casey Scott wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> My NAT and ipfw ruleset follow almost exactly what is given at = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html >>=20 >> The problem I'm encountering is that a portion of my outbound = internal traffic is being blocked by ipfw. This is a fresh Freebsd = installaion, so I'm kind of at a loss since the config matches the = handbook. Any suggestions are appreciated. >>=20 > =46rom what I have gathered the handbook is getting out of date - = particularly in this area. Try the IPFW list (they're very helpful and = rather quick to respond), but try checking the scripts in /etc first. = Man should be up to date too. >=20 > You should find some generic settings such as OPEN, SECURE, etc in the = scripts /etc. Just set the rc.conf to use those, and season to taste ;) >=20 > HTH > _______________________________________________ Hi Casey, I've setup a server myself using IPFW not long ago and used Example #2 form the page you mention. two things I changed to make things work for my situation: i completely removed rule nr 450: $cmd 450 deny log all from any to any out via $pif and I removed the 'setup' from $cmd 020 $skip tcp from any to x.x.x.x 53 out via $pif setup keep-state so it's now: $cmd 020 $skip tcp from any to x.x.x.x 53 out via $pif keep-state 450 is there to block all unauthorised outgoing traffic. There was no need for me to block this traffic as strictly. Could this also be your problem? greets Arno= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 10:32:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9998E785 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE1BF2005 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman.lon.namesco.net (lon.namesco.net [195.7.254.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id rA1AWWBM023931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:32:35 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <52738340.4050705@unsane.co.uk> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:32:32 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa , Wei Guo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to set up unbound on FreeBSD 10 References: <5270C384.9040502@pukruppa.de> <5270DDC0.2050603@gmail.com> <5270FCF2.1030209@pukruppa.de> In-Reply-To: <5270FCF2.1030209@pukruppa.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:32:42 -0000 On 30/10/2013 12:34, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > > On 10/30/13 11:21, Wei Guo wrote: >> 于 10/30/13, 4:29 PM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa 写é“: >>> Hi, >>> >>> as I can see there is a new default dns server shipping with FreeBSD 10: >>> unbound. >>> >>> When I try to set it up as described in >>> >>> http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ >>> >>> by typing >>> >>> # echo local_unbound_enable=yes >>/etc/rc.conf >>> # service local_unbound start >>> >>> I am locked out of my internet connection and nobody is served any dns . >>> So I guess something must be missing. >>> For example: Do I have to mount any devfs ? >> I guess you must have the following line in your ppp.conf: >> >> disable dns >> >> in order to stop ppp(8) from rewriting your /etc/resolv.conf. And you >> to can edit /var/unbound/forward.conf and /var/unbound/unbound.conf >> to meet your demands. > Thanks, that is a good hint - but it doesn't solve the problem. > As soon as I activate unbound I no dns requests from my machine (neither > from any other) will be answered. Hi, I Just tested this on a 10.0-BETA1 machine and am not having any issues. after starting local_unbound, whats the contents of your /etc/resolv.conf and the output of sockstat -4 | grep unbound ? for reverence mine is: root@bsdpkgbuild:~ # cat /etc/resolv.conf search mydomain.net # nameserver 192.168.11.1 # nameserver 192.168.11.2 nameserver 127.0.0.1 options edns0 root@bsdpkgbuild:~ # sockstat -4 | grep unbound unbound unbound 11042 6 udp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* unbound unbound 11042 7 tcp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* Vince > Greetings > > Peter >> >>> My machine has got two nics: one unconfigured to dial in to an ADSL >>> connection via DSL bridge and one with IP 192.168.10.1 to my LAN. >>> >>> With old named/bind all I need to set is >>> >>> named_enable="YES" >>> in /etc/rc.conf and >>> >>> listen-on { 127.0.0.1; >>> 192.168.10.1;}; >>> in /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your help >>> >>> Peter >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 13:54:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3211DBAF for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nanog@rsle.net) Received: from mx1.rsle.net (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1292E15 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prometheus.rsle.net (UNKNOWN [206.162.203.14] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.rsle.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA1DsLrJ027907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:54:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from nanog@rsle.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at antivirus.rsle.net Message-ID: <5273B287.8080000@rsle.net> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:54:15 -0400 From: "R. Scott Evans" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx1.rsle.net [206.162.201.2]); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:54:22 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:54:27 -0000 On 10/30/13 17:56, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Has anyone tried connecting OS X 10.9's Mail.app to sendmail with SSL? > > Server side all I get is: > >> sm-mta[53510]: STARTTLS=server, error: accept failed=0, reason=unknown, > > SSL_error=5, errno=0, retry=-1, relay=... > > Client side, the SMTP server is marked as offline, with no other > explanation. > Of course it all worked flawlessly until the customer decided to upgrade > from 10.8... > > I couldn't come a to a conlusion myself, but I'm seeing a lot of threads > about this out on the net; however, no solution is proposed. > > My guess is either a bug on the client side (as someone goes on to > suggest) or some exotic variation of the protocol... perhaps I need some > OpenSSL tweak? Some specific settings in sendmail's config? > > I tried both base's and ports' OpenSSL, but nothing seems to change. > > Any hint is appreciated. > > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I didn't think to test this until I saw this email but yeah after updating to 10.9 it no longer worked for me either. My almost identical error was: Oct 31 16:20:02 mailer sm-mta[88798]: STARTTLS=server, error: accept failed=-1, reason=unknown protocol, SSL_error=1, errno=0, retry=-1, relay=... and I fixed it in my Mac 10.9 Mail by going to "Mail > Preferences..." and under "Accounts" then "Account Information" and selecting "Edit SMTP Server List.." and finally under "Advanced", I changed from "Use default ports (25, 465, 587)" to "Use custom port" with the value of "587". I didn't change anything on the FreeBSD/Sendmail/SSL server side. Oct 31 16:26:39 mailer sm-mta[95592]: STARTTLS=server, relay=xxxxxxxx [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=NO, cipher=AES128-SHA, bits=128/128 Oct 31 16:26:39 mailer sm-mta[95592]: AUTH=server, relay=xxxxxxxx [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx], authid=XXXXX, mech=PLAIN, bits=0 Oct 31 16:26:40 mailer sm-mta[95592]: r9VKQcLs095592: from=, size=349, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<453C3868-D943-4861-8486-DFF788C7F3BE@YYYYYYY.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MSA, relay=... Hope that helps, -scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 15:27:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9512C7 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (mtumishi.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C902E2449 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91BBC7C5E; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:26:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5273C842.9010305@cyberleo.net> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:26:58 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130908 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Inputs and outputs in the right order References: <201311010256.rA12u1jx009134@x.it.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <201311010256.rA12u1jx009134@x.it.okstate.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:27:06 -0000 On 10/31/2013 09:56 PM, Martin McCormick wrote: > I know that expect does a great job of logging a session > but I am wondering if there is an easier way to get the shell > input echoed interwoven with all the output. In shorter words, > what is the easiest way to produce a session log that reads like > what actually happened when it happened? In bourne-compatible shells (/bin/sh, bash) run 'set -x' or pass the -x flag during invocation to turn on debug output. The shell will print out each command it is about to invoke. The output requires some interpretation, as it can get confusing in the presence of variable expansion, pipelines, and subshells; but it should be adequate for a simple list of commands. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 15:57:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CC1188 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crwhipp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x230.google.com (mail-qa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046B32615 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k4so708632qaq.0 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:57:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hq0rqntcY/c8HbqcqbhUfq1KXTT1NdnijdflFmX47B0=; b=P/QYvnDrFBVnb57RDy9p/0clxtlHfCpYiyTDMUj9jXRNBbw+qbig8WsL5gPqdMlX8x k2brHTDRxPjoBOwbRsKuCkwiRiD65rKveeYDUFnBGT858Ft87g1Ycf11zuwIni+ov/Fq xfXhkp2tI8zD7++hfeJzd61582hku8zqHXa250Oh+MyyCb38DVZpCBR65cZzEwjuZ2oL Tq1yoyAYUJCHz3JGpxtIGk9AZ3j2UYNtcN1LtmNvb9xVvUyt3iY3yFV+Gmons3QvGxxD 3wy1mpmiXUEzvNXjGhRAb1u1rd57FjQCLa8km1VPAVVJxZHbNfvGTqaBm4k73uL9lscd o9BA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.1.230 with SMTP id 6mr5041616qep.48.1383321455175; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.19.132 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:57:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20131031201101.GA3456@thinkpad.piggybox> References: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> <20131031201101.GA3456@thinkpad.piggybox> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:57:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Chromium rendering problem From: Craig Whipp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:57:36 -0000 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Peter Harrison wrote: > Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 20:56:03 +0000, LtCdData said: >> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:36:47 +0000 >> Peter Harrison wrote: >> >> > Hello list. >> > >> > I'm encountering a rendering problem in Chromium on 9.2-RELEASE. >> > >> > I updated my machine recently from 9.2-R from 9.1-R, and then ran a po= rt update which pulled in several updates - including bringing Chromium up = to 30.0.1599.101 from 30.0.1599.69, among other things. >> > >> > I now have a rendering problem in Chromium. On some sights, it will re= nder the page initially before the render is complete however the page blan= ks to white - no content visible at all. This happens consistently for exam= ple on www.theguardian.com/uk and play.google.com >> > >> > Other (presumably simpler) sites render fine - eg. www.freebsd.org. >> > >> > Any ideas where to look for a fix? I've tried disabling my only extens= ion (Vimium) to no effect. I've tried install a flashblocker (no difference= ). I don't have flash installed >> > >> > This is on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60 with 9.2-R i386 and a GENERIC kernel = using the intel xorg driver: >> > >> > xorg-7.7 X.Org complete distribution metaport >> > xorg-server-1.7.7_10,1 X.Org X server and related programs >> > xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_5 Driver for Intel integrated graphics chipsets >> > >> > >> > Thanks for your help, >> > >> > >> > >> > Peter Harrison. >> >> not sure if this is the same issue i had but...... >> >> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D15163 >> /etc/sysctl.conf >> kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=3D1 >> /etc/rc.d/sysctl restart >> > fixed it for me... _______________________________________________ > > > Thanks... > > But it's not that. > > I have kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set to 1 > > Without that, nothing works. > > With it some sites work (eg. www.freebsd.org), but some don't (www.thegua= rdian.com). > > I've now deleted and the installed again all my ports using the process i= n the portmaster manpage, just in case it was something that got disconnect= ed in the update to the latest chromium. > > Is anyone else seeing this? > > > > > Peter. > Yes. I have this exact problem, too. - Craig From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 16:10:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14B7AE8 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@rodperson.com) Received: from www6.pairlite.com (www6.pairlite.com [64.130.10.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9372746 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.118.32.120] (unknown [128.147.28.1]) by www6.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D161D67AEE; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:01:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5273D053.9070404@rodperson.com> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:01:23 -0400 From: Rod Person User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Whipp Subject: Re: Chromium rendering problem References: <20131029203647.GA3728@thinkpad.piggybox> <20131029205603.137c2eb6@avatar.davids-website.com> <20131031201101.GA3456@thinkpad.piggybox> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:10:37 -0000 On 11/1/2013 11:57 AM, Craig Whipp wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Peter Harrison > wrote: >> Is anyone else seeing this? >> >> >> >> >> Peter. >> > Yes. I have this exact problem, too. > > - Craig I also have this issue and I have never installed Chromium before, I had just installed it on 9.2 release to give it a try since the downfall of Opera. -- Rod So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand. -Thucydides History of The Peloponnesian War, 432BC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 16:29:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C49FFC5; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [216.70.247.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1AD2840; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0D82E444; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Draco.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [192.168.101.33]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDC22E43E; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRACO.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729]) by Draco.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729%10]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:29:03 -0700 From: Doug Sampson To: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Subject: RE: Problem w/ building p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 Thread-Topic: Problem w/ building p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.062 Thread-Index: Ac7VxvN8d/Pe/Pe9RcSvziDYbD9boAApE/YAAC0DqIA= Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:29:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.101.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:29:11 -0000 PiBGWUksIHJlYWTCoHBvcnRzLzE4MzQzNiBmb3IgZnVydGhlciBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4NCj4gDQo+ IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQo+IHN1bnBvZXQNCg0KVGhhdCB3YXMgaXQuIFRoYW5rcy4NCg0KfkRvdWcNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 16:36:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC0348C for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D07228F5 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA1GaMvq021035 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:36:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201311011636.rA1GaMvq021035@x.it.okstate.edu> From: Martin McCormick cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Inputs and outputs in the right order MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21033.1383323782.1@x.it.okstate.edu> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:36:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:36:26 -0000 CyberLeo Kitsana writes: > In bourne-compatible shells (/bin/sh, bash) run 'set -x' or pass the -x > flag during invocation to turn on debug output. The shell will print out > each command it is about to invoke. > > The output requires some interpretation, as it can get confusing in the > presence of variable expansion, pipelines, and subshells; but it should > be adequate for a simple list of commands. Thanks for a great suggestion. This is a perl script which runs omshell commands to adjust the data base on a pair of DHCP servers. omshell has no echo facility or this whole exercise would have most likely just worked. As it is, it does a fine job of modifying the DHCP servers but the output is the sort that would confuse and frustrate folks who aren't used to seeing hex representations of IP addresses and outputs that repeat existing data plus add the newest change so it's better to evaluate the results of what just happened and tell the caller, "Added abc.okstate.edu to dh1" or "failed to remove abc.okstate.edu from dh1." That is easy to do in a script when you can corral all the pieces of the puzzle in one list or array. When everything works, we do actually get enough echoed information to do this but if someone is trying to delete a system that doesn't exist, we only end up with a notice of an object not found and no name or identifying information that a caller could use to know what wasn't found. The person suggesting the use of the $| variable in perl is on to the right idea if I can ever get a log file containing the commands to omshell plus omshells output after each command. As with all such problems, one learns a lot. I was unaware of $| in perl and how it disables buffering if set to anything other than 0. I will also ask the dhcp discussion group if anyone has tricked omshell in to echoing. You can't give it a flag to do so or tell it to echo. We are in the realm of tricks to essentially get something to do what it is not designed to do. Most of us tinkerers don't mind that to an extent, but I never sease to be amazed at what ordinary tasks just refuse to work at times. Thank you, all. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 16:47:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F666DB for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7499298B for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id rA1Gl0RR055697; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:47:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5273DB04.4060600@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:47:00 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: headers in /usr/include are 9.1 but /usr/src/sys are 9.0 References: <52673D72.9080606@dreamchaser.org> <5267E5F1.7030202@ShaneWare.Biz> <5273D92F.1030004@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <5273D92F.1030004@dreamchaser.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:47:01 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:47:04 -0000 On 11/01/13 10:39, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 10/23/13 09:06, Shane Ambler wrote: >> On 23/10/2013 13:37, Gary Aitken wrote: >>> Using the generic kernel. Some time ago I upgraded from 9.0 to 9.1 >>> using freebsd-update. >>> >>> originally, under 9.0, I had lsof installed (from ports). >>> >>> Some time after all that I tried to reinstall sysutils/lsof and >>> couldn't. I wasn't desperate and ignored it... >>> >>> Looking into it further, the problem appears to be the result of >>> /usr/src/sys/sys/ containing 9.0.0 versions, and /usr/include/sys/ >>> containing 9.1.0 versions. >>> >>> I didn't think I had system source installed, but apparently I did. I >>> have vague recollections of telling the upgrade process not to >>> upgrade the source because I didn't think I had it installed; but >>> maybe it doesn't even ask. I'm not really familiar with the process >>> and it was a while back. >>> >>> Anyhow... >>> >>> 1. Is /usr/src/sys/sys always present? >> >> No. The system source files are optional. >> >>> 2. Do ports normally use headers from /usr/src/sys/sys instead of >>> /usr/include/sys if /usr/src/sys/sys is present? >> >> As I understand it the ports that would use /usr/src are ones that >> compile kernel modules. lsof would be an exception as I believe it >> accesses data structures from the running system to collect it's >> information, which are defined in the system sources. lsof should be >> compiled against the current system and complains when it isn't. >> >>> 3. What's the best way to fix this? freebsd-update fetch? >> >> freebsd-update is configured in /etc/freebsd-update.conf you should find >> an entry for Components which should contain src then update. >> >> Another option if you have subversion installed is to checkout the >> source tree straight from the svn servers. > > Finally got back to this. > > My freebsd-update.conf contains: > Components src world kernel > > I just did > freebsd-update fetch > freebsd-update install > and the source tree was not updated. > > Apparently it thinks the source is supposed to stay at 9.0.0 for some reason. > If I do an upgrade to 9.1 again, from a 9.1 system, will it upgrade only > those components which need upgrading, which in this case should be nothing > except src? Will it force an upgrade of the src? > > It would be handy if there were an option to show what work would be done > without actually doing it. Just realized the upgrade process spits out a summary and asks for confirmation, so I tried that but it doesn't even attempt the upgrade: # freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade freebsd-update: Cannot upgrade from 9.1-RELEASE to itself So... is there any way to get the source upgraded without going the svn route? Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 16:50:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D5C99F for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A5029DB for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id rA1GdBLc055672; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:39:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5273D92F.1030004@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:39:11 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shane Ambler Subject: Re: headers in /usr/include are 9.1 but /usr/src/sys are 9.0 References: <52673D72.9080606@dreamchaser.org> <5267E5F1.7030202@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <5267E5F1.7030202@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:39:12 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:50:19 -0000 On 10/23/13 09:06, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 23/10/2013 13:37, Gary Aitken wrote: >> Using the generic kernel. Some time ago I upgraded from 9.0 to 9.1 >> using freebsd-update. >> >> originally, under 9.0, I had lsof installed (from ports). >> >> Some time after all that I tried to reinstall sysutils/lsof and >> couldn't. I wasn't desperate and ignored it... >> >> Looking into it further, the problem appears to be the result of >> /usr/src/sys/sys/ containing 9.0.0 versions, and /usr/include/sys/ >> containing 9.1.0 versions. >> >> I didn't think I had system source installed, but apparently I did. I >> have vague recollections of telling the upgrade process not to >> upgrade the source because I didn't think I had it installed; but >> maybe it doesn't even ask. I'm not really familiar with the process >> and it was a while back. >> >> Anyhow... >> >> 1. Is /usr/src/sys/sys always present? > > No. The system source files are optional. > >> 2. Do ports normally use headers from /usr/src/sys/sys instead of >> /usr/include/sys if /usr/src/sys/sys is present? > > As I understand it the ports that would use /usr/src are ones that > compile kernel modules. lsof would be an exception as I believe it > accesses data structures from the running system to collect it's > information, which are defined in the system sources. lsof should be > compiled against the current system and complains when it isn't. > >> 3. What's the best way to fix this? freebsd-update fetch? > > freebsd-update is configured in /etc/freebsd-update.conf you should find > an entry for Components which should contain src then update. > > Another option if you have subversion installed is to checkout the > source tree straight from the svn servers. Finally got back to this. My freebsd-update.conf contains: Components src world kernel I just did freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install and the source tree was not updated. Apparently it thinks the source is supposed to stay at 9.0.0 for some reason. If I do an upgrade to 9.1 again, from a 9.1 system, will it upgrade only those components which need upgrading, which in this case should be nothing except src? Will it force an upgrade of the src? It would be handy if there were an option to show what work would be done without actually doing it. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 17:31:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD4CA99 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Received: from pukruppa.de (pd95cabe3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.92.171.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D02A2C29 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pukruppa.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pukruppa.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA1HV79W050604; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:31:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Message-ID: <5273E55B.3070705@pukruppa.de> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:31:07 +0100 From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vincent Hoffman , Wei Guo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to set up unbound on FreeBSD 10 References: <5270C384.9040502@pukruppa.de> <5270DDC0.2050603@gmail.com> <5270FCF2.1030209@pukruppa.de> <52738340.4050705@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <52738340.4050705@unsane.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:31:18 -0000 On 11/01/13 11:32, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > On 30/10/2013 12:34, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: >> >> On 10/30/13 11:21, Wei Guo wrote: >>> 于 10/30/13, 4:29 PM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa 写é“: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as I can see there is a new default dns server shipping with FreeBSD 10: >>>> unbound. >>>> >>>> When I try to set it up as described in >>>> >>>> http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ >>>> >>>> by typing >>>> >>>> # echo local_unbound_enable=yes >>/etc/rc.conf >>>> # service local_unbound start >>>> >>>> I am locked out of my internet connection and nobody is served any dns . >>>> So I guess something must be missing. >>>> For example: Do I have to mount any devfs ? >>> I guess you must have the following line in your ppp.conf: >>> >>> disable dns >>> >>> in order to stop ppp(8) from rewriting your /etc/resolv.conf. And you >>> to can edit /var/unbound/forward.conf and /var/unbound/unbound.conf >>> to meet your demands. >> Thanks, that is a good hint - but it doesn't solve the problem. >> As soon as I activate unbound I no dns requests from my machine (neither >> from any other) will be answered. > Hi, > I Just tested this on a 10.0-BETA1 machine and am not having any issues. > after starting local_unbound, whats the contents of your > /etc/resolv.conf and the output of sockstat -4 | grep unbound ? for > reverence mine is: > root@bsdpkgbuild:~ # cat /etc/resolv.conf > search mydomain.net > # nameserver 192.168.11.1 > # nameserver 192.168.11.2 > nameserver 127.0.0.1 > options edns0 > root@bsdpkgbuild:~ # sockstat -4 | grep unbound > unbound unbound 11042 6 udp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* > unbound unbound 11042 7 tcp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* Hello everybody, it seems I have found the way to work my setup: My /etc/resolv.conf must not be changed by unbound. I.e. After starting local_unbound I remove the lines nameserver 127.0.0.1 and options edns0 and uncomment the nameserver entries created by ppp. nameserver 217.237.151.51 nameserver 217.237.149.205 My /var/unbound/forward.conf I leave as it was generated: forward-zone: name: . forward-addr: 217.237.151.51 forward-addr: 217.237.149.205 and in my /var/unbound/unbound.conf I add some lines server: username: unbound directory: /var/unbound chroot: /var/unbound pidfile: /var/run/local_unbound.pid auto-trust-anchor-file: /var/unbound/root.key interface: 127.0.0.1 interface: 192.168.10.1 access-control: 127.0.0.0/8 allow access-control: 192.168.10.0/16 allow_snoop include: /var/unbound/forward.conf sockstat now gives me four lines: unbound unbound 50518 3 udp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* unbound unbound 50518 4 tcp4 127.0.0.1:53 *:* unbound unbound 50518 5 udp4 192.168.10.1:53 *:* unbound unbound 50518 6 tcp4 192.168.10.1:53 *:* Thanks for your help and support! Greetings Peter > Vince > >> Greetings >> >> Peter >>> >>>> My machine has got two nics: one unconfigured to dial in to an ADSL >>>> connection via DSL bridge and one with IP 192.168.10.1 to my LAN. >>>> >>>> With old named/bind all I need to set is >>>> >>>> named_enable="YES" >>>> in /etc/rc.conf and >>>> >>>> listen-on { 127.0.0.1; >>>> 192.168.10.1;}; >>>> in /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 19:03:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CB2D01 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lconrad@go2france.com) Received: from omx1.hctc.net (omx1.hctc.net [69.4.62.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82310217F for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hctc.net (unknown [69.4.62.44]) by omx1.hctc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA19114A0 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:55:21 -0500 (CDT) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=69.4.54.186; From: lconrad@go2france.com To: Subject: how to set PERL to right version Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:54:36 -0500 Message-ID: <5273f8ec.42f.2a9f1500.4cf3184e@go2france.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 69.4.54.186 X-Mailer: SurgeWeb - Ajax Webmail Client X-Authenticated-User: lconrad@go2france.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:03:05 -0000 FreeBSD mx1.hctc.net 7.2-RELEASE perl -v This is perl, v5.8.9 built for i386-freebsd-thread-multi-64int cd /usr/ports/mail/razor-agents/ make install ... Building package for razor-agents-2.84 ... Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/usr/ports/mail/razor-agents/work/razor-agents-2.84.tbz' tar: lib/perl5/5.8/man/man3/Razor2::Errorhandler.3.gz: Cannot stat: No such file or directory tar: lib/perl5/5.8/man/man3/Razor2::Preproc::deHTMLxs.3.gz: Cannot stat: No such file or directory tar: lib/perl5/5.8/man/man3/Razor2::Syslog.3.gz: Cannot stat: No such file or directory ... etc the problem is all the stuff is in lib/perl5/5.8.9/, not /5.8 How to tell make the correct dir? thanks Len From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 19:12:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30270E23 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@rsle.net) Received: from mx1.rsle.net (mx1.rsle.net [IPv6:2607:ff40:b0b::4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7E1F21FE for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prometheus.rsle.net (UNKNOWN [206.162.203.14] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.rsle.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA1JCeRB037147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:12:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@rsle.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at antivirus.rsle.net Message-ID: <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:12:35 -0400 From: "R. Scott Evans" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx1.rsle.net [206.162.201.2]); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:12:40 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:12:45 -0000 On 11/01/13 14:13, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 10/31/13 22:10, R. Scott Evans wrote: > > Hi Scott. > > First of all, thanks for your reply. > > >> and I fixed it in my Mac 10.9 Mail by going to "Mail > Preferences..." >> and under "Accounts" then "Account Information" and selecting "Edit SMTP >> Server List.." and finally under "Advanced", I changed from "Use default >> ports (25, 465, 587)" to "Use custom port" with the value of "587". I >> didn't change anything on the FreeBSD/Sendmail/SSL server side. > > I'm using port 465 and I tried manually setting it, but it did not help. > > Using 587, you mean you are using TLS, not SSL, right? > > bye & Thanks > av. I offer both SSL/TLS (465) and STARTTLS (587) to my users. In the Mac Mail I don't see an option for differentiating the connection security between SSL/TLS and STARTTLS other than specifying the port manually. There is a checkbox to Use SSL regardless of what port option is used (which I obviously have checked). Anyhow, I changed the port on my Mac to 465 and it still worked for me. Then again, I also just tried switching it back to the "default (25, 465, 587)" option for the port and it now works with that also, so I'm not sure what is going on? -scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 19:19:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAEDF50 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdlisten@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-x22e.google.com (mail-ea0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E96223D for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z15so2237889ead.5 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IAevtOMQDOGXGoiYFFZ35g2ldH59WPYO30O8NtOGFng=; b=B7V7nCyoHd6gpfaZ4hMmZWi84qru7yzAByx3ojWr569AxYUZ9baljKQPbH4Rda8DCj BLIRH+UPcUYRGw017K4uP129vh3fo2ib9lR3d5rYQWli0Ssi5XFgbX/YBrFYaA/e6Nst QKXUNufknwpRj3cx3IlkV7puL7l2DQoWmVYzx8ulP6UYfoEYpUNVmWFhxjmMfGo8KesC 5ZUqNJPGrN7hdCRVKjEXog8BnHpn4QB1LhQkUjYIrkCq1TmahN1XPPHgvU7xpzjuHItt TuDSSTUkoyFWnW/nkSIyc/nuqRSmC9edg5AxKEmf+tyWriiUMmPaW9GNLOKctqaHklfT G5tg== X-Received: by 10.14.122.132 with SMTP id t4mr4709286eeh.20.1383333562027; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arares-ThinkPad-X200 ([95.77.67.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r48sm11187267eev.14.2013.11.01.12.19.20 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:19:14 +0200 From: Rares Aioanei To: lconrad@go2france.com Subject: Re: how to set PERL to right version Message-ID: <20131101211914.080c51c6@arares-ThinkPad-X200> In-Reply-To: <5273f8ec.42f.2a9f1500.4cf3184e@go2france.com> References: <5273f8ec.42f.2a9f1500.4cf3184e@go2france.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:19:24 -0000 On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:54:36 -0500 lconrad@go2france.com wrote: ....... > > the problem is all the stuff is in lib/perl5/5.8.9/, not /5.8 > > How to tell make the correct dir? > You can simply use a symlink : "ln -s lib/perl5/5.8.9 lib/perl/5.8" -- Rares Aioanei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 20:13:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DED453 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B426B2599 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.137] (helo=smtp6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcKkt-00069h-Lc; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:51:39 +0100 Received: from 5419839c.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.131.156] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcKkt-0003eK-Er; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:51:39 +0100 Received: from [192.168.13.34] (peters-iphone.egypt.nl [192.168.13.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13E0239857; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:51:38 +0100 (CET) References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <41FDD162-5D7A-4F96-B226-CCFFA2D4A3EF@boosten.org> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B511) From: Peter Boosten Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:51:35 +0100 To: "R. Scott Evans" X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:13:36 -0000 >=20 > Anyhow, I changed the port on my Mac to 465 and it still worked for me. T= hen again, I also just tried switching it back to the "default (25, 465, 587= )" option for the port and it now works with that also, so I'm not sure what= is going on? >=20 >=20 There were several issues with Mavericks that required 'switching it off and= on again' (for instance the screen saver). Maybe this was one of them (alth= ough I didn't have any problems when connecting to postfix).=20 Peter= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 20:34:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14032EBC for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lconrad@go2france.com) Received: from omx1.hctc.net (omx1.hctc.net [69.4.62.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E933E26C7 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hctc.net (unknown [69.4.62.44]) by omx1.hctc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91031146E for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:35:14 -0500 (CDT) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=69.4.54.186; From: lconrad@go2france.com To: Subject: Re: Re: how to set PERL to right version Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:34:29 -0500 Message-ID: <52741055.42f.2bbe0400.3a5f1827@go2france.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 69.4.54.186 X-Mailer: SurgeWeb - Ajax Webmail Client X-Authenticated-User: lconrad@go2france.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:34:32 -0000 On Friday 01/11/2013 at 8:26 am, lconrad@go2france.com wrote: > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 36 Nov 1 14:24:50 2013 > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8@ -> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9 > > make install gives same errors > > Len > > > > On Friday 01/11/2013 at 2:19 pm, Rares Aioanei wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:54:36 -0500 >> lconrad@go2france.com wrote: >> >> ....... >> >>> >>> >>> the problem is all the stuff is in lib/perl5/5.8.9/, not /5.8 >>> >>> How to tell make the correct dir? >>> >> You can simply use a symlink : "ln -s lib/perl5/5.8.9 lib/perl/5.8" >> -- >> >> Rares Aioanei >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 1 20:35:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D34BF58 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3220626D8 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1329E21A50 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:35:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=/So013V6BUo4bxskyCPZLopVrRo=; b=aDec4 5MtpwYQivke2uWuJcJk8c8EXnRXdcSc+1FsropjgzxPPnBt7AbW5OEnkzoxTbSW6 7ce4x+0u6orcnKiaPdUMeMlcpHdL2atlm4lZyQh0Bm2gS7fV+u86B5aH9lcWKvcY dIOJQt2QdR6cguMeoI7U4XE7wmS7CCA+y4sW1Y= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id E95973214BD; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:35:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1383338122.25255.41759109.1F931A6B@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: LUukfCRYkKb6RKDWDhhCKjUkBQhG9JzXtBSzl3lyShf7 1383338122 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 Subject: Re: how to set PERL to right version Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:35:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5273f8ec.42f.2a9f1500.4cf3184e@go2france.com> References: <5273f8ec.42f.2a9f1500.4cf3184e@go2france.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:35:24 -0000 On Fri, Nov 1, 2013, at 13:54, lconrad@go2france.com wrote: > > FreeBSD mx1.hctc.net 7.2-RELEASE > Are you using an up-to-date ports tree? If so, it does not support FreeBSD 7.2. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 01:03:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DA4778 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 01:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seofreeservices12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x248.google.com (mail-ie0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B662925C2 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 01:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f200.google.com with SMTP id aq17so14512384iec.11 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SD8uC2aOvyJyQ2xHimtOAKi3VhE7gvevTa2j90FKOk8=; b=Fpa6d70Cl0+nCOnonbKmHzv2ehIiyndBVp3J9UtMuvnZIL6GEKo/3I5xRbjXnhiMQK 7QhHdID82S7WWJTbpMcwEDCYWu6sbNi/CdD1uC66F4swJoK/THTj3V0qj6ep59XqwrHD PAJ+aG1fzGfqjCuk/NrbRi0YCn9dPJO1E8NfgBYSpY5ctO9e3tX0vqg7a/V4G9B4VZHL NSnwjqYVHnlLbUp0szEw3V9dEQYvQLaIuJGhTgUtHWdbE7b9/I3fmrFWkKj6VQzdzM8J zn/6d0TfwVbGunyFD2c8wJtOV9t89R+uD96ptZF0z1eY2AR9fKST95Nm2+Fnw0RHPnZa jB0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.220.170 with SMTP id px10mr1799987obc.35.1383354196060; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001a11c1c5f074700604ea273fc4@google.com> Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 01:03:16 +0000 Subject: Freebsd.org - Integrated marketing help From: Chloe Lee To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 01:03:16 -0000 PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+PHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0i IzAwMDBmZiIgIA0KZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGI+RnJlZWJzZC5vcmc8L2I+ PC9mb250Pjxmb250ICANCmNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCBzYW5z LXNlcmlmIj6gVGVhbSw8L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9t OjBjbSI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMt c2VyaWYiPjxmb250PkkNCnRob3VnaHQgeW91IG1pZ2h0IGxpa2UgdG8ga25vdyBzb21lIHJlYXNv bnMgd2h5IHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IGdldHRpbmcNCmVub3VnaCBTb2NpYWwgTWVkaWEgYW5kIE9yZ2Fu aWMgc2VhcmNoIGVuZ2luZSB0cmFmZmljICANCmZvcqA8Yj5GcmVlYnNkLm9yZy48L2I+PC9mb250 PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBj b2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+MS4NCllv dXIgd2Vic2l0ZaA8Yj5GcmVlYnNkLm9yZ6A8L2I+aXMNCm5vdCByYW5raW5nIHRvcCBpbiBHb29n bGUgb3JnYW5pYyBzZWFyY2hlcyBmb3IgbWFueSBjb21wZXRpdGl2ZQ0Ka2V5d29yZCBwaHJhc2Vz LjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj4NCjxmb250 IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj4yLg0KWW91 ciBjb21wYW55IGlzIG5vdCBkb2luZyB3ZWxsIGluIG1vc3Qgb2YgdGhlIFNvY2lhbCBNZWRpYSAg DQpXZWJzaXRlcy48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBj bSI+DQo8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJp ZiI+My4NCllvdXIgc2l0ZSBpcyBub3QgdXNlciBmcmllbmRseSBvbiBtb2JpbGUgZGV2aWNlcy48 L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbSI+PGZvbnQgY29s b3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlRoZXJlDQph cmUgbWFueSBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGltcHJvdmVtZW50cyB0aGF0IGNvdWxkIGJlIG1hZGUgdG8geW91 ciB3ZWJzaXRlLA0KYW5kIGlmIHlvdSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGxlYXJuIGFib3V0IHRoZW0sIGFu ZCBhcmUgY3VyaW91cyB0byBrbm93DQp3aGF0IG91ciB3b3JraW5nIHRvZ2V0aGVyIHdvdWxkIGlu dm9sdmUsIHRoZW4gSSB3b3VsZCBiZSBnbGFkIHRvDQpwcm92aWRlIHlvdSB3aXRoIGEgZGV0YWls ZWQgYW5hbHlzaXMgaW4gdGhlIGZvcm0gb2YgYSA8Yj5XRUJTSVRFDQpBVURJVCBSRVBPUlQgZm9y IEZSRUU8L2I+LjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNt Ij4NCjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlm Ij5PdXINCmNsaWVudHMgY29uc2lzdGVudGx5IHRlbGwgdXMgdGhhdCB0aGVpciBjdXN0b21lcnMg ZmluZCB0aGVtIGJlY2F1c2UNCnRoZXkgYXJlIGF0IHRoZSB0b3Agb2YgdGhlIEdvb2dsZSBzZWFy Y2ggcmFua2luZ3MuIEJlaW5nIGF0IHRoZSB0b3ANCmxlZnQgb2YgR29vZ2xlICgjMS0gIzMgb3Jn YW5pYyBwb3NpdGlvbnMpIGlzIHRoZSBiZXN0IHRoaW5nIHlvdSBjYW4NCmRvIGZvciB5b3VyIGNv bXBhbnkmIzM5O3Mgd2Vic2l0ZSB0cmFmZmljIGFuZCBvbmxpbmUgcmVwdXRhdGlvbi4gWW91IHdp bGwNCmJlIGhhcHB5IHRvIGtub3cgdGhhdCwgbXkgdGVhbSBpcyB3aWxsaW5nIHRvIGd1YXJhbnRl ZSB5b3UgMTxzdXA+c3Q8L3N1cD4NCnBhZ2UgR29vZ2xlIHJhbmtpbmcgZm9yIG1vc3Qgb2YgeW91 ciB0YXJnZXRlZCBrZXl3b3JkIHBocmFzZXMgaW4gb3VyDQpzaXggbW9udGggb25nb2luZyBjYW1w YWlnbi48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbSI+PGZv bnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlNv dW5kDQppbnRlcmVzdGluZz8gRmVlbCBmcmVlIHRvIGVtYWlsIHVzIG9yIGFsdGVybmF0aXZlbHkg eW91IGNhbiBwcm92aWRlDQptZSB3aXRoIHlvdXIgcGhvbmUgbnVtYmVyIGFuZCB0aGUgYmVzdCB0 aW1lIHRvIGNhbGwgeW91LiBJIGFtIGFsc28NCmF2YWlsYWJsZSB0byBtZWV0IHlvdSBpbiBwZXJz b24gYW5kIHByZXNlbnQgeW91IHRoaXMgd2Vic2l0ZSBhdWRpdA0KcmVwb3J0Ljxicj4tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08V0JSPi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LTxXQlI+LS0tLS08YnI+QmVzdA0KUmVnYXJkcyw8YnI+PGI+Q2hsb2UgbGVlPC9iPjxicj5NYXJr ZXRpbmcNCkNvbnN1bHRhbnQ8YnI+PGJyPjxiPlBTDQpJOiA8L2I+SQ0KYW0gbm90IHNwYW1taW5n LiBJIGhhdmUgc3R1ZGllZCB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgYW5kIGJlbGlldmUgSSBjYW4gaGVscA0Kd2l0 aCB5b3VyIGJ1c2luZXNzIHByb21vdGlvbi4gSWYgeW91IHN0aWxsIHdhbnQgdXMgdG8gbm90IGNv bnRhY3QNCnlvdSwgeW91IGNhbiBpZ25vcmUgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBvciBhc2sgdG8gcmVtb3ZlIGFu ZCBJIHdpbGwgbm90DQpjb250YWN0IGFnYWluLjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9 Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj4NCjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJW ZXJkYW5hLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48Yj5QUw0KSUk8L2I+OiBJIGZvdW5kIHlvdXIgc2l0ZSB1c2lu ZyBHb29nbGUgc2VhcmNoIGFuZCBhZnRlciBoYXZpbmcgYSBsb29rDQpvdmVyIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0 ZSBJIHJlY29tbWVuZCB5b3UgdG8gaW1wbGVtZW50IGZ1dHVyZSB0ZWNobm9sb2dpZXMNCnN1Y2gg YXMgSFRNTDUgYW5kIFJlc3BvbnNpdmUgRGVzaWduIHRvIG1ha2UgeW91ciBzaXRlIG1vcmUgYWNj ZXNzaWJsZQ0KaW4gbW9iaWxlIHBob25lLCB0YWJsZXRzLCBkZXNrdG9wIGV0Yy48L2ZvbnQ+PC9m b250PjwvcD48L2Rpdj4NCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 01:04:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504B8939; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 01:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3CF25DB; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 01:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n12so5186535oag.26 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XR7rGrJfnGXR6k9IIv0SyiXmEovvreQ+rz8NEhR9a88=; b=HUZXFck9RJDh/KZhgPxKpNFeHsdfYT9HcL9/USbu4dBcwngSoc9oeUSr1DoLDlhSwI wm94ahn15/OiK8UnxIOr3H12uD5EjDLuTMxGinQVamGibLR89enORbiIbuMqfTp1kzOe 26nybOdnddWxFXxEvGRLhTEcXuxyW25LKGllnXRoozKhCcSyphRebXkuAlrJNhp7HrUR aij4Hf0h4kqoxs+L9cGnmFjuEi4kp4vOjlWe+mPT2XCfo/H4iPKr4EeXwyQ6+CHpC9F1 8dZvmxH4jK8Y5aiWBspu5rWdPUVg0t0knQICH2A4DE7kEsF2H69RKpcPUFps+g78QZkE N+nw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.78.227 with SMTP id e3mr4582961oex.5.1383354293348; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.19.115 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <001a11c1c5f074700604ea273fc4@google.com> References: <001a11c1c5f074700604ea273fc4@google.com> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:04:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Freebsd.org - Integrated marketing help From: Outback Dingo To: Chloe Lee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 01:04:54 -0000 =CE=D2=C3=C7=B2=BB=B8=D0=D0=CB=C8=A4=A3=AC=CF=D6=D4=DA=CD=A3=D6=B9=C7=EB=B7= =A2=CB=CD=D3=CA=BC=FE=B7=FE=CE=F1 On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Chloe Lee wrot= e: >

<**font color=3D"#0000ff" > face=3D"Verdana, sans-serif">Freebsd.org** color=3D"#0000ff"> Team, font>

>

<**font color=3D"#0000ff"> sans-serif">I > thought you might like to know some reasons why you are not getting > enough Social Media and Organic search engine traffic > for Freebsd.org.**

>

<**font color=3D"#0000ff"> sans-serif">1. > Your website Freebsd.org is > not ranking top in Google organic searches for many competitive > keyword phrases.

>

> 2. > Your company is not doing well in most of the Social Media > Websites.

>

> 3. > Your site is not user friendly on mobile devices.

>

<**font color=3D"#0000ff"> sans-serif">There > are many additional improvements that could be made to your website, > and if you would like to learn about them, and are curious to know > what our working together would involve, then I would be glad to > provide you with a detailed analysis in the form of a WEBSITE > AUDIT REPORT for FREE.

>

> Our > clients consistently tell us that their customers find them because > they are at the top of the Google search rankings. Being at the top > left of Google (#1- #3 organic positions) is the best thing you can > do for your company's website traffic and online reputation. You will > be happy to know that, my team is willing to guarantee you 1st > page Google ranking for most of your targeted keyword phrases in our > six month ongoing campaign.

>

<**font color=3D"#0000ff"> sans-serif">Sound > interesting? Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide > me with your phone number and the best time to call you. I am also > available to meet you in person and present you this website audit > report.
-------------------**-------------------------** > ---------------------
**Best > Regards,
Chloe lee
Marketing > Consultant

PS > I: I > am not spamming. I have studied your website and believe I can help > with your business promotion. If you still want us to not contact > you, you can ignore this email or ask to remove and I will not > contact again.

>

> PS > II: I found your site using Google search and after having a look > over your website I recommend you to implement future technologies > such as HTML5 and Responsive Design to make your site more accessible > in mobile phone, tablets, desktop etc.

> ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 02:37:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDF17CF for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 02:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x232.google.com (mail-oa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98FE62953 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 02:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j6so5268372oag.23 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:37:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; bh=u7W4AW1NoG8SciX4MbkFkbeq8I5JelO653P2FsXqjwI=; b=eGlO5/zvqqk4mwqzzhkjrVY3mqeJHsUJnSz27g2nWn2zfyRTvCNfCq6KRRsMiNGMge U6KcEfmQkmvjs72v4yda90f8l8IIbAJb0qA0VBSpWo3a4WiO1bKzdAzjEE06Ou99Au24 W0FeYYxYM1+wWdeQf5/leh2UJ6O6qbmuuSiWbU5YF9dyp/ZCJEf8r0KPy+x3e8VCB3Qv 0rwso3ToftfoJZtV2+JS6q5a5wspiG2MfB5D0bKTAsw3WDSi0GWpJ/wl+jMUs/rBqvED A1H5p41ed43npnIHgRHBkP4qk2xyZ9gsnXugLGjwATuBBwbQc2Z/tXST6iEeAoiOqjzC Sx2g== X-Received: by 10.182.125.65 with SMTP id mo1mr4841172obb.40.1383359864442; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tz10sm8027595obc.10.2013.11.01.19.37.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 19:37:43 -0700 (PDT) From: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: bcache for FreeBSD? Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:37:42 -0700 Message-Id: <93B87A48-A857-4A16-89B2-CA480A80C63C@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 02:37:45 -0000 Hi, Is there anything like this for FreeBSD; http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ - aurf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 06:12:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088FA3EB for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 06:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x230.google.com (mail-qa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD2A2342 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 06:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k4so1063766qaq.7 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:12:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sgqAVD/AB5Xr5SbuZGCvavHzbC9D20bXEyrqEdN5P2E=; b=RE0hjeTLpWr7lC9ra5sr5Q3R7PPcDRHGITuzfoDd/wTHcwxAY2tcTB070ttJ60nSaO dvH+7WPjyux6sGaEXILWaUGCdITOVH/JH9m3WkkVwYircjV/ebY9YlvXHbyR+sib6KzP rtXWKkzigAhLSJWUwP6YI7WyqgCYDnCmqXYF4aKt8kCU6YGAr7q/qwc7HoU+H/fZL9tz 06aNUtkuZdikaSKeAuOx1miQ7wnun8KFj7reU9V4pN9+N5jBBpGgL2u9unKeJ4vIlfAf jg1qtX+2i8c9VrNDLb6IPc6Xa8DDGGtxVVubRxP7dYWTy2upiSV7suPE08jGPc+DA3x9 iLAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.12.14 with SMTP id u14mr8690550qeb.74.1383372775969; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.207.66 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 23:12:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <93B87A48-A857-4A16-89B2-CA480A80C63C@gmail.com> References: <93B87A48-A857-4A16-89B2-CA480A80C63C@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 23:12:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5eGJOP3qz2hf2BdaP770RgGfBm0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bcache for FreeBSD? From: Adrian Chadd To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 06:12:57 -0000 Nope, but a geom module would be nice. Kent's a nice guy too. -adrian On 1 November 2013 19:37, aurfalien wrote: > Hi, > > Is there anything like this for FreeBSD; > > http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ > > - aurf > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 06:27:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16EF633; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 06:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x22c.google.com (mail-oa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC66223CD; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 06:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l20so5461839oag.3 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gYh1/4ajJY0/qkgvf6IWvQS1x1FlRtJJA1TIXctZENY=; b=atW5JwE6Er2pymXle/AfBNCo4cXqX6O30A7++XzcKjlx3jygDhekOCpUBfJk+TUTVZ uqBCzNh+nJorkCY35ARKoDB1Xe3gSy4GMssPbS7ZhaIPUVgHVhI7F098Gr1OMbsdDSS/ rzNM9y9InN1icHcJGPmCJv3OAqjb0bDRoiKV7hvb9p0AvGVPyoahcSf1tMtxA0jc8Z6u wWSBRX5XuV2kI3DmIdFX/ezVTN8BN2hbkNj2M04uBEN/fnpdsGr8Dn0eaxWzwHZRD8dm bswbvI6pSkCMry8Z0X0LBMup+aV8pkxo/JXFhdQGoL+fytMIxU14YRIEhlwyH5JmmYXl /xUg== X-Received: by 10.182.246.74 with SMTP id xu10mr5410802obc.23.1383373623316; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id it7sm18234160obb.11.2013.11.01.23.27.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 23:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bcache for FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 23:26:58 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <93B87A48-A857-4A16-89B2-CA480A80C63C@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 06:27:05 -0000 Does Kent have an affinity for good Scotch :) - aurf On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Nope, but a geom module would be nice. >=20 > Kent's a nice guy too. >=20 >=20 > -adrian >=20 >=20 > On 1 November 2013 19:37, aurfalien wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> Is there anything like this for FreeBSD; >>=20 >> http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ >>=20 >> - aurf >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 07:12:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29928B76 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from appleempire19@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-x230.google.com (mail-yh0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E439F259D for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f64so191905yha.21 for ; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 00:12:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=Rq3aX0PXk8G2aM8tHRiJS+s6uiHRNHsUPxdfxAo6yPc=; b=YhvsJhzi1EW4LXHHxJ3JrunB/SI/I+ixZoqOLNGjey5g19nfgHlK5Cv8pVE3/w2ow1 ogW7T8Ha6yy6YK69Xvpr+peOoO5rOkxLdaRdRTXVFnHPaB4JhxUUMaF/f/TFvhJFF890 rBrXqBA81io/wyXy8zg4TplWPfKQpDaSv/3EmeMMY67+iWwT8YoxFcB+C6g0oaVNvPyM U/QP5eooA9rLQ7rm4BreFvHj939gwjo3UXCl4H116kXQLDjfC0IjgS+ZyuoBWxW55bIg 6U/50JIxrYZpPgphQTbbamYAZoft5UIP/+t+DLNdST5XEmhHyJZs9V6FDkS+wkA0O1as TECQ== X-Received: by 10.236.59.7 with SMTP id r7mr5096544yhc.42.1383376326116; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 00:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.13] (c-24-126-198-115.hsd1.ga.comcast.net. [24.126.198.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v45sm10489342yha.2.2013.11.02.00.12.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Nov 2013 00:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Aquiring From: appleempire19@gmail.com Message-Id: <18A588AC-FA63-4B72-BABC-72E6BED49FB1@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 03:12:02 -0400 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:12:07 -0000 Would it be possible to buy the right to free bsd and a kernel structure? T= he entire distribution that's is.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 07:55:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE507F05 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BDCB2726 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA27toxI071875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:55:51 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk rA27toxI071875 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1383378951; bh=2YhVkIIibHlBvPrL+FBQ/DJI0LRbnuIeMyTztfXaxDY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Sat,=2002=20Nov=202013=2007:55:40=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Aquiring|References:=20<18A588AC- FA63-4B72-BABC-72E6BED49FB1@gmail.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<18A588AC-FA 63-4B72-BABC-72E6BED49FB1@gmail.com>; b=jmipF9juMjQ7nvv5NOwVlmqY1YX7byQDrL1yRyQ9vNDaRZ2KnZMx7OOlWSFX4pfPs 44ysx1kOeCDfcA5hO85i+7FOOVvFupQepAA5o64fzuAq8Yjhxsg2n00qguBn9QmJsF BKY6/jaIMzdaPnO9CeBYB7OpxJli4FjFjSD5ayGM= Message-ID: <5274AFFC.1030508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:55:40 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aquiring References: <18A588AC-FA63-4B72-BABC-72E6BED49FB1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <18A588AC-FA63-4B72-BABC-72E6BED49FB1@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=E7F39EBF Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iS6QkaAUmjh25c8nOEqlS5cGIoR6mxmUd" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:55:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iS6QkaAUmjh25c8nOEqlS5cGIoR6mxmUd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/11/2013 07:12, appleempire19@gmail.com wrote: > Would it be possible to buy the right to free bsd and a kernel structur= e? The entire distribution that's is. No. However, the license terms are very liberal. You can take the entire FreeBSD codebase and reissue it under a new license and charge whatever you want for it, so long as you do not remove the original copyrights or deny that you got the code from the FreeBSD project and its many contributors. Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --iS6QkaAUmjh25c8nOEqlS5cGIoR6mxmUd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSdLAGXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATQRkQAJTbr5yG6Q5yZ/xVMP5Xld4r frXylEL3BECWnFNAUXddGsKhQsUjyjD4fJyh49H+LttA9tvqs0YyqPUJz+2bHds2 zECwFoNSGBPuQZJs1l8+cPXyarFe4fQQqVouIrF9n7F44/aub0O2dWWrK4PKBFoa 4zAaVa+RNEU/Bnka/0DvENttbyQMqqzMPzpskpdKZsNYot3kPGdIg+HdCgFHA0A2 JD8R2uOX6EOLwKHMNS7ZxaKp0JpHFFyWf3Iw1RFwmD64S/Pox4Ss7WbeRLcDs/DF OsE2OWp4gnvpyXrHYa9yp5YRVPsoERyn0A67rT832oTUNQXGid2LkvMjyDPZLqNI IHwuRVpZcSqs5iSrz86sa3jMWzjwknNBSgjfa14wd2d44DYPeqBGXhXaK84UY9qv wMW4WlggWRAo/0LFhDRkZDglyIiV7h57dQ4mNAzKi+tG9AL7QEkfd+9V9/GpJwm4 lAdzdozMjxq2xIEu7YXi/iLHBPMQsmgc5o3YJqCetEseVxbbyWMPMA0w9Sm9q6Ib 45KSWnOPzTt0v2luzlZTahkYO7UjRAZ1wDD5OqbmkBil8HE+LEnlrH8tYdyMcZGC 3CViN9ihSzD+H1qMPnYN7k8gph+eGJKxCDnnWmRNYvll+UuVijn8tloxNzS/34qN wpUQO8soZXbWgMEdDkhG =ECYn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iS6QkaAUmjh25c8nOEqlS5cGIoR6mxmUd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 07:57:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9197C; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matts@bmihosting.com) Received: from mail.lampscaled.net (ip-66-181-1-67.cust.i2bnetworks.com [66.181.1.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAF692742; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bass (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lampscaled.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032F41702B; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 00:52:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.lampscaled.net Received: from mail.lampscaled.net ([127.0.0.1]) by bass (mail.lampscaled.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mWer5qFTP7kv; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 00:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (ip68-7-229-248.sd.sd.cox.net [68.7.229.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lampscaled.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64AEA17025; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 00:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bcache for FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Matthew Szubrycht In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 00:51:40 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2D8B9EE1-BAD5-485B-9EB6-71C8DE39BC71@bmihosting.com> References: <93B87A48-A857-4A16-89B2-CA480A80C63C@gmail.com> To: aurfalien X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:57:51 -0000 I'd chip in to such a noble cause :) On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:26 PM, aurfalien wrote: > Does Kent have an affinity for good Scotch :) >=20 > - aurf >=20 > On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >=20 >> Nope, but a geom module would be nice. >>=20 >> Kent's a nice guy too. >>=20 >>=20 >> -adrian >>=20 >>=20 >> On 1 November 2013 19:37, aurfalien wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> Is there anything like this for FreeBSD; >>>=20 >>> http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/ >>>=20 >>> - aurf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Matt Szubrycht 619-944-2927 "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would = probably never had happened." - Linus Torvalds From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 10:55:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E067A6 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4932E74 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1VcYrf-001CAp-F6>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:55:35 +0100 Received: from g226177206.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.226.177.206] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1VcYrf-002Jsr-Bx>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:55:35 +0100 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:55:34 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: CUPS and Epson Epson WF-3540 on FreeBSD 9.2/11.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <20131102115534.71afaa03@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/_30TaluENf=awroXZ6hIK+i"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.226.177.206 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:55:44 -0000 --Sig_/_30TaluENf=awroXZ6hIK+i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm about to purchase the Epson WF-3540DTWF and need to know whether this printer is also capacle of being run on FreeBSD. What I can see so far on www.openprinting.org is that Epson offers Linux BLOB drivers, wrapped as RPM or Debian DEB packages. There is no mentioning of FreeBSD or any other UNIXiod OS but Linux. It is also mentioned on the www.sane-project.org website, that this specific printer's scanner is working with Xsane/sane front- and backend, but it is, again, Linux via the binary, non-free/open driver. My question is whether I have a chance to get this printer run on FreeBSD as well. I intend to attach the printer as a network printer via a FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT CUPS 1.5.2 server. Any advice or suggestion will be appreciated. Oliver P.S. Since I do not subscribe the list, please CC me. --Sig_/_30TaluENf=awroXZ6hIK+i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSdNomAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N857cH/2fqK0QpTywuzKvFlGensVj1 z4qy65U9yWNqVdwEu9cPIPBeGS8xOtn2/2ipZ8UvjkK/FMz0rgBEVT2wImI8UjSf vZyiPExgnLnGYbS3Qt9t6ul/iqz4BrkTGwWMChe9SBZTX3v1+iBYjenuFD27kTyI PLRXTi8cXex+wi6FRoLVTCBEruHgxqpgCmbgfrI8mUeSONQ2s/qkrAOY4Ru5VP3l 7z7uGG+xpQhP9gttmx0bk+vVQEhPxwJxsyZtHdeHK2s9AlJFVICNOy3T/O8GNSQL gD6kJ10/9AWIOHyeDMZetuaBFsQgd3m/CSWdwzA2M5FuKp3wY3JOUsHJiAtjFX0= =m194 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_30TaluENf=awroXZ6hIK+i-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 18:35:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EBE773 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 18:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@vmeta.jp) Received: from glory.vmeta.jp (7c2952d4.i-revonet.jp [124.41.82.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C622C2278 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 18:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (softbank126005049169.bbtec.net [126.5.49.169]) by glory.vmeta.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 196762C4; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 03:35:48 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 03:35:44 +0900 From: Koichiro IWAO To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Elecom WDC-433SU2M USB wireless dongle timeouts waiting for MCU to initialize Message-ID: <20131102183543.GA29930@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:35:56 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to use Elecom WDC-433SU2M [1] possibly sold only in Japan. This dongle has Ralink RT2870 chip. It is mentioned in user's manual [2]. The manual is only available in Japanese but you can find "Ralink RT2870" in it. I confirmed output of usbconfig(8) and made a patch [3]. Its vendor id is as same as Edimax's. > ugen2.3: at usbus2, cfg=0 md=HOST > spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (160mA) Then I succeeded to recognize the dongle with my patched kernel. > run0: flags=8803 metric 0 mtu 2290 > ether 00:90:fe:xx:xx:xx > nd6 options=29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11b > status: associated > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 00:90:fe:9e:93:38 > inet6 fe80::290:feff:fe9e:9338%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd > nd6 options=23 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) > status: no carrier > ssid "" channel 1 (2412 MHz 11b) > regdomain JAPAN country JP authmode WPA1+WPA2/802.11i privacy OFF > txpower 23 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 wme bintval 0 However, it still doen't work with following messages. > run0: timeout waiting for MCU to initialize > run0: could not load 8051 microcode I also connected another run(4) dongle WLI-UC-GNM and it works perfectly. It means I've already written if_run_load="YES and runfw_load="YES" in loader.conf What can I do to use the dongle? [1] http://www2.elecom.co.jp/network/wireless-lan/adapter/wdc-433su2m/ [2] http://www.elecom.co.jp/support/manual/network/wireless-lan/adapter/WDC-433SU2M_users.pdf [3] http://w.vmeta.jp/temp/patch-wdc-433su2m.txt Regards, -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 2 20:02:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E4BA80 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6060B263B for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 4AE8869EE61 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:39:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA2Jd4wr072358 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:39:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA2JcsYw008459; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 20:38:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <527554CE.1040605@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:38:54 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "R. Scott Evans" Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> In-Reply-To: <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:39:17 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:02:54 -0000 On 11/01/13 20:12, R. Scott Evans wrote: > I offer both SSL/TLS (465) and STARTTLS (587) to my users. In the Mac > Mail I don't see an option for differentiating the connection security > between SSL/TLS and STARTTLS other than specifying the port manually. > There is a checkbox to Use SSL regardless of what port option is used > (which I obviously have checked). > > Anyhow, I changed the port on my Mac to 465 and it still worked for me. > Then again, I also just tried switching it back to the "default (25, > 465, 587)" option for the port and it now works with that also, so I'm > not sure what is going on? Thanks again. Would you mind sending me your .cf file, your FreeBSD, Sendmail, and OpenSSL version? Any other useful config file? Are you using a self-signed certificate? bye & Thanks av.