From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 00:00:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E096B2A0 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 00:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from luigi.brtsvcs.net (luigi.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:1f00::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF48AE0D for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 00:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:400:e60:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) by luigi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39E592D4FBF for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 00:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 983741AE for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 16:00:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <545EAE7E.60009@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:59:58 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Request for r261231 backport to 10.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 00:00:06 -0000 10.0 i386 introduced a bug in cron that results in it running jobs at the wrong time[1]. r261231[2] MFC'd the fix to 10-stable, but after 10.0-R. 10.1 is due in a few days, but it will be at least a month before move to 10.1 because I wait a bit for problems that tend to crop up only after release. Building cron from stable/10 r261231 and copying it over /usr/sbin/cron on my 10.0 systems fixes the issue, but that's an evil hack. Can we get this backported to 10.0 as an errata fix? 1: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194236 2: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=261231 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 03:04:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052F8585 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 03:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF25978F for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 03:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wp4so4341155obc.3 for ; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:04:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=phC5t+QZElhLV4A31poDJQi03aM38n0W8m31Kip69j4=; b=0x4aS8KlDvBPIM9yPkQOYlvSfgbSeK5gUSCCoJnjCRnpb4xDuDj13nbA0xpJgJBH0T qw4+Dya+mfkYy5ZVchH/zSz4SnFcKfm0uysGskFj+exUes+iGKr0bliIMBT/ZWqry+F3 BJr58REZFiaJdVrxRulvv9rnqNLSsCJANk3r2SNoRiydIf4gAzKmQOKMU4Vg2Fbdz6B0 UyNB4mVLj4UD9KaSuSMMNDUh030i57Y9eIg21ZpnvJoOSoN8jQA2gcPCN47L/g6ZHk/p dFGE9QCUjFfUxle+pZgy1ZBSurmxHfxLuBmQwApXGg+8+eTGdWomEeSWYjBxGqVIMEfp yUKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.89.161 with SMTP id bp1mr18848486obb.19.1415502244057; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:04:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.171.73 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:04:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.171.73 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:04:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 19:04:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Svn West down? From: jungle Boogie To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 03:04:05 -0000 Hello All, I'm trying to update my ten stable machine but I receive a message that the west location is unreachable. Svn0.us-west.freebsd.ord Is anyone else experiencing the some issue? Is this a planned outage? Thanks, J From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 03:27:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F96E934 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 03:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF9C89F2 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 03:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BY1PR0301MB0837.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 03:27:39 +0000 Message-ID: <545EDF25.5080705@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 21:27:33 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Svn West down? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BL2PR08CA0033.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.255.170.151) To BY1PR0301MB0837.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.143) X-MS-Exchange-Transport-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0837; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0837; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0390DB4BDA X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6049001)(6009001)(51704005)(24454002)(53754006)(189002)(199003)(59896002)(47776003)(20776003)(97736003)(110136001)(89122001)(31966008)(87976001)(23676002)(19580395003)(64706001)(66066001)(65806001)(65956001)(80316001)(54356999)(76176999)(21056001)(50986999)(65816999)(46102003)(77156002)(77096003)(62966003)(450100001)(75432002)(92726001)(120916001)(92566001)(122386002)(64126003)(40100003)(99396003)(50466002)(88552001)(107886001)(2351001)(95666004)(107046002)(102836001)(4396001)(86362001)(106356001)(42186005)(101416001)(105586002)(33656002)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0837; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0837; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 03:27:50 -0000 On 2014.11.08 21:04, jungle Boogie wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm trying to update my ten stable machine but I receive a message that the > west location is unreachable. > > Svn0.us-west.freebsd.ord > > Is anyone else experiencing the some issue? Is this a planned outage? I experienced the same thing a while ago and switched to us-east, but I assumed the outage was temporary... From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 03:52:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0943ABCD for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 03:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (wollman-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:ccb::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6992C35 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 03:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA93psEh077328; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:51:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.9/8.14.4/Submit) id sA93prxr077327; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:51:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:51:53 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <201411090351.sA93prxr077327@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu Subject: Re: Svn West down? References: <545EDF25.5080705@my.hennepintech.edu> Organization: none X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:51:56 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on hergotha.csail.mit.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 03:52:00 -0000 In article <545EDF25.5080705@my.hennepintech.edu>, aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu writes: >On 2014.11.08 21:04, jungle Boogie wrote: >> I'm trying to update my ten stable machine but I receive a message that the >> west location is unreachable. >> >> Svn0.us-west.freebsd.ord >> >> Is anyone else experiencing the some issue? Is this a planned outage? >I experienced the same thing a while ago and switched to us-east, but I assumed >the outage was temporary... All FreeBSD Project systems (there are a few hundred, counting jails) are updated once a month (most run -current or -stable). This month's updates were delayed a week because the cluster admins were at the MeetBSD event when they would otherwise have been overseeing the upgrade. (In my day, we had just ONE server, and we were thankful for it! You kids get off my lawn!) -GAWollman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 04:00:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12968D03 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 04:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.wemm.org (smtp2.wemm.org [192.203.228.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp2.wemm.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E634BCE8 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 04:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by smtp2.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFE3326; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:00:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wemm.org; s=m20140428; t=1415505636; bh=cKBcY+CNMA1YXyfWPtVhMxiHzInHiFprhFIZC905fsw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=X5Y8v5JmTppU/12GlGoCUDyuilxocsbX6EFZQ/dOmDIITDAeTDofIZ9x2s67Cf2DB GXgdXA4XYAKt4NzLQjBZDo5REbQHe0UVbC+aYNGNM/azthvZdT7ABhqTquCGUA5A0A avlhsOZw234Jb4zTi6kYEenr3SDDvSh6mZeQgDfg= From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Svn West down? Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:00:30 -0800 Message-ID: <1438135.Ko1o8OiEoo@overcee.wemm.org> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (FreeBSD/11.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.14.2; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201411090351.sA93prxr077327@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <545EDF25.5080705@my.hennepintech.edu> <201411090351.sA93prxr077327@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1689665.UTavMlOh4l"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu, Garrett Wollman X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 04:00:44 -0000 --nextPart1689665.UTavMlOh4l Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Saturday, November 08, 2014 10:51:53 PM Garrett Wollman wrote: > In article <545EDF25.5080705@my.hennepintech.edu>, >=20 > aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu writes: > >On 2014.11.08 21:04, jungle Boogie wrote: > >> I'm trying to update my ten stable machine but I receive a message= that > >> the > >> west location is unreachable. > >>=20 > >> Svn0.us-west.freebsd.ord > >>=20 > >> Is anyone else experiencing the some issue? Is this a planned outa= ge? > > > >I experienced the same thing a while ago and switched to us-east, bu= t I > >assumed the outage was temporary... >=20 > All FreeBSD Project systems (there are a few hundred, counting jails)= > are updated once a month (most run -current or -stable). This month'= s > updates were delayed a week because the cluster admins were at the > MeetBSD event when they would otherwise have been overseeing the > upgrade. It should have been just moments, however, things went horribly, horrib= ly=20 wrong. Highlights: Nov 9 02:24:40 bit-master kernel: pid 30460 (bsdtar), uid 0 inumber 86= 5562 on=20 /: filesystem full Nov 9 02:24:41 bit-master login: in openpam_load_module(): no pam_opie= .so=20 found Nov 9 02:24:41 bit-master login: pam_start(): system error ... Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf=20 can't find 'kernel' ... Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: Shared object "libedit.so.7" not found, required by "sh" Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: /rescue/sh #=20 # chflags -R noschg /lib /usr/lib Shared object "libc.so.7" not found, required by "chflags" etc. It's been one of those days. Tip: if you are using svn:// or http:// for mirrors rather than https:/= /, you=20 can use "svn://svnmir.freebsd.org" or "http://svnmir.freebsd.org" which= are=20 geo-dns routed and fail over in about 90 seconds if one server goes dow= n. (https:// won't work reliably because they have different ssl certs on = the=20 backends. We'll fix that, but not today.) =2D-=20 Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; KI= 6FJV UTF-8: for when a ' or ... just won\342\200\231t do\342\200\246 --nextPart1689665.UTavMlOh4l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJUXubjAAoJEDXWlwnsgJ4EoFIIAKPa1kGmzFs60G+q5Ogn8EQh Lf6hzRr0hTiuqlu18EnAk/eUQoovUp/wPu4ZLYgH1ecekyP6+mM8Wj2RnIUtsBIR 6A+trVFDzJkgUBVxVP50YxwpyfpQ3xhVvH6Zj9Cazs7dSvGk2YbNa1Ni1YWV6U03 41vdABNmBJ5AfGffzOLSQFno7+798ySJ2EB+UPgWFcpbc2eSCR8E6kMCzfJlQJJt P+xDdHJZqfI4fAMCA8be6HLqG5I7js5PZ6fVp9KUfnNz+eHxKSKKtTRLDCaxBZ7B zxjCfWnwJ+nVkmpL94QWDqtnlZKiwFQ3MBQB7PU/hluBQ7rVCVYGwmzdu7CZbpc= =AC5c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1689665.UTavMlOh4l-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 06:11:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B8B3A5C for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 06:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC4CA91D for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 06:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id s18so6250684lam.14 for ; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:10:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=4y3Wx90rmBtDF0qbvrBBALDGOnbPN0J0tyzNqChvQGQ=; b=aqxGIl3Mf0vzmpCYabLj0v08Q5MWfj9b223FW/baWNHN00NTEFiMB4vh5wtz4lXbKP gblxMFUQa8bXBPCmGWfoEN8RpkNE+BCWCX0u/hCH3J1rwOqPL4Wa9XoetHmWDN77x/4j dhe32Qs08KBD1i8yo/u+1WTE56h/AKjwl2IVNUODmIY6OyitMZ9GJ9DN0ZmpncPmj7pf gTAZvKVe8PFZv4yyQYId/vMik9Mlah0KXJtVLvDr3KOWOmH1hZojyTcO+xhHUdcgaAV3 Blg/QUSB7q7cqBH15g0yvihBlM4+D+yjWZmArpnw2MgAhn577cwVFwikc9oCaJvTJiEf QUzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk5RJWNM6ZVEADj0niktiOKYWH0BIGxFoM7i7Ppo1JydiiKYxesIbdidi0o5H+N1g81uRBe X-Received: by 10.112.56.134 with SMTP id a6mr21700008lbq.25.1415513131638; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:05:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from zealot.ksu.ru (zealot.hitv.ru. [83.151.8.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ba19sm4366964lab.31.2014.11.08.22.05.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Nov 2014 22:05:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <545F0426.6080505@li.ru> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 09:05:26 +0300 From: "Marat N.Afanasyev" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 SeaMonkey/2.28 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: Update to xf86-video-ati 7.5.0 References: <544E0FC8.8090605@FreeBSD.org> <5459B8E8.2000805@li.ru> <545A5422.8000002@ksu.ru> In-Reply-To: <545A5422.8000002@ksu.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090304070101070708070401" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 06:11:06 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms090304070101070708070401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: > Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: >> Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Before updating xf86-video-ati to 7.5.0, we would like some people to= >>> try it out. The reason is that 7.4.0 was crashing for several users, = so >>> we want to be sure it's fixed in 7.5.0. >>> >>> Here's patch: >>> https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/ports-xf86-video-ati-7.= 5.0.patch >>> >>> >>> >>> To apply it: >>> cd /usr/ports >>> patch -p1 < /path/to/ports-xf86-video-ati-7.5.0.patch >>> >>> Then update x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati with your method of choice. >>> >>> What we're especially looking for is report of successful or failed >>> startup of the X server. With 7.4.0, the server would crash during >>> startup. But with 7.5.0, none of us could reproduce the problem. >>> >>> When you're finished, you may restore your vanilla ports tree: >>> cd /usr/ports >>> patch -p1 -R < /path/to/ports-xf86-video-ati-7.5.0.patch >>> find x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati -name "*.orig" -delete >>> >>> Thank you for your help! >>> >> >> Strange problem. monitor doesn't wake up after all night sleep, >> moreover, when I tried to connect my tv on hdmi I had 256 colors inste= ad >> of 16 million and no hardware acceleration at all. ports tree is as ne= w >> as yesterday. >> >> btw, Jean-Sebastien, xf86-video-ati-ums doesn't work at all, just blan= k >> screen: >> >> [ 39.160] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable >> [ 39.160] drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 >> [ 39.160] drmOpenDevice: open result is 12, (OK) >> [ 39.160] drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:01:00.0 >> [ 39.160] drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 >> [ 39.161] drmOpenDevice: open result is 12, (OK) >> [ 39.161] drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 12 >> [ 39.161] drmOpenByBusid: Interface 1.4 failed, trying 1.1 >> [ 39.161] drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:01:00.0 >> [ 39.296] (EE) AIGLX error: r600 does not export required DRI >> extension >> >> X.Org X Server 1.12.4 >> > 7.4.0 works fine yet, I'll try to wait for a night sleep and wakeup of > monitor > I was too enthusiastic about 7.4.0, I suppose I have a big deal of bad=20 carma here, because of no version of any radeon-kms drivers works stable = for me at all. 7.4.0 just hanged out my machine without anything in logs = :( Jean, can you tell me what steps should be taken to make=20 xf86-video-radeon-ums work? now it just complains about (EE) AIGLX error: r600 does not export required DRI extension and refuses to show anything but black screen, monitor is on, so black=20 screen with correct resolution and refresh rate. does this -ums driver=20 load radeon kernel module, and. if loads, what module it should load?=20 will it work with vt or not? --=20 SY, Marat --------------ms090304070101070708070401 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMaTCC Bi0wggUVoAMCAQICAwsAMzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNV BAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRl IFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlh dGUgQ2xpZW50IENBMB4XDTE0MDgyOTAwMTgzOVoXDTE1MDgzMDA1MTgxN1owTzEZMBcGA1UE DRMQOE9aclhtWFpRMzIwNEFuUzEVMBMGA1UEAwwMYW1hcmF0QGxpLnJ1MRswGQYJKoZIhvcN AQkBFgxhbWFyYXRAbGkucnUwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC3elxx SBZDrD0uhfNnw4YsVJ2PSjkAEzBye2Ng46BFsFwUmB0Ely0LJz3zAn2HwAN3uN4bHzZ1yvVO Q7exjoEfyFjadNq3UHMDw3z+LIhxQX4SNdT2H072yndfOLsyKuayOBHeM/CyxLkvsl9cIl7i 45dVhE1NEkEUr71xDyHETaULAwejcEIE281JH/LVRRtysA2hCC9mIfcu+l8swGONGcPr7Ywr l9YegN0RwZvGZl/EWyLMQQXfyU0gAYgT3Y7P+w2obeMeWpxXny+oEub4vYsx18meyKFgnz1G 336Z3J0a7mPBC/P4Qx4X63o6Orfvu2M38AhIKgibRuW7pBBvAgMBAAGjggLSMIICzjAJBgNV HRMEAjAAMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIEsDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwHQYD VR0OBBYEFOzBNZZDHLsTtz2ojwcM4rHQBZSeMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFFNy7ZKc4NrLAVx8fpY1 TvLUuFGCMBcGA1UdEQQQMA6BDGFtYXJhdEBsaS5ydTCCAUwGA1UdIASCAUMwggE/MIIBOwYL KwYBBAGBtTcBAgMwggEqMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9w b2xpY3kucGRmMIH3BggrBgEFBQcCAjCB6jAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1 dGhvcml0eTADAgEBGoG+VGhpcyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB3YXMgaXNzdWVkIGFjY29yZGluZyB0 byB0aGUgQ2xhc3MgMSBWYWxpZGF0aW9uIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBvZiB0aGUgU3RhcnRDb20g Q0EgcG9saWN5LCByZWxpYW5jZSBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcHVycG9zZSBpbiBj b21wbGlhbmNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWx5aW5nIHBhcnR5IG9ibGlnYXRpb25zLjA2BgNVHR8ELzAt MCugKaAnhiVodHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jcnR1MS1jcmwuY3JsMIGOBggrBgEF BQcBAQSBgTB/MDkGCCsGAQUFBzABhi1odHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc3ViL2Ns YXNzMS9jbGllbnQvY2EwQgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGNmh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2Nl cnRzL3N1Yi5jbGFzczEuY2xpZW50LmNhLmNydDAjBgNVHRIEHDAahhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAGKPgpUPUgI65nQHxESjq9azfB4zS4Mz 1WP+l9/7VP4kiKBK9+lJmNwckKDD9gKvMxc75TZTFD1oNP9Q4izjBAKTx3EybLvjkW52kORJ go/3AUHE48patq/PQOJ4ti3nIMDqg/c6ikO4xKQcX+vGgszuSPjikQO9D/K+oGqtlhcE8CP6 M5qnVwIBwHWtk9ip/CH3dqu368CR5+zavJcd5N45LuDdEuaC0POX6znfUDmSo9Ydarzqunbf tS7T5RffXuMPA3VBsPQnbCXETlSBTZmUDrwqkLv6H6A2+v9keO1aDhnf1qlL7vEgjBF2BC59 8J7Qkmobp4FjebyGNEH0Ny8wggY0MIIEHKADAgECAgEeMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMH0xCzAJ BgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGln aXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMSkwJwYDVQQDEyBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0 aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw0wNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaFw0xNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaMIGMMQswCQYD VQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0 YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQcmlt YXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEK AoIBAQDHCYPMzi3YGrEppC4Tq5a+ijKDjKaIQZZVR63UbxIP6uq/I0fhCu+cQhoUfE6ERKKn u8zPf1Jwuk0tsvVCk6U9b+0UjM0dLep3ZdE1gblK/1FwYT5Pipsu2yOMluLqwvsuz9/9f1+1 PKHG/FaR/wpbfuIqu54qzHDYeqiUfsYzoVflR80DAC7hmJ+SmZnNTWyUGHJbBpA8Q89lGxah NvuryGaC/o2/ceD2uYDX9U8Eg5DpIpGQdcbQeGarV04WgAUjjXX5r/2dabmtxWMZwhZna//j diSyrrSMTGKkDiXm6/3/4ebfeZuCYKzN2P8O2F/Xe2AC/Y7zeEsnR7FOp+uXAgMBAAGjggGt MIIBqTAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUU3Ltkpzg 2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4UYIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUTgvvGqRAW6UXaYcwyjRoQ9BBrvIwZgYIKwYB BQUHAQEEWjBYMCcGCCsGAQUFBzABhhtodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2EwLQYI KwYBBQUHMAKGIWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNydDBbBgNVHR8EVDBS MCegJaAjhiFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zZnNjYS5jcmwwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6 Ly9jcmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNybDCBgAYDVR0gBHkwdzB1BgsrBgEEAYG1NwEC ATBmMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMDQG CCsGAQUFBwIBFihodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9pbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUucGRmMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4ICAQAKgwh9eKssBly4Y4xerhy5I3dNoXHYfYa8PlVLL/qtXnkFgdtY 1o95CfegFJTwqBBmf8pyTUnFsukDFUI22zF5bVHzuJ+GxhnSqN2sD1qetbYwBYK2iyYA5Pg7 Er1A+hKMIzEzcduRkIMmCeUTyMyikfbUFvIBivtvkR8ZFAk22BZy+pJfAoedO61HTz4qSfQo CRcLN5A0t4DkuVhTMXIzuQ8CnykhExD6x4e6ebIbrjZLb7L+ocR0y4YjCl/Pd4MXU91y0vTi pgr/O75CDUHDRHCCKBVmz/Rzkc/b970MEeHt5LC3NiWTgBSvrLEuVzBKM586YoRD9Dy3OHQg WI270g+5MYA8GfgI/EPT5G7xPbCDz+zjdH89PeR3U4So4lSXur6H6vp+m9TQXPF3a0LwZrp8 MQ+Z77U1uL7TelWO5lApsbAonrqASfTpaprFVkL4nyGH+NHST2ZJPWIBk81i6Vw0ny0qZW2N iy/QvVNKbb43A43ny076khXO7cNbBIRdJ/6qQNq9Bqb5C0Q5nEsFcj75oxQRqlKf6TcvGbjx kJh8BYtv9ePsXklAxtm8J7GCUBthHSQgepbkOexhJ0wP8imUkyiPHQ0GvEnd83129fZjoEhd GwXV27ioRKbj/cIq7JRXun0NbeY+UdMYu9jGfIpDLtUUGSgsg2zMGs5R4jGCA90wggPZAgEB MIGUMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMi U2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20g Q2xhc3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0ECAwsAMzAJBgUrDgMCGgUA oIICHTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNDExMDkw NjA1MjZaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBTnD+XWoNWGItc8fpftq70MODZbpjBsBgkqhkiG9w0B CQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcN AwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIGlBgkrBgEE AYI3EAQxgZcwgZQwgYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSsw KQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9T dGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDCwAzMIGn BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBl6CBlDCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29t IEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2 BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENB AgMLADMwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAQg7W3yhj+ZLLzZq+3s9QCjsHbxOmzGqS6etZ6IUo GkMenGns/R1UlgosN2r6KGp6S0wZM0zUL1DeFa4hrW4bLL/YRVFn4NfbL17mnjwZrFHCUXJ7 rU9j2+0Nc6en6i1ex5f5whdcPuK5Vdxi2rhZ7gkES/iyeGio7gG5QbnmJqUHKyZZHcdA2Yw+ uSqeud9wvQ8cIeJN2Ujjtg9m6lqBB7jUVRWnkCouoRqzXWtoHsd+A27jCvK8gDSG7sauRIFs lUEpRYEQVq9AtTBMiyek06RmsBWkA0sDo/VsSEv2gdVu92MAT3FoILyTVHQlzt2p/gw7AS4g T5XPYCF2/x3HowAAAAAAAA== --------------ms090304070101070708070401-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 12:16:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDA8E11; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 12:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4C61F8; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 12:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XnRPk-000I2e-2G; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 13:16:16 +0100 Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 13:16:15 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-RC4 Now Available Message-ID: <20141109121615.GS66862@home.opsec.eu> References: <20141102194344.GA21862@hub.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141102194344.GA21862@hub.FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Release Engineering Team , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 12:16:18 -0000 Hi! > Some of the changes between 10.1-RC3 and 10.1-RC4 include: I have some installs on 10.1-RC3 and those fail to upgrade to RC4, see the discussions at https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-November/080897.html -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 11:13:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C313EF1 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mlsender059.mlwbx.com (mlsender084.mlwbx.com [54.83.29.61]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "localhost", Issuer "localhost" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00131312 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mlwbx.com; i=@mlwbx.com; q=dns/txt; s=mlsender; t=1415617875; h=Content-Type : MIME-Version : Content-Transfer-Encoding : From : To : Reply-To : Subject : Errors-To : List-Unsubscribe : X-Report-Abuse : X-Identity : Precedence : Message-Id; bh=M7WOfnnt4/OM+SZrA+gi2iadEnWsrbNqf5CecxYqXTk=; b=ozXobzq2Lto+axeCihDBT7b1Sx2yOaOBP++KEt8tVtseHoG4KFHVYsTzu+tXIjMzRlnsWK CWpcFuPPd+ToJgYrfKcyvkhZxhayXmffnmdaynbDsOKnoZM0TQw05mDfYLojpNt6pEf1dHFI vafEwsxBxGG59fNTRytArDnA1PXiM= From: "Luciana" To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Reply-To: luciana.marcelino@claroembratel.com.br Subject: Atendimento Errors-To: 545f8703c62d88545b9f29c8_10395@mlwbx.com X-Report-Abuse: http://www.mailerweb.com.br/abuse X-Identity: 545f8703c62d88545b9f29c8_10395 Precedence: bulk Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:11:15 -0200 Sender: "Luciana" Message-Id: <1931be5f84394a36837ba97107ed8a77.1415617875@mlwbx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:13:49 -0000 [545f8703c62d88545b9f29c8_10395.gif] Bom dia. Gostaria atender sua empresa em telefonia móvel, agora já podemos tratar do plano dos celulares? Entraram vários novos modelos de Smatphones, e os valores de internet diminuíram, posso te fazer proposta da Claro baseada no uso atual de sua empresa? Basta me passar mais ou menos com quantas linhas a empresa está hoje, e quantas precisam de internet, eu faço a proposta. Agradeço antecipadamente. Luciana Marcelino Gerente de contas | Claro | Embratel | NET Tel.: (11) 4318-0643 ramal: 113 Cel.: (11) 98815-8575 luciana.marcelino@claroembratel.com.br Segue minha nova carta de apresentação, agora com telefonia e internet fixa: [1]http://claroembratel.com.br/carta.pdf R. Marechal Deodoro, 458 - Santa Paula - SCS - SP VAMOS CUIDAR JUNTOS DO MEIO AMBIENTE. EVITE IMPRIMIR DEMAIS. O conteúdo deste e-mail e os documentos em anexo contêm informação confidencial e exclusiva da Ideal Voz. Caso você não seja o destinatário desta mensagem, informamos que o uso não autorizado deste instrumento, como sua revisão, cópia ou distribuição são estritamente proibidos. Se você recebeu este e-mail por engano, por favor, apague a informação aqui contida e notifique o remetente respondendo a esta mensagem. . Caso não esteja visualizando corretamente esta mensagem, [2]acesse aqui. Este e-mail foi enviado para [3]freebsd-stable@freebsd.org. Se você não deseja mais receber nossos e-mails, [4]cancele sua inscrição aqui. Esta mensagem foi enviada utilizando Mailerweb, saiba mais em [5]http://www.mailerweb.com.br. References 1. https://painel.mailerweb.com.br/click/545f8703c62d88545b9f29c8_10395_38822/ 2. https://painel.mailerweb.com.br/view/545f8703c62d88545b9f29c8_10395/ 3. mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org 4. https://painel.mailerweb.com.br/contacts/contact/opt_out/545f8703c62d88545b9f29c8_10395/ 5. http://www.mailerweb.com.br/?utm_source=mw-campaign&utm_medium%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20=email&utm_campaign=customer_campaign From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 17:01:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92AC0D01 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grupofundar.com.ar (mail.grupofundar.com.ar [200.70.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44675D0A for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.grupofundar.com.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9674F2C8A7DD for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:45:51 -0300 (ART) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.grupofundar.com.ar Received: from mail.grupofundar.com.ar ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.grupofundar.com.ar [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cCi7XfNnjsgp for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:45:51 -0300 (ART) Received: from HP-Server (75-139-242-82.static.ftwo.tx.charter.com [75.139.242.82]) by mail.grupofundar.com.ar (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8C1A2C8D4BC for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:54:45 -0300 (ART) From: "iftd@reaalsns.nl" Subject: con respecto a mi =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=FAltimo?= correo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?electr=F3nico?= To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: david.boucher@reaalsns.nl Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:54:32 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20141110155445.B8C1A2C8D4BC@mail.grupofundar.com.ar> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:01:25 -0000 A la atenci=F3n de : Tengo algo de informaci=F3n vital para usted en relaci=F3n con una herencia que se quiso dar a usted. E-mail o tel=E9fono me llaman para que yo pueda darle una amplia desglose en este proyecto . Saludos, David Boucher www.snsbank.nl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 17:12:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C41836F for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grupofundar.com.ar (mail.grupofundar.com.ar [200.70.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8E9F06 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.grupofundar.com.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B372C89311 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:48:06 -0300 (ART) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.grupofundar.com.ar Received: from mail.grupofundar.com.ar ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.grupofundar.com.ar [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sA44xaYoVkwO for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:48:06 -0300 (ART) Received: from HP-Server (75-139-242-82.static.ftwo.tx.charter.com [75.139.242.82]) by mail.grupofundar.com.ar (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C00772C8DA14 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:56:29 -0300 (ART) From: "iftd@reaalsns.nl" Subject: con respecto a mi =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=FAltimo?= correo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?electr=F3nico?= To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: david.boucher@reaalsns.nl Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:56:17 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20141110155631.C00772C8DA14@mail.grupofundar.com.ar> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:12:21 -0000 A la atenci=F3n de : Tengo algo de informaci=F3n vital para usted en relaci=F3n con una herencia que se quiso dar a usted. E-mail o tel=E9fono me llaman para que yo pueda darle una amplia desglose en este proyecto . Saludos, David Boucher www.snsbank.nl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 12:50:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1060F7C for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from melo.ec-m.fr (melo.ec-m.fr [147.94.19.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7016E865 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amavis1.serv.int (amavis1.serv.int [10.3.0.45]) by melo.ec-m.fr (GrosseBox 1743 XXL) with ESMTP id 351FDAC866 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:44:41 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at centrale-marseille.fr Received: from melo.ec-m.fr ([10.3.0.13]) by amavis1.serv.int (amavis1.serv.int [10.3.0.45]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id iwFFZ8YL6P8V for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:44:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.13.1] (mezon.dgeos.net [109.190.117.153]) (Authenticated sender: dgeo) by melo.ec-m.fr (GrosseBox 1743 XXL) with ESMTPSA id 102BAAC848 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:44:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <546204B4.1020609@centrale-marseille.fr> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:44:36 +0100 From: geoffroy desvernay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 10.1RC3 to 10.1RC4 fails References: <143DE318-8A7B-4BEC-8B68-A66B7091C376@gmail.com> <3D371FF9-8A43-4079-A82D-6BE01F152F07@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <3D371FF9-8A43-4079-A82D-6BE01F152F07@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1LfT1cXCbb0mWgtNloAxbf5Fl1rG6cQ8b" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:50:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --1LfT1cXCbb0mWgtNloAxbf5Fl1rG6cQ8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/07/2014 10:11 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Mikhail Tsatsenko = wrote: >=20 >> 2014-11-05 6:34 GMT+04:00 George Kola : >> >>> I am trying to upgrade a 10.1 RC3 box to 10.1RC4 and it fails as foll= ows >>> >>> bsd01:~]$uname -r >>> 10.1-RC3 >>> [bsd01:~]$sudo freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.1-RC4 >>> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. >>> Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RC3 from update5.freebsd.org... = done. >>> Fetching metadata index... fetch: http://update5.freebsd.org/10.1-RC3= /amd64/t/c8fafcc79d7cc092c7782f4f1a29a777d751294183c8f2cb9daf940ba0525d96= : Not Found >>> failed. >>> >>> >>> Is there a work-around/fix for this ? >> >=20 >> Just faced the same issue. >> As far I can see http://update5.freebsd.org/10.1-RC3/amd64/t/ >> directory does not contain requested file, on other hand there is a >> file with another name. >=20 > I ran in to this as well. This forum thread proposes a workaround: > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/freebsd-update-r-10-1-rc4-upgrade-fa= ils.48835/ >=20 > Namely, run "freebsd-update rollback" and reboot before trying the upgr= ade. >=20 > Would be nice to see this fixed on the freebsd-update server side thoug= h.. >=20 Works here too, but can someone explain what happened here ? --=20 geoffroy desvernay C.R.I - Administration syst=E8mes et r=E9seaux Ecole Centrale de Marseille --1LfT1cXCbb0mWgtNloAxbf5Fl1rG6cQ8b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYgS1AAoJED/P9AlFh6DwtfsP/RTnT5WuX9NrBsrS/nrIll28 XcbBEnqes0V8EnSApeQZsvI7A2KkHMZjw1WRaAfpQj2F9xzzjfEltxWoyodDSJ1G tzgWCtTxBZjDLHHz8bEplIs5hvgdilUJ5B89mR7HAq+2RtQn0TUE3yu0ALx8+Qa1 RO0Q5dUC1Vx9M88HKZk1Q3EiOHC6ZloEu8mf3e2WcCxFfbYxBZjB5/g/Ac0vmL7O /Ppt8k9QY0eoZiRTpUuH5s6SVOQRe3r40OOKiuIGR8ei4LsdSLfPWuOVneDGQId6 2x2fzKqwj28sPuVTQNscDVTfvlui+dbaliyOuY+vTxLkUrxte3k7KkVB28c77olF a7ESDhh9lshbf2iCmyX6XEywnsXthMv+3aBiM6CUGun8lq1EWzBEN7CiEXiRPGaW 3HCjBL0TbaFK85gilReLTJ5DKsHkNDB9+8t3H6BldQE8LGdEna8pMBdwGCxr8F4v VVTmOMGacz1UVYBwLDiE1/jBQb0opsMiYLlwU/7Dljwc5ZhGpnnIJIyU/zs2HL1C 1MAb157Yx/2h/zp2jJ6ccCkBnbrxtnDRcCdty5WlE8rvh1ufiqgonry+jTFdjXta wlWfVGvH+0kVhN0Pa1S0edIA6Olj9SEiOOmLUnp6hARIUN5U8+sdIHBFwVErGzO6 WZ0sQUZFQQLfiUgHbCaN =gHuT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1LfT1cXCbb0mWgtNloAxbf5Fl1rG6cQ8b-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 17:31:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C263034E for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449B0CBE for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sABHUclB050762 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:30:38 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:30:38 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:30:38 +0400 (MSK) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:31:09 -0000 Dear colleagues, I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some documents including TestClusterOne, mainly: > For serial redirection to work, in the BIOS you need to redirect to com port > B and in /boot/device.hints you need hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" and enable getty on > cuau1 I can see BIOS screen ok; boot1/2 and boot/loader work fine also. However, I could not see kernel console output via SOL, neither getty on ttyu1 works. I tried different speeds, std vs 3wire, explicitely set console=comconsole vidconsole -- no luck. I even trued to use `ipmitool sol activate' on one side and `tip -115200 com2' on the other -- stiil no data between. Any hints? Thanks! For the reference: marck@centipede:~> ipmitool -H mc26.int -U root -I lanplus sol info Password: Set in progress : set-complete Enabled : true Force Encryption : false Force Authentication : false Privilege Level : USER Character Accumulate Level (ms) : 0 Character Send Threshold : 0 Retry Count : 0 Retry Interval (ms) : 0 Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 Non-Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 Payload Channel : 1 (0x01) Payload Port : 623 -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 17:52:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C79559B8 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67FE7F9E for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n3so2402226wiv.14 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:52:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y9th/to/5UfeGXV37wI6GlcAm3Iw5yriLMPgFdq4Qw0=; b=Wm5gpCcB0TIEivAxUMVb1R9eo3mmFfpnS7Hvojg2J/7pg2ACKX4T/vOHzvvxt1j+GJ +dlja+jtI07FhFXQgIX/zGxOOALNzfCWGBYNyNYKtlNaBmDmMriFDDHfykSQypBvpRNw pWibMBDuwm41XBewpHTQQhVxhckcrbzLkP5JLWxJiwkFN3AzBOQaaK0uaDcvaKtEyi/a 2Hq1mOPkEpkSzyZCDNUnbwiyWZtwAXcm4zEu/wa/JxSYZiPmjwPMwV6eX7+VbyVT+J2C zbyTEeNtvtVmJ7e2Og6uyKqg2u+iNfUerHj6IttLU9hg8EnKBaPAsPnKHo4OrDei6d9o pokw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCylvoWsU30EsHYVLUtAJsimjtPbzDXAiKv+oMqShuruXMNphwga4tlVMEJWuJlNyFjUq7 X-Received: by 10.194.23.10 with SMTP id i10mr55138800wjf.11.1415728370534; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:52:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.68] (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.141.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fr6sm18414746wic.1.2014.11.11.09.52.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:52:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54624D2B.9000007@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:53:47 +0000 From: Steven Hartland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:52:57 -0000 On 11/11/2014 17:30, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some documents > including TestClusterOne, mainly: > >> For serial redirection to work, in the BIOS you need to redirect to com port >> B and in /boot/device.hints you need hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" and enable getty on >> cuau1 > I can see BIOS screen ok; boot1/2 and boot/loader work fine also. However, I > could not see kernel console output via SOL, neither getty on ttyu1 works. > I tried different speeds, std vs 3wire, explicitely set console=comconsole > vidconsole -- no luck. > > I even trued to use `ipmitool sol activate' on one side and `tip -115200 com2' > on the other -- stiil no data between. > > Any hints? > > Thanks! > > For the reference: > > marck@centipede:~> ipmitool -H mc26.int -U root -I lanplus sol info > Password: > Set in progress : set-complete > Enabled : true > Force Encryption : false > Force Authentication : false > Privilege Level : USER > Character Accumulate Level (ms) : 0 > Character Send Threshold : 0 > Retry Count : 0 > Retry Interval (ms) : 0 > Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 > Non-Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 > Payload Channel : 1 (0x01) > Payload Port : 623 > This is what we use: http://blog.multiplay.co.uk/2012/12/freebsd-serial-over-lan/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 18:00:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFD3FA8 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9E9AC for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p9so4894976lbv.1 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:00:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SS/3RSvCFUmjw/fuqhWshVPjEYo9eivjfNeBH5M/y0w=; b=fUrAl/FBAq61m96gqwStgz8HVxApb4w56jBvQgzj/Rtvi0rlWXNPo3rdigF8DUdnCT xjtzXdDUSK9gTiaQZLA8kcnXWRgZKfwwL63uY+fmODszxcdUpZha/qDsW9FiMF+igHv2 0mS25NcVRNYwS0cBvO1GyZtYZOufRGNSh9l+ce+i1pOeBf3caUnz7ISiUsr23W4DsSXz 4GUxRkZEu4LAkq26iBqsXR6IToUKTX8FVL4tf2X6nam0/Mj3CrXiIerMv79eZtK9Lacy tyUklXq3R0Gwfi2x6PTfWp0S5LSzVvc9iNnw0XMjYdjc1cK00HZ4y9CuS3W/zyECLV7N b/ng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.36.137 with SMTP id q9mr37822227laj.63.1415728818972; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:00:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.78.134 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:00:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:00:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles From: Andreas Nilsson To: Dmitry Morozovsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:00:21 -0000 On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some > documents > including TestClusterOne, mainly: > > > For serial redirection to work, in the BIOS you need to redirect to com > port > > B and in /boot/device.hints you need hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" and enable > getty on > > cuau1 > > I can see BIOS screen ok; boot1/2 and boot/loader work fine also. > However, I > could not see kernel console output via SOL, neither getty on ttyu1 works. > I tried different speeds, std vs 3wire, explicitely set console=comconsole > vidconsole -- no luck. > > I even trued to use `ipmitool sol activate' on one side and `tip -115200 > com2' > on the other -- stiil no data between. > > Any hints? > > Thanks! > > For the reference: > > marck@centipede:~> ipmitool -H mc26.int -U root -I lanplus sol info > Password: > Set in progress : set-complete > Enabled : true > Force Encryption : false > Force Authentication : false > Privilege Level : USER > Character Accumulate Level (ms) : 0 > Character Send Threshold : 0 > Retry Count : 0 > Retry Interval (ms) : 0 > Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 > Non-Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 > Payload Channel : 1 (0x01) > Payload Port : 623 > > > -- > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Which version? 8/9/10-stable? On 9.3,9-stable,10.0,10-stable I have similar issues with serial emulation on HP iLO. I'm about to upgrade a supermicro box to 9.3, hopefully it will happen in a few hours. I'll get back with the results. Best regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 18:10:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5A556F for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54A85E3 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sABIA9x9051916; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:10:09 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:10:09 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Steven Hartland Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles In-Reply-To: <54624D2B.9000007@multiplay.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <54624D2B.9000007@multiplay.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:10:09 +0400 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:10:12 -0000 On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Steven Hartland wrote: > > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some > > documents > > including TestClusterOne, mainly: > > > > > For serial redirection to work, in the BIOS you need to redirect to com > > > port > > > B and in /boot/device.hints you need hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" and enable > > > getty on > > > cuau1 > > I can see BIOS screen ok; boot1/2 and boot/loader work fine also. However, > > I > > could not see kernel console output via SOL, neither getty on ttyu1 works. > > I tried different speeds, std vs 3wire, explicitely set console=comconsole > > vidconsole -- no luck. > > > > I even trued to use `ipmitool sol activate' on one side and `tip -115200 > > com2' > > on the other -- stiil no data between. > > > > Any hints? > > > > Thanks! > > > > For the reference: > > > > marck@centipede:~> ipmitool -H mc26.int -U root -I lanplus sol info > > Password: > > Set in progress : set-complete > > Enabled : true > > Force Encryption : false > > Force Authentication : false > > Privilege Level : USER > > Character Accumulate Level (ms) : 0 > > Character Send Threshold : 0 > > Retry Count : 0 > > Retry Interval (ms) : 0 > > Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 > > Non-Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 > > Payload Channel : 1 (0x01) > > Payload Port : 623 > > > This is what we use: > http://blog.multiplay.co.uk/2012/12/freebsd-serial-over-lan/ Hm. Does not seem to work for me, for 10.1: I set all the values at loader prompt, issue `boot -s' -- and then, last loader line (kernel load process) goes to both java KVM and sol, and then kernel messages only to KVM, and finally prompt for single user shell -- nowhere :( -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 18:40:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07811E8B for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gromit.dlib.vt.edu (gromit.dlib.vt.edu [128.173.126.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gromit.dlib.vt.edu", Issuer "Chumby Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE389C9 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pmather.lib.vt.edu (pmather.lib.vt.edu [128.173.126.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gromit.dlib.vt.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40D424F1; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:40:23 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles From: Paul Mather In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:40:22 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> References: To: Dmitry Morozovsky X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:40:33 -0000 On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear colleagues, >=20 > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some = documents Aye, and there's the rub: I've found that the COM port that SOL uses=20 varies across different Supermicro server models, and the BIOS support=20= for assigning or determining the COM port differs (or is sometimes=20 nonexistent) between those servers. :-( I recently spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out why SOL was=20 not working on a particular Supermicro server and it turned out to be=20 that the COM port differed to those I'd used in previous setups. > =20 > including TestClusterOne, mainly: >=20 >> For serial redirection to work, in the BIOS you need to redirect to = com port=20 >> B and in /boot/device.hints you need hint.uart.1.flags=3D"0x10" and = enable getty on=20 >> cuau1=20 >=20 > I can see BIOS screen ok; boot1/2 and boot/loader work fine also. = However, I=20 > could not see kernel console output via SOL, neither getty on ttyu1 = works. > I tried different speeds, std vs 3wire, explicitely set = console=3Dcomconsole=20 > vidconsole -- no luck. >=20 > I even trued to use `ipmitool sol activate' on one side and `tip = -115200 com2'=20 > on the other -- stiil no data between. >=20 > Any hints? In my trial and error, I've found that assigning the correct COM port=20 is usually the thing that gets it working. That comes down to the=20 correct "comconsole_port" setting in /boot/loader.conf. Here is what I put into /boot/loader.conf for serial/VGA console=20 support on my servers: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D # # System console support: uncomment only one "console=3D..." line below # # Speed and port for serial console comconsole_speed=3D115200 comconsole_port=3D0x2F8 # Uncomment below to enable only serial console #console=3D"comconsole" # Uncomment below to enable only VGA console #console=3D"vidconsole" # Uncomment below to enable VGA and serial consoles (preference to VGA) #console=3D"vidconsole,comconsole" # Uncomment below to enable serial and VGA consoles (preference to = serial) console=3D"comconsole,vidconsole" boot_multicons=3D"YES" =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D On the above particular system, SOL is on COM2, i.e.,=20 "comconsole_port=3D0x2F8". On two other servers, though, SOL is on = COM3,=20 i.e., "comconsole_port=3D0x3E8". Here are the settings for different COM ports: COM1 (ttyu0): comconsole_port=3D0x3F8 COM2 (ttyu1): comconsole_port=3D0x2F8 COM3 (ttyu2): comconsole_port=3D0x3E8 COM4 (ttyu3): comconsole_port=3D0x2E8 Note that the /boot/loader.conf settings are all you need; there's no=20 need for entries in /boot/device.hints and the likes. It can all be=20 set in /boot/loader.conf, at least on FreeBSD 9.3 and FreeBSD 10, which=20= I'm using. Once you've set up /boot/loader.conf, and assuming you have at least=20 comconsole output enabled, you'll see BIOS and boot messages. To get a=20= login, you also need to enable the corresponding ttyuX in /etc/ttys. =20 I've found that onifconsole works in 9.3; I'm not sure about 10.0, so=20 you might need to use "on" there. (Onifconsole appears to work in the=20= 10.1 release candidates.) Note, that kernel console output appears to go both to the comconsole=20 and vidconsole in a boot_multicons=3D"YES" setup, but other console=20 output (like system startup messages, etc.), goes only to the first one=20= specified. E.g., if you have console=3D"comconsole,vidconsole" in=20 /boot/loader.conf then you'll see some, but not all, console output on=20= the vidconsole. (You'll see all of it on the comconsole.) I hope this helps, because I wasted almost a whole afternoon trying to=20= figure out how to get SOL working on one Supermicro server last month.=20= :-( Cheers, Paul.= From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 19:13:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC85B05 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F273E66 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x13so12249535wgg.22 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:13:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jtQAaS/eASCdYecKNVsS63Ule4mZlZTeI8nUgN1/UT4=; b=IKrm6sJkrrYC7qsuv5jH1RjY8DLyK5/7VgYFiR2AyFFNTnNv+sfkv7WHdSehJ+8LEu 2InKdJ6HOqZef+2LDFS5SJqPoZ1SxMESo2L8NdxUwu2jcSc2t6uD4+DvF4DzpCW9Eew0 S86krof3KcGc3Cye0QFlGKyRY8yqrPlpf0Rb3tUKGHBLhdxe/pA+pVeK1Tex75NizYeS G1Iz9SRe8rs/FMMJ/tKigH6UtkfdfLab6uGj8hzBZe6ThStaQ8d6Wit1xNOFSj3sbmrd 6nAqzarmrrxczc0NgIv7qVQOd+SeWtNZRYzaXoWiK6Yw1xrh6MiuiQr/CaAuD7CyL0pD gQBw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqxM2Q9sxganK8TPEpfaoF0RQIrOfEhge/jXXDx/+RxJSzzMtnnnDO71P+BgX8Anx1a+vO X-Received: by 10.180.103.33 with SMTP id ft1mr32889032wib.71.1415733217599; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.68] (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.141.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm28417945wjf.49.2014.11.11.11.13.36 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:13:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5462601A.5070300@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:14:34 +0000 From: Steven Hartland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles References: <54624D2B.9000007@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:13:45 -0000 On 11/11/2014 18:10, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Steven Hartland wrote: > >>> I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some >>> documents >>> including TestClusterOne, mainly: >>> >>>> For serial redirection to work, in the BIOS you need to redirect to com >>>> port >>>> B and in /boot/device.hints you need hint.uart.1.flags="0x10" and enable >>>> getty on >>>> cuau1 >>> I can see BIOS screen ok; boot1/2 and boot/loader work fine also. However, >>> I >>> could not see kernel console output via SOL, neither getty on ttyu1 works. >>> I tried different speeds, std vs 3wire, explicitely set console=comconsole >>> vidconsole -- no luck. >>> >>> I even trued to use `ipmitool sol activate' on one side and `tip -115200 >>> com2' >>> on the other -- stiil no data between. >>> >>> Any hints? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> For the reference: >>> >>> marck@centipede:~> ipmitool -H mc26.int -U root -I lanplus sol info >>> Password: >>> Set in progress : set-complete >>> Enabled : true >>> Force Encryption : false >>> Force Authentication : false >>> Privilege Level : USER >>> Character Accumulate Level (ms) : 0 >>> Character Send Threshold : 0 >>> Retry Count : 0 >>> Retry Interval (ms) : 0 >>> Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 >>> Non-Volatile Bit Rate (kbps) : 115.2 >>> Payload Channel : 1 (0x01) >>> Payload Port : 623 >>> >> This is what we use: >> http://blog.multiplay.co.uk/2012/12/freebsd-serial-over-lan/ > Hm. Does not seem to work for me, for 10.1: I set all the values at loader > prompt, issue `boot -s' -- and then, last loader line (kernel load process) > goes to both java KVM and sol, and then kernel messages only to KVM, and > finally prompt for single user shell -- nowhere :( Just updated a Dell box to 10.1-RC4 and a Supermicro box on head and they both work for me. With the Supermicro box I did have to ensure the BIOS console and BMC agreed on the com settings including disabling the serial ports (not the console redirect). Without this the BIOS was using 115.2 but the BMC was using 19.2. Fixing the speeds showed the loader but nothing else, disabling the com ports and resetting the IPMI device allowed full booted support. If you have an old SIM you might want to try forcing usb to low speed as the old Supermicro IPMI modules advertise USB 2.0 but only work reliably at 1.0 speeds. To do this add the following to /boot/loader.conf with the rest of the settings mentioned in that blog post: hw.usb.ehci.no_hs="1" Signs that this is required is USB devices which fail to negotiate on boot of the machine. Hope this helps. Regards Steve From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 19:29:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58A67508 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB513FCF for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sABJTBOO055134; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:29:11 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:29:11 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Paul Mather Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles In-Reply-To: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Message-ID: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:29:11 +0400 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:29:35 -0000 Paul, On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Paul Mather wrote: > > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some documents > > Aye, and there's the rub: I've found that the COM port that SOL uses > varies across different Supermicro server models, and the BIOS support > for assigning or determining the COM port differs (or is sometimes > nonexistent) between those servers. :-( > > I recently spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out why SOL was > not working on a particular Supermicro server and it turned out to be > that the COM port differed to those I'd used in previous setups. Yes, at least on X8SIE your hint works, swithing to com3 with # SOL console boot_multicons="yes" boot_serial="YES" console="comconsole vidconsole" # com3 is ipmi/sol console comconsole_port="0x3E8" comconsole_speed="115200" works, thanks a lot! Still fighting microcloud blades... Next thing will be consolidation all these into conserver-com for both logging and centralized management... -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 19:43:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA96E9C for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5161FB for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sABJhZZH055819; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:43:35 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:43:35 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Paul Mather Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:43:35 +0400 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:43:38 -0000 On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Still fighting microcloud blades... for X10SLD-F/HF (Intel 1150-based Microcloud), the same settings work (com3 despite MB has no com2) but also loader_color="NO" is needed; otherwise, loader resets to black-on-black before invoking the kernel. Thanks a lot again! -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 19:45:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449362A7 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48CF222 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id gd6so10212246lab.34 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nbgANKjIrTlU0pEGYGhP5p0l1H/kzYjBD8JaVJne/tc=; b=wC0Tv7LBHldJQfcaaordcOIFs1whLD+ZQWaN4/uiwbKwlysxIlg0UqEFV2Ze5kdwd8 JDKusfa5tQbN2tBAgtzqLS14lLfJZcq8BvDmHPy3OiMb1hqiB93Ph12/vknaOH2+h46K ko7Mrpya6cRYJe+EAQv6Qrcs2lMt6RNGuZn8rmJd6GG7G7JYIBD1tTestElzdD7MmIVI OQvKyMLrfKg/k6ELYaZxaaBQFVDeTYrCsJXqbj/SS+lwEXfykdDfk0+/TJktgJBzFB1C mCuVUKD/gRHPD5iSKMovgcWcy6HLXh8oFr3piAFM8rdj0oB6tPvboMFkIJrWoPaOuVPw sXmw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.234.201 with SMTP id ug9mr38558690lbc.14.1415735117803; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.78.134 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:45:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles From: Andreas Nilsson To: Dmitry Morozovsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:45:20 -0000 On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Paul, > > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Paul Mather wrote: > > > > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some > documents > > > > Aye, and there's the rub: I've found that the COM port that SOL uses > > varies across different Supermicro server models, and the BIOS support > > for assigning or determining the COM port differs (or is sometimes > > nonexistent) between those servers. :-( > > > > I recently spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out why SOL was > > not working on a particular Supermicro server and it turned out to be > > that the COM port differed to those I'd used in previous setups. > > Yes, at least on X8SIE your hint works, swithing to com3 with > > # SOL console > boot_multicons="yes" > boot_serial="YES" > console="comconsole vidconsole" > # com3 is ipmi/sol console > comconsole_port="0x3E8" > comconsole_speed="115200" > > works, thanks a lot! > > Still fighting microcloud blades... > > Next thing will be consolidation all these into conserver-com for both > logging > and centralized management... > > > -- > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Well, I just performed my upgrade from 9.2 to 9.3 and now serial does not work anymore, so something funky is going on. I made sure to copy both the loader.conf and ttys file just to be sure. I see the loader loading modules, but as soon as kernel takes over serial console goes quiet :/ Best Regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 20:55:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hub.FreeBSD.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1364FF19; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:55:45 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Darren Pilgrim Subject: Re: Request for r261231 backport to 10.0 Message-ID: <20141111205545.GU1236@hub.FreeBSD.org> References: <545EAE7E.60009@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TegBI+r9roYdcP94" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <545EAE7E.60009@bluerosetech.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:55:49 -0000 --TegBI+r9roYdcP94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:59:58PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > 10.0 i386 introduced a bug in cron that results in it running jobs at the > wrong time[1]. r261231[2] MFC'd the fix to 10-stable, but after 10.0-R. > 10.1 is due in a few days, but it will be at least a month before move to > 10.1 because I wait a bit for problems that tend to crop up only after > release. >=20 > Building cron from stable/10 r261231 and copying it over /usr/sbin/cron on > my 10.0 systems fixes the issue, but that's an evil hack. >=20 > Can we get this backported to 10.0 as an errata fix? >=20 Once RE gets 10.1-RELEASE out, we'll begin work on an EN for 10.0 for this issue. Glen --TegBI+r9roYdcP94 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYnfRAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTFNUP/2CGA4SWnqpDU+SMBuudLhPj YUH+krhIFZf5VTwDyE+hMg8wg4uBSsVw/gMrzfcyDOU9vm74FnXNxWBjGxm7grms hTPOnQrBg3iFB8c5cdDeThtO8iu5WgBZvPRj+3zsUbkOr4QNExGUD7p5ZzdzkLw+ ew0sVVELq34iBlHLOMacovBhVfH1diImcJQ7UCSRnw8VVlojY01zAvf9cdabjA32 nijxuKKRwGXDDc2NP+WGo7fACbotw2ghcsr7VdnPJJdekn9Gr1y8bn8edr7vNTZs c6f2yWR0T0Y2XeMpIf0hJmcGfAGqRv7saSdG/HSaikIwRYH79IhDu4Vx+GAliBd2 3MC0pwM4kcGJFKc9CY/uW9bpzWk24IEKx2V+gGv/LRkAiA/yQ/zkZaRMS/q1sCms V2eqTDbGjxF3axiZt74ECfsdgpWMMfDewwY2mJ7amaTIRlsCpUJl/dLVQ+1XGpdF xKU8dOTIN7da2GZM+GXbLBPaa+urbMeYWIAsOTKb8FjeuJ5Z56KCvQ3bJClBaEYN lVmhgOLZdNlHd0RRJlLJeblERH1ZMfuwoooPALZWgblmbttzTE5hjBKdqHAV1gHL 3trO4NU3AaCo1DVW5WvWNymLgdwur69yQcQP0uhHU/6Lrz4HRRCbsHyFTeF4e7lJ eeJPlPxQ4/hH/F6dXhVJ =71cc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TegBI+r9roYdcP94-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 00:08:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956FAF9 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A721C4 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAC052EU059885; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:05:03 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 03:05:02 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Paul Mather Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:06:03 +0400 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:08:39 -0000 On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > Still fighting microcloud blades... > > for X10SLD-F/HF (Intel 1150-based Microcloud), the same settings work (com3 > despite MB has no com2) but also loader_color="NO" is needed; otherwise, > loader resets to black-on-black before invoking the kernel. > > Thanks a lot again! FWIW: I have couple of servers targetting both to HAST and to local rack console concentrators, each containing 3*MOXA serial 8-port card in them. There, com3 (at expected 0x3ef port) is detected as uart26 (or ttyuq in terms of /etc/tty). Moreover, if one of the MOXAs dies, it would change its name/number. It there any way to pre-reserve first 4 (not 2) ports in the kernel? -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 00:10:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0373633C for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C1FD1E1 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id mc6so10598805lab.12 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:10:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NSemd5gFYHpv+zqCJYnOURNG1nwLNxajfBXRpSMBfNI=; b=nurC+3/wD5fJMY/UE7/oim6iqiaHr7DljjOG5sMBvQ03enoKM5xxKtpBXzLK9+cAZ+ B+Gov2rNgvDz9pf6qR3UhgfjtZnC02rpjUUCX2V8dJo+KbU4Ecttq+BgsTdbXQ1od+rK TtqdkQTVlRl8wIhW1lv6kcnKzcu3NRKTLoXT2V18h6aMy4ZWtlBO3z43SIPEfXgy2+NW +LL8m5snm1MeNXUEdfQkgqXrMxWXOipeI/QwVZtfSRIH85CTqjqlUBZwV8nXHIinNII7 /iMYI8EZuSIpF5EwaAKy6a7f26csEYisknEQ5i/l6K0BiubLYapFQseTqwqnHSAfP940 GBmg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.136 with SMTP id z8mr11119938laa.2.1415751030843; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.78.134 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:10:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:10:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles From: Andreas Nilsson To: Dmitry Morozovsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:10:34 -0000 On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > >> Paul, >> >> >> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Paul Mather wrote: >> >> > > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading some >> documents >> > >> > Aye, and there's the rub: I've found that the COM port that SOL uses >> > varies across different Supermicro server models, and the BIOS support >> > for assigning or determining the COM port differs (or is sometimes >> > nonexistent) between those servers. :-( >> > >> > I recently spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out why SOL was >> > not working on a particular Supermicro server and it turned out to be >> > that the COM port differed to those I'd used in previous setups. >> >> Yes, at least on X8SIE your hint works, swithing to com3 with >> >> # SOL console >> boot_multicons="yes" >> boot_serial="YES" >> console="comconsole vidconsole" >> # com3 is ipmi/sol console >> comconsole_port="0x3E8" >> comconsole_speed="115200" >> >> works, thanks a lot! >> >> Still fighting microcloud blades... >> >> Next thing will be consolidation all these into conserver-com for both >> logging >> and centralized management... >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely, >> D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] >> [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> > Well, > > I just performed my upgrade from 9.2 to 9.3 and now serial does not work > anymore, so something funky is going on. > > I made sure to copy both the loader.conf and ttys file just to be sure. I > see the loader loading modules, but as soon as kernel takes over serial > console goes quiet :/ > > Best Regards > Andreas > Some more data points: The difference between working and non-working serial console are one single line in loader.conf: hw.uart.console=1234 loader.conf looks like: zfs_load="YES" geom_mirror_load="YES" ipfw_load="YES" ipmi_load="YES" coretemp_load="YES" beastie_disable="YES" boot_serial="YES" boot_multicons="YES" console="comconsole,vidconsole" hint.uart.0.port="0x3E8" hint.uart.0.irq="10" hw.uart.console="1234" hint.acpi_throttle.0.disbled=1 net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept=1 Best regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 00:20:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5524D3 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 278022F8 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q1so10396744lam.24 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:20:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9yY2tLlo6VII+YUX4Fb6ObNuXskWDcEH7x9XYt9JE2U=; b=talTbqqghCGu5RDc6qmev3Z7KlMzZW+aE3t11/pu24SkIQB8HoghiRSCgW7ImcU8Mo FXJZ6pctN9zr3RInphEbSDmF0+Aaq5pPN16EQMIfKcIfTjypLen/g7iDjhLwdMQNgqGI EjxSoAR4ZqARbKK3T3DaAN215WgRuQ5v6RMo6Q9eCfXTbI20skMiERm9Yml48mvoOBEy 8vhGSt1toqJRZtL8ZfZSOplXH3HiQ8SYCTL2ubWk8gydj7izCFKrmYljMMg3nj/1LY6M +NX8BRY12h28KKRH4ZsW3WDesr/hgVnddNKuQPvGDt5gd5tmOZrZmVfQiVRvtvwNFi55 8/kQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.225 with SMTP id d1mr13247669lab.38.1415751625196; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.78.134 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:20:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:20:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles From: Andreas Nilsson To: Dmitry Morozovsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:20:27 -0000 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Andreas Nilsson > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky >> wrote: >> >>> Paul, >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Paul Mather wrote: >>> >>> > > I'm trying to set up sol console for supermicro servers, reading >>> some documents >>> > >>> > Aye, and there's the rub: I've found that the COM port that SOL uses >>> > varies across different Supermicro server models, and the BIOS support >>> > for assigning or determining the COM port differs (or is sometimes >>> > nonexistent) between those servers. :-( >>> > >>> > I recently spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out why SOL was >>> > not working on a particular Supermicro server and it turned out to be >>> > that the COM port differed to those I'd used in previous setups. >>> >>> Yes, at least on X8SIE your hint works, swithing to com3 with >>> >>> # SOL console >>> boot_multicons="yes" >>> boot_serial="YES" >>> console="comconsole vidconsole" >>> # com3 is ipmi/sol console >>> comconsole_port="0x3E8" >>> comconsole_speed="115200" >>> >>> works, thanks a lot! >>> >>> Still fighting microcloud blades... >>> >>> Next thing will be consolidation all these into conserver-com for both >>> logging >>> and centralized management... >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely, >>> D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] >>> [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >> Well, >> >> I just performed my upgrade from 9.2 to 9.3 and now serial does not work >> anymore, so something funky is going on. >> >> I made sure to copy both the loader.conf and ttys file just to be sure. I >> see the loader loading modules, but as soon as kernel takes over serial >> console goes quiet :/ >> >> Best Regards >> Andreas >> > > Some more data points: > The difference between working and non-working serial console are one > single line in loader.conf: > hw.uart.console=1234 > > loader.conf looks like: > > zfs_load="YES" > > geom_mirror_load="YES" > > ipfw_load="YES" > > ipmi_load="YES" > > coretemp_load="YES" > > beastie_disable="YES" > > boot_serial="YES" > > boot_multicons="YES" > > console="comconsole,vidconsole" > > > hint.uart.0.port="0x3E8" > > hint.uart.0.irq="10" > > hw.uart.console="1234" > > hint.acpi_throttle.0.disbled=1 > > net.inet.ip.fw.default_to_accept=1 > > Best regards > Andreas > Oh, setting hw.uart.console=1234 renders me with a working serial console over iLO on the HP machine as well ( HP dl360 g5 ilo2-2.22 ) Best regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 01:36:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C1B4EBF for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC263CDB for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAC1QJal060748; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:26:19 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:26:19 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Andreas Nilsson Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:27:26 +0400 (MSK) Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:36:39 -0000 Andreas, first of all, thank you very much for your valuable submissions; it's still a bit unclear to me which path FreeBSD boot process selects esp. in some corner cases, and looking at the sources not every time scheds a light ;P On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Andreas Nilsson wrote: [snip] > setting hw.uart.console=1234 > renders me with a working serial console over iLO on the HP machine as well > ( HP dl360 g5 ilo2-2.22 ) could you please point me to some of the paths for this setting? I see some code at sys/boot/i386/libi386/comconsole.c -- but it's a bit puzzly to me ;) also, no man pages or examples reference to it... -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 02:58:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED876FF; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mario.brtsvcs.net (mario.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:a400::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5FFB7E2; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-71-59-211-166.hsd1.or.comcast.net [71.59.211.166]) by mario.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE3F52C160F; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (ivy.libssl.so [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82BAC21B; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:58:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5462CCDC.7070202@bluerosetech.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:58:36 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: Request for r261231 backport to 10.0 References: <545EAE7E.60009@bluerosetech.com> <20141111205545.GU1236@hub.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20141111205545.GU1236@hub.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:58:42 -0000 On 11/11/2014 12:55 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:59:58PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: >> 10.0 i386 introduced a bug in cron that results in it running jobs at the >> wrong time[1]. r261231[2] MFC'd the fix to 10-stable, but after 10.0-R. >> 10.1 is due in a few days, but it will be at least a month before move to >> 10.1 because I wait a bit for problems that tend to crop up only after >> release. >> >> Building cron from stable/10 r261231 and copying it over /usr/sbin/cron on >> my 10.0 systems fixes the issue, but that's an evil hack. >> >> Can we get this backported to 10.0 as an errata fix? >> > > Once RE gets 10.1-RELEASE out, we'll begin work on an EN for 10.0 for > this issue. Thank you! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 09:13:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11F32B9 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D48D209 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id hs14so4666693lab.23 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:13:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1872X2rWzb571Y3qrgT86ZqmChZcuCs9bpwkQwJ5vx0=; b=Xr0v+dIXO1vPbp7ddSkj8+9UhdMX8m07mtCkiuy1gyqfa0dm3pGjubWp71i7C4eeuJ s3FGkRX2Ry/l60QKpQ1bkYE7vGuDTUl1wHTSyfEzPCaxiKh2PYFIQ+7IJ17514dKH7hH /Z6kecfUB2Mn+tv+ZGLISKy76q0G/Esh4NqGrHceu4bVYXjPQ87hfPKqmak3imoxJEcJ G4fRXDn77zhy3LJrexBgrQttP7GruVFeWG9sVn8GtyElrBxkGrWjK9nmfCuccs2cmgz+ xpaV1CtvT2FTMQTpYCamqfFrUa2fpx+2wH6tcy1c6HX+JtlN3FKHXelXcTPc3hLw8kZh M0uw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.225 with SMTP id d1mr15212327lab.38.1415783634535; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.78.134 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:13:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles From: Andreas Nilsson To: Dmitry Morozovsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:13:57 -0000 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Andreas, > > first of all, thank you very much for your valuable submissions; it's > still a > bit unclear to me which path FreeBSD boot process selects esp. in some > corner > cases, and looking at the sources not every time scheds a light ;P > > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > [snip] > > > setting hw.uart.console=1234 > > renders me with a working serial console over iLO on the HP machine as > well > > ( HP dl360 g5 ilo2-2.22 ) > > could you please point me to some of the paths for this setting? I see some > code at sys/boot/i386/libi386/comconsole.c -- but it's a bit puzzly to me > ;) > > also, no man pages or examples reference to it... > > > -- > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Hello Dmitry, unclear is the word for it :) And thanks for looking into this. ipmi/ilo is important on a server os. I found a reference to it in a ML post: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072464.html The machines have similar setups: gpt-partitioned and root-on-zfs, albeit different zpool versions. Let me know if there is more info, or something else, you need. In the worst case a "bisect" of the changes to the kernel from 9.2-RELEASE to 9.3-RELEASE should reveal it I guess. Best regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 14 02:59:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C9F3C3 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A108E4C for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.2.95] (ppp118-210-137-175.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net [118.210.137.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id sAE2kpi9078059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:17:00 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:16:47 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> To: Andreas Nilsson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Spam-Score: 1.163 (*) BAYES_00,HELO_MISC_IP,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Dmitry Morozovsky X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:59:54 -0000 On 12 Nov 2014, at 19:43, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > unclear is the word for it :) And thanks for looking into this. = ipmi/ilo is > important on a server os. >=20 > I found a reference to it in a ML post: > = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072464.htm= l I started that thread :) I did get it working on the hardware I was using (Supermicro X9SCL-F and = X8SIL-F) I used the following BIOS settings =95 Remote Access - Enabled =95 Serial Port Number - COM3 =95 Serial Port Mode - 115200, 8, n, 1 =95 Flow Control - Hardware =95 Redirection After BIOS POST - Always =95 Terminal Type - VT100 =95 VT-UTF8 Combo Key Support - Disabled =95 Sredir Memory Display Delay - No Delay And the following in loader.conf # Give preference to VGA console console=3D"vidconsole,comconsole" # Uncomment below and comment above to give serial console preference #console=3D"comconsole,vidconsole" comconsole_speed=3D"115200" boot_multicons=3D"YES" hint.uart.0.flags=3D"0x0" hint.uart.2.at=3D"isa" hint.uart.2.port=3D"0x3E8" hint.uart.2.flags=3D"0x30" And this in /etc/ttys # IPMI console # Note: The Java console viewer doesn't seem to be very smart as it = doesn't # properly support VT100 cuau2 "/usr/libexec/getty 3wire.115200" vt100 on secure I could then access it using ipmitool like so ipmitool -H remoteip -U ADMIN -I lanplus sol activate [login] export TERM=3Dxterm Note that I wanted vidconsole by default because mostly the systems were = used by people local to them, however we could break into the loader and = type 'set console=3Dcomconsole,vidconsole=92 and then get everything = over the serial console for remote trouble shooting. You may also wish to check the IPMI configuration via the web interface = - by default it will failover to port 0 and it has terrible default = passwords. I changed the passwords and forced it to use the dedicated = IPMI port even if nothing was connected to it. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 14 18:31:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D55BD6DF for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6729EE06 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAEIUxJ3011005; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:31:00 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:30:59 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: "Daniel O'Connor" Subject: Re: SuperMicro IPMI/SOL and ipmitool troubles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <3C955A8F-9D1A-463B-BB9A-256C36BF0D4C@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:31:00 +0300 (MSK) Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Andreas Nilsson X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:31:25 -0000 Daniel, nice to see you here too ;) On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2014, at 19:43, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > unclear is the word for it :) And thanks for looking into this. ipmi/ilo is > > important on a server os. > > > > I found a reference to it in a ML post: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-February/072464.html > > I started that thread :) > I did get it working on the hardware I was using (Supermicro X9SCL-F and X8SIL-F) > > I used the following BIOS settings > ? Remote Access - Enabled > ? Serial Port Number - COM3 > ? Serial Port Mode - 115200, 8, n, 1 > ? Flow Control - Hardware > ? Redirection After BIOS POST - Always > ? Terminal Type - VT100 > ? VT-UTF8 Combo Key Support - Disabled > ? Sredir Memory Display Delay - No Delay > > And the following in loader.conf > # Give preference to VGA console > console="vidconsole,comconsole" > # Uncomment below and comment above to give serial console preference > #console="comconsole,vidconsole" > comconsole_speed="115200" > boot_multicons="YES" > hint.uart.0.flags="0x0" > hint.uart.2.at="isa" > hint.uart.2.port="0x3E8" > hint.uart.2.flags="0x30" > > And this in /etc/ttys > # IPMI console > # Note: The Java console viewer doesn't seem to be very smart as it doesn't > # properly support VT100 > cuau2 "/usr/libexec/getty 3wire.115200" vt100 on secure > > I could then access it using ipmitool like so > ipmitool -H remoteip -U ADMIN -I lanplus sol activate > [login] > export TERM=xterm > > Note that I wanted vidconsole by default because mostly the systems were used by people local to them, however we could break into the loader and type 'set console=comconsole,vidconsole? and then get everything over the serial console for remote trouble shooting. > > You may also wish to check the IPMI configuration via the web interface - by default it will failover to port 0 and it has terrible default passwords. I changed the passwords and forced it to use the dedicated IPMI port even if nothing was connected to it. Well, I'm almost done with most of our SM server, even concentrated console on our console server with such a simple config: ---- 8< ---- # ipmi/sol console template default ipmi { master localhost; type exec; exec /usr/local/bin/ipmitool -f /usr/local/etc/ipmi-pass -U root -I lanplus -H %.int sol activate; execsubst %=cs; #idletimeout 6h; break 0 { string "~B"; } } console gwn1 { include ipmi; } console gwn2 { include ipmi; } console gwn3 { include ipmi; } console gwn4 { include ipmi; } console gwn5 { include ipmi; } console gwn6 { include ipmi; } console gwn7 { include ipmi; } console gwn8 { include ipmi; } console gwc2 { include ipmi; } ---- 8< ---- This has console logging (including possible panics) as a surplus -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 03:44:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F8CC426 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 03:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997E7D0D for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 03:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u10so6307781lbd.17 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:44:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Rc4eTiwLAIF1TWlCq9byw+4cCPb+JlQu+etBQkl4QdA=; b=zEAe/vHR31o2PEtih4CC/rG72hHavxhSwp/DBWlxGHGTnVYIRuhIvdc/cRbFOLSWX1 Y5i8VIo9Z8IIaBQXMq1dQvJZ7eExx2s5oZ9bPQLbnvxyWwpNDIOcZthzXTPtK5AobtFf TD0xrrnwlTboiVRgycBhum6GLpoNZv2oPCvqe32mrZKr6ZuJMPeGUX08xoRDar97mmmt Ql2ui4Q5VXTt2nhSakYc7VF/LromplZ5LQYkC6i6ZeVwLISJGCHrfRSqfx9/r9IxTQhX eodsngbhxRSlvYlvNPgisyeRnaeVXUkW9EqOZA4K00zhw/NfjLnIKwfw3vRFbSWywe5Q Z1Rg== X-Received: by 10.112.42.114 with SMTP id n18mr11801200lbl.44.1416023092491; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:44:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: royce.williams@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.171.73 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:44:32 -0800 (PST) From: Royce Williams Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:44:32 -0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: koqf-WtlXvmZJhi-2fgPM5mNCEc Message-ID: Subject: best overall upgrade from 8.x? To: freebsd-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 03:44:56 -0000 I have some 8.x boxes that I'm looking to start planning to transition before 8.4 is likely to go EOL next year. All other things being equal, what's the general consensus on where to upgrade to from 8.x ... 9.x, or 10.x? I do know that YMMV, and I also know that 10.x is likely to be supported longer. I'm just looking for people's overall impressions. Royce From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 04:48:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A5DA9D2 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3692349 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x19so19095233ier.2 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:48:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o3COxkv6q6dg2Ai+8EcY+ipA8gUtoAOfXRWsBlSLp2s=; b=yEddDjLptsTRHk3V082lX3YXSMjQ0gUee8Qaeg1inzWELjaU3mbv+E17HiQcReLihB xsSBNulzROCZx067Na+h7mq6zCHwyKk8QcmXbtqGBnMQ+ukIBQrrmFgoLXTiMRYYARB/ aft08QIJEkoTma6UBDxGBv0/uoxxCuBAyM6KV0LOu0L7K8vFn4xcNySwZ9kjuNBiIdv/ DONbJMIsK3HGnOSkKkcKatBcls3hMBSGQGs1JMGv6RGIAy+W8pi2MYapBpzky94U/c27 t9xHOTockxHP3fxgoyA+5+2VSyg3BO/ZZeWp+UdHBNFWzeRODPGr/xdzV+Cu31Qle+Rb 1tTQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.117.71 with SMTP id kc7mr10812085igb.35.1416026929381; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:48:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.7.169 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:48:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:48:49 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0PO4S0y7g7akgUIXze19Tsv83MM Message-ID: Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? From: Kevin Oberman To: Royce Williams Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:48:50 -0000 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Royce Williams wrote: > I have some 8.x boxes that I'm looking to start planning to transition > before 8.4 is likely to go EOL next year. > > All other things being equal, what's the general consensus on where to > upgrade to from 8.x ... 9.x, or 10.x? > > I do know that YMMV, and I also know that 10.x is likely to be > supported longer. I'm just looking for people's overall impressions. > > Royce > I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop up, I'd go with 10.1 as it is an extended support release and will be supported until sometime in 2017. I have been running 10 for many months and all of my few systems are either running recent 10.1-STABLE or 10.1 release. If you have internally developed code, I'd suggest starting to test it when built with CLANG. While GCC is still available as a port, CLANG is the only base system compiler and will get the bulk of the support. Without a bit more information on the nature and workload of the systems, it's not possible to give any more specific recommendations. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 11:45:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0FF837 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-33.italiaonline.it (smtp-33.italiaonline.it [212.48.25.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC2BDAB for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.41.175.200]) by smtp-33.iol.local with bizsmtp id Fnkg1p00u4KncHT0ZnkgRY; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:44:41 +0100 x-libjamoibt: 1601 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=G/aSErU5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Jt+UxvNov/ecafJZOm2SWg==:117 a=Jt+UxvNov/ecafJZOm2SWg==:17 a=_M8H_RHeOCMA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=47006F4cU5eU9Z4KHuoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=YigEftXgijIA:10 a=zEj1TvEN1fMA:10 a=X5K6bVNKuHoA:10 Received: from guardian.ventu (bane.ventu [10.1.2.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.ventu (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sAFBiV2L065217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:44:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host bane.ventu [10.1.2.15] claimed to be guardian.ventu Message-ID: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:44:33 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.2.13 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:45:52 -0000 On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop up, > I'd go with 10.1 Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? No need to step through 9.x? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 12:03:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D45D3DDE for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x235.google.com (mail-vc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904BAF8E for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id le20so3047793vcb.26 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:03:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mVcrRaGFuXSdzy8WQXLNjDUJASUkzEAPZmkAGIBJTQU=; b=i6I+wRh0BW9ycGFStAhLHVmLwF0ROvKPFPGewPpczXVJDR57OTCg4HpjryfM7Lf7tM WhW6DzBCtg7k56SQZCEz3L19LRpuzsOzwH27651fobUUkyexYf4AMuyVsQsjBLKBAj3G wQI4wD5bzDe+YnVFqpk4RZx4szNV3YZX7W4+PGS8XcwGVvvesYbtGo/wFOYWvD5u91b9 Ox5uHH2/HYLKK36HXj6eWrINjgVlKF6AdgWiMDag6Z/iAHOy3p9kegrPmn6Pm0izzrR4 OE6hLZL7qrikg2pLcMs/4a5MDNnuNlsyqp7n8HbBIsL44rOwyD1+3v9q3K8zdx4X4Tab PXRw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.188.201 with SMTP id db9mr11470711vcb.10.1416053018592; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:03:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.142.77 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:03:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:03:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Mountroot prompt with the new vt(4) console not working. From: Kimmo Paasiala To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:03:39 -0000 I'm not able to use the mountroot prompt with the new vt(4) console on any of the systems I have, all of them either stable/10 or releng/10.1. The problem is that I can't type anything at the prompt or if I can the letters appear as garbage and they come out like one character every five seconds. Is the mountroot prompt working for anyone who is using the new vt(4) console? -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 12:38:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F48579B for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tau.lfms.nl (tau.lfms.nl [93.189.130.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0033304 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sim.dt.lfms.nl (dt.lfms.nl [83.84.86.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tau.lfms.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D9E8928D for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:32:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.130.112] (borax.dt.lfms.nl [192.168.130.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sim.dt.lfms.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00F69C09084 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:32:14 +0100 (CET) From: Walter Hop Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:32:14 +0100 References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:38:10 -0000 On 15 Nov 2014, at 12:44, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >=20 > On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: >=20 >> I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop = up, >> I'd go with 10.1 >=20 > Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? > No need to step through 9.x? I would assume so. We haven't used 9.x that much, and have already = upgraded around 30 machines from 8.4 to 10.0 without a problem. (Using = freebsd-upgrade instead of source, but I=E2=80=99d expect the results to = be the same) --=20 Walter Hop | PGP key: https://lifeforms.nl/pgp From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 12:54:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14655901 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound-queue-1.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (outbound-queue-1.mail.thdo.gradwell.net [212.11.70.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B5B670 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (bonnie.gradwell.net [212.11.70.2]) by outbound-queue-1.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE2721FE7 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:54:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from awontroba.plus.com (HELO swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk) (81.174.163.201) (smtp-auth username postmaster%pop3.stade.co.uk, mechanism cram-md5) by outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (qpsmtpd/0.83) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:54:35 +0000 Received: from swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAFCrntH027398 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:53:49 GMT (envelope-from aw1@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk) Received: (from aw1@localhost) by swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sAFCrmQx027397 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:53:48 GMT (envelope-from aw1) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:53:48 +0000 From: Adrian Wontroba To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? Message-ID: <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> Reply-To: aw1@stade.co.uk References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE Organization: Oh dear, I've joined one again. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Gradwell-MongoId: 54674d0b.b315-3134-2 X-Gradwell-Auth-Method: mailbox X-Gradwell-Auth-Credentials: postmaster@pop3.stade.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:54:43 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop up, > > I'd go with 10.1 > Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? > No need to step through 9.x? Even the move from 9.2 (a near year old 9/stable) to 10.1 (stable/10 as of about 3 weeks ago) is slightly problematic. Following the normal upgrade procedure of installkernel and then rebooting with the userland untouched runs into a problem whereby rc.conf falls apart with a shower of eval errors, no networking, ... I do not know the cause. Fortunately the quick and dirty upgrade approach works for this case. I did not expect it to (8-) cd /usr/src mergemaster -p make installkernel make installworld mergemaster shutdown -r now -- Adrian Wontroba From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 14:42:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E25B7F1 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E947F5F for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F4B490DD; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj) with ESMTPSA id B45EE20392 Message-ID: <54676659.9050908@riseup.net> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:42:33 +0100 From: Piotr Kubaj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ml@netfence.it Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G9JvF8SdPsEjMwSjDXfw9kavWWBcqokJK" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --G9JvF8SdPsEjMwSjDXfw9kavWWBcqokJK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It should be possible if base gcc can bootstrap clang. Since clang internally uses C99, it shouldn't be a problem. --G9JvF8SdPsEjMwSjDXfw9kavWWBcqokJK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUZ2ZaAAoJEC9nKukRsfY+KoIP/if/d1fJg88vaAlY78pmYPcp DXDEvFrW21taO6K/Td2wBw+St89D2coFN9dM+bAc0t45HfozNW3U+RkwDfCPW8ux bw2i1leqnPgVwZWHFebzzD3MA26Dpzxr9fXs/jfAtpYL7w48qwEDlhPPP0zthLcL d227k779tBq3j32kbSWb0PVYMf2LGmlsykPUDb86RkqPkPuxAQ3VlA1mbD8kYVjL IHqZCG9BbcMCZbXcZjO7R2+xuLYWgNWxf3DcBHkCdxJXP74KqHgF8lnmZzJf7ne3 z8U9Z0LHYnc6Fsv4iAjEd1QwKGcuwqeMtQIlxSjGNFwjXT6K3HM1MkhLXH7K304z ijh+biJPuG/6BJeas6E4XfuV1HZ8okQMT8oKGkY2Bh9EiDo67y/mTg0y6SLao6LG DwcMNMt2zHwKJdB9ezwvZD3QF+p4V9zcdTLzTnXgbgcW2QuMjEGcbSjGDc1Y7+IE bD34+jlxAvBbTnGNU4Gs7vEb5SlXLc8xws3oVpOKWLSX/NigHHAdWwh8kCP5DH57 tVNZKlCH/L/IDBHhoTxT+WQ2bIKKYRHSdzNaXK8rGVlQFBF6AQlLDdBgV9SnqNqW KCwU23GVUXZ5Kh7LyWGjguk7Zd9dzLTVJpEy835MdZshxe8Pzw79MevPUGFe7IkO F88vVk6hqlHoRbiJuo2i =3Jpr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G9JvF8SdPsEjMwSjDXfw9kavWWBcqokJK-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 14:55:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645B4A96 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258E78A for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BN3PR0301MB0835.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:55:31 +0000 Message-ID: <5467695F.3080902@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:55:27 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BL2PR08CA0037.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.255.170.155) To BN3PR0301MB0835.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.145) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0835; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0835; X-Forefront-PRVS: 03965EFC76 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(51704005)(189002)(479174003)(24454002)(199003)(21056001)(76176999)(23676002)(86362001)(4396001)(89122001)(110136001)(97736003)(87976001)(92566001)(92726001)(19580395003)(31966008)(80316001)(64126003)(65816999)(50986999)(54356999)(87266999)(50466002)(83506001)(99136001)(101416001)(33656002)(102836001)(88552001)(122386002)(59896002)(99396003)(93886004)(77156002)(40100003)(62966003)(77096003)(450100001)(46102003)(120916001)(75432002)(106356001)(65956001)(105586002)(65806001)(66066001)(95666004)(107046002)(2351001)(107886001)(64706001)(47776003)(20776003)(42186005)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0835; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0835; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:55:39 -0000 On 2014.11.15 06:53, Adrian Wontroba wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop up, >> > I'd go with 10.1 >> Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? >> No need to step through 9.x? > > Even the move from 9.2 (a near year old 9/stable) to 10.1 (stable/10 as > of about 3 weeks ago) is slightly problematic. > > Following the normal upgrade procedure of installkernel and then > rebooting with the userland untouched runs into a problem whereby > rc.conf falls apart with a shower of eval errors, no networking, ... > > I do not know the cause. > > Fortunately the quick and dirty upgrade approach works for this case. > I did not expect it to (8-) > > cd /usr/src > mergemaster -p > make installkernel > make installworld > mergemaster > shutdown -r now > Are you sure you followed the updating instructions exactly? That page of the handbook does change from time to time and doing mergemaster before installing world and kernel is certainly *not* correct. I highly recommend not memorizing the instructions, and to follow a current version of the handbook whenever updating. AFAICT, updating from source should *always* work perfectly (as long as the system is working enough to actually compile and install the new files). From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:14:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B44B0FD5 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kaija.ugh.net.au (kaija.ugh.net.au [IPv6:2a00:1a48:7803:107:65bc:4bde:ff08:1f7f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CF625C for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (77-64-252-109.dynamic.primacom.net [77.64.252.109]) by kaija.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53EB690E5 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:14:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrew Stevenson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: build world failing Message-Id: <2C0C65F2-558B-4759-BE6C-BB4668C0E681@ugh.net.au> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:14:37 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:14:49 -0000 Hi, I am having trouble building world. Currently running 10.1-PRERELEASE = r270922. I have update source a few times in case it was a temporary = breakage but am now trying to build r274327. It always stops in the same place: clang++ -O2 -pipe = -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/include = -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/to ols/clang/include = -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transform= s/Scalar -I. -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../.. /contrib/llvm/../../lib/clang/include -DLLVM_ON_UNIX -DLLVM_ON_FREEBSD = -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -DNDEBUG = -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCL ANG_ENABLE_REWRITER -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -fno-strict-aliasing = -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=3D\"x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1\" = -DLLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=3D\ "x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1\" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT=3D\"\" = -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti = -Wno-c++11-extensions -c /usr/src/ = lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Re= associate.cpp -o Reassociate.o Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/clang++ -cc1 = -triple x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1 -emit-obj -disable-free = -disable-llvm-verifier - main-file-name Reassociate.cpp -mrelocation-model static = -mdisable-fp-elim -relaxed-aliasing -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases = -munwind-tables -target -cpu x86-64 -coverage-file = /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/Reassociate.o -resource-dir = /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.4.1 -D L LVM_ON_UNIX -D LLVM_ON_FREEBSD -D __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D = __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D NDEBUG -D CLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -D = CLANG_ENABLE_REWRITER -D CLANG_ENABLE _STATIC_ANALYZER -D = LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE=3D"x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1" -D = LLVM_HOST_TRIPLE=3D"x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1" -D DEFAULT_SYSROOT=3D"" = -I /u sr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/include -I = /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/inc= lude -I /u = sr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Sc= alar -I . -I = /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/../../ lib/clang/include -isysroot /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp -internal-isystem = /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1 -O2 -Wno-c++11-extensions = -fdeprecated-macro=20 -fdebug-compilation-dir /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts = -ferror-limit 19 -fmessage-length 168 -stack-protector 1 -mstackrealign = -fno-rtti -fobjc-runtime=3Dgnustep -fdiagnostics-show-option = -fcolor-diagnostics -vectorize-loops -vectorize-slp -o Reassociate.o -x = c++ = /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/= Scalar/Reassociate.cpp=20 1. /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:1113:1 = : = current parser token '0x4000' 2. /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:209:1 = : = parsing namespace=20 'std' 3. /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:209:1 = : = parsing namespace=20 '__1' clang++: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault (core = dumped) clang++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to = see invocation) FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1 Thread model: posix clang++: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to = https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace, = preprocessed source, and=20 associated run script. clang++: note: diagnostic msg: Error generating preprocessed source(s). *** Error code 254 Stop. make[6]: stopped in /usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmscalaropts I have =93make clean=94ed. I am using a straight =93make buildworld=94, = no -j options. make.conf contains: TOP_TABLE_SIZE=3D197 NO_I4B=3DYES NO_PROFILE=3DYES The machine only has 1GB of RAM (but plenty of swap space) and in Intel = Atom 230 (1.6GHz) CPU. I don=92t know if the root cause s a clang bug, = as it suggests, or something else wrong. Thanks, Andrew= From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:21:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C29185 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C62F289 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::edec:632d:bcc:2985] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:edec:632d:bcc:2985]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F9EBB80A; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:20:55 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B3576B11-077F-4AD9-963E-3E6E50EC7306"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b1 From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:20:49 +0100 Message-Id: References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> To: aw1@stade.co.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:21:07 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_B3576B11-077F-4AD9-963E-3E6E50EC7306 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 15 Nov 2014, at 13:53, Adrian Wontroba wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop up, >>> I'd go with 10.1 >> Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? >> No need to step through 9.x? > > Even the move from 9.2 (a near year old 9/stable) to 10.1 (stable/10 as > of about 3 weeks ago) is slightly problematic. > > Following the normal upgrade procedure of installkernel and then > rebooting with the userland untouched runs into a problem whereby > rc.conf falls apart with a shower of eval errors, no networking, ... > > I do not know the cause. I almost certainly know the cause: you are supposed to reboot into single user mode after installkernel. A regular boot to full multi user mode may or may not work, depending on numerous unpredictable circumstances. :-) > Fortunately the quick and dirty upgrade approach works for this case. > I did not expect it to (8-) > > cd /usr/src > mergemaster -p > make installkernel > make installworld > mergemaster > shutdown -r now This is not the correct procedure, and just as above, it may or may not work. The new world you install with installworld can depend on kernel features which are only available *after* you reboot with the kernel just installed with installkernel. The proper procedure, mentioned at the bottom of /usr/src/UPDATING, is: make buildworld make kernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE [1] [3] mergemaster -Fp [5] make installworld mergemaster -Fi [4] make delete-old [6] Here, "make kernel" is just shorthand for "make buildkernel" followed by "make installkernel". -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_B3576B11-077F-4AD9-963E-3E6E50EC7306 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.26 iEYEARECAAYFAlRnb1cACgkQsF6jCi4glqOOIgCgnpudsGtqZN6XbaYTEvMEwiuf IHwAnRy7ILBBvQQu0t3VtlLgZ/hY+jzW =iawL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_B3576B11-077F-4AD9-963E-3E6E50EC7306-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:22:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A428C277 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7312834F for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id eu11so19545168pac.9 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:22:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4w4zrH4mVwZMkwCSuXvp2UyG6QdJGyQZT3zSG8rniU0=; b=KeI5TprHdm6YQLnN04LltywryEM12wcjMO7uqW0NHJD+A9RtFyIkMwZVu8mHqm1ZKu OvikED8YCO37uByNkW1ZX+WH6mE7xIY5N78DTdLd2vXmiR2sZ1ON0rvLj18EU2KTEUfW UAvU40+dTIDuN0oLgEcBKpnBum26CY4Bij3uoE3wpScH1rtwyWJQBHzM1pwNaVkCbxhh YsMaspSryDzNBHS6m+DZS4ShJlaKNKsAaykvnD5y9nhuxX5O8hevzQRt54enAjRimsJI OkeHY1REIA2nx0ySS20y2VzQ3OLd/+41KspmkhRuMNOoMi8Pr2TAHwDwOqDsu2rwGXfh fqDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.150.102 with SMTP id uh6mr653461pab.141.1416064940037; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:22:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.94.167 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:22:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5467695F.3080902@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> <5467695F.3080902@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:22:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? From: Adam Vande More To: Andrew Berg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:22:20 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Berg wrote: > > Are you sure you followed the updating instructions exactly? That page of > the > handbook does change from time to time and doing mergemaster before > installing > world and kernel is certainly *not* correct. A mergemaster -p should be run prior to installing new kernel. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:26:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB2B537A for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9B0369 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:26:08 +0000 Message-ID: <5467708A.8000402@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:26:02 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> <5467695F.3080902@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BL2PR08CA0027.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.255.170.145) To CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.148) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; X-Forefront-PRVS: 03965EFC76 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(24454002)(51704005)(189002)(199003)(377454003)(76176999)(54356999)(87266999)(93886004)(21056001)(99136001)(110136001)(77156002)(66066001)(122386002)(65806001)(20776003)(65956001)(47776003)(89122001)(92726001)(92566001)(64706001)(87976001)(40100003)(65816999)(50986999)(19580405001)(19580395003)(80316001)(86362001)(62966003)(77096003)(15975445006)(105586002)(106356001)(4396001)(107046002)(42186005)(1411001)(46102003)(75432002)(23676002)(88552001)(97736003)(99396003)(102836001)(33656002)(50466002)(101416001)(120916001)(31966008)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:26:16 -0000 On 2014.11.15 09:22, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Berg > wrote: > > Are you sure you followed the updating instructions exactly? That page of the > handbook does change from time to time and doing mergemaster before installing > world and kernel is certainly *not* correct. > > > A mergemaster -p should be run prior to installing new kernel. The handbook says otherwise. install kernel ... mergemaster -p install world mergemaster -iF ... https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:26:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1A045D; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6727036B; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id eu11so19241032pac.23 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:26:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eGEUsoYfaC9iyNbUW0zpnXKB7QjbuLrsXu/x0h3XXbM=; b=Z1nI8tk91qgUjKC4TT6HnIlwFa0dcuq8ddnYIiXKDdnJrP3HWcZFN2cR/E/v5nlMJl rdksi/YSfrm9XTDiBP5G73SO7wW9boxYNq1cAnxXSvQGdrHDCfxhWpOxAdRUZy8FICQH XlHyj4eb0BWr+aiEYOQAAC+vKgp08Dz/Bi72qrM/dxFcHGQ7zuD75hiTMlBdtgIyVhpH 1rQIBEuG1Msd2xYdFw2ZuKdonW/aSBurl6IVw3Sk9ME3j6RojIg2dDJKJZ/jWbYUwOJk 3RROaNZkCUL2+oAT10RhaGOzlyhgioqXuvd+FiM6tY3KH4u7AGrvLbO7xHvCji0l6zKH Is3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.249.99 with SMTP id yt3mr388276pbc.162.1416065182163; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.94.167 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:26:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:26:22 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? From: Adam Vande More To: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:26:23 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 15 Nov 2014, at 13:53, Adrian Wontroba wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >>> I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop > up, > >>> I'd go with 10.1 > >> Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? > >> No need to step through 9.x? > > > > Even the move from 9.2 (a near year old 9/stable) to 10.1 (stable/10 as > > of about 3 weeks ago) is slightly problematic. > > > > Following the normal upgrade procedure of installkernel and then > > rebooting with the userland untouched runs into a problem whereby > > rc.conf falls apart with a shower of eval errors, no networking, ... > > > > I do not know the cause. > > I almost certainly know the cause: you are supposed to reboot into > single user mode after installkernel. This is almost certainly not the cause. Something else in the horked up given procedure or some omission of facts is the likely cause. Fortunately, nice people have already created documentation on how to do this: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html -- Adam From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:35:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06183820 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm9-vm6.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (nm9-vm6.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com [106.10.148.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B2664C for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [106.10.166.123] by nm9.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Nov 2014 15:32:56 -0000 Received: from [106.10.151.186] by tm12.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Nov 2014 15:32:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1012.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Nov 2014 15:32:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 607495.96967.bm@omp1012.mail.sg3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 80695 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Nov 2014 15:32:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1416065576; bh=Zw2l0AjTLCaHSqrRTiiNTyGtVlBZ3pBgvNZH1uLLxOw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Jd78Mt9ytZLQeqQCfYykUqXOubaa/G9FHUzmR8OV5HgotXzzm8Ay6z/NvgFj9I3ojcsP8Be12v6cWiIRC+1udqD4eO9VUddSta0ht2Vtd8i8ftDhFY9/HcdHZ6RHYSqJXdpF3sLTSd3jiy9Sfd4zBbYmXXj+8hRpjFXV6u6iB9A= X-YMail-OSG: fJrNYR0VM1n0Ha_UXhET6tC3kiN7E3nLJHM3vT7KSmu4TIQ DphwSeksm4UPSPQyS3OAtySDJs46uT_c.KS7aNOfEGoz_MlWMzTK_U5dcp1_ XcAuUyvam4gIY8q_0RboR3iyoFwbXNa6fPZo9gOiH.f4Ht6osOpHC2ENshLX M8cejQHoql79uidTnPrGE0yar5Ij164FEFkCfgk9eIrK.nGd6YtxoyNs.Qpe o2_Gw.zf5xp343cLtuG2W6gWR7RQeSr7.hyqYyV5lnKzSj6SGctKsscBvS79 twGjhZN6GxI1aIuKE10Pc7af3OCfvvHAukguxHGPeGvE4ocD02cNSTu2hzMl yYFQhc3lLjHRs7T1rkpD8UuDGnKS85ha8Tb1QnRr0qaWicMnkaATQdbSft0G mg3OM407tybc99p96JCjgliUkKmg9hhxmRICgcX.C9eJniId0tlXLE3u5VlD D2YQ7SBQhd630yC.8GtWILG7B6ZV8gzUvZbif_JkZmdAk0ddBcf6Fl99xh.e LvI7KexO6Cv5AWlSnyP1QqIwF29Mq67Ne9EGNlipQWW_TEFt1DDYSyiva8eo j0KcaeUxOtSyYpw0Y6klbzeJN4bIhyawqM8joAMjJ36j5QBbbL5SrUfnj4.4 zeBAUKw-- Received: from [122.167.154.172] by web190701.mail.sg3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 23:32:56 SGT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SSBpbnN0YWxsZWQgMTAuMS1SQzMgdmlhIFVTQiBpbWFnZSBvbiBteSBsYXB0b3AsIGluIGJpZCB0byB1cGdyYWRlIDEwLjEtUkVMRUFTRSBJIHJhbgojZnJlZWJzZC11cGRhdGUgZmV0Y2ggLXIgMTAuMS1SRUxFQVNFCml0IGZhaWxzIHNheWluZwpMb29raW5nIHVwIHVwZGF0ZS5GcmVlQlNELm9yZyBtaXJyb3JzLi4uIDUgbWlycm9ycyBmb3VuZC4KRmV0Y2hpbmcgbWV0YWRhdGEgc2lnbmF0dXJlIGZvciAxMC4xLVJDMyBmcm9tIHVwZGF0ZTUuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcuLi4gZG9uZS4KRmV0Y2hpbmcgbWV0YWRhdGEBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.733 Message-ID: <1416065576.26947.YahooMailNeo@web190701.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 23:32:56 +0800 From: Masoom Shaikh Reply-To: Masoom Shaikh Subject: Upgrade from 10.1-RC3 to 10.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:35:41 -0000 I installed 10.1-RC3 via USB image on my laptop, in bid to upgrade 10.1-REL= EASE I ran=0A#freebsd-update fetch -r 10.1-RELEASE=0Ait fails saying=0ALook= ing up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.=0AFetching metadata s= ignature for 10.1-RC3 from update5.freebsd.org... done.=0AFetching metadata= index... fetch: http://update5.freebsd.org/10.1-RC3/amd64/t/c8fafcc79d7cc0= 92c7782f4f1a29a777d751294183c8f2cb9daf940ba0525d96: Not Found=0Afailed.=0A= =0Athis topic has already been discussed here=0Ahttps://lists.freebsd.org/p= ipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-November/080954.html and=0A=0Ahttps://forums.f= reebsd.org/threads/freebsd-update-r-10-1-rc4-upgrade-fails.48835/=0A=0A=0As= olution is actually mentioned in forums threads=0Awhat it suggest is =0A#fr= eebsd-update rollback=0A#reboot=0A#freebsd-update fetch=0A#freebsd-update u= pgrade -r 10.1-RC4=0A#freebsd-upgrade install=0A#reboot=0A#freebsd-upgrade = install=0A=0Afor me rollback fails saying=0ANo rollback directory found.=0A= maybe because I did not install RC3 via freebsd-update, nonetheless any fix= as yet?=0A From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:38:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25FF9936 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FCB672 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::edec:632d:bcc:2985] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:edec:632d:bcc:2985]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFDBBB80A; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:38:11 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: build world failing Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8BC8F18D-CA6B-4373-83EC-8402A16D7179"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b1 From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <2C0C65F2-558B-4759-BE6C-BB4668C0E681@ugh.net.au> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:38:04 +0100 Message-Id: References: <2C0C65F2-558B-4759-BE6C-BB4668C0E681@ugh.net.au> To: Andrew Stevenson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:38:15 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_8BC8F18D-CA6B-4373-83EC-8402A16D7179 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 15 Nov 2014, at 16:14, Andrew Stevenson wrote: >=20 > I am having trouble building world. Currently running 10.1-PRERELEASE = r270922. I have update source a few times in case it was a temporary = breakage but am now trying to build r274327. >=20 > It always stops in the same place: ... > clang++: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault (core = dumped) > clang++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to = see invocation) > FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) = 20140512 > Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1 > Thread model: posix > clang++: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to = https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace, = preprocessed source, and > associated run script. > clang++: note: diagnostic msg: Error generating preprocessed = source(s). ... > The machine only has 1GB of RAM (but plenty of swap space) and in = Intel Atom 230 (1.6GHz) CPU. I don=92t know if the root cause s a clang = bug, as it suggests, or something else wrong. Can you check dmesg and/or syslog for any messages regarding clang being out of memory? If it always crashes in the same place, then it could indeed be a clang bug (but it's unlikely, since you seem to be the only one having this problem), but it could also be some RAM problem that only manifests when you are actively using a lot of memory. I would do a few memcheck passes on the machine, just to be sure. Since clang does not seem to be able to generate the preprocessed sources, this will be tricky or impossible to reproduce. Maybe you can try getting a backtrace from the core dump? But this will require debug symbols, unfortunately. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_8BC8F18D-CA6B-4373-83EC-8402A16D7179 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.26 iEYEARECAAYFAlRnc2QACgkQsF6jCi4glqOt8ACgiOjCE9A0bLkZVNR2dDgyDHbo moMAoN9L3mjM0aCN6kJkXoFXWXzvm0gw =6nCk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_8BC8F18D-CA6B-4373-83EC-8402A16D7179-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 16:17:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8303DE4D; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E849D8; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [73.34.117.227] (helo=ilsoft.org) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpg2p-000Cph-3i; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:17:51 +0000 Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAFGHovt006211; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:17:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 73.34.117.227 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18Oi5rNMz+uwgHqaKf7Kg2N X-Authentication-Warning: paranoia.hippie.lan: Host revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240] claimed to be [172.22.42.240] Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? From: Ian Lepore To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:17:49 -0700 Message-ID: <1416068269.4781.144.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:17:53 -0000 On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 09:26 -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > On 15 Nov 2014, at 13:53, Adrian Wontroba wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > >> On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > >>> I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop > > up, > > >>> I'd go with 10.1 > > >> Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? > > >> No need to step through 9.x? > > > > > > Even the move from 9.2 (a near year old 9/stable) to 10.1 (stable/10 as > > > of about 3 weeks ago) is slightly problematic. > > > > > > Following the normal upgrade procedure of installkernel and then > > > rebooting with the userland untouched runs into a problem whereby > > > rc.conf falls apart with a shower of eval errors, no networking, ... > > > > > > I do not know the cause. > > > > I almost certainly know the cause: you are supposed to reboot into > > single user mode after installkernel. > > > This is almost certainly not the cause. Something else in the horked up > given procedure or some omission of facts is the likely cause. Fortunately, > nice people have already created documentation on how to do this: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html > > No. It is absolutely the cause. It's clear from the original poster's report of errors in rc scripts after booting on the new kernel. If the instructions were followed you'd end up in single-user mode and the old rc scripts would never have been run before the installworld put the new ones in. -- Ian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 17:01:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E680D1B for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87963DD2 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95320 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2014 16:55:11 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 15 Nov 2014 16:55:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:55:11 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20141115.175511.78795811.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: ian@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <1416068269.4781.144.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <1416068269.4781.144.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amvandemore@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, dim@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:01:56 -0000 > > > >>> I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop > > > up, > > > >>> I'd go with 10.1 > > > >> Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? > > > >> No need to step through 9.x? > > > > > > > > Even the move from 9.2 (a near year old 9/stable) to 10.1 (stable/10 as > > > > of about 3 weeks ago) is slightly problematic. > > > > > > > > Following the normal upgrade procedure of installkernel and then > > > > rebooting with the userland untouched runs into a problem whereby > > > > rc.conf falls apart with a shower of eval errors, no networking, ... > > > > > > > > I do not know the cause. > > > > > > I almost certainly know the cause: you are supposed to reboot into > > > single user mode after installkernel. > > > > > > This is almost certainly not the cause. Something else in the horked up > > given procedure or some omission of facts is the likely cause. Fortunately, > > nice people have already created documentation on how to do this: > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/makeworld.html > > > > > > No. It is absolutely the cause. It's clear from the original poster's > report of errors in rc scripts after booting on the new kernel. If the > instructions were followed you'd end up in single-user mode and the old > rc scripts would never have been run before the installworld put the new > ones in. Unfortunately this is a problem since some of us need to be able to perform a remote upgrade. Yes, I know this is not supported. I have been able to do so up to 9.3 so far - and I expect that I'll be able to do it for 10.1 also - though the steps may be slightly different from the standard procedure. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 17:39:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 948FDA72; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535A4E1; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.23.74.131] (helo=michael-think.fritz.box) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XphJO-0001Ij-SO; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:39:02 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: aw1@stade.co.uk, "Dimitry Andric" Subject: Re: best overall upgrade from 8.x? References: <54673CA1.5020008@netfence.it> <20141115125347.GC16633@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:38:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.98.4/19632/Sat Nov 15 12:39:41 2014) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:39:12 -0000 On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:20:49 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 15 Nov 2014, at 13:53, Adrian Wontroba wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:44:33PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> On 11/15/14 05:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>>> I'd wait a month or so and, if no problems that might impact you pop >>>> up, >>>> I'd go with 10.1 >>> Uh... is direct upgrade (using sources) possible from 8.4 to 10.1? >>> No need to step through 9.x? >> >> Even the move from 9.2 (a near year old 9/stable) to 10.1 (stable/10 as >> of about 3 weeks ago) is slightly problematic. >> >> Following the normal upgrade procedure of installkernel and then >> rebooting with the userland untouched runs into a problem whereby >> rc.conf falls apart with a shower of eval errors, no networking, ... >> >> I do not know the cause. > > I almost certainly know the cause: you are supposed to reboot into > single user mode after installkernel. A regular boot to full multi user > mode may or may not work, depending on numerous unpredictable > circumstances. :-) > If you follow the handbook, you are not supposed to reboot at all after installkernel. I think it was advised once, but it does no longer say so, it just says "drop to single user". Well, it still says "[single user] also minimizes any problems from running the old world on a new kernel." which you don't actually do if you follow the instructions. Michael From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 19:41:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CAD7AFD for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A29CDD1 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id rd18so20028205iec.35 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:41:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+4En/5kXqmVVpHj9iEjHcwqACna4QbbOxRAdbrvu6nM=; b=nKUnfvq77mn8qEEzcj75Asr+f9kGi4s5kIWMo7akQ0y6QYITtvHDuQPyCvnJX3xdiT 0RnRakySIWMe81fdl0vcuNtMtpJGvv4Y855MVQPMKcTq6vdMmuliyOdfm+r1CsPHtC66 1OcjCbLxPaSseiMs2VOBr0ken1ub5bJ8yL5BgQr74WJ1EMGMfruQhStGA7qm1e1qKRkc zYA0OtUMEdtqc+7iFV4XewgXN+ZD3gZjSwSIYx/ZvuBj2r68tSz1Le73YFxTS4potNBQ DE5ra2sJ+KI4PZChuSbSuvdV/TChR/TzAMLJljc6fM7NUL4ixLEwUFfV3XC/J44a5NGD 9TqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.142.201 with SMTP id t9mr9685399icu.60.1416080463467; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:41:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.7.169 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:41:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1416065576.26947.YahooMailNeo@web190701.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> References: <1416065576.26947.YahooMailNeo@web190701.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:41:03 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RYfXI8SeghEhhwIL2xp_TsDU4WY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upgrade from 10.1-RC3 to 10.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update From: Kevin Oberman To: Masoom Shaikh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:41:04 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Masoom Shaikh via freebsd-stable < freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> wrote: > I installed 10.1-RC3 via USB image on my laptop, in bid to upgrade > 10.1-RELEASE I ran > #freebsd-update fetch -r 10.1-RELEASE > it fails saying > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RC3 from update5.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... fetch: > http://update5.freebsd.org/10.1-RC3/amd64/t/c8fafcc79d7cc092c7782f4f1a29a777d751294183c8f2cb9daf940ba0525d96: > Not Found > failed. > > this topic has already been discussed here > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-November/080954.html > and > > > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/freebsd-update-r-10-1-rc4-upgrade-fails.48835/ > > > solution is actually mentioned in forums threads > what it suggest is > #freebsd-update rollback > #reboot > #freebsd-update fetch > #freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.1-RC4 > #freebsd-upgrade install > #reboot > #freebsd-upgrade install > > for me rollback fails saying > No rollback directory found. > maybe because I did not install RC3 via freebsd-update, nonetheless any > fix as yet? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You're using the wrong command to freebsd-update. # freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.1-RELEASE "fetch" is appropriate to updating for patches to the release you are currently running. Since you installed from a USB distribution, there is no rollback. The rollback data is created by freebsd-update. Also, I suspect you entered the data above from memory as freebsd-upgrade is not a command in base freebsd. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 20:29:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5FADE9 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3D428C for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpjxt-0004C3-2T for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:29:01 +0100 Received: from 117.85-200-5.bkkb.no ([85.200.5.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:29:01 +0100 Received: from christer.solskogen by 117.85-200-5.bkkb.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:29:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Christer Solskogen Subject: Typo in /etc/rc.d/jail ? Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:28:49 +0100 Lines: 8 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 117.85-200-5.bkkb.no User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:29:13 -0000 $ /etc/rc.d/jail Usage: /etc/rc.d/jail [fast|force|one|quiet](start|stop|restart|rcvar|enabled|config|console|status|status|poll) status is mentioned twice. -- chs From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 22:53:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5532DA0 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 22:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3996B1B0 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 22:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hi2so5776996wib.13 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:52:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=f0wDiajsCYvlVZ2pUpUzi9y8MdzvMYy8JrhXp9bn7c0=; b=eEc24N0sS8vqjesjvO/KMVlcPRwPnUVbP+ilecvGOe7vC/mcafBjb9eGqTNZo5ATMv wsHbaT87KFn9s8cWmCp+GHGiXeCqD9zcbqCxKR9pNjNlud+RB5RVrn4DldfRP+pzH/L4 oCVYXIbGfZHvFVsOvLaRM2kAY8iMpkZWmNf+RgJcEfurWxS4aL4Qwd7NBh8PEpwKZohs YQSdX3wu6qSTmGX2DdT01LauSeYOP7xBAqSFkETd12hUCz7mA7PazU/seUjHonzZOkz2 O25PzgTqICmufHgPjGdhNbS9ty+rXCT4DwiOwT+mkpbAQwd6TGvxl9iBdusEKtSHkPZ6 OO9g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.181.12.6 with SMTP id em6mr19307941wid.24.1416091978612; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:52:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.53.68 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:52:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:52:58 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Typo in /etc/rc.d/jail ? From: Sergey Kandaurov To: Christer Solskogen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 22:53:00 -0000 On 15 November 2014 23:28, Christer Solskogen wrote: > $ /etc/rc.d/jail > Usage: /etc/rc.d/jail > [fast|force|one|quiet](start|stop|restart|rcvar|enabled|config|console|status|status|poll) > > status is mentioned twice. > I believe this is the cause: Index: etc/rc.d/jail =================================================================== --- etc/rc.d/jail (revision 273814) +++ etc/rc.d/jail (working copy) @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ config_cmd="jail_config" console_cmd="jail_console" status_cmd="jail_status" -extra_commands="config console status" +extra_commands="config console" : ${jail_conf:=/etc/jail.conf} : ${jail_program:=/usr/sbin/jail} : ${jail_consolecmd:=/usr/bin/login -f root} i.e., status is automatically supported. -- wbr, pluknet From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 23:28:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED91A1AE for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 23:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com (mail-lb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B1B363F for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 23:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b6so14451565lbj.16 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:28:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=N3pinBga49shh9n9K5wNogq6Hxpw410ppj/bl20nrUk=; b=oYqczmpOYmIuVfBgrO2RMOYdM3LJI8f3blOWDhntm09g5UvmpUvSxHjV33/CR5TkTu QjqOls/FKDkyuaq8H+pAr2V/UGYLzPT2EiNq3JG1olllSD5Kxvv/3nf9P4RnIV2WmvyL E8IU6tDPyaSogIVp9lH6EOg6b5IGUS6V9hIujv7c/zbrFc82nZnQr4r9cPYWrSLXHoHH BwvVi9qFdKxeI7FZWIuebXDQ22KGVjikaKOk17ATj4xg3BLgx3LE3ng/b+Q0YjRDIBL9 dbpKvtpb+up9wXl/7wxDS36HAL0WDutjWZNjjgHLkT3zv4mJLoCj70fcrhSRrphjx7Yf gzew== X-Received: by 10.112.151.70 with SMTP id uo6mr16042799lbb.2.1416094082400; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:28:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.145.16 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:27:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Christer Solskogen Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:27:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Typo in /etc/rc.d/jail ? To: Sergey Kandaurov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 23:28:05 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 15 November 2014 23:28, Christer Solskogen > wrote: >> $ /etc/rc.d/jail >> Usage: /etc/rc.d/jail >> [fast|force|one|quiet](start|stop|restart|rcvar|enabled|config|console|status|status|poll) >> >> status is mentioned twice. >> > > I believe this is the cause: > > Index: etc/rc.d/jail > =================================================================== > --- etc/rc.d/jail (revision 273814) > +++ etc/rc.d/jail (working copy) > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > config_cmd="jail_config" > console_cmd="jail_console" > status_cmd="jail_status" > -extra_commands="config console status" > +extra_commands="config console" > : ${jail_conf:=/etc/jail.conf} > : ${jail_program:=/usr/sbin/jail} > : ${jail_consolecmd:=/usr/bin/login -f root} > > i.e., status is automatically supported. > Agreed. I figured that out myself :-) Probably something to patch in stable/10 if it's not already done. -- chs