From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 00:52:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0BD555 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 00:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28676E81 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 00:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LeugD-1XbLkC3KMp-00qnCl for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 01:46:43 +0100 Message-ID: <548CDDFD.7000509@gmx.us> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 19:46:53 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Wireshark Seg. Fault Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kzCkJW/kXmApjJtnaFARIdiQs4gvHE1Nc02Xxz6NsPusJLYPzkW gKUoBhCXhjJ/T0df232Ap26ag9oYnnLtJyCwRohzLP3YZLlfdP0veBW/DwNPr/Bg+KEqKWy IhELSuEqLiiaCjS84OI3TUVWKszSLE5kmF5tOyo1bc+zLslZ+Gv6WFsAhN4pG3cLAbE+GLC AuLtUefd+h7IJzCHc2D9A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 00:52:02 -0000 Greetings all: I've been having problems with connecting to svn mirrors lately. I tried using tcpdump to diagnose, but it was unavailing. So, I tried installing the port for wireshark. On first start, it core dumped. After confirming all shared libs were in place, I decided to just delete it and re-build, which went off again without noted error. Same thing: core dump. I then went to a separate machine and installed the package. Upon first attempt to run: again, seg fault and core dump. Ports machine:10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 Packages machine: 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 I've googled around without finding anything recent or close to this issue, Freebsd or otherwise. Bug tracker doesn't have anything recent except a submitted patch for running wireshark as a regular user (which I hope is acted upon, as this should be the default anyway.) UPDATING doesn't mention any issues with wireshark. Unfortunately, my gdb skills are zero. If anyone would like to offer hints as to tracking the problem, or offering some debugging tips, I'd be grateful. If further information is needed, please let me know. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 01:19:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F417D90F for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 01:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0DF7F6 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 01:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MdaP4-1YIcFr2RCO-00POnG for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 02:18:59 +0100 Message-ID: <548CE58D.3080504@gmx.us> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:19:09 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireshark Seg. Fault References: <548CDDFD.7000509@gmx.us> In-Reply-To: <548CDDFD.7000509@gmx.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hc0Y9Gg9rKcpz9UaurbyqL1lwaiV6yUV+WJvqii3V6N+mIg1rdq 8r5D2Hlp+boZOB563/Ui0dx5IPmbK5OnLs1fluq3VCHT355ev47P5rnFrEYbIjhg/s4Dmf0 u4+fXRCkjerwmb6Kkhzb9o1oUywSjyZKJ4hVQsBcHRr/JTwWQEkx53zxvIY2Q4q0qgIRphC 8TY760CzH+OBUxD3Uso/Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 01:19:01 -0000 On 12/13/14 19:46, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Greetings all: > > I've been having problems with connecting to svn mirrors lately. I > tried using tcpdump to diagnose, but it was unavailing. So, I tried > installing the port for wireshark. On first start, it core dumped. > After confirming all shared libs were in place, I decided to just delete > it and re-build, which went off again without noted error. Same thing: > core dump. > > I then went to a separate machine and installed the package. Upon first > attempt to run: again, seg fault and core dump. > > Ports machine:10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 > Packages machine: 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 > > I've googled around without finding anything recent or close to this > issue, Freebsd or otherwise. Bug tracker doesn't have anything recent > except a submitted patch for running wireshark as a regular user (which > I hope is acted upon, as this should be the default anyway.) UPDATING > doesn't mention any issues with wireshark. > > Unfortunately, my gdb skills are zero. If anyone would like to offer > hints as to tracking the problem, or offering some debugging tips, I'd > be grateful. If further information is needed, please let me know. Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Further Information: Keeping in mind that I know nothing about how to use gdb, I ran and the last three lines were: Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x000000080945ec0b in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 [New Thread 810006400 (LWP 100240/wireshark)] Both ld-elf.so.1 and libgobject.so.1 are present. I hope this is helpful to someone, but I don't know how to interpret it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 04:40:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74AD4626 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 04:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355AD8AF for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 04:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.139]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CD541C060 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:40:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter10-d.gandi.net Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7oCPMBV7639 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:40:37 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.147 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.147]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0810741C05D for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:40:36 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:10:36 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 10.1 : release : uefi : amd64 : kernel trap 1 with interrupts disabled ... Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Message-ID: X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 04:40:41 -0000 hello, i have an hp-aio 18 which works well under uefi based ubuntu as well as non-uefi freebsd 10.1 rc3. i just completed download of the memstick image for freebsd-10.1-release for amd64, burned it to a sandisk thumbdrive using imagewriter under windows 7. booted up the machine using it, but gave the following error during installer boot-up sequence; --------------------------------------------------------------- kernel trap 1 with interrupts disabled Fatal trap 1: privileged instruction fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80408000 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffffff814b5a70 frame pointer = 0x28:0x0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 () trap number = 1 panic: privileged instruction fault cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80963000 at ??+0 #1 0xffffffff80928125 at ??+0 #2 0xffffffff80d24f1f at ??+0 #3 0xffffffff80d24b7c at ??+0 #4 0xffffffff80d0a782 at ??+0 Uptime: 1s --------------------------------------------------------------- may i know how to resolve this and proceed with installation? hope this is the right mailing list for this, else, may i please be pointed in the right direction? thanks, ~mayuresh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 12:38:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875FDB13 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4587632F for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter29-d.gandi.net (mfilter29-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.160]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A03BFB887 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:38:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter29-d.gandi.net Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]) by mfilter29-d.gandi.net (mfilter29-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0Rlrz4yGyRQ for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:38:04 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.147 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.147]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B0823FB8A3 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:38:03 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:08:03 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD Handbook : available for Amazon Kindle! Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Message-ID: X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:38:09 -0000 hi, i just noticed that the freebsd handbook is now available for the amazon kindle at; http://www.amazon.com/FreeBSD-Handbook-Documentation-Project-ebook/dp/B00PX04QWU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1418560310&sr=8-2&keywords=freebsd is this authorized by the freebsd community and/or foundation? ~mayuresh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 16:24:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6AF5D9 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "miucha.iecc.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D09FB5 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25616 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2014 16:24:49 -0000 Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 14 Dec 2014 16:24:49 -0000 Date: 14 Dec 2014 16:24:31 -0000 Message-ID: <20141214162431.1016.qmail@ary.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Handbook : available for Amazon Kindle! In-Reply-To: Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Cc: mayuresh@kathe.in X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:24:55 -0000 >i just noticed that the freebsd handbook is now available for the amazon >kindle at; >http://www.amazon.com/FreeBSD-Handbook-Documentation-Project-ebook/dp/B00PX04QWU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1418560310&sr=8-2&keywords=freebsd > >is this authorized by the freebsd community and/or foundation? The handbook is BSD licensed so no permission is needed. I added a review pointing out that you can get the handbook for free online, and make your own up to date Kindle version in five minutes with Kindlegen. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 03:30:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE884A0 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D4794B for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r20so7671583wiv.2 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:30:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Dglx5Qn1slhKkeZGbqMn37gdHwUdellpqgWeSqGwXww=; b=bWB10T5T7rDKsES+GwZXwgoc3otm4C6Nh5KL5Fvk5+IwCOGFGXfs6GQecer+ul00XX Lo+K10ov0RLaXaDbIZaod6Oeu8cIdVppx/SatpjHilkVTqVQfUFlB1flEjMinBvwUo0C xb0Cx7cFRWPiigqajfJyqXNE3Wl7saoAW3EDb4bT/SCBC0rzOoon5ja51Y3YDWVglLQ7 NBGolxIlFT5Y1k3lC/NdLSnnZC7yE7eMHpp5/KsYEPtJCmvsa9NC9YJa+0PFMai3kWA3 2NILTCo6ZE9BNoM7qMR1gm4d9vhpfeiA0uZfOK5EacKDMFeIAMDgZf5xYwsdCZRF7Hz4 taAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.92.37 with SMTP id cj5mr48391824wjb.81.1418614236542; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:30:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.106.134 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:30:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 22:30:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD BSD License 3 -> 2 Clause History From: grarpamp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:30:38 -0000 Can someone link to the threads discussing the historical proposed change from BSD 3-clause (modified BSD) to BSD 2-clause (FreeBSD) license? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 05:40:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4966226; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356846BE; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so9382357wib.5; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 21:40:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TYfeKmNSf2onnVhAIJddaJMwmYBpZElFVcKdPC0lNxQ=; b=XFUJbfkBZRua5jk9yQd59evGDscZskmWsdKAv9DZj1X9HH5K+gNzhkk5+xzfM1gg8D Sjx6qbHaO6E+z09XGtOQI09o6z21bFOXP/aEMZwglUicpjGSpC0Xzzbf10NQQSgC48Uv hVKrwkYnCtsjRWO5+f1pG1eJYdCG6nuWip2DOQYaxhmVTqZZ3yESeNQmx1kMlOrX4UEv n5tGEo82TNM93CN6NNPsV4HLsloq/IaTZ922Ku4pIB3frLOYHUpHnmzSZtr9/xnAqHkL saDycMWmmMwRtjdvGZPf50iv2WyHSK2AQnNbyRogrlrhnxUajcDj+UEqVxLnYxuL9/G/ lvUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.198.164 with SMTP id jd4mr27839128wic.42.1418622043689; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 21:40:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.106.134 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 21:40:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141208153925.5df90587@prometheus> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:40:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? From: grarpamp To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing Lists , "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:40:45 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Jia-Shiun Li wrote: > Yes, Haswell has an additional store addr but still only one store data unit. > > http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4770k-haswell-review,3521.html > > But I guess they'd argue that they meant to saturate memory > channels with all available cores as possible first, and additional > threads are only for last resort. And that's probably what the most > schedulers do. > > I benchmarked it on a 4th gen i3. Buildkernel got 5~10% benefit IIRC. > The best way to tell is still to conduct tests with your own workload. > If the claimed 5% transistor cost brings 10% benefits, that's already > a win. OTTH how much you paid for it is another story. Where is the claim of "5% transistor cost" from? I don't see it linked in this thread. Is it in terms of $ as a sales feature to get HT/SMT, or transistor count to get it? I think SMT transistor count could change over CPU generations optimized. Any bump in price to get HT, is amortized over time. Any bump in performance due to HT, is integrated over time. A watt costs about $1/yr. If SMT is 5% faster, over 4hr saves 12 minutes of your time, which saves $n/day, which more than pays for purchase and watts. If it is slower, it hurts similarly $hard unless you turn it off and eat its purchase difference. Thus to see what people were seeing perf wise. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 05:53:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691D9457 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335A48B3 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id sBF5Yo3T028119 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 22:34:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <548E72FA.4000506@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 22:34:50 -0700 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: bash fdesc requirement? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Sun, 14 Dec 2014 22:34:51 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:53:11 -0000 Building up a 9.3-release system. After doing a pkg upgrade I see this message: Message for bash-4.3.30_1: ====================================================================== bash requires fdescfs(5) mounted on /dev/fd If you have not done it yet, please do the following: mount -t fdescfs fdesc /dev/fd To make it permanent, you need the following lines in /etc/fstab: fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0 Yet it seems to run just fine without it. (simple test, start bash and exit...) Can someone explain what's going on, and why one would or would not add the indicated line to /etc/fstab? Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 07:49:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4EDFD4 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6C12F2 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id s18so8876461lam.2 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:49:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=miqWlPttM32EtBgJ4y0icTpBIfumqofMgYWBhlTxUpw=; b=ABKR+nQqZhsDs4x3q3HOuAetnTJdFmRgtoJukgxXX+ngu1RTieZTETgqezWm2I3Eps FXpRzrw74e0zhh0EBn+O6MUGd9Ezllw5JIZOdw2i7OIN+tM5gl16gjAhhZWN82ooYWtT jfIruUBn03SSWHfBZ2qX5mlRnTO7c/7LGFUOhRyX0Ji6uk5+uZVKddJVIHQLbCSJadAo VhkfSU8ybaZ3UFK1ZQLndy94Gxtcdg4S4l9zHrlLFzn2oAQAqJgRIBNo0iJvJf+rEoaP 5nz93Bi8sU7KgM7RG8GuEuYLx5zwGCJvtqhwsxxRRPIpoRQlLGX2Xe34NQdB0ZSnQGdk eySA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.150.71 with SMTP id ug7mr28787068lbb.73.1418629783365; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:49:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.161.135 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:49:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:19:43 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: can ipfw check all permit rules without search termination? From: s m To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:49:45 -0000 hello guys, i want to define multiple rules for ipfw. i wanna know if there is any way to ipfw check all permit rules without termination search until it sees and deny rule??? i want to search terminate only when a deny rule meet. is there any option or sysctl variable to doing this for me? i read ipfw man page but find nothing. any comments or hints are appreciated. SAM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 07:58:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F562284 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE8E3DA for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp14-2-30-215.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.30.215]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2014 18:28:01 +1030 Message-ID: <548E9487.1080005@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:27:59 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grarpamp , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD BSD License 3 -> 2 Clause History References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:58:09 -0000 On 15/12/2014 14:00, grarpamp wrote: > Can someone link to the threads discussing the historical > proposed change from BSD 3-clause (modified BSD) > to BSD 2-clause (FreeBSD) license? Thanks. I don't know of any recorded discussions, I'd say that the wikipedia page contains the most info with links to other resources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses Also consider that changes have legal implications and most likely were discussed privately with a lawyer rather than on any public email list or forum. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 09:27:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0C66DD4 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5815BED1 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.114] (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE65627363 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:21:08 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <548EA803.3060208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:21:07 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: krb5 issues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:27:13 -0000 I'm playing around with kerberos and to cut a long story short I'm trying to get the mit krb working - has to be I'm afraid. I've built it from ports with ldap backend support, but after a lot of playing around I still can't get it to work and I'm tearing my hair out. Unfortunately krb5kdc is not very talkative or coherent either. I've already come across some areas where it says one thing yet means another, but I've now been over all this near 10 times now and even some imaginative speculation isn't resolving anything. What I have is this in my rc.conf (out of the handbook): kerberos5_server_enable="YES" kadmind5_server_enable="YES" kerberos5_server="/usr/local/sbin/krb5kdc" kadmind5_server="/usr/local/sbin/kadmind" kerberos5_server_flags="" And krb5.conf: [libdefaults] default_realm = [realms] = { kdc = admin_server = } [domain_realm] . = And kdc.conf: [kdcdefaults] kdc_ports = 88 [realms] = { kadmind_port = 749 max_life = 12h 0m 0s max_renewable_life = 7d 0h 0m 0s master_key_type = supported_enctypes = database_module = } [logging] default = CONSOLE default = FILE: kdc = CONSOLE kdc = FILE: admin_server = FILE: [dbdefaults] [dbmodules] = { db_library = kldap db_module_dir = /usr/local/lib/krb5/plugins/kdb/ disable_last_success = true ldap_kerberos_container_dn = ldap_kdc_dn = "" ldap_kadmind_dn = "" ldap_service_password_file = ldap_servers = ldapi:// ldap_conns_per_server = 5 The error I get on the console when I run either krb5kdc directly or the rc script is: krb5kdc: cannot initialize realm - see log file for details The log files simply refuse to give anything, and stubbornly remain empty. kldap exists and ldd seems to show that the library is included in the system as well. Anyone have anything or seen similar at some point? TIA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 09:36:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04BCE15D for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87180FC8 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l15so8345009wiw.4 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 01:36:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z+mfJKBVLJvMUGDICeJZ+wzEIADc+2AdSNqgT7Z/BeY=; b=NPDHqAt2X+Xgzbw3h90OoxFjifC658BJOJSpNYVe5bmjMW7eScN46wMTkcM0famYj0 48yneltrRj/qIKo7NZFZVwzFlvBxko9a3rmUHOZiGZunGSJo8tY2wIDC6Mu4XIniLuSI /rohueKI2J2wfCG+DFFR9znwSSdy0rE0PHPBiGgLKTFvh8ojqIDiKEtqRFnRTPYSRr7M D6ALyR0Uyy0ahQbhx80on/wv72bfrao6/nu7diWoP97tinq5WY10oNHOp8BxGOtn4BAn atSR1FrZtsa8TeQKS+U5WrxQUzSPzyVyJpZ+M1Ya1Nty2A36KroDzlkC36FuZ4RfZdFb pn0g== X-Received: by 10.180.96.10 with SMTP id do10mr30104534wib.16.1418636180596; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 01:36:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (host86-153-214-89.range86-153.btcentralplus.com. [86.153.214.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ex9sm12421457wib.14.2014.12.15.01.36.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 01:36:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <548EAB93.8030802@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:36:19 +0000 From: James Griffin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: configuring kernel for vt console driver Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:36:23 -0000 Hi everyone I'm tinkering with vt(4) tunables in loader.conf to get a console I like for use with my machine. My monitor is 1440x900 dimensions so I've set the tunable kern.vt.fb.default_mode=1440x900. I would like the i915 kms driver to be loaded as early on in the boot process as possible so I can get the nice resolution early on too. Currently, I have got the hw.vga.textmode=1 tunable set so it does start out in text mode, then switches over to the kms driver (i915kms). What i'd like to know is: if I take out the hw.vga.textmode=1 tunable 'should' this start my console in fb mode straight away or, will the resolution switch over to fb mode from a not so desirable resolution still - similar to what is happening now? so, is hw.vga.textmode=1 needed/recommended and; If I put the corresponding kernel config options in the kernel config file and recompile my kernel will it speed it all up significantly? I'm gunna change the default colors so compiling and installing a custom kernel is something i'm going to do anyway. and finally; The settings i've described so far, is that the correct way to achieve the resolution 1440x900 in fb mode using the i915 driver as soon as possible in the boot process or, should I be doing it differently? Here are the vt settings i've got in /boot/loader.conf: i915kms_load="YES" kern.vty=vt hw.vga.textmode=1 kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1440x900" Thanks for reading and thanks in advance for any feedback you might provide. Cheers, Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 10:03:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF26C7FE for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-4-out.integrity.hu (smtp-4-out.integrity.hu [212.52.165.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C537347 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.integrity.hu (mail-fe-1.integrity.hu [10.1.64.120]) by mail-smtp.integrity.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 75AC040269 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:03:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from n6K7ZNFaLCt5V+YrI2bxhTPC+Ff7DehZ by webmail.integrity.hu with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:03:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:03:34 +0100 From: gabor@zahemszky.hu To: Subject: pkg override =?UTF-8?Q?HOW=3F?= Message-ID: <29c3e5df6a2337ffb37c724a46b9b66c@zahemszky.hu> X-Sender: gabor@zahemszky.hu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:03:44 -0000 Hi! In man pkg-repository, there is a description, on how to use more repositories, and how to override the default precedence. The critical steps are: 1) install the package from the preferred repo with: pkg install -r PreferredRepoName PACKAGEname 2) and after installation, make an annotation on that package with: pkg annotate -A PACKAGEname repository PreferredRepoName There are at least two problems with it: a) The annotation halted with an error message: "Cannot add annotation" Because the package HAS the correct "repository" annotation - and every package has repository annotations - the packages, which was installed from remote has the "FreeBSD" tag, and the local-sourced package has the local-repo-name.) b) The bigger problem is that it doesn't work. It means: I have a local package (mail/faces), which has a default GTK-1.2 and GLIB-1.2 dependency. I don't need them (but faces), so I made a local package. Made the above steps, but the pkg update / upgrade commands updated it from the main FreeBSD repository. So what do I need to do, to make the package from my local repo is the preferred package? Thanks, Zahemszky, Gábor < Gabor at Zahemszky dot HU > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 14:10:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5AF025C for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x245.google.com (mail-pa0-x245.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7807D149 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id et14so72631307pad.8 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 06:10:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Sc8VUqp3POgj75ByRcaplKHFDumlLb5XwvyUsIH4qs0=; b=wnYU5Ln0kpwadRHC3VLJjTJZeeWXZDsrS+JZ1dCpsyxTZBE0I9cizm4jNm05fBHW4Y /oqPJBwruKeyp0G9eHu0HfZ963kGqDn9GRrDw+Jz38BAoStRKXfpoGI/9p6gHtJqWHOM DGOPxHobYBlfbKMJTsXaLR5vXx16QNWfB8TZWnqXaXhbmFi+QZEftpA3Sh4DOLE62xdD 2RZwjGrQnxVXo54kd3aH4xVzr/Lcv/j5mk2YZ3RuT3Xnd80ySgNR9YsSiP8gYfsx640R sNJOnGYAD8nhtgLsYBg8bOFyL4wZ3eezbxRZFSFnlyX85QnjiBVz5jSHoVMr/Xn4pTtV SU6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.39.102 with SMTP id o6mr26012565pdk.4.1418652613644; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 06:10:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <089e0160cf0818971b050a41cdfb@google.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:10:13 +0000 Subject: Want to take your business to a next level? From: James Miller To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:10:15 -0000 Hi freebsd.org Owner, Would you like to reach more customers? Do you want to take the market by storm? Want a kick-ass exposure for your products and services? If you want to get more customers than ever, you need to adopt the modern web technologies and tools. Of course, not just any flyer or 90's looking website will do. Clients believe that the way you present yourself online is directly proportional with how professional you are and how good your service is. Are you going to skimp out on your image and make the clients think you're unprofessional...or are you going to take your business to a next level? Let me help! I focus on user-experience to create custom and dynamic website designs and ultimately a successful online presence for you. We excel not only in website development and design but also in mobile website, which ultimately increases usability, gets ranked easily in search engines and helps your customer base grow! The insider secret recipe is to "Be Everywhere". If you want to boost-up your business, just reply back to this email or call me at +18436284551. I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, James Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 16:10:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F6381E7; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDFDC3; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F99D33C28; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:10:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 015DD39814; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:10:26 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: bash fdesc requirement? References: <548E72FA.4000506@dreamchaser.org> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:10:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <548E72FA.4000506@dreamchaser.org> (Gary Aitken's message of "Sun, 14 Dec 2014 22:34:50 -0700") Message-ID: <44ppbkevwt.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:10:40 -0000 Gary Aitken writes: > Building up a 9.3-release system. > After doing a pkg upgrade I see this message: > > Message for bash-4.3.30_1: > ====================================================================== > bash requires fdescfs(5) mounted on /dev/fd > If you have not done it yet, please do the following: > mount -t fdescfs fdesc /dev/fd > To make it permanent, you need the following lines in /etc/fstab: > fdesc /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0 > > Yet it seems to run just fine without it. (simple test, start bash and > exit...) > > Can someone explain what's going on, and why one would or would not > add the indicated line to /etc/fstab? It's for Process Substitution (described briefly in the manual). I don't know why the maintainer noted it as "required" -- in fact, I can't think of any functionality it enables that can't also be done with named pipes. But the maintainer added the note fairly recently, about the same time that the dependency on procfs was removed, so I'm probably missing something. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 18:14:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D0D01AB for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E361F0 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844FB33C28; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:14:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EBD9C39814; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:14:20 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: s m Subject: Re: can ipfw check all permit rules without search termination? References: Reply-To: freebsd-questions Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:14:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: (s. m.'s message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:19:43 +0330") Message-ID: <44k31seq6c.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:14:28 -0000 s m writes: > i want to define multiple rules for ipfw. i wanna know if there is any way > to ipfw check all permit rules without termination search until it sees and > deny rule??? i want to search terminate only when a deny rule meet. > is there any option or sysctl variable to doing this for me? i read ipfw > man page but find nothing. Why are you trying to do this? What are you actually trying to achieve? What you've described doesn't make sense, so you need to go back and figure out why you're asking the wrong question. Perhaps another firewall, like pf(4), might have syntax that makes more sense to you? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 21:39:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E39359 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host203.r-bonomi.com (host203.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723F0DFF for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by host203.r-bonomi.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) id sBFKcOX4016261; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:38:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bonomi) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:38:24 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201412152038.sBFKcOX4016261@host203.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, yuri@rawbw.com Subject: Re: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? In-Reply-To: <54892F4C.1030906@rawbw.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:39:22 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 11 13:22:19 2014 > Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:44:44 -0800 > From: Yuri > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Maybe somebody knows a good Bourne Shell book or tutorial? > > Asking here because it is used in FreeBSD a lot. > > Most google queries about Bourne Shell aspects bring answers like this: > Not sure, but if this was in bash, you could .... > And most documents found online aren't comprehensive, and only cover > beginner questions. No books on amazon look promising either. > > There are some quite tricky areas and questions about sh and hard to > find information. > > Anybody knows of some good book that would cover all essential issues of > Bourne shell programming? for _good_ computer books, see O'Reilly & Associates http://www.ora.com They have at least half-a-dozen titles on shell scripting, depending on which varient you want. I don't think they still have anything on the actual Bourne shell, but the POSIX-standard sh is Bourne with only a little added syntactic sugar. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 22:10:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1119CD for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host203.r-bonomi.com (host203.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89C4142 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by host203.r-bonomi.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) id sBFM2Omd016802 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:02:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bonomi) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:02:24 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201412152202.sBFM2Omd016802@host203.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mplayer configuration question In-Reply-To: <201412092214.sB9MEfOq099096@host203.r-bonomi.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:10:16 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 9 16:17:28 2014 > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:14:41 -0600 (CST) > From: Robert Bonomi > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: mplayer configuration question > > > I've got an HP DX5150 with ATI Radeon X300 on-board graphics. > > 'X' start-up indicates ATI R400 drm drivers are active. > > I've got both the VGA and DVI-D ports enabled in BIOS, and everthing shows > up just fine on both displays. > > EXCEPT for mplayer output, that is. > > when I launch mplayer (or gmplayer), I get a new window on both screens, > but _only_ the display on the VGA port has the movie displayed. on the > DVI port, it's an empty window. > > HOW do I get movies to display on the DVI port?? > > sign me 'baffled' > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > h 2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 22:35:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A407729 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host203.r-bonomi.com (host203.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FBE683 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by host203.r-bonomi.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) id sBFMRbVt016889 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:27:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bonomi) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:27:37 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201412152227.sBFMRbVt016889@host203.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP DX5150 and screen-savers In-Reply-To: <201412092220.sB9MKZAS099110@host203.r-bonomi.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:35:28 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 9 16:20:40 2014 > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:20:35 -0600 (CST) > From: Robert Bonomi > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: HP DX5150 and screen-savers > > > I'm pretty sure I've done something 'wrong', but can't figure out what. :(( > I'm running a stripped-down monolithic kernel, with evrything built-in (no > modules being run-time loaded), and cant get a screen-saver to work with the > built-in ATI Radeon x300 graphics. I've got the 'sc' console driver, and > 'vesa' support compiled-in, and fire_saver bitches at boot time, failing to > install. (-that- machine is at another location, so I don't have the exact > boot-time error message handy) Update: I *didn't* do anything wrong! The d*mn video card doesn't support low-end (CGA or EGA) graphics modes. The 'fire_saver' screen-saver (the one I'm trying to use) only tries GCA 320x200 graphics and two other modes specific to the 'PC98' implementation. So, of course the saver failed to initialize. I've hacked the code to try all the 'reasonable' graphics modes, and it now loads and runs. So far, so good. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 22:58:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3E0CEC for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host203.r-bonomi.com (host203.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41528ED for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by host203.r-bonomi.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) id sBFMoksQ017043 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:50:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bonomi) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:50:46 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201412152250.sBFMoksQ017043@host203.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: getting 'load averages' (or something similar) from inside a _kernel_ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:58:38 -0000 I'm trying to get the current 'runnable processes' count from inside a kernel loadable module for BSD 8.4, so I can tweak it's behavior depending on the current activity level. All I've found so far is what's in 'man 9 runqueue', and it is *badly* out-of-sync with the 8.4 kernel code. e.g., the external arrays at the beginning of the synopisis are shown as being of type 'struct rq' -- but there *ISN"T* any defined struct 'rq'; it seems to be named 'runq', at least in /usr/include/sys/runq.h Then the cr*p gets deeper -- trying to make heads or tails out of how to get a count of runnable processes from the _arrays_ (of unknown size) described on the 'man 9 runqueue' page info has me defeated. Looking at '/usr/include/sys/runq.h', it appears that 'struct runq' is a single item with an array of queues (by 'nice' level), and a bitmap of which array elements have non-zero length queues. I'm perfectly willing to brute-force the data out of the queue lists, *IF* there's some reasonable, _current_, descriptive info of the format/usage of those kernel structures. Alternatively, is there a way to directly access the 'sysctl' MIB data in kernel memory. sysctl(3) is out -- it's in 'libc', and not available to kernel modules. Pointers to descriptions of the kernel in-memory data for that MIB would be a big help. Or 'where to ask', if there's a better place. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 23:01:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44467B4 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x241.google.com (mail-wi0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2559AB for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f193.google.com with SMTP id bs8so3596687wib.0 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:01:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:subject:to:content-type:mime-version:reply-to :organization:date; bh=/3HHWOpU6PXXEI9jMsil+TCVO8wbjTZT4nPldf+Ci1w=; b=cQWGQRToEIaGT+4LgnfqViAw+pETYqh+yRqo+gqbz307BK1t7N8XUEpKT8ii2BuA+N eHnfXeBFHN4Jb/Zg64CWUPHDQtj4CwAIri0pFq5zYGIuc4byEgreI123LC7pgjx3u5r8 UTC/o1U3ciB5YC1h3z8oJRy4z6nFDfRbSqhKIvB/YbzEZvMJ/JqcKT9ucrsa5bEzWE+1 oexQ05yEgWAjvzvIu0exI4+25bd0WLnj3M9HvX3LvVHaxexQtvJST3IsiNhErtSvJD+J W9h1P8lZd0BsnStvw33wG5uEXl608pQ8jYrsZM5eUVkcmbt+E+cRSV+uNyg4fLMxAQ94 e+7w== X-Received: by 10.194.222.34 with SMTP id qj2mr57421713wjc.80.1418684490272; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from 87.68.226.188.adsl.012.net.il ([77.125.134.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm14671738wjs.32.2014.12.15.15.01.25 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:01:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <548f6846.223fc20a.5bf1.13f3@mx.google.com> From: "Rotem Hecht" Subject: Music composer for Tv commercials, films and video games To: "freebsd-questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: "contact@rotemmusic.com" Organization: Rotem Hecht Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:01:27 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:01:32 -0000 Hi=20 =20 I hope you well =20 I am Rotem Hecht. I work as a professional music composer and sound d= esigner, I'm based in Israel and in Los Angeles, California and working with production companies all over the world. I compose original music for movies, television commercials, video gam= es, events, corporate films and I am open to other media scenarios. My portfolio includes projects performed for Microsoft, Hershey's, Kre= -O, Hasbro, Mercedes, Audi, Nickelodeon, Hop! TV Channel and more =20 I=E2=80=99m capable of delivering high quality products at decent rate= s and in short period of time. I would like to offer you my services. Please check my portfolio on my= website www.rotemmusic.com =20 Thank You for your time. =20 Best Regards , =20 Rotem Hecht Mob:+972-528-227726 rotemhecht@gmail.com Skype: rhecht1282=20 =20 Unsubscribe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 00:10:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A313D6BD for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AEF614C for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id sBG0AHNp031261; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:10:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <548F7869.2040705@dreamchaser.org> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:10:17 -0700 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: s m , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: can ipfw check all permit rules without search termination? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:10:18 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:10:21 -0000 On 12/15/14 00:49, s m wrote: > i want to define multiple rules for ipfw. i wanna know if there is any way > to ipfw check all permit rules without termination search until it sees and > deny rule??? i want to search terminate only when a deny rule meet. > is there any option or sysctl variable to doing this for me? i read ipfw > man page but find nothing. If you don't want the search to terminate except on a deny rule, simply put all the deny rules first. Then put all your allow rules after that, with a final deny rule to catch whatever didn't match the allow rules. Perhaps I don't understand what you are trying to accomplish... If what you want to do on an allow rule is skip the rest of the allow rules through the following deny rule, and continue matching with the first rule after the deny rule, you can use the "skipto" action for the allow rules: add 100 skipto 1000 ip from via add 200 deny ip from via ... add 1000 skipto 2000 ... I've never used skipto so I may have the syntax a bit wrong. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 01:48:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39ACA743 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B68C98 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [24.134.156.212] (helo=michael-think.fritz.box) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0gxn-0005oX-Ob for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:30:11 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: pkg upgrade Problem: loop between packages, sqlite error To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:30:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.98.4/19785/Mon Dec 15 22:47:20 2014) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:48:22 -0000 Hello, pkg 1.4.0 FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r275326 I'm trying to upgrade my packages, and pkg keeps toggling between two ghostscript versions and keeps upgrading the same packages over and over again "ABI changed". After I uninstall ghostscript, pkg just keeps upgrading the same packages over and over again. Reinstalling all packages "pkg upgrade -f " bombs until I manually remove db42-4.2.52_5 db48-4.8.30.0_2 db-1.14,2 db5-5.3.28_2 Now "pkg upgrade -f" does no longer bomb, but "pkg upgrade" keeps upgrading the same packages over and over again "ABI changed". Once again I install GraphicsMagick-1.3.20, this pulls in ghostscript9-9.06_9 The swap-ghostscript against ghostscript-nox11-loop ad infinitum starts again. I do not know how to proceed here, please help. Postscript: I've updated to FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #5 r275815. Now "pkg upgrade -f" works, else still all the same. ( Is this (in part) because I'm running -CURRENT? First time I try -CURRENT, I do not know too much about eventual gotchas? Went all smooth on 10.1 ) Details: 1st run of "pkg upgrade": The following 54 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be REMOVED: ghostscript9-9.06_9 New packages to be INSTALLED: ghostscript9-nox11: 9.06_9 [FreeBSD] 2nd run of "pkg upgrade": The following 54 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be REMOVED: ghostscript9-nox11-9.06_9 New packages to be INSTALLED: ghostscript9: 9.06_9 [FreeBSD] 3rd run like 1st run. Now I try "pkg upgrade -f": Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. Updating gurder repository catalogue... gurder repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (327 candidates): 92% db42 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db? [Y/n]: Checking for upgrades (327 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (327 candidates): 100% pkg: sqlite error while executing UPDATE packages SET name=?1 WHERE name=?2; in file pkg_jobs.c:1601: UNIQUE constraint failed: packages.name Checking integrity...pkg: cannot load files from tiff to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from python27 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from py27-pytz to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from png to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from perl5 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from pcre to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from p5-Locale-gettext to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from nginx to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from mysql56-server to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from mysql56-client to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libxml2 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libxcb to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libidn to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libgpg-error to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libXext to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from jpeg to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from gmake to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from ghostscript9-nox11 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from gettext to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from freetype2 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from expat to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from exim to check integrity Assertion failed: (strcmp(uid, p->uid) != 0), function pkg_conflicts_check_local_path, file pkg_jobs_conflicts.c, line 350. Child process pid=10094 terminated abnormally: Abort trap I remove the ghostscript port with "pkg delete ghostscript9-nox11-9.06_9". I try "pkg upgrade" again. It reinstalls 51 packages: xproto-7.0.26 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) xextproto-7.3.0 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) svgalib-1.4.3_7 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) screen-4.2.1_3 [gurder] (ABI changed) python2-2_3 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-zope.interface-3.8.0_1 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedWords-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedWeb-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedRunner-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedPair-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedNews-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedNames-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedMail-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedLore-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedCore-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twistedConch-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-twisted-14.0.0 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-tornado-4.0.2 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-setuptools27-5.5.1 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-pygments-1.6_2 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-futures-2.1.6 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-docutils-0.12 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-certifi-14.05.14 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-backports.ssl_match_hostname-3.4.0.2 [gurder] (ABI changed) py27-asn1-0.1.7,1 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) py27-Babel-1.3_2 [gurder] (ABI changed) pkgconf-0.9.7 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) m4-1.4.17_1,1 [gurder] (ABI changed) libpthread-stubs-0.3_6 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) libpaper-1.1.24.3 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) libgcrypt-1.6.1_5 [gurder] (ABI changed) libXt-1.1.4_2,1 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) libXdmcp-1.1.1_2 [gurder] (ABI changed) libXau-1.0.8_2 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) libX11-1.6.2_2,1 [gurder] (ABI changed) libSM-1.2.2_2,1 [gurder] (ABI changed) libICE-1.0.9,1 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) lcms2-2.6_3 [gurder] (ABI changed) kbproto-1.0.6 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) jbigkit-2.1_1 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) jbig2dec-0.11_2 [gurder] (ABI changed) jasper-1.900.1_14 [gurder] (ABI changed) indexinfo-0.2 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) help2man-1.43.3_1 [gurder] (ABI changed) gsfonts-8.11_6 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) cups-image-1.7.3_1 [gurder] (ABI changed) cups-client-1.7.3_2 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) cmake-modules-3.0.2 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) cmake-3.0.2 [gurder] (ABI changed) autoconf-wrapper-20131203 [FreeBSD] (ABI changed) autoconf-2.69 [gurder] (ABI changed) This again loops, i. e. these packages get reinstalled on every "pkg upgrade" run. I try "pkg upgrade -f": Checking for upgrades (322 candidates): 93% db42 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db? [Y/n]: Y Checking for upgrades (322 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (322 candidates): 100% pkg: sqlite error while executing UPDATE packages SET name=?1 WHERE name=?2; in file pkg_jobs.c:1601: UNIQUE constraint failed: packages.name Checking integrity...pkg: cannot load files from tiff to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from python27 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from py27-pytz to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from png to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from perl5 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from pcre to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from p5-Locale-gettext to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from nginx to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from mysql56-server to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from mysql56-client to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libxml2 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libxcb to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libidn to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libgpg-error to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from libXext to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from jpeg to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from gmake to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from gettext to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from freetype2 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from expat to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from exim to check integrity Assertion failed: (strcmp(uid, p->uid) != 0), function pkg_conflicts_check_local_path, file pkg_jobs_conflicts.c, line 350. Child process pid=10913 terminated abnormally: Abort trap Answering "no" to the db42 change question yields: Checking for upgrades (325 candidates): 92% db42 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db? [Y/n]: n db42 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db? [Y/n]: n db42 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db48? [Y/n]: n db42 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db5? [Y/n]: n db42 has no direct installation candidates, change it to db6? [Y/n]: n Checking for upgrades (325 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (325 candidates): 100% Checking integrity...pkg: cannot load files from tiff to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from python27 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from py27-pytz to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from png to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from perl5 to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from pcre to check integrity pkg: cannot load files from p5-Locale-gettext to check integrity Assertion failed: (pkgdb_ensure_loaded(j->db, p2, PKG_LOAD_FILES|PKG_LOAD_DIRS) == EPKG_OK), function pkg_conflicts_need_conflict, file pkg_jobs_conflicts.c, line 211. Child process pid=10467 terminated abnormally: Abort trap "pkg check -d -a": Checking all packages: 0% devel/autoconf has a missing dependency: lang/perl5.16 Checking all packages: 18% misc/help2man has a missing dependency: lang/perl5.16 Checking all packages: 78% ftp/py-pyftpdlib has a missing dependency: devel/py-distribute Checking all packages: 100% >>> Missing package dependencies were detected. >>> Found 2 issue(s) in the package database. pkg: No packages available to install matching 'devel/py-distribute' have been found in the repositories >>> Summary of actions performed: lang/perl5.16 dependency failed to be fixed devel/py-distribute dependency failed to be fixed >>> There are still missing dependencies. >>> You are advised to try fixing them manually. >>> Also make sure to check 'pkg updating' for known issues. "pkg check -B -a": pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/bin/envsubst): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/bin/gettext): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/bin/gettext.sh): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/bin/ngettext): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/include/autosprintf.h): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/include/libintl.h): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/info/autosprintf.info): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/lib/libasprintf.a): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/lib/libasprintf.so): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/lib/libasprintf.so.0): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/lib/libintl.a): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/lib/libintl.so): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man1/envsubst.1.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man1/gettext.1.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man1/ngettext.1.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/bind_textdomain_codeset.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/bindtextdomain.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/dcgettext.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/dcngettext.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/dgettext.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/dngettext.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/gettext.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/ngettext.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/man/man3/textdomain.3.gz): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/gettext/ABOUT-NLS): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/locale.alias): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory pkg: fstat() failed for(/usr/local/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/gettext-runtime.mo): No such file or directory From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 06:03:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE88279 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFFA6A88 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z12so10383293lbi.18 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:03:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DdI7FcX4kxTjnOEkNlIkcH06us9nipV/YT6K9me3MQg=; b=Oa1CkD3PZzTEmclovxBo7mEni3U551ThCDASfCKi9AFfqq55x2fyBcRMqbbIYQeuLR il1ZF9THoW0q+wtzggGRQE0NibbkjeXRw+IE3olz6GRdqT2IErY7PvP9HU8sEvG9Zj3l +R9BTx2K7WHud+GYT9oo12MXFlpkH4TorNjkNpuBO0tTwQ8P4sLJpr/5ErMnBGZVO8n7 0oCQ9WaA+GO34HbOju97SVeAmjdL42ZfYcjziEaZcC4X1ruNBpXNsEy4l4Hzut7XO9/p Yf4futhxiNQ9O4zdTkeP6mvhhoy9NUWBq7Ieo0Nr3hxTNXSNu0ToavKcWGoI/NT2vNHF b6Tg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.162.226 with SMTP id yd2mr871623lbb.1.1418709797902; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:03:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.161.135 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:03:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <548F7869.2040705@dreamchaser.org> References: <548F7869.2040705@dreamchaser.org> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:33:17 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: Re: can ipfw check all permit rules without search termination? From: s m To: freebsd-questions , Gary Aitken , "from: Lowell Gilbert" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:03:20 -0000 hello guys, thanks for your answers. you know, i have different services and each one writes ipfw rules in different times. i want to aggregated all rules. i mean if two rules which are written by two different services, have overlap (for example rule number 222 permit packets with 192.168.5.5 src address while rule number 225 permit packets with 192.168.5.5 src address and set next-hop 192.168.10.2 for them), the rule which is more specified, match. in my example, i want to rule number 222 match for packets. in the other words, ipfw uses "first match win" search method. can i change this method??? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 07:14:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2484F2 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 07:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6947B157 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 07:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ex7so11228878wid.9 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:14:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pKYmmCbXvLz6/EWCitT1FXhPer4ZzWROKjzftKbWCcU=; b=P41CKNRB5Nmn074Vx1myvMa9VvWa2d3RMrZFFY5eTdl7Kikt3h8tmqzjRVGBr8BpQE MCv740CDy5i8O+AQgXFkMNhiM09wsMpQ/bE7J/IFEMsj+nisun0xabRFhyI6djk424tv NKlftqnoEWIkdh8xP4jz5HJH5l4h9fXaJ/hPvbKepgSXZHLfwxgyQ76/Yu4jRonoiWV6 +muOgX3PVie8twfAfAlhVf3iRZUEllF5pl31fC9awq90pxPB1CdrPKPz082s8Mm5zRiQ /VujOTDl8Lef6yLvZIgnEalrPHMgfq0KHX1p0quZO9kTpUtfJTP8gy8icil36xuGobww /AEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.101.200 with SMTP id fi8mr2018945wib.77.1418714091738; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.85.43 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:14:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:14:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: booting in blue From: Luca Ferrari To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 07:14:53 -0000 Hi all, I just installed a fresh 10.1-release and noted that the "Booting..." message is now on a blue background. Apparently this has been reported as a bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182145 I was instead wondering if FreeBSD has applied the same schema used by OpenBSD: the kernel messages have a different background. This helps a lot understanding what is going on in the console, and is in my opinion, a better way than using a bold white for the kernel messages. Now the question is: is there a configuration tunable for turning on blue all the kernel messages as the initial booting message? I mean something simpler than having to tune options and recompile the kernel (https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/boot-and-kernel-message-background-and-color.33196/). Thanks, Luca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 08:27:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B2E8E6 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EAC8A7A for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l2so16754784wgh.41 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:27:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=k9/LfBu0HZ29UwaO5luMebGsaw9NYE7JbTKG8mZuGII=; b=RbT7DVW248V8iu4cMrVBFoYImVPPY76Zm0HQYEHbXAseSkvCSeESgpp911dby3OyC4 v/lDXrziym4tta0g0GOJGXPZxG2TzgdpAGv4yFBX6fhZpQq2Tk+b6h4xPQs2mw5/LH3N AOrWMno5tbUyWOKGokLsjne/sI1CqumIG7yDcP4qUDTvCd1JiqHOSelAoSBljhXDKhaO xV9prSX6fZ0x47X+LPTEYj2L4+PtDr/cPv6bKN2OEanlZrHjOUrfW0EKT2JdpA0SpiVp jmuqFgyUGlQ52s2ZrnGy/hevkJhWqlhIifN0pft7xhCe/ah/0NJskk97Qaa8wbG5x+dM Wixw== X-Received: by 10.180.76.144 with SMTP id k16mr2555672wiw.3.1418718440119; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (host86-153-214-89.range86-153.btcentralplus.com. [86.153.214.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bj7sm172460wjc.33.2014.12.16.00.27.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:27:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:27:12 +0000 (GMT) From: griffin8j@gmail.com To: Luca Ferrari Subject: Re: booting in blue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:27:23 -0000 On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Luca Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > I just installed a fresh 10.1-release and noted that the "Booting..." > message is now on a blue background. Apparently this has been reported > as a bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182145 > I was instead wondering if FreeBSD has applied the same schema used by > OpenBSD: the kernel messages have a different background. This helps a > lot understanding what is going on in the console, and is in my > opinion, a better way than using a bold white for the kernel messages. > Now the question is: is there a configuration tunable for turning on > blue all the kernel messages as the initial booting message? > I mean something simpler than having to tune options and recompile the > kernel (https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/boot-and-kernel-message-background-and-color.33196/). > > Thanks, > Luca Yes you can keep these settings. You can use the vidcontrol utility or compile the kernel again using the knobs described in vt(4) man page. I have just done this to get yellow text on a black background. I tried the grey on blue too but the background blue is not the same in graphics mode, it sets a boldened blue appearing much lighter so I changed it. You achieve the same using sc(4) but you won't get the smaller text and you won't get utf-8 characters. Jamie Griffin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 11:55:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1379844 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E2016C0 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x12so17158583wgg.39 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 03:55:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=lnO45cQIF9MIfgMnfxDl9LmleCmhFVmW5kdDoGB/mu4=; b=RFJltDc9ZfplL7Y4eAbrORWTn4v2YutLxaNoMnnbtSBkakG0k2uypXkLV/PfuwQiaz D5Nn1TFQXi8MTxQY/opMiHhEp//GLBcVjBNAjtwEatMzVGo0AGEjFI5u0JiSyvIw6SxQ IME/3+bu+0uEqAv5glbU+ecQwM0IiYhc1Di8+Gk9mR8y5wj8spAxewu3bjJVrQDe254z QluitauQOYUAOi0cElLWql+nRJFxZKwg+RGkYw/5Aha51a9SzsvGLSAvE1HHqN13dfXy EzV++ksffaQHBu7sIVsvvVBdSOn+JHT1CJAKrdl0EJx/eO2m4IFzlLPxUGCPzAbqVZ8R mEKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.189.240 with SMTP id gl16mr59914776wjc.119.1418730915712; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 03:55:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: fluca1978@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.85.43 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 03:55:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:55:15 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OhGBWGPZ4IiiTxpqN-VociHRo_A Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg assertion failed From: Luca Ferrari To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:55:17 -0000 On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > Seems a problem with the package database to me, what should I do? I'm > running 10.1-release. Apparently it was a mix-mismatch of ports and packages. Issuing a # pkg udate # pkg upgrade fixed the problem. Thanks, Luca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 12:06:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89536BF8 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 235C91813 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b13so17325220wgh.18 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:06:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=e7LPrx7N8zKvZg3LCPMu2/6Vp9Q7ragh/bWVmyvUaoM=; b=oW4nHgs+Z6gzhDX3HBkLPHp3lAxX0JkqCSgUkFUfDvGJLGrNS9rZGYYJz6mTGD7VbG RWdiBAFValx5J085nI6MjETM6lN56Ztps5qJG6/1VcFCcEbG2zvfyb1d7gNkRRVlJFOm GYylH8yesCkLdi93PgB3DlfqPQQOqvFi9I3OsaaJEmOweNcUPVBQ2sus1Dz1BwSFF7bu 2qCE4ToL1upAxBTPQHjDdzzYP/vqeMPIVeanKUq0KPGBd1FbN4fQBT6AfUAK500xpTsW dhazP7FjA2dPkT9GaBa9wPddoH28uWCCrIC52WJMgq3fk3SZo4Hxg5OZRjMr9VT9u9GV 5bFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.189.240 with SMTP id gl16mr59157290wjc.119.1418725009762; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:16:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: fluca1978@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.85.43 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:16:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:16:49 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WnEatYMKiYO2FlSaNzKX7Nol9EQ Message-ID: Subject: pkg assertion failed From: Luca Ferrari To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:06:14 -0000 Hi all, while trying to install Emacs I got the following: # pkg install emacs-nox11-24.4_3,3 Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking integrity...Assertion failed: (pkgdb_ensure_loaded(j->db, p2, PKG_LOAD_FILES|PKG_LOAD_DIRS) == EPKG_OK), function pkg_conflicts_need_conflict, file pkg_jobs_conflicts.c, line 211. Child process pid=40415 terminated abnormally: Abort trap Seems a problem with the package database to me, what should I do? I'm running 10.1-release. Thanks, Luca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 15:34:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B224EC7 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D7C11A for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DAF4833C28; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:34:07 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: s m Subject: Re: can ipfw check all permit rules without search termination? References: <548F7869.2040705@dreamchaser.org> Reply-To: freebsd-questions Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:34:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: (s. m.'s message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:33:17 +0330") Message-ID: <44ppbjhamo.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:34:09 -0000 s m writes: > thanks for your answers. you know, i have different services and each one > writes ipfw rules in different times. i want to aggregated all rules. i > mean if two rules which are written by two different services, have overlap > (for example rule number 222 permit packets with 192.168.5.5 src address > while rule number 225 permit packets with 192.168.5.5 src address and set > next-hop 192.168.10.2 for them), the rule which is more specified, match. You want to use tables for these host-by-host rules. Otherwise managing the data gets unwieldy. > in my example, i want to rule number 222 match for packets. > in the other words, ipfw uses "first match win" search method. can i change > this method??? No. There are other firewalls that use other algorithms. The way to make priority work in ipfw is to simply arrange your rules so that either the one that takes priority gets checked *first*, or the other one gets skipped. In your example, you didn't show any reason why the next-hop rule came after rather than before the accept rule. In my experience, the only time it's difficult to arrange the priority is when the treatment of a packet is *intended* to depend on more than one positive match; in such cases, making the first match a "skipto" rule instead of "permit" has always been enough to structure the logic as I needed. The details depend on exactly what you want to do. If a given packet may end up with multiple kinds of special treatment, you might be better with a firewall that carries more state as the firewall rules are traversed, like pf. If the total number of ways packets can be treated is relatively small, you should be able to do fine with ipfw by checking the outright rejects first, the special treatments second, accepts third, and perhaps defaulting to reject after that. If the packets run through NAT, things get a little more complicated because you want to check source addresses before NAT and destination addresses afterwards -- but the rc.firewall that ships with FreeBSD demonstrates how to handle that. As a final note, I suspect that the next-hop rule is inappropriate. If, instead of setting the next-hop in the firewall, you just set a route in the routing table for that host, would you get the behaviour you want? Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 15:42:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBF51A7 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561FD220 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AD67F33C29; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:42:01 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Luca Ferrari Subject: Re: pkg assertion failed References: Reply-To: freebsd-questions Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:42:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Luca Ferrari's message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:55:15 +0100") Message-ID: <44k31rha9i.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:42:02 -0000 Luca Ferrari writes: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: >> Seems a problem with the package database to me, what should I do? I'm >> running 10.1-release. > > Apparently it was a mix-mismatch of ports and packages. > Issuing a Well, not literally. Once installed, there is no difference. In fact, these days building a port works by building a package without installing anything, and then installing that. > # pkg udate > # pkg upgrade > > fixed the problem. The problem is having some of your installed packages out of synch with each other. "pkg upgrade" is, indeed, the easy way to fix this (just remember to check UPDATING first, as with any method of upgrading the installed packages). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 17:08:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8E8729 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC2S27.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s27.hotmail.com [65.55.111.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334E0D6A for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU436-SMTP170 ([65.55.111.73]) by BLU004-OMC2S27.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:07:25 -0800 X-TMN: [1q3O56exXuajS0b6KBHkkbFUADbjZwFk] X-Originating-Email: [seo.competitiveranker@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Subject: No Cost Search Optimization for freebsd.org.! MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:37:24 +0530 From: Mark Peters To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2014 17:07:23.0192 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2522380:01D01952] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:08:32 -0000 Hi, We are offering certain website owners an opportunity to participate i= n a no cost search optimization project. Our online research came up w= ith your website "freebsd.org" as an under optimized site. Your websit= e is not ranking the way it should on Google, Yahoo & Bing this projec= t may help. We also offer optimization services that will fix all your= search problems at a very low cost. Well planned out search engine op= timization will increase your sites traffic, increase your brand recog= nition and grow your sales. All the things you need to succeed online!= We can help you get to the 1st page on Google, Bing and/or Yahoo typic= ally in five to six months. If you would like more information I can email you additional details.= I look forward to your reply. Sincerely - Mark Peters Senior Business Mgr If You have not interest then You may also ask us for "REMOVE" or mail= 2202 S Figuroa St, Los Angeles, Ca 90007.=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 17:18:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3797BA76 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm39-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm39-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48CEEAD for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1418750175; bh=/rJUjWXFmd80cpF8eRL1ue8k2FPp7ypI4gkEakl2Jj8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=ILM+DaMZ2Xx77uLiHz0Sq8zZgO1GOejPQyOD674jogskfVTxEIXJmrcuL1rDcWD93sx2AXtsIE4qtGbo/qeX3i/GMTydfx5nQQnle/cshfuOOg1OquMA5rfdX2diXPJTXhiZGakxYJS+sx+bg4xi0uVsJULeMbsBkd0Rw5TlnBFM+BMWp8zyl5mhO+i2E8VI9x9b+yvIKkCNntafw2lv3lwYqw11563yKBzcMVg1tr7Om9QT9JEsOB6rjA2BwvIYSGm2xFs8/28FHzra0Z2G7uzEf7nIlVq6y+jauQVb1SoGEYTxW1QTzJNGVfmylq77xT3hGnnHtnBEq4+k8DC5fw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.com; b=AyixvZbV46v3na/+4JRaQuWFiTORHTiQGq6SF86JY46tq6/Zy+yT1P+DWKH9KgMjTdVkkKKzckcjzM5m0BsbyrY6ofTgYhVOFuH8cAEI4Bo4EwSvrrexn0yYgulT3/sp88S+JR7BuTbYr1EmrGI5rVWi2BlOlBFUZFQIzCl88RXTKHp2WIWGNFe1BIsj/SwuWe+TUtxHFTCZ4VHmzroG9uNYysirsmWp5rtsFkqBlCcqIS2zNFWEM6u68cNwkG9I8LNfSw9cTzgL27DzJM/BSVb4DA8Qq1gm1czLuaoQnhOlVkU6YozgTa6MN/6QuTLsUaBlTabjfQ9ZhG+TRTwo1w==; Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm39.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2014 17:16:15 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.176] by nm39.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2014 17:13:18 -0000 Received: from [98.138.88.234] by tm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2014 17:13:18 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Dec 2014 17:13:18 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 175800.65326.bm@omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: AOE4s.MVM1lEmcPj6M9oRr1QaPpPmuidYeaWAcUwt9vFSUt1Y45zr1GbmT2HzfO SRnezADH5iuQgWsVfiWEb33f9XncnG4upuJ_esV0AY67Z.ZfrcJNP7V0EP.EvKmHtzLibjuu.PZC WwmHox5NiBYXOCQgyOTGsAnZwp8Bg0aB5D_7qNM1H_N4VqJtpQ1qJf2zX3H5Zx8Nq191xraQiJpz GiiKAK8LoK03XM6y11SSF4kVKzopynsYXI5kh5JdQ6gpxG7IKcteUmgC3tPBN9bzUVmgNT.eUqS1 HVZvU1VQGHESGNRlvyZWDz8Pdw3b83Y58T5JRSyadD2rJB7CIA6zslD4KEqRo4dg.Fi0X1Xm6nQf HhTtf8Zg8_.vhA93z.SnC6dGoW196IV0GHPNrql6gf05G_w.Wc7z.HNidPkPCekWaIDhQhSB.Pvu K5uTaKC4zuP_IqMx.b3rZmY5llRYatp3FGVrDSXSJBvh0Z64bBaoVqz1O7DNlLEqYNuwDAELCD1a aGXBYLPzKQ5.OvigqE3RpXJAnWwAAxRl3UxqyKHwg Received: by 98.138.105.203; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:13:17 +0000 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:13:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Unga Reply-To: Unga To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <1936276647.110396.1418749997346.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10001g.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Subject: How to run a server at normal priority? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:18:01 -0000 Hi all I have FreeBSD 9.0 on a i386 hardware. I have few server daemons run on this machine, all runs at normal priority = (20) except one at priority (52). All server daemons run as their respective user ID. How to run this low pri= ority server at normal priority as others? Many thanks in advance. Best regardsUnga=C2=A0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 17:36:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C01EAE for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDD4117 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id q108so8556710qgd.15 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:36:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BKrkPZM4W2PSo2p6S2KvQjSUfkeYoSiC6yG4kI1ygTA=; b=LeM26jNS+9sldgxFGYhV6xBwxDCbG+81vQS2keYlkS7Bp0nSeMTn7pPgPmH1lG23Pg qeep8hbvoAzzaiEgHVi7vGJ6AsU5WY8MEumFS78iLmfFkKxYKj7K52dOmRZl3MX6df9g +KbN9JSblRIMmLABxdTxhbFAEnSa+NnjvXP5EC/smYEjstw5TggjM+M2vZOHUVBrK/Kk b0xyWbcmZ2YynaNQjtUDSsIZG4vw7hGhwRSE4QeT4vZQhlt9IM0IvS/35Ims6S6PRH1Y C1mP8p2OhstZUiUCdj2Wh97l5F5w75U/tYhkWhkpPtp8RCFZaUDgtswlHC1wj00gnumx DuZQ== X-Received: by 10.224.120.65 with SMTP id c1mr25534012qar.87.1418751385150; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:36:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.70.165] (50-200-12-74-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.200.12.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f77sm1366050qgd.49.2014.12.16.09.36.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:36:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54906D97.4090304@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:36:23 -0600 From: Noel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to run a server at normal priority? References: <1936276647.110396.1418749997346.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10001g.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1936276647.110396.1418749997346.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10001g.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:36:26 -0000 On 12/16/2014 11:13 AM, Unga via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi all > I have FreeBSD 9.0 on a i386 hardware. > I have few server daemons run on this machine, all runs at normal priority (20) except one at priority (52). > All server daemons run as their respective user ID. How to run this low priority server at normal priority as others? > Many thanks in advance. > Best regardsUnga The developer chose that priority intentionally when they wrote the program. Consider carefully before you change it. man renice -- Noel Jones From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 18:35:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34290CEE for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 020E59BA for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id v10so14445321pde.40 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:35:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LAb/AV8DrwWIpOkwLE3As0mnD7MmtAgkKznw4s/5I/0=; b=bXQND5LSNM9Dk8vBIFhmmTSOCi4O1U5SSiBKBWoXi3/uWSMnARxw+E0QYqbLHT2twx RMjNjwvkVMHGA3f5x5Y9VEtG1lPaQIuBXzOeU9zpc4Fb39Cftzi6HhKg8xPJi5bl1brQ x/fz2BB2yV9ZOO8an3eA9S03rxwjTcaJ1yns9CwtCvOCSEgojwhX2iqFm82eAn+16xLs VO73KY+CEUvEnVEetCS4YbU9UMaQNk6Rhxa21pqU+9sS+XRGnZaU2EPxPJpskEPANHEW j3oUCzCoYS0snjH80sN+Qcc6/ayR7cvlzPPLYjlEG8Fm/ULbBASSX0h6a84S5OrNRnJ9 4wdw== X-Received: by 10.66.157.101 with SMTP id wl5mr62204822pab.37.1418754914536; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:35:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([209.12.167.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm1587086pbs.75.2014.12.16.10.35.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:35:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:34:57 -0800 From: Jungle Boogie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Perl rename utility assistance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:35:15 -0000 Hello All, I figure I would try my luck here with this question. Usually I go to stackoverflow for these things so pardon the noise if you're not accustom to seeing letters like this. Objective: remove an underscore from a filename using rename[0]. Example: 8213_freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf I only want to remove the underscore (_) between the 3 and f to make it: 8213 freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf or 8213 _freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf rename '-sr/^([:digit:]_) /^[:digit:] /g' * rename '-s/^[:digit:]_/^[:digit:] /g' * rename '-sr/^[:digit:]_/^[:digit:] /g' * Doesn't return any errors but the files don't get updated either. man page: rename -s/^[A-Z].*file/nofile/r * The target substring starts with a capital letter, and ends with string 'file'. There are 0 or any numbers of characters between the capital letter and 'file'. The substring, if encountered in filenames, will be replaced with 'nofile'. How is this supposed to actually work? [0] https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/rename/ -- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboogie@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boogie@jit.si From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 18:47:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB966328 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B2BAAF2 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ex7so13269357wid.3 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:47:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X9aSRC8xeZ+b29LRgcOdyuLDxPCh4L5c00xgGDWx0hw=; b=GPeNCkCkf1mGIxADBkHzj9FFfsPST2NJlO1EZGR5EBqnG8PfJ77/P2W1DE4RTQUyUA eMzZubyhQts24gZqFbtaZf4bgptRCo2OfbQXJvzTjk/wau4V2J3NRYtjjjHwC+oBdv9o WsII+NPHz8bYkv2RW15v9Ty0H2ZAgsXjSGPJLoWBlskCxWqrw/in6GZY0qziyrFm/QwY IIzJSeB7f03Y902vP76FnxWdbvtHHQbaDyAv/n0UrOBVE4VD936hfY3egqPnaissETY6 fDlrOT0B1xWMbAax7hJZDeU3XdV5UKiuX+RcSeozkJoEE9WFDOmtx2+b7ZIFAjjSuFlr WzRg== X-Received: by 10.180.85.4 with SMTP id d4mr7251180wiz.36.1418755634967; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from DaemON.home (90-156-31-193.internetia.net.pl. [90.156.31.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eu15sm3135127wid.18.2014.12.16.10.47.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:47:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:46:01 +0100 From: Serpent7776 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl rename utility assistance Message-ID: <20141216194601.23bdcc7f@DaemON.home> In-Reply-To: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> References: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jungle Boogie X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:47:17 -0000 Hello, On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:34:57 -0800 Jungle Boogie wrote: > Hello All, > > I figure I would try my luck here with this question. Usually I go to > stackoverflow for these things so pardon the noise if you're not accustom to > seeing letters like this. > > Objective: remove an underscore from a filename using rename[0]. > Example: 8213_freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf > > I only want to remove the underscore (_) between the 3 and f to make it: > 8213 freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf > or > 8213 _freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf > > rename '-sr/^([:digit:]_) /^[:digit:] /g' * > rename '-s/^[:digit:]_/^[:digit:] /g' * > rename '-sr/^[:digit:]_/^[:digit:] /g' * Try this: rename '-s/_/ /' 8213_freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf Don't use g modifier is you want only replace first occurence of pattern. -- //Serpent7776 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 19:16:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C89BCA68 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1B3E14 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id v63so10074860oia.15 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:16:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sxM1/nFs7Lw/Pg2XbWSXl+tq+zZWozTpAnE4SwR13ak=; b=N0Ru92g/tai2YXIo3jssdVJcsM3TprbeOaSJuirYZksEGXmGdqsZElsr3t/ScYJzaS BST9tRPWyvS1iXZOhF+NW2tO3ghRVXCdzbpZjKIs3z9FjOu9rxSGP6xEpI8vxR3dP+Dh uM+wIbYzbklD36LNh8WY3Bc4FUkUZEbGjfhCA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sxM1/nFs7Lw/Pg2XbWSXl+tq+zZWozTpAnE4SwR13ak=; b=Xkq+V/EVfHJlow79JTpVKI8o3Y65j9CbQWViWY7kz2b5xAPDnTMdrKfghFWAyYKpEq s97VP9tujiWoXynJNVrOYtnyqLEsZ7bxCCb8qaJfC8M8H9lyx6MLk0KDf4NgAXHuhOJG d6IenmKxLUlbCTUmYPFMH2c8yxU8YKX9Q57K44hWf/QBl57J1Ra1+K8Ycs//xwSKcW5s lqVMRvUUmZ9vCHofOI1tNEuWo45j9v6d3rKxkYJbRzNa845bFO8dAx7nAovKDCiv1c7m 7uHw7icXIAGdQfd6kIprcVj2IsTns66SdMbdcC6NVHiFNq/luJmSxp82UdfpS+pq5uEo FVig== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluUqhmi6xVQbFNAkstbKYwVq+/+0UoDEd4UiD9mqUbQpQ2h4QAjtoPee5sXMWqzZR7ZOQl X-Received: by 10.60.45.202 with SMTP id p10mr23409771oem.60.1418757395772; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([31.200.14.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lb3sm694520obb.24.2014.12.16.11.16.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:16:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:16:37 +0200 From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: gpg2: password verification through cli (disable gui) Message-ID: <20141216211637.268ca011@rsbsd.rsb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:16:36 -0000 I have created the Primary Key as only. Now I want to do an addkey, so I run "gpg2 --expert --edit-key", I select the options but process fails when Primary Key pw is asked through= GUI (User ID not found). Is there a way to force pw entry through CLI? security/pinentry is installed and security/pinentry-ncurses is a conflict. --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_11-Current_RadeonKMS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 19:18:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB32DB0B for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA9AE23 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id gq1so77539obb.9 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:18:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gcsBnZ6aDFszCtcguTIu8wm0N2GEyeMC+3dPt4taUAY=; b=oC2EfVcTu+rludXZKo8FkdqlSw4IzBK8ne/rt0qLQ+Gr/942a52Xo+GspxKAzVoweO Wel7srjSsbK6j5TwpP8fmwhlVsmYB57XGhp6d5DPqQapwlOBD8UK4legbEf5EI1VWjwE 3UStHAPt1/GvNxAIeDtjHTtNbkd7q+3smLWzN5dPwwJT1s8GXy/Y3GmDvrr/1ZGutBCl YV8ntsfqU/6ju9qJxlh+HeZsP/p/kweAtEj81oVsKUGLr2ICfmzKRhf1hetVGHloK4v+ I/WB5NggUb219wDoikDOqFTtq6tfYNaBILMBP7OrZxKLmNmGpyIJ+jJkFiNve0JGwMv+ p1nw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.191.65 with SMTP id p62mr489759oif.38.1418757481846; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:18:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.60.104 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:18:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141216194601.23bdcc7f@DaemON.home> References: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> <20141216194601.23bdcc7f@DaemON.home> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:18:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Perl rename utility assistance From: jungle Boogie To: Serpent7776 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:18:02 -0000 Hi Serpent! On 16 December 2014 at 10:46, Serpent7776 wrote: > Try this: > > rename '-s/_/ /' 8213_freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf > > Don't use g modifier is you want only replace first occurence of pattern. > This worked great! > -- > //Serpent7776 -- ------- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboogie@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boogie@jit.si From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 19:20:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5301BC8 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89338E4A for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id va2so95486obc.8 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:20:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=V33E4qkYCyzSj/WrlMpH9dUm3EWdxViFBby4wCTLg/E=; b=ncYWZVtxsf78sVt/1krAOn59ju435FPXKCEO058QCQoRfehZKcCiX7D5ZeahepFxK6 7C9ATtN+H3hozdvUyyNkvPcl/PMTuqGSP2tSPU4qmq2RYT+EPLSmAH+Ehj9VFwUlE4wj sc2D9/6HOQ/fjOXGhCQfX21GXnd+qghnDKZIUAFsctyhLtq/tuTCSs7EbixEhOOFkqkL 66JvwOwFsJSrOCRjq0FGmkjwX0ZV+XiYfJURlBBUgVsw0NCzfxwabDsjYlNCiXwCgV5B 2zMEXej2FR/PKbttypKANp7y1R8h05POaCjZ4P3gwfY8Cw832YjyDYba4Y5a0X496vpC Ocxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.191.65 with SMTP id p62mr496719oif.38.1418757650907; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:20:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.60.104 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:20:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141216184002.GA26978@neutralgood.org> References: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> <20141216184002.GA26978@neutralgood.org> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:20:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Perl rename utility assistance From: jungle Boogie To: kpneal@pobox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:20:51 -0000 Hello Kevin, On 16 December 2014 at 10:40, wrote: > A little bit of quick scripting should do this without needing a > rename or whatever program. > > #! /bin/sh > > oname="$1" > nname=$(echo "$oname" | sed 's/_/ /') > > set -x > mv "$oname" "$nname" What if you have a directory full of files you want to update? > -- > Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/ > > "I like being on The Daily Show." - Kermit the Frog, Feb 13 2001 -- ------- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboogie@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boogie@jit.si From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 19:39:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA7931B for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D186D0 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-93-98.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.93.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E21A24CFF; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:39:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sBGJd759002128; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:39:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:39:07 +0100 From: Polytropon To: jungle Boogie Subject: Re: Perl rename utility assistance Message-Id: <20141216203907.6dddfe9e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> <20141216184002.GA26978@neutralgood.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , kpneal@pobox.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:39:17 -0000 On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:20:50 -0800, jungle Boogie wrote: > Hello Kevin, > On 16 December 2014 at 10:40, wrote: > > A little bit of quick scripting should do this without needing a > > rename or whatever program. > > > > #! /bin/sh > > > > oname="$1" > > nname=$(echo "$oname" | sed 's/_/ /') > > > > set -x > > mv "$oname" "$nname" > > What if you have a directory full of files you want to update? See: #!/bin/sh set -x for oname in *.*; do nname=`echo "${oname}" | sed 's/_/ /'` mv "${oname]" "${nname}" done Not that it is _wrong_ to deal with file name iteration that way. Take my example as "works in many cases, but you shouldn't do it that way". Instead, go ahead and read: http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/fixing-unix-linux-filenames.html http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/filenames-in-shell.html Then return to do it better. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 10:57:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B87B45 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1214220 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C023C20137 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:32:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:32:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kempkens.io; h= x-sasl-enc:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; s=mesmtp; bh=xodVfztTvrWE0e3JH 47HIqbwDyE=; b=KMgyC0BjqpsJBvTvGiLuerr52/MBPJAFcxBmpBtgLMvstQm7c xwM5v7N1W9/vp7jts/1zVJ/68+jV1GdIPMah+O2lACecUlo+ZOLMC50RlS3smQaD R5RZB0Zvzy3xcfqj4lVu9nzPW9UHMvsurJk6nlmfWzWQLJJm/99CEm1/YI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=xodVfztTvrWE0e3JH47HIqbwDyE=; b=AaH 9fS289vOBCwtqfm5SEGqGe2+8Pl/QR/hI1/2MjCwaGkZOHlI92+NOunTXMMv3nzJ QKD4n5ojmTN/1hcp4zLEj0vOHNnMEgBGyn48XTRADpofzgsVLiICSmFlZIKn/jXH uYlIp33W2sKM4LK6rzJeOMPc5LqeKIPGNIZRJOwI= X-Sasl-enc: cBO9+NFA0QRSGkIk9oOvm25dPt5fljYaDo2FCXEYfD0c 1418812354 Received: from erlang.nedeco.local (unknown [5.145.140.133]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 634E768010E for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:32:34 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kempkens Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: freebsd-update wants to remove / Message-Id: <33BA6332-F00D-4833-9DFC-30A1054098A0@kempkens.io> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:32:33 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:57:49 -0000 Hi all, I=E2=80=99m currently running 10.1-RELEASE-p1 and I wanted to update to = 10.1-RELEASE-p2 using freebsd-update. Running freebsd-update prints the = following: # freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... = done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be removed as part of updating to = 10.1-RELEASE-p2: / # freebsd-update install Installing updates...rmdir: ///: Is a directory done. It doesn=E2=80=99t look like anything was actually removed, but the = update didn=E2=80=99t install/change anything either. Running ezjail-admin update -u basically has the same issue, but = additionally I=E2=80=99m getting a ton of these: # ezjail-admin update -u [=E2=80=A6] install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/bin: File exists install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/lib32: File exists install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/lib32: File exists install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/lib32: File exists install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/lib32: File exists install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/libdata: File exists install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/libdata: File exists install: mkdir /usr/jails/newjail//usr/libexec: File exists install: /usr/jails/newjail//libexec/ld-elf32.so.1: No such file or = directory [=E2=80=A6]= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 10:59:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74884CE4 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 304FE25B for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:59:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1418812345; bh=LXK3cl75L8DetHTuDYZho9tV8pvjNJiQnETtsf3NESU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=SVkpHOLnFFJGK/q2VOSVvIAKCSMXRGPaCwCmdzhAEO6y+lbxIkHSzAUlrHSUnDMF8/xjGdCD3Vn136r820bSjVLaqpYxDnQnZuWCcZM++72zD90RrkGlzIFni2kP1BC6ZOos4Gj+nkAbT40Ipuqg/qhVNx94XBZeSNaC/iEz7zrMps5qduwbamttvjbxtTkYePEsqMatgLYv3tcaNqrvNhCXorwUG9JsHC5KBU/HGYdyIZtC0NJSIr8AvHZxTE2yefk18yG9aH1g94POROIMdMNvdU8IKLkZU++IcvPLIF0ZWjQh3UGJr2RdkyPsIOn7M2XMfwVFBDZdE752Rue2Yg== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.com; b=G5tvdFLEWkfONuq4c6tyg8LedgukYum5KBQF0YnBuY4Wj2UT3klofpWpwWk3HwUM3y9H7pVH0y/Lv0fePgtdnTnN8VoxyxgbyyDoz3o7HM45egRXgvvIeJqJ6Ax400vnw0PL6v1SVp3ye1s34sEXocUQPXFkSCgS6jus5EIh6Ui6X9VwMPiKXbEviif8XeuzTHcjqZQFQRGX6kyZza+CstmXHGavhTysKjz4K9Qhyd6CqCKCIQS+AWCdM/JDHZty8zy+PpxDpWybvQTRZdA1OD3h9DynhYSiLte+xL3KsD1N0SPmvdXvjNbj1H/xZnAlxMMYfPZJdT3EXAAMqGuVPw==; Received: from [66.196.81.172] by nm9.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 10:32:25 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.228] by tm18.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 10:32:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1068.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 10:32:25 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 202954.75588.bm@omp1068.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: by 76.13.27.48; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:32:24 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:32:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Laszlo Danielisz Reply-To: Laszlo Danielisz To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <303350581.168208.1418812344298.JavaMail.yahoo@jws106144.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <54906D97.4090304@gmail.com> References: <54906D97.4090304@gmail.com> Subject: Re: How to run a server at normal priority? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:59:29 -0000 That is what I wanted to say, be carefully when you change the priority of = a process, they have that specific priority for a reason. Though, if you really want you my use renice:https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ma= n.cgi?query=3Drenice&sektion=3D8 renice command: Change the Priority of a Already Running Process =C2=A0=20 On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:36 PM, Noel wrote= : =20 On 12/16/2014 11:13 AM, Unga via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi all > I have FreeBSD 9.0 on a i386 hardware. > I have few server daemons run on this machine, all runs at normal priorit= y (20) except one at priority (52). > All server daemons run as their respective user ID. How to run this low p= riority server at normal priority as others? > Many thanks in advance. > Best regardsUnga=20 The developer chose that priority intentionally when they wrote the program.=C2=A0 Consider carefully before you change it. man renice =C2=A0 -- Noel Jones _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 11:15:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299B71926; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF3181D; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBH9bEaQ014203; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:37:14 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <54914ECA.9040300@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:37:14 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions , security-officer@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update and boot environments clash - rm / attempted! References: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:06 -0000 On 17/12/2014 09:28, Arthur Chance wrote: > I just updated my systems to deal with the latest security bulletin. On > the machines where I'm running zfs based boot environments I got the > somewhat worrying: A correction. It's not machines using boot environments, it's machines running 10.1-REL. (Most of my 10.1 boxes use b.e., the one that doesn't is very small and slow, so took a while to update.) The problem did not manifest on my one 10.0-REL box. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 11:15:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 123DB1928; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F24822; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBH9Si09014182; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:28:44 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:28:44 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions , security-officer@FreeBSD.org Subject: freebsd-update and boot environments clash - rm / attempted! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:15:07 -0000 I just updated my systems to deal with the latest security bulletin. On the machines where I'm running zfs based boot environments I got the somewhat worrying: root@arthur:5# freebsd-update fetch install Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 2 metadata patches.. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. Fetching 8 patches..... done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 14 files... done. The following files will be removed as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p2: / The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p2: [list snipped] Installing updates...rmdir: ///: Is a directory done. Fortunately it didn't remove /, although I really don't understand that message. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 12:08:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E159F448 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF53BFBD for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:63839] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by dnvrco-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id A3/E0-07892-E6171945; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:05:02 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6432C5D0E; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 02:09:19 -1000 (HST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 02:09:19 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: f-q Subject: A pager with explicit (un)wrap-long-lines key bindings and/or options Message-ID: <20141217120919.GA91144@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: f-q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.142:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=f9zGBYCM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:117 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=A92cGCtB03wA:10 a=jNdOH7PxC8cXv-q_-1MA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:08:22 -0000 Hi there, I am looking for a pager that has EXPLICIT options and/or key bindings (preferred) to set & unset wrapping of long lines[0]. I really don't want to deal with environment variables which may or may not be set. Options|Key bindings should override any environment variable or settings in a configuration file. Environment variable, LESS, is set to "-SsIXR -x4"[1]. less has only a option to now wrap long lines (-S | --chop-long-lines). Listed in the manual page is that default is not to wrap. (Well, invoking less as "\less" does not override the "-S" in LESS.) Also tried w3m; it does not have any option specific to wrapping of long lines. If nothing comes up, I will cook up some vi(m) solution (to work on both FreeBSD and any other given GNU/Linux setup). - parv [0] Problem comes up when trying to make sense of a URL in email (in mutt) along with text around for context. [1] As to obvious reason to not set "-S" in LESS: setting the -S option is helpful most of the time where seeing extra characters can be deferred. -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 12:24:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C33F881 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5284277 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portis.head.local ([109.193.238.174]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaXmV-1XeVES16hr-00mLIe for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:24:35 +0100 Message-ID: <549175FC.2070703@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:24:28 +0100 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: f-q Subject: Re: A pager with explicit (un)wrap-long-lines key bindings and/or options References: <20141217120919.GA91144@holstein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20141217120919.GA91144@holstein.holy.cow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hfiW9rsdzZOngNLbeWUKsixxOKnMYyFCr60r9MjXOc1XwKMaDAu 4DJuOZ9hEF9WrDRcq8q4osFQQ8CTLQQOII3sJto0cnq27kucoEAslbgNY+dosd7UvIF9q9W 2heeEmwKWFipKSbZP+okvgVE8j7bkkqB62HBZsWDIuu1+4nvQgLmYqBSP7mSaRQom68ENbl xI8KseAJr/7Ng4l3VS08Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:24:38 -0000 On 12/17/14 13:09, parv@pair.com wrote: > Hi there, Hi, > I am looking for a pager that has EXPLICIT options and/or key bindings > (preferred) to set & unset wrapping of long lines[0]. I really don't > want to deal with environment variables which may or may not be set. > Options|Key bindings should override any environment variable or > settings in a configuration file. > > Environment variable, LESS, is set to "-SsIXR -x4"[1]. less has only a > option to now wrap long lines (-S | --chop-long-lines). Listed in the > manual page is that default is not to wrap. (Well, invoking less as > "\less" does not override the "-S" in LESS.) While less is running, you can switch from chop to fold and reversely by pressing -S. Is this what you want? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 13:33:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F9EFD2 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F17CC1 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:42776] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by dnvrco-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 4D/DC-31058-F3681945; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:33:51 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5EEAA5CD0; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 03:38:08 -1000 (HST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 03:38:08 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: nvass@gmx.com Subject: Re: A pager with explicit (un)wrap-long-lines key bindings and/or options Message-ID: <20141217133808.GA91842@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: nvass@gmx.com, f-q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <549175FC.2070703@gmx.com> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.130:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Bq0TwOn5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:117 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=A92cGCtB03wA:10 a=uPZiAMpXAAAA:8 a=hSLGs5F87yaBtGYIgw0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: f-q X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:33:59 -0000 Nikos wrote on Wed Dec 17 12:24:38 UTC 2014 ... > > in message <20141217120919.GA91144@holstein.holy.cow>, > wrote parv@p thusly... > > > > I am looking for a pager that has EXPLICIT options and/or key bindings > > (preferred) to set & unset wrapping of long lines[0]. > ... > > Environment variable, LESS, is set to "-SsIXR -x4"[1]. less has > > only a option to now wrap long lines (-S | --chop-long-lines). > > Listed in the manual page is that default is not to wrap. (Well, > > invoking less as "\less" does not override the "-S" in LESS.) > ... > > [1] As to obvious reason to not set "-S" in LESS: setting the -S > > option is helpful most of the time where seeing extra > > characters can be deferred. > > While less is running, you can switch from chop to fold and > reversely by pressing -S. Is this what you want? Oh, yes! Exactly that behaviour is what I had wanted. Thanks, Nikos. That reminded me to re-read the option modification section, in particular ... -+ Followed by one of the command line option letters this will reset the option to its default setting and print a message describing the new setting. (The "-+X" command does the same thing as "-+X" on the command line.) This does not work for string-valued options. ... -! Followed by one of the command line option letters, this will reset the option to the "opposite" of its default setting and print a message describing the new setting. This does not work for numeric or string-valued options. ... so sending text to "less -+S" via pipe worked as expected. And, that stalled the creation of vi(m)-as-pager until some later date. To that end ... Pipe Vim buffer to stdout http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10686183/pipe-vim-buffer-to-stdout -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 13:41:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD7B2E6 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB7CDCE for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id g201so2275237oib.12 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:41:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y89kiz+xop+foJTNqgSuF55zQ5GVDPh+8jOsI1tiJd8=; b=SwXIgn5xhXw5apsBy4EcJOS0qirv8KsZYbhIOC3ZjVefIQLACJ05F6pKtQkJGqP2mH xcLvBpMobKpnR0Ncz0dQPIR4zOKgd+C1ZSzWyzTZ+mWlmsg9EHDMOOwLtf/I7uN1MWYW HVnJceFj7813GRCGtZ2i1ixYBWCr4AiUfql4w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y89kiz+xop+foJTNqgSuF55zQ5GVDPh+8jOsI1tiJd8=; b=iabrUqAKjq7+5p529Gb8zSQ5x3PkMhdkJkUi6beRv3/HaJe6JJRaMzo1MpEsf6tUnm xRuQgkNd0tvnL8D6ngnHl9d1CmZAw6Tpdh+5z6SKCNi1zs7REEmd1dThLMJLMvZUPHm5 vm+IVRdTxKH+ihCWIqbv5GIe8gigaqiRe4T4+HGTe8TdTbkxn9RS2Esfn7WHY6NJLUSO 99rgn5qOQJcSpSASDZVsHldQbP182PE35zw8yQSIiffkOF/3yqTaP0WbjQbfgqQ/J0md j3z0DQAuh5+MJ7joeIdVN6U+dH0MZmKDQXEK47U5knnWyOS4HkUmLMOGoiziyN70kEdg Tamw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmKkGsH/7pzz3rRA/nylGS6VfhFnIx/NYdkNcxyatD/57pGNIXtCmOpeEK0JV4Vz1r90c9L X-Received: by 10.182.197.163 with SMTP id iv3mr26224041obc.64.1418823706418; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:41:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([31.200.17.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n7sm1755767obh.25.2014.12.17.05.41.44 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 05:41:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:41:47 +0200 From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpg2: password verification through cli (disable gui) Message-ID: <20141217154147.5e612e2f@rsbsd.rsb> In-Reply-To: <20141216211637.268ca011@rsbsd.rsb> References: <20141216211637.268ca011@rsbsd.rsb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:41:47 -0000 Another problem is that dirmng segfaults. DK how much value this info adds: (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr=20 (no debugging symbols found)... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000801188b06 in pth_key_setdata () from /usr/local/lib/pth/libpth.so.= 20 --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_11-Current_RadeonKMS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 16:10:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74BF1A2E; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337D311FA; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706109E06; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 78AAA429F; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:10:07 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Arthur Chance Subject: Re: freebsd-update and boot environments clash - rm / attempted! References: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:10:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> (Arthur Chance's message of "Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:28:44 +0000") Message-ID: <86mw6m5kbl.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: security-officer@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:10:21 -0000 Arthur Chance writes: > The following files will be removed as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p= 2: > / > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p= 2: > [list snipped] > Installing updates...rmdir: ///: Is a directory > done. > > Fortunately it didn't remove /, although I really don't understand > that message. Yes, we know. We're not sure what causes it, but it is most likely fallout from https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/195302. The index (/var/db/freebsd-update/instal.*/INDEX-NEW) lacks the entry for /. It is most likely a bug in freebsd-update, but we don't know whether it's in the builder or the client. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 16:38:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 480E625E for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094DD15C8 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:38:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1418834313; bh=iUZvS4vJh7n2dcmdrsSx1axUZ3ArwKdmPt+R8JPy/ZE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=CPLNicYGFrlk7+x1V+gzojisc0u9kwMTci5vp40NlMQNDr65q09Yk5QGDV8GRNXwRuFqrAqm7pPzFzaEd5I8HhiL59K2fzYeDS+oa6+22F4Vq9LOgcmkrChQmLyGZtc4EYNibaBcm/05REFj//fTyV9KgY3VFcrWmOBuJkB1nwOLfXwYf5nf+culyPun69gDtHkPWinshhM21aEeevbptoVJcOG0Di4+Sjphxh2Sv38QnNSsLRuEb8gOTx1SIbEHHBOqOh8fnX0p72KGht1MlXBtD7tcivDFsheYNF1rB06P3ofhrLZb7eFSvb1dHGIN1yhO1NhWcylu2b9255VHPA== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.com; b=HXnRriG3JI7IVkyzlN/WyyuvegQlXTJIlYf/aMTHdVv8NCPvyNwHb/swWj6aeVvsa6FQ2BLKH00pSIuVZv5l0orNd0KXTnKcBf6MTzBkJmZduDy8FIEMLoks2cPGwLOzI2kDrJach6KFghoQf5MDBkRC33+kEpp/isDt8cetZnUjqgJT0eLogHNUqZlXYirFpC8dOTZ5YSt4b8vF/s9/ZxbV5GIAP0c9WNtu9UsWGl6nOjNBH368NiTFuLx6GCKrCaDgbnW6q6NmJHIy6n/RBi3okzHCCzKbJVEtn5E3XCPM+660DK9nYKRhwQ+GXgVh6upv7OvLqlWOSHcqIPQvqw==; Received: from [98.138.100.113] by nm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 16:38:33 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.162] by tm104.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 16:38:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1063.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 16:38:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 400206.49790.bm@omp1063.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: mbU8ip8VM1nlRI10HZpnU1EpRbXQksbqsraIUNsEpzWGHi4nM8xKRfKdsbrc1wj MoWNrFQY8Er3i2m7r7DGx6W1wY90_ezo.vqxbRsLQRyEtyukwpa0TIs8oDDH3uNzIprFc7UsL4D9 VOXkxo0uVQXQARczp47duoY5Oo3cBOBtQrqBhPwLYFWXhFQGTeyjyaH4JlNkrJWC9XensuAR4xh. nIPLFRzmPjJKUs4YAfkgR8ST8fGH5OUO7hwLe1mTLnRAooTc7BU3riCQFPODCN65Bf__C7p_GIwP 39dw3kd.waJbOZW_rq8PnVZSbPXF5jfiy0HJbOSwgKHn9YN4u.N7Er7iajvth9dVdFpq5rbOZR0. q3EEq5b3LGd0e3VTPgkdH0q.f.tg52Ygaz099RAuJ1_yWQ9ef1WbM8uEzbro7GXol2wyjRdAK.MU yk4YLp28G70OPL4ZGsdh35_rTsMOKKXIZfeKj1E3C3G_qxqup4esQJW1buHGkVbu92SIgj5XcRA_ LpKk- Received: by 98.138.105.211; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:38:32 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:38:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Unga Reply-To: Unga To: Laszlo Danielisz , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <926020051.182326.1418834312146.JavaMail.yahoo@jws100104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <303350581.168208.1418812344298.JavaMail.yahoo@jws106144.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <303350581.168208.1418812344298.JavaMail.yahoo@jws106144.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: How to run a server at normal priority? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:38:40 -0000 Hi Noel and Laszlo Thank you for replies. I'm the author of this server. It runs at Scheduling Priority (PRI) 52 and Nice 0. My other servers run at= PRI and Nice both at 0. I wonder why just one server run at PRI 52. Is this a problem? I find this = PRI 52 server respond quit slow. I do not want one server to run at lower scheduling priority. I prefer all = of my servers run at same normal priority. RegardsUnga =20 On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:37 PM, Laszlo Danielisz via freebsd-= questions wrote: =20 =20 That is what I wanted to say, be carefully when you change the priority of= a process, they have that specific priority for a reason. Though, if you really want you my use renice:https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ma= n.cgi?query=3Drenice&sektion=3D8 renice command: Change the Priority of a Already Running Process =C2=A0=20 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:36 PM, Noel wrote: =C2=A0=20 On 12/16/2014 11:13 AM, Unga via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi all > I have FreeBSD 9.0 on a i386 hardware. > I have few server daemons run on this machine, all runs at normal priorit= y (20) except one at priority (52). > All server daemons run as their respective user ID. How to run this low p= riority server at normal priority as others? > Many thanks in advance. > Best regardsUnga=20 The developer chose that priority intentionally when they wrote the program.=C2=A0 Consider carefully before you change it. man renice =C2=A0 -- Noel Jones _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =C2=A0=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 16:45:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86127382 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E6616C6 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:45:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1418834724; bh=qOQ4mfeGha6MSbfEQqpCuVs1wKQKgK2wpn1lcxKzR8A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=E3nZCabagFyKwoTHoNDa20Z5JPhFtNqbqaVryeuIW0k6RZFj0+/qrRJsqVoXQ1HJQ0jGLiVOuRiq6DAqpMJ5rjn6XtxAW33pTl/6/qV2ssiM5iluradVa255xJcr3JTaP2NW2EfOaTh3dkpV0NSo8cC2fsmk38h3YiUXb+JgFC/MwX/9gwoKTryOnqa66Q7KnKWbgdkZVn7LeBS3tudNhkTSVjCEhCvAbxiiP9CT0cdCHv1f+Ap8a2IvkpbNBpSZ4hV+7QJV+9A5ohyE74dP02zDkW+q/6j9KmFIXT7BMVPm2SfNnF3w8dEN9Lu5G6VIiasjWfcOZLxGz3+PS4IY/Q== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.com; b=Bt3BTioUs8/UHPjLb3EX5uAtoK0CLfl7leQ/iROgFgFCe0f0wswfQize/4lYkZFe565bdEX1ahFpSCdAqJ4J0ic+JNpmU0J0sXf4cPQXLB/47h0VMWcJM2TIAMQFoFjBjA9kndB+L4eXQ1SjsOxmBekiZaCkq70XIGfWUm0OD/kU6ScV42bhCd4BIZg/IFyO/uiebYgQg26hPa0Klk8UjhtCitzqm7RVQiuOxHdRXC+gSXlNWQtlh7dTJH0Scdsqkc0WE7VwpLXnL/aIAs3FwZ6OiZ/937u5K5Nop7wNSFCl+WvwnWeoW+AiUlWNndqN+gWkj1pK4VcgdwQGaWQL9Q==; Received: from [98.138.101.130] by nm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 16:45:24 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.199] by tm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 16:45:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2014 16:45:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 349188.82333.bm@omp1057.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: SHKeVeUVM1kheih5BXZ5MYo9EiOXWH_LqspDulPDXQQr4oxwEZJRAMQEny2EZx8 eArGkwrSs0TbDfF6oWIJZPlQFlenzk8YDu1OCFDiVK.IeECLcx4c9JKW8eYO0.D.3956DfQFKf_O BSROvknsGT4c12E1tmOjzGmbQl3wGrYY2U_kdmIVHJH648q3fxhIy3uqs8IxoPL9_YQiW2qA__7I HUnmACgxHATfyfFi.Tu3GdNhwwSrUExPu5Lw0T0hV3E2tlw1HjL3DT_G1cdt1ZHUf5ySHx2B3UlO UmGRqv4wUoxkg_Ao0GCt4k_mg5oXTmJLdoYap7n2vZfDJEfxlysP8gL40w7R.W5tFtDUzBPUhxgI 6_aZMHNAsnonTuDIym8MRA6dnufQGO1r9tqwiogBp41UY0O.KHCFsEXmb1BqFT6sZbAr9JyCi2Wz fSITE2l1ICCJOIWZ2Hb6lUURLvcuBwJBwcQ8BtNLAVRiq.fJPvdf7RVrPpdVjowQDxI6Ljal8WfC kJOeSYA-- Received: by 98.138.101.181; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:45:23 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:45:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Unga Reply-To: Unga To: Unga , Laszlo Danielisz , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <813295658.192676.1418834722347.JavaMail.yahoo@jws100162.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <926020051.182326.1418834312146.JavaMail.yahoo@jws100104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <926020051.182326.1418834312146.JavaMail.yahoo@jws100104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: How to run a server at normal priority? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:45:31 -0000 Correction: My all other servers run at PRI 20 and Nice 0.=C2=A0 Unga=20 On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 10:08 PM, Unga via freebsd-questions <= freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: =20 =20 Hi Noel and Laszlo Thank you for replies. I'm the author of this server. It runs at Scheduling Priority (PRI) 52 and Nice 0. My other servers run at= PRI and Nice both at 0. I wonder why just one server run at PRI 52. Is this a problem? I find this = PRI 52 server respond quit slow. I do not want one server to run at lower scheduling priority. I prefer all = of my servers run at same normal priority. RegardsUnga =20 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:37 PM, Laszlo Danielisz via= freebsd-questions wrote: =C2=A0=20 =20 That is what I wanted to say, be carefully when you change the priority of= a process, they have that specific priority for a reason. Though, if you really want you my use renice:https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ma= n.cgi?query=3Drenice&sektion=3D8 renice command: Change the Priority of a Already Running Process =C2=A0=20 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:36 PM, Noel wrote: =C2=A0=20 On 12/16/2014 11:13 AM, Unga via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi all > I have FreeBSD 9.0 on a i386 hardware. > I have few server daemons run on this machine, all runs at normal priorit= y (20) except one at priority (52). > All server daemons run as their respective user ID. How to run this low p= riority server at normal priority as others? > Many thanks in advance. > Best regardsUnga=20 The developer chose that priority intentionally when they wrote the program.=C2=A0 Consider carefully before you change it. man renice =C2=A0 -- Noel Jones _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =C2=A0=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =20 =C2=A0=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 17:37:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EC2A11F for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from luigi.brtsvcs.net (luigi.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:1f00::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7061D22 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luigi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DFA62D4F94; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 878171962; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:37:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491BF58.5000508@bluerosetech.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:37:28 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= Subject: Re: freebsd-update and boot environments clash - rm / attempted! References: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> <86mw6m5kbl.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86mw6m5kbl.fsf@nine.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:37:38 -0000 On 12/17/2014 8:10 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Yes, we know. We're not sure what causes it, but it is most likely > fallout from https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/195302. The index That URL shorthand isn't working. JFYI; not sure if it was a typo or something broken in the server config. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 18:46:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198BBD62 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host203.r-bonomi.com (host203.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3648FB for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by host203.r-bonomi.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) id sBHIcOht031153; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:38:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bonomi) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:38:24 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201412171838.sBHIcOht031153@host203.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl rename utility assistance In-Reply-To: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:46:26 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 16 12:27:31 2014 > Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:34:57 -0800 > From: Jungle Boogie > Subject: Perl rename utility assistance > > Hello All, > > I figure I would try my luck here with this question. Usually I go to > stackoverflow for these things so pardon the noise if you're not accustom to > seeing letters like this. > > Objective: remove an underscore from a filename using rename[0]. > Example: 8213_freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf > > I only want to remove the underscore (_) between the 3 and f to make it: > 8213 freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf > or > 8213 _freebsd_is_cool_Nov_2014.pdf > > rename '-sr/^([:digit:]_) /^[:digit:] /g' * > rename '-s/^[:digit:]_/^[:digit:] /g' * > rename '-sr/^[:digit:]_/^[:digit:] /g' * > > Doesn't return any errors but the files don't get updated either. Of course they don't. It did _exactly_ what you told it to. Your regex "^[:digit:]_" says: "^" start at the beginning of the name "[:digit:]" match one character from the following list ':digt' "_" match an underscore For some strange reason, this does not cause a match where there are leading digits, . to match a single character in the range '0'-'9', the syntax is '[[digit:]]' Then, you need to follow that '[[:digit:]]' with a '+' -- to add 'require one or more occurances of the previous match' to the incantation, in order to match what you're looking for. Secondly, you do *NOT* want the '^' in the replacement string. or the string '[:digit:]' these will be used _literally_ to replace the matched text, and you'll end up with a file whose name starts with '^[:digit:] ' with whatever was after the original '_' concatenated to that. Lastly, when the pattern is 'anchored' to either end of the string being searched, the 'g' switch is (almost always) surperfluous (there's only one match), or leads to an infinite-recursion replacement. It is a safe rule- of-thumb to say "never use the 'g' switch on an anchored search (unless you are absolutely certain what will happen on _all_ possible inputs)" I can construct a pathological 'hypothetical' where the 'g' switch does something constructive on an anchored search, but I've _never_ seen a real-world instance, in nearly 40 years experience. To transform '{foo}something{bar}' into "{foo}changed{bar}", you have to use a parenthesized sub-expression in the match regex, and a backslash reference to it in the replacement string. Applying _all_ those changes, you end up with something like: rename '-s/^([[:digit:]]+)_/\1 /' * From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 19:27:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23BF5E82 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog106.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog106.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71E16F2D for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob106.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVJHY6YyMN09XhqOr22Ucs72Jfs66EITQ@postini.com; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:26:59 UTC Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b13so21401755wgh.18 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:26:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=Ua1fPZqYvFPV/Co9NbIbu/2ns3UwtG1NmmsIFzRyQmU=; b=h3lrxbbaJNSYQ8hkT5NXm4iz7+iillCjFtLasKTBkXHeOTx9K/99d8QMs/tmrUAAL1 ESPyk+QAFR5pOjY94LGYqJk2mv8fwcLF30vKltdlMw/hjGpFY4ixu3GzC1dWOWLTDZds DiTZgAqycVCz/PTm3ktkAv8Qzv45IklBaJ47FZ7Vi8XG8nMZj3lNfDi/gUoldVV1RTRz YR/jWhT0WcB/eVI4njdBYhl9yGFCQ74FbEu0m3ZipO5cWu7y4hcfaXFn3EToZbO35Hiy 3whUI60CddmY5QpeUG4bA06DRJ2rX6VmW0YMtP3kP7Cp3xiJ1o9SxH1wpPZQtg3bR20H trRg== X-Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr15678599wib.32.1418829958537; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 07:25:58 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJyPE7W8+Jn+HDS2WhulZM6QV2droffEJZeHZMe7+cptD6CAVD5G+9K5BDHflPfBJ5CL17GV0VGpavKDYSb0wr8X8JM4W83cqR6woI0lB67wHqizvVErbOO3+Ija7dOvUTjPX+DVL5+TSr+XdZ5V9zGdnAgRsFRrGYwZhEVQPQvq/aGgs= X-Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr15678570wib.32.1418829958320; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 07:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u18sm5468253wjq.42.2014.12.17.07.25.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 07:25:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 07:25:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:25:56 GMT Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBHFPujd040515 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:25:56 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBHFPuH7040514 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:25:56 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201412171525.sBHFPuH7040514@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: nfs hostname:/path to mount is longer than 88 characters howto? Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:27:00 -0000 I think I hit this bug(?): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-April/038547.html I see these in dmesg: WARNING: autofs_trigger_one: request for cture/export/ completed with error 5 Is the 88 bytes limit still there? Is this really a bug? Is there any workaround? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 19:40:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CD9273 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6863510C1 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id rp18so15648903iec.38 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:40:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ffrzrR2X2+nZFktYApJgTyDi+CuzdL+Xr1+cSxPq++w=; b=eIzngYCxAyZyBePrshytqYFBjb9z/f1WUIWBcQAkwBuBwPV6xCbJg5Sxu9GNL9culg GI++Q9/HcQOxJHu9R5MX8IZgbf4Gx6wjUdo1aLY2A2ZW9WuWWAZJmAaOr0k4HeYPhOE7 IR/NrQNPOFngWYmUxtXYmpMsJZ5lXQE5n+z0tT4ZwSAgrNSS9xMSKeuIQUDqm0+0Sbok RmamZoHzbrwztXQO4qEi9phNgXF+F/y3rS8C0dXnLJikL0cslUeVBNF4PClkMJZPVIM5 OasWjwziFPIGfVK2jD7IDDuGpDyoHsfGX2DTdc/r7E9OWvjc6+USYqJvUsIhAeXQvMGJ GbcQ== X-Received: by 10.42.102.66 with SMTP id h2mr28266197ico.88.1418845235677; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:7:6c80:6f00::a767]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 23sm2200386ioq.1.2014.12.17.11.40.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:40:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491DC27.2080808@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:40:23 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs hostname:/path to mount is longer than 88 characters howto? References: <201412171525.sBHFPuH7040514@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201412171525.sBHFPuH7040514@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:40:36 -0000 On 12/17/2014 08:25 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I think I hit this bug(?): > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-April/038547.html > > I see these in dmesg: > > WARNING: autofs_trigger_one: request for > cture/export/ completed with error 5 > > Is the 88 bytes limit still there? > Is this really a bug? > Is there any workaround? > > Thanks > > Anton > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The max path name length is 4096. The filename itself (excluding the full path leading up to and including the containing dir) is 255 characters. See https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/max-length-file-name-and-dir-name-in-ufs-source.34200/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:15:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C886D33; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BE2615B4; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBHKFZwM068670; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:15:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:15:30 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" , freebsd-questions Subject: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:15:36 -0000 On a remote server, I replaced a dead 2TB disk with a new one that had 4096K sectors. 2014-12-11.22:40:30 zpool replace -f tank1 16144392433229115618 /dev/ada0 My ZFS pool then warned me after pool: tank1 state: ONLINE status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size. Expect reduced performance. action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured pool. Camcontrol and smartctl confirm the 2TB drive was indeed 4096. (All my previous ones were 512, so didnt think to check) # camcontrol identify ada0 | grep secto sectors/track 63 sector size logical 512, physical 4096, offset 0 LBA supported 268435455 sectors LBA48 supported 3907029168 sectors # smartctl -a /dev/ada0 | grep -i 512 Sector Sizes: 512 bytes logical, 4096 bytes physical So, with a new drive, I replaced the 4096 drive 2014-12-16.17:07:14 zpool replace tank1 ada0 ada11 # smartctl -a /dev/ada11 | grep -i 512 Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical # camcontrol identify ada11 | grep -i sector sectors/track 63 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 LBA supported 268435455 sectors LBA48 supported 3907029168 sectors yet, zfs is still complaining # zpool status pool: tank1 state: ONLINE status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size. Expect reduced performance. action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured pool. scan: resilvered 898G in 8h4m with 0 errors on Wed Dec 17 15:01:18 2014 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada12 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada10 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada6 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada14 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada11 ONLINE 0 0 0 block size: 512B configured, 4096B native ada1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada8 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada9 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada13 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada4 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada5 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada7 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors # zdb | grep -i shift metaslab_shift: 35 ashift: 9 metaslab_shift: 35 ashift: 9 metaslab_shift: 35 ashift: 9 This is RELENG_9 r275680 Any ideas if the reporting is cosmetic ? Or there is an issue Sorry for the xpost as this is sort of both a hardware and config issue. ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:20:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982CF141 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 581ED1699 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id l13so10078938iga.3 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:20:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGavw66ZLf4whg4zgr0g7VatdvaVoZYPkq29CDob6lk=; b=HPdRvunWXDbpjVlttHkqenYgoNnKNdfKIvD5jIcJ9wbLUZ4DbZkZhOLOr/J4Xo/Uif 2ld47IRjxGAEp1S5C2m6mwD+YY7pPhHOoTrVyby3jdDLCsfP5Iq4Wr78e66lnSE9BKO5 1dIVlEEZQwbtZOqxGgQTtnZgwUwOkAtCTgpvMfD/+VkW1pCU0V4vNt3eABeac9KcnrxN PB5b+dxGCteTLRzPENSzXZjnmYPEmdd16f2GX3/r1OosaGDZVTY6u1fqV6d8ZHUjccB6 lFc044tX3yh4wPuClMTgRSA6PZY1gqq1bLsN2cX7o/6zgxytDYME91YBXJ9gnidg8DWj CGvw== X-Received: by 10.50.29.107 with SMTP id j11mr10079688igh.32.1418847650811; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:20:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:7:6c80:6f00::a767]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bd5sm8299008igb.14.2014.12.17.12.20.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:20:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:20:48 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:20:51 -0000 On 12/17/2014 01:15 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block > size. > Expect reduced performance. The status report does not identify the offending drive, so if you remove the drive (instead of replacing it), do you still get the same status report? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:23:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7266B209 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from luigi.brtsvcs.net (luigi.brtsvcs.net [204.109.60.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF0D16C4 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luigi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17BA02D4F8E; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3E96197A; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:22:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:22:51 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd1008 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:23:07 -0000 On 12/17/2014 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > On 12/17/2014 01:15 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block >> size. >> Expect reduced performance. > The status report does not identify the offending drive, > so if you remove the drive (instead of replacing it), > do you still get the same status report? It shows the sector size mismatch for ada11 in the vdev configuration list. Does the zpool clear command make it go away? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:28:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDFF9324 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822BC1726 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r2so9398000igi.12 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:28:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kEqkWGAt4EwQPxGgkzGMDO7YBd7Ub1pNztiP4qlOMKg=; b=fWe9AzhokASMmSyqBaUu/m6E/vblf453FYAXC4OKfiZ9VRYhFUKMynKPlWSjYNY6Wb 2lO3zFCsm9u1gbAnkB/LL1rzzF+qPMTCrgGse6oFpntTi6lvxD0fbAlesU+KQH4RvsLE NfsDUg/1fku1wytq0aBg9cCTJ8wBG14G375ZxeUXjnz5dRTMeF2ZYNSz29EezPwvGlmo AkdjF8DE/vB+V1eyTQAvTSdNcbCiEI6eanj+0ypu++0Qr49fAvG06bV/PFyQlGvsBhRP d9y90UpM9MDYWYoiFRXUCsD409Tf5ZpCbDwi49yRIVr3znsE6pytRYY96D5YWIFPTD1W iCwA== X-Received: by 10.50.70.2 with SMTP id i2mr10116455igu.46.1418848118998; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:28:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:7:6c80:6f00::a767]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j139sm2093732ioe.20.2014.12.17.12.28.38 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:28:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:28:37 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:28:39 -0000 On 12/17/2014 01:22 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 12/17/2014 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 12/17/2014 01:15 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: >>> status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block >>> size. >>> Expect reduced performance. >> The status report does not identify the offending drive, >> so if you remove the drive (instead of replacing it), >> do you still get the same status report? > > It shows the sector size mismatch for ada11 in the vdev configuration > list. > > Does the zpool clear command make it go away? > > Manpage says: *zpool* *clear* [*-F* [*-n*]]/pool/ [/device/] Clears device errors in a pool. If no arguments are specified, all device errors within the pool are cleared. If one or more devices is specified, only those errors associated with the specified device or devices are cleared. *-F* Initiates recovery mode for an unopenable pool. Attempts to discard the last few transactions in the pool to return it to an openable state. Not all damaged pools can be recovered by using this option. If successful, the data from the discarded transactions is irretrievably lost. *-n* Used in combination with the*-F* flag. Check whether discard- ing transactions would make the pool openable, but do not actually discard any transactions. So, be sure to specify ada11 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:29:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 054EF3B7 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1BD4174B for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBHKTelv070313; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:29:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5491E7AF.2020006@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:29:35 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd1008 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:29:41 -0000 On 12/17/2014 3:20 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > On 12/17/2014 01:15 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block >> size. >> Expect reduced performance. > The status report does not identify the offending drive, > so if you remove the drive (instead of replacing it), > do you still get the same status report? Actually, it did identify it initially. ada0 was the offending 4096k sector drive. I replaced it, with a 512/512 sector drive, but the error didnt go away. The drives in the set are all now 512 raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada11 ONLINE 0 0 0 block size: 512B configured, 4096B native ada1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada8 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada9 ONLINE 0 0 0 # camcontrol identify ada11 | grep "sector.*physical" sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 # camcontrol identify ada1 | grep "sector.*physical" sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 # camcontrol identify ada8 | grep "sector.*physical" sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 # camcontrol identify ada9 | grep "sector.*physical" sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:31:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66630621 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1D6181F for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBHKVkJA070668; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:31:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5491E82D.8090105@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:31:41 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd1008 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:31:47 -0000 On 12/17/2014 3:28 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> Does the zpool clear command make it go away? Nope, tried that :( # zpool clear tank1 ada11 # zpool status pool: tank1 state: ONLINE status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size. Expect reduced performance. action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured pool. scan: resilvered 898G in 8h4m with 0 errors on Wed Dec 17 15:01:18 2014 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada12 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada10 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada6 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada14 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada11 ONLINE 0 0 0 block size: 512B configured, 4096B native -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:36:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16D4D9E7 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x242.google.com (mail-pa0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAA221895 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f66.google.com with SMTP id rd3so8856877pab.5 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:36:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mIA8SxmTMg/RB98zsNvFenDs+MSMfUqDrM8J1m1zWrM=; b=l9VsHyOOrc0u9G0iumb2POu17fKaYpTZN3maBZmYMwe/4CvEdb2BDchem7as5V8Bso YlfrdvdvAiw88LbebroNso6ZbeuXny1PH7ihznW7ci+jGbBxcs2cBo2aMFUri4nI/bWK e6457ZFwAHM/KiRw8hXFnTLkCH4halRUc86aJKftCkKXYRN81pd0VCe3tdiorAQD+2Wi SuO8F1tJ3Mf3g54ZSpE/HkYB5GfqS8ubDaIb/EkhRAqLRBmvWEZY74T4zWbGie8h5X9T NHLhmmkw7K7ZzuEva6l7SvGgrtTBADuEYU2Dc6Gh/gOHEaCcD9foxotareOPattjeKxx 9QgQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.68.172 with SMTP id x12mr73309139pbt.71.1418845466111; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:44:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.84.6 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:44:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.84.6 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:44:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:44:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Samsung SM-G313HZ kitkat device From: duos samsung To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:36:48 -0000 duoss4462 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:37:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71FFA90 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A07518AE for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9F092DC; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0983E42C3; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 21:37:20 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Darren Pilgrim Subject: Re: freebsd-update and boot environments clash - rm / attempted! References: <54914CCC.7080102@qeng-ho.org> <86mw6m5kbl.fsf@nine.des.no> <5491BF58.5000508@bluerosetech.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 21:37:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5491BF58.5000508@bluerosetech.com> (Darren Pilgrim's message of "Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:37:28 -0800") Message-ID: <86vblaovwg.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:37:33 -0000 Darren Pilgrim writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Yes, we know. We're not sure what causes it, but it is most likely > > fallout from https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/195302. The index > That URL shorthand isn't working. JFYI; not sure if it was a typo or > something broken in the server config. Typo. The correct URL is . DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:41:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219A7BD4 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89C1199A for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r2so9452446igi.0 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:41:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KvWSaKq/9tO6QzGxdITd6IUP4LnJjDQTL8W7xVWzklU=; b=ImR5dALpS9XszosNv8+387nHFMMIZrp95RmMmXcJBmR8jdEWoDW2HJGMqWsWjslweK B8s6eEso7cjpZOlAPI5mZPuhScWvTFXcZqy9mQ+BnPf9HR9vwG0IAVpITMWoNsl7gaTG UtTUmjFbtdbthLy1v/6UzHY2NgtKR9EWEDD/7EEJbbciRCX1oGBJak0aL1+BbL/LAolV oWj3vG+bkIPIH2AAggx/Dnmvh6v+m2T0N9R44nDn4V3H9ccpPB2Zg7ewMLnwhIsmIuaN 9B+fxoQvSZg9twXNc4Wwrlk+2HcWaIB77gt17L7pndGQ9EIdfY68MZqs048G/JMoATPp Ou8g== X-Received: by 10.43.142.13 with SMTP id jg13mr38351393icc.93.1418848868375; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:7:6c80:6f00::a767]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vf6sm2771698igb.6.2014.12.17.12.41.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:41:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491EA62.2080401@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:41:06 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com> <5491E82D.8090105@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <5491E82D.8090105@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:41:09 -0000 On 12/17/2014 01:31 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/17/2014 3:28 PM, jd1008 wrote: >>> Does the zpool clear command make it go away? > > > Nope, tried that :( > > # zpool clear tank1 ada11 > # zpool status > pool: tank1 > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block > size. > Expect reduced performance. > action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the > configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured > pool. > scan: resilvered 898G in 8h4m with 0 errors on Wed Dec 17 15:01:18 2014 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > tank1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada12 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada10 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada6 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada14 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada11 ONLINE 0 0 0 block size: 512B > configured, 4096B native > > One last suggestion: dismantle the whole pool (i.e. remove the drives) and rebuild it fresh using only 512 byte sector drives. Whole adding the drives back in, one at a time, recheck the status after each add and see if the error status appears. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:46:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B46ACE1E for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703EF1A0E for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBHKkU6s072654; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:46:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5491EBA1.6080606@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:46:25 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd1008 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com> <5491E82D.8090105@sentex.net> <5491EA62.2080401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5491EA62.2080401@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:46:31 -0000 On 12/17/2014 3:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: > One last suggestion: > dismantle the whole pool (i.e. remove the drives) > and rebuild it fresh using only 512 byte sector drives. > Whole adding the drives back in, one at a time, > recheck the status after each add and see if the > error status appears. I was hoping for a rather less intrusive option than backing up 10TB of data. Although its a backup of a backup (ie offsite) I was hoping there was a less drastic option available. I am confident if I "started fresh" with just the 512k sector drives, it will work fine. The question which remains is, if I replace a single 512 sector drive with a 4k sector drive, and then replace the 4k with another 512k, is there a way to remove said warning, or has something changed about the pool that cannot be undone ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:50:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115CE3F1 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A901AAD for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hl2so10137959igb.2 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:50:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w+J1qb57sPfmRh3SsH6Gh56Qr1slxtjifD7RQ1VySYM=; b=DiqPZNk4gLr3Ympy01fMZ9XmKnB5Mx2TaCNP+xLKeENBFtiHRe4Ivodb8Ri+e9GO9z j20vjRPrnWthq4V8WxtASV0FPy6/5SPdn5/dpBWtsL9BJ85VVNX+sdiWNCABOOLvqplm 47CZACV2+0yt5DRdI7zO05r4X7f74BFLOOHXEowHHwoar4/8cVKEimPfOt652YPqdifj C4LKrU/Zy41FVF+jKoCBfsWA1f1QuboGIK/FVPQ7Qx8/BDoongqJq6v80TQ//KDktmNw 3/OPKjzWU1TaWO/HFebaAnJvQK1/xzwzepy34aont6UVE/CeL0NpYmVcWXYAAn/IueER Rw7Q== X-Received: by 10.50.148.101 with SMTP id tr5mr10230369igb.12.1418849434226; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:7:6c80:6f00::a767]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l3sm2780348igj.9.2014.12.17.12.50.33 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:50:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491EC98.3000507@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:50:32 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com> <5491E82D.8090105@sentex.net> <5491EA62.2080401@gmail.com> <5491EBA1.6080606@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <5491EBA1.6080606@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:50:35 -0000 On 12/17/2014 01:46 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/17/2014 3:41 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> One last suggestion: >> dismantle the whole pool (i.e. remove the drives) >> and rebuild it fresh using only 512 byte sector drives. >> Whole adding the drives back in, one at a time, >> recheck the status after each add and see if the >> error status appears. > > I was hoping for a rather less intrusive option than backing up 10TB > of data. Although its a backup of a backup (ie offsite) I was hoping > there was a less drastic option available. > > I am confident if I "started fresh" with just the 512k sector drives, > it will work fine. The question which remains is, if I replace a > single 512 sector drive with a 4k sector drive, and then replace the > 4k with another 512k, is there a way to remove said warning, or has > something changed about the pool that cannot be undone > > ---Mike > > > Can you not dismantle the pool without destroying the data? I mean what if you took it offline, rebuilt the pool with the same drives in the same slots (one at a time - and recheck status)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:58:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DEB0654 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355261BF2 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBHKw4O0074099; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:58:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5491EE57.60801@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:57:59 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd1008 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com> <5491E82D.8090105@sentex.net> <5491EA62.2080401@gmail.com> <5491EBA1.6080606@sentex.net> <5491EC98.3000507@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5491EC98.3000507@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:58:05 -0000 On 12/17/2014 3:50 PM, jd1008 wrote: > Can you not dismantle the pool without destroying the data? > I mean what if you took it offline, rebuilt the pool with the same > drives in the same slots (one at a time - and recheck status)? I am not sure what you mean by dismantle then? All the drives in the pool are 512k now. The original pool was created with just 512k drives too (long ago). There are no 4096k drives part of it any more. The one that was 4096k (ada0) has been removed. # jot 15 0 | awk '{print " camcontrol identify ada"$1" | grep \"sector.*physical\""}' | sh sector size logical 512, physical 4096, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 # zpool status | grep ada0 # ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 23:13:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEC53569; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C312EE9E; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA03144; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:14:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Y1Nm4-000Jyi-LH; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: <54920DC0.8030200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:12:00 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa , "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:13:02 -0000 On 17/12/2014 22:15, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On a remote server, I replaced a dead 2TB disk with a new one that had 4096K > sectors. > > 2014-12-11.22:40:30 zpool replace -f tank1 16144392433229115618 /dev/ada0 > > > My ZFS pool then warned me after > > pool: tank1 > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size. > Expect reduced performance. > action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the > configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured > pool. > > Camcontrol and smartctl confirm the 2TB drive was indeed 4096. (All my previous > ones were 512, so didnt think to check) > > # camcontrol identify ada0 | grep secto > sectors/track 63 > sector size logical 512, physical 4096, offset 0 > LBA supported 268435455 sectors > LBA48 supported 3907029168 sectors > > # smartctl -a /dev/ada0 | grep -i 512 > Sector Sizes: 512 bytes logical, 4096 bytes physical > > So, with a new drive, I replaced the 4096 drive > > 2014-12-16.17:07:14 zpool replace tank1 ada0 ada11 > > # smartctl -a /dev/ada11 | grep -i 512 > Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical > # camcontrol identify ada11 | grep -i sector > sectors/track 63 > sector size logical 512, physical 512, offset 0 > LBA supported 268435455 sectors > LBA48 supported 3907029168 sectors > > yet, zfs is still complaining Does zpool clear help in this situation? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 01:43:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 985F7FA6 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186991FE5 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l4so196970lbv.12 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:43:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QA10zi0EMAtyTgBo14bB/Q3BpGyDPTmcFGuWPaz7sRM=; b=nN3cWmySHwty3SLvoU/C7Gi7B/GCJJCdtKGD2Qe2AaqCbmNfzfFFlm75hdn10iT/Hr hXppJ59Ouar1Tx2v7kF8tWnVCvEAYdConhevGWyjlpqKfLUNBJ6psGDFiWlrqCGwpzY/ rOgA1eUrVQf/LQ5McbMgYNG17w5km/F7sIvrTzl2iT0qkf+iqqPhTJ4gf79anEn5SKZn N5r1a04e2hGzd9Ngzyc5VYADWyB3+dbu9OVMaOssFtoZp1f0qejwhSkWAV4v+Se9P1k1 /JU86TLmlboUUGkugte2m7ZrpUBSqGEdNsHZi4nCJtD67ebLNqnDsC72p2fydg0RD+3s Lpmw== X-Received: by 10.152.18.225 with SMTP id z1mr27723267lad.0.1418867011062; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:43:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lazlar.no-ip.biz (213-64-218-92-no126.business.telia.com. [213.64.218.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm1356460lae.0.2014.12.17.17.43.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:43:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:43:29 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User questions Subject: Finding 32-bit binaries Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:43:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Since fewer and fewer applications are available as 32-bit only, I'm looking into disabling 32-bit compatibilty altogether. I don't have the Linuxulator enabled, so that won't be a problem. I just replaced rar with unrar, and that got rid of the last piece of 32-bit software that I'm aware of. However, I want to be absolutely certain that there is nothing left before I remove the compatibility layer and the libraries. Is there a quick way to scan for any 32-bit binaries? Regards, Rolf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUkjE0AAoJEPJMW41Co4JgH/cP/i6qMGUaXQT9pUcgfcsGdshe 2AsYJdoAqyYHBsGC+FArWG2Vpvpox47abhyC6DksGnWMEsc2kDLjUK02WMU1R2kh h9rmIqupjwPdFB0VKnp2/Yl6tXYvw5H2CqaDpU9CAmRJXsD1G3ekjB8DyqCrKMx9 0lHexyqCc04KnsU/QFKyevL8mIpbUp2z575gaqtkE2D66L0yrOvuJOUKEVTPNGiA zl7Csiu52yvGpI4tzpvcGc24ivhMAXz1aevAWP1rG7rf+JqYDkfq//PaDNGk+tAt Y1M4AqcwnPmmbvmQQhCIUc/NrKm3ITqjaQUvTZJUcKQtYQpZJ/FJERR45IcSs55i /pw6mWMEKpg1zuD2BzskJuzGMwX1nnvMzp5iUbWvb/ipmu7guyf0zMvo0tNid5ue izYewacQStU9+OL+lf8Ww+bEddo9Q/gHWtqSfhuGPJ9M/sDXeTfHo+yR6qEV0Cy3 oLCV1WzVfmT9aMmR/bEcKqg6aMavPTbJBR7I9K6ziAh7ET67o2GSfbxT52sLMkm7 r28LmlAnjZn7E9Ch4L8gQuJhYGatI+U5FhcoLPyNFobHvTqyeyeJlnIgyrXg6QBL t7iNCgTUC6ET5WX+O5KQ0vAH3+AtGwRFfhh/Si8CQ9LZlLBz9MNHrQsXv+mQfb43 P+IUTl5gX97WQgF5bgGT =QPlA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 07:36:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDCB622D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpb.telissant.net (smtpb.telissant.net [199.233.230.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24231034 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from barrida.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B82427379 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:28:18 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpb.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by barrida.3dresearch.com (barrida.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5kgU7OCvBHaV for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:28:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (pool-71-112-1-173.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [71.112.1.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7E522731F for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:28:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doncurzio.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 358E7A1E2D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:28:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:27:28 -0500 From: Janos Dohanics To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Loader panic 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 Message-Id: <20141218022728.3dd7c888a6c916c1aa4eb653@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:04 -0000 Greetings, I have recompiled kernel + world according to Handbook instructions. When rebooting after installworld and running mergemaster(8), I was greeted with: panic: bd_strategy: xxxxxx bytes I/O not multiple of block size Fortunately, I was able to boot using zroot:/boot/zfsloader.old. Do I have a corrupted /boot/zfsloader file? -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 13:14:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB8A3179 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd.crowsnest.tk (crowsnest.tk [188.116.52.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "nest", Issuer "nest" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167C51470 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd.crowsnest.tk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.crowsnest.tk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBICusB2012162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:56:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from crow@localhost.crowsnest.tk) Received: (from crow@localhost) by freebsd.crowsnest.tk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBICurGr012161; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:56:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from crow) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:56:53 +0100 From: Carrion Crow To: Rolf Nielsen Subject: Re: Finding 32-bit binaries Message-ID: <20141218125653.GA12129@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> References: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:14:09 -0000 Hi, Maybe try something like this: for DIR in /bin /sbin /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin; do for BIN in $DIR/*;= do file $BIN; done | grep '32-bit'; done --=20 Carrion Crow ----------------- "UNIX is basically a simple operating system,=20 but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity." -- Dennis Ritchie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 13:22:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A766357 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BAFE15EE for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hs14so961349lab.25 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:22:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xrqr+xRnu+PFZJQjzGb3qs4PwGmygRI4ALSCttU/d+A=; b=Fipa0dbpGq9ZQE8rRU35nkdV5xuwvBAPzl80oaClZZsbaLwa0fozWqTtuPg9KZm5Z2 v9JgbCqqLiFz06GkNsCVZDSPGlOVukt5kwBUA3iNWWCZKkH/cFLoGwT1SnOX4sADpd/D NlyZu2ZBDzn8e6HN4yBYyEtwIJ6LuzvM3jMNE9sPUn+uvYYe+i5ofL1YKqyF6ElmEAur eZrd0Cpm1l4zGe7TqOfq1ssp0URqRpHZTYtbQbh8yvlAiPT+GG+1TN6UhHHiXRqDrRUa MHA7Z8sHOJLKqr74hfSSNJWSGtPXgU8l2GE69THgg5c3j/mdXTEe0zvs1G/9GOq0V5RN S20Q== X-Received: by 10.112.78.39 with SMTP id y7mr2343342lbw.42.1418908934665; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:22:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from lazlar.no-ip.biz (213-64-218-92-no126.business.telia.com. [213.64.218.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id li3sm1782061lbc.31.2014.12.18.05.22.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:22:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5492D505.4090800@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:22:13 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding 32-bit binaries References: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> <20141218125653.GA12129@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> In-Reply-To: <20141218125653.GA12129@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:22:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-12-18 13:56, Carrion Crow wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe try something like this: > > for DIR in /bin /sbin /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin; do for BIN in > $DIR/*; do file $BIN; done | grep '32-bit'; done > Thanks. I did something similar, though not exactly the same. And I included more directories. And I found this file /usr/lib/kgzldr.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped What does it do? And why is it where I'd expect only 64-bit binaries? Will it be able to do whatever it's doing if I remove 32-bit compat and libs? Regards, Rolf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUktUFAAoJEPJMW41Co4JggXwP+gLgVPSxKs7+xIC9A3vNI+FW RZYs7i7LLmwuhPWGGspNN7aIh22VkU9wdAInF5Nkd6J/2Pg0viz1i8aWMXTFvoWM 2h0AWONzMOaNde4eTzk4bmbRs1Smxehzo0UlnQlS29BTsOpDjeE5epZvMuMvk318 5B64xADPNd1meTQ9+zenv001wdq0o/mibwk5wYP85V33r+/aiQ9aBeiL6OlQjjDM eGCtxnHf8uzCZ47mcq06/2EJ1Ip47JUHPXrUASYNvQjnLXqeqgUl84dIwzQI4sY2 WjwjzMDYdUwHh0Nf+q0P85KmxEssbyNYU5mMN0PGmwLZKFl/Blxi9xMK5KYY2rI7 BPO8fqygfURmTsW2qbdplIkXbz9SNlltrw9IceYSUK0jT3uYH9YrB7Ir9+owMtXP rdhSsdlxvWxEYLmGj8UBamn8AG/n9tOWillM4HvrYMVnEbyZOuvf5JFmpcQDWsw5 n7ox0EiXtOgEpxjVyxF75gF2gkuFreELz14dxfrM8hZwGiUBPv+A8vTu7O5xVxh5 qNzGjzoiQz2lqbknxLnqOLh15jzeluNBJ963wTHAisVsmVPUjhB9lS8DEaFfvqs2 CkkWDRC1Z4c/yZrRG5rwZSvAjS+9s0LOH5cl1WPdT5KjGuKstixcenrjlnjFHJ7f GqALPrs/cSrTlJ/W7fzs =pA+r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 13:53:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13168D15 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76411B66 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-93-98.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.93.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535FE3CFD9; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:53:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id sBIDrNK9002898; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:53:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:53:23 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Bernt Hansson Subject: Re: openoffice build fails. Message-Id: <20141218145323.271fa5a9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <546C43E8.7080103@bananmonarki.se> References: <54647A67.6020104@bananmonarki.se> <10033996.HOrm3u7UXj@matrix020.matrix.net> <546C43E8.7080103@bananmonarki.se> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:53:34 -0000 Sorry for the late reply, but just at this moment I have remote access to a FreeBSD 10 system running LibreOffice 4.1.5_1, and when I run % /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/spadmin I get the expected printer administration program. Note that I'm invoking the program with the full path here. But when I do % cd /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program % ./spadmin it works as well, contrary to your try. While spadmin is just a script, spadmin.bin is the real program. It can be started directly as well (both ways shown above work similarly). On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:16:56 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: > % cd /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program > % ./spadmin > ./spadmin: Command not found. Hm, strange. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 14:03:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4446B24C for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2AB41D34 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBIE3Ssa017071; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:03:29 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5492DEB0.5060805@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:03:28 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rolf Nielsen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding 32-bit binaries References: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> <20141218125653.GA12129@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> <5492D505.4090800@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5492D505.4090800@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:03:38 -0000 On 18/12/2014 13:22, Rolf Nielsen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2014-12-18 13:56, Carrion Crow wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Maybe try something like this: >> >> for DIR in /bin /sbin /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin; do for BIN in >> $DIR/*; do file $BIN; done | grep '32-bit'; done >> > > Thanks. I did something similar, though not exactly the same. And I > included more directories. And I found this file > > /usr/lib/kgzldr.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 > (FreeBSD), not stripped > > What does it do? And why is it where I'd expect only 64-bit binaries? > Will it be able to do whatever it's doing if I remove 32-bit compat > and libs? > Guessing wildly, I think that's something to do booting gzipped kernels. Source is at /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/kgzldr -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 14:04:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E592ED for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5B81D4C for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id V24F1p007516WCc0124GA9; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:04:17 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=UL5THUvy c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=cYTjFNdXV1EA:10 a=A92cGCtB03wA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=9iDbn-4jx3cA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=gZbpxnkM3yUA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=T-rMP7P-AAAA:20 a=l3s3uUTbTxJOzfmuCF8A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=83BAwlA7or3AT-TC:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 Received: from sedbergh.lan ([192.168.1.13] helo=curlew.lan) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1bgd-0001xr-65 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:04:15 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:04:11 +0000 Message-ID: <5990241.TqeihgW4az@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.2; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5492D505.4090800@gmail.com> References: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> <20141218125653.GA12129@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> <5492D505.4090800@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: Finding 32-bit binaries X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:04:27 -0000 On Thursday 18 Dec 2014 14:22:13 Rolf Nielsen wrote: > Thanks. I did something similar, though not exactly the same. And I > included more directories. And I found this file > > /usr/lib/kgzldr.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version > 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped > > What does it do? And why is it where I'd expect only 64-bit > binaries? Will it be able to do whatever it's doing if I remove > 32-bit compat and libs? kgzip -- compress a kernel /https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kgzip&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9. 3-stable&arch=default&format=html/[1] http://preview.tinyurl.com/oj3u62z -- Mike Clarke -------- [1] https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kgzip&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.3 -stable&arch=default&format=html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 14:41:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A780C29; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618E9244F; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBIEfveG078395; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:41:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5492E7AE.9010901@sentex.net> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:41:50 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon , "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <54920DC0.8030200@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <54920DC0.8030200@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:41:58 -0000 On 12/17/2014 6:12 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> yet, zfs is still complaining > > Does zpool clear help in this situation? > Looks like a reboot was needed to fix the issue. # zpool status pool: tank1 state: ONLINE scan: resilvered 898G in 8h4m with 0 errors on Wed Dec 17 15:01:18 2014 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada12 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada10 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada6 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada14 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada11 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada8 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada9 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada13 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada4 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada5 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada7 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 14:59:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A762986E for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D3D3266C for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBIExk3j017150; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:59:46 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5492EBE2.1040508@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:59:46 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Clarke , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "rmg1970swe@gmail.com >> Rolf Nielsen" Subject: Re: Finding 32-bit binaries References: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> <20141218125653.GA12129@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> <5492D505.4090800@gmail.com> <5990241.TqeihgW4az@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <5990241.TqeihgW4az@curlew.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:59:49 -0000 On 18/12/2014 14:04, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Thursday 18 Dec 2014 14:22:13 Rolf Nielsen wrote: >> Thanks. I did something similar, though not exactly the same. And I >> included more directories. And I found this file >> >> /usr/lib/kgzldr.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version >> 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped >> >> What does it do? And why is it where I'd expect only 64-bit >> binaries? Will it be able to do whatever it's doing if I remove >> 32-bit compat and libs? > > kgzip -- compress a kernel > > /https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kgzip&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9. > 3-stable&arch=default&format=html/[1] > > http://preview.tinyurl.com/oj3u62z kgzip seems not to be built under 10.1-REL, even though kgzldr.o is. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 15:10:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8770EADA for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpb.telissant.net (smtpb.telissant.net [199.233.230.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5953C27E2 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from barrida.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DBB27379 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:10:25 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpb.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by barrida.3dresearch.com (barrida.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id taCG47829v9Q for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:10:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (pool-71-112-1-173.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [71.112.1.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D45F5273BA for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:09:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doncurzio.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A50A5A1E2D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:09:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:09:37 -0500 From: Janos Dohanics To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Loader panic 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 Message-Id: <20141218100937.47049e65e2869ea15d0fa41e@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20141218022728.3dd7c888a6c916c1aa4eb653@3dresearch.com> References: <20141218022728.3dd7c888a6c916c1aa4eb653@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:10:26 -0000 On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:27:28 -0500 Janos Dohanics wrote: > Greetings, > > I have recompiled kernel + world according to Handbook instructions. > When rebooting after installworld and running mergemaster(8), I was > greeted with: > > panic: bd_strategy: xxxxxx bytes I/O not multiple of block size > > Fortunately, I was able to boot using zroot:/boot/zfsloader.old. > > Do I have a corrupted /boot/zfsloader file? I took the /boot/zfsloader file from another box running 10.1-STABLE #0 r275391 built on Dec 2, 2014 to the box with 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 - won't boot, same error message. However, /boot/zfsloader from 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 does boot 10.1-STABLE #0 r275391. So, I have this: Box #1: 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 amd64, built on Dec 16 /boot/zfsloader SHA256 (/boot/zfsloader) = 12ad6a59082fa4639f3f991319892259b1777b26b28c8aa09c2b53d0326d3b33 - Does not boot Box #1 - Does boot Box #2 /boot/zfsloader.old SHA256 (/boot/zfsloader.old) = b5530ce9f9128949b44384516974ba4ef741e587975e3e1d71933798150502e3 Box #2: 10.1-STABLE #0 r275391 amd64, built on Dec 2 /boot/zfsloader SHA256 (/boot/zfsloader) = 1e3d692dc53c5e0ddeb75b8a453a0a44cbf4c97bc8cfe02b0ad45928374f4718 - Does not boot Box #1 - Does boot Box #2 Would you please advise? -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 15:27:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8157A274 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DAEE2A53 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id q107so981200qgd.17 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:27:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=F4fmlNoz/LqpOnY8EIs/7TT3RIEsqsRZoCSKebKxxHo=; b=i7L6scRCVsKcwGfELyvzdQJ7KFM4iN/K7jDw5o0/q7V+2BBCPIQt+jnRuuCTEU+wY8 ZGr60BYPO0XZRu+P9z4UKextmzy1tt80vTPxgamsuMgyyNk1blDxl3Sfml+ZV6qdPseA JmOXu20EUTyJ3bafmkeWTuXZYdG2zGWaWAp8wPdvJE1vxhthFCGXd1XOr7Z+kA/lf1Ui Yo+fRhe+sNcFCUS8PAloHLWkAa2tYxIoSokzIIHusP5vO77kCzxdLGDn4rZaGdRvV7o4 hPlOpHFt/Ptztyk/npyPO/c62HB4yuRvuBohmkL2QvN03drYipTSvwY2ZvUtaKcdkF2l vz2g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.64.197 with SMTP id f5mr4571268qai.49.1418916460398; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.240.78 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:27:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:27:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: How do I upgrade linux kernel support From: Aryeh Friedman To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:27:41 -0000 I just (last night) installed releng/10.1 from svn, kldloadlinux and then tried to install x11/nvdia-driver and got this: ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 is not supported, please use 2.6.18, BEWARE this is highly experimental I do not want to go to -CURRENT. This is a completely fresh install so I also got ports.tar.gz last night -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 15:36:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0EC357D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BF1E2B9E for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id f15so1316203lbj.9 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+koKXPnPv4+unRf05waW9qZgAWhKUieI3+WkF+55mqs=; b=a6oAeyG/oe/CIDOA63KK1wU3x9OL181I9w0Sv9vJrry1u9TUUtpj1NU4kVDuc6BrVy zOnGE2mq0brIApcY8H4pSjO/+Y+EW52eT9ZyKxeOpqIL8zq5sr/aCbn4QpO0HjclAz4h qSUVapNxBRUt+wkK7APflyr5yNuFGiVqcYkxk5hm1F8UbH+cOL6OKadC+vo8PGkwmQXa nSi9ewFdhW+2DAeUtoV/sui5LMsKhZ6UFH7iD8Ks8GrY78H0ZjUVWawb1HJXUBVaFtD1 a9V0r90pBsSA1HVr7bzTpccOOc3say1/YEactPUkRFtyQcsyHEEiucCmTgOcoyC2RNYb ffow== X-Received: by 10.112.167.228 with SMTP id zr4mr2965120lbb.20.1418916972326; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lazlar.no-ip.biz (213-64-218-92-no126.business.telia.com. [213.64.218.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm1871146lar.24.2014.12.18.07.36.11 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5492F46A.2010107@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:36:10 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arthur Chance , Mike Clarke , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding 32-bit binaries References: <54923141.4090209@gmail.com> <20141218125653.GA12129@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> <5492D505.4090800@gmail.com> <5990241.TqeihgW4az@curlew.lan> <5492EBE2.1040508@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <5492EBE2.1040508@qeng-ho.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:36:15 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-12-18 15:59, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 18/12/2014 14:04, Mike Clarke wrote: >> On Thursday 18 Dec 2014 14:22:13 Rolf Nielsen wrote: >>> Thanks. I did something similar, though not exactly the same. >>> And I included more directories. And I found this file >>> >>> /usr/lib/kgzldr.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, >>> version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped >>> >>> What does it do? And why is it where I'd expect only 64-bit >>> binaries? Will it be able to do whatever it's doing if I >>> remove 32-bit compat and libs? >> >> kgzip -- compress a kernel >> >> /https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kgzip&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9. >> >> >> 3-stable&arch=default&format=html/[1] >> >> http://preview.tinyurl.com/oj3u62z > > kgzip seems not to be built under 10.1-REL, even though kgzldr.o > is. > So it would seem. I don't have it, and I'm running 10.1. And although freeing some space is one of my motivations for getting rid of 32-bit, I don't think compressing a 7.1MB kernel would be meaningful. I'm not THAT short on space. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUkvRdAAoJEPJMW41Co4JgXIkP/jCLQeJJsOC0LtZ+9O9ET794 sBoyXDkH+u+KJd2Cia9tRLI5GnVlj1bdIo/2eI5t33NqkEEUyl80MohaUMdxF5dY czHIT254/uJtNrhdrhCWE535BBaenncMyMsMJ/6X/kPmfKVaKQSO5kqXZ/BgTyjn allJSDzTYVl3aDWH+/mb+4/n+wLl8ygxaxSfqHIQOgjexTBC/I+Ey9rIjBfQ8kLY eHIvXW2U1Y+MAjnEdJ4WxL9FbmvVFLRQAvWQYnC2sZyHVE2y08Lssc/5ynb5MJy/ LmFnxpbm2kGsPO8JMNKz7YPZPtzdHv5pqMeNw8ZG88tiSQO1qwjYWp1COFRbFU4L VkKgqmXvb2Zq+mBIpGPjYa38bCFViVI5cH77gWj//P9JGaxc7UTSd875DiXPfOrX d3PA/8xyWyMxuVXIqfPBcXlMXaOoTGo4vpKiNxHIOpfRn93G0R4VfNWCRsIYWJmO zmfxmTPpUizANJerNWmbWVFIzZKQYy9RJIRE53FP5MPGr2xGJORvOnpAYWXkVjW5 FYX/rCGygDUVepPLBBjydTjoZgBCCx6X5F3HPH5hC6VifGCm5cKZBR5vjtnpiy0/ xS21+vfbzUF7s8SNTlZ+ezX9OBAygBiCjXWCOG2iHF5CYzBC64VXsqQbYsdbki0B BY4NlFuTbkZQb1cwk7UM =QHkO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 15:37:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 087DA645 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C092BB4 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x12so1954942wgg.39 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eo10AcQQ8ofPD+3p+NKqciL1iMNKmKt2LjDUR4LWpEE=; b=by01L7n4JSMz42KxuxoXo7pAPIyb4aSG321CqQBZwr8Npd7jTVGFO7xN4GTYLm7FSX GLsP+YDAl5xGQjB/sBt8ADn+0mquOuresuMa2YeK/n9Uww3NRVmF+VZ8lEHuX7fziLQc R3xqRk5Cj9NdypYYS4EYIsQ38z9SxhE3yLLdubZNRTA1HKTfy7KSsajfGHZ+t5a22JuH fcoK1KvUYz769raUwa2+Gn34SZs5iTCJ031GM7jZxVW16hz80gHMlSfhey2AkuSYqjbS ngPM/eOBb9VexHZvaSCX1byJDEoXq/fwuW2XYRNqDPOH7RA+Qj8Id5/Bg7hz/iouMBmM jKgA== X-Received: by 10.180.198.164 with SMTP id jd4mr25193865wic.42.1418917019833; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from t510.bsoft-company.ro (remote.ezwim.com. [193.239.202.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kn5sm9323436wjb.48.2014.12.18.07.36.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:36:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5492F49A.2020204@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:36:58 +0100 From: Andrei Brezan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I upgrade linux kernel support References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrei Brezan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:37:02 -0000 On 12/18/14 16:27, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > I just (last night) installed releng/10.1 from svn, kldloadlinux and > then tried to install x11/nvdia-driver and got this: > > ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE > ===>>> compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 is not supported, please use > 2.6.18, BEWARE this is highly experimental > > I do not want to go to -CURRENT. This is a completely fresh install > so I also got ports.tar.gz last night > You don't need to go to CURRENT for this. linux-c6 has replaced linux-f10 and linux kernel is 2.6.18 now. Please read entry 20141209 from /usr/ports/UPDATING. -- Andrei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 16:13:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B2E1BD for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A341511E4 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter2-d.gandi.net (mfilter2-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.140]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABFBA80BE for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:13:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter2-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter2-d.gandi.net (mfilter2-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2f6zjoGcM83v for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:13:56 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 120.60.147.36 Received: from localhost (triband-mum-120.60.147.36.mtnl.net.in [120.60.147.36]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5CA0A80CB for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:13:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:43:53 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: any non-x11 'gui' systems like qt/embedded? Message-ID: <20141218161352.GA1006@aio.kathe.in> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:14:00 -0000 hello, are there any non-x11 depending 'gui' systems available for freebsd? something like qt/embedded which works off the linux graphics framebuffer? if not, is there any specific documentation available for using the graphics framebuffer used for showing the boot splash screens? also, may i know what that graphics framebuffer is called in the freebsd world? thanks, ~mayuresh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 17:33:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E4D158 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpb.telissant.net (smtpb.telissant.net [199.233.230.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A0820CC for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from barrida.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B2B2739D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:33:11 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpb.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by barrida.3dresearch.com (barrida.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9pcLVIAvRkR for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (pool-71-112-1-173.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [71.112.1.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D97B327367 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doncurzio.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 43584A1E2D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:32:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:32:48 -0500 From: Janos Dohanics To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Loader panic 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 (also r275903) Message-Id: <20141218123248.2b38be5edb1b03a5dccabaf3@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20141218100937.47049e65e2869ea15d0fa41e@3dresearch.com> References: <20141218022728.3dd7c888a6c916c1aa4eb653@3dresearch.com> <20141218100937.47049e65e2869ea15d0fa41e@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:33:12 -0000 On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:09:37 -0500 Janos Dohanics wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 02:27:28 -0500 > Janos Dohanics wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > I have recompiled kernel + world according to Handbook instructions. > > When rebooting after installworld and running mergemaster(8), I was > > greeted with: > > > > panic: bd_strategy: xxxxxx bytes I/O not multiple of block size > > > > Fortunately, I was able to boot using zroot:/boot/zfsloader.old. > > > > Do I have a corrupted /boot/zfsloader file? > > I took the /boot/zfsloader file from another box running 10.1-STABLE > #0 r275391 built on Dec 2, 2014 to the box with 10.1-STABLE #0 > #r275828 - > won't boot, same error message. However, /boot/zfsloader from > 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 does boot 10.1-STABLE #0 r275391. > > So, I have this: > > Box #1: 10.1-STABLE #0 r275828 amd64, built on Dec 16 > > /boot/zfsloader > SHA256 (/boot/zfsloader) = > 12ad6a59082fa4639f3f991319892259b1777b26b28c8aa09c2b53d0326d3b33 > - Does not boot Box #1 > - Does boot Box #2 > > /boot/zfsloader.old > SHA256 (/boot/zfsloader.old) = > b5530ce9f9128949b44384516974ba4ef741e587975e3e1d71933798150502e3 > > Box #2: 10.1-STABLE #0 r275391 amd64, built on Dec 2 > > /boot/zfsloader > SHA256 (/boot/zfsloader) = > 1e3d692dc53c5e0ddeb75b8a453a0a44cbf4c97bc8cfe02b0ad45928374f4718 > - Does not boot Box #1 > - Does boot Box #2 > > Would you please advise? OK, svn-ned /usr/src and rebuilt world/kernel on Box #1 to 10.1-STABLE #0 r275903 - still getting the panic: bd_strategy... error message. I can only boot this machine using the old /boot/zfsloader file which is dated Jul 12 2014 and now it's saved as /boot/zfsloader.good. Would you please give your insight on how to fix this problem? I guess simply copying /boot/zfsloader.good to /boot/zfsloader isn't a fix, just bandaiding the real problem. -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 18:56:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2E99125 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F8D82DE7 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id q108so1327649qgd.15 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:56:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oDUPo/lMuCDTOKBeGFcqPIcRFd0opHOWVw9+zFllL3s=; b=D7b6/xAxDJoUSNP1aoca6M0/GY1jANxjfgP+HrmA1kV7vkHbb1W1gng9bRk2r4ALRN UtAwymb36dKIfJC9mYaPoaicP9PlFyF8edx2nhl4aIFed1eb4gweG6wYKA5ecOaRv2ZC MVYvQYWC4El//iE4f7DxhxNvef1kh+mgWG+ITf0iNe1DVgvDRClvUhJJ68JW/PXuI+vL 2jPyLAXXeRh1fzkTXMeVB3pSolC3UF/fjy2pKk2J9QDktUeqhvpdJyFVRlZv1ptT3LJL cmOueaN/RYo9Akrx5M4TzbzH36YcEWvApjQfL6nTufzm5Tvu6JJ0Vqbt0L7Pyh4Q2UR9 ZNww== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.32.166 with SMTP id h35mr6146540qgh.22.1418929010669; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:56:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.38.147 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:56:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:56:50 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: CMake Policy Settings From: B J To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:56:52 -0000 I've been having some difficulties in installing Squeak on a FreeBSD 10.1 installation. One possibility might be that the current version of CMake doesn't like how some of the source code files are set up. After running "configure", I get messages referring to a possible bug which earlier versions of CMake allowed. I'd like to try using a policy based on what was done previously to see how this might affect what I'm doing. However, I'm not sure how to set it. I've found information about it in the CMake wiki, but it's rather vague. Do I set it as a parameter in the command line when I run CMake? If so, how? Is it, instead, set in something like a configuration file such as /etc/rc.conf? If so, where is it located? Please advise. Thank you. B. M. Jatzeck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 19:29:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36AFE53 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x234.google.com (mail-qg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E49133E for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a108so1381497qge.11 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:29:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=v2khEuuTs+kCNChqZQhaw8cXaNG8g/9p5U7bDss1ioE=; b=Iz4ExyRQmAzfPgCZbGmgjRIWkxWsnpobFg1zcY7TZ/xf1cS+GlGfk5IgFkZWrLjaDz WtQPQ8MDfVxpBkpDcm5O6WWLhjJ/xpfn0BASJgNMsUS2NcZs6RZ008IqxZu5Rs8EWHXH flX64r0bl81RevYvy8KxXBfVp+HzktFgQPZys= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=v2khEuuTs+kCNChqZQhaw8cXaNG8g/9p5U7bDss1ioE=; b=Y5+qO0ewyIlbDk8GMz8YLk5kMLuhc89fPWEma6yYbXTTWigaQ4F6YpzHTfiw4Z7zlf xzo1Uz4CdCgvz0w7EGDRBiKA6K1RwC3BE19AIMYgz8DA7hHVJ7H1PtboMvuMQRfK/gT3 OMwH7vyOD1uRuyRBu8l5cAB2nw7K+O+xRrLTvmpou4prTXPYS59PDB/Wc4uiRdu1VmcN KrTaeaVgCM7tGHcEiMCjsU8uG3Wdp44sC2xkJSJZiHOC47QiqcHvbYZCygTNno3nSGI4 FAowgDN4ERpdxOV2B0V9OnUQNYSDB8+BvTn6fGk2PjGsm6fYosFB6vPuD17IKo5FPiy+ LrXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkT0BWTt/pDIAvaE7jzyAVUCOST/ATZKZRZbOyUa/LRO0BibJNMV6mdbd2JXfw/o7mBlrKv X-Received: by 10.229.140.72 with SMTP id h8mr6842251qcu.25.1418930952413; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:29:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.52.225 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:28:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201412181131.sBIBVlA8094616@NetBook.FreeBSD93> References: <201412181131.sBIBVlA8094616@NetBook.FreeBSD93> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:28:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: install failure,, help me please To: zezeon@netbook.freebsd93, "questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:29:13 -0000 Forwarding to questions@ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seungwon Park Date: 18 December 2014 at 03:31 Subject: install failure,, help me please To: eadler@freebsd.org I was installing FreeBSD 9.3 i386 memstick version xfce4 xwin manager. And it failed when it tried to install getopt package. error message was checksum mismatch.. So I gave option to ignore checksum as recommended, but it also failled with error messages. The message was unrecognized archive format.. could not extract the file.. How can I handle this, I am a novice in unix. Please help.. Thank you in advance.. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 22:23:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E829C70 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3EDB1094 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id gd6so1852324lab.3 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:23:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sELIU4SH3BLTIGB79Oo7Tnt1EuCudCUMFAipG2Yp6es=; b=0MvqgyuvVYvfzd1afGV430FMTU1s0J6WXdk5MIM2wqAeQ/YdJcjXBUcD184JfbJnLp LOn6YmtKW2USCwVI+ZTtI+k/tcY7Lr1R9RL88vD7lsXyKkCVqLPAPt7YwRf/W7jn3MWT md+S6YCOmwQOLu05mvyahYJG0lSkgwTLuDR04cesZ44aLCeq4/CFBPLnz7hlbZvVRoMc 0U1H2Mfnjm6ofcxUjiwvt6JIc4vQ13RScVDn+buy8YlQ3mEHEOxtTgnWn7uO49472227 Dndc4697QecGVVYQGYp7Or+zBRw2SZshjwv1rOl7OHapRwzciwaL5sNQSzYXeTSKXB5B KC6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.27.8 with SMTP id p8mr4611654lag.69.1418941402833; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:23:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.215.212 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:23:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:23:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: CUPS printing rastertospl error - troubleshooting From: Waitman Gobble To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:23:25 -0000 I have a Samsung SCX-3405W connected to USB /dev/ulpt0 Using the PPD file from Samsung Linux driver. linux-c6 and necessary libraries installed. I'm receiving cupsd filter error, (/usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/rastertospl) stopped with status 1. Running rastertospl from command line does not seem to cause an error. log - https://gist.github.com/waitman/2d047c6e54f0081c98a9 # uname -a FreeBSD blynk.waitman.net 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r275492: Fri Dec 5 06:52:11 PST 2014 waitman@blynk.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLYNK amd64 # ls -lh /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/rastertospl -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 88K Dec 18 12:30 /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/rastertospl Any troubleshooting suggestions appreciated. Thank you, -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 01:35:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3C602FE for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE9E2ECC for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:40387] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by dnvrco-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 61/3F-12444-7E083945; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:35:36 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17CB05C9A; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:39:56 -1000 (HST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:39:55 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: Perl rename utility assistance Message-ID: <20141219013955.GA1591@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Bonomi , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <54907B51.1060807@gmail.com> <201412171838.sBHIcOht031153@host203.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201412171838.sBHIcOht031153@host203.r-bonomi.com> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.130:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Zu1jKrLG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:117 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=A92cGCtB03wA:10 a=lM4-zUH5AAAA:8 a=ZmHAvgfS8omts-_tP30A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:35:43 -0000 in message <201412171838.sBHIcOht031153@host203.r-bonomi.com>, wrote Robert Bonomi thusly... > ... > Your regex "^[:digit:]_" says: > "^" start at the beginning of the name > "[:digit:]" match one character from the following list ':digt' > "_" match an underscore > > For some strange reason, this does not cause a match where there > are leading digits, . > to match a single character in the range '0'-'9', the syntax is > '[[digit:]]' ... The proper character class to match a digit is "[[:digit:]]", similar to "[0-9]". Pattern "[:digit:]" is to match numbers in the locale set, to match any number not just those in range "0-9" (ASCII). When run with "warnings" pragma when trying to match /^[:digit:]/, the problem is shown ... perl -Mwarnings -e 'my $x = q[234y] ; print $x =~ m/^([:digit:])/ ' POSIX syntax [: :] belongs inside character classes in regex; \ marked by <-- HERE in m/^([:digit:] <-- HERE )/ at -e line 1. ... (mind that nothing is printed as nothing was matched, but not due to the warning message itself). Run the above with "diagnostics" pragma for more information .... perl -Mdiagnostics -Mwarnings -e ' ... ' On a side note ... perl -Mwarnings -e 'my $x = q[xyz] ; $x =~ s/x(y)/y\1/ ; print $x' \1 better written as $1 at -e line 1. yyz -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 02:59:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94320309 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54828E1E for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter29-d.gandi.net (mfilter29-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.160]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5D8FB882 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:59:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter29-d.gandi.net Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]) by mfilter29-d.gandi.net (mfilter29-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfWjSlWZtDxq for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:59:32 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.143 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.143]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7EABFFB86F for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:59:32 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:29:32 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 10.1 : release : freebsd-update : fetch + install : first reboot screwup! Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Message-ID: <9daa5be87734e04107524745c7d2bf8b@kathe.in> X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:59:36 -0000 hi, finally got freebsd 10.1 release to run on my machine, it was a simple matter of disabling 'uefi' and do a non-uefi install. as always, the first thing done post install was "freebsd-update fetch", followed by "freebsd-update install" and then issued a "reboot". during shutdown, the system just froze at "all buffers synced". had to issue a hard reboot which raised various issues related to disk not cleanly unmounted during previous shutdown. went ahead and re-installed the system thrice, just to confirm that this problem is repeatable, and yes, it is. any work arounds? thanks, ~mayuresh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 03:57:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 708F2B7A for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out1.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out1.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED01618DD for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:57:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0GAKmhk1Ryxl6V/2dsb2JhbABagwZSWII2sSkBAQEBAQEGkisMhXACgSIWAQEBAQF9hA0BAQMBAQI3PwULCw0UJQ8FFAREiCQHDs9UAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEZBIYAiXIHFoMAgRMFkUiDHIIVgQ6EYiWFIYYNIoQAKjEBgkIBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,604,1413216000"; d="scan'208";a="285969349" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([114.198.94.149]) by icp-osb-irony-out1.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2014 11:56:44 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4171D6FF; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:56:44 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:56:44 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: mayuresh@kathe.in Subject: Re: 10.1 : release : freebsd-update : fetch + install : first reboot screwup! Message-ID: <20141219035644.GA41438@ozzmosis.com> References: <9daa5be87734e04107524745c7d2bf8b@kathe.in> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9daa5be87734e04107524745c7d2bf8b@kathe.in> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 03:57:59 -0000 On Fri 2014-12-19 08:29:32 UTC+0530, Mayuresh Kathe (mayuresh@kathe.in) wrote: > finally got freebsd 10.1 release to run on my machine, it was a simple > matter of disabling 'uefi' and do a non-uefi install. > > as always, the first thing done post install was "freebsd-update fetch", > followed by "freebsd-update install" and then issued a "reboot". > > during shutdown, the system just froze at "all buffers synced". > had to issue a hard reboot which raised various issues related to disk > not cleanly unmounted during previous shutdown. > > went ahead and re-installed the system thrice, just to confirm that this > problem is repeatable, and yes, it is. > > any work arounds? There's a thread about this on freebsd-stable: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-December/081211.html Also an entry on Bugzilla: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195458 Regards Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 04:09:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8DFCB0 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC2A1A0B for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter41-d.gandi.net (mfilter41-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.173]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADBCA80B5 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:08:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter41-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter41-d.gandi.net (mfilter41-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10BrqtqEc9Cj for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:08:58 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.148 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.148]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8EAADA80B0 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:08:58 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:38:58 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10.1 : release : freebsd-update : fetch + install : first reboot screwup! Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in In-Reply-To: <20141219035644.GA41438@ozzmosis.com> References: <9daa5be87734e04107524745c7d2bf8b@kathe.in> <20141219035644.GA41438@ozzmosis.com> Message-ID: <35d4b4d60c4e45062d52b8cf83bd5d51@kathe.in> X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:09:02 -0000 On 2014-12-19 09:26, andrew clarke wrote: > On Fri 2014-12-19 08:29:32 UTC+0530, Mayuresh Kathe (mayuresh@kathe.in) > wrote: > >> finally got freebsd 10.1 release to run on my machine, it was a simple >> matter of disabling 'uefi' and do a non-uefi install. >> >> as always, the first thing done post install was "freebsd-update >> fetch", >> followed by "freebsd-update install" and then issued a "reboot". >> >> during shutdown, the system just froze at "all buffers synced". >> had to issue a hard reboot which raised various issues related to disk >> not cleanly unmounted during previous shutdown. >> >> went ahead and re-installed the system thrice, just to confirm that >> this >> problem is repeatable, and yes, it is. >> >> any work arounds? > > There's a thread about this on freebsd-stable: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-December/081211.html > > Also an entry on Bugzilla: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195458 thanks for this andrew, much appreciate the pointers. best regards, ~mayuresh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 04:45:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AB90FBF; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9C4209D; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id l13so99624iga.9; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:45:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OK9TU41ESR4Dvyo5cPoFAtbfQRQtvowXHRI5VUbfZPw=; b=mJdJ8fpbiPstrwrCkopLKwrurUtKqJwwKv105EGOnKtaHjhmvWEk5B6s+jhSAZ61YR UPJq04sPb0B6nkUmUX3XfgrX+fgR2Pi3us0N44yr5/zE5Gtl+wDmjmUvhl3/Wk5nrM1N ME1f3dE74OJSldSb9OH55xMiTd/msAZfgiX9NPiKvBWduNJbgKwZTeDap2eUelNTyFSV ArCxTe+79RJNb6qR2+v5SKbCf00sr+We9QeAov7n+H9kYtdbRQEn/MqRicWp4AHWdV3L mDcjOm3NTNFRDMU0dGuOKnh9tPtDpm7mDNUkCcgJlhHx9IXuxiIOzM0FPjL6IZdtK1zp Hmqw== X-Received: by 10.107.154.198 with SMTP id c189mr5657499ioe.68.1418964305532; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:45:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.175.4 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:44:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141208153925.5df90587@prometheus> From: Jia-Shiun Li Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:44:35 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? To: grarpamp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing Lists , FreeBSD Questions , "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:45:06 -0000 On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:40 PM, grarpamp wrote: > Thus to see what people were seeing perf wise. HTT good for *some* workload? Definitely yes. HTT good for yours? It depends. It is not a solution to boost everything. You really need your own evaluation methods for your own real world workload. See if this extreme case motivates you. Script started on Fri Dec 19 04:11:36 2014 root@:~ # uname -a FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r275582: Sun Dec 7 22:29:51 UTC 2014 root@grind.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@:~ # sysctl hw.model hw.model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz root@:~ # sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq dev.cpu.0.freq: 3600 root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-cbc (...) type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-256-cbc 542270.57k 570008.23k 577700.69k 579443.71k 578661.43k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-cbc -multi 4 (...) evp 2168111.69k 2283320.41k 2309259.69k 2314799.72k 2323428.69k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-cbc -multi 8 (...) evp 3720872.65k 4373485.85k 4564089.08k 4615834.28k 4621740.71k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-gcm (...) type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-256-gcm 372850.59k 941017.15k 1402284.69k 1518668.74k 1552422.23k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-gcm -multi 4 (...) evp 1492887.94k 3132772.74k 4501002.29k 4929483.52k 5101510.17k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-gcm -multi 8 (...) evp 1924978.05k 4533256.96k 6764018.70k 7538217.64k 7985778.30k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-ctr (...) type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-256-ctr 491349.11k 1550444.11k 2372213.47k 2755245.59k 2879939.33k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-ctr -multi 4 (...) evp 1871084.37k 4992105.40k 7707692.29k 10242874.37k 10744955.05k root@:~ # openssl speed -evp aes-256-ctr -multi 8 (...) evp 2678304.52k 7575305.94k 11861913.17k 12971657.56k 13356457.98k root@:~ # ^D exit Script done on Fri Dec 19 04:16:08 2014 -Jia-Shiun. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 04:49:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC5419F for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (mail-qc0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1126120DE for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id r5so200078qcx.2 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:49:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rkyzjqR4yTOaEVz4HEDfI7mMClnb4CuJcuMewLR3GIs=; b=Jc+0yJIUrHyHaPpZGmKSsczdfk/hpSV+Uo9I6tXG+u5GKixxL+7KjU3rOSeOlYMwMy mgR2OTF5ZGxLPu94s7oIYS4lkPCkMl+dOK9cHUgoKzVhlarL/kp2hm87M9Odx4QLRkkF b8dKR7F8baMB3naHl0GVEL+IPLlXpohmilY+M5IPERWWinICx3WtzJ6z2ffmG9pdbCY0 Yv4Fd1QBxSiICiOk2KanNMBRv/q0MIIfS9GLf8LsZhdQmZWPrvxtnI0vsASknlSAwikq TwtaJaFayphe3wr1f9EIjeujaKwXvehzak19GEJ3NZfipIP2UnpYzeX098i7Q38csAUs rYfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlwvkngIgZ5ovoypfuNGj5zwAbhnAe+Xy0gzVovPXOfCUDYpQ/M3bTg5EXO7Xh8Osd+RlqL MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.39.201 with SMTP id v67mr9673639qgv.45.1418963072502; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:24:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.19.17 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:24:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:24:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: pkg versions don't match From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:49:19 -0000 Hi, I am new to pkg and using a relatively recently installed 10.0-RELEASE. Today I tried installing and upgrading stuff and the pkg versions on http://pkg.freebsd.org differ from those that pkg finds. I tried pkg update, etc. but everything says up to date. nevertheless the versions in: http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/ Do not match. Look at this example: root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg search fail2ban py27-fail2ban-0.9.0_2 root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg install py27-fail2ban Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: py27-fail2ban: 0.9.0_2 python27: 2.7.8_4 python2: 2_3 py27-setuptools27: 5.5.1 py27-sqlite3: 2.7.8_5 sqlite3: 3.8.6 The process will require 68 MB more space. 10 MB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/py27-fail2ban-0.9.0_2.txz: Not Found In effect the correct version should be py27-fail2ban-0.9.1.txz How to I update the local pkg db? I updated ports collections thinking they were somehow related but nothing. I don't know what else to do. Thanks for any pointers. -- Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 07:35:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1B52EE; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B121418D3; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so800782wiv.13; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:35:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ossn9MHsboVbJB4H2Uf60yLJunEBdg6fabX+dggLGZg=; b=tuFklD2Sg5gLbl45UetGNbSETT4/5NAIfzfk6AdaLcLcUuDK4vi+w+uvGaGCLFwsMJ 970iFUwFrpnHEPsqNjp2uw99dgfYq+W7uwsawD7Ga7FXx2HGLGdHxsD2LhSzrMA0ge80 V8eNCIcDHnHwMIJjE7xJH5wMUwbt0gyYJRSC63pl7cWjfmpALBPVhXc1NXGOrRW4yUsF Pa9T5B7h4iUhd7Cyra/cuUnPgPYweZWTkyV2pm9kqyIFHUwb+UXwMTyXSS5CkO3P5aNV j42ICC2Dt0hpeoUHKPZ8OX6xIn+KIO5EZH02ctoHRwrd/2DE6egxrlCXV7+y9AM1iUbw ObCw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.92.37 with SMTP id cj5mr11731812wjb.81.1418974535090; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:35:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.106.134 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:35:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141208153925.5df90587@prometheus> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:35:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HyperThreading on Intel Xeon Haswell, a benefit? From: grarpamp To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:35:37 -0000 On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Jia-Shiun Li wrote: > You really need your own evaluation methods for your own real world workload. Of course. Yet many users here might like to compare common things: o make buildworld times o iozone if disks are not limiting factor o openssl speed as below o etc > See if this extreme case motivates you. Not much since it provides no information regarding HTT. It doesn't, at minimum: o State whether HTT was on or off. o Show the results of two runs, one with HTT on, one with HTT off. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 09:14:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6034EF80 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286522BE0 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 200so197366ykr.6 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:14:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Rnd+8FOTQROvuKEVnKlABMUkPgUTAnobla+ATbwIZHA=; b=cpRZ3kFVyp0nd3toTnoQJTJx4Kt9Cye4SYCuHs4Jh3wnVwYYx0A0WXngRHO348cy2e 3Nt9cLKCZrtPDnsT0v9GLYLNuA69hNMIl3eQEvOrUIm7bu4sCmDvZ645vhuiKZ82xbMg fMGaNpKJxTig9KALAg117oVpEUmG6XZCe/S4CPQA+Ux4JvGx8zsJ8sZ+Pg5Zoc/uaDm8 TDkpY7T4TTEHo6W2vM/9Dvg7xHY1YrhB0scSCl+jovPh9TeoVl0SOWZcZyV/PMS+mMB4 URN9XDOhUvVLo1ZDiiyT3SunUNKIb7c51/GKhD88wl3h3eucm7qbDFXediG3sLtNQC58 QeSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.222.233 with SMTP id t99mr5246463yhp.125.1418980497351; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.76.135 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:14:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:44:57 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg versions don't match From: Alberto Mijares To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:14:58 -0000 Hi Alejandro, On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to pkg and using a relatively recently installed 10.0-RELEASE. > Today I tried installing and upgrading stuff and the pkg versions on > http://pkg.freebsd.org differ from those that pkg finds. > > I tried pkg update, etc. but everything says up to date. nevertheless the > versions in: > > http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/ > > Do not match. Look at this example: > > root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg search fail2ban > py27-fail2ban-0.9.0_2 > > root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg install py27-fail2ban > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > py27-fail2ban: 0.9.0_2 > python27: 2.7.8_4 > python2: 2_3 > py27-setuptools27: 5.5.1 > py27-sqlite3: 2.7.8_5 > sqlite3: 3.8.6 > > The process will require 68 MB more space. > 10 MB to be downloaded. > > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > pkg: > http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/py27-fail2ban-0.9.0_2.txz: > Not Found > > In effect the correct version should be py27-fail2ban-0.9.1.txz Try this: # pkg -f update and then try to install fail2ban again. > > How to I update the local pkg db? I updated ports collections thinking they > were somehow related but nothing. I don't know what else to do. > > Thanks for any pointers. > Before using pkg, had you used another package manager? (pkg_add, ports). If so, you should run # pkg2ng before attempt to install anything with pkgng. Hope this helps. Best regards, Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 09:53:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57EE4BAB for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (mail-qg0-f44.google.com [209.85.192.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1677D1108 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id q107so397649qgd.17 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:53:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g02NIgY32ToPWgyfBna077YMGD/+9uFTadgMv2HkguE=; b=QyPYQ9AbI8qY1Sx36cbvOUPYNzTUbSZiZQOQ4DhbNlZ19C+YJbFUinFkrXU32S0oH3 ssWFR3ERrm4KKwSyYIcOjXNa2toMgI5Cv3TMhHkBDwDrvMroyEDoUmN031IiMK5QuIGn cYwOenS4p9kxYDewCwhzRRlJbJoWpyzBHlQxCYDvHL3bILhk+goFVzz5gZGEplrvxooj fwUzQ+TyGOooESpRuBhC68ErUdBd+LTONhKuOFXr5dJM8A/qayiwqeH54ZfKYcMt+foL pRQN4kPZME+QVmdUFHVBWhr3yIMIzqC1mJULondSNclpgatP8HD9EHk5lSgA7UURFxnv bjiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJWONHbddrFKRBUf1B/7+wvqKXlb1k335ZbM5WwO72di/h6wsnthzGA018pJEKtMP+fb+Q MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.50.75 with SMTP id y11mr11948148qaf.89.1418982802762; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:53:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.19.17 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 01:53:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:53:22 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg versions don't match From: Alejandro Imass To: Alberto Mijares Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:53:29 -0000 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Alberto Mijares wrote: [...] > Try this: > > # pkg -f update > > and then try to install fail2ban again. > > > Alberto, thanks for the tip but -f says illegal option looked in man and it does not exist. This is a fresh 10.0-RELEASE install so it came with pkg preinstalled and no need for pkg2ng AFAICR. Anyway it was working just fine but it seems the versions in remote do not match the versions in my local pkgng database, even though it says is all up to date! root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg install py27-fail2ban Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: py27-fail2ban: 0.9.0_2 python27: 2.7.8_4 python2: 2_3 py27-setuptools27: 5.5.1 py27-sqlite3: 2.7.8_5 sqlite3: 3.8.6 The process will require 68 MB more space. 10 MB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/py27-fail2ban-0.9.0_2.txz: Not Found Best, -- Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 10:41:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DAD44D7 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x233.google.com (mail-yh0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE27E1A33 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a41so251549yho.10 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:41:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qAka9SpllcO9QZo+SrMbE4ZXhpyE0Eo/t/Ky5Nr/QT4=; b=EnBDf3xFQY26dWRontBDlQ4iX7xwBOMIkfxvzg1uKs2RemKNmZjSd76HtpN2fuuNnB dvC7puj7l8Bc/Ol5fIQN6lJBvAKg8A3yY5nrdyqavLeM49iExk48GZHEUSQUGOmkeZvt BHeFENrUpIQGxwHJ9Vebm6m8JUddfinXlS+paZkXQkFNB7s8HS6X4JCCwdWrjunJZcmF XOdwmcQdgFGAZ/hbtwO4befJdCXoo8nfWAegjse9mTPTyHuEzYHblRXqDQo03aY0mByT Pu+CFBteufMOXbXjV1uhoZws3gHUU6lZNS2iUYEgOEyXXIH/gklHWH5bYntMEDQKPuEu UfeQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.189.71 with SMTP id g68mr6331374yke.23.1418985670882; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:41:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.76.135 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:41:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:11:10 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg versions don't match From: Alberto Mijares To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:41:12 -0000 > > Alberto, thanks for the tip but -f says illegal option looked in man and it > does not exist. This is a fresh 10.0-RELEASE install so it came with pkg > preinstalled and no need for pkg2ng AFAICR. Anyway it was working just fine > but it seems the versions in remote do not match the versions in my local > pkgng database, even though it says is all up to date! > Sorry, it should be # pkg update -f The -f option ain't a pkg option but an "update" command option. Perhaps you should try # pkg upgrade pkg Regards, Alberto Mijares From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 10:44:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6509589 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd.crowsnest.tk (crowsnest.tk [188.116.52.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "nest", Issuer "nest" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE431AF6 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd.crowsnest.tk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd.crowsnest.tk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBJAJZss067806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:19:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from crow@localhost.crowsnest.tk) Received: (from crow@localhost) by freebsd.crowsnest.tk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sBJAJYZf067805; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:19:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from crow) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:19:34 +0100 From: Carrion Crow To: Alejandro Imass Subject: Re: pkg versions don't match Message-ID: <20141219101934.GA42903@freebsd.crowsnest.tk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:44:08 -0000 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:53:22AM -0500, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Alberto Mijares > wrote: > > [...] > > > > Try this: > > > > # pkg -f update > > > > and then try to install fail2ban again. > > > > > > > Alberto, thanks for the tip but -f says illegal option looked in man and it > does not exist. This is a fresh 10.0-RELEASE install so it came with pkg > preinstalled and no need for pkg2ng AFAICR. Anyway it was working just fine > but it seems the versions in remote do not match the versions in my local > pkgng database, even though it says is all up to date! > > root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg update > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg install py27-fail2ban > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > py27-fail2ban: 0.9.0_2 > python27: 2.7.8_4 > python2: 2_3 > py27-setuptools27: 5.5.1 > py27-sqlite3: 2.7.8_5 > sqlite3: 3.8.6 > > The process will require 68 MB more space. > 10 MB to be downloaded. > > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > pkg: > http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/py27-fail2ban-0.9.0_2.txz: > Not Found It should be: pkg update -f "-f" flag is for "update" option, not for pkg. -- Carrion Crow ----------------- "UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity." -- Dennis Ritchie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 12:40:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83D276F7 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C64B2F12 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-58.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id sBJCegah001786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:40:43 -0600 Message-ID: <54941E41.3040807@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:46:57 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: pkg versions don't match References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:40:50 -0000 On 12/19/14 03:53, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Alberto Mijares > wrote: > > [...] > > >> Try this: >> >> # pkg -f update >> >> and then try to install fail2ban again. >> >> >> > Alberto, thanks for the tip but -f says illegal option looked in man and it > does not exist. This is a fresh 10.0-RELEASE install so it came with pkg > preinstalled and no need for pkg2ng AFAICR. Anyway it was working just fine > but it seems the versions in remote do not match the versions in my local > pkgng database, even though it says is all up to date! > > root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg update > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > root@poseidon:/etc/pkg # pkg install py27-fail2ban > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 6 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > py27-fail2ban: 0.9.0_2 > python27: 2.7.8_4 > python2: 2_3 > py27-setuptools27: 5.5.1 > py27-sqlite3: 2.7.8_5 > sqlite3: 3.8.6 > > The process will require 68 MB more space. > 10 MB to be downloaded. > > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > pkg: > http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/py27-fail2ban-0.9.0_2.txz: > Not Found > > Best, > make that 'pkg update -f' instead .... most options are specific to the command & occur after it .... $0.02 .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 14:37:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF39560; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x22a.google.com (mail-yh0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDBB42287; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f42.google.com with SMTP id v1so432651yhn.1; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:37:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WqnMfeocu0NGNpvsjE0W1siogqo/tiVIL8fLNsIiQUk=; b=POzrnnm5fEDxK3zgnyHmIkYE9wTXiKcQTRMJlP9eYDKNdMgfoC4fzEPlyqNWL8e8Va pnkfQyiXsHwVbttmBnf6kUUmRA+j4HhgA1w0BOSZbqV002vBsXNtIOrkQcx0XY8yn91S fGfTcAdPeNyqJkdmQ1iqe1qz1PosVOQr4rDc4vPA5CNH7Ybz7DIfzIsWKk1CaXrcePA3 v7iDgQocGOsswJalNpOajH2RlnV0/DkGPWznsJ7UX29xCU/QvlD+t8OvJ19uDbVbnE5O NCIJVhWHQi6N6TGrdD4/lmJZalrvTyRd/4f6CRxLe64b5iupNC2rjLREVZ3iAUKNMlEE VeLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.134.72 with SMTP id a69mr7460827ykc.103.1418999843938; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:37:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.188.144 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:37:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5492E7AE.9010901@sentex.net> References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <54920DC0.8030200@FreeBSD.org> <5492E7AE.9010901@sentex.net> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:37:23 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes From: krad To: Mike Tancsa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions , Andriy Gapon , "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:37:25 -0000 If you do every rebuild the pool for whatever reason, make sure yor create it with ashift=12. We so many drives its an inevitability at some point you will be forced down the 4k drive path, so its best to prepare for it as soon as you can, and save some head aches in the future On 18 December 2014 at 14:41, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/17/2014 6:12 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> >>> yet, zfs is still complaining >>> >> >> Does zpool clear help in this situation? >> >> > > Looks like a reboot was needed to fix the issue. > > # zpool status > pool: tank1 > state: ONLINE > scan: resilvered 898G in 8h4m with 0 errors on Wed Dec 17 15:01:18 2014 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > tank1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada12 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada10 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada6 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada14 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada11 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada8 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada9 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada13 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada4 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada5 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada7 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > > > > -- > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 17:53:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA9FE9 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C63326D6 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id rp18so1159604iec.10 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:53:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=q6imL7CjSLTaltZKjvLZpmq8pO35NV9AYfVJVL6DUn0=; b=cmhidMQTyOsGL40TFrBobLb6Ukiz5DWkk+c55N9z0HHzwVleCzQ+UN91fBQJRnB20R PP6BzEVxq9hKHY+V9FC8yJUt/3540hUL4QAm+8/OMA+5WGYkjR+uQTeooL32IuN26a+q wEtM/30LfnR5JDEbGNg9aaaCQQGL0UyLasDE4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=q6imL7CjSLTaltZKjvLZpmq8pO35NV9AYfVJVL6DUn0=; b=h4EBmc0uGwRPr8/vnacj+zH/5ocdBUALHReJ6O/gU4zscgwlKjDjccKVZma7+6UUmp DMX28+nawSfTQik11L2TelZfq2aandYAlsAlV6DMSvjOSXKYWGJkGBS0XwebOwP6J+4D JStsFFVefn1bakSw7DyszjgbRrr/KB04xJeIwVj8rOAHqZi+u+mMJbXftD7nZ9JU0r4k wgCs9WQS+aEVEc2yBsvVmyBv1GHnsN9yCWWsw1eOUNNyiyCETeXQhKqDcr+hoiSk6mzX Wfw2/NFQIp/5HNnI7KdOpJbc69AuYDqT5s+3uSEl028syeq+A5IN51/BVauKLJlRugCW uktQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmYEdBOuU7IyfcV42jvnx+aAvuSj+56Eu1WfRChAp/B+sPIJbQ2kGDNdCHoYcEnP3grneMa MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.25.166 with SMTP id d6mr4268405igg.41.1419011632733; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.156.75 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:53:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:53:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: mfiutil / foreign drives From: Tim Gustafson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:53:53 -0000 I have a server with a 16-disk RAID controller. I have all the disks configured as RAID0 devices and then they are used to form a ZFS pool. One of my disks failed recently, and I swapped it out with a replacement. After that, mfiutil is showing the following: root@server: mfiutil -u 1 show drives mfi1 Physical Drives: 17 ( 0.0) ONLINE SATA E1:S0 18 ( 0.0) ONLINE SATA E1:S1 19 ( 0.0) UNCONFIGURED GOOD (FOREIGN) SATA E1:S4 21 ( 0.0) ONLINE SATA E1:S2 22 ( 0.0) ONLINE SATA E1:S3 23 ( 0.0) ONLINE SATA E1:S6 24 ( 0.0) ONLINE SATA E1:S7 When I try to do anything with the "foreign" drive, mfiutil reports: root@server: mfiutil -u 1 create raid0 E1:S4 mfiutil: Drive 19 is foreign I've tried to clear the foreign drive like this: root@server: mfiutil -u 1 foreign clear Are you sure you wish to clear ALL foreign configurations on mfi1? [y/N] y mfiutil: Command failed: Invalid parameter mfiutil: Failed to clear foreign configuration: Input/output error I even zero'd out the disk, like this: root@server: mfiutil -u 1 drive clear e1:s4 start That ran for several hours, but did not fix the "foreign" state of the drive. I even took the drive back out of the server, ran "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/whatever bs=1M count=1024" to overwrite the disk's partition table (and then some), and even that did not help. I installed the MegaCli port and was equally unsuccessful in fixing the problems. I've replaced drives in this server a dozen times over the years, and when it was a FreeBSD 9 box, it never once complained about foreign disks, despite the fact that this server has received a lot of hand-me-down disks over the years. This is the first disk I've had to replace since moving to FreeBSD 10, so I'm thinking that something changes between 9 and 10 to create this problem. Has anyone got any clues they can give me about how to get this disk configured to be a RAID-0 volume so that I can put it into the zpool? -- Tim Gustafson tjg@ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 18:45:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C06BD9 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CF21020 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBJIjY9k017672; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:45:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <54947245.4000403@sentex.net> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:45:25 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Gustafson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mfiutil / foreign drives References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:45:36 -0000 On 12/19/2014 12:53 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Has anyone got any clues they can give me about how to get this disk > configured to be a RAID-0 volume so that I can put it into the zpool? > Havent run into that one. Do you have a spare mfi card you can pop the drive into ? Perhaps make it a part of a raid1 config (raid1 from the controller) with another scratch disk, then, through the BIOS clear the config so the drives are unused/fresh ? ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 18:59:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D2088D for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9EB511F5 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moby.local ([109.193.238.174]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LtIZH-1XwJSj45b1-012mTB for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:59:23 +0100 Message-ID: <54947594.2060202@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:59:32 +0100 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: zvol vs plain file for VMs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:I9J7vtJaynQsgoaPe4DDYGxBS9ZUwnrTD9fIdQatf54ekre7r3m ybOfsdnIaktt7AEVOLRRHxkce08geWGR9bdjisd0Eqh1tQ+ehbt4Moy62uwzDi8rA15erw6 4eLW8zwsU2C5AEAZUmgame8fXxv6x5tR+X1r9jtilseDzLrhGEvJ2G2o02vE2ux3rDWA1KW w+W+p6Zcx/hs+EwfXK9ow== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:59:31 -0000 Hi, I have to convert a mail server to a VM and I don't know what kind of storage to use, a plain file or a zvol? Are there any pros in using ZVOLs instead of plain files? Thanks, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 23:25:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7889ECD0 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472502941 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id at20so1641647iec.33 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:25:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xNgZ7brD9Px6D/tX6D0XMa0bu4qw99GsX2rqInND6xs=; b=lY2ItlD4B1VpKyCgbQrEIxNCKIJK8+giXqlvTjZyy4qlK4Sxj2YF4Jwb+b3bY0OYWP YJSmiZHuvRMk4nZSBbVXoico2s0+jCiPWItgUXOFSOdaA1gLgi6ZzAxHRtvnyZdeL43y F4u2iH4/v6r+wOCE9AolUym2doPRpg4u3SBKc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xNgZ7brD9Px6D/tX6D0XMa0bu4qw99GsX2rqInND6xs=; b=f5CFtodktdan9GaXTXw95i8m+RZI/j8S2mQqQ/vjh+p1II2LlBB7u+qmViTl+oQcYb q0wHDwkmrPxCnDyiv9Nnlbj7EM1c7dt90FzYHmv9Xw01uHRCdA5QgU6F5Tr6MKBnYWrl eK1/HluDJ9Mtm1w2sq155LiWSEiPf6cs2pceOqfZyMoCYcVVjnpNWolrWwXeFZi2s2qQ UQ7jKXVi11rN+mFuhuajR+o71jSelEwI8Yjhr3pdBphsiVQvkSoV3qCUULoU7unA3/g9 S+qs9SuLP5QUbIp+1T2i1PbJy2fqF8EDhcghuTZ1tKal9BZ/JsG8V9VObkmHtWl95xNe 0E4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlm74Tv9QF9MFTA3NgjjUUKfY5hwmyJgye5nfGgJ3niMelEB4PfAhuGSDDWsBlKwyDB75Cq MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.17.169 with SMTP id 41mr9938167ior.90.1419031509552; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:25:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.156.75 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:25:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141219201729.GA50750@neutralgood.org> References: <20141219201729.GA50750@neutralgood.org> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:25:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mfiutil / foreign drives From: Tim Gustafson To: kpneal@pobox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:25:10 -0000 > Havent run into that one. Do you have a spare mfi card you can > pop the drive into ? Perhaps make it a part of a raid1 config (raid1 > from the controller) with another scratch disk, then, through the > BIOS clear the config so the drives are unused/fresh ? We do not have any spare cards, unfortunately. This is kind ancient hardware that was donated to us, so we don't have any spare parts. > Can you do it through the card's firmware during the boot process? That's a possibility; we'll try that on Monday. For now, I'm doing a "zfs send" of the pool data to another healthy server just in case this one dies completely. -- Tim Gustafson tjg@ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 05:41:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from chateau.d.if (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8824C5F4; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chateau.d.if (chateau.d.if [IPv6:::1]); by chateau.d.if (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6d594e31; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:11:17 +0530 (IST) From: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) To: Nikos Vassiliadis Subject: Re: zvol vs plain file for VMs Organization: The FreeBSD Project References: <54947594.2060202@gmx.com> X-Face: )vGQ9yK7Y$Flebu1C>(B\gYBm)[$zfKM+p&TT[[JWl6:]S>cc$%-z7-`46Zf0B*syL.C]oCq[upTG~zuS0.$"_%)|Q@$hA=9{3l{%u^h3jJ^Zl; t7 X-Uptime: 11:09AM up 12:56, 11 users, load averages: 0.16, 0.20, 0.22 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE/amd64 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Hashcash: 1:20:141220:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org::dllmXG0vvOoovvCP:000000000000000000000000000000000d8I X-Hashcash: 1:20:141220:nvass@gmx.com::p5cEIMyXmPPAjXj2:00001XEY Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:11:12 +0530 In-Reply-To: <54947594.2060202@gmx.com> (Nikos Vassiliadis's message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:59:32 +0100") Message-ID: <86mw6ilvyf.fsf@chateau.d.if> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJ1BMVEWpqal/f39tbW1jY2Md HR2goKCenp6UlJROTk7////9/f35+fnT09ORJdieAAACVklEQVQ4jXXUP2vbQBQA8AvUTkgz5OzY Z0iGWhpS6BSrkECn0mvx0MEJ6AjtYrfoBCVDlD8naJYmNlRfwZq8+mkKlIZaGpJSYmP7Q/XkJDrJ Td8i/H68u3vHPaPufwLdf32AMA4A6GcAgvAamY1pOJiDIFqicTwLswDhfr3uxfFtkAY/GFHPMwzD 8zpnACmIOnE6js7rQb+v4NJrG9od0C+QgpHMy5jBewV+UDSMWiw1Y4fWfyV7+NGFzDsYa3pth9LJ Q4XvXxFHcJRvHOmygn5NAEabnDcQQguarnfoiwSCJ99jmKKcphsZONmWsDK9Ro7cvZOCtQdg8nje egLhc2LNlkLmsezzTFUUy5w18ocox/f0LaLgJy0zO75zk+9pp85GAj36xjqhdI0y3tq2m4dqqcWX zQWBTz8L1irvolXV4J+3q7eCDgVnttjNq6X8H+9KOZsuNk1uCzx8pSp+E9HImfJOTLdcGqo+YKnG EIovizkEn48V7BO+ch2DXcD4ENSpWiU+q8hjjbgTBZCXnZtyj0Ws4Q1Q0B2WXFtYZo65Bbyeeldw RS6qFueM80LlLA29YlVwGRYvFD+kwI/0O+A2PlpOP9GwslUVciHuYGechuBTp922YiDZCrghTknm XSyOM+D3aoRZlo0Jb42zY7DN4p2x4AeZ+QAYutx1sHwTHzMT5cMNduQ9yW3GczN4KZ86kb0c9O8T yXDeFqpl2fryPEAYGXIlezAPXYh2NgVr/gvdoHIuDwuPwOhcWE8f8mmICq41eATkn8x0kuRTIKcB wE9+/QUtiiAnYcaN7wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:41:19 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:59:32 +0100, Nikos Vassiliadis said: | Hi, | I have to convert a mail server to a VM and I don't know what kind of | storage to use, a plain file or a zvol? | Are there any pros in using ZVOLs instead of plain files? | Thanks, Nikos I don't use FreeBSD for VMs, but theoretically plain file will have filesys= tem overhead which ZVOL won't. HTH =2D-=20 Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 Sent from my Emacs --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUlQv5AAoJEMdGz6nnT6SwRTAQALCCP0baxWlG87IFCoQwd6Ch lrRPRUXN/o4ArKHEbZ/FZ31TpOFFWs7ETZmsX3Q1nbhn06AgIoFdY5ipCApousWz GSoZvMQanNoZYw16UtXxYLisuuS3XH7dS9dYjdhMmEq3jL1ozLo/ni6jGsyCT5zK R14UAFoIhWKmfOw6DElIxy22cw81u64fXlkAR4mzVXMQwiOLkGqCN4BTVaxRAxE7 cfR8WCJAYzCbk/z9+TvZG2qnAQ27B46rG3BqSVLXx7jOyEH7QeS5zmdLN/ppVv3p VW1dNhndZeOVmGJ8BwiONpuk62hlLZSTyYljHrhZGaQkaQMcMezkELiEToB+TJb3 ZmVMQB4v0bCoBA9WYmX2yPuWr+X2ZzPZjKGPuzATHtWsJFWm1RVViIKRWYVIJ+rd TvJByDhhB0t19UAwTwCWhqZKFW4crHorElEARA2XfLcmDP9TbGFnFZI76g1KtkHX LaOckAz6ftgY2qyESRBeWdGu6i6PT4z1QHAKGXGK0GaQkNLW0bL9mEd/S7IRxIsl 7bA7Xi0gcJx8WLE07gyNYKNfMM1CGsKNKY9W3rHMVYQuJpz1Lh6XYKOXOB66Uvps d5aP50GSD/fU9zn00v0nRS/vO7RtXf6eqU/Df6aOB6k/E/BjvJzenUEdiCfqRGHf fYmZTiIdD8OgI1T6GWcZ =djp3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 15:34:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FEA2B64 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7E8186A for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:34:53 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from elsewhere.localdomain ([144.172.193.139]) by VL-VM-MR005.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0NGW00HDA0LZOSB0@VL-VM-MR005.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:34:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.7.61] (unknown [192.168.7.61]) by elsewhere.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F44210FDD3A for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:34:47 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Kiakas Subject: Not sure what this means on 10.1 freebsd-update to 10.1-RELASE-p2 Message-id: <6C652C5B-6B22-42F2-AEB5-0734E4A4D204@lrckinfo.com> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:34:46 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:34:54 -0000 Latest FreeBSD update root@ns2:~ # freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be removed as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p2: / root@ns2:~ # freebsd-update install Installing updates...rmdir: ///: Is a directory done. root@ns2:~ # Not sure if the update was successful or not. It looks like it was. Can someone confirm. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 19:04:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4001A252 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "miucha.iecc.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B7C223A for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97282 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2014 19:04:28 -0000 Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 20 Dec 2014 19:04:28 -0000 Date: 20 Dec 2014 19:04:11 -0000 Message-ID: <20141220190411.17338.qmail@ary.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not sure what this means on 10.1 freebsd-update to 10.1-RELASE-p2 In-Reply-To: <6C652C5B-6B22-42F2-AEB5-0734E4A4D204@lrckinfo.com> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Cc: reporter@lrckinfo.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:04:35 -0000 >root@ns2:~ # freebsd-update install >Installing updates...rmdir: ///: Is a directory > done. >root@ns2:~ # Known bug. Looks scary but since your root directory was not empty, it didn't do anything. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 19:58:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A44E8B4 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com (mail-qg0-f49.google.com [209.85.192.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 187EB2E97 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a108so1997467qge.36 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:57:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zzL4J0qNqGrzPBqUdXFkasSNZpOW5RWOCtj3f44itQo=; b=OwDDjQD+QuLjEIt9kATc6tqeYhwJ/iTuf1uKrRUfWYOfqWuMMqzzLW0OpxVUcnGpDX c7ASS+lmrQgSf9VT2pNWmDneWhK2KH5OppV4yXWV6S75K/aYlmMW3V54zcdXTl2o9I+h PTNl5qobJRIUxAEI5mjNV6IFPHK95otU2cZOxbPIwB1hWPsSXAN+iJqriDJqUTMAwN2o ffTd+gVyjJOnfvkKph5hIQV6JE7ZClQV45F3CdRRBSJsQamLZp79g4du/fAn2JJE+SP1 clhggEGawOvPcxA1DPRoAJgZ7QhNIh9p3GubgLGoaKk+QGTEoyuZHmD50dzV9xbvBDSO q0+w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4FoK+e8pomSpYkdSeP6UKK7pBcVnXE8LlPVsff8VR9uT8u0ZUFYTRCO56/M0kkbvF1gfU MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.122.131 with SMTP id l3mr25306252qar.10.1419105473701; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.19.17 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:57:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54941E41.3040807@hiwaay.net> References: <54941E41.3040807@hiwaay.net> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:57:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg versions don't match From: Alejandro Imass To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:58:00 -0000 On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:46 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 12/19/14 03:53, Alejandro Imass wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Alberto Mijares >> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> Try this: >>> >>> # pkg -f update >>> >>> and then try to install fail2ban again. >>> >>> >>> >>> [...] > > make that 'pkg update -f' instead .... most options are specific to the > command & occur after it .... $0.02 .... > > -- > > Thanks guys pkg update -f worked and fixed the problem. The handbook documentation pkg definitively needs work or there is some other pkg hidden manual besides the man page and the handbook? Thanks again, -- Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 20:20:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A715C254 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 20:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728611192 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 20:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r10so3344807pdi.9 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 12:20:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qDcW8PhC2+dQeUOlMGUtDdAhe/EWnf4mCCxfxGfR2pk=; b=RM/7rRQPjAR40yhAcsoL21oKs4H6UfLn8ypMb/vT10WsLQvpxZJ3myPN98ukscgm39 uJ4Z689P+jt2olnA8OJnuDECDFDMX5UiPnrsAbuoHFMDhWBlkxo6NM+1U3J4Di21YGaj nR6cOqzIpvO4+knaw5Q7rs0JZZJvhplg3qo+UKdQaJKbEd8m4ruaxoXff2i5geqHOvAM K00MTG1SoiW10Xdm4fQL5TIhYgF9AWPt/D2yhrJa2DniwaSTPo6Eof4XMoZdcP30hQnM kQ5y5aGM4NcG4DhZv8xTxuU6cEAs7GSHaSqsPYSfxaY3BUc+3OnQ5BS1Ubp7tK/01maI g0CQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.90.209 with SMTP id by17mr23041621pdb.162.1419106812988; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 12:20:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.94.167 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 12:20:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54941E41.3040807@hiwaay.net> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:20:12 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg versions don't match From: Adam Vande More To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 20:20:13 -0000 On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > > > make that 'pkg update -f' instead .... most options are specific to the > > command & occur after it .... $0.02 .... > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks guys pkg update -f worked and fixed the problem. The handbook > documentation pkg definitively needs work or there is some other pkg hidden > manual besides the man page and the handbook? I don't know of any hidden ones, but the standard pkg manual has the customary 'see also' section for more in-depth information. -- Adam