From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 24 01:22:40 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C716F7
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 01:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4921E342E
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 01:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7O1MeWc042844
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 01:22:40 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192937] [New Port] sysutils/consul
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 01:22:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: thomas@bartelmess.io
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-192937-13-gRgruxZe1O@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192937-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192937-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 01:22:40 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192937

--- Comment #7 from Thomas Bartelmess <thomas@bartelmess.io> ---
Hi, sorry for those mistakes this is my first submission to the ports tree.

I have one follow up question. When the port has a dependency that is not in
the ports tree, should the dependency be a separate submission or combined with
the existing. 

(In reply to John Marino from comment #4)
> Thanks!  Do you have any verification available?  In order of preference,
> examples of what I'm looking for are:
> 
> 1) "poudriere testport" or "poudriere bulk -t" logs
> 2) Redports or tinderbox logs
> 3) "make check-plist" followed by "make stage-qa" output 
> (https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html)
> 
> Also, please run "portlint" and paste the output.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.