From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 16:49:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5148EBF1 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3902029A3 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s74Gn2C7044942 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:49:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192258] [patch] upgrade editors/openoffice-4 to version 4.1.0 Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:49:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: truckman@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:49:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192258 Don Lewis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #145135|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Don Lewis --- Created attachment 145365 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145365&action=edit updated patch to upgrade editors/openoffice-4 to version 4.1.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 16:51:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2C7C3F for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466012A4C for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s74Gp8u3050057 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:51:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192258] [patch] upgrade editors/openoffice-4 to version 4.1.0 Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:51:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: truckman@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:51:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192258 --- Comment #4 from Don Lewis --- This updated patch is definitely a commit candidate. * I uploaded the ext_sources tarball to local_distfiles, so make fetch now works * portlint -a is now clean * check-plist is now clean * There is now only one stage Q/A warning: Warning: you may not need USES=desktop-file-utils The reason for this is that the .desktop files are installed under openoffice-4.1.0/openoffice4/share/xdg/ instead of share/applications By default, this port downloads a bunch of additional distfiles to ext_sources during the build phase, in addition to the distfiles that were unpacked from the ext_sources tarball and came from the aoo svn repository. While working on this port, I started running into build failures caused by download failures. I addition, I noticed that it looked like unnecessary distfiles were being downloaded for components that would not be build because -with-system-whatever was specified as a configure option. To fix both problems, to take care of both problems, I added the --disable-fetch-external configure option and added the following distfiles to the ext_sources tarball: boost, jpeg, mdds, and rhino. I also sorted the CONFIGURE_ARGS and *_DEPEND. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 06:02:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54FEA36F for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8F822BA for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s7562mQ8013318 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:02:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192258] [patch] upgrade editors/openoffice-4 to version 4.1.0 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 06:02:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: pfg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 06:02:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192258 Pedro F. Giffuni changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pfg@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #5 from Pedro F. Giffuni --- Thank you for working on this. While here, I think you can (and should) use graphics/silgraphite as a dependency and get rid of the corresponding ext_sources file. Unfortunately, we cannot use the system boost due to a bug (which I PR'd but no one has followed up). Also, FWIW, this version was somewhat buggy so there will be a new 4.1.1 release soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 06:25:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62403754 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A971257C for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s756PBGh092792 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 06:25:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192258] [patch] upgrade editors/openoffice-4 to version 4.1.0 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 06:25:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: truckman@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 06:25:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192258 --- Comment #6 from Don Lewis --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #5) > Thank you for working on this. > > While here, I think you can (and should) use graphics/silgraphite as a > dependency and get rid of the corresponding ext_sources file. I already enabled --with-system-graphite. That distfile isn't in this version of ext_sources. There may be other stuff in there that can be nuked as well, but I didn't look. I basically just fetched the stuff that was in the ext_sources svn repo and added the missing distfiles noted above. > Unfortunately, we cannot use the system boost due to a bug (which I PR'd but > no one has followed up). I spent way too much time battling boost and finally gave up. I didn't know there was a PR. I am currently working on a patch so that --with-system-jpeg will hopefully work. Because of the downloaded distfile issue during build, I also looked at rhino and mdds. There's no knob for rhino, and they are using a much older version of mdds, which seems to be incompatible with what we have in ports. > Also, FWIW, this version was somewhat buggy so there will be a new 4.1.1 > release soon. I'll keep an eye out. Hopefully that upgrade will go more smoothly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 16:26:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BB82F0 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBC6224B9 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bdrewery (uid 1298) (envelope-from bdrewery@freebsd.org) id c4e by freefall.freebsd.org (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.9+); Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:26:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 58104 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2014 11:26:00 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 5 Aug 2014 11:26:00 -0500 Message-ID: <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Libreoffice library caching [was Re: Yet another pkg bug?] References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> In-Reply-To: <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NnNkTRCc7DcAQ3dg83eM13T97grGLfcKJ" Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:26:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NnNkTRCc7DcAQ3dg83eM13T97grGLfcKJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can office@ chime in on this? On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> Hello. >> >> On a 10.0/amd64 system: >> >>> # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING >>> ... >>> 20140730: >>> AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt >>> AUTHOR: pi@FreeBSD.org >>> >>> libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries >>> versions have >>> been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on= >>> libgcrypt. >>> >>> # portmaster -r libgcrypt >>> or >>> # portupgrade -fr security/libgcrypt >>> or >>> # pkg install -fR security/libgcrypt >>> ... >>> # pkg info -r libgcrypt|less >>> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1: >>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 >>> gnupg-2.0.25_1 >>> libxslt-1.1.28_4 >>> # pkg info -r libxslt | less >>> libxslt-1.1.28_4: >>> rarian-0.8.1_1 >>> gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10_2 >>> gtk-doc-1.18_1 >>> inkscape-0.48.4_4 >>> vala-0.20.1_1 >>> policykit-gnome-0.9.2_7 >>> raptor2-2.0.14 >>> xmlto-0.0.26_2 >>> shiboken-1.2.2 >>> apiextractor-0.10.10_2 >>> libreoffice-4.2.5_3 >>> # portupgrade -frn libgcrypt >>> ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)= >>> + security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.6.1_1 -> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1)= >>> + textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.28_4 -> libxslt-1.1.28_4) >>> + security/gnupg (gnupg-2.0.25_1 -> gnupg-2.0.25_1) >>> + security/libgnome-keyring (libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 -> >>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8) >> >> So, libreoffice is not rebuilt and after "portupgrade -fr libgcrypt"..= =2E >> >>> # libchk -v | less -S >>> ... >>> Binaries that are linked with: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libgcrypt.so= =2E19 >>> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1.5.0 >>> /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libxsltfilterlo.so >> >> ... libreoffice is still using the old library. >> >> >=20 > Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem. >=20 > libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not > rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really > the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing somethin= g > special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. > So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually > provided by libxslt. >=20 > # pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so > /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8 > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so > /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 >=20 > Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so. >=20 > I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of > people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do= =2E > So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice= > care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of > libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice. >=20 > I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be= > safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed. >=20 >=20 >> >> Is the command provided in "UPGRADING" wrong? >> Is it yet another bug in pkg? In portupgrade? In libreoffice? >> Is something wrong in my setup? >> >> bye & Thanks >> av. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --NnNkTRCc7DcAQ3dg83eM13T97grGLfcKJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT4QWSAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPrXwH/2OT9NL52OlpR7cXd79vEwLu I0DDDOL2YhMJvM3nIhedp+JNhYhmorFFykgoSnUAvmzEcSvncj2mzlZ7hrKLRxI3 MslM8IV/INheujLaa1uLBC7ojYK4GqUxZCIGznXVmgrWjzBegBAjO4gVOIl4GTi9 89FbWEob77Rr2QUdyTUYQZAq3AZeqAFOpCr6keRmZ9pm0U6HV2qsCD3hNXzJbNxs 0nAI17ysYxugBm65RvoUe5L/E2mUcb5Mr1SttkX+xbxROGbv6dqGK7a6dZoopOj5 YI3Rg9mpGj9ynFP/cpds6ALs1D46fqUKW0KMJBUjU2qUwnhKG5Nm71Gv5lPP9mU= =AC33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NnNkTRCc7DcAQ3dg83eM13T97grGLfcKJ-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 16:35:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5821B73C for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4114B25A0 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s75GZ7BF017665 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:35:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192258] [patch] upgrade editors/openoffice-4 to version 4.1.0 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:35:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:35:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192258 --- Comment #7 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: truckman Date: Tue Aug 5 16:34:49 UTC 2014 New revision: 364119 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/364119 Log: Upgrade Apache OpenOffice to version 4.1.0. Fix all portlint -a and check-plist errors and warnings. Fix all but one stage-qa warnings. Disable --with-system-boost because it broke the build. Enable the --with-system-graphite, --with-system-hyphen, and --with-system-nss configure options. Add all distfiles that were previously downloaded during built to the ext_sources distfile. Add the --disable-fetch-external configure flag to disable downloads during build. PR: 192258 Approved by: office@ (bapt) Changes: head/editors/openoffice-4/Makefile head/editors/openoffice-4/distinfo head/editors/openoffice-4/files/extra-patch-libexttextcat-lingucomponent head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-configmgr head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-i123018 head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-moz-freetype_header_relocation head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-nss head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-nss-gcc46 head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-sal head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-vcl_source_glyphs_graphite_adaptors.cxx head/editors/openoffice-4/files/patch-webdav head/editors/openoffice-4/pkg-plist -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 16:58:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6732EE63 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD4427E9 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s75GwVJr060592 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:58:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192258] [patch] upgrade editors/openoffice-4 to version 4.1.0 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:58:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: truckman@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 16:58:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192258 Don Lewis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Issue Resolved Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Don Lewis --- Patch committed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 17:00:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D70FDC for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2DA2891 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s75H0bxp068972 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:00:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187218] [patch] editors/openoffice-4 build fails in bridges module on i386 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:00:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: truckman@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:00:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187218 Don Lewis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events --- Comment #2 from Don Lewis --- No longer relevant after upgrade to 4.1.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 17:02:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5EE91FB for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6E728BD for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s75H2k7a074993 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:02:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187681] [patch] editors/openoffice-4 build broken on i386 after gcc46->gcc47 upgrade Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:02:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: truckman@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:02:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187681 Don Lewis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events --- Comment #2 from Don Lewis --- No longer relevant after upgrade to Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 19:22:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC05AF02; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F326E2A67; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:22:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApUGADMu4VNbsV3c/2dsb2JhbABbgw1STQrLcodMAYEVF3eEBAEFJxMcIxALDgoJJQ8qHgYTiEYBw3YXj0wHhEsBBJUqhmKBVZMNg087Lw Received: from 220.93-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.93.220]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2014 21:22:26 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s75JMPfU005088; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 21:22:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 21:22:24 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: Libreoffice library caching [was Re: Yet another pkg bug?] Message-ID: <20140805212224.33dbbd7c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:22:34 -0000 On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: > Can office@ chime in on this? > > On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> On a 10.0/amd64 system: >>> >>>> # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING >>>> ... >>>> 20140730: >>>> AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt >>>> AUTHOR: pi@FreeBSD.org >>>> >>>> libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries >>>> versions have >>>> been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on >>>> libgcrypt. >>>> >>>> # portmaster -r libgcrypt >>>> or >>>> # portupgrade -fr security/libgcrypt >>>> or >>>> # pkg install -fR security/libgcrypt >>>> ... >>>> # pkg info -r libgcrypt|less >>>> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1: >>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 >>>> gnupg-2.0.25_1 >>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4 >>>> # pkg info -r libxslt | less >>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4: >>>> rarian-0.8.1_1 >>>> gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10_2 >>>> gtk-doc-1.18_1 >>>> inkscape-0.48.4_4 >>>> vala-0.20.1_1 >>>> policykit-gnome-0.9.2_7 >>>> raptor2-2.0.14 >>>> xmlto-0.0.26_2 >>>> shiboken-1.2.2 >>>> apiextractor-0.10.10_2 >>>> libreoffice-4.2.5_3 >>>> # portupgrade -frn libgcrypt >>>> ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>> + security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.6.1_1 -> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1) >>>> + textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.28_4 -> libxslt-1.1.28_4) >>>> + security/gnupg (gnupg-2.0.25_1 -> gnupg-2.0.25_1) >>>> + security/libgnome-keyring (libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 -> >>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8) >>> >>> So, libreoffice is not rebuilt and after "portupgrade -fr libgcrypt"... >>> >>>> # libchk -v | less -S >>>> ... >>>> Binaries that are linked with: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libgcrypt.so.19 >>>> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1.5.0 >>>> /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libxsltfilterlo.so >>> >>> ... libreoffice is still using the old library. >>> >>> >> >> Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem. >> >> libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not >> rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really >> the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing something >> special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. >> So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually >> provided by libxslt. >> >> # pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so >> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8 >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so >> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 >> >> Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so. >> >> I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of >> people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do. >> So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice >> care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of >> libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice. >> >> I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be >> safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed. It's not a special cache. It's just a normal library that libreoffice builds and installs. The library probably links to libexslt using "pkgconf --libs libexslt" which include -lgcrypt. Libreoffice should have had its PORTREVISION bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. There are other ports that should have been bumped. I'll look into it. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 19:32:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C21159 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69F942BA0 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bdrewery (uid 1298) (envelope-from bdrewery@freebsd.org) id c8a by freefall.freebsd.org (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.9+); Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:32:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 4310 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2014 14:32:21 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 5 Aug 2014 14:32:21 -0500 Message-ID: <53E1313F.4090106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:32:15 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: Libreoffice library caching [was Re: Yet another pkg bug?] References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> <20140805212224.33dbbd7c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140805212224.33dbbd7c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 19:32:23 -0000 On 8/5/2014 2:22 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Can office@ chime in on this? >> >> On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>>> On a 10.0/amd64 system: >>>> >>>>> # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING >>>>> ... >>>>> 20140730: >>>>> AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt >>>>> AUTHOR: pi@FreeBSD.org >>>>> >>>>> libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries >>>>> versions have >>>>> been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on >>>>> libgcrypt. >>>>> >>>>> # portmaster -r libgcrypt >>>>> or >>>>> # portupgrade -fr security/libgcrypt >>>>> or >>>>> # pkg install -fR security/libgcrypt >>>>> ... >>>>> # pkg info -r libgcrypt|less >>>>> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1: >>>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 >>>>> gnupg-2.0.25_1 >>>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4 >>>>> # pkg info -r libxslt | less >>>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4: >>>>> rarian-0.8.1_1 >>>>> gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10_2 >>>>> gtk-doc-1.18_1 >>>>> inkscape-0.48.4_4 >>>>> vala-0.20.1_1 >>>>> policykit-gnome-0.9.2_7 >>>>> raptor2-2.0.14 >>>>> xmlto-0.0.26_2 >>>>> shiboken-1.2.2 >>>>> apiextractor-0.10.10_2 >>>>> libreoffice-4.2.5_3 >>>>> # portupgrade -frn libgcrypt >>>>> ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>>> + security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.6.1_1 -> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1) >>>>> + textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.28_4 -> libxslt-1.1.28_4) >>>>> + security/gnupg (gnupg-2.0.25_1 -> gnupg-2.0.25_1) >>>>> + security/libgnome-keyring (libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 -> >>>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8) >>>> >>>> So, libreoffice is not rebuilt and after "portupgrade -fr libgcrypt"... >>>> >>>>> # libchk -v | less -S >>>>> ... >>>>> Binaries that are linked with: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libgcrypt.so.19 >>>>> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1.5.0 >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libxsltfilterlo.so >>>> >>>> ... libreoffice is still using the old library. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem. >>> >>> libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not >>> rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really >>> the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing something >>> special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. >>> So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually >>> provided by libxslt. >>> >>> # pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib >>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a >>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la >>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so >>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8 >>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a >>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la >>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so >>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 >>> >>> Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so. >>> >>> I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of >>> people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do. >>> So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice >>> care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of >>> libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice. >>> >>> I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be >>> safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed. > > It's not a special cache. It's just a normal library that libreoffice > builds and installs. The library probably links to libexslt using > "pkgconf --libs libexslt" which include -lgcrypt. Libreoffice should > have had its PORTREVISION bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. There > are other ports that should have been bumped. I'll look into it. > Hm, it seems to be building its own libxslt library though and placing it in its own directory. The rebuilding of libxslt did not update the one in the libreoffice dir. libreoffice->libxslt->libgcrypt Rebuilding libxslt should be enough to link against the newer libgcrypt and since libxslt has not change it should not require rebuilding libreoffice. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 20:08:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11999A1F; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1022021; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:08:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApUGAL844VNbsV3c/2dsb2JhbABbgw1STQrLc4dMAYEVF3eEAwEBBAEnExwjBQsLDgoJJQ8qHgYTiDoMAcNeF49MB4RLAQSVKoZigVWTDYNPOy8 Received: from 220.93-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.93.220]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2014 22:07:12 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s75K7AZL005319; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 22:07:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 22:07:10 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: Libreoffice library caching [was Re: Yet another pkg bug?] Message-ID: <20140805220710.5ebaaf63@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <53E1313F.4090106@FreeBSD.org> References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> <20140805212224.33dbbd7c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <53E1313F.4090106@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:08:23 -0000 On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:32:15 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/5/2014 2:22 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> Can office@ chime in on this? >>> >>> On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>> On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>>>> On a 10.0/amd64 system: >>>>> >>>>>> # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING >>>>>> ... >>>>>> 20140730: >>>>>> AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt >>>>>> AUTHOR: pi@FreeBSD.org >>>>>> >>>>>> libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries >>>>>> versions have >>>>>> been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on >>>>>> libgcrypt. >>>>>> >>>>>> # portmaster -r libgcrypt >>>>>> or >>>>>> # portupgrade -fr security/libgcrypt >>>>>> or >>>>>> # pkg install -fR security/libgcrypt >>>>>> ... >>>>>> # pkg info -r libgcrypt|less >>>>>> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1: >>>>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 >>>>>> gnupg-2.0.25_1 >>>>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4 >>>>>> # pkg info -r libxslt | less >>>>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4: >>>>>> rarian-0.8.1_1 >>>>>> gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10_2 >>>>>> gtk-doc-1.18_1 >>>>>> inkscape-0.48.4_4 >>>>>> vala-0.20.1_1 >>>>>> policykit-gnome-0.9.2_7 >>>>>> raptor2-2.0.14 >>>>>> xmlto-0.0.26_2 >>>>>> shiboken-1.2.2 >>>>>> apiextractor-0.10.10_2 >>>>>> libreoffice-4.2.5_3 >>>>>> # portupgrade -frn libgcrypt >>>>>> ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>>>> + security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.6.1_1 -> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1) >>>>>> + textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.28_4 -> libxslt-1.1.28_4) >>>>>> + security/gnupg (gnupg-2.0.25_1 -> gnupg-2.0.25_1) >>>>>> + security/libgnome-keyring (libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 -> >>>>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8) >>>>> >>>>> So, libreoffice is not rebuilt and after "portupgrade -fr libgcrypt"... >>>>> >>>>>> # libchk -v | less -S >>>>>> ... >>>>>> Binaries that are linked with: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libgcrypt.so.19 >>>>>> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1.5.0 >>>>>> /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libxsltfilterlo.so >>>>> >>>>> ... libreoffice is still using the old library. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem. >>>> >>>> libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not >>>> rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really >>>> the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing something >>>> special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. >>>> So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually >>>> provided by libxslt. >>>> >>>> # pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib >>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a >>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la >>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so >>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8 >>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a >>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la >>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so >>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 >>>> >>>> Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so. >>>> >>>> I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of >>>> people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do. >>>> So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice >>>> care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of >>>> libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be >>>> safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed. >> >> It's not a special cache. It's just a normal library that libreoffice >> builds and installs. The library probably links to libexslt using >> "pkgconf --libs libexslt" which include -lgcrypt. Libreoffice should >> have had its PORTREVISION bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. There >> are other ports that should have been bumped. I'll look into it. > > Hm, it seems to be building its own libxslt library though and placing > it in its own directory. The rebuilding of libxslt did not update the > one in the libreoffice dir. > > libreoffice->libxslt->libgcrypt > > Rebuilding libxslt should be enough to link against the newer libgcrypt > and since libxslt has not change it should not require rebuilding > libreoffice. Libreoffice links with libgcrypt directly. The reason it does so is because the output of "pkgconf --libs libexslt" is this: -lexslt -lxslt -lz -lm -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -L/usr/local/lib -lxml2 It's an example of how pkgconfig files can cause overlinking. Libreoffice comes up in this list: pkg rquery '%o %B' | grep libgcrypt.so | sort So it should have been bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. I had actually specifically asked for that list of ports to be included. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 20:19:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1EFCA1 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E83D2119 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bdrewery (uid 1298) (envelope-from bdrewery@freebsd.org) id c97 by freefall.freebsd.org (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.9+); Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:19:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 81538 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2014 15:19:31 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 5 Aug 2014 15:19:31 -0500 Message-ID: <53E13C4C.1020405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:19:24 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: Libreoffice library caching [was Re: Yet another pkg bug?] References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> <20140805212224.33dbbd7c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <53E1313F.4090106@FreeBSD.org> <20140805220710.5ebaaf63@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140805220710.5ebaaf63@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:19:34 -0000 On 8/5/2014 3:07 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:32:15 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 8/5/2014 2:22 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>> Can office@ chime in on this? >>>> >>>> On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>>> On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>>>>> On a 10.0/amd64 system: >>>>>> >>>>>>> # cat /usr/ports/UPDATING >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> 20140730: >>>>>>> AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt >>>>>>> AUTHOR: pi@FreeBSD.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> libgcrypt has been updated to 1.6.1 and all shared libraries >>>>>>> versions have >>>>>>> been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that depend on >>>>>>> libgcrypt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # portmaster -r libgcrypt >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> # portupgrade -fr security/libgcrypt >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> # pkg install -fR security/libgcrypt >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> # pkg info -r libgcrypt|less >>>>>>> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1: >>>>>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 >>>>>>> gnupg-2.0.25_1 >>>>>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4 >>>>>>> # pkg info -r libxslt | less >>>>>>> libxslt-1.1.28_4: >>>>>>> rarian-0.8.1_1 >>>>>>> gnome-doc-utils-0.20.10_2 >>>>>>> gtk-doc-1.18_1 >>>>>>> inkscape-0.48.4_4 >>>>>>> vala-0.20.1_1 >>>>>>> policykit-gnome-0.9.2_7 >>>>>>> raptor2-2.0.14 >>>>>>> xmlto-0.0.26_2 >>>>>>> shiboken-1.2.2 >>>>>>> apiextractor-0.10.10_2 >>>>>>> libreoffice-4.2.5_3 >>>>>>> # portupgrade -frn libgcrypt >>>>>>> ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>>>>> + security/libgcrypt (libgcrypt-1.6.1_1 -> libgcrypt-1.6.1_1) >>>>>>> + textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.28_4 -> libxslt-1.1.28_4) >>>>>>> + security/gnupg (gnupg-2.0.25_1 -> gnupg-2.0.25_1) >>>>>>> + security/libgnome-keyring (libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8 -> >>>>>>> libgnome-keyring-2.32.0_8) >>>>>> >>>>>> So, libreoffice is not rebuilt and after "portupgrade -fr libgcrypt"... >>>>>> >>>>>>> # libchk -v | less -S >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> Binaries that are linked with: /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libgcrypt.so.19 >>>>>>> /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libsoup-gnome-2.4.so.1.5.0 >>>>>>> /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libxsltfilterlo.so >>>>>> >>>>>> ... libreoffice is still using the old library. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Agreed it is not a pkg problem, nor a portupgrade problem. >>>>> >>>>> libreoffice is not directly depending on libgcrypt so it was not >>>>> rebuilt. Only direct dependencies are rebuilt. But this is not really >>>>> the problem. The problem is that Libreoffice seems to be doing something >>>>> special by building its own libxsltfilterlo.so into its own directory. >>>>> So the libxslt rebuild had no idea about it. It's not a file actually >>>>> provided by libxslt. >>>>> >>>>> # pkg info -l libxslt|grep /usr/local/lib >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.a >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.la >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libexslt.so.8 >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.a >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.la >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so >>>>> /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 >>>>> >>>>> Note the lack of libxsltfilterlo.so. >>>>> >>>>> I'd say the instructions were lacking. My guess is a small handfull of >>>>> people realize what's going on here and none of the other committers do. >>>>> So it's very likely that many UPDATING entries need special libreoffice >>>>> care as well and have not had it documented. I.e., every dependency of >>>>> libreoffice would require rebuilding libreoffice. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure what this program/ dir is, perhaps some cache. It would be >>>>> safer to have it disabled so this special care is not needed. >>> >>> It's not a special cache. It's just a normal library that libreoffice >>> builds and installs. The library probably links to libexslt using >>> "pkgconf --libs libexslt" which include -lgcrypt. Libreoffice should >>> have had its PORTREVISION bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. There >>> are other ports that should have been bumped. I'll look into it. >> >> Hm, it seems to be building its own libxslt library though and placing >> it in its own directory. The rebuilding of libxslt did not update the >> one in the libreoffice dir. >> >> libreoffice->libxslt->libgcrypt >> >> Rebuilding libxslt should be enough to link against the newer libgcrypt >> and since libxslt has not change it should not require rebuilding >> libreoffice. > > Libreoffice links with libgcrypt directly. The reason it does so is > because the output of "pkgconf --libs libexslt" is this: > > -lexslt -lxslt -lz -lm -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -L/usr/local/lib -lxml2 > > It's an example of how pkgconfig files can cause overlinking. Got it. > > Libreoffice comes up in this list: > pkg rquery '%o %B' | grep libgcrypt.so | sort > > So it should have been bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. I had > actually specifically asked for that list of ports to be included. > Well the problem here was the instructions did not indicate to upgrade all ports so it would not have caught it anyhow. The instructions were to use portupgrade/portmaster to things depending on libgcrypt. Perhaps we need to change our instructions (or portupgrade/portmaster) to use registered library dependencies as well rather than just package deps. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 20:56:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B059046C; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012B1257A; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:56:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQGALBE4VNbsV3c/2dsb2JhbABbgw1STQrLb4dQAYEVF3eEBAEFOhwjEAsOCgklDyoeBohZAcNjF49MB4RLAQSVKoI3hCuBVZMNg087Lw Received: from 220.93-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.93.220]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2014 22:56:52 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s75Kuon6005966; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 22:56:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 22:56:50 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: Libreoffice library caching [was Re: Yet another pkg bug?] Message-ID: <20140805225650.71e7b387@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <53E13C4C.1020405@FreeBSD.org> References: <53DB9BF4.5070208@netfence.it> <62714296e76c28f63d8b7ca430882a37@shatow.net> <53E10592.1000308@FreeBSD.org> <20140805212224.33dbbd7c@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <53E1313F.4090106@FreeBSD.org> <20140805220710.5ebaaf63@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <53E13C4C.1020405@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:56:54 -0000 On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:19:24 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/5/2014 3:07 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Libreoffice links with libgcrypt directly. The reason it does so is >> because the output of "pkgconf --libs libexslt" is this: >> >> -lexslt -lxslt -lz -lm -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -L/usr/local/lib -lxml2 >> >> It's an example of how pkgconfig files can cause overlinking. > > Got it. > >> Libreoffice comes up in this list: >> pkg rquery '%o %B' | grep libgcrypt.so | sort >> >> So it should have been bumped as part of the libgcrypt update. I had >> actually specifically asked for that list of ports to be included. > > Well the problem here was the instructions did not indicate to upgrade > all ports so it would not have caught it anyhow. The instructions were > to use portupgrade/portmaster to things depending on libgcrypt. Perhaps > we need to change our instructions (or portupgrade/portmaster) to use > registered library dependencies as well rather than just package deps. The list of ports that need to be updated on a system are given by: pkg query '%o %B' | awk '/libgcrypt\.so/{print $1}' But with proper revision bumps no special instructions are needed at all, so I'd rather do that and remove the instructions. A problem with that pkg query is that it doesn't necessarily print ports in the right order. Dependencies of a port need to be updated before that port. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 09:08:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F94B4E1 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D3028E8 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:08:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1407402509; l=1438; s=domk; d=Haakh.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From: Date; bh=vdUeLY0ySLyM4Rzt3EIJIRc9y8c=; b=YoFbor09kxE7ilpVPhTGsZS9dqBCZC0mQYKDB8SFCnPEkG4H7hA+ptV1sxWKJNqnDIg VQttGhpkO3iWQcsQmRsvHD9AVpweCS9M5dxe+nK/ok22JYNxVLrF06jB8lTGBhgkBanWo yDzc09Os40Hxg7gTZ1qQLsFlA+1H2/9dkWA= X-RZG-AUTH: :LWQcbViwW/e6OTbW0dHzwKkCepEs/ThuRG8zpeuciRNkwehqPJJjM7lRfBCZuA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from abaton.Haakh.de (p57A731C8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.167.49.200]) by post.strato.de (RZmta 35.3 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPA id 005388q7798S7dR for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 11:08:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Crabberio.Haakh.de (crabberio.Haakh.de [192.168.63.16]) by abaton.Haakh.de (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s7798S4p071739 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 11:08:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bugReporter@Haakh.de) Message-ID: <53E3420C.1050607@Haakh.de> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:08:28 +0200 From: "Dr. A. Haakh" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-office Subject: build of de-apache-openoffice-4.1.0 broken Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:08:34 -0000 Hi, on this system FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269301: Wed Jul 30 18:36:57 CEST 2014 toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64 I get this error: ===================================================== ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 | failed! in function: register_extensions ************************************************** in function: register_extensionsstopping log at Thu Aug 7 09:41:29 2014 dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.archive' 1 module(s): instsetoo_native need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/util When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by running: build --from instsetoo_native *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4 ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20140807-77714-1z11122 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.0.1_4 make BATCH=yes ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! editors/openoffice-4 (de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4) (unknown build error) ===================================================== Any ideas? Andreas From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 15:42:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34EDB4EE for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1392BD2 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s77Fgk3R078050 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:42:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192468] [PATCH] editors/libreoffice: deadlocks to render EPS file using GS Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:42:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:42:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192468 John Marino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |Open Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |office@FreeBSD.org |org | --- Comment #1 from John Marino --- over to maintainer group... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 16:52:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0C92DE for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (gw.catspoiler.org [75.1.14.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8923F27A5 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id s77Gq3Iv043814; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:52:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201408071652.s77Gq3Iv043814@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:52:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: build of de-apache-openoffice-4.1.0 broken To: bugReporter@Haakh.de In-Reply-To: <53E3420C.1050607@Haakh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 16:52:11 -0000 On 7 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: > Hi, > > on this system > > FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269301: > Wed Jul 30 18:36:57 CEST 2014 > toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64 > > I get this error: > > ===================================================== > ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true > 2>&1 | failed! > in function: register_extensions > ************************************************** > in function: register_extensionsstopping log at Thu Aug 7 09:41:29 2014 > dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.archive' > > 1 module(s): > instsetoo_native > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/util > > When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build > by running: > > build --from instsetoo_native > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4 > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade20140807-77714-1z11122 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > UPGRADE_PORT=de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.0.1_4 make > BATCH=yes > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > ! editors/openoffice-4 (de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4) (unknown > build error) > ===================================================== > > Any ideas? I just noticed the same failure on portsmon (also 10.0). I've done most of my builds on 8.4-STABLE and have never seen this problem. I'm not running 10.0 on anything here, but I did have success with 11.0-CURRENT a while back. I run that again to see if I can reproduce the problem. I did a web search and didn't find anything that looked relevant. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 01:12:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C704612 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 01:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (gw.catspoiler.org [75.1.14.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D10E2161 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 01:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id s781BvIO044474; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:12:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201408080112.s781BvIO044474@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:11:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: build of de-apache-openoffice-4.1.0 broken To: bugReporter@Haakh.de In-Reply-To: <201408071652.s77Gq3Iv043814@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 01:12:06 -0000 On 7 Aug, To: bugReporter@Haakh.de wrote: > On 7 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> on this system >> >> FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269301: >> Wed Jul 30 18:36:57 CEST 2014 >> toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64 >> >> I get this error: >> >> ===================================================== >> ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true >> 2>&1 | failed! >> in function: register_extensions >> ************************************************** >> in function: register_extensionsstopping log at Thu Aug 7 09:41:29 2014 >> dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.archive' >> >> 1 module(s): >> instsetoo_native >> need(s) to be rebuilt >> >> Reason(s): >> >> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/util >> >> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build >> by running: >> >> build --from instsetoo_native >> >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4 >> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa >> /tmp/portupgrade20140807-77714-1z11122 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade >> UPGRADE_PORT=de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.0.1_4 make >> BATCH=yes >> ** Fix the problem and try again. >> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >> ! editors/openoffice-4 (de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4) (unknown >> build error) >> ===================================================== >> >> Any ideas? > > I just noticed the same failure on portsmon (also 10.0). I've done most > of my builds on 8.4-STABLE and have never seen this problem. I'm not > running 10.0 on anything here, but I did have success with 11.0-CURRENT > a while back. I run that again to see if I can reproduce the problem. > > I did a web search and didn't find anything that looked relevant. I just broke for me on 11.0-CURRENT as well. That's a regression because it was working before. I see that portsmon was able to build it on 9.x. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 21:50:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5459D408; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 21:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1E32275; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 21:50:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1407534614; l=2290; s=domk; d=Haakh.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date; bh=3xKCYNLyl1rLXKXo3c/OCzaAioQ=; b=cHQA6iBPQBLUTLO7WlYQcOinOuBqcsbnvGTLbgxNiCsdTmtsa642AoedKMCPxSm/yBR EAKatpD+xfO2Lo/BD6uy7bC09LVY28uC2WNrHOYqyOGEeEEssqokqsJG8o+MTR+83inmL bFZtSJkX6/0wVnSMv/fajEzijVaU06e+MH4= X-RZG-AUTH: :LWQcbViwW/e6OTbW0dHzwKkCepEs/ThuRG8zpeuciRNkwehqPJJjMpQyueBuuw== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from abaton.Haakh.de (p57A73BAC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.167.59.172]) by post.strato.de (RZmta 35.3 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPA id L060f6q78LoDRS2; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 23:50:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Crabberio.Haakh.de (crabberio.Haakh.de [192.168.63.16]) by abaton.Haakh.de (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s78LoChB009335; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 23:50:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bugReporter@Haakh.de) Message-ID: <53E54614.7090108@Haakh.de> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 23:50:12 +0200 From: "Dr. A. Haakh" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis Subject: Re: build of de-apache-openoffice-4.1.0 broken References: <201408080112.s781BvIO044474@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201408080112.s781BvIO044474@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 21:50:19 -0000 Am 08.08.2014 03:11, Don Lewis schrieb: > On 7 Aug, To: bugReporter@Haakh.de wrote: >> On 7 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> on this system >>> >>> FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269301: >>> Wed Jul 30 18:36:57 CEST 2014 >>> toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64 >>> >>> I get this error: >>> >>> ===================================================== >>> ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true >>> 2>&1 | failed! >>> in function: register_extensions >>> ************************************************** >>> in function: register_extensionsstopping log at Thu Aug 7 09:41:29 2014 >>> dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.archive' >>> >>> 1 module(s): >>> instsetoo_native >>> need(s) to be rebuilt >>> >>> Reason(s): >>> >>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/util >>> >>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build >>> by running: >>> >>> build --from instsetoo_native >>> >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop. >>> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4 >>> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa >>> /tmp/portupgrade20140807-77714-1z11122 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade >>> UPGRADE_PORT=de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.0.1_4 make >>> BATCH=yes >>> ** Fix the problem and try again. >>> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>> ! editors/openoffice-4 (de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4) (unknown >>> build error) >>> ===================================================== >>> >>> Any ideas? >> I just noticed the same failure on portsmon (also 10.0). I've done most >> of my builds on 8.4-STABLE and have never seen this problem. I'm not >> running 10.0 on anything here, but I did have success with 11.0-CURRENT >> a while back. I run that again to see if I can reproduce the problem. >> >> I did a web search and didn't find anything that looked relevant. > I just broke for me on 11.0-CURRENT as well. That's a regression > because it was working before. > > I see that portsmon was able to build it on 9.x. > Any idea what might be the cause? From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 01:07:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7922F363 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 01:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (gw.catspoiler.org [75.1.14.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCA725CB for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 01:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id s7916tKM049658; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:06:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201408090106.s7916tKM049658@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:06:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: build of de-apache-openoffice-4.1.0 broken To: bugReporter@Haakh.de In-Reply-To: <53E54614.7090108@Haakh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 01:07:10 -0000 On 8 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: > > Am 08.08.2014 03:11, Don Lewis schrieb: >> On 7 Aug, To: bugReporter@Haakh.de wrote: >>> On 7 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> on this system >>>> >>>> FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269301: >>>> Wed Jul 30 18:36:57 CEST 2014 >>>> toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64 >>>> >>>> I get this error: >>>> >>>> ===================================================== >>>> ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true >>>> 2>&1 | failed! >>>> in function: register_extensions >>>> ************************************************** >>>> in function: register_extensionsstopping log at Thu Aug 7 09:41:29 2014 >>>> dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.archive' >>>> >>>> 1 module(s): >>>> instsetoo_native >>>> need(s) to be rebuilt >>>> >>>> Reason(s): >>>> >>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >>>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/util >>>> >>>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build >>>> by running: >>>> >>>> build --from instsetoo_native >>>> >>>> *** Error code 1 >>>> >>>> Stop. >>>> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4 >>>> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa >>>> /tmp/portupgrade20140807-77714-1z11122 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade >>>> UPGRADE_PORT=de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.0.1_4 make >>>> BATCH=yes >>>> ** Fix the problem and try again. >>>> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>> ! editors/openoffice-4 (de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4) (unknown >>>> build error) >>>> ===================================================== >>>> >>>> Any ideas? >>> I just noticed the same failure on portsmon (also 10.0). I've done most >>> of my builds on 8.4-STABLE and have never seen this problem. I'm not >>> running 10.0 on anything here, but I did have success with 11.0-CURRENT >>> a while back. I run that again to see if I can reproduce the problem. >>> >>> I did a web search and didn't find anything that looked relevant. >> I just broke for me on 11.0-CURRENT as well. That's a regression >> because it was working before. >> >> I see that portsmon was able to build it on 9.x. >> > Any idea what might be the cause? Not really, though either --with-system-graphite or --with-system-hyphen appears to be the culprit. If I disable both of those, I can build on 11.0-CURRENT, though it require some intervention because the necessary sources for these two packages aren't in the current ext_sources tarball. I'm currently trying to figure out which of the two packages is the culprit, which will take a while because this port takes so long to build. I've got some other Makefile tweaks that I want to do as well. I hope to reroll the ext_sources tarball and come up with a final patch by late this weekend. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 08:50:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5DE383; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 08:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D9920E0; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 08:50:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1407574213; l=6480; s=domk; d=Haakh.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date; bh=MEUAsgmMSn+dpNxumvAGrwwhp/g=; b=Mmu2IEn7vr8D1ujZwed40lwAc/jjz5IvnaU1/c2GmGR3kFwcZALmsr2AHxsJk5N01Zg fLCfTPgWDT7/1Pa+9RAmotY8UH0G+M3OvTS/VzjDxmUN2KDtN25MUDPAh3RGdfc31paYX yNmobEanNx01TGOVOtrM1i69fJjFAxWla5M= X-RZG-AUTH: :LWQcbViwW/e6OTbW0dHzwKkCepEs/ThuRG8zpeuciRNkwehqPJJjMpQyueBuuw== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from abaton.Haakh.de (p57A73BAC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.167.59.172]) by post.strato.de (RZmta 35.3 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPA id L03a77q798oCUKW; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 10:50:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Crabberio.Haakh.de (crabberio.Haakh.de [192.168.63.16]) by abaton.Haakh.de (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s798oBcP019402; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 10:50:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bugReporter@Haakh.de) Message-ID: <53E5E0C3.7080900@Haakh.de> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:50:11 +0200 From: "Dr. A. Haakh" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis Subject: Re: build of de-apache-openoffice-4.1.0 broken References: <201408090106.s7916tKM049658@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201408090106.s7916tKM049658@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 08:50:18 -0000 Am 09.08.2014 03:06, Don Lewis schrieb: > On 8 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: >> Am 08.08.2014 03:11, Don Lewis schrieb: >>> On 7 Aug, To: bugReporter@Haakh.de wrote: >>>> On 7 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> on this system >>>>> >>>>> FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269301: >>>>> Wed Jul 30 18:36:57 CEST 2014 >>>>> toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64 >>>>> >>>>> I get this error: >>>>> >>>>> ===================================================== >>>>> ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true >>>>> 2>&1 | failed! >>>>> in function: register_extensions >>>>> ************************************************** >>>>> in function: register_extensionsstopping log at Thu Aug 7 09:41:29 2014 >>>>> dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.archive' >>>>> >>>>> 1 module(s): >>>>> instsetoo_native >>>>> need(s) to be rebuilt >>>>> >>>>> Reason(s): >>>>> >>>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >>>>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/util >>>>> >>>>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build >>>>> by running: >>>>> >>>>> build --from instsetoo_native >>>>> >>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>> >>>>> Stop. >>>>> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4 >>>>> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa >>>>> /tmp/portupgrade20140807-77714-1z11122 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade >>>>> UPGRADE_PORT=de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.0.1_4 make >>>>> BATCH=yes >>>>> ** Fix the problem and try again. >>>>> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>>> ! editors/openoffice-4 (de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4) (unknown >>>>> build error) >>>>> ===================================================== >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas? >>>> I just noticed the same failure on portsmon (also 10.0). I've done most >>>> of my builds on 8.4-STABLE and have never seen this problem. I'm not >>>> running 10.0 on anything here, but I did have success with 11.0-CURRENT >>>> a while back. I run that again to see if I can reproduce the problem. >>>> >>>> I did a web search and didn't find anything that looked relevant. >>> I just broke for me on 11.0-CURRENT as well. That's a regression >>> because it was working before. >>> >>> I see that portsmon was able to build it on 9.x. >>> >> Any idea what might be the cause? > Not really, though either --with-system-graphite or --with-system-hyphen > appears to be the culprit. If I disable both of those, I can build on > 11.0-CURRENT, though it require some intervention because the necessary > sources for these two packages aren't in the current ext_sources > tarball. > > I'm currently trying to figure out which of the two packages is the > culprit, which will take a while because this port takes so long to > build. > > I've got some other Makefile tweaks that I want to do as well. I hope > to reroll the ext_sources tarball and come up with a final patch by late > this weekend. > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/logging/en-US/log_AOO410_en-US.log > I just searched the build-tree and found this logfile: "/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/logging/en-US/log_AOO410_en-US.log" It is not very informative but I will attach last few dozen lines... ====================================== 92.711017 : lang : ... removing superfluous directories ... 92.711060 : lang : 92.711164 : lang : Fri Aug 8 13:07:52 2014 (01:32 min.) 92.711202 : lang : ###################################################### 92.711235 : lang : Removing superfluous directories: 92.711261 : lang : ###################################################### 92.711494 : info : remove_empty_dirs_in_folder /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/install/en-US_inprogress/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_FreeBSD_install-arc_en-US/openoffice4/share/extensions 92.711599 : lang : ... registering extensions ... 92.711629 : lang : 92.711675 : lang : Fri Aug 8 13:07:52 2014 (01:32 min.) 92.711705 : lang : ###################################################### 92.711741 : lang : Registering extensions: 92.711769 : lang : ###################################################### 92.732339 : info : ... current dir: /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/install/en-US_inprogress/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_FreeBSD_install-arc_en-US/openoffice4/program ... 92.732503 : lang : Current dir: /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/install/en-US_inprogress/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_FreeBSD_install-arc_en-US/openoffice4/program 92.732575 : info : ... unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 | ... 92.732627 : lang : Systemcall: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 | 94.583061 : lang : ERROR: Could not execute "unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 |"! Exitcode: '139' 94.583587 : lang : 94.583641 : lang : Moved directory from /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/install/en-US_inprogress to /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/install/en-US_witherror 94.583691 : info : ... cleaning the output tree ... 94.583760 : info : ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_456081407495980 ... 94.583825 : lang : 94.583854 : lang : Removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_456081407495980 96.842067 : info : Error: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 | failed! in function: register_extensions 96.842167 : info : stopping log at Fri Aug 8 13:07:57 2014 ====================================== There is however one bigger change in the ports collection which may affect openoffice. The defaultversion of java changed to openjdk7. I do have some issues with openjdk7 but i'm not sure if or how it may affect aoo. I will remove openjdk7 and try to build aoo with either openjdk6 or openjdk8 and tell you if it helps. Andreas From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 21:24:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8CCBF0E for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19482A1B for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s79LOXN8048499 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:24:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192537] New: Port Update: devel/boost-* Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 21:24:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: antumdeluge@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 21:24:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192537 Bug ID: 192537 Summary: Port Update: devel/boost-* Product: Ports Tree Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: Needs Triage Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: Normal Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: antumdeluge@gmail.com CC: office@FreeBSD.org Update available for Boost libraries. New upstream version: 1.56.0. Current ports version 1.55.0. Ports affected (I think): devel/boost-all devel/boost-docs devel/boost-jam devel/boost-libs devel/boost-python-libs http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 21:25:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD2677 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936ED2A28 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s79LPLnI058733 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 21:25:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192537] Port Update: devel/boost-* Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 21:25:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: antumdeluge@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 21:25:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192537 --- Comment #1 from Jordan Irwin --- CC'd maintaner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 22:30:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA84CD7 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768DC20C5 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s79MUG4D098177 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:30:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192537] Port Update: devel/boost-* Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:30:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:30:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192537 John Marino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |Open CC| |marino@FreeBSD.org Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |office@FreeBSD.org |org | --- Comment #2 from John Marino --- Jordan, I'm assigning this to the maintainer as well, but I am curious about the motivation. Do you realize that each time boost is updated, dozens of ports break? The fact that office@ owns it tells me openoffice / libreoffice are also sensitive the version. I think at the very least you are looking a an EXP-RUN to figure out what the damage would be. So that said, why are proposing to the boost maintainer to update this before they feel it's necessary? Like I said, I am mainly curious. There's no wrong answer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 22:44:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51D0FF6 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E6A7222C for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s79MiVkV035465 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:44:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192537] Port Update: devel/boost-* Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:44:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: antumdeluge@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:44:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192537 --- Comment #3 from Jordan Irwin --- No, I didn't know that it caused port breaks. I simply got an email notification from SF that Boost had been updated. So I thought I would notify the maintainer about it. Perhaps it would be better for me to email maintainers directly rather than post to bugs for updates? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 22:48:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDDD5C6 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74A32243 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s79Mm7mL036835 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:48:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192537] Port Update: devel/boost-* Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:48:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:48:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192537 --- Comment #4 from John Marino --- PRs are cheap and public, and appropriate if you have patches. If it's just "hey, there's a newer version available" then PRs are not appropriate. Especially if it's on sourceforge, the maintainers already know about updated versions availability because portscout sends an email and tracks it. Anyway, it's fine. office@ knows now and can close the PR if they want. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 22:49:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F5610E for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4F0224F for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s79Mnk0s037429 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:49:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192537] Port Update: devel/boost-* Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:49:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: antumdeluge@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:49:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192537 --- Comment #5 from Jordan Irwin --- Okay, thanks. From now on if I feel the need to contact a maintainer about updates I will do so directly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.