Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:53:53 +0000
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp
Cc:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How to implement jail-aware SysV IPC (with my nasty patch)
Message-ID:  <2B7AA933-CB74-4737-8330-6E623A31C6DA@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <cc18282ebe394476120a139239225782@imap.cm.dream.jp>
References:  <cc18282ebe394476120a139239225782@imap.cm.dream.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

removed hackers, added virtualization.


> On 12 Jun 2015, at 01:17 , kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp wrote:
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m (still) trying to figure out how jail-aware SysV IPC =
mechanism should be.

The best way probably is to finally get the =E2=80=9Ccommon=E2=80=9D =
VIMAGE framework into HEAD to allow easy virtualisation of other =
services.  That work has been sitting in perforce for a few years and =
simply needs updating for sysctls I think.

Then use that to virtualise things and have a vipc like we have vnets.  =
The good news is that you have identified most places and have the =
cleanup functions already so it=E2=80=99d be a matter of transforming =
your changes (assuming they are correct and working fine; haven=E2=80=99t =
actually read the patch in detail;-)  to the different infrastructure.  =
And that=E2=80=99s the easiest part.


Bjoern




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2B7AA933-CB74-4737-8330-6E623A31C6DA>