From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 23 22:45:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01776BF for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC011D78; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1NMj9lV063972; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:45:09 GMT (envelope-from gerald@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gerald@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s1NMj9nm063971; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:45:09 GMT (envelope-from gerald) Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:45:09 GMT Message-Id: <201402232245.s1NMj9nm063971@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org, gerald@FreeBSD.org, gerald@FreeBSD.org From: gerald@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/182657: [patch] lang/gcc48: expose c99 math in 'std' namespace X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:45:10 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] lang/gcc48: expose c99 math in 'std' namespace State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: gerald State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 23 22:44:50 UTC 2014 State-Changed-Why: First of all, sorry for the delay. There have been a couple of issues with the lang/gcc ports that I needed to address first and this has taken longer than I had expected. I would love to expose c99 math to FreeBSD users of GCC. The proposed patch seems a bit hackish, though, and specific to the lang/gcc* ports? Or do you think that could be pushed upstream? That would be the best approach, first for GCC 4.9 and then we could look into backporting to GCC 4.8, perhaps GCC 4.7. Gerald http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182657