From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Oct 25 07:28:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4F07F4C for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 07:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net) Received: from mailstore06.sysedata.no (b.mail.tornado.no [195.159.29.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D941C1619 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 07:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net) Received: from [195.159.29.130] (helo=www.eposttjener.no) by mailstore06.sysedata.no with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqFRt-0007N5-Fc for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:10:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:10:37 +0100 From: Daniel Engberg To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ixl 40G bad =?UTF-8?Q?performance=3F?= Message-ID: <5aae0ee63c44627223d5d179f1901d00@pyret.net> X-Sender: daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 07:28:13 -0000 One thing I've noticed that probably affects your performance benchmarks somewhat is that you're using iperf(2) instead of the newer iperf3 but I could be wrong... Best regards, Daniel