From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 27 00:08:11 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFD86B9
 for <freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:08:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CCE02F3F
 for <freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:08:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s6R089js091876
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:08:09 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
 by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s6R089NX091873;
 Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:08:09 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:08:09 -0600 (MDT)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Subject: Re: Additional devfs rulesets
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407261346110.24514@wonkity.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407261737550.24514@wonkity.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407240945210.65901@wonkity.com>
 <20140726194437.00000ee4@Leidinger.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407261346110.24514@wonkity.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:08:09 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:08:11 -0000

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Warren Block wrote:

> If devfs accepted an optional file parameter, additional rulesets could be 
> defined with for each jail.  There might be security implications with that.

Actually, it looks like that can be done.  devfs_rulesets_from_file() in 
/etc/rc.subr has a parser, and evaluates all files defined in 
$devfs_rulesets.  By default, that is just /etc/defaults/devfs.rules and 
/etc/devfs.rules.  ezjail could just append a third file there, maybe 
/usr/local/etc/ezjail/jailname-devfs.rules.  Or even more elegantly, a 
here-doc from inside the ezjail/jailname file.