From owner-freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 16 16:24:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F307D51; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5721CCE; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA07312; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:24:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1W3pjo-000K5J-3i; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:24:12 +0200 Message-ID: <52D80773.4060300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:23:15 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable List , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: MFC-ability of SDT change X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "A discussion list for developers working on DTrace in FreeBSD." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:24:25 -0000 I would like to ask your opinion on the following change http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=258622 Can this change be MFC-ed to the stable branches? It does not actually change anything in ABI, but there is a semantic change that may result in incorrect names for SDT probes in third-party kernel code. Thank you! -- Andriy Gapon