From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 02:27:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938D0DFB; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.208.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4116A3E3; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.151.189]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0531173A711; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:27:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.208.146]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.151.189]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45665-01; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (S01067cb21b2ff4ca.gv.shawcable.net [24.108.26.71]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D09D173A70F; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:27:50 -0400 (AST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: 9-STABLE -> NFS -> NetAPP: From: Marc Fournier In-Reply-To: <860054725.3050415.1360941671689.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:27:48 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <25D0357F-4E1A-457A-A046-87319864738C@hub.org> References: <860054725.3050415.1360941671689.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> To: Rick Macklem X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Baldwin X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:27:53 -0000 On 2013-02-15, at 7:21 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: >>=20 > Righto. Thanks jhb and kib for looking at this. >=20 > Btw John, PBDRY still gets set for sleeps in the sys/rpc code. = However, > as far as I can tell, it just sets TDF_SBDRY when it is already set > and seems harmless. (Since this code is supposed to be generic and not > specific to NFS, maybe it should stay that way?) >=20 > Also, since PBDRY on the sleeps sets TDF_SBDRY, I think the above = patch > is ok for stable/9 without your recent head patch. >=20 > Maybe Marc can test the above patch? 'k, not sure what you want me to 'test', but so far, patch has been = applied / live for ~21hrs, and no processes in state T =85