From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 19 12:24:36 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EE12F9B
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:24:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de
 [80.67.29.28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D84FFD9
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [78.35.153.72] (helo=fabiankeil.de)
 by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128)
 (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de>)
 id 1XfpVS-00086F-Aq
 for freebsd-testing@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:22:42 +0200
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:22:44 +0200
From: Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de>
To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: atf_check() equivalent to test individual shell functions?
Message-ID: <1dfb5b7d.6133bc91@fabiankeil.de>
In-Reply-To: <1552a16f.63e4cafe@fabiankeil.de>
References: <41d8a2fb.75b47028@fabiankeil.de>
 <CAFY7cWDunqCZGVQdBbi0YZP-wxBa201zeFjgofsBw04WZmAdDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1552a16f.63e4cafe@fabiankeil.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/Bb/IFLwJuM1q=7yysZJ_xuE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD <freebsd-testing.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:24:36 -0000

--Sig_/Bb/IFLwJuM1q=7yysZJ_xuE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> wrote:

> Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Fabian Keil
> > <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> > > Here's another zogftw-related problem.
> >=20
> > What's zogftw?
>=20
> The program I'm writing tests for:
> http://www.fabiankeil.de/gehacktes/zogftw/

FYI, sysutils/zogftw 2014-09-19 comes with a bunch of ATF test
cases, the port optionally executes them before packaging:
http://www.fabiankeil.de/gehacktes/zogftw/#tests

With the help of Redports this has prevented a bug that affected
8.4 and 9.2 (which I don't use myself) from making it into the
final release:
https://www.redports.org/~fk/20140919190307-42924-246115/zogftw-0.0.2014.09=
.19.log

Debugging this was a bit painful due to lack of shell access and DTrace,
but obviously having a user debug this after the release would have been
painful, too.

Currently most of the system binaries zogftw relies are only mocked,
but I intend to look into optionally using the real ones in the
future.

Fabian

--Sig_/Bb/IFLwJuM1q=7yysZJ_xuE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlRDrRQACgkQBYqIVf93VJ0i/wCffH4hlefPeQBKZbxKGF9bktLk
b0wAoI3sulvXGAzjQpxmExNRYnmbZnVp
=qqck
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Bb/IFLwJuM1q=7yysZJ_xuE--