Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:05:52 -0700 From: Russell Haley <russ.haley@gmail.com> To: Ivan Radovanovic <radovanovic@gmail.com>, mono@freebsd.org, Jeff Sukow <jdsukow@gmail.com> Cc: monodevelop-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: MonoDevelop 5.10 For FreeBSD 10.2 Message-ID: <CABx9NuTkkUYzKjFGBwViVa=6dPgJMvDo0FHqBwuExGGJcnpbfw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I just thought I'd send a progress update. Currently, I am stuck between two different build methods for the "latest" MonoDevelop build. I have been able to successfully build from github and create patches. However, the existing ports Makefile (devel/monodevelop) uses the tarball method. My github approach fails when attempting to build using the tarball method. Cons of Github build: - The github approach doesn't feel stable. The monodevelop branch naming in git is all over the place and there are binaries in the externals download. Cons of Tarball build: - Have to figure out why it's failing too build. Seems to be issues with LibGet2Sharp, again in the externals folder. Other problems still outstanding: 1) kqueueEvent still causes crashes. An environment variable needs to be set to use the managed filesystemwatcher 2) I have to build gtksharp20 twice. Once before the initial compile. Then the Monodevelop build fails, I rebuild gtksharp20 and then Monodevelop continues to build to success. WTF? 2.5) The build says it's for Linux. Boo! 3) I'm getting errors when trying to save the solution file. Not sure if that's a MD bug, or a "me bug". That's it. If anyone has any input, I'd love to have it. Thanks, Russ
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABx9NuTkkUYzKjFGBwViVa=6dPgJMvDo0FHqBwuExGGJcnpbfw>