From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 4 05:27:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBB49BC for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 05:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x22e.google.com (mail-vb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B5942D6E for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 05:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id p13so1891743vbe.33 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=TJjKc7dhiFKEwe5aM+LbsrNIgjgGeXcE/wbqKlyjkog=; b=vqUMzPzLzCoGPJQGfWbAvVmhbGbfirK0e46XeVPpiRSZ408HWFe1XncqLsiFvt67e2 FVdTN6Evd+dUN9hM2h079EpaBlfHflZk74v+GQiZfuOelpCRMJ105mP8MlvcTsgrb+of sDF/ttqNhUD+5BQOcG/GhquatJM8cUREQqtvBu7XLZr8OkyEKn/j0K7RBx9hwGF5gXMV zg05z4sedYfIeCbUu5/+wVqu1Uaf1HflnCFKgWHWqSYR4Z4tMaI3g9tPsCmaAX10dqEu 5EA2VuFRjjm2Qdp8x3fSh/dYpgkVYcAPqMqwBYTXuJ9hO9Uo2/QBCB5LrwW7kpvsZXs+ H9Uw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.36.236 with SMTP id t12mr3511697vdj.95.1375594047781; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.38.134 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130802102100.GA11138@eris.bzerk.org> Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 09:27:27 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Strange sendmail behaviour after upgrade to 9.1-BETA2 From: Pavel Timofeev Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 05:27:29 -0000 Same thing on RELENG/9.2 2013/8/3 Pavel Timofeev : > 2013/8/2 Ruben de Groot : >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:54:08PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev typed: >>> I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine. >>> Same behaviour - Sendmail asks DNS only for AAAA record of mx server. >>> We don't use IPv6 in our company. >>> >>> 2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev : >>> > I wanted to say that sendmail asks only AAAA (IPv6) record of mx >>> > server, but not A (IPv4). >>> > Any ideas? >>> > >>> > 2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev : >>> >> Looks like my sendmail uses only IPv6 to resolve mx server dns name to >>> >> ip address. >>> >> >>> >> 14:59:50.793338 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.19032 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53417+ AAAA? xxx.ru. (24) >>> >> [13/98] >>> >> 14:59:50.793662 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.19032: >>> >> 53417* 0/1/0 (75) >>> >> 14:59:50.793696 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.55299 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53418+ A? xxx.ru. (24) >> >> Here it is definately asking an A record. > > And? It's not A record of mx server. > >>> >> 14:59:50.794087 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.55299: >>> >> 53418* 7/0/0 A 192.168.2.11, A 192.168.2.12, A 192.168.41.4, A >>> >> 192.168.14.12, A 192.168.34.100, A 192.168.34.110, A 192.168.44.19 >>> >> (136) >> >> And here is the reply. The quetion is more why is it repeating the same >> query (below) over and over. > > Yes, reply about xxx.ru, not about mx server's IP which is kalmar.xxx.ru > >> >> Ruben >> >>> >> 14:59:50.973445 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.29244 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53419+ MX? xxx.ru. (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.973754 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.29244: >>> >> 53419* 1/0/1 MX kalmar.xxx.ru. 10 (63) >>> >> 14:59:50.974061 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.56461 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53420+ AAAA? kalmar.xxx.ru. (31) >>> >> 14:59:50.974340 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.56461: >>> >> 53420* 0/1/0 (82) >>> >> 14:59:50.974570 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.28332 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53421+ AAAA? kalmar.xxx.ru. (31) >>> >> 14:59:50.974887 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.28332: >>> >> 53421* 0/1/0 (82) >>> >> 14:59:50.974919 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.21453 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53422+ AAAA? kalmar. (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.975290 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.21453: >>> >> 53422 ServFail 0/0/0 (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.975314 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.63038 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53422+ AAAA? kalmar. (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.975674 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.63038: >>> >> 53422 ServFail 0/0/0 (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.975749 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.38393 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53423+ AAAA? kalmar.xxx.ru. (31) >>> >> 14:59:50.976105 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.38393: >>> >> 53423* 0/1/0 (82) >>> >> 14:59:50.976176 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.45558 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53424+ AAAA? kalmar. (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.976483 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.45558: >>> >> 53424 ServFail 0/0/0 (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.976512 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.45297 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain: >>> >> 53424+ AAAA? kalmar. (24) >>> >> 14:59:50.976864 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.45297: >>> >> 53424 ServFail 0/0/0 (24) >>> >> >>> >> How to force it to use IPv4? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"