From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  7 10:31:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67508955;
 Sun,  7 Sep 2014 10:31:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0203D1D51;
 Sun,  7 Sep 2014 10:31:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ln8Tl-1Y1HPo3U0z-00hNPf; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 12:30:57
 +0200
Message-ID: <540C33E6.3040805@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 12:31:02 +0200
From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
Reply-To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" <apache@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
Subject: Re: apache 2.2 ports
References: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org>
In-Reply-To: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+iv7JYoOMX5L98dlzfLCTiWNGqI5Jw7fmM1ON2AsTP7Tnh86Eh8
 57IOzQBgGjRUFtquo8/Syj+t4lT36OEw99kx2HzuOQn8mltQFvCg5iujL0eyaW1uuzm5Mkc
 BZBX5T6Wa9vi/7JiZRMQBE6ow2uUxx2tHmX41KbaB4+PBKwL6lGgKkQm7DjwMZVf8B1B82g
 6B2rRvZUBVjpR7Cs2BM6Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Support of apache-related ports  <freebsd-apache.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-apache>,
 <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-apache/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-apache@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache>,
 <mailto:freebsd-apache-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:31:15 -0000

On 2014-09-06 17:24, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> apache team -
> 
> So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=22 doesn’t actually depend on apache-2.2. This means that every USE_APACHE=22 port is broken, and as of right now won’t have any 10.1 packages.
> 
> I’m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= APACHE=22” to this ports, but I wanted to check with you guys first. Is that the right way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done to make USE_APACHE=22 actually depend on apache-2.2?
> 
> # Adam
> 

Hi Adam,

could you give the patch below a try?
I've tested the patch with a small selection from USE_APACHE=(22|22+|24) ports and with the patch bsd.default-versions.mk does not overwrite the requirements.

// olli


Index: Mk/bsd.apache.mk
===================================================================
--- Mk/bsd.apache.mk    (revision 367503)
+++ Mk/bsd.apache.mk    (working copy)
@@ -288,8 +288,6 @@
 .      endif
 .elif defined(APACHE_PORT)
 _APACHE_VERSION!=      ${ECHO_CMD} ${APACHE_PORT} | ${SED} -ne 's,.*/apache\([0-9]*\).*,\1,p'
-.else
-_APACHE_VERSION:=      ${DEFAULT_APACHE_VERSION}
 .endif

 .if defined(USE_APACHE)