From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 20:22:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 606B3961 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 20:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475B36B8 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 20:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t18KM7q7075689 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 20:22:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194183] [arm] math/R missing libquadmath to compile Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:22:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:22:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194183 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 03:51:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D461BA20 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 03:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.umail10.cn4e.com (umail10.cn4e.com [219.239.95.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AABD1B for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 03:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smail116.cn4e.com (smail116.cn4e.com [124.202.153.116]) by mail.umail10.cn4e.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEA2FE446F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:51:40 +0800 (CST) X-Bordeaux-Score: 550 X-Spam-Flag: NO Received: from localhost([180.173.154.98]) by smail116.cn4e.com(5.0.0.3a) with ESMTP id 2DA3040A0006.232.1423453900.210975; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:51:40 +0800 (CST) X-BQId: 2DA3040A0006.232.1423453900.210975.1 X-Bordeaux-Type: AUTHSMTP X-35BMId: 2DA3040A0006.232.1423453900.210975.1 X-Bordeaux-LOG: SA: TSMF, 3-550-1-83886336,3-550-1-83886336,3-550-1-83886336 eJzt2btOwzAUBuAusADv4BGGWk7vVAi1DSmpmtZVayRW13UvUhKjXKQ8JA/AwBvwBkwkIgOKRNW lcQXni6KT4Qz/9svOWeXbK35jP6dJp1PLZMjoEGy069hoNvBtpwL+ifcDdkKP71zDaGHhNyQWyk PWYsJmaKCCleRx0qs3r5uYpE+d3xw9MQCgbOf5LPaHZTsUOUpw11ZhpC0e0OTzgB06PnoMAMAJu 8hnsT/6T8xGDn0cTbVFAxp9pG8NtzHZs9OPo630o53g0U75KIyFkGG4jt2yQgIAtLrMZ7E/Jv2R g4ZzOumiO4/7fCMD0uoJvyojKbbZZcW9tszg+LLzB0/74GXP2bNGCKmVlggAcGqu8lnsj7k5Y4j RtD3WgZTLcFXlgdcbpt+DxQNWwQbq40/L+mNudq1n9vsOHSOZRDLwuYuyXyFLlZSWDwCg3xcVfm K3 X-Bordeaux-Detail: eJxzsrIKjgwOcfW1snIGI0MDYysrE3MrK1MDLidMSRMrKyMDEEaR9YDIGhpaWVkCZY1RZYHIEaz FwAgoZ2WlkVeak6OJZrofyHQgAFLmMCUAqLwmTg== X-Bordeaux-Action-libantispam.so: Action: Relay[NEXT,10000,550:550:550] X-Bordeaux-Action-libspamsa.so: X-Bordeaux-Action-libclamav.so: X-Bordeaux-Action-libsmtpext.so: Message-ID: <297066447378A2CC0A3C17A8E071F2C3149D8EC75@CN-ETECH.COM> From: "Helen" Reply-To: To: Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:49:44 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Joinf MailSystem 8.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 03:51:41 -0000 RGVhciBteSBmcmllbmQ7DQpHb29kIGRheS4NClRoaXMgaXMgSGVsZW4gZnJvbSBFemxpZmUgQ28u LCBMdGQsIGVzdGFibGlzaGVkIGluIDIwMDMuDQpJIGtub3cgeW91IGZyb20gdGhlIGludGVybmV0 Lg0KV2UgYXJlIG9uZSBvZiB0aGUgbGVhZGluZyBjb21wYW5pZXMgaW4gcmVzZWFyY2ggJmRldmVs b3BtZW50LCBwcm9kdWN0aW9uIGFuZCBzYWxlcyBvZiBib2R5IHdhcm1lciwgaGFuZCB3YXJtZXIs IGZvb3Qgd2FybWVyLCB0b2Ugd2FybWVyLCBoZWF0aW5nLCBsaWZlIGdpZnQgcHJvZHVjdHMgaW4g Q2hpbmEuIA0KV2UgaGF2ZSAxMDAgd29ya2VycyBhbmQgYW5udWFsIHByb2R1Y3Rpb24gY2FwYWNp dHkgb2YgbGlmZSBwcm9kdWN0cyBoYXMgcmVhY2hlZCAxNTAsIDAwMCwgMDAwIHBpZWNlcy4NCldl IGhhdmUgZGlmZmVyZW50IGFzc2VtYmx5IGxpbmVzIHRoYXQgYXJlIHN1cGVydmlzZWQgYW5kIG1h bmFnZWQgYnkgcHJvZmVzc2lvbmFsIGRlc2lnbmVycyBhbmQgbWFuYWdlcnMuDQpPdXIgYWltIGlz IHRvIG1ha2UgeW91ciBsaWZlIGVhc3kgYW5kIGhhcHB5IHdpdGggaGlnaCB0ZWNobm9sb2d5Lg0K T3VyIHByb2R1Y3RzIGhhcyBiZWVuIGF3YXJkZWQgd2l0aCBDaGluZXNlLCBVU0EsIEdlcm1hbnks IGV0YyAtICBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9ucy4NCldlIHN0aWxsIG1ha2UgZWZmb3J0cyB0byBzdGVhZGls eSBwcm9ncmVzc2lvbiBhbmQgY3JlYXRpb24gb2YgbmV3IHByb2R1Y3RzLg0KV2UgcHJvdmlkZSBo aWdoIHF1YWxpdHkgcHJvZHVjdCB3aXRoIGNvbXBldGl0aXZlIHByaWNlIGFuZCBwcm9mZXNzaW9u YWwgc2VydmljZS4NCkZyZWUgc2FtcGxlIGlzIGZvciB5b3VyIHRlc3RpbmcgLg0KDQoNCkNvdWxk IHlvdSBnaXZlIHVzIGEgY2hhbmNlIHRvIHNlcnZlIHlvdSBpbiBjb2xvciwgY2F0Y2hlciwgc3Bv cnQgdG93ZWwsIGRhaWx5IGxpZmUgcHJvZHVjdHM/DQpMb29raW5nIGZvcndhcmQgIHRvIHlvdXIg a2luZGx5IHJlcGx5Lg0KDQoNCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcyENCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCkhlbGVuIFpoYW5n IA0KU2hhbmdoYWkgRXpsaWZlIENvLiBMdGQNCkFkZDogTm8uNDc5IENodW5kb25nIHJvYWQsTWlu aGFuZyBkaXN0cmljdCwgU2hhbmdoYWkgMjAxMTA4LCBDaGluYQ0KVGVsOjAwODYgMjE1NDcxMDAx MC04MDY3DQpGYXg6MDA4NiAyMSA2MTI5IDQ3NzkNCk1vYihWaWJlci9XaGF0c2FwcCk6IDAwODYg MTU4MDE3OTUwOTQNClNreXBlIElEOiBzaC5zZmZpbHRlY2gzDQpFbWFpbDogc2FsZXMyQGV6bGlm ZWNuLmNvbQ== From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 11:52:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3072A113 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A5A77D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19Bqa9J013664 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:52:36 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19BqaQ3013663; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:52:36 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:52:36 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "zbb (Zbigniew Bodek)" Subject: [Differential] [Request, 29 lines] D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Thread-Index: ZjlkNDcyMzZlMWIyNDBkZTI1NTY5ZjZiZGRj X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:52:37 -0000 zbb created this revision. zbb added reviewers: ian, andrew. zbb added a subscriber: freebsd-arm. REVISION SUMMARY If ARMv7 boots in HYP mode, switch to SVC32. Submitted by: Wojciech Macek Obtained from: Semihalf REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810 AFFECTED FILES sys/arm/arm/locore-v6.S sys/arm/include/asm.h To: zbb, ian, andrew Cc: freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 11:55:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14AA189 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34CA7A0 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19Btx5g016211 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:59 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19BtxiO016210; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:59 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:59 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "zbb (Zbigniew Bodek)" Subject: [Differential] [Request, 6 lines] D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Thread-Index: M2QzODA2Zjk4MzZkYTA3ZDk2NTI2YmM4NGFi X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:55:59 -0000 zbb created this revision. zbb added reviewers: ian, andrew. zbb added a subscriber: freebsd-arm. REVISION SUMMARY Do interrupt configuration as soon as is being mapped. Submitted by: Wojciech Macek Obtained from: Semihalf REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1811 AFFECTED FILES sys/arm/arm/intr.c To: zbb, ian, andrew Cc: freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 11:59:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59576203 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3687BC for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19BxpG9019014 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:59:51 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19Bxpr5019013; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:59:51 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:59:51 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "zbb (Zbigniew Bodek)" Subject: [Differential] [Request, 54 lines] D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Thread-Index: ZWNmMDY1OGJiODdhZGRlMmE5YjZkY2UwODU1 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:59:52 -0000 zbb created this revision. zbb added reviewers: ian, andrew. zbb added a subscriber: freebsd-arm. REVISION SUMMARY Switch the cache line size during invalidations/flushes to be read from CP15 cache type register. Submitted by: Wojciech Macek Obtained from: Semihalf REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1812 AFFECTED FILES sys/arm/arm/cpufunc.c sys/arm/arm/cpufunc_asm_armv7.S sys/arm/arm/elf_trampoline.c sys/arm/include/armreg.h To: zbb, ian, andrew Cc: freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 12:00:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4870141D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f181.google.com (mail-yk0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2367D5 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 200so5750458ykr.12 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 04:00:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1vLH2R5zbC47aCN/9nlLjQvCtbIuGQXL9PqT3vfkdCI=; b=hA+SkH32Zfg8iBpxn45yrwu/WrVznYWVA1Syyqqf2S1DrYodYituikiisGTPHeM3Ie GR1UzZwr8reM7FWEo9jEIbfZ7pjYYyqbKexLnpAVdwGz9I6VsBP+bHRDlWplsjXQljP5 rfKCKim/qzWoeMvrwXM54vzQmr91PsKfq3pD5nVn92D1DnhtTUzYbKWaIXCqDHfuKivp C1hOtBlBaY526QFLzyhs73MJJ4mfNxNRoN/MzT9w/ty7EzzQ2XnYVMCdUg0EAGxj3lrs Z8IbPq8FZeMOh3gZu7Fx92PlMv4tcdMWdrV03hqi3MR5k5Ra+xeRS7pnWKdyKeVOzqWw F7VQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlv19rMDxJ9gkWSuIBYGny7sq9m7XhgVl5FZDQy/piWRpa0que0NPpBG5+/wDyj4IlG83/7 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.172.5 with SMTP id o5mr6493823ykd.117.1423481920093; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 03:38:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.131.132 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 03:38:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D6631F.9030207@ignoranthack.me> References: <54D6631F.9030207@ignoranthack.me> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:38:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: armv7 and armv8 From: Zbigniew Bodek To: sbruno@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:00:34 -0000 2015-02-07 20:10 GMT+01:00 Sean Bruno : > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Not sure if there's a difference in the ELF header for files on armv7/v8 > vs armv6. Can someone who has armv7 and arvm8 binaries somewhere send > me the following for each target arch? > > elfdump -e > > and > > hexdump -C > > sean > > p.s. > > for armv6 this is what I have: > > elfdump -e > /usr/local/poudriere/jails/11armv6/rescue/sh > > > elf header: > > e_ident: ELFCLASS32 ELFDATA2LSB ELFOSABI_SYSV > e_type: ET_EXEC > e_machine: EM_ARM > e_version: EV_CURRENT > e_entry: 0x8180 > e_phoff: 52 > e_shoff: 7954024 > e_flags: 83886082 > e_ehsize: 52 > e_phentsize: 32 > e_phnum: 5 > e_shentsize: 40 > e_shnum: 20 > e_shstrndx: 19 > > hexdump -C /usr/local/poudriere/jails/11armv6/rescue/sh | head > -2 > > 00000000 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > |.ELF............| > 00000010 02 00 28 00 01 00 00 00 80 81 00 00 34 00 00 00 > |..(.........4...| > > > Hello Sean, armv8: elfdump -e sh elf header: e_ident: ELFCLASS64 ELFDATA2LSB ELFOSABI_SYSV e_type: ET_EXEC e_machine: EM_AARCH64 e_version: EV_CURRENT e_entry: 0x403250 e_phoff: 64 e_shoff: 133520 e_flags: 0 e_ehsize: 64 e_phentsize: 56 e_phnum: 7 e_shentsize: 64 e_shnum: 27 e_shstrndx: 26 hexdump -C sh | head -2 00000000 7f 45 4c 46 02 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |.ELF............| 00000010 02 00 b7 00 01 00 00 00 50 32 40 00 00 00 00 00 |........P2@.....| Best regards zbb From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 15:31:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1406C30F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89CA11C for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19FVVPb036286 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:31:31 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19FVVMb036285; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:31:31 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:31:31 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "imp (Warner Losh)" Subject: [Differential] [Accepted] D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 Message-ID: <65fc7b23f5f4e603cfa70170a5ca9de1@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZWNmMDY1OGJiODdhZGRlMmE5YjZkY2UwODU1IFTY0tM= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:31:32 -0000 imp added a subscriber: imp. imp accepted this revision. imp added a reviewer: imp. imp added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. This looks good to me... Please commit. Extra bonus points if you KASSERT at some early time during the init if USB_HOST_ALIGN is smaller than arm_dcache_line_size. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1812 To: zbb, ian, andrew, imp Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 15:32:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C1A368 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4231412D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19FWp6h037889 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:32:51 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19FWpVj037888; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:32:51 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:32:50 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "imp (Warner Losh)" Subject: [Differential] [Accepted] D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped Message-ID: <8dff98c4d8730240a04437df93482592@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: M2QzODA2Zjk4MzZkYTA3ZDk2NTI2YmM4NGFiIFTY0yI= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:32:51 -0000 imp added a subscriber: imp. imp accepted this revision. imp added a reviewer: imp. imp added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. This is likely to cause bumps / races that aren't in the code. Thankfully, most of these aren't that large and are easy to manage. INLINE COMMENTS sys/arm/arm/intr.c:122 extra braces REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1811 To: zbb, ian, andrew, imp Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 15:35:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743354AD for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 561A814A for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19FZTaZ039871 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:35:29 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19FZTqO039870; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:35:29 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:35:29 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "imp (Warner Losh)" Subject: [Differential] [Changed Subscribers] D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup Message-ID: <766ef2b7dc04d1154d0a6a1c100fa526@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZjlkNDcyMzZlMWIyNDBkZTI1NTY5ZjZiZGRjIFTY08E= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:35:29 -0000 imp added a subscriber: imp. imp added a comment. This seems reasonable, but I'm not knowledgeable enough about hyper mode to know if this is really good or not. INLINE COMMENTS sys/arm/arm/locore-v6.S:87 Do we want to note this fact in a variable that can be exported as a sysctl? Here and below? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810 To: zbb, ian, andrew Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 15:47:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C4A6C4 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BBE260 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19Fls4A046741 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:47:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197483] [arm] www/webkit-qt5 needs patch for FreeBSD CacheFlush Support Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:47:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kde@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:47:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197483 Bug ID: 197483 Summary: [arm] www/webkit-qt5 needs patch for FreeBSD CacheFlush Support Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: arm OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: kde@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sbruno@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Assignee: kde@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(kde@FreeBSD.org) Yet another port that needs a patch to support FreeBSD CacheFlush instructions on ARM. I'll get to this unless someone snaps it up and does the patch for it. Logs here: http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-02-06_22h08m16s/logs/errors/qt5-webkit-5.3.2_2.log ... In file included from /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit-qt5/work/qtwebkit-opensource-src-5.3.2/Source/JavaScriptCore/assembler/MacroAssemblerARM.h:33: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit-qt5/work/qtwebkit-opensource-src-5.3.2/Source/JavaScriptCore/assembler/ARMAssembler.h:1073:2: error: "The cacheFlush support is missing on this platform." #error "The cacheFlush support is missing on this platform." ... --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer kde@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 18:53:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7831D5 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13654D2C for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19Ir716074253 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:53:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197483] [arm] www/webkit-qt5 needs patch for FreeBSD CacheFlush Support Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:53:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael.urankar@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kde@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:53:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197483 mikael.urankar@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikael.urankar@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from mikael.urankar@gmail.com --- Created attachment 152815 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152815&action=edit fix build on armv6 The attached patch adds the CacheFlush instructions on ARM. build log (not a poudriere one): http://mikael.urankar.free.fr/FreeBSD/arm/build_logs/qt5-webkit-5.3.2_2.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 19:25:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6FF370 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49F112A for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19JP7jU071737 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:25:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197483] [arm] www/webkit-qt5 needs patch for FreeBSD CacheFlush Support Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:25:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kde@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:25:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197483 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #3 from Sean Bruno --- Test build running. It'll be a bit. http://tasty.ysv.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=11mips64-default&build=2015-02-09_19h15m14s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 21:30:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 947225EB for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7508C1FE for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19LUpKP002710 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:30:51 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19LUpRP002709; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:30:51 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:30:51 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Accepted] D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 Message-ID: <8ff1eebfd1b471672011647de21e893b@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZWNmMDY1OGJiODdhZGRlMmE5YjZkY2UwODU1IFTZJws= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:30:51 -0000 ian accepted this revision. ian added a comment. This is likely to fix a variety of mysterious problems we've been more or less ignoring lately, please commit asap. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1812 To: zbb, andrew, imp, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 22:42:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3208ECD8 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138D5BD6 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19Mfxn6009010 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:41:59 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19Mfx4T009009; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:41:59 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:41:59 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZjlkNDcyMzZlMWIyNDBkZTI1NTY5ZjZiZGRjIFTZN7c= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:42:00 -0000 ian added a comment. What about when we're ready to do something with hyper mode? The Zen guys bug us every once in a while to check out their patches because they have Dom0 support for us now (not sure how complete it is), is this just going to make their lives even harder? (I guess if I had ever even glanced at their patches I might know the answer to that.) INLINE COMMENTS sys/arm/arm/locore-v6.S:87 Note what fact? That the loader launched us in hyper mode? I'm not sure what use that would have. sys/arm/arm/locore-v6.S:88 ERET loads CPSR from SPSR_hyp, how do we know what mode that is going to return to? It seems like this code should be setting up the value and doing msr spsr_hyp, rN. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810 To: zbb, andrew, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 23:37:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CBBA277 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F14451B6 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t19NbFuV063818 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:37:15 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t19NbF2B063816; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:37:15 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 23:37:15 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped Message-ID: <8c30084f810d82d180f820f5e8b03dac@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: M2QzODA2Zjk4MzZkYTA3ZDk2NTI2YmM4NGFiIFTZRKs= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 23:37:16 -0000 ian added a comment. I think this is completely wrong and the interrupt needs to be configured when it is activated, not when it is parsed/decoded. Consider for example a gpio pin interrupt... we wouldn't want to mess with the pin state while the fdt data is being parsed because that data could refer to a possible configuration which is never going to be activated, and the actual use of the pin in the configuration that is active could be something else (not even related to interrupts). REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1811 To: zbb, andrew, imp, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 06:39:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B34B2C for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 06:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47175A53 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 06:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1A6duke078318 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 06:39:56 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1A6duiM078317; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 06:39:56 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 06:39:56 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "meloun-miracle-cz (Michal Meloun)" Subject: [Differential] [Changed Subscribers] D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped Message-ID: <2cb56cbfe9ac7c663862a8248fbe1b11@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1811: Configure interrupt on ARM when mapped X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: M2QzODA2Zjk4MzZkYTA3ZDk2NTI2YmM4NGFiIFTZp7w= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 06:39:56 -0000 meloun-miracle-cz added a subscriber: meloun-miracle-cz. meloun-miracle-cz added a comment. >From intrng: Each interrupt controller gets FDT(property) data in his decode fdt() routine. And it is entirely his responsibility, if he stores and uses it, immediately or later. Note: In theory, FDT data may contain more information than just polarity and triggering REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1811 To: zbb, andrew, imp, ian Cc: meloun-miracle-cz, imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 17:51:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9DAC67 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A4FE25 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AHppGW003415 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:51:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197483] [arm] www/webkit-qt5 needs patch for FreeBSD CacheFlush Support Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:51:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:51:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197483 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|kde@FreeBSD.org |sbruno@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 18:16:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C41E7783 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3C98D9 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AIGHwa032168 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:16:17 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1AIGH0W032167; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:16:17 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:16:17 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "zbb (Zbigniew Bodek)" Subject: [Differential] [Closed] D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 Message-ID: <3b0f5c42a0dcc7f9fd8a32b1d9ed86ab@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1812: Resolve cache line size from CP15 X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZWNmMDY1OGJiODdhZGRlMmE5YjZkY2UwODU1IFTaSvE= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:16:17 -0000 zbb closed this revision. zbb added a comment. Thank you! Committed to r278518 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278518 REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1812 To: zbb, andrew, imp, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:47:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5BC8AF for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60966D05 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AJlRBb026850 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:47:27 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1AJlRQo026849; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:47:27 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:47:27 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "emaste (Ed Maste)" Subject: [Differential] [Request, 9 lines] D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Thread-Index: NWZkOWMxYWMzY2RlZTkxODVmNDRiNGUwNzVh X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:47:28 -0000 emaste created this revision. emaste added a reviewer: andrew. emaste added a subscriber: freebsd-arm. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1817 AFFECTED FILES contrib/elftoolchain/libdwarf/libdwarf.h contrib/elftoolchain/libdwarf/libdwarf_reloc.c To: emaste, andrew Cc: freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:49:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C9C4A07 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps.hungerhost.com (vps.hungerhost.com [216.38.53.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5422AD21 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from global-1-26.nat.csx.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.184.26]:11363 helo=[192.168.69.1]) by vps.hungerhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YLGoj-0004us-0n for arm@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:49:53 -0500 From: "George Neville-Neil" To: arm@freebsd.org Subject: DTrace on ARM is now in the tree Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:49:51 +0000 Message-ID: <07404AD4-A38E-4230-A8C1-BE7D9025589D@neville-neil.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9r5055) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vps.hungerhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - neville-neil.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vps.hungerhost.com: authenticated_id: gnn@neville-neil.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:49:55 -0000 Howdy, There is now nascent support for DTrace for ARM32 in the tree. Only the BEAGLEBONE config has been updated to have this support, but it should be tested in more places. Only simple probes work right now, but increased support is being worked on as we speak. Best, George From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 20:08:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7455BECA for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5909EF24 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AK8Bs2064273 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:08:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:08:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform bug_file_loc op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:08:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 Bug ID: 197527 Summary: www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Product: Base System Version: 11.0-CURRENT Hardware: Any URL: http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015 -02-06_22h08m16s/logs/webkit2-gtk3-2.6.5.log OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: arm Assignee: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sbruno@FreeBSD.org CC: dim@FreeBSD.org I'll update a test instance and get more data along with the diagnostic files. This is a place holder until I do. [ 12%] Building CXX object Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp.o Assertion failed: (LIsBuiltins && RIsBuiltins && "Non-built-in locations must be rooted in the main file"), function isBeforeInTranslationUnit, file /usr/local/poudriere/jails/11armv6/usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp, line 2100. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ -cc1 -triple armv6--freebsd11.0-gnueabi -emit-obj -mrelax-all -disable-free -main-file-name LowLevelInterpreter.cpp -mrelocation-model pic -pic-level 2 -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -target-cpu arm1176jzf-s -target-feature +soft-float -target-feature +soft-float-abi -target-feature -neon -target-feature -crypto -target-abi aapcs-linux -msoft-float -mfloat-abi soft -dwarf-column-info -coverage-file /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp.o -resource-dir /nxb-bin/usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.5.0 -D BUILDING_GTK__=1 -D BUILDING_JavaScriptCore -D BUILDING_WITH_CMAKE=1 -D DATA_DIR="share" -D ENABLE_3D_RENDERING=1 -D ENABLE_PLUGIN_PROCESS_GTK2=1 -D GETTEXT_PACKAGE="WebKit2GTK-4.0" -D HAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -D JavaScriptCore_EXPORTS -D MOZ_X11=1 -D STATICALLY_LINKED_WITH_WTF -D USER_AGENT_GTK_MAJOR_VERSION=601 -D USER_AGENT_GTK_MINOR_VERSION=1 -D WEBKITGTK_API_VERSION_STRING="4.0" -D WTF_PLATFORM_X11=1 -D WTF_USE_3D_GRAPHICS=1 -D WTF_USE_EGL=1 -D WTF_USE_GSTREAMER -D WTF_USE_OPENGL=1 -D WTF_USE_TEXTURE_MAPPER=1 -D WTF_USE_TEXTURE_MAPPER_GL=1 -D WTF_USE_WEBAUDIO_GSTREAMER -D XP_UNIX -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5 -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/API -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/ForwardingHeaders -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/assembler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/bindings -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/builtins -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/bytecode -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/bytecompiler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/disassembler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/ftl -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/heap -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/debugger -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/agents -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/remote -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/interpreter -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/jit -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/llint -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/llvm -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/parser -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/profiler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/replay -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/tools -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/yarr -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/WTF -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources/ForwardingHeaders -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources/JavaScriptCore -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources/JavaScriptCore/inspector -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source -I /usr/local/include -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/disassembler/udis86 -I /usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -internal-isystem /usr/include/c++/v1 -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wpointer-arith -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -std=c++11 -fdeprecated-macro -fdebug-compilation-dir /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore -ferror-limit 19 -fmessage-length 0 -mstackrealign -fno-signed-char -fobjc-runtime=gnustep -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fdiagnostics-show-option -o CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp.o -x c++ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp 1. parser at end of file 2. Code generation c++: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap (core dumped) c++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) FreeBSD clang version 3.5.0 (tags/RELEASE_350/final 216957) 20141124 Target: armv6--freebsd11.0-gnueabi Thread model: posix c++: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. c++: note: diagnostic msg: ******************** PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT: Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at: c++: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/LowLevelInterpreter-a0bea6.cpp c++: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/LowLevelInterpreter-a0bea6.sh c++: note: diagnostic msg: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:24:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50356C2A for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3622320E for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AMOibB096766 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194183] [arm] math/R missing libquadmath to compile Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194183 --- Comment #7 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: sbruno Date: Tue Feb 10 22:24:03 UTC 2015 New revision: 378808 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/378808 Log: Repair overflow condition where WCHAR_MAX != INT_MAX https://github.com/andreas-schwab/tre/commit/182e1060dc3bfc175490f6e0e961d9330971299c Add MISSING option to the default build on armv6. PR: 194183 Submitted by: mikael.urankar@gmail.com, Adreas Schwab Approved by: maintainer timeout (3 months without PR comment) Changes: head/math/R/Makefile head/math/R/files/patch-src_extra_tre_tre-internal.h -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:30:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15F4BD99 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC712F7 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AMUMtA001004 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 --- Comment #1 from Sean Bruno --- Created attachment 152855 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152855&action=edit c source file from clang35 crash -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:30:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD20DE2 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7200A2FE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AMUvcK001295 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:30:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 --- Comment #2 from Sean Bruno --- Yep, its reproducible [ 14%] Assertion failed: (LIsBuiltins && RIsBuiltins && "Non-built-in locations must be rooted in the main file"), function isBeforeInTranslationUnit, file /usr/local/poudriere/jails/11armv6/usr/src/lib/clang/libclangbasic/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp, line 2100. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ -cc1 -triple armv6--freebsd11.0-gnueabi -emit-obj -mrelax-all -disable-free -main-file-name LowLevelInterpreter.cpp -mrelocation-model pic -pic-level 2 -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -target-cpu arm1176jzf-s -target-feature +soft-float -target-feature +soft-float-abi -target-feature -neon -target-feature -crypto -target-abi aapcs-linux -msoft-float -mfloat-abi soft -dwarf-column-info -coverage-file /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp.o -resource-dir /nxb-bin/usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.5.1 -D BUILDING_GTK__=1 -D BUILDING_JavaScriptCore -D BUILDING_WITH_CMAKE=1 -D DATA_DIR="share" -D ENABLE_3D_RENDERING=1 -D ENABLE_PLUGIN_PROCESS_GTK2=1 -D GETTEXT_PACKAGE="WebKit2GTK-4.0" -D HAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -D JavaScriptCore_EXPORTS -D MOZ_X11=1 -D STATICALLY_LINKED_WITH_WTF -D USER_AGENT_GTK_MAJOR_VERSION=601 -D USER_AGENT_GTK_MINOR_VERSION=1 -D WEBKITGTK_API_VERSION_STRING="4.0" -D WTF_PLATFORM_X11=1 -D WTF_USE_3D_GRAPHICS=1 -D WTF_USE_EGL=1 -D WTF_USE_GSTREAMER -D WTF_USE_OPENGL=1 -D WTF_USE_TEXTURE_MAPPER=1 -D WTF_USE_TEXTURE_MAPPER_GL=1 -D WTF_USE_WEBAUDIO_GSTREAMER -D XP_UNIX -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5 -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/API -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/ForwardingHeaders -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/assembler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/bindings -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/builtins -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/bytecode -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/bytecompiler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/disassembler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/ftl -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/heap -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/debugger -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/agents -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/remote -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/interpreter -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/jit -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/llint -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/llvm -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/parser -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/profiler -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/replay -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/tools -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/yarr -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/WTF -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources/ForwardingHeaders -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources/JavaScriptCore -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/DerivedSources/JavaScriptCore/inspector -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source -I /usr/local/include -I /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/disassembler/udis86 -I /usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -internal-isystem /usr/include/c++/v1 -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wpointer-arith -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -std=c++11 -fdeprecated-macro -fdebug-compilation-dir /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore -ferror-limit 19 -fmessage-length 0 -mstackrealign -fno-signed-char -fobjc-runtime=gnustep -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fdiagnostics-show-option -o CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp.o -x c++ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5/Source/JavaScriptCore/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp 1. parser at end of file 2. Code generation c++: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap (core dumped) c++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) FreeBSD clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final 225668) 20150115 Target: armv6--freebsd11.0-gnueabi Thread model: posix c++: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Building CXX object Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/assembler/ARMAssembler.cpp.o [ 14%] c++: note: diagnostic msg: ******************** PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT: Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at: c++: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/LowLevelInterpreter-c732b9.cpp c++: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/LowLevelInterpreter-c732b9.sh c++: note: diagnostic msg: ******************** Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/build.make:12042: recipe for target 'Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp.o' failed gmake[3]: *** [Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.cpp.o] Error 254 gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Building CXX object Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/assembler/ARMv7Assembler.cpp.o gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5' CMakeFiles/Makefile2:344: recipe for target 'Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/all' failed gmake[2]: *** [Source/JavaScriptCore/CMakeFiles/JavaScriptCore.dir/all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5' Makefile:137: recipe for target 'all' failed gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/webkit2-gtk3/work/webkitgtk-2.6.5' ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:35:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CAB5E85 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BDC32F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AMZp8L007182 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:35:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194183] [arm] math/R missing libquadmath to compile Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:35:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:35:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194183 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress CC| |freebsd-powerpc@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #8 from Sean Bruno --- Going to run a mips32 and mips64 test just to see if it builds as is suspected. Adding some of the powerpc guys to the list to see if they can test as well. Probably, OPTIONS_DEFAULT_powerpc+= MISSING if there's no libquadmath on these arch's ? Unable to test sparc64, but hopefully someone can test? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 04:38:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA876799 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA9B0E21 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1B4c5MJ092653 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:38:05 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1B4c5NW092652; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:38:05 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:38:05 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "rpaulo (Rui Paulo)" Subject: [Differential] [Accepted] D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NWZkOWMxYWMzY2RlZTkxODVmNDRiNGUwNzVhIFTa3K0= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:38:05 -0000 rpaulo added a subscriber: rpaulo. rpaulo accepted this revision. rpaulo added a reviewer: rpaulo. rpaulo added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Andrew should approve, but this looks sane to me. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1817 To: emaste, andrew, rpaulo Cc: rpaulo, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 05:47:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CAE5649 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feith1.FEITH.COM (feith1.FEITH.COM [192.251.93.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4E0798 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jwlab.FEITH.COM (jwlab.FEITH.COM [192.251.93.16]) by feith1.FEITH.COM (8.14.5+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id t1B5ZBwh025885; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:35:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from john@jwlab.FEITH.COM) Received: from jwlab.FEITH.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jwlab.FEITH.COM (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1B5ZBBH007721; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:35:11 -0500 (EST) Received: (from john@localhost) by jwlab.FEITH.COM (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id t1B5Z3c7007720; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:35:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:35:03 -0500 (EST) From: John Wehle Message-Id: <201502110535.t1B5Z3c7007720@jwlab.FEITH.COM> To: ganbold@gmail.com Subject: Re: Initial Amlogic aml8726-m6 and aml8726-m8 support files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-DCC--Metrics: feith1; whitelist X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 192.251.93.1 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:47:27 -0000 Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote on Mon Feb 2 07:19:11 UTC 2015: > Maybe making mmc stable is more priority. Try the attached patch. -- John --------------------8<-------------------8<----------------------------- --- sys/arm/amlogic/aml8726/aml8726_mmc.c.ORIGINAL 2015-01-07 00:57:31.000000000 -0500 +++ sys/arm/amlogic/aml8726/aml8726_mmc.c 2015-02-10 23:51:49.000000000 -0500 @@ -353,7 +353,8 @@ aml8726_mmc_intr(void *arg) return; } - if ((isr & AML_MMC_IRQ_STATUS_CMD_BUSY) != 0) { + if ((isr & AML_MMC_IRQ_STATUS_CMD_BUSY) != 0 + && (isr & AML_MMC_IRQ_STATUS_CMD_DONE_IRQ) == 0) { if (mmc_error != MMC_ERR_TIMEOUT) mmc_error = MMC_ERR_FAILED; @@ -431,13 +432,14 @@ aml8726_mmc_intr(void *arg) } /* - * If this command was successfully executed and there's - * a linked stop command, then start the stop command. + * If there's a linked stop command, then start the stop command. + * In order to establish a known state attempt the stop command + * even if the original request encountered an error. */ stop_cmd = (cmd->mrq->stop != cmd) ? cmd->mrq->stop : NULL; - if (stop_cmd != NULL && mmc_error == MMC_ERR_NONE) { + if (stop_cmd != NULL) { mmc_stop_error = aml8726_mmc_start_command(sc, stop_cmd); if (mmc_stop_error == MMC_ERR_NONE) { AML_MMC_UNLOCK(sc); ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com | | John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 08:44:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEFAA8B7 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EB50D88 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1B8ipVX064411 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:44:51 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1B8ipSA064410; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:44:51 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:44:51 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "andrew (Andrew Turner)" Subject: [Differential] [Accepted] D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support Message-ID: <36df0e406b665b23979c816ef0f382e0@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NWZkOWMxYWMzY2RlZTkxODVmNDRiNGUwNzVhIFTbFoM= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:44:51 -0000 andrew accepted this revision. andrew added a comment. This looks correct, other than the minor style issue. INLINE COMMENTS contrib/elftoolchain/libdwarf/libdwarf_reloc.c:72 This is in the opposite order to the other 64-bit architectures below. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1817 To: emaste, rpaulo, andrew Cc: rpaulo, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 12:14:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7C28FF for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE724803 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YLWBC-0001dV-BQ for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:14:11 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DTrace on ARM is now in the tree References: <07404AD4-A38E-4230-A8C1-BE7D9025589D@neville-neil.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:14:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <07404AD4-A38E-4230-A8C1-BE7D9025589D@neville-neil.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: - X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 645486d610a00fe5591aab0f6aa1616b X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:14:21 -0000 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:49:51 +0100, George Neville-Neil wrote: > Howdy, > > There is now nascent support for DTrace for ARM32 in the tree. Only the > BEAGLEBONE config has been updated > to have this support, but it should be tested in more places. Only > simple probes work right now, > but increased support is being worked on as we speak. > > Best, > George Very nice. Can you point out how to test it? What do I need to update in the config? Ronald. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 14:04:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B87AB2 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x231.google.com (mail-qa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C96B3E2 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id v8so2647984qal.8 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:04:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JI4Eiv2BRmW6EhVtE2M9t8jTgTB/VNOav8O/ciMEqqI=; b=iW7113fHtUPWMHKyHCEQ2T4Gqt2Vte0nhZN/Wzi1jcHCZmRnblCRdljbOGTb+HkQWZ s+hFdcebFqqsGHRHXNKzAgJMAX29zo07uN7DBWXC6uRx2MulPPRqpYxloF5lUW1DnhxN GV53q81PUa7XLTIiaSTM/60kF2mwiFjE1VkyhJlZTtqDQgK0N8jPWxRlVW9sgNYNxlbE 8rPLG+HSBCChbQn3UAWdeVqEHKdMuh4SDDF7N8U1hGUFnRzPb0SnsXz6FnGjgqRqakwD Tjj4kVFp6XDwAaEvWy0ezg2Y9NQ7dDe6AnZPoJJLypGdC4X90ow32mj9UwxmWkW5UGak JfwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.241.137 with SMTP id le9mr19274024qcb.20.1423663445158; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:04:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.104.229 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:04:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:04:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: "geli: Wrong key" unable to attach in RPi/ARM environment From: Brenden Bartelt To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:04:06 -0000 Hi all, This a follow up to a previous thread in freebsd-geom where it was determined that geli is functional in 11.0-CURRENT and it could be an ARM problem. I have been unable to geli attach in RPi, even with a very simple passphrase ("test"). Has anyone had success with this? I have tried on an external usb, da0 as well as a partition on the SD card itself, mmcsd0s3. The geli init appears to work, and a geli dump reveals that a master key was indeed written to the device. What is even more puzzling is that a geli onetime will work for the device, so it would appear that geli is functional, but something has gone wrong with the master key generating/writing/reading operation. Can anyone shed some light on something I am missing? Is geli not fully supported on ARM? Thanks, Brenden Log: # uname -a FreeBSD raspberry-pi 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r278031: Mon Feb 2 02:54:08 UTC 2015 root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI-B arm # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 8 1 0xc5657000 17000 geom_eli.ko 9 1 0xc572e000 2c000 crypto.ko # geli init mmcsd0s3 Enter new passphrase: Reenter new passphrase: Metadata backup can be found in /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli and can be restored with the following command: # geli restore /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli mmcsd0s3 # geli attach mmcsd0s3 Enter passphrase: geli: Wrong key for mmcsd0s3. # geli dump mmcsd0s3 Metadata on mmcsd0s3: magic: GEOM::ELI version: 7 flags: 0x0 ealgo: AES-XTS keylen: 128 provsize: 24796725248 sectorsize: 512 keys: 0x01 iterations: 21660 Salt: d2678fa977889263b18cbbb2e5a3151ac8185d9d0bc5dafa548abc4510ca49ce134ef9410cc= 63a9b0881514d9e9fedb6a3d392ba4096775030d0646fbfb4cce5 Master Key: 4c26413b864d809b7e537e13ad442d22eada3a12ef61cd538f3a2bc9fd3a1dbbe80e19d6a00= 9c51784461380ff150602c31c4910ad63aa52d105fc93b2005f18cd0b187e0e56b44eabc978= 4a6255e696a9c398653e4ec669cae64961bd7b43d9af01fa0897f84fef1608c632bbb881d41= 8bdf81e637afff4191ceda6ec829f33c93a0cb5ead63ee63e4c4ccc3ee0b076e6f86b05d514= c8b006bf8a11e3f78ac658e56bd824d6958747f09f3c8e80861d2f19eed3f334bbcc83aa28a= 227239c4bd9c4390a9e1acb5aefed4ef4602432359271217bfb9676eb753930f5c9c45899b0= f44bdd230517d3238fc9ab9763b2def43658f44fc76094ccb4af54c7c492a790eca0b407adf= 66fccf2f3b049c874b66d4bbccd4e82fe8a2e79985ae5e1d64affed7ac66808a2bbd9d661b4= 60c2b9acc1bac5a537bc7d862c711c9ca4892fcf3e607b6ee255555b742352483b7ffda8054= 5bd3774f90ff0e74db58ef87c6c050501c0643c3921345df6e6d7a296c7c535ec81468a8a73= 9824673303664a8874 MD5 hash: f97f3ca1cf95c25144c84a12b10d81ef # geli onetime mmcsd0s3 # geli list Geom name: mmcsd0s3.eli State: ACTIVE EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS KeyLength: 128 Crypto: software Version: 7 Flags: ONETIME KeysAllocated: 47 KeysTotal: 47 Providers: 1. Name: mmcsd0s3.eli Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r0w0e0 Consumers: 1. Name: mmcsd0s3 Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) Sectorsize: 512 Stripesize: 4194304 Stripeoffset: 0 Mode: r1w1e1 From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 14:29:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0D47DAB for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0464838 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1BETd2r063141 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:29:39 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1BETdLb063140; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:29:39 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:29:39 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "emaste (Ed Maste)" Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support Message-ID: <8ab60fe46e57fbd1639d1709bd044fe1@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NWZkOWMxYWMzY2RlZTkxODVmNDRiNGUwNzVhIFTbZ1M= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:29:40 -0000 emaste added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS contrib/elftoolchain/libdwarf/libdwarf_reloc.c:72 Ahh, indeed. I will put it in the same order before committing. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1817 To: emaste, rpaulo, andrew Cc: rpaulo, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 14:59:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F065E9 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89CEBBC0 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1BExxPb093990 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:59:59 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1BExxr7093989; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:59:59 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:59:59 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "emaste (Ed Maste)" Subject: [Differential] [Closed] D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support Message-ID: <3cfbc99b6333979ad7bcefcedf81e267@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1817: libdwarf: Add aarch64 relocation support X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NWZkOWMxYWMzY2RlZTkxODVmNDRiNGUwNzVhIFTbbm8= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:59:59 -0000 emaste closed this revision. emaste updated this revision to Diff 3732. emaste added a comment. Closed by commit rS278580 (authored by @emaste). CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1817?vs=3720&id=3732#toc REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1817 AFFECTED FILES head/contrib/elftoolchain/libdwarf/libdwarf.h head/contrib/elftoolchain/libdwarf/libdwarf_reloc.c To: emaste, rpaulo, andrew Cc: rpaulo, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 15:53:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 235453A2; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feynman.konjz.org (feynman.konjz.org [64.147.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB9824D; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (chomsky.torservers.net [77.247.181.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by feynman.konjz.org (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1BFwfqk075427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:58:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george@ceetonetechnology.com) Message-ID: <54DB7B07.4080704@ceetonetechnology.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:53:43 -0500 From: George Rosamond MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brenden Bartelt , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "geli: Wrong key" unable to attach in RPi/ARM environment References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:53:57 -0000 Brenden Bartelt: > Hi all, > > This a follow up to a previous thread in freebsd-geom where it was > determined that geli is functional in 11.0-CURRENT and it could be an ARM > problem. > > I have been unable to geli attach in RPi, even with a very simple > passphrase ("test"). Has anyone had success with this? I have tried on an > external usb, da0 as well as a partition on the SD card itself, mmcsd0s3. > The geli init appears to work, and a geli dump reveals that a master key > was indeed written to the device. What is even more puzzling is that a geli > onetime will work for the device, so it would appear that geli is > functional, but something has gone wrong with the master key > generating/writing/reading operation. > > Can anyone shed some light on something I am missing? Is geli not fully > supported on ARM? > > Thanks, > Brenden I haven't tried this, but two things: 1. did you try setting the key with -k when you attach? 2. I don't know if he's on this list, but I'm adding pdj@ to the cc. g > > Log: > > # uname -a > FreeBSD raspberry-pi 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r278031: Mon Feb > 2 02:54:08 UTC 2015 > root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI-B > arm > > # kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 8 1 0xc5657000 17000 geom_eli.ko > 9 1 0xc572e000 2c000 crypto.ko > > # geli init mmcsd0s3 > Enter new passphrase: > Reenter new passphrase: > > Metadata backup can be found in /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli and > can be restored with the following command: > > # geli restore /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli mmcsd0s3 > > # geli attach mmcsd0s3 > Enter passphrase: > geli: Wrong key for mmcsd0s3. > > # geli dump mmcsd0s3 > Metadata on mmcsd0s3: > magic: GEOM::ELI > version: 7 > flags: 0x0 > ealgo: AES-XTS > keylen: 128 > provsize: 24796725248 > sectorsize: 512 > keys: 0x01 > iterations: 21660 > Salt: > d2678fa977889263b18cbbb2e5a3151ac8185d9d0bc5dafa548abc4510ca49ce134ef9410cc63a9b0881514d9e9fedb6a3d392ba4096775030d0646fbfb4cce5 > Master Key: > 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 > MD5 hash: f97f3ca1cf95c25144c84a12b10d81ef > > # geli onetime mmcsd0s3 > # geli list > Geom name: mmcsd0s3.eli > State: ACTIVE > EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS > KeyLength: 128 > Crypto: software > Version: 7 > Flags: ONETIME > KeysAllocated: 47 > KeysTotal: 47 > Providers: > 1. Name: mmcsd0s3.eli > Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Mode: r0w0e0 > Consumers: > 1. Name: mmcsd0s3 > Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) > Sectorsize: 512 > Stripesize: 4194304 > Stripeoffset: 0 > Mode: r1w1e1 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 16:08:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79B3A59; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B71B3C9; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k15so3263000qaq.12; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:08:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HR+YF0HmmNZcioly70Pr2+u4PWirbQXOzB5icmXJXxQ=; b=Uq3qBI6Q/yR3u8WwjwKZccQsLL5o1M4pKyaJSuGecBlpWGHWDS60oBuWYj7rKnxN4G wDA7gcJ8epe1n3a7EpKYCth8UR1pdC0BiNebrlFJRAr30xKedagdSrtS1h4JFG+fYEfO hWgg/VAsZJQuYQ/Mbhh30MHnG4fyCfDjqjLdfYPdpLDOw50pIm7hRZBbDNmLMo8ujtxB iH9Lr1r8WFll7Bv79g6PrxoRM65Tgarpj/o41hwfGYpW1qPDV3J0DATEOv14yfTIMf0J 8CuggbUBSJCt0ru3wGhXXtNql7VRteKpV43OFGFUo3fpe38h+tnqJYhLRkY5EBJNf1AU udKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.65.133 with SMTP id j5mr51868611qci.27.1423670917756; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:08:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.104.229 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:08:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54DB7B07.4080704@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <54DB7B07.4080704@ceetonetechnology.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:08:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "geli: Wrong key" unable to attach in RPi/ARM environment From: Brenden Bartelt To: George Rosamond Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:08:39 -0000 I have tried it both with and without a -K/-k keyfile specified and with and without a passphrase (-P/-p). Any combination results in the same "geli: Wrong key for mmcsd0s3." For the sake of thoroughness I have even tried it with no PKCS#5v2 iterations and with a NULL ealgo. Each attempt writes a master key to the device metadata, but subsequent attempts to attach the device fail with a wrong key. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:53 AM, George Rosamond < george@ceetonetechnology.com> wrote: > Brenden Bartelt: > > Hi all, > > > > This a follow up to a previous thread in freebsd-geom where it was > > determined that geli is functional in 11.0-CURRENT and it could be an A= RM > > problem. > > > > I have been unable to geli attach in RPi, even with a very simple > > passphrase ("test"). Has anyone had success with this? I have tried on = an > > external usb, da0 as well as a partition on the SD card itself, mmcsd0s= 3. > > The geli init appears to work, and a geli dump reveals that a master ke= y > > was indeed written to the device. What is even more puzzling is that a > geli > > onetime will work for the device, so it would appear that geli is > > functional, but something has gone wrong with the master key > > generating/writing/reading operation. > > > > Can anyone shed some light on something I am missing? Is geli not fully > > supported on ARM? > > > > Thanks, > > Brenden > > I haven't tried this, but two things: > > 1. did you try setting the key with -k when you attach? > > 2. I don't know if he's on this list, but I'm adding pdj@ to the cc. > > g > > > > > Log: > > > > # uname -a > > FreeBSD raspberry-pi 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r278031: Mon > Feb > > 2 02:54:08 UTC 2015 > > root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI-B > > arm > > > > # kldstat > > Id Refs Address Size Name > > 8 1 0xc5657000 17000 geom_eli.ko > > 9 1 0xc572e000 2c000 crypto.ko > > > > # geli init mmcsd0s3 > > Enter new passphrase: > > Reenter new passphrase: > > > > Metadata backup can be found in /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli and > > can be restored with the following command: > > > > # geli restore /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli mmcsd0s3 > > > > # geli attach mmcsd0s3 > > Enter passphrase: > > geli: Wrong key for mmcsd0s3. > > > > # geli dump mmcsd0s3 > > Metadata on mmcsd0s3: > > magic: GEOM::ELI > > version: 7 > > flags: 0x0 > > ealgo: AES-XTS > > keylen: 128 > > provsize: 24796725248 > > sectorsize: 512 > > keys: 0x01 > > iterations: 21660 > > Salt: > > > d2678fa977889263b18cbbb2e5a3151ac8185d9d0bc5dafa548abc4510ca49ce134ef9410= cc63a9b0881514d9e9fedb6a3d392ba4096775030d0646fbfb4cce5 > > Master Key: > > > 4c26413b864d809b7e537e13ad442d22eada3a12ef61cd538f3a2bc9fd3a1dbbe80e19d6a= 009c51784461380ff150602c31c4910ad63aa52d105fc93b2005f18cd0b187e0e56b44eabc9= 784a6255e696a9c398653e4ec669cae64961bd7b43d9af01fa0897f84fef1608c632bbb881d= 418bdf81e637afff4191ceda6ec829f33c93a0cb5ead63ee63e4c4ccc3ee0b076e6f86b05d5= 14c8b006bf8a11e3f78ac658e56bd824d6958747f09f3c8e80861d2f19eed3f334bbcc83aa2= 8a227239c4bd9c4390a9e1acb5aefed4ef4602432359271217bfb9676eb753930f5c9c45899= b0f44bdd230517d3238fc9ab9763b2def43658f44fc76094ccb4af54c7c492a790eca0b407a= df66fccf2f3b049c874b66d4bbccd4e82fe8a2e79985ae5e1d64affed7ac66808a2bbd9d661= b460c2b9acc1bac5a537bc7d862c711c9ca4892fcf3e607b6ee255555b742352483b7ffda80= 545bd3774f90ff0e74db58ef87c6c050501c0643c3921345df6e6d7a296c7c535ec81468a8a= 739824673303664a8874 > > MD5 hash: f97f3ca1cf95c25144c84a12b10d81ef > > > > # geli onetime mmcsd0s3 > > # geli list > > Geom name: mmcsd0s3.eli > > State: ACTIVE > > EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS > > KeyLength: 128 > > Crypto: software > > Version: 7 > > Flags: ONETIME > > KeysAllocated: 47 > > KeysTotal: 47 > > Providers: > > 1. Name: mmcsd0s3.eli > > Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) > > Sectorsize: 512 > > Mode: r0w0e0 > > Consumers: > > 1. Name: mmcsd0s3 > > Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) > > Sectorsize: 512 > > Stripesize: 4194304 > > Stripeoffset: 0 > > Mode: r1w1e1 > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 17:41:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450E4E6A for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2D72CD for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i50so3894226qgf.2 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:41:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=vBFNA4k6J1ZH5VN0vievYNJeemhLc3dP2ry+6JLPvdI=; b=VQQniogCwiwO2vtKHasL7YcC/faFI2ruEY7w+j9HT0nK1S3mqylia07zYLYXbZCujI VWu4PmlojK1Cx/5JidmPBKNy4knCvNe67lOhy5D9l2yLEY7tLuF1Q4ymbMJVYGNL5js9 5GvgwB54xPcJNz0T62bnsUHN9PXkG3zp7iJ+u5/NUFiVMepAHRCN/X3jQRU1MUy+UQKq zrpMyk9jrVKsab2UE2XHkA85zsmB7IWhZn6YBvwRCZMj4sJyjAB2WIF90602wA7MvCHW kRUChhT5OwfSdMrnJ0/U577T0Uk25IYMVOVWCOr16QTqsVCIDzWEzXkyQozdwRelM9mq 1sAQ== X-Received: by 10.140.48.137 with SMTP id o9mr31608293qga.89.1423676509153; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:41:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.39.209 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:41:28 -0800 (PST) From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:41:28 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WfbC8_7c-yMiGElPqVZhPam-UFs Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification To: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:41:50 -0000 The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for the machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. To save us grief in the future I think it is worth following suit: diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h b/sys/arm64/include/param.h index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 --- a/sys/arm64/include/param.h +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & ~STACKALIGNBYTES) #ifndef MACHINE -#define MACHINE "arm64" +#define MACHINE "aarch64" #endif #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH -#define MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" +#define MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64" #endif I'm not proposing that we rename any of the source files. I believe this approach is consistent with the Debian project - they call it the "arm64" port, but report aarch64 from uname. I believe it will be much easier for us to carry around any special-case s/aarch64/arm64/ in the base system (if necessary) than trying to teach third-party software that the FreeBSD 64-bit ARM architecture is called arm64 instead of aarch64. Any objections or concerns? From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 17:56:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEBF3372; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pmta1.delivery3.ore.mailhop.org (pmta1.delivery3.ore.mailhop.org [54.191.214.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD904217; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.ore.mailhop.org (172.31.18.134) by pmta1.delivery1.ore.mailhop.org id hrebra20r84b; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:45:57 +0000 (envelope-from ) Received: from [73.34.117.227] (helo=ilsoft.org) by smtp2.ore.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YLbMP-0001EF-2N; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:46:01 +0000 Received: from revolution.hippie.lan (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1BHjsMW090712; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:45:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP X-Originating-IP: 73.34.117.227 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@duocircle.com (see https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX180eQK1hY/k4hZpJ3dJAYKc Message-ID: <1423676754.80968.39.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Ian Lepore To: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:45:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.8 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:56:09 -0000 On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 12:41 -0500, Ed Maste wrote: > The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for the > machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. > > It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used > elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. To > save us grief in the future I think it is worth following suit: > > diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 > --- a/sys/arm64/include/param.h > +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ > #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & ~STACKALIGNBYTES) > > #ifndef MACHINE > -#define MACHINE "arm64" > +#define MACHINE "aarch64" > #endif > #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH > -#define MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" > +#define MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64" > #endif > > I'm not proposing that we rename any of the source files. I believe > this approach is consistent with the Debian project - they call it the > "arm64" port, but report aarch64 from uname. > > I believe it will be much easier for us to carry around any > special-case s/aarch64/arm64/ in the base system (if necessary) than > trying to teach third-party software that the FreeBSD 64-bit ARM > architecture is called arm64 instead of aarch64. > > Any objections or concerns? That sounds good to me, but we're going to use it consistantly everywhere an arch name is needed, right? Like "make TARGET_ARCH=aarch64 ..." and so on? -- Ian From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 18:31:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B293BD3 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50876854 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from comporellon.tachypleus.net (polaris.tachypleus.net [75.101.50.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t1BIL7cp014794 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:21:08 -0800 Message-ID: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:21:07 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVZC0l33njHm44ffzbZrRPvhemt4d+qZAnnN1HaOiaca3CKGOuQhxGy05BI7IquSWYn3zN0pYz2u2M+pZtVhNyfeqy7euoGG9Oc= X-Sonic-ID: C;9DI0vxqy5BGM2uTWjn0JFw== M;+vOovxqy5BGM2uTWjn0JFw== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:31:54 -0000 On 02/11/15 09:41, Ed Maste wrote: > The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for the > machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. It would probably also be good if we had MACHINE = arm here. -Nathan > It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used > elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. To > save us grief in the future I think it is worth following suit: > > diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 > --- a/sys/arm64/include/param.h > +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ > #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & ~STACKALIGNBYTES) > > #ifndef MACHINE > -#define MACHINE "arm64" > +#define MACHINE "aarch64" > #endif > #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH > -#define MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" > +#define MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64" > #endif > > I'm not proposing that we rename any of the source files. I believe > this approach is consistent with the Debian project - they call it the > "arm64" port, but report aarch64 from uname. > > I believe it will be much easier for us to carry around any > special-case s/aarch64/arm64/ in the base system (if necessary) than > trying to teach third-party software that the FreeBSD 64-bit ARM > architecture is called arm64 instead of aarch64. > > Any objections or concerns? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 19:27:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4791D10C; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15544E4A; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecrp18 with SMTP id rp18so6486777iec.7; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:27:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dpz9Um3vgtICbponTE/wXD8YXKd0rQNQ0GCZQv5RhdA=; b=Ueot0CPH4438dJXPvxRYHAhTaKZSQNGCIOdKUP5BAs/wSR4kQSY/tmJjfi1ZaDrTDc ngkON+P9FPbzqgIEFAbMeL9OBMONhZ/LixW2x5h2rkPfwHXIoWx1jaqZ75H7oFv2RAl+ EXz9hJKXTCEEhJ/TBM93HROaU27rwlnpPC9QIA6EG1KR6n5BHaEpf0o4A+MDjTY9FaGm UoniQiEkp7oxeVXO9Vj8allniSrMgrTZ/LcYG9w9FLhF89lHvVx0uiew9nhnzBonvnwl T439+xsP1HRie/t90T78mDu68yDlCLweXwDAbuZq+Wu3aKi2sGhfZjfv4e27t8r0Xfgr JzxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.31.16 with SMTP id f16mr222415iof.88.1423682844765; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.28.148 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:27:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> References: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:27:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Michael Mitchell To: Nathan Whitehorn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:27:32 -0000 why swim upstream on a naming convention that is established? when you say arm64 how many people are going to read that as amd64? other than cosmetic, is there a technical rationale for picking a different naming convention other than what the industry uses? On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 02/11/15 09:41, Ed Maste wrote: > >> The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for the >> machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. >> > > It would probably also be good if we had MACHINE = arm here. > -Nathan > > > It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used >> elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. To >> save us grief in the future I think it is worth following suit: >> >> diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h b/sys/arm64/include/param.h >> index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 >> --- a/sys/arm64/include/param.h >> +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h >> @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ >> #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & ~STACKALIGNBYTES) >> >> #ifndef MACHINE >> -#define MACHINE "arm64" >> +#define MACHINE "aarch64" >> #endif >> #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH >> -#define MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" >> +#define MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64" >> #endif >> >> I'm not proposing that we rename any of the source files. I believe >> this approach is consistent with the Debian project - they call it the >> "arm64" port, but report aarch64 from uname. >> >> I believe it will be much easier for us to carry around any >> special-case s/aarch64/arm64/ in the base system (if necessary) than >> trying to teach third-party software that the FreeBSD 64-bit ARM >> architecture is called arm64 instead of aarch64. >> >> Any objections or concerns? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 19:31:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1592E185; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5ED7E68; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecar1 with SMTP id ar1so6593974iec.0; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:31:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=31U1SpGysQPtmAs3sM/ocMt+7Oc7tvvANpGbeEqJpuI=; b=akkkfpiOQNC+RYstIztFbBHhgb1qHVRjsSgJXcbE+XZSReEhYUmjXHyUmzPyaH9kvo S4GE2k2QdTxCsFT0SXu9NXD5LuKOcUHmaFbkMIUOKAZ+/jssFkGjkhfUgIX+a55cFJvd z4PtFGbDiHVIQ5OHAwW7d4KvKwnzvB6W/PRQ5J76c3ic2OXRWUILKVfCcMLvequ0qvxx v31Aquu91ShE/P+z0HTe282Pjce1BmTIW2LLQAGDBvO0R7c/V1gAM0+9WAeudd/LxxM3 qxVIs617+j+BHOtlxtzpr0yazYfwUrVbcPScZzvOgvn15MmdPDIWp8tjzYcT2wWZYueV t6fQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.43.198 with SMTP id y6mr32148913igl.16.1423683075685; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:31:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.28.148 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:31:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:31:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Michael Mitchell To: Nathan Whitehorn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:31:17 -0000 sent it too early... the changes are good to match the industry standard. i find it a PIA when people invent new terms 'cuz they can' and 'just to be different' :) now, as an side note, ARM does use the term aarch32 as a roughly the synonym for armv7 instruction set, its just not as widely established... any takers? :) On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Michael Mitchell wrote: > why swim upstream on a naming convention that is established? > > when you say arm64 how many people are going to read that as amd64? > > other than cosmetic, is there a technical rationale for picking a > different naming convention other than what the industry uses? > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Nathan Whitehorn > wrote: > >> >> On 02/11/15 09:41, Ed Maste wrote: >> >>> The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for the >>> machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. >>> >> >> It would probably also be good if we had MACHINE = arm here. >> -Nathan >> >> >> It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used >>> elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. To >>> save us grief in the future I think it is worth following suit: >>> >>> diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h b/sys/arm64/include/param.h >>> index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 >>> --- a/sys/arm64/include/param.h >>> +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h >>> @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ >>> #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & ~STACKALIGNBYTES) >>> >>> #ifndef MACHINE >>> -#define MACHINE "arm64" >>> +#define MACHINE "aarch64" >>> #endif >>> #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH >>> -#define MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" >>> +#define MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64" >>> #endif >>> >>> I'm not proposing that we rename any of the source files. I believe >>> this approach is consistent with the Debian project - they call it the >>> "arm64" port, but report aarch64 from uname. >>> >>> I believe it will be much easier for us to carry around any >>> special-case s/aarch64/arm64/ in the base system (if necessary) than >>> trying to teach third-party software that the FreeBSD 64-bit ARM >>> architecture is called arm64 instead of aarch64. >>> >>> Any objections or concerns? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 19:41:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E0B492 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ignoranthack.me [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6841CFE4 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.200.212] (unknown [50.136.155.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9BB71941DD for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54DBAF15.60007@ignoranthack.me> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:35:49 -0800 From: Sean Bruno Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:41:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/11/15 10:21, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 02/11/15 09:41, Ed Maste wrote: >> The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for >> the machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. > > It would probably also be good if we had MACHINE = arm here. > -Nathan > TARGET=arm TARGET_ARCH=aarch64 is much more friendly to my qemu universe as well. Is there going to be more than one TARGET_ARCH in aarch64? Is there code shared between TARGET_ARCH=armv6 and TARGET_ARCH=aarch64? sean >> It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used >> elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. >> To save us grief in the future I think it is worth following >> suit: >> >> diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h >> b/sys/arm64/include/param.h index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 --- >> a/sys/arm64/include/param.h +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h @@ >> -43,10 +43,10 @@ #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & >> ~STACKALIGNBYTES) >> >> #ifndef MACHINE -#define MACHINE "arm64" +#define >> MACHINE "aarch64" #endif #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH -#define >> MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" +#define MACHINE_ARCH >> "aarch64" #endif >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU268TXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5ktS0IALDbc9d+ql6EoEU/NelZ7X27 tS9oyXaGDBR6o2SU2v7NU5mZqwizsn4wzaLqwUbIOlrohlrAcHIW9A4yR98nUvxo 5eCK+Vwv3ZqSD8EtnVkd7Y+Mr2RUlAG9i3+rHgBsyHhjp85uYK1xg8K3xrUqdHEU GxALJReudIvrnCF4d05vyFYIUgqt7/1s17Ti4XE+Y1neOQlQ6Kmx9sXE0mEyah08 2mCCwQNjlSu5xOXzW0daMCtCo0AftPfD2ACwhw2ZQQIyLj8qwKVuChAfi5+Hdfy5 TfV0SZmVbai11GCh3pOIQm6js3X21XIUiTSslVrn4745sN5cHHYZc/rQgoB3Lnw= =jLJD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 19:56:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74679BF for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (anacreon.Physics.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.117.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu", Issuer "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9C6D17D for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1BJYDBF062470; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:34:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54DBAEB5.6030007@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:34:13 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD powerpc; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Mitchell Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:56:05 -0000 I think you have misunderstood my point. Where there is substantial overlap between architectures (e.g. 32-bit and 64-bit PowerPC, 32-bit and 64-bit MIPS, big- and little-endian versions of architectures), we usually set MACHINE and MACHINE_CPUARCH to something common (e.g. "arm", "powerpc", "mips") and MACHINE_ARCH to the 32-/64-/big-endian/little-endian variant name. So in this case, MACHINE would be "arm" and MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64", just as we now have arm/armv6, arm/armeb, etc. -Nathan On 02/11/15 11:27, Michael Mitchell wrote: > why swim upstream on a naming convention that is established? > > when you say arm64 how many people are going to read that as amd64? > > other than cosmetic, is there a technical rationale for picking a > different naming convention other than what the industry uses? > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Nathan Whitehorn > > wrote: > > > On 02/11/15 09:41, Ed Maste wrote: > > The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for the > machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. > > > It would probably also be good if we had MACHINE = arm here. > -Nathan > > > It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used > elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf > tests. To > save us grief in the future I think it is worth following suit: > > diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 > --- a/sys/arm64/include/param.h > +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ > #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & ~STACKALIGNBYTES) > > #ifndef MACHINE > -#define MACHINE "arm64" > +#define MACHINE "aarch64" > #endif > #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH > -#define MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" > +#define MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64" > #endif > > I'm not proposing that we rename any of the source files. I believe > this approach is consistent with the Debian project - they call > it the > "arm64" port, but report aarch64 from uname. > > I believe it will be much easier for us to carry around any > special-case s/aarch64/arm64/ in the base system (if necessary) than > trying to teach third-party software that the FreeBSD 64-bit ARM > architecture is called arm64 instead of aarch64. > > Any objections or concerns? > _________________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing > list > http://lists.freebsd.org/__mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@__freebsd.org > " > > > _________________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/__mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@__freebsd.org > " > > From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 00:20:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12D3CE for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B904F2FC for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hl2so1421303igb.0 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:20:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=88mAY65G+OVrYZINwKwB9t048iRoUxIb6a9FlXgJfhM=; b=g40V/vod78Fj2ENdivXAotDGvebx5F30cw7JJk3CQ1me/YhyL7SDj3Pv7dVpVsPWw2 5ZMNDbXZkqbxXRTolVlWXsSV5LNpG/jyJm4e1bEJixDnAMZz8PQmtLCTzUuk3EeQEzFA 4tqN5+dvoS0/cXViuIjc54VTIs2fjyiEerJNnPROGatS4JjS8IgBNz1wEkZgLeZK1N4q OwwH5HxECk5mttI2qqrtZx48MUsBTtid1AdsI94r5W/MQnNYaVZFgO5UDKdVYjCT+rjC TGdh5l5VpciVqwyIAiogsuhn1vWfu67rgmsmWQqOowG4tf9s1EsKrxdKfKvje7guqs/z Fgjw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnD25hkMSpPtiePtWDC4CLp6IjOBnjJ+X4INpUsFL2R/316tzArMD/ZysOWKwQ9D/a2Qr3a X-Received: by 10.42.113.2 with SMTP id a2mr5968865icq.30.1423700404747; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:20:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from netflix-mac-wired.bsdimp.com ([50.253.99.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm1365613ioi.41.2015.02.11.16.20.03 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:20:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:20:03 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> References: To: Ed Maste X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:20:11 -0000 > On Feb 11, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Ed Maste wrote: >=20 > The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for the > machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. Linux used the original aarch64, but later changed to arm64. I suggest that we follow this carefully. We botched the naming of amd64 and have dozens of warts in our build system because of it. > It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used > elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. To > save us grief in the future I think it is worth following suit: >=20 > diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 > --- a/sys/arm64/include/param.h > +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h > @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ > #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & ~STACKALIGNBYTES) >=20 > #ifndef MACHINE > -#define MACHINE "arm64" > +#define MACHINE "aarch64" > #endif This defines the kernel architecture. History with amd64 suggests that = we should have had machine amd64 an machine_arch x86_64. We have modo = places in the tree, and in external files, that do a s/amd64/x86_64/ = that=E2=80=99s only done for amd64. > #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH > -#define MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" > +#define MACHINE_ARCH "aarch64" > #endif >=20 > I'm not proposing that we rename any of the source files. I believe > this approach is consistent with the Debian project - they call it the > "arm64" port, but report aarch64 from uname. You can=E2=80=99t propose this change and *NOT* be proposing we rename = the system files. $MACHINE *IS* the directories that we keep the kernel files in, by = definition. > I believe it will be much easier for us to carry around any > special-case s/aarch64/arm64/ in the base system (if necessary) than > trying to teach third-party software that the FreeBSD 64-bit ARM > architecture is called arm64 instead of aarch64. >=20 > Any objections or concerns? I strongly object to the MACHINE change for reasons stated above, but = the MACHINE_ARCH is likely a very good change since it aligns with the expected values = for configuring things like clang, gcc, bintuils, etc. We should also change Makefile.inc to set MACHINE_ARCH to aarch64 when = MACHINE is arm64. Warner From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 00:22:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F9812E for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66763B4 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecrd18 with SMTP id rd18so8268844iec.5 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:22:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=JvUbTqWvfE9nwWjUkr6JyFrGwjUd9DUp+BonH4aIH38=; b=fvu+TANWA0MiqdFanYUVMQfwczqs/H2LJo7p0F1ENRQLYw+O6C6VbvzNe6DCmoO5Wp pr3gQ6THHszcGntUJvTFf2pcUxEXBLB+AoJq+D/97wI9Ydb3eC4f3qZa3NcvLfaYTzCt MDGpfTzwaFskeWjld3wFUXpQfYuG+mGs/wMkhtqSubD5UCuOSeG3Endu+oVainrkzTiM VO77J/Yi+hWaV95EH65Vm1VyTl5lXkJ1h/tuuaiQKbI/Vaa9hKeHB6RnEU1Tqwwl4DNZ EuTr7nPi5kBKyc6q1G/A1X6PC9Ryzp6DRbGgUX0Y2MGH49lgg0OEAuYey/5Eg/2C9/9R U+MQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9X158BDYRLYl8fVeSBefVpt99b4F5kl8Dw5/CZUU+eE4bJ79725qHISgLTP6eM/fb4+p8 X-Received: by 10.107.31.16 with SMTP id f16mr1626053iof.88.1423700536155; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from netflix-mac-wired.bsdimp.com ([50.253.99.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sd7sm144095igb.20.2015.02.11.16.22.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:22:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <54DBAF15.60007@ignoranthack.me> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:22:14 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7CC61B0E-8630-4DB2-A4BC-8C22B33AAD77@bsdimp.com> References: <54DB9D93.6070702@freebsd.org> <54DBAF15.60007@ignoranthack.me> To: sbruno@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:22:23 -0000 > On Feb 11, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Sean Bruno = wrote: >=20 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 >=20 > On 02/11/15 10:21, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>=20 >> On 02/11/15 09:41, Ed Maste wrote: >>> The FreeBSD/arm64 work in progress currently reports "arm64" for >>> the machine and processor type - i.e., uname -m and uname -p. >>=20 >> It would probably also be good if we had MACHINE =3D arm here.=20 >> -Nathan >>=20 >=20 > TARGET=3Darm TARGET_ARCH=3Daarch64 is much more friendly to my qemu > universe as well. Is there going to be more than one TARGET_ARCH in > aarch64? Is there code shared between TARGET_ARCH=3Darmv6 and > TARGET_ARCH=3Daarch64? MACHINE_CPUARCH takes care of those issues. If the kernel is implemented in sys/arm, MACHINE should be arm. if it is = in sys/arm64, it should be arm64. The MACHINE type corresponds directly to where we = have the kernel files, and having something that=E2=80=99s MACHINE that=E2=80=99s = different than this is going to be an enormous pita in lots of places. Don=E2=80=99t do it :) Warner > sean >=20 >>> It seems that the official, awkward name aarch64 is broadly used=20 >>> elsewhere - for example, in toolchain triples and autoconf tests. >>> To save us grief in the future I think it is worth following >>> suit: >>>=20 >>> diff --git a/sys/arm64/include/param.h >>> b/sys/arm64/include/param.h index 5cd0445..525a0e7 100644 --- >>> a/sys/arm64/include/param.h +++ b/sys/arm64/include/param.h @@ >>> -43,10 +43,10 @@ #define STACKALIGN(p) ((uint64_t)(p) & >>> ~STACKALIGNBYTES) >>>=20 >>> #ifndef MACHINE -#define MACHINE "arm64" +#define >>> MACHINE "aarch64" #endif #ifndef MACHINE_ARCH -#define >>> MACHINE_ARCH "arm64" +#define MACHINE_ARCH >>> "aarch64" #endif >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 >=20 > iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU268TXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx > MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5ktS0IALDbc9d+ql6EoEU/NelZ7X27 > tS9oyXaGDBR6o2SU2v7NU5mZqwizsn4wzaLqwUbIOlrohlrAcHIW9A4yR98nUvxo > 5eCK+Vwv3ZqSD8EtnVkd7Y+Mr2RUlAG9i3+rHgBsyHhjp85uYK1xg8K3xrUqdHEU > GxALJReudIvrnCF4d05vyFYIUgqt7/1s17Ti4XE+Y1neOQlQ6Kmx9sXE0mEyah08 > 2mCCwQNjlSu5xOXzW0daMCtCo0AftPfD2ACwhw2ZQQIyLj8qwKVuChAfi5+Hdfy5 > TfV0SZmVbai11GCh3pOIQm6js3X21XIUiTSslVrn4745sN5cHHYZc/rQgoB3Lnw=3D > =3DjLJD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 00:41:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB1A5B4 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4293F6C3 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1C0fHW6017017 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:41:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197550] [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:41:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform bug_file_loc op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:41:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197550 Bug ID: 197550 Summary: [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: arm URL: http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015 -02-11_21h58m04s/logs/errors/percona56-server-5.6.22.7 1.0.log OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: flo@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sbruno@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(flo@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: flo@FreeBSD.org I seem to remember doing something to fix a similar error on another port for arm. [ 64%] Building CXX object sql/CMakeFiles/sql.dir/mysqld.cc.o cd /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/sql && /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ -DGTEST_USE_OWN_TR1_TUPLE=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DHAVE_EVENT_SCHEDULER -DHAVE_POOL_OF_THREADS -DMYSQL_SERVER -O -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wextra -Wformat-security -Wvla -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-null-conversion -Wno-unused-private-field -O -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DDBUG_OFF -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/include -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/sql -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/regex -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/zlib -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/extra/yassl/include -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/extra/yassl/taocrypt/include -DHAVE_YASSL -DYASSL_PREFIX -DHAVE_OPENSSL -DMULTI_THREADED -o CMakeFiles/sql.dir/mysqld.cc.o -c /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/sql/mysqld.cc /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/sql/mysqld.cc:194:19: error: cannot combine with previous 'type-name' declaration specifier typedef fp_except fp_except_t; ^ /usr/include/machine/ieeefp.h:51:21: note: expanded from macro 'fp_except_t' #define fp_except_t int ^ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/sql/mysqld.cc:194:1: warning: typedef requires a name [-Wmissing-declarations] typedef fp_except fp_except_t; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/sql/mysqld.cc:232:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'fpsetmask'; did you mean 'sigsetmask'? fpsetmask(~(FP_X_INV | FP_X_OFL | FP_X_UFL | FP_X_DZ | ^~~~~~~~~ sigsetmask /usr/include/signal.h:119:5: note: 'sigsetmask' declared here int sigsetmask(int); ^ In file included from /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/sql/mysqld.cc:1276: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/extra/yassl/include/openssl/crypto.h:22:9: warning: 'ysSSL_crypto_h__' is used as a header guard here, followed by #define of a different macro [-Wheader-guard] #ifndef ysSSL_crypto_h__ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/percona56-server/work/percona-server-5.6.22-71.0/extra/yassl/include/openssl/crypto.h:23:9: note: 'yaSSL_crypto_h__' is defined here; did you mean 'ysSSL_crypto_h__'? #define yaSSL_crypto_h__ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ysSSL_crypto_h__ 2 warnings and 2 errors generated. *** Error code 1 --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer flo@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 00:45:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC6C656 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D3B7C2 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1C0j2Q6021799 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:45:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197551] [arm] emulators/dolphin-emu fails to build on armv6 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:45:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: martymac@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform bug_file_loc op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:45:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197551 Bug ID: 197551 Summary: [arm] emulators/dolphin-emu fails to build on armv6 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: arm URL: http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015 -02-11_21h58m04s/logs/errors/dolphin-emu-4.0.2_2.log OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: martymac@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sbruno@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(martymac@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: martymac@FreeBSD.org [ 7%] Building CXX object Source/Core/AudioCommon/CMakeFiles/audiocommon.dir/Src/OpenALStream.cpp.o cd /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/AudioCommon && /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ -DDATA_DIR=\"/usr/local/share/dolphin-emu/\" -DHAVE_ALSA=0 -DHAVE_AO=0 -DHAVE_BLUEZ=0 -DHAVE_LIBAV -DHAVE_OPENAL=1 -DHAVE_PORTAUDIO=1 -DHAVE_PULSEAUDIO=0 -DHAVE_WAYLAND=0 -DHAVE_WX=1 -DHAVE_X11=1 -DHAVE_X11_XINPUT2=1 -DHAVE_XRANDR=1 -DUSER_DIR=\".dolphin-emu\" -DUSE_EGL=1 -DUSE_GLES=1 -DUSE_UPNP -DWXUSINGDLL -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_M_ARM=1 -D_M_GENERIC=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE -D__LIBUSB__ -D__WXGTK__ -O -pipe -DLIBICONV_PLUG -fno-strict-aliasing -DLIBICONV_PLUG -Wtype-limits -Wsign-compare -Wignored-qualifiers -Wuninitialized -Wshadow -Winit-self -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fvisibility=hidden -I/usr/local/include/wx-3.0 -O -pipe -DLIBICONV_PLUG -fno-strict-aliasing -DLIBICONV_PLUG -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Externals/SFML/include -I/usr/local/include/portaudio2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/AL -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/AudioCommon/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/Common/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/Core/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/DebuggerUICommon/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/DebuggerWX/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/DiscIO/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/DolphinWX/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/InputCommon/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/VideoCommon/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/VideoUICommon/Src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Externals/Bochs_disasm -I/usr/local/include/soundtouch -I/usr/local/include/SDL -I/usr/local/include/miniupnpc -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Externals/SOIL -I/usr/include/GL -I/usr/local/include/libdrm -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Externals/CLRun/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -isystem /usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-3.0 -isystem /usr/local/include/wx-3.0 -marm -march=armv7-a -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-exceptions -fomit-frame-pointer -Wno-unknown-pragmas -std=gnu++0x -o CMakeFiles/audiocommon.dir/Src/OpenALStream.cpp.o -c /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/AudioCommon/Src/OpenALStream.cpp /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/AudioCommon/Src/OpenALStream.cpp:202:25: error: cannot initialize a parameter of type 'const SAMPLETYPE *' (aka 'const short *') with an lvalue of type 'float [512]' soundTouch.putSamples(dest, numSamples); ^~~~ /usr/local/include/soundtouch/SoundTouch.h:237:31: note: passing argument to parameter 'samples' here const SAMPLETYPE *samples, ///< Pointer to sample buffer. ^ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/AudioCommon/Src/OpenALStream.cpp:251:5: error: no matching function for call to 'dpl2decode' dpl2decode(sampleBuffer, nSamples, dpl2); ^~~~~~~~~~ /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu/work/dolphin-emu-dolphin-88fabf7/Source/Core/AudioCommon/Src/DPL2Decoder.h:8:6: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'soundtouch::SAMPLETYPE [49152]' to 'float *' for 1st argument void dpl2decode(float *samples, int numsamples, float *out); ^ 2 errors generated. *** Error code 1 --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer martymac@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 03:46:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B37CB9A for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A62D3C for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x3so6611526qcv.13 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:46:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OC/ilOaNjLZHM8FJ2Cez/4YDBBqVrtx7QVivAjcdNNM=; b=gDnIfez0IS9swrDsNU1/Bl6mOoze34CU/Mfa1NEA8UIskOxoTV8q3K1XRR6fSlsSrv UNQXGhZuif9B1rJ2JkqJ0eDZJYv7sWsdMYiif4X+ftX1t0m+S6X5TCiOwXYY4rPDZ/mQ kkSSmuLednRywoU7Ql0jbJ2+/u21zoHjheoDJgYTICiCXL1dDsRfBf9qCkDgbo3SRMsA 83E/+cZ9DM683+jD/eISWLnLT1kUBQ3G/lpcEEWu5uVthA3691p6TWB3imz1foz4E668 QEY0UoT5jDKdO6e+C6hXSFuQtaUsJ2Ug8MlpKxW/L00xniFd9IulWMAc3i816RngJZiD Cong== X-Received: by 10.229.175.131 with SMTP id ba3mr5218756qcb.3.1423712798240; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:46:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.39.209 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:46:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:46:18 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NAtnRZ1z12md032vjF2o56jNU4I Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:46:39 -0000 On 11 February 2015 at 19:20, Warner Losh wrote: > > Linux used the original aarch64, but later changed to arm64. Are you sure? As far as I can tell Linux reports "aarch64" for uname -m (i.e., hw.machine) and that is what config.guess / autoconf expects. > I suggest > that we follow this carefully. We botched the naming of amd64 and have > dozens of warts in our build system because of it. Indeed. We have to be sure that this is correct before it makes it to HEAD. > I strongly object to the MACHINE change for reasons stated above, but the MACHINE_ARCH > is likely a very good change since it aligns with the expected values for configuring things like > clang, gcc, bintuils, etc. As far as I can tell it's uname -m / sysctl hw.machine that's used by autoconf. Uname -p is hw.machine_arch and doesn't seem to be used. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 05:57:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFBE9C8 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01B7BD9 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from comporellon.tachypleus.net (polaris.tachypleus.net [75.101.50.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t1C5vWsW003083 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:57:33 -0800 Message-ID: <54DC40CC.2090103@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:57:32 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbCxzNvb4nHgxgwBJCNA4cNo8DpUoZPYlHeuVYWxMtVBPABw3/gzM78kt7ROTeSR656SzC+I8NeoZVJCBhbBj++ruNpu/ilQ38= X-Sonic-ID: C;dKwgCXyy5BGIYOTWjn0JFw== M;dNKkCXyy5BGIYOTWjn0JFw== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:57:35 -0000 On 02/11/15 19:46, Ed Maste wrote: > On 11 February 2015 at 19:20, Warner Losh wrote: >> Linux used the original aarch64, but later changed to arm64. > Are you sure? As far as I can tell Linux reports "aarch64" for uname > -m (i.e., hw.machine) and that is what config.guess / autoconf > expects. > >> I suggest >> that we follow this carefully. We botched the naming of amd64 and have >> dozens of warts in our build system because of it. > Indeed. We have to be sure that this is correct before it makes it to HEAD. > >> I strongly object to the MACHINE change for reasons stated above, but the MACHINE_ARCH >> is likely a very good change since it aligns with the expected values for configuring things like >> clang, gcc, bintuils, etc. > As far as I can tell it's uname -m / sysctl hw.machine that's used by > autoconf. Uname -p is hw.machine_arch and doesn't seem to be used. > _______________________________________________ It usually uses uname -p. For example, on powerpc64: $ uname -m powerpc $ uname -p powerpc64 $ ./configure checking build system type... powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0 checking host system type... powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0 Most software does the right thing here, with the exception of a few rare custom build systems I've run into. -Nathan From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 06:54:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB108233 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F4C177 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecrp18 with SMTP id rp18so9757462iec.10 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:54:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=ZPXkmnjmVD9dwjdNx0kMrIvTQcn4Wo+sxmD1rD1QBjg=; b=SejPCPm8PObATftiKDj4Fi7dpb1tNgzt8md4L2GNLpvmVLdgoWuFWLkHfYqenGJC3c lLusTdMy4NCvvpwrg+DGkZSpzEK6XCDstO+FWBZDc3FOsxvJbhuRp0e40P5QcKEK8pDF 3uFH6ldY+OyAvn+jZPAZkSXANaXhlqZHHyn1Shm/AeCbMI1LtFUbrvQNNyhj5YpxGbWT TgUj+U9lhUqScJrCd4iXoTszR5QGNwEVUoqQcKdoKUOx7SjvDwDESzd1EhGEPSSEiSI3 91hikxjrftF5zsSwxUsma3A5yfnSgejh0uZSAuRFSi2ZlCRQayAxGGnAK6+BLJkgXRKN /ZXA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmM847zWXeYF1hdxuPrFbCKZX7GZV8Ta9c50wjCKkHZOUph+X5z4NNkP2VV7hXjMdSseOVJ X-Received: by 10.50.124.73 with SMTP id mg9mr2087050igb.38.1423724081498; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:54:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from netflix-mac-wired.bsdimp.com ([50.253.99.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm714210igt.19.2015.02.11.22.54.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:54:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:54:39 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> To: Ed Maste X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:54:48 -0000 > On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:46 PM, Ed Maste wrote: >=20 > On 11 February 2015 at 19:20, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> Linux used the original aarch64, but later changed to arm64. >=20 > Are you sure? As far as I can tell Linux reports "aarch64" for uname > -m (i.e., hw.machine) and that is what config.guess / autoconf > expects. They moved the sources in the kernel from aarch64 to arm64. I=E2=80=99m = sure. >> I suggest >> that we follow this carefully. We botched the naming of amd64 and = have >> dozens of warts in our build system because of it. >=20 > Indeed. We have to be sure that this is correct before it makes it to = HEAD. >=20 >> I strongly object to the MACHINE change for reasons stated above, but = the MACHINE_ARCH >> is likely a very good change since it aligns with the expected values = for configuring things like >> clang, gcc, bintuils, etc. >=20 > As far as I can tell it's uname -m / sysctl hw.machine that's used by > autoconf. Uname -p is hw.machine_arch and doesn't seem to be used. I think you=E2=80=99re wrong here. uname -p is definitely used when you = configure things like gcc. This is why we had to hack it to make armv6 as our uname -p output work so we could bootstrap on the native hardware. amd64=E2=80=99s -p name should have been x86_64. We=E2=80=99ve created = no end of issues for ourselves by not doing that. config.guess uses uname -p: *:FreeBSD:*:*) UNAME_PROCESSOR=3D`/usr/bin/uname -p` echo ${UNAME_PROCESSOR}-unknown-freebsd`echo = ${UNAME_RELEASE}|sed -e 's/[-(].*//'` exit ;; so uname -p must be =E2=80=98aarch64=E2=80=99 since that=E2=80=99s what = is expected. name -m must be arm64 unless we move our kernel implementation to sys/aarch64 from = the sys/arm64 it is now. Warner= From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 10:31:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5620D1BC; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2DFAC88; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r20so3121705wiv.2; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:31:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hOOa64c7YQsHXSgKaEhizS/7/cQe/DY4oE7a4mq9fQM=; b=app8vinGY8p5CQtv0cHKJKXvV2XVHQ5MDuZpcqb+VAg0gRL+atoREY8TwnFIiPwPMx NfNFpLcjGkSqFh11zmFaNIAfOsoZOvyu6soYWmMX2Hrccd6VtLH8aHYojx4arbZx/2RW bfnYFdAcy1N6iEBA4l1/btqGSjqqg4V6Y3GpXCPLE6Wk5jvSbY9ZbCnbU6zRHXMFkjR5 2+QkMGzGAXpVo/ElNjlWI5MI4RVZwZLSmNldhGw++sBCTLJ1JVBCFx0P327otO9WP1Ok XhMCs+S8ZvibD8OVBI2I5TUrJ2xUSMgN0o0WoOC9hcMMB7Ea8PtP59MzhbL/zyCnkbEr EExg== X-Received: by 10.194.184.212 with SMTP id ew20mr6536215wjc.88.1423737078358; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:31:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1458:202:46::101:a51f? ([2001:1458:202:46::101:a51f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa3sm1918187wib.17.2015.02.12.02.31.17 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:31:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54DC80FC.6010606@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:31:24 +0100 From: Aurelien Martin <01aurelien@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brenden Bartelt , George Rosamond Subject: Re: "geli: Wrong key" unable to attach in RPi/ARM environment References: <54DB7B07.4080704@ceetonetechnology.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:31:20 -0000 Hi all, I have experienced the same behavior of geli with 11-CURRENT ARM r271779. I did the same steps as Brenden Cheers,Aurelien On 11/02/15 17:08, Brenden Bartelt wrote: > I have tried it both with and without a -K/-k keyfile specified and with > and without a passphrase (-P/-p). Any combination results in the same > "geli: Wrong key for mmcsd0s3." > For the sake of thoroughness I have even tried it with no PKCS#5v2 > iterations and with a NULL ealgo. > Each attempt writes a master key to the device metadata, but subsequent > attempts to attach the device fail with a wrong key. > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:53 AM, George Rosamond < > george@ceetonetechnology.com> wrote: > >> Brenden Bartelt: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This a follow up to a previous thread in freebsd-geom where it was >>> determined that geli is functional in 11.0-CURRENT and it could be an ARM >>> problem. >>> >>> I have been unable to geli attach in RPi, even with a very simple >>> passphrase ("test"). Has anyone had success with this? I have tried on an >>> external usb, da0 as well as a partition on the SD card itself, mmcsd0s3. >>> The geli init appears to work, and a geli dump reveals that a master key >>> was indeed written to the device. What is even more puzzling is that a >> geli >>> onetime will work for the device, so it would appear that geli is >>> functional, but something has gone wrong with the master key >>> generating/writing/reading operation. >>> >>> Can anyone shed some light on something I am missing? Is geli not fully >>> supported on ARM? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Brenden >> I haven't tried this, but two things: >> >> 1. did you try setting the key with -k when you attach? >> >> 2. I don't know if he's on this list, but I'm adding pdj@ to the cc. >> >> g >> >>> Log: >>> >>> # uname -a >>> FreeBSD raspberry-pi 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r278031: Mon >> Feb >>> 2 02:54:08 UTC 2015 >>> root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI-B >>> arm >>> >>> # kldstat >>> Id Refs Address Size Name >>> 8 1 0xc5657000 17000 geom_eli.ko >>> 9 1 0xc572e000 2c000 crypto.ko >>> >>> # geli init mmcsd0s3 >>> Enter new passphrase: >>> Reenter new passphrase: >>> >>> Metadata backup can be found in /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli and >>> can be restored with the following command: >>> >>> # geli restore /var/backups/mmcsd0s3.eli mmcsd0s3 >>> >>> # geli attach mmcsd0s3 >>> Enter passphrase: >>> geli: Wrong key for mmcsd0s3. >>> >>> # geli dump mmcsd0s3 >>> Metadata on mmcsd0s3: >>> magic: GEOM::ELI >>> version: 7 >>> flags: 0x0 >>> ealgo: AES-XTS >>> keylen: 128 >>> provsize: 24796725248 >>> sectorsize: 512 >>> keys: 0x01 >>> iterations: 21660 >>> Salt: >>> >> d2678fa977889263b18cbbb2e5a3151ac8185d9d0bc5dafa548abc4510ca49ce134ef9410cc63a9b0881514d9e9fedb6a3d392ba4096775030d0646fbfb4cce5 >>> Master Key: >>> >> 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 >>> MD5 hash: f97f3ca1cf95c25144c84a12b10d81ef >>> >>> # geli onetime mmcsd0s3 >>> # geli list >>> Geom name: mmcsd0s3.eli >>> State: ACTIVE >>> EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS >>> KeyLength: 128 >>> Crypto: software >>> Version: 7 >>> Flags: ONETIME >>> KeysAllocated: 47 >>> KeysTotal: 47 >>> Providers: >>> 1. Name: mmcsd0s3.eli >>> Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) >>> Sectorsize: 512 >>> Mode: r0w0e0 >>> Consumers: >>> 1. Name: mmcsd0s3 >>> Mediasize: 24796725248 (23G) >>> Sectorsize: 512 >>> Stripesize: 4194304 >>> Stripeoffset: 0 >>> Mode: r1w1e1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 12:19:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDE2ACA for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03B1971 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CCJZu2007458 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:19:35 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1CCJZwv007457; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:19:35 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:19:35 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "zbb (Zbigniew Bodek)" Subject: [Differential] [Updated, 41 lines] D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup Message-ID: <6662ee0d9e6a474d4486a71a375f2eaa@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZjlkNDcyMzZlMWIyNDBkZTI1NTY5ZjZiZGRjIFTcmlc= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:19:36 -0000 zbb updated this revision to Diff 3744. CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810?vs=3708&id=3744 REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810 AFFECTED FILES sys/arm/arm/locore-v6.S sys/arm/include/asm.h To: zbb, andrew, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 13:28:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4D12831 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89C0AFFF for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CDSrfK002347 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:28:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197550] [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:28:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael.urankar@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:28:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197550 mikael.urankar@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikael.urankar@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from mikael.urankar@gmail.com --- Created attachment 152897 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152897&action=edit fix build on armv6 For armv6, Declare FPSETMASK 0 and FEDISABLEEXCEPT 1 build log: http://mikael.urankar.free.fr/FreeBSD/arm/build_logs/percona56-server-5.6.22.71.0.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 15:25:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B3483C for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29365FDD for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CFP4VG011245 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:25:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197550] [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:25:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:25:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197550 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #3 from Sean Bruno --- confirmed. flo: You want to commit this or shall I? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 15:39:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59D2ACBB for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB22186 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CFdY5W022622 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194183] [arm] math/R missing libquadmath to compile Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194183 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed --- Comment #9 from Sean Bruno --- oh, math/R depend tree requires a functional lang/gcc This is not available on mips/mips64 at this time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 15:47:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C1112C for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ignoranthack.me [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1332228B for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.200.212] (unknown [50.136.155.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B176D1941DD for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54DCCB08.7050900@ignoranthack.me> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:47:20 -0800 From: Sean Bruno Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: internal linking, external tool chains, missing symbols References: <54BFC6ED.2090007@ignoranthack.me> In-Reply-To: <54BFC6ED.2090007@ignoranthack.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:47:24 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 01/21/15 07:34, Sean Bruno wrote: > > This is a fairly common failure pattern in some of the ports > builds. The final link stage seems to fail to find symbols that > were generated in code during the build, unsure why or how this is > happening with the external toolchain + qemu-bsd-user + poudriere > that I am using. > > > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/gotoblas-2.1.13.3.4.0_5.log > > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/l2tpd-0.69_3.log > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/code-eli-0.3.6.log > > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/upp-5485_2.log > > > > _______________________________________________ This appears to still be an issue with my last build on chips: http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=11armv6-11armv6&build=2015-02-06_22h08m16s -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU3MsDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kZmgH/jJUJC4tCcZUMS9QeTyu/As/ 2XsFWGUAmNrdCsOrGfnk8UwIKSvjIyAntJMgs9FgEuP2EC75FzgHC0XFZCPD8ehL Xaa48e0xHqpj7/9kRP4XSz2ORYxxfVzshEezZ5/mku5joqdDmyp0NgXQrr0Y6Fxy PRiwVB0KrVuiM+M24uDfqR4MNpjhwmpeXwW3FPUbYSunJ8yGaiXr89lrjyTTiDRS pvZojrbNwtLpn4ONQy1FLXaFdQXYg/BiETZD3E/oZk9OQfjK4YSP8od9QAbeUP17 ee+WjD5/bLm3pU1CcJkeodRD+XMNqkqOhMm2SQRnRm24z5/h+uypqhuafZjQqLM= =r7nb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 15:48:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42EDF175 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ignoranthack.me [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2202E299 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.200.212] (unknown [50.136.155.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 295F91941DD for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54DCCB2F.6060409@ignoranthack.me> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 07:47:59 -0800 From: Sean Bruno Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgcc failures, external tool chain builds References: <54BFC6A9.7020609@ignoranthack.me> In-Reply-To: <54BFC6A9.7020609@ignoranthack.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:48:01 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 01/21/15 07:32, Sean Bruno wrote: > > While cross building ports, I've come across a couple of common > failure cases for our toolchains. It seems that libgcc isn't > always built correctly for ARM or I need to do something different > for the external tool chain model that I use with qemu-bsd-user + > poudriere. I've categorized a couple of failure groups with > example logs here. Any suggestions? > > > __aeebi_memove/memset missing > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/pop3vscan-0.4_4.log > > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/FreeMat-4.2_4.log > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/cint-5.18.00_2.log > > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/nightfall-1.70_12.log > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/giacxcas-1.1.0_9.log > > > > __aeabi_dsub/dcmple/d2f/dcmpun/dcmpeq/i2d etc @GCC_3.5 > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/pnetcdf-1.5.0_7.log > > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/anyterm-1.1.29.log > > __modsi3 mising > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/cdcl-5.4.8.log > > seems to require glibc libdl? > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/mosh-scheme-0.2.7_2.log > > /usr/lib/libexecinfo is missing things? > http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015-01-19_15h28m19s/logs/errors/qgis-2.6.1_1.log > > > These are still an issue according to my latest build on chips. http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=11armv6-11armv6&build=2015-02-06_22h08m16s sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU3MsvXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kRx0H/3hSsMXdrTVzcELLF2axgWGv jOpiW9JfbWRBV1f3HLOZ8tzVp5GpsBhFQFTxG+Bvj7WrdxUpeNI78ZtwWL+WLq/9 n78V3z861+yACol0of4VQmQNUHIVPWSZVHOCyeWJo9dV6Wp3tVaMpFCTKkhGcKAV MeGIkmNqNyHrlA7ZbnqStqIx1a/ID0qHoyOGk3oNjJCM9asdX7Zn6gOBxXeMp+ux 0JS/SRiGf2hMwrmbeKLYByqY6TzThx93AOC80l+zb+KK/0P9q0/PZWwRf+9bYzWg yFeyI7VplhrHPOO5y5L18a4jYcFCQH10ZUrL56amWxhDbE/w2r3d4auBDJ/z/1k= =Fi1o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 16:04:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4E4B3D for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 706836A7 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CG42oo081622 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:04:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:04:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.description Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:04:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #152855|c source file from clang35 |tar archive of the c and sh description|crash |files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 16:05:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECA2BBF for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E98A26B6 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CG54dj082113 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.mimetype Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #152855|text/plain |application/x-gtar mime type| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 16:05:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1855CC0E for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC446C0 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i50so8683137qgf.2 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:05:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GOqTYRgj05ouhUO5RYrVig8IkINu6Zf0w2C5QF+OIYs=; b=DEUgm3Lhsxo6+5H1X+DcutxVMG4J/oK6OHfDzFLblcEWef0fmL91yuo7wsNsATsavp 55oDV93n8baoM47TlaphbPB+6ME+WlfIZ7OL4P/Nc6B+MNqHwsCdeGYJdqimiu6d7WZY q8GLNacnp4tfdeDWGmDaUFTbHYdEQMFp8hiKjHKxDB5dF+bTwWa5C5I2fF22gl2bZVSg 0OzBV0nBWJdg2lWBqAooRJAGdPQsVMkYXFk8/aE+Xj7+0952b3AP9SElx+NQW+3LDdr5 kvSSNi388Axi0ch1BY5RAeeC3jRqBJZOMQrKsOBkwQjmhKDNlJY99zQ0ELoZ3pe2RsCM 8/mA== X-Received: by 10.140.48.137 with SMTP id o9mr11411123qga.89.1423757142798; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:05:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.39.209 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:05:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> From: Ed Maste Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:05:22 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xN3Mb-ebQZijlHlToCEv8Z-Y2Q4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:05:44 -0000 On 12 February 2015 at 01:54, Warner Losh wrote: > > They moved the sources in the kernel from aarch64 to arm64. I=E2=80=99m s= ure. Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source in, only what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that has always been aarch64 for uname -m. > config.guess uses uname -p: > > *:FreeBSD:*:*) > UNAME_PROCESSOR=3D`/usr/bin/uname -p` > echo ${UNAME_PROCESSOR}-unknown-freebsd`echo ${UNAME_RELEASE}|sed= -e 's/[-(].*//'` > exit ;; Ah, yes - it looks like this has changed repeatedly over time, and I must have looked at a rather outdated config.guess. It's clear from this snippet though that this is a special case for FreeBSD, and most other cases rely on uname -m. I also found a few other configure-like scripts that only use uname -m. > so uname -p must be =E2=80=98aarch64=E2=80=99 since that=E2=80=99s what i= s expected. Yes, I agree this is necessary. > uname -m must > be arm64 unless we move our kernel implementation to sys/aarch64 from the > sys/arm64 it is now. We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match expectations of third-party software set by other operating systems. If that in turn means we have to move the kernel source, so be it. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 16:29:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31EC555F for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9A7E982 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecrl12 with SMTP id rl12so10665851iec.4 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:29:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=s89UB4ohmw/J8GUeYpvcacC9O2+RU6shKuQ84yvvWpU=; b=iSi/fzrrtRqq9GrLsvg1H6hMC+SCgRU3Iybuu7jdaiRDpHeqt44ECZ057ysYDeLCQq 1BjfBFG0CxaamQ56+8x+tIjHLYhKwN/kB/Nwp9x84te341WFB1slmzgOcbhHxKbYBWK8 UmFVZmSJ8QRyar6CWsdkVYekEf6AsYR0bt/X3URwf8PgPHjwFh6kIQkmhr9VBUYFJNXE aYpDPowefCgVIL60V2tjG7UhuHSb720mzuQJ7CU21cd6IB8Sh60DW88HzmQSk3A/S20f zAiG1Qko9yI7bopojp9v24mjGZ8bbO38oxmA49NXnoPrMb4+Ng0/UpBAxFSiAa/8taFp Xgxw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7Q701Z1koJSLFwTnrqW0BqmtkjFrMaAMVxIRzwFGLsib35tuTG1K/dPz13SOSu0OBgJYi X-Received: by 10.107.19.89 with SMTP id b86mr5561633ioj.35.1423758567540; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:29:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from netflix-mac-wired.bsdimp.com ([50.253.99.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm1460782igp.11.2015.02.12.08.29.26 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:29:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:29:25 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> To: Ed Maste X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:29:29 -0000 > On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Ed Maste wrote: >=20 > On 12 February 2015 at 01:54, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> They moved the sources in the kernel from aarch64 to arm64. I=E2=80=99m= sure. >=20 > Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source in, only > what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that has always been > aarch64 for uname -m. Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. >> config.guess uses uname -p: >>=20 >> *:FreeBSD:*:*) >> UNAME_PROCESSOR=3D`/usr/bin/uname -p` >> echo ${UNAME_PROCESSOR}-unknown-freebsd`echo = ${UNAME_RELEASE}|sed -e 's/[-(].*//'` >> exit ;; >=20 > Ah, yes - it looks like this has changed repeatedly over time, and I > must have looked at a rather outdated config.guess. It's clear from > this snippet though that this is a special case for FreeBSD, and most > other cases rely on uname -m. I also found a few other configure-like > scripts that only use uname -m. >=20 >> so uname -p must be =E2=80=98aarch64=E2=80=99 since that=E2=80=99s = what is expected. >=20 > Yes, I agree this is necessary. One done, one to go :) >> uname -m must >> be arm64 unless we move our kernel implementation to sys/aarch64 from = the >> sys/arm64 it is now. >=20 > We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match > expectations of third-party software set by other operating systems. > If that in turn means we have to move the kernel source, so be it. This one I=E2=80=99m not on board with. You=E2=80=99ve not made a = compelling case for it yet. Some scripts is a little vague for my liking, especially given = the justification for amd64 we had at the time we made that decision (they were also about compatibility, official names, and vague notions of correctness). One other area that these choices impact the system is in the = MACHINE_CPUARCH macro, which is derived from MACHINE_ARCH (-p), so it might need another special case. There=E2=80=99s also a number of places we test different = of these variables against arm* that will need to be audited if we make this change = as well. Thankfully, there=E2=80=99s only about a dozen. While not externally = visible, any change here will need to make sure we=E2=80=99re consistent when building. Warner= From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 17:15:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926301AA for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x234.google.com (mail-qa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F47EBC for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id v10so8581843qac.11 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:15:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uXLBtnu425MaM5vS6nPsTHlMLWxYrngS3eEG92cVvNY=; b=kW9LxxQb4Bnz3gt3t10DtolAvta3Vbp0i9a53ReuUAmO11Npbu9jWQp9jSHjL9nLl0 LX/OBQhqzqAZ/p8C4Vl15N7r3l1bWPf7+BGX+Zec2Qzn+IghHFXOM/fTgLsCtnop7r3C sBrS129vVggWC8LxyxTVPXW4WM2acajEpMBkC5QJ2bFIO6qzRr5iZ3c3JkSmEvcCDprc bnCuICRED5OAcIabAdxZdHjn/g+eLRss3Aa7j6/+8GBW5Qlb3uubMkVRmkGCqNlM/Wua yjf44xFo5WKxl+M2sG7HGs66iIpZntF9w3FUPVg6/CydVUdi1DQEXwUeueKyH9IKN0Of /qpA== X-Received: by 10.140.94.6 with SMTP id f6mr12282997qge.38.1423761336370; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:15:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.39.209 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:15:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> From: Ed Maste Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:15:16 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: J_FfPHFC09jy1ZA1RjoIzeE6g6M Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:15:37 -0000 >> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source in, only >> what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that has always been >> aarch64 for uname -m. > > Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. >> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match >> expectations of third-party software set by other operating systems. >> If that in turn means we have to move the kernel source, so be it. > > This one I=E2=80=99m not on board with. You=E2=80=99ve not made a compell= ing case for > it yet. That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've never had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". There's no reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses "aarch64." Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname -p seems a bit odd. > One other area that these choices impact the system is in the MACHINE_CPU= ARCH > macro, which is derived from MACHINE_ARCH (-p), so it might need another > special case. There's a special case already for TARGET_TRIPLE :C/arm64/aarch64/. > There=E2=80=99s also a number of places we test different of these variab= les > against arm* that will need to be audited if we make this change = as well. > Thankfully, there=E2=80=99s only about a dozen. While not externally visi= ble, any change here > will need to make sure we=E2=80=99re consistent when building. Yes, I'm not too worried about the naming within our tree - dealing with a few dozen tests in the FreeBSD tree is much easier than trying to change expectations of third-party software. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 17:26:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638E04C5 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A71FFEC for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdjy10 with SMTP id y10so13259028pdj.6 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:26:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=86jM1JweKAz/7o3VDqKaBpPMqd3KAifIKzdqsQ7rLJg=; b=I4y+CffC2pqOkEzOZy96Ee/EZYKN6Xv5VhpG4QOCmdYYn3MMNPSd1tza/4N1Vn2x7c J26hUJ/7w3ChFrhATas+1yqyLl0YAPV6fb8tQ8m7hJaUZkhVHgNBt3X3gpZ3u811t7aN kMV2mKY62DD1F5CAfCkwwrX8fogTx+UmdedWs8zWVXnZHlcCfryBB4JieEdstBPP47nc 1dwzwDfr31b4W6/v9lXiMKi/EigZLBlxxfC5l0PkTEsDdDX8H418p/8fTdEV9mcpwKAP KudoAdXwjOZ+YFKKo/2/7HdTGSZGcIUWKeFKEmMyo/h56/vg+spam1zBFClU5EdiLx79 jOvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkX4kWBiJLVqN58Xt2HxE8ql/E7feOfJbWGEvCK87WzOym9p8Ec8JjHAnqVt7lm1hvMpP5u X-Received: by 10.70.36.174 with SMTP id r14mr8314307pdj.148.1423761989254; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:26:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.64.26.244] ([69.53.236.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pr5sm4275437pdb.92.2015.02.12.09.26.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:26:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:26:26 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <84AC4061-2FF8-4066-8C38-D5240F7FB86A@bsdimp.com> References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> To: Ed Maste X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:26:30 -0000 > On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Ed Maste wrote: >=20 >>> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source in, = only >>> what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that has always been >>> aarch64 for uname -m. >>=20 >> Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. >=20 > Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. >=20 >>> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match >>> expectations of third-party software set by other operating systems. >>> If that in turn means we have to move the kernel source, so be it. >>=20 >> This one I=E2=80=99m not on board with. You=E2=80=99ve not made a = compelling case for >> it yet. >=20 > That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. >=20 > However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've never > had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". There's no > reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses "aarch64." > Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname -p seems a bit > odd. They are different because they can be different. The machine name for pc98 is pc98 not i386. It=E2=80=99s the platform, while the machine_arch = name is i386 since that=E2=80=99s the cpu abi it is built on. FWIW, netbsd reports =E2=80=98amd64=E2=80=99 for the machine and = =E2=80=98x86_64=E2=80=99 for machine_arch which is one of the reasons I know ours is wrong :( >> One other area that these choices impact the system is in the = MACHINE_CPUARCH >> macro, which is derived from MACHINE_ARCH (-p), so it might need = another >> special case. >=20 > There's a special case already for TARGET_TRIPLE :C/arm64/aarch64/. We=E2=80=99ll likely need more of this sort of thing. which is kinda a = pita. >> There=E2=80=99s also a number of places we test different of these = variables >> against arm* that will need to be audited if we make this = change as well. >> Thankfully, there=E2=80=99s only about a dozen. While not externally = visible, any change here >> will need to make sure we=E2=80=99re consistent when building. >=20 > Yes, I'm not too worried about the naming within our tree - dealing > with a few dozen tests in the FreeBSD tree is much easier than trying > to change expectations of third-party software. My worry is that they get fixed at the same time any name changes, which weren=E2=80=99t in the patches :) I=E2=80=99m not at all sure what the right thing here will be. Warner= From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 17:57:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA2D5207 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (anacreon.Physics.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.117.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu", Issuer "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C693DA for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CHvCt1071755 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:57:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54DCE978.8030104@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:57:12 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD powerpc; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:57:13 -0000 On 02/12/15 08:05, Ed Maste wrote: > On 12 February 2015 at 01:54, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> They moved the sources in the kernel from aarch64 to arm64. I’m sure. > > Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source in, only > what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that has always been > aarch64 for uname -m. > >> config.guess uses uname -p: >> >> *:FreeBSD:*:*) >> UNAME_PROCESSOR=`/usr/bin/uname -p` >> echo ${UNAME_PROCESSOR}-unknown-freebsd`echo ${UNAME_RELEASE}|sed -e 's/[-(].*//'` >> exit ;; > > Ah, yes - it looks like this has changed repeatedly over time, and I > must have looked at a rather outdated config.guess. It's clear from > this snippet though that this is a special case for FreeBSD, and most > other cases rely on uname -m. I also found a few other configure-like > scripts that only use uname -m. > >> so uname -p must be ‘aarch64’ since that’s what is expected. > > Yes, I agree this is necessary. > >> uname -m must >> be arm64 unless we move our kernel implementation to sys/aarch64 from the >> sys/arm64 it is now. > > We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match > expectations of third-party software set by other operating systems. > If that in turn means we have to move the kernel source, so be it. I don't think we will (or should). We've had platforms where they don't match for years and years (I'm writing you this email on one such system now) and have had very little trouble with it. In the wild, close enough to all code does the right thing that we don't need to worry about it. In the few cases where it doesn't, ports already has the relevant patches. -Nathan From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 17:58:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A40A379 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (anacreon.Physics.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.117.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu", Issuer "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95183E5 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CHwDst071758 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:58:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54DCE9B5.8040203@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:58:13 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD powerpc; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:58:14 -0000 On 02/12/15 09:15, Ed Maste wrote: >>> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source in, only >>> what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that has always been >>> aarch64 for uname -m. >> >> Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. > > Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. > >>> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match >>> expectations of third-party software set by other operating systems. >>> If that in turn means we have to move the kernel source, so be it. >> >> This one I’m not on board with. You’ve not made a compelling case for >> it yet. > > That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. > > However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've never > had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". There's no > reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses "aarch64." > Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname -p seems a bit > odd. I would assume uname -m would be "arm", not "arm64". Unless there are fundamental platform differences you are baking in somehow, which I don't know. -Nathan From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 18:16:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45514709 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE68853 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CIGxcM001555 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:16:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197576] [arm] lang/gnustep-base fails configure step Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:16:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: theraven@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform bug_file_loc op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:16:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197576 Bug ID: 197576 Summary: [arm] lang/gnustep-base fails configure step Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: arm URL: http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015 -02-12_15h33m26s/logs/errors/gnustep-base-1.24.6_6.log OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: theraven@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sbruno@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Assignee: theraven@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(theraven@FreeBSD.org) I'm a bit confused what the actual error in configure is in the buildlog keeping this from building. I've linked to the log in the URL. #define HAVE_OBJC_ROOT_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE 1 configure: exit 1 (end of "config.log") *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/gnustep-base ====>> Cleaning up wrkdir ===> Cleaning for gnustep-base-1.24.6_6 --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Auto-assigned to maintainer theraven@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 18:19:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDBF7A0 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 022B2864 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CIJTnb002629 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:19:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197550] [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:19:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:19:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197550 --- Comment #4 from Florian Smeets --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #3) There is an update pending, I'll try to get that in today, if it works out I'll include your patches. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 18:37:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A034E47 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3727BA15 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdjy10 with SMTP id y10so13655016pdj.6 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:37:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=MTWd/Sn+i9jyvFyHe7Ek7AasqUQ0DT+6nWRUYOuIVmE=; b=AmHG0x7e2VVBiR7BezqplgP7KsuSvowGlCFmmx9WbS1+2v96aRcSzbvZbTpefscqLW JFJ0aqE6T868hVyWYEPnn4T0YjmtpDf90m8J01poWWlwfRGEc7kBvR1hLyn7pGQ+7Y29 LwlPcRLBSnsdWtw8/Q6T3LbUPJ/aiRsaX+tLVypUZjURlHcGDx2I0tOGvolg/QIr1UpU AV4W3oDMMoaZpWkwktajbU2i8NkamUvuCYWLrxC/P6QziVzArX75TL6mG9wDn0b0FW+1 h4uKDIo26pGkpzlfedf8wCmek8JLTD+3g/UZUh3BWPlfAQEYdWzGnKtNleB9gjE+66GH Iikg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwo0EY1vP063v6dv6l31zBDNN7aQs2p6oTEZJbtAhMDZvjvwtk1EyR6gB5vj3VrUdVyQXe X-Received: by 10.68.224.6 with SMTP id qy6mr8378237pbc.155.1423766261331; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:37:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.64.26.244] ([69.53.236.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ep2sm4396396pbc.78.2015.02.12.10.37.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:37:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <54DCE9B5.8040203@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:37:38 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> <54DCE9B5.8040203@freebsd.org> To: Nathan Whitehorn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:37:48 -0000 > On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Nathan Whitehorn = wrote: >=20 > On 02/12/15 09:15, Ed Maste wrote: >>>> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source in, = only >>>> what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that has always = been >>>> aarch64 for uname -m. >>>=20 >>> Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. >>=20 >> Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. >>=20 >>>> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match >>>> expectations of third-party software set by other operating = systems. >>>> If that in turn means we have to move the kernel source, so be it. >>>=20 >>> This one I=E2=80=99m not on board with. You=E2=80=99ve not made a = compelling case for >>> it yet. >>=20 >> That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. >>=20 >> However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've never >> had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". There's no >> reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses "aarch64." >> Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname -p seems a bit >> odd. >=20 > I would assume uname -m would be "arm", not "arm64". Unless there are = fundamental platform differences you are baking in somehow, which I = don't know. arm would be a pleasing outcome, but looking at his WIP tree, it looks = like it would be possible, but rather inconvenient to merge the arm64 = bits back under arm and make them conditional. Warner From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 18:44:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610E21DD for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (anacreon.Physics.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.117.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu", Issuer "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21437AFB for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CIirsi071863; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:44:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54DCF4A5.2020305@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:44:53 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD powerpc; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> <54DCE9B5.8040203@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:44:55 -0000 On 02/12/15 10:37, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Nathan Whitehorn >> wrote: >> >> On 02/12/15 09:15, Ed Maste wrote: >>>>> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source >>>>> in, only what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that >>>>> has always been aarch64 for uname -m. >>>> >>>> Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. >>> >>> Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. >>> >>>>> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match >>>>> expectations of third-party software set by other operating >>>>> systems. If that in turn means we have to move the kernel >>>>> source, so be it. >>>> >>>> This one I’m not on board with. You’ve not made a compelling >>>> case for it yet. >>> >>> That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. >>> >>> However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've >>> never had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". >>> There's no reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses >>> "aarch64." Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname >>> -p seems a bit odd. >> >> I would assume uname -m would be "arm", not "arm64". Unless there >> are fundamental platform differences you are baking in somehow, >> which I don't know. > > arm would be a pleasing outcome, but looking at his WIP tree, it > looks like it would be possible, but rather inconvenient to merge the > arm64 bits back under arm and make them conditional. > > Warner > > That's unfortunate. Among other things, it precludes easy use of cc -m32. So what is the long-term plan here? Is the new ARM port a new, legacy-free, version that should grow separate 32-bit support for new armv7 systems and then we abandon sys/arm to the ARMv5 stuff? Or are 32-bit and 64-bit ARM just going to live separate lives forever? -Nathan From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 20:07:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A3948B for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3707135C for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CK7nAN070690 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:07:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197581] [arm] devel/psptoolchain-binutils creates directories for arm not armv6 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:07:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform bug_file_loc op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:07:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197581 Bug ID: 197581 Summary: [arm] devel/psptoolchain-binutils creates directories for arm not armv6 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: arm URL: http://chips.ysv.freebsd.org/data/11armv6-11armv6/2015 -02-12_15h33m26s/logs/errors/psptoolchain-binutils-2.2 2_1.log OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sbruno@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org, tphilipp@potion-studios.com CC: tphilipp@potion-studios.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(tphilipp@potion-studios.com) This port fails at pkg creation time as it compiles and builds an arm-unknown-freebsd directory not an armv6-unknown-freebsd. I suspect the configure script needs to be tweaked to change this. Probably look at devel/binutils for a clue here. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/binutils/Makefile?revision=378882&view=markup --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation --- Maintainer CC'd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 22:28:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A5D822 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A056D5 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CMS72S091876 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:28:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:28:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:28:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 --- Comment #3 from Dimitry Andric --- This also causes an assert with clang 3.6.0. I'll verify if it also happens with the latest trunk. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 22:38:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA892CDB for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFFDF838 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CMcdGL001043 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:38:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197550] [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:38:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:38:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197550 --- Comment #5 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: flo Date: Thu Feb 12 22:38:20 UTC 2015 New revision: 378901 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/378901 Log: Update to 5.6.22-72.0 Fix build on arm [1] PR: 197550 [1] Submitted by: mikael.urankar@gmail.com [1] Tested by: sbruno [1] Changes: head/databases/percona56-client/files/patch-scripts_CMakeLists.txt head/databases/percona56-client/pkg-plist head/databases/percona56-server/Makefile head/databases/percona56-server/distinfo head/databases/percona56-server/files/extra-patch-config.h.cmake head/databases/percona56-server/files/patch-scripts_CMakeLists.txt head/databases/percona56-server/pkg-plist -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 22:39:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D26D2D for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7EC844 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CMdKt5001347 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197550] [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197550 --- Comment #6 from Florian Smeets --- Committed. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 22:39:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E126AD6E for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6DFB848 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1CMdkum001511 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197550] [arm] databases/percona56-server using unsupported fpsetmask types Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: flo@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:39:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197550 Florian Smeets changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 22:57:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8EA428; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (nibbler.fubar.geek.nz [199.48.134.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384C9A21; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bender.lan (97e078e7.skybroadband.com [151.224.120.231]) by nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E939073000; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:56:55 +0000 From: Andrew Turner To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification Message-ID: <20150212225655.26c865aa@bender.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> <54DCE9B5.8040203@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:57:10 -0000 On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:37:38 -0700 Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Nathan Whitehorn > > wrote: > >=20 > > On 02/12/15 09:15, Ed Maste wrote: > >>>> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source > >>>> in, only what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that > >>>> has always been aarch64 for uname -m. > >>>=20 > >>> Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. > >>=20 > >> Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. > >>=20 > >>>> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match > >>>> expectations of third-party software set by other operating > >>>> systems. If that in turn means we have to move the kernel > >>>> source, so be it. > >>>=20 > >>> This one I=E2=80=99m not on board with. You=E2=80=99ve not made a com= pelling case > >>> for it yet. > >>=20 > >> That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. > >>=20 > >> However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've > >> never had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". > >> There's no reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses > >> "aarch64." Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname > >> -p seems a bit odd. > >=20 > > I would assume uname -m would be "arm", not "arm64". Unless there > > are fundamental platform differences you are baking in somehow, > > which I don't know. >=20 > arm would be a pleasing outcome, but looking at his WIP tree, it > looks like it would be possible, but rather inconvenient to merge the > arm64 bits back under arm and make them conditional. They are two different architectures. They don't share any assembly, and the exception handling is different, both in exception types and number of modes/levels. Along with this they only sort of share the special registers. The method to access them is different, on 32-bit it is via a coprocessor call where on 64-bit there is an instruction to get them by name. We may be able to share some of the new pmap code, however it would need a lot of work as the virtual memory layout is different and it is likely we will need to handle 64k granules on arm64 in the future. Because of this any sharing there would need to be handled carefully. The interrupt controller and timer drivers will be shared, but these are both devices and maybe they should be moved under sys/dev. The two architectures will share very little code or headers. An ARMv8 core may be able to execute either 32 or 64-bit code (both are optional so either one or both options will be enabled) so there is a case for use to handle cc -m32, but I don't feel this is enough justification to merge two otherwise different architectures just because they were designed by the same company. Andrew From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 23:11:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325C88B4 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1773B4E for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so10892505pdb.5 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=DI/cyAltft+ovNxR1Paa/zSyCX5JMVc9V8So0BSetR4=; b=gjJjeU7MJtzhS33+xavAQsRqDc8vf/BdFDSYeRjNUNxYMvvoE8+WB9L5yox/pKKnQ/ 7THIQwCukG8c7Xi2H7FYOu2sycJXrBqCH/1LZ6qZuirLzjDtWzcqT9jS32Ltl0pCIohe KuZFTG/hg3SMHZDPxiy/Xa8NC7Qj3w2o6PZqwwsU034zhwh5L+9tVVY7v8LCuuNzXlBd VX/25WS1ntAqdFWyxTc8PZwa3q/yNsjJ94UJ5uyZj8CmkjVX8i/mmHpKk8UpkoUCJd7S W+jEegLwN0002yAmQh+Vgk/5UkoOzzqvOb1rk0RoyGtate3P7sdR3GVYhhHSwJ6I791P qrLg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkbFMInJ/Gs2Y1so4guzG4hKlDpugkxllz4nhPOePIhcs4YvWXupgtwPhC45jCWk0pDgnmo X-Received: by 10.68.69.6 with SMTP id a6mr10498017pbu.82.1423782692162; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.64.26.244] ([69.53.236.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g11sm4821519pat.24.2015.02.12.15.11.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20150212225655.26c865aa@bender.lan> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:11:29 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <51DBDD85-A1FD-4A18-946D-FB78252BB845@bsdimp.com> References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> <54DCE9B5.8040203@freebsd.org> <20150212225655.26c865aa@bender.lan> To: Andrew Turner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:11:33 -0000 > On Feb 12, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Andrew Turner = wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:37:38 -0700 > Warner Losh wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Nathan Whitehorn >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 02/12/15 09:15, Ed Maste wrote: >>>>>> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source >>>>>> in, only what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that >>>>>> has always been aarch64 for uname -m. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. >>>>=20 >>>> Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. >>>>=20 >>>>>> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match >>>>>> expectations of third-party software set by other operating >>>>>> systems. If that in turn means we have to move the kernel >>>>>> source, so be it. >>>>>=20 >>>>> This one I=E2=80=99m not on board with. You=E2=80=99ve not made a = compelling case >>>>> for it yet. >>>>=20 >>>> That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. >>>>=20 >>>> However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've >>>> never had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". >>>> There's no reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses >>>> "aarch64." Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname >>>> -p seems a bit odd. >>>=20 >>> I would assume uname -m would be "arm", not "arm64". Unless there >>> are fundamental platform differences you are baking in somehow, >>> which I don't know. >>=20 >> arm would be a pleasing outcome, but looking at his WIP tree, it >> looks like it would be possible, but rather inconvenient to merge the >> arm64 bits back under arm and make them conditional. >=20 > They are two different architectures. They don't share any assembly, > and the exception handling is different, both in exception types and > number of modes/levels. >=20 > Along with this they only sort of share the special registers. The > method to access them is different, on 32-bit it is via a coprocessor > call where on 64-bit there is an instruction to get them by name. >=20 > We may be able to share some of the new pmap code, however it would > need a lot of work as the virtual memory layout is different and it is > likely we will need to handle 64k granules on arm64 in the future. > Because of this any sharing there would need to be handled carefully. >=20 > The interrupt controller and timer drivers will be shared, but these > are both devices and maybe they should be moved under sys/dev. Yea, rather inconvenient :) > The two architectures will share very little code or headers. An ARMv8 > core may be able to execute either 32 or 64-bit code (both are = optional > so either one or both options will be enabled) so there is a case for > use to handle cc -m32, but I don't feel this is enough justification = to > merge two otherwise different architectures just because they were > designed by the same company. We support -m32 on x86 where we have amd64 and i386 MACHINE values and directories today. I=E2=80=99m not sure how having either = aarch64/aarch64 or arm64/aarch64 instead of arm/aarch64 would preclude -m32 from working. Warner From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 00:12:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E58A932 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (anacreon.Physics.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.117.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu", Issuer "anacreon.physics.wisc.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B57E240 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anacreon.physics.berkeley.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1D0Co0H074244; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:12:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54DD4182.7040505@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:12:50 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD powerpc; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh , Andrew Turner Subject: Re: FreeBSD/arm64 MACHINE/MACHINE_ARCH identification References: <607BF592-A09B-4DB4-9872-C9E63066AB57@bsdimp.com> <71E9C1B9-F819-420B-90A5-A36D58E71817@bsdimp.com> <228428CC-4042-4902-90A4-E7040F4BFFF5@bsdimp.com> <54DCE9B5.8040203@freebsd.org> <20150212225655.26c865aa@bender.lan> <51DBDD85-A1FD-4A18-946D-FB78252BB845@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <51DBDD85-A1FD-4A18-946D-FB78252BB845@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:12:59 -0000 On 02/12/15 15:11, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Andrew Turner wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:37:38 -0700 >> Warner Losh wrote: >> >>> >>>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Nathan Whitehorn >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/12/15 09:15, Ed Maste wrote: >>>>>>> Oh - I don't care what directory Linux puts the kernel source >>>>>>> in, only what's reported by uname. As far as I can tell that >>>>>>> has always been aarch64 for uname -m. >>>>>> >>>>>> Traditionally in Linux, they have been a matched set. >>>>> >>>>> Ok, it appears they may have abandoned this. >>>>> >>>>>>> We might decide that "uname -m" has to be aarch64 to match >>>>>>> expectations of third-party software set by other operating >>>>>>> systems. If that in turn means we have to move the kernel >>>>>>> source, so be it. >>>>>> >>>>>> This one I’m not on board with. You’ve not made a compelling case >>>>>> for it yet. >>>>> >>>>> That's why I said "we might decide" -- I'm not sure myself. >>>>> >>>>> However, there's no backwards compatibility concern here, we've >>>>> never had a FreeBSD release that reports "arm64" for "uname -m". >>>>> There's no reason for us to prefer "arm64" if everyone else uses >>>>> "aarch64." Also, having arm64 for uname -m and aarch64 for uname >>>>> -p seems a bit odd. >>>> >>>> I would assume uname -m would be "arm", not "arm64". Unless there >>>> are fundamental platform differences you are baking in somehow, >>>> which I don't know. >>> >>> arm would be a pleasing outcome, but looking at his WIP tree, it >>> looks like it would be possible, but rather inconvenient to merge the >>> arm64 bits back under arm and make them conditional. >> >> They are two different architectures. They don't share any assembly, >> and the exception handling is different, both in exception types and >> number of modes/levels. >> >> Along with this they only sort of share the special registers. The >> method to access them is different, on 32-bit it is via a coprocessor >> call where on 64-bit there is an instruction to get them by name. >> >> We may be able to share some of the new pmap code, however it would >> need a lot of work as the virtual memory layout is different and it is >> likely we will need to handle 64k granules on arm64 in the future. >> Because of this any sharing there would need to be handled carefully. >> >> The interrupt controller and timer drivers will be shared, but these >> are both devices and maybe they should be moved under sys/dev. > > Yea, rather inconvenient :) Yes. For my own interest, how similar are 32-bit ARMv8 and 64-bit ARMv8? Is 32-bit ARMv8 just the same as 32-bit ARMv7? It seems weird that the architectures would be that disjoint, but, if they are, I agree it makes sense more to treat them like ia64 and i386 than a conventional 32-bit/64-bit port. >> The two architectures will share very little code or headers. An ARMv8 >> core may be able to execute either 32 or 64-bit code (both are optional >> so either one or both options will be enabled) so there is a case for >> use to handle cc -m32, but I don't feel this is enough justification to >> merge two otherwise different architectures just because they were >> designed by the same company. > > We support -m32 on x86 where we have amd64 and i386 MACHINE values > and directories today. I’m not sure how having either aarch64/aarch64 or > arm64/aarch64 instead of arm/aarch64 would preclude -m32 from working. It just makes it harder since /usr/include/machine isn't shared. There were a lot of hacks required to make that functional on x86, which you'd have to repeat. -Nathan From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 02:12:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2B32356 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A82B895 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1D2C4w4079054 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:12:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197581] devel/psptoolchain-binutils creates directories for arm not armv6 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:12:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:12:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197581 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa Summary|[arm] |devel/psptoolchain-binutils |devel/psptoolchain-binutils |creates directories for arm |creates directories for arm |not armv6 |not armv6 | --- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak --- [tags] in summary not needed when Hardware field is set. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 09:08:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2411B5 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net (mail.kulturflatrate.net [46.163.119.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76180FD5 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C7AF5ACDBC for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:59:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at kulturflatrate.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.kulturflatrate.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FpZXgRRLjlVc for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from len-x61s.klaas (247.210.broadband18.iol.cz [109.81.210.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDC5DF5ACDB3 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by len-x61s.klaas (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 51519E059E; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:00:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:00:58 +0100 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD on Raspberry Pi 2 Message-ID: <20150213090058.GK29181@len-x61s.klaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:08:38 -0000 Hi, my new Raspberry Pi 2 should arrive soon. Recently I saw this thread [1] where Gary Palmer is asking whether FreeBSD will work on it. It turns out uboot needs to be updated [2]. So it won't run if I build FreeBSD on my own [3]? I would like to ask before I spend hours worth nothing. :) 1: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-February/010132.html 2: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-February/010135.html 3: http://kernelnomicon.org/?p=275 I am quite curious about it since I just started using FreeBSD recently and would like to continue using it on my future machines instead of any Linux-Distro. Thank you and best, -- Niklaas From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 09:22:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B2E409 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F26371BD for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1D9Ma6B047430 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:22:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:22:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:22:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 --- Comment #4 from Dimitry Andric --- Still asserts with clang trunk r228967 (as of yesterday). I'll prepare an upstream bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 12:08:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C6D8A3 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36EA66E0 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DC8Ya2000172 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:08:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197527] www/webkit2-gtk3 cross compile clang 3.5 failure detected Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:08:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: dim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:08:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197527 Dimitry Andric changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #5 from Dimitry Andric --- Reported upstream as: http://llvm.org/PR22576 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 12:21:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF640AB5 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0C59836 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DCLjlE086088 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:21:45 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1DCLjjl086087; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:21:45 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:21:45 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "zbb (Zbigniew Bodek)" Subject: [Differential] [Request, 2 lines] D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Thread-Index: OGRiNDkxY2NmMjRiNTc0MjQ4YTYwNWVkNzIy X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:21:46 -0000 zbb created this revision. zbb added reviewers: kmacy, rpaulo, imp. zbb added a subscriber: freebsd-arm. REVISION SUMMARY This issue is mostly the fix for ARMv7 architecture. Make sure that memory writes appear in correct order and that the correct value is observable on the dequeue side. Submitted by: Wojciech Macek Obtained from: Semihalf REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1833 AFFECTED FILES sys/sys/buf_ring.h To: zbb, kmacy, rpaulo, imp Cc: freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 14:45:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E615A68 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33FF9AE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DEixM5050521 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:44:59 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1DEixd9050520; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:44:59 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:44:59 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZjlkNDcyMzZlMWIyNDBkZTI1NTY5ZjZiZGRjIFTeDes= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:45:00 -0000 ian added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS sys/arm/arm/locore-v6.S:88 What is the value in spsr at this point? Previous debugging experience tells me it's random bits, at least on some cortex-a processors. I think the right sequence would be to just manipulate the state of cpsr that's already in r0 and save it as spsr. Except... once that occurred to me, it then popped into my head that we don't need this entire sequence (from #if through #endif), instead we should replace the very first instruction above with: cpsid ifa, #(PSR_SVC32_MODE) And the same in mpentry below. That should work on all armv6/v7 no matter what the entry-time processor mode is, right? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810 To: zbb, andrew, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:44:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC371837 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com (mail-ie0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFDA106 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecvy18 with SMTP id vy18so21160844iec.13 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:44:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2EE4IzlZqt2JH2TrNUhfW4NRLDWvdTH5aL+O1/EOaCo=; b=T85OpFQOY9FvaqE9ytM8JYIvYavcfjFMsmkyEazJ+R/kI53Mlw8zlZJnCR7U78bLiw OP6RYHdMbfxTf7XuO5MG4JYfu9yPXLz7F+k4FUjCW4SJqC3mfEsNlZokQgMdPjLWopmW DKATAZFQqEg0bHzy8UOVKXD+erEwtNV1mC4H7LuTLeA4nzOB20S28N5hSipQTPalmapx ZmSskejFZssDF+A3jUk/75uOYFYYqCQdIC8or0Uj7t6LmIDblMLJqhMsjS7zSOsGKL/b w2ak946j0oHt6yWVgx8xxHmBHpsWOyGKmRAKLdXo+pQzu9zk3NEKBh/2xxs4gD2qsmom tG+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.136.230 with SMTP id s99mr13254974ioi.8.1423849473624; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:44:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.17.66 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:44:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150213090058.GK29181@len-x61s.klaas> References: <20150213090058.GK29181@len-x61s.klaas> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:44:33 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Bni_MFvLp0dig8eLjRDg-m53jIk Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Raspberry Pi 2 From: Adrian Chadd To: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:44:40 -0000 Hi, Andy is working on the r-pi 2 bringup. I'm sure a post will be made when it's up and running. -a On 13 February 2015 at 01:00, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Hi, > > my new Raspberry Pi 2 should arrive soon. Recently I saw this thread [1] > where Gary Palmer is asking whether FreeBSD will work on it. It turns > out uboot needs to be updated [2]. So it won't run if I build FreeBSD on > my own [3]? I would like to ask before I spend hours worth nothing. :) > > 1: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-February/010132.html > > 2: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-February/010135.html > > 3: http://kernelnomicon.org/?p=275 > > I am quite curious about it since I just started using FreeBSD recently > and would like to continue using it on my future machines instead of any > Linux-Distro. > > Thank you and best, > > -- > > Niklaas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:45:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D9389C for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CB611B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DHjd8I025077 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:45:39 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1DHjd8P025076; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:45:39 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:45:39 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "adrian (Adrian Chadd)" Subject: [Differential] [Changed Subscribers] D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: OGRiNDkxY2NmMjRiNTc0MjQ4YTYwNWVkNzIyIFTeOEM= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:45:39 -0000 adrian added a subscriber: adrian. adrian added a comment. Damn, we don't have an atomic way to assign a pointer value? (ie, expressing it via an atomic acq/rel semantic) ? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1833 To: zbb, kmacy, rpaulo, imp Cc: adrian, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 21:22:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2C1704; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A967CD6; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k48so19064335wev.0; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:22:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9TN/Aq8DnVbM3FGsgrhqCsJTvbmtDkdzcHFeOH4pLpA=; b=Rz5PJn6J4CQJ6qz8TYyUSBSoT8lNF8L4FbvTt7mWL7xqq4Z11Pv+N9S+hcGGFk+SmX TUzFmLtuQSCBXjyAQbxMPVmKBUibp+7NxDtfpqCfA5Mp2AIXZ4IXtg9Gl319wuEmtOD2 /Q/SODMJ7vsVlyxrcFLGYQ9SBQfkBqJgtCDF1aPyGuvZgg378dWJTgaLraKw5UXzGDnL oPMFTT0oKNOg/9xpP+92ZWyR0krB3q7pio9hQK4fUjNJTW0ho9wGf2kSLnwYQ42RNII+ pF8VSyGcULSz6LN0o7ZkZEIZu6699DTRfOL9J79wo40pM33e5ydUNAw3C859egUAqe49 iwGw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.88.193 with SMTP id bi1mr16848386wib.70.1423862527495; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:22:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.210.200 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:22:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.210.200 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:22:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150213090058.GK29181@len-x61s.klaas> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:22:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Raspberry Pi 2 From: Waitman Gobble To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:22:09 -0000 On Feb 13, 2015 9:44 AM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote: > > Hi, > > Andy is working on the r-pi 2 bringup. I'm sure a post will be made > when it's up and running. > > > -a > > > On 13 February 2015 at 01:00, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > my new Raspberry Pi 2 should arrive soon. Recently I saw this thread [1] > > where Gary Palmer is asking whether FreeBSD will work on it. It turns > > out uboot needs to be updated [2]. So it won't run if I build FreeBSD on > > my own [3]? I would like to ask before I spend hours worth nothing. :) > > > > 1: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-February/010132.html > > > > 2: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-February/010135.html > > > > 3: http://kernelnomicon.org/?p=275 > > > > I am quite curious about it since I just started using FreeBSD recently > > and would like to continue using it on my future machines instead of any > > Linux-Distro. > > > > Thank you and best, > > > > -- > > > > Niklaas > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" i just got a couple of them so if any help / testing needed lemme know. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 21:38:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3149B257 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167E8E04 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DLc1sx007416 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:38:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194183] [arm] math/R missing libquadmath to compile Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:38:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jhibbits@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:38:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194183 Justin Hibbits changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jhibbits@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #10 from Justin Hibbits --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #8) This should also be done for powerpc and powerpc64. I can open a new bug if you'd like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 21:42:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A08834F0 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86628EBE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DLgH6v014462 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:42:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194183] [arm] math/R missing libquadmath to compile Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:42:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:42:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194183 --- Comment #11 from Sean Bruno --- (In reply to Justin Hibbits from comment #10) powerpc/powerpc64 done in r378945 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 22:01:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22ECFA8C for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A61E7 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DM1JZ3019903 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:01:19 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1DM1Jh1019900; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:01:19 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:01:19 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "rpaulo (Rui Paulo)" Subject: [Differential] [Requested Changes To] D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring Message-ID: <727a18b80886ae40e11d76bde7fb26f4@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: OGRiNDkxY2NmMjRiNTc0MjQ4YTYwNWVkNzIyIFTedC8= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:01:20 -0000 rpaulo requested changes to this revision. rpaulo added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. Hmm, I think these memory barriers were in the tree but were removed recently. I think it would be nice to use the atomic load acq/rel because this change could negatively impact x86. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1833 To: zbb, kmacy, imp, rpaulo Cc: adrian, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 22:27:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE89A657 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD136399 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1DMRjfJ046905 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:27:45 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1DMRj0x046904; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:27:45 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:27:45 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Changed Subscribers] D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring Message-ID: <5222a64f48ca455a47b47cd0b337ecb0@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: OGRiNDkxY2NmMjRiNTc0MjQ4YTYwNWVkNzIyIFTeemE= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:27:46 -0000 ian added a subscriber: ian. ian added a comment. an atomic_store_rel would put the dmb() before writing the producer ring head, the opposite of what this change proposes (which reinforces my vague feeling that this change isn't quite right somehow). On the consumer side, it's not clear what piece of data would be the subject of an atomic_load_acq(), because I can't really tell from the current placement of the rmb() what reordering it's trying to prevent. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1833 To: zbb, kmacy, imp, rpaulo Cc: ian, adrian, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 00:49:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3728FF33 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6CA32B for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1E0n70c000574 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:49:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197227] [PATCH] Fix mutexes in databases/db5 on ARMv6 and later Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:49:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: Andrew@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:49:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197227 Sean Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress CC| |freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Sean Bruno --- Hrm. All three built with no error. I assume that this is a runtime, not a compile issue then? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 03:38:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C458269 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72E3066E for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1E3csMV065943 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:38:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197609] security/cryptlib: builds on ARMv6 (Poudriere Powered) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:38:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: egypcio@googlemail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ale@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:38:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 egypcio@googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |egypcio@googlemail.com, | |freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org, | |sbruno@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from egypcio@googlemail.com --- Patched by miki (#bsdmips@EFnet). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 09:11:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7549DF2A; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net (mail.kulturflatrate.net [46.163.119.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B697800; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE0BF5ACDBC; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:11:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at kulturflatrate.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.414 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.414 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.kulturflatrate.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-5QI_hkGEHr; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:11:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from len-x61s.klaas (247.210.broadband18.iol.cz [109.81.210.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF0D4F5ACDB4; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:11:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by len-x61s.klaas (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF565E7962; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:13:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:13:19 +0100 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: Adrian Chadd , Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Raspberry Pi 2 Message-ID: <20150214091319.GB8638@len-x61s.klaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.kulturflatrate.net/niklaas/niklaas-baudet-von-gersdorff.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:11:33 -0000 Hi, Adrian Chadd [2015-02-13 09:44 -0800] : > Andy is working on the r-pi 2 bringup. I'm sure a post will be made > when it's up and running. great to hear! Waitman Gobble [2015-02-13 13:22 -0800] : > i just got a couple of them so if any help / testing needed lemme > know. I can also test the RPi 2 release once it's ready. Just put me CC. Best, -- Niklaas From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 09:44:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B1953A for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77A9AAA8 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1E9iPGn094656 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:44:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:44:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vsz27207@qisoa.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:44:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197619 Bug ID: 197619 Summary: live) india vs pakistan live stream Product: Base System Version: 8.4-STABLE Hardware: arm OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: arm Assignee: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Reporter: vsz27207@qisoa.com LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx Live Cricket Streaming & Live Cricket Score on starsportscom wwwstarsportscom/ Watch live cricket streaming online and enjoy live cricket scores, videos, = news & updates on starsportscom Preview, India vs Pakistan: Fireworks on standby In the news Watch India Vs Pakistan Cricket Live Online, 2015 ICC World Cup Streaming V= ideo The Inquisitr=E2=80=8E - 8 hours ago Fans can watch the India vs Pakistan cricket match live online and see as t= he two long-time=20 How to Watch Cricket World Cup 2015 Live on Your PC, Smartphone, or Tablet NDTV=E2=80=8E - 12 hours ago India vs Pakistan: Date, Live Stream, TV Info, Cricket World Cup 2015 Previ= ew Bleacher Report=E2=80=8E - 2 hours ago More news for india vs pakistan live stream Live Cricket Streaming-Watch Cricket Online-World Cup=20 wwwwatchcriclivecom/ Cricket fans will be able to watch India vs Pakistan live streaming in 2015 where everyone can evidence them playing for both Asia cup Live and T20 wor= ld Cup=20 India vs Pakistan | Watch Live streaming of Hockey=20 wwwtensportscom/event/hockey-champions-trophy//india-vs-pakistan India vs Pakistan - Watch live streaming videos of Hockey Champions Trophy Other Sports at tensportscom Live Cricket Streaming - Live Cricket and Watch Online=20 crichdin/live/live-cricket-streaming Live Cricket Streaming free on internet and watch online streaming on our website CricHD 19:20, India vs Pakistan (Ind vs Pak), India vs Pakistan (I= nd vs Pak)=20 ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 Live Streaming, Score=20 livecricketscoreio/ India vs Pakistan Live Streaming 2015, ICC World Cup Watch and Stream Onlin= e, India vs Australia vs England Cricket World Cup Live Streaming 2015 Watchcricnet - Live Cricket Streaming, Schedules, Results=20 watchcricnet/ Feb 15, 2015 South Africa Vs Zimbabwe 3rd Match - ICC Cricket World Cup, 20= 15 Live action starts from: 01:00 GMT; Feb 15, 2015 India Vs Pakistan 4th Matc= h=20 India vs Pakistan Live Cricket Streaming T20 world cup=20 Video for india vs pakistan live stream=E2=96=B6 3:50 wwwdailymotioncom//xtyfy1_india- LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx Dailymotion India vs Pakistan Live Cricket Streaming T20 world cup super 8 Sahil Khan = For live match and highlights=20 India vs Pakistan Live Cricket Streaming World Cup 2015 cricketwatchcriclivecom/4th-odi-india-vs-pakistan-live-streaming/233 India vs Pakistan Live Streaming: India will play against Pakistan for 4th = ODI for World Cup 2015 tournament Pakistan vs India is scheduled on 15 February= ,=20 India Vs Pakistan Live Streaming World cup 2015 indiavswestindiescom/ India Vs Pakistan Live Streaming of Cricket world cup 2015 February 15, 201= 5, Pakistan Vs India Preview, Prediction, Scorecard, Broadcasting TV Channel --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 10:57:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A470A373 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70FFDCC for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EAvUZM088777 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:57:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:57:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: khurram_sipra@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:57:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 Musa Jutt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |khurram_sipra@hotmail.com --- Comment #1 from Musa Jutt --- Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live Watch Here Online Matches with Full Live Streaming Online of Full WOrld Cup 2015 Matches --- http://worldcup2015livecricket.com/ptv-sports-live -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 11:03:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A7C57C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084F9194 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EB3C3g094743 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:03:12 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1EB3Cew094742; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:03:12 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:03:12 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "andrew (Andrew Turner)" Subject: [Differential] [Changed Subscribers] D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: OGRiNDkxY2NmMjRiNTc0MjQ4YTYwNWVkNzIyIFTfK3A= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:03:13 -0000 andrew added a subscriber: andrew. INLINE COMMENTS sys/sys/buf_ring.h:107 atomic_store_rel_int includes a dmb before writing to &br->br_prod_tail. I don't think this code will be hitting ARM errata 761319 [1] as the read is in a loop where we exit when we see the new value at least once meaning it has been incremented to the value we expect. . [1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.uan0004a/UAN0004A_a9_read_read.pdf sys/sys/buf_ring.h:167 It feels like one or both of these should be read with atomic_load_acq_int. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1833 To: zbb, kmacy, imp, rpaulo Cc: andrew, ian, adrian, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 11:10:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6D969F for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738FE1D2 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EBA37f030777 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:10:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197227] [PATCH] Fix mutexes in databases/db5 on ARMv6 and later Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:10:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: Andrew@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: Andrew@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:10:03 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197227 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Turner --- I have a local patch to llvm to not allow the bad instructions, unfortunately it's not able to be sent upstream as it breaks using them on earlier arm platforms where they are valid. I can test the other ports with these patches when I've cleared out my current patch queue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 11:54:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE61DD0 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC5B80D for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EBsL3W073581 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:54:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:54:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rene@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:54:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 Rene Ladan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rene@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |Not A Bug Status|New |Closed --- Comment #2 from Rene Ladan --- spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 12:04:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709931C7 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 556248FD for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EC48V6056546 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: evarestchow@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197619 spot67 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |evarestchow@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from spot67 --- LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 12:04:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5582211 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C4A902 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EC4gXA082225 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: evarestchow@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:04:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197619 --- Comment #4 from spot67 --- LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 12:05:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0210425B for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAC1D906 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EC5Aoq003111 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:05:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:05:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: evarestchow@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:05:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197619 --- Comment #5 from spot67 --- cLIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1=3D=3D=3D=3D http://x.co/7T41T http://x.co/7T41T LINK 2::::::::::::>>>> http://tiny.cc/xveutx http://tiny.cc/xveutx LINK3=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80= =9D=E2=80=9D http://bit.ly/1Im8Q3L http://tiny.cc/xveutx --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 13:31:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2345F38 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988F3A2 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EDV7bn046581 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: niloyman2017@sharklasers.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 niloy man changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |niloyman2017@sharklasers.co | |m --- Comment #6 from niloy man --- LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 13:31:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A281AF79 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83270A4 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EDVfBK047333 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:41 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: niloyman2017@sharklasers.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 --- Comment #7 from niloy man --- LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ LIVE WATCH >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINK1==== http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/2015/02/13/ind-vs-pak-live-stream-wc-2015-cricket-score/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 13:34:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1D5FD2 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3CBB0 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EDY2Eq050392 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: niloyman2017@sharklasers.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 --- Comment #8 from niloy man --- http://thecwsa.org/content/watcst-johnstone-vs-celtic-live-free-online-scotland-premiership http://thecwsa.org/content/dundee-fc-v-partick-thistle-live-free-online-scottish-premiership-soccer http://thecwsa.org/content/scottish-premier-league-live-streaming-and-tv-listings-prediction http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-ross-county-vs-motherwell-live-stream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-st-mirren-vs-inverness-ct-live-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-bayer-leverkusen-vs-wolfsburg-live-st-ram-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-bayern-munich-vs-hamburger-sv-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-borussia-moenchengladbach-vs-fc-cologne-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-hoffenheim-vs-vfb-stuttgart-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-werder-bremen-vs-augsburg-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-romania-vs-moldova-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/switzerland-super-league-basel-vs-sion-live-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/spain-liga-bbva-sevilla-vs-cordoba-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/spain-liga-bbva-real-madrid-vs-deportivo-la-coruna-live-free-online-14-february-2015 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346642 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346664 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346675 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346687 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346701 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346707 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346714 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346721 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346728 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346730 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346755 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346761 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346774 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346791 https://www.change.org/p/2887021/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887041/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887051/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887066/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887086/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887096/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887111/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887141/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887146/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887161/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887191/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887211/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887226/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887231/preview http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76576/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76657/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76684/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76750/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76787/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76832/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76870/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76914/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76940/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/76954/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77060/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77085/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77124/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77157/ http://thecwsa.org/content/fa-cup-crystal-palace-vs-liverpool-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-derby-county-vs-reading-live-st-ream-free-fa-cup-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/watch-blackburn-rovers-vs-stoke-city-live-st-ream-free-fa-cup-online-14-february-2015 http://thecwsa.org/content/fa-cup-west-bromwich-albion-vs-west-ham-united-live-st-ream-free-online-14-february-2015 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346802 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346818 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346831 https://vk.com/topic-86749481_31346847 https://www.change.org/p/2887241/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887251/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887256/preview https://www.change.org/p/2887271/preview http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77181/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77202/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77222/ http://www.mousesports.com/en/forum/thread/77242/ Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link>>>> http://livetv2pc.com/go/sports13/ Link >>>> http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 13:34:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C85F9B for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E77B2 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EDYOUj050543 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: niloyman2017@sharklasers.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 --- Comment #9 from niloy man --- (In reply to cricket5 from comment #0) Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link>>>> http://livetv2pc.com/go/sports13/ Link >>>> http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/ Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link >>> http://livetv2pc.com Link>>>> http://livetv2pc.com/go/sports13/ Link >>>> http://icccricketworldcuptv.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 15:45:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39419A89 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C55E55 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EFjKfp070598 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ankora@yopmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 Shohag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ankora@yopmail.com --- Comment #10 from Shohag --- Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 15:45:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FC77AD1 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4562EE5B for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EFjddn070746 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197619] live) india vs pakistan live stream Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ankora@yopmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:45:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197619 --- Comment #11 from Shohag --- (In reply to cricket5 from comment #0) Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ Watch in HD HERE==> http://onlinetv4pc.blogspot.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 18:57:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 396EC65E for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00E3F84C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EIv850032179 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:08 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1EIv8dO032178; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:08 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:08 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZjlkNDcyMzZlMWIyNDBkZTI1NTY5ZjZiZGRjIFTfmoQ= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:09 -0000 ian added a comment. Replies from Wojciech Macek (who doesn't have direct write access here) 1. The write barrier. Yep, it might be not necessary. I was testing it on the revision which did not have br_prod_tail atomic. I've just removed it and run the test again, but it will take about 24h, cause the reproduction rate is really low. 2. Read barrier I wouldn't say that it prevents reordering here. It rather guarantees observability of the valid data. Im my scenario I'm running drdb_dequeue_sc/buf_ring_dequeue_sc few times in the loop. It's inline, so the compiler puts them inside the loop's body. I suspect, that the issue is possible only on cortex-a15, due to its long pipeline and advanced branch predictors. In normal case, where the ring is empty, the dequeue_sc returns NULL. But the core wants to optimize memmory accessess, so there is a chance that it preloads its readbuffers with a data that can be used in further code execution. The cons_head does not change within the function, so there is no reason why the core shouldn't early-load the br->br_ring[cons_head] pointer, which might be outdated. The core just has no knowledge that the data is valid only when prod_tail changes. Nevertheless, without rmb the buffer did not work properly - dequeue function returned some "old" mbuf which left there from the previous pas s. This is basically how I found this bug. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810 To: zbb, andrew, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 18:59:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E3080D for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7175686D for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EIxHq3033597 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:59:17 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1EIxHRF033596; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:59:17 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:59:17 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "ian (Ian Lepore)" Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup Message-ID: <5024e85eaa1836a6fe13ce755b7639e4@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1810: Leave HYP mode upon startup X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: ZjlkNDcyMzZlMWIyNDBkZTI1NTY5ZjZiZGRjIFTfmwU= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:59:17 -0000 ian added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS sys/arm/arm/locore-v6.S:88 Michal pointed out that cpsid can't be used to leave Hyp mode, only return-from-exception is allowed to transition hyp->other. So nevermind on the cpsid suggestion, but I still think constructing spsr from the hyp mode cpsr is the right thing to do. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1810 To: zbb, andrew, ian Cc: imp, freebsd-arm From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 20:57:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF1D5C1 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE15E650 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1EKvfcB061411 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:57:41 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1EKvfTU061410; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:57:41 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:57:41 +0000 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: "kmacy (Kip Macy)" Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring Message-ID: <9488b40e69c7ed9a70a252770a91f7c9@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1833: Add memory barriers to buf_ring X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: OGRiNDkxY2NmMjRiNTc0MjQ4YTYwNWVkNzIyIFTftsU= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:57:42 -0000 kmacy added a comment. I'm mostly echoing Ian Lepore's comments here: - The wmb() is equivalent to an atomic_store_acq_32 - which is not part of the API. It would seem we'd rather have a atomic_load_acq_32 where the value is actually later to be read. - I don't know what the rmb() is protecting against. - This penalizes architectures that don't need it so at the very least a local macro needs to be defined that is a no-op on all other architectures. Are you actually seeing problems that is fixed by this change? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1833 To: zbb, imp, rpaulo, kmacy Cc: andrew, ian, adrian, freebsd-arm