From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Oct 12 02:50:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A00A115B8 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6D0904 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9C2oi2H040711; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:50:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.14.9/8.14.5/Submit) id t9C2oipC040710; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:50:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:50:44 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Mattia Rossi Cc: freebsd-arm , bob prohaska Subject: Re: Panic running nsd-4.1.5 Message-ID: <20151012025044.GB97450@www.zefox.net> References: <5614D7B8.3040604@gmail.com> <561784D9.90805@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <561784D9.90805@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:50:52 -0000 On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:11:53AM +0200, Mattia Rossi wrote: > > >Can you please try this: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3617 > >Just download raw diff, apply, build new kernel, and run. > > > > > Just came around trying the patch, and it's not compiling. > I tried to find the issue here, as it doesn't make much sense, given > that cp15_ats1cpr_set has not been changed in the patch: The patch seems to apply without issue on RPI2 and appear to be helpful. Stress2 tests have been running about 2x longer with the patch, though crashes and silent hangs still occur. In some cases the debugger reports zero values, but on occasion they are not zero, for example, at www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/crashes/crash_10_11_15/console. Apart from crashes under stress2 testing (usually in the syscall tests) the Raspberry Pi seems vastly improved over a few months ago. bob prohaska