From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 23:44:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E0A9F3B for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [72.5.230.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB52F47 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-124-78.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.124.78]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1421623718940639.706693404541; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 15:28:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:28:36 -0600 From: Bigby James To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Message-ID: <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:44:01 -0000 So as part of setting up a Poudriere build server I decided to run a buildworld on my machines and, as per John Baldwin's request, I merged r270516 from HEAD with r277351 from STABLE. I can confirm Kevin Oberman's findings---things are working fine so far. I got to learn a thing or two about FreeBSD development and some of the basics of using Subversion. Thanks a lot for the pointers, folks. So what are the chances of getting this merged into STABLE so myself and others don't have to MFC every update? -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 04:20:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFBF5189 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 838B6CD4 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id r20so5994829wiv.4 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:20:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o20s/1hzhypNxPHP79HK+BI83HI6BzGavcSbZT3+i90=; b=qfWnUPyJXN84TgTvzJpIvcIofw0+s6SewXmbEx5yl46CkFC3fufVn/aTt+69cRAJG+ bcirLTqK1e6fcbxIfRx3FcBWxqreVRdva3VcQQDUK7pzzBiXPysKFQ/RjRLrVUhaLZyL aRoHVLQDZuY/rTJPmv3znaqTasXdOzFJrChAWKg7ui47yvqvgVXeGA83beCBEZZ69CJz zhzsWDRjK6DJneX0H45x9wkYvkbgTuCLt/Xe0d80Jv8aOBhkro6C1Tcw4sOhz2sQS0sd Uxx459A5y+ISk6VFPS2yd5WIPUlnslC/aMYG7q4RZFUZXdanOxpqFGBb/EoGsWG5murV SelA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.20.6 with SMTP id j6mr30480835wie.59.1421641222036; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:20:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.41.136 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:20:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:20:21 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PMjgRsqwV9U5MQysvaswR9AoMrE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support From: Adrian Chadd To: Bigby James Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:20:24 -0000 hm, someone just needs to do the MFC. I don't have stable/10 on any laptop, so I'd be doing it blind. Would someone with stable/10 please MFC 270516 from HEAD? Pretty please? -a On 18 January 2015 at 15:28, Bigby James wrote: > So as part of setting up a Poudriere build server I decided to run a buildworld > on my machines and, as per John Baldwin's request, I merged r270516 from HEAD > with r277351 from STABLE. I can confirm Kevin Oberman's findings---things are > working fine so far. I got to learn a thing or two about FreeBSD development > and some of the basics of using Subversion. Thanks a lot for the pointers, > folks. So what are the chances of getting this merged into STABLE so myself and > others don't have to MFC every update? > > -- > "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely > foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 04:31:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6587124C for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3198CDC8 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id tr6so988109ieb.2 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:31:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4QreW5u4xnWfPri/ArITQaH2R3uYRbQQGui5EgTZCdA=; b=xHYO8izAd0hifAG4wMIJYiAgmzu+VlCFQaAbiGm7uZmAqg0vTdnp9vIpQTAgoB5okj 1rsEhYf9WFefYB3tXjUBrd/aBhuNP9oh10qIsdT3/X09i/PweSmrYMgR1W4gTpmeD14U NOgE2zrtcYH1rNPDvOLiDrKffzDKdh3LJDpYBt+vE4Vv9SZvBJkVN5SBV2ZCJFBs2vDI HxKKT5R7+AgHlQO6UQUrHRKDBVF+kYz12CLWHF+3qbAClw/g0ZJW+l4kQ1pizOrVAVXM JU1iNore/CtEc60eCj7XWaNpp/hsERhH9XeR2jk3EwmTKlSDQEglZ1ePR65HbuYyDjg8 DuwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.164.16 with SMTP id n16mr30835575ioe.44.1421641907526; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:31:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.52.19 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:31:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:31:47 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: E06YOPK5qVH3nCW7lofO4U_ffdg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support From: Kevin Oberman To: Bigby James Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:31:48 -0000 On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Bigby James wrote: > So as part of setting up a Poudriere build server I decided to run a > buildworld > on my machines and, as per John Baldwin's request, I merged r270516 from > HEAD > with r277351 from STABLE. I can confirm Kevin Oberman's findings---things > are > working fine so far. I got to learn a thing or two about FreeBSD > development > and some of the basics of using Subversion. Thanks a lot for the pointers, > folks. So what are the chances of getting this merged into STABLE so > myself and > others don't have to MFC every update? > First, if you use subversion, you won't need to merge the patches every update. As long as those files are not updated, there is no action required. If any of them are, you will be notified of the conflict during the update and you can then resolve it. As intel_opregion.c is pretty stable, I hope it will be MFCed before any other MFCs happen. I will also mention that I did update my system today and the kernel build failed if I did a parallel build (-jN). The failure was in the "depend" stage, so it failed rather quickly. I did two builds with -j6 and two without. Both builds with -j6 failed and both without it succeeded. So something is not quite right and, since I have seen no other reports and it fails while in drm2/i915, it seems very likely it is related to the patch. Of course, it is possible that I messed up the merge, but it seems unlikely that a bad merge would cause this failure. This would indicate a race, possibly triggered by the changes. It could also be hardware dependent. Races can be a real challenge to track down. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 00:42:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0840D377 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D7121D for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0K0gElx036937 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 162859] [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jkim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 Jung-uk Kim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkim@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #16 from Jung-uk Kim --- Created attachment 151870 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151870&action=edit A patch to test -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 00:42:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3B5417 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A2C22C for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0K0gxlV037158 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 162859] [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jkim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jkim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:42:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 Jung-uk Kim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org |jkim@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #17 from Jung-uk Kim --- Please test the patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 17:32:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5728C619 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F15F55 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-124-78.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.124.78]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1421775163719700.3043200711999; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:32:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:32:41 -0600 From: Bigby James To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Message-ID: <20150120173241.GA26304@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:32:48 -0000 On 01/18, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I will also mention that I did update my system today and the kernel build > failed if I did a parallel build (-jN). The failure was in the "depend" > stage, so it failed rather quickly. I did two builds with -j6 and two > without. Both builds with -j6 failed and both without it succeeded. So > something is not quite right and, since I have seen no other reports and it > fails while in drm2/i915, it seems very likely it is related to the patch. > Of course, it is possible that I messed up the merge, but it seems unlikely > that a bad merge would cause this failure. This would indicate a race, > possibly triggered by the changes. It could also be hardware dependent. > Races can be a real challenge to track down. Huh. I just built both my custom kernel and the GENERIC configuration, using both '-j8' (my usual setting) and '-j6.' Both completed successfully. You and I were likely building from the same commit as well (I wrote my message to the list immediately after updating), so that's odd. -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 19:02:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E05675C9; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F9DBCB; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 083A6B93A; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:02:41 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:44:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <20150118232836.GA1494@workbox.Home> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201501201044.07013.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:02:41 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:02:43 -0000 On Sunday, January 18, 2015 11:20:21 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: > hm, someone just needs to do the MFC. I don't have stable/10 on any > laptop, so I'd be doing it blind. I think most of these types of MFCs are blind as most of the folks testing it in HEAD are running HEAD. > Would someone with stable/10 please MFC 270516 from HEAD? Pretty please? Eh, you can always use a VM to test the 10 build if you wish, but since you committed this head, you should just MFC it to 10. You've already gotten one confirmation by a user reporting that it works fine when merged, so I think that is ample. -- John Baldwin