From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  8 05:27:17 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE08D293
 for <freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Sep 2014 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B55671527
 for <freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Sep 2014 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s885RHvx083837
 for <freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 05:27:17 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 186841] rc.conf ifconfig syntax for binding ip-ranges broken
 [regression]
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:27:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: conf
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: hrs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-186841-4805-qtHyJfGqC0@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-186841-4805@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-186841-4805@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
 <freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:27:17 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186841

--- Comment #4 from Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> ---
Sorry, I had missed this PR.  I am thinking that making _IPEXPANDMAX be
user-configurable in rc.conf is better than removing it completely because the
number of resulting addresses can be too large.  Do you have any specific
reason that we should remove this restriction at all?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.