From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 19 15:15:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DE75AA;
 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from f10.opsec.eu (f10.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A1023A8;
 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:15:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by f10.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@FreeBSD.org>)
 id 1X8WLs-0009jK-JO; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:15:08 +0200
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:15:08 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org>
To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: www/p5-libapreq2: libtool fix, strip libs, pkg-plist followup,
 p5-fix
Message-ID: <20140719151508.GB33102@f10.opsec.eu>
References: <20140608081334.GK1427@f10.opsec.eu>
 <20140608083407.GL1427@f10.opsec.eu>
 <20140608083636.GM1427@f10.opsec.eu>
 <20140608085842.GO1427@f10.opsec.eu> <53945E98.3080408@gmx.de>
 <20140610094949.GY3484@f10.opsec.eu> <539752DE.5060208@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <539752DE.5060208@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18
Cc: Frederic Culot <culot@FreeBSD.org>, skv@FreeBSD.org, apache@freebsd.org,
 Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Support of apache-related ports  <freebsd-apache.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-apache>,
 <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-apache/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-apache@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache>,
 <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:15:15 -0000

Hello,

> > Back to my proposed change for www/libapreq2 and this question:
> > 
> >>> Would it be more useful to make the slave port (p5-libapreq2)
> >>> a seperate port depending on the other ?
> > 
> > Looking at the pkg-plist and Makefile mess: Is it really useful
> > to have this master/slave port or should I split and depend on libapreq2 ?

Attached are two diffs for both ports that seperate them.

> running a short grep over the tree shows there are only two libapreq2 consumers
> - www/mod_amazon_proxy
> - www/p5-libapreq2
> 
> but eleven p5-libapreq consumers
> - net-mgmt/netdisco
> - net-mgmt/netdot
> - www/foswiki-ModPerlEngineContrib
> - www/p5-Apache-Gallery
> - www/p5-Apache2-SiteControl
> - www/p5-CGI-Application-Plugin-Apache
> - www/p5-HTML-Mason
> - www/p5-Maypole
> - www/rt38
> - www/rt40.cpan
> - www/rt42.cpan

I ran a bulk poudriere run with this:

www/mod_amazon_proxy
net-mgmt/netdisco
net-mgmt/netdot
www/foswiki-ModPerlEngineContrib
www/p5-Apache-Gallery
www/p5-Apache2-SiteControl
www/p5-CGI-Application-Plugin-Apache
www/p5-HTML-Mason
www/p5-Maypole
www/rt38
www/rt40
www/rt42

and DEFAULT_VERSIONS=perl5=5.20 apache=2.2

without problems on 10amd64 and 91amd64.

Attached are the two diffs, please comment, and if it's OK, please
approve.

I'll also update 191161 for testing.

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                          6 years to go !