From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 06:42:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105EAC70; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 06:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3A129F5; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 06:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA02144; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:42:28 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VG1Mh-000HgK-Vk; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:42:28 +0300 Message-ID: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:41:32 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Mike Harding X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 06:42:31 -0000 on 01/09/2013 02:40 Adrian Chadd said the following: > > > > On 31 August 2013 10:35, Mike Harding > wrote: > > I've tracked this down to a single line, details in > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632. Basically, the code is > now doing a 'sti, hlt' vs. a 'sti' in some code that is only supposed to run > if idle is disabled. Given that 'hlt' is the idle instruction, this doesn't > seem right. > > > Wow, nice! > > Avg - can we get this fixed? Or just revert this! Thank you for trying to be helpful. But let's not jump to conclusions. BTW, I am following up on the problem in the PR. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 07:53:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EDC3AB for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 07:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7B92C3E for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 07:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id m14so998088wgh.31 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 00:53:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MNBOF/Ix1mpIV9bb7QwK+E4PvedOKabvUSezndd1PvA=; b=vdQ0Z/+5JNQMzoKYBP2z215YXvx3D//L2n4WosrYoNFdQSVYF0ujE9C4ixuBfK+e4V NH7I5ZRkjx56eN9OFSWunMjsnT5VjUlsq4EeKIk6dEJDLeLKF4PU87vM7h2bNv1m08Ag s4mpfJ88I/P/pZ9XjO4fHb0zQBcsCJRribZ4zktedj2Z64NUxjaMu8SXMBwrVo+XDxT7 7+O0xX6cpiaBUJKJRpe2ejKzzQtQoNmjpm7AadHaLqtFw5SjMIAVEk6Kwv3MWr2YYNAs C8R5M9dajd8iCEVZjq9bIU3Q8heEHEfVkXQt0CTfJrpPLdijGP3CQYLjTfy825uskK2I C6Bw== X-Received: by 10.180.37.227 with SMTP id b3mr1091245wik.24.1378022028843; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 00:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (58.33.91.91.rev.sfr.net. [91.91.33.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dr11sm9196357wid.3.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Sep 2013 00:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5222F285.20006@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:53:41 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130819 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some PR never seen to delete References: <1377894637267-5840455.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1377894637267-5840455.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:53:50 -0000 On 30.08.2013 22:30, Jakub Lach wrote: > Why would you want to have valid ones closed? > They are not all valids anymore. For instance burncd(1) is deprecated and does not work with ahci IIRC. I don't have xfce4 crash anymore. And the random ACPI panics have been fixed. For the other, they are almost 3 years old. Cheers From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 09:48:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D576D8 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scdbackup@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0535A2286 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scdbackup.webframe.org ([87.167.183.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lh7M3-1VlKLM3h4h-00oTEH for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 11:48:20 +0200 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 11:47:35 +0200 From: "Thomas Schmitt" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <17644646325771834813@scdbackup.webframe.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:FAb0BJY3MpfkN02sIoziqP/2wn421TzVE5txDEHfreZ8w5G6R4a RZ4ayakjaJA3on861oaNHYAkZ/cbALCvVeQqcgn/l8uuUxNLPV/oq215PciX3ckcumFAlIN r2M0OPaosTctk/LuXxqaLkwa6QuHwaOW1pz56QigJ0JC7hhvawLlp5WmemqFE/NKI+Sq63I RpzSlb4byZ0Bp8FXtnJow== X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:48:22 -0000 Hi, sorry for breaking this message thread. I was not subscribed when i found it and so i have no Message Id to refer to. I am only a casual user of CAM for DVD burning (once per release cycle of libburn). But i can analyse some of the relation between growisofs and the error messages. > when a blank is inserted: > Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for this track) > ... > Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 I doubt that his is caused by growisofs, which knows how to recognize a blank DVD. It is not overly smart to try reading from a blank medium. Whatever process or driver did this, it should have checked the reply of READ DISC INFORMATION for Disc Status first. The reaction of the drive is plausible in this case. Especially the caller was able to bring a READ command to the drive and to get an answer. So there is, at least partly, access to the drive. > :-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for device. The message with the frown comes from growisofs.c. union ccb ccb; ... ccb.ccb_h.func_code = XPT_GDEVLIST; if (ioctl (in_fd,CAMGETPASSTHRU,&ccb) < 0) There are also two occasions in transport.hxx. All three are associated with function code XPT_GDEVLIST. Both identifiers bring me to http://www.unix.com/man-page/FreeBSD/4/pass/ If the call in growisofs.c had succeeded, then growisofs.c would have used the result for sprintf (pass,"/dev/%.15s%u",ccb.cgdl.periph_name,ccb.cgdl.unit_number); cam = cam_open_pass (pass,O_RDWR,NULL); ... ioctl_handle = (void *)cam; In transport.hxx, a private variable cam is set by a similar gesture and later used to send SCSI commands: if ((ret = cam_send_ccb(cam, &ccb)) < 0) So i assume the failed ioctl is essential for growisofs to get a connection to the drive. -------------------------------------------------------------- My own software libburn does not use ioctl CAMGETPASSTHRU in its FreeBSD adapter. It opens e.g. d->devname = "/dev/cd0" by: cam = cam_open_device(d->devname, O_RDWR); ... d->cam = cam; and then sends SCSI commands via err = cam_send_ccb(d->cam, ccb); See also libburn/sg-freebsd.c of: http://www.freshports.org/devel/libburn (Ping: The stable release is 1.3.2 meanwhile, not 1.2.4.) > /sbin/dump -0u -L -C16 -B4589840 -P 'growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0' /u The equivalent with program cdrskin out of the libburn port would be ... -P 'cdrskin -v dev=/dev/cd0 -eject -' ... I am not sure whether growisofs does the auto-eject/auto-reload dance on FreeBSD. One should eject after burning to force the device drivers into forgetting their cached medium status. If you want to keep DVD-R or DVD+R writable for further sessions, then add option -multi (won't work with DVD+RW and alike). -------------------------------------------------------------- > The actual program, cdrecord, works when invoked from the command line. growisofs does not depend on cdrecord, but rather on mkisofs. It does all its burning activities on its own. To my opinion, it handles the various media types more properly than cdrecord. -------------------------------------------------------------- About the "/dev/fd/0" discussion: The growisofs command growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0 surely pipes the standard input of growisofs into a burn run on /dev/cd0. The pseudo-path "/dev/fd/0" is not used with open(2) or alike, but interpreted in growisofs.c main(): if (sscanf(in_image,"/dev/fd/%u",&imgfd) == 1) imgfd = dup (imgfd); /* validate descriptor */ I.e. growisofs uses "/dev/fd/" as keyword to obtain the number of an open file descriptor. In this case: 0 = standard input. -------------------------------------------------------------- Have a nice day :) Thomas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 14:21:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7C8AE7 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62D582E3C for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hz10so4186171pad.2 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1P8urz8Sg34+IeYuT8/XNCz6KsqN/mIx7rAypfQRtbo=; b=A83blmdcOibFRCc2OsRUTdFdryfeVdBpM6GQd1+oLlw1CFCEtVp4RPKsGvpHgq+XoN EM9egXfwhowUpW+KMyNlrRvkMnF8UuzTft7aMnfwaIgGkIgfRMLcaTj0h95EAsv7XaxS ytjU3JFygDh32G5GDGhAjAXt4ER+WSPK6iF80= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=1P8urz8Sg34+IeYuT8/XNCz6KsqN/mIx7rAypfQRtbo=; b=K4Pz4wwxKH5cCmjN/kjssgBMVAPNSCQlhQH80e9i1/ZATRmZfRTVTA2QQXoMnS47s/ oOetITWEXooBIO4K3IkDLH+budApDwlJPaXRWFveJrMh1HYWGNr8jrc1Iaj5vhmRcmcQ H0j5HNjUMwMdFVe1SdiGZtQne1wlEE2hIm0RGL9qR2+ISS03tTv0ePap6eMPOTySlovR k4bFN/vZBLMp0dq4+hLH85QXw1eVn5/kMm9Q1j56bR68rnFxTN1oEKY/KXebSHwm9WxC 1/4hRczK0BjyQ0aYP7ZyJdZVexTfIn8heNkOLJMSUtuMEl86+k/iypK9QaFTZGAWe5/s H/eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlh44s6g/zev4ScqCJLvhmpSk96FPYMlJ8fA483F2q95FpNYBuuXn2NIOILvomuff9j2SL5 X-Received: by 10.66.156.199 with SMTP id wg7mr21179447pab.81.1378045290008; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 07:21:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.6.3 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 07:20:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5222F285.20006@gmail.com> References: <1377894637267-5840455.post@n5.nabble.com> <5222F285.20006@gmail.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 10:20:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some PR never seen to delete To: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:21:30 -0000 On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:53 AM, David Demelier wrote: > On 30.08.2013 22:30, Jakub Lach wrote: >> Why would you want to have valid ones closed? >> > > They are not all valids anymore. For these, they should be closed. I closed 2010/09/16 kern/150628 [acd] [ata] burncd(1) can't write to optical drive 2011/01/25 ports/154288 glewis[patch] games/nethack*: remove old ports and cleanup latest 2012/12/23 ports/174650 xfcex11-wm/xfce4 crash with Which of the others are completely invalid now (as opposed to just old?) >For the other, they are > almost 3 years old. Merely being old doesn't mean they won't be fixed: I have committed fixes for 10 year old PRs. ;) -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 14:48:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAE24DD for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lausts@acm.org) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0CA206F for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:47:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fJG7LOme c=1 sm=0 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:17 a=I9A6gpd8bSkA:10 a=s75quw-ptJ0A:10 a=kWQ6D_09QQAA:10 a=kHc8Q_KJ-KsA:10 a=N54-gffFAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=vT9F0_NJh1UA:10 a=XqXNuob2AAAA:8 a=wSQ68h_lKC2m9akZxD4A:9 a=vU1HVcDkLOncnzhY:21 a=5V9nXmYSBQLDN4RN:21 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 98.31.3.233 Received: from [98.31.3.233] ([98.31.3.233:47720] helo=mail.laus.org) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 14/B0-27973-89353225; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:47:53 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (laust2 [192.168.1.100]) by mail.laus.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r81ElqS1003356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 10:47:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lausts@acm.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.laus.org: Host laust2 [192.168.1.100] claimed to be [192.168.1.100] From: "Thomas Laus" Organization: ABB To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 10:47:52 -0400 Subject: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer - Maybe ATA Related Message-ID: <52235398.5531.1DE273@lausts.acm.org> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lausts@acm.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:48:00 -0000 > I am only a casual user of CAM for DVD burning (once per release cycle of libburn). But i > can analyse some of the relation between growisofs and the error messages. >> when a blank is inserted: >> Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error >> Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition >> Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal >> mode for this track) >> ... >> Aug 30 11:04:41 shack kernel: (cd0:ata3:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 > I doubt that his is caused by growisofs, which knows how to recognize a blank DVD. > > It is not overly smart to try reading from a blank medium. Whatever process or driver did this, > it should have checked the reply of READ DISC INFORMATION for Disc Status first. > > The reaction of the drive is plausible in this case. Especially the caller was able to bring > a READ command to the drive and to get an answer. So there is, at least partly, access to the > drive. > This error concerning a blank disk in the drive on the system console is long standing and I have been ignoring it for a while. It is a 'red herring' on this problem. Thank you for this information, it gives me a little more information. >> :-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for device. > The message with the frown comes from growisofs.c. > > union ccb ccb; > ... > ccb.ccb_h.func_code = XPT_GDEVLIST; > if (ioctl (in_fd,CAMGETPASSTHRU,&ccb) < 0) > > There are also two occasions in transport.hxx. All three are associated with function code > XPT_GDEVLIST. Both identifiers bring me to http://www.unix.com/man-page/FreeBSD/4/pass/ > > If the call in growisofs.c had succeeded, then growisofs.c would have used the result for > sprintf (pass,"/dev/%.15s%u",ccb.cgdl.periph_name,ccb.cgdl.unit_number); cam = cam_open_pass > (pass,O_RDWR,NULL); ... ioctl_handle = (void *)cam; In transport.hxx, a private variable cam > is set by a similar gesture and later used to send SCSI commands: > > if ((ret = cam_send_ccb(cam, &ccb)) < 0) > > So i assume the failed ioctl is essential for growisofs to get a connection to the drive. > I think that this is the root cause of my problem. That is why I am starting another thread on this topic. I don't have this problem using the dump utility on my laptop running FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 like I have on the other computers. The only difference is that the laptop uses AHCI and all of my other computers use ATA. I had an old drive on the shelf that still had FreeBSD 9.1 STABLE from last Winter that I was going to install to see if my problem existed before FreeBSD 9.2 tag was released. That drive sat too long and won't spin up. Could someone else try to make a 'dump to DVD' backup using the example at the bottom of the DUMP (8) man page to confirm that it works or doesn't for them? /sbin/dump -0u -L -C16 -B4589840 -P 'growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0' /u I will enter a PR if my results are duplicated. It doesn't work for me on 3 ATA based computers using new drives and media. It DOES work on one AHCI based computer. Tom -- Public Keys: PGP KeyID = 0x5F22FDC1 GnuPG KeyID = 0x620836CF From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 15:03:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B488AF for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from amailer.gwdg.de (amailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB7C21B1 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p5dc3f34c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.195.243.76] helo=krabat.raven.hur) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VG9BH-0004Xx-Ct; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 17:03:11 +0200 Message-ID: <52235729.3080406@gwdg.de> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 17:03:05 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130808 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: Some PR never seen to delete References: <1377894637267-5840455.post@n5.nabble.com> <5222F285.20006@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: David Demelier , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:03:23 -0000 Am 01.09.2013 16:20, schrieb Eitan Adler: > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:53 AM, David Demelier wrote: >> On 30.08.2013 22:30, Jakub Lach wrote: >>> Why would you want to have valid ones closed? >>> >> >> They are not all valids anymore. > > For these, they should be closed. > > I closed > > 2010/09/16 kern/150628 [acd] [ata] burncd(1) can't write to optical drive > 2011/01/25 ports/154288 glewis[patch] games/nethack*: remove old ports > and cleanup latest > 2012/12/23 ports/174650 xfcex11-wm/xfce4 crash with > > Which of the others are completely invalid now (as opposed to just old?) May I suggest two ports more, which were not mentioned on the list before: 2013/07/30 ports/180945: gdal-1.10.0 committed on 20130821. 2013/08/30 ports/181667: openoffice-devel fix committed on 2013/08/31 > >> For the other, they are >> almost 3 years old. > > Merely being old doesn't mean they won't be fixed: I have committed > fixes for 10 year old PRs. ;) > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 16:40:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020A317B for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scdbackup@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0E626BA for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scdbackup.webframe.org ([87.167.183.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MMCFR-1VNbMD0wwf-0084Sp for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 18:40:48 +0200 Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 18:40:03 +0200 From: "Thomas Schmitt" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <52235398.5531.1DE273@lausts.acm.org> In-Reply-To: <52235398.5531.1DE273@lausts.acm.org> Message-Id: <22596646334175747437@scdbackup.webframe.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hfmqlgrYyTd0pzm9hWceYOtkXkyJmC1c4noaBkOdBpr/VWOT/Tn zuv5W6VkPbiN4Y82YI6ijlasIJaJxzDgI8Kk8ghyN8lGFgfaJS9HADaNlBhr7TNzaH0YHAg QdaSX8YR0M0bBLumIM0AMgB2vlv8uKNReIR4/yXhY0iGZLMXv1JClOZC/sAAnEEx7uunqzG lzdVXSV/Zd1TJAuxL71LQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 16:40:56 -0000 Hi, > >> :-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for device. > > Could someone else try to make a 'dump to DVD' backup [...] > /sbin/dump -0u -L -C16 -B4589840 -P 'growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0' /u A test with less disk load would be to write e.g. 100 MB of zeros to e.g. DVD+RW media (in order to reduce waste): dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100 | growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0 Have a nice day :) Thomas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 20:40:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D141E88A; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152DB24A7; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id l18so333041wgh.16 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 13:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+pP6GjNDfUDbLgtBGg2rfZsLHmha8o//3ObcRKQoPmk=; b=tL3fWtYqwEyKhAX4y7eKGLmKqz++dOrsKzWp24rrFDc8zgrU6EFkgIUjs0gi6aYADC qN2S8ff+Mx1Rqjy+hg8tqMd/vpQtv1IzeR70GXuPRSvGDUthrnnqwNrCwhPI/SalnSfk 7Pb36xyOyK/UTtKf+AlUbOARhBNUdOA3c0t2ODsJngakRxdUmZlV8XYNF47jhvcvT53Q EKfsDZGBW+u7MdxM6xjzeuP0hqTXwAL+3jCMxMekLo8C0iopNHH9cjaAidQpscuL+RYY aVBjA372NUa8CW99gDrDWEfiK3OU8PQ6bt7PGiX7V7YCyssupZukkhBO0K8RiH0yb591 8qsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.37.164 with SMTP id z4mr10911294wij.30.1378068041804; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 13:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.146.2 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 13:40:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 13:40:41 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BayHoyoSKTHzmC1H4Y09Zfzfotc Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Adrian Chadd To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Mike Harding X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 20:40:44 -0000 On 31 August 2013 23:41, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > I've tracked this down to a single line, details in > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632. Basically, the > code is > > now doing a 'sti, hlt' vs. a 'sti' in some code that is only > supposed to run > > if idle is disabled. Given that 'hlt' is the idle instruction, this > doesn't > > seem right. > > > > > > Wow, nice! > > > > Avg - can we get this fixed? Or just revert this! > > Thank you for trying to be helpful. But let's not jump to conclusions. > BTW, I am following up on the problem in the PR. > Sure, I'd like to know why it's behaving badly. But since we're so close to 9.2-REL, do you think you can get it sorted out and bug-free on all the existing platforms that people are using 9.2 on (including server, desktop and laptop) without reverting it? Reverting and fixing it later seems like the safest option to me. Is there a bigger problem that you tried to fix in that patch that wasn't as obvious? Thanks, -adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 21:36:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB63F410; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 21:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53CD26CA; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 21:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA11313; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:36:12 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VGFJc-000Ip7-EG; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:36:12 +0300 Message-ID: <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:35:15 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Mike Harding X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 21:36:21 -0000 on 01/09/2013 23:40 Adrian Chadd said the following: > On 31 August 2013 23:41, Andriy Gapon > > wrote: > > > > > I've tracked this down to a single line, details in > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632. Basically, the code is > > now doing a 'sti, hlt' vs. a 'sti' in some code that is only supposed > to run > > if idle is disabled. Given that 'hlt' is the idle instruction, this > doesn't > > seem right. > > > > > > Wow, nice! > > > > Avg - can we get this fixed? Or just revert this! > > Thank you for trying to be helpful. But let's not jump to conclusions. > BTW, I am following up on the problem in the PR. > > > Sure, I'd like to know why it's behaving badly. But since we're so close to > 9.2-REL, do you think you can get it sorted out and bug-free on all the existing > platforms that people are using 9.2 on (including server, desktop and laptop) > without reverting it? Do you have any evidence that there is anybody else besides Mike who has this problem? Also, I usually try to "sort out" things after there is a clear understanding of what the problem is and how it should be fixed. > Reverting and fixing it later seems like the safest option to me. Is there a > bigger problem that you tried to fix in that patch that wasn't as obvious? I do not see any problem with the code*.* I do not see any explanation of the root cause of the problem that Mike has. I do not see why anything has to be reverted. Especially because "since we're so close to 9.2-REL". Just in case, I'll remind that the commit in question is in stable/9 since Dec 23 2012. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 21:58:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC288C0; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 21:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F25E027AC; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 21:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w60so3495991wes.29 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dhzOgP9Evd6NgojDkPJFJmWBRsN7wJL70CV2/JYUltk=; b=AcIyR8EXmFrSKN9qtruQZXPjMVM4oTZbpvKOSXOq00j5FkyRk+LjIXhWXkytxFnSCF Cc+k9QCVYN8KqUu17RVPadQxj+SnMFYciXh/cwBrf6YVDjp3r/IVKq2hIosZnCikOVI5 ShA2jcMLDKuyv+KPo9KZ1V5awS14VGHSeQUdymLqq7xFBVTfwGBoN+0myanbJZQBkZso aW2s/5twXuFmApwzFlH8ERRSmaN4KA2puiEwLpTLvi/nE/jvh/Z7iPxzZNOHGud8r7mq FmP8PowSn7BAw0jzox0UWQF4pUSromNzmhEWwOE4H8EIK48a+xXF5iAEbd35EJdFJYN4 UF4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.42 with SMTP id o10mr11236796wia.0.1378072709730; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.146.2 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:58:29 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: H7DTAwVcmUqmrfEMXuEtRmfdKZ8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Adrian Chadd To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Mike Harding X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 21:58:32 -0000 On 1 September 2013 14:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Do you have any evidence that there is anybody else besides Mike who has > this > problem? > Nope! but we can't assume that users are reporting all the system slowdowns. And honestly, I've heard enough strange stories on mailing lists and IRC of things like "during disk IO, blah would be really slow, when I change timekeeping or halt from ACPI to something else, things get better." So I can't discount that this is affecting people and they either don't know, or just chalk it up as "shitty hardware." Also, I usually try to "sort out" things after there is a clear > understanding of > what the problem is and how it should be fixed. > > Well, the big change is that it's now going into a sleep state on a HT core, right? Are you able to go into an ACPI sleep state on a HT logical CPU, rather than the physical core? Or am I mis-understanding what's going on? > > Reverting and fixing it later seems like the safest option to me. Is > there a > > bigger problem that you tried to fix in that patch that wasn't as > obvious? > > I do not see any problem with the code*.* I do not see any explanation of > the > root cause of the problem that Mike has. I do not see why anything has to > be > reverted. Especially because "since we're so close to 9.2-REL". > Just in case, I'll remind that the commit in question is in stable/9 since > Dec > 23 2012. > > Right, but I also know a lot of people who just have stayed with 8.x or 9.0-RELEASE and haven't bothered upgrading. Again, I can't assume that everyone has been keeping up to date with stable/9 and providing feedback. Thanks, -adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 22:04:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A062C20; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 22:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4984E2807; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 22:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA11670; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 01:04:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VGFlE-000Irc-3P; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 01:04:44 +0300 Message-ID: <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 01:03:47 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Mike Harding X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 22:04:47 -0000 on 02/09/2013 00:58 Adrian Chadd said the following: > On 1 September 2013 14:35, Andriy Gapon > wrote: > > > Do you have any evidence that there is anybody else besides Mike who has this > problem? > > > > Nope! but we can't assume that users are reporting all the system slowdowns. Why? > And honestly, I've heard enough strange stories on mailing lists and IRC of > things like "during disk IO, blah would be really slow, when I change > timekeeping or halt from ACPI to something else, things get better." So I can't > discount that this is affecting people and they either don't know, or just chalk > it up as "shitty hardware." Strange stories are just that. > Also, I usually try to "sort out" things after there is a clear understanding of > what the problem is and how it should be fixed. > > > Well, the big change is that it's now going into a sleep state on a HT core, right? > > Are you able to go into an ACPI sleep state on a HT logical CPU, rather than the > physical core? Or am I mis-understanding what's going on? Most likely. I do not see how the change is HT-specific or HT-related at all. > > > Reverting and fixing it later seems like the safest option to me. Is there a > > bigger problem that you tried to fix in that patch that wasn't as obvious? > > I do not see any problem with the code*.* I do not see any explanation of the > root cause of the problem that Mike has. I do not see why anything has to be > reverted. Especially because "since we're so close to 9.2-REL". > Just in case, I'll remind that the commit in question is in stable/9 since Dec > 23 2012. > > > Right, but I also know a lot of people who just have stayed with 8.x or > 9.0-RELEASE and haven't bothered upgrading. Again, I can't assume that everyone > has been keeping up to date with stable/9 and providing feedback. I am positive that it's not everyone who uses (up-to-date) stable/9. Still, I believe that a user-base of stable/9 is >> 1. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 22:21:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0647D104; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 22:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2AE28DD; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 22:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id cb5so15265wib.9 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:21:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FILi6APwSH5WlkfZUnUVfArsNjrZgEFnxsohfYyQBTA=; b=cG22GVf7DKi+PITKaOhuHURT06G7+NdA6w5pVlHvxLrcx2JkpH4uIWkMJcjX9cFyQJ a6W8wo91esmQdK0/pcZhFntoScpMSN+/MHiV6wdE+ed6rU13shDXPiRVixm3pYltwD0s 5EwvyXFEZlExd017FVCCiBIKvrhtKLsYNhZJ9oY3XwLKcjfNGnfi3aZA8+3oVRAB0x6e prKdBSILEq1EiC6f9RDxOROv0VOiQLd5jwEKEy6QAwC234lFdmUoMyTiVtGojlDfxLKe OY068CCaDPyj/foral0TyIVy2gzh7artyeAZ+yqzRAJGyCOxcECN9PxKiBC1jgGxnQO2 3XGw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.72.198 with SMTP id f6mr11085195wiv.46.1378074115345; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.146.2 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:21:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 15:21:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: O2pV1mL9kRhK0-9h-NvtKy0XVcw Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Adrian Chadd To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Mike Harding X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 22:21:58 -0000 .. well, when is that pointer NULL? It looks like it's supposed to be NULL for one pair of the two HT CPUs? Are you taking the whole core into an ACPI idle state if one of two logical CPUs representing a core is going idle? -adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 23:13:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596CF8F0; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 23:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mvharding@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673D52BC1; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 23:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c11so1236342wgh.1 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tlSW+JdT/E5H9P5CaLXK50Q6dqSTE19VjOYwNyanDFk=; b=PHzbjgBUeRIs6MXrgKtUMeJcepFwzTA66U+mrHP6S07UeNtvoVXdcKJ6yZ6XjhYsUX IYXeu4ynNYB9fccUj3dw0Fr2UOpgj12I5ZnFU/a5JWgvtpqEQIQF5nrP3N5i9zbSIsql HGd1MltKwCtLpeNlzRlJ5ctx5Sabhd8DwMSxGSyjcmIP/aIYkryUins3IFDGuifWsrM0 iXfXuE89hGo4ocvtcyfMrTi+egVMwLCEf0jnn7sPH8GfX6AuaO1mLOvkmwf2ZHlqssDW fwaDZUxGmNO5rIbKuJg76l979eqD0qy4kLjPCT4JWXe959kiiTZJG0D521K8JojDmBN3 mF6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.178.166 with SMTP id cz6mr35207wjc.53.1378077193737; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.67.69 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:13:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Mike Harding To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:13:16 -0000 This would be a 'strange story' if I had not tracked this down. The disk works, only much slower than normal. I only noticed it because I was doing a buildworld. There is no crash, no dmesg, no console logs. I'll ask again, why change that line? Did you feel that the original author of the code had made a mistake? The code in question is from Oct. 2005. Also why move the check for the HT in front of the check for the disabled idle? The only change that affects my system is that idle is enabled in a code path that should only be run when idle is disabled. I don't know the larger context but I also don't know why the code was changed. It looks like the intent of the code has been changed ("don't suspend if this flag is set") and I don't know what benefit this provides. The code path seems to only be run during startup, shutdown and wake from sleep. Contact me via email and I'll set up remote access. This is a personal machine so this is a bit awkward. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 1 23:54:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E664560 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 23:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lausts@acm.org) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E462F82 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 23:54:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fJG7LOme c=1 sm=0 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:17 a=I9A6gpd8bSkA:10 a=cJzkC_CqN18A:10 a=kWQ6D_09QQAA:10 a=kHc8Q_KJ-KsA:10 a=N54-gffFAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=-mWxnwzdiyYA:10 a=32OzNUlwblOaR5kEY0QA:9 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 98.31.3.233 Received: from [98.31.3.233] ([98.31.3.233:13764] helo=mail.laus.org) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id DF/6A-27973-A93D3225; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:54:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (laust2 [192.168.1.100]) by mail.laus.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r81Ns1NH004322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:54:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lausts@acm.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.laus.org: Host laust2 [192.168.1.100] claimed to be [192.168.1.100] From: "Thomas Laus" Organization: ABB To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 19:54:15 -0400 Subject: Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer Message-ID: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lausts@acm.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:54:04 -0000 Hi, > >> :-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for device. > > Could someone else try to make a 'dump to DVD' backup [...] > /sbin/dump -0u -L -C16 -B4589840 -P 'growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0' /u A test with less disk load would be to write e.g. 100 MB of zeros to e.g. DVD+RW media (in order to reduce waste): dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100 | growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0 I got the same result and error message as I did when trying to dump the file system on all of the computers that use ATA for disk access. On the one PC that uses AHCI, it was able to write to the DVD. Tom -- Public Keys: PGP KeyID = 0x5F22FDC1 GnuPG KeyID = 0x620836CF From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 04:47:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3804843; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 04:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE9D2D18; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 04:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id HAA15790; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:47:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VGM3E-000MHz-Lt; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:47:44 +0300 Message-ID: <52241838.8020906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:46:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Mike Harding X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 04:47:48 -0000 on 02/09/2013 01:21 Adrian Chadd said the following: > .. well, when is that pointer NULL? It's never NULL. But that is besides the point as we are talking about a different check. * if (is_idle_disabled(sc)) {* - ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS(); + acpi_cpu_c1(); > It looks like it's supposed to be NULL for > one pair of the two HT CPUs? > > Are you taking the whole core into an ACPI idle state if one of two logical CPUs > representing a core is going idle? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 04:50:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A9DA61; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 04:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C7C2D75; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 04:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id HAA15817; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:50:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VGM6G-000MIB-RG; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:50:52 +0300 Message-ID: <522418F4.9030007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:56 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Harding Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 04:50:56 -0000 on 02/09/2013 02:13 Mike Harding said the following: > I'll ask again, why change that line? I got your question the first few times you asked it. I do not see why you keep asking it when nobody has a clear explanation of what exactly is going on on your system and I've already told that I want to investigate / analyze that first. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 05:46:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99790597; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 05:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mvharding@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9ED12F51; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 05:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f12so824257wgh.14 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 22:46:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=65LnWEHbGIzsSaO5YTAsy0pp5oNV9wBg0g/evi9n3wc=; b=rJLua8N9yk9AB08e4P6e+qto/qUEoetOdzNAFKrAiwNk6LBYXokIuz8oA7KJYO//I+ 9PqotVReJPWd43NwF7YMdRZ4Gbzg429wLGaXxRQbtrF1JomDYdulGMJRHeK/DlnY0FLH jn7zIC9H4V0uoLfgrksSRHWvkRLr2keqCS6bQIuiQl/4WmsTE3Glqemt8Knh0GSvID2g ED+jSTDteG5hAzFhlcVfRCTkMlct0SAM+IUUnXAAw45GaaWj8kPwGK1+8l7paT6MR9Lw t4/O6uc2cVA45vXoxW3aYXFG8J4OgUgWzfzDZ6QDBhKaNvIC/j5kdIxoDBD5XdR1ImZM anqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.19.5 with SMTP id a5mr286025wje.48.1378100816887; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 22:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.67.69 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 22:46:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <522418F4.9030007@FreeBSD.org> References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> <522418F4.9030007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 22:46:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Mike Harding To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 05:46:59 -0000 Why not put this out to stable and take a survey with more than 2 members? I am sure that there are those who will be delighted, as I was with 9.1, to discover that suspend/resume worked without rebooting the machine. I can make the system available to you, contact me at this email. I am in the PDT time zone. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 06:16:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41046A3F for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trtrmitya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97AF208F for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c11so2952706lbj.13 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:16:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KOKkEM+6nlHVIggYSMNtVFSg+kPiKQ2iDGQQQTzQiO4=; b=gmzQXUQmzUVEjvRx0+HX16LCaHiHA1/5SbbP31kzzr2Oc7B2EHy8n66o3BiMval4Mt TzHiqBm8JyHdFb/iNzPNnPMYql6FC5xVAeM2YW76+Tuccrs2Jih0AIFLjy+aKIcFyuOU q3P5+cX+h6BRtVDPHVErBR6nCIcQ38Qffckk9PcQAq5cxGG9nPdQHz8FiAtB3Cues141 qeuEA+uMm/U7gM65qscejiSJBPOOShO/C6hHG8QqbRnLZ4K5vMdsqFqAhem2GNGk5OAi CEuboeYdzEPjfDWYVStpIN3d5Hgaobf0XdptcfHdMtd1n39UbdB7ohcZx1KZM94BkJFX m2Eg== X-Received: by 10.152.21.225 with SMTP id y1mr20265933lae.18.1378102605540; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp174-208-red.yandex.net (dhcp174-208-red.yandex.net. [95.108.174.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm4989314lbv.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Sep 2013 23:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: 9-STABLE panic on intensive fork From: Dmitry Sivachenko In-Reply-To: <20130829184515.GN4972@kib.kiev.ua> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 10:16:43 +0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <99023A4B-AA44-45DD-B163-D9FF23E7AEA4@gmail.com> References: <20130829184515.GN4972@kib.kiev.ua> To: Konstantin Belousov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:16:48 -0000 On 29.08.2013, at 22:45, Konstantin Belousov = wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:20:29PM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >> Hello! >>=20 >> I am using very recent FreeBSD-9-STABLE snapshot: >> 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254986: Wed Aug 28 17:18:57 = MSK 2013 >>=20 >> I run uwsgi program (ports/www/uwsgi) on that machine. >>=20 >> When uwsgi starts, it forks pre-configured number of worker = processes. >> If I raise workers parameter high enough (128), I get kernel panic = (100% reproducible): >>=20 >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >>=20 >> If I compile kernel with KDB enabled, I get the following stack: >>=20 >> pmap_demote_pde_locked() >> pmap_copy() >> vmspace_fork() >> fork1() >> sys_fork() >>=20 >> I have only remote console for that machine, so I made 2 screenshots: >>=20 >> 1) http://people.freebsd.org/~demon/screen1.jpg >> Panic screen when kernel has no KDB support compiled in >>=20 >> 2) http://people.freebsd.org/~demon/screen2.jpg >> Panic screen (2nd part) with the above stack shown. > Look up the source line for the pmap_demote_pde_locked()+0x471 for = your > kernel. Dump the core from the panic. Kernel dump is not generated (despite it is configured at boot), there = is no "Dumping...." message on console. These screenshots shows everything I see on console. I performed some more investigations on this: I have several (14) totally identical configured machines running = exactly the same software. Hardware is a bit different though. I tried to analyze motherboard = differences but failed to find common things for the affected machines. Under conditions described in my initial e-mail, some of them crash = (exactly the same way), some of them do not. I am confident there is no hardware problems, these machines run for = months without reboot, as for now I discovered the only way to crash = them. I updated one of the affected servers to 10-current and I can state it = does not crash anymore with the same usage scenario. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 06:28:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8DEB5 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scdbackup@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DFF211B for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scdbackup.webframe.org ([87.167.161.30]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Las1k-1Vj4WW2xWC-00kOWt for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 08:28:00 +0200 Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 08:27:16 +0200 From: "Thomas Schmitt" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org> In-Reply-To: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org> Message-Id: <529964598962419723@scdbackup.webframe.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:DUifkx1r95Jf4q74rj2hdK1JEdgV1wAWA3ireQUwb8lHrwjHJUv Mb7N67OiZRoqgt2ryx/XAlJECyEZbWU6dwX2HADHv7eeEbmuKN/+mq5+67ZOG1ySBWUfRih 8XNmgbz/P43oVX0sIm1oR74m/bIEb2dy7rH1TMcgdwQ7eZgvsilscmiyBgSnDojKuc00Iyq XCQKrX6l70/JhWwOGtFXw== X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:28:04 -0000 Hi, > I got the same result and error message as I did when trying to dump the > file system The question towards FreeBSD developers is therefore: Why does device "/dev/cd0" with this gesture ... in_fd = open (device,O_RDONLY)) ... ... if (ioctl (in_fd,CAMGETPASSTHRU,&ccb) < 0) cause error ENOTTY, as indicated by growisofs message "Inappropriate ioctl for device" Maybe it is necessary to write a small demo program, because growisofs is kindof an anti-example of a clean software architecture. (Well, a debugger should make clear how it gets to the failed ioctl attempt.) ------------------------------------------------------------------- The question towards the port maintainer of growisofs would be whether there is interest to develop a workaround which avoids that special ioctl. I would help, if desired. A test with cdrskin as substitute for growisofs would demonstrate whether this is worthwhile: /sbin/dump ... -P 'cdrskin -v dev=/dev/cd0 -eject -' ... or dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100 | cdrskin -v dev=/dev/cd0 -eject - (We have some indication by success of cdrecord. But i am reluctant for social reasons to analyze the FreeBSD doings of cdrecord. Its author accuses others of stealing his code.) I would further like to bring to the porter's attention a bug fix for growisofs with blank BD-R media: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713016 Meanwhile well tested by users of Fedora. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a nice day :) Thomas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 07:53:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7BE1D2; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 649AD2518; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id pa12so2884617veb.16 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:53:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T4FPVuTlO6GzqeCxkGe8sOXs3cY0Y52pOvhwbahGE4c=; b=V4bsxwungVaZZi2ugw9FfN2JahVNdVzehW2p7DDiFLEWz6FDsMola8ae4aoIIWub5v cmgCOzHxEgKStCyDJgstsVbLCscalhR30k+vGzXzZkgASiRcA50TzLyoIbW0QskksapB R33H6qNEEGI65l39MxSUMXcJNXupsh48CuxtnG8lpKWTUj8m0Bs8IkVORVVTYY5Ppcv3 9KP94WrHTv44mKk3aICll6pCVWqt+XEl8S8LuP9HGwTZIZ1jVS1e02fELKhJcOizE9F/ oaj+SAf/2jQ9Kh8X3iVQkI2Ln1Dum3wF0DrWTDwFJnWr+ggd6lAQw0UShlQKFPl5cuTp BaMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.105.199 with SMTP id u7mr21497724vco.1.1378108407067; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.122.1 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 00:53:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <370A25C8-7747-4B96-A506-EB92FD0F77CF@FreeBSD.org> <1377895898.1111.341.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 03:53:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash? From: Zaphod Beeblebrox To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Stable , Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:53:29 -0000 The first one (kern.geom.transient_map_retries) causes the system to wedge. The second one (default is 180, I doubled to 360) causes the system to crash but not dump. So... neither fixes the problem. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Edward Tomasz Napiera=B3a wrote: > Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dniu= 31 > sie 2013, o godz. 00:49: > > Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA > errors without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make -= j4 > again... and here is the relatively similar core.txt.5 > > > > > https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=3Dfiles&t=3Dd99648ef5876b= 91c5957148445e60c87 > > > > Looking at it, gmirror is dropping the same error and the underlying > hardware is not causing the error... > > Let me quote Konstantin: > > > It is either an exhaustion of the transient map, or a deadlock. > > For the first, setting kern.geom.transient_map_retries to 0 could help. > > For the second, the count of the transient buffers must be increased, > > by kern.bio_transient_maxcnt loader tunable. > > Could you try both and tell which one of them fixed the problem? Thanks! > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 09:18:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9781CC38 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 09:18:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maurizio.vairani@cloverinformatica.it) Received: from smtpdg12.aruba.it (smtpdg7.aruba.it [62.149.158.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA46D2B06 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 09:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloverinformatica.it ([188.10.129.202]) by smtpcmd04.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id L9JA1m00a4N8xN4019JBNL; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 11:18:13 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.81] (ASUS-TERMINATOR [192.168.0.81]) by cloverinformatica.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E0117EDD; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 11:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <522457D2.1070304@cloverinformatica.it> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 11:18:10 +0200 From: Maurizio Vairani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: Boot problem if a ZFS log device is missing References: <521F05F0.4090607@cloverinformatica.it> <521F0DEB.20408@FreeBSD.org> <522075D6.70600@FreeBSD.org> <52207800.2060901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <52207800.2060901@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Charles Sprickman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:18:25 -0000 On 30/08/2013 12.46, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 30/08/2013 13:37 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> on 30/08/2013 00:38 Charles Sprickman said the following: >>> If one is willing to accept that data is lost (like the log device is totally smoked), is there a way to boot knowing that you may have some data loss, or is the only option to boot alternate media and force a pool import (assuming that works without the log device)? >> I think it's the latter. I am not aware of any way to select a behavior similar >> to import -m or import -F during boot. >> Perhaps... ZFS_IMPORT_MISSING_LOG should be a default behavior for a root pool >> or maybe the behavior could be controllable by a tunable. >> > Maurizio, > > you might want to try the following patch as an interim solution for your > environment: > > --- a/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa.c > +++ b/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa.c > @@ -4112,6 +4112,7 @@ spa_import_rootpool(const char *name) > } > spa->spa_is_root = B_TRUE; > spa->spa_import_flags = ZFS_IMPORT_VERBATIM; > + spa->spa_import_flags |= ZFS_IMPORT_MISSING_LOG; /* XXX make tunable */ > > /* > * Build up a vdev tree based on the boot device's label config. > > HI all, unfortunately the patch don't works. The laptop returns the same error message: "Mounting from zfs:tank0 failed with error 6" and the same "mountroot>" prompt. I am available for further testing if needs. Thanks anyway, Maurizio From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 10:23:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EBDA3A; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 10:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruben@verweg.com) Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [IPv6:2a02:898:96::5e8e:f508]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3322F92; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 10:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.202] (helium.xs4all.nl [83.163.52.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.verweg.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r82AMCB1060399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Sep 2013 10:22:16 GMT (envelope-from ruben@verweg.com) X-Authentication-Warning: erg.verweg.com: Host helium.xs4all.nl [83.163.52.241] claimed to be [192.168.1.202] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_36DCE10C-8EC8-471B-A73B-3206B03C788D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Stiil a regression with jails/IPv6/pf? From: Ruben van Staveren In-Reply-To: <20130831194951.GC44979@carrick-users.bishnet.net> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:22:11 +0200 Message-Id: <8A6CE540-7AF3-4472-B0CC-A222036557C0@verweg.com> References: <20130831194951.GC44979@carrick-users.bishnet.net> To: Tim Bishop X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (erg.verweg.com [94.142.245.8]); Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:23:59 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_36DCE10C-8EC8-471B-A73B-3206B03C788D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, On 31 Aug 2013, at 21:49, Tim Bishop wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > This is regarding kern/170070 and these two threads from last year: >=20 > = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-July/068987.html > = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/069043.html >=20 > I'm running stable/9 r255017 and I'm seeing the same issue, even with > the fix Bjoern committed in r238876. This is still with "modulate state" in some rules that also hit ipv6 = traffic ? It almost looks like doing this kind of traffic alteration is considered = harmful for IPv6 http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D36595 If that is the case, then this should be applicable only to ipv4 = traffic, without requiring specific knowledge from the user >=20 > My setup is a dual stack one (IPv6 is done through an IPv4 tunnel) and > the problem is only with IPv6. I have jails with both IPv4 and IPv6 > addresses, and I use pf to rdr certain ports to certain jails. With = IPv6 > I'm seeing failed checksums on the packets coming back out of my = system, > both with UDP and TCP. >=20 > If I connect over IPv6 to the jail host it works fine. If I connect = over > IPv6 to a jail directly (they have routable addresses, but I prefer = them > to all be masked behind the single jail host normally), it works fine. > So the only failure case is when it goes through a rdr rule in pf. >=20 > This system replaces a previous one running stable/8 which worked fine > with the same pf config file. >=20 > Has anyone got any suggestions on what I can do to fix this or to = debug > it further? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Tim. >=20 > --=20 > Tim Bishop > http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ > PGP Key: 0x6C226B37FDF38D55 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_36DCE10C-8EC8-471B-A73B-3206B03C788D Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlIkZtMACgkQZ88+mcQxRw2kTgCeOvKE4byQ2ACgcKOSpiWvrjbE 7sAAnihUaLcLBzVXVqOPLzS8I++i0Mp6 =gZJp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_36DCE10C-8EC8-471B-A73B-3206B03C788D-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 13:35:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A458BC; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 13:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD06A214F; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 13:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so3730910wes.41 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:35:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4j5KltgmtMMH1+OMUW06jIXiB5Do60MrsTO1xTe5n4c=; b=kC0xeAMpBrllzZeb9E17fLJQUb9RdPmjZ2H2LvO+HvTR2IzZrlDlMbl8OrBEeOsrzT DYO1nafPR49wvrdsbaLCXC3Z06Y31BircvsL67ylbwh9wrCR6ME4fHW33qPPDtor7Aye YkffKyYngDsL5vusfkMq6cJKFV6eAT57rtlOvGHuDEn3h100086CUnmaxWXAAuX8HKum D6tXkZakcd+kjBE7pVdvQUtQ85Nij148+aq/XQLbjT3n+D/scYVvyJkWYNJDqftckW5/ zREH1ffzZtM5SgKiFnEBVx0YFuZFDeKSGsnZcTBf4oJlydZ6TiFr4nvHqSd+3Cx9JnBH 7kRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.211.206 with SMTP id ne14mr13911670wic.30.1378128926073; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.146.2 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:35:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> <522418F4.9030007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:35:25 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: E74zhiE6t9WchBvULI4jcGcG4IY Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Adrian Chadd To: Mike Harding Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 13:35:28 -0000 So you tinkered with this - which particular line(s) did you revert back to get the old behaviour? -adrian On 1 September 2013 22:46, Mike Harding wrote: > Why not put this out to stable and take a survey with more than 2 > members? I am sure that there > are those who will be delighted, as I was with 9.1, to discover that > suspend/resume worked without > rebooting the machine. > > I can make the system available to you, contact me at this email. I am in > the PDT time zone. > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 14:25:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7742C8; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 14:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mvharding@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F8226E0; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 14:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t60so488743wes.28 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:25:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8fSgdL0ShkaLdAchBIBO0uXUU0b+J2PcE3MHnT9UafI=; b=HaRZCnSyK8mpItwlLLgWiHI9pbFaAfvDH+6qx/zpoDcaLxSwPvQT1j2IEDGF8pfyZ0 e/zrXOCtiVfLOf3ymEUijmtSQHnO9yAdar5s53J5KUcpksIYjM/BKcaXztBhU+f4BZJu iu/dGH/LbbSvZ6VmDgu8LnnRbHT1/XeYi3yOzFuUQCt5uzoPSEGeor0Y2IhIs6ju61U1 +zZBBmg+vJXXpKdguJQtgWPzrUmxoX0puyg1yQhZLLZJCVDnHQN+z+K+72OjRbdm0zsD sMdXaxjNGwAjOypsvl+eJ/vX0oRQZ3kHyJQ9VInO+v4DjsTRWrVL9WQpJDBnbRqYP5zu GpnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.72.104 with SMTP id c8mr13923576wiv.63.1378131940960; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.67.69 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:25:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> <522418F4.9030007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:25:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Mike Harding To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 14:25:43 -0000 It's detailed in the ticket, see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632 and search for 'reverted'. On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > So you tinkered with this - which particular line(s) did you revert back > to get the old behaviour? > > -adrian > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 14:29:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BA75A9; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 14:29:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778CA2770; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 14:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c11so1858567wgh.3 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:29:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=e5Vt2ezBEEUs0Q8KXFDiSoz6VL10rSATImopfQSs8mw=; b=D/iKt+B06E8b4nNilbZUXmOajQs10P4fUTZ2k1pnHkQJSey1mmESGyPHmrj3RCxK3j d6GOCPYbcrKV9kl+CwC4lnEYDBxeUqlMMjpwpYDBTp/GqdjVnK5W+X229waXRWoqJheb KETXeWrF/+SdUtEevrAwzs3HbEJI71b+a3WjeCJGXK5Yqdz4kxDCv8fExttPOlQSnosA uCSUdatxWEHtTSj7rLh7U8u88V7AOGgWaRFUld1/qDhKOfyMrnyZg5GDnM9i9ql75rbv qIVgWFV7UfzrNTZYE/0ty8z7bljABRslSJ9zblq7noYykzGvczxDzGBHjSjn0wFmobw6 sBIw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.72.198 with SMTP id f6mr14023973wiv.46.1378132162711; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.146.2 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:29:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> <522418F4.9030007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:29:22 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q65bufPzkILe1R2IwOzmfjFEX10 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Adrian Chadd To: Mike Harding Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 14:29:25 -0000 On 2 September 2013 07:25, Mike Harding wrote: > It's detailed in the ticket, see > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632 and search for > 'reverted'. > > Ok. You and avg@ are digging into it deeper, so I'll leave it be for now. I'll retest this on my test laptops when I'm back home. -adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 19:33:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3943D506; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 19:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdb@carrick.bishnet.net) Received: from carrick.bishnet.net (carrick-mx.bishnet.net [IPv6:2a01:348:132:51::14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF052D2D; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 19:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from carrick-users.bishnet.net ([2a01:348:132:51::10]) by carrick.bishnet.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VGZsn-0004jO-3O; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 20:33:53 +0100 Received: (from tdb@localhost) by carrick-users.bishnet.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r82JXqDv018189; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 20:33:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from tdb) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 20:33:52 +0100 From: Tim Bishop To: Ruben van Staveren Subject: Re: Stiil a regression with jails/IPv6/pf? Message-ID: <20130902193352.GA18004@carrick-users.bishnet.net> References: <20130831194951.GC44979@carrick-users.bishnet.net> <8A6CE540-7AF3-4472-B0CC-A222036557C0@verweg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8A6CE540-7AF3-4472-B0CC-A222036557C0@verweg.com> X-PGP-Key: 0x6C226B37FDF38D55, http://www.bishnet.net/tim/tim-bishnet-net.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 4BD9 5F90 8A50 40E8 D26C D681 6C22 6B37 FDF3 8D55 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: bz@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 19:33:55 -0000 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:22:11PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote: > On 31 Aug 2013, at 21:49, Tim Bishop wrote: > > This is regarding kern/170070 and these two threads from last year: > >=20 > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-July/068987.html > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/069043.ht= ml > >=20 > > I'm running stable/9 r255017 and I'm seeing the same issue, even with > > the fix Bjoern committed in r238876. >=20 > This is still with "modulate state" in some rules that also hit ipv6 > traffic ? No, I'm not using "modulate state". Only "keep state". > It almost looks like doing this kind of traffic alteration is > considered harmful for IPv6 > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D36595 So it doesn't look like that's the same problem. It's certainly similar (IPv6 and pf), but doesn't involve the rdr rule or jails. IPv6 is otherwise working fine through pf. Tim. > If that is the case, then this should be applicable only to ipv4 > traffic, without requiring specific knowledge from the user >=20 > >=20 > > My setup is a dual stack one (IPv6 is done through an IPv4 tunnel) and > > the problem is only with IPv6. I have jails with both IPv4 and IPv6 > > addresses, and I use pf to rdr certain ports to certain jails. With IPv6 > > I'm seeing failed checksums on the packets coming back out of my system, > > both with UDP and TCP. > >=20 > > If I connect over IPv6 to the jail host it works fine. If I connect over > > IPv6 to a jail directly (they have routable addresses, but I prefer them > > to all be masked behind the single jail host normally), it works fine. > > So the only failure case is when it goes through a rdr rule in pf. > >=20 > > This system replaces a previous one running stable/8 which worked fine > > with the same pf config file. > >=20 > > Has anyone got any suggestions on what I can do to fix this or to debug > > it further? > >=20 > > Thanks, > >=20 > > Tim. --=20 Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ PGP Key: 0x6C226B37FDF38D55 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSJOggAAoJEGwiazf9841VvDIP/1MkJBNLCOAIqoXZQugIhayb RsUXlRryDBnRwkgtlaoO4gjs4LCFCy2ZptIQ1WPtHWK4pkpZ9tlf427R+c5LFaXD YVD3InkzhN83o+YZFoLIhbdjxVirVAC0aTPnnDX/z1vnossk5KBa/yA36ApEeMGK xxWuam70WtD6WgNOAqXe9RDKH3C5jvZhhqt7HwUFLyCPt0ZTK5easlcHf6u6cd9q 22aTwl0NqCvJdPz5j5GbCQjyfIB68Zt4prtTSv9lgEzoFXb9YZ3r3xLrmTmt16mi LtXH2ZC83uLMhZ0YuKuqj1I0FJ/ADKogEobW7Se3qlgR5VFS8hBeS6ywuYdyoYWP Zv9fb/ZDgB02GYY1gmBxz4AIQ39SIJop5vRY0wAVwfbZNtughhN7swiKWNo/+FuQ TontRkcodO6ZDU0GzoEHs3SqOi7ySQfeGNtvG/bZTjWGYdaHxpCBlKz/8FHNFN9Y oxuFL83ENbCa38L3arr+ca9ClkUg+TjVMVLzelxhrnGGx8JbYj9C+2fKo99Xxcpa sdCxVCkQu9/MIB00kLYT4sX09sotC6IKTeB+mzi9pUZCW6zKNKGxvK36iQcrELZy gqO5clAUnI5Y4tC9uE65czsUp1JbsHOift8xeH1ll1OucqjzsVBTdBg8w4psxiWL wg1YCWhPZqpGWgc0o4oS =o6Y7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 03:31:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687BFF25; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 03:31:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryanv@daemoninthecloset.org) Received: from torment.daemoninthecloset.org (torment.daemoninthecloset.org [94.242.209.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2907A20AE; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 03:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sage.daemoninthecloset.org (unknown [70.114.209.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "sage.daemoninthecloset.org", Issuer "daemoninthecloset.org" (verified OK)) by torment.daemoninthecloset.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279DF42C2632; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 05:36:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemoninthecloset.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemoninthecloset.org Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 22:31:06 -0500 (CDT) From: Bryan Venteicher To: Harald Schmalzbauer Message-ID: <840834829.1419.1378179066875.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> In-Reply-To: <1428315986.19291.1377615172231.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> References: <601099152.721.1375661537866.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> <5214D37F.5000307@omnilan.de> <1117188271.19176.1377577117350.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> <521CB7AC.90605@omnilan.de> <1428315986.19291.1377615172231.JavaMail.root@daemoninthecloset.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] VMware vmxnet3 ethernet driver MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [192.168.10.24] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.2_GA_5569 (ZimbraWebClient - GC29 (Mac)/8.0.2_GA_5569) Thread-Topic: VMware vmxnet3 ethernet driver Thread-Index: m3nkTpbhAoxSRywSkYqJdsIgyubJ+ntvBhrF Cc: FreeBSD Stable , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 03:31:28 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > > Bez=C3=BCglich Bryan Venteicher's Nachricht vom 27.08.2013 06:18 (local= time): > >=20 > > ... > >=20 > The intr usage is higher than the other drivers you compared against > because if_vmx does the off-level processing in ithreads where as the > others do it in a taskqueue. >=20 > BTW: if_vmx can to LRO as well. I don't think the emulated e1000 can, > but I bet the e1000e does. >=20 > > if_vmx <-> if_vmx > > 1.32 GBits/sec, load: 10-45%Sys 40-48%Intr > >=20 > > if_vmxJumbo <-> if_vmxJumbo > > 5.01 GBits/sec, load: 10-45%Sys 40-48%Intr > >=20 > > Please find attached the different outputs of dev.vmx.X (the mtu9000 ru= n > > was > > only 3.47GBits/sec in that case, took the numbers anyway) > >=20 Thanks for the sysctl output.=20 dev.vmx.0.txq0.ringfull: 133479 dev.vmx.0.txq0.hstats.tso_packets: 564986 dev.vmx.0.txq0.hstats.ucast_packets: 570604 For the number of packets transmitted, there's a really high percentage of time we find the Tx queue full enough it is not able to hold the next to transmit frame. I've haven't been able to recreate this. But I recently made a commit [1] that might help alleviate this. [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D255055 > > wbr, > >=20 > > -Harry > >=20 > >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 13:24:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9E291D for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74DA72AD2 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1VGqas-000HpG-Tj for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:24:31 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Intel 10Gb network card Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:24:30 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:24:45 -0000 hi, I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says: ... ix0: port 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci4 ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54 ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 ix1: port 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xd9f00000-0xd9f7ffff,0xd9ffc000-0xd9ffffff irq 44 at device 0.1 on pci4 ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors ix1: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:55 ix1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 ... pciconf says: ix0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x7a118086 chip=0x10fb8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' class = network subclass = ethernet but both manuals ixgb and ixgbe mention a different chip, and device man for ixb says: ... ixgb - Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating sys- tem ... The ixgb driver provides support for PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapters based on the Intel 82597EX Ethernet controller chips. The driver supports man for ixgbe says: ... ixgbe - Intel(R) 10Gb Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating system ... the Intel 82598EB ... to make things even more confusing, Dell says: DELL INTEL X520 DA2 10GBe DP+SERVER ADAPTER PCIE and finally, there is no man ix 'will the real ix please stand up?' danny From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 13:28:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC846B2D for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731DC2B70 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ea20so4730190lab.27 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 06:28:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uV8OnVwshxJhpwvs41B8jmGlln/mhRvQr/MeMCSQYT0=; b=nblCC+nXmBppBu6EsIjcDXUXdtXhT+zL72oDF7Eh6BxfGdRVvqgl0u7Kfzi6+1CXcG FiLwQ3K2mjkVs2LadPq5aZ4xNHvu240E+AaGaewG1bNR7rlLtFScWy/aAVS8fhtBY90U rr71sRa3Gw7Y1fnhz9ONbRp9K299Vm8rzQqavMwcBmXZIFmqbJ8bN2cCoWFolEw8ETXT 8e1QungsV0mo/2ErFC22HAa7lz/aZHUfLsZU1vkV/XYpV/SwZFrCeR3Whg/JvKPoVfhG dTsR82Uhi8FYVvYgs1+b5h7zj0LfeBA4Bn8f+9KML8OX4vHPM6ffewhlwsHunc4SgZ1J aWPg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.143.3 with SMTP id sa3mr25384158lbb.12.1378214881384; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 06:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rizzo.unipi@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.200.165 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:28:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:28:01 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: veNRGfHXdKTlTur4aplk2A5JwII Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel 10Gb network card From: Luigi Rizzo To: Daniel Braniss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:28:04 -0000 On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > hi, > I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says: > ... > ix0: port > 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at > device > 0.0 on pci4 > CI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 > ... > > pciconf says: > ix0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x7a118086 chip=0x10fb8086 rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > but both manuals ixgb and ixgbe mention a different chip, and device > man for ixb says: > ... > ixgb - Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating > sys- > tem > ... > The ixgb driver provides support for PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapters > based > on the Intel 82597EX Ethernet controller chips. The driver supports > > man for ixgbe says: > ... > ixgbe - Intel(R) 10Gb Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating system > ... > the Intel 82598EB > ... > > to make things even more confusing, Dell says: > DELL INTEL X520 DA2 10GBe DP+SERVER ADAPTER PCIE > > > and finally, there is no man ix > > 'will the real ix please stand up?' > danny > > > this is the ixgbe driver. The one that works with netmap :) cheers luigi From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 14:02:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B64272 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nonesuch@longcount.org) Received: from mail-qa0-f51.google.com (mail-qa0-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9A82ED1 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id bv4so1301578qab.3 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=+nu+cBTt5m7UlROak97RWGLnY5IKAK4R5EO3Dgd7co4=; b=aBn4CX3o39QFdWf1oekfPR7JZLF3MLi7UIXEUZu9xortq1TGpJXEQSFB93EtkwJoJx jqq5omxC09ZNRm7a9Xa6PzSN2TMGE/Dtm2d7t5Re9coLqSpsTDx64vdWYZokUD+n1Q0w taT6pA2Y2uYq4AT/lJtoXF0goSBy25gW1br5icZtOD5/4VhQNYoRhz5IkfXJuzObw56r C0JJV9fZX+CyJ4rTpEy/Kvmexbjzi1eazq81d/pkmoeabezeaOOoMlSM8r6zcCf9OD6N ug3anLITEkMNX1XLL/ulmbi/14lXBR97KOvvAbnBK1cM507eSJe4UyUrvhV5xNA7QHYH Lh7A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQks3noL13vpJEuNmKQW7u29nDFSgxcZWXGE2UAWH0pN34DXgE26WockEn37uctVDQdL6p3O X-Received: by 10.49.121.134 with SMTP id lk6mr7733690qeb.23.1378216949846; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [97.165.13.201] (201.sub-97-165-13.myvzw.com. [97.165.13.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm26191478qaa.13.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT) References: <201308311738.r7VHcnRR021632@svn.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <201308311738.r7VHcnRR021632@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Mark Saad Subject: Re: svn commit: r255104 - stable/9/sys/ufs/ufs Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:02:25 -0400 To: Kirk McKusick Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:02:37 -0000 Kirk Will this be merged into 9.2-RC? Before the Release ? =20 --- Mark saad | mark.saad@longcount.org On Aug 31, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Kirk McKusick wrote: > Author: mckusick > Date: Sat Aug 31 17:38:49 2013 > New Revision: 255104 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/255104 >=20 > Log: > MFC of 253998: >=20 > This bug fix is in a code path in rename taken when there is a > collision between a rename and an open system call for the same > target file. Here, rename releases its vnode references, waits for > the open to finish, and then restarts by reacquiring its needed > vnode locks. In this case, rename was unlocking but failing to > release its reference to one of its held vnodes. The effect was > that even after all the actual references to the vnode had gone, > the vnode still showed active references. For files that had been > removed, their space was not reclaimed until the filesystem was > forcibly unmounted. >=20 > This bug manifested itself in the Postgres server which would > leak/lose hundreds of files per day amounting to many gigabytes of > disk space. This bug required shutting down Postgres, forcibly > unmounting its filesystem, remounting its filesystem and restarting > Postgres every few days to recover the lost space. >=20 > Reported by: Dan Thomas and Palle Girgensohn > Bug-fix by: kib > Tested by: Dan Thomas and Palle Girgensohn >=20 > Modified: > stable/9/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c > Directory Properties: > stable/9/sys/ (props changed) >=20 > Modified: stable/9/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > --- stable/9/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c Sat Aug 31 17:33:25 2013 (r2551= 03) > +++ stable/9/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c Sat Aug 31 17:38:49 2013 (r2551= 04) > @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ relock: > error =3D VFS_VGET(mp, ino, LK_EXCLUSIVE, &nvp); > if (error !=3D 0) > goto releout; > - VOP_UNLOCK(nvp, 0); > + vput(nvp); > atomic_add_int(&rename_restarts, 1); > goto relock; > } > _______________________________________________ > svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-9 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-9-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 15:06:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62E5FEB; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x229.google.com (mail-vb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD0023CD; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g17so4161026vbg.28 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sbEIHtc9cneRCIj/hio8dudBdAPeSOIkaBKTXHCBDyY=; b=Kaz+ZADzHxGl6eMsXkOZfsLCC9ZEQcMV89DdJP91UgQcpfOjAEDMIsXXieS9mza+bU kTC7YgrGDaT8fmJ3fdNyembFYM2AhqvgE7pe+jYDdvb9JqR1ULqUG7bqNm93cTp4SGoK YsMp2D4p+wTlFXCoXkaKWtUuD9EppP/1uZfJh4gGCgpMhuWtQu6haoERL+uoExIdb2x8 KsdYONIttR4xWilSHgJflRr7NLwvsk3c2a8ZX9ZM0VJiLaxa4aJ43KJHqgiYsEgyCDd0 O2v6ICS4vNl0YtOk4KubIBgC00qFNlS0i66CeyeGQI0tIWmG4mTlLuJJ4I+ZWZaN1jGa QrRA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.108.74 with SMTP id hi10mr8235081veb.14.1378220789548; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.122.1 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <370A25C8-7747-4B96-A506-EB92FD0F77CF@FreeBSD.org> <1377895898.1111.341.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 11:06:29 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash? From: Zaphod Beeblebrox To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Stable , Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:06:30 -0000 Since there weren't any more ideas here, I tried turning off hyper-threading. This is an old pentium-D type CPU --- that is: one core with HT. I'm wondering if the HT nature is helping this resource exhaustion, so I turned off HT (basically making this a single-threaded CPU) and it seems to have made the problem go away. That is not to say that the problem is fixed: it simply means that replication may be tied to multiple CPUs and/or the allocation of resources by an HT CPU core. On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote= : > The first one (kern.geom.transient_map_retries) causes the system to wedg= e. > > The second one (default is 180, I doubled to 360) causes the system to > crash but not dump. > > So... neither fixes the problem. > > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Edward Tomasz Napiera=B3a < > trasz@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dni= u 31 >> sie 2013, o godz. 00:49: >> > Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA >> errors without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make = -j4 >> again... and here is the relatively similar core.txt.5 >> > >> > >> https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=3Dfiles&t=3Dd99648ef5876= b91c5957148445e60c87 >> > >> > Looking at it, gmirror is dropping the same error and the underlying >> hardware is not causing the error... >> >> Let me quote Konstantin: >> >> > It is either an exhaustion of the transient map, or a deadlock. >> > For the first, setting kern.geom.transient_map_retries to 0 could help= . >> > For the second, the count of the transient buffers must be increased, >> > by kern.bio_transient_maxcnt loader tunable. >> >> Could you try both and tell which one of them fixed the problem? Thanks= ! >> >> > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 16:47:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE26BF4 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x233.google.com (mail-vb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106712CA2 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x16so4013738vbf.24 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/A8fvVw7XBHoDEG/Yy4j4RS0wG8ahKNE+qvtGnLG+R0=; b=tQK8911clpZ8pHLqDkFVKggVPXXZiXzVuFHIg4Rdb/p1W0v/gVCXFgM0xTW7M9g5VV m7QgXYXdgW5MWY4KlkBGhFpp1GMGCGqcHt1kAjf7EetycsXD3GOKzpBVcjRAsAVHC61S tMDMu2IJyhHO5wzP7hqqPeLQDOB67mG27qQtU2wsZriK1Co2ta8F8aGdj9J701i/uMIR AqK80lOW2+W7PgGRX16OwN5IZMGMGOjj867Is2AlfYDPcf3vt34OwCGFPnISSFahkZQ1 okRSggirXS8wedmYHBoWmUrrWo2OeqVnKEtTsqgs1JjiMX8NFGw5HnOG0xs2cBv1J1LQ Xrsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.54.70 with SMTP id h6mr503306vep.36.1378226821965; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.159.141 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:47:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:47:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel 10Gb network card From: Jack Vogel To: Daniel Braniss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:47:03 -0000 ixgb is the old PCI-X based adapter, ixgbe is for all pci express hardware. The latter is almost certainly what you want :) Jack On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > hi, > I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says: > ... > ix0: port > 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at > device > 0.0 on pci4 > ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54 > ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 > ix1: port > 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xd9f00000-0xd9f7ffff,0xd9ffc000-0xd9ffffff irq 44 at > device > 0.1 on pci4 > ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > ix1: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:55 > ix1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 > ... > > pciconf says: > ix0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x7a118086 chip=0x10fb8086 rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > but both manuals ixgb and ixgbe mention a different chip, and device > man for ixb says: > ... > ixgb - Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating > sys- > tem > ... > The ixgb driver provides support for PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapters > based > on the Intel 82597EX Ethernet controller chips. The driver supports > > man for ixgbe says: > ... > ixgbe - Intel(R) 10Gb Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating system > ... > the Intel 82598EB > ... > > to make things even more confusing, Dell says: > DELL INTEL X520 DA2 10GBe DP+SERVER ADAPTER PCIE > > > and finally, there is no man ix > > 'will the real ix please stand up?' > danny > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 16:50:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88350E39 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from S.Kuzminsky@F5.com) Received: from mail.f5.com (mail.f5.com [208.85.209.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1862D52 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:50:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=f5.com; i=S.Kuzminsky@f5.com; q=dns/txt; s=seattle; t=1378227020; x=1409763020; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=1tJSHEuORPEVjPQRq3Z93Xw5BXWFb+AdJbign1gNqq0=; b=I84/KYNa5feFFFLkiDj3hcHKVf+uxHjiKiRWFbhgTjdvp0tOKv16gJ02 gRYiahssGF72/5ecqLBGW6D8/G4ZPXSfv+MBnLo/uXwX1KUMKPzsfTSTI RhW2kcCapZNMlUph0IrID/GWH4c+1WBOP7LT0yIQ4PwCjKywgzSB13eR7 I=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,1015,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="80177108" Received: from unknown (HELO exchmail.f5net.com) ([192.168.10.235]) by mail.f5.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 03 Sep 2013 16:50:14 +0000 Received: from SEAEMBX01.olympus.F5Net.com ([fe80::3440:4256:38f6:d3a0]) by SEAECAS04.olympus.F5Net.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:50:13 -0700 From: Sebastian Kuzminsky To: David Demelier Subject: Re: Some PR never seen to delete Thread-Topic: Some PR never seen to delete Thread-Index: AQHOpZYSaKfWDkObR0ioo+rZSw0alZm0tYoA Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:50:12 +0000 Message-ID: <6828F6FC-8C15-43BD-A75B-459330352390@f5.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.16.236] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:50:20 -0000 On Aug 30, 2013, at 09:31 , David Demelier wrote: > In the past I've sent some PR that has never been seen, I think we > should close them now. >=20 > 2010/09/16 kern/150628 [acd] [ata] burncd(1) can't write to optical drive > 2010/07/14 ports/148591 x11 information note for x11-drivers/xf86-input-s= ynaptic > 2010/12/01 kern/152750 wireless[ath] ath0 lot of bad series hwrate > 2010/12/12 bin/153052 [patch] watch(8) breaks tty on error > 2011/01/25 ports/154288 glewis[patch] games/nethack*: remove old ports > and cleanup latest > 2011/02/07 kern/154567 wireless[ath] ath(4) lot of bad series(0) > 2011/07/01 conf/158557rc [patch] /etc/rc.d/pf broken messages > 2012/11/05 kern/173408 acpi[acpi] [regression] ACPI Regression: > battery does not update often > 2012/11/22 kern/173840 snd_hda(4) volume mixer not working anymore > 2012/11/24 kern/173896 Kernel does not boot if splash loaded and > hint.sc.0.vesa_mode set > 2012/12/23 ports/174650 xfcex11-wm/xfce4 crash with > exaGetPixmapFirstPixel called for invalid bpp 1 > 2012/12/28 kern/174766 acpi[acpi] Random acpi panic > 2013/01/31 kern/175722 wireless[ath]lot of bad seriesx hwrate in kernel m= essages >=20 > Some are still valid but will never been taken so I propose to close them= . I believe this one is fixed, but the PR is still open: kern/173004: [netinet] [patch] Incorrect IP checksums when forwarding resul= ts in fragmentation --=20 Sebastian Kuzminsky From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 06:25:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9D16DA for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 06:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2565B25E2 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 06:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1VH6X6-0001Dx-DU; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:25:40 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Intel 10Gb network card In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Jack Vogel message dated "Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:47:01 -0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:25:40 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , Luigi Rizzo X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 06:25:49 -0000 thanks Luigi and Jack! I also solved the question by doing grep -ir 82599EB /sys/dev and it found the ixgbe driver - may the src be with you :-) My point - not well expressed - was the the manuals had little/confusing info. iconfig: re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8209b ... them man 4 re RE(4) FreeBSD Kernel Interfaces Manual RE(4) NAME re - RealTek 8139C+/8169/816xS/811xS/8168/810xE/8111 PCI/PCIe Ethernet adapter driver or nfe0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c219b man 4 nfe NFE(4) FreeBSD Kernel Interfaces Manual NFE(4) NAME nfe - NVIDIA nForce MCP Ethernet driver etc, etc, etc. no man ix, no mention of /dev/ix%d in man ixgbe Q: does the copper (10G Based T) version work? cheers, danny > --089e0122ad0624ac8504e57d70c5 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > ixgb is the old PCI-X based adapter, ixgbe is for all pci express hardware. > > The latter is almost certainly what you want :) > > Jack > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > > hi, > > I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says: > > ... > > ix0: port > > 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at > > device > > 0.0 on pci4 > > ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > > ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54 > > ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 > > ix1: port > > 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xd9f00000-0xd9f7ffff,0xd9ffc000-0xd9ffffff irq 44 at > > device > > 0.1 on pci4 > > ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > > ix1: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:55 > > ix1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 > > ... > > > > pciconf says: > > ix0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x7a118086 chip=0x10fb8086 rev=0x01 > > hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > > device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > > > but both manuals ixgb and ixgbe mention a different chip, and device > > man for ixb says: > > ... > > ixgb - Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating > > sys- > > tem > > ... > > The ixgb driver provides support for PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapters > > based > > on the Intel 82597EX Ethernet controller chips. The driver supports > > > > man for ixgbe says: > > ... > > ixgbe - Intel(R) 10Gb Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating system > > ... > > the Intel 82598EB > > ... > > > > to make things even more confusing, Dell says: > > DELL INTEL X520 DA2 10GBe DP+SERVER ADAPTER PCIE > > > > > > and finally, there is no man ix > > > > 'will the real ix please stand up?' > > danny > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > --089e0122ad0624ac8504e57d70c5 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >
ixgb is the old PCI-X based adapter, ixgbe is for all= > pci express hardware.

The latter is almost certainly wha= > t you want :)

Jack

_extra"> >

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Daniel B= > raniss < =3D"_blank">danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote:
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd= > ing-left:1ex"> > hi,
> I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says:
> ...
> ix0: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.15>= > ; port
> 0xecc0-0xecdf mem 0xd9e80000-0xd9efffff,0xd9ff8000-0xd9ffbfff irq 40 at dev= > ice
> 0.0 on pci4
> ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
> ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:54
> ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8
> ix1: <Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.15>= > ; port
> 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xd9f00000-0xd9f7ffff,0xd9ffc000-0xd9ffffff irq 44 at dev= > ice
> 0.1 on pci4
> ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
> ix1: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:29:c0:55
> ix1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8
> ...
>
> pciconf says:
> ix0@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x7a118086 chip=3D0x10fb8086 rev=3D= > 0x01
> hdr=3D0x00
> =A0 =A0 vendor =A0 =A0 =3D 'Intel Corporation'
> =A0 =A0 device =A0 =A0 =3D '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connect= > ion'
> =A0 =A0 class =A0 =A0 =A0=3D network
> =A0 =A0 subclass =A0 =3D ethernet
>
> but both manuals ixgb and ixgbe mention a different chip, and device
> man for ixb says:
> ...
> =A0 =A0 =A0ixgb - Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operat= > ing sys-
> =A0 =A0 =A0tem
> ...
> =A0 =A0 The ixgb driver provides support for PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapters = > based
> =A0 =A0 =A0on the Intel 82597EX Ethernet controller chips. =A0The driver su= > pports
>
> man for ixgbe says:
> ...
> ixgbe - Intel(R) 10Gb Ethernet driver for the FreeBSD operating system
> ...
> =A0 =A0 the Intel 82598EB
> ...
>
> to make things even more confusing, Dell says:
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 DELL INTEL X520 DA2 10GBe DP+SERVER ADAPTER PCIE
>
>
> and finally, there is no man ix
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 'will the real ix please stand up?'
> danny
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > mailing list
> =3D"_blank">http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " ubscribe@freebsd.org">freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

> > --089e0122ad0624ac8504e57d70c5-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 12:05:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BB7A2B for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 12:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnuhurd91@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x241.google.com (mail-oa0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56262D23 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 12:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f65.google.com with SMTP id k18so44905oag.4 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K/zwA/UuEomeONWNcFO+5dHINVgqRM5M4igzGNKbv2k=; b=VD8rpfWak3QJg4UO7q3z6MvGo6C7536G++XTdeaojJt/VuCz3M5swddVaI915Xj8zZ xR1zFInSyP9gaGGM/z5oJhHBxYV4x0CXLw5NDN6LT80//UgHnt0iprBeyzI5XKrBshDW SwHZgZADlO4GYkcPpl249jqfetinV0gsd0HmowxZgO0G5n3pIWojdrz6C9A/J7R4AgDb x2rIDIbObV+qw9TP1JEdtFGM8/YyDxQpjL+alTjR/QxomUoSoWk4L0Ev3QR9jO3EI8WH 0pRkUgJxv8OqjpkMSVLCw3tsFW58DOjyyVAA+0SB6SB/FiVmaoRpWykD3VR9s4oYFguE tKzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.230.135 with SMTP id sy7mr1877398obc.24.1378296355160; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.25.72 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 16:35:55 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: From: gnuhurd91 gnuhurd91 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:05:56 -0000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 14:11:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EE5B48; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 14:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C87D26EA; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 14:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B435B9AE; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:11:20 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unexpected idprio 31 behavior on 9.2-BETA2 and 9.2-RC1 Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:58:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p28; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <1375737316.96778.10.camel@firkin.mischler.com> <5203A90D.6020008@vangyzen.net> <5203AE08.30504@vangyzen.net> In-Reply-To: <5203AE08.30504@vangyzen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201309040958.48377.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:11:20 -0400 (EDT) Cc: J David , Eric van Gyzen , avg@freebsd.org, dave@mischler.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:11:21 -0000 On Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:41:12 am Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 08/08/2013 09:19, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > > On 08/06/2013 14:23, J David wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > >>>> on an otherwise idle amd64 system with 4 CPUs. The first command in the > >>>> build.log file: > >>>> > >>>> rm -rf /usr/obj/home/freebsd/tmp > >>>> > >>>> took over three minutes. It should have taken about three /seconds/. > >>>> > >>>> "uptime" reported a load average of around 1.00. > >>>> "top" showed no threads (user or kernel) using CPU. > >>>> "iostat" showed an average of less than 20 tps on ada0. > >>>> "rm" was usually in the RUN state. > >> We are looking at something similar. Would you be able to try to > >> reproduce it using a kernel with: > >> > >> nooptions SCHED_ULE > >> options SCHED_4BSD > >> > >> to see if it makes a difference? It seems to, but the problem is > >> inconsistent enough that I can't be sure. > > The 4BSD scheduler does //not// exhibit this problem. I tested with the > > latest releng/9.2 (r254054) and an otherwise GENERIC config. > > To be thorough, I built a GENERIC kernel at the same rev, and it still > exhibits the problem. Please try this change: Index: sched_ule.c =================================================================== --- sched_ule.c (revision 255020) +++ sched_ule.c (working copy) @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ struct tdq { int tdq_transferable; /* Transferable thread count. */ short tdq_switchcnt; /* Switches this tick. */ short tdq_oldswitchcnt; /* Switches last tick. */ - u_char tdq_lowpri; /* Lowest priority thread. */ + u_short tdq_lowpri; /* Lowest priority thread. */ u_char tdq_ipipending; /* IPI pending. */ u_char tdq_idx; /* Current insert index. */ u_char tdq_ridx; /* Current removal index. */ @@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ sched_choose(void) tdq->tdq_lowpri = td->td_priority; return (td); } - tdq->tdq_lowpri = PRI_MAX_IDLE; + tdq->tdq_lowpri = PRI_MAX_IDLE + 1; return (PCPU_GET(idlethread)); } -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 17:41:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3514933C for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:41:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.ballantine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12404269E for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g10so624112pdj.40 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:41:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=45xShktk+C0rz7ASfFhwS+31Fbio4/DoVyVOerEv+1I=; b=hZ9lJupdvsLuhbJNT7NK/45y439lr/W/W7V/CvDkzqfwl+tDR+ASieAwCmOIQNZasc brXMjUk6OMwBdV+wP+2PmiGDlOCWTYJISQIQ1Bk/z00cer2e0gGw0P3jr8YE0q2LTiSy BlvanP82kjG0Yefk3BmjY4d+Qt5k5dld5UMvHsE79qMpbp8uDl8UgWjhCwt+O7NvYTze 3IP6128ZmcmuAWhsiyS53O1vx9R+LiGjtdgN+wj6BEfqTwtqjim9nf+LEQ3cBVIJAkob TEOm8ppYlKMsQ+vDNNaHUXYrM4QO/kdb/mjpsBaghEcfZFC88AbeSNjCJjM6N4SoNAaK ebaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.197.36 with SMTP id ir4mr4504925pbc.96.1378316470744; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.30.67 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:41:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Package database From: Jim Ballantine To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:41:11 -0000 My /var/db/pkg has become corrupt, and I can't find an archive of it to install in it's place. Does one exist and if so where? If not any ideas on how to rebuild the db? Thanks Jim Ballantine From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 17:43:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C409484 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x233.google.com (mail-qa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7D926D0 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id bv4so368257qab.17 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:43:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=g9SrLHhFIgg4C/LHeQLPY2DpaXlaEEMjua3TZ8FatMY=; b=QLAsI3GziJzqeXAhgkei7opeE5Q+ega+0mIF03p9mJ5pmNJtAYwiSSS0eCljgAg3K1 d2JWlUneZ0r2daJpbjGywXhx/iomSuncXFcAv2JuAFHnrqXOqQ2z/6EoX8yYlYyg8NXi eCNr3Wmgc7iRh6/vbSgfs9qmyHMaBybKwjgRuBRoOp7q6b1SQUOvMRqDROlzgdiYL4Cl wIFM5xhIRiqUCDe7lmRdCxvHzjU2buiKqoJaI68yiWMtKSyjuLYZkA5EYXjccGeTOULj pE8duij94spPaKxZpUSuKNGsV6V/877MgGp1lQicDuPJ94q60LUkd7TroX6XbrBxiq7q JmLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.35.196 with SMTP id q4mr2753397qad.106.1378316632362; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 10:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.39.33 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:43:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:43:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Package database From: Freddie Cash To: Jim Ballantine Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:43:53 -0000 On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jim Ballantine wrote: > My /var/db/pkg has become corrupt, and I can't find an archive of it to > install in it's place. Does one exist and if so where? If not any ideas > on > how to rebuild the db? > Are you using PKGng or the old pkg_* tools? Meaning, is your data stored as individual files under /var/db/pkg/PORTNAME/*, or as a single sqlite database under /var/db/pkg? If using PKGng, there's a backup copy under /var/db/backup* If using the older pkg_* tools, you're screwed. :) -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 17:45:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B465A0 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent@peterschmitt.fr) Received: from peterschmitt.fr (peterschmitt.fr [5.135.177.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C31E26F5 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.128] (4ab54-4-88-163-248-31.fbx.proxad.net [88.163.248.31]) by peterschmitt.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF2236083 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 19:45:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <522771BD.5070709@peterschmitt.fr> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:45:33 +0200 From: Florent Peterschmitt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130806 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Package database References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q7smEO0bIA1ol7rWQmsiIG9wExmdaoFug" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 17:45:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --q7smEO0bIA1ol7rWQmsiIG9wExmdaoFug Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 04/09/2013 19:43, Freddie Cash a =E9crit : > If using PKGng, there's a backup copy under /var/db/backup* And if the backup is corrupted, maybe with remote query and by making the list of files in /usr/local, you can match packages that have to be reinstalled (and maybe rebuild the database without reinstalling all packages?). Something to try. --=20 Florent Peterschmitt | Please: florent@peterschmitt.fr | * Avoid HTML/RTF in E-mail. +33 (0)6 64 33 97 92 | * Send PDF for documents. http://florent.peterschmitt.fr | * Trim your quotations. Really. Proudly powered by Open Source | Thank you :) --q7smEO0bIA1ol7rWQmsiIG9wExmdaoFug Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSJ3G9AAoJEFr01BkajbiBX7YQALF5ZKoM71jxu7j16C4lc7Oj oASrQl6tQISourIpiv/YdA25f0TGvlyeskJnxiLY/abpVbhW6dU4qKZM4L4zwbmV RN5XFHZAb+0QMFqAdB98vNF9p/YZc+9Tx2u5tWyoHu5qTgC1Rl9Em8+AtHD66f0i Eza0j7XTUDRa9hojxP8n4CCIqG8gUJx4FnFR1AC8L9U4QpXMphjTxOEAoHD2Ax8Z kfVFXTRSYBzwPyEUzLtZlbCAcWtnWCr9AmdX1gugIY8IMsD47ocss6uMSvjVXLgu v+ld35uPZsjfCDff/ohevKW43/XZugLNaGFP/RkMBu5PPGUyOsd+sICYxHNzydRc FxqN/jQqDhy5OwPgeOHFY54fWEDMkRWUNMgAWF7GTWEmC96bSF8hogBUubEXrnir fJBe9y1HY47m7efKAlpWQoPUFEHdjWKZbowO3pXjTQBZAYAm9M0pXIQwfiafht6Q tLYCrq6mZumuIQgpw6UUMKSGWpPEA/SP5MhMXC5eCHJX4oiGeOa/opsToyRNijvY RGPjL8Qbi2HAlHdBVUOliNP55pYIG5DwIsyCM6rGarP78Ak2n8EZMQavHtsv1sKc FrTtRT0MH7Rex9GtipBmsCqesPu6ETRBRLrd+rOncSY6gg+QGcd6aH37iqX6x37b Hnf1Rw/67bcjrPfvEeeo =FShy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q7smEO0bIA1ol7rWQmsiIG9wExmdaoFug-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 19:08:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D17AD1 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 19:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scdbackup@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA1252CC2 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 19:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scdbackup.webframe.org ([87.167.166.50]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MEo4s-1VEbpi03bu-00FxEp for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 21:08:48 +0200 Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 21:08:03 +0200 From: "Thomas Schmitt" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org> In-Reply-To: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org> Message-Id: <3272064609847963126@scdbackup.webframe.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GtquDgDt4I17IyIhRmhaHGCwxjdZ+mqrbuTNXOUHoWPNPjjgINV dXaMFN+N13GZLL4KTrNLiuD7cW3KCZQhkwRPdjSZOgm4+HpfeCG7XtGeNlbJR3imeyFiPUD asMFFSn3R9lqDAYTfrU7P9S4tLxbU6NnucnvEdVhedFfBqpEC+3zF/6T+zyEJwqJt2/0Z26 44VEzfEtsasI+4VEHd1UA== X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:08:56 -0000 Hi, i stumbled over a prescription in xorriso's README: "Currently it is fully supported [...] on FreeBSD with ATAPI/CAM support enabled in the kernel, see atapicam(4) " What i read from http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=atapicam&sektion=4 it could be that this is what's missing or not working properly on your machine. Further i remember a report where CAM related software needed to be re-compiled before it worked: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31181 (It also says you don't need atapicam ... shrug) Have a nice day :) Thomas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 4 20:07:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30135EBF for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mauzo@anubis.morrow.me.uk) Received: from isis.morrow.me.uk (isis.morrow.me.uk [204.109.63.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEBC21B8 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anubis.morrow.me.uk (host86-182-11-25.range86-182.btcentralplus.com [86.182.11.25]) (Authenticated sender: mauzo) by isis.morrow.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C87C450B6 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:01:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 isis.morrow.me.uk 1C87C450B6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=morrow.me.uk; s=dkim201101; t=1378324891; bh=tMOaQ/AQDtXt76wmbdB/5fwPtPxUnj+BKbOVbfnVSTo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=IBG0+bhxPXZkwlO20nDwI+wNjS7AIwJdQwWbGvbWBJRZCzWj9Sume3xtcfypYKZ4U VjqJ8KRn2BecDEPfd2+4s+rWdjM8VX9GQjTHqmUfDZLGvj3tIqHQ6D90aP0v3nYmm0 BJEnQR3/DPP+nzNuLsD9eU4w5sAqJjBklJ+qm3gI= X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at isis.morrow.me.uk Received: by anubis.morrow.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 5001) id BA42AD2CA; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:01:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:01:28 +0100 From: Ben Morrow To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Package database Message-ID: <20130904200124.GA1914@anubis.morrow.me.uk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.stable User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:07:19 -0000 Quoth Freddie Cash : > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jim Ballantine wrote: > > > My /var/db/pkg has become corrupt, and I can't find an archive of it to > > install in it's place. Does one exist and if so where? If not any ideas > > on > > how to rebuild the db? > > Are you using PKGng or the old pkg_* tools? > > Meaning, is your data stored as individual files under > /var/db/pkg/PORTNAME/*, or as a single sqlite database under /var/db/pkg? > > If using PKGng, there's a backup copy under /var/db/backup* > > If using the older pkg_* tools, you're screwed. :) With either package system /etc/periodic/daily/220.backup-pkgdb backs up the whole of /var/db/pkg into /var/backups/pkgdb.bak.tbz*. With pkgng /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/411.pkg-backup also backs up the pkgng db into /var/backups/pkgng.db; probably this means 220.backup-pkgdb should be turned off, but this doesn't happen by default. Ben From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 00:54:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51CE353 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 00:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sukokov@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc3-s1.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s1.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B358B26F3 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 00:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU175-W35 ([65.55.116.73]) by blu0-omc3-s1.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:54:13 -0700 X-TMN: [wbcI/nuO+9uuU/ZXEFSEEJwk3kyyJQsN] X-Originating-Email: [sukokov@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: No Wait To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Requesting Technical Assistance Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 18:54:12 -0600 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2013 00:54:13.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[70A7BB30:01CEA9D2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:54:21 -0000 Hello. =20 For the last 3 weeks or so=2C I've been unable to load AFF properly. =20 The page comes up=2C but the hyperlinks are placed oddly and I get placehol= ders instead of pictures. I can't even check messages. =20 I appreciate any insight you might have. Thank you in advance! Username =3D Sukokov = From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 07:52:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B73F7AC for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 07:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hlh@restart.be) Received: from tignes.restart.be (tignes.restart.be [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:bdbe:0:1::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D3324F5 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 07:51:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=2001:41d0:8:bdbe:1:1::; helo=restart.be; envelope-from=hlh@restart.be; receiver=freebsd-stable@freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 tignes.restart.be 3cVvHf0NJ8zSxs DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=restart.be; s=tignes; t=1378367518; bh=6dMvlbxjFhmKmaTbhsNkPE/MKr+UKTwvKqowYjjGhvo=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2005=20Sep=202013=2009:51:56=20+0200|From:=20Henri=2 0Hennebert=20|To:=20lausts@acm.org|CC:=20freebsd-s table@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Lost=20CAM=20Access=20to=20DVD= 20Writer|References:=20<5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org>|In-R eply-To:=20<5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org>; b=ejqVuRBHs6lWjl2CdwYLuW0TDMseINrmUAP+29xDsRrHVdi+hAcowFv3wpbsAhhVM JAd5T1XSnctYw/ZGsU/dnRpuNqozNiW+qwAsSRljyGuOgjAZ7gFj5kkd3xurHn2Od/ v1nabJw2CuxWyjqKInRkRTM1niZk+QLJqglZiGmpgcot6LP2Hzp+UNiaejG97OQ4As N7Sah0PPKLHuqS3s5ebsHco/axcMNNmGM5cdGcky83BMx3UEVhlP3Z/yDFxfej92m0 uu+yC+/DJvC/JvgBC3t6MiJPxXuojr+Pclv5iM76ubYcBqkTs4BTHtgJi3erwPgMvZ 67FC+CezvvJdA== Received: from restart.be (avoriaz.restart.be [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:bdbe:1:1::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.restart.be", Issuer "CA master" (verified OK)) by tignes.restart.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3cVvHf0NJ8zSxs; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from morzine.restart.bel (morzine.restart.be [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:bdbe:1:2::]) (authenticated bits=0) by restart.be (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r857pulE042716; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:51:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hlh@restart.be) X-Authentication-Warning: avoriaz.restart.bel: Host morzine.restart.be [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:bdbe:1:2::] claimed to be morzine.restart.bel Message-ID: <5228381C.1010705@restart.be> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:51:56 +0200 From: Henri Hennebert Organization: RestartSoft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130820 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lausts@acm.org Subject: Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer References: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org> In-Reply-To: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 07:52:00 -0000 On 09/02/2013 01:54, Thomas Laus wrote: > Hi, > >>>> :-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for > device. I encounter the same problem and reinstalling dvd+rw-tools-7.1 solved it. Henri >> >> Could someone else try to make a 'dump to DVD' backup [...] >> /sbin/dump -0u -L -C16 -B4589840 -P 'growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0' /u > > A test with less disk load would be to write e.g. 100 MB of zeros > to e.g. DVD+RW media (in order to reduce waste): > > dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100 | growisofs -Z /dev/cd0=/dev/fd/0 > > I got the same result and error message as I did when trying to dump the file > system on all of the computers that use ATA for disk access. On the one PC > that uses AHCI, it was able to write to the DVD. > > Tom > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 09:42:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA3B1ED for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com [213.75.39.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF0F2F35 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 09:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.197]) by cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:41:15 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF101.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.4]) by cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:41:15 +0200 Received: from sjakie.klop.ws ([212.182.167.131]) by CPSMTPM-TLF101.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:41:15 +0200 Received: from 212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sjakie.klop.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C61415D77 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:41:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Requesting Technical Assistance References: Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 11:41:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2013 09:41:15.0719 (UTC) FILETIME=[10C0A570:01CEAA1C] X-RcptDomain: freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:42:26 -0000 On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 02:54:12 +0200, No Wait wrote: > Hello. > > For the last 3 weeks or so, I've been unable to load AFF properly. > > The page comes up, but the hyperlinks are placed oddly and I get > placeholders instead of pictures. I can't even check messages. > > I appreciate any insight you might have. Thank you in advance! > > Username = Sukokov > I have no idea what you are talking about. Maybe the wrong mailinglist? Ronald. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 12:52:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78D3905 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 12:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.ballantine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06AB2BF0 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 12:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id lb1so1865536pab.26 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Vggq5uMXC30Fto+QcVO/1Oz9wZHZdMynqF5q8uEgtBA=; b=RQUZlVNPAjSvwC1YpHMclYXhQy80b1vzVa5/+Y4lhPpQWlCBCuRjmFnyvj5O5tZZ1u TSpfOKFeQlitEa8a7zw56JaotFXUqGHXQg+gAENJtUlHi1Ph/uYIV6Katozq6M4z92oc g7kVfIfDHnAh0xxYcu1FJNS+oSeu0aLupYwG+gLEV8yZH+hKVdIpdomgwtCjaJeXAOVp 9iP1Yl4FTy8Gb4iYj0NAyP9N7e8NcKXGp3mLAv0zxl/tUL2RxRVIzjAXzGLJ89NeugdG sCvH4XlwX2O0rZPvDgXtdoPJVWVggRVpKRhouAZYY8rReJxEj905QBoYVmdmL7AmA/Rn LJvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.197.36 with SMTP id ir4mr9012171pbc.96.1378385526346; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.30.67 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 05:52:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:52:06 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Package database From: Jim Ballantine To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:52:07 -0000 Sorry these didn't get to the list. gmail responses only to sender and not cc, it also seems to top post. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jim Ballantine Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM Subject: Re: Package database To: Freddie Cash I looked in /var/db and there is not dir/file named backup. There is a dir named pkg.bak but it is empty. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jim Ballantine wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade with portmaster and getting: > > portmaster -Gadv > ===>>> Sorting ports by category > ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports > > ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/ORBit2-2.14.19/+CONTENTS > > ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/R-3.0.1/+CONTENTS > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jim Ballantine wrote: >> >>> My /var/db/pkg has become corrupt, and I can't find an archive of it to >>> install in it's place. Does one exist and if so where? If not any >>> ideas on >>> how to rebuild the db? >>> >> >> Are you using PKGng or the old pkg_* tools? >> >> Meaning, is your data stored as individual files under >> /var/db/pkg/PORTNAME/*, or as a single sqlite database under /var/db/pkg? >> >> If using PKGng, there's a backup copy under /var/db/backup* >> >> If using the older pkg_* tools, you're screwed. :) >> >> >> -- >> Freddie Cash >> fjwcash@gmail.com >> > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 15:16:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24003A7; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693442675; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ij15so1240456vcb.16 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 08:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TdeuSSoGbdREMMlKXemEI68o59UlDkKftyZprEmDv7s=; b=xToEpFbiUTWqTxFx76bPQvYq0wNx2/LG1zMWnF0Gc55fuj8qigeoQw9bEvbOvOscAS rmR6JITqTowNGXorKgH4Qr2m7392zttzTpGWsgPNQfu/v1SQkTejtYgogire2wrp1nHk 08iBP/Rugp2+/R4Oxg4XVJw9VGrCaKAYWOcP2MjU0jrDCcoGfvtmZq+cSfmCsiKnxLXx KteLhALcj59P7WkIcFCLby65MhAU8CZK2kAUtK86kIDcYK6+RrwdvEOh1/X3Wi4J+WOR P3g7j715aS32jm1/B+4ZwStE3yjGRNtPSZ8BJt/aWbRH7Z8s+FtK9zjGVXJ31L2c1UuI Y2BQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.10.194 with SMTP id q2mr2576633vcq.2.1378394202471; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 08:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.30.130 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:16:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <370A25C8-7747-4B96-A506-EB92FD0F77CF@FreeBSD.org> <1377895898.1111.341.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:16:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash? From: Zaphod Beeblebrox To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Stable , Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:16:43 -0000 Replying to myself again, I again doubled the bio_transient_maxcnt: original value 160, failed doubling 360, new value 720; and the machine was able to successfully "for i in jot 10; do make -j4 buildkernel; done" ... But doesn't this mean that we still have a resource exhaustion to worry about? Isn't this just another race waiting for the the right set of conditions? On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote= : > Since there weren't any more ideas here, I tried turning off > hyper-threading. This is an old pentium-D type CPU --- that is: one core > with HT. I'm wondering if the HT nature is helping this resource > exhaustion, so I turned off HT (basically making this a single-threaded > CPU) and it seems to have made the problem go away. > > That is not to say that the problem is fixed: it simply means that > replication may be tied to multiple CPUs and/or the allocation of resourc= es > by an HT CPU core. > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrot= e: > >> The first one (kern.geom.transient_map_retries) causes the system to >> wedge. >> >> The second one (default is 180, I doubled to 360) causes the system to >> crash but not dump. >> >> So... neither fixes the problem. >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Edward Tomasz Napiera=B3a < >> trasz@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dn= iu >>> 31 sie 2013, o godz. 00:49: >>> > Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA >>> errors without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make= -j4 >>> again... and here is the relatively similar core.txt.5 >>> > >>> > >>> https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=3Dfiles&t=3Dd99648ef587= 6b91c5957148445e60c87 >>> > >>> > Looking at it, gmirror is dropping the same error and the underlying >>> hardware is not causing the error... >>> >>> Let me quote Konstantin: >>> >>> > It is either an exhaustion of the transient map, or a deadlock. >>> > For the first, setting kern.geom.transient_map_retries to 0 could hel= p. >>> > For the second, the count of the transient buffers must be increased, >>> > by kern.bio_transient_maxcnt loader tunable. >>> >>> Could you try both and tell which one of them fixed the problem? Thank= s! >>> >>> >> > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 21:33:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE64DC9 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.hartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A7621F4 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([92.231.87.154]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mb31L-1VXqTY1klv-00KhEn for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 23:32:59 +0200 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 23:37:25 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: devel/llvm33: failed to compile due to CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID issue Message-ID: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YrJsAZTydiOb+wCJLMC90Qs7ctw/6rXRGARRfV5m1mte9c+OtIz /eK1Nfj75ojuOLYgs+WUT5XHHuzBMSmWkXR0zMTqgvRsO5sSb85FHivTb0Qv/rAuVX7w+Br p/fX9wtZqrllal6yemYnGKMzljqJE0FuDNvUq0O0qONmC6LVXlvuslN5eoefkb+u29XboXC JR+fKMcwXcZ/ywkG1hdMw== X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:33:01 -0000 On a laptop, running FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r255170: Tue Sep 3 11:54:29 CEST 2013 amd64, compiling/updating port devel/llvm33 fails with the error shown below. The port is at llvm-3.3_2 and is supposed to be updated to llvm-3.3_4. On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT there is no problem compiling the port. [...] llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Release build In file included from Process.cpp:85: /usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Unix/Process.inc:75:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID' if (::clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &TS) == 0) ^ 1 error generated. gmake[1]: *** [/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Release/Process.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support' gmake: *** [all] Error 1 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 21:46:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08DD658 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2A222DD for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id eh20so2697239obb.15 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:46:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=L5be+ayDOQfNoL8t4hMgCuMl4af4yjkxPnjDIBzpxIo=; b=zQ+sk1hL4Slc7m6kZxfSMieZd285XEv+whBwoMYciz1LgYl8RGrPW57uzZFiuOtgIp PjoOCQs7Y34CDgqw4kmZGOa/kt4jxzfF99QKh+x5l5F+Bck7NaK3FHciGxoU+qL1YlpJ y7aif7nNvhdYEByCQwslLQc2bmWRxukhzBHxw/XUqWrq4tWhUrS+44AXYFgFF7MaF32i ujSofmEox7U4JP4MQDGSD+A+WVvWok8g3MDHvxr0tRY4JSdh73hRI2vFmL8mNDqUKd3W ASM4Lu1ayCBLXtu8pYW5B+/ieGbap8ClsQe/3NiFudBNV9cus4Y2ClR+j9hHYvW0ZmV9 vEqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.204.4 with SMTP id ku4mr8216229obc.21.1378417601871; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.22.161 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:46:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> References: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 23:46:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: devel/llvm33: failed to compile due to CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID issue From: Oliver Pinter To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:46:42 -0000 On 9/5/13, O. Hartmann wrote: > On a laptop, running FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r255170: Tue Sep 3 > 11:54:29 CEST 2013 amd64, compiling/updating port devel/llvm33 fails > with the error shown below. > > The port is at llvm-3.3_2 and is supposed to be updated to > llvm-3.3_4. > > On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT there is no problem compiling the port. > > [...] > llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Release build > In file included from Process.cpp:85: > /usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Unix/Process.inc:75:23: > error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID' if > (::clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &TS) == 0) ^ > 1 error generated. > gmake[1]: *** > [/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Release/Process.o] > Error 1 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[1]: Leaving > directory `/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support' > gmake: *** [all] Error 1 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/181817 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 22:39:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4FB88E for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lausts@acm.org) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57BB2546 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:39:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=V4T/IJbi c=1 sm=0 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:17 a=I9A6gpd8bSkA:10 a=cJzkC_CqN18A:10 a=kWQ6D_09QQAA:10 a=kHc8Q_KJ-KsA:10 a=N54-gffFAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=-mWxnwzdiyYA:10 a=3R5mbVEqzzlM79xceRoA:9 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 98.31.3.233 Received: from [98.31.3.233] ([98.31.3.233:48024] helo=mail.laus.org) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id C4/32-26119-E1809225; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 22:39:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (laust2 [192.168.1.100]) by mail.laus.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r85MdPqU015197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:39:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lausts@acm.org) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.laus.org: Host laust2 [192.168.1.100] claimed to be [192.168.1.100] From: "Thomas Laus" Organization: ABB To: Henri Hennebert , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 18:39:25 -0400 Subject: Re: Lost CAM Access to DVD Writer Message-ID: <5229081D.3267.E1D67@lausts.acm.org> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <5228381C.1010705@restart.be> References: <5223D3A7.25445.31835A@lausts.acm.org>, <5228381C.1010705@restart.be> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lausts@acm.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 22:39:33 -0000 > > Hi, > > > >>>> :-( Unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd0 Inappropriate ioctl for > > device. > > I encounter the same problem and reinstalling dvd+rw-tools-7.1 solved it. > > Henri > Henri: Thank you for solving this problem for me. I removed and re-installed dvd+rw-tools-7.1 and this issue went away on both i386 computers. I have been tracking FreeBSD 9-STABLE one one of them since 9.0 and I use FreeBSD release updates on the other one. A system library must have changed that affected growisofs that required re-installation of that port. It was totally unexpected that an update within a branch would affect a port. There wasn't any UPDATING entry in /usr/ports that would have provided a warning to rebuild ports that depend on the updated system function. Tom -- Public Keys: PGP KeyID = 0x5F22FDC1 GnuPG KeyID = 0x620836CF From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 11:17:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627B558A; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:17:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23CB522BF; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::7c61:722b:7bc8:5bde] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:7c61:722b:7bc8:5bde]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E15F5C44; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A78DFC7E-B8D9-4DC4-9B4E-A4799D344C3C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: devel/llvm33: failed to compile due to CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID issue From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:16:58 +0200 Message-Id: <3A76D5BA-4A37-4747-9DF8-B12C32015672@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> To: Oliver Pinter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:17:15 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A78DFC7E-B8D9-4DC4-9B4E-A4799D344C3C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 5, 2013, at 23:46, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 9/5/13, O. Hartmann wrote: >> On a laptop, running FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r255170: Tue Sep 3 >> 11:54:29 CEST 2013 amd64, compiling/updating port devel/llvm33 fails >> with the error shown below. >>=20 >> The port is at llvm-3.3_2 and is supposed to be updated to >> llvm-3.3_4. >>=20 >> On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT there is no problem compiling the port. >>=20 >> [...] >> llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Release build >> In file included from Process.cpp:85: >> = /usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Unix/Process.inc:75:= 23: >> error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID' if >> (::clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &TS) =3D=3D 0) ^ >> 1 error generated. >> gmake[1]: *** >> = [/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Release/Process.o] >> Error 1 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[1]: = Leaving >> directory `/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support' >> gmake: *** [all] Error 1 >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/181817 This is because David Xu MFC'd his time.h changes to stable/9, but did = not merge r245428, for some reason. There was quite a large window = where -current was broken in this respect. I will merge the fix to stable/9 tonight, but I don't think it will make = it into 9.2-RELEASE, so we will still need a workaround for the port, = for the life of 9.2. :-( -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_A78DFC7E-B8D9-4DC4-9B4E-A4799D344C3C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlIpubUACgkQsF6jCi4glqPvOQCg0s9lPPdTWo7CKhB58CuUc5gt /EQAoK8TRj4JPuIac4rtE00X6qbQt2fO =9r/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_A78DFC7E-B8D9-4DC4-9B4E-A4799D344C3C-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 12:29:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DF986F; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FC926F2; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::7c61:722b:7bc8:5bde] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:7c61:722b:7bc8:5bde]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07B815C44; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:29:48 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4984B11F-8E79-4CB6-A183-DCAAD94697CF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: devel/llvm33: failed to compile due to CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID issue From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <3A76D5BA-4A37-4747-9DF8-B12C32015672@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:29:38 +0200 Message-Id: References: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> <3A76D5BA-4A37-4747-9DF8-B12C32015672@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Pinter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:29:53 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_4984B11F-8E79-4CB6-A183-DCAAD94697CF Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 6, 2013, at 13:16, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Sep 5, 2013, at 23:46, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> On 9/5/13, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> On a laptop, running FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r255170: Tue Sep 3 >>> 11:54:29 CEST 2013 amd64, compiling/updating port devel/llvm33 fails >>> with the error shown below. >>>=20 >>> The port is at llvm-3.3_2 and is supposed to be updated to >>> llvm-3.3_4. >>>=20 >>> On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT there is no problem compiling the port. >>>=20 >>> [...] >>> llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Release build >>> In file included from Process.cpp:85: >>> = /usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Unix/Process.inc:75:= 23: >>> error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID' if >>> (::clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &TS) =3D=3D 0) ^ >>> 1 error generated. >>> gmake[1]: *** >>> = [/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Release/Process.o] >>> Error 1 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[1]: = Leaving >>> directory `/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support' >>> gmake: *** [all] Error 1 >>=20 >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/181817 >=20 > This is because David Xu MFC'd his time.h changes to stable/9, but did = not merge r245428, for some reason. There was quite a large window = where -current was broken in this respect. >=20 > I will merge the fix to stable/9 tonight, but I don't think it will = make it into 9.2-RELEASE, so we will still need a workaround for the = port, for the life of 9.2. :-( Note: the workaround I've used in head is = http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250616 . This simply does = -DCLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID=3D15 on the command line of = lib/Support/Process.cpp, which is ugly, but works fine, unless somebody = changes the define again. :-) -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_4984B11F-8E79-4CB6-A183-DCAAD94697CF Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlIpyroACgkQsF6jCi4glqOgGwCg+t8XFBv+GmdYEIaklQhanuAF p+EAoL313jBNO7zXfSSKgjoy70wM/FbI =hkij -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_4984B11F-8E79-4CB6-A183-DCAAD94697CF-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 13:54:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC7410C; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47692C34; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k18so3852460oag.26 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:54:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=noSLOC0WcKFIjfVmThfmAunY3tRoMBe6hKkT10rXaBs=; b=bqa5cz4afjChWbiOXWKVGAvARAsPM0uRdyYz79Z4p1RYuYo0IywlCH5xXh+KH+1xGP o87Tf4sdBvDtfCNyvww6/Pw3yhlwBo95drm34dmEtCjIOGuG/lCiasqHwdzMuoMz+naJ h/Fwv/D7bWOYhdQPoV4htoXMVYORLWZhBfu///EXmMOeLBB8VOwLJyDbnFUQqv4gxxcl Tee7yvHBYe19PCXoLFY6b0ePANvkkuQ6CQnN9jsfrvreSPze0qempglgKL2PfF6LZWXA 8SdiDu4x3qZhtMdT3iXOq/gsr99O/dS8lkYa438wxTZUZ3UVQGKhh0OTwJvTek/wbOmd 7s2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.48.194 with SMTP id o2mr1936689obn.90.1378475649198; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.22.161 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:54:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> <3A76D5BA-4A37-4747-9DF8-B12C32015672@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 15:54:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: devel/llvm33: failed to compile due to CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID issue From: Oliver Pinter To: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:54:10 -0000 On 9/6/13, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Sep 6, 2013, at 13:16, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On Sep 5, 2013, at 23:46, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>> On 9/5/13, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> On a laptop, running FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r255170: Tue Sep 3 >>>> 11:54:29 CEST 2013 amd64, compiling/updating port devel/llvm33 fails >>>> with the error shown below. >>>> >>>> The port is at llvm-3.3_2 and is supposed to be updated to >>>> llvm-3.3_4. >>>> >>>> On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT there is no problem compiling the port. >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Release build >>>> In file included from Process.cpp:85: >>>> /usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Unix/Process.inc:75:23: >>>> error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID' if >>>> (::clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &TS) == 0) ^ >>>> 1 error generated. >>>> gmake[1]: *** >>>> [/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Release/Process.o] >>>> Error 1 gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gmake[1]: Leaving >>>> directory `/usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support' >>>> gmake: *** [all] Error 1 >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/181817 >> >> This is because David Xu MFC'd his time.h changes to stable/9, but did not >> merge r245428, for some reason. There was quite a large window where >> -current was broken in this respect. >> >> I will merge the fix to stable/9 tonight, but I don't think it will make >> it into 9.2-RELEASE, so we will still need a workaround for the port, for >> the life of 9.2. :-( > > Note: the workaround I've used in head is > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250616 . This simply does > -DCLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID=15 on the command line of > lib/Support/Process.cpp, which is ugly, but works fine, unless somebody > changes the define again. :-) thanks! ;) > > -Dimitry > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 14:53:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02686359 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com [213.75.39.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0CC2387 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpsps-ews27.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.193]) by cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:53:46 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.7]) by cpsps-ews27.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:53:46 +0200 Received: from sjakie.klop.ws ([212.182.167.131]) by CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:53:46 +0200 Received: from 212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sjakie.klop.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id C112E16125; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:53:45 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Jim Ballantine" Subject: Re: Fwd: Package database References: Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:53:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2013 14:53:46.0194 (UTC) FILETIME=[E351D320:01CEAB10] X-RcptDomain: freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:53:57 -0000 Than I'll top-post too. Anyway. Try this: $ ls -al /var/backups/ total 16417 drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 10 Sep 6 03:03 ./ drwxr-xr-x 25 root wheel 25 Sep 5 14:42 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1688 Dec 6 2012 aliases.bak -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1665 Aug 4 2011 aliases.bak2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 761 Feb 6 2013 group.bak -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 761 Jan 2 2013 group.bak2 -rw------- 1 root wheel 2994 Feb 6 2013 master.passwd.bak -rw------- 1 root wheel 2994 Jan 2 2013 master.passwd.bak2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8362370 Sep 6 03:03 pkgdb.bak.tbz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8362370 Sep 5 03:03 pkgdb.bak.tbz.2 On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:52:06 +0200, Jim Ballantine wrote: > Sorry these didn't get to the list. > gmail responses only to sender and not cc, > it also seems to top post. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jim Ballantine > Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM > Subject: Re: Package database > To: Freddie Cash > > > I looked in /var/db and there is not dir/file named backup. There is a > dir > named pkg.bak but it is empty. > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jim Ballantine > wrote: > >> I'm trying to upgrade with portmaster and getting: >> >> portmaster -Gadv >> ===>>> Sorting ports by category >> ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports >> >> ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/ORBit2-2.14.19/+CONTENTS >> >> ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/R-3.0.1/+CONTENTS >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jim Ballantine >>> wrote: >>> >>>> My /var/db/pkg has become corrupt, and I can't find an archive of it >>>> to >>>> install in it's place. Does one exist and if so where? If not any >>>> ideas on >>>> how to rebuild the db? >>>> >>> >>> Are you using PKGng or the old pkg_* tools? >>> >>> Meaning, is your data stored as individual files under >>> /var/db/pkg/PORTNAME/*, or as a single sqlite database under >>> /var/db/pkg? >>> >>> If using PKGng, there's a backup copy under /var/db/backup* >>> >>> If using the older pkg_* tools, you're screwed. :) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Freddie Cash >>> fjwcash@gmail.com >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 16:23:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F66B3A0 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.ballantine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com (mail-pd0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758F42C92 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q10so3450973pdj.35 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:23:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jszhDYXjxssQoWK+RKjLOur+QXlU7Tr0/35BXvtOmjg=; b=zVioaF5xThoKPYVXOylIHXvoR4nXIqthrk4SFktpEji7Ocu0BpWyOGcTVExS+eE4r3 wfFKR6R5oEtyk7WlcEfcugi4ATv+abtE8IuKLpQ6lyDuOMu2ONALjiu8bQQ0vfpIILoo iBOrrVxlZ+zLD3nE1774CO3AAh6bRFqqQ8TjEY8O4aeLFbL3F6RPid0mT9yYFc0QzwdP xIe/wo8wpWrcIfMo4/6jaPXRZ7WatDaK6NPKTfUDyuqtN4CSsYENqiinwAISK25HJoXO FiVqCxdyCT7B3sqBCudD0u7mPqD6dEpD4jObnwPQJF5xrxjzSWx9iZpUe0iNkqNU41cB gvgQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.164.161 with SMTP id yr1mr3004517pbb.199.1378484585015; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.30.67 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:23:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Package database From: Jim Ballantine To: Ronald Klop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:23:05 -0000 The backup in /var/backups was a copy of the current DB, so it was not usable, however there was/is and older backup that was not corrupt. So I restored it into /var/db and then update that one. Jim On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: > Than I'll top-post too. Anyway. Try this: > > $ ls -al /var/backups/ > total 16417 > drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 10 Sep 6 03:03 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 25 root wheel 25 Sep 5 14:42 ../ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1688 Dec 6 2012 aliases.bak > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1665 Aug 4 2011 aliases.bak2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 761 Feb 6 2013 group.bak > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 761 Jan 2 2013 group.bak2 > -rw------- 1 root wheel 2994 Feb 6 2013 master.passwd.bak > -rw------- 1 root wheel 2994 Jan 2 2013 master.passwd.bak2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8362370 Sep 6 03:03 pkgdb.bak.tbz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8362370 Sep 5 03:03 pkgdb.bak.tbz.2 > > > > > On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:52:06 +0200, Jim Ballantine > wrote: > > Sorry these didn't get to the list. >> gmail responses only to sender and not cc, >> it also seems to top post. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Jim Ballantine >> Date: Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM >> Subject: Re: Package database >> To: Freddie Cash >> >> >> I looked in /var/db and there is not dir/file named backup. There is a >> dir >> named pkg.bak but it is empty. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jim Ballantine > >wrote: >> >> I'm trying to upgrade with portmaster and getting: >>> >>> portmaster -Gadv >>> ===>>> Sorting ports by category >>> ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports >>> >>> ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/ORBit2-2.14.19/+**CONTENTS >>> >>> ===>>> No ORIGIN in /var/db/pkg/R-3.0.1/+CONTENTS >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jim Ballantine >>> >wrote: >>>> >>>> My /var/db/pkg has become corrupt, and I can't find an archive of it to >>>>> install in it's place. Does one exist and if so where? If not any >>>>> ideas on >>>>> how to rebuild the db? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Are you using PKGng or the old pkg_* tools? >>>> >>>> Meaning, is your data stored as individual files under >>>> /var/db/pkg/PORTNAME/*, or as a single sqlite database under >>>> /var/db/pkg? >>>> >>>> If using PKGng, there's a backup copy under /var/db/backup* >>>> >>>> If using the older pkg_* tools, you're screwed. :) >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Freddie Cash >>>> fjwcash@gmail.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@** >> freebsd.org " >> > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 16:37:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0860AB34; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC0A82DAD; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::7c61:722b:7bc8:5bde] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:7c61:722b:7bc8:5bde]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE9C15C44; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CACB69E4-8310-4AB6-953C-AB79BFC808EE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: devel/llvm33: failed to compile due to CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID issue From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <3A76D5BA-4A37-4747-9DF8-B12C32015672@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:36:59 +0200 Message-Id: <32568C11-7AAE-41D7-AC47-94B30494F9C9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> <3A76D5BA-4A37-4747-9DF8-B12C32015672@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Pinter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:37:14 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_CACB69E4-8310-4AB6-953C-AB79BFC808EE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 6, 2013, at 13:16, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Sep 5, 2013, at 23:46, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> On 9/5/13, O. Hartmann wrote: ... >>> = /usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Unix/Process.inc:75:= 23: >>> error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID' ... > This is because David Xu MFC'd his time.h changes to stable/9, but did = not merge r245428, for some reason. There was quite a large window = where -current was broken in this respect. >=20 > I will merge the fix to stable/9 tonight, but I don't think it will = make it into 9.2-RELEASE, so we will still need a workaround for the = port, for the life of 9.2. :-( Fortunately, re@ gave me permission to merge it into releng/9.2 (see = r255308), so the change will make it into 9.2-RELEASE! -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_CACB69E4-8310-4AB6-953C-AB79BFC808EE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlIqBLAACgkQsF6jCi4glqM50wCgn13ZV0W9EhoGmj4pp+VsyWGr PpYAoJJ0pUrZaQkYBFSuEjgW8ljcmANr =HeTV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_CACB69E4-8310-4AB6-953C-AB79BFC808EE-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 18:10:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF47BEA; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x22f.google.com (mail-qa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32BB423AD; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j7so647968qaq.6 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nyuXJfShUEH5fKAECuOq3cYtG7XlYK+fFAGL88mf5JI=; b=oF52XuATJppJ+1/BS9io8T7NPRCKSS+o4FtRSeE0Z6u2IoI92swjfm+XnXhDmq3TUZ x0DSvUf/L2D/FFFP8J+ZPK9nsoBj6VeHE7s1P4AoDo5iCMZXt4FEenzPX7PIBdUdmeHH qHF1GKcne+KHYp2OxyJl2Mdy1TOvdYU63Q1EtViW6Qwk9R3XMfzVtV44WHy2ABkC6cNf HLv5JgN7t+o8iTD7lhuF3uiDeEEVMegQpfGq0pj+sFKjZdoHot0URQR6oElhPYlUXL6j Uq2e5KeOd7O2rzGz0QGrlKP3IwFTLhuNULqJhANAU6YvHdYaJoHd5UWNFJqSAStULboy n+Pg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.47.84 with SMTP id b20mr3402867qen.83.1378491031183; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.70.225 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:10:31 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: akQppvT48aW_Kl01vFiZEbYISoA Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 DHCP Installer restart problem From: CeDeROM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:10:32 -0000 Hello :-) When installer is restarted DHCP fails to (re)configure interface, probably because it is already configured :-) I got into this using bootonly installer and machine with low capacity drive... Please fix :-) http://justpaste.it/bc8q Best regards, Tomek Cedro -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 18:14:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A962A5DE; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [208.86.227.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECD5246A; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (c-71-224-221-174.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E9D18C47; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:14:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us 5E9D18C47 Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:14:00 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 DHCP Installer restart problem Message-ID: <20130906181400.GI77463@glenbarber.us> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YrQNB5Deg1WGKZi3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:14:05 -0000 --YrQNB5Deg1WGKZi3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:10:31PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello :-) >=20 > When installer is restarted DHCP fails to (re)configure interface, > probably because it is already configured :-) I got into this using > bootonly installer and machine with low capacity drive... Please fix > :-) >=20 > http://justpaste.it/bc8q >=20 Can you provide information on how to reproduce this? Glen --YrQNB5Deg1WGKZi3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSKhtoAAoJEFJPDDeguUajdq4IAIm2fimnS6wC6aVoXTHKIQ11 IZQoQHqSK2LDRdYPwMjBVWbEugjhEEpfV6UlWL8R0IvNb6BFmzAOA2WsCZg4I9cl Rhq3VtbKYXDFqMhTinbEWSzuqugbzifAItnh5y8rQbgQp+sfAn5XAIHYyEcmwOLD NxtfhMhrKuwuxRWttPvYAoPVqio9pBptfquFpe7BpnyYTArmxjzsv/U6rXyyW9lS C63HdwjI6p6xIjZkWuA2ME5Ki1K1xJh2DFeaoxs/5r/CFJpHvZUbbRcWZBKoLav5 0++UiOc2cGDrruGn/BYpO5rBH+cPUeFx1k3YcSypmnGws/kcQwWvGoFqOHCbep0= =iFuq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YrQNB5Deg1WGKZi3-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 19:09:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56887FCC; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA42C27BF; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q4so1927505qcx.40 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:09:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4gb++r01H3tyFo89VLRrwmSaDQaBGvcSI2/sN5omdIw=; b=Mlzl2w66G2y5kJEapBztCOcb0PIs4ZSx82GwF4Wntc/A0oDA+SpO9F6rJOZqNbUrhC zJf/CKzojNaqT+C8h2ChrsLYRv6mbdiBMh6hTWRUCHtpX3A3QlcVErbtlk4oeRWdpLX2 C81EylogdtCiuNTdO/o2hk/96nEXtVQY4990RufuEcnbI0n11I1OUfIaRuOU/pEgKg49 kCePhVjZnFFCwwRx3srKbIbXS7m6bVgJKQSsWm+Po1hyoaPVYGUOKiGSNGu9tjf65utX iaoybpbfvr2lDCnUu3r8JNCKCR8H7eJvQl3y3ucKpV8MUuVVBXydCg30MAVbBlsUvLce GRSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.24.207 with SMTP id w15mr4765074qef.51.1378494581009; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.70.225 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:09:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130906181400.GI77463@glenbarber.us> References: <20130906181400.GI77463@glenbarber.us> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:09:40 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jPg1yx9R5LIGKN5KQ8FZ6MTiJRs Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 DHCP Installer restart problem From: CeDeROM To: Glen Barber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 19:09:42 -0000 Hello Glen :-) As I have mentioned - I started bootonly installation on a device with insufficient disk space, so in general there were errors during installation, then installer asked me if I want to restart installation, I have agreed, when it came to NIC configuration DHCP was unable to obtain the configuration/lease. So please try to start installer, configure NIC once, then restart the installer and the problem should occur on another DHCP configuration of the NIC :-) Best regards! :-) Tomek Cedro CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:10:31PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote: >> Hello :-) >> >> When installer is restarted DHCP fails to (re)configure interface, >> probably because it is already configured :-) I got into this using >> bootonly installer and machine with low capacity drive... Please fix >> :-) >> >> http://justpaste.it/bc8q >> > > Can you provide information on how to reproduce this? > > Glen > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 21:29:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198CA83F; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA6E27BB; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1VI3bA-001koK-O5>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 23:29:48 +0200 Received: from f052146113.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.52.146.113] helo=munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.80.1) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1VI3bA-004Bu1-KR>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 23:29:48 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 23:34:09 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: devel/llvm33: failed to compile due to CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID issue Message-ID: <20130906233409.0ae7bb0b@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <32568C11-7AAE-41D7-AC47-94B30494F9C9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130905233725.05106d2a@munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de> <3A76D5BA-4A37-4747-9DF8-B12C32015672@FreeBSD.org> <32568C11-7AAE-41D7-AC47-94B30494F9C9@FreeBSD.org> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/GORj2pFLu=H=gbmzBaNQiPQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 78.52.146.113 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:29:51 -0000 --Sig_/GORj2pFLu=H=gbmzBaNQiPQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:36:59 +0200 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Sep 6, 2013, at 13:16, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On Sep 5, 2013, at 23:46, Oliver Pinter > > wrote: > >> On 9/5/13, O. Hartmann wrote: > ... > >>> /usr/ports/devel/llvm33/work/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Support/Unix/Process.in= c:75:23: > >>> error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID' > ... > > This is because David Xu MFC'd his time.h changes to stable/9, but > > did not merge r245428, for some reason. There was quite a large > > window where -current was broken in this respect. > >=20 > > I will merge the fix to stable/9 tonight, but I don't think it will > > make it into 9.2-RELEASE, so we will still need a workaround for > > the port, for the life of 9.2. :-( >=20 > Fortunately, re@ gave me permission to merge it into releng/9.2 (see > r255308), so the change will make it into 9.2-RELEASE! >=20 > -Dimitry >=20 That is great. Thanks a lot. Oliver --Sig_/GORj2pFLu=H=gbmzBaNQiPQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKkpZAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8EMUH/jRfJ0654mpARtrBCLLKJAkh phAmDk++kwQ4Uq0xTrWBJ56S7Ydyua28cPqV6emLPEB42W1Dujs8i8FFt1J0FdXv J0Bl8baGLY5lbJYf0Gqn+q4ym0y9VpcjX/u9+9ls7m0/4e0ymmQJGBDdsQCj6oLc 7nxB8tnQ9qYLJr0NsLxwKHJiJC3srWq+gPOlOadZHOXaSM+MTRcsUmfMt6SRXg95 7lhwbAVm2XeURHGOjln3pN4XkfzIOk6bzk7egFeRz0dkus6kIFB72A3hCvHAuft/ /OznrzMBQMNoQ9BnD/UiAD/Syhhkhc2q8EraKOZgSNpPf0wY39qW2orLKy1W3so= =LQzc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/GORj2pFLu=H=gbmzBaNQiPQ-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 6 22:01:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E281743; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BCB42C9D; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 22:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cb5so1470346wib.4 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:01:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YMBMIO4rJrd6+3GOvCf4rLa9RcreZoEwc2C/aDkK3DI=; b=x7hHfAc5woRJIptkFl6OoU9bEWHuvMP53Qh8ZY3+BZV0pDhxafPQQPNyVxGlH+UeaZ T8YPA1Ycy/oAs4UZDn+zl7O7DMFkxNxrRi5s4X9r4oLbtfj9+/KpbMAW3045NR4YBWif 1/p9kI5YR5Z79L9jTNwr+BkT8LBiPROsyJwUAJesYUxQVc2ZTCOpL6nyrz+nmAG2oVY3 0qyw01ANDOO3/d3SiNV0nS5ES4Hhfl25yzNT4KbVhq7z4BOlhjidOorlrnnjPPBFCgOY Zt3OIUcWKFyt9xA9xQLYfxD19uQRMntr+JHZY44JMa9cr7ZRcMWh9VzTWW+gGXKJjq6B JTkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.131 with SMTP id j3mr90639wix.0.1378504886872; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.73.133 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 15:01:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> <5223B313.9060708@FreeBSD.org> <5223B9C3.2070508@FreeBSD.org> <522418F4.9030007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 15:01:26 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oaMIqjsuWpUFfu_kIpgt-iqCzY4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance From: Adrian Chadd To: Mike Harding Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 22:01:29 -0000 .. anything happening? -adrian On 2 September 2013 07:29, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 2 September 2013 07:25, Mike Harding wrote: > >> It's detailed in the ticket, see >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632 and search for >> 'reverted'. >> >> > Ok. You and avg@ are digging into it deeper, so I'll leave it be for now. > I'll retest this on my test laptops when I'm back home. > > > > -adrian > >