From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 00:38:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCCACDF; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D969A167E; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0Q0cBFv003513; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:38:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0Q0cBr4003510; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:38:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:38:11 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: [patch] PH tells crap about GMAKE (Was: Re: svn commit: r340018 - head/textproc/scew) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201401170910.s0H9Aw9O087448@svn.freebsd.org> <20140117093546.GA16656@FreeBSD.org> <20140117095020.GD4006@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20140117141440.GA94157@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:38:11 -0700 (MST) Cc: doc@freebsd.org, Pietro Cerutti X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 00:38:13 -0000 On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> Please consider attached patch. It is not a polished gem, and most likely >> would need a review and wordsmithing from doc@ guys. >> >> While here I've also standardized the spelling of "okay", and fixed couple >> of grammar nits. These changes are not related to GMAKE ones, and probably >> should be committed separately, but I'm not splitting the diff for personal >> convenience, sorry. :) > > Attached is a quick editing pass. I have not tested it for building yet, and > edited the diff directly, so it has some a new blank line. I would like to be more specific in this part: Quite often, a specific implementation is required, like GNU make, or legacy FreeBSD make. I think that should say: Quite often, a specific implementation is required, like GNU make (gmake), or legacy FreeBSD make (fmake). Is that correct? Thanks!