From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 12:47:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBABED76 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF40632B4 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moby.local ([109.193.238.174]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRoRF-1YRcj02xEf-00Su1a for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:47:15 +0100 Message-ID: <549812D7.4020809@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:47:19 +0100 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: GELI + g_eli_orphan_spoil_assert() X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:IOYxdVdGN7IuVd9Ryqi7OVAmw7jZ9kDbOXJlDdd+roXsfY+B4Mh zFsUA7HQ+JGaqujUebsGK97ov7WorfIpKFyoOd4DT9CBVLz/cjeIEpvxoECPijErg4BazYP ie0jpm67pecoE5v8TLEZZ8hASkdzB/CtGB+mTacl+nrRXUM3ykhWXOptwcQKP8A7Fby20lf wY3tCgoCIm+sNJPhINgYA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:47:19 -0000 Hi, On an old - before 10.0-RELEASE - 10-STABLE I am seeing this failed assertion, g_eli_orphan_spoil_assert(), in g_media_changed_event(). The system has two USB disks, which are both encrypted and I use the second one to backup the first via zfs send/recv. The target (AKA second one) disk is not 100% healthy. Could that be the reason for the panic? Could somebody explain more regarding g_eli_orphan_spoil_assert()? > http://postimg.org/image/fg7z6wun7/ Thanks, Nikos