From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 02:36:28 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58524256
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com
[IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25A41E4C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:36:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 86851 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2014 02:36:24 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34)
by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 26 Jan 2014 02:36:24 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=52e474a9.xn--i8sz2z.k1401; i=johnl@user.iecc.com;
bh=9f7dlMb/GYrQ+gxfViPLdro6qf15qCWnwH5Qp+HXTrY=;
b=nIJOHUpsci9PquGa+EIrGeViHRFtqKASd+PeSSHYsXPPqF1K/2SV35Qxpy5iQcv0llDOnQTtB6WBatWvw/EkCXhhAmOp1/YCMran9ljSBjoOsukaGDHJ3N/mCEklKwVZg/2C2c5xN7qErllt/8sf2QUDGFP4UQBEnN8Xim1FxD6K/LEDriRFqGE6IskcC1nEKDsjSoLSM+saus8NwIJ5/Rf30NjqfXHIC8twgh/Ec9YpqRJtWrGCrJzhGvIUWxFU
Date: 26 Jan 2014 02:36:02 -0000
Message-ID: <20140126023602.95324.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Field delimiter in sort program in freebsd
In-Reply-To: <CABAubTjqyFuvgsAHgSBL=FmazytGxY0e3YaYkd7Ur+Oa5dG5mg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Cc: shayan@liveve.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:36:28 -0000
>Using \xff as the record separator makes sense for binary files. Any idea
>why there is such a condition in the sort program?
Probably because its authors implemented the POSIX spec for the sort utility,
which sorts text files.
If you want to sort binary stuff using the standard sort program, turn it into text,
sort it, and turn it back. Or write your own specialized binary sort.
R's,
John
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 04:53:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1A267F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:53:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E29231778
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:53:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-149-155.dynamic.qsc.de
[92.195.149.155])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5233CB4A;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:53:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s0Q4rEXq004410;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:53:14 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:53:14 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: M V <dreamsun777@operamail.com>
Subject: Re:
Message-Id: <20140126055314.8dc12ca0.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <1390710325.11907.75367605.1B8FD246@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1390623216.13279.75096525.21DA4B31@webmail.messagingengine.com>
<20140125052554.d1dd907a.freebsd@edvax.de>
<1390710325.11907.75367605.1B8FD246@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:53:48 -0000
*** re-including the list, hope that's okay ***
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:25:25 -0800, M V wrote:
> well thanks for clearing things up for me i did not know i was
> downloading a server ISO
You are wrong. FreeBSD is not a "server OS" with the meaning
that it is for _server only_. As I said, it's a multi-purpose
OS, and this is reflected by how the installation media works.
They can be used to install on a server, but the same (!) media,
for example the CD #1, will install a graphical workstation.
For example, the laptops and PCs I'm running at home have
been installed using that particular CD #1. By looking at
my desktop (on screen) the initial text mode operations to
install the OS can't be seen anymore. :-)
> what is confusing to me is that it asked if i
> wanted to run from live cd i assumed it would boot into graphics ??
No, the live system CD does not include X. It's primarily
intended for performing system repair, recovery preparation
or other kind of maintenance operations.
But there are FreeBSD-derived systems that do. A famous example
is FreeSBIE, but I think it isn't being maintained actively
anymore. It is a live CD that boots into a GUI desktop environ-
ment.
http://www.freesbie.org/
The latest version is based on FreeBSD 6, which isn't actively
supported anymore. Still it will boot fine on your Dell laptop.
Even FreeSBIE 1.1 (using FreeBSD 5) will. I have tried it. :-)
> any
> way i am downloading the pcbsd now i hope that i will be able to create
> a dial up connection using this distro
That should work without problems. I've been using dial-up
Internet via PPP many years ago.
> for the life of me i have never
> been able to get clear commands on how to enable the modem and configure
> connection i have gotten better with linux commands but for some reason
> i can never get clear command info on how to create a dial up connection
You should have a look at the ppp utility. PC-BSD includes
a "dialing manager" that lets you control the modem and
manage connections.
Also see the relevant chapter in The FreeBSD Handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ppp-and-slip.html
You can choose to automatically have the system dial, or
dial manually if you prefer to have more control over your
connection time and manner.
PPPoE is also supported and works very nicely. Connections
can be started right with the system startup. I've also been
using that way to get online some years ago.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 06:18:29 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B951C9A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85311CDF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:18:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id n12so4464907wgh.12
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:18:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=EVVXdvV8nMxPPH7IUQjxGDFzwj5t3JqUmHpEO3imyhw=;
b=oYGDJsm8DOrfxBbQ+en+CWffafga08xIWMHYYjCFnV2cGo6qb/kBAP+OqG6xE30ClX
0bLvMCdaFvaOqbnyoa/icLWED4hxkO9W5mLm7RxynI4qxjp+TKTXp2pC7Hyi+dTS2Uc2
xI9OwEy1n0GXKnUeyrNE0T1cWPqiJPZWMNon59g/zJaiX6Dbs5w3g5IHvrXv0aUymEHo
owg+KmgUUhPkcEzkxMLrxNqmJ1oad/M7lgkHfIYrDOP/Rg+ybnRt8SS/IeiMxRnNbJaR
Ms8nIOaqbJ5QUXiknDuoXLFti1/IQq4g15F88arVEtyOyrsL6kLtxtU0dCgG+S7Q4S4S
9qkg==
X-Received: by 10.194.202.230 with SMTP id kl6mr16403153wjc.9.1390717107315;
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:18:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.30.169 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:17:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <97A0F01F-3E78-47D6-BDD6-ECE45D1BC45C@gmail.com>
References: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk>
<201401252137.50132.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
<52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk> <97A0F01F-3E78-47D6-BDD6-ECE45D1BC45C@gmail.com>
From: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:17:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CALeGphxqeeyVLnJ+vdcf04rFxAq6pYLZSsW4kx_zGC0LBs9gEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
To: Matthew Pherigo <hybrid120@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>,
"freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:18:29 -0000
Many systems have removed nslookup from the base system so FreeBSD
removing it is nothing new. At first, I was pretty annoyed but it
makes sense that bind should not be part of the base system unless
it's purpose is to serve as a DNS server. For all other users,
installing bind-utils is fine.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Matthew Pherigo <hybrid120@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> To my understanding, almost half of all the security vulnerabilities in t=
he entire lifetime of the FreeBSD project have been from BIND. Personally, =
I'd say that's "pretty spectacular."
>
> --Matt
>
>> On Jan 25, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/01/2014 19:37, Mark Tinka wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 09:13:08 PM Frank Leonhardt
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unbelievable, but true - someone somewhere thought that
>>>> removing nslookup from the base system was the way to
>>>> go.
>>>>
>>>> Why? Can anyone shed any light on how this decision was
>>>> made?
>>> If you read:
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.0R/relnotes.html
>>>
>>> Under the "2.3. Userland Changes" section, you will notice:
>>>
>>> "BIND has been removed from the base system.
>>> unbound(8), which is maintained by NLnet Labs, has
>>> been imported to support local DNS resolution
>>> functionality with DNSSEC. Note that it is not a
>>> replacement of BIND and the latest versions of BIND
>>> is still available in the Ports Collection. With
>>> this change, nslookup and dig are no longer a part
>>> of the base system. Users should instead use
>>> host(1) and drill(1) Alternatively, nslookup and
>>> dig can be obtained by installing dns/bind-tools
>>> port. [r255949]"
>>>
>>> So install /usr/ports/dns/bind-tools and you're a happy guy.
>>>
>>> As to the philosophy of it all, no point arguing. Fait
>>> accompli.
>>>
>>> Mark.
>> As you and Waitman both pointed out, nslookup IS part of BIND, yet as I =
said in the diatribe following the question in my post, so is "host" and th=
at's still there. Also Windoze has nslookup but doesn't include BIND. I agr=
ee there's no point arguing unless you know the rational behind what appear=
s an arbitrary decision; hence my question. Was this simply an oversight or=
is there a thought-out reason for it that one can take issue with?
>>
>> IIRC, nslookup was present in 4.3BSD, and I'm pretty sure it existed bef=
ore that. (That's BSD, not FreeBSD). Its relied on in scripts. The reason f=
or dropping it from the base system must be pretty spectacular.
>>
>> FreeBSD 10.0 might be better known as FreeBSD Vista, at this rate.
>>
>> Regards, Frank.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.=
org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o=
rg"
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 11:39:40 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76231C66
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:39:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vulpes.vvelox.net (vulpes.vvelox.net [99.69.115.42])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5EE1F63
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:39:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net (vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net
[192.168.15.2]) (Authenticated sender: kitsune)
by vulpes.vvelox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E880D492BA76
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:39:18 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:33:47 -0600
From: "Zane C. B-H." <v.velox@vvelox.net>
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: life post SuPHP
Message-ID: <20140126053347.2dcaab19@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:39:40 -0000
Just noticed SuPHP is dead. Has any one found any thing non-hackish
to get suexec like functions with PHP now? The closest I've come is a
ugly mess that uses PHP-FPM to create per user pools.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 12:42:36 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BADDCB2F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:42:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5942B1377
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:42:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u57so4332288wes.0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:42:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=XZiOd55XCYKaYUEC15mMHsU5LrY0+IdXFZ+4nZppd/k=;
b=djrTmZcY05lQHiNHWzoaU/eTMEZpwTm4xSMxW2BzzJJ1uatuXO9zoE8iFg6vRHnAaP
Cp+u+bTG+KerSOKIVo2OvvpzDxO35sq7CQOuTjx6YYOI3QMuTv8DjLQngDl7lHiYN44x
AUi1UyRI/fC54x2hK+BmDNSPsRZGWg5ECuLL+toFC4zJ44vEvKsbxh4gcVwQCFwjWbRt
CEoVCi49f2qbbvKpx2z94lFH5/on/dz3+JNeIVhUem/KUrkhONqSda+nlM3bAdK04T7J
D048IPBEe+Guhk4+Ww7WLz4JRIAZf2BzzsrLhzkFEodJZWQdrhgudRZ/EG0J8eZeKCsi
yDpA==
X-Received: by 10.180.187.229 with SMTP id fv5mr8933728wic.24.1390740154692;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:42:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.30.169 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:42:36 -0000
Does anyone have any ideas on why startx would cause Xorg to consume
100% cpu and stuck in RUN state. kill -9 does nothing to it and forced
to reboot to kill it.
If I ssh localhost and startx, it works normally.
I'm running FreeBSD 10.0 and it's a Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 with
USE_XORG_NEW undefined.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 13:12:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97CB115A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F60A167B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=5KcMJfEdPyO0Mu+tHSRKE4Fk/1sLrWJu1feSlIrTtqg=;
b=tgCGkwxySBk1F0WEFd6waDe4dhxZgdHuFHGpW9GCHoZ3M66gytYlZeMkPRND354m7dFCwAmqrnEMQi1dVUOMdlJzrqF4u+nc+vm5aiVaA9naBn64RoUVSO/MmQDCphNHGk3sidoBFbx2Sb41Jyqx0++W2SoC6i1um6z3x0DTE2A=;
Received: from [39.209.53.164] (port=63633 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7PVx-003t7H-OY; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:12:42 -0700
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:12:17 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
Message-ID: <20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:12:48 -0000
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800
"Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have any ideas on why startx would cause Xorg to consume
> 100% cpu and stuck in RUN state. kill -9 does nothing to it and forced
> to reboot to kill it.
>
> If I ssh localhost and startx, it works normally.
>
> I'm running FreeBSD 10.0 and it's a Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 with
> USE_XORG_NEW undefined.
>
try to add WITH_GALLIUM and compile X again.
X will work via ssh as it does not have anything to display on that
machine then. It is the graphic card driver which is your problem.
Erich
_______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 13:18:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC49219
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:18:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E5216A3
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:18:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x55so4318054wes.36
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:18:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=/Y9QWX8nvnH3aaJnQJBOnntPsonsGCfBQQHkqmJFK+w=;
b=GmF6cfPZ1x0GSRcicQCkV8L2i+UPlIwlDJ3jVsolDUnAMDDNTYDioV2NRGtBgWjovn
k8+sRGQSThA9+Z8ca0THCmguyPFYyqmyGMMs+Xqfl+O4Z9oKBxuz/7AkWeqUvuAEiZrp
TtAZanhIC1LWq3R/wcStVfS/4oEDOyxy/TWEhaEaFFvDZDoGuYHL2xdD/BBn6DKmSa0Q
fZWJhbVH7T+BNYS+Zi55mDYbvxcAq23sQ5dtk7suqHc0H/N2C4zkFWFVbDH8fvuucbYu
KFRJThgIeuxyuL38vDJjHv9z9WjpQE467jmLP4cCAdtzBh0xujAhX6jDbo5m7Q99mEpz
vX+g==
X-Received: by 10.194.108.100 with SMTP id hj4mr108666wjb.83.1390742302506;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:18:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.30.169 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:17:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
References: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
From: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:17:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CALeGphy3D1nehj=1weSo6CSLkwZNs47rWT1VsoAyf4xPe9QtLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:18:24 -0000
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Erich Dollansky
<erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800
> "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any ideas on why startx would cause Xorg to consume
>> 100% cpu and stuck in RUN state. kill -9 does nothing to it and forced
>> to reboot to kill it.
>>
>> If I ssh localhost and startx, it works normally.
>>
>> I'm running FreeBSD 10.0 and it's a Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 with
>> USE_XORG_NEW undefined.
>>
> try to add WITH_GALLIUM and compile X again.
>
> X will work via ssh as it does not have anything to display on that
> machine then. It is the graphic card driver which is your problem.
>
> Erich
grep -ir "WITH_GALLIUM" /usr/ports/x11*
didn't show anything, what does that do? The ati driver worked fine in
FreeBSD 9.2. This card doesn't support KMS as it's an older laptop
video card.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 13:33:01 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB41F68D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8321F17CB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=iBfuMeWfUnlvZW469y5l0jwL1NiopMnc2IqnXMLmOTo=;
b=sG5pQgIVF5dq8tV2xn9sQ7LvCcreHIbhatMZut0goewKu0b5mtubY+xExqhkJOeLzsX+1qBRilNeAd594jMj2TK0MXz8QFFenXgV0rapeP4tA0LwvODvtUiU8XV36BzoNb55LZF1AFWWndH9tL1h/Gd+WWJ6pYg1VxVRa7ZlAkM=;
Received: from [39.209.53.164] (port=34759 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7Ppb-0041qR-Ff; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:33:01 -0700
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:32:47 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
Message-ID: <20140126213247.53fc82ee@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALeGphy3D1nehj=1weSo6CSLkwZNs47rWT1VsoAyf4xPe9QtLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphy3D1nehj=1weSo6CSLkwZNs47rWT1VsoAyf4xPe9QtLg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:33:01 -0000
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:17:42 -0800
"Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Erich Dollansky
> <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800
> > "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone have any ideas on why startx would cause Xorg to
> >> consume 100% cpu and stuck in RUN state. kill -9 does nothing to
> >> it and forced to reboot to kill it.
> >>
> >> If I ssh localhost and startx, it works normally.
> >>
> >> I'm running FreeBSD 10.0 and it's a Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 with
> >> USE_XORG_NEW undefined.
> >>
> > try to add WITH_GALLIUM and compile X again.
> >
> > X will work via ssh as it does not have anything to display on that
> > machine then. It is the graphic card driver which is your problem.
> >
> > Erich
>
> grep -ir "WITH_GALLIUM" /usr/ports/x11*
>
> didn't show anything, what does that do? The ati driver worked fine in
> FreeBSD 9.2. This card doesn't support KMS as it's an older laptop
> video card.
if KMS is not supported, then take the VESA driver and see what happens.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 14:25:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BB8533A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5FE1AD9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:25:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5DCBC010.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[93.203.192.16]) (authenticated bits=128)
by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0QEPQPv025018;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:25:27 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
by park.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s0QEKcQJ024279;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:20:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0QEKKMn080851;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:20:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Message-Id: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:03:52 GMT."
<52E426B8.3080905@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:20:20 +0100
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:25:54 -0000
> There must be a discussion about how the decision was taken somewhere,
> mustn't there? If there isn't, its looking like an accident.
>
> Regards, Frank.
Hi Frank & questions@,
There were discussions. Nslookup was treated as a corollary of
removing bind from src/ to ports/. To find discussions search archives
with word bind in subject headers, (better than keyword nslookup or named).
I recall archives to search as current@ or stable@ freebsd.org.
The rationale for bind removal from src/ I thought ill advised; it won't
suprise me if FreeBSD gets roasted for no longer being net server ready.
Complaints or calls for review should go to <arch@freebsd.org>.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ".
Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 18:22:19 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0591591
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:22:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFFC1E8E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:22:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x13so4672810wgg.21
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:22:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=PxcP2ffDnoca3J4VLtX3X/hOkLJtsVhpqbuEQ0Jy6WI=;
b=dA1FaSu41cymgHbyn4KlFATA9uM2at/egnl61HDk2kfQv8izK+1gqOhipE8cevwBS1
Sen+PdUc5pJGtWcABvTWd3zBsHdj5JIXx+faUR8Awk9U/2JO3/87Vy2jBZU9RnXmszlC
EOBSgSnUAKn3cnGiC1DD67zRg3j5vltBqrsPRo0kxUYJ1kin/7xznG616L1+Z2OD/QPR
d+IQTSDrvV57iqcgntH40gAzv5Y0kmT+o8KWM/0F+Obbv3P4C4Q76VClcZkdSqTksIOD
NS+6RR5+b3IdpaD25932rZ5TpVcrMBWiPK00soNRct8oKMLqwiyyW1PuJ9g6Rh3vHlMv
2lJQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.21.244 with SMTP id y20mr9593928wie.37.1390760537004;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:22:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (105.33.91.91.rev.sfr.net. [91.91.33.105])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q15sm19054330wjw.18.2014.01.26.10.22.16
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E55257.6030901@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:22:15 +0100
From: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk>
<201401252137.50132.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:22:19 -0000
On 25/01/2014 20:52, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> On 25/01/2014 19:37, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 09:13:08 PM Frank Leonhardt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Unbelievable, but true - someone somewhere thought that
>>> removing nslookup from the base system was the way to
>>> go.
>>>
>>> Why? Can anyone shed any light on how this decision was
>>> made?
>> If you read:
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.0R/relnotes.html
>>
>> Under the "2.3. Userland Changes" section, you will notice:
>>
>> "BIND has been removed from the base system.
>> unbound(8), which is maintained by NLnet Labs, has
>> been imported to support local DNS resolution
>> functionality with DNSSEC. Note that it is not a
>> replacement of BIND and the latest versions of BIND
>> is still available in the Ports Collection. With
>> this change, nslookup and dig are no longer a part
>> of the base system. Users should instead use
>> host(1) and drill(1) Alternatively, nslookup and
>> dig can be obtained by installing dns/bind-tools
>> port. [r255949]"
>>
>> So install /usr/ports/dns/bind-tools and you're a happy guy.
>>
>> As to the philosophy of it all, no point arguing. Fait
>> accompli.
>>
>> Mark.
> As you and Waitman both pointed out, nslookup IS part of BIND, yet as I
> said in the diatribe following the question in my post, so is "host" and
> that's still there. Also Windoze has nslookup but doesn't include BIND.
> I agree there's no point arguing unless you know the rational behind
> what appears an arbitrary decision; hence my question. Was this simply
> an oversight or is there a thought-out reason for it that one can take
> issue with?
>
> IIRC, nslookup was present in 4.3BSD, and I'm pretty sure it existed
> before that. (That's BSD, not FreeBSD). Its relied on in scripts. The
> reason for dropping it from the base system must be pretty spectacular.
>
> FreeBSD 10.0 might be better known as FreeBSD Vista, at this rate.
>
> Regards, Frank.
>
Please don't piss off, there was thousands of reasons for removing BIND
from base. It generates at least 5 security advisories by year. FreeBSD
has a great feature called "ports" / "packages". Of course it's always
great to have a fully functional system just after an installation. But
can you seriously use a FreeBSD fresh install? I think you need to
install a bunch of packages before :-).
So just a pkg install bind-tools is not so hard, isn't it?
Regards,
David.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 19:09:11 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E73BD
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org
[12.32.44.142])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C302311C2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:09:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org.
[12.32.36.73])
by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s0QJ93NG011320
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:09:03 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org)
Message-ID: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:09:03 -0700
From: Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: ps problem
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
(nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]);
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:09:03 -0700 (MST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:09:11 -0000
I'm trying to debug a duplex printing issue with my printer.
I've got cups installed.
The following file, when printed with
lpr filename.ps
goes through the duplexing motions, but never prints anything.
Not being much of a ps geek... hints?
%!PS-Adobe-3.0
%cupsJobTicket: media=Letter sides=two-sided-long-edge
%%BoundingBox: 36 36 576 756
%%Pages: 2
%%LanguageLevel: 2
% This file has two pages, with the second supposed to be printed back to back in proper orientation;
% i.e. not upside down.
%%Requirements: duplex
%%DocumentNeededResources: font Times-Roman
%%EndComments
%%BeginDefaults
%%PageOrientation: Portrait
1.0 setgray
/Times-Roman findfont
60 scalefont
setfont
%%EndDefaults
%%BeginSetup
%%BeginFeature: *Duplex DuplexNoTumble
<< /Duplex true /Tumble false >> setpagedevice
%%EndFeature
%%EndSetup
%%Page: (Front Page (1)) 1
% Page 1 text
1.0 setgray
/Times-Roman findfont
60 scalefont
setfont
newpath
100 200 moveto
(This is page (1).)
%%Page: (Back Page (2)) 2
% Page 2 text
/Times-Roman findfont
1.0 setgray
60 scalefont
setfont
newpath
100 200 moveto
(This is page (2).)
showpage
%%EOF
%
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 19:18:44 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D6B2C4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 727E71259
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id o15so6349319qap.30
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:18:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=seibercom.net; s=google;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=GyxHNw2RkEwrVm1XuTvh0zu8BHghqj3v0d1Mjrj5eeE=;
b=lSTZCvwbFhS5W9gOWRBjZ5svPu2VEFd25NagZgMS02gviWz5J9Wqw96mQHwqZLYVX1
IgaMc+2BhcZj4r1xgzwI5rP7XN9HH/Cab00QTA2g+WOzTURZVRiKES/eFCDjZhtKS79k
ucxU1TrFcIxFC7Y8pxLtnz36pG8OayVAkvi3w=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=GyxHNw2RkEwrVm1XuTvh0zu8BHghqj3v0d1Mjrj5eeE=;
b=dp8XB9rlnnXKID2yjqm/BZmiKGwhBlzDTX/zZUvF/VRiKbFKKBMZKLUhCsb/t9TquW
k8shqEaCUOoRchKVwLw0i9x9BstihVl89IasBPKuxhmHNTNWO1rOzNGYNr/mcrqzfMZB
f9buRWXS7OzMKz7qn6LmIq6bTfiXnxvmPVdaPNWiZ+CiFzhs0pJW69J8ZGJWYJ9eBgf3
th1kEYivBg6PiyIgu4TPo3F2G+L/jtZX2NN0nwWxYBwhZgZpRH0EXff1eT6y+H4Nsdv6
0PCa013ggyxWUxU+PHRilCAsfk8UTrauV99IbYH1fwtt0LKPtbiFWb+wyDXC6P9SI8ZM
IS/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkNvpzAcAwvJ9WQ3gBVc5DFmG3LaxWa5EeUDoKoVjKgHSb8UxiiY3Bz9z//LY5c2ErQ8o2h
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.69.133 with SMTP id z5mr4296510qai.57.1390763923630;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.91.163 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:18:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CALiBPo8E8YjAdEW59eHdmSQ_ppNH8qmSKQo79KU+=OX8fqr3jA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Mouse not working in KDE after upgrading to FreeBSD 10.0
From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net>
To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:18:44 -0000
I was running the last BETA release of FreeBSD until this morning. Having
nothing better to do, I used "FreeBSD-update" to install the latest
version. Everything appeared to go fine. However, I now find that the mouse
will no longer work in KDE. This is a portion of the Xorg.0.log file:
(II) config/hal: Adding input device Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0
(II) LoadModule: "mouse"
(II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so
(II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 1.9.0
Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 7.0
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/ums0"
(==) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Protocol: "Auto"
(**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: always reports core events
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/ums0"
(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/ums0
Device busy.
(EE) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: cannot open input device
(II) UnloadModule: "mouse"
(EE) PreInit returned NULL for "Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0"
(EE) config/hal: NewInputDeviceRequest failed (8)
This is what it looked like when things were working:
(II) config/hal: Adding input device Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0
(II) LoadModule: "mouse"
(II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so
(II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 1.9.0
Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 7.0
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse"
(==) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Protocol: "Auto"
(**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: always reports core events
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse"
(==) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout: 50
(**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5
(**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Buttons: 5
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver
v7.0" (type: MOUSE)
(**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: (accel) keeping acceleration scheme
1
(**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: (accel) acceleration profile 0
(II) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: SetupAuto: hw.iftype is 4, hw.model
is 0
(II) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: SetupAuto: protocol is SysMouse
Absolutely nothing else was updated except for FreeBSD itself. I have tried
rebooting twice with negative results. I can see the mouse pointer in KDE,
but I cannot move it. However, in the CLI environment, the mouse works
normally. I don't even know where to look to correct this problem.
--
Jerry
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 20:41:22 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD073F3
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B04261892
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0QKfH6I030694;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:41:17 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0QKfG0x030691;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:41:17 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:41:16 -0700 (MST)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
Subject: Re: ps problem
In-Reply-To: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:41:17 -0700 (MST)
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:41:22 -0000
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Gary Aitken wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a duplex printing issue with my printer.
> I've got cups installed.
Gah. That might introduce other problems, I don't know.
> 1.0 setgray
1.0 is white, 0 is black.
> /Times-Roman findfont
> 60 scalefont
> setfont
> newpath
> 100 200 moveto
> (This is page (1).)
The paren operator defines a string. Also, escaping parens inside the
string with a backslash is a good idea. But after defining a string, it
just sits on the stack unless you draw it to the page with show:
(This is page \(1\).) show
After drawing everything on a page, the showpage operator prints the
page, and then you can begin on the second page, which should also be
followed by a showpage.
ps2pdf from ghostscript is handy for debugging without burning through
paper.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 21:22:03 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3015190F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:22:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93D551CCD
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:22:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0QLLpVd056859
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:21:52 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E57C72.3070001@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:21:54 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk>
<201401252137.50132.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <52E41619.1000505@fjl.co.uk>
<52E55257.6030901@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E55257.6030901@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:22:03 -0000
On 26/01/2014 18:22, David Demelier wrote:
> On 25/01/2014 20:52, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>> On 25/01/2014 19:37, Mark Tinka wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 25, 2014 09:13:08 PM Frank Leonhardt
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unbelievable, but true - someone somewhere thought that
>>>> removing nslookup from the base system was the way to
>>>> go.
>>>>
>>>> Why? Can anyone shed any light on how this decision was
>>>> made?
>>> If you read:
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.0R/relnotes.html
>>>
>>> Under the "2.3. Userland Changes" section, you will notice:
>>>
>>> "BIND has been removed from the base system.
>>> unbound(8), which is maintained by NLnet Labs, has
>>> been imported to support local DNS resolution
>>> functionality with DNSSEC. Note that it is not a
>>> replacement of BIND and the latest versions of BIND
>>> is still available in the Ports Collection. With
>>> this change, nslookup and dig are no longer a part
>>> of the base system. Users should instead use
>>> host(1) and drill(1) Alternatively, nslookup and
>>> dig can be obtained by installing dns/bind-tools
>>> port. [r255949]"
>>>
>>> So install /usr/ports/dns/bind-tools and you're a happy guy.
>>>
>>> As to the philosophy of it all, no point arguing. Fait
>>> accompli.
>>>
>>> Mark.
>> As you and Waitman both pointed out, nslookup IS part of BIND, yet as I
>> said in the diatribe following the question in my post, so is "host" and
>> that's still there. Also Windoze has nslookup but doesn't include BIND.
>> I agree there's no point arguing unless you know the rational behind
>> what appears an arbitrary decision; hence my question. Was this simply
>> an oversight or is there a thought-out reason for it that one can take
>> issue with?
>>
>> IIRC, nslookup was present in 4.3BSD, and I'm pretty sure it existed
>> before that. (That's BSD, not FreeBSD). Its relied on in scripts. The
>> reason for dropping it from the base system must be pretty spectacular.
>>
>> FreeBSD 10.0 might be better known as FreeBSD Vista, at this rate.
>>
>> Regards, Frank.
>>
> Please don't piss off, there was thousands of reasons for removing BIND
> from base. It generates at least 5 security advisories by year. FreeBSD
> has a great feature called "ports" / "packages". Of course it's always
> great to have a fully functional system just after an installation. But
> can you seriously use a FreeBSD fresh install? I think you need to
> install a bunch of packages before :-).
>
> So just a pkg install bind-tools is not so hard, isn't it?
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
All this is may be true, but I was asking about nslookup, specifically
not BIND (as I pointed out in the original question). If you read most
of this thread, people just want to talk about BIND and as a result I
can see why you'd think this was the agenda when it wasn't. I'm having a
few interesting off-list discussions about the merits or otherwise of
BIND and where BIND10 is going, but that's not a question (feel free to
join in by email).
So, to get back to the question, the problem is that nslookup is missing
from base. Why?
Yes, it was part of BIND, but it needn't be as it uses its own resolver
(which is one of its long-running criticisms, but in this case it's a
strength).
Dig and host were also part of BIND. BIND's dig has been replaced in
ldns by the semi-compatible "drill". BIND's host has been replaced on
FreeBSD 10.0 by an ldns re-write. BIND's nslookup, the oldest utility of
them all, the one that people use for scripting because it's been there
since the beginning of time (nearly), the one that's available
(out-of-the-box) on every platform including Microsoft - is suddenly GONE!
If someone's not involved in server-type stuff and don't use shell
scripts the significance of this may be less hard to see, but the reason
for having a base system, unlike the disparate Linux distributions where
nothing can be taken for granted, is that you can take a script written
in 1986 that has limited itself to base-system utilities and it will
STILL RUN in 2014.
So did this happen because someone decided that there was no need to
have a DNS server in base when all that was needed was a caching
resolver, and the nslookup utility was simply overlooked. Or did someone
decide that nslookup was a problem and dropped it. Or is it on someone's
To Do list and got missed off that way?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 21:37:01 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866EAF46
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x236.google.com (mail-qa0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A7A1DEB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id i13so6393940qae.13
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:37:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version
:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
bh=L673bQr+VFcd8x3WeUnq/4IIzxZfBR9L0my6ntiVufw=;
b=CkiQoo6yMdTv6g8nSS90p3fqWXND4p3Q8/flGbICt0f6IxT3KqChPm0KDk/wYHc78z
EKiEsRIAkFFMUnI5FL4xIklUH93EfNtbGpD3hXMoSDDm+i+sGbCXPIr/Np5Pd/F8ZzJK
QSIFCg+7zlPBDavcywCEu20JvIUcepJlUK9OEosuleQUXrN0vb6OVDyoR6Jn1FbRseyB
imvKKZm0qf7a5Bc8mDiVnLZBXzqxCEZZ4j7FEBd/29GqoxNYAujsSZNz3w3Pu3qPsPNL
0NHiVbpo5p646p5EJFfqPLP7kGToOHulKfZup5s9x181jPPqznDNI0KQbrh45jNIfwPp
4hZQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.36.129 with SMTP id t1mr38044663qad.8.1390772220491;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:37:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lumiwa.farms.net ([71.241.213.42])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j97sm6779779qge.22.2014.01.26.13.36.59
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:37:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Ajtim <lumiwa@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: google-earth
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:36:58 -0500
Message-ID: <1660577.COmRtWhp6G@lumiwa.farms.net>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.4 (FreeBSD/10.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.11.4; amd64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:37:01 -0000
Hi!
I have still problem with
Google Earth
6.0.3.2197
Build Date
5/13/2011
Build Time
5:16:07 pm
Renderer
OpenGL
Operating System
Linux (2.6.16.0)
Video Driver
Mesa Project
Max Texture Size
2048x2048
Server
kh.google.com
on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE (amd64).
When I search for the city I got:
Invalid HTTP request
Is it possible to save this problem, please?
--
Mitja
-------
http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 21:53:50 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8ABB608
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1A11F6B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0QLrmkT060385
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:53:48 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E583EF.6080007@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:53:51 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
In-Reply-To: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:53:51 -0000
On 26/01/2014 14:20, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> There must be a discussion about how the decision was taken somewhere,
>> mustn't there? If there isn't, its looking like an accident.
>>
>> Regards, Frank.
> Hi Frank & questions@,
> There were discussions. Nslookup was treated as a corollary of
> removing bind from src/ to ports/. To find discussions search archives
> with word bind in subject headers, (better than keyword nslookup or named).
> I recall archives to search as current@ or stable@ freebsd.org.
>
> The rationale for bind removal from src/ I thought ill advised; it won't
> suprise me if FreeBSD gets roasted for no longer being net server ready.
>
> Complaints or calls for review should go to <arch@freebsd.org>.
>
> Cheers,
> Julian
Thanks - I'm following this up. Incidentally, I've tested it and
nslookup /runs/ just fine without any other part of BIND being present.
Regards, Frank.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 22:37:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18FA4138
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:37:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org
[12.32.44.142])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B011287
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:37:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org.
[12.32.36.73])
by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s0QMb2Hm011842;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:37:02 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org)
Message-ID: <52E58E0E.5010000@dreamchaser.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:37:02 -0700
From: Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Subject: Re: ps problem
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
(nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]);
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:37:02 -0700 (MST)
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:37:05 -0000
On 01/26/14 13:41, Warren Block wrote:
>> 1.0 setgray
>
> 1.0 is white, 0 is black.
that might have something to do with it, :-)
except rgb failed also.
>> /Times-Roman findfont 60 scalefont setfont newpath 100 200 moveto
>> (This is page (1).)
>
> The paren operator defines a string.
Got that part already, thanks.
> But after defining a
> string, it just sits on the stack unless you draw it to the page with
> show:
>
> (This is page \(1\).) show
Ah... that was the magic, thanks.
> After drawing everything on a page, the showpage operator prints the
> page, and then you can begin on the second page, which should also be
> followed by a showpage.
>
> ps2pdf from ghostscript is handy for debugging without burning
> through paper.
thanks, *much* more convenient.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 23:16:55 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B641D4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9239415E9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ii20so6475504qab.32
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:16:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
bh=p4xghI2DXKE5getsJ7zNa/xYr3S2x/FpMBkURROFr5o=;
b=wJ1kdvoHd9qiYGY/xrbiPmjb9aIPu2Chkcm7etu1x1oVCvG3wS+2Jn6RmfoWP9Fw8w
h19GRdLInC6vsHS12MP/3k64tZlLp/MssEHmhThAap0KnPoRephyMuf2rjUxcq4WSoWW
Og2AB6viidAvjdaTKwy8e5CpHVvonDCbDMsrSjEV6a9bWHdlKWGQwWDZGo4VIB4k5NnX
S89mtaWtVa+RFKXWg4pe7TNt7at2QU2c/OHV8n3wjGrtRRkauq413iBeUwWjvIlwYL3L
DsGedCkE5pvJZdeWgi3TvXhOp5x5J+9Aqj4HB+SK6jacnbWkkqQwcFA/dzb7Vf/prNnc
Du3A==
X-Received: by 10.224.44.9 with SMTP id y9mr38433878qae.45.1390778214848;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lumiwa.farms.net ([71.241.213.42])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l2sm20838678qae.19.2014.01.26.15.16.53
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:16:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Ajtim <lumiwa@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: google-earth
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:16:52 -0500
Message-ID: <2459346.WuU7G1VcRq@lumiwa.farms.net>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.4 (FreeBSD/10.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.11.4; amd64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1660577.COmRtWhp6G@lumiwa.farms.net>
References: <1660577.COmRtWhp6G@lumiwa.farms.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:16:55 -0000
On Sunday 26 January 2014 16:36:58 Ajtim wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have still problem with
>
> Google Earth
> 6.0.3.2197
> Build Date
> 5/13/2011
> Build Time
> 5:16:07 pm
> Renderer
> OpenGL
> Operating System
> Linux (2.6.16.0)
> Video Driver
> Mesa Project
> Max Texture Size
> 2048x2048
> Server
> kh.google.com
>
> on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE (amd64).
> When I search for the city I got:
> Invalid HTTP request
>
> Is it possible to save this problem, please?
>
>
>
The problem is solved. I deleted libcurl.so.4 from google-earth directory and it works :).
--
Mitja
-------
http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 26 23:22:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71E91496
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 341DB1689
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:22:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-149-155.dynamic.qsc.de
[92.195.149.155])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5A6924D29;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:22:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s0QNLqKj001966;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:21:52 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:21:52 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org
Subject: Re: ps problem
Message-Id: <20140127002152.6ba140c3.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <52E58E0E.5010000@dreamchaser.org>
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
<52E58E0E.5010000@dreamchaser.org>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:22:26 -0000
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:37:02 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 01/26/14 13:41, Warren Block wrote:
> > ps2pdf from ghostscript is handy for debugging without burning
> > through paper.
>
> thanks, *much* more convenient.
Even though considered old-fashioned, gv is an excellent
viewer for "not too complicated" PS and even PDF; ghostscript
also contains a viewer called gs (when compiled with X11
support).
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 00:03:59 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89098D3B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:03:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de
[IPv6:2a01:488:42::50ed:8591])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D0FC1A18
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:03:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from xdsl-78-34-136-66.netcologne.de ([78.34.136.66]
helo=dijkstra-old.cruwe.de); authenticated
by wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1W7Zg8-0005QG-NK; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:03:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:03:51 +0100
From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, freebsd-x12@freebsd.org
Subject: Black screen and strange error on GeForce GT 730M / Thinkpad T440p
Message-ID: <20140127010351.2e450a9b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;cjr@cruwe.de;1390781039;1857db75;
Cc: hiren.panchasara@gmail.com
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:03:59 -0000
I have got a new Thinkpad T440p with dual Intel / Nvidia graphics. As
Intel Haswell is of now unspupported I had high hopes for the nvidia
GPU. However, with x11/nvidia-driver I get a black screen and
following error message on dmesg:
nvidia0: <GeForce GT 730M> on vgapci0
vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI
Error: Field [TBF3] at 270336 exceeds Buffer [NULL] size 262144 (bits)
(20130823/dsopcode-249) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed
[\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_.GETB] (Node 0xfffff80005341e00),
AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20130823/psparse-553) ACPI Error: Method
parse/execution failed [\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._ROM] (Node
0xfffff80005341e40), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20130823/psparse-553) ACPI
Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) em0:
link state changed to UP ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
(20130823/nsarguments-97)
I updated BIOS with
http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS037576 to
have the newsest version.
I have seen such an error message reported to the letter in Sep '13 by
Hiren. Can anybody help me understand what's happening here, I have
absolutely no idea what that should mean.
Thanks and cheers,
--
Christopher
TZ: GMT + 1h
GnuPG/GPG: 0xE8DE2C14
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r256184: Thu Oct 10 19:12:54 CEST 2013
cjr@dijkstra.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/home/cjr/media/src/freebsd/base/stable/9/sys/GEN_WDTRACE
Punctuation matters:
"Lets eat Grandma." or "Lets eat, Grandma." - Punctuation saves lives.
"A panda eats shoots and leaves." or "A panda eats, shoots, and
leaves." - Punctuation teaches proper biology.
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." (RFC 1925)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 02:39:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B8DD43
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:39:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22b.google.com (mail-ea0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6665613DE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:39:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id f15so1449185eak.30
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:39:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=Nv1Nno3eI3qg10nliAYUvWzUxUrkyvWWhbdZe9BP02M=;
b=NXrLsPuR2tyrto8Fa/mvEGlZvfmrdFj8RWPxnzudorK10nxq+fQ+QtlmlfNHgMqIlY
ewaegPF/PiZRriplbefe1EW1jJ+sTf8nuY11ELCsj8tuXQ0nQABGiLs3gBhtp5D43dCS
0iv/ZqSXjqgpcComscV+2c6J3227MWyqAegh/XoBjlob+jkPDpTzsi35KOWZMW2Dmqeo
zYEeW3vwO5a0ULsHB3fl7ngVEztdcLrfYJZhXgExt/2Td2nsBK0qKLkwznVgT5RAUcSQ
A4jaJwGI8gWYEoxdlFRrOd7tYf0jLxLBDy1nemkZ00l+I4N/48KvuvzOq+TFvNd3tw1V
t1Cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.3.130 with SMTP id 2mr22457680eeh.36.1390790359879; Sun,
26 Jan 2014 18:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.15.102.76 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:39:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+QLa9Dsy=+4KQ+8MQTS4iHh9r=fN_shNPD5Fngw4ww1xO+i6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Sendmail Error at Boot
From: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:39:21 -0000
I've just installed FreeBSD 10.0 and I'm getting the following line in
the /var/log/maillog file:
sm-mta[759]: STARTTLS=server: file /etc/mail/certs/dh.param unsafe: No
such file or directory
How do I fix this? What is the missing file?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 02:41:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1231BDE9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E135149F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:41:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w62so4642576wes.38
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:41:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=kbWddt+70GlD3jLS6peSwoNHomqlydTNmRHsFikVFZs=;
b=IPeOKQXVzHMKCklncK58pBNw+LfnPRVUqkTNXr+62EDqCjCTxz2FMwHiEAGgIowtNt
cGxoBNGjGYVP6JkwLyMylh++grmsoMYQL/rOElZyOERTbU9A8oxDRTwRoaUYu+PcaBqJ
eLuFGzKWf1kxWqr6Zq6i69WCXUO31/FWf5Xg2d//XdYMZyrQTGlCeCOZlvyB02CdePbA
Nx08nqpbe3z5GzqdKPiAEg4+wqn1bPVyQJ/EXnM5LGRH3F06zG4wMtUu+tr9juKAFWdf
jfYzKl/bTEeqUb5VMTT3DbAQVOhp1qb0Fz+OLg8Nt6chVdVUr33th7Ua3gZiGr3BRSiF
kKBg==
X-Received: by 10.194.24.65 with SMTP id s1mr61072wjf.38.1390790488420; Sun,
26 Jan 2014 18:41:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.30.169 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:40:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140126213247.53fc82ee@X220.alogt.com>
References: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphy3D1nehj=1weSo6CSLkwZNs47rWT1VsoAyf4xPe9QtLg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126213247.53fc82ee@X220.alogt.com>
From: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:40:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CALeGphwbV29CP4=cUk55890FK1VJXScF7h9vogaeWebpCz9fkA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:41:31 -0000
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Erich Dollansky
<erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:17:42 -0800
> "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Erich Dollansky
>> <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800
>> > "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Does anyone have any ideas on why startx would cause Xorg to
>> >> consume 100% cpu and stuck in RUN state. kill -9 does nothing to
>> >> it and forced to reboot to kill it.
>> >>
>> >> If I ssh localhost and startx, it works normally.
>> >>
>> >> I'm running FreeBSD 10.0 and it's a Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 with
>> >> USE_XORG_NEW undefined.
>> >>
>> > try to add WITH_GALLIUM and compile X again.
>> >
>> > X will work via ssh as it does not have anything to display on that
>> > machine then. It is the graphic card driver which is your problem.
>> >
>> > Erich
>>
>> grep -ir "WITH_GALLIUM" /usr/ports/x11*
>>
>> didn't show anything, what does that do? The ati driver worked fine in
>> FreeBSD 9.2. This card doesn't support KMS as it's an older laptop
>> video card.
>
> if KMS is not supported, then take the VESA driver and see what happens.
>
vesa works fine but wanted it to work with the ati driver which has acceleration
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 02:43:42 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14ACE8B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:43:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bsdbox.co (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B38B14B7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:43:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.bsdbox.co (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2272238654
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:43:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <52E5C7D3.8050703@bsdbox.co>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:31 +1100
From: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail Error at Boot
References: <CA+QLa9Dsy=+4KQ+8MQTS4iHh9r=fN_shNPD5Fngw4ww1xO+i6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+QLa9Dsy=+4KQ+8MQTS4iHh9r=fN_shNPD5Fngw4ww1xO+i6w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:43:42 -0000
On 27/01/2014 1:39 PM, Robert Simmons wrote:
> I've just installed FreeBSD 10.0 and I'm getting the following line in
> the /var/log/maillog file:
> sm-mta[759]: STARTTLS=server: file /etc/mail/certs/dh.param unsafe: No
> such file or directory
>
> How do I fix this? What is the missing file?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
cd /etc/mail/certs
openssl dhparam -out dh.param 4096
--
bsdbox.co
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 02:44:20 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED94FAE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:44:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5977714CD
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:44:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id t61so4575237wes.7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:44:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=uM96oYQzQnl4EqWdi2YfmfarFRjROgkgG1KANIteuww=;
b=SFN4kta2Rj3zg7b5Nv/9OyZFEWT/S7vZMNFOj9EyJadMbf/gJxXJH65y1ahNceb70C
65BB3k8rKZ9JwtFGSN1WgUNxDVxQ3g3MvJAQL5yJ1agTJb1tbPx/tqhCB87gwgGPUAC6
onf/1R2zPUewgNTMr8B7rieNCp99Rvwy+x1CJ6wwbSVLcyRsRrgfUj6qvZwINiXot6OH
7YcRip7fEqrSk8/Bl6AuYoNJFWc3rGAdeHKHTvU1XRe/x0TVYPgHt1k31mzz2AnMeDEL
yok4ZKFWcP1yYqZWs01Ck1PyyJ1kZ80Bu8dhH/5KmE7uOe3tIIy2cUg0mKxQ96DP0JnE
dqAw==
X-Received: by 10.180.187.229 with SMTP id fv5mr10287809wic.24.1390790658763;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:44:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.30.169 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:43:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALiBPo8E8YjAdEW59eHdmSQ_ppNH8qmSKQo79KU+=OX8fqr3jA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiBPo8E8YjAdEW59eHdmSQ_ppNH8qmSKQo79KU+=OX8fqr3jA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:43:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CALeGphwZQXMY4RRtPQWew37WzboS6OTY+JTFMcdAMnhAierxyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mouse not working in KDE after upgrading to FreeBSD 10.0
To: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:44:20 -0000
Try reinstalling hal and the xf86-input-mouse driver and see if that solves it.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> wrote:
> I was running the last BETA release of FreeBSD until this morning. Having
> nothing better to do, I used "FreeBSD-update" to install the latest
> version. Everything appeared to go fine. However, I now find that the mouse
> will no longer work in KDE. This is a portion of the Xorg.0.log file:
>
> (II) config/hal: Adding input device Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0
> (II) LoadModule: "mouse"
> (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so
> (II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
> compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 1.9.0
> Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
> ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 7.0
> (**) Option "Device" "/dev/ums0"
> (==) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Protocol: "Auto"
> (**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: always reports core events
> (**) Option "Device" "/dev/ums0"
> (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/ums0
> Device busy.
> (EE) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: cannot open input device
> (II) UnloadModule: "mouse"
> (EE) PreInit returned NULL for "Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0"
> (EE) config/hal: NewInputDeviceRequest failed (8)
>
> This is what it looked like when things were working:
>
> (II) config/hal: Adding input device Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0
> (II) LoadModule: "mouse"
> (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so
> (II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
> compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 1.9.0
> Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
> ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 7.0
> (**) Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse"
> (==) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Protocol: "Auto"
> (**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: always reports core events
> (**) Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse"
> (==) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout: 50
> (**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5
> (**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: Buttons: 5
> (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver
> v7.0" (type: MOUSE)
> (**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: (accel) keeping acceleration scheme
> 1
> (**) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: (accel) acceleration profile 0
> (II) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: SetupAuto: hw.iftype is 4, hw.model
> is 0
> (II) Microsoft 2.4GHz Transceiver v7.0: SetupAuto: protocol is SysMouse
>
> Absolutely nothing else was updated except for FreeBSD itself. I have tried
> rebooting twice with negative results. I can see the mouse pointer in KDE,
> but I cannot move it. However, in the CLI environment, the mouse works
> normally. I don't even know where to look to correct this problem.
>
> --
> Jerry
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 02:55:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 474762EC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:55:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C0A41596
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:55:18 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=74PI0+P9xrqB1x8hcuINlMUwcqdmvgKjR/uEQq2+BSY=;
b=DLglEdNu6+smI/+wHjN8eKtTYC6H6FVvLdTslD5C2eCUSXqfgz37QkrW7wKx9k7fJxrVZQ8IlMgtrcEyy5Sylg+bZe2jqJGY7QVRX0lqmSAJ52ZoE0vkr/xkV8bToYN3UQ7IUs8GgiI9S6yy2I42zZA93v222Q6QzSRpRZ390H4=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=30678 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7cLz-000PKT-Uv; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:55:17 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:55:08 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
Message-ID: <20140127105508.526a9e5f@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALeGphwbV29CP4=cUk55890FK1VJXScF7h9vogaeWebpCz9fkA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphy3D1nehj=1weSo6CSLkwZNs47rWT1VsoAyf4xPe9QtLg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126213247.53fc82ee@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphwbV29CP4=cUk55890FK1VJXScF7h9vogaeWebpCz9fkA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:55:18 -0000
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:40:46 -0800
"Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Erich Dollansky
> <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:17:42 -0800
> > "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Erich Dollansky
> >> <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800
> >> > "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Does anyone have any ideas on why startx would cause Xorg to
> >> >> consume 100% cpu and stuck in RUN state. kill -9 does nothing to
> >> >> it and forced to reboot to kill it.
did you try the kill as root?
> >>
> >> didn't show anything, what does that do? The ati driver worked
> >> fine in FreeBSD 9.2. This card doesn't support KMS as it's an
> >> older laptop video card.
> >
> > if KMS is not supported, then take the VESA driver and see what
> > happens.
> >
> vesa works fine but wanted it to work with the ati driver which has
> acceleration
Ok, did you upgrade FreeBSD?
The recompile at least hal and the video driver.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 03:20:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4F1A0C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:20:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ee0-x231.google.com (mail-ee0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::231])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906B517F8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:19:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d17so1975286eek.8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:19:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=FI6bbL9Xxl1bAVYxF9gAJ4TBoAwsMjTCBPszaFeZE1E=;
b=ieaouM2DRmJs+l4JDdWXhcFG3CTVraPjIl5/qqk+xWRJ0N3oXK3b/T6/65mwgCTJ5F
29+q47/Sy0UJ4TAvtYpm17kWW6Sw1Fsn/xbjzVYukl7vG/BHgDua6FmJT3JsnRkOgybr
06zJv0ZdHQ63WZralrOyJ9nbevr/xZ2r6h2oSv1LcOKOyyC2aUCFgmQKXppzFPovGIxj
ZIQ1z5ECk09RYZW7qno5FGogFukL53yf4rBPCXJrkHwA3s3cSWO2GeOtjlhgBV4wNDaQ
SVBho/m8jeNb6177d0y3RKciP1l1UNub2UKPeZnsQ8uy1J9TSnZGkbVQlFph8fptp35+
1I/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.179.73 with SMTP id g49mr18626366eem.71.1390792797811;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:19:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.15.102.76 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:19:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E5C7D3.8050703@bsdbox.co>
References: <CA+QLa9Dsy=+4KQ+8MQTS4iHh9r=fN_shNPD5Fngw4ww1xO+i6w@mail.gmail.com>
<52E5C7D3.8050703@bsdbox.co>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:19:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+QLa9Dd_BFVJ0V37gLyDuhf4z98+GVQt71B3bp6y19qW6uP4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sendmail Error at Boot
From: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>
To: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:20:00 -0000
Why is this not part of the install?
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:43 PM, nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co> wrote:
> On 27/01/2014 1:39 PM, Robert Simmons wrote:
>>
>> I've just installed FreeBSD 10.0 and I'm getting the following line in
>> the /var/log/maillog file:
>> sm-mta[759]: STARTTLS=server: file /etc/mail/certs/dh.param unsafe: No
>> such file or directory
>>
>> How do I fix this? What is the missing file?
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>
> cd /etc/mail/certs
> openssl dhparam -out dh.param 4096
>
> --
> bsdbox.co
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 04:22:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2616314
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:22:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from luigi.brtsvcs.net (luigi.brtsvcs.net
[IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:1f00::2])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C1C1D03
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:22:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown
[IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee])
by luigi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6092B2D4FAE;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:b40d:eb14:4f81:f42f] (unknown
[IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:b40d:eb14:4f81:f42f])
by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9330F88F;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:22:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:22:26 -0800
From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
In-Reply-To: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:22:18 -0000
On 1/26/2014 6:20 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> The rationale for bind removal from src/ I thought ill advised; it won't
> suprise me if FreeBSD gets roasted for no longer being net server ready.
The irony being that if you were at all serious about running mail, DNS,
NTP, etc., you used a port because the in-base versions were old and
could not be easily upgraded in the event of security problems. This is
one of many points made during the discussion on removing BIND from the
base.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 04:51:57 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20E6F97F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:51:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org
[12.32.44.142])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46FF1EBB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:51:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org.
[12.32.36.73])
by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s0R4pssg012820;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:51:54 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org)
Message-ID: <52E5E5EA.3060101@dreamchaser.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:51:54 -0700
From: Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: upside down duplexed page -- CUPS issue (was Re: ps problem)
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
(nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]);
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:51:54 -0700 (MST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:51:57 -0000
I need a sanity check, please, someone with cups and openoffice installed.
In my case I'm using an HP OfficeJet Pro 8500 tied to the
HP Photosmart P1100 ppd file, which seems to be the recommendation.
the fbsd implementation of cups installs an lpr command in
/usr/local/bin
the system supplies one in
/usr/bin
The normal path puts /usr/bin ahead of /usr/local/bin
1. If I print the file below using
/usr/bin/lpr duplex.ps
it comes out duplexed properly.
2. If I print it using
/usr/local/bin/lpr duplex.ps
it comes out with the duplexed page upside down.
I'd appreciate it if someone could verify whether or not they see
similar behavior.
If I create a simple 2 page document in openoffice,
when printing from openoffice, I see the following:
3. If printed duplexed direct from OO, duplexed pages are upside down.
4. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
no duplexing occurs -- I get two separate sheets.
5. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/local/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
duplexed pages are upside down.
================ duplex.ps ===============
%!PS-Adobe-3.0
%cupsJobTicket: media=Letter sides=two-sided-long-edge
%%BoundingBox: 36 36 576 756
%%Pages: 2
%%LanguageLevel: 2
%%Requirements: duplex
%%DocumentNeededResources: font Times-Roman
%%EndComments
%%BeginDefaults
%%PageOrientation: Portrait
0.0 setgray
/Times-Roman findfont 60 scalefont setfont
%%EndDefaults
%%BeginSetup
%%BeginFeature: *Duplex DuplexNoTumble
<< /Duplex true /Tumble false >> setpagedevice
%%EndFeature
%%EndSetup
%%Page: (Front Page (1)) 1
% Page 1 text
newpath 100 200 moveto (Page 1 Duplex.ps) show
showpage
%%Page: (Back Page (2)) 2
% Page 2 text
newpath 100 200 moveto (Page 2 Duplex.ps) show
showpage
%%EOF
%
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 05:06:20 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D89BED
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:06:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FABC1F53
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:06:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-149-155.dynamic.qsc.de
[92.195.149.155])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA4724AB7;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:06:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s0R55pFx004786;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:05:51 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:05:51 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org
Subject: Re: upside down duplexed page -- CUPS issue (was Re: ps problem)
Message-Id: <20140127060551.80c21869.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <52E5E5EA.3060101@dreamchaser.org>
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
<52E5E5EA.3060101@dreamchaser.org>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:06:20 -0000
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:51:54 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
> I need a sanity check, please, someone with cups and openoffice installed.
> In my case I'm using an HP OfficeJet Pro 8500 tied to the
> HP Photosmart P1100 ppd file, which seems to be the recommendation.
>
> the fbsd implementation of cups installs an lpr command in
> /usr/local/bin
> the system supplies one in
> /usr/bin
That's the default beviour. CUPS can be instructed to
overwrite the OS tools, or the system can be installed
with omitting the lpr tools (see src.conf option).
> The normal path puts /usr/bin ahead of /usr/local/bin
Unless you change this - yes.
> 1. If I print the file below using
> /usr/bin/lpr duplex.ps
> it comes out duplexed properly.
I assume this will simply override CUPS. As your printer
speaks PS, the file will simply be transferred into the
printer and will be processed "as is".
> 2. If I print it using
> /usr/local/bin/lpr duplex.ps
> it comes out with the duplexed page upside down.
This will use CUPS's settings which may add a "preample"
of PS to the printer to reflect those settings, for example
which "duplexing manner" (long or short edge "wrap") will
be used.
To find out if those settings exist, open a web browser (bah)
and go to http://localhost:631 where you can find the CUPS
administration web pages. Check your printer's settings
carefully. (I know there's also a lpadmin tool, but haven't
bothered learning it because I tend to avoid CUPS whenever
possible, because when you have a PS-capable printer, it's
probably just useless overhead.)
> I'd appreciate it if someone could verify whether or not they see
> similar behavior.
>
> If I create a simple 2 page document in openoffice,
> when printing from openoffice, I see the following:
>
> 3. If printed duplexed direct from OO, duplexed pages are upside down.
As expected.
> 4. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
> no duplexing occurs -- I get two separate sheets.
This could be explained by the way OO generates PDF and how
the printer filters turn that into PS. Or if your printer is
also capable of speaking PDF (directly), no mentioning that
it should use duplex is in the PDF input. If the printer has
an operator panel which allows setting duplex precedence,
check if duplex is off or on there.
> 5. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/local/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
> duplexed pages are upside down.
Matches number 3.
>From your PS source:
> %cupsJobTicket: media=Letter sides=two-sided-long-edge
There's also two-sided-short-edge (corresponding to the setting
accessible via localhost:631).
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 05:16:44 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7784AE2D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:16:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F7D1FEA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:16:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0R5GeY8033402;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:16:40 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0R5GeOr033399;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:16:40 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:16:40 -0700 (MST)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
Subject: Re: upside down duplexed page -- CUPS issue (was Re: ps problem)
In-Reply-To: <52E5E5EA.3060101@dreamchaser.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401262207270.33343@wonkity.com>
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
<52E5E5EA.3060101@dreamchaser.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:16:40 -0700 (MST)
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:16:44 -0000
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Gary Aitken wrote:
> I need a sanity check, please, someone with cups and openoffice installed.
> In my case I'm using an HP OfficeJet Pro 8500 tied to the
> HP Photosmart P1100 ppd file, which seems to be the recommendation.
>
> the fbsd implementation of cups installs an lpr command in
> /usr/local/bin
> the system supplies one in
> /usr/bin
>
> The normal path puts /usr/bin ahead of /usr/local/bin
>
> 1. If I print the file below using
> /usr/bin/lpr duplex.ps
> it comes out duplexed properly.
The base system lpr and lpd do not mess with the incoming files unless
you set up a filter.
> 2. If I print it using
> /usr/local/bin/lpr duplex.ps
> it comes out with the duplexed page upside down.
I would suspect this is because CUPS has modified the file based on the
PPD. Redirecting the final output to a file might be possible, but I
don't use CUPS and can't help with that.
> I'd appreciate it if someone could verify whether or not they see
> similar behavior.
>
> If I create a simple 2 page document in openoffice,
> when printing from openoffice, I see the following:
>
> 3. If printed duplexed direct from OO, duplexed pages are upside down.
> 4. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
> no duplexing occurs -- I get two separate sheets.
Again mostly guessing, but the duplexing information, being
device-specific, is probably removed when the PDF is created.
> 5. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/local/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
> duplexed pages are upside down.
And that duplexing works here would be due to CUPS adding the
device-specific information when a job is printed.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 05:27:27 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B99D7D3
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:27:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-x245.google.com (mail-ie0-x245.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::245])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D03A115D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:27:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f197.google.com with SMTP id e14so18041870iej.4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:27:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=lDD2jzl4fOZK+CS04/0QvxAgGkVSDizkVKhTf4XZqNc=;
b=mp7rczM3T+oBMRIF36ZwObdNwx070ezz+rCi2gR8lJHj1q3Go7V/2pTI1va64OdytQ
C7zU/rROltP6K2wd3YqQoMucie36Y174dG/fAZNcBUXhkp04XUMnRcfABGyv8YhhwS39
PA+xS/rAEIcqGLav5JVvKrSpyrjxFAhNXjU6g6qpTE0XCqVTQtslIKTrYp8/UFNdteXT
mECaSBKaQ0kJ0Av0+zeHTxRD8CVCjhSxAX0QCr4FaWo7VG99GvtA3+B2RdGkuXvCBSrJ
nlqJbDrgQOMVa5AQipksaPWDo2GqY3g1OePXCrfsDrfrQbKo95zZeilDnkeOayTBUAvr
ni3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.67.8 with SMTP id j8mr2071415igt.7.1390800446433; Sun, 26
Jan 2014 21:27:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <047d7bd770e49033aa04f0ecf68e@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:27:26 +0000
Subject: Local business - Freebsddiary.org
From: Nita Nair <topseolinkbuilder@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:27:27 -0000
PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+PHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj4NCgkNCgkNCgkNCg0K
DQo8L3A+PHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+
PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+RGVhcg0KYnVzaW5lc3Mgb3duZXIg
b2agPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFu
YSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGI+RnJlZWJzZGRpYXJ5Lm9yZzwvYj4sPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48
L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48
Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5JDQp3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIHRha2Ug
YSBmZXcgbWludXRlcyBmcm9tIHlvdXIgc2NoZWR1bGUgYW5kIGFzayBmb3IgeW91cg0KYXR0ZW50
aW9uIHRvd2FyZHMgSW50ZXJuZXQgbWFya2V0aW5nIGZvcqA8L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjxiICANCnN0
eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMCwwLDI1NSk7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6VmVyZGFuYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5G
cmVlYnNkZGlhcnkub3JnPC9iPjxmb250ICANCmNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJW
ZXJkYW5hLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj4uPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2lu
LWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAg
DQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5Bcw0KYSBidXNpbmVzcyBPd25lciB5b3UgbWlnaHQgYmUgaW50ZXJlc3Rl
ZCB0byBnYWluIHByb2ZpdCBieSBwbGFjaW5nDQp5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgYW1vbmcgdG9wIGluIHNl
YXJjaCBlbmdpbmVzLiBZb3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgbmVlZHMNCmltbWVkaWF0ZSBpbXByb3ZlbWVudCBm
b3Igc29tZSBtYWpvciBpc3N1ZXMgd2l0aCB5b3VyICANCndlYnNpdGUuPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48
L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48
Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj4tTG93DQpvbmxpbmUgcHJlc2VuY2Ug
Zm9yIG1hbnkgY29tcGV0aXRpdmUga2V5d29yZCBwaHJhc2VzPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8
cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBm
YWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj4tVW5vcmdhbml6ZWQNCnNvY2lhbCBtZWRpYSBh
Y2NvdW50czwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48
Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+
LU5vdA0KY29tcGF0aWJsZSB3aXRoIGFsbCBtb2JpbGUgZGV2aWNlczwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9w
Pg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZv
bnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+LU1hbnkNCmJhZCBiYWNrIGxpbmtzIHRv
IHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZTwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206
MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1z
ZXJpZiI+TG9va2luZw0KYXQgdGhlIGFib3ZlIGlzc3VlcyBhbmQgb3RoZXIgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBp
bXByb3ZlbWVudHMgZm9yIHlvdXINCndlYnNpdGUsIEkgd291bGQgcmVxdWVzdCB5b3UgdG8gZ2l2
ZSB1cyBhIGNoYW5jZSB0byBmaXggdGhvc2UgaXNzdWVzLg0KT3VyIHRlYW0gb2YgU2VhcmNoIEVu
Z2luZSBhbmQgU29jaWFsIE1lZGlhIGV4cGVydHMgYXJlIGhlcmUgdG8gc2VydmUNCnlvdSB3aXRo
IGJlc3QgaW5wdXRzLiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGludGVyZXN0ZWQgaW4gbGVhcm5pbmcgbW9yZSBhYm91
dA0KY3VycmVudCBzdGF0dXMgb2YgeW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlLCB3ZSB3b3VsZCBiZSBnbGFkIHRvIHNo
YXJlICANCjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZl
cmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxmb250PjxiPldFQlNJVEUNCkFVRElUIFJFUE9SVCBvZqA8
L2I+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PGIgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigwLDAsMjU1KTtm
b250LWZhbWlseTpWZXJkYW5hLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPkZyZWVic2RkaWFyeS5vcmc8L2I+PGZvbnQg
IA0KY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxmb250
PjxiPqBmb3IgIA0KRlJFRTwvYj48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAw
MDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+LjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+
PC9wPg0KDQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZm
Ij48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5Zb3UNCndpbGwgZmVlbCB0aGUg
ZGlmZmVyZW5jZSBvbmNlIHlvdSBnZXQgc2VydmljZXMgZnJvbSBvdXIgY29tcGFueSBhcyB3ZQ0K
bmV2ZXIgbGV0IG91ciBjbGllbnRzIGV4cGVjdGF0aW9ucyBnbyBkb3duLiBCZWluZyBhdCB0aGUg
dG9wIGxlZnQgb2YNCkdvb2dsZSAoIzEtICMzIG9yZ2FuaWMgcG9zaXRpb25zKSBpcyB0aGUgYmVz
dCB0aGluZyB5b3UgY2FuIGRvIGZvcg0KeW91ciBjb21wYW55JiMzOTtzIHdlYnNpdGUgdHJhZmZp
YyBhbmQgb25saW5lIHJlcHV0YXRpb24uIFlvdSB3aWxsIGJlDQpoYXBweSB0byBrbm93IHRoYXQs
IG15IHRlYW0gaXMgd2lsbGluZyB0byBndWFyYW50ZWUgeW91IDFzdCBwYWdlDQpHb29nbGUgcmFu
a2luZyBmb3IgeW91ciB0YXJnZXRlZCBsb2NhbCBrZXl3b3JkIHBocmFzZXMuPC9mb250PjwvZm9u
dD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZm
Ij48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5JZg0KbXkgcHJvcG9zYWwgc291
bmQmIzM5O3MgaW50ZXJlc3RpbmcgZm9yIHlvdXIgYnVzaW5lc3MgZ29hbCwgZmVlbCBmcmVlIHRv
DQplbWFpbCB1cywgb3IgY2FuIHByb3ZpZGUgbWUgd2l0aCB5b3VyIHBob25lIG51bWJlciBhbmQg
dGhlIGJlc3QgdGltZQ0KdG8gY2FsbCB5b3UuIEkgYW0gYWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZm9yIGFuIG9u
bGluZSBtZWV0aW5nIHRvIHByZXNlbnQgeW91DQp0aGlzIHdlYnNpdGUgYXVkaXQgcmVwb3J0Ljwv
Zm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xv
cj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+LS0tLS0tLS0t
LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPFdCUj4tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08
V0JSPi0tLS0tPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cD48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZv
bnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGZvbnQ+PGI+QmVzdA0KUmVnYXJkczwvYj48
L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVy
ZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+LDwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHA+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9
IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxmb250PjxiPk5pdGEN
Ck5haXI8L2I+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250
IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxicj48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250Pjxmb250IGNv
bG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48Zm9udD48
Yj5NYXJrZXRpbmcNCkNvbnN1bHRhbnQ8L2I+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PGI+IDwvYj4N
CjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbSI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYi
Pjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxiPlBTDQpJPC9iPjogSSBhbSBu
b3Qgc3BhbW1pbmcuIEkgaGF2ZSBzdHVkaWVkIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBhbmQgYmVsaWV2ZSBJDQpj
YW4gaGVscCB3aXRoIHlvdXIgYnVzaW5lc3MgcHJvbW90aW9uLiBJZiB5b3Ugc3RpbGwgd2FudCB1
cyB0byBub3QNCmNvbnRhY3QgeW91LCB5b3UgY2FuIGlnbm9yZSB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIG9yIGFzayB0
byByZW1vdmUgYW5kIEkgd2lsbA0Kbm90IGNvbnRhY3QgYWdhaW4uPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+
DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9u
dCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48Yj5QUw0KSUk8L2I+OiBJIGZvdW5kIHlv
dXIgc2l0ZSB1c2luZyBHb29nbGUgc2VhcmNoIGFuZCBhZnRlciBoYXZpbmcgYSBsb29rDQpvdmVy
IHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBJIHJlY29tbWVuZCB5b3UgdG8gaW1wbGVtZW50IGZ1dHVyZSB0ZWNobm9s
b2dpZXMNCnN1Y2ggYXMgSFRNTDUgYW5kIFJlc3BvbnNpdmUgRGVzaWduIHRvIG1ha2UgeW91ciBz
aXRlIG1vcmUgYWNjZXNzaWJsZQ0KaW4gbW9iaWxlIHBob25lLCB0YWJsZXRzLCBkZXNrdG9wIGV0
Yy48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD48cD48L3A+PHA+PC9wPjwvZGl2Pg0K
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 05:36:22 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A86089DC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:36:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C8111EC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:36:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b8so4116346lan.18
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:36:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=QLsz1nj/5413cKQ8vibPRwEz6bXAlpmmpdIIfLuz3p4=;
b=ghryVxYr0q9bBtCKkTGuJZY6bqkWrgtGwQFEtBvvhESYuUDYoMmpUOBRWJjp8LD9Sk
zTarwGVoDMqMyq/BISGVChTuLQQLpPHuAlKmkDmBcbcj+PLID7/eKkzEHEeA04/yTk1y
iGlxXNZXNQSDUpO3C0f6jmKMM02NrNPH6yJDtTvrFbq1YF6g4sROR5sa9TncKBr1zqE8
kQHyf6e32JrqB6kCKZOfXHnfF9C1KjZes1F8gG+3cRwe8Y+b5fXq/wLAh/ZWQ1JQLw9e
Nz8jd/smz4u/sJO+sS2wV8rs9v0mIShb5zqPJnhX+auK+44o9V+jemNWqhEmUnyvCXn2
yV2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.155.106 with SMTP id vv10mr12280lbb.53.1390800980131;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.5.193 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:06:20 +0330
Message-ID: <CAA_1SgHuz78q3ZfFMKKQ6GrJUxxv7XquyGZeSsvCcMivtD_-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: ipsec with dynamic ip addresses
From: s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:36:22 -0000
hello guys
i wanna have ipsec with dynamic ip address. i searched a lot and just
little unclear answers found. one post mentions to use
"dhclient-exit-hooks" script to update ipsec configuration file when an ip
address is assigned. another old post says to use certificate. are these
solution correct and useable???
can't ipsec-tool manage it yourself (by some command in config files)???
linux has a "hacking_vpn_tools" in net-firewall. it has a variable
"set_racoon_ip" to handle dynamic ip addresses. is there such thing in
freebsd or not?
thanks in advance
SAM
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 06:28:03 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D84588
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:28:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org
[12.32.44.142])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F1B31528
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org.
[12.32.36.73])
by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s0R6RtEk013094;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:27:56 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org)
Message-ID: <52E5FC6B.3050600@dreamchaser.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:27:55 -0700
From: Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Subject: Re: upside down duplexed page -- CUPS issue (was Re: ps problem)
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
<52E5E5EA.3060101@dreamchaser.org> <20140127060551.80c21869.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140127060551.80c21869.freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
(nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]);
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:27:56 -0700 (MST)
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:28:03 -0000
On 01/26/14 22:05, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:51:54 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> 2. If I print it using
>> /usr/local/bin/lpr duplex.ps
>> it comes out with the duplexed page upside down.
>
> This will use CUPS's settings which may add a "preample"
> of PS to the printer to reflect those settings, for example
> which "duplexing manner" (long or short edge "wrap") will
> be used.
Except that in this case the %cupsJobsTicket: comment should
instruct it to use long-edge duplexing, which should override
any cups default. The default for this printer is no-duplex,
so if it overrides it shouldn't duplex at all.
> To find out if those settings exist, open a web browser (bah)
> and go to http://localhost:631 where you can find the CUPS
> administration web pages. Check your printer's settings
> carefully. (I know there's also a lpadmin tool, but haven't
> bothered learning it because I tend to avoid CUPS whenever
> possible, because when you have a PS-capable printer, it's
> probably just useless overhead.)
Checked that already, and it is set by default to not duplex.
So presumably its preamble would not change the duplexing.
But the document itself has embedded duplexing along the long
edge. Why would that result in the short-edge behavior?
>> If I create a simple 2 page document in openoffice,
>> when printing from openoffice, I see the following:
>>
>> 3. If printed duplexed direct from OO, duplexed pages are upside down.
>
> As expected.
Why? Default is no duplex, but I turned long edge duplex on
in the print dialog.
>> 4. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
>> no duplexing occurs -- I get two separate sheets.
>
> This could be explained by the way OO generates PDF and how
> the printer filters turn that into PS. Or if your printer is
> also capable of speaking PDF (directly), no mentioning that
> it should use duplex is in the PDF input.
ok, at least that part makes sense. /usr/bin/lpr will ignore the
$cupsJobTicket: statement.
> If the printer has
> an operator panel which allows setting duplex precedence,
> check if duplex is off or on there.
No duplexing option there.
>> 5. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/local/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
>> duplexed pages are upside down.
>
> Matches number 3.
>>From your PS source:
>
>> %cupsJobTicket: media=Letter sides=two-sided-long-edge
>
> There's also two-sided-short-edge (corresponding to the setting
> accessible via localhost:631).
That's what I don't understand.
It says two-sided-long-edge. Why would it be performing as if
it said two-sided-short-edge?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 06:54:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4314497D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gg0-x24d.google.com (mail-gg0-x24d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::24d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 078B616EB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-gg0-f205.google.com with SMTP id n5so49655ggj.8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:54:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=U5n+wpdkI2StDZE5jwGPv1FrlwEqWe1QoAkhiatMbSo=;
b=xHhRNu8B5kYTmANQUx4E0CRQB8c9SMI1HYRveF4fxLp1pUnDweie2zGjLwLvDYm8TO
ip+VRAqO+LI9ma56fDg4nEFXFys8tJgithgrF+GveFniTKixYSMZSCUMxzV56sHGbQQv
OYR8utXBCKuQDiiRYWedsCKmy45M10pguUiKEnadaVEgjYJtBZEhFysJykoUb6T0Ir6x
dRpqrYb/ZvopwMKbIDfyeuVSPe0nkL5YZ9BtUcAqDL/1TGGr5vCGkI8OxM3/l/3azgeN
TgR179CYv/EG7oIRFBatAYbZszhkEEsA9Pov+s6QovVwXKF06JMrqjOj2wnk9faLPXMH
7vjQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.128.243 with SMTP id f79mr8509224yhi.27.1390805687286;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20cf3005dfc0f142e204f0ee2edf@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:54:47 +0000
Subject: Important Information For Your Website: Freebsd.org :ZS
From: Kymn Crox <kymcrox18@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:54:48 -0000
DQoNCkhpIEZyZWVic2Qub3JnIFRlYW0sDQoNCkhvcGUgeW91IGFyZSBkb2luZyBncmVhdCBhbmQg
ZXZlcnl0aGluZyBmaW5lIGF0IHlvdXIgZW5kLg0KDQpJIHRob3VnaHQgeW91IG1pZ2h0IGxpa2Ug
dG8ga25vdyBzb21lIG9mIHRoZSBtb3N0IGltcG9ydGFudCBmYWN0b3JzIG9mIHlvdXINCndlYnNp
dGUgYW5kIHJlYXNvbnMgb2YgbGFja2luZyBlbm91Z2ggb3JnYW5pYyB0cmFmZmljICYgbW9zdCBv
ZnRlbiB5b3UNCnN0aWNrIHRvIEFkIHdvcmRzIHRvIGdldCBtb3JlIHRyYWZmaWMgd2hpY2ggaXMg
cXVpdGUgZXhwZW5zaXZlIGFuZCB0aGUNCmNoYW5jZXMgaXMgaGlnaCBvZiBnZXR0aW5nIGEgc3Bh
bSB0cmFmZmljIGFzIHdlbGwuDQoNCipTb21lIG9mIHRoZSBtYWpvciBmYWN0b3JzIHdoaWNoIGNh
biBiZSBvdmVyY29tZSB0byB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgdG8gcmFuaw0Kd2VsbCBpbiBTRVJQIG9yZ2Fu
aWNhbGx5IGFuZCBpbmNyZWFzZSB5b3VyIHNvY2lhbCBtZWRpYSBwcmVzZW5jZSBhcmU6Kg0KDQox
LiBTZWVtcyBsaWtlIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBjYXJyaWVzIGEgbG90IG9mIHRlY2huaWNhbCBlcnJv
cnMgd2hpY2ggcHJldmVudHMNCnNlYXJjaCBlbmdpbmUgdG8gY3Jhd2wgYW5kIGluZGV4IHlvdXIg
d2Vic2l0ZSBwcm9wZXJseS4NCg0KMi4gU2VlbXMgeW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlIG5lZWRzIGEgcHJvcGVy
IGtleXdvcmQgc2VsZWN0aW9uIGZyb20gd2hpY2ggeW91IG1pZ2h0DQpnZXQgcHJvcGVyIHBvc2l0
aW9uIHdpdGggcGVyZmVjdCB0cmFmZmljIGZvciB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgaW4gc2VhcmNoIGVuZ2lu
ZXMNCi4NCg0KMy4gWW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlIHNob3VsZCBiZSBtb3JlIGluY2xpbmVkIHRvd2FyZHMg
U29jaWFsIG1lZGlhIHByb21vdGlvbiBhbmQNCmEgcmVndWxhciB1cGRhdGVzIGluIG1ham9yIHNv
Y2lhbCBuZXR3b3JrcyBmb3IgaXRzIGJyYW5kIGF3YXJlbmVzcy4NCg0KNC4gTWlzc2luZyBvZiBx
dWFsaXR5IHdlYiBhbmQgcHJvbW90aW9uIGNvbnRlbnRzIChBcnRpY2xlLCBCbG9ncyBldGMuKQ0K
d2hpY2ggaXMgcHJldmVudGluZyB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgdG8gZ2FpbiBtb3JlIGF1dGhvcml0eSBh
bmQgcmFua2luZyBpbiBXZWINCk1hcmtldC4NCg0KSW4gdGhlIHByZXNlbnQgZGF5IHNjZW5hcmlv
IGl0knMgdmVyeSBlc3NlbnRpYWwgdG8gdGFrZSBhIHByb3BlciBjYXJlIG9mDQp5b3VyIHdlYnNp
dGUgYW5kIGtlZXAgaXQgdXBkYXRlZCB3aXRoIGZyZXNoIGFuZCBvcmlnaW5hbCBjb250ZW50cy4g
VGhlcmUNCmFyZSBtYW55IGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgaW1wcm92ZW1lbnRzIHdoaWNoIGNhbiBoZWxwIHlv
dXIgd2Vic2l0ZSB0byBnYWluIG1vcmUNCnRyYWZmaWMgYW5kIHZpc2liaWxpdHkuIElmIHlvdSBh
cmUgaW50ZXJlc3RlZCB0byBsZWFybiBtb3JlIGFuZCBjdXJpb3VzIHRvDQprbm93IGhvdyB3ZSBj
YW4gaGVscCB5b3UgdG8gaW1wcm92ZSB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgdG8gZ2V0IGEgaGlnaGVyIHRyYWZm
aWMsDQp0aGVuIEkgd291bGQgYmUgZ2xhZCB0byBwcm92aWRlIHlvdSBhIGRldGFpbGVkIHByb3Bv
c2FsIGZvciB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUuDQoNClN1Y2Nlc3NmdWwgU2VhcmNoIEVuZ2luZSBPcHRpbWl6
YXRpb24gcmVxdWlyZXMgYSBjb21wcmVoZW5zaXZlLCBjdXN0b21pemVkDQphcHByb2FjaCBiYXNl
ZCBvbiBhIHNpdGUncyB1bmlxdWUgY2hhcmFjdGVyaXN0aWNzLiBUaGUgU2VhcmNoIEVuZ2luZQ0K
T3B0aW1pemF0aW9uIHByb2plY3Qgd2lsbCBuZWVkIHRvIHN0cmlrZSBhIHRydWUgYmFsYW5jZSBi
ZXR3ZWVuIHdlYnNpdGUgYW5kDQpmdW5jdGlvbmFsaXR5LCB0aGUgc2VhcmNoaW5nIGJlaGF2aW91
cnMgb2YgdGhlIHRhcmdldCBhdWRpZW5jZXMsIGFuZCB0aGUNCmFsZ29yaXRobXMgdXNlZCBieSBz
ZWFyY2ggZW5naW5lcyB0byBmaW5kIHJlc3VsdHMuDQoNClRoaXMgZW1haWwganVzdCB0ZWxscyB5
b3UgdGhlIGZyYWN0aW9uIG9mIHRoaW5ncyB3ZSBkbywgb3VyIG9wdGltaXphdGlvbg0KcHJvY2Vz
cyBpbnZvbHZlcyBtYW55IG90aGVyIHRlY2huaWNhbCBmYWN0b3JzIHdoaWNoIGNhbiBiZSBzZW50
IHRvIHlvdSBvbg0KeW91ciByZXF1ZXN0LiBJZiB5b3Ugd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBrbm93IG1vcmUg
YWJvdXQgb3VyIHNlcnZpY2VzIHRoZW4gcGxlYXNlDQp3cml0ZSB1cyBiYWNrIGVsc2UgeW91IGNh
biBhc2sgdXMgdG8gY2FsbCB5b3UgYW5kIHdlIHdpbGwgZ2V0IGJhY2sgdG8geW91DQphcyBwZXIg
eW91ciBzdWl0YWJsZSB0aW1lLg0KDQpMZXQgbWUga25vdyB5b3VyIHRob3VnaHRzIGFuZCBsb29r
aW5nIGZvcndhcmQgdG8gd29yayB0b2dldGhlci4NCg0KKkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcywqDQoNCipLeW0g
Q3JveCAqDQpTZW5pb3IgU0VPIEFkdmlzb3INClNreXBlOiB3ZWJtYXJrZXRpbmcuc2FsZXMNCg0K
Kk5vdGU6ICpXZSBhcmUgbm90IHNwYW1tZXJzLiBXZSBqdXN0IHdhbnQgdG8ga25vdyB5b3VyIGlu
dGVyZXN0IHRvd2FyZHMgdGhlDQpiZXR0ZXIgcGVyZm9ybWFuY2Ugb2YgeW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlIGFu
ZCBlbmhhbmNlIHlvdXIgYnVzaW5lc3MgaW4gd2ViIG1hcmtldC4NCklmIHlvdSB3aWxsIGJlIGlu
dGVyZXN0ZWQgd2Ugd2lsbCBkaXJlY3RseSBjb21tdW5pY2F0ZSB3aXRoIHlvdSB0aHJvdWdoIG91
cg0KY29ycG9yYXRlIElkLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgdGhpbmsgaXQncyB1bm5lY2Vzc2FyeSBmb3IgeW91
IHNvIHBsZWFzZSBlbWFpbCB1cyBiYWNrIHRvIHJlbW92ZSBhbmQNCndlIHdpbGwgdW5zdWJzY3Jp
YmUgeW91LiBIb3BlIHlvdSB3aWxsIGNvLW9wZXJhdGUuDQoNCg0KDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t
LS0tRExQLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KDQoNCg==
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 07:07:34 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD670CDC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:07:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from c.mdgmx.mailserve.net (c.mdgmx.mailserve.net [64.151.72.209])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9913517A8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:07:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from g.one.gosocius.in (g.one.gosocius.in [69.59.168.70])
by c.mdgmx.mailserve.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB7215EB46B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:28 +0530 (IST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (mdreg-mst.qlc.co.in [127.0.0.1])
by g.one.gosocius.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84D9B2075
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:23 +0530 (IST)
From: "Bhumika" <bhumika@24framesdigital.in>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Catch LIVE: The Banking Technology Awards 2012-13
X-Abuse-Reports-To: abuse@mailer.sendernet.co.in
X-campaignid: 1390647760
ListMember: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:listowner@mailer.sendernet.co.in>
Errors-To: errors@mailer.sendernet.co.in
X-Mailer: MailDirect v2.03 for [24 Frames Digital]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20140127061223.D84D9B2075@g.one.gosocius.in>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:23 +0530 (IST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "bhumika@24framesdigital.in" <bhumika@24framesdigital.in>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:07:34 -0000
This mail is an invitation to watch the LIVE webcast only.
To recognize and reward talent in the technology segment of the Banking =
Industry, the Banking Technology Awards 2012-13 are back. This event will =
begin at 5:00 PM on 27th January, 2014.
Catch these moments of pride LIVE through your desktop/laptop on:=20
Desktop link:=C2=A0=20
http://tinyurl.com/qgavw7z=C2=A0
[System requirements: Laptop/desktop with good internet connection (at =
least 512 kbps and above bandwidth), latest Flash Player, firewall (if =
any) to allow streaming content to watch the LIVE webcast on =
laptop/desktop).]=20
and on mobile devices - (iOS, Android and Blackberry devices): =
http://tinyurl.com/m3ws58a=20
[System requirement to watch the LIVE webcast on mobile devices: =
Multimedia phone with active wifi/3G connection with atleast 512 kbps =
dedicated bandwidth (phone should have capability to playing streaming =
media content), firewall/proxy should allow streaming video on network (if =
viewing using office internet)]=20
Hope you get a chance to watch this LIVE webcast. Please contact us in =
case you face any difficulty in viewing. =20
=C2=A0
Warm Regards,
Bhumika Gangar,
+91-9320877709=C2=A0
24 Frames Digital=C2=A0
Tel: +91-22-23719111, 23090630=20
Address: 511-C, Shatrunjay Darshan Building, Motisha Cross Lane, Byculla =
East, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400027.
Offices: Mumbai: +91-9987026862 | Delhi: +91-9810808642 | Bengaluru: =
91-9742758884
=20
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 07:28:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D36F01C7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk
[IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647261905
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk
[81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0R7SXLE001758
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:28:34 GMT
(envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s0R7SXLE001758
Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s0R7SXLE001758;
dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none
Message-ID: <52E60AA0.8080904@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:28:32 +0000
From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail Error at Boot
References: <CA+QLa9Dsy=+4KQ+8MQTS4iHh9r=fN_shNPD5Fngw4ww1xO+i6w@mail.gmail.com>
<52E5C7D3.8050703@bsdbox.co>
<CA+QLa9Dd_BFVJ0V37gLyDuhf4z98+GVQt71B3bp6y19qW6uP4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+QLa9Dd_BFVJ0V37gLyDuhf4z98+GVQt71B3bp6y19qW6uP4A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="fPf7UVWWuFst7JcwVB7ubqqPBiWF29n22"
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
DCC_CHECK autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:28:40 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--fPf7UVWWuFst7JcwVB7ubqqPBiWF29n22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 27/01/2014 03:19, Robert Simmons wrote:
> Why is this not part of the install?
Sendmail in base doesn't come configured to use TLS by default, although
the appropriate capabilities are compiled in to the binaries.
I've no idea why enabling TLS isn't the default -- seems like a
no-brainer in this day and age. It would require generating a key and
(self-signed) cert on first startup after installation, much like the
way SSH keys are generated, but so long as the problems with startup
entropy availability have been satisfactorily sorted out (which I
believe they have) I can't see any huge problem with that.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
--fPf7UVWWuFst7JcwVB7ubqqPBiWF29n22
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJS5gqhXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC
QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATZs8P/0AWev4rZL6Y96Soec1GtAVE
NBqVR4Elq9DfvnXUPT51oYXXEyj7TYB7rAfGJ4bDTVB96d2zuk7b0BbVPbQ/AlaT
yZI89T5fN5RmBXpne1itwEOh3fU9Fot7brLpS7ub5ZK1dXovw9fkhV8WjveXdMfb
Jy0drqbDSguV+HdjpQgygXrnCD7s9t9Fq6rw602CX+mD3BrDi0Wqitu3KqdpAfHP
BCv3nb7P699jfFA6pM8i06sBVf2qwmIKn4lz5HqbHRvhbIJV2ZrNtPYW+QzmUtT5
SxJ3Fh8YxQVgu+vFNVPDXFSJIXJF0bp9QpnrZcW5aM1IztmDSrYFVXERe3qVvced
ylNRoH6D+Yn1AtZunMJp8tr8hs3oE450uRq88RC1e7IOFGqChwPnDv4PP2LRRPKK
YYYYp0dt+7csO6PJ6kBTkInI6q82a8N0VJYiCizNcXK42bgBL4JPuJLK+E5MenDn
CW4jGcEh0fbAWFjp7cmSzptWcflJdorAIEEbhuKG5xsZ0USOVNRfT9DyRtmAQVVA
5aq1cdCr1vzmllR4CwYq6/nemQpShfiH8OSQTpT/0S2HV2r5hco6twl0hSQCLZy9
C2nT8nECM2q8i2d0ngyQ+EhOlVhv8IzBCS3FkRaXhHQg1N/nqf5/01YUcxZS66hU
mT7GohMdzQ78tqGAGqmA
=BQY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--fPf7UVWWuFst7JcwVB7ubqqPBiWF29n22--
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 07:40:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37CC551
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ea0-x235.google.com (mail-ea0-x235.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::235])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9F41A15
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id m10so2114163eaj.12
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:40:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=rs371c3ZIfok3vECBndIZchyLUWdmNN276dY9xXgbio=;
b=GxdLtQ2J+P++8QBQOTc8PI90+ayCENcBn/P9uJrlaZPyp52yT+2lGKjaTTlRNORuck
AE259y0WvbXtBI5Ehlmh7ru3OgaqZR5m1VW2AIbXg0tiJl/gOw2FUdH/tJpxNX+y1WhV
aVbnY/jkXFFXkoljHK7DhyLbP+0A8CbLf9P6VyyqIV8OeJ2djwFA+lxsg9nLafU9qkww
CYcpknFCgLNbte04jgNuVH7B6mW6KXksz8FT+s0svzwGsm2cTgNx1ivxmdnIq16o4eFz
039n0NooTsp+S6eh0VB4VDq10ikC3yKQrkoZNHrma6WamqYdcIhYgkd3JSJiFHEBptGX
HkdQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.198.6 with SMTP id u6mr33367een.113.1390808450157; Sun,
26 Jan 2014 23:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.15.102.76 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:40:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E60AA0.8080904@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CA+QLa9Dsy=+4KQ+8MQTS4iHh9r=fN_shNPD5Fngw4ww1xO+i6w@mail.gmail.com>
<52E5C7D3.8050703@bsdbox.co>
<CA+QLa9Dd_BFVJ0V37gLyDuhf4z98+GVQt71B3bp6y19qW6uP4A@mail.gmail.com>
<52E60AA0.8080904@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:40:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+QLa9B2XyzoD=Z0bFKxqtL65iHeudLCLqoBipWNdjncXfU9og@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sendmail Error at Boot
From: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:40:52 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 27/01/2014 03:19, Robert Simmons wrote:
>> Why is this not part of the install?
>
> Sendmail in base doesn't come configured to use TLS by default, although
> the appropriate capabilities are compiled in to the binaries.
>
> I've no idea why enabling TLS isn't the default -- seems like a
> no-brainer in this day and age. It would require generating a key and
> (self-signed) cert on first startup after installation, much like the
> way SSH keys are generated, but so long as the problems with startup
> entropy availability have been satisfactorily sorted out (which I
> believe they have) I can't see any huge problem with that.
Thanks for the explanation. I agree with the no-brainer. Last week the
keynote at ShmooCon was Ian Golberg, and one of the main points of his
talk was that nothing should ever be sent over a network in plaintext
from now on. And there should not be a choice of two protocol
versions, one encrypted and one plaintext, because a non-zero number
of users will choose plaintext.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 07:43:41 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3CAF617
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:43:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x250.google.com (mail-qa0-x250.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::250])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653D61A34
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:43:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f80.google.com with SMTP id ii20so58255qab.3
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:43:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=/XFgItHSlky8RD6Io3Gt6F+UDNPbhUBApUFHzm5ns1k=;
b=nhK5cRe1tKiEU2VldWYjiMIrSOeZaz+lHzimwwTeVbdOqHS8LZJauxanb7eAQo/yBv
Bowk1/INJEOrFpocQbjaZSj6OiASFBZHGfcnUqLc0VULPGPWdxz017Shhp+Zn378sVpW
F2rmoEWJ2hI5xfryHUPvVCrlGPJUjjE2vpEUY3O0yPMBnXagFMbBeTTIdyxzD9vTjpth
/Qii8t9cdpHYL7UUy9cI1HchFtymyNgg5a/d4dSDzFlZIFKB3xzwJjehkOGk3yv6wb4V
M4Zd8TisuN2j6b5Z6sXZSxxYBlOXOkEJ12IwwJ1QEMR6rgkuqLPUZ1uk18geVjRUXi6g
g1Ig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.137.12 with SMTP id x12mr9058866yhi.17.1390808620588;
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20cf30363713c7e54c04f0eeddb1@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:43:40 +0000
Subject: Important Information For Your Website: Freebsd.org :ZS
From: Kym Crox <kymcrox21@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:43:41 -0000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From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 09:08:30 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 176C832E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:08:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no
[IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F07510C5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:08:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0R98Ngd022500
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:08:23 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
Received: from localhost (trond@localhost)
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0R98NfA022497;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:08:23 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:08:23 +0100 (CET)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no
To: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
In-Reply-To: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet
OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:08:30 -0000
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:12-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm really confused about something so I hope someone can help me clear the
> fog up....
>
> basically I'm about to setup a ZFS RAIDZ3 pool and having discovered this
> site:
>
> https://calomel.org/zfs_raid_speed_capacity.html
>
> as a reference for disk quantity got totally confused.
Dead link as far as I can tell.
> Though in addition have checked out these sites too:
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/ahl/entry/triple_parity_raid_z
>
> http://www.zfsbuild.com/2010/06/03/howto-create-raidz2-pool/
>
> http://www.zfsbuild.com/2010/05/26/zfs-raid-levels/
>
> http://www.linux.org/threads/zettabyte-file-system-zfs.4619/
>
>
> Implementing a test ZFS pool on my old FreeBSD 8.3 box using dd derived vdevs
> coupled with reading the man page for zpool found that raidz3 needs a minimum
> of 4 disks to work.
>
> However, according to the above mentioned site for triple parity one should
> use 5 disks in 2+3 format.
>
> My confusion is this: does the 2+3 mean 2 disks in the pool with 3 hot spares
> or does it mean 5 disks in the pool?
No one's answered this, so I'll just give you my 2 cents.
Triple parity means you're using storage capacity equivalent of three
drives for parity alone. If you use five drives in total, this gives
you 2 drives worth of real data and 3 drives worth of parity. In other
words, you should really consider using a lot more drives when using
triple parity, say nine drives.
> As in:
>
> zpool create <pool_name> raidz3 disk1 disk2 disk3 disk4 disk5
No spares are configured. You should consider something like this:
zpool create <pool_name> raidz3 disk1 disk2 disk3 disk4 disk5 spare disk6 disk7 disk8
> In addition to my testing I was looking at ease of expansion... ie. growing
> the pool, so is doing something like this:
>
> zpool create <pool_name> raidz3 disk1 disk2 disk3 disk4
>
> Then when I needed to expand just do:
>
> zpool add <pool_name> raidz3 disk5 disk6 disk7 disk8
You should do some further experimentation and consider the effects of
the zpool attach command.
> which gets:
>
> pool: testpool
> state: ONLINE
> status: The pool is formatted using a legacy on-disk format. The pool can
> still be used, but some features are unavailable.
> action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
> pool will no longer be accessible on software that does not support
> feature
> flags.
> scan: none requested
> config:
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> testpool ONLINE 0 0 0
> raidz3-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0
> raidz3-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk6 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk7 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk8 ONLINE 0 0 0
This is an unclever setup. Of the eight drives configured, you'll only
are allowed to use real storage capacity equivalent of two of the
drives. Maybe you're aiming for redundancy rather than storage
capacity.
> ----------
>
> The same as this:
>
> ----------
>
> pool: testpool
> state: ONLINE
> status: The pool is formatted using a legacy on-disk format. The pool can
> still be used, but some features are unavailable.
> action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the
> pool will no longer be accessible on software that does not support
> feature
> flags.
> scan: none requested
> config:
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> testpool ONLINE 0 0 0
> raidz3-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk6 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk7 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk8 ONLINE 0 0 0
This setup is a bit more clever, as you'll get the storage capacity
equivalent of fives drives for real data and the storage capacity
equivalent of three drives for parity.
> ?? Of course using the 1st method there is extra meta data involved but not
> too much especially with TB drives.
>
> Having created a zfs filesystem on top of both setups, the fs will grow over
> the 1st scenario to utilize disks 5 through 8 added later; while of course
> with the second setup the filesystem is already created over all 8 disks.
>
>
> In a real situation however, the above would certainly be 5 disks at a time to
> gain the triple parity, with ZIL and L2ARC on SSD's and hot swap spares.
>
>
> The reason am asking the above is that I've got a new enclosure with up to 26
> disk capacity and need to create a stable environment and make best use of the
> space. So another words, maximum redundancy with max capacity allowed per
> method: which would be raidz1..3 and of course raidz3 offers the best
> redundancy but yet has much more capacity then a raid1+0 setup.
I'm a bit unsure as to whether it's better to simply attach new disks
to the existing raidz3 vdev rather than adding entire new raidz3 vdevs
to the pool. Once you do either, there's no going back unless you are
prepared to recreate the entire pool. Maybe someone else can chime in
on this.
> My intention was to grab 5 disks to start with then expand as necessary plus 2
> SSD's for ZIL+L2ARC using (raid0 mirroring and raid1 mirroring consecutively)
> and then 3x hot swap spares and use lz4 compression on the filesystem. With
> FreeBSD 10.0 as base OS... my current 8.3 must be EOL now though on a
> different box so no matter :-)
Spare drives can be added anytime (zpool add spare diskN) and removed
(zpool remove) unless the spare drive is currently engaged by some
pool.
> Hopefully someone can help me understanding the above.
>
>
> Many thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Kaya
--
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, |
| Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, |
| Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, |
| tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. |
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 09:59:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E522C2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E9414BD
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id t60so4886228wes.23
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:59:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Ed9xzUqW1bKvnAvX0OpxMJOS+x/gGBwhcOAHCAZFAJw=;
b=AIjWbt+RETIi31mZ41/w6eYCP9cg+CJqjBI8jt9oMfCLISc0rJr9e5W7qSs0pWlJFN
fnF9hUcS0ypQi0Blt+SRfbJakB61EMvjJIQaAg1+3KDMcO+Tm1f/OBQQrAWLbUMllHxl
h7p/TZrg2ii5Lxw166ZMplzSLLdMS3YMhMd4QEaGqBxxtMVHtYXAB+O6VXBo3HdUnOBM
jgVeEqAV6r199khFXjyedphEhxiZNrnkJCExZkJQfeJh2rznS33SbUuRJ7MMxY0Nw0MM
WJcF6quO7tjtWjNHj8E0HDbmuiWr9cJJRSAGKVXv9acYU8rvnncomPsftnVzN29TFLoK
cUqQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.241.228 with SMTP id wl4mr19797511wjc.2.1390816769587;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:59:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x220.optiplex-networks.com (81-178-2-118.dsl.pipex.com.
[81.178.2.118])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eo4sm26496208wib.9.2014.01.27.01.59.28
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:59:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59:27 +0000
From: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?=
<Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59:31 -0000
Many thanks Trond for the response....
I was getting worried for a sec there :-)
On 01/27/2014 09:08 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:12-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> [...]
> No one's answered this, so I'll just give you my 2 cents.
>
> Triple parity means you're using storage capacity equivalent of three
> drives for parity alone. If you use five drives in total, this gives
> you 2 drives worth of real data and 3 drives worth of parity. In other
> words, you should really consider using a lot more drives when using
> triple parity, say nine drives.
So, basically if I have (just as silly example); 5x drives of 100MB
capacity, this would equal 500MB in total.
Meaning that only 200MB would be usable.....
Having just done a quick experiment:
zpool create test_pool raidz3 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3
/tmp/disk4 /tmp/disk5
I get:
test_pool 476M 304K 476M 0% 1.00x ONLINE -
then writing a 300M file to pool:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=300M count=1
dd: /test_pool/file: No space left on device
test_pool 476M 396M 79.8M 83% 1.00x ONLINE -
du -sch /test_pool/file
157M /test_pool/file
157M total
>
>
So I guess, now I have to ask; when building a disk pool, what's the
best option to go for between capacity and redundancy?
In my case I gradually want to expand my storage when I need it, so to
maximize capacity RAID0 would be the easiest. This doesn't give me any
redundancy however, unless I use RAID1+0 but then I loose physical
capacity due to the mirrors.
Would it be better to create a raidz1 pool then just add raidz1 pools to
the master as time goes by?
As in:
zpool create test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3
/tmp/disk4 /tmp/disk5
zpool add test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk6 /tmp/disk7 /tmp/disk8 /tmp/disk9
/tmp/disk10
dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=600M count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
629145600 bytes transferred in 190.069986 secs (3310073 bytes/sec)
Then running a 'zpool list' gets:
test_pool 952M 751M 201M 78% 1.00x ONLINE -
So virtually out of:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
test_pool ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk6 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk7 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk8 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk9 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/disk10 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
I have 8 disks usable with 2x disks for parity.... if my understanding
is correct.
Regards,
Kaya
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 10:00:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70B5936D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:00:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0FA1531
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:00:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net
[71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0)
by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.7/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s0R9fXoK068077
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:41:35 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from bc979@lafn.org)
From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: TCP Port Capture
Message-Id: <995B2B03-C742-4FF9-82FE-3D0EDA8529D2@lafn.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:41:32 -0800
To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at zoom.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:00:54 -0000
I have a process that is occasionally giving me a situation that I don't =
understand. It listens to a well-known port and processes requests =
received on that report. It does return data to the calling system. =
When a request is received, a child process is created that actually =
does most of the work. The child process uses another process via a =
pipe during the processing to obtain some data it uses.
Occasionally, the main process exits with nothing logged. I suspect its =
doing an exit, but thats just a guess at this time. Some of the time =
(fairly infrequently), the main process cannot be restarted. The =
process at the end of the pipe is now shown as having the port open. =
lsof shows that. If I restart that process, then the main process can =
be restarted properly.
Why would the process at the end of the pipe end up being attached to =
the port? Unfortunately, the system always seems to be quiet (no =
requests in process) when this happens so nothing is logged by any =
process. Normally I have a monitoring process that detects the main =
process being gone and restarts it. But that doesn't work when the port =
is held by the final process.=
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 10:27:41 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 955AAB7E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from www2556.sakura.ne.jp (www2556.sakura.ne.jp
[IPv6:2403:3a00:201:19:210:224:185:196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268EB1703
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:27:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from www2556.sakura.ne.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2556.sakura.ne.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0RARdcd049825
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:27:39 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from yosapark-meri@www2556.sakura.ne.jp)
Received: (from yosapark-meri@localhost)
by www2556.sakura.ne.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id s0RARddx049824;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:27:39 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from yosapark-meri)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:27:39 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <201401271027.s0RARddx049824@www2556.sakura.ne.jp>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Express Delivery Failure
From: "Costco" <manager@yosapark-meri.sakura.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: MailStyleVersion4.2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Costco <manager@yosapark-meri.sakura.ne.jp>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:27:41 -0000
Costco
WHOLESALE
Unfortunately the delivery of your order
COS-0096759642
was cancelled since
the specified address of the recipient was not correct. You are
recommended to complete
this form and send it
back with your reply to us.
Please do this within the period of one week - if we dont get your
timely reply you will be paid your money back less 01%.
1998-2014
Costco Wholesale Corporation
All rights reserved
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 10:34:43 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D72D82
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:34:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (uk1rly2283.eechost.net [217.69.40.75])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7EB17B6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:34:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com)
by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <steve@sohara.org>) id 1W7jIe-0001xX-8W
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:20:16 +0000
Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com)
by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
(envelope-from <steve@sohara.org>) id 1W7jIk-000Dy4-SZ
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:20:22 +0000
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:20:22 +0000
From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
Message-Id: <20140127102022.1caee0134a656d112aeae977@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:34:43 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59:27 +0000
Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be better to create a raidz1 pool then just add raidz1 pools to
> the master as time goes by?
I would advise against using any scheme that only allows a single
disc failure. When (not if) a disc fails and needs to go RMA you're stuck
with no redundancy at all until the replacement comes back and gets
resilvered. That can be an uncomfortably long time, especially if all your
drives came from the same batch (if at all possible don't let that happen,
I've seen a big RAID array lose several drives in one day because they all
came from the same batch and all wore out together).
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 10:46:37 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D2A2F7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:46:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A8618A4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:46:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by btw.pki2.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0RAkO2w061696
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:46:24 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from freebsd@penx.com)
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
From: Dennis Glatting <freebsd@penx.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20140127102022.1caee0134a656d112aeae977@sohara.org>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<20140127102022.1caee0134a656d112aeae977@sohara.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:46:24 -0800
Message-ID: <1390819584.26485.24.camel@btw.pki2.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting
X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-ID: s0RAkO2w061696
X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@penx.com
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:46:37 -0000
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 10:20 +0000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59:27 +0000
> Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Would it be better to create a raidz1 pool then just add raidz1 pools to
> > the master as time goes by?
>
> I would advise against using any scheme that only allows a single
> disc failure. When (not if) a disc fails and needs to go RMA you're stuck
> with no redundancy at all until the replacement comes back and gets
> resilvered. That can be an uncomfortably long time, especially if all your
> drives came from the same batch (if at all possible don't let that happen,
> I've seen a big RAID array lose several drives in one day because they all
> came from the same batch and all wore out together).
>
+1
I've been burned by multiple drive failures more times than I care to
admit. Most of my RAID arrays are now RAID6 or RAIDz2. I mirror when I
have small space requirements (storage and physical) and I'm satisfied
with the risk.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 11:05:29 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FB39EA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.97])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538BB1A02
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:05:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [80.67.16.121] (helo=webmailfront01.ispgateway.de)
by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W7k0F-000290-R2
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
Received: from port-92-204-90-83.dynamic.qsc.de
(port-92-204-90-83.dynamic.qsc.de [92.204.90.83]) by webmail.df.eu (Horde
Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
Message-ID: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
From: lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: weird error messages with various ports
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.0.4)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:05:29 -0000
Hello!
This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
everything ok.
I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything was
just fine.
Until I did a
$ sudo portsnap fetch update
today and afterwards a
$ sudo portmaster -aD
which told me that it wanted to update lang/ruby19. I confirmed its
wish and it started making this port. After a couple of seconds it
failed with the following error message:
ruby library version = 1.9
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating ruby-1.9.pc
===> Building for ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1
make[2]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby19/work/ruby-1.9.3-p484
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby19
*** Error code 1
I did some research but could not find anything. I tried to rebuild
security/openssl, which failed with the following error message:
generating dummy tests (if needed)...
Since you've disabled or enabled at least one algorithm, you need to do
the following before building:
make depend
Configured for BSD-x86_64.
/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|^MANDIR=.*$|MANDIR=$(MANPREFIX)/man|' -e
's|$(LIBDIR)/pkgconfig|libdata/pkgconfig|g' -e 's|LIBVERSION=[^ ]*
|LIBVERSION=8 |'
/usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.1f/Makefile
===> Building for openssl-1.0.1_9
make[2]: don't know how to make WHOLE_ARCHIVE_FLAG. Stop
make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.1f
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl
I tried some other ports, too, like mail/mutt, which fails during the
build of www/lynx ("don't know how to make helpdir") ... One port did
work, though, lang/go.
What is going on here? Has my make environment some sort of amnesia?
Thanks for help in advance!
I'm happy to provide more information if needed.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 11:19:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A790D02
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:19:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE621DCB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:19:13 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=vjWgE0Aj0fTOEfftLj4LqRyo/8MZY3fLxu/zzWDWVQM=;
b=lwqE6mgNPW5s15EZJnZdVZVoYYOS37S5D9P49hHGLkA63Y493I8BMbgvPkBRL5279ETgnl776WJusWHiEm26BN18d5DWM9uQqlKbqb6Rb7GzgwVYHJ9lw6Z/bpnSDS0T0hbARc/vcNqZd7aoh+pB6xE6kuUgh07FpBmarQ68a+0=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=55900 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7kDf-003t1E-GZ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:19:12 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:18:58 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de
Subject: Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:19:13 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
> everything ok.
do not worry to much about this.
>
> I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything was
> just fine.
>
I do the same.
> Until I did a
>
> $ sudo portsnap fetch update
>
> today and afterwards a
>
> $ sudo portmaster -aD
>
I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning but I used
svn and portupgrade without any problems.
How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
I do not see what basic thing is wrong here.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 11:20:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF87E71
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no
[IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A286B1E33
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0RBK0Ur023282
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:20:00 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
Received: from localhost (trond@localhost)
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0RBK0Nk023279;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:20:00 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:20:00 +0100 (CET)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no
To: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
In-Reply-To: <52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet
OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:20:05 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Many thanks Trond for the response....
>
> I was getting worried for a sec there :-)
>
> On 01/27/2014 09:08 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:12-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > No one's answered this, so I'll just give you my 2 cents.
> >
> > Triple parity means you're using storage capacity equivalent of three
> > drives for parity alone. If you use five drives in total, this gives
> > you 2 drives worth of real data and 3 drives worth of parity. In other
> > words, you should really consider using a lot more drives when using
> > triple parity, say nine drives.
>
> So, basically if I have (just as silly example); 5x drives of 100MB capacity,
> this would equal 500MB in total.
>
> Meaning that only 200MB would be usable.....
Also remember a couple of things:
ZFS uses dynamically stripe widths, not fixed ones as HW RAID. A 37K
file will occupy 37K, rounded up to the nearest integer of disk
blocks, plus the space needed for parity and metadata.
Without a dedicated ZIL, ZFS will also use some of the available space
for housekeeping, e.g. ZIL.
You shouldn't fill a pool in production completely with data, leaving
no room for any COW operations.
> Having just done a quick experiment:
>
> zpool create test_pool raidz3 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3 /tmp/disk4
> /tmp/disk5
>
> I get:
>
> test_pool 476M 304K 476M 0% 1.00x ONLINE -
>
> then writing a 300M file to pool:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=300M count=1
> dd: /test_pool/file: No space left on device
>
> test_pool 476M 396M 79.8M 83% 1.00x ONLINE -
>
> du -sch /test_pool/file
> 157M /test_pool/file
> 157M total
>
> So I guess, now I have to ask; when building a disk pool, what's the best
> option to go for between capacity and redundancy?
If you value your data and your data grows, as it usually does, go for
both. I hope you're adding some form of backup to the mix, as ZFS is
no substitute for doing proper backups to independent media.
> In my case I gradually want to expand my storage when I need it, so to
> maximize capacity RAID0 would be the easiest. This doesn't give me any
> redundancy however, unless I use RAID1+0 but then I loose physical capacity
> due to the mirrors.
>
>
> Would it be better to create a raidz1 pool then just add raidz1 pools to the
> master as time goes by?
>
> As in:
>
> zpool create test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3 /tmp/disk4
> /tmp/disk5
>
>
> zpool add test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk6 /tmp/disk7 /tmp/disk8 /tmp/disk9
> /tmp/disk10
>
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=600M count=1 1+0
> records in
> 1+0 records out
> 629145600 bytes transferred in 190.069986 secs (3310073 bytes/sec)
>
>
> Then running a 'zpool list' gets:
>
> test_pool 952M 751M 201M 78% 1.00x ONLINE -
>
>
> So virtually out of:
>
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> test_pool ONLINE 0 0 0
> raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0
> raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk6 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk7 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk8 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk9 ONLINE 0 0 0
> /tmp/disk10 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> errors: No known data errors
>
>
> I have 8 disks usable with 2x disks for parity.... if my understanding is
> correct.
Correct. One "parity drive" evenly (or close to evenly) spread over
the members in each raidz1 vdev.
I just realized having multiple zraidN vdevs reduces the time needed
for resilvering. Just don't make each vdev too small, i.e. with too
few drives.
As other's have told you, consider raidz2 or raidz3, as drives from
the same batch and with equal wear and tear, might fail more or less
simultaneously.
--
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, |
| Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, |
| Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, |
| tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. |
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 11:30:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83829405
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:30:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367AA1E9E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:30:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id e16so7706416qcx.7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:30:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=seibercom.net; s=google;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=rxs0Pmj+HZSQpiK8EiYbYdCliaLzkL4bkXfrNU8QBiI=;
b=kR3l5h5veC5DOX4QdinlPz/4BLs5mHaX3AQ/VhrTV5jYJKCbaetMF/naCqlkQomi2R
Td5yaUrXD6x+rEipRWLffASetPesmeggVnz62lhovVUmFC+pgm2gGm4d3L/ssbX5q95d
NCWN7z/a7B1kVXWDlKA8heUdeWUD7iWyX4628=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
:references:reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=rxs0Pmj+HZSQpiK8EiYbYdCliaLzkL4bkXfrNU8QBiI=;
b=RMJ8KbtTfpRQUtW727KoQjOe8OhfUpxC9lxtQc+sQxt269EasXIXODwxG+WgRWWZ9K
fMXzayal/ih9vl65B6pKNhIFfeIhjc+dztFwIKK1i49sR1K2Pf4bPMqxXfdoi2SBNQHw
Ulv+TF6rUdRYrdxB196EWUCAhBKbP9xhfnwHnQDQ0oLgYN6J8GHX2WefLiQDP/83+P4S
i7xNDVAC5NM0ZkplelviK7WI4+GZn6bNQNBc+duBJmgp0Ne68ulsPhAf9nsDmX7XW4oF
5Rd6XEF6dJLaRx2+MaHNPpoMrJievjhtF5y+BxVRZ2OPhs1zdp8nSgh25VtUeEqH3v3z
gFyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZWwPwBN3Jtz+l4L3hqAUqOATZL4uk047B0rbITdE3PUSDLV9f1edl8yM8SpBBoljk6vUu
X-Received: by 10.140.47.101 with SMTP id l92mr39822406qga.9.1390822204169;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm24719664qat.1.2014.01.27.03.30.03
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:30:01 -0500
From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net>
To: User questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Mouse not working in KDE after upgrading to FreeBSD 10.0
Message-ID: <20140127063001.185284c1@scorpio>
In-Reply-To: <CALeGphwZQXMY4RRtPQWew37WzboS6OTY+JTFMcdAMnhAierxyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiBPo8E8YjAdEW59eHdmSQ_ppNH8qmSKQo79KU+=OX8fqr3jA@mail.gmail.com>
<CALeGphwZQXMY4RRtPQWew37WzboS6OTY+JTFMcdAMnhAierxyg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: User questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:30:05 -0000
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:43:38 -0800, Jack L. stated:
> Try reinstalling hal and the xf86-input-mouse driver and see if that
> solves it.
I re-installed both and then rebooted the system and now all is well. I
am not sure if re-installing either one by itself would have alleviated
the problem; however, since doing both only consumed a few minutes, it
is not worth investigating any further.
I would be interested in knowing if anyone else had this problem. If
so, perhaps creating a note for it somewhere might be a good idea.
--
Jerry
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 11:42:08 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CEE83B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.18])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05DDD1FA2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:cwr@otaku.freeshell.org
[192.94.73.9])
by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0RBftsB023662
(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:41:57 GMT
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG>
X-X-Sender: cwr@faeroes.freeshell.org
To: lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de
Subject: Re: weird error messages with various ports
In-Reply-To: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401271140380.9750@faeroes.freeshell.org>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:08 -0000
I am getting the same error with ruby19 on my poudriere build server:
===> Building for ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1
make[1]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/ruby19/work/ruby-1.9.3-p484
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby19
Charlie
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
> From: lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: weird error messages with various ports
>
> Hello!
>
> This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
> everything ok.
>
> I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything was
> just fine.
>
> Until I did a
>
> $ sudo portsnap fetch update
>
> today and afterwards a
>
> $ sudo portmaster -aD
>
> which told me that it wanted to update lang/ruby19. I confirmed its
> wish and it started making this port. After a couple of seconds it
> failed with the following error message:
>
> ruby library version = 1.9
> configure: creating ./config.status
> config.status: creating Makefile
> config.status: creating ruby-1.9.pc
> ===> Building for ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1
> make[2]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
>
> make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby19/work/ruby-1.9.3-p484
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby19
> *** Error code 1
>
> I did some research but could not find anything. I tried to rebuild
> security/openssl, which failed with the following error message:
>
> generating dummy tests (if needed)...
>
> Since you've disabled or enabled at least one algorithm, you need to do
> the following before building:
>
> make depend
>
> Configured for BSD-x86_64.
> /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|^MANDIR=.*$|MANDIR=$(MANPREFIX)/man|' -e
> 's|$(LIBDIR)/pkgconfig|libdata/pkgconfig|g' -e 's|LIBVERSION=[^ ]*
> |LIBVERSION=8 |' /usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.1f/Makefile
> ===> Building for openssl-1.0.1_9
> make[2]: don't know how to make WHOLE_ARCHIVE_FLAG. Stop
>
> make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.1f
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl
>
> I tried some other ports, too, like mail/mutt, which fails during the build
> of www/lynx ("don't know how to make helpdir") ... One port did work, though,
> lang/go.
>
> What is going on here? Has my make environment some sort of amnesia?
>
> Thanks for help in advance!
>
> I'm happy to provide more information if needed.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
cwr@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 11:42:55 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B088CE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177221FB1
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x13so5321155wgg.3
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:42:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=aR3j1+9iaqaE0xOh7aVd/n2T1IltwgFti8l1gcQU/+A=;
b=v/3yzQ3eJ/uls8u+tf8szr7xc7xo24rU75rYOnHtI5OgPSsjpLxDLDBvdxhlc0LBRN
FRBT0PcDke49e48R95laoMvNTwrktM4te9P5cU7+E1r4IFP/+eFHIqvqZcgwG20hrzEY
tCaxLzNTsRZxC5Ol6LsgWSTTAKuysyJNWy5YV1YRUFkFFdMWBHWTbbtSW578n3/FJ8gg
buuEWiQ9kDIamDEVUYBHIlOj+nuGisL/Yg74l7F+mODsgfltEkRJ280Nce7Myk2fG3S6
oYHF93jSFjoFkruUZt8bIc4NwAggHhV5Gc6OweDeGdG9VSANncOVRfojpOBNjbKcdZ6r
I5sw==
X-Received: by 10.180.219.44 with SMTP id pl12mr11917695wic.12.1390822973511;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x220.optiplex-networks.com (81-178-2-118.dsl.pipex.com.
[81.178.2.118])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ci4sm24539324wjc.21.2014.01.27.03.42.52
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:52 +0000
From: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?=
<Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42:55 -0000
Many thanks everyone (Trond, Dennis, Steve)!!
So RAIDz2 or 3 is going to be preferred per the advice given.
Now I just need to figure out how to make that work best with my current
5 block of disks.... perhaps wait for a while then add some more disks
in the mix then create the raidz(x) platform??
It would be really good if raidz could be expandable, ie by adding extra
'new' disks into the same vdev.
Anyhow, luckily I have multiple backups of everything in any case; just
flying around on loose disks though :-(
Regards,
Kaya
On 01/27/2014 11:20 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> Many thanks Trond for the response....
>>
>> I was getting worried for a sec there :-)
>>
>> On 01/27/2014 09:08 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:12-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> No one's answered this, so I'll just give you my 2 cents.
>>>
>>> Triple parity means you're using storage capacity equivalent of three
>>> drives for parity alone. If you use five drives in total, this gives
>>> you 2 drives worth of real data and 3 drives worth of parity. In other
>>> words, you should really consider using a lot more drives when using
>>> triple parity, say nine drives.
>> So, basically if I have (just as silly example); 5x drives of 100MB capacity,
>> this would equal 500MB in total.
>>
>> Meaning that only 200MB would be usable.....
> Also remember a couple of things:
>
> ZFS uses dynamically stripe widths, not fixed ones as HW RAID. A 37K
> file will occupy 37K, rounded up to the nearest integer of disk
> blocks, plus the space needed for parity and metadata.
>
> Without a dedicated ZIL, ZFS will also use some of the available space
> for housekeeping, e.g. ZIL.
>
> You shouldn't fill a pool in production completely with data, leaving
> no room for any COW operations.
>
>> Having just done a quick experiment:
>>
>> zpool create test_pool raidz3 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3 /tmp/disk4
>> /tmp/disk5
>>
>> I get:
>>
>> test_pool 476M 304K 476M 0% 1.00x ONLINE -
>>
>> then writing a 300M file to pool:
>>
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=300M count=1
>> dd: /test_pool/file: No space left on device
>>
>> test_pool 476M 396M 79.8M 83% 1.00x ONLINE -
>>
>> du -sch /test_pool/file
>> 157M /test_pool/file
>> 157M total
>>
>> So I guess, now I have to ask; when building a disk pool, what's the best
>> option to go for between capacity and redundancy?
> If you value your data and your data grows, as it usually does, go for
> both. I hope you're adding some form of backup to the mix, as ZFS is
> no substitute for doing proper backups to independent media.
>
>> In my case I gradually want to expand my storage when I need it, so to
>> maximize capacity RAID0 would be the easiest. This doesn't give me any
>> redundancy however, unless I use RAID1+0 but then I loose physical capacity
>> due to the mirrors.
>>
>>
>> Would it be better to create a raidz1 pool then just add raidz1 pools to the
>> master as time goes by?
>>
>> As in:
>>
>> zpool create test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3 /tmp/disk4
>> /tmp/disk5
>>
>>
>> zpool add test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk6 /tmp/disk7 /tmp/disk8 /tmp/disk9
>> /tmp/disk10
>>
>>
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=600M count=1 1+0
>> records in
>> 1+0 records out
>> 629145600 bytes transferred in 190.069986 secs (3310073 bytes/sec)
>>
>>
>> Then running a 'zpool list' gets:
>>
>> test_pool 952M 751M 201M 78% 1.00x ONLINE -
>>
>>
>> So virtually out of:
>>
>>
>> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
>> test_pool ONLINE 0 0 0
>> raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk6 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk7 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk8 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk9 ONLINE 0 0 0
>> /tmp/disk10 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>
>> errors: No known data errors
>>
>>
>> I have 8 disks usable with 2x disks for parity.... if my understanding is
>> correct.
> Correct. One "parity drive" evenly (or close to evenly) spread over
> the members in each raidz1 vdev.
>
> I just realized having multiple zraidN vdevs reduces the time needed
> for resilvering. Just don't make each vdev too small, i.e. with too
> few drives.
>
> As other's have told you, consider raidz2 or raidz3, as drives from
> the same batch and with equal wear and tear, might fail more or less
> simultaneously.
>
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 11:49:28 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD96DE9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:49:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.101])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA27E1FF2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:49:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W7kgp-00080i-Kg; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:49:29 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
> lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
>=20
> > This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
> > everything ok.
>=20
> do not worry to much about this.
> >=20
> > I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything was
> > just fine.
> >=20
> I do the same.
>=20
> > Until I did a
> >=20
> > $ sudo portsnap fetch update
> >=20
> > today and afterwards a
> >=20
> > $ sudo portmaster -aD
> >=20
> I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning but I used
> svn and portupgrade without any problems.
>=20
> How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
Three days old.=20
> I do not see what basic thing is wrong here.
Too bad ;)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:03:33 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184B23C5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D641163
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:03:32 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=Qf7flRj95Fsn4MnDDA5wHNrdxv4kuVAE757oRVQzGuY=;
b=PF1fNt+cw71TKpAh8UcHY0pvuC7e1c9svBZ17sGmTpXPOt48rbUnz93EoVI4z/rQ2hayUNiq67UU0RP40fmhpWkg7pR9eKjTFjmgfjqAj5xLcD8krq75mymslAAP1dLoESuJd9cBJpIRN7MDPntWinDArAHAK6cq3R+S7rrTmFU=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=59351 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7kuZ-004AwG-Fo; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:03:32 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:03:26 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:03:33 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
_1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
> > lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> >
> > > This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
> > > everything ok.
> >
> > do not worry to much about this.
> > >
> > > I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything
> > > was just fine.
> > >
> > I do the same.
> >
> > > Until I did a
> > >
> > > $ sudo portsnap fetch update
> > >
> > > today and afterwards a
> > >
> > > $ sudo portmaster -aD
> > >
> > I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning but I
> > used svn and portupgrade without any problems.
> >
> > How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
>
> Three days old.
>
ok, get the latest one and try again. If it still does not work, I
could give you the revision number of my working ports tree.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:10:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E8260F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de
[80.67.29.24])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872E711ED
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W7l12-0004d0-OD; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:13 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:12 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error
messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:10:21 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:03:26PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
> > > lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
> > > > everything ok.
> > >
> > > do not worry to much about this.
> > > >
> > > > I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything
> > > > was just fine.
> > > >
> > > I do the same.
> > >
> > > > Until I did a
> > > >
> > > > $ sudo portsnap fetch update
> > > >
> > > > today and afterwards a
> > > >
> > > > $ sudo portmaster -aD
> > > >
> > > I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning but I
> > > used svn and portupgrade without any problems.
> > >
> > > How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
> >
> > Three days old.
> >
> ok, get the latest one and try again. If it still does not work, I
> could give you the revision number of my working ports tree.
It still does not work. However, I do not have a revision number,
IIUC, because I'm updating my ports with portsnap and not with svn,
right? I might try to checkout ports anew and see whether that works
then.
Christian.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:11:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0BA96A0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:11:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5274211FB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:11:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0RCBIMs064085
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:11:18 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E64CE9.10304@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:11:21 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail Error at Boot
References: <CA+QLa9Dsy=+4KQ+8MQTS4iHh9r=fN_shNPD5Fngw4ww1xO+i6w@mail.gmail.com>
<52E5C7D3.8050703@bsdbox.co>
<CA+QLa9Dd_BFVJ0V37gLyDuhf4z98+GVQt71B3bp6y19qW6uP4A@mail.gmail.com>
<52E60AA0.8080904@FreeBSD.org>
<CA+QLa9B2XyzoD=Z0bFKxqtL65iHeudLCLqoBipWNdjncXfU9og@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+QLa9B2XyzoD=Z0bFKxqtL65iHeudLCLqoBipWNdjncXfU9og@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:11:22 -0000
On 27/01/2014 07:40, Robert Simmons wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 27/01/2014 03:19, Robert Simmons wrote:
>>> Why is this not part of the install?
>> Sendmail in base doesn't come configured to use TLS by default, although
>> the appropriate capabilities are compiled in to the binaries.
>>
>> I've no idea why enabling TLS isn't the default -- seems like a
>> no-brainer in this day and age. It would require generating a key and
>> (self-signed) cert on first startup after installation, much like the
>> way SSH keys are generated, but so long as the problems with startup
>> entropy availability have been satisfactorily sorted out (which I
>> believe they have) I can't see any huge problem with that.
> Thanks for the explanation. I agree with the no-brainer. Last week the
> keynote at ShmooCon was Ian Golberg, and one of the main points of his
> talk was that nothing should ever be sent over a network in plaintext
> from now on. And there should not be a choice of two protocol
> versions, one encrypted and one plaintext, because a non-zero number
> of users will choose plaintext.
>
It's not as simple as that as quite a lot of application software uses
the unencrypted ports and it has no way of knowing whether it's talking
on a secure unencrypted line (i.e. local copper or VPN).
I haven't played with the latest release sendmail, but if SSL and SASL
are easier to turn on, that's a great start.
I don't think anyone with a brain has been sending unencrypted email
across the Internet, except possibly iPhone users, for whom installing a
self-signed certificate seems to be impossible (if anyone knows a method
that's simple enough for a fanboi to understand, please tell me!)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:12:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F35F744
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:12:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no
[IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF1A1210
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:12:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0RCC26K023583
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:12:02 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
Received: from localhost (trond@localhost)
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0RCC2nk023580;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:12:02 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:12:02 +0100 (CET)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no
To: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
In-Reply-To: <52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet
OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:12:07 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Many thanks everyone (Trond, Dennis, Steve)!!
>
> So RAIDz2 or 3 is going to be preferred per the advice given.
>
> Now I just need to figure out how to make that work best with my current 5
> block of disks.... perhaps wait for a while then add some more disks in the
> mix then create the raidz(x) platform??
>
> It would be really good if raidz could be expandable, ie by adding extra 'new'
> disks into the same vdev.
It's there!
Try: zpool attach <pool_name> <existing_member> <new_member1> [new_member2 ...]
> Anyhow, luckily I have multiple backups of everything in any case; just flying
> around on loose disks though :-(
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kaya
>
> On 01/27/2014 11:20 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:59-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
> >
> > > Many thanks Trond for the response....
> > >
> > > I was getting worried for a sec there :-)
> > >
> > > On 01/27/2014 09:08 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:12-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > No one's answered this, so I'll just give you my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > > > Triple parity means you're using storage capacity equivalent of three
> > > > drives for parity alone. If you use five drives in total, this gives
> > > > you 2 drives worth of real data and 3 drives worth of parity. In other
> > > > words, you should really consider using a lot more drives when using
> > > > triple parity, say nine drives.
> > > So, basically if I have (just as silly example); 5x drives of 100MB
> > > capacity,
> > > this would equal 500MB in total.
> > >
> > > Meaning that only 200MB would be usable.....
> > Also remember a couple of things:
> >
> > ZFS uses dynamically stripe widths, not fixed ones as HW RAID. A 37K
> > file will occupy 37K, rounded up to the nearest integer of disk
> > blocks, plus the space needed for parity and metadata.
> >
> > Without a dedicated ZIL, ZFS will also use some of the available space
> > for housekeeping, e.g. ZIL.
> >
> > You shouldn't fill a pool in production completely with data, leaving
> > no room for any COW operations.
> >
> > > Having just done a quick experiment:
> > >
> > > zpool create test_pool raidz3 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3 /tmp/disk4
> > > /tmp/disk5
> > >
> > > I get:
> > >
> > > test_pool 476M 304K 476M 0% 1.00x ONLINE -
> > >
> > > then writing a 300M file to pool:
> > >
> > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=300M count=1
> > > dd: /test_pool/file: No space left on device
> > >
> > > test_pool 476M 396M 79.8M 83% 1.00x ONLINE -
> > >
> > > du -sch /test_pool/file
> > > 157M /test_pool/file
> > > 157M total
> > >
> > > So I guess, now I have to ask; when building a disk pool, what's the best
> > > option to go for between capacity and redundancy?
> > If you value your data and your data grows, as it usually does, go for
> > both. I hope you're adding some form of backup to the mix, as ZFS is
> > no substitute for doing proper backups to independent media.
> >
> > > In my case I gradually want to expand my storage when I need it, so to
> > > maximize capacity RAID0 would be the easiest. This doesn't give me any
> > > redundancy however, unless I use RAID1+0 but then I loose physical
> > > capacity
> > > due to the mirrors.
> > >
> > >
> > > Would it be better to create a raidz1 pool then just add raidz1 pools to
> > > the
> > > master as time goes by?
> > >
> > > As in:
> > >
> > > zpool create test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk2 /tmp/disk3 /tmp/disk4
> > > /tmp/disk5
> > >
> > >
> > > zpool add test_pool raidz1 /tmp/disk6 /tmp/disk7 /tmp/disk8 /tmp/disk9
> > > /tmp/disk10
> > >
> > >
> > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/test_pool/file bs=600M count=1 1+0
> > > records in
> > > 1+0 records out
> > > 629145600 bytes transferred in 190.069986 secs (3310073 bytes/sec)
> > >
> > >
> > > Then running a 'zpool list' gets:
> > >
> > > test_pool 952M 751M 201M 78% 1.00x ONLINE -
> > >
> > >
> > > So virtually out of:
> > >
> > >
> > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> > > test_pool ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk6 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk7 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk8 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk9 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > /tmp/disk10 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > >
> > > errors: No known data errors
> > >
> > >
> > > I have 8 disks usable with 2x disks for parity.... if my understanding is
> > > correct.
> > Correct. One "parity drive" evenly (or close to evenly) spread over
> > the members in each raidz1 vdev.
> >
> > I just realized having multiple zraidN vdevs reduces the time needed
> > for resilvering. Just don't make each vdev too small, i.e. with too
> > few drives.
> >
> > As other's have told you, consider raidz2 or raidz3, as drives from
> > the same batch and with equal wear and tear, might fail more or less
> > simultaneously.
--
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, |
| Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, |
| Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, |
| tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. |
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:14:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA768CF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.18])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26CD1233
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:cwr@otaku.freeshell.org
[192.94.73.9])
by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0RCEXZD014516
(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:34 GMT
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG>
X-X-Sender: cwr@faeroes.freeshell.org
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
In-Reply-To: <20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401271213470.28649@faeroes.freeshell.org>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:40 -0000
My failure occured on a ports tree that was updated about 30 minutes ago
via portsnap.
Charlie
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:03:26 +0800
> From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
> To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
>>> lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
>>>> everything ok.
>>>
>>> do not worry to much about this.
>>>>
>>>> I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything
>>>> was just fine.
>>>>
>>> I do the same.
>>>
>>>> Until I did a
>>>>
>>>> $ sudo portsnap fetch update
>>>>
>>>> today and afterwards a
>>>>
>>>> $ sudo portmaster -aD
>>>>
>>> I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning but I
>>> used svn and portupgrade without any problems.
>>>
>>> How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
>>
>> Three days old.
>>
> ok, get the latest one and try again. If it still does not work, I
> could give you the revision number of my working ports tree.
>
> Erich
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
cwr@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:24:08 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06305CE4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:24:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D084B12EC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:24:07 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=Y2E/fg25ZH699p+UhqoyukjQeu9B9T1wHXz1BHAuA6Y=;
b=Ev1pDCIdxGLVLxgsGXziYz2tF09VTHRinKmeOmtvhHjpvX8U0MbQ2baeYc59wjreGhDlcVgU9HkbSu5t5kTDx2iuIfGeTNk5suh/BASZoxhBVHxkFMg4pvIL7keMgofsAEsfe0i6qD0/OmLoHBj/17xD5iqnmgNA0HncvNOAfmw=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=63678 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7lET-004JPL-Ux; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:24:06 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:23:42 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127202342.5cbe5014@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401271213470.28649@faeroes.freeshell.org>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<Pine.NEB.4.64.1401271213470.28649@faeroes.freeshell.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:24:08 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:33 +0000 (UTC)
Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG> wrote:
> My failure occured on a ports tree that was updated about 30 minutes
> ago via portsnap.
can you try revision 341159?
It works for me.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:30:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE44ECE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C801378
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=igLFMOKkMTH8dqQfEMWxRb07nesb6honfX+ouhOI8og=;
b=roorAoLEDL60mOnq/wBt0R4jKqgiIE9JKg31X8MKzfIqDQl7h3V8EzNX36O0gAaPWLquDRckKC5+dCXTjSLwOthyYUyDfs5avEe70rDTQ3FS468qYPxFcUWahUP+KqgKbQ0mEhuBPqokNfkONvMJjAiJiZAqG19So7ZhQpKMhK8=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=17739 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7lKM-004Lpx-HR; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:30:12 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:30:02 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error
messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:30:12 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:12 +0100
_1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:03:26PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
> > _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
> > > > lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am
> > > > > doing everything ok.
> > > >
> > > > do not worry to much about this.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and
> > > > > everything was just fine.
> > > > >
> > > > I do the same.
> > > >
> > > > > Until I did a
> > > > >
> > > > > $ sudo portsnap fetch update
> > > > >
> > > > > today and afterwards a
> > > > >
> > > > > $ sudo portmaster -aD
> > > > >
> > > > I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning
> > > > but I used svn and portupgrade without any problems.
> > > >
> > > > How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
> > >
> > > Three days old.
> > >
> > ok, get the latest one and try again. If it still does not work, I
> > could give you the revision number of my working ports tree.
>
> It still does not work. However, I do not have a revision number,
> IIUC, because I'm updating my ports with portsnap and not with svn,
> right? I might try to checkout ports anew and see whether that works
> then.
of course.
You might should consider to switch to svn and portupgrade. There is
one advantage of this pair. Portupgrade does not leave you with a
machine that cannot be used anymore. The worst case is that no port
gets upgraded but your machine still works. Svn has the advantage that
you can chose your port 'version' if the current revision does not work
for you.
Anyway, some other reported the same problem with a current ports tree.
I have the revision number 341159 in case of you want to try.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:33:58 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23820F5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:33:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB13913A2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:33:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i8so7829236qcq.18
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:33:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=efCub8wf6tjtkDATBwGGRjD2jAVd+8soSrs/ZAPelc0=;
b=k/vD2R+cXNz5ZEBrPpyrLitYc5xRk4FOd05u+iq6pmZKbbicQ1nchxKcva1ENclreu
0WfJBq/M6H9RVBamRDUccNRWiTt4FEfIuaj/5Uqkf7AAu6Gi+0VgoLzfQmK2OhL2/cj3
NdHtC2OFrALgCET505TV0IIJPg9ll0vwroohxtFeP6eZtL6CP/I/4EQJPr7WVZ68xzqM
yYeTxHxEr94YYABzNNu4Sq1UddPq/6NN9ssVqOcldm3mtKNngJ7qLWhSQzwHdsP0OQjr
tFhL2zzayo8q1WuP/SSMAJLctuar4tqWFyMLSRZ225F/bXUzZZ1mbvnTvYY1+Y93rzL7
ff2A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.89.241 with SMTP id v104mr40201208qgd.27.1390826036993;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.143.5 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:33:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFfb-hoftsOuK0ccy_Cabd=ZsAW=Gxp0uniVb1JHFv2=o=HLMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Regarding ses in FreeBSD 9.2
From: Joar Jegleim <joar.jegleim@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:33:58 -0000
Hi,
I just upgraded a server from 9.1-RELEASE -> 9.2-RELEASE
I noticed I get these about once every minute in /var/log/messages, as
well as to the console:
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: pass25,ses0: SAS Device Slot
Element: 1 Phys at Slot 23, Not All Phys
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 0: SAS device type 0 id 0
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 0: protocols: Initiator(
None ) Target( None )
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 0: parent 5001438017e2f4ff addr 0
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: pass25,ses0: SAS Device Slot
Element: 1 Phys at Slot 24, Not All Phys
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 0: SAS device type 0 id 0
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 0: protocols: Initiator(
None ) Target( None )
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 0: parent 5001438017e2f4ff addr 0
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: pass25,ses0: Element descriptor:
'900080050002'
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: pass25,ses0: SAS Expander: 36
Physses0: phy 0: connector 26 other 1
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 1: connector 27 other 2
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 2: connector 28 other 3
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 3: connector 29 other 4
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 4: connector 30 other 5
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 5: connector 31 other 6
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 6: connector 32 other 7
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 7: connector 33 other 8
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 8: connector 34 other 9
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 9: connector 35 other 10
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 10: connector 36 other 11
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 11: connector 37 other 12
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 12: connector 38 other 13
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 13: connector 39 other 14
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 14: connector 40 other 15
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 15: connector 41 other 16
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 16: connector 42 other 17
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 17: connector 43 other 18
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 18: connector 44 other 19
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 19: connector 45 other 20
Jan 27 13:26:11 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 20: connector 46 other 21
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 21: connector 47 other 22
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 22: connector 48 other 23
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 23: connector 49 other 24
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 24: connector 50 other 25
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 25: connector 59 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 26: connector 60 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 27: connector 61 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 28: connector 62 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 29: connector 63 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 30: connector 64 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 31: connector 65 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 32: connector 66 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 33: connector 255 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 34: connector 255 other 255
Jan 27 13:26:12 store01 kernel: ses0: phy 35: connector 255 other 255
I suspect it has something to to with an LSI HBA I've installed on that box,
LSI SAS 9207-4i4e SGL
The card was installed and ran on the 9.1-RELEASE install, and ses
didn't post those messages then ...
Does anyone know if these messages are to worry about ? and how I may
stop them ?
The LSI card is connected via external sas to an MSA storage shelf
with 20 midline disks + 2 ssd disks + one sas disk.
--
----------------------
Joar Jegleim
Homepage: http://cosmicb.no
Linkedin: http://no.linkedin.com/in/joarjegleim
fb: http://www.facebook.com/joar.jegleim
AKA: CosmicB @Freenode
----------------------
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:39:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13127358
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (uk1rly2283.eechost.net [217.69.40.75])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C966913D7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com)
by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <steve@sohara.org>) id 1W7lSs-000887-Iy
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:38:58 +0000
Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com)
by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
(envelope-from <steve@sohara.org>) id 1W7lT3-0003lp-6i
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:09 +0000
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:09 +0000
From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
Message-Id: <20140127123909.dd04175320e6d6dc5c64a08e@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:12 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:12:02 +0100 (CET)
Trond Endrestøl <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> > It would be really good if raidz could be expandable, ie by adding
> > extra 'new' disks into the same vdev.
>
> It's there!
>
> Try: zpool attach <pool_name> <existing_member> <new_member1>
> [new_member2 ...]
No it is not - from man zpool:
=========================
zpool attach [-f] pool device new_device
Attaches new_device to an existing zpool device. The existing
device cannot be part of a raidz configuration.
==========================
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:39:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B533E9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D81A13E4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w61so5210450wes.16
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:39:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=qikfrl+WJqmw6k6SURXNnL1EHQVyZ0bM6kGro5lNhJQ=;
b=Tk33e6rNyl8TkPAbpZbfGCx3VIDYGg0AQhLcj02nB6x/mv3aH4NhQo9qG2MOko8wP4
Zey9cot4PdV+1iEVq2B/GZEnGvxEGfacB+1AJ6w9fYwoYMSUBo+f+pCg91F2Za2+okX4
7w6y4qElw4A698IzicW3+Z662EcGqRsB6LAjagB7qBP5Ga6dps3oP5Q4niEpfJ1F/sNo
xldTNdD+BxEQ5xylDJgATUHqK5bovooQvEBEdmIihW9dCLfEBw/p3SXaVGgbNGc2CjB/
x/OrpoOyQxd3sPHch7UWGCfDoi5HFgnP5QbFaRTwXaMBjrpjVRhvN5B2DqgnAoR4TpCX
RHLg==
X-Received: by 10.194.179.69 with SMTP id de5mr20240207wjc.4.1390826368881;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:39:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x220.optiplex-networks.com (81-178-2-118.dsl.pipex.com.
[81.178.2.118])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm27494513wix.10.2014.01.27.04.39.27
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:39:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E6537F.8020907@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:27 +0000
From: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?=
<Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39:31 -0000
On 01/27/2014 12:12 PM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> Many thanks everyone (Trond, Dennis, Steve)!!
>>
>> So RAIDz2 or 3 is going to be preferred per the advice given.
>>
>> Now I just need to figure out how to make that work best with my current 5
>> block of disks.... perhaps wait for a while then add some more disks in the
>> mix then create the raidz(x) platform??
>>
>> It would be really good if raidz could be expandable, ie by adding extra 'new'
>> disks into the same vdev.
> It's there!
>
> Try: zpool attach <pool_name> <existing_member> <new_member1> [new_member2 ...]
>
>
Yep, though of course as I'm just testing with temp files currently I
was unable to make it work:
zpool attach test_pool /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk6
cannot attach /tmp/disk6 to /tmp/disk1: can only attach to mirrors and
top-level disks
This is ok though as my block of 5 disks arrive tomorrow with the
chassis arriving either tomorrow or day after that.
Does 'attaching' create a hybrid raidz2/3 + 1 array or am I confusing again?
Being familiar with raid 1 and 0, I know that the attach command will
simply mirror a disk:
zpool attach <pool> disk1 disk2
would create a raid1 mirror between the disks... is this the same
principle or does the command function differently in raidz?
Just checking out the man page gives this:
zpool attach [-f] pool device new_device
Attaches new_device to an existing zpool device. The existing
device
cannot be part of a raidz configuration. If device is not
currently
part of a mirrored configuration, device automatically transforms
into a two-way mirror of device and new_device. If device is
part of
a two-way mirror, attaching new_device creates a three-way mirror,
and so on. In either case, new_device begins to resilver
immediately.
-- unless things have been updated since my FBSD version?
Regards,
Kaya
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 12:50:49 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877A7674
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0845A1567
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0RCok13069035
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:47 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E6562A.2050402@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:50 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
<52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:49 -0000
On 27/01/2014 04:22, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 1/26/2014 6:20 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> The rationale for bind removal from src/ I thought ill advised; it won't
>> suprise me if FreeBSD gets roasted for no longer being net server ready.
>
> The irony being that if you were at all serious about running mail,
> DNS, NTP, etc., you used a port because the in-base versions were old
> and could not be easily upgraded in the event of security problems.
> This is one of many points made during the discussion on removing BIND
> from the base.
Ah, but American's don't do irony.
I'm never going to steer this away from BIND and back to nslookup, and
if you can't beat'em...
I think you're quite correct in pointing this out. The argument for
keeping BIND as part of the base system is similar to the argument for
including Apache or Samba. If you're running a server you're probably
going to need one or other, or both; probably more than BIND. And while
we're at it, how about replacing imapd and qpopper (anyone for a REAL
security problem???) with Dovecot, and ftpd with PureFTP and....
So I'm actually okay with installing BIND from ports, as long as it works.
But these are all services. nslookup is a utility, normally found in
/usr/bin (not /usr/local...). It's the only utility to have been removed
from the system binary directories. I don't know if this is written
somewhere in blood, but I've spent the last 30 years assuming anything
in /bin and /usr/bin is going to be safe to use in scripts because it
will always be there. I reckon history is on my side here!
Sendmail could be considered a bit dated too. Will that be next? If so,
with "... | mail root" still work?
Regards, Frank.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:01:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3231CC09
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relaygateway01.edpnet.net (relaygateway01.edpnet.net
[212.71.1.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E90163F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AooGAHBX5lLV04zG/2dsb2JhbABZgww4g1O6ZBd0gk8zWAIFDAcOAhEFJYhAnFOPEZdehH8TBIEpjXUMglmBSQSYJgGSHoMuOw
X-IPAS-Result: AooGAHBX5lLV04zG/2dsb2JhbABZgww4g1O6ZBd0gk8zWAIFDAcOAhEFJYhAnFOPEZdehH8TBIEpjXUMglmBSQSYJgGSHoMuOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,729,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="232851608"
Received: from 213.211.140.198.dyn.edpnet.net (HELO mordor.lan)
([213.211.140.198])
by relaygateway01.edpnet.net with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA;
27 Jan 2014 13:42:54 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:00:59 +0100
From: Julien Cigar <jcigar@ulb.ac.be>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: stupid question about NFSV4
Message-ID: <20140127130059.GG2136@mordor.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:01:09 -0000
Hello,
We're busy to upgrade some machines from 8.2-RELEASE to 10-RELEASE.
I take this opportunity to migrate from NFSV3 to NFSV4.
Let's say I would like to allow NFSV4 _only_, in /etc/exports:
- is a single V4: line enough ?
- can I have multiple V4: lines ?
- are lines that don't begin with V4: also taken into account for NFSV4?
For the moment I have the following: https://dpaste.de/gLeZ but it
doesn't seems to work with that single V4: line ... (the mount works,
but ls returns nothing)
So basically I would like to export /usr/home with a V4: /exports and
/usr/home nullfs mounted under /exports/home
Any idea ? :)
Thanks,
Julien
--
No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:11:44 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0344FF4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no
[IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EEA216F8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:11:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0RDBebM023871
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:11:40 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
Received: from localhost (trond@localhost)
by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0RDBe1j023868;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:11:40 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:11:40 +0100 (CET)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no
To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
In-Reply-To: <20140127123909.dd04175320e6d6dc5c64a08e@sohara.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271410590.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<20140127123909.dd04175320e6d6dc5c64a08e@sohara.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet
OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:11:44 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:39-0000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> =========================
> zpool attach [-f] pool device new_device
>
> Attaches new_device to an existing zpool device. The existing
> device cannot be part of a raidz configuration.
> ==========================
My bad.
--
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, |
| Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, |
| IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, |
| Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, |
| tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. |
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:13:32 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B89A19B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:13:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F2A1716
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:13:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x13so7800468qcv.6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:13:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=u0FQtU3hCziwwe6KWWKlf8LXdipdPqwYaLBD8bvgsEk=;
b=al4b6PiJ34F/7tCsSIoT2VvpNnFJsWanh2iOJD70rBnetjrjXho0JqLXzlRYjOFzEH
/Rco1Yg6fPW5WwaYMvABrmwAxa20huYLDY76NtxyiWfbqE9yP7ZyWlBctcV2VkL+dKqQ
g3bsGJad2h5RyovZMAx3CuhsugiLeJiG/VI1zcrxg1d3a7Bl16VZJI23bOui3d0NZtoV
+43UWZp3ciHBN6DMY90BQgIvXCrx7P9NkxvHTlGSnso7xIXtffGHqc9tIHkB5ueCJkpK
adMvnhLmjz9LWDlY8vYn2IuPewRyI4SK6zwE4rJuHJff2hrBqqL7ZOQLpDvBVBqjNL08
+HuA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.101.104 with SMTP id t95mr3699782qge.106.1390828410835;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.37.227 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:13:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E6537F.8020907@gmail.com>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6537F.8020907@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:13:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CALfReyeO0sOAHLp2y_FpxT-yAUoqSdrtdbjQG_EEOzNL33q1XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
To: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:13:32 -0000
Neither of these setups is ideal, The best practice for your vdev is to use
2^n + your parity drives
This means in your case with raidz3 you would do something
2 + 3
4 + 3
8 + 3
the 1st two are far from ideal as the ratios are low 8 + 3, so 11 drives
per raidz3 vdev would be optimal. This would fit nicely with your 26 drive
enclosure as you would use 2x11 drive raidz3 vdevs, 2 hot spares, and two
devices left for l2arc/zil. Probably best chop up the ssds, mirror the zil
and stripe the l2arc, assuming you dont want to do down the route using
generic SSD's rather than write/read optimized ones
the reason you want 2^n for data drives is that each block/record stands a
chance of being broken up into equal chunks and striped nice and neatly
across the drives.
9 drives would give bad numbers with raidz3, as any data would be / 6 so
128 / 6 =3D 21.33333.. not ideal. However for raidz 9 is fine as it gives y=
ou
8 data drives
On 27 January 2014 12:39, Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/27/2014 12:12 PM, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:42-0000, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>> Many thanks everyone (Trond, Dennis, Steve)!!
>>>
>>> So RAIDz2 or 3 is going to be preferred per the advice given.
>>>
>>> Now I just need to figure out how to make that work best with my curren=
t
>>> 5
>>> block of disks.... perhaps wait for a while then add some more disks i=
n
>>> the
>>> mix then create the raidz(x) platform??
>>>
>>> It would be really good if raidz could be expandable, ie by adding extr=
a
>>> 'new'
>>> disks into the same vdev.
>>>
>> It's there!
>>
>> Try: zpool attach <pool_name> <existing_member> <new_member1>
>> [new_member2 ...]
>>
>>
>>
> Yep, though of course as I'm just testing with temp files currently I was
> unable to make it work:
>
> zpool attach test_pool /tmp/disk1 /tmp/disk6
> cannot attach /tmp/disk6 to /tmp/disk1: can only attach to mirrors and
> top-level disks
>
> This is ok though as my block of 5 disks arrive tomorrow with the chassis
> arriving either tomorrow or day after that.
>
>
> Does 'attaching' create a hybrid raidz2/3 + 1 array or am I confusing
> again?
>
> Being familiar with raid 1 and 0, I know that the attach command will
> simply mirror a disk:
>
> zpool attach <pool> disk1 disk2
>
> would create a raid1 mirror between the disks... is this the same
> principle or does the command function differently in raidz?
>
>
> Just checking out the man page gives this:
>
>
> zpool attach [-f] pool device new_device
>
> Attaches new_device to an existing zpool device. The existing
> device
> cannot be part of a raidz configuration. If device is not
> currently
> part of a mirrored configuration, device automatically transform=
s
> into a two-way mirror of device and new_device. If device is
> part of
> a two-way mirror, attaching new_device creates a three-way mirro=
r,
> and so on. In either case, new_device begins to resilver
> immediately.
>
> -- unless things have been updated since my FBSD version?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Kaya
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:29:04 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F91C990
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95201837
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w62so5188853wes.38
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/EYFyc9ZpyU8FZO5i/VoOYYAROpUJLr00/R+TzhNhsM=;
b=xw9h+ETF2Svgx6FT49YoqZOQX0oNTFl7c34E6wJqHhJlJsOFy7xIW4yES1BLNWG81N
VsM7ZsNbYtiuJ/14FaGAXKf6dydBKJ8c65mJpdYCWPQwSiVWoXLPAqM5vsQef5rhj2QJ
W6JxJQ7R9YJZyTAcc+8mWlepSFWJ8WrLmZtCrErbiSYGYJalzCE3TmFv0NVxO5goAZwV
kH24cdOs1411Y2N/ssp0hVoIFevSA8oG1qlrEPn3KLW/medhF1SvHFeVeBPNnsarnlH4
MVB38gTTdqW7MCtSlT5jCHs4g0N46Es0AZAgSapWRi+yV3++WDTsmzVby0BhEIP5uSFh
DlAA==
X-Received: by 10.180.77.200 with SMTP id u8mr3251164wiw.48.1390829342416;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-112-13.bethere.co.uk.
[87.194.112.13])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ea4sm29072936wib.7.2014.01.27.05.29.01
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:00 +0000
From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
Message-ID: <20140127132900.1db7bca9@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E6562A.2050402@fjl.co.uk>
References: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
<52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com> <52E6562A.2050402@fjl.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:04 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:50 +0000
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> Sendmail could be considered a bit dated too. Will that be next?
There has been some talk about replacing it with something more
lightweight that would handle local mail (and possibly remote
submission).
> If
> so, with "... | mail root" still work?
yes
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:35:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181D5D66
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:35:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.26])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A135F18DF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:35:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W7mLE-0001a8-Ii; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:35:08 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:35:08 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127133508.GA9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:35:18 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:30:02PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:12 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:03:26PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
> > > _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
> > > > > lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am
> > > > > > doing everything ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > do not worry to much about this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and
> > > > > > everything was just fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > I do the same.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Until I did a
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ sudo portsnap fetch update
> > > > > >
> > > > > > today and afterwards a
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ sudo portmaster -aD
> > > > > >
> > > > > I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning
> > > > > but I used svn and portupgrade without any problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
> > > >
> > > > Three days old.
> > > >
> > > ok, get the latest one and try again. If it still does not work, I
> > > could give you the revision number of my working ports tree.
> >
> > It still does not work. However, I do not have a revision number,
> > IIUC, because I'm updating my ports with portsnap and not with svn,
> > right? I might try to checkout ports anew and see whether that works
> > then.
>
> of course.
>
> You might should consider to switch to svn and portupgrade. There is
> one advantage of this pair. Portupgrade does not leave you with a
> machine that cannot be used anymore. The worst case is that no port
> gets upgraded but your machine still works. Svn has the advantage that
> you can chose your port 'version' if the current revision does not work
> for you.
Thanks for this advice. :)
That leads me to another question: Is there a way to do this while
preserving the configurations I made to the ports?
> Anyway, some other reported the same problem with a current ports tree.
> I have the revision number 341159 in case of you want to try.
I am giving it a try right away.
Christian.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:43:06 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7F3D2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEECC197E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0RDh3pi079518
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:03 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E6626A.3080606@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:06 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <201401261420.s0QEKKMn080851@fire.js.berklix.net>
<52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com> <52E6562A.2050402@fjl.co.uk>
<20140127132900.1db7bca9@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127132900.1db7bca9@gumby.homeunix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:43:06 -0000
On 27/01/2014 13:29, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:50 +0000
> Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>
>
>> Sendmail could be considered a bit dated too. Will that be next?
> There has been some talk about replacing it with something more
> lightweight that would handle local mail (and possibly remote
> submission).
>
>
>> If
>> so, with "... | mail root" still work?
> yes
>
I don't imagine anyone planned to break scripts when BIND was replaced
either ;-) The law of unintended consequences applies.
Regards, Frank.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:45:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57418180
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1E31997
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=mRxow3z0yMI0tlb7kwy8ODImfXrNmksSskaVFjMdFWk=;
b=Vw7yKeIiOsZQwX9nHso+M9BKDphO+mFEKR/UGkc82NB5i7sNNiZewAIo815B9CKdnzGhvS4MP6Ok3fAZ4owNJjuzpJUfbLWaYUwVTClyB0kxW3GLiDS0Xw/+SMpTalLqtNByO5LvXi328znrNtOgbfrDixdRxQheZBH/FV52E8Y=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=20308 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7mUq-000U68-2p; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:45:05 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:44:40 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127214440.4075ae45@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127133508.GA9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127133508.GA9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:45:12 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:35:08 +0100
_1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
> That leads me to another question: Is there a way to do this while
> preserving the configurations I made to the ports?
>
if you have a normal installation, just move /use/ports
to /usr/ports.whatever and create an empty /usr/ports.
You can then checkout the ports tree with svn.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:46:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65736220
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:46:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relaygateway02.edpnet.net (relaygateway02.edpnet.net
[212.71.1.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0532E19AB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:46:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8GAPZh5lLV04zG/2dsb2JhbABZgww4g1O5CU+BDBd0giUBAQEEAQEBICsIGBsLGAICBQwHDgICDwUTAQkILAcEARwEh2gJq0WXXIR/F4EpjRMBAVYKDIJZgUkElVSCUgGBMpBsgy47MYEE
X-IPAS-Result: Ao8GAPZh5lLV04zG/2dsb2JhbABZgww4g1O5CU+BDBd0giUBAQEEAQEBICsIGBsLGAICBQwHDgICDwUTAQkILAcEARwEh2gJq0WXXIR/F4EpjRMBAVYKDIJZgUkElVSCUgGBMpBsgy47MYEE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,729,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="224791868"
Received: from 213.211.140.198.dyn.edpnet.net (HELO mordor.lan)
([213.211.140.198])
by relaygateway02.edpnet.net with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA;
27 Jan 2014 14:26:06 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:45:14 +0100
From: Julien Cigar <jcigar@ulb.ac.be>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: stupid question about NFSV4
Message-ID: <20140127134514.GJ2136@mordor.lan>
References: <20140127130059.GG2136@mordor.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127130059.GG2136@mordor.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:46:26 -0000
OK it seems to work with:
vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4
vfs.nfsd.server_max_nfsvers=4
and:
V4: /exports -sec=sys -network 192.168.0.0/24
/exports/home -maproot=root: -network=192.168.0.0/24
I hope it's the way to go.. :)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 02:00:59PM +0100, Julien Cigar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're busy to upgrade some machines from 8.2-RELEASE to 10-RELEASE.
> I take this opportunity to migrate from NFSV3 to NFSV4.
>
> Let's say I would like to allow NFSV4 _only_, in /etc/exports:
> - is a single V4: line enough ?
> - can I have multiple V4: lines ?
> - are lines that don't begin with V4: also taken into account for NFSV4?
>
> For the moment I have the following: https://dpaste.de/gLeZ but it
> doesn't seems to work with that single V4: line ... (the mount works,
> but ls returns nothing)
>
> So basically I would like to export /usr/home with a V4: /exports and
> /usr/home nullfs mounted under /exports/home
>
> Any idea ? :)
>
> Thanks,
> Julien
>
> --
> No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
> However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
--
No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:51:37 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF6751B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:51:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493A71A51
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:51:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from park.js.berklix.net (pD9FBEA92.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[217.251.234.146]) (authenticated bits=128)
by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0RD5W1s086651
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:05:33 GMT
(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
by park.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s0RD1cHA062324
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:01:38 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0RD1Q0O080595
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:01:38 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Message-Id: <201401271301.s0RD1Q0O080595@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:22:26 PST."
<52E5DF02.4010500@bluerosetech.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:01:26 +0100
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:51:37 -0000
Hi, Reference:
> From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
> Reply-to: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:22:26 -0800
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 1/26/2014 6:20 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > The rationale for bind removal from src/ I thought ill advised; it won't
> > suprise me if FreeBSD gets roasted for no longer being net server ready.
>
> The irony being that if you were at all serious about running mail, DNS,
> NTP, etc., you used a port because the in-base versions were old and
> could not be easily upgraded in the event of security problems. This is
> one of many points made during the discussion on removing BIND from the
> base.
bind was in src/ from 4.4BSD_Lite to 9.2-RELEASE. No warning of pending
removal in a prior release. Alternatives existed, but removal was forced
& botched, too late before release, (inconsistencies were still being
reported between src & ports very recently). Lack of management & planning.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ".
Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 13:56:23 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48C86AD
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6563A1A77
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w62so5212804wes.41
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:56:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=0WoikG3pRvoIFqDrr2g+LcZtlRgSf6bmvUnYfsiolcM=;
b=gcEXpsbWbHdLc2IIPVHYA50SVPJ4RMTcjZF8OtgrtYN5xShoxFlmj82aMRMZbMShn3
V3jTW8C6lphCC5WrhyEohj9zCCWqIQfkt1zBInZTWv4EbBb2VJkH63+qByrRVrToKYpy
6Qg3eGAypQpAvtptA/V670R2mLx84W2xqYaR5oI4CoJY0uwWgsazabrnxuTwyiIiWVQ1
STFQOs96Dlc64i4NQrsGlroVg8Z41NZtPvZ5clNfcXUBQRMRaZn5mOYggP9flrxtkV0Z
aRt2e1koucvPrsIfL4CvaRhOwWXsHPwtOm48EoJ5BzAH0zFSY9mObNbYzpZdKN0V16d/
APTg==
X-Received: by 10.180.188.197 with SMTP id gc5mr11995037wic.30.1390830981802;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x220.optiplex-networks.com (81-178-2-118.dsl.pipex.com.
[81.178.2.118])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm3sm25430798wib.8.2014.01.27.05.56.20
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E6657E.1050103@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:56:14 +0000
From: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no> <52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no> <52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no> <52E6537F.8020907@gmail.com>
<CALfReyeO0sOAHLp2y_FpxT-yAUoqSdrtdbjQG_EEOzNL33q1XQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALfReyeO0sOAHLp2y_FpxT-yAUoqSdrtdbjQG_EEOzNL33q1XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:56:23 -0000
Many thanks for the explanation :-)
On 01/27/2014 01:13 PM, krad wrote:
> Neither of these setups is ideal, The best practice for your vdev is
> to use 2^n + your parity drives
> This means in your case with raidz3 you would do something
>
> 2 + 3
> 4 + 3
> 8 + 3
>
> the 1st two are far from ideal as the ratios are low 8 + 3, so 11
> drives per raidz3 vdev would be optimal. This would fit nicely with
> your 26 drive enclosure as you would use 2x11 drive raidz3 vdevs, 2
> hot spares, and two devices left for l2arc/zil. Probably best chop up
> the ssds, mirror the zil and stripe the l2arc, assuming you dont want
> to do down the route using generic SSD's rather than write/read
> optimized ones
Yep was going to use your suggestion for l2arc/zil on 2x 128GB Corsair
Force Series GS, 2.5" which have quite good w/r speeds - also I use
these on other servers which tend to be quite good and reliable.
I think the way to create a mirrored zil and stiped l2arc would be to
use GPT to partition the drives, then use the zfs features across the
partitions.
Hmm.... so it also looks like I'm gona have to wait a while for some
more drives then in order to create an 11 disk raidz3 pool.
But at least things will be done properly and in a good manner rather
then going down a patch with "no return".
>
>
Regards,
Kaya
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 14:00:11 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F155C880
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:00:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D321AA8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:00:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W7mjL-0005dh-Dw
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:00:03 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:00:03 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:00:03 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: KDE4 pkg
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:59:38 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <slrnlecihm.47t.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:00:12 -0000
I know this a bit cheesy/arse-licky but, having installed the kde4
desktop -- and expecting to encounter many problems -- i'd just like to
say how impressed I am with it.
Everything works brilliantly and for the first time in ages I can use
all of my hardware without issues; webcam, printers, it's great.
So thanks to the people working on this. A really fantastic job I think.
Cheers, Jamie
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 14:04:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D652A3F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:04:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C29B1B41
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:04:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id to1so822986ieb.28
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:04:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=usweYykJPhb3IMgLDaldc4HuQRGkEmj8dvaNaJPg+g0=;
b=hrFzu5HyTxFIfw9qT+itbLBOnWP98ESDptmY/jcbn1mDeVt6+LjznzOqbDCn1KnuqJ
2rcSmJlP1eYEj6ctO6undq6omqV1ahWl3ry70C1m1TuV/U4ftDOek3E5bgvvWbA6v2Rk
vgQpwtWsfFNBmV1a1QSXMX+rRUidsc+2s7X4zCvjNlmhUuXkfrbB3Rj0no/10s928WWQ
UqRIgVoPt4UR8TgcCt/mbyVL4WYb9m1wj+iL1qlVxc4lgHqVHkWr6pXTahYWnKBPsySj
+LCGrdV4FFBxmwxMu6sb7av0F5oQtnsZGDmkc0D+S7BOhFs3qjiilPND/UuCraPGemWa
n/+Q==
X-Received: by 10.50.67.180 with SMTP id o20mr17433157igt.43.1390831452306;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:04:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.14.130 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:03:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <slrnlecihm.47t.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlecihm.47t.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
From: Fred Morcos <fred.morcos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:03:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH3a3KVVqN5kXQFTagWkgeuUN5-jgEE+eyE2zq98ubNnPDsTNw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: KDE4 pkg
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:04:13 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:59 PM, James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>wrote:
> I know this a bit cheesy/arse-licky but, having installed the kde4
> desktop -- and expecting to encounter many problems -- i'd just like to
> say how impressed I am with it.
>
> Everything works brilliantly and for the first time in ages I can use
> all of my hardware without issues; webcam, printers, it's great.
>
> So thanks to the people working on this. A really fantastic job I think.
>
> Cheers, Jamie
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Nice to hear that. Never been a KDE user myself though. I am curious about
your hardware, could you elaborate more about that? Is it a laptop or a
desktop? What kind of webcam? How is network management in KDE+FreeBSD
without NetworkManager? (not that I like NetworkManager particularly, but
are there specific KDE tools for network management on FreeBSD?)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 14:17:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A75AE12A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:17:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.31])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9511D8E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:17:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W7n0R-0000k0-2X; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:17:43 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:17:42 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] weird error messages
with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127141742.GB9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127133508.GA9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127214440.4075ae45@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127214440.4075ae45@X220.alogt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:17:52 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:44:40PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > That leads me to another question: Is there a way to do this while
> > preserving the configurations I made to the ports?
> >
> if you have a normal installation, just move /use/ports
> to /usr/ports.whatever and create an empty /usr/ports.
>
> You can then checkout the ports tree with svn.
I did just that.
But it seems to me that I have now lost (aka 'it is in a different
copy of the ports tree) all the configuration changes I did to various
ports, like enabling patches in mail/mutt or which video drivers
x11/xorg should install... Is there a way to copy those from one copy
of a ports tree to another?
Or am I just overlooking something here? ;)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 14:23:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA84440
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:23:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.26])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A6D91E2B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W7n4t-0000bd-Sn; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:22:20 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:22:19 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error
messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127142219.GA21339@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<Pine.NEB.4.64.1401271213470.28649@faeroes.freeshell.org>
<20140127202342.5cbe5014@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127202342.5cbe5014@X220.alogt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:23:47 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:23:42PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:33 +0000 (UTC)
> Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG> wrote:
>
> > My failure occured on a ports tree that was updated about 30 minutes
> > ago via portsnap.
>
> can you try revision 341159?
It works here, too.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 14:45:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66FCFBF6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:45:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BBEA1FBE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:45:52 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=Xis9DOS5EvMdQcGMLL/mDIbJZloOksfVajtZWH7wQjg=;
b=DvbCM4Xj6JS1/tzPIAui39cLBe8tj1A44ij5o9C55RmlTIJpDvmYX2zBnNMgsoWDE7bExOg/uYptwEQtlpcBb+5rmPzgqGx9jrjpbtsQWkCPLnPbUk4XKzdXPkCglittKE7jlyN8lKKvgGVhGW+k/kt/GOk8PdtV0CTbWhyPwgE=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=62954 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7nRd-000xcs-Ga; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:45:51 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:45:41 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] weird error
messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127224541.48885efb@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127141742.GB9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127133508.GA9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127214440.4075ae45@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127141742.GB9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:45:52 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:17:42 +0100
_1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:44:40PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > That leads me to another question: Is there a way to do this while
> > > preserving the configurations I made to the ports?
> > >
> > if you have a normal installation, just move /use/ports
> > to /usr/ports.whatever and create an empty /usr/ports.
> >
> > You can then checkout the ports tree with svn.
>
> I did just that.
>
> But it seems to me that I have now lost (aka 'it is in a different
> copy of the ports tree) all the configuration changes I did to various
> ports, like enabling patches in mail/mutt or which video drivers
> x11/xorg should install... Is there a way to copy those from one copy
> of a ports tree to another?
>
> Or am I just overlooking something here? ;)
you should have them in the other ports tree named /usr/ports.whatever
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 14:59:56 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE20E61
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:59:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098561107
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:59:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id z12so5724606wgg.30
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:59:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=aPnbZwZ6sN+0lDPl/J5rduhQ1aha0uvsg4ygaFMz88U=;
b=lHeVDoLR/BduD3499mGoIIRmWAIe4BpEostUZRATqEBSCAsmUMf5059uI4cGfI3JL0
x/l2e+AB2aCxcOW6NwWWgRHEQJShBBAb1o7XiiTrkIFSM+fvYg42hY8YZAKK6CCQbjYO
0TiT6K8fQmMpDYMf6tV27ETtNaCRMGks8gRHjN+ZDJBVqNEc2A1YxMxyj6zv992vRoiE
oqR0eCpWNjYa8xbAYGBh32qfQ93OOeNK5TLqCrTCzRljgBD/jbTI+Y0W8aAOpt47F8As
Lj+0cQGM8QialCxf1uCEo0Q5NRgFWe9S1OGFJ7gJ/UzxsXxOMAmxMzex9skiK06U+WFX
ULsw==
X-Received: by 10.180.211.208 with SMTP id ne16mr12262716wic.21.1390834794337;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:59:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: zhao6014@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.240.167 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:59:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Jov <amutu@amutu.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:59:34 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fQRgXW5d9LDlzOb8pkAPIdHDR1M
Message-ID: <CADyrUxPMYJyaQTqxxBCpOyMUYxGSDnZRuvaGg3dR1+3X7_J_Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: tripwire port build error on fresh FreeBSD 10.0:*** No rule to make
target `SYSPRE'. Stop.
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:59:56 -0000
use clang and gcc48(set CC and CXX in make.conf) get the same error.
===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user
===> Found saved configuration for tripwire-2.4.2.2_2
===> tripwire-2.4.2.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found
===> Fetching all distfiles required by tripwire-2.4.2.2_2 for building
===> Extracting for tripwire-2.4.2.2_2
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for tripwire-2.4.2.2-src.tar.bz2.
===> Patching for tripwire-2.4.2.2_2
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for tripwire-2.4.2.2_2
===> tripwire-2.4.2.2_2 depends on executable: gmake - found
===> Configuring for tripwire-2.4.2.2_2
===> FreeBSD 10 autotools fix applied to
/data/port/ports/security/tripwire/work/tripwire-2.4.2.2-src/aclocal.m4
===> FreeBSD 10 autotools fix applied to
/data/port/ports/security/tripwire/work/tripwire-2.4.2.2-src/configure
configure: loading site script /data/port/ports/Templates/config.site
checking build system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0
checking host system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0
checking target system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g
wheel
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... (cached) /usr/bin/awk
checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for gcc... cc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by gmake... GNU
checking dependency style of cc... none
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether c++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of c++... none
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for bison... no
checking for byacc... byacc
checking for vi... /usr/bin/vi
checking for sendmail... /usr/sbin/sendmail
checking how to run the C preprocessor... cpp
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... (cached) /usr/bin/grep
checking for egrep... (cached) /usr/bin/egrep
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checking for memory.h... (cached) yes
checking for strings.h... (cached) yes
checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes
checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/param.h... (cached) yes
checking for sys/mount.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/ustat.h usability... no
checking sys/ustat.h presence... no
checking for sys/ustat.h... no
checking sys/sysmacros.h usability... no
checking sys/sysmacros.h presence... no
checking for sys/sysmacros.h... no
checking sys/syslog.h usability... yes
checking sys/syslog.h presence... yes
checking for sys/syslog.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking iconv.h usability... yes
checking iconv.h presence... yes
checking for iconv.h... yes
checking for langinfo.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/statfs.h usability... no
checking sys/statfs.h presence... no
checking for sys/statfs.h... no
checking signum.h usability... no
checking signum.h presence... no
checking for signum.h... no
checking bits/signum.h usability... no
checking bits/signum.h presence... no
checking for bits/signum.h... no
checking for stdarg.h... (cached) yes
checking for malloc.h... (cached) no
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... (cached) yes
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for int... (cached) yes
checking size of int... 4
checking for long... (cached) yes
checking size of long... 8
checking for long long... (cached) yes
checking size of long long... 8
checking for strftime... (cached) yes
checking for gethostname... (cached) yes
checking for gethostid... yes
checking for mkstemp... (cached) yes
checking for socket in -lc... yes
checking for gethostbyname in -lc... yes
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... c++ -E
checking locale usability... yes
checking locale presence... yes
checking for locale... yes
checking for wchar.h... (cached) yes
checking for OpenSSL directory... /usr/local
checking openssl/md5.h usability... yes
checking openssl/md5.h presence... yes
checking for openssl/md5.h... yes
checking openssl/sha.h usability... yes
checking openssl/sha.h presence... yes
checking for openssl/sha.h... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating man/Makefile
config.status: creating man/man4/Makefile
config.status: creating man/man5/Makefile
config.status: creating man/man8/Makefile
config.status: creating src/Makefile
config.status: creating src/cryptlib/Makefile
config.status: creating src/core/Makefile
config.status: creating src/db/Makefile
config.status: creating src/fco/Makefile
config.status: creating src/fs/Makefile
config.status: creating src/tw/Makefile
config.status: creating src/twcrypto/Makefile
config.status: creating src/twparser/Makefile
config.status: creating src/util/Makefile
config.status: creating src/twprint/Makefile
config.status: creating src/twadmin/Makefile
config.status: creating src/siggen/Makefile
config.status: creating src/tripwire/Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
===> Building for tripwire-2.4.2.2_2
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/data/port/ports/security/tripwire/work/tripwire-2.4.2.2-src'
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `SYSPRE'. Stop.
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/data/port/ports/security/tripwire/work/tripwire-2.4.2.2-src'
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make[1]: stopped in /data/port/ports/security/tripwire
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /data/port/ports/security/tripwire
Jov
blog: http:amutu.com/blog <http://amutu.com/blog>
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 15:24:30 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7968A4C9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F7A1339
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
(authenticated bits=0)
by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0RFNVa1053449
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:23:32 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <52E679F3.8020003@tundraware.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:23:31 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: /var/run/dmesg.boot Empty After Boot
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:23:32 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: s0RFNVa1053449
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:24:30 -0000
Is there some special sauce to get /var/run/dmesg.boot to be
populated with the boot time system messages? Mine is empty
and I'm not quite sure why...
Thanks,
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 15:26:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B745C57E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de
[80.67.29.23])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720A91353
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W7o4U-00056E-J6; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:25:58 +0100
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:25:58 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re:
[freebsd-questions] weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127152558.GA50946@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127133508.GA9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127214440.4075ae45@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127141742.GB9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127224541.48885efb@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127224541.48885efb@X220.alogt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:26:07 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:45:41PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:17:42 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:44:40PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > > That leads me to another question: Is there a way to do this while
> > > > preserving the configurations I made to the ports?
> > > >
> > > if you have a normal installation, just move /use/ports
> > > to /usr/ports.whatever and create an empty /usr/ports.
> > >
> > > You can then checkout the ports tree with svn.
> >
> > I did just that.
> >
> > But it seems to me that I have now lost (aka 'it is in a different
> > copy of the ports tree) all the configuration changes I did to various
> > ports, like enabling patches in mail/mutt or which video drivers
> > x11/xorg should install... Is there a way to copy those from one copy
> > of a ports tree to another?
> >
> > Or am I just overlooking something here? ;)
>
> you should have them in the other ports tree named /usr/ports.whatever
Yes, I do.
But imagine, I want to switch to the svn-style update of my ports tree
and ditch portsnap because of situations like today. Can I copy my configurations?
I hope you don't mind me asking.
Christian.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 15:31:35 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE581698
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD701432
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W7o9s-00034M-Hy
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:31:32 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:31:32 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:31:32 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: KDE4 pkg
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <slrnlecuu7.4i6.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlecihm.47t.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
<CAH3a3KVVqN5kXQFTagWkgeuUN5-jgEE+eyE2zq98ubNnPDsTNw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:31:35 -0000
On 2014-01-27, Fred Morcos <fred.morcos@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:59 PM, James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I know this a bit cheesy/arse-licky but, having installed the kde4
>> desktop -- and expecting to encounter many problems -- i'd just like to
>> say how impressed I am with it.
>>
>> Everything works brilliantly and for the first time in ages I can use
>> all of my hardware without issues; webcam, printers, it's great.
>>
>> So thanks to the people working on this. A really fantastic job I think.
>>
>> Cheers, Jamie
> Nice to hear that. Never been a KDE user myself though. I am curious about
> your hardware, could you elaborate more about that? Is it a laptop or a
> desktop? What kind of webcam? How is network management in KDE+FreeBSD
> without NetworkManager? (not that I like NetworkManager particularly, but
> are there specific KDE tools for network management on FreeBSD?)
I use a desktop. It's a Lenovo Think Centre, bought it about 3 years
ago. Very standard machine: Dual-Core Pentium processor, Intel Chipset,
Logitech webcam, canon iP4700 printer (cups+gutenprint driver).
I haven't needed to do anything with the network configuration. It was
configured automatically and has been fine. A brief look at what's
installed shows no particular network management tools to speak off,
although there may well be other pkg's one can install for that.
As you would expect I had to set up devd but that is simple and fast to
do.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 15:38:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D37DAF9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:38:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19F2514A7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:38:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uq10so9276261igb.5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:38:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=gEbORj4FdTG9sSom0X8Ml6N0hYib1VFk9fkm+Kp76Xc=;
b=Iqo2RaPyfaYpNqzfGQghBGyRxFG/Fyj2RnDIcpsm7sD9hymqZ1c+rvKWEFI2XAxb6H
b4+VjU8FvYOjJKhBQ1NxhwuJM+D2nfEb5IGjyOfMekzdXYEB3T65MssPVZyERCrv2P7u
I0DsoWKJw3LyWffzebaMb1ecxdcEjtxsEwMfKYsWbx3WF1gKsVOhU44q3Q2wUYnnIoET
GHPy2yYApsFBh6w4EpAxjUxUz0Lq2udFpgJAzJBiT/I84KZaSUAur7EXoQcmeMyFmmKN
Rn/oyVUl17sIKMpXQqVhT3D/uoJtcHWYeaoVWE486hc9Ofxe+Uw5mncG3dC20D4PJAzo
14NQ==
X-Received: by 10.50.222.99 with SMTP id ql3mr17772873igc.42.1390837127504;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:38:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.14.130 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:38:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <slrnlecuu7.4i6.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlecihm.47t.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
<CAH3a3KVVqN5kXQFTagWkgeuUN5-jgEE+eyE2zq98ubNnPDsTNw@mail.gmail.com>
<slrnlecuu7.4i6.jmz@kontrol.kode5.net>
From: Fred Morcos <fred.morcos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:38:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH3a3KVvgkUE5BC3nHgkgxDh2Zzyke1QodOUCsxCUx=GhWd=JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: KDE4 pkg
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:38:48 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:31 PM, James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2014-01-27, Fred Morcos <fred.morcos@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:59 PM, James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I know this a bit cheesy/arse-licky but, having installed the kde4
> >> desktop -- and expecting to encounter many problems -- i'd just like to
> >> say how impressed I am with it.
> >>
> >> Everything works brilliantly and for the first time in ages I can use
> >> all of my hardware without issues; webcam, printers, it's great.
> >>
> >> So thanks to the people working on this. A really fantastic job I think.
> >>
> >> Cheers, Jamie
>
> > Nice to hear that. Never been a KDE user myself though. I am curious
> about
> > your hardware, could you elaborate more about that? Is it a laptop or a
> > desktop? What kind of webcam? How is network management in KDE+FreeBSD
> > without NetworkManager? (not that I like NetworkManager particularly, but
> > are there specific KDE tools for network management on FreeBSD?)
>
> I use a desktop. It's a Lenovo Think Centre, bought it about 3 years
> ago. Very standard machine: Dual-Core Pentium processor, Intel Chipset,
> Logitech webcam, canon iP4700 printer (cups+gutenprint driver).
>
> I haven't needed to do anything with the network configuration. It was
> configured automatically and has been fine. A brief look at what's
> installed shows no particular network management tools to speak off,
> although there may well be other pkg's one can install for that.
>
> As you would expect I had to set up devd but that is simple and fast to
> do.
>
Thanks for your response. May I ask what devd setup you had to do?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 15:42:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B251FC9D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:42:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84C661583
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:42:07 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=RE8E00OgYU6SzdWLNiUiSciRgjjM0R7CShAKOEMZp0E=;
b=GjbJQKEkkuADeZDXgwA24OYo54GdFmlZSqYHk6/1bbphSShBJ6bc5T91lZb/Vme0SoTq1cUeAVqBlBOGTw4FKqkSBeI5lwarPLpfGTNeT+3lbAnl7jVbe8l9dpXTW7dOLQfeixlnJpBJ4bKQW8NdtPCQzvjpHH3I/W2kD6rEbf4=;
Received: from [39.217.157.8] (port=25642 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W7oK5-001RvN-N9; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:42:07 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:41:58 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re:
[freebsd-questions] weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140127234158.617056f6@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140127152558.GA50946@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127133508.GA9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127214440.4075ae45@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127141742.GB9272@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127224541.48885efb@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127152558.GA50946@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:42:07 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:25:58 +0100
_1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> > > Or am I just overlooking something here? ;)
> >
> > you should have them in the other ports tree
> > named /usr/ports.whatever
>
> Yes, I do.
>
> But imagine, I want to switch to the svn-style update of my ports tree
> and ditch portsnap because of situations like today. Can I copy my
> configurations?
svn has a feature for this I never use. Just check the manual.
>
> I hope you don't mind me asking.
Isn't this the idea behind this list?
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 16:52:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF565C4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22c.google.com (mail-qa0-x22c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22c])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 145A71AF0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w5so7697531qac.31
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:52:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=M4a+dcFtokc/ODQ6mr1GkRyo8iInA6SBfgdqsgdNdMg=;
b=q2109/fXG4KNRrjjntBIknZgbo89NILC84P7SoaVCq1Spa1xOiG9T06KNCHVnbHgqQ
/XpvhBIAd0UBmMFTL/MIYGYmCdcSqMDhjvzz8l1ZciZjzR14URtXBoTPQU2RR78g1T4O
zck83X5DKeswRYpJvcGFeBECxZf764Cw0LM2JIXaAJXs9hR87+R3oJD4yFyaze2qgWxT
le5h4XGTXU+NnOFVGTsbtGvib4+JYuaL/hcdRfGt631nJMOV5jCDRKKcyEzHAKAk3pn9
eXBZ4TzRUHOx9U7jIC/E4Fgvx2pkdwlJ+KO/5wBX3fMobH2yBTY3UvXeGyGYmy+NG93C
5aRg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.13.195 with SMTP id d3mr36355245qca.4.1390841537142;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.37.227 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:52:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E6657E.1050103@gmail.com>
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no>
<52E6537F.8020907@gmail.com>
<CALfReyeO0sOAHLp2y_FpxT-yAUoqSdrtdbjQG_EEOzNL33q1XQ@mail.gmail.com>
<52E6657E.1050103@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:52:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CALfReyf_V+9iWrPTceHya9GnW3c6_aNA+Et8ZzJQypNsHrriNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
To: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:52:18 -0000
Look into under provisioning the SSD drives as well, this can preserve
write performance in the long term and decrease write wear. Looking at the
number of drives, and general spec of what you are putting together, I
would try to stretch to 256 GB ssd but only provision them to use say
128-160 GB of the capacity.
I'm not 100% sure this is still all necessary now as TRIM support is much
better now under zfs but here is how i did my ssd drives under linux. You
may well be able to do it under freebsd but I havent figured out how.
root@ubuntu-10-10:~# hdparm -N /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
max sectors = 312581808/312581808, HPA is disabled
root@ubuntu-10-10:~# hdparm -Np281323627 /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
setting max visible sectors to 281323627 (permanent)
Use of -Nnnnnn is VERY DANGEROUS.
You have requested reducing the apparent size of the drive.
This is a BAD idea, and can easily destroy all of the drive's contents.
Please supply the --yes-i-know-what-i-am-doing flag if you really want this.
Program aborted.
root@ubuntu-10-10:~# hdparm -Np281323627 --yes-i-know-what-i-am-doing /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
setting max visible sectors to 281323627 (permanent)
max sectors = 281323627/312581808, HPA is enabled
root@ubuntu-10-10:~#
On 27 January 2014 13:56, Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many thanks for the explanation :-)
>
>
> On 01/27/2014 01:13 PM, krad wrote:
>
>> Neither of these setups is ideal, The best practice for your vdev is to
>> use 2^n + your parity drives
>> This means in your case with raidz3 you would do something
>>
>> 2 + 3
>> 4 + 3
>> 8 + 3
>>
>> the 1st two are far from ideal as the ratios are low 8 + 3, so 11 drives
>> per raidz3 vdev would be optimal. This would fit nicely with your 26 drive
>> enclosure as you would use 2x11 drive raidz3 vdevs, 2 hot spares, and two
>> devices left for l2arc/zil. Probably best chop up the ssds, mirror the zil
>> and stripe the l2arc, assuming you dont want to do down the route using
>> generic SSD's rather than write/read optimized ones
>>
>
> Yep was going to use your suggestion for l2arc/zil on 2x 128GB Corsair
> Force Series GS, 2.5" which have quite good w/r speeds - also I use these
> on other servers which tend to be quite good and reliable.
>
> I think the way to create a mirrored zil and stiped l2arc would be to use
> GPT to partition the drives, then use the zfs features across the
> partitions.
>
>
> Hmm.... so it also looks like I'm gona have to wait a while for some more
> drives then in order to create an 11 disk raidz3 pool.
>
>
> But at least things will be done properly and in a good manner rather then
> going down a patch with "no return".
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>
>
> Kaya
>
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 18:15:32 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF411E00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D21D125A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x13so5862816wgg.15
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:15:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=/OFKYigwLPRrUR/occVtieYGYXTJbw4IAhQdjd8io7U=;
b=FqNf+KTz84HSYIZIPZdStkT9nBZKIr2KyvqlqmCQj1E5ZoILwOz+ftZdbPBZrapvkD
xTVjLe1ZP7XCbpHmFdgYST21VD3Di1n1XCeFEdOGx7OhQJXcoIA1W1l7P7ogxpqNgss/
nDwIX3BC+hpgchKsyuC3BktK+8zB914Cf2oOMxvQNYjvl1lHxnnW6/LN+bhvohOLI0Z9
GF3AudIFdK6iND2u0ICOaFIkZa+elJ/KbrqlX9vXv5ttnwSt/apnGvcOIWP2NpQNahoP
XI0WJBzICuzSdzr5nrazS2eU8WM0WU4LAdoiXmaG+PADGDkdb4y6s/wWCdyrJ9hODogU
ZK1Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.71.47 with SMTP id r15mr21336944wju.19.1390846530762;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x220.optiplex-networks.com (81-178-2-118.dsl.pipex.com.
[81.178.2.118])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm29575970wij.3.2014.01.27.10.15.29
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E6A240.8010404@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:15:28 +0000
From: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS confusion
References: <52E40C82.7050302@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401270944100.4811@mail.fig.ol.no> <52E62DFF.3010600@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271149160.4811@mail.fig.ol.no> <52E6463C.6090805@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401271309090.4811@mail.fig.ol.no> <52E6537F.8020907@gmail.com> <CALfReyeO0sOAHLp2y_FpxT-yAUoqSdrtdbjQG_EEOzNL33q1XQ@mail.gmail.com> <52E6657E.1050103@gmail.com>
<CALfReyf_V+9iWrPTceHya9GnW3c6_aNA+Et8ZzJQypNsHrriNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALfReyf_V+9iWrPTceHya9GnW3c6_aNA+Et8ZzJQypNsHrriNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:15:32 -0000
Many thanks I really appreciate the advice :-)
Best Regards,
Kaya
On 01/27/2014 04:52 PM, krad wrote:
> Look into under provisioning the SSD drives as well, this can preserve
> write performance in the long term and decrease write wear. Looking at
> the number of drives, and general spec of what you are putting
> together, I would try to stretch to 256 GB ssd but only provision them
> to use say 128-160 GB of the capacity.
>
> I'm not 100% sure this is still all necessary now as TRIM support is
> much better now under zfs but here is how i did my ssd drives under
> linux. You may well be able to do it under freebsd but I havent
> figured out how.
>
> root@ubuntu-10-10:~# hdparm -N /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
> max sectors = 312581808/312581808, HPA is disabled
>
> root@ubuntu-10-10:~# hdparm -Np281323627 /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
> setting max visible sectors to 281323627 (permanent)
> Use of -Nnnnnn is VERY DANGEROUS.
> You have requested reducing the apparent size of the drive.
> This is a BAD idea, and can easily destroy all of the drive's contents.
> Please supply the --yes-i-know-what-i-am-doing flag if you really want this.
> Program aborted.
>
> root@ubuntu-10-10:~# hdparm -Np281323627 --yes-i-know-what-i-am-doing /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
> setting max visible sectors to 281323627 (permanent)
> max sectors = 281323627/312581808, HPA is enabled
>
> root@ubuntu-10-10:~#
>
>
> On 27 January 2014 13:56, Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com
> <mailto:kayasaman@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Many thanks for the explanation :-)
>
>
> On 01/27/2014 01:13 PM, krad wrote:
>
> Neither of these setups is ideal, The best practice for your
> vdev is to use 2^n + your parity drives
> This means in your case with raidz3 you would do something
>
> 2 + 3
> 4 + 3
> 8 + 3
>
> the 1st two are far from ideal as the ratios are low 8 + 3, so
> 11 drives per raidz3 vdev would be optimal. This would fit
> nicely with your 26 drive enclosure as you would use 2x11
> drive raidz3 vdevs, 2 hot spares, and two devices left for
> l2arc/zil. Probably best chop up the ssds, mirror the zil and
> stripe the l2arc, assuming you dont want to do down the route
> using generic SSD's rather than write/read optimized ones
>
>
> Yep was going to use your suggestion for l2arc/zil on 2x 128GB
> Corsair Force Series GS, 2.5" which have quite good w/r speeds -
> also I use these on other servers which tend to be quite good and
> reliable.
>
> I think the way to create a mirrored zil and stiped l2arc would be
> to use GPT to partition the drives, then use the zfs features
> across the partitions.
>
>
> Hmm.... so it also looks like I'm gona have to wait a while for
> some more drives then in order to create an 11 disk raidz3 pool.
>
>
> But at least things will be done properly and in a good manner
> rather then going down a patch with "no return".
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Kaya
>
>
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 18:50:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02A84612
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:50:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56C471507
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:50:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
(authenticated bits=0)
by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0RIo5e2045240
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:05 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <52E6AA5D.70303@tundraware.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:05 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: MCA Parity Errors
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:50:05 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: s0RIo5e2045240
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:50:18 -0000
I just replaced mobo/CPU on FBSD server (Gigabyte Z-87-D3HP with
an Intel i3-4130). I am not overclocking an have set vcore up to
1.4V but I continue to see this sort of thing:
MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
Dmesg shows:
MCA: Vendor "GenuineIntel", ID 0x306c3, APIC ID 0
MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
MCA: Bank 0, Status 0x90000040000f0005
MCA: Global Cap 0x0000000000000c07, Status 0x0000000000000000
Is this benign? Is there a way to correct it?
The machine does seem to be running OK but this worries me...
TIA.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 19:11:23 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1B03B99
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from www2140.sakura.ne.jp (www2140.sakura.ne.jp
[IPv6:2403:3a00:101:15:182:48:49:50])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758A91741
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from www2140.sakura.ne.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2140.sakura.ne.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0RJBLUc000531
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:11:21 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from salooncradle@www2140.sakura.ne.jp)
Received: (from salooncradle@localhost)
by www2140.sakura.ne.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id s0RJBLmT000530;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:11:21 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from salooncradle)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:11:21 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <201401271911.s0RJBLmT000530@www2140.sakura.ne.jp>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Delivery Canceling
From: "Costco Shipping Manager" <manager@salooncradle.sakura.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: MailStyleVersion4.2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Costco Shipping Manager <manager@salooncradle.sakura.ne.jp>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:11:23 -0000
Costco
WHOLESALE
Unfortunately the delivery of your order
COS-0047637950
was cancelled since
the specified address of the recipient was not correct. You are
recommended to complete
this form and send it
back with your reply to us.
Please do this within the period of one week - if we dont get your
timely reply you will be paid your money back less 14%.
1998-2014
Costco Wholesale Corporation
All rights reserved
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 19:13:02 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC16C67
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:13:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333431767
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:13:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa1so6267595pad.41
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:13:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=P0Idn9ynALXipa42w39anbOVjVbJi4fhSNjL/pW7ucs=;
b=PEcUSKRgKGrymJFowST5vmKSMFfFlnCQPVJdcXOIY+IMrPsdZS826WiWQqMZniCF4p
fxDozBjE1DoaesjQN3sWMkoaEWTm9OGpbbxEUlYj+9qtZBXAifa4hlreNaZ+tQaDejR5
6IOHbQIXA/3OznzR5DpHfl56IxCHWYhRLH4iJ7GlZAO8ZyBXb2j9F7XMp0wYUDWP1XZ9
9cpG8OZk0MLeBj3XUYY85lilIna+HGImkzU5GOp7fbfz7NiyFV6niawZi1/XP6LagkBR
xos2E90+4sbGSvSTPL2ovIW6XpSSePRj1RB3LJdyisg2KgQbnK8rS2DyAVmOd0lbcNNq
04Ag==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.49.74 with SMTP id s10mr32122775pan.0.1390849981674; Mon,
27 Jan 2014 11:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.92.71 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:13:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E6AA5D.70303@tundraware.com>
References: <52E6AA5D.70303@tundraware.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:13:01 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+tpaK1WHJReECjfZ8fOAXz8Q7WxFzWkGepBK4dGckBGymq5JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MCA Parity Errors
From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:13:02 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>wrote:
> I just replaced mobo/CPU on FBSD server (Gigabyte Z-87-D3HP with
> an Intel i3-4130). I am not overclocking an have set vcore up to
> 1.4V but I continue to see this sort of thing:
>
> MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
>
> Dmesg shows:
>
> MCA: Vendor "GenuineIntel", ID 0x306c3, APIC ID 0
> MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
> MCA: Bank 0, Status 0x90000040000f0005
> MCA: Global Cap 0x0000000000000c07, Status 0x0000000000000000
>
>
> Is this benign? Is there a way to correct it?
>
> The machine does seem to be running OK but this worries me...
>
I think sysutils/mcelog can tell you more about it. The MCE issues I have
seen aren't benign
--
Adam
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 20:56:41 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731ED89F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:56:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A061FF1
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:56:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nebel.ror.de ([91.47.115.193]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with
ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1XDJ-1VJM521C6j-00tPq8 for
<freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:56:33 +0100
Received: by nebel.ror.de (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 303EA5C63; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:56:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by nebel.ror.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2595C62
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:56:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:56:34 +0100 (CET)
From: Volker Nebel <vnebel@web.de>
X-X-Sender: volker@localhost
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: No sound on Macmini with FreeBSD 10
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401272128360.1409@localhost>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uTS9XMQYH+9sIzh/lYGl9xv62p5wyWi86BnO31NG/sBew+kA6jG
hTB2mrvGVH8tMhySxcZ1EqIL2AZ4U5eU/ogLT+J3KcVeAAWypnTZAVsxO9cw4E8rLNNxSI6
quq3u5NzwJAFmX3Uzvu3Bc5hsTZZUwWLOB7F5qKoSOThU9umFNUpPerYIGcADjBnAelayw2
AGrAFrmtjb0V+Ai9HD4xQ==
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:56:41 -0000
Good morning!
Since a few days my Macmini 6.1 is running on FreeBSD 10.0 (yeah, and
FreeBSD alone)! Unfortunately, it does not (yet) produce any sound, and I
really need help on this. I followed the handbook and it looks like,
driver snd_hda is used. [CMD=" "]dmesg | grep hda[/CMD] gives the output
shown below. Soundcard seems to be Cirrus Logic CS4206.
I tried the following steps:
- Find a specific driver for this sound card: Nothing.
- Turn volume up with [CMD=" "]mixer pcm 100 vol 100[/CMD]. Still nothing
to hear.
- Change the value of hw.snd.default_unit to 0,1,2. No effect.
Has anybody a good idea how to proceed?
Don't know, whether the following is relevant: [CMD=" "]kldload
snd_driver[/CMD] gives 6 times "ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range". When
booting, I get this message once.
Best regards,
Volker
dmseg | grep hda gives:
hdac0: <Intel Panther Point HDA Controller> mem 0xa0710000-0xa0713fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
hdacc0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
hdaa0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
pcm0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog)> at nid 11 and 12 on hdaa0
pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa0
pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog Headphones)> at nid 10 on hdaa0
hdacc1: <Intel Panther Point HDA CODEC> at cad 3 on hdac0
hdaa1: <Intel Panther Point Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (6) in association 1! Disabling association.
hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (7) in association 1! Disabling association.
hdac0: <Intel Panther Point HDA Controller> mem 0xa0710000-0xa0713fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
hdacc0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
hdaa0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
pcm0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog)> at nid 11 and 12 on hdaa0
pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa0
pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog Headphones)> at nid 10 on hdaa0
hdacc1: <Intel Panther Point HDA CODEC> at cad 3 on hdac0
hdaa1: <Intel Panther Point Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (6) in association 1! Disabling association.
hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (7) in association 1! Disabling association.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 21:10:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BFACF9E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103D4116F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:10:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e9so9005089qcy.15
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=seibercom.net; s=google;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=07XG4LN7Og1LMP2UqMobxvi9CPLbXWFJnCGgwNmEby4=;
b=CnGXn0s/TOYarLH+W5KyeIPwqsz9tH+I1lI2zZcOimKFFKSrdS1lJIJov2kgYipbW0
YNtPIK3FTOR67K4cYxFc8yzo+fvIXe3cg9N4FXOAul5EyH98VWZE1pnaksLTG40CDmdS
oZZmpK5z08dzTB8ENDFtiauCCfQGI2F489ejs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
:references:reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=07XG4LN7Og1LMP2UqMobxvi9CPLbXWFJnCGgwNmEby4=;
b=J6pWtNXxpawgDtN6t3NY0G0LVnPjYmbQkIc4UqYE1szhLKMYHr7LnJYNPsrh+94hzm
Sn6yiEOMy/7H9E6GWmNeyI+3IVb9jh7FbnzAJ8//V4OSQrpzynE21i/NCVfOUFCYnfnD
MDYj5aW2ZfiT/Hc5MvBmhmFZStieLeDYqgN+53GLsltzXJ+cwF2YfHC3Sfx8dW+w0qtH
4Z3Ja+Z9MBXmsB+wbao6LmtBfDi3cwdVZoK3OsJxgComxf1zusTFTNp2ZQH8VT+b0EZy
P+CbAGmVQy/7Inl4lFThw4u43tgFMetjulKOc8/rnLv4BgyWRyfmsvuDpax66CxidYcz
VWeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmMY5OQnOv+eMDUIT2zCVeIOl0tPD8iuXSiqJxpPt2TcIrerunMxE03Ji0ZjGLRl/2iztPF
X-Received: by 10.229.35.194 with SMTP id q2mr46247383qcd.7.1390857009202;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm19534720qar.12.2014.01.27.13.10.08
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:10:07 -0500
From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net>
To: User questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: No sound on Macmini with FreeBSD 10
Message-ID: <20140127161007.5e1e199b@scorpio>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401272128360.1409@localhost>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401272128360.1409@localhost>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: User questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:10:10 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:56:34 +0100 (CET), Volker Nebel stated:
> Since a few days my Macmini 6.1 is running on FreeBSD 10.0 (yeah, and
> FreeBSD alone)! Unfortunately, it does not (yet) produce any sound,
> and I really need help on this. I followed the handbook and it looks
> like, driver snd_hda is used. [CMD=" "]dmesg | grep hda[/CMD] gives
> the output shown below. Soundcard seems to be Cirrus Logic CS4206.
> I tried the following steps:
> - Find a specific driver for this sound card: Nothing.
> - Turn volume up with [CMD=" "]mixer pcm 100 vol 100[/CMD]. Still
> nothing to hear.
> - Change the value of hw.snd.default_unit to 0,1,2. No effect.
> Has anybody a good idea how to proceed?
> Don't know, whether the following is relevant: [CMD=" "]kldload
> snd_driver[/CMD] gives 6 times "ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range".
> When booting, I get this message once.
Dumb question perhaps, but did you ever have sound working on the unit?
I had a similar situation on a PC running MS Windows. One day there was
just no sound. It turned out the sound card had burnt out.
--
Jerry
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 22:45:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483D394A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:45:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041561923
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:45:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W7uvV-0001s9-GX
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:45:09 +0100
Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net ([86.21.186.149])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:45:09 +0100
Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net
with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:45:09 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Subject: Can't upgrade /lang/ruby19
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:44:44 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <lc6ngs$ea$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net
User-Agent: XPN/1.2.6 (Street Spirit ; FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:45:13 -0000
I am trying to upgrade ruby-1.9.3.484,1 to ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1 (using portupgrade) but am getting the following compiler error on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE:
===> Building for ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1
make[2]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
Is there a workaround, or have I missed something?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 23:10:49 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED3B95EB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E951B2D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c9so8970225qcz.41
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:10:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
bh=Dec55E26dFO15yUhr5jsjlycJi0Un8DiSNS4FRW2ZtI=;
b=Kca2nPiebBmQ+6Ia7RhCUk/074d3xTV8iHf4asIGH+ZB7vu6dEg15Jfl3cnbB0Zi4u
O1eZxRU62wONOuKNcinTsxKoEd/67pYtVkYtOXrKjczFT0IF9QTSJ6drK6l7NR2tkZs2
eB/cekZ3B3eZJoHrbMz4f6XH/WpwFrHiznfke1MzV6w47yqHvX3POvjofq5UhCdmnsRQ
AREbmEpW20icogh5VTeXRZ7y8g8HwcI6ZOfqRaAh0vzUBfbWlm/NtfBrXc8HaWRNs4q3
XdmyVG/Qpa/OojY6VPSqW6Z/jz0JFe7K+PIdpvzuIIUh8NDm0uIfxaoyOEQZMjULyezS
eJ+A==
X-Received: by 10.224.76.70 with SMTP id b6mr47662914qak.19.1390864248933;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:10:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lumiwa.farms.net ([71.241.213.42])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm28934321qaz.8.2014.01.27.15.10.44
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:10:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Ajtim <lumiwa@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: No sound on Macmini with FreeBSD 10
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:10:43 -0500
Message-ID: <1482573.eBeQ4SjVDB@lumiwa.farms.net>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.4 (FreeBSD/10.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.11.4; amd64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401272128360.1409@localhost>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401272128360.1409@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Volker Nebel <vnebel@web.de>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:10:50 -0000
On Monday 27 January 2014 21:56:34 Volker Nebel wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> Since a few days my Macmini 6.1 is running on FreeBSD 10.0 (yeah, and
> FreeBSD alone)! Unfortunately, it does not (yet) produce any sound, and I
> really need help on this. I followed the handbook and it looks like,
> driver snd_hda is used. [CMD=" "]dmesg | grep hda[/CMD] gives the output
> shown below. Soundcard seems to be Cirrus Logic CS4206.
> I tried the following steps:
> - Find a specific driver for this sound card: Nothing.
> - Turn volume up with [CMD=" "]mixer pcm 100 vol 100[/CMD]. Still nothing
> to hear.
> - Change the value of hw.snd.default_unit to 0,1,2. No effect.
> Has anybody a good idea how to proceed?
> Don't know, whether the following is relevant: [CMD=" "]kldload
> snd_driver[/CMD] gives 6 times "ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range". When
> booting, I get this message once.
>
> Best regards,
> Volker
>
>
> dmseg | grep hda gives:
>
> hdac0: <Intel Panther Point HDA Controller> mem 0xa0710000-0xa0713fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
> hdacc0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
> hdaa0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
> pcm0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog)> at nid 11 and 12 on hdaa0
> pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa0
> pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog Headphones)> at nid 10 on hdaa0
> hdacc1: <Intel Panther Point HDA CODEC> at cad 3 on hdac0
> hdaa1: <Intel Panther Point Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
> hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (6) in association 1! Disabling association.
> hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (7) in association 1! Disabling association.
> hdac0: <Intel Panther Point HDA Controller> mem 0xa0710000-0xa0713fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
> hdacc0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
> hdaa0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
> pcm0: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog)> at nid 11 and 12 on hdaa0
> pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa0
> pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog Headphones)> at nid 10 on hdaa0
> hdacc1: <Intel Panther Point HDA CODEC> at cad 3 on hdac0
> hdaa1: <Intel Panther Point Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
> hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (6) in association 1! Disabling association.
> hdaa1: hdaa_audio_as_parse: Duplicate pin 0 (7) in association 1! Disabling association.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
I don't know if will help you but anyway
I have iMac 11,1 and:
cat /dev/sndstat
Installed devices:
pcm0: <ATI R6xx (HDMI)> (play)
pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog 4.0+HP/2.0)> (play/rec) default
pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Analog Line-in)> (rec)
pcm3: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Digital)> (play/rec
I did play with hint and on my computer works:
/boot/loader,conf:
hint.hdaa.1.gpio_config="3=set"
hint.hdaa.1.nid9.config="as=4 seq=15"
After the first one I got sound through internal speakers but not headphones. Than I add the second one and I got sound through headphones but at the same time as through speakers.
I hope that will help you too.
And mine dmesg |grep hda:
dmesg |grep hda
hdac0: <ATI RV770 HDA Controller> mem 0xd0630000-0xd0633fff irq 17 at device 0.1 on pci1
hdac1: <Intel 5 Series/3400 Series HDA Controller> mem 0xd0700000-0xd0703fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
hdacc0: <ATI R6xx HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
hdaa0: <ATI R6xx Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
pcm0: <ATI R6xx (HDMI)> at nid 3 on hdaa0
hdacc1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac1
hdaa1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog 4.0+HP/2.0)> at nid 10,11,9 and 13 on hdaa1
pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Analog Line-in)> at nid 12 on hdaa1
pcm3: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa1
hdac0: <ATI RV770 HDA Controller> mem 0xd0630000-0xd0633fff irq 17 at device 0.1 on pci1
hdac1: <Intel 5 Series/3400 Series HDA Controller> mem 0xd0700000-0xd0703fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
hdacc0: <ATI R6xx HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
hdaa0: <ATI R6xx Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
pcm0: <ATI R6xx (HDMI)> at nid 3 on hdaa0
hdacc1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac1
hdaa1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog 4.0+HP/2.0)> at nid 10,11,9 and 13 on hdaa1
pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Analog Line-in)> at nid 12 on hdaa1
pcm3: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa1
hdac0: <ATI RV770 HDA Controller> mem 0xd0630000-0xd0633fff irq 17 at device 0.1 on pci1
hdac1: <Intel 5 Series/3400 Series HDA Controller> mem 0xd0700000-0xd0703fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
hdacc0: <ATI R6xx HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
hdaa0: <ATI R6xx Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
pcm0: <ATI R6xx (HDMI)> at nid 3 on hdaa0
hdacc1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac1
hdaa1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog 4.0+HP/2.0)> at nid 10,11,9 and 13 on hdaa1
pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Analog Line-in)> at nid 12 on hdaa1
pcm3: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa1
hdac0: <ATI RV770 HDA Controller> mem 0xd0630000-0xd0633fff irq 17 at device 0.1 on pci1
hdac1: <Intel 5 Series/3400 Series HDA Controller> mem 0xd0700000-0xd0703fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0
hdacc0: <ATI R6xx HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac0
hdaa0: <ATI R6xx Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc0
pcm0: <ATI R6xx (HDMI)> at nid 3 on hdaa0
hdacc1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 HDA CODEC> at cad 0 on hdac1
hdaa1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 Audio Function Group> at nid 1 on hdacc1
pcm1: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Analog 4.0+HP/2.0)> at nid 10,11,9 and 13 on hdaa1
pcm2: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Analog Line-in)> at nid 12 on hdaa1
pcm3: <Cirrus Logic CS4206 (Rear Digital)> at nid 16 and 15 on hdaa1
--
Mitja
-------
http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 01:16:16 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDDFC135
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ccm23.constantcontact.com (ccm23.constantcontact.com
[208.75.123.131])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA941533
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ccm27.constantcontact.com (p2-pen4.ad.prodcc.net [10.252.0.104])
by p2-dmail8.ccm23.constantcontact.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D82AFDC96E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:16:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from p2-jbsched02.ad.prodcc.net (p2-pen4.ad.prodcc.net
[10.252.0.104])
by p2-mail202.ccm27.constantcontact.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E2FC24FF1
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:16:03 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; q=dns/txt; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=1000073432;
d=auth.ccsend.com;
h=to:subject:mime-version:message-id:from:date:list-unsubscribe:reply-to;
bh=PhWohY75fcd+y9YsMlIWCrPSIMKAodUJNT6U61xOR1A=;
b=ZsO6vHuorf3+ASLdjcPPDUvOC33Tn/74Fz/So3ZHi/ymOt2CpJ2ILTKOsul0B+nRe0mXFqK4TUZ9YJ/BIcmnO06w61iSUGSla2AoQnJz5JQBZVLZaJiMkt21mMTB2Fo5Bm5EMALFzagOC8HMYnRcTLSy2DL0k66vEFzHeCnqf4k=
Message-ID: <1116372346621.1112599889229.16922.2.13201521@scheduler.constantcontact.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:16:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Shadow Ops Weaponry <general@shdwops.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: $300 for the first 300 Silencers!
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Roving Constant Contact 2009 (http://www.constantcontact.com)
X-Return-Path-Hint: ESC1116372346621_1112599889229_16922_r20@in.constantcontact.com
X-Roving-ID: 1112599889229.16922
X-Lumos-SenderID: 1112599889229
X-Roving-CampaignId: 1116372346621
X-Roving-StreamId: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: general@shdwops.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:16:16 -0000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We're launching our SHDW45, and launching it hard!
On our launch of this new product, we've decided to do a special offer to get our
product in the public hands & through CLASS 3 dealers across the country so they
could see what an amazing device this is. The normal price on these are $599, but
for the first 300 orders, we're letting them sell for a flat $300 each. There is
no restriction on the amount purchased, but this price is better than wholesale
prices from almost every other high quality manufacturer in the country.
You'll never find a 45ACP silencer for this price again. Once we hit serial #300,
this special ends.
This silencer is a special "Cayce" design and utilizes special internal methods
and measurements in order to provide a top 45 ACP silenced performance, as well
as easy maintenance:
Specifications:
Caliber......................................................45 ACP (This can also
be used on 9mm, 10mm, 40 cal firearms with different pistons)
With our heavy spring piston adapter that allows for the flawless functionality
on semi-auto handguns including;
HK, Colt 1911, Smith & Wesson, FNH and Glock semi-auto pistols.
Suppression Sound Level......................-35 to -40 dB (depending on type of
firearm it is used on)
Material...................................................Aircraft Quality 7075-T6
Anodized Aluminum / Stainless steel piston
Method of Attachment............................ 0.578" x 28 Threads (other thread
patterns available)
Weight................................................... 12.5 ounces
Length................................................... 6.5 inches
Diameter............................................... 1.5 inches
Use the following coupon code purchase at this price: SPARTA
We also show an embedded video of what our .45 suppressor sounds like on YouTube.
http://www.shadowopsweaponry.com/products/261-shdw45-acp-silencer.aspx [http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001U9CtNFAEiNP2htP7sRYKsC0DXHnC2rif3ES70ELvvXrg6UuDgvomsMTEQ4XKFDcoiGcw8uPNGi48R0gq5CxejCZkkSeTVty-vviTH8ti3dECajcaEImUWn-SPgEngTXHLyvrs8sm8yQgO2WHKDvocyXjHami4ja5U2GlAurdsgINeySGqADKDA==]
Thanks,
Paul
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forward this email
http://ui.constantcontact.com/sa/fwtf.jsp?llr=nkb5bgmab&m=1112599889229&ea=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org&a=1116372346621
This email was sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org by general@shdwops.com.
Update Profile/Email Address
http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&mse=001_ZFr6KrqiGz6dpScYu-f1sRlGLiR2eIp1k22EulTO2g%3D&t=001GpxJ929912h4d_pTBCZ4CQ%3D%3D&llr=nkb5bgmab
Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe(TM)
http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&mse=001_ZFr6KrqiGz6dpScYu-f1sRlGLiR2eIp1k22EulTO2g%3D&t=001GpxJ929912h4d_pTBCZ4CQ%3D%3D&llr=nkb5bgmab
Privacy Policy:
http://ui.constantcontact.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp
Online Marketing by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com
Shadow Ops Weaponry | 1830 Boston Avenue | Unit E | Longmont | CO | 80501
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 01:17:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC2EE1CA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:17:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BEB1543
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:17:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x10so6456165pdj.39
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:17:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=wFj9fBgUh0DfArzaGabuY8EgGOn8gbYQqrjIZhBpd7Q=;
b=DJw3xlJRCDpZtqlxgzuhKyIhUFzxfx2u2OlVkQ7IiKrqe6sYgN8HXssTC6rZ3fnLBD
OjE/yVlIgSPlP6vMs9X+fhSFtMR0sDWURHyEMmWHNpCy+xV3gWYXsuHHmJWhKPtwnpXi
kBG4GQRjmWEryyblFBQGRqkwcfFFm95VmclfNJaLkE17vvxU5AdubMpk/0k8GPlzNr9M
lmgBPviXbo+KcuadUP6+rt15uNsg1W74yGZWk041PgZbJd2d0jaYeD1amyzRjm8xGRKy
0BeIYMDJZeTEuahdvdFX+McB+CoJ/4y93iL9ysMyofYbSjZFpLHMnEdH6bajqveXx+rX
1sRQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.137.65 with SMTP id qg1mr23413219pbb.124.1390871825339;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.90.138 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:17:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401242352280.95135@wonkity.com>
References: <CAOy9mGrfS2sWi4DMGkKY0j8+SSySog=w3fp4QvLo259bOJ+-bA@mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401242352280.95135@wonkity.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 02:17:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOy9mGqXO7AdkkTedndkLOKQYUR0chmhizFhCXsKHMnQO4QbjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Unable to boot on USB key on Lenovo Thinkpad T440
From: Kata Goto <black.katagoto@gmail.com>
To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:17:05 -0000
2014-01-25 Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Kata Goto wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>>
>> I recently (this week), recieved a Lenovo Thinkpad T440 and I want to
>> install FreeBSD, so I have disabled the secure boot and force the legacy
>> boot mode only.
>> Then I have downloaded an USB image and write it via
>> $ dd if=FreeBSD-9.2-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/da0 bs=64k
>>
>> (I also tried with 10.0-RELEASE)
>> And my laptop refuses to boot on it, even if I force to boot on it (via
>> <F12>).
>> My USB key works well on other computers (they boot on it) and my laptop
>> boots well on an Ubuntu USB key.
>> I have also tried to boot on an external CD Drive, but nothing change :/
>>
>> I am running out of ideas.
>> If you have the same issue or new ideas, please, let me know.
>>
>
> The USB image uses a bare BSDlabel, aka "dangerously dedicated", meaning
> there is no MBR at all. Some versions of Thinkpad firmware had strange
> misconceptions about disk formats. A CD could boot fine, being a more
> common format. Make certain the Thinkpad firmware is the latest version,
> and the USB image might work.
>
> Some work with gpart and dd might be able to convert the USB image to an
> MBR/BSDlabel format which would boot.
>
> Or the problem might not be related to the bare BSDlabel, but that it
> works on everything but the Thinkpad make it a good guess.
>
Thanks,
In fact I have to enable the UEFI USB Boot setting :/
Thanks for all.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 01:28:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2ED12CE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vb0-x22c.google.com (mail-vb0-x22c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22c])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F29315FA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f12so3929577vbg.31
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:28:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=/coA66XhwEMaZ5l3il16hjorarhpdwLaG9mds8WjRo4=;
b=XWU7SeMHZkwxzyax8pHz9NvXJvANTKNPkpi2vp2vDfOGmpTy3sI64s+xHoa8kFUD5r
wm6TjZI8CtqAmckW5A6bLCeUK3FAY3mXpf5/eh7oHQEZJV4HrxrwHgBkQwEFic/ElocR
FpF+MXSq1ojHeyFv0cfoX/J/7tjmuuBNLYKJZ37qMOq5PxOF1P6kVBr9p3orK8OGTmUX
/j1HU6tNn68MdoEn87cuDWiaDjLQjJchYRxEhVdrhFq/msX0r7FPdhBP7+R0NjuN01kN
vgA3NFApzZSW3AUyRHuQi+BlusIlJf2uFse5YFQC61yij/EnBYVVPsFvrEIC7YHmJVNM
R89w==
X-Received: by 10.52.227.7 with SMTP id rw7mr113540vdc.77.1390872505706; Mon,
27 Jan 2014 17:28:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nicolas.geniteau@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.105.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:28:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401242352280.95135@wonkity.com>
References: <CAOy9mGrfS2sWi4DMGkKY0j8+SSySog=w3fp4QvLo259bOJ+-bA@mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401242352280.95135@wonkity.com>
From: Nicolas Geniteau <nicolas@geniteau.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 02:28:05 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: k1_NpYrpVgLlREW2OEaiqB_JZig
Message-ID: <CADw3u-cETBBYZzXSSSGNwSfCMT6Yv_mCyq-08KqWQTJxF0LT9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Unable to boot on USB key on Lenovo Thinkpad T440
To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Kata Goto <black.katagoto@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:28:26 -0000
Hello,
I have the same problem on all HP dc7800 / dc7900 desktops of my university.
2014-01-25 Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>:
> Some work with gpart and dd might be able to convert the USB image to an
> MBR/BSDlabel format which would boot.
As Warren suggested, some work with gpart / dd can resolve the problem :
# dd if=/dev/da0a of=bsd-install.dd bs=4M
# gpart destroy -F da0
# gpart create -s mbr da0
# gpart bootcode -b /boot/mbr da0
# gpart add -t freebsd da0
# gpart set -a active -i 1 da0
# gpart create -s bsd da0s1
# gpart bootcode -b /boot/boot da0s1
# gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -a 4k da0s1
# dd if=bsd-install.dd of=/dev/da0s1a bs=4M
# mount /dev/da0s1a /mnt
# echo "/dev/da0s1a / ufs ro,noatime 1 1" > /mnt/etc/fstab
# umount /mnt
It worked for me. I hope it will work for you too.
--
Nicolas
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 03:13:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FCB946
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:13:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BBC21FB8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:13:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-149-155.dynamic.qsc.de
[92.195.149.155])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25BB3CC14;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:13:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s0S3CbeI002641;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:12:37 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:12:36 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org
Subject: Re: upside down duplexed page -- CUPS issue (was Re: ps problem)
Message-Id: <20140128041236.780f0dfe.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <52E5FC6B.3050600@dreamchaser.org>
References: <52E55D4F.8060803@dreamchaser.org>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1401261331160.29800@wonkity.com>
<52E5E5EA.3060101@dreamchaser.org>
<20140127060551.80c21869.freebsd@edvax.de>
<52E5FC6B.3050600@dreamchaser.org>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:13:12 -0000
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:27:55 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 01/26/14 22:05, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:51:54 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
>
> >> 2. If I print it using
> >> /usr/local/bin/lpr duplex.ps
> >> it comes out with the duplexed page upside down.
> >
> > This will use CUPS's settings which may add a "preample"
> > of PS to the printer to reflect those settings, for example
> > which "duplexing manner" (long or short edge "wrap") will
> > be used.
>
> Except that in this case the %cupsJobsTicket: comment should
> instruct it to use long-edge duplexing, which should override
> any cups default. The default for this printer is no-duplex,
> so if it overrides it shouldn't duplex at all.
Yes, "should", but the reality of complex software teaches that
in many cases, things don't work as they should. :-)
It would be required to capture the "postprocessed" PS that
CUPS sends to the printer to be sure about what _exactly_ will
be sent to the printer. Sometimes printers themselves can
change things (duplex on/off, short/long edge etc.).
> > To find out if those settings exist, open a web browser (bah)
> > and go to http://localhost:631 where you can find the CUPS
> > administration web pages. Check your printer's settings
> > carefully. (I know there's also a lpadmin tool, but haven't
> > bothered learning it because I tend to avoid CUPS whenever
> > possible, because when you have a PS-capable printer, it's
> > probably just useless overhead.)
>
> Checked that already, and it is set by default to not duplex.
> So presumably its preamble would not change the duplexing.
> But the document itself has embedded duplexing along the long
> edge. Why would that result in the short-edge behavior?
The wonder of modern software. :-)
No, honestly: If you already have a good printer that can
understand PS, and you don't require a _specific_ CUPS-only
feature, I'd suggest to get rid of CUPS and use the system's
printer spooler. You'll probably don't need any printer filter
here.
> >> If I create a simple 2 page document in openoffice,
> >> when printing from openoffice, I see the following:
> >>
> >> 3. If printed duplexed direct from OO, duplexed pages are upside down.
> >
> > As expected.
>
> Why? Default is no duplex, but I turned long edge duplex on
> in the print dialog.
Strange case of conflicting pre- and postprocessing maybe?
PS content changes and precedence?
> >> 4. If printed to a pdf file and /usr/bin/lpr is used on the pdf,
> >> no duplexing occurs -- I get two separate sheets.
> >
> > This could be explained by the way OO generates PDF and how
> > the printer filters turn that into PS. Or if your printer is
> > also capable of speaking PDF (directly), no mentioning that
> > it should use duplex is in the PDF input.
>
> ok, at least that part makes sense. /usr/bin/lpr will ignore the
> $cupsJobTicket: statement.
Correct. It will send the PS _as is_ to the printer and let it
deal with the PS content, which is defined by the PS interpreter's
implementation "inside the printer".
> >>From your PS source:
> >
> >> %cupsJobTicket: media=Letter sides=two-sided-long-edge
> >
> > There's also two-sided-short-edge (corresponding to the setting
> > accessible via localhost:631).
>
> That's what I don't understand.
> It says two-sided-long-edge. Why would it be performing as if
> it said two-sided-short-edge?
I'd imagine that there's a conflicting setting somewhere in the
CUPS configuration. Instead of manually searching through the
web interface, you could also search for options related to
"duplex", "edge", or "tumble" in /usr/local/etc/cups in the
configuration files and maybe the PPDs employed. For example,
the string "*DefaultDuplex: DuplexNoTumble" looks promising.
There are other entries related to that concept.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 04:51:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B2D648F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:51:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CAB1682
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:51:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
(authenticated bits=0)
by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0S4oW0D081553
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:50:33 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <52E73717.3000503@tundraware.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:50:31 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Kernel Geniuses: Need Help With MCA Code
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:50:33 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: s0S4oW0D081553
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:51:05 -0000
I am running 9.2 stable i386 r261207. As noted earlier:
>I just replaced mobo/CPU on FBSD server (Gigabyte Z-87-D3HP with
>an Intel i3-4130). I am not overclocking ... but I continue to see this sort of thing:
>MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
Dmesg shows:
>MCA: Vendor "GenuineIntel", ID 0x306c3, APIC ID 0
>MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
>MCA: Bank 0, Status 0x90000040000f0005
>MCA: Global Cap 0x0000000000000c07, Status 0x0000000000000000_
I've swapped CPUs (i5). I've fiddled with an endless supply of
mobo settings. I've switched power supplies. I've moved mem
sticks around .... No joy.
So, I dug through the sources and found this:
mca_log(const struct mca_record *rec)
{
uint16_t mca_error;
printf("MCA: Bank %d, Status 0x%016llx\n", rec->mr_bank,
(long long)rec->mr_status);
printf("MCA: Global Cap 0x%016llx, Status 0x%016llx\n",
(long long)rec->mr_mcg_cap, (long long)rec->mr_mcg_status);
printf("MCA: Vendor \"%s\", ID 0x%x, APIC ID %d\n", cpu_vendor,
rec->mr_cpu_id, rec->mr_apic_id);
printf("MCA: CPU %d ", rec->mr_cpu);
if (rec->mr_status & MC_STATUS_UC)
printf("UNCOR ");
else {
printf("COR ");
if (rec->mr_mcg_cap & MCG_CAP_CMCI_P)
printf("(%lld) ", ((long long)rec->mr_status &
MC_STATUS_COR_COUNT) >> 38);
}
It looks like the trailing else clause is kicking out the error but I am
unclear what the error means, beyond the fact that it appears to be a parity
error somewhere within the CPU's internal memory (cache?). Is this error
getting corrected? Is this benign, Should I get a different mobo?
Um .... Haaaaalp :)
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 04:54:23 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738A0528
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73721694
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net
[71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0)
by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.7/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s0S4sEBf000290
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:54:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: TCP Port Capture
From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140128005911.GA31430@neutralgood.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:54:14 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E024B57B-B5A0-41B6-B58A-44B88940F3EA@lafn.org>
References: <995B2B03-C742-4FF9-82FE-3D0EDA8529D2@lafn.org>
<20140128005911.GA31430@neutralgood.org>
To: kpneal@pobox.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at zoom.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:54:23 -0000
On 27 January 2014, at 16:59, kpneal@pobox.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:41:32AM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a process that is occasionally giving me a situation that I =
don't understand. It listens to a well-known port and processes =
requests received on that report. It does return data to the calling =
system. When a request is received, a child process is created that =
actually does most of the work. The child process uses another process =
via a pipe during the processing to obtain some data it uses.
>>=20
>> Occasionally, the main process exits with nothing logged. I suspect =
its doing an exit, but thats just a guess at this time. Some of the =
time (fairly infrequently), the main process cannot be restarted. The =
process at the end of the pipe is now shown as having the port open. =
lsof shows that. If I restart that process, then the main process can =
be restarted properly.
>>=20
>> Why would the process at the end of the pipe end up being attached to =
the port? Unfortunately, the system always seems to be quiet (no =
requests in process) when this happens so nothing is logged by any =
process. Normally I have a monitoring process that detects the main =
process being gone and restarts it. But that doesn't work when the port =
is held by the final process.
>=20
> It sounds like the process at the end of the pipe has inherited the =
network
> ports that are open in the parent at the time the process is created.
>=20
> When using fork() the child process has all the same open files =
(including
> network connections and ports) as the parent. And after using one of =
the
> exec family of functions the child process _still_ has all the open =
files
> it had before the exec.
>=20
> Good housekeeping is in order when creating child processes. Before =
doing
> the exec of the program at the end of the pipe that process should =
close
> all files that are not needed by the pipe-writing-program.
That appears to be a reasonable explanation. I don't know if I have =
access to all the source, but I will see if I can trace that out. =
Thanks.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 05:36:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04862771
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:36:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bsdbox.co (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4F418DD
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:36:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.bsdbox.co (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A86382388CB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:36:00 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <52E741BF.2050703@bsdbox.co>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:35:59 +1100
From: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Missing PHP libraries after 10.0-RELEASE upgrade
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:36:10 -0000
During my upgrade from 9.2-RELEASE to 10.0-RELEASE the ports tree was
broken [0]. This upset the standard freebsd-update major release upgrade
process [1]: at the portmaster -f point, most builds failed due to the
STAGEDIR debacle. By the time the ports tree was fixed and I was able to
successfully reinstall all ports, the final freebsd-update install
command returned the message that there was nothing to do. I rebooted
and thought nothing of it. A couple days later, I've tried to update
lang/php55 and all lang/php55-extensions to 5.5.8 (from 5.5.7); PHP
successfully updated but all extensions are failing due to missing
libraries:
/usr/ports/lang/php55-extensions # make install clean
===> Found saved configuration for php55-extensions-1.8
===> php55-extensions-1.8 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found
===> Fetching all distfiles required by php55-extensions-1.8 for building
===> Extracting for php55-extensions-1.8
===> Patching for php55-extensions-1.8
===> php55-extensions-1.8 depends on file:
/usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found
!---------------------------------[ highlight
]---------------------------------!
===> php55-extensions-1.8 depends on file:
/usr/local/lib/php/20121212/bz2.so - not found
!--------------------------------------[/]--------------------------------------!
===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/php/20121212/bz2.so in
/usr/ports/archivers/php55-bz2
===> Staging for php55-bz2-5.5.8
===> php55-bz2-5.5.8 depends on file:
/usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found
===> Generating temporary packing list
!---------------------------------[ highlight
]---------------------------------!
install:
/var/ports/basejail/usr/ports/archivers/php55-bz2/work/php-5.5.8/ext/bz2/modules/bz2.so:
No such file or directory
*** [do-install] Error code 71
!--------------------------------------[/]--------------------------------------!
I am running into the same problem on both systems that I upgraded from
9.2-RELEASE [2].
How do I fix this?
Thanks.
[0] r340369
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=340369
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.0R/installation.html
freebsd-update fetch
freebsd-update install
freebsd-update -r 10.0-RELEASE upgrade
freebsd-update install
reboot
freebsd-update install
portmaster -f
freebsd-update install
reboot
[2] uname -a
FreeBSD idhs 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789: Thu Jan 16
22:34:59 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
FreeBSD scif 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789: Fri Jan 17
01:46:25 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
--
bsdbox.co
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 08:03:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FC8E2CE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.99])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601F4128A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [87.78.0.77] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W83dz-0004fk-Su; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:03:40 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:03:39 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Can't upgrade /lang/ruby19
Message-ID: <20140128080339.GA4970@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <lc6ngs$ea$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <lc6ngs$ea$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:03:48 -0000
Hi Walter!
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:44:44PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade ruby-1.9.3.484,1 to ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1 (using port=
upgrade) but am getting the following compiler error on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEAS=
E:
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D> Building for ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1
> make[2]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
>=20
> Is there a workaround, or have I missed something?
Apparently, it's not only lang/ruby19. See thread "weird error
messages with various ports" from yesterday. The ports/some ports
seems to be messed up. I don't know what happened.
If you happen to use ports with svn, you could use revision
341159. This one worked for me. I did not check whether any updates to
the ports tree resolved the issue, but I assume you used the latest
one, so I guess it ain't resolved yet.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 08:36:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A65BF72
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:36:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5393614FE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:36:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id uo5so82217pbc.13
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:36:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=AOQIi01FnkNHvpc0BcnGvfV3ascXnk3F6z5G5418YPc=;
b=teIIp5rPjhhOuyNhFvQcczkNZHKX/dyQBLSenE8C06bLK50cHUCB05NnEdg1hXcovo
zc9gbRZJRVgHwFJTkVmX7dJuLEDGEju/LYW2gWEphRdY6ohLkdIpS3pwOedNs+lXXsTX
CfZ29E0tWVDeYpffcDiZFQSyTw/Sde2DDfQL6KgxPp61GH/jKG590pZTclT6VkoQOz5H
teXirgp8clWbJKd2/I3BQYpxG+qbFJQHg+Pgr+9y3Gplg+FMHbJWVjLh1VsFHhryM9vA
cqi7MLOJVE7UnrZX7BMFeIxvmSd8lpAeQKPVvl2MGuC82qLNsBawhMSOwwgCohtcQZ+y
hqPw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.171.4 with SMTP id aq4mr249306pbc.150.1390898211968; Tue,
28 Jan 2014 00:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.16.230 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:36:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CANmv3=wDOTDP8RwrUaxv_TKMyD-=ytyX9jviQHy8beJdqQ-7Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: PHP APC on FreeBSD 10
From: Ross <basarevych@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:36:52 -0000
Hello.
I updated FreeBSD from 9.2 to 10 and reinstalled all the ports (using
portupgrade, no pkg).
Now I have a problem with pecl-APC. With about 50% probability I get error
500 from apache instead of the page.
Disabling APC extension seems to solve the problem, but I need it. Does
anyone know a solution?
I have this in /var/log/httpd-error.log:
(pid 20018) terminated due to uncaught signal '10' (Bus error)
And this in virtual host's log:
FastCGI: incomplete headers (0 bytes) received from server
APC-related settings in php.ini:
apc.shm_size = 128M
apc.mmap_file_mask=/dev/zero
And sysctl.conf:
kern.ipc.shmmax=1073741824
kern.ipc.shmall=262144
Versions:
apache22-worker-mpm-2.2.26
php5-5.4.24
pecl-APC-3.1.14_1 (which is 3.1.13 actually according to SVN log)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 08:45:02 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD3460F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:45:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.101])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BD9015CB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:45:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [87.78.0.77] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W84HF-0001xF-Ot; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:44:14 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:44:13 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Can't upgrade /lang/ruby19
Message-ID: <20140128084154.GA16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <lc6ngs$ea$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <lc6ngs$ea$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:45:02 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:44:44PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade ruby-1.9.3.484,1 to ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1 (using portupgrade) but am getting the following compiler error on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE:
>
> ===> Building for ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1
> make[2]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
>
> Is there a workaround, or have I missed something?
I just tried the latest svn revision (341124) and lang/ruby19 compiles
just fine. Maybe you only need to update your ports tree to the very
latest.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 08:46:56 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B907178E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:46:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de
[80.67.29.24])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487B515E7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:46:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [87.78.0.77] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W84JA-0000Zs-7P
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:46:12 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:46:11 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140128084611.GB16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:46:56 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:05:19PM +0100, lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am doing
> everything ok.
>
> I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and everything was
> just fine.
>
> Until I did a
>
> $ sudo portsnap fetch update
>
> today and afterwards a
>
> $ sudo portmaster -aD
>
> which told me that it wanted to update lang/ruby19. I confirmed its
> wish and it started making this port. After a couple of seconds it
> failed with the following error message:
>
> ruby library version = 1.9
> configure: creating ./config.status
> config.status: creating Makefile
> config.status: creating ruby-1.9.pc
> ===> Building for ruby-1.9.3.484_1,1
> make[2]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
>
> make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby19/work/ruby-1.9.3-p484
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby19
> *** Error code 1
>
> I did some research but could not find anything. I tried to rebuild
> security/openssl, which failed with the following error message:
>
> generating dummy tests (if needed)...
>
> Since you've disabled or enabled at least one algorithm, you need to do
> the following before building:
>
> make depend
>
> Configured for BSD-x86_64.
> /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|^MANDIR=.*$|MANDIR=$(MANPREFIX)/man|' -e
> 's|$(LIBDIR)/pkgconfig|libdata/pkgconfig|g' -e 's|LIBVERSION=[^ ]*
> |LIBVERSION=8 |'
> /usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.1f/Makefile
> ===> Building for openssl-1.0.1_9
> make[2]: don't know how to make WHOLE_ARCHIVE_FLAG. Stop
>
> make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl/work/openssl-1.0.1f
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make: stopped in /usr/ports/security/openssl
>
> I tried some other ports, too, like mail/mutt, which fails during the
> build of www/lynx ("don't know how to make helpdir") ... One port did
> work, though, lang/go.
>
> What is going on here? Has my make environment some sort of amnesia?
>
> Thanks for help in advance!
>
> I'm happy to provide more information if needed.
For the record: with the latest svn revision (341124), at least
lang/ruby19 compiles just fine again.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 08:49:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F3F49BE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:49:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.40])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FD01614
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:49:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [87.78.0.77] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W84MS-00012A-7z; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:49:36 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:49:35 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re:
[freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140128084935.GC16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:49:45 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:30:02PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:12 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:03:26PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
> > > _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
> > > > > lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am
> > > > > > doing everything ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > do not worry to much about this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and
> > > > > > everything was just fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > I do the same.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Until I did a
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ sudo portsnap fetch update
> > > > > >
> > > > > > today and afterwards a
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ sudo portmaster -aD
> > > > > >
> > > > > I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning
> > > > > but I used svn and portupgrade without any problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
> > > >
> > > > Three days old.
> > > >
> > > ok, get the latest one and try again. If it still does not work, I
> > > could give you the revision number of my working ports tree.
> >
> > It still does not work. However, I do not have a revision number,
> > IIUC, because I'm updating my ports with portsnap and not with svn,
> > right? I might try to checkout ports anew and see whether that works
> > then.
>
> of course.
>
> You might should consider to switch to svn and portupgrade. There is
> one advantage of this pair. Portupgrade does not leave you with a
> machine that cannot be used anymore. The worst case is that no port
> gets upgraded but your machine still works. Svn has the advantage that
> you can chose your port 'version' if the current revision does not work
> for you.
I can see why a ports tree that is being checked out with svn instead
of being updated with portsnap might be a wise choice, but I'm not
quite sure if I understand correctly what the abilities of portupgrade
are that portmaster lacks? Do you want to elaborate on that? ;)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 09:00:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 130AFCD8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22d.google.com (mail-ea0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97C6016DE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:59:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id d10so63227eaj.18
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:59:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to
:mime-version:content-type;
bh=dcOV1vGCqyCFNlHEPqCSN83ZDQdFuzj5VM8giP7epgQ=;
b=IyOyM3+A8AuXkcq3e7+/BenbGqqcjF87JfDg1JYVf4O1QZpLYLt34lEj1+xIRtvI/A
KgDoaQyg7CxMjR7eJQm3Kooj9DKZ9EhmM90aR+PpF2H5vFPSNXje9DxhUVAjYdO2X3tb
6QIKd0wwAq0iMxtJ4koWs3eMsi1htAcPzOeQt6KkL0uqCV4kWaUqsmOLkoC+b3BrRWp4
7uNvf6NYA+o3iMtPVGCB7Zlb7ikv5d45jm81IKCJ0IOB4bMXL3nvssCU3gSjsgyqaQ4p
NC1p/RpiAuam8p4XyAsxN0751HeQMs5EvK52x6sueVxV2OhRI+ZIFbxKTw2kqHzE8z2N
a89g==
X-Received: by 10.15.61.7 with SMTP id h7mr373077eex.49.1390899597924;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:59:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([81.213.83.53])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm53041660eed.14.2014.01.28.00.59.56
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:59:47 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-9?Q?G=F6k=FEin?= Akdeniz <goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Can't upgrade /lang/ruby19
Message-Id: <20140128105947.c8af32a0d55c088734275ca2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140128080339.GA4970@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <lc6ngs$ea$1@ger.gmane.org>
<20140128080339.GA4970@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg="PGP-SHA1";
boundary="Signature=_Tue__28_Jan_2014_10_59_47_+0200_5KC6cLKg+eUiFJyo"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:00:00 -0000
--Signature=_Tue__28_Jan_2014_10_59_47_+0200_5KC6cLKg+eUiFJyo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:03:39 +0100 tarihinde
_1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> yazm=FD=FE:
> If you happen to use ports with svn, you could use revision
> 341159. This one worked for me. I did not check whether any updates to
> the ports tree resolved the issue, but I assume you used the latest
> one, so I guess it ain't resolved yet.
>=20
It is fixed. Update your ports tree and start upgrading.
--=20
G=F6k=FEin Akdeniz <goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com>
--Signature=_Tue__28_Jan_2014_10_59_47_+0200_5KC6cLKg+eUiFJyo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)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=P89x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Tue__28_Jan_2014_10_59_47_+0200_5KC6cLKg+eUiFJyo--
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 09:24:59 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BFBC368
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:24:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D17191E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:24:59 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=B7sS+NAnPb8wyLczxCnNO4x1FwxIvWLUnjGAODzVq1g=;
b=Sx01eMbKqigy9ZXHj5gtsejxtToD0Sy6xBjM9VDxXlPSPA23OsCA4brCJNSIIdU+gsMmoPRpWW6NTH5RDnWS1GCG3cSR3cG0RZ4YDUCkaacrG5Vbr+8M8c/u1fKo7HiChZupGEIqJuyBz3laRw/dxJHN4fkrzqjh2L5ycATtEXk=;
Received: from [182.10.249.147] (port=13108 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W84uf-001BTD-CP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 02:24:58 -0700
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:24:49 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re:
[freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140128172449.73adf28a@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140128084935.GC16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140128084935.GC16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:24:59 -0000
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:49:35 +0100
_1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
> I can see why a ports tree that is being checked out with svn instead
> of being updated with portsnap might be a wise choice, but I'm not
> quite sure if I understand correctly what the abilities of portupgrade
> are that portmaster lacks? Do you want to elaborate on that? ;)
portupgrade never left an un-usable machine after an upgrade for me. As
such, I have no reason to look for any other tool.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 09:35:40 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BAB803
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:35:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bsdbox.co (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA6219EC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:35:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.bsdbox.co (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 263E62388DA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:35:36 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <52E779E7.8010800@bsdbox.co>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:35:35 +1100
From: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re:
[freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140128084935.GC16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140128172449.73adf28a@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140128172449.73adf28a@X220.alogt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:35:40 -0000
On 28/01/2014 8:24 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:49:35 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can see why a ports tree that is being checked out with svn instead
>> of being updated with portsnap might be a wise choice, but I'm not
>> quite sure if I understand correctly what the abilities of portupgrade
>> are that portmaster lacks? Do you want to elaborate on that? ;)
>
> portupgrade never left an un-usable machine after an upgrade for me. As
> such, I have no reason to look for any other tool.
>
> Erich
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
It's left my machine unserviceable a couple times too.
Portmaster bails out mid-upgrade if it can't build one port, sometimes
leaving apps broken if only so many dependencies are upgraded or if
Portmaster deletes a package before realizing it can't build the upgrade.
At least portupgrade carries on building what can be built and has a
couple extra functions that Portmaster lacks, which adds to its appeal.
I used to prefer Portmaster for the --packages-build option, which is
incompatible with pkgng, so I think I'll move to portupgrade.
--
bsdbox.co
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 11:01:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D9EB4E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:01:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9192510EC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:01:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W86Pz-0005kc-T2
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:01:23 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:01:23 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:01:23 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:01:00 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:01:26 -0000
I have installed the Skype package really just to test my webcam and the
in-built microphone. Sadly the microphone doesn't appear to work.
I've followed the instructions found on the various FreeBSD-specific
info sites but am now stuck. The webcam is a Logitech C310, using
FreeBSD 10 stable.
I don't care about skype, like I said I just wanted to test things out.
But I would like to see if I can get the microphone working.
Below, is the dmesg output for this particular device, should it help:
uaudio0: <vendor 0x046d product 0x081b, class 239/2, rev 2.00/0.10, addr
3> on usbus3
uaudio0: No playback.
uaudio0: Record: 48000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
uaudio0: Record: 32000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
uaudio0: Record: 24000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
uaudio0: Record: 16000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
uaudio0: No MIDI sequencer.
pcm2: <USB audio> on uaudio0
uaudio0: No HID volume keys found.
Is there anything I can try, any ideas?
Cheers, Jamie.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 11:34:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 915E839A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:34:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sh4-5.1blu.de (sh4-5.1blu.de [178.254.11.41])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CC1131A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ftp51246-2575596 by sh4-5.1blu.de with local (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de>)
id 1W86vb-0008P2-KF; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:34:03 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:34:03 +0100
From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Message-ID: <20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:34:12 -0000
El día Tuesday, January 28, 2014 a las 11:01:00AM +0000, James Griffin escribió:
> I have installed the Skype package really just to test my webcam and the
> in-built microphone. Sadly the microphone doesn't appear to work.
>
> I've followed the instructions found on the various FreeBSD-specific
> info sites but am now stuck. The webcam is a Logitech C310, using
> FreeBSD 10 stable.
>
> I don't care about skype, like I said I just wanted to test things out.
> But I would like to see if I can get the microphone working.
>
> Below, is the dmesg output for this particular device, should it help:
>
>
> uaudio0: <vendor 0x046d product 0x081b, class 239/2, rev 2.00/0.10, addr
> 3> on usbus3
> uaudio0: No playback.
> uaudio0: Record: 48000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
> uaudio0: Record: 32000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
> uaudio0: Record: 24000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
> uaudio0: Record: 16000 Hz, 1 ch, 16-bit S-LE PCM format, 2x8ms buffer.
> uaudio0: No MIDI sequencer.
> pcm2: <USB audio> on uaudio0
> uaudio0: No HID volume keys found.
>
> Is there anything I can try, any ideas?
What does show 'mixer' about?
Btw: you can test recording with for example:
# dd if=/dev/dsp of=/tmp/mastersVoice
and play it back the same way switching if= and of=
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 11:39:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66AB8454;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sh4-5.1blu.de (sh4-5.1blu.de [178.254.11.41])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CA0E133B;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:39:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ftp51246-2575596 by sh4-5.1blu.de with local (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de>)
id 1W870r-0000mH-Fx; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:39:29 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:39:29 +0100
From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: netbook Asus T100 && FreeBSD
Message-ID: <20140128113929.GB31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:39:31 -0000
Hi,
The new netbook from Asus, the T100, looks very nice. One can remove the
keyboard and it works like a small tablett PC:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7NgPvQZr7A&cc_load_policy=1
See also
http://liliputing.com/2013/10/booting-ubuntu-asus-transformer-book-t100.html
about a test with Ubuntu. Any tests with FreeBSD done already?
Thx
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 12:16:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C0CF66
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:16:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F67168E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:16:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W87as-0003uR-2u
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:16:42 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:16:42 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:16:42 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:16:18 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:16:45 -0000
On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
> What does show 'mixer' about?
>
> Btw: you can test recording with for example:
>
> # dd if=/dev/dsp of=/tmp/mastersVoice
>
> and play it back the same way switching if= and of=
>
> matthias
Hi matthias, mixer command shows this:
Mixer vol is currently set to 75:75
Mixer pcm is currently set to 75:75
Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100
Mixer line is currently set to 1:1
Mixer mic is currently set to 67:67
Mixer cd is currently set to 74:74
Mixer mix is currently set to 100:100
Mixer rec is currently set to 72:72
Mixer igain is currently set to 0:0
Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100
Mixer monitor is currently set to 67:67
Recording source: cd
I looked at someones website, they described modifying a file
/compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf - i haven't tried it yet, maybe
some settings in this will help?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 12:35:28 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53EE875
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:35:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nm37.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm37.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
[212.82.96.62])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D126F1891
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:35:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [212.82.98.55] by nm37.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Jan 2014 12:32:08 -0000
Received: from [46.228.39.71] by tm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Jan 2014 12:32:08 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp108.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
28 Jan 2014 12:32:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024;
t=1390912328; bh=q9+4dx8FYVziV+6vUUrRTpSn4uETDYZiW8xAd3djJNQ=;
h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Received:X-Google-DKIM-Signature:X-Received:MIME-Version:Received:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Content-Type;
b=veMFsEFtOLs3qySHB6qUv8hKyLW4UfeNqQ1jCXeyYtiQN2aTjQ2fqjcZc1W38FS2TcLPJRuujlxZIuBZIUGFeuVzE3GnYeBVBbu3vQ6AsbxCT28noclcKxJHLRQyodkq4ny7DtcV2vvN8HxS+E+AxWs6bloLS8rK0EcemaASsFI=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 665614.80261.bm@smtp108.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: gpav5ZoVM1nxIA2Njg9ugvgofUKiUsDTDqwrq1x3byVDdez
CMBxB6UQScaetq9SnbJvvE.ACYLqGqDZOckREXrmqW01ATkwaPuN3rrjv86W
3Xb_CVuRDVCKCKZnQiHYRQY5nalczniRJA6sg9uWbuykoOhkc74wE5JmkjKX
Li0ix.Z1iGaJcWuh_JmvsQZ7eIYxqE1piR_vYMJyHrTwKBtDbc_lW_21mHtx
IYXoy.ZeNm1TzcjOYqvYIqb6Q37wNHUprPQCRX7t2V87WCR6CqghV3rZhnHg
Iy6EkyiqwH4V4_hz0Cz2OSn_h16JN_8de7RirzsM5aJdVjgO1BBQtQtl_kJ_
.DkBxmM5DpPsmzvmj_42QPUTNkF30fCtwmsz0KLJpVeWUVLKuR_FoEDupRdX
RtUmvmMvzP1X_U0Yf3S2r5YJku8OBK03b2_jLK35oQzSO6nqV9xH_7ERtQeK
d6pWQDXNcM_mAZhks3Z7tKwuJCRjWBORCPe169vVKfCoPFUBHB9krSINAZmq
2sQhqkutPBr0oShKXoxHmjqJtnhq1KZsta6xEGFUIoTGt
X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u
X-Rocket-Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.216.49 with
plain [98.139.211.125])
by smtp108.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2014 12:32:08 +0000 UTC
Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w8so348919qac.22
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:32:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=q9+4dx8FYVziV+6vUUrRTpSn4uETDYZiW8xAd3djJNQ=;
b=NDlQh2BWxfcbNwhOZVFMdxqxpPDVhw5DzgSGBfX4svchnZVFqksczIcQo8V+adWaUU
LNDnMJIq4uckCBpyDWKf1MMsPuXYgaJqoXEfr+lPHZVRJ/AJutAfRI2FnA/xDAo3SoMd
1pZihw+1FsHJuWqYzmNjCTKm8VqdqqYh35ImfNcV6ucJJXECamA2Xkiqj0NB4Uo6qpYP
2d82BBsanoEFaBydQsGU3Rl+rXd20D4bIJ6h2hrXrgEyJD+R5L51ZfZnVL14acN3UApj
4E65IuZOdf+8MgGM7uZ+T1MSB/XIIk5dxPkq79xrR3wZqRjfB2Ykn4ARCygBi1vLtoxW
Z2aA==
X-Received: by 10.140.37.146 with SMTP id r18mr1611960qgr.61.1390912327022;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:32:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.161.193 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:31:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Alexandre <axelbsd@ymail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:31:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+8gk9-S-cQwjKNv-=m0uibHL=sjM1qjHigKpAHohunwG8cifw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: MakeWhatis Output Error
To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:35:28 -0000
Hi,
I upgraded my server from 9.2-RELEASE to 10.0-RELEASE using freebsd-update
tool, but I received these message from 'periodic weekly' cron task :
--------------------------
Rebuilding locate database:
Rebuilding whatis database:
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_base_set.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_disable.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_enable.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_free.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_new.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_read.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_settimeout.3.gz: No such file
or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_write.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/bufferevent_write_buffer.3.gz: No such file
or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_add.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_add_buffer.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_add_printf.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_add_vprintf.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_drain.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_find.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_free.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_new.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_read.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_readline.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evbuffer_write.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_clear_nameservers_and_suspend.3.gz:
No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_config_windows_nameservers.3.gz: No
such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_count_nameservers.3.gz: No such file
or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_err_to_string.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_nameserver_add.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_nameserver_ip_add.3.gz: No such file
or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_resolv_conf_parse.3.gz: No such file
or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_resolve_ipv4.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_resolve_reverse.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_resume.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_search_add.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_search_clear.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_search_ndots_set.3.gz: No such file
or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_set_log_fn.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evdns_shutdown.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_add.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_base_dispatch.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_base_loop.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_base_loopexit.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_base_set.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_del.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_dispatch.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_initialized.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_loop.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_loopexit.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_once.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_pending.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_priority_init.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_priority_set.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/event_set.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evhttp_free.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evhttp_start.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evtimer_add.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evtimer_del.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evtimer_initialized.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evtimer_pending.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/evtimer_set.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/signal_add.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/signal_del.3.gz: No such file or directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/signal_initialized.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/signal_pending.3.gz: No such file or
directory
makewhatis: /usr/local/man/man3/signal_set.3.gz: No such file or directory
--------------------------
Content of the directory /usr/local/man/man3
--------------------------
root@DL365G2-1:/usr/local/man/man3 # ls -al
total 76
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 5632 Jan 22 09:24 .
drwxr-xr-x 28 root wheel 512 Jan 28 13:18 ..
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1273 Dec 12 18:17 bind_textdomain_codeset.3.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1282 Dec 12 18:17 bindtextdomain.3.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_base_set.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_disable.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_enable.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_free.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_new.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_read.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_settimeout.3.gz
-> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_write.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 bufferevent_write_buffer.3.gz
-> ../man/-.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 39 Dec 12 18:17 dcgettext.3.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 40 Dec 12 18:17 dcngettext.3.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 39 Dec 12 18:17 dgettext.3.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 40 Dec 12 18:17 dngettext.3.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_add.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_add_buffer.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_add_printf.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_add_vprintf.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_drain.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_find.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_free.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_new.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_read.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_readline.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evbuffer_write.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4659 Dec 12 18:14 evdns.3.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14
evdns_clear_nameservers_and_suspend.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14
evdns_config_windows_nameservers.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_count_nameservers.3.gz
-> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_err_to_string.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_init.3.gz -> evdns.3.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_nameserver_add.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_nameserver_ip_add.3.gz
-> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_resolv_conf_parse.3.gz
-> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_resolve_ipv4.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_resolve_reverse.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_resume.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_search_add.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_search_clear.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_search_ndots_set.3.gz
-> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_set_log_fn.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evdns_shutdown.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5596 Dec 12 18:14 event.3.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_add.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_base_dispatch.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_base_loop.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_base_loopexit.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_base_set.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_del.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_dispatch.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Dec 12 18:14 event_init.3.gz -> event.3.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_initialized.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_loop.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_loopexit.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_once.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_pending.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_priority_init.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_priority_set.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 event_set.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evhttp_free.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evhttp_start.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evtimer_add.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evtimer_del.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evtimer_initialized.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evtimer_pending.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 evtimer_set.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1942 Dec 12 18:17 gettext.3.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1139 Dec 12 18:17 ngettext.3.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8027 Jan 15 17:37 pkg_printf.3.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1020 Jan 15 17:37 pkg_repos.3.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 signal_add.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 signal_del.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 signal_initialized.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 signal_pending.3.gz ->
../man/-.gz
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Dec 12 18:14 signal_set.3.gz -> ../man/-.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1058 Dec 12 18:17 textdomain.3.gz
--------------------------
Can I remove these links or another solution is available to solve this
problem?
Thank for your help.
Kind regards,
Alexandre
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 13:24:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2CD86BB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:24:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com
[209.85.215.52])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6961D36
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:24:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c6so313647lan.25
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent;
bh=sD18qY1tNXqI8gdqizGnLcbnmcK8W+214rIxHahzhqk=;
b=cX3I/hb/030VBnvil5NmOjnDcJ75j9ECwIj0NZqH9I0mnxyvEfQpP5Oh7QfZXJ/0BU
SLrGZ6HfJnbY+p406gtZKfdg+u5BR2YaswfcEUL979F4ZqDmmTCEFEGlmiu4lMjXOmWe
6qo8nnEfXSUtdbewFebTCgOijdbhXAeFwKPqp5fxoWsmVkTilz2hYyZ2v9tSSgYUdzUg
AeAaXwJUFX6kLK8YUl0hR9FhMFgDzLsJUrK4eKKTuvlLRBALoSIaKe6d9A0dRFFBA2X+
gBUMRzSMz/c44xbXw0pP2WdClLbILUsIdN6jZk4rj0C9pLumM91zHF8/lE6Er0gMYlAo
UtZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnfUjePJYj0qg0oLhv8tURe5HkscKO+0nj+8R3wFbhnjtqwGT6UP5/8rCIl8xuy0xFRoE5
X-Received: by 10.152.161.234 with SMTP id xv10mr976324lab.41.1390915471144;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:24:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (off-40.addr.fotocdn.net. [193.105.179.40])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j1sm23041688laj.3.2014.01.28.05.24.28
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:24:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:24:27 +0400
From: Vagner <vagner@bsdway.ru>
To: FreeBSD questions Mail List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Geom error 11
Message-ID: <20140128132427.GA89022@vager-wrk.bsdway.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD questions Mail List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:24:40 -0000
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everybody!
I've created geom stripe raid for my SSD drives. But when I gave load to
this raid, I've got error:=20
> <kern.crit> server kernel:
> g_vfs_done():stripe/st0a[WRITE(offset=3D214821666816, length=3D32768)]err=
or =3D 11
and mine server was gone...
In src tree I've found that this happend because we've called function
g_io_transient_map_bio(struct bio *bp); We try to allocate
memory for transient_arena and get error in g_io_deliver(bp, EDEADLK);
g_io_transient_map_bio was called by function g_down_procbody(void
*arg) there. So, could you tell me, why we try to execute function
g_io_transient_map_bio(struct bio *bp), and where kthread
g_down_procbody(void *arg) was runs for execution? I think this error mean =
that
I haven't kernel memory space for allocate transient_arena object. But I
think what attempt for allocate memory is effect of some error... May be
somebody had error like this. Could you help me?
My OS version: 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r255421M
Thanks a lot!
--=20
Respectfully,
Stanislav Putrya
Lead System administrator
FotoStrana.Ru Ltd. (DBA Department)
ICQ IM: 328585847
Jabber-GoogleTalk: root.vagner
mob.phone SPB: +79215788755
email: vagner[at]bsdway.ru
email: putrya[at]playform.ru
email: root.vagner[at]gmail.com
site: bsdway.ru
site: fotostrana.ru
----------------------------------------
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign
X - against HTML, vCards and
/ \ - proprietary attachments in e-mail
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS56+FAAoJEJ+YE8DIktFdVz0H/ifjoK036Gb1q9lpeXguF6N1
t0355x6f0SM2Wg7kSjUlo+QBTr0xE1zHRQ+TjL/wYyh+tcG80/PJHPgapbzd7Fos
sNf6aMY3Y7WW3uMDeBFElYVmKqlPtKkcpO9Tlfjj18Dsmcok9QblnwS2Qv1ZUpxV
RqPJUwuZamXz2KjpOlSiittZSetI4rBCCTg8dnnCy8mikhTf2tG1fVpBNrKHZw38
VtjRF8jv6q7vCCRUAsQMWnbE+DH3Io0M9j8T3yNekcLLpSuc4QE08ZUgCaPeQDjz
I1MTBezsOj/DAuKQvFaHgmkzuFLm2HFXeTqwIJU+xbLFce7Ts7cQ8oEljoFCJdw=
=K+dY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 13:27:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49B2763
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sh4-5.1blu.de (sh4-5.1blu.de [178.254.11.41])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87CF91D54
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ftp51246-2575596 by sh4-5.1blu.de with local (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de>)
id 1W88hG-0003Gp-5J; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:27:22 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:27:22 +0100
From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Message-ID: <20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:27:24 -0000
El día Tuesday, January 28, 2014 a las 12:16:18PM +0000, James Griffin escribió:
> On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
>
> > What does show 'mixer' about?
> >
> > Btw: you can test recording with for example:
> >
> > # dd if=/dev/dsp of=/tmp/mastersVoice
> >
> > and play it back the same way switching if= and of=
> >
> > matthias
>
> Hi matthias, mixer command shows this:
>
> Mixer vol is currently set to 75:75
> Mixer pcm is currently set to 75:75
> Mixer speaker is currently set to 100:100
> Mixer line is currently set to 1:1
> Mixer mic is currently set to 67:67
> Mixer cd is currently set to 74:74
> Mixer mix is currently set to 100:100
> Mixer rec is currently set to 72:72
> Mixer igain is currently set to 0:0
> Mixer ogain is currently set to 100:100
> Mixer monitor is currently set to 67:67
> Recording source: cd
What does
# cat /dev/sndstat show?
You should play around with the mixer settings and use the above dd cmd for
tests;
> I looked at someones website, they described modifying a file
> /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf - i haven't tried it yet, maybe
> some settings in this will help?
This is only for Skype and if you have more then one sound device.
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 13:44:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC009AB0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 949411EE0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W88y3-00089l-Fd
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:44:43 +0100
Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net ([86.21.186.149])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:44:43 +0100
Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net
with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:44:43 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Can't upgrade /lang/ruby19
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <lc8c7h$3gt$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <lc6ngs$ea$1@ger.gmane.org>
<20140128080339.GA4970@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140128105947.c8af32a0d55c088734275ca2@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net
User-Agent: XPN/1.2.6 (Street Spirit ; FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:44:52 -0000
Gökºin Akdeniz wrote:
>
> It is fixed. Update your ports tree and start upgrading.
>
Indeed it is. Thanks, and thanks to _1126.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 13:49:01 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52149D89
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103F71F1B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W892A-0001Vv-D0
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:48:58 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:48:58 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:48:58 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:49:01 -0000
On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
> What does
>
> # cat /dev/sndstat show?
Installed devices:
pcm0: <Analog Devices AD1882 (Analog)> (play/rec) default
pcm1: <Analog Devices AD1882 (Front Analog Headphones)> (play)
pcm2: <USB audio> (rec)
> You should play around with the mixer settings and use the above dd cmd for
> tests;
Yeah, I will do that next.
>> I looked at someones website, they described modifying a file
>> /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf - i haven't tried it yet, maybe
>> some settings in this will help?
>
> This is only for Skype and if you have more then one sound device.
>
> matthias
I only have one sound device, although I would use Skype a little if
this would work. Will modifying this file resolve that issue with Skype
do you think?
Thanks for your help. I will report back with the result of the 'dd'
command you suggested.
Jamie.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 14:03:38 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F391F1BC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07471085
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W89G0-0000Os-1u
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:03:16 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:03:16 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:03:16 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No sound on Macmini with FreeBSD 10
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:02:49 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <slrnlefe4m.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1401272128360.1409@localhost>
<1482573.eBeQ4SjVDB@lumiwa.farms.net>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:03:38 -0000
On 2014-01-27, Ajtim <lumiwa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 27 January 2014 21:56:34 Volker Nebel wrote:
>> Good morning!
>>
>> Since a few days my Macmini 6.1 is running on FreeBSD 10.0 (yeah, and
>> FreeBSD alone)! Unfortunately, it does not (yet) produce any sound, and I
>> really need help on this. I followed the handbook and it looks like,
>> driver snd_hda is used. [CMD=" "]dmesg | grep hda[/CMD] gives the output
>> shown below. Soundcard seems to be Cirrus Logic CS4206.
>> I tried the following steps:
>> - Find a specific driver for this sound card: Nothing.
>> - Turn volume up with [CMD=" "]mixer pcm 100 vol 100[/CMD]. Still nothing
>> to hear.
>> - Change the value of hw.snd.default_unit to 0,1,2. No effect.
>> Has anybody a good idea how to proceed?
>> Don't know, whether the following is relevant: [CMD=" "]kldload
>> snd_driver[/CMD] gives 6 times "ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range". When
>> booting, I get this message once.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Volker
Did you try using the default sound driver first? I use speakers plugged
into the headphones port on my macmini as the default speaker is really
quiet. Have you tried speakers and/or headphones?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 14:14:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F6CA89
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:14:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from man.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE7D1165
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:14:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from man.dat.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by man.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8C4CF1DAA;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:14:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl
Received: from man.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1])
by man.dat.pl (man.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id hnvcMU3VFOvX; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:14:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.6.80] (unknown [212.69.68.42])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by man.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FBECCEF680;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:14:44 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52E7BB53.7080303@dat.pl>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:14:43 +0100
From: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jmzgriffin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:14:54 -0000
On 28.01.2014 14:48, James Griffin wrote:
> On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
>
>> What does
>>
>> # cat /dev/sndstat show?
> Installed devices:
> pcm0: <Analog Devices AD1882 (Analog)> (play/rec) default
> pcm1: <Analog Devices AD1882 (Front Analog Headphones)> (play)
> pcm2: <USB audio> (rec)
And do you have more than one mixer device?
ls /dev/mixer*
And check which device is recording input. Currently you have CD set as
recording device(I think that's default) and you probably should have
rec(or mic).
Maciej
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 14:20:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D728F1EA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:20:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 923BA11BB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [82.113.99.75] (helo=tiny-r255948)
by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <guru@unixarea.de>)
id 1W89WF-0005WZ-04; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:20:03 +0100
Received: from tiny-r255948 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tiny-r255948 (8.14.7/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s0SEK0nd002440;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:20:00 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from guru@unixarea.de)
Received: (from guru@localhost)
by tiny-r255948 (8.14.7/8.14.3/Submit) id s0SEJx4r002439;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:19:59 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from guru@unixarea.de)
X-Authentication-Warning: tiny-r255948: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de
using -f
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:19:59 +0100
From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Message-ID: <20140128141956.GA2429@tiny-r255948>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r235646 (i386)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Con-Id: 51246
X-Con-U: 0-guru
X-Originating-IP: 82.113.99.75
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:20:13 -0000
El día Tuesday, January 28, 2014 a las 01:48:34PM +0000, James Griffin escribió:
> I only have one sound device, although I would use Skype a little if
> this would work. Will modifying this file resolve that issue with Skype
> do you think?
If you have /dev/dsp and /dev/mixer the default file
/compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf will work;
matthias
--
Sent from my FreeBSD netbook
Matthias Apitz, <guru@unixarea.de>, http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 15:17:37 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B09181C5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4677C16C5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:17:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.155] (host213-123-246-88.in-addr.btopenworld.com
[213.123.246.88]) (authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0SFHSeV060507
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:17:29 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E7CA08.8050508@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:17:28 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
Organization: Frank Leonhardt
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Geom error 11
References: <20140128132427.GA89022@vager-wrk.bsdway.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20140128132427.GA89022@vager-wrk.bsdway.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: frank2@fjl.co.uk
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:17:37 -0000
On 28/01/2014 13:24, Vagner wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> I've created geom stripe raid for my SSD drives. But when I gave load to
> this raid, I've got error:
>> <kern.crit> server kernel:
>> g_vfs_done():stripe/st0a[WRITE(offset=214821666816, length=32768)]error = 11
> and mine server was gone...
>
> In src tree I've found that this happend because we've called function
> g_io_transient_map_bio(struct bio *bp); We try to allocate
> memory for transient_arena and get error in g_io_deliver(bp, EDEADLK);
> g_io_transient_map_bio was called by function g_down_procbody(void
> *arg) there. So, could you tell me, why we try to execute function
> g_io_transient_map_bio(struct bio *bp), and where kthread
> g_down_procbody(void *arg) was runs for execution? I think this error mean that
> I haven't kernel memory space for allocate transient_arena object. But I
> think what attempt for allocate memory is effect of some error... May be
> somebody had error like this. Could you help me?
>
> My OS version: 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r255421M
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
Before digging in to this (or pointing out the obvious about using a
-RELEASE build), how big exactly are these SSDs?
Regards, Frank.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 16:12:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9B48238
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:12:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762AA1CB4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:12:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8BHE-0001id-On
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:12:40 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:12:40 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:12:40 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:12:15 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <slrnleflnc.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net> <52E7BB53.7080303@dat.pl>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:12:45 -0000
On 2014-01-28, Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl> wrote:
> On 28.01.2014 14:48, James Griffin wrote:
>> On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
>>
>>> What does
>>>
>>> # cat /dev/sndstat show?
>> Installed devices:
>> pcm0: <Analog Devices AD1882 (Analog)> (play/rec) default
>> pcm1: <Analog Devices AD1882 (Front Analog Headphones)> (play)
>> pcm2: <USB audio> (rec)
> And do you have more than one mixer device?
> ls /dev/mixer*
>
> And check which device is recording input. Currently you have CD set as
> recording device(I think that's default) and you probably should have
> rec(or mic).
>
> Maciej
Hi Maciej,
There are 3 mixer devices:
/usr/home/jmz % ls /dev/mixer*
/dev/mixer0 /dev/mixer1 /dev/mixer2
I have set the rec device; $mixer =rec mic
Looking again at the output for `cat /dev/sndstat` perhaps this should
be set to rec (pcm2: <USB audio> (rec)) as the webcam is usb peripheral?
I will try both to see. Does this sound correct to you?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 16:31:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65FE28AA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:31:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from man.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED6C1E4F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:31:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from man.dat.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by man.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7C3CF1DAA;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:31:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl
Received: from man.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1])
by man.dat.pl (man.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id bpLNFG0tWtci; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:31:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.6.80] (unknown [212.69.68.42])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by man.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33CF1CEF680;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:31:44 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52E7DB6F.2060003@dat.pl>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:31:43 +0100
From: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net> <52E7BB53.7080303@dat.pl>
<slrnleflnc.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
In-Reply-To: <slrnleflnc.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:31:48 -0000
On 28.01.2014 17:12, James Griffin wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> There are 3 mixer devices:
>
> /usr/home/jmz % ls /dev/mixer*
> /dev/mixer0 /dev/mixer1 /dev/mixer2
>
> I have set the rec device; $mixer =rec mic
>
> Looking again at the output for `cat /dev/sndstat` perhaps this should
> be set to rec (pcm2: <USB audio> (rec)) as the webcam is usb peripheral?
> I will try both to see. Does this sound correct to you?
Your webcam looks as pcm2 so i suspect one of the other mixers(I bet
mixer2) is connected with it.
Check volume on this mixer to be sure it's not muted and then try
testing some records.
Maciej
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 16:32:30 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF58946
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mta02.eastlink.ca (mta02.eastlink.ca [24.224.136.13])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F881E60
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:32:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cmgw04.eastlink.ca ([71.7.199.170])
by mta02.eastlink.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server
7u4-21.01 64bit (built Feb 16 2011))
with ESMTP id <0N0400EOACAP87G1@mta02.eastlink.ca> for
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:02:22 -0400 (AST)
Received: from jessie.mcd.on.ca ([24.138.139.204]) by cmgw04.eastlink.ca with
id KU2Y1n0054QnV8g01U2YBn; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:02:33 -0400
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=HYUtEE08 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
a=ZO6pHcMdJg0d/rVB3wuddA==:117 a=ZO6pHcMdJg0d/rVB3wuddA==:17 a=g-34lIDIPAUA:10
a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=rKw277qhUEEA:10 a=d66BYYewDtBB4b7d9GMA:9
Received: from jessie.mcd.on.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by jessie.mcd.on.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0SG2LHK004122
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:02:21 -0500
Received: (from eastick@localhost) by jessie.mcd.on.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit)
id s0SG2LPb004121 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue,
28 Jan 2014 11:02:21 -0500 (EST envelope-from eastick)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:02:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Doug Eastick <eastick@mcD.on.ca>
Message-id: <201401281602.s0SG2LPb004121@jessie.mcd.on.ca>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: how to upgrade from i386-9.0 to amd64/9.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:32:30 -0000
Hi, I am currently running the following i386 9.0 on my firewall system.
FreeBSD jessie.mcd.on.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I need to upgrade to 9.1 or 9.2 or higher but I'd also like to switch over to amd64 as
my install of i386 was a stupid mistake 2 years ago :-).
tips on how to install /upgrade please? Will the installer of amd64/9.2 notice my existing system?
thanks,
doug
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 16:35:43 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB66D2A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:35:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8272A1EB3
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:35:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8BdV-0001kn-BE
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:35:41 +0100
Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net ([86.21.186.149])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:35:41 +0100
Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net
with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:35:41 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error
messages with various ports
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:35:17 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <lc8m85$9bp$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140128084935.GC16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140128172449.73adf28a@X220.alogt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net
User-Agent: XPN/1.2.6 (Street Spirit ; FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:35:43 -0000
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:49:35 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can see why a ports tree that is being checked out with svn instead
>> of being updated with portsnap might be a wise choice, but I'm not
>> quite sure if I understand correctly what the abilities of portupgrade
>> are that portmaster lacks? Do you want to elaborate on that? ;)
>
> portupgrade never left an un-usable machine after an upgrade for me. As
> such, I have no reason to look for any other tool.
>
Erich,
Your replies in this thread have been illuminating. In the light of them, I have decided to stick with portupgrade, but to move ports updating from portsnap to svn, for the extra flexibility.
Thanks!
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 17:14:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5AB0CD5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:14:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A9C12A6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:14:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8CEd-0007f4-KC
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:14:03 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:14:03 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:14:03 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:13:40 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <slrnlefpah.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128141956.GA2429@tiny-r255948>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:14:07 -0000
On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
> If you have /dev/dsp and /dev/mixer the default file
> /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf will work;
>
> matthias
>
Ok, got Skype with microphone working.
Had to edit the file /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf
pcm.oss2 {
...
device /dev/dsp2
...
Description " ... Webcam"
}
ctl.oss2 {
...
device /dev/mixer2
...
Description " ... Webcam"
}
... added to the file. So essentially adding a second copy of the text
in there with a second device number; in my case, I chose 2 because
that's what dmesg | grep uaudio showed the camera had been attached to.
Hope that makes sense???
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 20:42:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7814DDE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:42:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk
[IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785F817AC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:42:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk
[81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s0SKgiLU092668
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:42:45 GMT
(envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s0SKgiLU092668
Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s0SKgiLU092668;
dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none
Message-ID: <52E8163A.1060004@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:42:34 +0000
From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to upgrade from i386-9.0 to amd64/9.x
References: <201401281602.s0SG2LPb004121@jessie.mcd.on.ca>
In-Reply-To: <201401281602.s0SG2LPb004121@jessie.mcd.on.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="tGDshXPSqXU0XbVQLdHoe7VkT7VDa6j1u"
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
DCC_CHECK autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:42:52 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--tGDshXPSqXU0XbVQLdHoe7VkT7VDa6j1u
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 28/01/2014 16:02, Doug Eastick wrote:
> Hi, I am currently running the following i386 9.0 on my firewall system=
=2E
>=20
>=20
> FreeBSD jessie.mcd.on.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3=
07:15:25 UTC 2012 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/G=
ENERIC i386
>=20
> I need to upgrade to 9.1 or 9.2 or higher but I'd also like to switch o=
ver to amd64 as=20
> my install of i386 was a stupid mistake 2 years ago :-).
>=20
> tips on how to install /upgrade please? Will the installer of amd64/9=
=2E2 notice my existing system?
Re-install your system using the amd64 installation media. Simple as tha=
t.
You should back up anything you want to keep onto removable media or a
different machine and plan on completely wiping out your current setup.
Even if you ultimately manage to preserve some parts of the current
system, better to be prepared in case anihilation is the (desired or
not) outcome.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
--tGDshXPSqXU0XbVQLdHoe7VkT7VDa6j1u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=U7ud
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tGDshXPSqXU0XbVQLdHoe7VkT7VDa6j1u--
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 00:10:59 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8843195
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 726DB18EA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
(authenticated bits=0)
by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0T0AhOI085107
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:10:43 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <52E84703.4080306@tundraware.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:10:43 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Followup: Need Help With MCA Code
References: <52E73717.3000503@tundraware.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E73717.3000503@tundraware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:10:43 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: s0T0AhOI085107
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:10:59 -0000
On 01/27/2014 10:50 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am running 9.2 stable i386 r261207. As noted earlier:
>
>> I just replaced mobo/CPU on FBSD server (Gigabyte Z-87-D3HP with
>> an Intel i3-4130). I am not overclocking ... but I continue to see this sort of thing:
>
>> MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
>
> Dmesg shows:
>
>> MCA: Vendor "GenuineIntel", ID 0x306c3, APIC ID 0
>> MCA: CPU 0 COR (1) internal parity error
>> MCA: Bank 0, Status 0x90000040000f0005
>> MCA: Global Cap 0x0000000000000c07, Status 0x0000000000000000_
>
> I've swapped CPUs (i5). I've fiddled with an endless supply of
> mobo settings. I've switched power supplies. I've moved mem
> sticks around .... No joy.
>
> So, I dug through the sources and found this:
>
>
>
> mca_log(const struct mca_record *rec)
> {
> uint16_t mca_error;
>
> printf("MCA: Bank %d, Status 0x%016llx\n", rec->mr_bank,
> (long long)rec->mr_status);
> printf("MCA: Global Cap 0x%016llx, Status 0x%016llx\n",
> (long long)rec->mr_mcg_cap, (long long)rec->mr_mcg_status);
> printf("MCA: Vendor \"%s\", ID 0x%x, APIC ID %d\n", cpu_vendor,
> rec->mr_cpu_id, rec->mr_apic_id);
> printf("MCA: CPU %d ", rec->mr_cpu);
> if (rec->mr_status & MC_STATUS_UC)
> printf("UNCOR ");
> else {
> printf("COR ");
> if (rec->mr_mcg_cap & MCG_CAP_CMCI_P)
> printf("(%lld) ", ((long long)rec->mr_status &
> MC_STATUS_COR_COUNT) >> 38);
> }
>
>
> It looks like the trailing else clause is kicking out the error but I am
> unclear what the error means, beyond the fact that it appears to be a parity
> error somewhere within the CPU's internal memory (cache?). Is this error
> getting corrected? Is this benign, Should I get a different mobo?
>
> Um .... Haaaaalp :)
I have now tried different motherboards, CPUs, memory, and power supplies and
this error is still showing up now and then.
This points strongly to either FreeBSD bogus reporting, or these errors being
benign. It's hard to believe that the exact same error might occur with
completely different hardware ... unless it's being caused by the case.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 01:10:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB38670E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2281D24
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
(authenticated bits=0)
by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0T1A19K059173
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:10:01 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <52E854E9.6070203@tundraware.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:10:01 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: 1920x1080 With xorg Intel Driver On HD 4600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:10:01 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: s0T1A19K059173
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:10:11 -0000
I am trying to get X to jump into 1920x1080 on an i5-based system
with Intel HD 4600 video. The intel driver seems to know nothing
about this chipset and vesa doesn't want to go that high in res.
Ideas? Workarounds?
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 01:25:55 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EC5A6B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:25:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57211E33
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=yCJzng9fv9twQznCBVn5R+2148lwTN5OFdh0QF99a+4=;
b=gEGRGBR15zfbwoIFUWe1NCZqerkN5YTB/P3Ki99i0E1x+foYvEoVWUKHbOo//dPXf/wmkklspfp9ou2PBgvt9nMA+CLxQck2b7QlFS2gCEGM/IgTeRsk6v9i6pfvX/4oaO/P600g24itdHXlGGfIfXzBF5KoPE+qraiCf+PlHbM=;
Received: from [39.196.10.7] (port=20750 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W8JuS-0009Ue-JV; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:25:46 -0700
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:25:37 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
Subject: Re: 1920x1080 With xorg Intel Driver On HD 4600
Message-ID: <20140129092537.08cd9404@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <52E854E9.6070203@tundraware.com>
References: <52E854E9.6070203@tundraware.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:25:55 -0000
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:10:01 -0600
Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote:
> I am trying to get X to jump into 1920x1080 on an i5-based system
> with Intel HD 4600 video. The intel driver seems to know nothing
> about this chipset and vesa doesn't want to go that high in res.
>
> Ideas? Workarounds?
I do not know about newer CPU versions as I have a second generation
i7. I also have had to give X an hint via xorg.conf. But this was more
than a year ago and should not be needed anymore.
If your is a fourth generation i5, it could be that it is not fully
supported yet. Just check the FreeBSD wiki regarding KMS, Intel etc.
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 06:22:27 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFDD128E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:22:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7738014EA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:22:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id z12so2553476wgg.18
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:22:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=CWQbsta5T9x/7nw/hywYLhCen2Hl1Rq015TvdXKIsUs=;
b=npbi8rT8CXzceXFaIy6MqeqmwQm+5cw4UU28vltXZ4sd7zIqzPGkaHm8iqD4CoP1fc
mS/hDyw/NR4tPLPpGlRJXWfyNeZnQn86G9SD37leiRyy/eihl7SdGRK5iacd2WBK/l1x
P7zaIS8JUnBvcOmU/m7tk0XOgaNX4J4PdrEW8pRQD2rVr48xttXGRWmkCW1X3heToqhn
CjwgdL/GiqWub9JsfzLyl5rU+on2ZfTQskGprSJIKWby9oQxX+NiVhBOKEvCGh33Y0Ub
tadNdpCmrOlQBsXghOGENiA4d6DJvSmP9dfe1ROpodsNVTqLVqxiLJzuN7qbOKxtCl3K
QhXQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.19.65 with SMTP id c1mr11452259wie.39.1390976545930;
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:22:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.30.169 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:21:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140127105508.526a9e5f@X220.alogt.com>
References: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphy3D1nehj=1weSo6CSLkwZNs47rWT1VsoAyf4xPe9QtLg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126213247.53fc82ee@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphwbV29CP4=cUk55890FK1VJXScF7h9vogaeWebpCz9fkA@mail.gmail.com>
<20140127105508.526a9e5f@X220.alogt.com>
From: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:21:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CALeGphwxcjRMJkwtg_J_=PAeybQp1KFs-yb-y7jGaDt7nCajwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:22:27 -0000
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Erich Dollansky
<erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:40:46 -0800
> "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Erich Dollansky
>> <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 05:17:42 -0800
>> > "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Erich Dollansky
>> >> <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:41:54 -0800
>> >> > "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Does anyone have any ideas on why startx would cause Xorg to
>> >> >> consume 100% cpu and stuck in RUN state. kill -9 does nothing to
>> >> >> it and forced to reboot to kill it.
>
> did you try the kill as root?
>> >>
yes, nothing
>> >> didn't show anything, what does that do? The ati driver worked
>> >> fine in FreeBSD 9.2. This card doesn't support KMS as it's an
>> >> older laptop video card.
>> >
>> > if KMS is not supported, then take the VESA driver and see what
>> > happens.
>> >
>> vesa works fine but wanted it to work with the ati driver which has
>> acceleration
>
> Ok, did you upgrade FreeBSD?
>
> The recompile at least hal and the video driver.
it was a fresh install. Now I am able to reproduce it only half the
time after recompiling the kernel with the latest 10 stable.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 06:41:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DFAD517
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:41:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51976163E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:41:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com;
s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
bh=1StgpGkgm2Omk7Zx8+ZfHcW7oWrtKni+A8id6oWqHcI=;
b=FImVXOgw/q2/QmSL1Yea510uOTAdoXaJ52uFkNtVkFhUdoxHx5awlP1izPT06eh6QLONe/04kiBeVMXZxJ3SlHsotmXDIu2TOwrgVBAeWWdMfeEB2i3148tmKYVUZg8O7G9JQCpoVgtbqfmZ/UFYRwPN5pHtUCwP+eMdNx9v2A8=;
Received: from [39.196.10.7] (port=49264 helo=X220.alogt.com)
by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>)
id 1W8Opl-002UeE-Ik; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:41:14 -0700
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:41:08 +0800
From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
To: "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: startx hangs locally but not over ssh
Message-ID: <20140129144108.36e97258@X220.alogt.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALeGphwxcjRMJkwtg_J_=PAeybQp1KFs-yb-y7jGaDt7nCajwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALeGphzMZGLZy54=EsETQmBhMbeT3mULwfN5BopGK173BOk_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126211217.3c74f133@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphy3D1nehj=1weSo6CSLkwZNs47rWT1VsoAyf4xPe9QtLg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140126213247.53fc82ee@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphwbV29CP4=cUk55890FK1VJXScF7h9vogaeWebpCz9fkA@mail.gmail.com>
<20140127105508.526a9e5f@X220.alogt.com>
<CALeGphwxcjRMJkwtg_J_=PAeybQp1KFs-yb-y7jGaDt7nCajwA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id:
erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:41:15 -0000
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:21:45 -0800
"Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Erich Dollansky
> <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> >
> > did you try the kill as root?
> >> >>
> yes, nothing
with kill -9?
>
> >> >> didn't show anything, what does that do? The ati driver worked
> >> >> fine in FreeBSD 9.2. This card doesn't support KMS as it's an
> >> >> older laptop video card.
> >> >
> >> > if KMS is not supported, then take the VESA driver and see what
> >> > happens.
> >> >
> >> vesa works fine but wanted it to work with the ati driver which has
> >> acceleration
> >
> > Ok, did you upgrade FreeBSD?
> >
> > The recompile at least hal and the video driver.
> it was a fresh install. Now I am able to reproduce it only half the
> time after recompiling the kernel with the latest 10 stable.
It is getting more weird.
Fresh installs with binaries can cause some problems.
I have no idea what it could be now. What are the logs for X saying?
Erich
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 08:04:36 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52ED3BE6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:04:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF1901CEA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l18so7543048wgh.5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:04:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=uAMMSxzN6jP9Pv2xuRu8QHzueTv0yqIYuzheKfoifCQ=;
b=USXyo1XTmPK86+6wFucjXHWdX2Y8xjv4xsMGCaVXK3TdKHWgP9zwzpUBBtIusnVAjw
ddVPZcWvJmnBPdrLEJX0hufxFtP17Vdezwj7GWNk/FDsxsIcYXiCN18FgezmRuCSi2Q+
QNl3/uo4PioODwtMZ4CNqL1kSQujKCz0UyxnnQZ5lnQ75I53LqhM816WcLva0GiINggy
lqyMXSLd5+H6D3f+vY9IvbWVmF3lcZtEELKx69kxYWzH5AT+nX1j8Wh7ZGbmAPQTOJhG
nmA2PKMYgoDDdnrdutW/wlGA2t4E2Aq9eDRFJ7iWYJMUh7TJKbOt1D+GBRPaEQMYh9tz
X8pQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.179.69 with SMTP id de5mr3958796wjc.4.1390982674070;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (LNantes-156-74-19-50.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr.
[82.127.90.50])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uq2sm3019653wjc.5.2014.01.29.00.04.33
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:04:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E8B610.6060204@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:04:32 +0100
From: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Question about zfs snapshots and clones
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:04:36 -0000
Hello there,
I have a question about snapshots and clones. I created a template
dataset and snapshot for creating new jails. I call it
tank/jails/template and tank/jails/template@1.
So we have:
tank/jails/template@1
tank/jails/A (origin template@1)
tank/jails/B (origin template@1)
Now, I wanted to upgrade the template and create a new snapshot @2. Then
I would like to destroy the @1 because it will not be used to create new
jails. Because it's the parent of A and B I needed to promote them and
there is the thing that I didn't understand. I thought that promote was
a way to `detach' the children of a parent so that jails lives on their
own but it's not actually what I expected.
zfs promote on tank/jails/A and tank/jails/B gave me unexpected results.
I got my tank/jails/template@1 renamed to something like tank/jails/B@1
and the origin of tank/jails/A has been set to the latest IIRC.
So, I'm guessing that promote is not actually what I wanted, how should
I release the jails origin so they are completely free and I can destroy
the oldest template snapshot?
Regards,
--
David Demelier
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 08:58:49 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9571BE5;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:58:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F0610B5;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:58:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0T8gZtD054938;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:42:35 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org)
Message-ID: <52E8BEFB.1010300@qeng-ho.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:42:35 +0000
From: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Doug Eastick <eastick@mcD.on.ca>
Subject: Re: how to upgrade from i386-9.0 to amd64/9.x
References: <201401281602.s0SG2LPb004121@jessie.mcd.on.ca>
<52E8163A.1060004@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <52E8163A.1060004@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:58:49 -0000
On 28/01/2014 20:42, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 28/01/2014 16:02, Doug Eastick wrote:
>> Hi, I am currently running the following i386 9.0 on my firewall system.
>>
>>
>> FreeBSD jessie.mcd.on.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>>
>> I need to upgrade to 9.1 or 9.2 or higher but I'd also like to switch over to amd64 as
>> my install of i386 was a stupid mistake 2 years ago :-).
>>
>> tips on how to install /upgrade please? Will the installer of amd64/9.2 notice my existing system?
>
>
> Re-install your system using the amd64 installation media. Simple as that.
>
> You should back up anything you want to keep onto removable media or a
> different machine and plan on completely wiping out your current setup.
> Even if you ultimately manage to preserve some parts of the current
> system, better to be prepared in case anihilation is the (desired or
> not) outcome.
>
Matthew's advice is the sensible answer and really should be the way you
go as it's your firewall.
However, I'm in a similar position myself but the machine in question is
an unimportant spare I'm using for playing around on, and I specifically
want to get familiar with FreeBSD's cross building capabilities because
I want to do some custom builds for Raspberry Pi soon (yes, I know about
crochet). Therefore, I'm intending to do things the hard way for the
practice, and if I screw up, it won't really matter. As part of my
research on the topic I came across this page on the wiki:
https://wiki.freebsd.org/amd64/i386Migration
If that doesn't convince you to follow Matthew's advice, good luck. :-)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 09:03:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098D8D8C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:03:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de
[80.67.29.23])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E58113A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [134.95.7.245] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W8R36-0004an-BB; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:03:08 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:03:08 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re:
[freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140129090308.GA3535@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<20140128084935.GC16541@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140128172449.73adf28a@X220.alogt.com>
<lc8m85$9bp$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <lc8m85$9bp$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:03:18 -0000
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 04:35:17PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote:
> Erich Dollansky wrote:
>=20
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:49:35 +0100
> > _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
> >
> >>=20
> >> I can see why a ports tree that is being checked out with svn instead
> >> of being updated with portsnap might be a wise choice, but I'm not
> >> quite sure if I understand correctly what the abilities of portupgrade
> >> are that portmaster lacks? Do you want to elaborate on that? ;)
> >
> > portupgrade never left an un-usable machine after an upgrade for me. As
> > such, I have no reason to look for any other tool.
> >
> Erich,
>=20
> Your replies in this thread have been illuminating. In the light of
> them, I have decided to stick with portupgrade, but to move ports
> updating from portsnap to svn, for the extra flexibility.
I think I'll do the same. At least the svn part. Have to figure out
how to deal with custom configured ports, though. In the worst case,
I'll reconfigure and rebuild all ports.=20
=20
> Thanks!
Thanks indeed.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 09:52:11 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07E27DB1
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:52:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nm2-vm7.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
(nm2-vm7.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.87])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3239115A6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:52:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [212.82.98.54] by nm2.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
29 Jan 2014 09:52:00 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.86] by tm7.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
29 Jan 2014 09:52:00 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
29 Jan 2014 09:52:00 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 968686.37113.bm@omp1023.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 61498 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 2014 09:52:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024;
t=1390989120; bh=zsFryD/7bYwWHouht2u1OqyEdGbFXoGYZ9ZxR2pu9sA=;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=Er5Ev8uQ8+mitwTTaC+R2pVBRCAVQ1Q16so88Ej4OsrRQHYMO3ARsmizFiRNLWKjPne9pAjWQqE1LnUVmH/AUKdGlWu0sS3xG8Y9DMiczQ7eXsd8DMQexunzawJ7vyN6oiTVSFfee/H3WzAPxUyRiiN13j/0/rW0t0skB6iAZwU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=UiYOuq/jjUqHw6kVnTmTG/zulgGws40p28GR0XZaI/7xwwyPlqppeC0e6YGDmmc8gdq6K2DCHKWwHkvf4DFIfInz0Qmk9rDs4QOMgc9Oq9y8avDonSLSjUW3s2zCzI1scTTi2sBJKN5Lxs0tZU3tFdBrp5I+JubZfEICQlV6Hxc=;
X-YMail-OSG: ilpM57AVM1ndiXHMBzBW3xTh0iK5_Rej9QzC4dGEh_p9oZB
tf57QIS2zYa4sc6Jwv.Yy1ekCCtIXr8JGFzjvwx8KKs_AjQWL2OQ3dqhikZT
S_.XDdtaXaWsCyV91plXnoheJemhxpd2LNaTa5dEvRez8yxLalB.MqETobnP
7LzrU7Yohcw3UM_vOzplZzMmZgGwrBGRJ7h6pHOnFA7r.RZOpHVkidj7Z.Oo
cuxarRTp5YXNfOxKakGwdwXKQ1DkePqXzVt1kR5axh0akQhiEWJRfcDJ.8Lt
pGiKSdf5guEw3v7MWbQoqFhGc0y2flXOl7G306WJWfyYdKXJk7iELKQmw80K
yMYq3D0J1BDkzW1SmVis4VtzdE3GKrGs2R5rP.ayJE33E02ghWuUw3we4mgH
YqPI4m.zo.f5Wf2LADjf__.Xdodxa.6wdayDsc57wYeWnyGobbbk44LbVUkP
ZL.HDCA6S1BhND9CCEkxjQx8Pk5_ynfZoCPxpeguVdn0hObk7_tVCGIektIv M
Received: from [89.165.120.140] by web171402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:52:00 GMT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,
SGkKUmVjZW50bHkgSSd2ZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHNvbWUgc291cmNlIGNvZGVzIGluIC91c3Ivc3JjLy4gSG93IGNhbiBJIGFwcGx5IHRoZSBjaGFuZ2VzIHRvIEZyZWVCU0Q_ATABAQEB
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.174.629
Message-ID: <1390989120.58975.YahooMailNeo@web171402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:52:00 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ted Reynard <ted.reynard@yahoo.com>
Subject: Rebuild world after changing source code
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ted Reynard <ted.reynard@yahoo.com>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:52:11 -0000
Hi=0ARecently I've changed some source codes in /usr/src/. How can I apply =
the changes to FreeBSD?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 10:11:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D5F351C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F80A171D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:11:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-45-52.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.45.52])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 794EB3CE4F;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:11:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s0TABEbn002792;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:11:14 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:11:14 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: Ted Reynard <ted.reynard@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Rebuild world after changing source code
Message-Id: <20140129111114.7a8edb12.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <1390989120.58975.YahooMailNeo@web171402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
References: <1390989120.58975.YahooMailNeo@web171402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:11:47 -0000
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:52:00 +0000 (GMT), Ted Reynard wrote:
> Hi
> Recently I've changed some source codes in /usr/src/.
> How can I apply the changes to FreeBSD?
As explained in The FreeBSD Handbook. :-)
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
Also see the commend header in /usr/src/Makefile which
contains a summary of the procedure.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 10:53:59 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ECD92B6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:53:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-x243.google.com (mail-pa0-x243.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::243])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E86E91A2F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:53:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f67.google.com with SMTP id rd3so753754pab.2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 02:53:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=o/X1T0+QpN9uT21xh6T/J/85dr/+8/LKnrtrh8l6idE=;
b=w+W7jSpzCEHvh7NXP2TUFUUq2/NmfakHdWHV5tVUavK+eduz8HuFhMCeFdkHrUn7q+
Rny1vpecz+0/lDMNsUrsNj4Rm3xcIYW6yPoZ3lcuQHma6LqP+SCxCzRT28ES/PQ7MbaO
3D8/bAf8Ipqx0hkOS3XF+3dBZO3bhMqq2NnONwskV4jy8HQf0jzuPdHG3yRB6WGxBQki
nIjxav79A0DPxvh1igDMB53PZJkpbkBR2UzIxOC2vlxeRfwH13BFkmSIR1CtjNML4HWu
0Q5NBEM8yjDZR5tsIaOFlWHtjnqjdAG1YME6dmq9H+vYUAEEas4h5POt1zXUInGtuf4j
KR3Q==
X-Received: by 10.68.239.70 with SMTP id vq6mr7059515pbc.152.1390992838629;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 02:53:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.42.43.21] ([203.129.198.35])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qq5sm5872902pbb.24.2014.01.29.02.53.56
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 02:53:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E8DDC4.3070609@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:23:56 +0530
From: kalyani1101 <auditreport.madelink@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Local business =?windows-1252?Q?=96_Freebsd=2Eorg?=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:53:59 -0000
Dear business owner of *Freebsd.org*,
I would like to take a few minutes from your schedule and ask for your
attention towards Internet marketing for *Freebsd.org*.
As a business Owner you might be interested to gain profit by placing
your website among top in search engines. Your website needs immediate
improvement for some major issues with your website.
-Low online presence for many competitive keyword phrases
-Unorganized social media accounts
-Not compatible with all mobile devices
-Many bad back links to your website
Looking at the above issues and other additional improvements for your
website, I would request you to give us a chance to fix those issues.
Our team of Search Engine and Social Media experts are here to serve you
with best inputs. If you are interested in learning more about current
status of your website, we would be glad to share WEBSITE AUDIT REPORT
of *Freebsd.org* for FREE.
You will feel the difference once you get services from our company as
we never let our clients expectations go down. Being at the top left of
Google (#1- #3 organic positions) is the best thing you can do for your
company's website traffic and online reputation. You will be happy to
know that, my team is willing to guarantee you 1st page Google ranking
for your targeted local keyword phrases.
If my proposal sound's interesting for your business goal, feel free to
email us, or can provide me with your phone number and the best time to
call you. I am also available for an online meeting to present you this
website audit report.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Best Regards,
*Anjali Verma*
Marketing Consultant
PS I: I am not spamming. I have studied your website and believe I can
help with your business promotion. If you still want us to not contact
you, you can ignore this email or ask to remove and I will not contact
again.
PS II: I found your site using Google search and after having a look
over your website I recommend you to implement future technologies such
as HTML5 and Responsive Design to make your site more accessible in
mobile phone, tablets, desktop etc.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 13:02:36 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6894592C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:02:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from man.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2078F160E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:02:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from man.dat.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by man.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AE3CF1DAA;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:02:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl
Received: from man.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1])
by man.dat.pl (man.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id bNxh9I9e3UlD; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:02:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.6.80] (unknown [212.69.68.42])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by man.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 560CECEF680;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:02:32 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52E8FBE7.7040509@dat.pl>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:02:31 +0100
From: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128141956.GA2429@tiny-r255948>
<slrnlefpah.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlefpah.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:02:36 -0000
On 28.01.2014 18:13, James Griffin wrote:
> On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
>
>> If you have /dev/dsp and /dev/mixer the default file
>> /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf will work;
>>
>> matthias
>>
> Ok, got Skype with microphone working.
>
> Had to edit the file /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf
>
> pcm.oss2 {
> ...
> device /dev/dsp2
> ...
> Description " ... Webcam"
> }
>
> ctl.oss2 {
> ...
> device /dev/mixer2
> ...
> Description " ... Webcam"
> }
>
> ... added to the file. So essentially adding a second copy of the text
> in there with a second device number; in my case, I chose 2 because
> that's what dmesg | grep uaudio showed the camera had been attached to.
>
> Hope that makes sense???
As long as that works fine - that makes sense :)
Maciej
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 13:11:50 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44BD5E94
for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:11:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from frv191.fwdcdn.com (frv191.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.191])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A2816DC
for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:11:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.1.23] (helo=frv199.fwdcdn.com)
by frv191.fwdcdn.com with esmtp ID 1W8UWK-000NVI-K0
for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:45:32 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
s=ffe;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Cc:To:Subject:From:Date;
bh=J78dzmwjnhMXZAuV2RB1+jsYGeIAtpT9+mcostG3u3A=;
b=dYhXvjbulFz2cZp9sI02HYtSrjNl9hWPSQzpZRcfX4HptjeinrS3IjF+eSLe3lCRxgyxjxUJU133BcC27NuuaoHXvXMz4hnMuDsXXIsbHtG8rIJzVBilG2duzeFeEkJOdzgVh095OkqgLBBuIllwwpN9QI3GdN3kyHBAMktQ9sc=;
Received: from [10.10.10.35] (helo=frv35.ukr.net)
by frv199.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1W8UWD-000NHy-6V
for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:45:25 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:45:24 +0200
From: Vladislav Prodan <universite@ukr.net>
Subject: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
To: questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0
Message-Id: <1390999493.115887823.pfbg2ep5@frv35.ukr.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from universite@ukr.net by frv35.ukr.net;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:45:24 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: "net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:11:50 -0000
Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
10.1.2.3 -> 100.1.2.3
10.1.2.4 -> 100.1.2.4
10.1.2.5 -> 100.1.2.5
10.1.2.6 -> 100.1.2.6
...
IP addresses such an over 20k
prompt you implement?
--
Vladislav V. Prodan
System & Network Administrator
http://support.od.ua
+380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508
VVP88-RIPE
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 13:35:16 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3139B30
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8A618AE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8VIQ-0007nX-7y
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:35:14 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:35:14 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:35:14 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Webcam in-built microphone problem
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <slrnlei0s7.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlef3fp.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128113403.GA31364@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlef7su.1k3.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128132722.GA11532@sh4-5.1blu.de>
<slrnlefd9v.27t.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140128141956.GA2429@tiny-r255948>
<slrnlefpah.290.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net> <52E8FBE7.7040509@dat.pl>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:35:17 -0000
On 2014-01-29, Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl> wrote:
> On 28.01.2014 18:13, James Griffin wrote:
>> On 2014-01-28, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
>>
>>> If you have /dev/dsp and /dev/mixer the default file
>>> /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf will work;
>>>
>>> matthias
>>>
>> Ok, got Skype with microphone working.
>>
>> Had to edit the file /compat/linux/etc/alsa/pcm/pcm-oss.conf
>>
>> pcm.oss2 {
>> ...
>> device /dev/dsp2
>> ...
>> Description " ... Webcam"
>> }
>>
>> ctl.oss2 {
>> ...
>> device /dev/mixer2
>> ...
>> Description " ... Webcam"
>> }
>>
>> ... added to the file. So essentially adding a second copy of the text
>> in there with a second device number; in my case, I chose 2 because
>> that's what dmesg | grep uaudio showed the camera had been attached to.
>>
>> Hope that makes sense???
>
> As long as that works fine - that makes sense :)
>
> Maciej
Yep, it works well. Thanks for your help Maciej. And to Matthias too.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 13:49:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E83AD2F4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB3719CC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u14so1488262lbd.9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:48:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wsS1Ts+1m4T8MOsoqkProxmK9AhCcmHjwrENbyihojg=;
b=Vl2BkVUz0hcFVxE8JPErG623+Yi41lHWMn8hGgCEK1QP9yKNLmfSulhARH0cm6V597
EEMxUoY0/33mWqZeS3R1NnahuQqvEY0CA+M5JYLcEXAm+ydVG6HCoZGXbTwDLQ9nKT0p
Bz9LOHLfITGLGnMugMW7RtGckJhPXCRG6B9hG/wY3FOxudysl2+5kIn3no4xsdcbdQOf
hwVCc7rfA7DoKEUG0v8kiTq9D6MD0m0l0AA6PxDv2ttj3WH+kbwSv8x6tiGP/+hesfxb
kQz8OakvJ+v4g9+TiaPQyfS6pMSRi39jVl+bZdN0QUUssAzql/m0j6i35kdmJD6rSNnY
gpfg==
X-Received: by 10.112.92.112 with SMTP id cl16mr5260217lbb.15.1391003338095;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:48:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.129] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm2587353lbj.1.2014.01.29.05.48.57
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:48:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E906C8.8020806@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:48:56 +0200
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Zane C. B-H." <v.velox@vvelox.net>,
"freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: life post SuPHP
References: <20140126053347.2dcaab19@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140126053347.2dcaab19@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:49:01 -0000
26.01.2014 13:33, Zane C. B-H. wrote:
> Just noticed SuPHP is dead. Has any one found any thing non-hackish
> to get suexec like functions with PHP now? The closest I've come is a
> ugly mess that uses PHP-FPM to create per user pools.
Never touched suPHP but am using per user pools chrooted to the project
root. All required files and libs are nullfs mounted to project root.
--
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 14:06:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 462EE9EE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.18])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A94A1CBF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:06:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:cwr@otaku.freeshell.org
[192.94.73.9])
by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0TE6X8I025554
(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO);
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:06:35 GMT
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:06:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG>
X-X-Sender: cwr@faeroes.freeshell.org
To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error
messages with various ports
In-Reply-To: <20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:06:47 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:30:02 +0800
> From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
> To: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error
> messages with various ports
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:10:12 +0100
> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:03:26PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:19 +0100
>>> _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:18:58PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:05:19 +0100
>>>>> lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is my first posting on this mailinglist, so I hope I am
>>>>>> doing everything ok.
>>>>>
>>>>> do not worry to much about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am running a 10.0-RELEASE on a Thinkpad X220 - and
>>>>>> everything was just fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I do the same.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Until I did a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ sudo portsnap fetch update
>>>>>>
>>>>>> today and afterwards a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ sudo portmaster -aD
>>>>>>
>>>>> I did nearly the same either yesterday night or this morning
>>>>> but I used svn and portupgrade without any problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> How old was your ports tree before the upgrade?
>>>>
>>>> Three days old.
>>>>
>>> ok, get the latest one and try again. If it still does not work, I
>>> could give you the revision number of my working ports tree.
>>
>> It still does not work. However, I do not have a revision number,
>> IIUC, because I'm updating my ports with portsnap and not with svn,
>> right? I might try to checkout ports anew and see whether that works
>> then.
>
> of course.
>
> You might should consider to switch to svn and portupgrade. There is
> one advantage of this pair. Portupgrade does not leave you with a
> machine that cannot be used anymore. The worst case is that no port
> gets upgraded but your machine still works. Svn has the advantage that
> you can chose your port 'version' if the current revision does not work
> for you.
>
> Anyway, some other reported the same problem with a current ports tree.
> I have the revision number 341159 in case of you want to try.
>
> Erich
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
I might suggest you look into poudriere if you are concerned about not
breaking a system by doing port upgrades. Poudriere is an awesome tool
that allows you to build packages and essentially maintain your own local
package repo.
So, on your desktop (or whatever) machine that you want to keep running
smoothly, you would simply use 'pkg' to install and upgrade everything.
You would use poudriere to build the packages from ports. The advantages
being: if a port breaks during build, your system will remain untouched.
You just wait for the problem to be fixed, then rebuild your packages.
Once the packages are built successfully, you can upgrade your system. The
second advantage being that if you have several machines to maintain, you
no longer have to wait for each one to build ports. Just build once using
poudriere, fire up a web server to host the package repo, and point all
the machines at that repo. Build once, install many!
Charlie
cwr@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 14:26:02 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBCD6AA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bsdbox.co (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7636E1EB2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
[122.149.22.79])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.bsdbox.co (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38A5923874C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <52E90F70.6070000@bsdbox.co>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:25:52 +1100
From: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: weird error messages with various ports
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:26:02 -0000
On 30/01/2014 1:06 AM, Charlie wrote:
>
> The second advantage being that if you have several machines to
> maintain, you no longer have to wait for each one to build ports. Just
> build once using poudriere, fire up a web server to host the package
> repo, and point all the machines at that repo. Build once, install many!
>
> Charlie
>
Assuming all systems are the same architecture and require the same
build options. Sure, Poudriere on amd64 can build for i386 too, but
that's not necessarily any more efficient in some scenarios.
Would be much nicer if port trees were broken less often.
--
bsdbox.co
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 14:47:37 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285BB5D6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:47:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [37.59.62.186])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40381160
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:47:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mr185083.univ-rennes1.fr (mr185083.univ-rennes1.fr
[129.20.185.83])
by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A54662F41
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:47:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mr185083 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mr185083.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268C71CA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:47:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:47:27 +0100
From: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: poudriere bulk freebsd 10 packages on 9.2 host ?
Message-ID: <20140129154727.2cb7329e@mr185083>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(smtp.lamaiziere.net [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:47:28 +0100 (CET)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:47:37 -0000
Hello,
With poudriere, can we build packages for FreeBSD 10/stable on a 9.2/stable host
(same arch)?
I have many build failures so I'm asking if this is supported.
For example libaudiofile fails on #include <string> :
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -
I. -I../.. -I./.. -DNDEBUG -Wall -Wno-multichar -fvisibility=hidden
-fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-alia
sing -MT ALAC.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ALAC.Tpo -c -o ALAC.lo ALAC.cpp
libtool: compile: c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I./.. -DNDEBUG -Wall -Wno-mu
ltichar -fvisibility=hidden -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fvisibility-inlines-hidde
n -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -MT ALAC.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ALAC.Tpo -c ALAC.
cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ALAC.o
In file included from ALAC.cpp:22:
In file included from ./ALAC.h:24:
In file included from ./Module.h:25:
./../AudioFormat.h:27:10: fatal error: 'string' file not found
#include <string>
Thanks, regards
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:03:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5844F46
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:03:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.40])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E111333
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:02:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de)
by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>)
id 1W8WfC-0001Op-Jk; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:02:50 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:02:50 +0100
From: _1126 <lists@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
To: Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG>
Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re:
[freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports
Message-ID: <20140129150249.GA51211@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
<20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
<20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
<20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
<Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl
Cc: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>,
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:03:00 -0000
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:06:33PM +0000, Charlie wrote:
> I might suggest you look into poudriere if you are concerned about not=20
> breaking a system by doing port upgrades. Poudriere is an awesome tool=20
> that allows you to build packages and essentially maintain your own local=
=20
> package repo.
>=20
> So, on your desktop (or whatever) machine that you want to keep running=
=20
> smoothly, you would simply use 'pkg' to install and upgrade everything.=
=20
> You would use poudriere to build the packages from ports. The advantages=
=20
> being: if a port breaks during build, your system will remain untouched.=
=20
> You just wait for the problem to be fixed, then rebuild your packages.=20
> Once the packages are built successfully, you can upgrade your system. Th=
e=20
> second advantage being that if you have several machines to maintain, you=
=20
> no longer have to wait for each one to build ports. Just build once using=
=20
> poudriere, fire up a web server to host the package repo, and point all=
=20
> the machines at that repo. Build once, install many!
I wanted to check this out sometime in the near future. As a first
time using FreeBSD as main OS, I got enough to tinker with anyway. But
thanks for reminding me :)
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)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=pCU4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:08:14 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0BC327B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:08:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750751382
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:08:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id x13so3841681wgg.9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:08:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=4GgK30+Ia158cfy/HUiixGqccz3uflbQcv2StnHgb2s=;
b=sp/cUi+b3QeKeUJaRrgg/kQQ2SGZcTiEY7/bGsB5EqW7JLUv/v3Iw7z25E9jgnpBPZ
/ylJbukpwzg1Zh3qGhjDFnf0KQ7Ww2UWZr4UrwsYCNaPfkeHIfDxpQsAhldau89SUXeU
O2zXca7NrVNx8fqQLQ0HKWHSbIIDO0F12/VvQrDz4FI9BOid9nRlC6Vb+KWAaDvZWbGH
mR7MlbGRvA/O74K+sXEVBNnc43pgXWGjrcsje4TLJ6zwjAJQ2C/vGEwX69KkOAtPzP6O
gxs6ELVEeV2E+ZDqbZV/5dZQJOSHRhLa6WkaLxMgYPxHzCgM8LDHtRbRtEmbLcC3Pw82
tf3Q==
X-Received: by 10.180.164.174 with SMTP id yr14mr6110569wib.18.1391008092816;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (LNantes-156-74-19-50.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr.
[82.127.90.50])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm43016917wic.9.2014.01.29.07.08.11
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E91957.5030408@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:08:07 +0100
From: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: poudriere bulk freebsd 10 packages on 9.2 host ?
References: <20140129154727.2cb7329e@mr185083>
In-Reply-To: <20140129154727.2cb7329e@mr185083>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:08:14 -0000
On 29/01/2014 15:47, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With poudriere, can we build packages for FreeBSD 10/stable on a 9.2/stable host
> (same arch)?
>
> I have many build failures so I'm asking if this is supported.
>
> For example libaudiofile fails on #include <string> :
>
> /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -
> I. -I../.. -I./.. -DNDEBUG -Wall -Wno-multichar -fvisibility=hidden
> -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-alia
> sing -MT ALAC.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ALAC.Tpo -c -o ALAC.lo ALAC.cpp
> libtool: compile: c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I./.. -DNDEBUG -Wall -Wno-mu
> ltichar -fvisibility=hidden -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fvisibility-inlines-hidde
> n -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -MT ALAC.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ALAC.Tpo -c ALAC.
> cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ALAC.o
> In file included from ALAC.cpp:22:
> In file included from ./ALAC.h:24:
> In file included from ./Module.h:25:
> ./../AudioFormat.h:27:10: fatal error: 'string' file not found
> #include <string>
>
> Thanks, regards
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
No, bapt@ told me that you can't bulk build for superior versions.
However, earlier versions are supported as well.
Regards,
David.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:16:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F17883F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:16:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C397E14C4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:16:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.106.109.150] ([46.233.72.111]) (authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0TFGAJ4051801
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:16:11 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E91B3D.4000601@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:16:13 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
Organization: Frank Leonhardt
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
References: <1390999493.115887823.pfbg2ep5@frv35.ukr.net>
In-Reply-To: <1390999493.115887823.pfbg2ep5@frv35.ukr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: frank2@fjl.co.uk
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:16:15 -0000
On 29/01/2014 12:45, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
>
> 10.1.2.3 -> 100.1.2.3
> 10.1.2.4 -> 100.1.2.4
> 10.1.2.5 -> 100.1.2.5
> 10.1.2.6 -> 100.1.2.6
> ...
> IP addresses such an over 20k
> prompt you implement?
>
I don't understand the question exactly (I expect I will not be the only
one). natd will allow 1:1 mappings like this very easily. Are you saying
you have a lot of these and you do not want to write the config file by
hand?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:48:51 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F46D943
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:48:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from asav21.altibox.net (asav21.altibox.net [109.247.116.8])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD92517C4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:48:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by asav21.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03105804C0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:41:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from asav21.altibox.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (asav21.lysetele.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id X4d0dGfO6hf4 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:41:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.10.110] (129.81-166-80.customer.lyse.net
[81.166.80.129])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no)
by asav21.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8E6180175
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:41:49 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52E9213D.7030707@kleppnett.no>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:41:49 +0100
From: Kenneth Hatteland <kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Force install function in PKGNG
References: <mailman.6097.1390941779.1399.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.6097.1390941779.1399.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:48:51 -0000
My system always have had problems getting my HP cp1515n to work. But
installing HPLIP from ports, then installing HPIJS with pkg_add -rf will
get the correct PPDs to show up in CUPS.
After swithcing to pkgng it does not seem to exist a force option so
I have to do all my prints on another machine, which is slightly
annoying. I have read man pages and googled but can not seem to find a
force funtion. Does anybody know about one or have a better way of
making the right PPDs install to get my printer going ? Having only
HPLIP, or HPIJS installed does not make this possible.
Thanks in advance, Kenneth Hatteland
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:51:03 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A12BCE;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:51:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de
[IPv6:2a01:488:42::50ed:8591])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B591861;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:51:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from xdsl-78-34-137-130.netcologne.de ([78.34.137.130]
helo=dijkstra-old.cruwe.de); authenticated
by wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1W8XPo-0008Gc-1P; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:51:00 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:50:58 +0100
From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Black screen and strange error on GeForce GT 730M / Thinkpad T440p
Message-ID: <20140129165058.59990d06@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140127010351.2e450a9b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
References: <20140127010351.2e450a9b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;cjr@cruwe.de;1391010663;48ea769e;
Cc: danfe@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:51:03 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:03:51 +0100
"Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de> wrote:
> I have got a new Thinkpad T440p with dual Intel / Nvidia graphics. As
> Intel Haswell is of now unspupported I had high hopes for the nvidia
> GPU. However, with x11/nvidia-driver I get a black screen and
> following error message on dmesg:
>
> nvidia0: <GeForce GT 730M> on vgapci0
> vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
> vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> ACPI Error: Field [TBF3] at 270336 exceeds Buffer [NULL] size 262144
> (bits) (20130823/dsopcode-249) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution
> failed [\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_.GETB] (Node 0xfffff80005341e00),
> AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20130823/psparse-553) ACPI Error: Method
> parse/execution failed [\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._ROM] (Node
> 0xfffff80005341e40), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20130823/psparse-553) ACPI
> Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
> Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) em0:
> link state changed to UP ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> (20130823/nsarguments-97)
>
> I updated BIOS with
> http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS037576
> to have the newsest version.
>
>
> I have seen such an error message reported to the letter in Sep '13 by
> Hiren. Can anybody help me understand what's happening here, I have
> absolutely no idea what that should mean.
>
> Thanks and cheers,
cc'ing MAINTAINER of x11/nvidia-driver and freebsd-x11
After some investigation, it appears that due to "errors" in the acpi
implementation, the driver issues non-conforming acpi calls. Similiar
problems have been reported on Archlinux.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=170074
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/37465
https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/bbswitch/issues/65
I have opened a topic on devtalk.nvidia.com
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/680155/freebsd/x11-nvidia-driver-331-20-malfunction/
I have can be of any assistance debugging, please say so.
Thanks for any attention,
--
Christopher
TZ: GMT + 1h
GnuPG/GPG: 0xE8DE2C14
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r256184: Thu Oct 10 19:12:54 CEST 2013
cjr@dijkstra.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/home/cjr/media/src/freebsd/base/stable/9/sys/GEN_WDTRACE
Punctuation matters:
"Lets eat Grandma." or "Lets eat, Grandma." - Punctuation saves lives.
"A panda eats shoots and leaves." or "A panda eats, shoots, and
leaves." - Punctuation teaches proper biology.
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." (RFC 1925)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:52:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F193CCBF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from frv198.fwdcdn.com (frv198.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.198])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9353187F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
s=ffe;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:To:Subject:From:Date;
bh=W/2sN2hdeOL1WgIFGx3yjzjl/gJDKx1oITuVLlu3yqY=;
b=kd8tFyadOqFljZlukK+UCjA03s5X4leezIdvzgw6/b9ZPawKmZh12W6ROkMVRzMaxNOor+5LSjWj3nYtE3lbsPt9EuKKE+KFgS+86w2p7O5JynpQXxVvXDCTMwYa9xJGpHC5eh/ahN57Ji/3ZoqF7ywIIpRD8W8zyGBAkw6QnsQ=;
Received: from [10.10.10.35] (helo=frv35.ukr.net)
by frv198.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1W8XQt-0007aU-LK
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:52:07 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:52:07 +0200
From: Vladislav Prodan <universite@ukr.net>
Subject: Re[2]: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
To: frank2@fjl.co.uk
X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0
Message-Id: <1391010653.726619904.szvwo6t9@frv35.ukr.net>
In-Reply-To: <52E91B3D.4000601@fjl.co.uk>
References: <1390999493.115887823.pfbg2ep5@frv35.ukr.net>
<52E91B3D.4000601@fjl.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from universite@ukr.net by frv35.ukr.net;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:52:07 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:52:13 -0000
>
> On 29/01/2014 12:45, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> > Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
> >
> > 10.1.2.3 -> 100.1.2.3
> > 10.1.2.4 -> 100.1.2.4
> > 10.1.2.5 -> 100.1.2.5
> > 10.1.2.6 -> 100.1.2.6
> > ...
> > IP addresses such an over 20k
> > prompt you implement?
> >
> I don't understand the question exactly (I expect I will not be the only
> one). natd will allow 1:1 mappings like this very easily. Are you saying
> you have a lot of these and you do not want to write the config file by
> hand?
>
>
I'm not sure that FreeBSD withstand an over 20k rules of the form:
ipfw nat 3 config ip 100.1.2.3
ipfw nat 4 config ip 100.1.2.4
ipfw nat 5 config ip 100.1.2.5
ipfw nat 6 config ip 100.1.2.6
...
+ Two rules to handle each nat N
Probably need to somehow use nat tablearg, but I do not understand logic.
--
Vladislav V. Prodan
System & Network Administrator
http://support.od.ua
+380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508
VVP88-RIPE
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 15:52:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07561D53
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:52:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCA741881
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:52:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8XQy-0002DN-JY
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:52:12 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:52:12 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:52:12 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:52:26 -0000
Hi
I'm going to start using poudriere. I just wanted to check the step(s)
required to create the zfs/zpool in order to use it.
I'm using FreeBSD 10, default zfs layout/setup from installation.
I've read on a site that `zpool create ... ada0` to start? I just want
to ask before I go ahead so I don't screw it up. I'm not familiar yet
with zfs filesystem. There doesn't appear to be any clear guides
available on setting up the zfs environment needed for poudriere; not
that I could find anyway.
Thanks for any info received.
Jamie.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 16:28:29 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19F162F6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de
[IPv6:2a01:488:42::50ed:8591])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCE351CAB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:28:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from xdsl-78-34-137-130.netcologne.de ([78.34.137.130]
helo=dijkstra-old.cruwe.de); authenticated
by wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1W8Y02-0006pW-V0; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:28:27 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:28:26 +0100
From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
Message-ID: <20140129172826.54fc6d7b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;cjr@cruwe.de;1391012908;62d4dbad;
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:28:29 -0000
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm going to start using poudriere. I just wanted to check the step(s)
> required to create the zfs/zpool in order to use it.
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 10, default zfs layout/setup from installation.
>
> I've read on a site that `zpool create ... ada0` to start? I just want
> to ask before I go ahead so I don't screw it up. I'm not familiar yet
> with zfs filesystem. There doesn't appear to be any clear guides
> available on setting up the zfs environment needed for poudriere; not
> that I could find anyway.
>
> Thanks for any info received.
>
> Jamie.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Assuming you are running 10.0-RELEASE on zfs and further assuming you
do not run multiple zpools, you already have your zpool set up.
You configure the $ZPOOL poudriere uses in
/usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf, which is extensively commented.
Then, poudriere jail -c <...> will create your zfs dataset for you. I
recommend to create datasets for packages like
zroot/poudriere/packages/10amd64, but this is not required.
Cheers,
--
Christopher
TZ: GMT + 1h
GnuPG/GPG: 0xE8DE2C14
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r256184: Thu Oct 10 19:12:54 CEST 2013
cjr@dijkstra.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/home/cjr/media/src/freebsd/base/stable/9/sys/GEN_WDTRACE
Punctuation matters:
"Lets eat Grandma." or "Lets eat, Grandma." - Punctuation saves lives.
"A panda eats shoots and leaves." or "A panda eats, shoots, and
leaves." - Punctuation teaches proper biology.
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." (RFC 1925)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 16:42:51 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C0AA69
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:42:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26F01E16
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:42:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8YDx-00034g-Oc
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:42:49 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:42:49 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:42:49 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <slrnleibrv.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140129172826.54fc6d7b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:42:52 -0000
On 2014-01-29, Christopher J. Ruwe <cjr@cruwe.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
> James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm going to start using poudriere. I just wanted to check the step(s)
>> required to create the zfs/zpool in order to use it.
>>
>> I'm using FreeBSD 10, default zfs layout/setup from installation.
>>
>> I've read on a site that `zpool create ... ada0` to start? I just want
>> to ask before I go ahead so I don't screw it up. I'm not familiar yet
>> with zfs filesystem. There doesn't appear to be any clear guides
>> available on setting up the zfs environment needed for poudriere; not
>> that I could find anyway.
>>
>> Thanks for any info received.
>>
>> Jamie.
>
> Assuming you are running 10.0-RELEASE on zfs and further assuming you
> do not run multiple zpools, you already have your zpool set up.
>
> You configure the $ZPOOL poudriere uses in
> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf, which is extensively commented.
>
> Then, poudriere jail -c <...> will create your zfs dataset for you. I
> recommend to create datasets for packages like
> zroot/poudriere/packages/10amd64, but this is not required.
>
> Cheers,
Hi, thanks for the info. I think I was overcomplicating the process.
I've got it all up and running now (I think - so far so good).
Jamie.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 18:44:28 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02F0F79
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp9.server.rpi.edu (smtp9.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.229])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9116818D6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp-auth2.server.rpi.edu (route.canit.rpi.edu [128.113.2.232])
by smtp9.server.rpi.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id
s0TIfHpB009644; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:41:18 -0500
Message-Id: <201401291841.s0TIfHpB009644@smtp9.server.rpi.edu>
Received: from smtp-auth2.server.rpi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp-auth2.server.rpi.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66E9180D7;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (webmail1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.169])
by smtp-auth2.server.rpi.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F1B180CB;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
X-Originating-Ip: 128.113.124.121
X-Http_host: webmail.rpi.edu
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:41:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: /var/run/dmesg.boot Empty After Boot
X-Mailer: EMUmail 6.0.1.32
From: drosih@rpi.edu
X-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.
59.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.9 Safari/534.59.8
X-Webmail-User: drosih@mail.rpi.edu
To: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outgoing, @@RPTN)
X-Spam-Score: 0.00 () [Hold at 15.00] MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER:0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD:-0.01
X-CanIt-Incident-Id: 02LjSFibh
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=128.113.2.169; country=US; region=NY; city=Troy;
postalcode=12180; latitude=42.7495; longitude=-73.5951; metrocode=532;
areacode=518; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=42.7495,-73.5951&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.229
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: drosih@rpi.edu
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:44:29 -0000
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:23:31 EST Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> Is there some special sauce to get /var/run/dmesg.boot to be
> populated with the boot time system messages? Mine is empty
> and I'm not quite sure why...
>
> Thanks,
It should happen automatically in the default system config.
There should be a 'dmesg_enable="YES"' line in your
/etc/defaults/rc.conf file, so you should get that behavior
unless that variable is set to "NO" in /etc/rc.conf.
Which version of FreeBSD are you running? (I doubt it makes
a difference, but it would be good to say what it is).
One thing that might be happening is that /etc/rc.d/dmesg is
run at startup, but then something mounts a new filesystem
on top of /var .
You could always run /etc/rc.d/dmesg shortly after a system
reboot, and see what that does to /var/run/dmesg.boot.
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosih@rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 21:44:25 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EE94DA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:44:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1BCF18D5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0TLiDJH029847
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:44:15 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E9762F.10208@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:44:15 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
References: <1390999493.115887823.pfbg2ep5@frv35.ukr.net> <52E91B3D.4000601@fjl.co.uk>
<1391010653.726619904.szvwo6t9@frv35.ukr.net>
In-Reply-To: <1391010653.726619904.szvwo6t9@frv35.ukr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:44:25 -0000
On 29/01/2014 15:52, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 29/01/2014 12:45, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
>>> Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
>>>
>>> 10.1.2.3 -> 100.1.2.3
>>> 10.1.2.4 -> 100.1.2.4
>>> 10.1.2.5 -> 100.1.2.5
>>> 10.1.2.6 -> 100.1.2.6
>>> ...
>>> IP addresses such an over 20k
>>> prompt you implement?
>>>
>> I don't understand the question exactly (I expect I will not be the only
>> one). natd will allow 1:1 mappings like this very easily. Are you saying
>> you have a lot of these and you do not want to write the config file by
>> hand?
>>
>>
> I'm not sure that FreeBSD withstand an over 20k rules of the form:
>
> ipfw nat 3 config ip 100.1.2.3
> ipfw nat 4 config ip 100.1.2.4
> ipfw nat 5 config ip 100.1.2.5
> ipfw nat 6 config ip 100.1.2.6
> ...
>
> + Two rules to handle each nat N
>
> Probably need to somehow use nat tablearg, but I do not understand logic.
>
>
I do not think there would be a problem with natd. It uses libalias and
this calls malloc() to add each redirect to a simple linked list. A
quick looks suggests it's only 50-ish bytes/entry (depending on
processor) so a table of 20K of them would be ~1Mb (+malloc overhead).
There was a time when 1Mb was a lot of core, but not any more. It may
slow down a bit, as it links through he list.
There might be something in the newer libalias that does it more
efficiently, but if you give it a go I think it will probably work.
Regards, Frank.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 22:10:04 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9040233
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69DD1A8C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id tp5so2707053ieb.21
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:10:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:from:content-type:message-id:date:to
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
bh=Ug8U62PFxRvBUM3T67Zs1/e+OWmAn+QhEJI8mDkUeco=;
b=ehOXht8NT5/8pgSYT1HsGez+i5gpJugwYEEkiLjm/azNabJvhWh+5ps1mjoZl93z7r
vVm2VSn41hPDPEDY7zZXDnbI+4SIiSBPP1X1RTp7NVjWG+GG9S0pghkBJiK7KJaNUtAg
n0wWxDR5FwREda8wQ/YOebpai0Guh6qX/9P+0MH0/lWME+VTVRtT1JhRY3B09EZUnHo0
r+zZNnVaE88kphdJb0glZ8qaO7j84Ty4bMI/JZHqFirR4gIU5md503q8Ew6qv/81nqVy
0AVL7LwwDGHSZ+jkDmUdtW/+Awg2SxC4KXkecEIkDOX0M2wUo0i0PdZoIWa2LltP1555
MrMA==
X-Received: by 10.50.103.5 with SMTP id fs5mr14077591igb.24.1391033404011;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:10:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.2.129.223] ([166.137.84.62])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fk5sm72318967igb.9.2014.01.29.14.10.02
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
From: Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a)
Message-Id: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:10:03 -0500
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:10:05 -0000
Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available a=
s either part of ipfw or pf.=20
Regards,
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
Email/jabber: juicewvu@gmail.com
Phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Sent from my iPhone.=20
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 22:13:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4AA6364
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (mail-ob0-f173.google.com
[209.85.214.173])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB631B11
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id vb8so2679515obc.32
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:13:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=GckPHiI9a/2+Gf0AHSbohTZlaqKbhg9pQP7WdXxKGCo=;
b=gynnUql15H7UQWQVGNvDCMhnMeXGs/q3ykXwVN93aezcjU9dXEqjYbCxrVZmP3nAYM
vCFbhi7Mb9gPliBEPJXtOYmmQX3qcN5vZarL9r3X016bq8xXxtwuafoMWJ+bhPL/U6Pb
9tyZLL4ByE3bTdCsEthTDqbBlyLWfXK5p+KvZBNo8Mu0IOjcODQEbJ+Lo0R48qrc/qj3
uvNOb19sOEYA2ikeMfBCfvx1o+e6Cc3jfIpey0zy1/QUFVHJRwXbgYavFLdH4lkeYDD9
MioAnaibwndXrn5wALn4NJktqBOdy+kL8ldINfQHhv9I4CMq4Cmh3HnZPUwV68DanjLx
euFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlLZsxgxyUWPFIdKIOditrrb2ul0gteLYe0YQr+PC9w1eGbE729pv58k2TooPMIwMQoxigs
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.135.194 with SMTP id pu2mr8446331obb.38.1391033581991;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.21.8 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:13:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
References: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:13:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHu1Y73ojcVwG43zzc9bDgWiDehGiaP6ww_GDQYmXzhx_3STUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To: Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:13:10 -0000
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available as either part of ipfw or pf.
Kernel nat for ipfirewall requires a custom kernel (GENERIC does not
have LIBALIAS).
- M
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 22:17:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64571691
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:17:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B2B1B67
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-163-127-175.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.127.175])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0TMHpUi036196
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:17:52 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52E97E11.9030300@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:17:53 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
References: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
<CAHu1Y73ojcVwG43zzc9bDgWiDehGiaP6ww_GDQYmXzhx_3STUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y73ojcVwG43zzc9bDgWiDehGiaP6ww_GDQYmXzhx_3STUA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:17:54 -0000
On 29/01/2014 22:13, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available as either part of ipfw or pf.
> Kernel nat for ipfirewall requires a custom kernel (GENERIC does not
> have LIBALIAS).
>
>
Although it's moot as I believe the kernel ends up with the same code
(could be wrong), so it makes no difference to any limits. The kernel
NAT is probably better as it handles hairpins whereas natd does not (or
I've never been able to make it!)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 22:19:03 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABDDC72E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from frv198.fwdcdn.com (frv198.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.198])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624311C7A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
s=ffe;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:To:Subject:From:Date;
bh=7FpUL6IC8YYV9UvY7ryUIOsmzxtrQR/T7vv1ERM2pHg=;
b=WFG3oEWLTNqwec4g+I4NdBsZ4POi/vo1Y7CIOqL+BmPIeoSvL2MBYqik1mIZ4vcBxfE8E9zFqdhn3iuEOedfYDxHgcskSb27uURdmsAdivVeG6wnkQRsMSdWpnsjFv9d+BEM7WPeE6SwDjdLQqeIg4a3K3geJK4sPHqSQa6ddKo=;
Received: from [10.10.10.35] (helo=frv35.ukr.net)
by frv198.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1W8dTH-0000KC-AO
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:18:59 +0200
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:18:59 +0200
From: Vladislav Prodan <universite@ukr.net>
Subject: Re[2]: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
To: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0
Message-Id: <1391033938.846207368.s17yjvjq@frv35.ukr.net>
In-Reply-To: <52E9762F.10208@fjl.co.uk>
References: <1390999493.115887823.pfbg2ep5@frv35.ukr.net>
<52E91B3D.4000601@fjl.co.uk> <1391010653.726619904.szvwo6t9@frv35.ukr.net>
<52E9762F.10208@fjl.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from universite@ukr.net by frv35.ukr.net;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:18:59 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:19:03 -0000
> On 29/01/2014 15:52, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 29/01/2014 12:45, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> >>> Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
> >>>
> >>> 10.1.2.3 -> 100.1.2.3
> >>> 10.1.2.4 -> 100.1.2.4
> >>> 10.1.2.5 -> 100.1.2.5
> >>> 10.1.2.6 -> 100.1.2.6
> >>> ...
> >>> IP addresses such an over 20k
> >>> prompt you implement?
> >>>
> >> I don't understand the question exactly (I expect I will not be the only
> >> one). natd will allow 1:1 mappings like this very easily. Are you saying
> >> you have a lot of these and you do not want to write the config file by
> >> hand?
> >>
> >>
> > I'm not sure that FreeBSD withstand an over 20k rules of the form:
> >
> > ipfw nat 3 config ip 100.1.2.3
> > ipfw nat 4 config ip 100.1.2.4
> > ipfw nat 5 config ip 100.1.2.5
> > ipfw nat 6 config ip 100.1.2.6
> > ...
> >
> > + Two rules to handle each nat N
> >
> > Probably need to somehow use nat tablearg, but I do not understand logic.
> >
> >
>
> I do not think there would be a problem with natd. It uses libalias and
> this calls malloc() to add each redirect to a simple linked list. A
> quick looks suggests it's only 50-ish bytes/entry (depending on
> processor) so a table of 20K of them would be ~1Mb (+malloc overhead).
> There was a time when 1Mb was a lot of core, but not any more. It may
> slow down a bit, as it links through he list.
>
> There might be something in the newer libalias that does it more
> efficiently, but if you give it a go I think it will probably work.
>
> Regards, Frank.
>
>
Thank you for your feedback.
I will try to assemble the stand and test scripts to simulate the behavior of users.
--
Vladislav V. Prodan
System & Network Administrator
http://support.od.ua
+380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508
VVP88-RIPE
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 22:25:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4135991
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:25:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from frv191.fwdcdn.com (frv191.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.191])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 991B51D0F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:25:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.1.30] (helo=frv196.fwdcdn.com)
by frv191.fwdcdn.com with esmtp ID 1W8dZ4-0003ss-FH
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:58 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
s=ffe;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:To:Subject:From:Date;
bh=hdIHBEDm9Sc9jGQybZ6mJaVUDW1/Lj9iffp9QqVqsYA=;
b=eBy6tGaAimg4bvKnZKTEF3wX/lBQJVKtve4zNR75tCuS27pjLmVdJAnQEhqIZ7Y5Mx3vKs8n6nU6vz0g2ksNBOdXo8FwhUuYgd5vkxtJjavZthD95hqmbxX8NoWUtORXTzcsZKJ4NjwG5FttsimSxXJ7VO5ivJsMoAl5Gt1CWNM=;
Received: from [10.10.10.35] (helo=frv35.ukr.net)
by frv196.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1W8dYs-000Kov-Ar
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:46 +0200
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:46 +0200
From: Vladislav Prodan <universite@ukr.net>
Subject: Re[2]: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
To: Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0
Message-Id: <1391034285.808273914.tglqx9fb@frv35.ukr.net>
In-Reply-To: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
References: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from universite@ukr.net by frv35.ukr.net;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:46 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:25:01 -0000
> Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available as either part of ipfw or pf.
>
>
> Regards,
> --
> Josh Smith
> KD8HRX
>
I just do not know other ways to natd and tablearg for 20k IP.
Can offer a how-to which direction to go?
--
Vladislav V. Prodan
System & Network Administrator
http://support.od.ua
+380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508
VVP88-RIPE
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 23:26:20 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 074FED45
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from moku60.aloha50.net (moku60.aloha50.net [66.180.132.237])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6BC12C6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mohawk7.intra.net (unknown [66.180.149.18])
by moku60.aloha50.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4091702D;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:17:37 -1000 (HST)
Message-ID: <52E98C10.7060408@hdk5.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:17:36 -1000
From: Al Plant <noc@hdk5.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Leonhardt <freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Why was nslookup removed from FreeBSD 10?
References: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <52E40CC4.6090401@fjl.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: noc@hdk5.net
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:26:20 -0000
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> Unbelievable, but true - someone somewhere thought that removing
> nslookup from the base system was the way to go.
>
> Why? Can anyone shed any light on how this decision was made?
>
> That's the question. The remainder are a few observations to save an
> obvious response...
>
> nslookup has been deprecated in some quarters for while now, with that
> annoying message asking people to use dig instead, although ISC changed
> its mind on this point after BIND 9.8. That's not a reason, and anyway,
> dig is missing too.
>
> Was it dropped because it's part on BIND, and that's been dropped from
> the base system (bad idea if you ask me, but no one did)? Well, as far
> as I can tell, this move has left us having to use "host" instead, and
> that's part of the BIND package too.
>
> What's next? Will someone get the bright idea that "ls" is a bit dated
> and/or unfamiliar to Microsofties and replace it with "dir"? (And EVEN
> WINDOWS has nslookup).
>
> If I wanted an OS that lacked features such as DNS out of the box, I'd
> have chosen Linux.
>
> Regards, Frank.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Aloha Frank,
FWIW:
I just had to use nslookup and dig.
I am working on moving a DNS for a mail server from an ATM setup to
inside of a lan with a public IP from my ISP.
Both tools are what Zone Edit uses on their servers. So I am going to
add the /usr/ports/dns/bind-tools when I replace my current Desktop BSD
boxes to FreeBSD10.
AL :)
~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740
+ http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
+ http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9* +
< email: noc@hdk5.net >
"All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 02:06:38 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F85146
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:06:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22b.google.com (mail-pd0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9B414C5
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:06:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id g10so2436855pdj.30
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:06:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=9iOeO/zEToa3lserg87n0ZcSk5DxDvO2X5+krQoIzrY=;
b=q6rwD1gLNRxHYAyRaQTE/FappmtiV2YZpVO7LxNl2lU3i1O03+o/CTeFfuVtcRd+ib
vkRG3Ogy2giN6y6ZZhYrVGfKQXTF0R2+X0HhRI6V2xdCr3ZhSQWXU6r1lhnIRE5fR5MO
jsyeRReNnfHQOD86ubyJm4xZ9AiZmOgXrsybaHaM25kJOagNr3lXCOCnJmd09Y10+i0O
IuOMZH88zqiD7qMNvzAtozD3uauqxmmsxphwUyzEAwxIv/0psxbbt2c2Dh9acK5B+jiq
zIAEhJvcX4N4Qs/3Ixgn01ZWRTVOJm1A9jhxiz0jK7VJKl/dCZq596cdfCKsuBYlcwFt
3wsw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.139.8 with SMTP id qu8mr11546427pab.157.1391047598310;
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.92.71 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:06:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E73717.3000503@tundraware.com>
References: <52E73717.3000503@tundraware.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:06:38 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+tpaK0u+6DLKmd-MCdML4HZ5m6a80Ax5Nx=7HRngfhvEOTJEg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel Geniuses: Need Help With MCA Code
From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:06:38 -0000
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>wrote:
>
>
> I've swapped CPUs (i5). I've fiddled with an endless supply of
> mobo settings. I've switched power supplies. I've moved mem
> sticks around .... No joy.
>
Looks like the only thing left is rpl to start pulling out dimms.
So, I dug through the sources and found this:
>
>
>
> mca_log(const struct mca_record *rec)
> {
> uint16_t mca_error;
>
> printf("MCA: Bank %d, Status 0x%016llx\n", rec->mr_bank,
> (long long)rec->mr_status);
> printf("MCA: Global Cap 0x%016llx, Status 0x%016llx\n",
> (long long)rec->mr_mcg_cap, (long long)rec->mr_mcg_status);
> printf("MCA: Vendor \"%s\", ID 0x%x, APIC ID %d\n", cpu_vendor,
> rec->mr_cpu_id, rec->mr_apic_id);
> printf("MCA: CPU %d ", rec->mr_cpu);
> if (rec->mr_status & MC_STATUS_UC)
> printf("UNCOR ");
> else {
> printf("COR ");
> if (rec->mr_mcg_cap & MCG_CAP_CMCI_P)
> printf("(%lld) ", ((long long)rec->mr_status &
> MC_STATUS_COR_COUNT) >> 38);
> }
>
>
> It looks like the trailing else clause is kicking out the error but I am
> unclear what the error means, beyond the fact that it appears to be a
> parity
> error somewhere within the CPU's internal memory (cache?). Is this error
> getting corrected? Is this benign, Should I get a different mobo?
>
> Um .... Haaaaalp :)
A pity you didn't follow my earlier suggestion.
--
Adam
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 03:16:33 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A456F413
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:16:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614D01A22
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:16:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
(authenticated bits=0)
by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0U3GHKK026955
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:16:17 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <52E9C401.9060704@tundraware.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:16:17 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel Geniuses: Need Help With MCA Code
References: <52E73717.3000503@tundraware.com>
<CA+tpaK0u+6DLKmd-MCdML4HZ5m6a80Ax5Nx=7HRngfhvEOTJEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+tpaK0u+6DLKmd-MCdML4HZ5m6a80Ax5Nx=7HRngfhvEOTJEg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:16:17 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: s0U3GHKK026955
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:16:33 -0000
On 01/29/2014 08:06 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com <mailto:tundra@tundraware.com>> wrote:
>
>
> I've swapped CPUs (i5). I've fiddled with an endless supply of
> mobo settings. I've switched power supplies. I've moved mem
> sticks around .... No joy.
>
>
> Looks like the only thing left is rpl to start pulling out dimms.
I did that too.
<SNIP>
>
> A pity you didn't follow my earlier suggestion.
Um, mcelog does not grok the output from 4th Gen (Haswell)
parts.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 08:01:25 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BE68CC;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:01:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from extmx.bcc.ru (extmx.bcc.ru [217.170.85.214])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6E41EDB;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by extmx.bcc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C0915D2A;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:27:08 +0400 (GMT-4)
Received: from extmx.bcc.ru ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (extmx.bcc.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 04131-02; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:26:56 +0400 (GMT-4)
Received: from mail.bcc (unknown [172.16.250.23])
by extmx.bcc.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F782117BF;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:26:56 +0400 (GMT-4)
Received: from snasonovnbwxp.bcc ([192.168.201.205]) by mail.bcc over TLS
secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:36:15 +0400
From: Sergey Nasonov <snasonov@bcc.ru>
To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Black screen and strange error on GeForce GT 730M / Thinkpad T440p
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:36:02 +0400
Message-ID: <1505617.Rred16yIh6@snasonovnbwxp.bcc>
Organization: BCC
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (FreeBSD/10.0-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20140129165058.59990d06@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
References: <20140127010351.2e450a9b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
<20140129165058.59990d06@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2014 07:36:15.0345 (UTC)
FILETIME=[F4E7A610:01CF1D8D]
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bcc.ru
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: danfe@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
"Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:01:25 -0000
Hello all.
Just for note.
Some time ago I upgraded T430 from Stable-9 to Stable-10. And after upgrade I
notice the same ACPI warnings:
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
But in my case Nvidia adapter working fine. T430 has NVS 5400 adapter
vgapci0: <VGA-compatible display> port 0x5000-0x507f mem
0xf2000000-0xf2ffffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xf0000000-0xf1ffffff irq 16 at device
0.0 on pci1
nvidia0: <NVS 5400M> on vgapci0
vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
vgapci0: Boot video device
Im using Nvidia driver version 331.20.
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:50:58 Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:03:51 +0100
>
> "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de> wrote:
> > I have got a new Thinkpad T440p with dual Intel / Nvidia graphics. As
> > Intel Haswell is of now unspupported I had high hopes for the nvidia
> > GPU. However, with x11/nvidia-driver I get a black screen and
> > following error message on dmesg:
> >
> > nvidia0: <GeForce GT 730M> on vgapci0
> > vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
> > vgapci0: child nvidia0 requested pci_enable_io
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch
> > - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> > ACPI Error: Field [TBF3] at 270336 exceeds Buffer [NULL] size 262144
> > (bits) (20130823/dsopcode-249) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution
> > failed [\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_.GETB] (Node 0xfffff80005341e00),
> > AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20130823/psparse-553) ACPI Error: Method
> > parse/execution failed [\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._ROM] (Node
> > 0xfffff80005341e40), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20130823/psparse-553) ACPI
> > Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch -
> > Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20130823/nsarguments-97) em0:
> > link state changed to UP ACPI Warning: \134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97) ACPI Warning:
\134_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_._DSM:
> > Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package]
> > (20130823/nsarguments-97)
> >
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 10:28:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 405018DD
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kukulies.org (mail.kukulies.org [78.47.239.221])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0295E1CCF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.27.4.215] (unknown [87.79.34.228])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by kukulies.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 732411AD85F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:22:51 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52EA27F6.2030308@kukulies.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:22:46 +0100
From: "Christoph P.U. Kukulies" <kuku@kukulies.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: fsck doesn't recognize FreeBSD filesystems (9.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:48 -0000
I just was wondering why the following did not work:
root@isdn:/dev # mount /dev/ad6s1a /mnt/ad6s1a
mount: /dev/ad6s1a: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run
fsck.: Operation not permitted
root@isdn:/dev # fsck /dev/ad6s1a
fsck: Could not determine filesystem type <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
root@isdn:/dev # fsck -t ufs /dev/ad6s1a
** /dev/ad6s1a
** Last Mounted on /
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
1867 files, 82726 used, 423761 free (3385 frags, 52547 blocks, 0.7%
fragmentation)
***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN *****
I had thought that FreeBSD could recognize its own filesystems (though
this one is from an earlier version of FreeBSD)
--
Christoph
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 10:40:34 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FDEEED7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:40:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 422451E16
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:40:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-45-52.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.45.52])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AFA63CBC9;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:40:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s0UAe0XY003514;
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:40:00 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:40:00 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: "Christoph P.U. Kukulies" <kuku@kukulies.org>
Subject: Re: fsck doesn't recognize FreeBSD filesystems (9.2)
Message-Id: <20140130114000.e04f922a.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <52EA27F6.2030308@kukulies.org>
References: <52EA27F6.2030308@kukulies.org>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:40:34 -0000
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:22:46 +0100, Christoph P.U. Kukulies wrote:
> I just was wondering why the following did not work:
>
> root@isdn:/dev # mount /dev/ad6s1a /mnt/ad6s1a
> mount: /dev/ad6s1a: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run
> fsck.: Operation not permitted
> root@isdn:/dev # fsck /dev/ad6s1a
> fsck: Could not determine filesystem type <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> root@isdn:/dev # fsck -t ufs /dev/ad6s1a
> ** /dev/ad6s1a
> ** Last Mounted on /
> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
> ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
> 1867 files, 82726 used, 423761 free (3385 frags, 52547 blocks, 0.7%
> fragmentation)
>
> ***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN *****
>
>
> I had thought that FreeBSD could recognize its own filesystems (though
> this one is from an earlier version of FreeBSD)
What you're experiencing is fully normal and intended. The detection
mechanism is not based upon actual file system types, but instead
relies on what /etc/fstab defines (either by reference of the mount
point or the device file or associated label).
See "man fsck":
The fsck utility invokes file system-specific programs to check the spe-
cial devices listed in the fstab(5) file or in the command line for con-
sistency.
If your /etc/fstab has an entry for /dev/ad6s1a or /mnt/ad6s1a with
the ufs file system specifier, both
# fsck /dev/ad6s1a
and
# fsck /mnt/ad6s1a
should work as you intend.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 11:18:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6125EEEB
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:18:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9BF10CE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:18:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8pdS-00015x-PD
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:18:18 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:18:18 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:18:18 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Force install function in PKGNG
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:17:55 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <slrnlekd7g.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <mailman.6097.1390941779.1399.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
<52E9213D.7030707@kleppnett.no>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:18:21 -0000
On 2014-01-29, Kenneth Hatteland <kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no> wrote:
> My system always have had problems getting my HP cp1515n to work. But
> installing HPLIP from ports, then installing HPIJS with pkg_add -rf will
> get the correct PPDs to show up in CUPS.
>
> After swithcing to pkgng it does not seem to exist a force option so
> I have to do all my prints on another machine, which is slightly
> annoying. I have read man pages and googled but can not seem to find a
> force funtion. Does anybody know about one or have a better way of
> making the right PPDs install to get my printer going ? Having only
> HPLIP, or HPIJS installed does not make this possible.
>
> Thanks in advance, Kenneth Hatteland
Have a look at the pkg-add(8) man page. Specifically, the -f option.
This provides the force function you need I believe. Or you might be
able to build it as a port to get it installed.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 11:34:16 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9732BF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:34:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de
[IPv6:2a01:488:42::50ed:8591])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD23121C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:34:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from xdsl-78-34-150-157.netcologne.de ([78.34.150.157]
helo=dijkstra-old.cruwe.de); authenticated
by wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1W8psr-0000YV-J5; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:34:13 +0100
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:34:08 +0100
From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 1920x1080 With xorg Intel Driver On HD 4600
Message-ID: <20140130123408.1f9e3dbd@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140129092537.08cd9404@X220.alogt.com>
References: <52E854E9.6070203@tundraware.com>
<20140129092537.08cd9404@X220.alogt.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;cjr@cruwe.de;1391081656;63389bbd;
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:34:16 -0000
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:25:37 +0800
Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:10:01 -0600
> Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote:
>
> > I am trying to get X to jump into 1920x1080 on an i5-based system
> > with Intel HD 4600 video. The intel driver seems to know nothing
> > about this chipset and vesa doesn't want to go that high in res.
> >
> > Ideas? Workarounds?
>
> I do not know about newer CPU versions as I have a second generation
> i7. I also have had to give X an hint via xorg.conf. But this was more
> than a year ago and should not be needed anymore.
>
> If your is a fourth generation i5, it could be that it is not fully
> supported yet. Just check the FreeBSD wiki regarding KMS, Intel etc.
>
> Erich
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
I do not know about your setup. I have a Thinkpad T440p with HD4600
internal GPU and Nvidia GeForce 730M dedicated. Currently, I can only
run VESA and can _only_ use 1920x1080.
Ports are compiled from revision=341507.
Hope that helps, cheers,
--
Christopher
TZ: GMT + 1h
GnuPG/GPG: 0xE8DE2C14
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r256184: Thu Oct 10 19:12:54 CEST 2013
cjr@dijkstra.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/home/cjr/media/src/freebsd/base/stable/9/sys/GEN_WDTRACE
Punctuation matters:
"Lets eat Grandma." or "Lets eat, Grandma." - Punctuation saves lives.
"A panda eats shoots and leaves." or "A panda eats, shoots, and
leaves." - Punctuation teaches proper biology.
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." (RFC 1925)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 11:38:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FAE4F0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00EB1247
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8pxE-0003CY-Ks
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:38:44 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:38:44 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:38:44 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <slrnlekedq.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140129172826.54fc6d7b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
<slrnleibrv.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:38:47 -0000
On 2014-01-29, James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2014-01-29, Christopher J. Ruwe <cjr@cruwe.de> wrote:
>> Assuming you are running 10.0-RELEASE on zfs and further assuming you
>> do not run multiple zpools, you already have your zpool set up.
>>
>> You configure the $ZPOOL poudriere uses in
>> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf, which is extensively commented.
>>
>> Then, poudriere jail -c <...> will create your zfs dataset for you. I
>> recommend to create datasets for packages like
>> zroot/poudriere/packages/10amd64, but this is not required.
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> Hi, thanks for the info. I think I was overcomplicating the process.
> I've got it all up and running now (I think - so far so good).
>
> Jamie.
The command i'm using to create the jail isn't working. I've checked the
man page, the command is correct so i'm stuck. The command is:
# poudriere jail -c -j 10amd64
df command shows the dataset/filesystem is mounted:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
zroot/ROOT/default 220G 9.4G 210G 4% /
devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev
fdescfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev/fd
procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc
linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /compat/linux/proc
zroot/tmp 210G 824K 210G 0% /tmp
zroot/usr/home 211G 625M 210G 0% /usr/home
zroot/usr/ports 212G 1.6G 210G 1% /usr/ports
zroot/usr/src 211G 1.1G 210G 0% /usr/src
zroot/var 213G 2.2G 210G 1% /var
zroot/var/crash 210G 148K 210G 0% /var/crash
zroot/var/log 210G 556K 210G 0% /var/log
zroot/var/mail 210G 156K 210G 0% /var/mail
zroot/var/tmp 210G 24M 210G 0% /var/tmp
zroot/poudriere/ports/default 211G 1.2G 210G 1% /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default
Can anyone advise?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 12:32:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1684EDF3
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:32:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.18])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E906E16B8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:32:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:cwr@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.15])
by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0UCW1a3012682
(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO);
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:32:04 GMT
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:32:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG>
X-X-Sender: cwr@sdf.lonestar.org
To: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
In-Reply-To: <slrnlekedq.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401301229490.19675@sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140129172826.54fc6d7b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
<slrnleibrv.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<slrnlekedq.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:32:05 -0000
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, James Griffin wrote:
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
> From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
>
> On 2014-01-29, James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2014-01-29, Christopher J. Ruwe <cjr@cruwe.de> wrote:
>
>>> Assuming you are running 10.0-RELEASE on zfs and further assuming you
>>> do not run multiple zpools, you already have your zpool set up.
>>>
>>> You configure the $ZPOOL poudriere uses in
>>> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf, which is extensively commented.
>>>
>>> Then, poudriere jail -c <...> will create your zfs dataset for you. I
>>> recommend to create datasets for packages like
>>> zroot/poudriere/packages/10amd64, but this is not required.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hi, thanks for the info. I think I was overcomplicating the process.
>> I've got it all up and running now (I think - so far so good).
>>
>> Jamie.
>
> The command i'm using to create the jail isn't working. I've checked the
> man page, the command is correct so i'm stuck. The command is:
>
> # poudriere jail -c -j 10amd64
>
> df command shows the dataset/filesystem is mounted:
>
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> zroot/ROOT/default 220G 9.4G 210G 4% /
> devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev
> fdescfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev/fd
> procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc
> linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /compat/linux/proc
> zroot/tmp 210G 824K 210G 0% /tmp
> zroot/usr/home 211G 625M 210G 0% /usr/home
> zroot/usr/ports 212G 1.6G 210G 1% /usr/ports
> zroot/usr/src 211G 1.1G 210G 0% /usr/src
> zroot/var 213G 2.2G 210G 1% /var
> zroot/var/crash 210G 148K 210G 0% /var/crash
> zroot/var/log 210G 556K 210G 0% /var/log
> zroot/var/mail 210G 156K 210G 0% /var/mail
> zroot/var/tmp 210G 24M 210G 0% /var/tmp
> zroot/poudriere/ports/default 211G 1.2G 210G 1% /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default
>
> Can anyone advise?
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
What do you have in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf for
ZPOOL=
and
ZROOTFS=
It should be ZPOOL=zroot and ZROOTFS=/poudriere
Charlie
cwr@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 12:33:34 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE139E99
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:33:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from www32.your-server.de (www32.your-server.de [213.133.104.32])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8969816D0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:33:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [145.253.194.41] (helo=[0.0.0.0])
by www32.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.74) (envelope-from <thomas.scholten@unbescholten.de>)
id 1W8qM3-0007UM-7o
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:04:23 +0100
Message-ID: <52EA3FC4.4050801@unbescholten.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:04:20 +0100
From: Thomas Scholten <thomas.scholten@unbescholten.de>
Organization: unbescholten.de IT Beratung
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Help: ipfw log is scrambled in syslog messages
X-Authenticated-Sender: thomas.scholten@unbescholten.de
X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.97.8/18415/Thu Jan 30 08:45:49 2014)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:33:35 -0000
Hello,
i hope you guys can give a hand debugging ipfw logging issues on my
firewall machine.
Currently i get scrambled syslog messages generated by ipfw log and ran
out of clues fixing it.
According
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2007-September/003160.html
this has
been an issue with 6.2 and was fixed with a mutex patch vor kernel
logging device.
Currently i run 7.4p10 (i know it's EOL) and the problem seems to rearise.
System is:
FreeBSD tom 7.4-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed Oct 31
07:22:00 UTC 2012
root@build64-7.XXX.XXXX.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DL380DNS amd64
syslogd is used to write the ipfw log messages to /var/log/kern and
/var/log/security showing
the follwing behavior:
syslogd is running with opts: -s -vv
/var/log/kern:
Jan 30 11:24:21 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 98
Jan 30 11:24:21 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 4
Jan 30 11:24:21 <kern.crit> tom kernel: v
Jan 30 11:24:22 <kern.crit> tom kernel: v
Jan 30 11:24:23 <kern.crit> tom kernel: c
Jan 30 11:24:24 <kern.crit> tom kernel: .
Jan 30 11:24:24 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 0
Jan 30 11:24:25 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 5
Jan 30 11:24:25 <kern.crit> tom kernel: f
Jan 30 11:24:26 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 1
Jan 30 11:24:27 <kern.crit> tom kernel: f
Jan 30 11:24:27 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 7
Jan 30 11:24:28 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 4
Jan 30 11:24:28 <kern.crit> tom kernel: 5
Jan 30 11:24:29 <kern.crit> tom kernel: e
Jan 30 11:24:30 <kern.crit> tom kernel: :
Jan 30 11:24:30 <kern.crit> tom kernel: D
/var/log/security ( X is used to anonymize the info a bit):
Jan 30 11:24:21 <security.info> tom kernel: Accept UDP XX.XX.XX.XX:58904
XX.XX.XX.XX:694 out via vl349
Jan 30 11:24:21 <security.info> tom kernel: ipfw: 7998 Accept UiDpPf
w1:0 .06.9497.87 4Ac:6c0e08p7t 1 0.U0D.P47 .1750:6.904. 4o7u.t 19v4i:a5
b8c90e0
Jan 30 11:24:21 <security.info> tom kernel: XX.XX.XX.XX:694 out via vl349
Jan 30 11:24:21 <security.info> tom kernel: ipfwip:f w:7 969989 8A
cAccecepptt UUDDPP 1100..00..4477..7159:55:15620781 81
01.00..04.74.77.41:9649:46 9i4n ivina vbciea0
Jan 30 11:24:21 <security.info> tom kernel: l349
Hope someone had this before and can give me hint.
Regards,
Thomas
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 12:38:07 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38FF42E8
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:38:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84261720
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8qsd-0008Vz-8V
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:38:03 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:38:03 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:38:03 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <slrnlekhss.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140129172826.54fc6d7b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
<slrnleibrv.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<slrnlekedq.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<Pine.NEB.4.64.1401301229490.19675@sdf.lonestar.org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:38:07 -0000
On 2014-01-30, Charlie <cwr@SDF.ORG> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, James Griffin wrote:
>> The command i'm using to create the jail isn't working. I've checked the
>> man page, the command is correct so i'm stuck. The command is:
>>
>> # poudriere jail -c -j 10amd64
>>
>> df command shows the dataset/filesystem is mounted:
>>
>>
>> [ ... ]
>> Can anyone advise?
>>
>
> What do you have in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf for
>
> ZPOOL=
Yep, got that.
> and
>
> ZROOTFS=
Yep, got that too.
> It should be ZPOOL=zroot and ZROOTFS=/poudriere
>
> Charlie
File contents are:
ZPOOL=zroot
ZROOTFS=/poudriere
FREEBSD_HOST=ftp://ftp.freebsd.org
RESOLV_CONF=/etc/resolv.conf
BASEFS=/usr/local/poudriere
POUDRIERE_DATA=${BASEFS}/data
USE_PORTLINT=no
USE_TMPFS=yes
DISTFILES_CACHE=/usr/ports/distfiles
SVN_HOST=svn0.eu.FreeBSD.org
CHECK_CHANGED_OPTIONS=verbose
CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS=yes
CCACHE_DIR=/var/cache/ccache
SAVE_WRKDIR=yes
WRKDIR_ARCHIVE_FORMAT=txz
I changed only the necessary fields in the file (sample).
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 13:27:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72BE31DA
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:27:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de
[IPv6:2a01:488:42::50ed:8591])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30DA41B5A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:27:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from xdsl-78-34-150-157.netcologne.de ([78.34.150.157]
helo=dijkstra-old.cruwe.de); authenticated
by wp376.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1W8rej-0000yL-UN; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:27:45 +0100
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:27:44 +0100
From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
Message-ID: <20140130142744.564b721e@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlekedq.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140129172826.54fc6d7b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
<slrnleibrv.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<slrnlekedq.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;cjr@cruwe.de;1391088468;2ddd11be;
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:27:48 -0000
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The command i'm using to create the jail isn't working. I've checked
> the man page, the command is correct so i'm stuck. The command is:
>
> # poudriere jail -c -j 10amd64
This is not sufficient, you just "named" your jail, but did not specifiy
which version you like there. Correct is
# poudriere jail -c -j 10amd64 -v 10.0-RELEASE
Cheers,
--
Christopher
TZ: GMT + 1h
GnuPG/GPG: 0xE8DE2C14
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r256184: Thu Oct 10 19:12:54 CEST 2013
cjr@dijkstra.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/home/cjr/media/src/freebsd/base/stable/9/sys/GEN_WDTRACE
Punctuation matters:
"Lets eat Grandma." or "Lets eat, Grandma." - Punctuation saves lives.
"A panda eats shoots and leaves." or "A panda eats, shoots, and
leaves." - Punctuation teaches proper biology.
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." (RFC 1925)
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 13:42:56 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6321B705
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:42:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBAF1E2D
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:42:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>) id 1W8rtN-0001Tw-Lr
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:53 +0100
Received: from kontrol.kode5.net ([80.229.5.32])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:53 +0100
Received: from jmzgriffin by kontrol.kode5.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:53 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: poudriere zfs/zpool create question
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <slrnleklmj.2dis.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
References: <slrnlei8t2.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140129172826.54fc6d7b@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
<slrnleibrv.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<slrnlekedq.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
<20140130142744.564b721e@dijkstra-old.cruwe.de>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kontrol.kode5.net
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:42:56 -0000
On 2014-01-30, Christopher J. Ruwe <cjr@cruwe.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
> James Griffin <jmzgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The command i'm using to create the jail isn't working. I've checked
>> the man page, the command is correct so i'm stuck. The command is:
>>
>> # poudriere jail -c -j 10amd64
>
> This is not sufficient, you just "named" your jail, but did not specifiy
> which version you like there. Correct is
>
> # poudriere jail -c -j 10amd64 -v 10.0-RELEASE
>
> Cheers,
Thanks Cristopher. I had manage to work it out in the end, about 30 mins
ago. Initially, I didn't realise the -v switch is mandatory.
I appreciate your help.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 15:34:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B873D2
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:34:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail1-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk (mail1-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk
[95.142.156.16])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3C91781
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:34:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [92.27.29.68] (helo=pantagruel.lan)
by mail1-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ben@benpaley.com>)
id 1W8sYj-0002LA-Ia; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:25:37 +0000
From: Ben Paley <ben@benpaley.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: VirtualBox and Xorg
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:25:41 +0000
Message-Id: <2D1C469F-D67C-4FB5-95C6-E5939BDD0111@benpaley.com>
To: wblock@wonkity.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:34:13 -0000
Warren,
Sorry not to have replied earlier, I=92ve been very busy with other =
things.
Your xorg.conf totally solved my difficulty! I=92ve got HAL and DBUS =
enabled so I uncommented the AutoAddDevices line.
Thanks very very much! :-)
Ben Paley
>=20
>=20
> If the desktop environment does not require it, build=20
> x11-servers/xorg-server with the HAL option off. Otherwise, add
>=20
> Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off"
>=20
> to the ServerLayout section of xorg.conf. This is the entire =
xorg.conf=20
> from a 9.1-STABLE VM (with HAL off):
>=20
> Section "ServerLayout"
> Identifier "xfce"
> InputDevice "Mouse1"
> # Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off"
> EndSection
>=20
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Mouse1"
> Driver "vboxmouse"
> EndSection
>=20
> Autoconfiguration of everything else works. The AutoAddDevices line =
is=20
> not present on mine, uncomment it to disable HAL.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 19:24:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C598ACF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:24:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 035841D42
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:24:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-161-164-213.range86-161.btcentralplus.com [86.161.164.213])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0UJOf2s095099
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:24:42 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52EAA6FD.3030504@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:24:45 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: ntfs-3g, cp and 'Bad address' errors
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:24:45 -0000
I'm getting weird things happening when I use cp -a to copy files from
an ntfs volume to zfs. On a few files I'm seeing:
cp: /data/<snip>avi: Bad address
(This is the destination file name)
I'm also getting some like:
cp: sourcename<snip>avi: Permission denied
These are, so far, weird files - sometimes in the Windows recycle bin;
sometimes files originating on a Macintosh and uncompressed to the ntfs
volume on a Windows box - particularly the "Bad Address" version. I
don't mind permission denied.
Although it's affected less than 1% of the files, and I don't care about
them, I still want to know what's going on. I assume that something is
passing back an EFAULT (error 14) and decoding it using libc. EFAULT is
defined as:
Bad address. The system detected an invalid address in attempting to
use an argument of a call.
Having trawled through the source the only place an error message in
this format could come from is seems to be directory searching code in
cp.c, which doesn't make a lot of sense (around like 285 in 10.0-RELEASE).
I don't even know whether to blame ZFS or ntfs-3g, although EFAULT
errors have been noted as a problem with the latter in other posts
questioning its reliability.
Does anyone know what's going on here?
Thanks, Frank.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 20:13:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DFBB0A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 809FE115F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35]
(host86-161-164-213.range86-161.btcentralplus.com [86.161.164.213])
(authenticated bits=0)
by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0UKD5iU004721
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:13:05 GMT
(envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk)
Message-ID: <52EAB255.8050304@fjl.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:13:09 +0000
From: Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ntfs-3g, cp and 'Bad address' errors - further
References: <52EAA6FD.3030504@fjl.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <52EAA6FD.3030504@fjl.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:13:09 -0000
On 30/01/2014 19:24, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> I'm getting weird things happening when I use cp -a to copy files from
> an ntfs volume to zfs. On a few files I'm seeing:
>
> cp: /data/<snip>avi: Bad address
>
> (This is the destination file name)
>
> I'm also getting some like:
>
> cp: sourcename<snip>avi: Permission denied
>
> These are, so far, weird files - sometimes in the Windows recycle bin;
> sometimes files originating on a Macintosh and uncompressed to the
> ntfs volume on a Windows box - particularly the "Bad Address" version.
> I don't mind permission denied.
>
> Although it's affected less than 1% of the files, and I don't care
> about them, I still want to know what's going on. I assume that
> something is passing back an EFAULT (error 14) and decoding it using
> libc. EFAULT is defined as:
>
> Bad address. The system detected an invalid address in attempting to
> use an argument of a call.
>
>
> Having trawled through the source the only place an error message in
> this format could come from is seems to be directory searching code in
> cp.c, which doesn't make a lot of sense (around like 285 in
> 10.0-RELEASE).
>
> I don't even know whether to blame ZFS or ntfs-3g, although EFAULT
> errors have been noted as a problem with the latter in other posts
> questioning its reliability.
>
> Does anyone know what's going on here?
>
> Thanks, Frank.
>
Further to this, looking more closely at various files they were almost
certainly encrypted to the user. Attempting to open them results in read
error. For some reason cp displays "Permission denied" and the source
file name OR "Bad address" and the destination file name, and I can't
see anything different about the files in question. That the files
cannot be read is okay - they're supposed to be encrypted. Why some of
the error messages are misleading remains a question.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 30 21:49:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0C7BEF
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:49:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk
[IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A66B41959
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk
[81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s0ULnInV057921
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:49:19 GMT
(envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s0ULnInV057921
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1391118559;
bh=rmrG+1hWlam2Xr2Wb7frmVkdFD1yLbjmwNQRjKGieGM=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
z=Date:=20Thu,=2030=20Jan=202014=2021:49:10=20+0000|From:=20Matthew
=20Seaman=20<m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>|To:=20freebsd-questi
ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Force=20install=20function=20in=2
0PKGNG|References:=20<mailman.6097.1390941779.1399.freebsd-questio
ns@freebsd.org>=20<52E9213D.7030707@kleppnett.no>=20<slrnlekd7g.1i
q.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>|In-Reply-To:=20<slrnlekd7g.1iq.jmz
griffin@kontrol.kode5.net>;
b=KCLEIwLdd+f/q3mkiwBqY6Qw3BZxPykqXaTq4NK+1gMLaDK2aohttaQ9+EPlDncec
3NH2G/+aAZlEJj4N47yPsUCM0542gAyJ4Qag2uqcbg+88Bf4OnVsLwNUiKJNEk6ypL
ltdcKVj+ssqPluhynrb0j7P1HSVVJwKZtfw19y10=
Message-ID: <52EAC8D6.6020805@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:49:10 +0000
From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Force install function in PKGNG
References: <mailman.6097.1390941779.1399.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
<52E9213D.7030707@kleppnett.no> <slrnlekd7g.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlekd7g.1iq.jmzgriffin@kontrol.kode5.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=E7F39EBF
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="utfFwSPGwLu8hMATruoqDgxwH5hjtLFbE"
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
DCC_CHECK,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:49:26 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--utfFwSPGwLu8hMATruoqDgxwH5hjtLFbE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 30/01/2014 11:17, James Griffin wrote:
> On 2014-01-29, Kenneth Hatteland <kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no> wrote=
:
>> My system always have had problems getting my HP cp1515n to work. But =
>> installing HPLIP from ports, then installing HPIJS with pkg_add -rf wi=
ll=20
>> get the correct PPDs to show up in CUPS.
>>
>> After swithcing to pkgng it does not seem to exist a force option so=
=20
>> I have to do all my prints on another machine, which is slightly=20
>> annoying. I have read man pages and googled but can not seem to find a=
=20
>> force funtion. Does anybody know about one or have a better way of=20
>> making the right PPDs install to get my printer going ? Having only=20
>> HPLIP, or HPIJS installed does not make this possible.
>>
>> Thanks in advance, Kenneth Hatteland
>=20
> Have a look at the pkg-add(8) man page. Specifically, the -f option.
> This provides the force function you need I believe. Or you might be
> able to build it as a port to get it installed.=20
pkg-add is used when you have downloaded a pkg tarball manually.
Virtually always you probably want to use pkg-install -- as this will
handle automatically fetching the package and any dependencies from a
repository. pkg-install understands '-f' to force installation.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk
--utfFwSPGwLu8hMATruoqDgxwH5hjtLFbE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJS6sjeXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC
QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATBiAP/35NnPIMkKLa+phJKZ+W/Orf
SMTIDKoycRfeai1QOoa8pzsVsnWEKtNWa1H4Zo0Pu8OGTvem441inBzKVidhJmyB
cfYw4n20aIL9ZPQ+7VJLn40t5k9vlU3aivRi5TEMlxMl40tl5Ib8T/68iGeMMLm7
B2Y3ne5B8zy5MhBdWlmzP2xjfGhuQ+dmGOisYvYWeJzOlNxGrGn9srR24FJ2soxb
s15d9up5uTOvImjuCDACQ6J+Sd7tpjTF8B1XOHAtrq3EHQybTWX8cksYkoNP6VVs
6/jEC3Qw/7ytf1F+D6uXmn37rII7RYVcTX9fAMrXlN8UeF8DzCGmN/pVj9Ros16y
nlmtrFHvFoBt3uWnMv/yjZvW8O7EC/CZu9pNK7JBVjN2YUBgcOBBw5k/XjRkRiUf
mbktiAtlfSE35MJB8Lgqen5ijBKmaSwvAfBSIzWZkX0frfVgb6EmAVq3lSWJ7Jrt
UvdG4RK0vAEHRSLnnMrDpmdUQa4RioH0Xfxx1rfXKoR0yActb8SZVjNGU6sZD1l+
PiReqwUxURNrB7KKDRCAUiUtcnDwuhPMefjuEfrCj36jgjvRLg58ewYSFSqD0sWu
4FFzxsR6MGmCJcklj8Xrs+U0UiAquFnUxh3k9nq8CJ7Qf2JkFysLs1C3NzUOKxR5
EBMMTiUuZp44qCaNI1xk
=lcsv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--utfFwSPGwLu8hMATruoqDgxwH5hjtLFbE--
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 13:41:14 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9289C29;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x230.google.com (mail-qa0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::230])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B701207;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f11so6207016qae.7
for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 05:41:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=kkYTF1LJq2m9Gpb9EGlqyeWvYWaEcrWd2U4gEAilAHw=;
b=ouFsnG5VKxam/YnmeKJRMukr4QwnB933MmQauvpBFQ7k6WfTM7IpAh3YZicrjdJf5Z
SMcqTEIwpwrAnHvQEPvagUfAcUhorcAKLU9KSW2pBfOvU8/Fm69qCRu9Ko8osWt0pP65
NluR9FjQceG0j2fWW/VqNRgNYvNeIx5KA1uhvu+XlqJRmf8JWwDOdyuKmW75qOsXXvjV
y3Zo/kI8F7VthoDu2LtD0euIB9QjDAz4q57MN6KCQwE4QSr5dm1ZUFGe7ffJFUZjiJEv
TB6ToP18pKg2HszewZ0Jo5agogtsl/5E/W5ZwsjQDY6qjAnbJN3m7l8ombHa+rCxaNwK
qvoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.2.6 with SMTP id 6mr32086036qah.12.1391175673294; Fri,
31 Jan 2014 05:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.151.73 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 05:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:41:13 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: KHPwa0F4eSGqksUN_xxhu6qkiME
Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:41:14 -0000
Hello :-)
Some time ago I have definitely moved from EXT2 to UFS2. This greatly
improved my speed and stability on FreeBSD, but I somehow lost access
and portability for other OS in "native" read-write mode. I am looking
for an universal fs driver for other OS mainly Linux and Windows that
would allow me to use UFS(2) natively (such as ext2fsd). I am sure
there is already such solution, as fs standard is open and BSD
licensed, so other OS would surely benefit from that support/driver
:-)
Please advise :-)
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 14:07:09 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8644111
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:07:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailrelay4.qsc.de (mailrelay4.qsc.de [195.158.160.129])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15998139E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:07:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([213.148.129.14]) by mailgate4.qsc.de;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:06:28 +0100
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-45-52.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.45.52])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B353C0AC;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:06:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s0VE61Lm002778;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:06:01 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:06:01 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
Message-Id: <20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-cloud-security-sender: freebsd@edvax.de
X-cloud-security-recipient: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN
X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on
mailgate4 with CA8EB1490004
X-cloud-security-connect: mx01.qsc.de[213.148.129.14], TLS=, IP=213.148.129.14
X-cloud-security: scantime:.1962
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:07:09 -0000
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:41:13 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello :-)
>
> Some time ago I have definitely moved from EXT2 to UFS2. This greatly
> improved my speed and stability on FreeBSD, but I somehow lost access
> and portability for other OS in "native" read-write mode.
The lowest common denominator is msdosfs (DOS FAT) which is
usable in r/w nearly everywhere. If you require long file
names, you need the 16 bit version. This is commonly considered
the "typical solution" for the problem you're describing, even
though it doesn't really look any attractive because, as I
said, it's the _lowest_ common denominator where "lowest" is
determined by the inability of "Windows" products to be
willing to accept anything that isn't made, approved, certified
and sold by MICROS~1. :-)
> I am looking
> for an universal fs driver for other OS mainly Linux and Windows that
> would allow me to use UFS(2) natively (such as ext2fsd).
The _most universal_ file system isn't even a file system.
Instead, it's tar. Yes, really: "tar-formatted" media can
be read almost everywhere (DOS, IRIX, Solaris, BSD, Linux,
AIX etc.). Everything you need is a tar implementation on
the target system. It works with almost all media (floppy
disks, CD, DVD, USB drives, SD cards, even hard disks).
The major downside is that it isn't really a file system.
It's good for transfer from A to B, but not for adding,
changing or removing files...
> I am sure
> there is already such solution, as fs standard is open and BSD
> licensed, so other OS would surely benefit from that support/driver
> :-)
No, something like that doesn't exist because nobody cares
about interoperability of data. :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 14:53:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268C6AE5;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:53:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C89BE1767;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:53:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id o15so6445682qap.30
for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:53:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=rxC3DQmVEF7cxdCZW90QDMbZXKy0QJcmy/PN70q9X/8=;
b=xMpQxtir2VHhwl9dnUDD6Q2ga5vxii42SXDBhlDhSeyGQ16tYDH5VTGKx9lEwj1hqJ
bUHx79/FzKI1/3QHctIWEAyKLvaKet4yrMoN63apYLJ4jNyZkwUaLdR+oFgeN4081bfX
+Ja9J2XDDo1L2nDqXjI5vVVytLUIdCPOk+K0cjiJSV/Ydu8C5a/LC08A3AyPjWtKPxlr
leOCsJJp9so0wQuxzKQhRjfewGsZhxK4+dkY9NEBqLlNV0/WRVyV/r/byHqIeeYHWSFU
Apu13nwHDGwwvT15RJDkJMP2WTsl9ahFP6pomX1ohl3SWnyrArQtWj+zB1ERQ70GwVsz
B/pw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.83.112 with SMTP id i103mr30634914qgd.100.1391180030865;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:53:50 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.151.73 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:53:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
References: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:53:50 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VqWfuBzxEzQSK2LCMc2fq8KyGCo
Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=8SZjpRdQ0-udNnZ0+vHW0DZtoxQ_KcTsCE=uXk6rhSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:53:52 -0000
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:41:13 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
>> Hello :-)
>>
>> Some time ago I have definitely moved from EXT2 to UFS2. This greatly
>> improved my speed and stability on FreeBSD, but I somehow lost access
>> and portability for other OS in "native" read-write mode.
>
> The lowest common denominator is msdosfs (DOS FAT) which is
> usable in r/w nearly everywhere. If you require long file
> names, you need the 16 bit version.
Hey Polytropon :-) I need large files over 4GB and some existing
access riight not to be modified so FAT does not apply, also extFAT is
patented so I wont give it even a try...
> The _most universal_ file system isn't even a file system.
> Instead, it's tar. Yes, really: "tar-formatted" media can
> (..)
> It's good for transfer from A to B, but not for adding,
> changing or removing files...
For archives maybe yes, but I need it as live r/w filesystem, just
like I used EXT2 - lets say three small OS partitions and one large
data partition on the workstation :-)
>> I am sure
>> there is already such solution, as fs standard is open and BSD
>> licensed, so other OS would surely benefit from that support/driver
>> :-)
>
> No, something like that doesn't exist because nobody cares
> about interoperability of data. :-)
How about UFS2 driver for other OS? Is UFS2 endianness sensitive? Even
if, on one machine that would not be the problem :-)
Did anyone implement public UFS2 driver for other OS (Windows, Linux)?
Best regards :-)
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 17:20:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6FD68A;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:20:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-x231.google.com (mail-oa0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::231])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06437159C;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:20:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id i7so5465792oag.22
for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:20:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=dduCv0WQQWnnDAIK0dAeq753ajmJE/SgCs/vIGSbrIw=;
b=Gsn6LuH8GJ34BBJRY8+3LOEj0/MFFCi8gm6MMYPjo4uz38fPCmvbFnIjxA341GYa/C
Mgi+NNGc5hKuwZ7s7lRzrlqGfpBnkEFEonrHfDUAbgnITcTluCS2+h1zV0Rb/TZWxvhK
+leP+TgefybU6Z9JoGtPxrfJ9+OLx1NtQzEX+ZVD8j4zJoHDygumvk1O9MOycnaInUXH
MxGG3oCsPN0KhjycmvTwXta+yhR1g+GLdlwLzmIrLNTylfhgruSP2v0avmRDAyZDbke7
mUlwqLch9UGJ3Ycc8FzcizthJ1ZJLG6Nt6qjhhxtrltbNjLmZwQKdKiUDLfvFHQMWbCr
G0KA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.18.102 with SMTP id v6mr1557707obd.71.1391188838278;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.132.9 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:20:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
References: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:20:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOjFWZ4B3W=iXkycTymJb+pVnwKPF-tqezcNiBX9C0pCqLy8TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:20:39 -0000
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:41:13 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
> > Hello :-)
> >
> > Some time ago I have definitely moved from EXT2 to UFS2. This greatly
> > improved my speed and stability on FreeBSD, but I somehow lost access
> > and portability for other OS in "native" read-write mode.
>
> The lowest common denominator is msdosfs (DOS FAT) which is
> usable in r/w nearly everywhere. If you require long file
> names, you need the 16 bit version. This is commonly considered
> the "typical solution" for the problem you're describing, even
> though it doesn't really look any attractive because, as I
> said, it's the _lowest_ common denominator where "lowest" is
> determined by the inability of "Windows" products to be
> willing to accept anything that isn't made, approved, certified
> and sold by MICROS~1. :-)
There's also UDF which doesn't suffer from a lot of the issues the
FAT16/32/32x does on large-ish devices. FreeBSD, Windows, Linux, MacOSX
all support read/write to UDF, although it may depend on the OS version for
Windows (I think XP needs a 3rd party driver).=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B
I've used UDF successfully on USB drives, although I don't think you can
boot off it.
--=20
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 17:33:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B09D702;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 267ED16F9;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i8so7517048qcq.32
for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:33:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=m+2E3Vp2I6Sd0qKYOH7L8sY1S2Io1UyUGnA6YBFcsGM=;
b=ndqxGRglMZvnDBdt5coUew5FniFJGdgEZtyb4IFe3rLn0Z7yNegr2CMtwtte1NRaV0
g6Fg4vow7Lt0ugNwcacn6oSbJ5iElu/79n7Pv5AFSaLY5U2DZhvUs5p1GveMA8wu6lY5
QlaqogD69jp8UUEzFRw9Vs065jqnwgfcdi1vlYSQi0PlCPnpRhz3oMHMxxBiOPZZYlI9
1hngfoRuLP0xhBBkVMY/sPbzJqYWamMzcQE07NzInemCXjU5NTlw0jTyAmHDYbqYkvyH
PaUx0eQfyHo9e1qgnOGjHIQnY6hirajJq/GY4N2OyAb3NUYa8IDDD5kFhgsPzaZ04yph
QMCw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.94.74 with SMTP id f68mr31975324qge.64.1391189597242;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.151.73 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:33:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ4B3W=iXkycTymJb+pVnwKPF-tqezcNiBX9C0pCqLy8TQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
<CAOjFWZ4B3W=iXkycTymJb+pVnwKPF-tqezcNiBX9C0pCqLy8TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 18:33:17 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q5pAtOcLDCS5p_SOphYKTM5mWvk
Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=B221Mm1SO+zZT+_iSo9YVLF=K2iXgcC8e0B2yJDzGkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:33:18 -0000
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's also UDF which doesn't suffer from a lot of the issues the
> FAT16/32/32x does on large-ish devices. FreeBSD, Windows, Linux, MacOSX
> all support read/write to UDF, although it may depend on the OS version for
> Windows (I think XP needs a 3rd party driver).
> I've used UDF successfully on USB drives, although I don't think you can
> boot off it.
Yess, thats what I need! Thank you Freddie, I will try it out!! :-)
No need to boot of data partition anyway.. and I remember some UDF
related issues on mkisofs port some time ago.. but this might be the
best solution also for data storage on a HD and seems non -endian
problematic :-) :-)
Best regards! :-)
Tomek
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 17:54:40 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78461EF3;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C208E1904;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:54:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y1so3634085lam.8
for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=uG2NfkPmBUU2dtXxlmOvMnN4rBJ8WI+suh+llDqSGe0=;
b=brytn/v5zZrxDzOZiQ32FH609kyl6BlcdTjEuK+M/yE+UjJ5aH/065qOVKjOzMtMLk
xGEJGRIvpZlJUvySxooyJ6DKuHOzRnsD9oSdttpDymPAZp4mPUjePyP4DTVgQ5FHYSAB
xRc9c2/ljtcFS0cJhEsmlplKA7fe0uS/lBgi4pvLfB0ljKCho6tdpBtZFBrYmmsD2YC4
wk+h23xaADi2bE21v0hiydp3DN3n2qZqk27kY5KBPI6AwFBWvCKAu9hr01wPI5HjErY1
1VLS5zAqKHyH8kSUllHFFIR9fON6+7ZpXRuXDXt4xpLxFb8AgPqgIw+XMI8Zd/GXvXR9
jDqA==
X-Received: by 10.152.236.72 with SMTP id us8mr14493299lac.11.1391190877881;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.129] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bn5sm10993313lbc.10.2014.01.31.09.54.36
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52EBE35C.6090905@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:54:36 +0200
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
References: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
<CAOjFWZ4B3W=iXkycTymJb+pVnwKPF-tqezcNiBX9C0pCqLy8TQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ4B3W=iXkycTymJb+pVnwKPF-tqezcNiBX9C0pCqLy8TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:54:40 -0000
31.01.2014 19:20, Freddie Cash напиÑав(ла):
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:41:13 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
>>> Hello :-)
>>>
>>> Some time ago I have definitely moved from EXT2 to UFS2. This greatly
>>> improved my speed and stability on FreeBSD, but I somehow lost access
>>> and portability for other OS in "native" read-write mode.
>>
>> The lowest common denominator is msdosfs (DOS FAT) which is
>> usable in r/w nearly everywhere. If you require long file
>> names, you need the 16 bit version. This is commonly considered
>> the "typical solution" for the problem you're describing, even
>> though it doesn't really look any attractive because, as I
>> said, it's the _lowest_ common denominator where "lowest" is
>> determined by the inability of "Windows" products to be
>> willing to accept anything that isn't made, approved, certified
>> and sold by MICROS~1. :-)
>
>
> There's also UDF which doesn't suffer from a lot of the issues the
> FAT16/32/32x does on large-ish devices. FreeBSD, Windows, Linux, MacOSX
> all support read/write to UDF, although it may depend on the OS version for
> Windows (I think XP needs a 3rd party driver).​​
Waaaaait. This doesn't mean FreeBSD can mount UDF for read/write,
doesn't it?
--
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 17:56:40 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CAE26A;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:56:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E14191F;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:56:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wm4so5422696obc.27
for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:56:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=PCnfFVjaAObNwMlmwsWJ3RkVN5KXCsFA+figboFFWFg=;
b=vbSqIGZhuYLWyt4S8RY/lrwWjflsQX0UEWBjkP9REFvO8XNAJhkl97qTvTPy/9l+O2
wuBrEGnkgdiKCIWO6lKu3SbzPVVrdTsB4kzTwjLr+Mdey2vGClECDoCdIK88LmE17HmV
iqM5AJDOvC8I1wQz4tKcCVSDqc9XRbfFeTNKuJHSzfj2Vu04J2V54KkMX1u+CILhoo+a
X4rJP2PzmwGgfcReaNxT8o1NB32pT5Id7JH/kmtKvG+afy0ySSucsoN9aFxqtGu/+iSY
hI8oYraTct5J9amAaN5lfgkiPvlEGAEC3LwZc+NUdxyFJ+0fSd172cAh3meJjZ78D3eI
y7qA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.19.132 with SMTP id f4mr17540990obe.14.1391190998948;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:56:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.132.9 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:56:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52EBE35C.6090905@gmail.com>
References: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
<CAOjFWZ4B3W=iXkycTymJb+pVnwKPF-tqezcNiBX9C0pCqLy8TQ@mail.gmail.com>
<52EBE35C.6090905@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:56:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOjFWZ54p4+7Q6CFicMwX5QJf1wskv46wBNOcSX8HB9UrsSCdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:56:40 -0000
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>wrot=
e:
> 31.01.2014 19:20, Freddie Cash =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=B2=
(=D0=BB=D0=B0):
>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:41:13 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello :-)
>>>>
>>>> Some time ago I have definitely moved from EXT2 to UFS2. This greatly
>>>> improved my speed and stability on FreeBSD, but I somehow lost access
>>>> and portability for other OS in "native" read-write mode.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The lowest common denominator is msdosfs (DOS FAT) which is
>>> usable in r/w nearly everywhere. If you require long file
>>> names, you need the 16 bit version. This is commonly considered
>>> the "typical solution" for the problem you're describing, even
>>> though it doesn't really look any attractive because, as I
>>> said, it's the _lowest_ common denominator where "lowest" is
>>> determined by the inability of "Windows" products to be
>>> willing to accept anything that isn't made, approved, certified
>>> and sold by MICROS~1. :-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> There's also UDF which doesn't suffer from a lot of the issues the
>> FAT16/32/32x does on large-ish devices. FreeBSD, Windows, Linux, MacOSX
>> all support read/write to UDF, although it may depend on the OS version
>> for
>> Windows (I think XP needs a 3rd party driver).=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B
>>
>
> Waaaaait. This doesn't mean FreeBSD can mount UDF for read/write, doesn't
> it?
I'd have to re-test it at home, but I'm pretty sure it worked on FreeBSD 9
as well.
--=20
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 19:10:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25274DB
for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22c.google.com (mail-qa0-x22c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22c])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A412C1FAD
for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w5so6868697qac.3
for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:10:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=uzUFsWQZ35iexuQdepqs4XMBYZiiSa9Wux7HUJp07MI=;
b=TVDkCN1hJsmpm0BpNUtzHB8ddSEGGwZGDHYeAuXRF7AtjmmnzP1k5kbil71YR87oVn
4Z706fadlTTH4paxsgkZUvKPf2zerXU3fhUFZkrycB/6zKgNVZxQ5vb+SuGWlcNDuUhq
AketxumTLG5CYIGlfWzk0ExhJDFdR3oJ84cOASRiqwL/tWWf50vqMoTe7dWWIeLEvkWP
zf8y35gSddgOJ7+K+wKVXyJntzvbC3sP9nCLuxrzs22CLuSTygWbzwuj6MkR2gM2j+dn
1/NAebZCbMvYKR9ApPLD+Hv3afUKLG+vFZrWCG5DAUsjxV9g7Q8iKy6fcwuMQhDxw00Q
xvnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.42.51 with SMTP id b48mr32866604qga.23.1391195452660;
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.202.130 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:10:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGwGbgZDSv2ZfDtzoA1FVstYa=98AckPcN0gFtnqfK2dAWs7HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: iSCSI queuedepth in FreeBSD 10.0
From: Sachin Agarwal <sachinkagarwal@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:10:54 -0000
Hi all,
I am trying out the new iSCSI target of FreeBSD 10.0.
I was looking at the man pages of ctld and ctlconf, and the handbook page
for iscsi on FreeBSD 10.0. I cannot find how to set the queuedepth for a
LUN iSCSI target in FreeBSD 10.0; can someone point me to the correct place
to configure this setting.
Thanks in advance.
Sachin
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 31 22:52:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC1AFE1
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:52:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from outbound-02.safaricombusiness.co.ke
(outbound-02.safaricombusiness.co.ke [41.203.208.109])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E768911C9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:52:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsIbALaE6VIpy9CKg2dsb2JhbABZgXIGgUynN4EmgzmRSAEDAYEEFg4BAQEKCQ0FFiiCCmsFOQdnFg8lBwQBEAwEh2IJm1mHC6dSBIgFhhQRAQKDBA+BegSJQ4VOnHWBcTkxgQQ
X-IPAS-Result: AsIbALaE6VIpy9CKg2dsb2JhbABZgXIGgUynN4EmgzmRSAEDAYEEFg4BAQEKCQ0FFiiCCmsFOQdnFg8lBwQBEAwEh2IJm1mHC6dSBIgFhhQRAQKDBA+BegSJQ4VOnHWBcTkxgQQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,744,1384290000"; d="scan'208";a="353687567"
Received: from 3g-relay-01.safaricombusiness.co.ke ([41.203.208.138])
by smtp02.safaricombusiness.co.ke with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2014 01:51:47 +0300
Message-ID: <0223bbbf-41669-e3af0775704398@user-pc>
From: "Chaflin Kenya Ltd" <info@chaflin.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Best Prices on Smart Phones
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:51:42 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Chaflin Kenya Ltd <info@chaflin.com>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:52:24 -0000
Chaflin Ltd Special Offer on Smart Phones. One Year Warranty for All phones purchased from us. Samsung gets two Years warranty
Free delivery within Nairobi.
For more information please call 0722-373450 or 0723-732313 or 0737-732313
For more information about our products please go to www.chaflin.com
Blackberry Q-10 ------------ Ksh 44,500/-
Blackberry Z-10 ------------ Ksh 29,000/-
Samsung Galaxy Core ------- Ksh 22,000/-
Samsung Galaxy Gear ------- Ksh 27,500/-
Samsung Galaxy Grand ------- Ksh 28,000/-
Samsung Galaxy Mega ------- Ksh 32,000
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 --- Ksh 48,000/-
Samsung Galaxy Note 2 ------ Ksh 43,000/-
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 ------ Ksh 59,000/-
Samsung Galaxy S-Duos ------- Ksh 16,000/-
Samsung Galaxy S-Duos 2------ Ksh 16,500/-
Samsung Galaxy Young ------- Ksh 11,500/-
Samsung S-3 Galaxy --------- Ksh 38,000/-
Samsung S-3 Mini ----------- Ksh 24,000/-
Samsung S-4 Galaxy --------- Ksh 49,000/-
Samsung S-4 Mini ----------- Ksh 35,000/-
Samsung Tab 3 10.1 --------- Ksh 41,500/-
Samsung Tab 3 7.0 ---------- Ksh 30,500/-
Htc Desire 200 ------------- Ksh 13,000/-
Htc Desire 301 ------------- Ksh 26,000/-
Htc Desire 500 ------------- Ksh 27,500/-
Htc Desire 600 ------------- Ksh 32,500/-
Htc Desire 606 ------------- Ksh 33,000/-
Htc Desire 608 ------------- Ksh 32,000/-
Htc Desire 700 ------------- Ksh 44,500/-
Htc One -------------------- Ksh 48,000/-
Htc One Dual --------------- Ksh 54,500/-
Htc One Max ---------------- Ksh 59,000/-
Htc One Mini --------------- Ksh 36,000/-
Htc One X ------------------ Ksh 31,500/-
I-Pad 4 64gb 4G ------------ Ksh 69,000/-
I-Pad Air 16gb 4G ---------- Ksh 59,500
I-Pad Air 32gb 4G ---------- Ksh 68,000/-
I-Pad Air 64gb 4G ---------- Ksh 78,000/-
I-Pad Mini 16gb 4G --------- Ksh 44,000/-
I-Pad Mini 32gb 4G --------- Ksh 52,000/-
I-Phone 5 16gb ------------- Ksh 59,000/-
I-Phone 5 64gb ------------- Ksh 67,000/-
I-Phone 5C 16gb ------------ Ksh 53,000/-
I-Phone 5S 16 Gb ----------- Ksh 65,500/-
I-Phone 5S 32gb ------------ Ksh 74,000/-
I-Phone 5S 64gb ------------ Ksh 86,000/-
I-Phone Power Pack --------- Ksh 2,500/-
New series LG pricelist
LG p715 L7------------------ Ksh 20,000/-
LG E455 L5 ----------------- Ksh 13,850/-
LG E445 L4 ----------------- Ksh 10500/-
LG E435 L3 ----------------- Ksh 10700/-
LG E420 L1 ----------------- Ksh 9,400/-
Lg G2 ---------------------- Ksh 53,000/-
LG Nexus 5 ----------------- Ksh 48,000/-
Nokia Lumia 1020 ----------- Ksh 52,000/-
Nokia Lumia 520 ------------ Ksh 13,500/-
Nokia Lumia 620 ------------ Ksh 19,500/-
Nokia Lumia 625 ------------ Ksh 21,000/-
Nokia Lumia 720 ------------ Ksh 22,500/-
Nokia Lumia 820 ------------ Ksh 23,500/-
Nokia Lumia 920 ------------ Ksh 30,000/-
Nokia Lumia 925 ------------ Ksh 39,000/-
Sony Xperia C -------------- Ksh 26,000/-
Sony Xperia E -------------- Ksh 14,000/-
Sony Xperia J -------------- Ksh 19,500/-
Sony Xperia L -------------- Ksh 22,000/-
Sony Xperia M -------------- Ksh 21,500/-
Sony Xperia Sp ------------- Ksh 28,500/-
Sony Xperia V -------------- Ksh 28,500/-
Sony Xperia Z -------------- Ksh 40,500/-
Sony Xperia Z One ------ --- Ksh 53,000/-
Sony Xperia Z Ultra ------- Ksh 53,000/-
Acer Tablets Price List
Acer Iconia B1 - 711 7 inch ----------Ksh 23,100/-
Acer Iconia A1 - 811 8 inch 8gb ----- Ksh 27,450/-
Acer Iconia A1 - 811 8 inch 16gb ----- Ksh 29,600/-
Acer Iconia W511 10 inch + keyboard -- Ksh73,000/-
Infinix Smart Phones pricelist
InfiniX x351 (Surf smart 3G) --- Ksh 8,500/-
InfiniX X402 (Diamond) ---------Ksh 15,000/-
InfiniX X450(Race bolt) -------- Ksh 17,000/-
InfiniX X451(Race bolt Q) ------ Ksh 21,000/-
InfiniX X500(Race eagle) ------- Ksh 18,800/-
InfiniX X530(Race maxQ) -------- Ksh 21,200/-
InfiniX X570(Alpha) ------------Ksh 30,000/-
InfiniX X800(Joypad) -----------Ksh 20,500/-
Kaspersky Antivirus 2014
Kaspersky Antivirus 2 Users -------------- Ksh 1,800/-
Kaspersky Internet Security 2 Users ----- Ksh 2,800/-
Kaspersky Internet Security 4 Users ----- Ksh 3,800/-
Techno Smart Phones Price List
Techno n9 ---------------- Ksh 22,750
Techno N7 ---------------- Ksh 17,000
Techno M9 ---------------- Ksh 30,150
Techno S7 ---------------- Ksh 17,025
Techno D9 ---------------- Ksh 23,170
Techno P5 ---------------- Ksh 12,550
Techno M5 ---------------- Ksh 16,030
Techno M7 ---------------- Ksh 17,900
Techno F7 ---------------- Ksh 22,050
Techno S5 ---------------- Ksh 15,500
Techno P9 ---------------- Ksh 17,050
To unsubscribe from future email please send us an email to the Subject Unsubscribe to unsubscribe@chaflin.com
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 09:05:19 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F61719E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 09:05:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895BE1D44
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 09:05:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s118l8bT035178;
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:47:09 +1100 (EST)
(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:47:08 +1100 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
In-Reply-To: <mailman.6090.1391033595.1398.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20140201194118.G99797@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References: <mailman.6090.1391033595.1398.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:05:19 -0000
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 504, Issue 5, Message: 31
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:13:01 -0800 Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat
> > available as either part of ipfw or pf.
>
> Kernel nat for ipfirewall requires a custom kernel (GENERIC does not
> have LIBALIAS).
Not so, Michael. From /etc/rc.d/ipfw
ipfw_prestart()
{
if checkyesno dummynet_enable; then
required_modules="$required_modules dummynet"
fi
if checkyesno natd_enable; then
required_modules="$required_modules ipdivert"
fi
if checkyesno firewall_nat_enable; then
required_modules="$required_modules ipfw_nat"
fi
}
ipfw_nat.ko is compiled with libalias, and works fine with GENERIC.
cheers, Ian
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 11:11:29 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BAADAF0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 11:11:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B5114F4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 11:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id y10so10243692wgg.10
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 03:11:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date
:to:mime-version;
bh=tsNyyHhkrBeOv+3Emp83QZD0hq6yr2aKlEU3CKxdNHI=;
b=Ufdsswt5hAeaISRMLDinTVzhc03OaXOc6PKvEBvITqhPA/yJyqvdoU6SBM4MxkWbY2
/flKJGPIQh5Lk7VFyJ8CpQEYZ753ZNxquzpjKqTNRyeklIjzN1NXQqQOewtIyWQDVE7H
V9x0NtwhLNfTMP2QlN6OIuMn7ND5XKO7asOrcNTxycDnlGxENw3IEkqAXYY01NGPfn4y
n0oTVeF9xZ3rN/zjrHRA2PvPtnDZCVBN/51b5rmXfyU11KNhypZKA8x333JbjFCyVsV4
4u5U87C5d8gu2hbB7NVrTW1nbflVxx20Pkc1gamnJKn/A0Xq+5pj66ujc94wM8UvhU5d
S3xQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.186.204 with SMTP id fm12mr17134613wjc.27.1391253086884;
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 03:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nicolass-mbp.home
(AOrleans-652-1-121-246.w90-21.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.21.136.246])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm5867310wij.3.2014.02.01.03.11.25
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 03:11:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Nicolas Kozic <nkzphx@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: MACBOOKPRO HELP, PLEASE.
Message-Id: <81B806F9-0145-4C85-8D42-A07FAF8252C9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:11:23 +0100
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:11:29 -0000
Hello,
My problem I can=92t BOOT ON CD-ROM neither usb flash.=20
*****************************************************************
I NEED BOOT COMMANDS of the STAGE 2 of boot.
*****************************************************************
THANK YOU FOR YOUR EFFECTIVE HELP.=
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 15:38:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE942B88
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net
[151.189.21.44])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D371735
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net
[151.189.8.36]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81088AB04F
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:07:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02.arcor-online.net
[151.189.21.42])
by mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825EE3F8304
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:07:35 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: Passed host: 92.75.209.93
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-02.arcor-online.net DC66730190
Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-092-075-209-093.pools.arcor-ip.net
[92.75.209.93])
by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC66730190
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:07:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s11F7VBK002760
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:07:31 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from mailnull@lorvorc.mips.inka.de)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s11F7VYt002759
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:07:31 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from mailnull)
From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
Subject: Invalid time in real time clock
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:07:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <lcj2jj$2bu$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:38:21 -0000
Over the last few months I started noticing that my FreeBSD/amd64
desktop box would often come up with a date of Jan 1, 2008 after
boot. Presumably the CMOS battery was dying and the motherboard
picked a date from its year of manufacture.
So I replaced the CR2032 battery on the motherboard and reapplied
the BIOS settings that had been lost during the change. Unfortunately,
I'm still greeted with
atrtc0: WARNING: Battery failure indication
Invalid time in real time clock.
Check and reset the date immediately!
Incongruously, the RTC time is actually correct. Well, off by a
minute or so. Clearly the new battery is good.
I guess this is more a PC question, but how do I get the RTC to
indicate a valid time again? The motherboard manual (Asus) is
rather silent on the whole issue of CMOS battery replacement.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 15:42:27 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4D40F08
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A39617B7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
(authenticated bits=0)
by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s11FgHqZ005738
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 09:42:17 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <52ED15D9.1090907@tundraware.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:42:17 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Invalid time in real time clock
References: <lcj2jj$2bu$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
In-Reply-To: <lcj2jj$2bu$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
(ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:42:17 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: s11FgHqZ005738
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:42:27 -0000
On 02/01/2014 09:07 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Over the last few months I started noticing that my FreeBSD/amd64
> desktop box would often come up with a date of Jan 1, 2008 after
> boot. Presumably the CMOS battery was dying and the motherboard
> picked a date from its year of manufacture.
>
> So I replaced the CR2032 battery on the motherboard and reapplied
> the BIOS settings that had been lost during the change. Unfortunately,
> I'm still greeted with
>
> atrtc0: WARNING: Battery failure indication
> Invalid time in real time clock.
> Check and reset the date immediately!
>
> Incongruously, the RTC time is actually correct. Well, off by a
> minute or so. Clearly the new battery is good.
>
> I guess this is more a PC question, but how do I get the RTC to
> indicate a valid time again? The motherboard manual (Asus) is
> rather silent on the whole issue of CMOS battery replacement.
>
I've seen something similar to this before. A good solution
is to use ntpdate at boot to initially set the time properly,
and the run ntpd to keep it correct. Both are enabled
via /etc/rc.conf.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 18:33:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8ADA84
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 18:33:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com
[212.247.8.98])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D69D1367
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 18:33:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB
Received: from [172.16.2.176] (ua-83-227-186-34.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se
[83.227.186.34]) (Authenticated sender: peo)
by terrapin.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F6B4433C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:23:42 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52ED3BAB.4020807@intersonic.se>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:23:39 +0100
From: Per olof Ljungmark <peo@intersonic.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Watch Netflix on FreeBSD Lap/Desktop?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:33:39 -0000
Seems it is not possible or did someone on the list manage? Ironic as
they use FBSD for distribution it seems.
//per
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 18:46:50 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F26DCD7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 18:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from luigi.brtsvcs.net (luigi.brtsvcs.net
[IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:1f00::2])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E07911450
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 18:46:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-76-115-19-22.hsd1.or.comcast.net
[76.115.19.22])
by luigi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7686B2D4FAE;
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:7c6d:fe68:afd7:e91] (unknown
[IPv6:2601:7:880:bd0:7c6d:fe68:afd7:e91])
by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71EF2E39;
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52ED410D.9050306@bluerosetech.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:46:37 -0800
From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Per olof Ljungmark <peo@intersonic.se>,
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Watch Netflix on FreeBSD Lap/Desktop?
References: <52ED3BAB.4020807@intersonic.se>
In-Reply-To: <52ED3BAB.4020807@intersonic.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:46:50 -0000
On 2/1/2014 10:23 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Seems it is not possible or did someone on the list manage? Ironic as
> they use FBSD for distribution it seems.
The Netflix in-browser player is a Silverlight app, so you're limited to
Windows and Mac OS X. It will work within a VM guest if the VM can do
hardware graphics acceleration.
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 19:00:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7874211;
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A651532;
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w7so9154961qcr.0
for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:59:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=z/cpAkk+GztKNrqujxbB5FtKPuzFdw7AkJEuHLbJXEE=;
b=QW0Y4LuK0h1UU5CGgqU6TRaEgL1t4l2NqyziRoyGKsDiGMzAVW6MGWN7JltFAyP+M4
xNpFXlNjrpMLG22cFb6W6FTY11u0e55V9U5UycXdjL2ql/rTvjR91FllSWfjROD6XAv4
ke3M60xwQiXkl52e0PW+b6ahmRR55R9XBsKcNQY2496v5EzN5XKWS/SRKrFyK2MvGRQh
uieEK8BlG/ZUgPe31qIi5sPqQkGnE66/yID74qic0MttR9zYEG8lToJIoibmYm9QRWCI
ixVR8oLYjz9YxAeGRyQp4o6ImeV9kvbakcDfpxLq4cJ1IptzOZaAonoC1IM11GCFViTR
PD8Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.124.74 with SMTP id t10mr42660043qar.40.1391281199425;
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.151.73 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:59:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXj=B221Mm1SO+zZT+_iSo9YVLF=K2iXgcC8e0B2yJDzGkw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFYkXj=xGbnVfJuBwXmj+gu5gR7sWxk6o48rJ233N-=eRcTpyw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de>
<CAOjFWZ4B3W=iXkycTymJb+pVnwKPF-tqezcNiBX9C0pCqLy8TQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFYkXj=B221Mm1SO+zZT+_iSo9YVLF=K2iXgcC8e0B2yJDzGkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:59:59 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5RQZY3qwq_ws78ZDrA31mDGjaok
Message-ID: <CAFYkXjkhnh=aZLxnE2yPvcpoLdTPnQTQZ=_e72RsYPJ=DqmTAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:00:00 -0000
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:33 PM, CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There's also UDF which doesn't suffer from a lot of the issues the
>> FAT16/32/32x does on large-ish devices. FreeBSD, Windows, Linux, MacOSX
>> all support read/write to UDF, although it may depend on the OS version for
>> Windows (I think XP needs a 3rd party driver).
>> I've used UDF successfully on USB drives, although I don't think you can
>> boot off it.
>
> Yess, thats what I need! Thank you Freddie, I will try it out!! :-)
UDF disk does not work on FreeBSD :-(
I can create filesystem on a file, but not a memory disk (not
supported on my operating system yet). Then I cannot mount both of
them anyway.
Dead end for UDF disk on FreeBSD?
Is seems possible on Linux and Windows though:
http://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article93/usb-udf
root@hexagon:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=udf.bin bs=64k count=128k
131072+0 records in
131072+0 records out
8589934592 bytes transferred in 111.747670 secs (76869026 bytes/sec)
root@hexagon:~ # newfs_udf -L UDFTEST udf.bin
Opening device udf.bin
UDF device udf.bin is a regular file
bufcache thread initialising
Disc info for disc in device udf.bin
MMC profile : Unknown[0] profile
sequential : no
recordable : yes
erasable : no
blankable : no
formattable : no
rewritable : yes
mount raineer : no
packet writing : no
strict overwrite : no
blocking number : 1
disc state : random writable
last session state : incomplete
sectorsize : 512
Number of sessions 1
Session 0
start at 0
ends at 16777216
length for 16777216
next writable at 16777217
free blocks 0
packet size 64
Creating a filingsystem on a recordable rewritable CD-RW or
DVD+RW/DVD-RW or fixed length file
Free unallocated space on this volume 8587442688
Closing disc
Dismounting disc
syncing disc
syncing `4dc9e13a`:`00001674`:`UDFTEST`
syncing data
syncing nodes
used/freed space tables
Closing logical volume `4dc9e13a`:`00001674`:`UDFTEST`
wait for syncing disc to idle
stopping bufcache thread
bufcache thread joining
signal disc its finished with writing
wait for final disc idling
close device
Disc access statistics
sector reads 1 (0 Kbyte)
sector written 4267 (2133 Kbyte)
switches 3
root@hexagon:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=udf2.bin bs=64k count=8k
8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
536870912 bytes transferred in 7.191754 secs (74650899 bytes/sec)
root@hexagon:~ # mdconfig -a -f udf2.bin
md0
root@hexagon:~ # newfs_udf -L UDFTEST2 /dev/md0
Opening device /dev/md0
Got error executing SCSI command, assuming IDE disc
UDF: no explicit support for disc devices yet for this operating system.
: No such file or directory
Trying readonly access...
: No such file or directory
UDF: warning... reading/writing on 'disc' device
bufcache thread initialising
Disc info for disc in device /dev/md0
MMC profile : Unknown[0] profile
sequential : no
recordable : no
erasable : no
blankable : no
formattable : no
rewritable : no
mount raineer : no
packet writing : no
strict overwrite : no
blocking number : 1
disc state : random writable
last session state : complete/closed disc
sectorsize : 512
Number of sessions 1
Session 0
start at 0
ends at 0
length for 0
next writable at 0
free blocks 0
packet size 0
Can't create filingsystem on a non recordable disc
Closing disc
Dismounting disc
dismounting readonly disc
stopping bufcache thread
bufcache thread joining
Disc access statistics
sector reads 0 (0 Kbyte)
sector written 0 (0 Kbyte)
switches 0
root@hexagon:~ # mount_udf -v /dev/md0 /mnt/tmp
mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid argument
root@hexagon:~ # mdconfig -d -u 0
root@hexagon:~ # mount_udf -v udf.bin /mnt/tmp
mount_udf: udf.bin: Invalid argument
root@hexagon:~ # mdconfig -a -f udf.bin
root@hexagon:~ # mount_udf /dev/md0 /mnt/tmp
mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid argument
Did I miss anything? :-(
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 20:29:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 927FE6AC
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22d.google.com (mail-yk0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22d])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F771AF9
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 20so31213644yks.4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:29:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date
:to:mime-version;
bh=RDLQWcQINicJPv3XmCTdwEqcbdc9sBkCeGQq/K9AZGE=;
b=GGSZ5ChJfsl3ORdXR30Jhdzs4fFcq+cDs/lOHbRSvtX6wQdMJ04w6KJSwPatytHHIz
Fjqa4urJkm/L7oLF0OALjxSqnhoAX5/H8OLVtTfVUTpQ7NCN+/8VQVa8uekKvDfJEQsi
s13+CH1EbdXCebPXgK/3M/kTXNdcJXOxZ2Zg2B32BgI0Lf13Y+orF2QsnPPgPQYUNq8P
bbHhET+igij9vhSE+yn5PU5RaG5kEmggiaH3dC2M5smju53XXBYyhJ7vv0ICy01TLR3e
s5E8bL+WktTeDl7zWClz3G3GCETmW3iMv2QmjJ3166lr7d9oxDStdwbhas5LPhEC9Jhy
2KWw==
X-Received: by 10.236.165.74 with SMTP id d50mr25484466yhl.7.1391286570446;
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.76] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net.
[75.63.29.182])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m68sm49558578yhj.22.2014.02.01.12.29.29
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:29:30 -0800 (PST)
From: aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: 64-bit linux emulation?
Message-Id: <F457E755-31B4-4CBC-AAC6-88DBE5B5CF76@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:29:28 -0800
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:29:31 -0000
Hi,
Does it make sense to ask wether its possible to have 64 bit Linux =
emulation in a jail?
And if it does make sense, is there a road map for such a thing?
- aurf
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 20:30:43 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 607C375C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:30:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from asav4.altibox.net (asav4.altibox.net [81.167.36.153])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028D21B7A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:30:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by asav4.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D4520422
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:25:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from asav4.altibox.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (asav4.ulh.lysetele.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id gDL8R6B740uL for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:25:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.10.110] (129.81-166-80.customer.lyse.net
[81.166.80.129])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no)
by asav4.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F0272030B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:25:19 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52ED582E.4080509@kleppnett.no>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 21:25:18 +0100
From: Kenneth Hatteland <kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Force install function in PKGNG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:30:43 -0000
On 2014-01-29, Kenneth Hatteland<kenneth.hatteland@kleppnett.no> wrote:
> My system always have had problems getting my HP cp1515n to work. But
> installing HPLIP from ports, then installing HPIJS with pkg_add -rf will
> get the correct PPDs to show up in CUPS.
>
> After swithcing to pkgng it does not seem to exist a force option so
> I have to do all my prints on another machine, which is slightly
> annoying. I have read man pages and googled but can not seem to find a
> force funtion. Does anybody know about one or have a better way of
> making the right PPDs install to get my printer going ? Having only
> HPLIP, or HPIJS installed does not make this possible.
>
> Thanks in advance, Kenneth Hatteland
/Have a look at the pkg-add(8) man page. Specifically, the -f option.
This provides the force function you need I believe. Or you might be
able to build it as a port to get it installed.
/
/pkg-add is used when you have downloaded a pkg tarball manually.
Virtually always you probably want to use pkg-install -- as this will
handle automatically fetching the package and any dependencies from a
repository. pkg-install understands '-f' to force installation.
Cheers,
Matthew
/
/-- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. I have tried pkg install -f hpijs (
after installing hplip via ports) ===> Cleaning for
foomatic-filters-4.0.17 ===> Cleaning for hplip-3.14.1
root@Europa:/usr/ports/print/hplip # pkg install -f hpijs Updating
repository catalogue The following 1 packages will be installed:
Installing hpijs: 2.1.4_6 The installation will require 3 MB more space
0 B to be downloaded Proceed with installing packages [y/N]: y Checking
integrity...pkg: WARNING: locally installed foomatic-filters-4.0.17
conflicts on /usr/local/bin/foomatic-rip with: - hpijs-2.1.4_6 pkg:
WARNING: locally installed hplip-3.14.1 conflicts on
/usr/local/bin/hpijs with: - hpijs-2.1.4_6
root@Europa:/usr/ports/print/hplip # So it does not seem to have a
working force function. In the olden days pkg_add -f hpijs here hammered
the file in with the same complaints, but with a working printer and a
correct HPcp1515n.ppd available in cups. Any suggestions to work aorund
this ? Blessed be , Kenneth /
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 21:29:08 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BBC07AE
for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:29:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22b.google.com (mail-oa0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22b])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1627F1FE6
for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:29:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id h16so6742797oag.30
for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:29:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=VWJ3r+HfM2Ry0XuEwWGSMpCNJ7MxsPhWYVg0r/cg/7M=;
b=GVNU9D4UTk4XbcaOYSSuX2SnDDMSq2LuqtNrt9fAoT/cyfGTucpim0x5oAydgjVtVW
rxepENOIQ8aZ8o2nUeMAKsjJwYS/MBOjK+qCVFdh0OUqBPnqjYZ6zHTZ07QAPCQyRh8z
lJXKkbi3LnnNRsm8ZRRSO0MU2LGfvBHfY86PeSDPcmimW6xZNX1r3ngBKaV9ALcwhLS/
4wFzv25677erF8S/YTpNrA0qlviRDRL894u8UGM7uG4wYz6lkyKjQSL5VQRDYi0W451t
C3ju6+idv+JSz3U+WxUKWOmGM4SloxuFfzKKE5H6rS0S7g9BfEWjUiOsSbLueT9cCY4p
Qvgw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.16.230 with SMTP id j6mr3229870oed.47.1391290147313; Sat,
01 Feb 2014 13:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.45.228 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:29:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+dWbmbTxfvEL_e2Up0KzZmav5qRBeKOEOO9u3d7Jh3U8sb=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: ZFS: Add disk to single disk pool
From: Patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com>
To: FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 21:29:08 -0000
I set up a 9.2 system following the "RootOnZFS" instructions in the wiki. I
have:
# zpool status
pool: zroot
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zroot ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk0 ONLINE 0 0 0
I have another disk that I'd like to add to expand the size of the volume,
but I'm not sure how to do that.
I've prepped the disk with:
gpart create -s gpt ada1
gpart add -t freebsd-zfs -l disk1 ada1
I tried a few different things, but I'm clearly not getting something:
# zpool add zroot /dev/gpt/disk1
cannot add to 'zroot': root pool can not have multiple vdevs or separate
logs
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated...
Patrick
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 21:51:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF0C9AE
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:51:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0459F117C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:51:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id va2so6510916obc.1
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:51:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=p1sUBrQwTxU8QUXb6bKw0zW4+5+4FbpiFeqYRfEj5aY=;
b=B5M5SaqVkqZQCaFD7Su5tgx+lD+2+sGProRBov/G3TDvRo757Rn/d91z0oUGwI+Gp9
K/vB+AQAhAJ0qnXQvX33pf082LuDiDTzLox3e0StxfaTtwfV4hf4pW/wxx6RPHR7iHa4
DeFQtYZiXLWqiYvazCrxsNRw8QG1Pa9Sx2rNqnoqgGq0NsEjNGBguoK1RfUaLSGs+qw5
faA5S1nagzC+F4RbQRrWjFGNYy5qSKiHtUJu9q/L7sxJ+Q0whNQ8Ye8tAOrWTFLRy7l6
vjxDdJVuvE20Dz4dBX30BgSLx+fqmaiGR6NWX92MthMx5ppr+2UERp5x/y00soCxmttH
bAIg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.246.104 with SMTP id xv8mr23275188oec.18.1391291506234;
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.45.228 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:51:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+dWbma3s1Mx6uC9yGdrvAWgeDDgNopjco1Fy1PbqXmYMw7O6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: No space left on device during freebsd-update install (stage 1)
From: Patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com>
To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 21:51:47 -0000
$ sudo freebsd-update install
Installing updates...
/: write failed, filesystem is full
install: ///boot/kernel/INS@9Y2g: No space left on device
Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run
"/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates.
I was just doing an update from FreeBSD 9.2 to 10, and my root partition
filled up on the first "install" stage (after running freebsd-update -r
10.0-RELEASE upgrade). Is there a way I can redo that first "freebsd-update
install" step? I'm concerned that the files didn't get copied over fully,
and rebooting may leave me with a broken system.
*checks man page*
Okay, so looks like I'll be doing freebsd-update rollback and start over.
Seems like freebsd-update should detect an error like a write failed
though...
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 22:47:55 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6C38BF4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net
[151.189.21.48])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB371489
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net
[151.189.8.28]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FDF3AFA3A
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:41:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net
[151.189.21.44])
by mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB7C7FE741
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:41:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: Passed host: 92.75.209.93
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-04.arcor-online.net 08F45AAF6B
Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-092-075-209-093.pools.arcor-ip.net
[92.75.209.93])
by mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F45AAF6B
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:41:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s11LfsvL043260
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:41:54 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from mailnull@lorvorc.mips.inka.de)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s11LfsPR043259
for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:41:54 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from mailnull)
From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
Subject: Re: Invalid time in real time clock
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <lcjpn2$1a07$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References: <lcj2jj$2bu$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:47:55 -0000
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
> atrtc0: WARNING: Battery failure indication
> Invalid time in real time clock.
> Check and reset the date immediately!
>
> Incongruously, the RTC time is actually correct. Well, off by a
> minute or so. Clearly the new battery is good.
Turns out I misunderstood this. I thought the system time was still
set from the RTC despite the warning. It isn't. Instead, it is
set from the time stamp of the root file system. That's why I lose
about a minute--that's the time it takes the machine to reboot.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 22:59:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B5A3E8E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:59:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lancer.b1c1l1.com (lancer.b1c1l1.com
[IPv6:2607:f358:1a:1a:1000::])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED101561
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:59:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lancer.b1c1l1.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 208DD1745FC;
Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:59:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=b1c1l1.com; s=default;
t=1391295544; bh=XsSDC4Ibba7p0iLqo4VE0EHH3f/QRT9S8Gk37uXR9lI=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
b=244tSPcGF+OX9TY3klZaQoIUd/x35wMRRRl15Lknq0Nx5CQgkeMBcM2WeGoEnOFyq
blCSTTGFSuBT+nGDZaT+WQgeW9qH165glBB3TYDAVHuQKjUaTYb3E2pWbc7Zs+wBXf
aSP2cEdWxMpDk9byVgfvnJ8vnDVa9Ckty0Ie8FPI=
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:58:59 -0800
From: Benjamin Lee <ben@b1c1l1.com>
To: Patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No space left on device during freebsd-update install (stage 1)
Message-ID: <20140201145859.0eb2237a@b1c1l1.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+dWbma3s1Mx6uC9yGdrvAWgeDDgNopjco1Fy1PbqXmYMw7O6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+dWbma3s1Mx6uC9yGdrvAWgeDDgNopjco1Fy1PbqXmYMw7O6g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
boundary="Sig_/62jIIu8/b35mQze3ihvT+mz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:59:10 -0000
--Sig_/62jIIu8/b35mQze3ihvT+mz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:51:46 -0800, Patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com> wrote:
> $ sudo freebsd-update install
> Installing updates...
> /: write failed, filesystem is full
> install: ///boot/kernel/INS@9Y2g: No space left on device
>=20
> Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run
> "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates.
>=20
> I was just doing an update from FreeBSD 9.2 to 10, and my root partition
> filled up on the first "install" stage (after running freebsd-update -r
> 10.0-RELEASE upgrade). Is there a way I can redo that first "freebsd-upda=
te
> install" step? I'm concerned that the files didn't get copied over fully,
> and rebooting may leave me with a broken system.
>=20
> *checks man page*
>=20
> Okay, so looks like I'll be doing freebsd-update rollback and start over.
> Seems like freebsd-update should detect an error like a write failed
> though...
You just need to install and boot into the new kernel before running
'freebsd-update install' again, e.g.:
* make buildkernel installkernel
OR
* download and extract the appropriate release kernel.txz for your arch
(e.g. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/10.0-RELEASE/)
Once you finish the full upgrade you should delete your data directory
(defaults to /var/db/freebsd-update) to avoid rolling back to an
inconsistent state in the future.
--=20
Benjamin Lee
http://www.b1c1l1.com/
--Sig_/62jIIu8/b35mQze3ihvT+mz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=dbtA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/62jIIu8/b35mQze3ihvT+mz--
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 23:20:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF700262
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 23:20:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B393316C6
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 23:20:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id uy5so6499535obc.19
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:20:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=ofe3SXw5KDB15VNoiBrwSp/O3S7Uv9g4IXGKpIMp8HI=;
b=0mDbmhWh8LEe/VT+LcUlOCQb0MYGlQlKWtlURlkK7hmHDFa84ET0hJP7OsHCZlYqCt
ZDzuYeoNSgkzmkobeIdcg6O3osTk7JXGOwUwRhT2hRQhXZCPP3yfeb55qAjFn4o6JZ0x
PaKT4bbNxgkFTB+GL4UFwAFuW4QPaIDDAMoYogYwyKMPEec8pyjVfWJegUD6mc8sjYKU
AjL5Ee6IzCai92ALLK5Y91NoaelY02YQQWrUR7CkmRLATYx1yGzc9BNqoyKYSawyhkj2
gERm//ZQjo3W8bIlukbdC0IKn2lV5BM614lgcx4E8gRmdo+wa4WmLB5CWQAahPvrXobL
ILvw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.209.106 with SMTP id ml10mr23108194obc.31.1391296814615;
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:20:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.45.228 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:20:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140201145859.0eb2237a@b1c1l1.com>
References: <CA+dWbma3s1Mx6uC9yGdrvAWgeDDgNopjco1Fy1PbqXmYMw7O6g@mail.gmail.com>
<20140201145859.0eb2237a@b1c1l1.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:20:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+dWbmZdaBDCASjqi59p=BvwHF1K94H1LJAER4OC3TwNb8Qb5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No space left on device during freebsd-update install (stage 1)
From: Patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Lee <ben@b1c1l1.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 23:20:16 -0000
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Benjamin Lee <ben@b1c1l1.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 13:51:46 -0800, Patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > $ sudo freebsd-update install
> > Installing updates...
> > /: write failed, filesystem is full
> > install: ///boot/kernel/INS@9Y2g: No space left on device
> >
> > Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run
> > "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates.
> >
> > I was just doing an update from FreeBSD 9.2 to 10, and my root partition
> > filled up on the first "install" stage (after running freebsd-update -r
> > 10.0-RELEASE upgrade). Is there a way I can redo that first
> "freebsd-update
> > install" step? I'm concerned that the files didn't get copied over fully,
> > and rebooting may leave me with a broken system.
> >
> > *checks man page*
> >
> > Okay, so looks like I'll be doing freebsd-update rollback and start over.
> > Seems like freebsd-update should detect an error like a write failed
> > though...
>
> You just need to install and boot into the new kernel before running
> 'freebsd-update install' again, e.g.:
>
> * make buildkernel installkernel
>
> OR
>
> * download and extract the appropriate release kernel.txz for your arch
> (e.g. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/10.0-RELEASE/)
>
> Once you finish the full upgrade you should delete your data directory
> (defaults to /var/db/freebsd-update) to avoid rolling back to an
> inconsistent state in the future.
>
>
> --
> Benjamin Lee
> http://www.b1c1l1.com/
>
Yeah, except that there was an error installing the new kernel, so it
seemed risky to reboot into a potentially incomplete kernel. I opted to use
the rollback command. That part seemed to go okay, but now when I try to
upgrade, I get:
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching public key from update2.freebsd.org... done.
Fetching metadata signature for 9.2-RELEASE from update2.freebsd.org...
done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
Fetching 2 metadata files... done.
Inspecting system... done.
The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed:
kernel/generic world/base world/games
The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed:
src/src world/doc
Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y
Fetching metadata signature for 10.0-RELEASE from update2.freebsd.org...
done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
Fetching 1 metadata patches. done.
Applying metadata patches... done.
Fetching 1 metadata files... done.
The update metadata is correctly signed, but
failed an integrity check.
Cowardly refusing to proceed any further.
And replacing /var/db/freebsd-update with a clean directory doesn't make a
difference.
*sobs*
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 23:21:19 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 276412F7
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 23:21:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com
[209.85.217.180])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FF8172C
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 23:21:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n15so4462696lbi.11
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:21:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=sHzrldOPmufDFjldwMYwJt5fhWfqxLFZSJLhFTKXs1w=;
b=HiTQBvHbcjP8nWPR+onx5WlCOHfuP8pSJ1PUoiWLiu2pqMLo5CA52HUKhGgKDxbXvr
xpz8x5FV8kTYaH4SYM4GKY+kCcfqRU3Bzt2xBVHhsyVGPl+psuHGB7SHhBxLNGLponVC
bQOxt06oXB2gLz851trtLCYAy1clwHaLTlrtkOp1aunCpYXonTVQaXCfRBeAUgCLzcub
cbFZ/6hDJjA/hFS3gvutmIflQ6foM2BxQmfm9+P/FJpjFY7hLR7z5TQnHsqX1wy3NYvH
vK4zx08CBAfRUmKMjpAObUsNNr3pl73fWWDinh6kBNYtBEpv/e3OQoBvQcYNj0B53gz6
WQcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmL8b9GvAT6E3oQa4r0E+enuhLQBovPrq3f1xR38KfJCeFdit3BC7vslynt0n/YTgMzTKFl
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.45.108 with SMTP id l12mr7160541lbm.21.1391296869683;
Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:21:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.218.39 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:21:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [121.98.161.40]
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:21:09 +1300
Message-ID: <CAJuc1zP1pwh=_dECTW=rYUHtxHEbNh-N9fXRBDrjYS3obU-5Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Creating packages using pkgng
From: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 23:21:19 -0000
Hi,
The old pkg_create command had the option to recursively create a
package and all its dependancies. I can't seem to find the equivalent
in pkgng. Can someone enlighten me as to how this can be done?
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>