From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 01:09:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563DCC70 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1598D1CE for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE7A27673; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:09:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0I196GD006010; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:09:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:09:06 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? Message-Id: <20150118020906.d798a523.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:09:11 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:24:12 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ? > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > I for one, would very much like it. I think the same. If you look into FreeBSD's history of dealing with source code checkout methods, you'll find this: port cvsup-without-gui -> base csup -> move to SVN -> port subversion -> ? - here a tool to get updates from source control would be nice. In the past, the CVS-based tool did allow you to "make update" for the /usr/src and /usr/ports tree. For the ports, we have portsnap to obtain a snapshot (not _precisely_ current), but for /usr/src, we currently don't have a tool in the base system. Installing the full subversion port isn't that hard, but a csup-lookalike in the base would be nice, for the simple task to checkout sources, even if it's just a bootstrap mechanism (cf. pkg). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 01:21:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8E4157 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.bocal.org (mx1.bocal.org [163.5.69.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B8437B for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (81-67-132-196.rev.numericable.fr [81.67.132.196]); by mx1.bocal.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 703e9010; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO; for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:15:12 +0100 (CET) From: Emmanuel Vadot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? Message-Id: <004E38C7-7BEE-4A34-A072-4D2F522CF50C@bocal.org> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:15:12 +0100 References: <20150118020906.d798a523.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150118020906.d798a523.freebsd@edvax.de> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B440) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:21:55 -0000 There is svnlite in base for that. --=20 Emmanuel Vadot > On 18 Jan 2015, at 02:09, Polytropon wrote: >=20 >> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:24:12 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BAS= E ? >>=20 >> Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. >>=20 >> I for one, would very much like it. >=20 > I think the same. If you look into FreeBSD's history of > dealing with source code checkout methods, you'll find > this: port cvsup-without-gui -> base csup -> move to > SVN -> port subversion -> ? - here a tool to get updates > from source control would be nice. In the past, the > CVS-based tool did allow you to "make update" for the > /usr/src and /usr/ports tree. For the ports, we have > portsnap to obtain a snapshot (not _precisely_ current), > but for /usr/src, we currently don't have a tool in > the base system. Installing the full subversion port > isn't that hard, but a csup-lookalike in the base > would be nice, for the simple task to checkout sources, > even if it's just a bootstrap mechanism (cf. pkg). >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 01:23:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ADA01EA for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE69338B for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 11A936D86BA9; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:22:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:22:58 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:23:06 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I think I'm missing a piece. The problem I'm trying to solve is similar to that previously discussed and whose solution I found via Google. I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: i915kms_load=3D"YES" kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1366x768" But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUuwrxAAoJEBV64x4SNmArUIgP/A3ANuKa1rrf5T5QpDe8zwxo e342aN0nzzUqK+n+RIyvVjPph/Tp4wMTIrqoaj1breLILO1QXvqqiusaZ27t1eyE 6nxZiJBFkX+UuP0PQu9aqRJnyWGB7jJW5rU3keLQw9h7/EnTO1+sGdTz/H9pmVwM f0440D4Ny47nrNfFO+FDjL38wVQ77kFjrsNWCDQNtNTqxF7q3FMnBESZOOT6U3C6 gykzwfHq4Sf3q7M15kqCwZ2zZNIVBTZpexn9Ca4NWSnApqrVZCaSiEO6srGKz24R NAep8DolYHgTNBxFUxbzb6xMf2+AFW3zxWaavnQadWZbwPZr8ens1ymrdJd+IWGQ oTMEpdVxXsN88nPl8l+tTpNjAR9xHxjAOcfm/HyrvdyQHIKqO6NXECG7mo9bpamr Gvzsd+IjCQt/M/lVakJxBqwCA25e9n4lJLW/mtXs7yWA6A2UCxzPMTsGrhkYtTIN 90Ma3CldVpUab+dhxUy7xzkCxUhch7BKkRvqD4MOz9Ejia4J4KMQJkppe+J5lS4V 5bh3nHOpIXsjY2HjKi5H9/3oRK3FffTk/H9fScLHSKSKh6J7U4VdSbxLa+kKcPgA SzshJrBa1nde3G6Y8qZTsJuMy9JAVuiKBP56C14A4FZMzuVpSOmZmX0eoS65wDjF 2NRqvmXNSVnB3WiCMQYV =2mUC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 02:53:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C09A2B4 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B9B9CA5 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hz1so1120646pad.8 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:53:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yKd4rb0ZoPUNtwR9lSXGPkpww1sgPavBLwTCXUff6ao=; b=M/NoZmainzF6cGo70Z50HauIx8hR5+yJ47WGgLX0jA758GMAz7g2abBslY29QCoQT1 61oKhTVrUUthJBFxBv2sCp/bHR1qZGaf09mrDOAE7Rb0yPpScBN7Tp36RBCAD23nG7x/ 8/jWBVQftRdu45JztlUltraPnDxsQxM++1xyqmZIKYBUBCJ5GiJGJMqC1L9mBnzpSage P6cQqPdXdqBTveaNBos21Fh05/HsY2uqV0P2YtKrF+T8WmfE1GPOHogdSDvJ8u9/eWaT Y3aiWh7+926g/GDgcXYOBm2qt+5FhDg7klbxM7YWw9oxDtmLpMd6Z5vqpyPe7Jz4Zds0 rfLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.29.67 with SMTP id i3mr5766093pdh.132.1421549582646; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:53:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:53:02 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: i915 at boot From: Adam Vande More To: David Benfell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:53:03 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:22 PM, David Benfell wrote: > Hi all, > > I think I'm missing a piece. The problem I'm trying to solve is > similar to that previously discussed and whose solution I found via > Google. > > I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more > reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. > Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: > > i915kms_load="YES" > kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1366x768" > > But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: > You didn't indicate if you are actually using VT, the default on 10 is off. You must also use: kern.vty=vt -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 03:26:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A58C882 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a0i241.smtpcorp.com (a0i241.smtpcorp.com [216.22.15.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008ABFFA for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:26:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpcorp.com; s=a0_1; h=Feedback-ID:X-Smtpcorp-Track:Date:Subject:To:From:Message-ID; bh=TjfgeriIlXD+s0LdOlzHcohE8U8FTA2b0PgXJu8sz9Q=; b=HMwGGxvsK5n9egdRB2bEc7YTdpVjTB7Ps0rj006TAT64Mmwr3B2v7MY1gZmK2Eehmzs4BvcL8fBQS9/1Bo3mEan6xoRxQhSDvpOT/I96nLXSuKzPfBefK09eGgO+by2xQOXQ7O1sgVIuxtjngQ4bgnGGD0qN3M6T+EokSTc3Y+8=; Message-ID: <6B4CFED1D675483F912D222B0A555B67@republic> From: "Daniel Corbe" To: "Warren Block" , "Carmel NY" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Flow Charting Program Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:26:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1YCgVJ4gfJgMOb.Iyf-y33tC Feedback-ID: 10661m:10661aegzayD:10661soeqc6rO2l:SMTPCORP Cc: User questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:26:42 -0000 I personally like Lucidchart because it's a chrome (and possibly other browswers?) plugin. Therefore it runs on anything that chrome runs on. It also seems to handle visio files better than anything else I've ever seen. -----Original Message----- From: Warren Block Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 3:00 PM To: Carmel NY Cc: User questions Subject: Re: Flow Charting Program On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Carmel NY wrote: > I am looking for a flow charting program, similar to MS Visio. I tried > "dia" > but it is not really very intuitive and the help page is broken. I tried > notifying the port maintainer regarding the help feature, but never > received > back an answer. > > Can anyone recommend a good flow charting program like Visio? LibreOffice Draw is supposed to support some of that kind of thing: https://help.libreoffice.org/Impress/Creating_a_Flowchart _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 03:44:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7380DD2F for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42BFF1F7 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id fp1so5167390pdb.4 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:44:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=d/si4TtMKmtQYg/5nq5pwgtJUkZUXgnYKLRcXfkfaRw=; b=AuAf1OmOnp4If9bRn4Lcoafs+WiWvz03IwM/zZV89RbY+31L3wfn8lJVBs7YeXE2yn BFPgnXudvT1CJ8EniAN5kYaAYkLIsq2wb36eFYPyxGMsrMsp4krqlgD3J+kGO5j1vaJ2 OJE//LYhH0T1fNus++1C+sm5Byx1ncOwXYBAJylW0f0+aVat91OIBcULnwFEI9a8TBiJ yhDqYggTxYnOnKQWTpTFIxSgQMXTGcWfGzLKJgR+vqCGx/KKNs17nmoIJXp4N5YLbdfm 5qYsvsaTJ8TymLjvyjJzi/enn0VscBYNccZcN4EX4epFmDM7L+gezw3kpFNG0eVwC11q bUgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.19.201 with SMTP id h9mr25936589pde.153.1421552674706; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:44:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:44:34 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flow Charting Program From: Adam Vande More To: Carmel NY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:44:35 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Carmel NY wrote: > I am looking for a flow charting program, similar to MS Visio. I tried > "dia" > but it is not really very intuitive and the help page is broken. I tried > notifying the port maintainer regarding the help feature, but never > received > back an answer. > > Can anyone recommend a good flow charting program like Visio? editors/calligra -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 04:20:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 862E8F2F for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA6D64A for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0I4K2Zj006573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:20:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0I4Jx3x006559; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:20:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:19:59 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:20:02 -0700 (MST) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:20:42 -0000 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > I purchased a little Acer Aspire to run as a small FreeBSD server. The > price was right for what came with it. However, changing the boot order in > the BIOS seemed to have no effect. As if the DVD drive was not even > installed. If I set manual boot selection, the FreeBSD install CD was not > an option at boot time. To check to see if the DVD drive is functioning I > allowed it to go through the whole windows install procedure. Sure enough > -- the DVD works. I have tried several other boot disks to no avail. > > Moreover, after going through the setup, Windows seemed to have hijacked > the whole boot process, and I can't even get into the BIOS. What is the > deal? Does M$ have some kind of deal with Acer to make it impossible to > install another OS? I have never purchased a computer with the OS already > on it. I have always built my own PC's, but for $209 I figured it couldn't > be beat. > > Has anyone else had a similar experience with ultra cheapie Windows boxes? Likely UEFI with SecureBoot enabled. Turn SecureBoot off, enable "legacy" or "CSM" booting in what was formerly known as the BIOS setup screens. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 05:19:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1E43A1 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B12FAE5 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 99B5E6D86BAA; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:19:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:19:15 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150118051915.GA90781@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:19:16 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 08:53:02PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:22 PM, David Benfell > wrote: >=20 > > I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more > > reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. > > Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: > > > > i915kms_load=3D"YES" > > kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1366x768" > > > > But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: >=20 > You didn't indicate if you are actually using VT, the default on 10 is > off. You must also use: >=20 > kern.vty=3Dvt >=20 This is indeed also present. It seems like there is a vga mode where I want fb and it isn't giving me that. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUu0JTAAoJEBV64x4SNmArtPkP/3S6etG5uQQCN4skEcwFCmKG 2FrAcTcR26OPkt+/F4aX6OoSvPHVUbcBgojCXiQqAQ3zDxV0ZNQBXoE0zTUI76e0 ks8FiZFkJYPQWSkpKchjZrnMcW0qlXp4WS1J8tyw0lCJAwfiqG3JWfOvmeBlJ7CB Kmduuv2ewOrLb1Qo0zHqcvTeei2wr9RSQmhsY5UdAWo3o2FssEcv/7x27XXSJh30 F1ErQpJ3g+5USQt9lq+2YFDdl+bTgsyYwmxnwPeFMNTP3j0Gf/bSKJnrwO41IDqN ia/ldsCePYLE7eu5lLw566GH3f1MJQDb19uJXndy8/zAiFJ+/yptqhmeGGJEdN8n sS6MN63gBaKLcHt4qWcbHANbIGaOrMW7juY0HDMYhkTb71zj7pkO1S00apt6y3gD c5icFzkJlwFg3gP3lkHL2MPREwQBHC5Yp74wtYmJaVCMtPmk+nfsCyz1ayOupj0J PR1ctYgd0UKbGfkPin6c6WuygqHONAWbsxH0W+WwY4Ls8IR9WvHf+sxoVGIWU0b6 l/8itnSTzss/0ul/uTymTh6o1A+XJs1UROZ+WSkZcYJe0k9lMQZeI///p9oty+4z noXy4CfGURCV4/ub9aMVyWE5T/2lgQFfVs/fQI24qei4Q4iy8IswcOIw+AXpT6fi nv8xwEW4y7B6o9rXkoKs =VDvy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 05:48:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA06C33 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE9DD4D for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z2so10617923wiv.5 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:48:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lf1ICb58GomVDwV3hfu/6xvhSKzocJgOnUdzHb914/k=; b=zRbIl6YLpVgPDJVODPojhPsdYDSJSyu27FZfvhcS6XSWlbbTZrbQSQCOJofF/MqfLW GYnpQmwUl0exkWSkUPvhwwOw2l/PfY1xC2cTu94kYymZibaL0K6Db537uzgMYqydSrJI h9k61rG7RKiVRfgmtkRCEq3KRCFZiXXrQUkTh4hH8OoqlnD2FTFuR8HwR/lEgA2pyL+O 5/r5l8Tq34qF9eIHcD6JnxizOW0qxlgbWHjjsRoqZFm9DntZas6chO60UKStUCGjs1Ke HORdFlYXREIZY6DeIvHct2KQ2KlsF+IMguDmcEnB6jb+ZiEk/l5RdKY6dnbw1pK+jfjr pJQw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.198.51 with SMTP id iz19mr21816797wic.65.1421560130421; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:48:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:48:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: license From: Waitman Gobble To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:48:52 -0000 Curious about what people are doing to comply with #2 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. (in each file in /usr/src) arduous but necessary task. Thank you, -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 05:59:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19BDCE6 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FE7E00 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id bs8so11220428wib.5 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:59:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SdnYkUYHbdBP1nK1Lnu1OXbM0K0jo3+DzzZooNf8n5U=; b=Iq+yAb34X+zey1X8ccOxtZgVwhlhktcm1/kVpztM/y6gQULCa+QCL+0bqWFWWNdbSf O5MhTkCXqjNxTnVuFE/eV/ehqjRk3zGuN9nsj1QAaKUxS+CAjWlkuy3XNLvqyMVcXuN3 Sl2QXWhDA7WMWzF8uXDmEe0dMNOx2iLfCeiV81afAgPOiQuKovCFJYCNa183fI6y0aCi 2lboVbJXmuXoHYw7OmVr0NTJhhsAAbRbwTcPKlmrZpTc2djMxioBqRAgi9T4Xo9vsvxv xGcBY0T26VOuwtAnPuGmChDJskAy9SPrzaXICyWdesit7WuLU+IcKCIbtTcJhWeLdqqT 1q7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.198.51 with SMTP id iz19mr21870404wic.65.1421560749794; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:59:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.212.129 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:59:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:59:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: license From: Waitman Gobble To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:59:11 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Curious about what people are doing to comply with #2 > > 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, > this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation > and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > > (in each file in /usr/src) > > arduous but necessary task. > > Thank you, > > -- > Waitman Gobble > Los Altos California USA > 510-830-7975 Hmmm, maybe not so difficult, I suppose I can look at the binary distributions of FreeBSD for guidance. -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 08:45:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B177DA2 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C223FD87 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r2so9421112igi.2 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:45:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=awlJAaEJXnQ56krPdahRCKuMzs10BMX6H/YbFGyZ4SQ=; b=c7GgCSH+M68ejuOywj70YtlVMAsZW/ge2h8OdEvlqLtjTdbRuM3AN4tP8Asd15mtPb cWCAbF03h6pzKflrVGoEzvX7NlkHf+XphDc2cti7FoPceb8yoRV7Z5e4lsY+3AMyK6N/ JzJg7HDBMhQpv6M1ZAivgNctEMKKLoNpr+Fl1OALXAkYj44049HuYe2pMO1z/mxCvXbx jpjuz72ckkXYDbDQPfQjfLAugGxcvC+MyrAn1HvJdDJIIlC+14ZAybhlPdCFtHFLdN83 DjGI97tqTGUNmYoldqJcFKWrUz34lgQ9Qx8tCTER7P7QUeuAIM6DMMaztd259Ia9BIJk SyAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.16.75 with SMTP id y72mr10971540ioi.17.1421570700116; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:45:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.14.213 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:45:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:45:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: XeNKFh6kHA8Yd8l3417qjB1pGb8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 From: Chris Maness To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:45:01 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > > I purchased a little Acer Aspire to run as a small FreeBSD server. The >> price was right for what came with it. However, changing the boot order >> in >> the BIOS seemed to have no effect. As if the DVD drive was not even >> installed. If I set manual boot selection, the FreeBSD install CD was not >> an option at boot time. To check to see if the DVD drive is functioning I >> allowed it to go through the whole windows install procedure. Sure enough >> -- the DVD works. I have tried several other boot disks to no avail. >> >> Moreover, after going through the setup, Windows seemed to have hijacked >> the whole boot process, and I can't even get into the BIOS. What is the >> deal? Does M$ have some kind of deal with Acer to make it impossible to >> install another OS? I have never purchased a computer with the OS already >> on it. I have always built my own PC's, but for $209 I figured it >> couldn't >> be beat. >> >> Has anyone else had a similar experience with ultra cheapie Windows boxes? >> > > Likely UEFI with SecureBoot enabled. Turn SecureBoot off, enable "legacy" > or "CSM" booting in what was formerly known as the BIOS setup screens. > > > Yes, I had turned SecureBoot off. There does not seem to be an option for legacy or CSM in the BIOS menu. I cannot get it to even see my memory stick with a FreeBSD install image on it. Even my macbook pro mostly boots this and hangs on some hardware issues (as I expected but just wanted to make sure the usb stick was actually bootable). Thanks for the help, I purchased an MSI mobo in the ITX form factor last night. However, I would prefer to get the el cheapo acer going and return the stuff I purchased last night. No dice on the Acer thus far. Regards, Chris Maness From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 09:01:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7D9F8F for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sif.iconz.co.nz (etrn.iconz.co.nz [210.48.22.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C26EF0 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sif.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9664A2A091 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:01:53 +1300 (NZDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at sif.iconz.co.nz Received: from sif.iconz.co.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sif.iconz.co.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id einCw2bXlg-J for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:01:52 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ip-210-185-10-221.internet.co.nz [210.185.10.221]) by sif.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB9E2A081 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:01:51 +1300 (NZDT) Message-ID: <1421571719.52172.1.camel@internet.co.nz> Subject: Re: Evolution - cannot send attachments greater than 10k From: Glenn Todd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:01:59 +1300 In-Reply-To: <20150117200415.5f82c115@X220.alogt.com> References: <1421486443.98325.10.camel@internet.co.nz> <20150117200415.5f82c115@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:01:57 -0000 Hi, I have installed Thunderbird and found that I can send emails with large attachments using this client. So it does appear that my problem is unique to Evolution. Glenn On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 20:04 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > did you try any other e-mail client to confirm that it only can be > caused by Evolution? > > Erich > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:20:43 +1300 > Glenn Todd wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am using Evolution 3.12.9 on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p10 #0: Mon Oct 20 > > 12:42:25 UTC 2014 > > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > But I cannot send emails with attachments greater than 10k. > > Everything looks fine system advises that the mail send process > > completes successfully, but the mail never reaches the destination. > > > > Mail with no attachments go and are received without issue, also > > emails with attachments less than around 10k. > > > > The problem appeared a few weeks ago after updating the ports, so have > > checked all the settings spoken to my ISP to confirm that there no > > issues at their end. So updated my ports again yesterday and brought > > my system up to date. But the problem remains. > > > > I am using the Mate desktop. > > > > Any help to solve this would be appreciated. > > > > Cheers > > > > Glenn > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 11:11:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FE19131 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EC0AC8A for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c41so13384640yho.13 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=Wuz6anl6l273WQPgkIMOFHEiocNZ0XUcIwT5oVbKF38=; b=Wmm1wamYG7X5zbI0l22VGVIbexBb5a6grUk4MgqdCw7SKS17BdRROSmNCdMfr0cUsT lwUlh1Scx9m2Js6X3Yyv/AoEat4vgR86cUs2FNgr6hRtJ8vpcd7Z25batIlbLWXHYWzQ BZuvUnbQZ1Ao2/vqJGRIX4K+5gMIe23GkViGA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=Wuz6anl6l273WQPgkIMOFHEiocNZ0XUcIwT5oVbKF38=; b=WkRaJrIRoYAYx1dDT8psC9bukuDTVQ+M/4ZSKcgqeP+ue2URIXv+nrcQOpM/xDSaVM XDKQWcbiBRN1uzVNFR/SFXFEkFIFOZ2nUwuQ2AtUtJK0udcIwXPgr9EB9AhD2UduHhKH JbzHhyqm2TbeKUR2Ee6CjvCJfei3lN6koo25AHRm8w+gy6dKcb0o3rYwiTYlfzMtZH2e tHmgnUN7/LmALzR4A698fhjvriujff384T+LSs1dzC8fH/D2TkUM7mMjIAbR7UaWlWOb hD/gkwnark+Uizh0gLBy5aUSc6fKSeu/NCqGXrrKqweFVOYpkb1m7RJTe1gZT9PtMG7n t0kw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDlPAAapQ/cn4FnedqcFH4b5OXeGL8wVW0wwibcn4UlqfHznqOwrOjvYbn3+MVEAmlF2Sq X-Received: by 10.236.67.106 with SMTP id i70mr14988908yhd.177.1421579479800; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z23sm5750485yhz.35.2015.01.18.03.11.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 03:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.104.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kQD2t68Hkz3DlXn for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 06:11:18 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 06:11:17 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 Message-ID: <20150118061117.054c260f@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: User questions Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/xueIzoZ.elFBwq4kjCdE4Fk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:11:21 -0000 --Sig_/xueIzoZ.elFBwq4kjCdE4Fk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:45:00 -0800, Chris Maness stated: >Yes, I had turned SecureBoot off. There does not seem to be an option for >legacy or CSM in the BIOS menu. > >I cannot get it to even see my memory stick with a FreeBSD install image on >it. Even my macbook pro mostly boots this and hangs on some hardware >issues (as I expected but just wanted to make sure the usb stick was >actually bootable). > >Thanks for the help, I purchased an MSI mobo in the ITX form factor last >night. However, I would prefer to get the el cheapo acer going and return >the stuff I purchased last night. No dice on the Acer thus far. Just out of morbid curiosity, have you tried calling their support line? --=20 Jerry --Sig_/xueIzoZ.elFBwq4kjCdE4Fk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUu5TVAAoJEElTsHIJnX8eXjUIALMyokdQy9YcSYZyrFwHyJfj MrNFeBe2Ix1L0lN0Db1sjPy/aay05CsYFmkMnGqvZodT0uum1vXnRELHlE3Thl4k 7z+Fqd7JfyIbf2y9/xfzS8QkBRRSQMMWuitXVpQ/tJ6DTDeI6N4BkHJF5vhCkwWe Di7kyo8UiQii5HRC5ei5VJUE5L8Vu61kXWukiYaHQSkEIcE2le7XcdWvYZT1ugdj m5pcDiVeqTQrlNhW49QNm7/KKGWKz8756H9Igq1P660cfREHJavYQS9etYPaYOnG yuGYJDKXUHef2pHas/muhkc0Jd0ZjMOGFfSPqMztSpzioA6DGFUCqCdJA8mpPOo= =wtmv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xueIzoZ.elFBwq4kjCdE4Fk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 12:13:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5738B8 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp206.alice.it (smtp206.alice.it [82.57.200.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65224C for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (80.181.51.90) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 547D8AFA08626836 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:07:46 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.1/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0IC7hSm078828 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:07:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <54BBA1F4.7060106@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:07:16 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blu ray References: <54A97B1B.2080808@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <54A97B1B.2080808@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:13:16 -0000 On 01/04/15 18:40, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I know the question has come up several times, but things change... > > Are Blu Ray recorders supported? Especially internal SATA ones? > > Could I buy one just for backup purposes, i.e. preparing a 25-50 GB ISO > and writing it? > What would be the maximum file size? > > Should I use cdrecord? groisofs? Anything else? > > Is 9.3 enough? Any improvement in 10.1? Hello. I'll answer myself; maybe this info will be useful to others. I bought an LG BH16NS40 and it's working flawlessly, using 9.3 and cdrecord. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 12:32:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCF64C4 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B197161B for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gq15so551312lab.12 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:32:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WR96DdAc9Xo+yaeS5FMv6dZOijhC5cILfyXykWK5laE=; b=Loljvhz3TZGALj8WiQGnFanipWNjaMDgJGAruYVa6DnInfjcHpsRtyA3KggDd2Pe5O 7uVwSLBRuQzaz4qa04f64c/GtsWVNDn0/MAezb2SkHrtHg2UKKYs+qhjR6sNf/vg85LI QJRzOkMD5UL6of6guoykoruEhpLfNWhZtmrG5c+MCWE2Ivj7uDR8ux0Bg1o/C2y3bph1 iWmSLt24gtssXWtj0gly0SgZmXLhkFH5Ow7S/jK55NH+3jRmbk+rJIQNZXG0P2E2O0+y /Q7nLKJvfzZuyhDpYtweICo3kqtJ0E003imYi3/n6IdmLrtjHHV+FmWzv+0o2NwD8vLK a54A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.131.1 with SMTP id oi1mr24262246lbb.2.1421584352832; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.161.1 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:32:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BBA1F4.7060106@netfence.it> References: <54A97B1B.2080808@netfence.it> <54BBA1F4.7060106@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 06:32:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Blu ray From: Andrew Gould To: Andrea Venturoli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:32:35 -0000 On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 01/04/15 18:40, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I know the question has come up several times, but things change... >> >> Are Blu Ray recorders supported? Especially internal SATA ones? >> >> Could I buy one just for backup purposes, i.e. preparing a 25-50 GB ISO >> and writing it? >> What would be the maximum file size? >> >> Should I use cdrecord? groisofs? Anything else? >> >> Is 9.3 enough? Any improvement in 10.1? >> > > Hello. > I'll answer myself; maybe this info will be useful to others. > > I bought an LG BH16NS40 and it's working flawlessly, using 9.3 and > cdrecord. > > bye > av. > > Thank you. That's good information to have. Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 12:39:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB246AB for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from transbay.net (transbay.net [208.184.217.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.transbay.net", Issuer "mail.transbay.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A599B67B for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.10.176] (ecsd.transbay.net [208.76.28.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by transbay.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0ICWKVS081622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:32:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54BBA7CE.1050406@transbay.net> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 04:32:14 -0800 From: Eric Dynamic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Please help with this conundrum! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:39:42 -0000 Vanilla fresh install of FreeBSD 10.1. From my old habits I downloaded the current ports tarball, unpacked it to be /usr/ports, and installed numerous things with it without a problem, including php56. However, in trying to connect PHP with apache, after installing www/mod_php56, httpd crashes and I wonder if I forgot ZTS. I want to start over and make sure ZTS threads are there. I look on the FreeBSD site for anything relating to the php56 port and all there is is the skeletal information, nothing about the choices one faces. Fine; I'll just blindly start over. But just to be safe: I know the ports system is altered from the old days, so I go to the online doc to see this: Procedure 5.1. Portsnap Method The base system of FreeBSD includes Portsnap. This is a fast and user-friendly tool for retrieving the Ports Collection and is the recommended choice for most users. This utility connects to a FreeBSD site, verifies the secure key, and downloads a new copy of the Ports Collection. The key is used to verify the integrity of all downloaded files. 1. To download a compressed snapshot of the Ports Collection into |/var/db/portsnap|: |#| *|portsnap fetch|* 2. When running Portsnap for the first time, extract the snapshot into |/usr/ports|: |#| *|portsnap extract|* 3. After the first use of Portsnap has been completed as shown above, |/usr/ports| can be updated as needed by running: |#| *|portsnap fetch|* |#| *|portsnap update|* When using |fetch|, the |extract| or the |update| operation may be run consecutively, like so: |#| *|portsnap fetch update|* After running portsnap as directed by the web page, try to compile lang/php56 and am told # make ===> License PHP301 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for php56-5.6.4 ===> php56-5.6.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/sbin/pkg in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg You are about to convert your system to pkg while you have ports/packages installed with the old pkg_install tools. To switch to pkg: 1) Install ports-mgmt/pkg cd ports-mgmt/pkg && make UPGRADEPKG=1 install clean 2) Convert your package database by running pkg2ng *** [pre-everything] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. *** [pkg-depends] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php56. *** [stage] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php56. I would think in FreeBSD 10.1 that the ports system should be internally self-consistent and already upgraded to the new regime; so if "pkg" was not available already it would just be compiled and installation would proceed, although if "pkg" is so central, perhaps a version of it should be part of the base system. No matter (I suppose), I do what the instructions say, and here's what happens: # pwd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg # make UPGRADEPKG=1 install clean */usr/lib/libssl.a(s2_lib.o): In function `ssl2_get_cipher_by_char':** **s2_lib.c:(.text+0x41e): undefined reference to `OBJ_bsearch'** **/usr/lib/libssl.a(s3_lib.o): In function `ssl3_get_cipher_by_char':** **s3_lib.c:(.text+0x6b4): undefined reference to `OBJ_bsearch'** ***** [pkg-static] Error code 1* Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.6/src. *** [all-recursive] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.6. *** [all] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.4.6. *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. *** [/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/.build_done.pkg._usr_local] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. So "pkg" itself won't compile, and so the ports are totally hosed. What gives? What can I do to fix this? Can the online documentation be upgraded to be consistent with the actual procedures required, if what the documentation says is not correct? Also, I notice that the system's "pkg" command that _had been_ working for the original ports I compiled, seems to have been wiped out by some aspect of the portsnap process, apparently. Had it simply been left alone, I think much of the above could have been avoided. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 12:55:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D488CB9 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0117.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5CA9D1 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BN3PR0301MB0836.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:55:12 +0000 Message-ID: <54BBAD29.70402@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 06:55:05 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Please help with this conundrum! References: <54BBA7CE.1050406@transbay.net> In-Reply-To: <54BBA7CE.1050406@transbay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BN1PR02CA0036.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.56.36) To BN3PR0301MB0836.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.146) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=aberg010@my.HennepinTech.edu; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; X-Forefront-PRVS: 046060344D X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6049001)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(62966003)(33656002)(450100001)(68736005)(77156002)(122386002)(64126003)(92566002)(77096005)(42186005)(2950100001)(101416001)(64706001)(110136001)(47776003)(65956001)(97736003)(66066001)(87976001)(65806001)(83506001)(89122001)(107886001)(2351001)(106356001)(88552001)(86362001)(40100003)(75432002)(105586002)(50466002)(46102003)(54356999)(50986999)(76176999)(23676002)(226693001)(65816999)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: my.HennepinTech.edu does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2015 12:55:12.6571 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0301MB0836 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:55:16 -0000 On 2015.01.18 06:32, Eric Dynamic wrote: > Vanilla fresh install of FreeBSD 10.1. > ===> php56-5.6.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - not found > ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/sbin/pkg in > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg > You are about to convert your system to pkg while you have ports/packages > installed with the old pkg_install tools. One of these is untrue (most likely the former). Did you copy over your old package database or something? FreeBSD 10 does not have the old pkg_* tools and cannot deal with old-style packages at all, aside from pkg2ng, which will convert the old package system into the new one. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 13:05:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BCBE0E for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from transbay.net (transbay.net [208.184.217.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.transbay.net", Issuer "mail.transbay.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02569AF5 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.10.176] (ecsd.transbay.net [208.76.28.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by transbay.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0ID5cub000683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:05:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54BBAF9C.5060903@transbay.net> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 05:05:32 -0800 From: Eric Dynamic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please help with this conundrum! References: <54BBA7CE.1050406@transbay.net> In-Reply-To: <54BBA7CE.1050406@transbay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:05:40 -0000 Please ignore the prior email - the error occurred on a different system than I thought I was working on. Lo Sientos Mucho. -ecsd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 14:39:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2434A4 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2F7626 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0IEd5Wi057893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0IEd0na057890; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:00 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:05 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:39:57 -0000 On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > Likely UEFI with SecureBoot enabled.  Turn SecureBoot off, enable "legacy" or "CSM" booting in what was formerly known as the BIOS setup screens. > > > > Yes, I had turned SecureBoot off.  There does not seem to be an option for legacy or CSM in the BIOS menu. > > I cannot get it to even see my memory stick with a FreeBSD install image on it.  Even my macbook pro mostly boots this and hangs on some hardware issues (as I expected but just wanted > to make sure the usb stick was actually bootable). UEFI alone might do that. Only UEFI-approved boot devices are shown unless legacy or compatibility mode is enabled. Unfortunately, there are varying names and methods in the settings between different manufacturers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 16:05:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97642101 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E50DE10 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hs14so25285023lab.11 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:05:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aah65k7De0zVhCeUQnBgUvNprw113N1ANPYs/Ail+QY=; b=daLu3bR0+utkcYbJid894uRQwhambNnrq+bhZ3va9J5Uom0bJHhMg7THnC5k4EQjjI E0fG73LE4oLkn8ciSIHHZCyi1CaYRpo8eAuDUwsclrTFLHrigclzxg6JpK1QbvD0ys52 2/Jn9dYNXMqvbswSS8ygwNY87JOY5T8m4BKSuRkROlL/3nQnej9Jsc/DyDk4wqz+4G4/ 9i47b1SbOPTGIOZa454XN3hEGOCvP5XAw5LF1I+X3YTcACQI+DRlB1+H6qEyofYjU5fK wvXs3TKYgYiPMy9LyPfpycMSTggaGFId10lh21QZkS84a9QOq3iklD4Z+g+N5OTGiNmF /kDw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzffWAbI3NSdqI2opcNHzpeKgn1fhGLbwe9r1pNb93Br+YzscgTnAM8CSPJvPEpcKS7yp+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.238.1 with SMTP id vg1mr25538391lac.83.1421597123164; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.47.75 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:05:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:05:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? From: Damien Fleuriot To: Andrew Berg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:05:32 -0000 On 17 January 2015 at 16:52, Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2015.01.17 09:24, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of > BASE ? > > > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > > > I for one, would very much like it. > What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)? > > Andrew, Emmanuel, I wouldn't know, first time I hear of the binary. It may be failure on my part but I do not remember having read about it in any of the handbook's pages either. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 17:13:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43DFAEA1 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB59C650 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:13:16 +0000 Message-ID: <54BBE9A4.80300@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:13:08 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? References: <54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BL2PR05CA0012.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.226.12) To CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.148) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=aberg010@my.HennepinTech.edu; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; X-Forefront-PRVS: 046060344D X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(189002)(51704005)(199003)(88552001)(23676002)(65816999)(76176999)(47776003)(64706001)(65806001)(66066001)(86362001)(40100003)(54356999)(122386002)(2950100001)(50986999)(97736003)(106356001)(105586002)(19580405001)(46102003)(68736005)(77096005)(15975445007)(87976001)(92566002)(77156002)(62966003)(42186005)(33656002)(101416001)(75432002)(19580395003)(89122001)(50466002)(83506001)(110136001)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: my.HennepinTech.edu does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0842; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2015 17:13:16.4270 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0301MB0842 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:13:26 -0000 On 2015.01.18 10:05, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 17 January 2015 at 16:52, Andrew Berg > wrote: > > On 2015.01.17 09 :24, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ? > > > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > > > I for one, would very much like it. > What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)? > > > Andrew, Emmanuel, > > > I wouldn't know, first time I hear of the binary. > > It may be failure on my part but I do not remember having read about it in any > of the handbook's pages either. > It is new for 10.0. I thought the handbook had been updated, but apparently not. There is an outstanding PR, however: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194080 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 17:46:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3106C2 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37FA95D for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t0IHjuru005288; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:45:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:45:56 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Polytropon Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20150119024349.T82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Damien Fleuriot , Andrew Berg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:46:19 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 554, Issue 7, Message: 3 On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:09:06 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:24:12 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ? > > > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > > > I for one, would very much like it. > > I think the same. If you look into FreeBSD's history of > dealing with source code checkout methods, you'll find > this: port cvsup-without-gui -> base csup -> move to > SVN -> port subversion -> ? - here a tool to get updates > from source control would be nice. In the past, the > CVS-based tool did allow you to "make update" for the > /usr/src and /usr/ports tree. For the ports, we have > portsnap to obtain a snapshot (not _precisely_ current), > but for /usr/src, we currently don't have a tool in > the base system. Installing the full subversion port > isn't that hard, but a csup-lookalike in the base > would be nice, for the simple task to checkout sources, > even if it's just a bootstrap mechanism (cf. pkg). No it isn't that hard, but unless you're developing for the tree, svn's pretty heavyweight on space-constrained systems; lots of dependencies and lots of extra space used. svnup(1) is easy to install - bootstrap, if you like - with make install or pkg install; it's tiny; has no dependencies; and has proper manpages svnup(1) and svnup.conf(5). None of which can be said for svn{,lite}(1) I don't know how it may be plugged into 'make update', but it's designed to be largely cvsup-compatible in usage & configuration, so that should be doable. I'm happy enough running 'svnup stable' as and when desired. [Damian's original and Andrew's response are in the list archives though both failed to appear in this and the last digest issues; very unusual.] Andrew Berg wrote: > What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)? I think several for it's designed purpose, a compact cvsup replacement. svnlite only arrived with 10.1, so is not what 8.x and 9.x users need. It doesn't appear as an available port for 9.3. Its manpage is useless, an s/svn/svnlite/g job on svn(1), neither of which instruct in usage at all, referring to a site that, nowhere that I could find, even mentions svnlite and friends. Developer friendly, casual user hostile at best. So just how 'lite' is svnlite? Could someone running 10.1+ please replace svnup with svnlite in equivalents to the following queries: smithi@x200:~ % ll `which svnup` -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 47040 Jan 19 01:26 /usr/local/bin/svnup smithi@x200:~ % ldd `which svnup` /usr/local/bin/svnup: libmd.so.5 => /lib/libmd.so.5 (0x800824000) libssl.so.6 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 (0x800a34000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c8a000) libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x800fe5000) smithi@x200:~ % ll /lib/libmd.so.5 /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 /lib/libc.so.7 /lib/libcrypto.so.6 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1407536 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libc.so.7 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1748528 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libcrypto.so.6 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 69072 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libmd.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 355576 Jun 25 2014 /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 smithi@x200:~ % du -hd0 /usr/src 830M /usr/src smithi@x200:~ % du -hd0 /usr/ports 1.6G /usr/ports Note neither /usr/src nor /usr/ports need any .svn directory here; ports/.svn was almost as big again after bsdinstall installed ports. I don't now recall if I had to rm /usr/src/.svn after install also. Developers tend to have big, fast, new boxes with plenty of disk; not so everyone. My X200 came with a 64GB SSD - fast but not exactly spacious: smithi@x200:~/de118i-2 % df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ada0s2a 1.5G 902M 466M 66% / devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev /dev/ada0s2d 2.9G 2.1G 554M 80% /var /dev/ada0s2e 13G 9.4G 3.1G 75% /usr /dev/ada0s2f 32G 15G 15G 50% /home Bottom line: I don't think plugging to get svnup into base is worth pursuing. Few developers took any interest that I noticed, it was largely tested by users. John Mehr has been very responsive to any issues. To one to whom C is mostly read-only, it reads very well. I think it's ok as a port .. perhaps a small section in the Handbook? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 18:32:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D170113 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6BDAD79 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BY1PR0301MB0840.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:16:39 +0000 Message-ID: <54BBF87F.5080003@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:16:31 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? References: <20150119024349.T82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20150119024349.T82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BL2PR05CA0047.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.226.47) To BY1PR0301MB0840.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.146) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=aberg010@my.HennepinTech.edu; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; X-Forefront-PRVS: 046060344D X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6049001)(6009001)(199003)(24454002)(189002)(51704005)(77156002)(2950100001)(65816999)(450100001)(50986999)(76176999)(86362001)(64706001)(97736003)(87976001)(54356999)(89122001)(110136001)(64126003)(87266999)(19580395003)(80316001)(77096005)(88552001)(68736005)(66066001)(46102003)(65956001)(59896002)(33656002)(62966003)(19580405001)(50466002)(101416001)(65806001)(23676002)(106356001)(107886001)(40100003)(2351001)(47776003)(83506001)(92566002)(105586002)(122386002)(75432002)(42186005)(89472002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: my.HennepinTech.edu does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0840; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2015 18:16:39.9699 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0301MB0840 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:32:21 -0000 On 2015.01.18 11:45, Ian Smith wrote: > svnlite only arrived with 10.1, so is not what 8.x and 9.x users need. 10.0, not 10.1. I am a bit surprised that it wasn't backported to 9.3, though. > It doesn't appear as an available port for 9.3. Its manpage is useless, > an s/svn/svnlite/g job on svn(1), neither of which instruct in usage at > all, referring to a site that, nowhere that I could find, even mentions > svnlite and friends. Developer friendly, casual user hostile at best. The svn(1) man page isn't very useful either. However, I do agree that the documentation could be a lot better at explaining what svnlite is and how it differs from normal svn. > So just how 'lite' is svnlite? Could someone running 10.1+ please > replace svnup with svnlite in equivalents to the following queries: > > smithi@x200:~ % ll `which svnup` > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 47040 Jan 19 01:26 /usr/local/bin/svnup [candace ~]# ls -l $(which svnlite) -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3210464 Jan 3 22:26 /usr/bin/svnlite > smithi@x200:~ % ldd `which svnup` > /usr/local/bin/svnup: > libmd.so.5 => /lib/libmd.so.5 (0x800824000) > libssl.so.6 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 (0x800a34000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c8a000) > libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x800fe5000) [candace ~]# ldd $(which svnlite) /usr/bin/svnlite: libbsdxml.so.4 => /lib/libbsdxml.so.4 (0x800b29000) libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x800d50000) libcrypt.so.5 => /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x800f66000) libmagic.so.4 => /usr/lib/libmagic.so.4 (0x801186000) libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x8013a4000) libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x801798000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801a03000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801c28000) > > smithi@x200:~ % ll /lib/libmd.so.5 /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 /lib/libc.so.7 /lib/libcrypto.so.6 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1407536 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libc.so.7 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1748528 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libcrypto.so.6 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 69072 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libmd.so.5 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 355576 Jun 25 2014 /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 [candace ~]# ls -l /lib/libbsdxml.so.4 /lib/libz.so.6 /lib/libcrypt.so.5 /usr/lib/libmagic.so.4 /lib/libcrypto.so.7 /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 /lib/libthr.so.3 /lib/libc.so.7 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 161760 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libbsdxml.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1647720 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libc.so.7 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 62008 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libcrypt.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2038496 Jan 3 22:26 /lib/libcrypto.so.7 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 106120 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libthr.so.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 89576 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libz.so.6 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 123976 Jan 3 22:25 /usr/lib/libmagic.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 439776 Jan 3 22:26 /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 > > smithi@x200:~ % du -hd0 /usr/src > 830M /usr/src > smithi@x200:~ % du -hd0 /usr/ports > 1.6G /usr/ports [candace ~]# du -hd0 /usr/src 783M /usr/src and FWIW: [candace ~]# du -sh /usr/src/.svn 398M /usr/src/.svn This is a two-week-old checkout of 10-STABLE (from which the aforementioned binaries were built). I don't have a ports tree from SVN (both trees I use for poudriere are using portsnap at the moment). I'm not sure any of the above matters too much, but I might do a speed comparison of svn, svnup, and svnlite, which I think will be the most important for most people if they are indeed that much different from each other in that regard. On a side note, backticks are bad and you shouldn't use them. :P > Bottom line: I don't think plugging to get svnup into base is worth > pursuing. Few developers took any interest that I noticed, it was > largely tested by users. John Mehr has been very responsive to any > issues. To one to whom C is mostly read-only, it reads very well. > > I think it's ok as a port .. perhaps a small section in the Handbook? A mention in the handbook would definitely be good. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 19:00:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BB2687 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sif.iconz.co.nz (etrn.iconz.co.nz [210.48.22.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7EFFF for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sif.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB752A0B2 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:00:24 +1300 (NZDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at sif.iconz.co.nz Received: from sif.iconz.co.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sif.iconz.co.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrsZD3nL4pLD for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:00:20 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ip-210-185-10-221.internet.co.nz [210.185.10.221]) by sif.iconz.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C0B2A091 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:00:20 +1300 (NZDT) Message-ID: <1421607628.2253.4.camel@internet.co.nz> Subject: Re: Evolution - cannot send attachments greater than 10k From: Glenn Todd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:00:28 +1300 In-Reply-To: <1421571719.52172.1.camel@internet.co.nz> References: <1421486443.98325.10.camel@internet.co.nz> <20150117200415.5f82c115@X220.alogt.com> <1421571719.52172.1.camel@internet.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:00:35 -0000 Hi, I ran Evolution from the command line and when trying to send an email with a largish attachment, to get a better picture of my problems, I am getting the following CamelStreamFilter errors reported. Any ideas how I resolve this>: (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelStreamFilter::write() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelStreamFilter::write() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelStreamFilter::write() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelDataWrapper::write_to_stream_sync() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelDataWrapper::decode_to_stream_sync() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelMimePart::write_to_stream_sync() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelMultipart::write_to_stream_sync() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelMimeMessage::write_to_stream_sync() reported failure without setting its GError (evolution:1827): camel-WARNING **: CamelSmtpTransport::send_to_sync() reported failure without setting its GError Glenn On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 22:01 +1300, Glenn Todd wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed Thunderbird and found that I can send emails with large > attachments using this client. So it does appear that my problem is > unique to Evolution. > > Glenn > > On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 20:04 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > did you try any other e-mail client to confirm that it only can be > > caused by Evolution? > > > > Erich > > > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:20:43 +1300 > > Glenn Todd wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am using Evolution 3.12.9 on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p10 #0: Mon Oct 20 > > > 12:42:25 UTC 2014 > > > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > But I cannot send emails with attachments greater than 10k. > > > Everything looks fine system advises that the mail send process > > > completes successfully, but the mail never reaches the destination. > > > > > > Mail with no attachments go and are received without issue, also > > > emails with attachments less than around 10k. > > > > > > The problem appeared a few weeks ago after updating the ports, so have > > > checked all the settings spoken to my ISP to confirm that there no > > > issues at their end. So updated my ports again yesterday and brought > > > my system up to date. But the problem remains. > > > > > > I am using the Mate desktop. > > > > > > Any help to solve this would be appreciated. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Glenn > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 20:05:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDBED5CB for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E5293A for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4372B60451 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 30449A0685; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:23 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: npm install canvas on FreeBSD 10.1 From: opendaddy@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150118193023.30449A0685@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:05:55 -0000 Hello! Can anyone tell what's up with this? `cairo-1.12.18_1,2` is installed. I've tried `export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig` to no avail: # uname -a FreeBSD test 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 # npm install canvas / > canvas@1.1.6 install /usr/home/www/myapp/node_modules/canvas > node-gyp rebuild ./util/has_cairo_freetype.sh: line 4: pkg-config: command not found gyp: Call to './util/has_cairo_freetype.sh' returned exit status 0. while trying to load binding.gyp gyp ERR! configure error gyp ERR! stack Error: `gyp` failed with exit code: 1 gyp ERR! stack at ChildProcess.onCpExit (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules/node-gyp/lib/configure.js:343:16) gyp ERR! stack at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:98:17) gyp ERR! stack at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (child_process.js:820:12) gyp ERR! System FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE gyp ERR! command "node" "/usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js" "rebuild" gyp ERR! cwd /usr/home/www/myapp/node_modules/canvas gyp ERR! node -v v0.10.35 gyp ERR! node-gyp -v v1.0.2 gyp ERR! not ok npm ERR! FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE npm ERR! argv "node" "/usr/local/bin/npm" "install" "canvas" npm ERR! node v0.10.35 npm ERR! npm v2.1.18 npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE npm ERR! canvas@1.1.6 install: `node-gyp rebuild` npm ERR! Exit status 1 npm ERR! npm ERR! Failed at the canvas@1.1.6 install script 'node-gyp rebuild'. npm ERR! This is most likely a problem with the canvas package, npm ERR! not with npm itself. npm ERR! Tell the author that this fails on your system: npm ERR! node-gyp rebuild npm ERR! You can get their info via: npm ERR! npm owner ls canvas npm ERR! There is likely additional logging output above. npm ERR! Please include the following file with any support request: npm ERR! /usr/home/www/myapp/npm-debug.log Thanks! O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 20:05:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE7D5CA for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E9E93B for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 386A74023E for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1B8D6A0685; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:40 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:30:39 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: gem install rmagick on FreeBSD 10.1 From: opendaddy@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150118193040.1B8D6A0685@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:05:55 -0000 Hello! Can anyone tell what's up with this? `ImageMagick-6.9.0.2,1` is installed. I've tried `export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig` to no avail: # uname -a FreeBSD test 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # gem install rmagick -v '2.13.4' Building native extensions. This could take a while... ERROR: Error installing rmagick: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. /usr/local/bin/ruby20 -r ./siteconf20150118-18361-mtqf82.rb extconf.rb checking for Ruby version >= 1.8.5... yes checking for cc... yes checking for Magick-config... yes Warning: Found a partial ImageMagick installation. Your operating system likely has some built-in ImageMagick libraries but not all of ImageMagick. This will most likely cause problems at both compile and runtime. Found partial installation at: /usr/local checking for ImageMagick version >= 6.4.9... yes /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found checking for stdint.h... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for wand/MagickWand.h... no Can't install RMagick 2.13.4. Can't find MagickWand.h. *** extconf.rb failed *** Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more details. You may need configuration options. Provided configuration options: --with-opt-dir --without-opt-dir --with-opt-include --without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include --with-opt-lib --without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib --with-make-prog --without-make-prog --srcdir=. --curdir --ruby=/usr/local/bin/ruby20 extconf failed, exit code 1 Gem files will remain installed in /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.0/gems/rmagick-2.13.4 for inspection. Results logged to /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.0/extensions/amd64-freebsd-10/2.0/rmagick-2.13.4/gem_make.out Thanks! O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 21:11:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3D9D44 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5335CF27 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 15BBD60406 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id A1914A0684; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:11:53 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:11:53 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: npm install canvas on FreeBSD 10.1 From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150118193023.30449A0685@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150118211153.A1914A0684@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:11:55 -0000 Marked as solved -- I was missing the `pkgconfig` package. Thanks! O.D. On 18. januar 2015 at 7:59 PM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > >Hello! > >Can anyone tell what's up with this? `cairo-1.12.18_1,2` is >installed. I've tried `export >PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig` to no avail: > > # uname -a > FreeBSD test 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue >Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 > # npm install canvas > / > > canvas@1.1.6 install /usr/home/www/myapp/node_modules/canvas > > node-gyp rebuild > > ./util/has_cairo_freetype.sh: line 4: pkg-config: command not >found > gyp: Call to './util/has_cairo_freetype.sh' returned exit >status 0. while trying to load binding.gyp > gyp ERR! configure error > gyp ERR! stack Error: `gyp` failed with exit code: 1 > gyp ERR! stack at ChildProcess.onCpExit >(/usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules/node- >gyp/lib/configure.js:343:16) > gyp ERR! stack at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:98:17) > gyp ERR! stack at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit >(child_process.js:820:12) > gyp ERR! System FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE > gyp ERR! command "node" >"/usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules/node-gyp/bin/node- >gyp.js" "rebuild" > gyp ERR! cwd /usr/home/www/myapp/node_modules/canvas > gyp ERR! node -v v0.10.35 > gyp ERR! node-gyp -v v1.0.2 > gyp ERR! not ok > npm ERR! FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE > npm ERR! argv "node" "/usr/local/bin/npm" "install" "canvas" > npm ERR! node v0.10.35 > npm ERR! npm v2.1.18 > npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE > > npm ERR! canvas@1.1.6 install: `node-gyp rebuild` > npm ERR! Exit status 1 > npm ERR! > npm ERR! Failed at the canvas@1.1.6 install script 'node-gyp >rebuild'. > npm ERR! This is most likely a problem with the canvas package, > npm ERR! not with npm itself. > npm ERR! Tell the author that this fails on your system: > npm ERR! node-gyp rebuild > npm ERR! You can get their info via: > npm ERR! npm owner ls canvas > npm ERR! There is likely additional logging output above. > > npm ERR! Please include the following file with any support >request: > npm ERR! /usr/home/www/myapp/npm-debug.log > >Thanks! > >O.D. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 21:33:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9B24A5 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 641BC174 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A822765F; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:33:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0ILXjmJ002054; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:33:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:33:45 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Ian Smith Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? Message-Id: <20150118223345.b2014c1b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150119024349.T82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20150119024349.T82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:33:56 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:45:56 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 554, Issue 7, Message: 3 > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:09:06 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:24:12 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ? > > > > > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > > > > > I for one, would very much like it. > > > > I think the same. If you look into FreeBSD's history of > > dealing with source code checkout methods, you'll find > > this: port cvsup-without-gui -> base csup -> move to > > SVN -> port subversion -> ? - here a tool to get updates > > from source control would be nice. In the past, the > > CVS-based tool did allow you to "make update" for the > > /usr/src and /usr/ports tree. For the ports, we have > > portsnap to obtain a snapshot (not _precisely_ current), > > but for /usr/src, we currently don't have a tool in > > the base system. Installing the full subversion port > > isn't that hard, but a csup-lookalike in the base > > would be nice, for the simple task to checkout sources, > > even if it's just a bootstrap mechanism (cf. pkg). > > No it isn't that hard, but unless you're developing for the tree, svn's > pretty heavyweight on space-constrained systems; lots of dependencies > and lots of extra space used. This was my primary concern. It's not the problem of installing it per se, but the user might be on a system where every MB is "expensive", or he might follow the concept of "I only install what I need" and therefore consider the many dependencies "not needed". > svnup(1) is easy to install - bootstrap, if you like - with make install > or pkg install; it's tiny; has no dependencies; and has proper manpages > svnup(1) and svnup.conf(5). None of which can be said for svn{,lite}(1) > I don't know how it may be plugged into 'make update', but it's designed > to be largely cvsup-compatible in usage & configuration, so that should > be doable. I'm happy enough running 'svnup stable' as and when desired. The "make update" mechanism works like this (here shown for CVS): First you add the following lines to /etc/make.conf: SUP= /usr/bin/csup SUP_UPDATE= /usr/bin/csup SUPFLAGS= -L 2 SUPHOST= cvsup.freebsd.org SUPFILE= /etc/sup/stable.sup PORTSSUPFILE= /etc/sup/ports.sup DOCSUPFILE= /etc/sup/doc.sup DOC_LANG= en_US.ISO8859-1 de_DE.ISO8859-1 Here you name the program and its flags and options that will be used when you enter "make update". You then have to create the three files in /etc/sup from the example files in /usr/share/examples/cvsup. They contain the rules on what to update. For example, stable.sup looks like this: *default host=cvsup.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all And release.sup (when you want to track the RELEASE branch instead of STABLE), Only the line *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8_2_0 would be different. Please note that this refers to the non-SVN (i. e., the CVS) related use of the terms "STABLE" and "RELEASE" before the great transition. :-) FInally ports.sup starts with *default host=cvsup.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress and then continues either with ports-all or with the list of categories you want to have updated. ports-base ports-german ports-security ports-shells ports-sysutils ... and so on. The list from the example file can be used as a template with the "# selector". If you run the "make update" command in /usr/ports, only the ports tree will be updated; run it in /usr/src, and both the source tree and the ports tree will be brought to the current state. Every other mechanism that works with CVS (like .cvsignore) will work. Additionally, the locally installed "cvs" binary allows you to use CVS "for your own version control". :-) NB: Those explanations don't apply anymore, they are shown from my 8-STABLE home system and for archaeological display purposes only (or at least primarily). :-) It's probably possible to add a similar mechanism for svnup, svnlite or svn, with increasing amounts of dependencies. :-) > Andrew Berg wrote: > > > What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)? > > I think several for it's designed purpose, a compact cvsup replacement. > > svnlite only arrived with 10.1, so is not what 8.x and 9.x users need. > It doesn't appear as an available port for 9.3. Its manpage is useless, > an s/svn/svnlite/g job on svn(1), neither of which instruct in usage at > all, referring to a site that, nowhere that I could find, even mentions > svnlite and friends. Developer friendly, casual user hostile at best. Good documentation is an essential point, no matter if you see it as a developer or as a user. Both "man cvs" and "man csup" fulfill that requirement. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 21:47:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E169E7A8 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C652B26A for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C124E01B0 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id E7DEEA0684; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:47:18 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:47:18 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gem install rmagick on FreeBSD 10.1 From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150118193040.1B8D6A0685@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150118214718.E7DEEA0684@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:47:26 -0000 Marked as solved -- I was missing the `pkgconf` package. Thanks! O.D. On 18. januar 2015 at 7:59 PM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > >Hello! > >Can anyone tell what's up with this? `ImageMagick-6.9.0.2,1` is >installed. I've tried `export >PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig` to no avail: > > # uname -a > FreeBSD test 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue >Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 >root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > # gem install rmagick -v '2.13.4' > Building native extensions. This could take a while... > ERROR: Error installing rmagick: > ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. > > /usr/local/bin/ruby20 -r ./siteconf20150118-18361- >mtqf82.rb extconf.rb > checking for Ruby version >= 1.8.5... yes > checking for cc... yes > checking for Magick-config... yes > > Warning: Found a partial ImageMagick installation. Your >operating system likely has some built-in ImageMagick libraries >but not all of ImageMagick. This will most likely cause problems >at both compile and runtime. > Found partial installation at: /usr/local > checking for ImageMagick version >= 6.4.9... yes > /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found > /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found > /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found > /usr/local/bin/Magick-config: pkg-config: not found > checking for stdint.h... yes > checking for sys/types.h... yes > checking for wand/MagickWand.h... no > > Can't install RMagick 2.13.4. Can't find MagickWand.h. > *** extconf.rb failed *** > Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of >necessary > libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more >details. You may > need configuration options. > > Provided configuration options: > --with-opt-dir > --without-opt-dir > --with-opt-include > --without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include > --with-opt-lib > --without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib > --with-make-prog > --without-make-prog > --srcdir=. > --curdir > --ruby=/usr/local/bin/ruby20 > > extconf failed, exit code 1 > > Gem files will remain installed in >/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.0/gems/rmagick-2.13.4 for inspection. > Results logged to >/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.0/extensions/amd64-freebsd- >10/2.0/rmagick-2.13.4/gem_make.out > >Thanks! > >O.D. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 22:25:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21DC142E for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C1B834 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 949E4C0189 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 6126FA0685; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:46:38 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:46:38 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: npm install canvas on FreeBSD 10.1 From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150118211153.A1914A0684@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <20150118193023.30449A0685@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150118211153.A1914A0684@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150118214638.6126FA0685@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:25:55 -0000 * pkgconf On 18. januar 2015 at 9:05 PM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > >Marked as solved -- I was missing the `pkgconfig` package. > >Thanks! > >O.D. > >On 18. januar 2015 at 7:59 PM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: >> >>Hello! >> >>Can anyone tell what's up with this? `cairo-1.12.18_1,2` is >>installed. I've tried `export >>PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig` to no avail: >> >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD test 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: >Tue >>Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 >> # npm install canvas >> / >> > canvas@1.1.6 install /usr/home/www/myapp/node_modules/canvas >> > node-gyp rebuild >> >> ./util/has_cairo_freetype.sh: line 4: pkg-config: command not >>found >> gyp: Call to './util/has_cairo_freetype.sh' returned exit >>status 0. while trying to load binding.gyp >> gyp ERR! configure error >> gyp ERR! stack Error: `gyp` failed with exit code: 1 >> gyp ERR! stack at ChildProcess.onCpExit >>(/usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules/node- >>gyp/lib/configure.js:343:16) >> gyp ERR! stack at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:98:17) >> gyp ERR! stack at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit >>(child_process.js:820:12) >> gyp ERR! System FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE >> gyp ERR! command "node" >>"/usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules/node-gyp/bin/node- >>gyp.js" "rebuild" >> gyp ERR! cwd /usr/home/www/myapp/node_modules/canvas >> gyp ERR! node -v v0.10.35 >> gyp ERR! node-gyp -v v1.0.2 >> gyp ERR! not ok >> npm ERR! FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE >> npm ERR! argv "node" "/usr/local/bin/npm" "install" "canvas" >> npm ERR! node v0.10.35 >> npm ERR! npm v2.1.18 >> npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE >> >> npm ERR! canvas@1.1.6 install: `node-gyp rebuild` >> npm ERR! Exit status 1 >> npm ERR! >> npm ERR! Failed at the canvas@1.1.6 install script 'node-gyp >>rebuild'. >> npm ERR! This is most likely a problem with the canvas >package, >> npm ERR! not with npm itself. >> npm ERR! Tell the author that this fails on your system: >> npm ERR! node-gyp rebuild >> npm ERR! You can get their info via: >> npm ERR! npm owner ls canvas >> npm ERR! There is likely additional logging output above. >> >> npm ERR! Please include the following file with any support >>request: >> npm ERR! /usr/home/www/myapp/npm-debug.log >> >>Thanks! >> >>O.D. >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 04:17:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F95D96 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D5DCA9 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rd3so36182264pab.0 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:17:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cTVx5oGvTD0JMRqvIOzWnC3iHmQ5AXBbiB1kN/sY+WQ=; b=cTOip3vdinMHxts5RiMOm2r20JMD++04+n/0aVFE1+GwyEVYKyP7stizz0SQVA/ByC yIzvJh5Zcg1+ZhC8LaqrsGvkzBwe/1kFUYnng2VHMLPcufJt8qV989ZjSgWwkza5itRq nPrlDejyCLVyK7QoHcTzDQ4KwgOMpWqf1+HxQz2kaX3XCa3J9lN87eF8N8ULmHJcsWOC ZeLCkl1bCzy0sBLjEoO6v92Oudr+sU1+pSPGRWpQ9DwfQBp5Fm2IBcrO06cF3dbjB1DL IDTAmspOE1uYH3xTtEyzXhK2MwvnhG9k04HGimmwo4OvfeVuNKyXtB7fD+dcnIw280wP 1/YQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.253.197 with SMTP id ac5mr14407918pad.152.1421641030908; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:17:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.99.171 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:17:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:17:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: modfind() returns -1 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:17:11 -0000 Hello, I am trying to implement a simple system call module, but after I install it and try to find its offset with modfind, I somehow get -1. The code implementing the syscal resides in sc_example_no_args.c: #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include static int sc_example_no_args(struct thread *td, void *syscall_args) { printf("%s\n", "Hello, world!"); return 0; } static struct sysent sc_example_sysent_no_args = { 0, sc_example_no_args }; static int offset = NO_SYSCALL; static int load(struct module *module, int cmd, void *arg) { int error = 0; switch(cmd) { case MOD_LOAD: uprintf("System call loaded at offset %d.\n", offset); break; case MOD_UNLOAD: uprintf("System call unloaded at offset %d.\n", offset); break; default: error = EOPNOTSUPP; break; } return error; } SYSCALL_MODULE(sc_example_no_args, &offset, &sc_example_sysent_no_args, load, NULL); The Make file that compiles it is KMOD=sc_example_no_args SRCS=sc_example_no_args.c .include The ouput of make is $ make Warning: Object directory not changed from original /home/rambius/drafts/fbsdrootkits/ch01/sc_example_no_arg cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -fno-common -mno-aes -mno-avx -mno-mmx -mno-sse -msoft-float -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs -fdiagnostics-show-option -Wno-error-tautological-compare -Wno-error-empty-body -Wno-error-parentheses-equality -Wno-error-unused-function -c sc_example_no_args.c ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o sc_example_no_args.kld sc_example_no_args.o :> export_syms awk -f /sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk sc_example_no_args.kld export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % sc_example_no_args.kld ld -Bshareable -d -warn-common -o sc_example_no_args.ko sc_example_no_args.kld objcopy --strip-debug sc_example_no_args.ko I now have the module compiled in sc_example_no_args.ko and I can kldload it: $ sudo kldload ./sc_example_no_args.ko System call loaded at offset 210. $ kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 6 0xc0400000 13a35fc kernel 2 1 0xc900a000 5000 ums.ko 3 1 0xca38f000 2000 sc_example_no_args.ko So far, so good. Here is the code that tries to invoke that system call: $ cat interface.c #include #include #include #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int syscall_num; struct module_stat stat; int mod_id; stat.version = sizeof(stat); mod_id = modfind("sc_example_no_args"); printf("%d\n", mod_id); if (mod_id == -1) { perror("Error finding module"); exit(2); } modstat(210, &stat); syscall_num = stat.data.intval; return syscall(syscall_num, argv[1]); } I compile interface.c with: $ cc -Wall interface.c -o interface When I run it I see that it cannot find the module: $ cc -Wall interface.c -o interface $ ./interface -1 Error finding module: No such file or directory $ echo $? 2 I would be very helpful for any help or hints. I am able to do the syscall through perl $ perl -e 'syscall(210);' $ dmesg | tail -n 1 Hello, world! Thank you in advance! Regards Rambius -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 04:39:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D161B731 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9427FE89 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b16so4566081igk.1 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:39:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rlFTo7F/GVTronUqvuAft8LVT6M/wWdChYJoeAy9ebY=; b=hJhJftuDwdQmSzy3BwIKUHosTKDwn5NzNfopYIYijdAFE0wh14CG/P+eEK2CP92/AC YDSqJO4oViAoraZQtTx5FDz8duTiUOcubij6FJXEWf+szGTHlQvpvw/NP5VFBbhGVPNd QAzHPzseH5OIQec3CGFGKGbVMqQBFiWIqngd4wBMRfTO5f0Hhw1Fs1Htd3/fgN1rKwtY +qYZQMF3TgYI91te6G6IZ/3NfvOBAMNHQaDqlcpYd3Vt7RVN5r765Z/4BZD2xl5MnOK2 vRh4RCTFd5ECIfJqkFKQhPX1CwYcFyMYN7XsQxf2GDpw8HT9BRCnAqysUpY8D/DHHXYD huyA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.138.25 with SMTP id m25mr30217664iod.85.1421642361990; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:39:21 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:39:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:39:21 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NVy67l-Jjn9oHnSr1_mxvrqpeHs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 From: Chris Maness To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:39:22 -0000 On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > > Likely UEFI with SecureBoot enabled. Turn SecureBoot off, enable >> "legacy" or "CSM" booting in what was formerly known as the BIOS setup >> screens. >> >> >> >> Yes, I had turned SecureBoot off. There does not seem to be an option >> for legacy or CSM in the BIOS menu. >> >> I cannot get it to even see my memory stick with a FreeBSD install image >> on it. Even my macbook pro mostly boots this and hangs on some hardware >> issues (as I expected but just wanted >> to make sure the usb stick was actually bootable). >> > > UEFI alone might do that. Only UEFI-approved boot devices are shown > unless legacy or compatibility mode is enabled. Unfortunately, there are > varying names and methods in the settings between different manufacturers. Thanks, Warren. I am up and running with a Micro-ITX AMD mobo and solid state drive I put together myself. I am going to take the Acer back tomorrow. Seems as though I was locked out of installing any other OS on it. That was so lame, and a big waste of time. Thanks, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 06:44:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BEBDAA5 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4DC4C1A for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id bs8so14432511wib.0 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:44:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=E6UnrIF6bNTZWdzoK1yoT06y5V8EOQIU5uK9HbISYpI=; b=weT7LMKCpgy+rXV46c70Hgg9Tz1U5wJRR2GepSDyTwlu6p4rZ67onMIaiCRrq263aC E5uHQgi1MUuspmRPjFakJZ6D0GTH3bLwkKsI5NvIqCRyS9FfeMDjr0ZokUeoHjXVIrAI z06N8C5dyxjflnvRaAy5mgfHjaDf8LX7ShozfDsmXJyzuq0C9nkXnmFYN10gkss3QsvG vVMY+lA2gVn6uslp1mjBIwGRmQyzW4RNFzvrv3kNDGLTMzEo7OnB73dNGEwuEyvWU5Fa lqjj1rU6HXvqmE9H2Pi6wAVllhR2xixaBLGHzJXssui2RNFmi6ckI23pYCuzgzt/B7HV k1ow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.200.1 with SMTP id jo1mr4765352wjc.64.1421649877381; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:44:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.127.71 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:44:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.127.71 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:44:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:44:37 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Raid hard disk From: Kumar Perumal To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:44:39 -0000 Hi, I am not able to raid both hard disk in my server 6.0.0. Earlier I was using "raidctl -s raid0" for server 5.7.1 Please help me Regards, Kumar Perumal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 08:38:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8297C14E for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm19-vm4.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm19-vm4.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA69941 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:38:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1421656539; bh=bjBUk/YUvUxsdJ7qPxm/op4MpZwsIrODIDkedxg/VBk=; h=Date:From:To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=TEc1ooYL1dE9LiFWYEsX8U7INYqqGB6fAbWhUUW66fnki6e+cwFHpx4WTWKU+DXgVyyiEW4hIQjLjxnJnuzLxQlnk2eP7YipmLlgKy0NQ2NpqQGfLGKGVA01shbgNIUbJxS2zsz9wUKSl4uqd9ajpHXEBOjjtY6kYcVtnDWML/K8SJ5PKC0yZYv1JEeTTesmxxjvgt4L+IuOb7EwuSaQUgdXGzy9WgT4sbQbLc2sUNmWa6eE+jT3q+VpSZFb7ylzR7sdorlv+6CwtpW1zc6vgtljwWfYguji3BVKKN6WLYVvMHXKaNM5FuntHLcGhHEQF1C/ZYi0n3D8h+Y9rLCTkA== Received: from [66.196.81.155] by nm19.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jan 2015 08:35:39 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.243] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jan 2015 08:35:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Jan 2015 08:35:39 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 548117.8093.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <548117.8093.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:35:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: nEMpgnoVM1n2Xt0AIdKNR8smPR3oJ81l.xQytiOVrWmVXSP lfu1D5JkMm2mDe5YTQ7vZGSB7mQNMvWi3fsoSzZJ25VcZTJHIfQE2mf8hrWn ilAFarKcikPVrM4.70DLy1TwkmDDDvgpm14DwfMg3YZeycc_uo4SXXlVdcee TfEoWyo8ckgskjJjwylLPrWsz9HrtQ8tg2hYsMC5Q2uuBi1Sd7xOmt0E9YCO aJFP83i.Dy7ldUYb.PnpLzZHhIezZWiHtWhj63_8TJvke4lvMkjkueydTE2a 3TIUrinxedbg2x7rp2NjvtYaSGNqPtJhupHUd3o1Mgh3BXxv5myAjOdjttFX qQ0FaVbK44ZvuMsyfdGn0CS4Buas7mBHUfnH1HKhE4XnRGGVuv_WyOU3Sv.1 yFbpsa82yfUgc7iH_qdSuooqeUlhbLz6C_fTCy.mBLwO4_xvJSlcvn1uFFtM t29MnkCJf1tTQUZ33OXvMs0v2U0gy0lqlKnXOsxWGrt1.B5vHwSTIgqZYzs_ 0Wh_yCqbCx3wa7YdmhWANWI6MYEit3Pe3RRo_3NU0gs4qiq2GILuUygqFESI GLZmAH60PyUtTCTEna8hNFvcaLiG.hAf.6DjR6yIWAr5Bf2XLfvlD67tG X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20150116022642.L82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <485578.59945.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20150116002206.b48967c9.freebsd@edvax.de> <478925.90815.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20150116235719.4f030c44.freebsd@edvax.de> Subject: Re: Mount NTFS from base system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:38:01 -0000 Responding to Polytropon: In the case of a USB 2.0 stick, I might do better to install to SATA or USB 3.0 hard drive and rsync to USB stick, after partitioning USB stick with gpart. Then I could use gpart to make bootable. All this would be with GPT. Old FreeBSD 8.2 installation was on an older computer, from July 2001. Now there is no Internet access on current computers using FreeBSD 8.2, or I assume, 8.x. That FreeBSD 8.2 installation was to an MBR slice with traditioning FreeBSD subpartitioning; I was rather crunched for disk space. So no updating, need to start fresh. I was ultimately able to access NTFS hard drive from FreeBSD-current amd64 with fusefs-ntfs; had to kldload fuse for it to work (discussed on freebsd-ports list). If I had kept that stuff from OS/2 Warp 4, possibly I could have installed it to FreeBSD + Virtualbox; possibly it might have worked but no assurance. I found www.freevms.net site: progress looks to be barely crawling. My guess is nobody currently living on earth will live long enough to see anything meaningful come of FreeVMS (just as with OSFree). Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 09:21:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6023C7EB for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from skeleton.phys.spbu.ru (skeleton.phys.spbu.ru [195.19.241.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C481DC7 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from skeleton.phys.spbu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skeleton.phys.spbu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CE8B68EC for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:14:47 +0400 (MSK) Received: from laura.ws.pu.ru (laura [172.27.209.137]) by skeleton.phys.spbu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31004B68E1 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:14:47 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:14:47 +0300 From: Dima Veselov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Cross-compile and distribute updates Message-ID: <20150119091446.GA3857@laura.ws.pu.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:21:59 -0000 Hello! I will try once more to ask this question here, because last time I wasn't clear enough. FreeBSD documentation and wiki have two different topics: 1. Cross-compiling world. 2. Distributing built world to other hosts. Both work well, but they can't be combined: 1. cross-compiling want to install directly onto target through NFS 2. distributing sync /usr/src and /usr/obj and rely on same arch on buildhost and target, because installation use /usr/obj tools. For now I have successfully built sparc64 world on amd64 platform. Also, my two sparc64 platforms are in other network. In NetBSD I can build distribution sets, unpack them into target and use etcupdate on etc.tgz, but I can't find same technologies in FreeBSD. What is most nice, reliable and cheap way to cross-compile world and install it on remote machine? -- Sincerely yours From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 09:38:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C0B9FE for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail134-16.atl141.mandrillapp.com (mail134-16.atl141.mandrillapp.com [198.2.134.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB0AF01 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:38:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=mandrill; d=mail134-16.atl141.mandrillapp.com; h=From:Sender:Subject:To:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; i=emma@mail134-16.atl141.mandrillapp.com; bh=HY/dX6EXdCH8BU1nw0HVLI675yU=; b=G6LoSLnZEUxzDPfJldKrbPN0LnK5qDeTVPfRiriTKpQBTiZdscpi2MrNQA8CoNrW83N23PkX7d8F 4pk6qShuNyY6cCV8b39PzpOkIjFvkXRkfG8AI2VVAqapMI6TYtQ2pgeGHbclNfhzmFXBOX5Bx05m TyJZ3pRU9o/qqfKwd4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=mandrill; d=mail134-16.atl141.mandrillapp.com; b=Lb+ZTlwLVkkMsBG3wp32mb6YrbWiuisOeTFCkrJQS6Q1f6dclHPYELcVvS9sBrnpcPhA6oIz7Z/+ 6GKtGFs5t4COOyX/Y/w6IqbPySOV3/+NUvUNJlnv3RTGH0YIKEb8zz9SUUOxmlnzT6McfaK5SSQG iaxPipvqDW/lt79WCz8=; Received: from pmta14.atl01.mandrillapp.com (127.0.0.1) by mail134-16.atl141.mandrillapp.com id hnj8821sau8m for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:38:07 +0000 (envelope-from ) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mandrillapp.com; i=@mandrillapp.com; q=dns/txt; s=mandrill; t=1421660287; h=From : Sender : Subject : To : Message-Id : Date : MIME-Version : Content-Type : From : Subject : Date : X-Mandrill-User : List-Unsubscribe; bh=dMzFXKAUUGKE2WFk/P22bX5KyEFv8ZMOmYJhJwNk7L0=; b=fgUhJmOA7aYPRc3ik0/NEHvqTmYzCucvDM+gB55AVul0QGOB79sf86qsMTnPcIIwiyv1zA UcBXWSXFNd5ihqA11009T1zXedhVGJ07zDWi6GeSlnNipK23KUYJgbkcZefWAwjrek7vIZ57 OLEWCRdbXm88GQBnhloMODYTYmV2o= From: Emma Turing Sender: Emma Turing Subject: Kickstarter Invitation To: Received: from [54.146.80.80] by mandrillapp.com id 29ff174d54bc4e21b99a4260f2f79d25; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:38:07 +0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please forward a copy of this message, including all headers, to abuse@mandrill.com X-Report-Abuse: You can also report abuse here: http://mandrillapp.com/contact/abuse?id=30485748.29ff174d54bc4e21b99a4260f2f79d25 X-Mandrill-User: md_30485748 Message-Id: <30485748.20150119093807.54bcd07f7f88d3.78488431@mail134-16.atl141.mandrillapp.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:38:07 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:38:09 -0000 Hi, I'd like to invite you to back our Kickstarter project - The World's First Personal Robot . We're already 210% funded and the #1 Robot Project on Kickstarter now. PERSONAL ROBOT IS THE WHOLE PACKAGE: - The world's first personal assistant robot that can see, hear, smell, move, and feel - The smartest home automation system (supports both Z-Wave and Zigbee) - A photographer, storyteller, companion, security guard, and more - Powered by Artificial Intelligence algorithms - Open APIs We're been featured by TechCrunch, Mashable, and VentureBeat. Thanks, Emma *If you're not interested, please simply reply "don't email" and we'll stop emailing you immediately.* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 13:30:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1A7FF1D for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41DD6C6D for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id gm9so2711280lab.0 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:30:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=3LJcJ3MCaIGz5/zo0PD29T7MQyZ1guPIFXk6TGBBYuo=; b=nFFpLpJjwA9VAc+cULnLe36r2b0Qp8AEA0UOgjpNo+kVI5/mE4hKXzW+9Bth2jLI9q 4KL6othLpfIxG1zDpbUFUqEyLCVXoncd4AD63Z7xExtAVfe3MoZSELIMFdVCcQThUz7X C0z7BJfK5ZS98jRLBK4dU9PMKM0ZWrpJyczEepze1JjANeWujcdZCFJalSCBS6qmfRxR NRf4jRPN0XJ1LeKngfi85YpuxxJyXaO7S9tBWQGAYTeC9+VUJ0npGEhzPUbLnc77taFH jH0pBkpWzfy9uPCzeDa5tCurVg8psUg/CLcHhg2OovRXRU46+n/XoDrhOOLdRrM3KbbK +wXQ== X-Received: by 10.112.119.201 with SMTP id kw9mr30592783lbb.99.1421674203168; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:30:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:29:22 -0800 (PST) From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:29:22 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc To: User Questions , Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:30:06 -0000 Now, suppose I did not install gcc from the ports and I'd like to install an application by hand using native tools for FreeBSD 10.x, how do I do that? I need a lecture on this:-) For instance, I want to install squid-3.5.1 by hand so I have done the following: root@mail:~wash/ILI/Squid/3.5/squid-3.5.0.4 # pwd /usr/home/wash/ILI/Squid/3.5/squid-3.5.0.4 ./configure --prefix=/opt/squid35 \ --enable-removal-policies="lru heap" \ --disable-epoll \ --enable-auth \ --enable-auth-basic="DB NCSA PAM MSNT PAM POP3 SSPI MSNT" \ --enable-external-acl-helpers="session unix_group file_userip" \ --enable-auth-ntlm="smb_lm SSPI" \ --enable-auth-negotiate="SSPI kerberos" \ --with-pthreads \ --enable-storeio="ufs diskd aufs" \ --enable-delay-pools \ --enable-snmp \ --with-openssl=/usr \ --enable-forw-via-db \ --enable-cache-digests \ --enable-wccpv2 \ --enable-follow-x-forwarded-for \ --with-large-files \ --enable-large-cache-files \ --enable-error_default_language=English \ --enable-esi \ --enable-kqueue \ --enable-icap-client \ --enable-kill-parent-hack \ --enable-ssl \ --enable-leakfinder \ --enable-ssl-crtd \ --enable-url-rewrite-helpers \ --enable-xmalloc-statistics \ --enable-stacktraces \ --enable-zph-qos \ --enable-eui \ --enable-pf-transparent \ --enable-ipf-transparent After that, I type `make` and it all boomerangs:-) root@mail:~wash/ILI/Squid/3.5/squid-3.5.0.4 # make Making all in compat /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I../include -I../lib -I../src -I../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/ include -I../libltdl -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -Werror -Qunused-arguments -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include -MT eui64_aton.l o -MD -MP -MF .deps/eui64_aton.Tpo -c -o eui64_aton.lo eui64_aton.c libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I../include -I../lib -I../src -I../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I../libltdl -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -Werror -Qunused-arguments -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include -MT eui64_aton.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/eui64_aton.Tpo -c eui64_aton.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/eui64_aton.o gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-Qunused-arguments' *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/home/wash/ILI/Squid/3.5/squid-3.5.0.4/compat *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/home/wash/ILI/Squid/3.5/squid-3.5.0.4 Don't laugh at me. I am playing catch with this 10.x series I am told the following: "This is a clang specific option. Please be aware that on FreeBSD 10+ the default compiler is clang and Squid FreeBSD 10 packages are designed to build with that compiler. Any CXXFLAGS or similar environment variables the packaging builds Squid with will be tuned for Clang not GCC." Can someone please translate that into normal English? :-) Matthew, please? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 13:30:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1FDFB7 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S29.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s29.hotmail.com [65.55.111.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81210D12 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU436-SMTP241 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S29.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:28:17 -0800 X-TMN: [EJmv8bbV5mm6kPOoRO3pegWm7HAIx2e5] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:58:04 +0530 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2015 13:28:14.0409 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7149390:01D033EB] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:30:52 -0000 On 01/16/2015 18:31=2C Trond Endrest=F8l wrote: > On Fri=2C 16 Jan 2015 18:03+0530=2C Manish Jain wrote: > >> Hi=2C >> >> Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to >> FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous >> "GLIBC_2.11 not found" message. > > These two ports are not native to FreeBSD=2C but precompiled Linux > executables=2C AFAICT. > > On my system=2C editors/sublime{=2C3} needs: > > emulators/linux_base-c6 > accessibility/linux-c6-atk > graphics/linux-c6-cairo > textproc/linux-c6-expat > x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig > graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf2 > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2 > graphics/linux-c6-jpeg > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango > graphics/linux-c6-png > graphics/linux-c6-tiff > x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs > > Maybe you should check the condition of the "Linuxulator" ports > installed on your system. The above list would be a good start. Hi=2C I tried installing as per your advice. base-c6 asked me to remove=20 base-f10 with 'pkg delete'. That done I installed all the ports in your=20 list. Now running 'make install' in sublime3 gives me Error Code 1 : > linux-sublime-3.0.65 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - = not found > =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release in /= usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 > > =3D=3D=3D> linux_base-f10-10_7 conflicts with installed package(s): > linux_base-c6-6.6 > They will not build together. Thanks for any help. Regards Manish Jain +91-98995-82709 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 13:47:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2B17BB for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4614E99 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0JDlZbB026851 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:47:36 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0JDlZbB026851 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1421675256; bh=fU0a/prieL5UeuN4NBloHYEp+FiWZFYYkViPpKawQOc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Mon,=2019=20Jan=202015=2013:47:28=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20Odhiambo=20Was hington=20,=20=0D=0A=20User=20Questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20FreeBSD=2010=20and=20 manually=20compile=20applications=20without=20gcc|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20; b=KJwFsCVWyghg7vFCJKHJv3W0b4zvdM5MjWUJUtmSVYF0cnhUMOYPoen4o+cLD2LaI ZBKWTB9IhRjl/j7fdAQgvnR8oGf8SKMhn/UeegmE7RsuiXPt3V6fukteYYNUi7LWAO rbW1C1z42oGfShY7bfHNzBf07XLTBpRtTd84PM1s= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be zero-gravitas.local Message-ID: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:47:28 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington , User Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F7jBBxjv5nJog1fG7ksdBmPiAOTm6Sr9c" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:47:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --F7jBBxjv5nJog1fG7ksdBmPiAOTm6Sr9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015/01/19 13:29, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Now, suppose I did not install gcc from the ports and I'd like to insta= ll > an application by hand using native tools for FreeBSD 10.x, how do I do= > that? > I need a lecture on this:-) This is exactly why the ports exists: the port maintainer understands how to make whatever software it is compile smoothly and generally do what you want, so you don't have to. If you insist on building your own de-novo, then you are going to need to crawl up that fairly steep learning curve. I'm afraid I cannot deliver a simple lecture on 'do this, and it will work' because, well, it's not simple at all. Your first hurdle seems to be getting configure to choose consistent settings. configure is expecting 'cc' on FreeBSD 10.x to actually be clang -- which is what it usually is. If you want to use gcc instead, then you need to tell configure that, which you usually do by setting the CC environment variable when you call configure. Matthew --F7jBBxjv5nJog1fG7ksdBmPiAOTm6Sr9c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUvQr4AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnt0oQAKSIjor42q11+ZOD8NgA3+Mw 7Pb5rAzNSGhLeL93HGJP3fSjuYarkYUuJ8r3d03hbpUHISHLhOkxNwpSruvPmuOS 6MUUe1V0TgKRZ+f+69iOJJ6TyT9GmDe0t/nx5xaL1WkQZMbhIBQG1RJX+ktPyu17 0qwIgzjcEiR9ywvY6rMTzvawaN9+0qC8+LAII4NyV7j4WOKJXSF7N8+ONirlaxkn JJoCK4C2H72kXAeRJF6MKICOD8L2i+tdBmIUN5q4NNUvwQg5O2yIuu0W/aQQRYEH bIXcCIAP9f5VYv+W2E4iz5BodyuLWWDCF7g13aInMXPtxXCe1RYMsWLf3Szl2alT 7rjpZG/6oYv8wXQcuEct44BR7mYUFyIwM6LcK+IM6kEvnm3g3aTniGHrb2iJsyKY QNagQDuk4xaASeyj1yROLAgphGqnaevKjHK4ThXjAIvqN9TPATxhl7tfmEovOVWS Losyc07jqvcZZR96ma7qmnlTLyI9ncfMix2XnayZ12u6cxEZ5cIeTb7fdsBJCjEE JcJWJ18bR8bW5FDftFX0wDi3LbwSwz+xTCrpiNn4IxcVrfUtjRVBZSdpwFFWQ3cC G7Dnl9FdqylcHNUfKepIQYB2BR2y9SbDOoqEcRTlc4et33RQfxSFSQ/ZizDMSyaF XR0loEB0k6e+aDXXjL4k =Jna4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F7jBBxjv5nJog1fG7ksdBmPiAOTm6Sr9c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 14:01:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD176E54 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75E92DD for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-42.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0JE1Ggs006400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:01:16 -0600 Message-ID: <54BD0FA2.7030307@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:07:30 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:01:24 -0000 On 01/18/15 08:39, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > >> Likely UEFI with SecureBoot enabled. Turn SecureBoot off, enable >> "legacy" or "CSM" booting in what was formerly known as the BIOS >> setup screens. >> >> >> >> Yes, I had turned SecureBoot off. There does not seem to be an >> option for legacy or CSM in the BIOS menu. >> >> I cannot get it to even see my memory stick with a FreeBSD install >> image on it. Even my macbook pro mostly boots this and hangs on some >> hardware issues (as I expected but just wanted >> to make sure the usb stick was actually bootable). > > UEFI alone might do that. Only UEFI-approved boot devices are shown > unless legacy or compatibility mode is enabled. Unfortunately, there > are varying names and methods in the settings between different > manufacturers. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > How common is this problem w/ laptops ? I am thinking of buying a laptop specifically to install either FreeBSD or OpenBSD, how likely am I to run into this type of issue ? I have heard of such on Linux lists in the past, but mostly ignored those threads since I was not a laptop user. Times they are a changin', though & I might be up against it now .... Are some manufacturers worse than others, or are they all about the same in this regard ? TIA for any enlightenment :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 14:05:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB4E2E6 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D899131 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ge10so7975043lab.10 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:05:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=II5FwcM0Ii0NDYNUuDB2uHLHgAVlm09bWDEURe7Cvqs=; b=w0AIe3DBmRYhVFttDl+keFaTqVPioS/0bSbrPPP5K2yQz/qM2vY185pllvZn46hb58 9XkRqLtGrU62pP+XQLwDUsRhptxR9V/Q+WOlmpkCf+T2xOnBmVagB7WAKGcs7NByxoaT g6aZd35Jz6QUydDR9q5K00H+NnrtwkKg2DrDH9Y5q3keJvE7uoednO1fQK/X3ohfckUL kKeou2pzts5JglWvv75lBCpjyJr3xEBrecR/4rFkAmuXGVt1RC4AH4Q5FRx0mM6Bg47k tyM8jMcNDb1rpQEvnLw6s6jUHZwJvEVc2O7xAUnAAzx8Qkm1QVT/9DYwsH9G8OA3vRyv KJYg== X-Received: by 10.153.11.170 with SMTP id ej10mr1956780lad.24.1421676326344; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:05:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:04:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:04:45 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:05:28 -0000 Hi Matthew, Thank you do much for that short lecture. It really helps:) I am fond of compiling bleeding edge apps at certain times to see how the new features created will play with my setup and then give feedback to the developers. Then again there are times like this, when I am having a hell with squid-3.4.10 on FreeBSD 10 (amd64) - with memory leaks. I an running with the same configuration on FreeBSD 9.3 (amd64) but with Squid-3.5.0.4 and have no memory leaks! I know the best way to get around this would be report to squid dev about it, but I wanted to try squid-3.5 and it's not in the ports, hence the need to compile by hand. So is there a shortcut way?:) On 19 January 2015 at 16:47, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/01/19 13:29, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Now, suppose I did not install gcc from the ports and I'd like to install > > an application by hand using native tools for FreeBSD 10.x, how do I do > > that? > > I need a lecture on this:-) > > This is exactly why the ports exists: the port maintainer understands > how to make whatever software it is compile smoothly and generally do > what you want, so you don't have to. > > If you insist on building your own de-novo, then you are going to need > to crawl up that fairly steep learning curve. I'm afraid I cannot > deliver a simple lecture on 'do this, and it will work' because, well, > it's not simple at all. > > Your first hurdle seems to be getting configure to choose consistent > settings. configure is expecting 'cc' on FreeBSD 10.x to actually be > clang -- which is what it usually is. If you want to use gcc instead, > then you need to tell configure that, which you usually do by setting > the CC environment variable when you call configure. > > Matthew > > > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 14:10:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931983D8 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333E8174 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0JEACPC027448 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:13 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0JEACPC027448 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1421676613; bh=aCOwuWBBRJI62CZqTyTlE49m0/YLRp5FWIoL+CI9sCQ=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Mon,=2019=20Jan=202015=2014:10:05=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20Odhiambo=20Was hington=20|CC:=20User=20Questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20FreeBSD=2010=20and=20manual ly=20compile=20applications=20without=20gcc|References:=20 =20<54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20|In-Reply-To:=20< CAAdA2WOrzDrUPFZb8YgQNadWVzJoYjuwtOQmasTON88BiA97ZQ@mail.gmail.com >; b=moVq+WDubhIonZr+aIXP9Yc+KJhQXXQ+OYfwRaDFwXbqz+lTkdAgzMmVcQAuGzMex J/JA03HkIftWU7ryCoc2sGMdondHOW5QPx8eu66gwjtU4YQpm8as7Q7yCuUjQ2fhW4 UMvOH7LN/+agtIKInPsMDbBDcryExknrH5FXBdKw= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be zero-gravitas.local Message-ID: <54BD103D.4050300@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:05 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc References: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SP7cxsx3IELC0jflpn9gRqKOWXSDWj15H" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --SP7cxsx3IELC0jflpn9gRqKOWXSDWj15H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015/01/19 14:04, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > So is there a shortcut way?:) Start with the Squid 3.4 port and attempt to upgrade it to Squid 3.5? If you succeed, submit a PR so the rest of the world can benefit from your work. I notice that the position of squid port maintainer is currently vacant, which probably explains why squid35 is not in ports at the moment. Squid is quite an important port to be left maintainer-less, so I'm sure you'ld be welcomed with open arms should you volunteer... Cheers, Matthew --SP7cxsx3IELC0jflpn9gRqKOWXSDWj15H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUvRBFAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnc80P/iEtFkcZR4PrD5ajxO9Xf3Ot cslEKyQC7UBjw/hsHUMeGhv9ZrS8MkDdWs+2ncs2jGCLskG5GEDyoGu3KaE2J/Rh 98HFSgMIVOPw5r/n3wlAo/DxFcnx/INnXnHozFVF+P0QSOm97DKz9XqZBCtW9o54 ShNn4cvVq5/98UCw/1aQzuv1Rkj7EoRkPEkm5oJw/g3AHwhIN/Hm4KNQkOY0pybI ldhBpG9nz6kGwFFcaxhmRUCFfS7QM+BRMaiV/BVel5NUBMtyaShjlqeJOFsEalCE QI7ew7ZkbOsNsIhEU/In94zSlvom9honQl0fM7f/nwW79QQIvGNBUFoABV6nhook p3+mAvA2zKH2RK3c957Aek8AaXD7H7SVmzwXgJsLvggAzxmUB8fHxDYQrkj1LbyB SlSteu+Q+V2a0KnMZ7fObFUeANEUI49vfBy/v3+MMgcJWP5WZeFdgplqwxQ84R0+ 9AeS1h5ixlet/7E0atmKy+JX2ecZ+T+T0r14t1rFUAkfKmEwJpjUgb/w6648YFbn KwlL6Mi8ZuqOb/kNbqlnBTSE7kRbYQlKsH7G8ozmt/+lYFX2dcvhYsMsDp2EdOWp 733NhpLcviZW83avMlVXxvCcv7Yux57K91PcLkAMHPAbdW8BRof0hGxfGBNrzATa FF//G+h70jwyjFLSI+gL =lgd1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SP7cxsx3IELC0jflpn9gRqKOWXSDWj15H-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 14:10:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E627C3D9 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A98E175 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0JEAHsx016201 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:10:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0JEAH7V016198; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:10:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:10:17 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Manish Jain Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:10:24 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:58+0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 01/16/2015 18:31, Trond Endrestřl wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:03+0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to > > > FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous > > > "GLIBC_2.11 not found" message. > > > > These two ports are not native to FreeBSD, but precompiled Linux > > executables, AFAICT. > > > > On my system, editors/sublime{,3} needs: > > > > emulators/linux_base-c6 > > accessibility/linux-c6-atk > > graphics/linux-c6-cairo > > textproc/linux-c6-expat > > x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig > > graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf2 > > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2 > > graphics/linux-c6-jpeg > > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango > > graphics/linux-c6-png > > graphics/linux-c6-tiff > > x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs > > > > Maybe you should check the condition of the "Linuxulator" ports > > installed on your system. The above list would be a good start. > > Hi, > > I tried installing as per your advice. base-c6 asked me to remove base-f10 > with 'pkg delete'. That done I installed all the ports in your list. Now > running 'make install' in sublime3 gives me Error Code 1 : > > > linux-sublime-3.0.65 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - not > > found > > ===> Verifying install for /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release in > > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 > > > > ===> linux_base-f10-10_7 conflicts with installed package(s): > > linux_base-c6-6.6 > > They will not build together. > > Thanks for any help. Hum. For some reason it wants the old Fedora stuff on your system, not the newer CentOS stuff as it wants on my system. Is your ports tree up to date? What's the contents of /etc/make.conf? -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestřl, | Trond Endrestřl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjřvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 14:15:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B202610 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E3E25D for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id gm9so2956019lab.0 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:15:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=pDgVC+bzDzC/QmwW7E5pf1sfzFk0+rNytw6ddqVXPIw=; b=eUbfjkV1ii3uYZIEm1YgYeMI4JZMuEKu8pd2lVzdw0zaVWQ/lTXKLKdMJm2xBiiU2z WLeKpO6kPz/XacAagT779XP/jEtzXduXAfvYHHQ5gniqZ+wI50mb81g9kOD1dxM6aK3D no90U+eLYhT7WmewbAn54Y0RquRwAtP7E3+o+tXqmU7N3JuqgrczD91RfdoVm/V0Je+z zbEDM7p39ot5KsdZbdFa4C+QIbRsaD0eYusAyi54rdZTD6HHXHkTio7lpm9aRpcjmAw+ IVeAVvmhJbD5q+/rcEgFuO+j3JQa0DmOegEEEYvCyPrdhma2IB4tIgjgA0Azu1HCBAHD /gig== X-Received: by 10.112.72.197 with SMTP id f5mr30907968lbv.21.1421676917381; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:15:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:14:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BD103D.4050300@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <54BD103D.4050300@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:14:37 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:15:20 -0000 Hahaaa... That would be a long shot! I give up. On 19 January 2015 at 17:10, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/01/19 14:04, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > So is there a shortcut way?:) > > Start with the Squid 3.4 port and attempt to upgrade it to Squid 3.5? > If you succeed, submit a PR so the rest of the world can benefit from > your work. > > I notice that the position of squid port maintainer is currently vacant, > which probably explains why squid35 is not in ports at the moment. > Squid is quite an important port to be left maintainer-less, so I'm sure > you'ld be welcomed with open arms should you volunteer... > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 15:16:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DFA58C for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCF9AE8 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-42.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0JFGrlD003618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:16:54 -0600 Message-ID: <54BD215C.3040506@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:23:08 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:16:55 -0000 On 01/19/15 08:10, Trond Endrestřl wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:58+0530, Manish Jain wrote: > >> On 01/16/2015 18:31, Trond Endrestřl wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:03+0530, Manish Jain wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to >>>> FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous >>>> "GLIBC_2.11 not found" message. >>> These two ports are not native to FreeBSD, but precompiled Linux >>> executables, AFAICT. >>> >>> On my system, editors/sublime{,3} needs: >>> >>> emulators/linux_base-c6 >>> accessibility/linux-c6-atk >>> graphics/linux-c6-cairo >>> textproc/linux-c6-expat >>> x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig >>> graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf2 >>> x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2 >>> graphics/linux-c6-jpeg >>> x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango >>> graphics/linux-c6-png >>> graphics/linux-c6-tiff >>> x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs >>> >>> Maybe you should check the condition of the "Linuxulator" ports >>> installed on your system. The above list would be a good start. >> Hi, >> >> I tried installing as per your advice. base-c6 asked me to remove base-f10 >> with 'pkg delete'. That done I installed all the ports in your list. Now >> running 'make install' in sublime3 gives me Error Code 1 : >> >>> linux-sublime-3.0.65 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release - not >>> found >>> ===> Verifying install for /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release in >>> /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 >>> >>> ===> linux_base-f10-10_7 conflicts with installed package(s): >>> linux_base-c6-6.6 >>> They will not build together. >> Thanks for any help. > Hum. For some reason it wants the old Fedora stuff on your system, not > the newer CentOS stuff as it wants on my system. > > Is your ports tree up to date? > > What's the contents of /etc/make.conf? > Could it be that the pkg in question needs to be told to use the linux-c6 compatibility stuff, not linux-f10 ? I have had issues on this front in the last 6-8 weeks. Mine eventually got resolved through no effort on my part (including messing around w/ ports tree) except for whining on-list .... It seems that some pkg's need to be told to use the newer linux-compatibility stuff .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 15:22:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E187D1 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S22.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s22.hotmail.com [65.55.111.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC346BDD for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU437-SMTP67 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S22.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:21:05 -0800 X-TMN: [piRg3F2IAIBjxj2peJsM8KPLOmg4/Gse] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:50:53 +0530 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2015 15:21:03.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[89830F60:01D033FB] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:22:13 -0000 On 01/19/2015 18:58=2C Manish Jain wrote: > > On 01/16/2015 18:31=2C Trond Endrest=F8l wrote: >> On Fri=2C 16 Jan 2015 18:03+0530=2C Manish Jain wrote: >> >>> Hi=2C >>> >>> Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to >>> FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous >>> "GLIBC_2.11 not found" message. >> >> These two ports are not native to FreeBSD=2C but precompiled Linux >> executables=2C AFAICT. >> >> On my system=2C editors/sublime{=2C3} needs: >> >> emulators/linux_base-c6 >> accessibility/linux-c6-atk >> graphics/linux-c6-cairo >> textproc/linux-c6-expat >> x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig >> graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf2 >> x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2 >> graphics/linux-c6-jpeg >> x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango >> graphics/linux-c6-png >> graphics/linux-c6-tiff >> x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs >> >> Maybe you should check the condition of the "Linuxulator" ports >> installed on your system. The above list would be a good start. > > > Hi=2C > > I tried installing as per your advice. base-c6 asked me to remove > base-f10 with 'pkg delete'. That done I installed all the ports in your > list. Now running 'make install' in sublime3 gives me Error Code 1 : > >> linux-sublime-3.0.65 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release >> - not found >> =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release in >> /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 >> >> =3D=3D=3D> linux_base-f10-10_7 conflicts with installed package(s): >> linux_base-c6-6.6 >> They will not build together. > > Thanks for any help. > > > Regards > > Manish Jain > +91-98995-82709 Hi Trond=2C Running portsnap fetch/extract/update lets the install complete=2C but=20 then sublime exits immediately : /home/bourne/wine/oed # sublime /home/bourne/wine/oed # type sublime sublime is hashed (/usr/local/bin/sublime) /home/bourne/wine/oed # sublime /home/bourne/wine/oed # ps waux | grep subl bourne 64416 0.0 0.1 10320 1816 2 S+ 8:46PM 0:00.00=20 grep subl /home/bourne/wine/oed # Regards Manish Jain +91-98995-82709 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 15:29:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387E3A5C for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S6.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s6.hotmail.com [65.55.111.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC159C4D for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU436-SMTP75 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S6.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:29:27 -0800 X-TMN: [Fu6+JosNbqSVeob+xBQTUgsdV1XW5Y4d] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:59:15 +0530 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Getting help for apcupsd References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2015 15:29:24.0976 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4AD0F00:01D033FC] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:29:34 -0000 Hi, I have an APC UPS (USB) which works perfectly under Windows XP SP3, but fails to shut down upon power failure via a daemon installed through the port sysutils/apcupsd. Seemingly, the daemon is unable to communicate with the UPS to determine remaining battery level. I sent a message to the maintainer itetcu@FreeBSD.org over 2 weeks back, but there has been no reply. What can I do next to get the UPS to function correctly ? Thanks. Regards Manish Jain +91-98995-82709 On 01/10/2015 21:08, Manish Jain wrote: > > That must rank as one of my favourite picks amongst posts to > freebsd-questions. Whether or not the supplies are approved, they do > seem to suit the immediate needs of subscribers/responders on this list. > > Regards > > Manish Jain > +91-98995-82709 > > On 01/10/2015 17:30, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: >> Message: 22 >> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:51:39 +0530 >> From: "Himsan Polymer" >> To: >> Subject: SILICONE TUBING, BRAIDED HOSES, GASKETS,SHEETS AND FBD >> GASKETS (FDA 21 CFR 177.2600) APPROVED) >> Message-ID: >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Respected Sir, Sub. : Silicone & Viton Rubber Products for >> Food, Pharma & Medical, Textile and Allied Industrial >> Applications We wish to introduce ourselves as leading supplier of >> Silicon & Viton Rubber Products for Food, Pharma & Medical >> Application with distinguished characteristic as follows. We are one >> of the leading manufacturers of Silicon Rubber Products in INDIA. We >> are supplying our products to Pharma Machinery manufacturers & >> suppliers, Pharmaceutical & Biotech Industries, Thermal Power >> Stations, Chemical Plants and Heavy Engineering Sectors in all over >> world. Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company)(1) A >> Destination to Endless diversities CATEGORIES:- TUBINGS, BRAIDED >> HOSES, O RINGS, FBD INFLATABLE GASKETS, EXTRUDED DOOR GASKETS, RUBBER >> SHEETS, AUTO CLAVE DOOR GASKETS, RUBBER EXPANSION BELLOW, COMPRESSION >> BELLOW, DIAPHRAGMS, SQUARE, RECTANGULAR & ROUND CORDS, ENVELOPE >> GASKETS, GLAND PACKING ROPES, SHIFTER GASKETS, RMG GASKE > T >> S MOC:- SILICONE,VITON, EPDM, NEOPRENE, NITRILE(NBR), BUTYL, POLY >> BUTADINE, HYPALON, SBR, NATURAL, PTFE, PVC, NYLON (2) In-house >> Testing facility We have got in house well ? equipped testing >> facility, and our each supply accomplishes our own Testing >> certificates. Our products are as per FDA standard. Non Toxic and >> safety designed for Food ? Pharma ? Medical Application. Thanking you >> and looking forward to your fruitful business association with us. >> Humbly waiting your kind feedback. Thanks & Regards, Sreesanth >> Saruvil Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company) >> CORPORATE OFFICE:- R-1,SAI KRUPA NIWAS, OPP. KAMLAKAR BHANDARI HOUSE, >> CHARKOP VILLAGE, KANDIVALI WEST-400067 FACTORY:- B/1, VISHAL INDL. >> ESTATE, PANCHAL, NEAR HP GAS GODOWN, BHAYANDER (E)-401105 EMAIL:- >> sales@himsanpolymer.com MOB:- +91-7738363930 / +91-7715871508 / 09/ >> 10 www.himsanpolymer.com FACEBOOK:- >> facebook.com/himsanpolymer TWITTER:- >> www.twitter.com/HimsanPolymer LI > N >> KEDIN:- in.linkedin.com/in/himsanpolymer WHATSAPP:- >> +91-7738363930 / +91-7715871510Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 >> Certified Company) Silicone Transparent Tubings (Platinum Cured & >> Peroxide Cured) 1) Made from medical grade Silicone Rubber which >> complies With USP class VI requirement & FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 >> 2) Suitable for Peristaltic Pump applications. 3) Temperature >> resistance from-80?C to+250?C [-110?F to +480?F] 4) Sterilisable >> by steam, dry heat, ethylene oxide (ETO) and gamma radiation. 5) >> Available in sizes ranging from 0.3 mm ID to 98 mm ID 6) Food - >> Pharma - Medical Grade and Complies with USP class VI requirement >> & FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified >> Company) Silicone Braided Hoses (Platinum Cured & Peroxide >> Cured) 1) Made from medical grade Silicone Rubber which complies >> With USP class VI requirement & FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 2) >> Suitable for Peristaltic Pump applications. 3) >> Temperature resistance from-80?C to+250?C [-110?F to +480?F] >> 4) Sterilisable by steam, dry heat, ethylene oxide (ETO) and gamma >> radiation. 5) Available in sizes ranging from 1/4? ID to 2? ID >> 6) Food - Pharma - Medical Grade and Complies with USP class VI >> requirement & FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 Himsan Polymer (An ISO >> 9001:2008 Certified Company) Silicone SS Braided Hoses (Platinum >> Cured & Peroxide Cured) 1) Made from medical grade Silicone >> Rubber which complies With USP class VI requirement & FDA 21 CFR >> 177.2600 2) Suitable for Peristaltic Pump applications. 3) >> Temperature resistance from-80?C to+250?C [-110?F to +480?F] 4) >> Sterilisable by steam, dry heat, ethylene oxide (ETO) and gamma >> radiation. 5) Available in sizes ranging from 1/2? ID to 1.5? ID >> 6) Food - Pharma - Medical Grade and Complies with USP class VI >> requirement & FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 Himsan Polymer (An ISO >> 9001:2008 Certified Company)Inflatable Gaskets For FBD > / >> FBE / FBC & Sterilizers Our FBD Inflatable Gasket functions >> like a cycle tube. When inflated, it seals the bowl and ensures proper >> sealing. It is being made up of Food-Pharma Grade white Neoprene >> Rubber. This Gasket is inflated by 10 mm to 12 mm when 2 to 4kg >> pressure is applied. There basically three gaskets in fluid bed >> dryer:- 1) PC-Top Bowl Sealing Gasket. (40mm x 22mm) 2) PC-Bottom >> Sealing Gasket. (40mm x 22mm) 3) Fitter Press Bag Sealing Gasket. >> (50mm x 20mm) Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company) >> Tri-Clover (T/C) Gaskets 1) Made from medical grade Silicone >> Rubber which complies With USP class VI requirement & FDA 21 CFR >> 177.2600 2) Available in sizes ranging from 1/2? ID to 1.5? ID >> 3) Sizes Available are 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", 1", >> 1.5", 2", 2.5",3?,4?,6? & Any Other Custom sizes. >> Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company)Silicone Autoclave >> & Sterilizer Door Gasket (Non-Inflatable) >> We offer its wide range of Sillicone Autoclave Gasket in more than >> 1000 different shapes and designs. We also offer soft Sillicone Sponge >> Gasket (Hardness range from Shore A15 to 30) to Solid silicone Gasket >> (Hardness range from Shore A 35 to 85). These Gaskets are being >> made from Food-Pharma Grade Sillicone Rubber. It easily withstands a >> temperature range of -80?C to + 300?C. These gaskets are available >> in square cross sections like 20mm x 20mm, 25mm x 25mm x 25mm with >> central hole of 10mm Dia etc. These gaskets are available in Red, >> White, Orange or any other colour as per customer's requirement. >> Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company) Silicone, >> Neoprene,Viton & PTFE Rubber Sheets Size available from 1 feet >> x 1 feet up to maximum 1200 MM x 10 MTR Thickness ranges from 1mm, 2mm >> to 20mm Transparent Silicone Sheet is also made available which is of >> Highest Quality Standard (FDA 21CFR 177.2600) Himsan Polymer (An ISO >> 9001:2008 Certified Company) R > u >> bber O Rings We offer it's wide range of 'O' Ring from ID 2.0mm to >> 600mm from it's 500 single piece moulds. We have also successfully >> developed Viton 'O' Rings of ID upto 3000mm. These 'O' Rings are >> manufactured on a Hydraulic Press with tightly controlled temperature >> and time and ensures accurate dimension, excellent finish, invisible >> flash line, properly post cured and absolutely defect free. Himsan >> Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company)Silicone Sponge & >> Solid Gaskets 1) Available in Round Square and Rectangular Cross >> Section. 2) Colours are available in White, Red, Grey, Green & >> Orange. 3) Complies to FDA 21 CFR 177.2600. Himsan Polymer (An ISO >> 9001:2008 Certified Company) Viton, Nitrile, EPDM & PTFE Tubes >> 1) Designed for various applications 2) Complies to FDA 21 CER >> 177.2600. 3) Sizes are available as per customer?s requirement. >> Thanks & Regards, Sreesanth Saruvil Himsan Polymer (An ISO >> 9001:2008 Certified Company) CORPORATE OFFICE:- R-1,SAI > >> KRUPA NIWAS, OPP. KAMLAKAR BHANDARI HOUSE, CHARKOP VILLAGE, KANDIVALI >> WEST-400067 FACTORY:- B/1, VISHAL INDL. ESTATE, PANCHAL, NEAR HP GAS >> GODOWN, BHAYANDER (E)-401105 EMAIL:- sales@himsanpolymer.com MOB:- >> +91-7738363930 / +91-7715871508 / 09/ 10 >> www.himsanpolymer.com FACEBOOK:- >> facebook.com/himsanpolymer TWITTER:- >> www.twitter.com/HimsanPolymer LINKEDIN:- >> in.linkedin.com/in/himsanpolymer WHATSAPP:- +91-7738363930 / >> +91-7715871510 Himsan Polymer (An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company) > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 15:35:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C02FB8 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S14.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s14.hotmail.com [65.55.111.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E075D5C for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU437-SMTP83 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S14.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:34:39 -0800 X-TMN: [NjNlRKhKp0llvvOed4b3rvH3STKoJehL] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:04:28 +0530 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Getting help for apcupsd (re-post) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2015 15:34:36.0945 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E9FC010:01D033FD] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:35:46 -0000 Hi, [Kindly ignore the original message which contains unwanted stuff] I have an APC UPS (USB) which works perfectly under Windows XP SP3, but fails to shut down upon power failure via a daemon installed through the port sysutils/apcupsd. Seemingly, the daemon is unable to communicate with the UPS to determine remaining battery level. I sent a message to the maintainer itetcu@FreeBSD.org over 2 weeks back, but there has been no reply. What can I do next to get the UPS to function correctly ? Thanks. -- Regards Manish Jain +91-98995-82709 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 16:12:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857EF6E4 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE691E3 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.151.27.41] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YDF05-0004jk-4Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:16:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YDEl7-000EvZ-8b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:00:57 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:00:56 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ZFS and sparse file backed md devices Message-Id: <20150119160056.7c7ece19f5d0fccded7e913f@sohara.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 24227@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:12:00 -0000 Hi, I tried to follow the suggestions for converting a ZFS mirror (mine was a three way mirror) to a RAIDZ (or in my case a RAIDZ2) when tight on discs by creating a pool using sparse file backed md devices to stand in for the missing discs. Fortunately I experimented with a dry run using nothing but sparse file backed md devices first. I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p3. The first surprise was when I created four 2TB sparse file backed md devices using truncate and mdconfig and then tried to make a zfs pool out of them. The sparse files became not sparse - or at least tried to but of course there wasn't 8TB of space to use in /tmp so it filled up and it took a reboot to kill the zpool create run. Next experiment was more modest, four 128MB sparse files, sure enough once the zpool create finished they were four 128MB files and not sparse. Creating a pool on real discs certainly doesn't write on all the blocks - so why did my sparse files get filled in ? A little more experimenting revealed that I could offline the 128MB md devices one by one, destroy the device, truncate the file up to 2TB, recreate the device, wipe the ZFS meta data and replace the offlined device without filling in the sparse file. All was well until I did this to the fourth device and the pool tried to autoexpand - after a few seconds the box locked up and became completely unresponsive to everything except pings. Anybody have any idea why ? At this point I decided that the sparse file method was a non-starter and rebuilt my pool using four 1TB partitions out of the two available drives, copied the data, and then replaced the partitions one by one with whole drives[1], eventually winding up where I wanted to be with my three drive mirror converted to a four drive RAIDZ2. Still I am puzzled as to why the sparse file md device route no longer works. [1] Well single partitions covering most of each drive. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 16:31:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEBD3B53 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8261D60F for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a3so3755478oib.8 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:31:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z5zK42oXpNR+ugxs1DF4AmBDLSNdu1VUBoaNdkuZ6z4=; b=PzkCm/xeO16oFwjYoIsmXvJzMPpb3XyUHTch2xw6EOy59k+JB1zr6zzlSY930nfReL 4qB5fTBP4GTxkhbxwGa+khZPpeLfizOYaHnPO4uh89lg83QtIe8w7UdPIu1b8W2/VU4k biyFhp4YETdQKkCznxyHLAmmXd4mwNtmTM/2M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Z5zK42oXpNR+ugxs1DF4AmBDLSNdu1VUBoaNdkuZ6z4=; b=OIG/yA4u8OyDdRL4LqCb+VsO6kcpZZtzZR4gf6lZqGk++/gPvXA0SCvJHtImQEXdWM kW7ojCXwa31ER+f6ysUVIjVSaEdbrmbdix4lPi1wxT6LzT1yOc41MAmJBVxrfFJU10sN JW9W/+qjfjbhrUrS223Q1GZ2L8qym63ZqYEUaKZz6HH4/70QVomFK/8Tu+/YrniEJjk9 Oe8E848FmxDfQEKFFEOmDTNfB6rTOGu2HMHmfBNWVdoRhq8TdhopxgvB6kEZjM62kAmc 4Ao+iOjNGiZm41FnEMOZF9gST11lZEQE3OnuSmVoNI2v6N6yShwX+Q1JKaJBYDrB3lV/ YUmg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbwV4V43ea7vbVwRDr96qarAf8k03vCcgAOxeZ8o13gzAT8boPczt2tjHAy9+/tCBa241G MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.169.200 with SMTP id s191mr17833216oie.7.1421685073554; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:31:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.28.103 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:31:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:31:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: kernel panic twice in two days. how to tell if it is hardware or software? From: Vick Khera To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:31:14 -0000 Two days in a row last week, one of my FreeBSD/amd64 systems running 10.0 failed with the following panic: [panic: vm_radix_insert: key 46f is already present cpuid = 9 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1820 ] [kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b18d0 panic() at panic+0x155/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1950 ] [vm_radix_insert() at vm_radix_insert+0x2ed/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b19b0 vm_page_cache() at vm_page_cache+0x121/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b19f0 ] [vm_pageout() at vm_pageout+0x8f7/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1a70 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x9a/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1ab0 ] [fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1ab0 --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xfffffe3fcf1b1b70, rbp = 0 --- ] At this point the serial console was unresponsive, network unresponsive. After about 35 minutes, I just power cycled it. I figured if it was dumping the RAM I should let it finish, but it didn't seem to be doing so. The above was captured by my serial port terminal server. Obviously nothing made it to the log files on the server itself. After this panic, I disabled crash dumps on a hunch that it may have been stuck doing that. Almost exactly 25 hours later, the same panic occurred: [panic: vm_radix_insert: key 46f is already present cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1820 ] [kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b18d0 panic() at panic+0x155/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1950 ] [vm_radix_insert() at vm_radix_insert+0x2ed/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b19b0 vm_page_cache() at vm_page_cache+0x121/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b19f0 ] [vm_pageout() at vm_pageout+0x8f7/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1a70 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x9a/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1ab0 ] [fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe3fcf1b1ab0 --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xfffffe3fcf1b1b70, rbp = 0 --- ] Again, the serial console was unresponsive. Since I knew there was not going to be a crash dump, I remote power-cyced it within a couple of minutes and it recovered quite nicely. I *LOVE* ZFS. :) This machine has 256GB of ECC RAM, and 2 6-core Intel Xeon CPUs with hyper-threading turned off. The uptime was 300 days when it crashed first on Thursday. The sole purpose of this machine is running Postgres 9.2 server. The other things it does is run NRPE for nagios monitoring and slony1 for database replication. The boot messages are below. This is running FreeBSD 10.0. I wanted to try the tips in Section 17.6 of the handbook, but the panic did not emit an instruction pointer for me. I run a custom kernel. I have plans to update this system to FreeBSD 10.1, but I wanted to see if there was any other debugging I could do here to figure out if it is a kernel bug or if it is a hardware fault starting to happen. The system in question is just about 1 year old. The rest of this email is just the dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2014 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #1 r261210: Tue Jan 28 10:36:57 EST 2014 vivek@devbox.int.kcilink.com:/n/yertle1/sources/usr10/obj/n/yertle1/sources/usr10/src/sys/KCI64 amd64 FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz (2400.05-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x306e4 Family = 0x6 Model = 0x3e Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x7fbee3ff AMD Features=0x2c100800 AMD Features2=0x1 Standard Extended Features=0x281 TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics real memory = 274894684160 (262160 MB) avail memory = 267173515264 (254796 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600 ACPI APIC Table: < > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 12 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 6 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 4 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu4 (AP): APIC ID: 8 cpu5 (AP): APIC ID: 10 cpu6 (AP): APIC ID: 32 cpu7 (AP): APIC ID: 34 cpu8 (AP): APIC ID: 36 cpu9 (AP): APIC ID: 38 cpu10 (AP): APIC ID: 40 cpu11 (AP): APIC ID: 42 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 48-71 on motherboard random: initialized kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 cpu2: on acpi0 cpu3: on acpi0 cpu4: on acpi0 cpu5: on acpi0 cpu6: on acpi0 cpu7: on acpi0 cpu8: on acpi0 cpu9: on acpi0 cpu10: on acpi0 cpu11: on acpi0 attimer0: port 0x40-0x43 irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100 atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 irq 8 on acpi0 Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0 hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 950 Event timer "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 350 Event timer "HPET1" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 340 Event timer "HPET2" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 340 Event timer "HPET3" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 340 Event timer "HPET4" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 340 Event timer "HPET5" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 340 Event timer "HPET6" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 340 Event timer "HPET7" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 340 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 26 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: mem 0xdfc00000-0xdfc03fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci2 pci3: on pcib3 pcib4: irq 26 at device 1.1 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 igb0: port 0x8020-0x803f mem 0xdfb20000-0xdfb3ffff,0xdfb44000-0xdfb47fff irq 27 at device 0.0 on pci4 igb0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors igb0: Ethernet address: 00:25:90:c3:be:14 igb0: Bound queue 0 to cpu 0 igb0: Bound queue 1 to cpu 1 igb0: Bound queue 2 to cpu 2 igb0: Bound queue 3 to cpu 3 igb0: Bound queue 4 to cpu 4 igb0: Bound queue 5 to cpu 5 igb0: Bound queue 6 to cpu 6 igb0: Bound queue 7 to cpu 7 igb1: port 0x8000-0x801f mem 0xdfb00000-0xdfb1ffff,0xdfb40000-0xdfb43fff irq 30 at device 0.1 on pci4 igb1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors igb1: Ethernet address: 00:25:90:c3:be:15 igb1: Bound queue 0 to cpu 8 igb1: Bound queue 1 to cpu 9 igb1: Bound queue 2 to cpu 10 igb1: Bound queue 3 to cpu 11 igb1: Bound queue 4 to cpu 0 igb1: Bound queue 5 to cpu 1 igb1: Bound queue 6 to cpu 2 igb1: Bound queue 7 to cpu 3 pcib5: irq 33 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci6: on pcib5 pcib6: irq 41 at device 3.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib6 mps0: port 0x7000-0x70ff mem 0xdfa40000-0xdfa4ffff,0xdfa00000-0xdfa3ffff irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci7 mps0: Firmware: 17.00.01.00, Driver: 16.00.00.00-fbsd mps0: IOCCapabilities: 1285c pci0: at device 4.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.5 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.6 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 4.7 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 5.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 22.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 22.1 (no driver attached) ehci0: mem 0xdfd01000-0xdfd013ff irq 16 at device 26.0 on pci0 usbus0: EHCI version 1.0 usbus0 on ehci0 pcib7: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci8: on pcib7 pcib8: irq 19 at device 28.7 on pci0 pci9: on pcib8 pcib9: at device 0.0 on pci9 pci10: on pcib9 pcib10: at device 0.0 on pci10 pci11: on pcib10 pcib11: at device 0.0 on pci11 pci12: on pcib11 vgapci0: mem 0xde000000-0xdeffffff,0xdf800000-0xdf803fff,0xdf000000-0xdf7fffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci12 vgapci0: Boot video device pcib12: at device 1.0 on pci10 pci13: on pcib12 ehci1: mem 0xdfd00000-0xdfd003ff irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 usbus1: EHCI version 1.0 usbus1 on ehci1 pcib13: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci14: on pcib13 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 31.6 (no driver attached) pcib14: on acpi0 pci127: on pcib14 pci127: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 10.2 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 10.3 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 11.3 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 12.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 12.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 12.2 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 13.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 13.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 13.2 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 14.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 15.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 15.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 15.2 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 15.3 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 15.4 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 15.5 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.2 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.3 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.4 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.5 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.6 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 16.7 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 19.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 19.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 19.4 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 19.5 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 22.0 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 22.1 (no driver attached) pci127: at device 22.2 (no driver attached) pcib15: on acpi0 pci128: on pcib15 pcib16: irq 50 at device 1.0 on pci128 pci129: on pcib16 pcib17: irq 57 at device 2.0 on pci128 pci130: on pcib17 pci128: at device 4.0 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 4.1 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 4.2 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 4.3 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 4.4 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 4.5 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 4.6 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 4.7 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci128: at device 5.2 (no driver attached) pcib18: on acpi0 pci255: on pcib18 pci255: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 10.2 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 10.3 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 11.3 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 12.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 12.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 12.2 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 13.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 13.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 13.2 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 14.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 15.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 15.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 15.2 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 15.3 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 15.4 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 15.5 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.2 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.3 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.4 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.5 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.6 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 16.7 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 19.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 19.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 19.4 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 19.5 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 22.0 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 22.1 (no driver attached) pci255: at device 22.2 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 uart0: console (115200,n,8,1) ipmi0: port 0xca2,0xca3 on acpi0 ipmi0: KCS mode found at io 0xca2 on acpi orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xce000-0xcefff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 coretemp0: on cpu0 acpi_throttle1: on cpu1 acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle1 attach returned 6 coretemp1: on cpu1 acpi_throttle2: on cpu2 acpi_throttle2: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle2 attach returned 6 coretemp2: on cpu2 acpi_throttle3: on cpu3 acpi_throttle3: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle3 attach returned 6 coretemp3: on cpu3 acpi_throttle4: on cpu4 acpi_throttle4: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle4 attach returned 6 coretemp4: on cpu4 acpi_throttle5: on cpu5 acpi_throttle5: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle5 attach returned 6 coretemp5: on cpu5 acpi_throttle6: on cpu6 acpi_throttle6: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle6 attach returned 6 coretemp6: on cpu6 acpi_throttle7: on cpu7 acpi_throttle7: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle7 attach returned 6 coretemp7: on cpu7 acpi_throttle8: on cpu8 acpi_throttle8: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle8 attach returned 6 coretemp8: on cpu8 acpi_throttle9: on cpu9 acpi_throttle9: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle9 attach returned 6 coretemp9: on cpu9 acpi_throttle10: on cpu10 acpi_throttle10: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle10 attach returned 6 coretemp10: on cpu10 acpi_throttle11: on cpu11 acpi_throttle11: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle11 attach returned 6 coretemp11: on cpu11 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec random: unblocking device. usbus0: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 usbus1: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 ugen1.1: at usbus1 uhub1: on usbus1 ipmi0: IPMI device rev. 1, firmware rev. 2.19, version 2.0 ipmi0: Number of channels 3 ipmi0: Attached watchdog da0 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da0: Serial Number BTTV335200Z3100FGN da0: 600.000MB/s transfers da0: Command Queueing enabled da0: 95396MB (195371568 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 12161C) da1 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da1: Serial Number BTTV335106X6100FGN da1: 600.000MB/s transfers da1: Command Queueing enabled da1: 95396MB (195371568 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 12161C) da2 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 4 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da2: Serial Number Z0M0032V00009328Z4K4 da2: 600.000MB/s transfers da2: Command Queueing enabled da2: 572325MB (1172123568 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 72961C) da3 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 5 lun 0 da3: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da3: Serial Number Z0M0006B00009329D7CW da3: 600.000MB/s transfers da3: Command Queueing enabled da3: 572325MB (1172123568 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 72961C) da4 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 6 lun 0 da4: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da4: Serial Number Z0M002MT00009329D793 da4: 600.000MB/s transfers da4: Command Queueing enabled da4: 572325MB (1172123568 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 72961C) da5 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 7 lun 0 da5: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da5: Serial Number Z0M003L200009338Y1P0 da5: 600.000MB/s transfers da5: Command Queueing enabled da5: 572325MB (1172123568 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 72961C) da6 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 8 lun 0 da6: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da6: Serial Number BTWL33900172080KGN da6: 600.000MB/s transfers da6: Command Queueing enabled da6: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 9729C) da7 at mps0 bus 0 scbus0 target 9 lun 0 da7: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-6 device da7: Serial Number BTWL339000A5080KGN da7: 600.000MB/s transfers da7: Command Queueing enabled da7: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 9729C) GEOM_MIRROR: Device mirror/gmroot launched (2/2). GEOM_MIRROR: Device mirror/gmusr launched (2/2). GEOM_MIRROR: Device mirror/gmvar launched (1/2). GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmvar: rebuilding provider da6p5. SMP: AP CPU #10 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #5 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #6 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #7 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #11 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #4 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #9 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! SMP: AP CPU #8 Launched! Timecounter "TSC-low" frequency 1200025156 Hz quality 1000 Root mount waiting for: usbus1 usbus0 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Root mount waiting for: usbus1 usbus0 ugen0.2: at usbus0 uhub2: on usbus0 ugen1.2: at usbus1 uhub3: on usbus1 Root mount waiting for: usbus1 usbus0 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered uhub3: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ugen0.3: at usbus0 ukbd0: on usbus0 kbd2 at ukbd0 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mirror/gmroot [rw]... WARNING: / was not properly dismounted ZFS filesystem version: 5 ZFS storage pool version: features support (5000) igb0: link state changed to UP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 16:53:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B40F378 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nikki.convalesco.org (convalesco.org [IPv6:2a01:7c8:aab0:264::100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7DDA8BC for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hilbert.lan (79.103.165.42.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [79.103.165.42]); by nikki.convalesco.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 396aad01; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO; for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:53:41 +0100 (CET) From: Panagiotis Atmatzidis X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4942EA50-CF56-4EEF-A377-392340A15DE8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Subject: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:53:40 +0200 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:53:45 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_4942EA50-CF56-4EEF-A377-392340A15DE8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, I=E2=80=99m trying to load my PF at system startup but having issues = after installing an OpenVPN server. The first approach I tried was via = rc.conf, here is my configuration: $ grep pf /etc/rc.conf pf_enable=3D"YES" pf_rules=3D"/etc/pf.conf" pflog_enable=3D"YES" pfstatd_enable=3D"YES" pflog_logfile=3D"/var/log/pflog=E2=80=9D Theoretically this should be enough. However PF doesn=E2=80=99t load = anything at boot. I have to do it manually. I added the following lines = at =E2=80=98/etc/rc.local=E2=80=99 and worked for a couple of months: $ grep pf /etc/rc.local /sbin/pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf Not this approach won=E2=80=99t work either. This is a FreeBSD based = VPS. Every time I reboot the VPS I have to manually login and run = =E2=80=98pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf=E2=80=99 to load the ruleset. I think that this has something to do with =E2=80=98tun0=E2=80=99 = interface which is the last thing that is loaded at boot. Probably PF = runs before this, sees rules that it doesn=E2=80=99t understand (related = to tun0) and comes up short, then tun0 is loaded but it=E2=80=99s too = late. Any ideas on how to solve this are welcomed! Thanks Panagiotis (atmosx) Atmatzidis email: atma@convalesco.org URL: http://www.convalesco.org GnuPG ID: 0x1A7BFEC5 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1A7BFEC5 "As you set out for Ithaca, hope the voyage is a long one, full of = adventure, full of discovery [...]" - C. P. Cavafy --Apple-Mail=_4942EA50-CF56-4EEF-A377-392340A15DE8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Public Key Encryption iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUvTaUAAoJEPy01a8ae/7F4/IQAKtd0p8Iw5L2Cgrrth2pESnG ylaxQfZPgmfQdXNKt/4nC/Pale//Gwb3pDJAVSAgGtkJPt5FjkisqST+1VYRR6PI y5hSEYBj+Ulqv0Ecb6GZI3NrBL2553npe15wPXkJHRUQdBWaiXiG8GJnFD0Aj0AM P/bnzcUdLzOkAYC7jklIElWJCbrLHIfOFRW33otehiLhn0s119uoelcQaCnPRr/o 1t1rs0poTI/FznzOvtjKVZ+B/1HB5BsOxV6lU0nBlj2cn/v1Nq3si52BDXBGx52H AHfupIdmIaLdLfrK1gSfudMPbKpFMapXRE8ooLktz+nbceypfd9/qTg53EiQZclu QpDAD6u9KnUNyqCZKhp7YWR/dAoctOy+7Vr0OBghwbnKdY4qNF7QJf8JPvNvkngS Hz06xzwx35nREd0+ZpYohcdaC9TV1beLS4Vmb+VlYmacK9LwhZTXCAAdTMr1JUCn M1WiJ4xWjRSEekHAHrHPj7888OdNDZUwOnht0nWP3fhFnUBZu/HXc1XfMW679fDZ oiTrYcpW7dyuSOKe7r+vfJZBPpFMrMXjDo/4UnyFusKGIoq33qwx9PGM2M5fKNgR BCvXylWmUwUZfQv5pz/fcW9Gmw/oh5JpYt8jlDbH3o2hexbJHcdQosMhMT4ibqmi nVP2l3vNf9YQVV8KrGJO =dfPh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_4942EA50-CF56-4EEF-A377-392340A15DE8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 17:11:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF0AA3D for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED23AE2 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.79.195.143] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YDFkk-0007sO-He for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:04:38 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:04:42 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and sparse file backed md devices Message-ID: <263b82a2.0cfdaef0@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <20150119160056.7c7ece19f5d0fccded7e913f@sohara.org> References: <20150119160056.7c7ece19f5d0fccded7e913f@sohara.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/w3jskIZlxm.Vo09E_hrb9b9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:11:42 -0000 --Sig_/w3jskIZlxm.Vo09E_hrb9b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > I tried to follow the suggestions for converting a ZFS mirror (mine > was a three way mirror) to a RAIDZ (or in my case a RAIDZ2) when tight on > discs by creating a pool using sparse file backed md devices to stand in > for the missing discs. Fortunately I experimented with a dry run using > nothing but sparse file backed md devices first. >=20 > I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p3. >=20 > The first surprise was when I created four 2TB sparse file backed > md devices using truncate and mdconfig and then tried to make a zfs pool > out of them. The sparse files became not sparse - or at least tried to but > of course there wasn't 8TB of space to use in /tmp so it filled up and it > took a reboot to kill the zpool create run. Next experiment was more > modest, four 128MB sparse files, sure enough once the zpool create finish= ed > they were four 128MB files and not sparse. Creating a pool on real discs > certainly doesn't write on all the blocks - so why did my sparse files get > filled in ? My first suspect would be vdev trimming. On recent FreeBSD releases it's enabled by default, even if none of the disks actually support trimming. I set vfs.zfs.trim.enabled=3D0 on all my systems were it doesn't work (all of them, as I use geli below ZFS). > A little more experimenting revealed that I could offline the 128MB > md devices one by one, destroy the device, truncate the file up to 2TB, > recreate the device, wipe the ZFS meta data and replace the offlined > device without filling in the sparse file. All was well until I did this = to > the fourth device and the pool tried to autoexpand - after a few seconds > the box locked up and became completely unresponsive to everything except > pings. Anybody have any idea why ? See above. =20 > At this point I decided that the sparse file method was a > non-starter and rebuilt my pool using four 1TB partitions out of the two > available drives, copied the data, and then replaced the partitions one by > one with whole drives[1], eventually winding up where I wanted to be with= my > three drive mirror converted to a four drive RAIDZ2. Still I am puzzled as > to why the sparse file md device route no longer works. I'm frequently using sparse files for testing and at least for me it works as expected: fk@r500 ~ $sudo mdconfig -f /tank/scratch/testfile md0 fk@r500 ~ $zogftw import 2015-01-19 17:52:18 zogftw: No pool name specified. Trying all unattached l= abels: test 2015-01-19 17:52:18 zogftw: No geli keyfile found at /home/fk/.config/zogft= w/geli/keyfiles/test.key. Not using any. 2015-01-19 17:52:21 zogftw: 'test' attached 2015-01-19 17:52:23 zogftw: 'test' imported fk@r500 ~ $zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT tank 228G 196G 32.0G - 51% 85% 1.00x ONLINE - test 1016P 218K 1016P - 0% 0% 1.00x ONLINE - Fabian --Sig_/w3jskIZlxm.Vo09E_hrb9b9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlS9ORkACgkQBYqIVf93VJ3JfwCguAvHIHBga+64R17Y/exzvGEa Rj8AnA7vr28sFUZSkXqvWiO7Xp+vPqtD =WRUC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/w3jskIZlxm.Vo09E_hrb9b9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 17:18:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86EF5C0F for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47C36B4E for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id rp18so31300753iec.11 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:18:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GGI5Zj41xE9cDbF+ozTYCTFrfYaTKywRT1MLVuG+6ck=; b=KF5FXWyalf8/RoY7hvKQzZi41+C1ZlgME7nTdzxXh5WW9Cjx+7xTJwWcphgbTOUPNy H3XXRPEKZfCyN3HqbMrXV/ulVd0rFmo67+fp5V2ZPqlMoeDXSo1qCcybmuHGZDXWjx+8 +BJZ//EqrCCv4JEf0FLk+dBhbcAkkNLvX633NiT78Dd1obhwvIh6VOXDLzKT8CAW2z/J vxwDq3ogMADEmcFjcJhXhd/KSAYFmxYIPnwKiOXXCkTD9NtoPfwUbshEvbDriJ96l0dw Dzl9aS/Fw3Nu2KYDnZs6tk5VRZpNhrOSMPDyaqCtje+fq22QKZv7WhDAUtRL6P+WYNbT y+rA== X-Received: by 10.42.78.137 with SMTP id n9mr29814664ick.53.1421687887663; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:18:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([73.3.70.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 77sm111336ion.0.2015.01.19.09.18.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:18:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54BD3C3E.6080901@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:17:50 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 References: <54BD0FA2.7030307@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54BD0FA2.7030307@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:18:08 -0000 On 01/19/2015 07:07 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/18/15 08:39, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: >> >>> Likely UEFI with SecureBoot enabled. Turn SecureBoot off, enable >>> "legacy" or "CSM" booting in what was formerly known as the BIOS >>> setup screens. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, I had turned SecureBoot off. There does not seem to be an >>> option for legacy or CSM in the BIOS menu. >>> >>> I cannot get it to even see my memory stick with a FreeBSD install >>> image on it. Even my macbook pro mostly boots this and hangs on >>> some hardware issues (as I expected but just wanted >>> to make sure the usb stick was actually bootable). >> >> UEFI alone might do that. Only UEFI-approved boot devices are shown >> unless legacy or compatibility mode is enabled. Unfortunately, there >> are varying names and methods in the settings between different >> manufacturers. >> > > How common is this problem w/ laptops ? I am thinking of buying a > laptop specifically to install either FreeBSD or OpenBSD, how likely > am I to run into this type of issue ? I have heard of such on Linux > lists in the past, but mostly ignored those threads since I was not a > laptop user. Times they are a changin', though & I might be up against > it now .... Are some manufacturers worse than others, or are they all > about the same in this regard ? TIA for any enlightenment :-) .... > My $.02's worth: get a laptop without secure boot or even uefi in the bios. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 18:25:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F92E212 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59362336 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0JIPhJi035626 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:25:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <54BD4C02.30109@sentex.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:25:06 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting help for apcupsd (re-post) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:25:46 -0000 On 1/19/2015 10:34 AM, Manish Jain wrote: > I have an APC UPS (USB) which works perfectly under Windows XP SP3, but > fails to shut down upon power failure via a daemon installed through the > port sysutils/apcupsd. Seemingly, the daemon is unable to communicate > with the UPS to determine remaining battery level. what does usbconfig show ? also, what is the output of grep -v ^# /usr/local/etc/apcupsd/apcupsd.conf | strings ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 18:50:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A956F76D for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7085F7C7 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ar1so2108853iec.13 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:50:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gjqJ2UWLfKuuUUaQ8XJZE2HPF/C+51q2KyKwvbfqg6A=; b=01rjx5zhctHyfrx4MlL0eHtW0YZZlj4EU2pc2O/5PpUMNIBtHlghVLGs4aliiKs9oC oB7sB5Iqw6b+lwHCdKFOpqx5WMHQhqFbmyvIbvKOfc6W1MJjPCVDXhfdOoaH2zxAPFSA OO6WE++55CsBqfMwQ2XDCHC9c9e8bPx3mIZHP9kq4AMTm1s/tR/PSk2gBYh7fugMkOk8 /OuqOPRkeFoKrTFqDGtR66mcKZS08gh6RfAqJj2YqLeTGvktR4lnks3GpjfQQJkoYPOF +y1FOOOHk8kw6KrrQ3BeNsEs3INCmDENWYqEa3Ee8x6dMeVIcLTjFxzdGYLjCxnMEXvj JeuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.234.194 with SMTP id ug2mr21075349igc.39.1421693428928; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:50:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:50:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:50:28 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e3kNOpLm-PFSDWRd_IfhqY9CCHg Message-ID: Subject: Dump/Restore for system migration From: Chris Maness To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:50:29 -0000 I have used dump/restore for system migration a couple of time and noticed it is pretty good, but every once in a while it will miss or corrupt a file. Is there a better way to do this? I would imagine having a system mounted r/o would help, but this is not always possible. Is there a way to check the deltas between systems manually after migration to see if any files need to be merged or copied. I would imagine the files that are in jeopardy are ones that are being written to while the dump is taking place. I had a file the keeps track of rss feeds end up missing on the target system. Any advice here? Thanks, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 19:08:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44580979 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B76B9AC for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0JJ8KhE043440; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:08:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <54BD55FF.6060102@sentex.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:07:43 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Maness , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:08:56 -0000 On 1/19/2015 1:50 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > I have used dump/restore for system migration a couple of time and noticed > it is pretty good, but every once in a while it will miss or corrupt a > file. Is there a better way to do this? I would imagine having a system > mounted r/o would help, but this is not always possible. Is there a way to Are you using -L when doing the dump ? I dont think there is a built in way to checksum things, but moving to zfs is one of the benefits as there are many more such safety features ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 19:08:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E8597A for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A969AD for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id va2so20453425obc.2 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:08:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hKj7TzQOxRcN2IJgc1pZmiEfOAs5yws0kAsFC8EnqTQ=; b=KTk8fxsEdcfVheczvOezblduuJR6ZQgkDP3ntSTzOHN8dPJYEQL+sExSbSf7L5uBM8 huGUW8wHHhB/kD35TlPRQDXtlcPTMH8QsXJvpxYgBi4f+NB0VIBoPb9vv7wL3dABf4pt a4NR3rSrbZCjqLlCsFnO1JBrfnY4qYCCHAj6NRqMiVAUVYhMCFUZdkLulex/rMY8inWr +OxGlEejOxctTVNs/GCU1yIWRN9G2/JYb6LxMYPBcJV11fgXbZEB6tNzeD5AKOHTXtLn Bha6Pp6Tp0/Iw66OpZLn8nTwSuUjESAK6Q4WUjgDRbUZKCgAq64TImm6yei61/pGsxPk QGUw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmZgDNoctlGzHTyZ7Vyezp0zxYmghqofOPYnNqdUxfRwrB+skiOKNPAQthaBQrCbQdExywJ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.91.137 with SMTP id p131mr2556584oib.3.1421694531295; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:08:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.92.195 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:08:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:08:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration From: Michael Sierchio To: Chris Maness Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:08:59 -0000 If you're using a filesystem that supports snapshots, do the dump against the snapshot, or use dump with the -L option, to indicate that you're taking a dump of a live filesystem. - M On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > I have used dump/restore for system migration a couple of time and noticed > it is pretty good, but every once in a while it will miss or corrupt a > file. Is there a better way to do this? I would imagine having a system > mounted r/o would help, but this is not always possible. Is there a way to > check the deltas between systems manually after migration to see if any > files need to be merged or copied. I would imagine the files that are in > jeopardy are ones that are being written to while the dump is taking > place. I had a file the keeps track of rss feeds end up missing on the > target system. > > Any advice here? > > Thanks, > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 19:15:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2230EC98 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB89FA9D for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hl2so12007500igb.5 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:15:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=xOIuoYGJjZslSyNFlBBC5YrDs7gW5ZyrvJm9vFShoB0=; b=U47e1o58il019Vd+njgTjrar2crLtMoLyvUA28/IG5cyjaJn8+XF0tfAkcakFSzCCc ViaWpKvHmx+EiQo6EEdng2MXqPpo9fUcxe15zpG0KmpIzM5rW2mNRyV3p4FfrS69qyas JCfOHVfPBcgElxZMoltJ9RR2stew/ODy/VBtHh9/loMOaBOd+fhLPDx+u0TNgN7JAlOm 0Xo7rSDSqUtQwmKDk7PefcoEBuD8Qd17ZgmE7ZavR9dIa1khpqA7SN5ruC2re03E3xEv XcrO7E29bodzea7pH5mUG+j+nuUSa/B95hFacG3Lu/Cgm3FeNS6luHeJpJyNuxHxFQ4K SYpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.142.106 with SMTP id rv10mr21472362igb.18.1421694958300; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:15:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:15:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:15:58 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NP9hteeKlXFNaCZO_BT0eatKDjs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration From: Chris Maness To: Michael Sierchio , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:15:59 -0000 On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > If you're using a filesystem that supports snapshots, do the dump against > the snapshot, or use dump with the -L option, to indicate that you're > taking a dump of a live filesystem. > > - M > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Chris Maness > wrote: > >> I have used dump/restore for system migration a couple of time and noticed >> it is pretty good, but every once in a while it will miss or corrupt a >> file. Is there a better way to do this? I would imagine having a system >> mounted r/o would help, but this is not always possible. Is there a way >> to >> check the deltas between systems manually after migration to see if any >> files need to be merged or copied. I would imagine the files that are in >> jeopardy are ones that are being written to while the dump is taking >> place. I had a file the keeps track of rss feeds end up missing on the >> target system. >> >> Any advice here? >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Yes, I am using arguments -Luanf. I made a script to do this automagically a long time ago. I am currently using UFS. I am not sure if it supports snapshot. Thanks, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 19:22:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 254B6E12 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5181B7B for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g10so5133024pdj.12 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:22:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UQn18Iho9wAUnJQO8QnfJ4xOlhgLOWW4NLJ1kG8vvuw=; b=tTZbqhfzWgZ+ENIWuntN9vBgT5ro5CWqmi8AXESINJ+6prWOlGOC5L5z7C3HiLXAC+ +nLpD10b1YNg18vKHeGMt/U8OH7OonSrgZePbsm824MJ/9l3iam/YTL7J3KhKb5Pkdvu 6jRKyvDHagFWlbNhi9QgI6ZIkUbTIPo2kQW+GCXfadkstL0rPeKW5guNkQB9XaPvVvNq HKKmFP6VMwZdQp1T0fZpdQ620TdR9R9VcY1rPpgSSs0rzy5A4AjnX3ga1GaEfPt1LkaI UY8VEIXddHn5k2qM27oLvtT1vWQzdEyhlPxQnNl7hOXRnAbAriVe8HVlKSJPu5gqWOeP QMcA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.66.46 with SMTP id c14mr47284983pat.136.1421695329410; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:22:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:22:09 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration From: Adam Vande More To: Chris Maness Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Michael Sierchio , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:22:10 -0000 On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > > Yes, I am using arguments -Luanf. I made a script to do this automagically > a long time ago. I am currently using UFS. I am not sure if it supports > snapshot. > UFS SU+J doesn't support snapshots, UFS SU and UFS SU+gjournal does. dump levels can be used for incremental backups. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 19:27:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E624AF1A for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from planemo.joshualokken.com (planemo.joshualokken.com [192.184.92.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE28BBE for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 0019cb2ce9ff.click-network.com ([131.191.16.14] helo=localhost) by planemo.joshualokken.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YDHd8-0005UW-ON for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:04:55 -0800 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:05:45 -0800 From: Joshua Lokken To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Package Issue updating a package] Message-ID: <20150119190545.GB30820@satellite.workgroup.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:17 -0000 ----- Forwarded message from Joshua Lokken ----- =46rom: Joshua Lokken To: Doug Hardie Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:04:18 -0800 Subject: Re: Package Issue updating a package On Jan/17 02:37AM, Doug Hardie wrote: > I needed to update clamav-milter. I used: >=20 > pkg upgrade clamav-milter >=20 > The result was an error: >=20 > Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > conflict rule: The following packages conflict with each other: clamav-mi= lter-0.98.5_1(r), clamav-0.98.5_1(r) > conflict rule: The following packages conflict with each other: clamav-mi= lter-0.98.5_1(r), clamav-milter-0.98.5_1(r) > upgrade rule: upgrade local clamav-milter-0.98.4_1 to remote clamav-milte= r-0.98.5_1 > cannot install package clamav-milter, remove it from request? [Y/n]: n >=20 >=20 > pkg list only shows clamav-milter, not clamav. At one time I did have cl= amav installed, but deleted it. >=20 > So I used pkg delete clamav-milter. That worked. >=20 > Then, pkg install clamav-milter. Same errors. How do I recover and get = an updated clamav-milter? I believe pkg is telling you that clamav and clamav-milter are mutually exc= lusive. I think: # pkg delete clamav # pkg install clamav-milter Would get you the desired result. -- Joshua From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 19:27:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E5FFA7 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F11BBCC for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id rl12so9479852iec.0 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9g6Y75YMpSBE/zYXDq+1W8g5jW/HeKF1qDsfDVGT6NU=; b=PpaDEnBX8cZcnJw2F3gaaggmCjbt9qMy6T3NbSHLoAZa1dzgdcLCDsUI3smnaiTPHg SzhFKCIhumqoF+Ivo7YEfaj49H85XmVM3YYRsw8WbT/gJQ0J8OSo4QPoKgRJNE1oB6Qn /NQUvl6YInEkYiLnKnXI6nc2TC4s3jugHFWJd2fbWV+MWsWJ/wj0wIRApz0Z4sch1lrO 3Ze4jV+lgD6fav7JhESNdQne0R3gYiEjRuvCWkIY/mZW6qVN+cpx8PCWtqdk71I4j1UE 16GFZ1CXUsMgG4YBE/+LRrhSjsFHVSYX9nqo7h5YYxxDhDWm0HDKhPhNxOKbxFJLzvZi A2Kw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.142.38 with SMTP id rt6mr21322004igb.39.1421695665799; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:27:45 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b7ssb-oR7VGsTnazZz37z0s2JR4 Message-ID: Subject: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update From: Chris Maness To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:46 -0000 I much prefer mergemaster to the freebsd-update (diff) method of merging configuration files. However, the freebsd community seems to be moving in the binary upgrade direction. I still build from source so that I can use mergemaster. Where can I make a feature request to have mergemaster as an option in a freebsd-update (binary) upgrade? Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? I used svn the last time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. I think I should be able to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not been my friend here. I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, but I have not been able to figure it out. Thanks, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 19:56:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BA8E4F for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30760EEA for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id gd6so7020432lab.4 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:56:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=i46evt7HcX3R0sRo1ia66aQ8+MFl+kIz9XbWhLdXbYs=; b=a7/DRbdHwQvi+K4/x+6B+xluIS0Ku/unGiK8GAC2s0LlSLAMPUnPByDQBzYdbx2djB DgywdywZAPT6MsxuoG3RNxbRXFCs41J9bQ13u7VWmk4htqi9fT77Za8JBcb9lDNyiJDM p8ojpsr/Ccm8rz6S3jN0Kb881wQXY2i3VDEnmznv6CHm+kMAkahguUrJfuMHGvJTmrdB nWJ1gYSz92RnTB08nQNYyMpYl+ewnArlnaXrwMKHRr4BZE52dcBWsMZ1r7M/Mx/I1pE8 tcYPtxyzFEUgXH90gmGTV+eBYJCm+1Y1MUgNhXxAKhsvChH+gwoQ1ZV7QwsP9DiXouBd q/zA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl6yLP3LtvzuHdSIRBZYP8tDoAFQLKyRczNl6RBTzPVnDfsadgouWH2NVxsSI4A3ByxK3LL MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.222.135 with SMTP id qm7mr33673778lbc.19.1421697389271; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:56:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.112.164 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:56:29 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [70.209.195.214] Received: by 10.152.112.164 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:56:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:56:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update From: "Brian W." To: Chris Maness Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:56:37 -0000 Re the svn update running svn up /usr/src gets me only changes not the whole tree. On Jan 19, 2015 11:27 AM, "Chris Maness" wrote: > I much prefer mergemaster to the freebsd-update (diff) method of merging > configuration files. However, the freebsd community seems to be moving in > the binary upgrade direction. I still build from source so that I can use > mergemaster. Where can I make a feature request to have mergemaster as an > option in a freebsd-update (binary) upgrade? > > Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? I used svn the last > time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. I think I should be able > to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not been > my friend here. I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, but I > have not been able to figure it out. > > Thanks, > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 20:06:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD02C1F2 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a0i241.smtpcorp.com (a0i241.smtpcorp.com [216.22.15.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85CF9FEC for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:06:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpcorp.com; s=a0_1; h=Feedback-ID:X-Smtpcorp-Track:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=f8SiGwnH4Ma8xnAWw3AQixj9YuMNBIOnMRYQA+zVpjE=; b=fpjwJ26IhAGxw8OWjFcpy0kcZFYAmy6P+Gq+8cans5/hyjWo2tBC/mLqlIY649JGJpXLoyuwmnZ1dI0qRPMoRBe8adGY0AiESK+vj/Gl3lIwt2Oz7eZSNYrjQFmiR6nsoXaG5G2zsEx6ENFscdT8YfYJChfS7F72qycxOloKf0w=; From: Daniel Corbe To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update References: Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:06:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Chris Maness's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:27:45 -0800") Message-ID: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1YDmaINRKFQmjb.vWeR5ZTGI Feedback-ID: 10661m:10661aegzayD:10661sHaNSVRXum:SMTPCORP Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:06:47 -0000 Chris Maness writes: > > Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? I used svn the last > time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. I think I should be able > to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not been > my friend here. I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, but I > have not been able to figure it out. > > Thanks, > Chris Once you've fetched the entire tree for the first time, all you need to do is continually run svn fetch in /usr/src to grab any updates or additions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 20:09:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B044384 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387887A for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id b16so7532766igk.1 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:09:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Tg3PVI8QiYsje0E6rIQrHxJmOss6M3sBEMJWkhSGDMk=; b=Hi4/2Y2c8/y60X4Tt1mRn2QyIgAmwiTv+Fyg1CHy8c2dOEu96hF9Snx5XoDwt7WxBT b/C3dDC60j4j2S3tdR4J13Dy0BPkptJq9n1oJYD0I8FmAGoctK98V653yObJ0CQuC6sn MKhXJR87Zu+dQrJZAJYGlDEKXpJkXOi1uHWUtGQwq0jcgW7C29tyIlVF/h5u+oEhEnWJ EDedlqvj6AN0vssXiaj1DhBDBM7dThVy67P6n+i89CDIleG25S2n5OVsMu7iZRlCAefE GBaGvRT7oG5vHI5LD5JYhRh2uxFLOhUm7/7GaGue1V3JFnHswul1fygJiGHC+hp8Wsxh pU3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.137.99 with SMTP id qh3mr21588516igb.7.1421698195232; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:09:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:09:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:09:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> References: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:09:55 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MEf1Cv_Uea_C2VP3Ldb0iSkb6yI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update From: Chris Maness To: Daniel Corbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:09:56 -0000 On Jan 19, 2015 12:07 PM, "Daniel Corbe" wrote: > > > Chris Maness writes: > > > > Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? I used svn the last > > time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. I think I should be able > > to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not been > > my friend here. I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, but I > > have not been able to figure it out. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris > > Once you've fetched the entire tree for the first time, all you need to > do is continually run svn fetch in /usr/src to grab any updates or > additions. > I had figured that out, but how do you increment up a minor version? Thanks, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 21:00:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1073FC12 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a0i241.smtpcorp.com (a0i241.smtpcorp.com [216.22.15.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC8228C4 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:00:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpcorp.com; s=a0_1; h=Feedback-ID:X-Smtpcorp-Track:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=b4aBMzDYyZ1G4Pdkzw8/3FjyYfu8WGUqyaKLEzeFr2g=; b=nwhl3xeqZZIVWduPMy4DOgeRUIomoVvxrID4NLJnOlg/4BgIYbrw9BOTo7h41TQWThWzc/5SZX4a7wVm6pL99h/NSrjVmWks365le2G8vqhER4UdbOQohMcPMm+4+Xpi8N42cPBm5IDF5/6jkiiVXonzXZNbUHSMOh2gaoAQE6o=; From: Daniel Corbe To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update References: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:00:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Chris Maness's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:09:55 -0800") Message-ID: <8761c2lc3n.fsf@corbe.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1YDJRJmkf1lKLX.vbCjHm_Mx Feedback-ID: 10661m:10661aegzayD:10661sHaNSVRXum:SMTPCORP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:00:51 -0000 Chris Maness writes: > On Jan 19, 2015 12:07 PM, "Daniel Corbe" wrote: >> >> >> Chris Maness writes: >> > >> > Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree?=C2=A0 I used svn= the last >> > time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree.=C2=A0 I think I shoul= d be able >> > to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not= been >> > my friend here.=C2=A0 I know that svn has that capability like cvsup d= id, but I >> > have not been able to figure it out. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Chris >> >> Once you've fetched the entire tree for the first time, all you need to >> do is continually run svn fetch in /usr/src to grab any updates or >> additions. >> > > I had figured that out, but how do you increment up a minor version? That depends on what you mean by minor version. If (for example) you want to go from 10.1 to 10.1 p3, then a simple svn fetch will do the trick. If you're trying to go from 10.0 to 10.1 then you need to point your repo to the right place. IE: svn switch --relocate http://svn0.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1 && svn fetch I'd specifically avoid going from release to release until my systems were no longer supported and I could no longer get security updates for them. Don't fix what isn't broken and all that. -Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 21:24:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2C35B8 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B39B81 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0JLO6gT063681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:24:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0JLO3a9063678; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:24:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:24:03 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:24:06 -0700 (MST) Cc: Daniel Corbe , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:24:56 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > On Jan 19, 2015 12:07 PM, "Daniel Corbe" wrote: >> >> >> Chris Maness writes: >>> >>> Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? I used svn the > last >>> time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. I think I should be > able >>> to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not > been >>> my friend here. I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, > but I >>> have not been able to figure it out. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris >> >> Once you've fetched the entire tree for the first time, all you need to >> do is continually run svn fetch in /usr/src to grab any updates or >> additions. >> > > I had figured that out, but how do you increment up a minor version? The version was specified by the path of the initial 'svn checkout'. Afterwards, any changes to that branch are included when an 'svn update' is run. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/svn.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 21:30:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1638A1 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C610BC1 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0JLTrDn065037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:29:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0JLTrkt065034; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:29:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:29:53 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:29:53 -0700 (MST) Cc: Daniel Corbe , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:30:44 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > >> On Jan 19, 2015 12:07 PM, "Daniel Corbe" wrote: >>> >>> >>> Chris Maness writes: >>>> >>>> Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? I used svn the >> last >>>> time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. I think I should be >> able >>>> to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not >> been >>>> my friend here. I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, >> but I >>>> have not been able to figure it out. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Chris >>> >>> Once you've fetched the entire tree for the first time, all you need to >>> do is continually run svn fetch in /usr/src to grab any updates or >>> additions. >>> >> >> I had figured that out, but how do you increment up a minor version? > > The version was specified by the path of the initial 'svn checkout'. > Afterwards, any changes to that branch are included when an 'svn update' > is run. > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/svn.html Oops, I misunderstood your question. To switch to a different branch, like from 10.0 to 10.1, use 'svn switch'. (See 'svn help switch'.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 21:35:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500DEB04 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112CCCAF for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id a13so14666866igq.0 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:35:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=naMBPMnyy/gTEb1+hkkdEIFkNmsCZLo1eaI2esgRdrU=; b=MWl1KwpKTFig8dPi2LwCKJkl4zGWRlLoEcvF4UjUpYc+SELzpMeLriw6k4whV80UK7 HXhqDPCsyql3GZ0qqVuFlcUwJ34uPTBD+EuZmp/8lxaHvFeEXN7Lueo/AjhErgjLnhFv d+1uEVKo5uQ04MHYuKVChp10/0aQggB9yMZhgiF3dQAIm7yzbkJotiz9eLRG3GscmCEK 2OHjYEdAqbavyvO8BEca29+5n35Q86Hsa0WxrICoZvvsP/JXUi6juZoIQoibY9UruHKx ee8v6XW63AujLaubkTmUEp2gLwxr0clg15DDlqOA4H0fi/uuK5HZszvrtMN1FbYY8ayK L80w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.137.99 with SMTP id qh3mr22104692igb.7.1421703324493; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:35:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:35:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:35:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Z-MVDyleaV5nsVDG_A6wmyaZhCc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update From: Chris Maness To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Daniel Corbe , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:35:25 -0000 On Jan 19, 2015 1:24 PM, "Warren Block" wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > >> On Jan 19, 2015 12:07 PM, "Daniel Corbe" wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Chris Maness writes: >>>> >>>> >>>> Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? I used svn the >> >> last >>>> >>>> time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. I think I should be >> >> able >>>> >>>> to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not >> >> been >>>> >>>> my friend here. I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, >> >> but I >>>> >>>> have not been able to figure it out. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Chris >>> >>> >>> Once you've fetched the entire tree for the first time, all you need to >>> do is continually run svn fetch in /usr/src to grab any updates or >>> additions. >>> >> >> I had figured that out, but how do you increment up a minor version? > > > The version was specified by the path of the initial 'svn checkout'. > Afterwards, any changes to that branch are included when an 'svn update' > is run. > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/svn.html So in that case I would have to blow the whole tree away to go from 10.0 to 10.1. I understand that some may have a different philosophy on following version changes, but the last time I let go until the end of support it took a lot of effort to get up to speed. I was also missing out on much better ports mgmt tools. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 00:00:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 833DE7DD for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (e.febed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.254.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail", Issuer "mail" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD06D09 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0JNfoMv046140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:41:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:42:43 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Manish Jain Subject: Re: Getting help for apcupsd (re-post) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:07 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Manish Jain wrote: > I have an APC UPS (USB) which works perfectly under Windows XP SP3, > but fails to shut down upon power failure via a daemon installed > through the port sysutils/apcupsd. Seemingly, the daemon is unable to > communicate with the UPS to determine remaining battery level. > > I sent a message to the maintainer itetcu@FreeBSD.org over 2 weeks > back, but there has been no reply. > > What can I do next to get the UPS to function correctly ? Thanks. Check your cable, for one thing. I seem to recall that APC uses a bizarre nonstandard pinout. If you use the cable that came with the UPS, you should be OK. HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 00:06:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA00ACE for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C933DFE for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0283CE4A; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:05:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0K05peD002059; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:05:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:05:51 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration Message-Id: <20150120010551.c17d9f50.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:06:03 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:50:28 -0800, Chris Maness wrote: > I have used dump/restore for system migration a couple of time and noticed > it is pretty good, but every once in a while it will miss or corrupt a > file. There is a reason for this. Are you dumping from a live file system? If you can accept filesystem downtime, dump unmounted filesystems. For filesystems which support the use of snapshots, -L can be used. Note that journaled file systems (SU+J) currently doesn't have that feature. A common command line is # dump -0Lauf - | (cd && restore -rf -) where the SOURCE is the device name which you dump from, and TARGET the mounted directory you restore to. And have a look at this excellent advice: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/backup.html You can see further options there. It's also worth having read "man dump" and "man restore" for understanding the options in use here. > Is there a better way to do this? Usually not, because dump + restore is _the_ way to do it. Except of course you're using ZFS. :-) > I would imagine having a system > mounted r/o would help, but this is not always possible. This is where -L is useful: Instead of dumping the actual file system, a snapshot, "fixed in time" of invocation, will be dumped. It's usually considered to be safe, but personally I believe in the immutability of the dumped data, so mounting ro or not mounting at all will steer you away from any doubts. > Is there a way to > check the deltas between systems manually after migration to see if any > files need to be merged or copied. There are tools to get checksums of the sources and targets, and then compare them. But this is an _additional_ step. > I would imagine the files that are in > jeopardy are ones that are being written to while the dump is taking > place. Correct, that's the danger, because dump simply isn't designed to read data that's changing, and restore isn't designed to create consistent copies of something that's changing. How could that even work?! :-) Again, use -L to prevent this, and know the corner case where -L does _not_ work. > I had a file the keeps track of rss feeds end up missing on the > target system. Obtain it manually from the source. You could even run a cpdup (in ports) session to get all the files that have changed since the dump + restore session, which again somehow defeats the purpose of dump + restore... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 00:56:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B69553 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07EB34C for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511BA2778D; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:56:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0K0uaqA002277; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:56:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:56:36 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update Message-Id: <20150120015636.8664f310.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:56:48 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:27:45 -0800, Chris Maness wrote: > I much prefer mergemaster to the freebsd-update (diff) method of merging > configuration files. However, the freebsd community seems to be moving in > the binary upgrade direction. I still build from source so that I can use > mergemaster. Where can I make a feature request to have mergemaster as an > option in a freebsd-update (binary) upgrade? You can probably tune freebsd-update to fit your needs better. Have a look at "man freebsd-update.conf" and check the "UpdateIfUnmodified" and "MergeChanges" options. > Also, is the a tool like portsnap for my source tree? At the moment, there is no such tool, as far as I know. > I used svn the last > time and downloaded the whole version 10.0 tree. This is because svn needs to initialize the local copy of the source tree. This is only required one time (svn checkout). Any further updates are usually done quickly (svn update), depending on how big the delta is. > I think I should be able > to apply deltas only for the minor upgrade to 10.1, but google has not been > my friend here. You can find a good description here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html > I know that svn has that capability like cvsup did, but I > have not been able to figure it out. Unlike cvs, svn needs to "start from scratch" to work properly. Previously, it has been possible to download src.txz (the compressed RELEASE source archive) and then just apply the changes (for example, from RELEASE to the current patch level, or to the recent STABLE version). This is also possible with svn, but you need to checkout the initial version first. If you want to switch to a different branch, use "svn switch" (for example, from 10.0 to 10.1). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 03:27:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D7CD82 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D251F6C0 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kq14so42730849pab.6 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8x2f8Uc47EWTwNVJSNi74SW0JeOsgHaE/CvN9TlnW1g=; b=kpZbmOKjF79BWAEoh413cTdDqlb7tF47bJSlcb2GCK9KKNjCwknuqJ5K/afqqwkg8h TdcgVhEbXx97v/1EIqdB05udMkMMbPrUxMITH7WmqAG8SZrLQULDws8ip5tTha3fwFQb vNgw5HmmErgp/Q+P2oe8NSC0qG9RdcCaMlYOhfUp4O/uaPuMXX42TOBbhPHnWnHNVOnU fxpezGn+xYtZSsHPqLIjWM4PJKLRG2nlfnP2l+KbFvL537C8DlH+k6fwRe05LiqXvuAG xXNlABVd9o5aUr5dROhdbnzYVHeBUYSxYYguA9QwPt88oGWEh0loJxoh0OG8+n/BNCx+ O4Ig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.89.207 with SMTP id bq15mr49259748pdb.68.1421724436325; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.99.171 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:27:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150120004633.GA5448@charmander.picturesperfect.net> References: <20150120004633.GA5448@charmander.picturesperfect.net> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 05:27:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: modfind() returns -1 From: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" To: Mark Johnston Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:27:17 -0000 Hello, On 1/20/15, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:17:10AM +0200, Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to implement a simple system call module, but after I >> install it and try to find its offset with modfind, I somehow get -1. >> >> [...] >> Here is the code that tries to invoke that system call: >> >> $ cat interface.c >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> >> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { >> int syscall_num; >> struct module_stat stat; >> int mod_id; >> >> stat.version = sizeof(stat); >> mod_id = modfind("sc_example_no_args"); > > Does it work if you instead look up "sys/sc_example_no_args"? > Yes, it works with mod_id = modfind("sys/sc_example_no_args"); Thank you very much for your help. Can you explain though why prefixed with sys/ ? Regards Rambius -- Tangra Mega Rock: http://www.radiotangra.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 03:38:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0046ED4 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6E1822 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p10so28695503pdj.1 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:38:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3rB/s17JXYqvup3lbAzfX5o3I8itEtVh2Jg+J/rnTdE=; b=gojHeq416p93xEsqdsrE8OwgHgItastdAQJtyIm0tjdw9762cvvh65Qf0Us2hRHb5U V4SHtsyAa2hfIzYW35JOFEaxl9CQyr5MK+yC5boxLSJ5fkWOwmdBKhRY8rODFjsrqEM3 4QN2Mat/YCQ4zFX0BcSsRHbdNLg4ZLQiLeGC1vo08xzuUYiLrnThsFKdtZACl9iIN7KQ mq06nC5yfwtXxdf1WuwBlQmwNc3YkGQD3nPMVt+71ykKfm8ziv23QME1vQ2iAwQudonx EXmnmk6SzcEoMg2CNtiW4pK/4jZY+so2EFz+pK8hf6eZiLqpGiKjWdwzfAm52nypEMHH jgFA== X-Received: by 10.68.201.1 with SMTP id jw1mr27031074pbc.167.1421725101358; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:38:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from charmander (75-149-173-2-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [75.149.173.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm363601pdb.14.2015.01.19.19.38.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:38:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:38:06 -0800 From: Mark Johnston To: "Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" Subject: Re: modfind() returns -1 Message-ID: <20150120033806.GA8920@charmander> References: <20150120004633.GA5448@charmander.picturesperfect.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "mail.list freebsd-questions" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:38:22 -0000 On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 05:27:16AM +0200, Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote: > Hello, > > On 1/20/15, Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:17:10AM +0200, Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am trying to implement a simple system call module, but after I > >> install it and try to find its offset with modfind, I somehow get -1. > >> > >> [...] > >> Here is the code that tries to invoke that system call: > >> > >> $ cat interface.c > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> > >> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { > >> int syscall_num; > >> struct module_stat stat; > >> int mod_id; > >> > >> stat.version = sizeof(stat); > >> mod_id = modfind("sc_example_no_args"); > > > > Does it work if you instead look up "sys/sc_example_no_args"? > > > > Yes, it works with > > mod_id = modfind("sys/sc_example_no_args"); > > Thank you very much for your help. Can you explain though why prefixed > with sys/ ? I just looked at the SYSCALL_MODULE(9) definition - it prepends "sys/" to the module name. This doesn't appear to be documented though, which is a bug. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 04:09:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540FD343 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mario.brtsvcs.net (mario.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:a400::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292D6ADF for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mario.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D595A2C1613; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87F788F0; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:08:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54BDD4D5.7060100@bluerosetech.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:08:53 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Mergemaster with Freebsd-Update References: <87sif6lem6.fsf@corbe.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:09:00 -0000 On 1/19/2015 12:09 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > I had figured that out, but how do you increment up a minor version? I configure freebsd-update to only fetch the src component. If I want to fetch a new source tree, you can use the -r flag to specify the new version. The side effect is you can't move to -stable or -current with it, but it's quite handy if you don't care to install subversion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 07:59:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BD5B9E for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4747A3E8 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0K7xQjF048467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:59:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0K7xQVI048464; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:59:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:59:26 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Manish Jain Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:59:33 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:50+0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 01/19/2015 18:58, Manish Jain wrote: > > > > On 01/16/2015 18:31, Trond Endrestřl wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:03+0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Has anyone managed to fully port Sublime Text/Sublime Text3 to > > > > FreeBSD-10.1-i386 ? Running st3 on my system gets me the famous > > > > "GLIBC_2.11 not found" message. > > > > > > These two ports are not native to FreeBSD, but precompiled Linux > > > executables, AFAICT. > > > > > > On my system, editors/sublime{,3} needs: > > > > > > emulators/linux_base-c6 > > > accessibility/linux-c6-atk > > > graphics/linux-c6-cairo > > > textproc/linux-c6-expat > > > x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig > > > graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf2 > > > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2 > > > graphics/linux-c6-jpeg > > > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango > > > graphics/linux-c6-png > > > graphics/linux-c6-tiff > > > x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs > > > > > > Maybe you should check the condition of the "Linuxulator" ports > > > installed on your system. The above list would be a good start. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I tried installing as per your advice. base-c6 asked me to remove > > base-f10 with 'pkg delete'. That done I installed all the ports in your > > list. Now running 'make install' in sublime3 gives me Error Code 1 : > > > > > linux-sublime-3.0.65 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release > > > - not found > > > ===> Verifying install for /compat/linux/etc/fedora-release in > > > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 > > > > > > ===> linux_base-f10-10_7 conflicts with installed package(s): > > > linux_base-c6-6.6 > > > They will not build together. > > > > Thanks for any help. > > > > > > Regards > > > > Manish Jain > > +91-98995-82709 > > > Hi Trond, > > Running portsnap fetch/extract/update lets the install complete, but then > sublime exits immediately : > > /home/bourne/wine/oed # sublime > /home/bourne/wine/oed # type sublime > sublime is hashed (/usr/local/bin/sublime) > /home/bourne/wine/oed # sublime > /home/bourne/wine/oed # ps waux | grep subl > bourne 64416 0.0 0.1 10320 1816 2 S+ 8:46PM 0:00.00 grep subl > /home/bourne/wine/oed # If it exits without telling you what's wrong, the check the log files to see if it has written anything there. If sublime still hold its tongue, then this is an example of bad programming. Running "truss `which sublime`" might give you a hint of what's going on. Personally, I prefer builing my own ports, but that's an entirely different discussion. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestřl, | Trond Endrestřl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjřvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 09:12:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD992E64 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from archeo.suszko.eu (archeo.unixguru.pl [IPv6:2001:41d0:a:698b::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BDEDDAC for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from archeo (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by archeo.suszko.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B351AF166; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:11:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at archeo.local Received: from archeo.suszko.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by archeo (archeo.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id vGAb-ahKTqEY; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:11:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from helium (gate.grtech.pl [195.8.99.234]) by archeo.suszko.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 561D41AF10F; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:11:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=suszko.eu; s=dkim; t=1421745110; bh=ckxipyh/B4kyInz57lpxzc2NMyjwvr7V3jRR3vq6/lI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=P2v6MdXwR2hMkLuwNqvzD15cvJnahB0auCZMPxKq0eeZ73PKKfJK6qPtFzK9uGzi3 O8/Aka2B1KksJ2Nh8XOXEn/Zbg+EeT6bj5s+qtmqNXgZxL8wbo4pRutt/ItPiKbAi2 fZc7I4CYC5WbVrOLTxrg+lCknTL0d53eQtHPN3c8= Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:11:44 +0100 From: Maciej Suszko To: Panagiotis Atmatzidis Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN Message-ID: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/EQLjcHOetPKo7dziY2DT=Jm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:12:04 -0000 --Sig_/EQLjcHOetPKo7dziY2DT=Jm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:53:40 +0200 Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: [...] > I think that this has something to do with =E2=80=98tun0=E2=80=99 interfa= ce which is > the last thing that is loaded at boot. Probably PF runs before this, > sees rules that it doesn=E2=80=99t understand (related to tun0) and comes= up > short, then tun0 is loaded but it=E2=80=99s too late. That's simple to test, just destroy your tun device and check the output of: # pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf --=20 regards, Maciej Suszko. --Sig_/EQLjcHOetPKo7dziY2DT=Jm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlS+G9AACgkQCikUk0l7iGpwdwCdHxbVHRAd4zfm8QU3iluGBSSs j4EAnjR7vz23tv0toB8Ue41kkjrqSAP/ =qWYa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/EQLjcHOetPKo7dziY2DT=Jm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 09:16:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366C1F3B for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4864DDD for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q9so6378877ykb.3 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:16:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hRPfRtHufw0CMGR+jQnDsDjR2UoKjGJldDFPukVVpnY=; b=qVFnnU8K+ltY3sqc9f6i8oplUlcWXxVea3Elw2GJDmod5L1DxyAzRmtYHcdAjx8/cg vwsGW2SsZWmFXUv6HsQt/R/+JSGNvsoWtdA5YqawW3Y0ZKixeEzkE7dUtY+TU5ZZ8WT7 y7op/Zzs+3iHlg++MYxYNfX63hOrT+sKh9ih63TazEJt/EPhep1ZQugt+U3O+IGW821p aRiBbRyBKGpX+PbyxgqHARuSHvJ0RZM27S/y9CjtNgnc7erlTXVeXNyZD7qclhTdpZf4 Ifxgc+Rg6m/vwyYpa26CHl/+jquGE92VMzGlIKZUfRitg6+AlLfohrKH47baDbXxQE3Y fs8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.105.227 with SMTP id k63mr9654506yhg.100.1421745389074; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.188.144 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:16:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> References: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:29 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN From: krad To: Maciej Suszko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Panagiotis Atmatzidis , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:16:30 -0000 put this in your rc conf it may help cloned_interfaces=3D"tun0" that will create the interface early on way before openvpn is spawned. You may need to force openvpn to use tun0 as it might try to create tun1 On 20 January 2015 at 09:11, Maciej Suszko wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:53:40 +0200 > Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: > > [...] > > > I think that this has something to do with =E2=80=98tun0=E2=80=99 inter= face which is > > the last thing that is loaded at boot. Probably PF runs before this, > > sees rules that it doesn=E2=80=99t understand (related to tun0) and com= es up > > short, then tun0 is loaded but it=E2=80=99s too late. > > That's simple to test, just destroy your tun device and check the > output of: > > # pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf > -- > regards, Maciej Suszko. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 12:18:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA697DCB for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nikki.convalesco.org (convalesco.org [IPv6:2a01:7c8:aab0:264::100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C19E6AF for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hilbert.lan (130.43.124.168.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [130.43.124.168]); by nikki.convalesco.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e23c83f6; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:18:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B54CF411-D952-47FF-B9B4-C2322620D6F3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 From: Panagiotis Atmatzidis In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:18:28 +0200 Message-Id: References: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Maciej Suszko X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:18:36 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_B54CF411-D952-47FF-B9B4-C2322620D6F3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, Thanks for the replies > On 20 Jan 2015, at 11:16, krad > wrote: >=20 > put this in your rc conf it may help >=20 > cloned_interfaces=3D=E2=80=9Ctun0" That didn=E2=80=99t work either. Although the interface was created, = still =E2=80=98pf=E2=80=99 was not able to start when I just created = tun0 without starting OpenVPN. I=E2=80=99m not sure if this problem can be reproduced elsewhere. I = never had such issues with Linux iptables for example and googling = around for a 2 days I didn=E2=80=99t find anyone else having the same = issue on any system, which is weird, because I=E2=80=99m sure that there are many = *BSD + OpenVPN deployments. >=20 > that will create the interface early on way before openvpn is spawned. = You > may need to force openvpn to use tun0 as it might try to create tun1 >=20 > On 20 January 2015 at 09:11, Maciej Suszko > wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:53:40 +0200 >> Panagiotis Atmatzidis > wrote: >>=20 >> [...] >>=20 >>> I think that this has something to do with =E2=80=98tun0=E2=80=99 = interface which is >>> the last thing that is loaded at boot. Probably PF runs before this, >>> sees rules that it doesn=E2=80=99t understand (related to tun0) and = comes up >>> short, then tun0 is loaded but it=E2=80=99s too late. >>=20 >> That's simple to test, just destroy your tun device and check the >> output of: >>=20 >> # pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf >> -- >> regards, Maciej Suszko. >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org = mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions = > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org = " I resolved the issue by creating a devd conf file: $ cat /etc/devd/tun.conf # Run PF when tun0 is up notify 0 { match "system" "IFNET"; match "subsystem" "tun0"; match "type" "LINK_UP"; action "/etc/rc.d/pf start"; }; This file makes sure =E2=80=98pf=E2=80=99 is executed right after = =E2=80=98tun0=E2=80=99 interface is UP, which happens at boot anyway = since openvpn is started by =E2=80=98rc.conf=E2=80=99. You need have = =E2=80=98pf=E2=80=99 enabled in =E2=80=98rc.conf=E2=80=99 of course. It works fine now on every reboot :-) Thanks guys! ps. A nice fella on #freeBSD@Freenode w/ nickname =E2=80=98frogs=E2=80=99 = helped me with devd debugging. Panagiotis (atmosx) Atmatzidis email: atma@convalesco.org URL: http://www.convalesco.org GnuPG ID: 0x1A7BFEC5 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1A7BFEC5 "As you set out for Ithaca, hope the voyage is a long one, full of = adventure, full of discovery [...]" - C. P. Cavafy --Apple-Mail=_B54CF411-D952-47FF-B9B4-C2322620D6F3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Public Key Encryption iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUvkeUAAoJEPy01a8ae/7F/e8P/im99hfh5uVrgYCzKcFQ10OG uUkq6Lb86KAf1J5cTp7jJ6zSZRHj7sK4ILVEtmrCwLkJGNO9/9jt9UizNbZprF32 KbNbrhUoG1O/3KUNhq/nn1xs4d6gcG+K+BRU2WDu7rxMZWkBwFB0Z0SCrbG2N5D1 Dd6MbKVQCssqp4CcWpzK2/5y7ifDeQZhKkTkjK8sJfnkBV1dWXnhkGRCKxMmkNwS pTxWavZAdyPbDQZmI1TfuNtZR2ge92R8PfhpPUiCQx6zhHlSUoEr1pOwdVSh2myb pXdP3p3xB1ZvHFNEVfPRGVPXRn0ScP/mLCEPIWaBGp5gxqCOk/QN+bGTHwG/oxw/ ccWP7ghuDcTu04zBD1uvXyofM/5M2EtUSHzVTgcs72wHSga7nnrdzJO1iukkSq92 MwfbbRSs727TxwepjrjvqezOh5XzvxpgPYIvS8AB4tZdIjvES6ShY4UJfl7hBN9M 2h49tM9ZSQpBgPbx0MBbDBa56orxK65KTB4aNHWQAVDKmxpPJ39/KsqyWsXiFSbM FF/CHnY8VGIiufLDdvrr4Gnxez0lYWvvoHxx7ZqO36NclD1rP59C4VAzMB70dcK0 mqt+qDVmZEfMucwjujBuyXtNEeq9uL0O6n+yMTeyWsRCM1Os2P/kB7yT2v1iIoTz 7O2SugLnn7qYH2sWbqVm =rPVf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_B54CF411-D952-47FF-B9B4-C2322620D6F3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 13:06:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F79AC35 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from archeo.suszko.eu (archeo.unixguru.pl [37.187.116.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5B9BFF for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from archeo (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by archeo.suszko.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A221AF166; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:06:35 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at archeo.local Received: from archeo.suszko.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by archeo (archeo.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id L9Qofbrh0W9d; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:06:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from helium (gate.grtech.pl [195.8.99.234]) by archeo.suszko.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 616FA1AF10F; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:06:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=suszko.eu; s=dkim; t=1421759194; bh=lqtl9WLu7kgoofA6QyoC5fZoZscQck+zfAnDoB/W0yw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=cfqtmXKgqUWikq0RPUp9GBtfUxM8+pahXxEb3o6V9ijlJUxCb+65zMOsYyu9LP+Ek pxDvJiG0HOwhKvU1jZ/fjxLp+oBuh/2RjHA7FqQp/nxAYaxKgadrR8cG2jwR7+a2bf 0d/ddBX2WeiM05QPfLl9ttUSSM2gVvD45jt91ofE= Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:06:31 +0100 From: Maciej Suszko To: Panagiotis Atmatzidis Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN Message-ID: <20150120140631.377bee87@helium> In-Reply-To: References: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/SRhyV5=PZ/wnOuSzNPPNfzV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:06:42 -0000 --Sig_/SRhyV5=PZ/wnOuSzNPPNfzV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:18:28 +0200 Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: [...] > I resolved the issue by creating a devd conf file: >=20 > $ cat /etc/devd/tun.conf > # Run PF when tun0 is up > notify 0 { > match "system" "IFNET"; > match "subsystem" "tun0"; > match "type" "LINK_UP"; > action "/etc/rc.d/pf start"; > }; >=20 > This file makes sure =E2=80=98pf=E2=80=99 is executed right after =E2=80= =98tun0=E2=80=99 interface is UP, which happens at boot anyway since openvp= n is started by =E2=80=98rc.conf=E2=80=99. You need have =E2=80=98pf=E2=80= =99 enabled in =E2=80=98rc.conf=E2=80=99 of course. >=20 > It works fine now on every reboot :-) It just looks like solution taken directly from Linux world... If we don't know why it's not working, let's put rc script somewhere - problem solved! In my opinion, properly created pf.conf have nothing to do with openvpn - neither running nor stopped. Post your pf.conf, pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf with tun0 present and absent, look at dmesg -a, messages etc. Just my 2 cents... --=20 regards, Maciej Suszko. --Sig_/SRhyV5=PZ/wnOuSzNPPNfzV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlS+UtcACgkQCikUk0l7iGo30wCeP51FlyPzPgo9tBfLatzoKiEM 4tsAnjxGwSSCB2YB21NTIw2RV3PDBwWM =dzNj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SRhyV5=PZ/wnOuSzNPPNfzV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 13:39:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C0C03FF for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nikki.convalesco.org (convalesco.org [IPv6:2a01:7c8:aab0:264::100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 991E5F1C for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hilbert.lan (130.43.124.168.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [130.43.124.168]); by nikki.convalesco.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ff2eb314; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:39:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EEADD4A2-9CDF-4A03-8A6A-7D855B5E24E9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 From: Panagiotis Atmatzidis In-Reply-To: <20150120140631.377bee87@helium> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:39:13 +0200 Message-Id: <44269B05-51E7-4279-B828-1990DC73251F@convalesco.org> References: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> <20150120140631.377bee87@helium> To: Maciej Suszko X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:39:23 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_EEADD4A2-9CDF-4A03-8A6A-7D855B5E24E9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, > On 20 Jan 2015, at 15:06, Maciej Suszko wrote: >=20 > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:18:28 +0200 > Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] >=20 > Post your pf.conf, pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf with tun0 present and > absent, look at dmesg -a, messages etc. Using =E2=80=98pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf=E2=80=99 without tun0 comes up = with the following error: No IP address found for tun0 /etc/pf.conf:86: could not parse host specification Line is 86 is: = https://gist.github.com/atmosx/2dcff31a0d8868d4b1c7#file-pf-conf-L83 = But how do I bypass this using pf.conf alone? The .conf needs to become = =E2=80=98dynamic=E2=80=99 somehow. >=20 > Just my 2 cents... > -- > regards, Maciej Suszko. Panagiotis (atmosx) Atmatzidis email: atma@convalesco.org URL: http://www.convalesco.org GnuPG ID: 0x1A7BFEC5 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1A7BFEC5 "As you set out for Ithaca, hope the voyage is a long one, full of = adventure, full of discovery [...]" - C. P. Cavafy --Apple-Mail=_EEADD4A2-9CDF-4A03-8A6A-7D855B5E24E9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Public Key Encryption iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUvlqFAAoJEPy01a8ae/7FexAP/2B73+TSdkwMHsKdGp7Efn1G p0zzn5wWsQWFU0hCjp/hvp0p/3LyYu8ud1wSIivgLzxJyYjZ0RdTE2u9gOF76uzD fZQ9E52diTziOmksCVkwdHx6IiYPwh7icmnfkrhJuose8CrJeaF2HGXv7a/epe3I H2QZYnuvE/L3ld7EBgf/iiQV2ZW3hdNUCU8qbmU0E9mA54rHSFrxiICIEd2d3yLM 8K26py/zWLJhZoOCVvPMLK+XLB+yjKktRQcQX6NCsQ68S28e+rDPRrC3Aixush8N 1iZ/mlXCwqEhbpQzHdYCXFQdF5ewXcSpjEFdCp9j+Hq/q95IBLPJW7GISO2EhEmh HWiDWi/8Drl+1iaxwu3p8LmsqPeE+JhYfZc6zR8aRnTm0oGVlpcRs1L/ehVUn+t/ VqDi0X+OT3/y6nyakH0bwU6DFfIqxp3rUntODDxqaVuhSDgsWKXyfUimUzmE89U8 05U6cDN5CSFUOMedMXw2CyU7SW8qhdNES7AP3Rc5qdn+ksXHAhuL0RiN6lIb2IAe ro+I5PSWIj5GX+nVAKnSmMlw9opjsF6GK0P9ra2jL7rKtACuB/ia0Rofy8SJsGuR f2liGMCvzYGhHlVUvUy6kqStHjklDhvm/DL+pB+CUI9C+tWZmYUs/NzppionMsP7 fHXdSgxXl4YOSJRHF6vq =GOCw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_EEADD4A2-9CDF-4A03-8A6A-7D855B5E24E9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 13:54:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41F05A7 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nikki.convalesco.org (convalesco.org [IPv6:2a01:7c8:aab0:264::100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203E515B for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hilbert.lan (130.43.124.168.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [130.43.124.168]); by nikki.convalesco.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9bebfdda; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:54:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN [SOLVED] Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_82304AC1-2751-48EC-B623-CE3AECBDD82C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 From: Panagiotis Atmatzidis In-Reply-To: <20150120140631.377bee87@helium> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:53:57 +0200 Message-Id: <74BA96D6-EB31-4534-9428-C646EF901E5B@convalesco.org> References: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> <20150120140631.377bee87@helium> To: Maciej Suszko X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:54:06 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_82304AC1-2751-48EC-B623-CE3AECBDD82C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On 20 Jan 2015, at 15:06, Maciej Suszko wrote: >=20 > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:18:28 +0200 > Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: >=20 > [...] >=20 >> I resolved the issue by creating a devd conf file: >>=20 >> $ cat /etc/devd/tun.conf >> # Run PF when tun0 is up >> notify 0 { >> match "system" "IFNET"; >> match "subsystem" "tun0"; >> match "type" "LINK_UP"; >> action "/etc/rc.d/pf start"; >> }; >>=20 >> This file makes sure =E2=80=98pf=E2=80=99 is executed right after = =E2=80=98tun0=E2=80=99 interface is UP, which happens at boot anyway = since openvpn is started by =E2=80=98rc.conf=E2=80=99. You need have = =E2=80=98pf=E2=80=99 enabled in =E2=80=98rc.conf=E2=80=99 of course. >>=20 >> It works fine now on every reboot :-) >=20 > It just looks like solution taken directly from Linux world... If we > don't know why it's not working, let's put rc script somewhere - > problem solved! >=20 > In my opinion, properly created pf.conf have nothing to do with = openvpn > - neither running nor stopped. >=20 > Post your pf.conf, pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf with tun0 present and > absent, look at dmesg -a, messages etc. >=20 > Just my 2 cents... > -- > regards, Maciej Suszko. Actually never-mind, that rule created the problem and it=E2=80=99s not = needed at all. VPN users have access to all ports, so I=E2=80=99m all = set now. Thanks Maciej and Krad :-) Panagiotis (atmosx) Atmatzidis email: atma@convalesco.org URL: http://www.convalesco.org GnuPG ID: 0x1A7BFEC5 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1A7BFEC5 "As you set out for Ithaca, hope the voyage is a long one, full of = adventure, full of discovery [...]" - C. P. Cavafy --Apple-Mail=_82304AC1-2751-48EC-B623-CE3AECBDD82C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Public Key Encryption iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUvl35AAoJEPy01a8ae/7F6FIP/jsgmTI64WndynOxfdx2OogT jQqETHib4Gtb9D+mZ/FCqdYEbctzxVxnpbNZk7Tc7eaNfU4jBaWPBoEO9nzIyE7+ SLvTpiNxR0j8zRbDfRZ7LsHbxd75aVgbFUSEaHzpDcHqayXbFs8HUYF9mMow0drJ dH+tBUhH20dPmY6HFHaK63akHvRDgra7B1/yzLI5rob3Z1St8avwlcScUmbXZCNz XhfUqi0n86+n5ZJFDOdIhidoDN0tCcv1UWjH+mzKMTyC1eVXyYWOKqroV5zPzoif qDOBgVLqsrFS78TJkcsSMPlpWYnYSGT8E12DxqSKgY5U49NIS0OCUP0EEYIk4mjA v7JMT3w0k7N/sv/CAmAe2CeHs+L9SS3LBTsa40LSfr2//5BUcwdg/Ifc7R82cB01 456338KqkY0mixxVoW7Yf+X/UGNy3BehbDXeRCGgiQMPGBsMYe8Qq1/IbMJKb0+k H7WA7HtlgCdFQOpySAyvM01jMKlf5j7h7bO6JBJaPBwUIH50l6+DFfEech1GPHEq UmxffMZIlWE1aHpEgh6ZuWD+w2jccbhggSnnhN9v9JP+yI87Jt4S5g3zjx5KgrWD HYLQd6vECWVU8sB7qPsrvxplQceH38w7uOz2Vkb2JM7dKEhubWx2EWxg0ZT96/sW RcGNSycwH/Ecz3GNg9bf =IOXf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_82304AC1-2751-48EC-B623-CE3AECBDD82C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 14:13:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A4CDD7 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from archeo.suszko.eu (archeo.unixguru.pl [IPv6:2001:41d0:a:698b::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F8723F5 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from archeo (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by archeo.suszko.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34D41AF166; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:13:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at archeo.local Received: from archeo.suszko.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by archeo (archeo.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id LBcXYPDkVoqt; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:13:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from helium (gate.grtech.pl [195.8.99.234]) by archeo.suszko.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 190431AF10F; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:13:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=suszko.eu; s=dkim; t=1421763191; bh=j1M5cX/Cr/kHpIn6uaYXDUkbFzLgqLY/vcGBhhoFwpY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Se7E5eIVk3XEt1AXm9T6wbXjJqk16i7KnYq4mcZ44N6cJr8rurBOprvIYW62k6K5i 5AkBHk3/fbUtnERrlBetRhHPh7ZkRw8FtW3EZ6jWmd8xbEns57wFzE5ij0fXZZ9XGP CCpftEfL6n4SiYocHxHr4K+HiKA59bSQa3bIAPwU= Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:13:08 +0100 From: Maciej Suszko To: Panagiotis Atmatzidis Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN Message-ID: <20150120151308.1dabff40@helium> In-Reply-To: <44269B05-51E7-4279-B828-1990DC73251F@convalesco.org> References: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> <20150120140631.377bee87@helium> <44269B05-51E7-4279-B828-1990DC73251F@convalesco.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Pj7fUBtbPqCmVYxWROPr7s1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:13:19 -0000 --Sig_/Pj7fUBtbPqCmVYxWROPr7s1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:39:13 +0200 Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: [...] > Using =E2=80=98pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf=E2=80=99 without tun0 comes up wit= h the following error: >=20 > No IP address found for tun0 > /etc/pf.conf:86: could not parse host specification Interface tun0 is bringed up by openvpn, so you know your network before it's up. You can use some macro, vpn_net for example. --=20 regards, Maciej Suszko. --Sig_/Pj7fUBtbPqCmVYxWROPr7s1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlS+YnQACgkQCikUk0l7iGq7FwCfRYHZGvQxXR+xfkUf5Y9Lob+X RvAAoITNuEdOJTXMXrZgPk+WjrChLdm/ =xJT0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Pj7fUBtbPqCmVYxWROPr7s1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 14:14:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C825E69 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22e.google.com (mail-yk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E43955E2 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 131so4637231ykp.5 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:14:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nPHQnSbdkRirbKqhTzN30L1rBTEmGJzD+gmjgPF4COc=; b=ADnZPWGcUuxdLn2w7ynmzEsX/lXshapG+8Po4O3ZMBx2Vd0NMDcHNDGCFvqlAopYY6 d4pPq5AGEjHFcGOAPmrFCWUDYH+6auXw9jk24yIBKA+UkjQo1TNPGI/3aWPjoU25aebQ 9lPIeiYfO8QZD9GLff2iOBIsx6d6OYtlQryZUqKCXM0HGtZptKgwoaoF5FkGa4lbn41o DJKUmTXBMybmCkei3TXWK6qhZVCp1vYGGKIc+GHeC5C7PNMRcjacvhkmy1jzvYPqbA8v p3TiNJ2RdpJNZWFWTJeRxvbm4RNb3aKVE8GbwagnsgFB7LgIM/etCC7z6VFnp0UCLEUu J78Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.83.4 with SMTP id z4mr24247486ykz.103.1421763269112; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:14:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.188.144 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:14:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <44269B05-51E7-4279-B828-1990DC73251F@convalesco.org> References: <20150120101144.735f0b67@helium> <20150120140631.377bee87@helium> <44269B05-51E7-4279-B828-1990DC73251F@convalesco.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:14:29 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN From: krad To: Panagiotis Atmatzidis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Maciej Suszko , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:14:30 -0000 cloned_interfaces should take care of that, as i have tun0 referenced in my pf.conf and it works fine. Check its defined correctly with: # sysrc cloned_interfaces cloned_interfaces: gif0 tun0 bridge0 another way of doing it would be to comment out the last line in your pf.conf and add an anchor at the end eg anchor "vpn/*" then do something like echo "pass in quick on vtnet0 proto { tcp udp } from tun0 to vtnet0 port 8123" | pfctl -a vpn -f - after openvpn has started up. The problem you have is someone stops openvpn from running at startup suddenly you have no firewall. Its also starting up much later than it should so you are exposing yourself for a small window of time. On 20 January 2015 at 13:39, Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: > Hello, > > > On 20 Jan 2015, at 15:06, Maciej Suszko wrote: > > > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:18:28 +0200 > > Panagiotis Atmatzidis wrote: > > > > [=E2=80=A6] > > > > Post your pf.conf, pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf with tun0 present and > > absent, look at dmesg -a, messages etc. > > Using =E2=80=98pfctl -nvf /etc/pf.conf=E2=80=99 without tun0 comes up wit= h the following > error: > > No IP address found for tun0 > /etc/pf.conf:86: could not parse host specification > > Line is 86 is: > https://gist.github.com/atmosx/2dcff31a0d8868d4b1c7#file-pf-conf-L83 < > https://gist.github.com/atmosx/2dcff31a0d8868d4b1c7#file-pf-conf-L86> > > But how do I bypass this using pf.conf alone? The .conf needs to become > =E2=80=98dynamic=E2=80=99 somehow. > > > > > Just my 2 cents... > > -- > > regards, Maciej Suszko. > > > > Panagiotis (atmosx) Atmatzidis > > email: atma@convalesco.org > URL: http://www.convalesco.org > GnuPG ID: 0x1A7BFEC5 > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1A7BFEC5 > > "As you set out for Ithaca, hope the voyage is a long one, full of > adventure, full of discovery [...]" - C. P. Cavafy > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 17:59:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3848E942 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC8D21E for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x3so12999412wes.1 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:59:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0moTa0KvspvrAzSizckoT3/vkeutdF8IsOLcpzBFMks=; b=Gtou9uc5jf0lS9yObKlfuXNvpIKddkUJU894m6+E4bSdFUI2e/qmbKjojpDkCDWM6R gJaS/fnKHk/C1sO3WCCBTiBY61TbS3cl1NBgHrs3DQJFDhjIcOteL1DhcClOdCp7+GCd PEYnY65N6ljhQnycFV/LdCvloZz2aY8ASn6O9Gh5cuvH6GVYF+z963DUggUJeJ+JkUfz l6BOSq1qm2UH3tcwCPXF1M0I7gePFBNn6m30SOmZ7MRXiySBy+G4M4WytbMhgoGH6bqq MQV0QfgQzGriPV118ElVzQUiTqO9GH1wd06XQsKSzv/wB2lAjq93p1nYl9+hopWKFN9w k9jw== X-Received: by 10.194.110.69 with SMTP id hy5mr74970990wjb.121.1421776766922; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from x220.optiplex-networks.com (optiplexnetworks.plus.com. [212.159.80.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ep9sm3974728wid.3.2015.01.20.09.59.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:59:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1421776765.3146.22.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Anyone running phpBB3 with oauth for Google and Facebook? From: Kaya Saman To: freebsd-questions Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:59:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:59:29 -0000 Hi, I'm wondering if anyone has setup phpBB3.1 on FreeBSD and authentication with Facebook and Google? Currently I am attempting to test on both Apache24 and Nginx but not having any luck with any of them. The basic forum and authentication works fine without any issues however the issue begins with external based oauth. It simply returns a white screen after going through login procedures from FB/Google. I have setup both FB/Google backends and have client ID's and Secrets for each. Php version being run is 56 built from ports and am using a Postgresql backend. With Nginx I have php-fpm and of course Apache24 has a module for php. Both logs suggest a similar issue and taking the Apache24 log as an example it is showing me this: [Tue Jan 20 17:05:05.791147 2015] [:error] [pid 10133] [client :13630] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'OAuth\\Common\\Http\ \Exception\\TokenResponseException' with message 'Failed to request resource.' in /usr/local/www/phpBB3/vendor/lusitanian/oauth/src/OAuth/Common/Http/Clie= nt/StreamClient.php:54\nStack trace:\n#0 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/vendor/lusit= anian/oauth/src/OAuth/OAuth2/Service/AbstractService.php(97): OAuth\\Common= \\Http\\Client\\StreamClient->retrieveResponse(Object(OAuth\\Common\\Http\\= Uri\\Uri), Array, Array)\n#1 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/phpbb/auth/provider/oaut= h/service/facebook.php(69): OAuth\\OAuth2\\Service\\AbstractService->reques= tAccessToken('AQBuYcGxf76_8oa...')\n#2 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/phpbb/auth/pro= vider/oauth/oauth.php(198): phpbb\\auth\\provider\\oauth\\service\\facebook= ->perform_auth_login()\n#3 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/phpbb/auth/auth.php(937): = phpbb\\auth\\provider\\oauth\\oauth->login('', '')\n#4 /usr/local/www/phpBB= 3/includes/functions.php(2831): phpbb\\auth\\auth->login('', '', false, 1, = 0)\n#5 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/ucp.php(84): login_box('index.php')\n#6 {main}= \n thrown in /usr/local/www/phpBB3/vendor/lusitanian/oauth/src/OAuth/Commo= n/Http/Client/StreamClient.php on line 54, referer: http://:85/ucp.p= hp?mode=3Dlogin [Tue Jan 20 17:06:05.795329 2015] [:error] [pid 10135] [client 192.168.0.119:47111] PHP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'OAuth\\Common \\Http\\Exception\\TokenResponseException' with message 'Failed to request resource.' in /usr/local/www/phpBB3/vendor/lusitanian/oauth/src/OAuth/Common/Http/Clie= nt/StreamClient.php:54\nStack trace:\n#0 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/vendor/lusit= anian/oauth/src/OAuth/OAuth2/Service/AbstractService.php(97): OAuth\\Common= \\Http\\Client\\StreamClient->retrieveResponse(Object(OAuth\\Common\\Http\\= Uri\\Uri), Array, Array)\n#1 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/phpbb/auth/provider/oaut= h/service/facebook.php(69): OAuth\\OAuth2\\Service\\AbstractService->reques= tAccessToken('AQDazjJE3srAEf_...')\n#2 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/phpbb/auth/pro= vider/oauth/oauth.php(198): phpbb\\auth\\provider\\oauth\\service\\facebook= ->perform_auth_login()\n#3 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/phpbb/auth/auth.php(937): = phpbb\\auth\\provider\\oauth\\oauth->login('', '')\n#4 /usr/local/www/phpBB= 3/includes/functions.php(2831): phpbb\\auth\\auth->login('', '', false, 1, = 0)\n#5 /usr/local/www/phpBB3/ucp.php(84): login_box('index.php')\n#6 {main}= \n thrown in /usr/local/www/phpBB3/vendor/lusitanian/oauth/src/OAuth/Commo= n/Http/Client/StreamClient.php on line 54, referer: http://:85/ucp.p= hp?mode=3Dlogin&sid=3D7447624df297b6f14e910e7531a5521e The general config file for Apache vhost is this: DocumentRoot /usr/local/www/phpBB3 ServerName AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php DirectoryIndex index.php Options +FollowSymLinks Require all granted AllowOverride None Originally I installed phpbb3 from @ports however, the version there is 3.0.x so I grabbed the latest version directly from the phpbb site which is 3.1.x. Would anyone be able to suggest what might be wrong or even better a fix?? Btw it is intentional for the site to be running on port 85 as it's only a throw-away demo test instance. Thanks. Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 18:52:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA2832C3 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D617A96 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id iJqu1p00307iGuj01Jqvz6; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:50:55 +0100 Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E8E4312418; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:50:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:50:53 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Odhiambo Washington , Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc Message-ID: <20150120185053.GA57651@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , Matthew Seaman , User Questions References: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:52:08 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:47:28PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/01/19 13:29, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Now, suppose I did not install gcc from the ports and I'd like to insta= ll > > an application by hand using native tools for FreeBSD 10.x, how do I do > > that? > > I need a lecture on this:-) > > This is exactly why the ports exists: the port maintainer understands > how to make whatever software it is compile smoothly and generally do > what you want, so you don't have to. So true. :-) But if you want to become a power user it is very useful to study how this machinery works! > If you insist on building your own de-novo, then you are going to need > to crawl up that fairly steep learning curve. I'm afraid I cannot > deliver a simple lecture on 'do this, and it will work' because, well, > it's not simple at all. Every journey begins with a first step. :-) Running ./configure --help can be helpful. It shows what the possible optio= ns and environment variables are. > Your first hurdle seems to be getting configure to choose consistent > settings. configure is expecting 'cc' on FreeBSD 10.x to actually be > clang -- which is what it usually is. If you want to use gcc instead, > then you need to tell configure that, which you usually do by setting > the CC environment variable when you call configure. Usually, the configure from gnu autoconf expects gcc? I think that the defa= ult usage of clang is a feature of the ports tree. At least I often see a messa= ge like "patching auto** for FreeBSD 10" whizzing by when compiling a port. In general you have to set some environment variables for configure to use clang. For another app that I needed to compile outside of the ports tree I had to do something like this; env LDFLAGS=3D-L/usr/local/lib CPPFLAGS=3D-I/usr/local/include CC=3Dcla= ng \ CXX=3Dclang++ CFLAGS=3D-O2 ./configure gmake install You generally have to use =E2=80=98gmake=E2=80=99 instead of =E2=80=98make= =E2=80=99, since autotools Makefiles require extensions that only exist in gmake. In the best case the program doesn't require FreeBSD specific patches and t= he abovementioned commands work. But since the FreeBSD port of squid *does* contain FreeBSD specific patches (see in this case =E2=80=9C/usr/ports/www/squid/files/patch-*=E2=80=9D), you might need to ap= ply these as well to get the compile to work. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUvqONAAoJEED21dyjijPgWMEQAIr8R3NU7WeBe9BVEdjNinHr UAqS6bJW7TOAvWKVU+TnVJdgjrAerDJxwRyDiFEaFb44BI77znnjDP73w4nJVI6K YfUB48nsjwJdxoMiMOHrfF8tY9pGK/StaHNi6WbN0U65QyfvUNK/Ewv30tWqeDgf xKdh7sK1TZupGW9yfiCzbJxks9RTro8tfuXHUu7sc7s/h3MciUA7Ledv8w65CcL/ qntoEwugzLRhyaBZzArKDw0UaYSVKHCjq2BvcyU+Y00GYj4DX6A9EseOp/XIzsHu vSQxfPqvdEltFTSl9iiQ5mV1UwTpSGRKViYWeos4bgjutf6AyUaYmNYcKbKI0THf 5BApBaV0r0ApjfsY9b6WY6mZGDQwkzHudKgd6tlKbpCJzXzCPjzMTbScqEEKczwO oSyRO3oNvTKdhFXjsbYIEbvbxNO+ye25WTORi2jlGp5eoZdxNhPzeDIk7bZSan8h 2v6F6F8mjUNxgZUq+WyagAtF7qDEfAkLHWzCrTGCGhQ6RjUI3GgZ8GULOYzY2UZE azC4FFBmYL1ENWjBzK4w6N/FDFvk/t5zHJjHD27nEi44KZ+w2/cf/N3CodZv8Ntz QqZcl4K0YD3mBVrOxlJaJ5zOr/igwXJ/ldrm7Rnki9ipgzOP0lsj9dhVpBJh3wiN fMkoT4rlUH6WEEbFl1Yf =x4Ul -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 19:03:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B4E8F3 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37018BE6 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id iK3M1p00A07iGuj01K3Nq3; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:03:29 +0100 Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 78D4C12418; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:03:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:03:21 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration Message-ID: <20150120190321.GB57651@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Maness , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:03:31 -0000 --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:50:28AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: > I have used dump/restore for system migration a couple of time and noticed > it is pretty good, but every once in a while it will miss or corrupt a > file. Is there a better way to do this? I would imagine having a system > mounted r/o would help, but this is not always possible. Nevertheless this is the best way to go. Especially if you use UFS with journaled soft-updates (which is the default now, IIRC) where you cannot use snapshots. If I want to dump the filesystems on a machine, I use init(8) to go so runlevel 1 (single user mode), where the root fs is mounted r/o and the rest is unmounted. I mount /tmp, and dump the rest of the filesystems to files in /tmp. That procedure has never failed for me. > Is there a way to > check the deltas between systems manually after migration to see if any > files need to be merged or copied. I would imagine the files that are in > jeopardy are ones that are being written to while the dump is taking > place. I had a file the keeps track of rss feeds end up missing on the > target system. For copying files between running systems, I tend to use rsync(1). If anything was being modified during the first run, a second run will usua= lly fix it. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUvqZ5AAoJEED21dyjijPgcegP/1WlwkfSBRNHh3kyvP4h3/GX UzASsVKkZ5CqJs+rr/95u++LinwFxNJJM5n5ndTIjCYG8jp00drJGxg34M7z0o6R PHfL7Dmlr+w6gFqw+FRciph7kE2MK/3bbNmUTV05/szlL6hLpegkRCYeKUZWxGP3 +DgyOyj3oMyt0rUm+RorjmJfB9Y69L9qtrA5A5C+SWg6j2s1BLbbLq+qn4gMv5L+ AWsxCs3PYhCsjd5BlNH58AKf/UOo2lnIa3bWxrwuRrmbUZl4rz4Mj8tz/UHmRTI8 MSpYJ9J2eUQ34FJNTPsd7oYhHawzlPurbnkzI1sMcJ0MWHmaH5PyWEQhKbTM1bxM IOIajBRvxzIryMIeRaRHji42NxRzJKRgf+a6oZA03xoILdrZlZu75JcXn8umFPKQ 247Uq7Yio2Mv/60KUVZXs8WstSi0T9xqQqtmAdtRo/nW1+gxFzG7LuPowDDRGST9 J20QTMGjPiTN7W6Ac0SPtqj4jFPdbjygDVm7dTy3mPyXHs1uDX+uAwPTDRfuhl2d XxKels5bOpetUyNrmeoer2KNdt3smyg0FgcVdVboJF8lOTb8gZQdzNlTmIu81r7R 86xl2jdJ2tn03IPeGpwaVWq98+65igsn4yPdWFUbjLYsoy6I6zuO0mQOguxEQTFG 9hq6oJnwBgK4rXdQLoiG =fAMB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 19:41:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F7E0586 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B81D9F85 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id pv20so36296436lab.13 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:41:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Y/xJ9YUIKg7CIyg6sKpLBlvLilF+6mBWyNQgSwkapzE=; b=saLfIKy9WtNf4JnOgAMX17plmJQCUqBFfsXNK9g9W2sbG3i3Xz3510jFJw1wKm9PqV KeGMACH+Va62fbQXs6Jl/SMDuzj84hWqW2D8kF+5vj47aqeoWO2wzvq0FTw568M/nwaL 2/w+thZBDCalRQaaS6Af3VDVTnQp5btKTMizOtPxxgToif25138Iiggn8ieMWyBTYgwG fw2DTWCxvUdSPQpFVfNgfPlrSZtP1NKC2/nDSxZJofpiM+zzbzfjmcjgHNEuwtCMRwZy soBqF3cDUUlfERxS818RN98U0iG8fh3QDRxROvlw5tCQhbHhK+X1UA/i4AyN+NmpI9Yd UzdA== X-Received: by 10.112.160.33 with SMTP id xh1mr40775177lbb.60.1421782875850; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:41:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:40:35 -0800 (PST) From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:40:35 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:41:18 -0000 Was IPFilter dropped in 10.1? Can I still use it? Say, by compiling a custom kernel? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 20:20:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED2B9A9 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S34.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s34.hotmail.com [65.55.111.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84F1672 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU436-SMTP186 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S34.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:19:48 -0800 X-TMN: [5hRwmMJgiHhTAAec4zQ+krag2PUXfmUj] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:49:40 +0530 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2015 20:19:46.0549 (UTC) FILETIME=[6F27E250:01D034EE] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:20:57 -0000 > If it exits without telling you what's wrong, the check the log files > to see if it has written anything there. If sublime still hold its > tongue, then this is an example of bad programming. > > Running "truss `which sublime`" might give you a hint of what's going > on. > > Personally, I prefer builing my own ports, but that's an entirely > different discussion. Hi Trond, Things not looking good. sublime exits immediately, with no message in /var/log/messages or dmesg.today Running it under truss gives the following : linux_brk(0x0,0x28136fc4,0x0,0x8048034,0x8,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) linux_newuname(0xbfbfd5e6,0x31c,0x28136fc4,0x281378f8,0x39,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 672366592 (0x28138000) linux_access("/etc/ld.so.preload",4) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' linux_open("/etc/ld.so.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2c0,0x28136fc4,0x28137880,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x2fa0,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 672370688 (0x28139000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,036) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd308,0x28136fc4,0x2813ac1a,0x8053b9d,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x18c98,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672382976 (0x2813c000) linux_mmap2(0x28152000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672473088 (0x28152000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/libdl.so.2",0x0,0155) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2ec,0x28136fc4,0x2813b862,0x8053c04,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x4074,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672485376 (0x28155000) linux_mmap2(0x28158000,0x2000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672497664 (0x28158000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/libc.so.6",0x0,0170) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\^C\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2d0,0x28136fc4,0x2813b9ab,0x8053c2c,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1959ac,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672505856 (0x2815a000) linux_mmap2(0x282ea000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 674144256 (0x282ea000) linux_mmap2(0x282ed000,0x29ac,0x3,0x32,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674156544 (0x282ed000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674168832 (0x282f0000) linux_set_thread_area(0xbfbfd79c,0x28136fc4,0x282f06c0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x282ea000,0x2000,0x1,0x28138560,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x28158000,0x1000,0x1,0x281382c8,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x28136000,0x1000,0x1,0x2813751c,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x28139000,12192) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/dev/tty",0x8802,00) = 3 (0x3) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_brk(0x0,0x282ebff4,0x0,0x0,0x21000,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) linux_brk(0x8143000,0x282ebff4,0x8143000,0x8122000,0x8143000,0x6) = 135540736 (0x8143000) linux_open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive",0x8000,01) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0x282ecb00,0x282ebff4,0xbfbfd530,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x200000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 674172928 (0x282f1000) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x11f000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 676270080 (0x284f1000) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 672370688 (0x28139000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_getuid(0x282ebff4,0x0,0x282b0526,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) linux_getgid(0x3e9,0x0,0x282b0526,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) geteuid() = 1001 (0x3e9) getegid() = 1001 (0x3e9) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8120b1c,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_time(0x0,0xbfbfdacc,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1421784797 (0x54beb6dd) linux_open("/proc/meminfo",0x80000,0666) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfb49c,0x282ebff4,0x8122aa8,0x1fff,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 672374784 (0x2813a000) read(3,"\t total: used:\tfree: s"...,4096) = 297 (0x129) close(3) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x2813a000,4096) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8121240,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_newuname(0xbfbfd5b6,0x0,0x282ebff4,0xff,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_stat64("/usr/home/bourne",0xbfbfd640,0xbfbfd640) = 0 (0x0) linux_stat64(".",0xbfbfd5e0,0xbfbfd5e0) = 0 (0x0) linux_getpid(0x8124750,0x5f,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1437 (0x59d) linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd4ac,0x282ebff4,0x3,0x282b023f,0x6) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules",0x0,0666) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd3e0,0x282ebff4,0x8124958,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x8000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 677445632 (0x28610000) read(3,"# GNU libc iconv configuration."...,32768) = 32768 (0x8000) read(3,"JAPANESE//\tEUC-JP//\nalias\tOSF"...,32768) = 23335 (0x5b27) read(3,0x28610000,32768) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x28610000,32768) = 0 (0x0) linux_getppid(0x8124750,0x0,0x1,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1436 (0x59c) gettimeofday({1421784797.882516 },0x0) = 0 (0x0) getpgrp() = 1436 (0x59c) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_getrlimit(0x6,0xbfbfd6ac,0x282ebff4,0x1,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/usr/local/bin/sublime",0x8000,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_ioctl(0x3,0x5401,0xbfbfd6f8,0xbfbfd738,0x282ebff4,0x6) ERR#25 'Inappropriate ioctl for device' linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd760,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(3,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\n/usr/loc"...,80) = 64 (0x40) linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd760,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_getrlimit(0x7,0xbfbfd72c,0x282ebff4,0x813ede0,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x1,0xbfbfd75c,0xbfbfd75c,0x282ebff4,0x6) ERR#9 'Bad file descriptor' dup2(0x3,0xff,0xff,0xbfbfd75c,0x3,0x6) = 255 (0xff) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x2,0x1,0x813ede0,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x3,0x0,0x0,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fstat64(0xff,0xbfbfd7d0,0x282ebff4,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_llseek(0xff,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd790,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(255,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\n/usr/loc"...,64) = 64 (0x40) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd658,0xbfbfd5d8,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_clone(0x1200011,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x282f0728,0x6) = 1438 (0x59e) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd5d8,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd6e0,0xbfbfd660,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd660,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd6e0,0xbfbfd660,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd450,0xbfbfd3c4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_waitpid(0xffffffff,0xbfbfd61c,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1438 (0x59e) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd660,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd430,0xbfbfd3a4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(255,0x813ee68,64) = 0 (0x0) process exit, rval = 0 Thanks and Regards, Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 20:21:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD8DCA2D for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S21.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s21.hotmail.com [65.55.111.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8282975B for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU436-SMTP103 ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S21.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:20:00 -0800 X-TMN: [W2PbCgCKXCKLOGel5V7/DHRYxkyjl6Sx] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:49:52 +0530 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2015 20:19:58.0183 (UTC) FILETIME=[76171770:01D034EE] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:21:08 -0000 > If it exits without telling you what's wrong, the check the log files > to see if it has written anything there. If sublime still hold its > tongue, then this is an example of bad programming. > > Running "truss `which sublime`" might give you a hint of what's going > on. > > Personally, I prefer builing my own ports, but that's an entirely > different discussion. Hi Trond, Things not looking good. sublime exits immediately, with no message in /var/log/messages or dmesg.today Running it under truss gives the following : linux_brk(0x0,0x28136fc4,0x0,0x8048034,0x8,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) linux_newuname(0xbfbfd5e6,0x31c,0x28136fc4,0x281378f8,0x39,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 672366592 (0x28138000) linux_access("/etc/ld.so.preload",4) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' linux_open("/etc/ld.so.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2c0,0x28136fc4,0x28137880,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x2fa0,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 672370688 (0x28139000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,036) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd308,0x28136fc4,0x2813ac1a,0x8053b9d,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x18c98,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672382976 (0x2813c000) linux_mmap2(0x28152000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672473088 (0x28152000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/libdl.so.2",0x0,0155) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2ec,0x28136fc4,0x2813b862,0x8053c04,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x4074,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672485376 (0x28155000) linux_mmap2(0x28158000,0x2000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672497664 (0x28158000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/libc.so.6",0x0,0170) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\^C\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2d0,0x28136fc4,0x2813b9ab,0x8053c2c,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1959ac,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672505856 (0x2815a000) linux_mmap2(0x282ea000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 674144256 (0x282ea000) linux_mmap2(0x282ed000,0x29ac,0x3,0x32,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674156544 (0x282ed000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674168832 (0x282f0000) linux_set_thread_area(0xbfbfd79c,0x28136fc4,0x282f06c0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x282ea000,0x2000,0x1,0x28138560,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x28158000,0x1000,0x1,0x281382c8,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x28136000,0x1000,0x1,0x2813751c,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x28139000,12192) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/dev/tty",0x8802,00) = 3 (0x3) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_brk(0x0,0x282ebff4,0x0,0x0,0x21000,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) linux_brk(0x8143000,0x282ebff4,0x8143000,0x8122000,0x8143000,0x6) = 135540736 (0x8143000) linux_open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive",0x8000,01) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0x282ecb00,0x282ebff4,0xbfbfd530,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x200000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 674172928 (0x282f1000) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x11f000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 676270080 (0x284f1000) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 672370688 (0x28139000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_getuid(0x282ebff4,0x0,0x282b0526,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) linux_getgid(0x3e9,0x0,0x282b0526,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) geteuid() = 1001 (0x3e9) getegid() = 1001 (0x3e9) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8120b1c,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_time(0x0,0xbfbfdacc,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1421784797 (0x54beb6dd) linux_open("/proc/meminfo",0x80000,0666) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfb49c,0x282ebff4,0x8122aa8,0x1fff,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 672374784 (0x2813a000) read(3,"\t total: used:\tfree: s"...,4096) = 297 (0x129) close(3) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x2813a000,4096) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8121240,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_newuname(0xbfbfd5b6,0x0,0x282ebff4,0xff,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_stat64("/usr/home/bourne",0xbfbfd640,0xbfbfd640) = 0 (0x0) linux_stat64(".",0xbfbfd5e0,0xbfbfd5e0) = 0 (0x0) linux_getpid(0x8124750,0x5f,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1437 (0x59d) linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd4ac,0x282ebff4,0x3,0x282b023f,0x6) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules",0x0,0666) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd3e0,0x282ebff4,0x8124958,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x8000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 677445632 (0x28610000) read(3,"# GNU libc iconv configuration."...,32768) = 32768 (0x8000) read(3,"JAPANESE//\tEUC-JP//\nalias\tOSF"...,32768) = 23335 (0x5b27) read(3,0x28610000,32768) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x28610000,32768) = 0 (0x0) linux_getppid(0x8124750,0x0,0x1,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1436 (0x59c) gettimeofday({1421784797.882516 },0x0) = 0 (0x0) getpgrp() = 1436 (0x59c) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_getrlimit(0x6,0xbfbfd6ac,0x282ebff4,0x1,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/usr/local/bin/sublime",0x8000,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_ioctl(0x3,0x5401,0xbfbfd6f8,0xbfbfd738,0x282ebff4,0x6) ERR#25 'Inappropriate ioctl for device' linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd760,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(3,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\n/usr/loc"...,80) = 64 (0x40) linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd760,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_getrlimit(0x7,0xbfbfd72c,0x282ebff4,0x813ede0,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x1,0xbfbfd75c,0xbfbfd75c,0x282ebff4,0x6) ERR#9 'Bad file descriptor' dup2(0x3,0xff,0xff,0xbfbfd75c,0x3,0x6) = 255 (0xff) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x2,0x1,0x813ede0,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x3,0x0,0x0,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fstat64(0xff,0xbfbfd7d0,0x282ebff4,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_llseek(0xff,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd790,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(255,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\n/usr/loc"...,64) = 64 (0x40) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd658,0xbfbfd5d8,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_clone(0x1200011,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x282f0728,0x6) = 1438 (0x59e) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd5d8,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd6e0,0xbfbfd660,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd660,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd6e0,0xbfbfd660,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd450,0xbfbfd3c4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_waitpid(0xffffffff,0xbfbfd61c,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1438 (0x59e) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd660,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd430,0xbfbfd3a4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(255,0x813ee68,64) = 0 (0x0) process exit, rval = 0 Thanks and Regards, Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 22:55:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14819496 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F9AA44 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id bs8so30382225wib.5 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:55:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=os5GZ7q3KinmM49rmsVLl1UO1msuqbwNz+xaPS6lWj4=; b=WjdaSw+XC0YXKBMWE0csWHfQLHnDhi5XFXhfF/rMwY7B0bHRmb8kef5p2zhY7ChJp6 ti8CQ9onDnNclLjT0JPbz9vml6zmGEQOHoyI15ILFHV2ryN4Uuwv7HFUfMPeAqBixnJ3 LSI8+GM/5Dgn0dx3yrRYZXYPHclvhX9Ndfn86Ih/qhygZ19Rc9VGqVOafSMMEju1DGut TR06fTGP/h2oCAvsyZOa1a5nJbnNP59jc26IhZ2JoxWvFyzjDA5ktnr2F7AzTHNP2zXf D45RnNKfVGe4EiftiG/8mjuvnWbkXlXryL0dKxPnKBoEgiEzwsVxB8NevJ7uppg79/K4 BFKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.126.99 with SMTP id mx3mr51552570wib.66.1421794500984; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:55:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:55:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:55:00 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 From: Ben Woods To: Odhiambo Washington Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:55:03 -0000 No IPFilter has not been removed in FreeBSD 10.1. It was, however updated to version 5.1.2 as part of FreeBSD 10.0. This can be seen in the source code here: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/contrib/ipfilter/ Instructions on how to use IPFilter are available in the handbook here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipf.html What makes you think it was removed in FreeBSD 10.1? On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Was IPFilter dropped in 10.1? > > Can I still use it? Say, by compiling a custom kernel? > > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254733744121/+254722743223 > "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 00:56:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0317779C for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BA58B4 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DCF776D86BAA; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:56:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:56:18 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:56:22 -0000 --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:58PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: >=20 > I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more > reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. > Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: >=20 > i915kms_load=3D"YES" > kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1366x768" >=20 > But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: >=20 > FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 > r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 > root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >=20 Looking into this further; dmesg tells me I'm missing dependencies. It doesn't tell me what those dependencies are. And Google is not enlightening me as to how to determine what those dependencies are. I tried adding i915. No joy: VT: running with driver "vga". KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUvvkyAAoJEBV64x4SNmArUu0QALWgqYS4yLkhfr1zoXGHZ63h AhP51dOaEMKhX0UDowR/DnETpkC0aZmAAOsZPiSNoeilwLG+7fAB2KiYi+3w6Ocu 245jxItIJbGi0gNTFDsKJiQ9+nNjo30eK42ZOkV4UUYA4rqPOrOslfC4I8vjSvc9 faIEGuh9jih35RaeZ7KSTkpZBvkB+RGxmEQc/cFbE296eV/A5gv85JpoFqpk3KYx +3+Wo49sAYU5Xrh58WEWGEtVbQWhIIVQt+D3YdSCLAWI47559jz1z1Q1yTW5SqkD RmoUJRPdfwOwPtf6mQdLc4EBGFBKOzkepiWt8kbjlfC9tVdHF0aAmCcL1gkAMH/Y dZ5oDi/Oid4bdpiMUPVoUWr28qlxJKcwzt0JHdfSlzDAqSH0VQsU+QBEpbOzNFne pl1pCDdMyYKBTO9jKBVJ93bQ0d/S8DSWUYupbEMMmBn55lx6LXp0qvBEuWA85YbQ OAcY9UYXqn8YDCNgI6ZGFRRM/kPQ7MaWC52OCw3aE/oesEeETTpxOdRECpEi88gy LMghQCNy1XB6JwbT9JVQPCd8eKuu898+0YiiVnJAhPeFm6wvYEuW8C3eObP/zOlZ 364Wa/oiMmmM/6Dy/wWgoIl3gPHbvX4trrt/FCfG9t0TYvm3pMNHXbi0KjsB9EpV +08oBNeKE+mPYrffnZu7 =DW15 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:02:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF932A08 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA70EB8 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LxxfG-1Xi6R21rwS-015FeE for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:49:52 +0100 Message-ID: <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:49:50 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i915 at boot References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ivs4oc5oXJO3ifTBm5Zvp3rg8n5pNP2x3SISw6wj6BimR3zM/SP vSbtLnRQw6mGeVsLH+ls1hjAnXDzSz2n8xAKG1exbnGeAIandmNyDefsSZhpR0uuF9y+cD2 rB5G6jq2JTntTZL2BXY/SlFAnAeA11jQvDHgRljrVAmuw6DbrO6SIHKv1EkqiX8uIZ0aXZG saErZJaZNHsCsY10VNF4A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:02:50 -0000 On 01/20/15 19:56, David Benfell wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:58PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: >> >> I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more >> reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. >> Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: >> >> i915kms_load="YES" >> kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1366x768" >> >> But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: >> >> FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 >> r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 >> root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >> > Looking into this further; dmesg tells me I'm missing dependencies. It > doesn't tell me what those dependencies are. And Google is not > enlightening me as to how to determine what those dependencies are. > > I tried adding i915. No joy: > > VT: running with driver "vga". > KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies > KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies > What do the commands: and return? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:07:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37B26B0D for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059C9EE5 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lf10so49565673pab.5 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:07:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JlyZuGVzr17XvFljOvc4ahZReEondUNulKUIKGY9ItQ=; b=jeMPyXPPwbl5eVdYAE16HCDzyuMpUEJZbWL/wK8OJB8iNbUNDNWhKBh9oYI4y5faDD ZKDUmg3TjcS14nm7tFhkf+xOHP7oQn6dQlr3Lr4Hof6wZ5pCfQ0vU4stBuBh+sffh5mX 4hEuxLYLdxtayt83sB+H57wb9K5QJYfe7boe4w8MmNehWCQs1JEMipPQo1YbLA5Fr+Ox ucVaziTLiXWpYwwbqS9qoJ+6lTzsbxqsJHQU04O+kIQnJ+E1DzrUh6xEjzbVf1je7kEf tEbnrIm0QfkdXb30Kjnop7FZBhAPMR+xOXVMtqOUNyklcd3WCuVJej5YZ1m/eLWtwRaW T3xw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.90.209 with SMTP id by17mr58868734pdb.162.1421806049469; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:07:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:07:29 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: i915 at boot From: Adam Vande More To: David Benfell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:07:30 -0000 On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:56 PM, David Benfell wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:58PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > > > > I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more > > reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. > > Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: > > > > i915kms_load="YES" > > kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1366x768" > > > > But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: > > > > FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 > > r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 > > root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > Looking into this further; dmesg tells me I'm missing dependencies. It > doesn't tell me what those dependencies are. And Google is not > enlightening me as to how to determine what those dependencies are. > > I tried adding i915. No joy: > > VT: running with driver "vga". > KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies > KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies > kern.vty="vt" i915kms_load="YES" is completely sufficient for me to load all the needed parts so I suspect you have an issue with your modules. Are you running GENERIC? -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:41:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13014220 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB69D2F7 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id tr6so10143124ieb.4 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:41:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Vpn2EpKKK57xBohzoPPONemJyKqor/eXARHicsK0mK4=; b=0InlMlKQVo9A59OjyvUnqonAHwjbI5sT5bvIW2LB2DuH0hHJoZVogD3k+jOdXQG9Xk ugDEmR5Q1dtgYluYBq8GbvFAtDUFIMdvAUefceB4AsYsmQAH1oSSLTIo7PiOcA9c5Go+ FAL2trqzgINeuGMEOGfqym//5yOJQvG7LVJVaeLjBy3pWRhP8xnJev3rpp+mEXvgTkW+ Pgvwlt10+1JSndpVoJvWlE/Yh4VpgpXrIaVurglBB7ynDsfiuH4eHiBv75KVsFu6arao MNfUB0H6FVm7rwzb4P7qGsS7XWwYipx7RoVClZmmG2yg4wT348Tw7lvO8KP+l2KS3ija WlpQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.44.69 with SMTP id c5mr1136329igm.18.1421808100943; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:41:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:41:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150120190321.GB57651@slackbox.erewhon.home> References: <20150120190321.GB57651@slackbox.erewhon.home> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:41:40 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qYaVr44g--nUloO8ugXbMdQ-dvY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration From: Chris Maness To: Chris Maness , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:41:42 -0000 On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:50:28AM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: > > I have used dump/restore for system migration a couple of time and > noticed > > it is pretty good, but every once in a while it will miss or corrupt a > > file. Is there a better way to do this? I would imagine having a system > > mounted r/o would help, but this is not always possible. > > Nevertheless this is the best way to go. Especially if you use UFS with > journaled soft-updates (which is the default now, IIRC) where you cannot > use > snapshots. > > If I want to dump the filesystems on a machine, I use init(8) to go so > runlevel 1 (single user mode), where the root fs is mounted r/o and the > rest > is unmounted. I mount /tmp, and dump the rest of the filesystems to files > in > /tmp. That procedure has never failed for me. > > > Is there a way to > > check the deltas between systems manually after migration to see if any > > files need to be merged or copied. I would imagine the files that are in > > jeopardy are ones that are being written to while the dump is taking > > place. I had a file the keeps track of rss feeds end up missing on the > > target system. > > For copying files between running systems, I tend to use rsync(1). > If anything was being modified during the first run, a second run will > usually > fix it. > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ > [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] > pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) > Awesome, Roland. That is perfect. That would definitely get all of the missed files. However, I have never been able to setup a direct login with root. I think I would need that to use rsync as root. Thanks, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:42:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118B32AD for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCCC305 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AF5E76D86BAA; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:42:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:42:15 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Dutch Ingraham Subject: Re: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:42:22 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:49:50PM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On 01/20/15 19:56, David Benfell wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:58PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > >> > >> I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more > >> reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. > >> Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: > >> > >> i915kms_load=3D"YES" > >> kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1366x768" > >> > >> But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: > >> > >> FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 > >> r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 > >> root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > >> > > Looking into this further; dmesg tells me I'm missing dependencies. It > > doesn't tell me what those dependencies are. And Google is not > > enlightening me as to how to determine what those dependencies are. > > > > I tried adding i915. No joy: > > > > VT: running with driver "vga". > > KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies > > KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies > > > What do the commands: >=20 > and return? I'm not seeing the connection, but this quite lengthy output is posted at: https://parts-unknown.org/stikked/view/f30670e0 Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUvxIHAAoJEBV64x4SNmArhawP/0vQBxflaO4PMhEWeScliRL5 RqDTupixzUgzFgdBmmFFVdgGOUuDYRC/d+VziKyuDJ4iZn0uCQY+SPGaVRcwwAkK cAIWKy9yFXNQb9/b/eB24/q+jLcCh7vbtfXcXQIhkZX3sHKvnwRXQ5yULHhZ+h0a 15iB9VYdbYrtT1IDPdOvPsFXRiTWO/LU4ApiSHtUbHxxj2PvdrPQ6QjOsvZHTXUE E4F4DneDBCJY9cbJt27TnJEWu8pQ86uoYNpiUGFr08OYGxjHEI9lEXnPpHJWVHFV y9RPvKzFvlF6vbvrtEJoH97wKex5oYI7a3Vq2GwQV5IOwVXj+fcEKZyzcbOCDxYF Wlnr11WdJaXPxJzaLKsbde+mEKMpROl9dWa/3HV9ybohp1YAct4L1b3LmTDp42Q9 UgzdWGJPhmAbxqs7kqW4v8U7b2UVZ+nz017wE8y2WF16shxPZgxx00lslKpU1hWf 4hAF/s6x+506bVC+DwqiWQxEZJa3or9bia1uwuylrt3OSBe7MaJ+p0iaEYfHmp4U ydX+64EuJ9Afk8TMGF/nZNeioylICLGjSURlzf8ETLCfNMDMJUYlccDpS4iQ2zwG JyEw9Yvhg7H+GcBRT7xgHU6lOMPg9xf3oaD5Niir++5T/6DSxTmPV7p96MqXlSUQ EyEaZlTMlycnEHloIK01 =0qSD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:44:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A08513 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DFB5329 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5E1C26D86BAA; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:44:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:44:08 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150121024408.GB21785@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:44:09 -0000 --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:07:29PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:56 PM, David Benfell > wrote: >=20 > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:58PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > > > > I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more > > reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. > > Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: > > > > i915kms_load=3D"YES" > > kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1366x768" > > > > But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: > > > > FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 > > r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 > > root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC=A0 amd64 > > > Looking into this further; dmesg tells me I'm missing dependencies. It > doesn't tell me what those dependencies are. And Google is not > enlightening me as to how to determine what those dependencies are. >=20 > I tried adding i915. No joy: >=20 > VT: running with driver "vga". > KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies > KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies >=20 >=20 > kern.vty=3D"vt" > i915kms_load=3D"YES" >=20 > is completely sufficient for me to load all the needed parts so I suspect= you > have an issue with your modules.=A0 Are you running GENERIC? Yes, I'm running GENERIC, STABLE: FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Should I try building a more recent version? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUvxJ4AAoJEBV64x4SNmArBNwP/R24+F1riUTwXMC3WWctIifx N8aCCo5LIij6gBf4kluy73xIm3tQVnzq03DbHY+RYiatHAivHkDvzEfBquFXoyjc j3DoYnR6E0r+TVlhJOoHEjkYDzpZ3I2wDfJbCPh5nvxfG3x/W++Y/cR7IOMy8CsP hbqlC1l9ezlfMSfdONJvjVjn3Y9SWcAHSOWnigIHkcSOQ45YshxZ3lTyFjdGfet7 rTRgescoTMqQ4mg0r8zi+SMADGSlW3JCDkelqL8OBTEABthqlYmTAW+KH3gUtBiz rg9KvwZw3uOPgRTvb9vlT0FBrcm9g0TtTxFontxqimTvlPhd+AuLxbK+eVmhHq7p f6i0NkGHLp6l5ujkreLLKOiaCAYXzMJmIyMK7eiSd7eAbceOjk05dzp4DVgmQGbc +X9GOq5pgtOshtQYCRvwB/J4vODrPJqYv/1gpPGxnHqsI/y+lum8c66T6W7dAft0 zXHp+9MtTRTyhXAIzLSbne0wA6FGoVYObRPsibaxj6R6lSRGB2McQWqdI81+aGmn AYqysA5tIbTqLsLGPM83y7uPjJuYY8Ei6vWTHvXLszPJw1mTGXH6hJXgXoO+0sfq 9wfjP9vJtpcuW4QS7mvVImsLI5mQKVVVCKqkLgfCUez/c8C62LYYaRraL/K2essm rUMVfhBUTk8/ZM1Z3T8O =JO+k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:59:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 544F3B95 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A262630 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id bj1so49799213pad.9 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:59:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MjTbBvq91qDvA2cmPc84XbQcPUFVdDJMxhyizFVX4VM=; b=ZNsjss+2Oq/0yTkOpfPYa59mV++l6+0zzKTUJmTLbuzSTQC91S7RGu5W5VZ2YzBi7e 76K+n8J6aGbCJUA2bAo0ebbvdyVIWlWdOLUufe13ozUmOMzNBgV6yFbdb3+W7n45tyag 9tYJG8HPw1616RIMUdgb4gn5n8sGMmeGYJqw7fnTIHNzImoMxODRTmB/2ksjksHz0wY5 aZO8jnr6gVp0Y4MBghfxEW4DLWNJCp0HslMccMAp6XyhGen8bUxO2ua+ITOiUzyF5vUo UIORCj9V7lA+2Znk56Sp7q7vFdcIHEhMsV6I3lnC9nEhKor2ITKnyIft6kiFghdC1v0x cf/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.68.131 with SMTP id w3mr10171795pbt.132.1421809143462; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:59:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150121024408.GB21785@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121024408.GB21785@home.parts-unknown.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:59:03 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: i915 at boot From: Adam Vande More To: David Benfell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:59:04 -0000 On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:44 PM, David Benfell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:07:29PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:56 PM, David Benfell < > benfell@parts-unknown.org> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:58PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > > > > > > I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more > > > reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. > > > Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: > > > > > > i915kms_load="YES" > > > kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1366x768" > > > > > > But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: > > > > > > FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 > > > r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 > > > root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > Looking into this further; dmesg tells me I'm missing dependencies. > It > > doesn't tell me what those dependencies are. And Google is not > > enlightening me as to how to determine what those dependencies are. > > > > I tried adding i915. No joy: > > > > VT: running with driver "vga". > > KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies > > KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies > > > > > > kern.vty="vt" > > i915kms_load="YES" > > > > is completely sufficient for me to load all the needed parts so I > suspect you > > have an issue with your modules. Are you running GENERIC? > > Yes, I'm running GENERIC, STABLE: > > FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 > r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 > root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > Should I try building a more recent version? > Well, probably wouldn't hurt, but technically should work without that. What does "kldload -v i915kms" say? For reference, here is relevant bits of mine: 3 1 0xffffffff8139e000 b98c8 i915kms.ko (/boot/kernel/i915kms.ko) Contains modules: Id Name 7 vgapci/i915kms 11 intel_iicbb/iicbb 9 intel_gmbus/iicbus 12 drmn/intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy 10 drmn/intel_iicbb 8 drmn/intel_gmbus 4 2 0xffffffff81458000 5528 iicbb.ko (/boot/kernel/iicbb.ko) Contains modules: Id Name 3 iicbb/iicbus 5 5 0xffffffff8145e000 5f08 iicbus.ko (/boot/kernel/iicbus.ko) Contains modules: Id Name 2 iichb/iicbus 6 2 0xffffffff81464000 4050 iic.ko (/boot/kernel/iic.ko) Contains modules: Id Name 4 iicbus/iic 7 2 0xffffffff81469000 77d88 drm2.ko (/boot/kernel/drm2.ko) Contains modules: Id Name 5 drmn/drm_iic_dp_aux 6 drmn -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 03:11:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778B7D7 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4213A91E for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZCgs-1YS8E8385E-00L1aP for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:11:28 +0100 Message-ID: <54BF18DF.6090707@gmx.us> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:11:27 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i915 at boot References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GUsrd4iZdzRD9fCC6+vefAeNrGu2SXakgzCgTFVOHE7wXhcKINi 8QTCh44cGllhMiK6dMh0mU0TBy+M5dKzrv19+JrGbFGU3CqkT8Qzju3PycvunllwCY1Vo22 4KuZ+oS8SogONxgg5g9iHAQzrQ5SYGKJl71tAGtprszyEFG1fUq4AyLPrvOwyHYJJmaNB/w nYEcjUva0gCoDvLeW8hdw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 03:11:30 -0000 On 01/20/15 21:42, David Benfell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:49:50PM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >> On 01/20/15 19:56, David Benfell wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:58PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: >>>> >>>> I notice after starting Xorg, that my console font is a lot more >>>> reasonable and I would like for this font to be activated at boot. >>>> Here is the loader.conf snippet I have added: >>>> >>>> i915kms_load="YES" >>>> kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1366x768" >>>> >>>> But I'm still getting the oversize default font. I am running: >>>> >>>> FreeBSD n4rky.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 >>>> r275948: Fri Dec 19 19:42:39 PST 2014 >>>> root@n4rky.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >>>> >>> Looking into this further; dmesg tells me I'm missing dependencies. It >>> doesn't tell me what those dependencies are. And Google is not >>> enlightening me as to how to determine what those dependencies are. >>> >>> I tried adding i915. No joy: >>> >>> VT: running with driver "vga". >>> KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies >>> KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies >>> >> What do the commands: >> >> and return? > > I'm not seeing the connection, but this quite lengthy output is posted > at: https://parts-unknown.org/stikked/view/f30670e0 > > Thanks! > The /boot/loader.conf I'm using is: kern.vty=vt i915kms_load="YES" kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1440x900" You seem to be missing that first line. Also, looking at the output of those two commands above (aside from a lot of missing shared libs and at least one missing package dependency which are likely irrelevant), you have the nvidia driver installed. Maybe someone with significant freebsd graphics stack experience can opine on whether there is some type of kernel module conflict causing your problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 05:45:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D90CDF2 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82072950 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 10so37280583lbg.1 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:45:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0eP9SInGx5NMaieqf5x/ACCEZ1oQf4nt7uTTKcDQERM=; b=NfDGf4/jjOz90PVdAqc5hcKHHeDyiqfutta67y7jIGysuVJuAL0bc4DByl6VAjBvGf NejkI9ZtjWdz9JvC0Gx5VmMaCitZJ2ol0NhoqOhKbdr4LEkl1/lOx+irRSXYrZwTOS6F 0cQ9vZtXueXDqSNQatCN/Ce+POaNOgev0vSHiqCFRolC2jIkYW0X6p5EYWeixniVGFRn 384sWj7DYGBSM8SsixGDivr3/nvxaYpb5BFIABGz0uSydXHlaMPO8el9Agp0OFrUuHOF 5l7ea3KZCcUqO03yFf/dGJW1pt3aGcnDg7R3Inuz0n1MwN7zeCEPom520fT5j7p4aNw9 E//g== X-Received: by 10.152.5.38 with SMTP id p6mr42206208lap.91.1421819148483; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:45:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:45:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:45:07 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 To: Ben Woods Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:45:51 -0000 Hi Ben, Thanks for this. I actually read this bit of it having been updated to version 5.1.2 in FreeBSD 10.0. However, my problem emanated from the fact that rules that I use on FreeBSD-8.4/9.3 simply could not work on 10.1 I simply carried the rules over, and did not compile a custom kernel on 10.1. I was believing that the module will be automatically loaded and rules would work. They didn't! Only 'ipf -D' would let connections to be made from LAN PCs to my gateway PC.. Someone somewhere suggested that IPFilter was removed from 10.0, but I can still see /boot/kernel/ipl.ko wash@mail:~$ uname -a FreeBSD mailhost 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014 root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 wash@mail:~$ ls -al /boot/kernel//ipl* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 478792 Nov 12 00:06 /boot/kernel//ipl.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3170296 Nov 12 00:06 /boot/kernel//ipl.ko.symbols So what is the trick to get IPFilter to work on 10.1? I read a post in which someone had to copy the sources from 9.x to 10.x and recompile in order to get it to work with the rules from 9.x On 21 January 2015 at 01:55, Ben Woods wrote: > No IPFilter has not been removed in FreeBSD 10.1. It was, however updated > to version 5.1.2 as part of FreeBSD 10.0. > > This can be seen in the source code here: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/contrib/ipfilter/ > > Instructions on how to use IPFilter are available in the handbook here: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipf.html > > What makes you think it was removed in FreeBSD 10.1? > > > On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Odhiambo Washington > wrote: > >> Was IPFilter dropped in 10.1? >> >> Can I still use it? Say, by compiling a custom kernel? >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Odhiambo WASHINGTON, >> Nairobi,KE >> +254733744121/+254722743223 >> "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > -- > > -- > From: Benjamin Woods > woodsb02@gmail.com > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 07:37:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EBE59DD for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D5D31D for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id iXd41p00D07iGuj01Xd5CD; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:37:10 +0100 Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4649012435; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:37:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:37:04 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration Message-ID: <20150121073704.GA79993@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Maness , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <20150120190321.GB57651@slackbox.erewhon.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:37:19 -0000 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:41:40PM -0800, Chris Maness wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Roland Smith wrote: >=20 > > > Is there a way to > > > check the deltas between systems manually after migration to see if a= ny > > > files need to be merged or copied. I would imagine the files that ar= e in > > > jeopardy are ones that are being written to while the dump is taking > > > place. I had a file the keeps track of rss feeds end up missing on t= he > > > target system. > > > > For copying files between running systems, I tend to use rsync(1). > > If anything was being modified during the first run, a second run will > > usually > > fix it. >=20 > Awesome, Roland. That is perfect. That would definitely get all of the > missed files. However, I have never been able to setup a direct login wi= th > root. I think I would need that to use rsync as root. You can do two things; 1) Set =E2=80=9Crsyncd_enable=3D"Yes"=E2=80=9D in /etc/rc.conf, to make rsy= ncd start automatically. 2) Log in as a normal user. (This user should be in the =E2=80=9Cwheel=E2= =80=9D group.), use =E2=80=9Csu=E2=80=9D to become root and then run =E2=80=9Cservice rs= yncd onestart=E2=80=9D. Since I don't want rsyncd running when I don't need it, I prefer to use the second method. Direct root logins are generally disabled and frowned upon for security reasons. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUv1cgAAoJEED21dyjijPgXFkP/1aNtKGk2O2XRzOxrkFZ6rH0 Wul5jfU6erjY1o8FkifNqE/94re/FtBT9HD/6owSFJLr2AB4uPYSr7o1gw4ogMXm GGlSKA8TlkC6mRxV0LMJJorH50RWSGjxTGo6gw4mxMGpPqPGoXhcmsNZZ0kjQIHR ITEue4J9GonaYvpULuyxT2PSbGJlp4yHhTTEksDgo4+RkOI0TLwAboX+p39I0w3W UYMLUzdr4GI2mUKlu+WFZYB3Vpv+ihHN6HC1SS5JKrWuG7ddxK/yv77nvoaK7BKr TEctuGsKy3t39PvFO2lTW8BKlUMfiMky+nkSshOvXjOsbEaHPdb99dEHveY1X1HC baHVjd9rUKXaH+JeBWilxtIk9EyPohgn/h/lwS0xBfz7IOYAtllsF80s2KDKmeC0 O/Gj2uI+5qe9YQAnSlFB3dCA0ba3DDUL6e0nzC/A/ixc9wtNRs6fOKtQ3jnu3si6 ZOTKA/ELnuP3NPq6c6ogBhJJZQaqX96YQLk/ITNNxA39GJU1fV3oYVuN6ScqRvax cLbtS5zse7lJxkHuevwIB4MpnBfbNSGD0ytNnSd9qH2mz86HEkF8VSFdPuG0zr2o FwI80W1wBludzuUGdSMP2YkpwbjHkJCCiQZRq2c1ZxWCe8N/zW5WeaLjx+qDnbLt AyAGixBKHeX97BzkFk1+ =dLlf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 09:24:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6DDB70 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC9AD1 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp14-2-13-162.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.13.162]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2015 19:54:34 +1030 Message-ID: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:54:32 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:24:43 -0000 On 21/01/2015 16:15, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for this. I actually read this bit of it having been updated to > version 5.1.2 in FreeBSD 10.0. > > However, my problem emanated from the fact that rules that I use on > FreeBSD-8.4/9.3 simply could not work on 10.1 > > I simply carried the rules over, and did not compile a custom kernel on > 10.1. I was believing that the module will be automatically loaded and > rules would work. They didn't! Only 'ipf -D' would let connections to be > made from LAN PCs to my gateway PC.. > I read a post in which someone had to copy the sources from 9.x to 10.x and > recompile in order to get it to work with the rules from 9.x The update from 4.1.28->5.1.2 may include changes that requires adjusting old rules to the new syntax. While going back to an older version can get your old settings to work again it also removes any security fixes from the update. Updating your ruleset would be a better solution. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 09:30:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506D22D0 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2EC8144 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b6so12613638lbj.11 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:30:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=iRVs/pxX6sq7yxWTtSGsYJiEIymyCMryHn9e9sFnbuk=; b=vI/aafvwFiN4/1NQX8vJRfbfxLtFQRSlif96QPwY7VtJdi209Wkeo2FdQE1x7XROt5 ofZ0omiWx3Iusj8Wfg0q7afkZFscijqiILXa+Daj3Nvcb+PZsu1qWOslEmFdVLRLI+sw ub4CP4WVP4ZDZpPVw+08Ajs4IDGuDVXtrsfHBns7h8DtI8QxiNpQ3nNylykiz9K01kYq wCm4l1RxHOLuy/Smwcsz3GZStzFpsjD49zIlHULa7tDstZa7R/yEi6OhRMXLOqTHF8UW yM4Acprk+S5LgxAzGbfyykxz9ZUNmL+I5mekpYz4+qis5QmZ9uMaFHwcUMhz0oSEz2rB YtGQ== X-Received: by 10.152.25.129 with SMTP id c1mr43606824lag.65.1421832600860; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:30:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:29:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:29:20 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 To: Shane Ambler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:30:03 -0000 Hi Shane, Where is the new syntax documented? Or I just have to 'man ipf'? I'd love to see a web discussion about it, which I obviously missed. Is there a sort of rule converter? :-) Thank you for mentioning this syntax thing. Must be the one that was biting me on 10.1 On 21 January 2015 at 12:24, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 21/01/2015 16:15, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> Hi Ben, >> >> Thanks for this. I actually read this bit of it having been updated to >> version 5.1.2 in FreeBSD 10.0. >> >> However, my problem emanated from the fact that rules that I use on >> FreeBSD-8.4/9.3 simply could not work on 10.1 >> >> I simply carried the rules over, and did not compile a custom kernel on >> 10.1. I was believing that the module will be automatically loaded and >> rules would work. They didn't! Only 'ipf -D' would let connections to be >> made from LAN PCs to my gateway PC.. >> > > I read a post in which someone had to copy the sources from 9.x to 10.x >> and >> recompile in order to get it to work with the rules from 9.x >> > > The update from 4.1.28->5.1.2 may include changes that requires > adjusting old rules to the new syntax. > > While going back to an older version can get your old settings to work > again it also removes any security fixes from the update. Updating your > ruleset would be a better solution. > > > -- > FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing > > Shane Ambler > > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 11:10:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328BA3E0 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from o62.emailer.hubspot.com (o62.emailer.hubspot.com [198.37.146.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0AFBEBF for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:10:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hubspot.com; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:list-unsubscribe; s=smtpapi; bh=PcCcMLd41edDSfVMql2A+3DmCU4=; b=vaxcBZh3t25hzbCk/J l2PGkJBXgSIuYJvX1laW5s3VWQExgBVTdZ7F3+aVCjJaSxBuE28OJJjGRIgzWvqI tYvUtSDQI1qgtSeCpdVL5xu/cn/R5sJhNYIwjGDsjb8wDJcp4TmKAwWp7IEHywzO surmb6y5Euy7b2jX5R7kvxOiw= Received: by filter0035p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0035p1mdw1.10517.54BF890315 2015-01-21 11:09:56.193210063 +0000 UTC Received: from shelburnemoriah (ec2-54-159-140-199.compute-1.amazonaws.com [54.159.140.199]) by ismtpd-004 (SG) with ESMTP id 14b0c2f3815.6ff.103225 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:09:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Mara Gordon Reply-To: mgordon@playwire.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1421838367939.9385353c-e6eb-46f9-840e-3103c3062d0f@smtp.hubapi.com> Subject: Playwire Launches Major Update, Debuts Bolt 3.0! MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HubSpot-MID: CiQ5Mzg1MzUzYy1lNmViLTQ2ZjktODQwZS0zMTAzYzMwNjJkMGYQrLsbGHEgACjEtbwHMLPIEzodZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmdAw/mu4bApSAFaIDc2ODE3MWYzZTZmMjNhYmViMWU5ZmE3N2U4YmIwZGJlZQAAoEBoAHCr1xSAAQCKASQ2ZmI4NWYyNi0zMThlLTNjNjItOTliNi1lODZkZGY2ODEwYzOgAQA= Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:09:56 +0000 (UTC) X-SG-EID: FFnPVu6lb0A5TuepcCdqxLOfczNEIxluOZzq9GOc07qjoDt+uosH+bCRqUSP+lkhl/jRRUG/XvohB7 R8rfGMBPCHmauFOc74zMoJPGi63Df+wXHQnNgjV7yL2lFX06TPIjc8GHnQpB+QWxyIY+TEFuCZy+Dt rmsgd09MsaYb79g33e2FcN2cXxO98OMgYlhF X-SG-ID: BaKDar+VrkG/S9kwb9JXA7xplEEq9ib+M/qsdPz55frZKl7HeZ0jQ9Vgfw6m8HiFsNfvRYfVFvBlwJ j3QMw/o3otSs08TiKp/14mwEImcY+ZL3RsCsW3z75PhUYvWn6J0yha84lKl1SS3i3StG1g8J9Wzmxb n6jt5q8LQ4UvwgDKQteLQx3lqDre0ppf6W8xfzhytl+StVw8/mxolpU0aAiyoJsxHxZfq7Rj58LUGn frWUSzTQJglNL0zv/ipB+3fZjZQhOMtQ3L+ccHdL0ueZRQ+RV3m+ymDH7TUOnkxDpH9w6jvXpkY1YG HYH45FDdI4eSORQMAI4djkeHRjCbIrD1h9+O1dg15b06+W77SUY= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:10:05 -0000 VGhlIEJvbHQgMy4wIFBsYXllciBpcyBoZXJlISBUaGUgQm9sdCBWaWRlbyBQ bGF5ZXIgaGFzIGhhZCBhIG1ham9yIG92ZXJoYXVsIGFuZCB3ZSBob3BlIHlv dSBhcmUgYXMgZXhjaXRlZCBhYm91dCBpdCBhcyB3ZSBhcmUuCgpOb3QgcmVu ZGVyaW5nIGNvcnJlY3RseT8gVmlldyB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFzIGEgd2ViIHBh Z2UgaGVyZSAoaHR0cDovL2VtYWlsLnBsYXl3aXJlLmNvbS9wbGF5d2lyZS1s YXVuY2hlcy1tYWpvci11cGRhdGUtYnktZGVidXRpbmctYm9sdC0zMD9lY2lk PUFDc3BydnNhZThOOVRhNWtoNnpfeE9BUW1Ud2ZQOEs4eWt0Zlp2YkIwWXZi SlF2NG5vMlA1bTJZZDJIRjhiZnNTZi1CVElhZkpoUDUmdXRtX2NhbXBhaWdu PUJvbHQrUGxheWVyKzMuMCZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWhzX2VtYWlsJnV0bV9tZWRp dW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9MTU2Njk5NTYmX2hzZW5jPXAyQU5xdHot LWZWckI3UnVQNTNlckNiUlVwREpJS2RVamFtVmVfRWNJWF9Ec0VwOVI5WW1X TVdEaHV3UHdNVTJCQXp5d1lZMGhSdXJjclFMUVdNM2pmUEFIckxuSDZwRkpY SmtIMlBTb2dFeHBVQVE4QXRzYXlXTFEmX2hzbWk9MTU2Njk5NTYpIC4KClBs YXl3aXJlIExvZ28gKGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucGxheXdpcmUuY29tP3V0bV9jYW1w YWlnbj1Cb2x0K1BsYXllciszLjAmdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1oc19lbWFpbCZ1dG1f bWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PTE1NjY5OTU2Jl9oc2VuYz1wMkFO cXR6LThkNHV6Y0ZSaXlIam5KNDliaTRDZnlkLVNjOUpEbmx0UEQ1cG1qOS1Y YUFqMVRSQnZhdkp2YUYxdE8tdzIzWUxyNjY3V29EdjVGZi11RGx0TlRwUHJ1 UzZVdUFOWFVWLUZTdkNPX21xT0lXVnlfbFVJJl9oc21pPTE1NjY5OTU2KSAK ClBsYXl3aXJlIE11bHRpc2NyZWVuIChodHRwOi8vcGxheXdpcmUuY29tLz91 dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249Qm9sdCtQbGF5ZXIrMy4wJnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9aHNfZW1h aWwmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY29udGVudD0xNTY2OTk1NiZfaHNl bmM9cDJBTnF0ei05QmVackxoQmR5dDBYNzk2MWgyQ0RXVWh6TWZCTmpZV0Ft cnFxLXc4c0hyTl9iakgwdHdCVHd6SzV0MWJjcFhzZzR5ZzN3ajRWMExlZXlJ NmZpMGYyNlc5b3VpclhBRU03dkdBOWNaVVNielZtbU1tWSZfaHNtaT0xNTY2 OTk1NikgCgpIacKgLAoKSGVyZSBhdCBQbGF5d2lyZSAoaHR0cDovL3BsYXl3 aXJlLmNvbS8/dXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPUJvbHQrUGxheWVyKzMuMCZ1dG1fc291 cmNlPWhzX2VtYWlsJnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9MTU2 Njk5NTYmX2hzZW5jPXAyQU5xdHotOHNScXJySmdCZVNKbUxLQm5lSlNOZUFf RXBYVzZlSC1FMjhRTDluNVpyMFV4TkQ2Rl82cE94WEFQdHN0QmVOTFF5bVhH VkFObWhWcGlBclgzR3NIZi1nUGI1bTRBWDJEeGpwOXRLU252a2hELUpMaVkm X2hzbWk9MTU2Njk5NTYpICwgd2UgYXJlIHNvIGV4Y2l0ZWQgdG8gYW5ub3Vu Y2UgYSBodWdlIHVwZGF0ZS4uLlRoZSBCb2x0IDMuMCBWaWRlbyBQbGF5ZXIg aXMgaGVyZSEgVGhlIEJvbHQgVmlkZW8gUGxheWVyIGhhcyBoYWQgYSBtYWpv ciBvdmVyaGF1bCBhbmQgd2UgaG9wZSB5b3UgYXJlIGFzIGV4Y2l0ZWQgYWJv dXQgaXQgYXMgd2UgYXJlLiAKClRoZSBuZXcgQm9sdCBWaWRlbyBQbGF5ZXIg Y2FuIGRvIGFsbCBvZiB0aGUgc2FtZSBncmVhdCB0aGluZ3MgYXMgdGhlIHBy ZXZpb3VzIHZlcnNpb25zIHN1Y2ggYXMgbWFuYWdlLCBkaXN0cmlidXRlLCBt b25ldGl6ZSAoaHR0cDovL3BsYXl3aXJlLmNvbS9wbGF0Zm9ybS9tb25ldGl6 ZT91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249Qm9sdCtQbGF5ZXIrMy4wJnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9aHNf ZW1haWwmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY29udGVudD0xNTY2OTk1NiZf aHNlbmM9cDJBTnF0ei05WS1VYjZSZmhSM2p1amtjdUZ6RnpJM0oycDVOVGd6 UkVDYnV6RXlyaVpvWkJyUlg0SjZiSVNIVVVIcmRmUlN6akdSeWd6cXpVYmVR OF9tTjNzTnRxaDYxcnNSS3owd3BKZndFUVRNUWVUZERTYlZZRSZfaHNtaT0x NTY2OTk1NikgYW5kIGFuYWx5emUgKGh0dHA6Ly9wbGF5d2lyZS5jb20vcGxh dGZvcm0vYW5hbHl6ZT91dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249Qm9sdCtQbGF5ZXIrMy4wJnV0 bV9zb3VyY2U9aHNfZW1haWwmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY29udGVu dD0xNTY2OTk1NiZfaHNlbmM9cDJBTnF0ei04M0R5MnhsZWUyTWc5OXp5VVl3 VjVRbHIzOEU4dzBwNHNyQklSX3dndTFlYmx3cjFFWXIzVXA5MXFPbGZLbEJ0 eXVuYUJuTUM5eG5aX2E0ZmJ0eWhNNm45QjFrcXNpNUEyQ3NXc1VxaDRrSGd2 bi1HQSZfaHNtaT0xNTY2OTk1NikgeW91ciB2aWRlb3MgYnV0IG5vdyBCb2x0 IDMuMCBoYXMgc29tZSBrZXkgbmV3IGZlYXR1cmVzIHRvIG1ha2UgeW91ciB2 aWRlbyBwbGF5ZXIgZXZlbiBiZXR0ZXIhwqAKCsKgCgpOZXcgZmVhdHVyZXMg YW5kIGJlbmVmaXRzIGluY2x1ZGU6wqAKCi0gSGlnaGVyIHF1YWxpdHkgdmlk ZW8KCi0gU21hbGxlciBmaWxlIHNpemUgZm9yIGZhc3RlciBsb2FkIHRpbWVz CgotIEJldHRlciBtb2JpbGUgc3VwcG9ydDogQ29tcGF0aWJsZSB3aXRoIG1v cmUgZGV2aWNlcywgZnVsbHkgcmVzcG9uc2l2ZSwgYW5kIHN1cHBvcnRzIGFs bCBCb2x0IGZlYXR1cmVzIG9uIG1vYmlsZQoKLSBSaWNoIEFQSSB1c2FibGUg YWNyb3NzIGFsbCBkZXZpY2VzCgotIEZ1bGx5IHJlc2tpbm5hYmxlOyBsb29r IGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMgaW4gZnV0dXJlIGNvbW11bmljYXRpb25zLCBv ciBjb250YWN0IHVzIGlmIHlvdSB3YW50IHRvIGdldCBzdGFydGVkIHdpdGgg cmVza2lubmluZyBub3chCgotIFN1cHBvcnQgZm9yIGJyb3dzZXJzIHdoZXJl IEZsYXNoIGlzIG5vdCBpbnN0YWxsZWQgb3IgaXMgZGlzYWJsZWQKCi0gTWF4 aW1pemVkIGFkIHJldmVudWU6IENvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBtb3JlIGFkIHR5 cGVzIG9uIG1vcmUgZGV2aWNlcywgaW1wcm92ZXMgZmlsbCBieSByZXRyeWlu ZyBhZHMgd2hlbiB0aGUgZmlyc3QgZmFpbHMKCi0gUmljaGVyIEdvb2dsZSBB bmFseXRpY3MgdHJhY2tpbmcgZm9yIHB1Ymxpc2hlcnMgd2hvIGhhdmUgcHJv dmlkZWQgR29vZ2xlIEFuYWx5dGljcyBJRHMKCsKgCgpXYW50IHRvIGxlYXJu IG1vcmUgYWJvdXQgdGhlIG5ldyBCb2x0IFZpZGVvIFBsYXllcj8gwqBWaXNp dCB0aGUgc3VwcG9ydCBwYWdlIChodHRwOi8vc3VwcG9ydC5wbGF5d2lyZS5j b20vYm9sdC8/dXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPUJvbHQrUGxheWVyKzMuMCZ1dG1fc291 cmNlPWhzX2VtYWlsJnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9MTU2 Njk5NTYmX2hzZW5jPXAyQU5xdHotLUJsb052NTBGT19GVFAzRVBYVE5qNVNl X2xnVGV6Ykk3ZlRWMkFZZldhOEE3ZkhHRmczX0NiSXk4RVlocV85VXhZb2F1 bWMyaWExLVhZanBaMlQ0TTVidm1FS01fcnVQaXVCWEhzQV9IODF1elkzbTQm X2hzbWk9MTU2Njk5NTYpIMKgZm9yIGEgZ3VpZGUgdG8gdXNpbmcgdGhlIG9u bGluZSB2aWRlbyBwbGF5ZXIuIFlvdeKAmWxsIHNlZSBmdWxsIEFQSSBkb2N1 bWVudGF0aW9uLCBjb2RlIHNhbXBsZXMsIGFuZCBtb3JlLiBJZiB5b3UgZHlu YW1pY2FsbHkgaW5zZXJ0IHRoZSBCb2x0IFZpZGVvIFBsYXllciBpbnRvIHlv dXIgcGFnZXMsIHlvdeKAmWxsIGVzcGVjaWFsbHkgd2FudCB0byByZXZpZXcg dGhlIGRvY3VtZW50YXRpb24uCgpBbmQgcmVtZW1iZXIgdGhhdCBhbGwgUGxh eXdpcmUgdXNlcnMgaGF2ZSBleGNsdXNpdmUgYWNjZXNzIHRvIHRoZSBQbGF5 d2lyZSBTYW5kYm94IChodHRwOi8vcGxheXdpcmUuY29tL3BsYXRmb3JtL3B1 Ymxpc2g/dXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPUJvbHQrUGxheWVyKzMuMCZ1dG1fc291cmNl PWhzX2VtYWlsJnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9MTU2Njk5 NTYmX2hzZW5jPXAyQU5xdHotOTRHcFBUX1Zkdmc3VmN2eFpiSl9kUDQ3S3Vz UEtJcklQaGE5OUIwQUt3dWhVZmd3dHR0MWR5RmRlaDQ1NkRPaFNmYS1FbkFY NnhNX2xJdExCaVdyN09jdi1QMmEzZHU2b2M1S2RHblljM0FMMldBaGMmX2hz bWk9MTU2Njk5NTYpIC0gYSB2aWRlbyBsaWJyYXJ5IHRoYXQgb2ZmZXJzIGNv bnRlbnQgdGhhdCBjYW4gb25seSBiZSBmb3VuZCBoZXJlLiBUaGUgU2FuZGJv eCBvZmZlcnMgZXZlbiBtb3JlIHJldmVudWUgb3Bwb3J0dW5pdGllcyBieSB1 cGxvYWRpbmcgeW91ciBvd24gY29udGVudCBhbmQgc2hhcmluZyBvdGhlcnMu IExlYXJuIG1vcmUgYWJvdXQgdGhlIFNhbmRib3ggaGVyZS4KClRha2UgYWR2 YW50YWdlIG9mIGFsbCBvZiB0aGVzZSBhbmQgbW9yZSBncmVhdCBuZXcgZmVh dHVyZXMgYW5kIGdpdmUgUGxheXdpcmUgYSB0cnkhCgpMZWFybiBNb3JlICho dHRwOi8vY3RhLWltYWdlLWNtczIuaHVic3BvdC5jb20vY3MvY2kvP3BnPTEy YzU0N2QwLThmODgtNGNiYi05ODA2LTAyNDM5M2FkM2ZiYyZwaWQ9NDQ5OTY0 JmVjaWQ9QUNzcHJ2c2FlOE45VGE1a2g2el94T0FRbVR3ZlA4Szh5a3RmWnZi QjBZdmJKUXY0bm8yUDVtMllkMkhGOGJmc1NmLUJUSWFmSmhQNSZ1dG1fY2Ft cGFpZ249Qm9sdCtQbGF5ZXIrMy4wJnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9aHNfZW1haWwmdXRt X21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY29udGVudD0xNTY2OTk1NiZfaHNlbmM9cDJB TnF0ei05YndiUC03S21taUEtcnFJN2ZpSTZ6aEpldm9OV0ZBVk41Rmlpd2dr WUFybXBVT3c1NFdqY2h3R0Z3ek4tZDQyWElvZVdBQVU3aWlobERfa3lrbWNv SXdQWXRlNUVaSTR2dzFIMXNlVXdsSS1VZ0JabyZfaHNtaT0xNTY2OTk1Nikg ICAKClNpZ24gVXAgTm93IChodHRwOi8vY3RhLWltYWdlLWNtczIuaHVic3Bv dC5jb20vY3MvY2kvP3BnPWE5MWM3ODg3LTA2ZjAtNGVhMS04MzUwLTYzM2Iy OTNlMDc2MyZwaWQ9NDQ5OTY0JmVjaWQ9QUNzcHJ2c2FlOE45VGE1a2g2el94 T0FRbVR3ZlA4Szh5a3RmWnZiQjBZdmJKUXY0bm8yUDVtMllkMkhGOGJmc1Nm LUJUSWFmSmhQNSZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249Qm9sdCtQbGF5ZXIrMy4wJnV0bV9z b3VyY2U9aHNfZW1haWwmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY29udGVudD0x NTY2OTk1NiZfaHNlbmM9cDJBTnF0ei1fWEpFUTRUamN2RElJWlBGRDlPX1Rw Yk1henpvcUw5b1Rxc2VwanhRd3V4dDk3TDBCTkRXMjZlZkh4aWtaR3FhVlZo ZTVNSHJMeERhLWhHMEpkYl9qZ1NDY2ZJVHZDUW5qOE9lUEdKRWNpY0V4aXVW cyZfaHNtaT0xNTY2OTk1NikgICAKCsKgCgpNb3JlIEFib3V0IFVzCgpQbGF5 d2lyZSBpcyBhIGxlYWRpbmcgb25saW5lIHZpZGVvIHBsYXllciBwbGF0Zm9y bSB0aGF0IG1ha2VzIGRpZ2l0YWwgY29udGVudCBwcm9maXRhYmxlIGZvciBw dWJsaXNoZXJzLCBhcnRpc3RzIGFuZCBjb250ZW50IGNyZWF0b3JzLiBFc3Rh Ymxpc2hlZCBpbiAyMDExIGFzIGEgZGl2aXNpb24gb2YgUGxheXdpcmUgTWVk aWEgKGZvcm1lcmx5IEludGVyZ2kgRW50ZXJ0YWlubWVudCksIHdlIG9mZmVy IGEgY29tcHJlaGVuc2l2ZSBhbmQgZWFzeS10by11c2UgdmlkZW8gaG9zdGlu ZyBwbGF0Zm9ybSB0aGF0IHByb3ZpZGVzIGFsbCBvZiB0aGUgc2VydmljZXMg bmVjZXNzYXJ5IGZvciBzdXBlcmlvciBvbmxpbmUgdmlkZW8gcHVibGlzaGlu Zy4gUGxheXdpcmXigJlzIHNlY3JldCBzYXVjZSwgdGhlIEJvbHQgUGxheWVy LCBpcyB1c2VkIGJ5IG1vcmUgdGhhbiAzNDAwIHB1Ymxpc2hlcnMgc3RyZWFt aW5nIGJpbGxpb25zIG9mIHZpZGVvcyBhY3Jvc3MgYWxsIGRldmljZXMgLSBk ZXNrdG9wLCBtb2JpbGUsIHRhYmxldCwgYW5kIGNvbm5lY3RlZCBUViBkZXZp Y2VzLiBXaXRoIGNsaWVudHMgcmFuZ2luZyBmcm9tIEZvcnR1bmUgNTAwIGNv bXBhbmllcyB0byBpbmRpdmlkdWFsIHNpdGUgb3duZXJzLCBQbGF5d2lyZSBp cyB0aGUgb25seSBvbmxpbmUgdmlkZW8gcGxheWVyIHdpdGggYSBidWlsdC1p biBhZCBtb2R1bGUgYW5kIDEwMCUgZ2xvYmFsIGFkIGZpbGwuIEluIGFkZGl0 aW9uIHRvIHRoZSBCb2x0IFBsYXllciwgb3VyIHNlcnZpY2VzIGluY2x1ZGUg aG9zdGluZywgZW5jb2RpbmcsIHN0cmVhbWluZywgYW5hbHl0aWNzLCBkaXN0 cmlidXRpb24sIGFkIHNhbGVzIGFuZCBhZCBzZXJ2aW5nLiBUb2dldGhlciwg d2Ugd29yayB3aXRoIG91ciBwYXJ0bmVycyB0byBtYXhpbWl6ZSB0aGUgcG90 ZW50aWFsIG9mIHRoZWlyIGNvbnRlbnQgc3RyYXRlZ3ksIGVuc3VyaW5nIHRo YXQgd2XCoE1BS0UgRVZFUlkgVklFVyBDT1VOVC4KCsKgCgrCoAoKU2luY2Vy ZWx5LAoKVGhlIFBsYXl3aXJlIFRlYW0KClNoYXJlIHdpdGggYSBmcmllbmQh CgpTaGFyZSBvbiBGYWNlYm9vayAoaHR0cDovL3d3dy5mYWNlYm9vay5jb20v c2hhcmUucGhwP3U9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRmVtYWlsLnBsYXl3aXJlLmNvbSUy RnBsYXl3aXJlLWxhdW5jaGVzLW1ham9yLXVwZGF0ZS1ieS1kZWJ1dGluZy1i b2x0LTMwJTNGdXRtX21lZGl1bSUzRHNvY2lhbCUyNnV0bV9zb3VyY2UlM0Rm YWNlYm9vayZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249Qm9sdCtQbGF5ZXIrMy4wJnV0bV9zb3Vy Y2U9aHNfZW1haWwmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY29udGVudD0xNTY2 OTk1NiZfaHNlbmM9cDJBTnF0ei05LVZBcVNLOTRiVzNWeXNOejh3a2dqbWRY aUVNT0hxVEdoNzdoLWRmdmdrSElkdS1GYW9XdU9CSDQwaXowSFV0RlJXS0xN YldnQ3djX1BCWmExWjhadDJqQkZLd1ppUWdHSHV2QnpUSHhyY0RJbXFYTSZf aHNtaT0xNTY2OTk1NikgU2hhcmUgb24gTGlua2VkSW4gKGh0dHA6Ly93d3cu bGlua2VkaW4uY29tL3NoYXJlQXJ0aWNsZT9taW5pPXRydWUmdXJsPWh0dHAl M0ElMkYlMkZlbWFpbC5wbGF5d2lyZS5jb20lMkZwbGF5d2lyZS1sYXVuY2hl cy1tYWpvci11cGRhdGUtYnktZGVidXRpbmctYm9sdC0zMCUzRnV0bV9tZWRp dW0lM0Rzb2NpYWwlMjZ1dG1fc291cmNlJTNEbGlua2VkaW4mdXRtX2NhbXBh aWduPUJvbHQrUGxheWVyKzMuMCZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWhzX2VtYWlsJnV0bV9t ZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX2NvbnRlbnQ9MTU2Njk5NTYmX2hzZW5jPXAyQU5x dHotX3AwQmpRejZvdTF6RFdkZ3JSOGNYREx0UFJscXg3a2RYajRrSjE1Tng0 aU13Q2dIZmtxLXZYU0ZuM0Z6WHpCc0RCUG1vS19LejVjMnRGLV9YZW43WW05 TF9jdkxGSDVnX3lRQkFfQzlrM2NMbW9Vcm8mX2hzbWk9MTU2Njk5NTYpIFNo YXJlIG9uIFR3aXR0ZXIgKGh0dHBzOi8vdHdpdHRlci5jb20vaW50ZW50L3R3 ZWV0P29yaWdpbmFsX3JlZmVyZXI9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRmVtYWlsLnBsYXl3 aXJlLmNvbSUyRnBsYXl3aXJlLWxhdW5jaGVzLW1ham9yLXVwZGF0ZS1ieS1k ZWJ1dGluZy1ib2x0LTMwJTNGdXRtX21lZGl1bSUzRHNvY2lhbCUyNnV0bV9z b3VyY2UlM0R0d2l0dGVyJnVybD1odHRwJTNBJTJGJTJGZW1haWwucGxheXdp cmUuY29tJTJGcGxheXdpcmUtbGF1bmNoZXMtbWFqb3ItdXBkYXRlLWJ5LWRl YnV0aW5nLWJvbHQtMzAlM0Z1dG1fbWVkaXVtJTNEc29jaWFsJTI2dXRtX3Nv dXJjZSUzRHR3aXR0ZXImc291cmNlPXR3ZWV0YnV0dG9uJnRleHQ9UGxheXdp cmUrTGF1bmNoZXMrTWFqb3IrVXBkYXRlK2J5K0RlYnV0aW5nK0JvbHQrMy4w JTIxJnV0bV9jYW1wYWlnbj1Cb2x0K1BsYXllciszLjAmdXRtX3NvdXJjZT1o c19lbWFpbCZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PTE1NjY5OTU2 Jl9oc2VuYz1wMkFOcXR6LS1WYmN3ZWN6N0ZINkRLODlzMzdXOVR1WkVkeEJl dnlyeGxGRUFmbnVZcldRZHVJNjlRQkd2UnVuSGUwdDh6SGNIYU1jeTFpY251 aWZKMERGRVpCaXRJS2tubE5ZWGp5VGdsV0lQN2dVZkpYNTBNVk1ZJl9oc21p PTE1NjY5OTU2KSBTaGFyZSBvbiBFbWFpbCAobWFpbHRvOj9zdWJqZWN0PUNo ZWNrIG91dCBodHRwJTNBJTJGJTJGZW1haWwucGxheXdpcmUuY29tJTJGcGxh eXdpcmUtbGF1bmNoZXMtbWFqb3ItdXBkYXRlLWJ5LWRlYnV0aW5nLWJvbHQt MzAlM0Z1dG1fbWVkaXVtJTNEc29jaWFsJTI2dXRtX3NvdXJjZSUzRGVtYWls ICZib2R5PUNoZWNrIG91dCBodHRwJTNBJTJGJTJGZW1haWwucGxheXdpcmUu Y29tJTJGcGxheXdpcmUtbGF1bmNoZXMtbWFqb3ItdXBkYXRlLWJ5LWRlYnV0 aW5nLWJvbHQtMzAlM0Z1dG1fbWVkaXVtJTNEc29jaWFsJTI2dXRtX3NvdXJj ZSUzRGVtYWlsKSAKClBsYXl3aXJlIMKgwqAxMDAwIEUgSGlsbHNib3JvIEJs dmQgwqBTdWl0ZSAxMDMgwqBEZWVyZmllbGQgQmVhY2gsIMKgRkwgwqDCoDMz NDQxIMKgwqBVU0EgCgpZb3UgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBiZWNhdXNl IHlvdSBhcmUgc3Vic2NyaWJlZCB0byBNYXJrZXRpbmcgSW5mb3JtYXRpb24g ZnJvbSBQbGF5d2lyZS4gCgpVcGRhdGUgeW91ciBlbWFpbCBwcmVmZXJlbmNl cyAoaHR0cDovL2VtYWlsLnBsYXl3aXJlLmNvbS9ocy9tYW5hZ2UtcHJlZmVy ZW5jZXMvdW5zdWJzY3JpYmU/dj0xJmQ9ZXlKbFlTSTZJbVp5WldWaWMyUXRj WFZsYzNScGIyNXpRR1p5WldWaWMyUXViM0puSWl3aVpXTWlPakUxTmpZNU9U VTJMQ0p6ZFdKeiUwRCUwQVkzSnBjSFJwYjI1SlpDSTZNekl3TlRZemZRJTNE JTNEJTBEJTBBJnV0bV9jYW1wYWlnbj1Cb2x0K1BsYXllciszLjAmdXRtX3Nv dXJjZT1oc19lbWFpbCZ1dG1fbWVkaXVtPWVtYWlsJnV0bV9jb250ZW50PTE1 NjY5OTU2Jl9oc2VuYz1wMkFOcXR6LV9UbTJtTDRwX3lIT1J4by1nRGxPMXVI NmlNbWE5UWo2bnNlSFZzT2JPNVJiWFZ1Q3R0Z2R4eEhXVUZZNEp6ODJVLS1L d1RaYXJGRGJJYUROSHVYTVpFZ1pZZVVsMTJZaFpBNjZrWWVmN0pDRk9xUmo4 Jl9oc21pPTE1NjY5OTU2KSB0byBjaG9vc2UgdGhlIHR5cGVzIG9mIGVtYWls cyB5b3UgcmVjZWl2ZS4gCgrCoFVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIGZyb20gYWxsIGZ1dHVy ZSBlbWFpbHMgKGh0dHA6Ly9lbWFpbC5wbGF5d2lyZS5jb20vaHMvbWFuYWdl LXByZWZlcmVuY2VzL3Vuc3Vic2NyaWJlLWFsbD92PTEmZD1leUpsWVNJNklt WnlaV1ZpYzJRdGNYVmxjM1JwYjI1elFHWnlaV1ZpYzJRdWIzSm5JaXdpWldN aU9qRTFOalk1T1RVMkxDSnpkV0p6JTBEJTBBWTNKcGNIUnBiMjVKWkNJNk16 SXdOVFl6ZlElM0QlM0QlMEQlMEEmdXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPUJvbHQrUGxheWVy KzMuMCZ1dG1fc291cmNlPWhzX2VtYWlsJnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRt X2NvbnRlbnQ9MTU2Njk5NTYmX2hzZW5jPXAyQU5xdHotOEtqVDBDX0dvRU5q cWg5b1dhS054ZXZQZ3BXOWxWZ0V2cVpEczNzdENLcnNZTXVRZEdycjJTWFlj Q0N1NG5zNy1OanhhVEtadnBMMmpiUGhWSFVtM2dWMXp4OFRrVzgyZGpWZlJr U3U1Sm1hQ0N3TUkmX2hzbWk9MTU2Njk5NTYp From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 15:01:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB1EFC39 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04FB7D76 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0LF1P1k084057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:01:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0LF1PQf084054; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:01:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:01:25 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Manish Jain Subject: Re: Installing Sublime Text3 on FreeBSD-10.1-i386 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:01:31 -0000 On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:49+0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > > If it exits without telling you what's wrong, the check the log files > > to see if it has written anything there. If sublime still hold its > > tongue, then this is an example of bad programming. > > > > Running "truss `which sublime`" might give you a hint of what's going > > on. > > > > Personally, I prefer builing my own ports, but that's an entirely > > different discussion. > > > Hi Trond, > > Things not looking good. sublime exits immediately, with no message in > /var/log/messages or dmesg.today > > Running it under truss gives the following : > > linux_brk(0x0,0x28136fc4,0x0,0x8048034,0x8,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) > linux_newuname(0xbfbfd5e6,0x31c,0x28136fc4,0x281378f8,0x39,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 672366592 (0x28138000) > linux_access("/etc/ld.so.preload",4) ERR#2 'No such file or > directory' > linux_open("/etc/ld.so.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2c0,0x28136fc4,0x28137880,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x2fa0,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 672370688 (0x28139000) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_open("/lib/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,036) = 3 (0x3) > read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd308,0x28136fc4,0x2813ac1a,0x8053b9d,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x18c98,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672382976 (0x2813c000) > linux_mmap2(0x28152000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672473088 (0x28152000) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_open("/lib/libdl.so.2",0x0,0155) = 3 (0x3) > read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2ec,0x28136fc4,0x2813b862,0x8053c04,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x4074,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672485376 (0x28155000) > linux_mmap2(0x28158000,0x2000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672497664 (0x28158000) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_open("/lib/libc.so.6",0x0,0170) = 3 (0x3) > read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\^C\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd2d0,0x28136fc4,0x2813b9ab,0x8053c2c,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1959ac,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672505856 (0x2815a000) > linux_mmap2(0x282ea000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 674144256 (0x282ea000) > linux_mmap2(0x282ed000,0x29ac,0x3,0x32,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674156544 > (0x282ed000) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674168832 (0x282f0000) > linux_set_thread_area(0xbfbfd79c,0x28136fc4,0x282f06c0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mprotect(0x282ea000,0x2000,0x1,0x28138560,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mprotect(0x28158000,0x1000,0x1,0x281382c8,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mprotect(0x28136000,0x1000,0x1,0x2813751c,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > munmap(0x28139000,12192) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_open("/dev/tty",0x8802,00) = 3 (0x3) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_brk(0x0,0x282ebff4,0x0,0x0,0x21000,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) > linux_brk(0x8143000,0x282ebff4,0x8143000,0x8122000,0x8143000,0x6) = 135540736 > (0x8143000) > linux_open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive",0x8000,01) = 3 (0x3) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0x282ecb00,0x282ebff4,0xbfbfd530,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x200000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 674172928 (0x282f1000) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x11f000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 676270080 (0x284f1000) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 672370688 (0x28139000) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_getuid(0x282ebff4,0x0,0x282b0526,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) > linux_getgid(0x3e9,0x0,0x282b0526,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) > geteuid() = 1001 (0x3e9) > getegid() = 1001 (0x3e9) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8120b1c,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_time(0x0,0xbfbfdacc,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1421784797 (0x54beb6dd) > linux_open("/proc/meminfo",0x80000,0666) = 3 (0x3) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfb49c,0x282ebff4,0x8122aa8,0x1fff,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 672374784 (0x2813a000) > read(3,"\t total: used:\tfree: s"...,4096) = 297 (0x129) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > munmap(0x2813a000,4096) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8121240,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_newuname(0xbfbfd5b6,0x0,0x282ebff4,0xff,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_stat64("/usr/home/bourne",0xbfbfd640,0xbfbfd640) = 0 (0x0) > linux_stat64(".",0xbfbfd5e0,0xbfbfd5e0) = 0 (0x0) > linux_getpid(0x8124750,0x5f,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1437 (0x59d) > linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd4ac,0x282ebff4,0x3,0x282b023f,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules",0x0,0666) = 3 (0x3) > linux_fstat64(0x3,0xbfbfd3e0,0x282ebff4,0x8124958,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_mmap2(0x0,0x8000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 677445632 (0x28610000) > read(3,"# GNU libc iconv configuration."...,32768) = 32768 (0x8000) > read(3,"JAPANESE//\tEUC-JP//\nalias\tOSF"...,32768) = 23335 (0x5b27) > read(3,0x28610000,32768) = 0 (0x0) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > munmap(0x28610000,32768) = 0 (0x0) > linux_getppid(0x8124750,0x0,0x1,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1436 (0x59c) > gettimeofday({1421784797.882516 },0x0) = 0 (0x0) > getpgrp() = 1436 (0x59c) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xbfbfd540,0xbfbfd4b4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_getrlimit(0x6,0xbfbfd6ac,0x282ebff4,0x1,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_open("/usr/local/bin/sublime",0x8000,00) = 3 (0x3) > linux_ioctl(0x3,0x5401,0xbfbfd6f8,0xbfbfd738,0x282ebff4,0x6) ERR#25 > 'Inappropriate ioctl for device' > linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd760,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > read(3,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\n/usr/loc"...,80) = 64 (0x40) > linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd760,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_getrlimit(0x7,0xbfbfd72c,0x282ebff4,0x813ede0,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x1,0xbfbfd75c,0xbfbfd75c,0x282ebff4,0x6) ERR#9 'Bad file > descriptor' > dup2(0x3,0xff,0xff,0xbfbfd75c,0x3,0x6) = 255 (0xff) > close(3) = 0 (0x0) > linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x2,0x1,0x813ede0,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x3,0x0,0x0,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_fstat64(0xff,0xbfbfd7d0,0x282ebff4,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_llseek(0xff,0x0,0x0,0xbfbfd790,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > read(255,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\n/usr/loc"...,64) = 64 (0x40) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd658,0xbfbfd5d8,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_clone(0x1200011,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x282f0728,0x6) = 1438 (0x59e) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd5d8,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd6e0,0xbfbfd660,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd660,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xbfbfd6e0,0xbfbfd660,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd450,0xbfbfd3c4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_waitpid(0xffffffff,0xbfbfd61c,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1438 (0x59e) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xbfbfd660,0x0,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xbfbfd430,0xbfbfd3a4,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282ebff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) > read(255,0x813ee68,64) = 0 (0x0) > process exit, rval = 0 Shoddy Romulan technology ... :P (A reference to Star Trek: Away Team.) There's not much to go on, given my (limited) experience. Maybe you should open a PR and let the maintainer and other parts of the community chime in. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestřl, | Trond Endrestřl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjřvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 16:51:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED97AED1 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC05C89 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id em10so18124955wid.3 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:51:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eP0g3hWVeHz4pzvx08OI5CksOXuTKNitI2pR1TDmrAE=; b=rw50t5O0D+CbJAtLZUUjEJB/+TB0XnRaYQJcTcgJ19cPtEWI45heW5bXFQnZftFGxN 14ebro3AnvS3EVb4ncZ0Q1j66NYUhRPkye4H/QlbmSn7FnHCyrQZwCQEmoO5bkaO5obF uOyS3uCIPLPlxQ+1H67DjRWZzM/kVEMY7go+txzWY0xrO95xEb7K1IKsHhrZzpIvYxt9 V7j61qFm//jyr39R8hUicj3NL68JfmSi+Yj2jncLAcxpAIEFt/pipskOMDlDci5bOBzc XD6OURKCea/acN4AOlDIdVnQLO5HAoaJveiMB3NInKl6btoMlsA3uP6Iht8kuOw7+2Ep oY9A== X-Received: by 10.194.206.97 with SMTP id ln1mr1957102wjc.112.1421859079923; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from MARC-THINKPAD.queenland (AOrleans-656-1-23-170.w90-20.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.20.238.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bo3sm449419wjb.44.2015.01.21.08.51.18 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:51:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:51:17 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TcOkcms=?= Owen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: SANE Network Scanner Message-ID: <20150121175117.5712f713@MARC-THINKPAD.queenland> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:51:22 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to share an Epson Perfection 3490 over the network through SANE. I know it is supported because it worked on linux (Debian). The host (FreeBSD 10.1) recognizes it and it seems to work if I invoke this command: scanimage -d snapscan:libusb:/dev/usb:/dev/ugen1.3 --format pnm > /tmp/outfile.pnm The issue is that my clients (all Debian 7 boxes) don't seem to be able to detect the scanner over the network using xsane or the scanimage -L / sane-find-scanner -q commands. Maybe some of you will be able to enlighten me. Here are the content of a few configuration files from the server: /etc/rc.conf inetd_enable="YES" saned_enable="YES" /etc/services sane-port 6566/tcp #SANE /etc/inetd.conf sane-port stream tcp nowait saned /usr/local/sbin/saned saned In /usr/local/etc/sane.d/dll.conf, everything is commented except 'snapscan' as FreeBSD seems to detect the scanner as snapscan and not epson. /usr/local/etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf #------------------------------ General ----------------------------------- # Change to the fully qualified filename of your firmware file, if # firmware upload is needed by the scanner firmware /usr/local/share/sane/snapscan/Esfw52.bin # If not automatically found you may manually specify a device name. # For USB scanners also specify bus=usb, e.g. # /dev/usb/scanner0 bus=usb # For SCSI scanners specify the generic device, e.g. /dev/sg0 on Linux. # /dev/sg0 #--------------------------------------------------------------------------- # No changes should be necessary below this line #--------------------------------------------------------------------------- #-------------------------- SCSI scanners ---------------------------------- # These SCSI devices will be probed automatically scsi AGFA * Scanner scsi COLOR * Scanner scsi Color * Scanner scsi ACERPERI * Scanner #--------------------------- USB scanners ----------------------------------- # These USB devices will be probed automatically # (This will currently work only on Linux) # Benq/Acer/Vuego 310U usb 0x04a5 0x1a20 usb 0x04a5 0x1a26 # Benq/Acer/Vuego 320U usb 0x04a5 0x2022 # Benq/Acer/Vuego 620U / 620UT usb 0x04a5 0x1a2a usb 0x04a5 0x2040 # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640U usb 0x04a5 0x2060 # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BU usb 0x04a5 0x207e # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BT usb 0x04a5 0x20be # Benq/Acer/Vuego 1240U usb 0x04a5 0x20c0 # Benq/Acer/Vuego 3300 / 4300 usb 0x04a5 0x20b0 # Benq/Acer/Vuego 4300 usb 0x04a5 0x20de # Benq 5000E / 5000U usb 0x04a5 0x20f8 # Benq 5000 usb 0x04a5 0x20fc # Benq/Acer 5300 usb 0x04a5 0x20fe # Benq 5250C usb 0x04a5 0x2137 # Agfa 1236U usb 0x06bd 0x0002 # Agfa 1212U usb 0x06bd 0x0001 usb 0x06bd 0x2061 # Agfa Snapscan e10 usb 0x06bd 0x2093 # Agfa Snapscan e20 usb 0x06bd 0x2091 # Agfa Snapscan e25 usb 0x06bd 0x2095 # Agfa Snapscan e26 usb 0x06bd 0x2097 # Agfa Snapscan e40 usb 0x06bd 0x208d # Agfa Snapscan e42 usb 0x06bd 0x20ff # Agfa Snapscan e50 usb 0x06bd 0x208f # Agfa Snapscan e52 usb 0x06bd 0x20fd # Epson Perfection 660 usb 0x04b8 0x0114 # Epson Perfection 1670 usb 0x04b8 0x011f # Epson Perfection 2480 usb 0x04b8 0x0121 # Epson Perfection 3490 usb 0x04b8 0x0122 # Epson Stylus CX-1500 usb 0x04b8 0x080c From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 18:20:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7624BDC for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A058E3 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id eu11so20076557pac.13 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:20:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LgzdFmLD3hDMEXjvKcv4S/q+zR2KHSvstbXASpPVHZc=; b=R3ZiePDh8nIZqfgRy/+N0kfi7mpwXFE+1KaveWAp3LhPk5i+y572qwrvGHUArAT1qi TL2Jluvkaj6mihZSmaBFsujvUql+avMj7NLbpyGCa/jVnhTRl3hEfOHNHowWlegtBp8b /sQwb7HBVbt0nwMAofeZRKVoBhkQh6RrhS/p0pw1U1n6Vh1CGb37V9EYiaj1L/oa/UjZ O4BbhoLgJESGvySr7UkM6xDXlekmRz79qVAImIMqyGgqpfFjJtQ0tSf6eZ6KTZAEZgJB rEyhVIqGCuMAqxXjwxIps+W9L40mvzIlyRfm5vwMnZt6rcBTbCG8YY/9x0V6PXONvBFb ut/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.236.67 with SMTP id us3mr63199887pbc.121.1421864407027; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:20:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.90.203 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:20:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150121175117.5712f713@MARC-THINKPAD.queenland> References: <20150121175117.5712f713@MARC-THINKPAD.queenland> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:20:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SANE Network Scanner From: Zsolt Udvari To: =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A4rk_Owen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:20:07 -0000 Did you enable your client's IP in saned.conf? Check here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sane#Network_scanning I've done it with RPI, and followed ArchWiki - you don't need inetd. 2015-01-21 17:51 GMT+01:00 M=C3=A4rk Owen : > Hi, > > I'm trying to share an Epson Perfection 3490 over the network through > SANE. I know it is supported because it worked on linux (Debian). The > host (FreeBSD 10.1) recognizes it and it seems to work if I invoke this > command: > > scanimage -d snapscan:libusb:/dev/usb:/dev/ugen1.3 --format pnm > > /tmp/outfile.pnm > > The issue is that my clients (all Debian 7 boxes) don't seem to be able > to detect the scanner over the network using xsane or the scanimage > -L / sane-find-scanner -q commands. > > Maybe some of you will be able to enlighten me. Here are the content of > a few configuration files from the server: > > /etc/rc.conf > inetd_enable=3D"YES" > saned_enable=3D"YES" > > /etc/services > sane-port 6566/tcp #SANE > > /etc/inetd.conf > sane-port stream tcp nowait > saned /usr/local/sbin/saned saned > > In /usr/local/etc/sane.d/dll.conf, everything is commented except > 'snapscan' as FreeBSD seems to detect the scanner as snapscan and not > epson. > > /usr/local/etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf > #------------------------------ General > ----------------------------------- > > # Change to the fully qualified filename of your firmware file, if > # firmware upload is needed by the scanner > firmware /usr/local/share/sane/snapscan/Esfw52.bin > > # If not automatically found you may manually specify a device name. > > # For USB scanners also specify bus=3Dusb, e.g. > # /dev/usb/scanner0 bus=3Dusb > > # For SCSI scanners specify the generic device, e.g. /dev/sg0 on Linux. > # /dev/sg0 > > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > # No changes should be necessary below this line > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > > #-------------------------- SCSI scanners > ---------------------------------- # These SCSI devices will be probed > automatically scsi AGFA * Scanner > scsi COLOR * Scanner > scsi Color * Scanner > scsi ACERPERI * Scanner > > #--------------------------- USB scanners > ----------------------------------- # These USB devices will be probed > automatically # (This will currently work only on Linux) > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 310U > usb 0x04a5 0x1a20 > usb 0x04a5 0x1a26 > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 320U > usb 0x04a5 0x2022 > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 620U / 620UT > usb 0x04a5 0x1a2a > usb 0x04a5 0x2040 > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640U > usb 0x04a5 0x2060 > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BU > usb 0x04a5 0x207e > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BT > usb 0x04a5 0x20be > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 1240U > usb 0x04a5 0x20c0 > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 3300 / 4300 > usb 0x04a5 0x20b0 > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 4300 > usb 0x04a5 0x20de > > # Benq 5000E / 5000U > usb 0x04a5 0x20f8 > > # Benq 5000 > usb 0x04a5 0x20fc > > # Benq/Acer 5300 > usb 0x04a5 0x20fe > > # Benq 5250C > usb 0x04a5 0x2137 > > # Agfa 1236U > usb 0x06bd 0x0002 > > # Agfa 1212U > usb 0x06bd 0x0001 > usb 0x06bd 0x2061 > > # Agfa Snapscan e10 > usb 0x06bd 0x2093 > > # Agfa Snapscan e20 > usb 0x06bd 0x2091 > > # Agfa Snapscan e25 > usb 0x06bd 0x2095 > > # Agfa Snapscan e26 > usb 0x06bd 0x2097 > > # Agfa Snapscan e40 > usb 0x06bd 0x208d > > # Agfa Snapscan e42 > usb 0x06bd 0x20ff > > # Agfa Snapscan e50 > usb 0x06bd 0x208f > > # Agfa Snapscan e52 > usb 0x06bd 0x20fd > > # Epson Perfection 660 > usb 0x04b8 0x0114 > > # Epson Perfection 1670 > usb 0x04b8 0x011f > > # Epson Perfection 2480 > usb 0x04b8 0x0121 > > # Epson Perfection 3490 > usb 0x04b8 0x0122 > > # Epson Stylus CX-1500 > usb 0x04b8 0x080c > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 19:18:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF4035B for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3F7F6D for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id b13so13125151wgh.9 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:18:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xWLE2OPSixPPZLentpo2/6eC9fpjlC/wiXwixfx1Cdo=; b=xKseFqX/w5mvbTZX6x5px68kx4u/LXHNuMhrc3/BiZJkeoInz524rvPTSEhSw23iz8 +BdG2bGof/nBLrMYfzO42q0TVCwMFWmo1vggSGrkyi1gnq21UB/reXwjrnUMWatGEaMr iV1i3niwdl+5gftsFjyZuXEhMxL3J5qbaYnLnieUS7Pf57myGpb+8N2HVnSJ+ekX9pEY s5lexznYLD75vm6qiR9uAQtS0Sc+blSE0rrjDh+GxEdZuymPr79LrLI7LeatxYzM5jjO 0NSPeoLLCdoWR0WVyJygtpGCrPgBo7WCKBuu3syPr6eir14NljEiuH2bBwIkK5AW97OP vs/g== X-Received: by 10.194.185.243 with SMTP id ff19mr35169531wjc.126.1421867922854; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:18:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.99.98.113] (254-239.198-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.198.239.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ep9sm71145wid.3.2015.01.21.11.18.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:18:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54BFFB92.4020708@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:18:42 +0100 From: Chris Ernst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:18:45 -0000 Hi Atma i had similar issues with exactly the same setup. I was able to solve the issues by using *brackets* in pf.conf actually brackets specify dynamic IPs. By using brackets pf knows the IP may change. here is an extract out of my pf.conf user@gateway:~ # more /etc/pf.conf intIf = "vr3" extIf = "vr0" vpnIf = "tun0" [...] [...] ### filter rules block all [...] [...] # allow from vpn to internal pass in on $vpnIf inet proto {tcp,udp} from ($vpnIf:network) to $intNet keep state pass in on $intIf inet proto {tcp,udp} from ($vpnIf:network) to $intNet keep state best regards Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 19:27:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A81793D for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail5.networktest.com (mail5.networktest.com [204.109.60.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 133A2F7 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65D12FCE46 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail5.networktest.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail5.networktest.com [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43323-02 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp130.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [12.20.174.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B5DA2FCE43 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:17:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:17:23 -0800 From: David Newman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: frequency of pkg updates Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:27:17 -0000 How often is the FreeBSD pkg repository updated? Asking because 'sudo pkg audit' sometimes shows vulnerabilities in one or more packages, yet 'sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -f ' offers only to reinstall the vulnerable version. An updated pkg can take days to show up. The ports tree is updated much faster, but I'm trying to move to pkg where possible. (Yes, I know I could run poudriere and create a pkg repository, but I'm asking here about FreeBSD's pkg system.) This is on 10.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64. Thanks! dn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 20:46:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F80D02 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA2BC05 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k11so45387333wes.6 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:46:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4Slpp7vBujegkg4jymyA06Sh28zRFg6gyF6pZiT9FM4=; b=WoxamrHLThn3/qZW2cd/41mArbR/nmjDJKbza7m7t5PHeMWAHH0JANFjkTZ/ti29S7 UaqQZg/6PC7XpYrgRrg+rW8VPDJhN8UkpGTJ4GrZjPLQoa1PloyfFpPEA8qQbflT5tRI q3nsO/z0l9+yNUcZ8qGNRPHRnnqqkaE650CFC7SqWasMvKjIRNd0WUt6gIPDeokCaI5V b3cpizaj45CkI1b5bdGPdO4qyFH9rKs+kumGxQvytQibyS5Gs4qqN+L1kQorLkfY8OUM 9LwOx2GBb2nAimR4YqKk9irG00h377VDJsZWn2aeJFNamZAhGEnQIpJQtJH/1feMqlJw OB3w== X-Received: by 10.180.73.108 with SMTP id k12mr59932121wiv.24.1421873190445; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from MARC-THINKPAD.queenland (AOrleans-656-1-23-170.w90-20.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.20.238.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u7sm302093wiy.18.2015.01.21.12.46.29 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:46:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:46:28 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TcOkcms=?= Owen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Fw: SANE Network Scanner Message-ID: <20150121214628.3b42c157@MARC-THINKPAD.queenland> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:46:32 -0000 Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:11:54 +0100 From: M=C3=A4rk Owen To: Zsolt Udvari Subject: Re: SANE Network Scanner On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:20:06 +0100 Zsolt Udvari wrote: > Did you enable your client's IP in saned.conf? > Check here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sane#Network_scanning > I've done it with RPI, and followed ArchWiki - you don't need inetd. >=20 > 2015-01-21 17:51 GMT+01:00 M=C3=A4rk Owen : >=20 > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to share an Epson Perfection 3490 over the network > > through SANE. I know it is supported because it worked on linux > > (Debian). The host (FreeBSD 10.1) recognizes it and it seems to > > work if I invoke this command: > > > > scanimage -d snapscan:libusb:/dev/usb:/dev/ugen1.3 --format pnm > > > /tmp/outfile.pnm > > > > The issue is that my clients (all Debian 7 boxes) don't seem to be > > able to detect the scanner over the network using xsane or the > > scanimage -L / sane-find-scanner -q commands. > > > > Maybe some of you will be able to enlighten me. Here are the > > content of a few configuration files from the server: > > > > /etc/rc.conf > > inetd_enable=3D"YES" > > saned_enable=3D"YES" > > > > /etc/services > > sane-port 6566/tcp #SANE > > > > /etc/inetd.conf > > sane-port stream tcp nowait > > saned /usr/local/sbin/saned saned > > > > In /usr/local/etc/sane.d/dll.conf, everything is commented except > > 'snapscan' as FreeBSD seems to detect the scanner as snapscan and > > not epson. > > > > /usr/local/etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf > > #------------------------------ General > > ----------------------------------- > > > > # Change to the fully qualified filename of your firmware file, if > > # firmware upload is needed by the scanner > > firmware /usr/local/share/sane/snapscan/Esfw52.bin > > > > # If not automatically found you may manually specify a device name. > > > > # For USB scanners also specify bus=3Dusb, e.g. > > # /dev/usb/scanner0 bus=3Dusb > > > > # For SCSI scanners specify the generic device, e.g. /dev/sg0 on > > Linux. # /dev/sg0 > > > > > > #----------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > > # No changes should be necessary below this line > > > > #----------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > > > > #-------------------------- SCSI scanners > > ---------------------------------- # These SCSI devices will be > > probed automatically scsi AGFA * Scanner > > scsi COLOR * Scanner > > scsi Color * Scanner > > scsi ACERPERI * Scanner > > > > #--------------------------- USB scanners > > ----------------------------------- # These USB devices will be > > probed automatically # (This will currently work only on Linux) > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 310U > > usb 0x04a5 0x1a20 > > usb 0x04a5 0x1a26 > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 320U > > usb 0x04a5 0x2022 > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 620U / 620UT > > usb 0x04a5 0x1a2a > > usb 0x04a5 0x2040 > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640U > > usb 0x04a5 0x2060 > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BU > > usb 0x04a5 0x207e > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BT > > usb 0x04a5 0x20be > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 1240U > > usb 0x04a5 0x20c0 > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 3300 / 4300 > > usb 0x04a5 0x20b0 > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 4300 > > usb 0x04a5 0x20de > > > > # Benq 5000E / 5000U > > usb 0x04a5 0x20f8 > > > > # Benq 5000 > > usb 0x04a5 0x20fc > > > > # Benq/Acer 5300 > > usb 0x04a5 0x20fe > > > > # Benq 5250C > > usb 0x04a5 0x2137 > > > > # Agfa 1236U > > usb 0x06bd 0x0002 > > > > # Agfa 1212U > > usb 0x06bd 0x0001 > > usb 0x06bd 0x2061 > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e10 > > usb 0x06bd 0x2093 > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e20 > > usb 0x06bd 0x2091 > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e25 > > usb 0x06bd 0x2095 > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e26 > > usb 0x06bd 0x2097 > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e40 > > usb 0x06bd 0x208d > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e42 > > usb 0x06bd 0x20ff > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e50 > > usb 0x06bd 0x208f > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e52 > > usb 0x06bd 0x20fd > > > > # Epson Perfection 660 > > usb 0x04b8 0x0114 > > > > # Epson Perfection 1670 > > usb 0x04b8 0x011f > > > > # Epson Perfection 2480 > > usb 0x04b8 0x0121 > > > > # Epson Perfection 3490 > > usb 0x04b8 0x0122 > > > > # Epson Stylus CX-1500 > > usb 0x04b8 0x080c > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Yes, I did. Here's my saned.conf: # saned.conf # Configuration for the saned daemon ## Daemon options # Port range for the data connection. Choose a range inside [1024 - 65535]. # Avoid specifying too large a range, for performance reasons. # # ONLY use this if your saned server is sitting behind a firewall. If your # firewall is a Linux machine, we strongly recommend using the # Netfilter nf_conntrack_sane connection tracking module instead. # # data_portrange =3D 10000 - 10100 ## Access list # A list of host names, IP addresses or IP subnets (CIDR notation) that # are permitted to use local SANE devices. IPv6 addresses must be enclosed # in brackets, and should always be specified in their compressed form. # # The hostname matching is not case-sensitive. #scan-client.somedomain.firm #192.168.0.1 192.168.1.0/24 #[2001:db8:185e::42:12] #[2001:db8:185e::42:12]/64 # NOTE: /etc/inetd.conf (or /etc/xinetd.conf) and # /etc/services must also be properly configured to start # the saned daemon as documented in saned(8), services(4) # and inetd.conf(4) (or xinetd.conf(5)). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 21:33:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C644FA for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B937015E for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maggot.black-earth.co.uk (maggot.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0LLXPeH048555 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:33:25 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0LLXPeH048555 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t0LLXPeH048555; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <54C01B26.1080407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:33:26 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:33:31 -0000 On 2015/01/21 19:17, David Newman wrote: > How often is the FreeBSD pkg repository updated? > > Asking because 'sudo pkg audit' sometimes shows vulnerabilities in one > or more packages, yet 'sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -f name>' offers only to reinstall the vulnerable version. > > An updated pkg can take days to show up. The ports tree is updated much > faster, but I'm trying to move to pkg where possible. (Yes, I know I > could run poudriere and create a pkg repository, but I'm asking here > about FreeBSD's pkg system.) > > This is on 10.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64. Packages are built weekly from a snapshot of the ports taken on a Wednesday at (I think) 01:00 UTC. It's definitely some time on Wednesday though. The package builders then build all of the packages for all the supported release branches + HEAD, which takes until some time the following weekend. Thus if a package of interest to you updates on a Thursday, it can be about 10 days before an updated package is available from the repos. More hardware is being procured to cut down the time it takes to build packages, so the update frequency should improve. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 21:41:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894FF642 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E511BD for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-65.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0LLfOb4014449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:41:25 -0600 Message-ID: <54C01E7B.6090403@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:47:39 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> <54C01B26.1080407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <54C01B26.1080407@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:41:32 -0000 On 01/21/15 15:33, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/01/21 19:17, David Newman wrote: >> How often is the FreeBSD pkg repository updated? >> >> Asking because 'sudo pkg audit' sometimes shows vulnerabilities in one >> or more packages, yet 'sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -f > name>' offers only to reinstall the vulnerable version. >> >> An updated pkg can take days to show up. The ports tree is updated much >> faster, but I'm trying to move to pkg where possible. (Yes, I know I >> could run poudriere and create a pkg repository, but I'm asking here >> about FreeBSD's pkg system.) >> >> This is on 10.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64. > Packages are built weekly from a snapshot of the ports taken on a > Wednesday at (I think) 01:00 UTC. It's definitely some time on > Wednesday though. The package builders then build all of the packages > for all the supported release branches + HEAD, which takes until some > time the following weekend. > > Thus if a package of interest to you updates on a Thursday, it can be > about 10 days before an updated package is available from the repos. > > More hardware is being procured to cut down the time it takes to build > packages, so the update frequency should improve. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hmmmm .... So the individual pkg's are actually built by .... who ? The pkg maintainer ? A central coordinating body ? Somebody/Something else ? Inquiring minds wanna know .... They might also be interested in contributing hardware if that would noticeably speed things up ;-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 23:11:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53EBD21A for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC77CEB for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id inBH1p002516WCc01nBJD0; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:18 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Y852s3uN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=cYTjFNdXV1EA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=h4N5dq4t4jmZGHCmDfgA:9 a=qh3MtrGF9qjCHbMV:21 a=qA3_ZW8Tn6kqaATk:21 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13] helo=milibyte.co.uk) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YE4Qe-00096U-Js; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:17 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:15 +0000 Message-ID: <2028260.lLgEXe72zl@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.2; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Cc: David Newman X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:28 -0000 On Wednesday 21 Jan 2015 11:17:23 David Newman wrote: > How often is the FreeBSD pkg repository updated? > > Asking because 'sudo pkg audit' sometimes shows vulnerabilities in one > or more packages, yet 'sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -f name>' offers only to reinstall the vulnerable version. > > An updated pkg can take days to show up. The ports tree is updated much > faster, but I'm trying to move to pkg where possible. (Yes, I know I > could run poudriere and create a pkg repository, but I'm asking here > about FreeBSD's pkg system.) > > This is on 10.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64. You can check on the state of the latest build at http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/#latest_builds for AMD64 and http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/#latest_builds for i386. Any ports which have been updated since the start of the build won't appear in the repository until the following week's build. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 23:32:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C47076D6 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C48FF71 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 22C5ACB8C9B; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:32:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:32:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:32:34 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Odhiambo Washington" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: User Questions , Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:32:40 -0000 On Wed, January 21, 2015 3:29 am, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Hi Shane, > > Where is the new syntax documented? Or I just have to 'man ipf'? I'd love > to see a web discussion about it, which I obviously missed. > > Is there a sort of rule converter? :-) > > Thank you for mentioning this syntax thing. Must be the one that was > biting > me on 10.1 > > > > On 21 January 2015 at 12:24, Shane Ambler wrote: > >> On 21/01/2015 16:15, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >>> Hi Ben, >>> >>> Thanks for this. I actually read this bit of it having been updated to >>> version 5.1.2 in FreeBSD 10.0. >>> >>> However, my problem emanated from the fact that rules that I use on >>> FreeBSD-8.4/9.3 simply could not work on 10.1 >>> >>> I simply carried the rules over, and did not compile a custom kernel on >>> 10.1. I was believing that the module will be automatically loaded and >>> rules would work. They didn't! Only 'ipf -D' would let connections to >>> be >>> made from LAN PCs to my gateway PC.. >>> >> >> I read a post in which someone had to copy the sources from 9.x to 10.x >>> and >>> recompile in order to get it to work with the rules from 9.x >>> >> >> The update from 4.1.28->5.1.2 may include changes that requires >> adjusting old rules to the new syntax. >> >> While going back to an older version can get your old settings to work >> again it also removes any security fixes from the update. Updating your >> ruleset would be a better solution. >> >> >> -- >> FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing >> >> Shane Ambler >> I wonder if anyone knows URl of official website of ipfilter. Both project info on sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipfilter/) and wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPFilter) point at the place which apparently doesn't exist so you end up getting just front page of the university: http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/ ... One does want to read the documentation to be able to keep using ipfilter on FreBSD 10.x (as one did on FreeBSD 9.x in the past). And with syntax changed, one does have to read Documentation (and here brilliant FreeBSD documentation seems to be outdated...) Thanks a lot for your answers! Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 23:34:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2904A7F3 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B331FF94 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A697D3CCDD; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:34:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0LNY0Wo002826; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:34:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:34:00 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates Message-Id: <20150122003400.c91771b9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54C01E7B.6090403@hiwaay.net> References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> <54C01B26.1080407@FreeBSD.org> <54C01E7B.6090403@hiwaay.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:34:12 -0000 On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:47:39 -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/21/15 15:33, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 2015/01/21 19:17, David Newman wrote: > >> How often is the FreeBSD pkg repository updated? > >> > >> Asking because 'sudo pkg audit' sometimes shows vulnerabilities in one > >> or more packages, yet 'sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -f >> name>' offers only to reinstall the vulnerable version. > >> > >> An updated pkg can take days to show up. The ports tree is updated much > >> faster, but I'm trying to move to pkg where possible. (Yes, I know I > >> could run poudriere and create a pkg repository, but I'm asking here > >> about FreeBSD's pkg system.) > >> > >> This is on 10.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64. > > Packages are built weekly from a snapshot of the ports taken on a > > Wednesday at (I think) 01:00 UTC. It's definitely some time on > > Wednesday though. The package builders then build all of the packages > > for all the supported release branches + HEAD, which takes until some > > time the following weekend. > > > > Thus if a package of interest to you updates on a Thursday, it can be > > about 10 days before an updated package is available from the repos. > > > > More hardware is being procured to cut down the time it takes to build > > packages, so the update frequency should improve. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Matthew > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Hmmmm .... So the individual pkg's are actually built by .... who ? The > pkg maintainer ? A central coordinating body ? Somebody/Something else ? It's an automated build system, a build cluster I think. The port maintainers are responsible for making sure the Makefile and the patches work, they primarily do the porting (when the original software has been created on and for Linux) and the testing. Then they commit the changes to the official ports tree, for example, when they updated foo-1.2.3 to foo-1.2.4. The build system then uses that version for the next scheduled build session. Note that the update might be in the ports tree a bit earlier than the binary packages become available. If you urgently require bleeding-edge ports, using portsnap (or probably even better: svn) is the way to go. With binary packages, you'll have to wait a little. > Inquiring minds wanna know .... They might also be interested in > contributing hardware if that would noticeably speed things up ;-) .... Provide a time machine so the scheduled day of the week can be deployed to _all_ of the seven weekdays at once. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 23:53:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90683F64 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52CD9259 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a141so14547041oig.5 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:53:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lQHR1cIw5jMWoWqKUWLAZICfnjF/xw67Z+8mEvHSFKc=; b=bwy1gSXNJy90lzTt0fVSNiYnhgNziboXU6eBU37K/89AndxHIsxkObUoyEgkV9LLq0 tDgmnHW3uP2YGnnMAl3uHT/pXtQsVktwX1DYp6LkE1Dd1wbB0DvSVatK2LojRxuwiQF6 KWADdh8g7lUZrOmGyOmvAX6I8QbdbX8PMHb9N1KBfCAGqOwgDBAWNUkTOUAKYAMREWuK Y9cJkrcV76sGDrux+UGlAKzr9bDuWPE4glm7tgarCq52Gk8eK4UmhV2BTVzg9IT50bRv DdbomhCg2U9rgMlCkQEasEDSGPe36W48fNNAWTFg2mHGFP9YNQxUEDrBsCgAeEm0kYxK 8PRw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.62.241 with SMTP id b17mr26484737oes.17.1421884410687; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.247.74 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:53:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C01E7B.6090403@hiwaay.net> References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> <54C01B26.1080407@FreeBSD.org> <54C01E7B.6090403@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:53:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates From: jungle Boogie To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:53:31 -0000 HI William, On 21 January 2015 at 13:47, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 2015/01/21 19:17, David Newman wrote: >>> >> How often is the FreeBSD pkg repository updated? >>> >> > > Hmmmm .... So the individual pkg's are actually built by .... who ? The pkg > maintainer ? A central coordinating body ? Somebody/Something else ? > Inquiring minds wanna know .... They might also be interested in > contributing hardware if that would noticeably speed things up ;-) .... > A website that may interest you (maybe you already know about it): https://www.freshports.org/ Search for a package like ack: http://www.freshports.org/textproc/ack/ Gives a description up top and the maintainer (sometimes a group) and if you scroll down, you'll see when it was last updated and why. Some may reference a PR like this update: http://www.freshports.org/www/neon If you review that in Bugzilla, it will explain what's changed, by whom, and why: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195786 Freshports.org isn't run by the freeBSD project but by an awesome guy: https://twitter.com/dlangille And seen here in color TV: http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2014_12_31-daemons_in_the_north > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > Best, jungle -- ------- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboogie@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boogie@jit.si From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 01:23:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78DF0B1D for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40215D3F for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id fp1so28279751pdb.4 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:23:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pj9VUPD38OTmeZ2ut9kuoFCbVoGQSFeeDEIXOd3wlwo=; b=eq0MWvKufR8UBu1VyBL+58PSkTXBngwzr1C9gR4clAQpIEgx9QiLHuYtdQMHZrL/WY 01RnKvC7mN1n+uDj37kXBDK5Y2TTzozVjXA4vFRAntCEP5yl5aD58ISDr5BruTFZmDgY dm21wje1o3LDzip6iBSUDz58bimpHbohKVeq7rWRLrIRfDoVLP3CMM0/R/ViD7k6/N8T C168JRK0K/ubmydCAT9uhtobRh/OB9LtgCKscY0B6JJgxHT+jvFYp3XIAQ9TDxRdlxQg djvM8USIm4owbU+bsJVNhcVPnZhDbYmUd84F+cp9sYBcf4klr8F4llD6Hk/3qaDS9rbi dHMw== X-Received: by 10.70.91.67 with SMTP id cc3mr66634386pdb.76.1421889802838; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:23:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.118] ([120.29.76.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ka5sm7134860pbc.27.2015.01.21.17.23.20 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:23:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54C0510C.8070408@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:23:24 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Odhiambo Washington , User Questions , Luzar , Shane Ambler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:23:23 -0000 Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, January 21, 2015 3:29 am, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> Hi Shane, >> >> Where is the new syntax documented? Or I just have to 'man ipf'? I'd love >> to see a web discussion about it, which I obviously missed. >> >> Is there a sort of rule converter? :-) >> >> Thank you for mentioning this syntax thing. Must be the one that was >> biting >> me on 10.1 >> >> >> >> On 21 January 2015 at 12:24, Shane Ambler wrote: >> >> >>> On 21/01/2015 16:15, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Ben, >>>> >>>> Thanks for this. I actually read this bit of it having been updated to >>>> version 5.1.2 in FreeBSD 10.0. >>>> >>>> However, my problem emanated from the fact that rules that I use on >>>> FreeBSD-8.4/9.3 simply could not work on 10.1 >>>> >>>> I simply carried the rules over, and did not compile a custom kernel on >>>> 10.1. I was believing that the module will be automatically loaded and >>>> rules would work. They didn't! Only 'ipf -D' would let connections to >>>> be >>>> made from LAN PCs to my gateway PC.. >>>> >>>> >>> I read a post in which someone had to copy the sources from 9.x to 10.x >>> >>>> and >>>> recompile in order to get it to work with the rules from 9.x >>>> >>>> >>> The update from 4.1.28->5.1.2 may include changes that requires >>> adjusting old rules to the new syntax. >>> >>> While going back to an older version can get your old settings to work >>> again it also removes any security fixes from the update. Updating your >>> ruleset would be a better solution. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing >>> >>> Shane Ambler >>> >>> > > I wonder if anyone knows URl of official website of ipfilter. Both project > info on sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipfilter/) and > wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPFilter) point at the place > which apparently doesn't exist so you end up getting just front page of > the university: http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/ ... > > One does want to read the documentation to be able to keep using ipfilter > on FreBSD 10.x (as one did on FreeBSD 9.x in the past). And with syntax > changed, one does have to read Documentation (and here brilliant FreeBSD > documentation seems to be outdated...) > > Thanks a lot for your answers! > > Valeri > > > I moved my 8 production machines from 9.2 to 10.1 and my 9.2 IPFilter rules worked just fine on 10.1. It also has a private LAN and users can reach the public network. Matter of fact I have been using the same IPF rules since version 3.4. I find it hard to believe that as popular as IPFilter is no one else has voiced any problems about it. Your problem is a major show stopper and should be effecting ALL IPFilter users if it was a IPF software or 10.1 bug. IPFilter does not have any syntax chances. I pretty much use the IPF rule set as shown in the handbook. On the other hand PF does have major syntax differences between the old back version FreeBSD is running and the current version openbsd documentation shows. Maybe PF-IPF is what the previous poster was confused over. Rest assured, IPFiter does work on 10.1. Something changed on your system. Check all the basic IPF config files. Lan not reaching pubic network may mean your ipf.nat file is missing or codded wrong. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 02:16:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA88E488 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F2223C for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4EB78CB8C9B; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:16:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from 76.193.18.182 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:16:54 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <8292.76.193.18.182.1421893014.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <54C0510C.8070408@gmail.com> References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <54C0510C.8070408@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:16:54 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Ernie Luzar" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:16:56 -0000 On Wed, January 21, 2015 7:23 pm, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Wed, January 21, 2015 3:29 am, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >>> Hi Shane, >>> >>> Where is the new syntax documented? Or I just have to 'man ipf'? I'd >>> love >>> to see a web discussion about it, which I obviously missed. >>> >>> Is there a sort of rule converter? :-) >>> >>> Thank you for mentioning this syntax thing. Must be the one that was >>> biting >>> me on 10.1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 21 January 2015 at 12:24, Shane Ambler >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 21/01/2015 16:15, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Ben, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for this. I actually read this bit of it having been updated >>>>> to >>>>> version 5.1.2 in FreeBSD 10.0. >>>>> >>>>> However, my problem emanated from the fact that rules that I use on >>>>> FreeBSD-8.4/9.3 simply could not work on 10.1 >>>>> >>>>> I simply carried the rules over, and did not compile a custom kernel >>>>> on >>>>> 10.1. I was believing that the module will be automatically loaded >>>>> and >>>>> rules would work. They didn't! Only 'ipf -D' would let connections to >>>>> be >>>>> made from LAN PCs to my gateway PC.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I read a post in which someone had to copy the sources from 9.x to >>>> 10.x >>>> >>>>> and >>>>> recompile in order to get it to work with the rules from 9.x >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The update from 4.1.28->5.1.2 may include changes that requires >>>> adjusting old rules to the new syntax. >>>> >>>> While going back to an older version can get your old settings to work >>>> again it also removes any security fixes from the update. Updating >>>> your >>>> ruleset would be a better solution. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing >>>> >>>> Shane Ambler >>>> >>>> >> >> I wonder if anyone knows URl of official website of ipfilter. Both >> project >> info on sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipfilter/) and >> wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPFilter) point at the >> place >> which apparently doesn't exist so you end up getting just front page of >> the university: http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/ ... >> >> One does want to read the documentation to be able to keep using >> ipfilter >> on FreBSD 10.x (as one did on FreeBSD 9.x in the past). And with syntax >> changed, one does have to read Documentation (and here brilliant FreeBSD >> documentation seems to be outdated...) >> >> Thanks a lot for your answers! >> >> Valeri >> >> >> > I moved my 8 production machines from 9.2 to 10.1 and my 9.2 IPFilter > rules worked > just fine on 10.1. It also has a private LAN and users can reach the > public network. > Matter of fact I have been using the same IPF rules since version 3.4. > I'm certainly happy for you. > I find it hard to believe that as popular as IPFilter is no one else has > voiced any problems about it. > Your problem is a major show stopper and should be effecting ALL > IPFilter users if it was a IPF software > or 10.1 bug. No, I'm not the original poster of this thread, the problem I have is different, I'll describe it later > > IPFilter does not have any syntax chances. I pretty much use the IPF > rule set as shown in the handbook. It was just what someone else on this thread mentioned: change of syntax. I can not verify that directly on the website of ipfilter author as this website doesn't seem to exist anymore (read my post) > On the other hand PF does have major syntax differences between the old > back version FreeBSD is running and > the current version openbsd documentation shows. Maybe PF-IPF is what > the previous poster was confused over. > > Rest assured, IPFiter does work on 10.1. Something changed on your > system. Check all the basic IPF config files. > Lan not reaching pubic network may mean your ipf.nat file is missing or > codded wrong. > Again, my problem is different. Originally after upgrade from 9.3 RELEASE to 10.0 RELEASE (shortly after it was released). I started observing too many packets (more that 90%) dropped by ipfilter. Network feels like 100 time slower. All config files are in place. I asked on this list for help - no one replied (if my memory doesn't fail me). Then I looked into the code of kernel module itself, I noticed it is much slimmer than kernel module code on 9.3 (many files are missing, some of the ones that are there are noticeably shorter). I moved /usr/src off the way and checked out fresh copy: all is exactly the same. After that I just replaced the code of ipfilter module with the one from 9.3, rebuilt kernel module, unloaded and loaded freshly built module. And my ipfilter problem was fixed. I just posted this to the thread I have started, so it looks like one of the posts here on this thread just quotes what I did (or maybe someone else did and described the same). Note that config files didn't change. After some time living with 10.0 on that box, that box was upgraded to 10.1 RELEASE. Also shortly after it was released. And the same problem reappeared: ipfilter when it is on drops majority of packets, connections seem to be 100 slower... I know, happy people (who do not have problem themselves) ... hm ... not always can imagine that problem can be real for somebody else. But I still hope someone will be able to answer my questions. 1. How can I find website (Documentation) for latest ipfilter? Where is new place for it (it appears, developer moved it from where it was in the past) 2. Did the syntax change between versions or not? On 9.3 I have version: v4.1.28 (496), whereas on 10.1: v5.1.2 (608). If yes, where do I find appropriate documentation. I certainly will be able to rewrite my rules myself after reading documentation. After all I wrote them (of course, using amazing FreeBSD online documentation ! ;-) Thanks in advance for all your replies. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 02:24:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64E75CB for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28A8331 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 784CC6D86BA9; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:24:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:24:03 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Dutch Ingraham Subject: Re: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150122022403.GA6514@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF18DF.6090707@gmx.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54BF18DF.6090707@gmx.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:24:05 -0000 --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:11:27PM -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > >>> > >>> I tried adding i915. No joy: > >>> > >>> VT: running with driver "vga". > >>> KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies > >>> KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies > >>> > > Thanks! > > > The /boot/loader.conf I'm using is: >=20 > kern.vty=3Dvt > i915kms_load=3D"YES" > kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1440x900" >=20 Actually, no, that line *is* present. Here is my loader.conf (sans most commments): #nvidia_load=3D"YES" crypto_load=3D"YES" aesni_load=3D"YES" geom_eli_load=3D"YES" zfs_load=3D"YES" kern.vty=3Dvt hw.vga.textmode=3D1 if_tap_load=3D"YES" i915_load=3D"YES" i915kms_load=3D"YES" kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1366x768" Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUwF9DAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr6E4P/3Py7cjZKX0F7sQs44VCoDJT Fhl97NPMGbWjNJvgOwn+/poQa7ITjEOhQN1tGGTbLC4AD95s37WH7K2HhxeI0mpp zJdPaozsuGUQlGq+gFirpn4DIh2xHpft0mQ0yqGX3aBI26SHKpRy8jWOYcbNAd96 maG39QeZk+xip0AFhZOEWyB6c7O13UjEEFlxesvFIqSMpMG/fSaK6oUH9dSlU0ef W3+Ev/KikJlguBVSaMBr+SO9+MSiuEp0fsld0/cys7D3hkTMMaEm7K5PFs8NkTye FCt1A2dqsofOdIyDF34ZCn8gWsd0z2rt+okJ+aZdvljaranrZfgk2GeVpfWm3oT0 O6mV2wDoH0PFnZNDuzrRHTOzRfLtzX+pqdiY52ylfgKzA2kPWm8oeJwBiC7c1xOb H3PwQmn5CP4q4OM4ph2Rxf2W2/GaPu40tA35kC0Gw0Q1F0F10eUifVrWBjh6oGfB NZxOsCYIIltW5fZEyag8IymOwPq0GUKC89FTlmjrkLrNagTqRX1BtH2tzGxAFnXX yV5ntoqAsxuaBnrSwNYPSEB133m9urFL2KvEU5ug0DAIi0Q7uuMKtcQIehoIu9WV s1lXtdzk+vrGzEILuZnvja7pq5MEUEHVcpjyiC8GfByFgKKD/iIlWWbxfsBYmdM3 iUYOrVSd8CGeIxcHkbQd =Ttv5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 03:48:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EFCC8DC for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 03:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C579DF7 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 03:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id et14so57296321pad.3 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:48:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r7E7KHk3YGtevb98huHGsgT94/jZdiSb2k4przednGI=; b=cvc1HnZjohGBj9Vu5VJm+e+uDtHUHHN7Z8aLdiMSypcxAMvpchnseYCwemff1+QfiF xzf3PDVUx1bb9FHyBTjN/F64/vI5ck/uowuvfeMpIsvt2Z+J1j48T8939rQcjfk8oFI7 EQxDHviEvwAfDsA+YLO+/UAWQK6wnHG8/lJ8p8ro/aeVE14CF7lNLxRozF69mM8Ufewq yoEiZFvOwzuJicr7r3H7EJd6Ls1uyMVT5rvjDGaJyzEde17Ml1tUrd2v9vTVWcPMuhkA pQHeflll2CW28nPutVrSU0FJvb+7hszbJH55lX2VSDuI7ERg/WteAQ9FWMU7X1UB9xaz 3KDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.66.46 with SMTP id c14mr68095740pat.136.1421898530598; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:48:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150122022403.GA6514@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF18DF.6090707@gmx.us> <20150122022403.GA6514@home.parts-unknown.org> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:48:50 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: i915 at boot From: Adam Vande More To: David Benfell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Dutch Ingraham , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 03:48:51 -0000 On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Benfell wrote: > hw.vga.textmode=1 > Change to 0 -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 05:07:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8187A416 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DAC27CF for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-128.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0M573B6021803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:07:03 -0600 Message-ID: <54C086EE.5000603@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:13:18 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> <54C01B26.1080407@FreeBSD.org> <54C01E7B.6090403@hiwaay.net> <20150122003400.c91771b9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150122003400.c91771b9.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:07:06 -0000 On 01/21/15 17:34, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:47:39 -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 01/21/15 15:33, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 2015/01/21 19:17, David Newman wrote: >>>> How often is the FreeBSD pkg repository updated? >>>> >>>> Asking because 'sudo pkg audit' sometimes shows vulnerabilities in one >>>> or more packages, yet 'sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -f >>> name>' offers only to reinstall the vulnerable version. >>>> >>>> An updated pkg can take days to show up. The ports tree is updated much >>>> faster, but I'm trying to move to pkg where possible. (Yes, I know I >>>> could run poudriere and create a pkg repository, but I'm asking here >>>> about FreeBSD's pkg system.) >>>> >>>> This is on 10.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64. >>> Packages are built weekly from a snapshot of the ports taken on a >>> Wednesday at (I think) 01:00 UTC. It's definitely some time on >>> Wednesday though. The package builders then build all of the packages >>> for all the supported release branches + HEAD, which takes until some >>> time the following weekend. >>> >>> Thus if a package of interest to you updates on a Thursday, it can be >>> about 10 days before an updated package is available from the repos. >>> >>> More hardware is being procured to cut down the time it takes to build >>> packages, so the update frequency should improve. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Matthew >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> Hmmmm .... So the individual pkg's are actually built by .... who ? The >> pkg maintainer ? A central coordinating body ? Somebody/Something else ? > It's an automated build system, a build cluster I think. > The port maintainers are responsible for making sure the > Makefile and the patches work, they primarily do the porting > (when the original software has been created on and for Linux) > and the testing. Then they commit the changes to the official > ports tree, for example, when they updated foo-1.2.3 to foo-1.2.4. > The build system then uses that version for the next scheduled > build session. > > Note that the update might be in the ports tree a bit earlier > than the binary packages become available. If you urgently > require bleeding-edge ports, using portsnap (or probably > even better: svn) is the way to go. With binary packages, > you'll have to wait a little. > > > >> Inquiring minds wanna know .... They might also be interested in >> contributing hardware if that would noticeably speed things up ;-) .... > Provide a time machine so the scheduled day of the week can > be deployed to _all_ of the seven weekdays at once. ;-) I'll get right on that ;-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 05:25:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1406A896 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6C89A4 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp14-2-13-162.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.13.162]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2015 15:50:03 +1030 Message-ID: <54C08881.2010200@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:50:01 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu, Odhiambo Washington Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:25:25 -0000 On 22/01/2015 10:02, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Wed, January 21, 2015 3:29 am, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> Hi Shane, >> >> Where is the new syntax documented? Or I just have to 'man ipf'? I'd love >> to see a web discussion about it, which I obviously missed. >> >> Is there a sort of rule converter? :-) >> >> Thank you for mentioning this syntax thing. Must be the one that was >> biting >> me on 10.1 I use ipfw myself, I read the email out of curiosity. Personally I would clear the rules and add one at a time till I get an error. Sounds like some people have no problem so there may only be one small change that breaks your rules. > > I wonder if anyone knows URl of official website of ipfilter. Both project > info on sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipfilter/) and > wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPFilter) point at the place > which apparently doesn't exist so you end up getting just front page of > the university: http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/ ... The handbook page on ipfilter links to http://www.phildev.net/ipf/ which is only a faq page, so it looks like the man pages are the best docs. Sourceforge could still be the place of all development, the cvs repo has a few files that were changed 7 months ago. > One does want to read the documentation to be able to keep using ipfilter > on FreBSD 10.x (as one did on FreeBSD 9.x in the past). And with syntax > changed, one does have to read Documentation (and here brilliant FreeBSD > documentation seems to be outdated...) > > Thanks a lot for your answers! > > Valeri -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 07:05:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D0566F for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22e.google.com (mail-yk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 425DD280 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 131so9128888ykp.5 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:05:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NNCkSqXTCb34A0d9VTx4dFyQkEDwbLjfzosj6OYUAEM=; b=V4hn3gZhVH1pHmda+B6+i1cX5uvDSTwZYCuoPT4eW2GEQa36PFKRoPUe2DDlTFBTvX mfh6tMOyjmO3ZeCip+r4Ygt/kkkLygRqRApusNgWlzPgtN33pmd7lRwYMETwUn+DVK4n kYiXy/HTYeYMccL94rMejs7dEWEy5RW+R55r5Lm9sbtNLZ0Zd2qiv80FuhDVaRWiqWnu SYANnNq+MOGQdugU7DxSzdXqrMOpuN3zFahiyenhj9J1EDlulon8xyNdjTeJvzcUe6H6 oIP/AFrQS7yDuwp+GKgtDtQHSIBqS7HNMNn14hAsMd/t4rguOE3tI36++rt8AFsKQxYN ZJ+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.52.203 with SMTP id 194mr9459397yku.62.1421910327504; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.188.144 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.188.144 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:05:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BFFB92.4020708@gmail.com> References: <54BFFB92.4020708@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:05:27 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A way to load PF rules at startup using OpenVPN From: krad To: Chris Ernst Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:05:28 -0000 Good spot you are right I forgot about that On 21 Jan 2015 19:18, "Chris Ernst" wrote: > Hi Atma > > i had similar issues with exactly the same setup. I was able to solve the > issues by using *brackets* in pf.conf > actually brackets specify dynamic IPs. By using brackets pf knows the IP > may change. > > here is an extract out of my pf.conf > > user@gateway:~ # more /etc/pf.conf > intIf = "vr3" > extIf = "vr0" > vpnIf = "tun0" > [...] > [...] > ### filter rules > block all > [...] > [...] > # allow from vpn to internal > pass in on $vpnIf inet proto {tcp,udp} from ($vpnIf:network) to $intNet > keep state > pass in on $intIf inet proto {tcp,udp} from ($vpnIf:network) to $intNet > keep state > > best regards > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 07:11:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15268789 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7878738F for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q1so12040lam.2 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/RG8G2BzustNqH/Up6FFWj5QQR0lRvvkAquTBGvPyps=; b=Ka/FNh6Sz0mDZLDLhnhvcAxOupZbwTYw2MSn+4E2+rRDRH05QnEwgWPIwhSXUaHCXT aLKstjmsSSf2shvq2Cx0IkJrMsY0L10igFjx05NnqF+ipgFEj3Ig1datSNpvzDNzehb/ LX1/bEn2h7L9lK5FFVLvMEp8kSo3xGuWoOcXG4ftvXhzBaed5mg9DHBWe9S27tWXJTgl GV2NDsrq9b+6PSRAZaP4ebaNwV9Y3Ma+5Q9/zSW1gPh+0RDXRnq77gd4RrLh9LA3J9uz xhnc8oZ3YKVFIEPXqlEIjUs7UXBRHYJL/O8S+vhI/gkTwlhaQYDec3WaJyT6JXkno6Mx iB3g== X-Received: by 10.152.4.8 with SMTP id g8mr20497246lag.58.1421910686283; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:11:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:10:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C0510C.8070408@gmail.com> References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <54C0510C.8070408@gmail.com> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:10:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 To: Ernie Luzar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Shane Ambler , User Questions , galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:11:29 -0000 On 22 January 2015 at 04:23, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> On Wed, January 21, 2015 3:29 am, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Shane, >>> >>> Where is the new syntax documented? Or I just have to 'man ipf'? I'd love >>> to see a web discussion about it, which I obviously missed. >>> >>> Is there a sort of rule converter? :-) >>> >>> Thank you for mentioning this syntax thing. Must be the one that was >>> biting >>> me on 10.1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 21 January 2015 at 12:24, Shane Ambler wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 21/01/2015 16:15, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Ben, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for this. I actually read this bit of it having been updated to >>>>> version 5.1.2 in FreeBSD 10.0. >>>>> >>>>> However, my problem emanated from the fact that rules that I use on >>>>> FreeBSD-8.4/9.3 simply could not work on 10.1 >>>>> >>>>> I simply carried the rules over, and did not compile a custom kernel on >>>>> 10.1. I was believing that the module will be automatically loaded and >>>>> rules would work. They didn't! Only 'ipf -D' would let connections to >>>>> be >>>>> made from LAN PCs to my gateway PC.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I read a post in which someone had to copy the sources from 9.x to 10.x >>>> >>>> >>>>> and >>>>> recompile in order to get it to work with the rules from 9.x >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The update from 4.1.28->5.1.2 may include changes that requires >>>> adjusting old rules to the new syntax. >>>> >>>> While going back to an older version can get your old settings to work >>>> again it also removes any security fixes from the update. Updating your >>>> ruleset would be a better solution. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing >>>> >>>> Shane Ambler >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> I wonder if anyone knows URl of official website of ipfilter. Both project >> info on sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipfilter/) and >> wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPFilter) point at the >> place >> which apparently doesn't exist so you end up getting just front page of >> the university: http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/ ... >> >> One does want to read the documentation to be able to keep using ipfilter >> on FreBSD 10.x (as one did on FreeBSD 9.x in the past). And with syntax >> changed, one does have to read Documentation (and here brilliant FreeBSD >> documentation seems to be outdated...) >> >> Thanks a lot for your answers! >> >> Valeri >> >> >> >> > I moved my 8 production machines from 9.2 to 10.1 and my 9.2 IPFilter > rules worked > just fine on 10.1. It also has a private LAN and users can reach the > public network. > Matter of fact I have been using the same IPF rules since version 3.4. > > I find it hard to believe that as popular as IPFilter is no one else has > voiced any problems about it. > Your problem is a major show stopper and should be effecting ALL IPFilter > users if it was a IPF software > or 10.1 bug. > > IPFilter does not have any syntax chances. I pretty much use the IPF rule > set as shown in the handbook. > On the other hand PF does have major syntax differences between the old > back version FreeBSD is running and > the current version openbsd documentation shows. Maybe PF-IPF is what the > previous poster was confused over. > > Rest assured, IPFiter does work on 10.1. Something changed on your system. > Check all the basic IPF config files. > Lan not reaching pubic network may mean your ipf.nat file is missing or > codded wrong. > The same rules which refused to work on 10.1 are working on 9.3. All I had to change were the interface names and the IP subnets. Trust me I verified and ensured that I did not mix up the names. If you want, I am willing to give someone access to my box to try and get this to work. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 07:53:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91062CA7 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7465F98C for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C13B76D86BA9; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:53:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:53:36 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150122075335.GA78991@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF18DF.6090707@gmx.us> <20150122022403.GA6514@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Dutch Ingraham , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:53:43 -0000 --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:48:50PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Benfell > wrote: >=20 > hw.vga.textmode=3D1 >=20 > Change to 0 >=20 *THAT* made a difference. The font is still large, but visibly different. In dmesg, I'm still seeing: VT: running with driver "vga". KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies I *did* check to see if I could still get back to a console from X with that setting. I can. Yay! loader.conf now looks like this: crypto_load=3D"YES" aesni_load=3D"YES" geom_eli_load=3D"YES" zfs_load=3D"YES" kern.vty=3Dvt hw.vga.textmode=3D0 if_tap_load=3D"YES" i915_load=3D"YES" i915kms_load=3D"YES" kern.vt.fb.default_mode=3D"1366x768" What next? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUwKx/AAoJEBV64x4SNmArqbUP/1xtC/d6YEmH4QdP9PLHntPg 6+ghBnn9JvI/87xJ8Hw6WT5/b2ha1GYgHi+PLkFQqjl8w7Ps929ibXgiTAW7dqHy z//qEGujWGOkG9HIaQWSlL5Y0HCAcPjh/huTsMhyrctjE99vhhZhuGOVqM/p0oqN uKLI8GRNRV4hGUlt4jKnZxaXi7B4i+KACfvECZDnuG9AqecpV7EPDMssMKvLV3kc 2bfeGOda3pY9BkwvUSv7NvOGBiP223CuSjeLkJzX8irEd2FLoRpOIG6dznfbvUBA sU/feDvyI0tIZLjMKLtLFtQYSvF8ldfmkN291Fut67Z9zVNS4lHtZppUNPLbMzST 5IXRREXiOXv4suO2/TrSGeMNlMROse+oZUOj9oRZjPoUg66ccHjAkV9ExSB/18ln iW2OpGOMRcbZWbmG+L93J842W7Kx5gIxudSeGXyDX7lQOTSeauTpjg/bl2s9Uzlb cw16DCtnmjRW7iqnZStuElL1ynJypdTZkHVrANcMgsV0IYCpdNwTo2MGCAjZl5cS ZeIsqpAlxfDze74NsUeaHfnzkEDattEE3iRfsNbrgivv6VSGPWMHDiqAkg5JTiZT HroJXBLKy/jLxQLi1taJfEx+DveSuo6HFSQFquhL+0p/e2GiknXfPpHyVD6Ea5aH PNAVoe8OPhDPAO+ttK6r =mAKw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 09:59:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD045C4 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm10-vm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm10-vm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4E0C8EB for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:59:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1421920745; bh=IW5RZbP5qIKDL4+sZzFTvBVZ0lskKRJn4pJAoHGEaIA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=f5vl16AvvT1Ka/ZUJuHB+qdZ47LZcilLF+KgBAoUqwUSXXDX+M756YGNnfqaqgGosiKLbXGNu/T12rJQCkwZ61UhLNLct8fvBtxbj9MtKaEQ6uMIIurTVs5j+DaeFHOdNFGayvva+sEbClb6VY23ZsegdZuV+1IW7dSKVdAogbpRIMFchdtgFyb36uEAXu+FMPwx7hxlVXdIvqOHeBhvmKrTlJu/xl++SKQ7RxP/Yv54WjljODK3EfXgMjFzfyUxDMm0b/SVC+nEr9sXFpxe7ICnl79PWxYK0GRBDyNEJY9zKMxZrs8DfmGOQxMUJBsBVBCkRjJSmkXNKGG7PdiOyQ== Received: from [212.82.98.125] by nm10.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2015 09:59:05 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.82] by tm18.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2015 09:59:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp119.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2015 09:59:05 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 532750.96159.bm@smtp119.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: cFC4p2wVM1kpZW939dbQQBbjoVsfETDF3tEt4EqOV2thuR0 jOZbzv21dtiH.1NdEM83BkvN4luipvidEFcCRakxThZWip3aI1KW0es4U2oY qaHklM9Yk5x6qRqaY4liWxAc8BF2wY24_6.6U56Cuy4nTgMdrnG9bx_mEiSD w.tWNzyIbeVeSxiMpaCuOQ41bbzj2Qa8c7ibER7JotywxSGVkMMF74fheEo6 yROtNEeRMogBKqMsK45a0WoZtS55utiKJg6nzQiDdD8eU1zQPdvS.tiYM4Fa o0hIraCxj_oL7ifPVV5THllWPv3DtxZNce0fSg34FkfagACYy5xDfvqupckx z38IyW_qhw6qCZkotKAQM3PTS6.I8Tc0aNPuZ1x4DPEQ5vLhmvxygOYvpvk2 hGPV7Nj2gc25gfusKY4sX0Ut8XLCvkTqEUZx0Llt3FjGVgxbTr3vbkuEENIL ZIFn23FAMoVTV.ZrO_e.j4TzihcjTVxSK7UBuKdKiIwunntALIEQjXmVR8t4 qll4WbVhSZX7GIsuL4SEZ4aGXf1i4Ibsq X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:59:25 +0100 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raid hard disk Message-Id: <20150122105925.42ca6bd64d4a8cf96f9574db@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:59:14 -0000 On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:44:37 +0300 Kumar Perumal wrote: > Hi, > I am not able to raid both hard disk in my server 6.0.0. > > Earlier I was using "raidctl -s raid0" for server 5.7.1 Are you sure it's FreeBSD? There's no 5.7.1 FreeBSD version, and version numbering uses X.Y schema, not X.Y.Z. Show us the output of uname -a > Please help me > > Regards, > > Kumar Perumal --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 11:00:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378A5776 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BDCF24 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a1so983435wgh.12 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 03:00:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bZtGpNfsy3KGoS1rcg/tjZNStzYd2FdKuziRaI5zVTs=; b=Gh2h9OcYUXaILYgFEF2O3YhIEowJ+xd/b7tMbAyNZPK79/sB673yvu8lygygnFqz10 WkxgHH7/cmUeux68pbrWDk3rzDV6kCM9C0zl2ys8dPWLC3yCi50C4+ZQtI89rHCJ4WwJ qQKXsOQTgfD2UUe7hsJ1kS5eilVDYR//Dx3KyxGmDPhlYibJirH+FmPd0Dy408wUNwq+ X7f9kfM1VfIkmtHPjzHJhy/b9Kl/jhYIDO1DrmMvQD5la7dmMOkC6NsAiKQigrcygJYe SkgrGGbj2mlIAtqKFVP2mNFe2do5LqBqiNdrz2xgwNhLulEj2i0yZeERCxK21Wqzxa1S ZaFQ== X-Received: by 10.194.175.202 with SMTP id cc10mr1714688wjc.27.1421924416813; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 03:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from MARC-THINKPAD.queenland (AOrleans-656-1-23-170.w90-20.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.20.238.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g10sm2545099wic.7.2015.01.22.03.00.15 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 03:00:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:00:14 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TcOkcms=?= Owen Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SANE Network Scanner Message-ID: <20150122120014.3f3e6d67@MARC-THINKPAD.queenland> In-Reply-To: <20150121214628.3b42c157@MARC-THINKPAD.queenland> References: <20150121214628.3b42c157@MARC-THINKPAD.queenland> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:00:19 -0000 On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:46:28 +0100 M=C3=A4rk Owen wrote: >=20 >=20 > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:11:54 +0100 > From: M=C3=A4rk Owen > To: Zsolt Udvari > Subject: Re: SANE Network Scanner >=20 >=20 > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:20:06 +0100 > Zsolt Udvari wrote: >=20 > > Did you enable your client's IP in saned.conf? > > Check here: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sane#Network_scanning I've > > done it with RPI, and followed ArchWiki - you don't need inetd. > >=20 > > 2015-01-21 17:51 GMT+01:00 M=C3=A4rk Owen : > >=20 > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trying to share an Epson Perfection 3490 over the network > > > through SANE. I know it is supported because it worked on linux > > > (Debian). The host (FreeBSD 10.1) recognizes it and it seems to > > > work if I invoke this command: > > > > > > scanimage -d snapscan:libusb:/dev/usb:/dev/ugen1.3 --format pnm > > > > /tmp/outfile.pnm > > > > > > The issue is that my clients (all Debian 7 boxes) don't seem to be > > > able to detect the scanner over the network using xsane or the > > > scanimage -L / sane-find-scanner -q commands. > > > > > > Maybe some of you will be able to enlighten me. Here are the > > > content of a few configuration files from the server: > > > > > > /etc/rc.conf > > > inetd_enable=3D"YES" > > > saned_enable=3D"YES" > > > > > > /etc/services > > > sane-port 6566/tcp #SANE > > > > > > /etc/inetd.conf > > > sane-port stream tcp nowait > > > saned /usr/local/sbin/saned saned > > > > > > In /usr/local/etc/sane.d/dll.conf, everything is commented except > > > 'snapscan' as FreeBSD seems to detect the scanner as snapscan and > > > not epson. > > > > > > /usr/local/etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf > > > #------------------------------ General > > > ----------------------------------- > > > > > > # Change to the fully qualified filename of your firmware file, if > > > # firmware upload is needed by the scanner > > > firmware /usr/local/share/sane/snapscan/Esfw52.bin > > > > > > # If not automatically found you may manually specify a device > > > name. > > > > > > # For USB scanners also specify bus=3Dusb, e.g. > > > # /dev/usb/scanner0 bus=3Dusb > > > > > > # For SCSI scanners specify the generic device, e.g. /dev/sg0 on > > > Linux. # /dev/sg0 > > > > > > > > > #--------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- > > > # No changes should be necessary below this line > > > > > > #--------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- > > > > > > #-------------------------- SCSI scanners > > > ---------------------------------- # These SCSI devices will be > > > probed automatically scsi AGFA * Scanner > > > scsi COLOR * Scanner > > > scsi Color * Scanner > > > scsi ACERPERI * Scanner > > > > > > #--------------------------- USB scanners > > > ----------------------------------- # These USB devices will be > > > probed automatically # (This will currently work only on Linux) > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 310U > > > usb 0x04a5 0x1a20 > > > usb 0x04a5 0x1a26 > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 320U > > > usb 0x04a5 0x2022 > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 620U / 620UT > > > usb 0x04a5 0x1a2a > > > usb 0x04a5 0x2040 > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640U > > > usb 0x04a5 0x2060 > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BU > > > usb 0x04a5 0x207e > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 640BT > > > usb 0x04a5 0x20be > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 1240U > > > usb 0x04a5 0x20c0 > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 3300 / 4300 > > > usb 0x04a5 0x20b0 > > > > > > # Benq/Acer/Vuego 4300 > > > usb 0x04a5 0x20de > > > > > > # Benq 5000E / 5000U > > > usb 0x04a5 0x20f8 > > > > > > # Benq 5000 > > > usb 0x04a5 0x20fc > > > > > > # Benq/Acer 5300 > > > usb 0x04a5 0x20fe > > > > > > # Benq 5250C > > > usb 0x04a5 0x2137 > > > > > > # Agfa 1236U > > > usb 0x06bd 0x0002 > > > > > > # Agfa 1212U > > > usb 0x06bd 0x0001 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x2061 > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e10 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x2093 > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e20 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x2091 > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e25 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x2095 > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e26 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x2097 > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e40 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x208d > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e42 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x20ff > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e50 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x208f > > > > > > # Agfa Snapscan e52 > > > usb 0x06bd 0x20fd > > > > > > # Epson Perfection 660 > > > usb 0x04b8 0x0114 > > > > > > # Epson Perfection 1670 > > > usb 0x04b8 0x011f > > > > > > # Epson Perfection 2480 > > > usb 0x04b8 0x0121 > > > > > > # Epson Perfection 3490 > > > usb 0x04b8 0x0122 > > > > > > # Epson Stylus CX-1500 > > > usb 0x04b8 0x080c > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >=20 > Yes, I did. Here's my saned.conf: >=20 > # saned.conf > # Configuration for the saned daemon >=20 > ## Daemon options > # Port range for the data connection. Choose a range inside [1024 - > 65535]. # Avoid specifying too large a range, for performance reasons. > # > # ONLY use this if your saned server is sitting behind a firewall. If > your # firewall is a Linux machine, we strongly recommend using the > # Netfilter nf_conntrack_sane connection tracking module instead. > # > # data_portrange =3D 10000 - 10100 >=20 >=20 > ## Access list > # A list of host names, IP addresses or IP subnets (CIDR notation) > that # are permitted to use local SANE devices. IPv6 addresses must be > enclosed # in brackets, and should always be specified in their > compressed form. # > # The hostname matching is not case-sensitive. >=20 > #scan-client.somedomain.firm > #192.168.0.1 > 192.168.1.0/24 > #[2001:db8:185e::42:12] > #[2001:db8:185e::42:12]/64 >=20 > # NOTE: /etc/inetd.conf (or /etc/xinetd.conf) and > # /etc/services must also be properly configured to start > # the saned daemon as documented in saned(8), services(4) > # and inetd.conf(4) (or xinetd.conf(5)). I'm going to answer myself here. I managed to solve my issue, it was in fact a simple permission problem. I changed my /etc/devfs.rules files by replacing 'usb' with 'saned': [system=3D5] add path 'ugen1.3' mode 0660 group saned add path 'usb/1.3.*' mode 0660 group saned As Zsolt said, I removed the inetd service and simply let SANED share the scanner over the network by itself and it worked. Thanks for the help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 11:37:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277657BF for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11F466B for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tower.forge.com ([59.101.99.122]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCtef-1YNqjl0ZN5-009jpd for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:37:51 +0100 Message-ID: <54C0E108.7060206@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 22:37:44 +1100 From: mortoxa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i915 at boot References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF18DF.6090707@gmx.us> <20150122022403.GA6514@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150122075335.GA78991@home.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20150122075335.GA78991@home.parts-unknown.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:unnZBshOGV360ns5YZNst019hDYpXbCvkQuAnGPfzFBcLMk+dM3 3VpV+9oV1Z7CJ9Va1gdhp5fxBnb7CQY8Scm/eHBoujSpt5JfwpLIyXSSt3A5PMWTQ8kl15T tP5yLun1V9SLJVCfzJqWbH9OTXv/eF4m/gQkqq2xVEOcAiyjKuS2CBHRh/tKkOFRcc9h/yP cYbVKLF/UZhcNtRJ+yM6g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:37:58 -0000 On 01/22/15 18:53, David Benfell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:48:50PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Benfell >> wrote: >> >> hw.vga.textmode=1 >> >> Change to 0 >> > *THAT* made a difference. The font is still large, but visibly > different. > > In dmesg, I'm still seeing: > > VT: running with driver "vga". > KLD file i915.ko is missing dependencies > KLD file i915kms.ko is missing dependencies > > I *did* check to see if I could still get back to a console from X > with that setting. I can. Yay! > > loader.conf now looks like this: > > crypto_load="YES" > aesni_load="YES" > geom_eli_load="YES" > zfs_load="YES" > kern.vty=vt > hw.vga.textmode=0 > if_tap_load="YES" > i915_load="YES" > i915kms_load="YES" > kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1366x768" > > What next? > > Thanks! I had some trouble with the i915 module when I loaded it via loader.conf. It just went to a black screen and I had to reset the box. I read somewhere about adding it to /etc/rc.conf as follows: kld_list="i915kms" and deleting the i915kms_load"YES" from loader.conf It seems having it loaded later in the boot process make it behave itself better on my system. Might be worth a try on yours. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 13:03:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2756DC68 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22E6F2 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id g10so1611579pdj.0 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:03:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dkgM340L0rNHBeyvi3kcaXrYjAKjJxiJzMdkqasflUw=; b=MydEleI+mTXaSVScjIb0cKkOokq6IDAJOzvQBVge966uKsyDROpQSRuTrssIrJJA8c gabOtN3/cl3pdyDHoj1+CG9cU7X8oxqtHLsgqwZnw0L1VqrYfmOehgU7GdjzAAbpIzsH K1bRMaRrbC1JuqxO1gRgyMRS5bp/nuuUq3zCsG1R/xOd2GHHNuVc9TXYKqM7IWmZGpGU DPF9bQVy/q+Wza3PC2Qoq2kdRwIC6bSTsFV8VtTg2jYIDJFPquHF1JYXLZpmU3Px271i IAwmR+0TBTDjENxUBdnyGasMxOhvae3gl6ztLLOa26+JnBKRWAqinOP/xw+LLdpJi+X5 5czg== X-Received: by 10.70.35.227 with SMTP id l3mr1941677pdj.33.1421931820497; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:03:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.118] ([120.29.76.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w3sm2296369pbs.11.2015.01.22.05.03.38 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:03:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54C0F52E.2010906@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:03:42 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <54C0510C.8070408@gmail.com> <8292.76.193.18.182.1421893014.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <8292.76.193.18.182.1421893014.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions , Luzar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:03:41 -0000 > > No, I'm not the original poster of this thread, the problem I have is > different, I'll describe it later > > > Again, my problem is different. Originally after upgrade from 9.3 RELEASE > to 10.0 RELEASE (shortly after it was released). I started observing too > many packets (more that 90%) dropped by ipfilter. Network feels like 100 > time slower. All config files are in place. I asked on this list for help > - no one replied (if my memory doesn't fail me). Then I looked into the > code of kernel module itself, I noticed it is much slimmer than kernel > module code on 9.3 (many files are missing, some of the ones that are > there are noticeably shorter). I moved /usr/src off the way and checked > out fresh copy: all is exactly the same. After that I just replaced the > code of ipfilter module with the one from 9.3, rebuilt kernel module, > unloaded and loaded freshly built module. And my ipfilter problem was > fixed. I just posted this to the thread I have started, so it looks like > one of the posts here on this thread just quotes what I did (or maybe > someone else did and described the same). Note that config files didn't > change. > > After some time living with 10.0 on that box, that box was upgraded to > 10.1 RELEASE. Also shortly after it was released. And the same problem > reappeared: ipfilter when it is on drops majority of packets, connections > seem to be 100 slower... > > I know, happy people (who do not have problem themselves) ... hm ... not > always can imagine that problem can be real for somebody else. But I still > hope someone will be able to answer my questions. > > 1. How can I find website (Documentation) for latest ipfilter? Where is > new place for it (it appears, developer moved it from where it was in the > past) > There is no website where the IPF rule documentation is published. There is only the "man pages". > 2. Did the syntax change between versions or not? On 9.3 I have version: > v4.1.28 (496), whereas on 10.1: v5.1.2 (608). If yes, where do I find > appropriate documentation. I certainly will be able to rewrite my rules > myself after reading documentation. After all I wrote them (of course, > using amazing FreeBSD online documentation ! ;-) > In 10.0 where ipfilter is stated as new version added gives no warning that rule syntax has changed > Thanks in advance for all your replies. > > Valeri > > > There is a very long thread dated Apr 15, 2013 with subject "ipfilter(4) needs maintainer" in the questions and current mailing lists Cy Schuert became the maintainer. Cy.Schuert@komquats.com He's the person you should be talking to. If you still get no joy then file a PR to shine more light on your problem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 13:21:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 474F0F27 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5B0A32A for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id p9so1482369lbv.4 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:21:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=f03RER1ntZw9yakFQtIYZFXMBQlQxJvKU1QXuvTibbA=; b=0SbHGCypBsFWQ+e72NvFcuPXPaXNKk4AjM5d1l+CAa0m537j2AX5fDZ2+n5gTn/T57 hw2gDg91N+NJa1Khd4jmGJlJk9LaFr4QZ/1zYwc8dsk2vBPjxjKljzDKCXe+/MmsOvZd NAU5kn3NSpw1HnWrcZpQAugsyt44RQCETfHWitnQhc7RqGumyVP5oOtBCziUr7eKbfqE qwGnFXc5WFRkzsRl8qhhtEUhfroeQ002AGipF+wzFpltbshRuEkLnsye7ZdmYtN7gUDI aoGhsk7kDrqMlgpqr+NehSDJG+7AkVnQet1VJndtl+2kDMdL+S04bpNt47w4oETe22HH t23g== X-Received: by 10.152.29.193 with SMTP id m1mr1514059lah.84.1421932899584; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:21:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.20.229 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:20:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C0F52E.2010906@gmail.com> References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <54C0510C.8070408@gmail.com> <8292.76.193.18.182.1421893014.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <54C0F52E.2010906@gmail.com> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:20:59 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 To: Ernie Luzar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions , galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:21:42 -0000 I looked at /usr/share/examples/ipfilter/ on FreeBSD-8.4, 9.3, 10.1 and I did not see anything different in those files. Now, my rules work quite well on 8.4, 9.3, but fail in 10.1 I have been using these rules forever on many many boxes and all I was doing is to edit ipnat.conf and ipfilter.conf to change the interface names and the IPs/subnets for the LAN/WAN. On 22 January 2015 at 16:03, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > >> No, I'm not the original poster of this thread, the problem I have is >> different, I'll describe it later >> >> Again, my problem is different. Originally after upgrade from 9.3 >> RELEASE >> to 10.0 RELEASE (shortly after it was released). I started observing too >> many packets (more that 90%) dropped by ipfilter. Network feels like 100 >> time slower. All config files are in place. I asked on this list for help >> - no one replied (if my memory doesn't fail me). Then I looked into the >> code of kernel module itself, I noticed it is much slimmer than kernel >> module code on 9.3 (many files are missing, some of the ones that are >> there are noticeably shorter). I moved /usr/src off the way and checked >> out fresh copy: all is exactly the same. After that I just replaced the >> code of ipfilter module with the one from 9.3, rebuilt kernel module, >> unloaded and loaded freshly built module. And my ipfilter problem was >> fixed. I just posted this to the thread I have started, so it looks like >> one of the posts here on this thread just quotes what I did (or maybe >> someone else did and described the same). Note that config files didn't >> change. >> >> After some time living with 10.0 on that box, that box was upgraded to >> 10.1 RELEASE. Also shortly after it was released. And the same problem >> reappeared: ipfilter when it is on drops majority of packets, connections >> seem to be 100 slower... >> >> I know, happy people (who do not have problem themselves) ... hm ... not >> always can imagine that problem can be real for somebody else. But I still >> hope someone will be able to answer my questions. >> >> 1. How can I find website (Documentation) for latest ipfilter? Where is >> new place for it (it appears, developer moved it from where it was in the >> past) >> >> > There is no website where the IPF rule documentation is published. There > is only the "man pages". > >> 2. Did the syntax change between versions or not? On 9.3 I have version: >> v4.1.28 (496), whereas on 10.1: v5.1.2 (608). If yes, where do I find >> appropriate documentation. I certainly will be able to rewrite my rules >> myself after reading documentation. After all I wrote them (of course, >> using amazing FreeBSD online documentation ! ;-) >> >> > In 10.0 where ipfilter is stated as new version added gives no warning > that rule syntax has changed > >> Thanks in advance for all your replies. >> >> Valeri >> >> >> >> > > There is a very long thread dated Apr 15, 2013 with subject "ipfilter(4) > needs maintainer" in the questions and current mailing lists > Cy Schuert became the maintainer. Cy.Schuert@komquats.com > > He's the person you should be talking to. If you still get no joy then > file a PR to shine more light on your problem > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 13:31:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111841C0 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0136.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D831626 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BN3PR0301MB0836.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.65.19; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:15:33 +0000 Message-ID: <54C0F7EF.4000805@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:15:27 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> <2028260.lLgEXe72zl@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <2028260.lLgEXe72zl@curlew.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: DM2PR07CA0016.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.52.144) To BN3PR0301MB0836.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.146) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=aberg010@my.HennepinTech.edu; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0464DBBBC4 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6049001)(6009001)(189002)(24454002)(199003)(51704005)(92566002)(105586002)(77096005)(122386002)(106356001)(2420400003)(450100001)(88552001)(77156002)(19580395003)(80316001)(89122001)(33656002)(2351001)(2950100001)(107886001)(110136001)(64706001)(47776003)(68736005)(64126003)(101416001)(86362001)(15975445007)(97736003)(65806001)(87976001)(42186005)(66066001)(23676002)(65956001)(50466002)(65816999)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(75432002)(62966003)(40100003)(59896002)(83506001)(46102003)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: my.HennepinTech.edu does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0836; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2015 13:15:33.7257 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0301MB0836 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:31:39 -0000 On 2015.01.21 17:11, Mike Clarke wrote: > You can check on the state of the latest build at > http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/#latest_builds for AMD64 and > http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/#latest_builds for i386. > > Any ports which have been updated since the start of the build won't appear in > the repository until the following week's build. > A handy tip for anyone mixing packages from the official repo and their own packages from ports: each individual build page displays the SVN revision of the ports tree from which that particular set of packages was built, so you can sync your own ports tree with it. This, of course, requires using SVN instead of portsnap to keep your tree up-to-date. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 14:21:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577D697B for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDBBEB7C for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id j2MM1p004516WCc012MNBi; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:21:23 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Y852s3uN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=cYTjFNdXV1EA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=RGegcSrbAAAA:20 a=UR_ZzNpR11H_CLUYvRkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=FiNG2Fn9aG8A:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13] helo=milibyte.co.uk) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YEIdN-0001TI-DG; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:21:21 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:21:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4619319.I3UruO6Dxl@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.2; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54C0F7EF.4000805@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <54BFFB43.7060208@networktest.com> <2028260.lLgEXe72zl@curlew.lan> <54C0F7EF.4000805@my.hennepintech.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: frequency of pkg updates Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Cc: David Newman , Andrew Berg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:21:27 -0000 On Thursday 22 Jan 2015 07:15:27 Andrew Berg wrote: > A handy tip for anyone mixing packages from the official repo and their own > packages from ports: each individual build page displays the SVN revision of > the ports tree from which that particular set of packages was built, so you > can sync your own ports tree with it. This, of course, requires using SVN > instead of portsnap to keep your tree up-to-date. Anyone interested in doing this might be interested in an earlier post I made or where I included a short script for automating this process derived from an earlier script posted by Reed A. Cartwright. To use this script you will need the textproc/jq package. Since posting the script I noticed that, unlike portsnap, svnlite doesn't update INDEX but it's a trivial matter to add an extra line to run "make -C /usr/ports fetchindex". -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 14:26:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5B3EAF for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7314BD1 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t0MEPfrL091031; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:25:42 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:25:41 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Andrew Berg Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20150123001645.Y22179@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:26:05 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 555, Issue 1, Message: 10 On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:16:31 -0600 Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2015.01.18 11:45, Ian Smith wrote: > > svnlite only arrived with 10.1, so is not what 8.x and 9.x users need. > 10.0, not 10.1. I am a bit surprised that it wasn't backported to 9.3, though. Hmm, well if that's so, man.cgi hss it wrong; it only shows up when selecting 10.1 or 10-stable, not 10.0. But then, I've found a few odd things in man.cgi the last couple of months so I'm not confident I can trust it re what versions support various things lately - like this one? One example; enter 'pkg' with default settings, you get pkg(7) which of course has links to pkg(8) - clicking on which meet 'not found' unless you select AND PORTS. For another, try looking for 'ep'; you get nothing unless you know in advance that you have to pick 'i386'; I think the 'default' architecture (presumably amd64?) should say 'ANY'. svn(1) is available as a port for 9.3, but not svnlite(1) .. and I think neither deserve their (1) until there's a real 'how to use it' manual. > > So just how 'lite' is svnlite? Could someone running 10.1+ please > > replace svnup with svnlite in equivalents to the following queries: > > > > smithi@x200:~ % ll `which svnup` > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 47040 Jan 19 01:26 /usr/local/bin/svnup > [candace ~]# ls -l $(which svnlite) > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3210464 Jan 3 22:26 /usr/bin/svnlite Yeah, under 1.5% :) > > smithi@x200:~ % ldd `which svnup` > > /usr/local/bin/svnup: > > libmd.so.5 => /lib/libmd.so.5 (0x800824000) > > libssl.so.6 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 (0x800a34000) > > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c8a000) > > libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x800fe5000) > [candace ~]# ldd $(which svnlite) > /usr/bin/svnlite: > libbsdxml.so.4 => /lib/libbsdxml.so.4 (0x800b29000) > libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x800d50000) > libcrypt.so.5 => /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x800f66000) > libmagic.so.4 => /usr/lib/libmagic.so.4 (0x801186000) > libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x8013a4000) > libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x801798000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801a03000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801c28000) In both cases, pretty standard libraries. > > smithi@x200:~ % ll /lib/libmd.so.5 /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 /lib/libc.so.7 /lib/libcrypto.so.6 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1407536 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libc.so.7 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1748528 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libcrypto.so.6 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 69072 Jun 25 2014 /lib/libmd.so.5 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 355576 Jun 25 2014 /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 > [candace ~]# ls -l /lib/libbsdxml.so.4 /lib/libz.so.6 /lib/libcrypt.so.5 > /usr/lib/libmagic.so.4 /lib/libcrypto.so.7 /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 > /lib/libthr.so.3 /lib/libc.so.7 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 161760 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libbsdxml.so.4 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1647720 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libc.so.7 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 62008 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libcrypt.so.5 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2038496 Jan 3 22:26 /lib/libcrypto.so.7 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 106120 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libthr.so.3 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 89576 Jan 3 22:25 /lib/libz.so.6 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 123976 Jan 3 22:25 /usr/lib/libmagic.so.4 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 439776 Jan 3 22:26 /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 My, how things have grown between 9.3 and 10.1. But that's not so much extra, I guess working out the size of svnlite's installed dependencies would be more revealing. I haven't a 10.x system to check, and I'm not assuming it carries most of svn's load, but svnup(1) has none at all. > > smithi@x200:~ % du -hd0 /usr/src > > 830M /usr/src > > smithi@x200:~ % du -hd0 /usr/ports > > 1.6G /usr/ports Sorry, ports was completely bogus; including over 500MB of distfiles .. > [candace ~]# du -hd0 /usr/src > 783M /usr/src Similar; I've got a few patches and diffs in there. > and FWIW: > [candace ~]# du -sh /usr/src/.svn > 398M /usr/src/.svn You mean your /usr/src without .svn/ would only be 385M? That seems small, unless it's compressed? Also, perhaps .svn/ is compressed now? I was saying 'almost double' from the /usr/ports/.svn that accompanied the ports distribution with 9.2-R. > This is a two-week-old checkout of 10-STABLE (from which the aforementioned > binaries were built). > I don't have a ports tree from SVN (both trees I use for poudriere are using > portsnap at the moment). I've never had an issue with portsnap, though we see some say they have. I wouldn't recommend using svnup for ports either, but haven't tried it. > I'm not sure any of the above matters too much, but I might do a speed > comparison of svn, svnup, and svnlite, which I think will be the most important > for most people if they are indeed that much different from each other in that > regard. If you do, be sure to compare an initial fetch of a tree to small (or no change) updates. svnup used to be kinda slow on initially fetching and building a tree, and quite fast enough, for me, for incrementals. Also check svn vs http vs https methods. I need to do more tests too. Again, svnup is specifically for non-developer, more casual updaters. > On a side note, backticks are bad and you shouldn't use them. :P Because? > > Bottom line: I don't think plugging to get svnup into base is worth > > pursuing. Few developers took any interest that I noticed, it was > > largely tested by users. John Mehr has been very responsive to any > > issues. To one to whom C is mostly read-only, it reads very well. > > > > I think it's ok as a port .. perhaps a small section in the Handbook? > A mention in the handbook would definitely be good. Yeah; I wish I wan't so crap at documentation, too verbose by half .. now if we could convince Warren to check it out .. :) Polytropon's point about documentation stands. svn is deep and wide; there are primers and wiki pages for those getting their teeth into it, but its manpage could at least point to something immediately useful. Polytropon wrote: > Good documentation is an essential point, no matter if > you see it as a developer or as a user. Both "man cvs" > and "man csup" fulfill that requirement. As does do svnup(1) and svnup.conf(5). Pretty painless to check out; you can point it elsewhere than /usr/src to play around and compare. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 14:53:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D19551F for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0147.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7E8ED4 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BY1PR0301MB0838.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:53:27 +0000 Message-ID: <54C10EDF.6020106@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:53:19 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? References: <20150123001645.Y22179@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20150123001645.Y22179@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BL2PR05CA0019.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.226.19) To BY1PR0301MB0838.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.144) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=aberg010@my.HennepinTech.edu; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0838; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0838; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0464DBBBC4 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(51704005)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(15975445007)(77096005)(92566002)(68736005)(77156002)(122386002)(62966003)(23676002)(110136001)(65956001)(66066001)(101416001)(65806001)(59896002)(46102003)(75432002)(97736003)(450100001)(40100003)(80316001)(19580395003)(106356001)(50466002)(65816999)(50986999)(83506001)(54356999)(87266999)(76176999)(107886001)(2351001)(105586002)(89122001)(64126003)(64706001)(33656002)(47776003)(88552001)(2950100001)(87976001)(86362001)(42186005)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0838; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: my.HennepinTech.edu does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0838; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2015 14:53:27.6413 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0301MB0838 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:53:38 -0000 On 2015.01.22 08:25, Ian Smith wrote: > svn(1) is available as a port for 9.3, but not svnlite(1) .. and I think > neither deserve their (1) until there's a real 'how to use it' manual. Blame Apache for the way they distribute SVN documentation. You have the website: https://subversion.apache.org/docs/ and the SVN book. Unfortunately, this is quite incompatible with the way FreeBSD generally distributes documentation, so we would need someone to make man pages out of all that, which is not trivial. BTW, man.cgi doesn't have a man page for svnlite in 10.0 because 10.0 didn't ship with the man page. > I wouldn't recommend using svnup for ports either, but haven't tried it. Please elaborate. If getting the ports tree with svnup is an issue, then it definitely doesn't belong in base. > > On a side note, backticks are bad and you shouldn't use them. :P > > Because? Because they are more difficult to read (very easy to confuse with ' at first glance) and shell code needs all the readability it can get. > Yeah; I wish I wan't so crap at documentation, too verbose by half .. > now if we could convince Warren to check it out .. :) One of these days, I will learn how to work with man pages and such. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 15:36:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E45B6190 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD776A5 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45851276D8; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0MFaQu5002020; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:26 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Eduardo Morras Subject: Re: Raid hard disk Message-Id: <20150122163626.416a4980.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150122105925.42ca6bd64d4a8cf96f9574db@yahoo.es> References: <20150122105925.42ca6bd64d4a8cf96f9574db@yahoo.es> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kumarchinnapappu@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:36:37 -0000 On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:59:25 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:44:37 +0300 > Kumar Perumal wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am not able to raid both hard disk in my server 6.0.0. > > > > Earlier I was using "raidctl -s raid0" for server 5.7.1 > > Are you sure it's FreeBSD? There's no 5.7.1 FreeBSD version, [...] That's correct, 5.4 was the last version in v5. Additionally, both v5 and v6 are out of support now. Also see the HISTORY section of http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=raidctl&sektion=8&manpath=FreeBSD+5.0-RELEASE The raidctl command doesn't seem to be part of 5.3 and later. > [...] and version numbering uses X.Y schema, not X.Y.Z. THat's not fully correct. See /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree for some examples, such as 2.1.5, 2.1.6, even 2.1.6.1, 2.2.1 up to 2.2.8, 3.5.1, 4.1.1, 4.6.1 or 5.2.1. :-) > Show us the output of uname -a That should be helpful. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 15:37:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D04232 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.ssimicro.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD6E6C0 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from markham.ssimicro.com (markham.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0MFZAqr003752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:35:10 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54C118B0.4020804@corp.ssimicro.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:35:12 -0700 From: markham breitbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eduardo Morras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Raid hard disk References: <20150122105925.42ca6bd64d4a8cf96f9574db@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <20150122105925.42ca6bd64d4a8cf96f9574db@yahoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:37:53 -0000 Actually, I remember the 5.2.1 distro well! We ran that for many years. In fact, I still know of a server running it. On 2015-01-22 2:59 AM, Eduardo Morras wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:44:37 +0300 > Kumar Perumal wrote: > >> Hi, >> I am not able to raid both hard disk in my server 6.0.0. >> >> Earlier I was using "raidctl -s raid0" for server 5.7.1 > Are you sure it's FreeBSD? There's no 5.7.1 FreeBSD version, and version numbering uses X.Y schema, not X.Y.Z. > > Show us the output of uname -a > >> Please help me >> >> Regards, >> >> Kumar Perumal > --- --- > Eduardo Morras > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 15:38:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0692E4 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7836D5 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id C5CE4CB8C96; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:51 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <47390.128.135.70.2.1421941131.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <54C08881.2010200@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <54BF7050.90605@ShaneWare.Biz> <51264.128.135.70.2.1421883154.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <54C08881.2010200@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:51 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: IPFilter & FreeBSD-10.1 From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Shane Ambler" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:38:54 -0000 On Wed, January 21, 2015 11:20 pm, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 22/01/2015 10:02, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Wed, January 21, 2015 3:29 am, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >>> Hi Shane, >>> >>> Where is the new syntax documented? Or I just have to 'man ipf'? I'd >>> love >>> to see a web discussion about it, which I obviously missed. >>> >>> Is there a sort of rule converter? :-) >>> >>> Thank you for mentioning this syntax thing. Must be the one that was >>> biting >>> me on 10.1 > > I use ipfw myself, I read the email out of curiosity. > > Personally I would clear the rules and add one at a time till I get an > error. Sounds like some people have no problem so there may only be one > small change that breaks your rules. Yes, thanks. Indeed that's right way to do troubleshooting, which we always used... I feel embarrassed I didn't do this sort of troubleshooting myself before posting the question. (Yet, I've found "workaround", and described it in the thread I've started which partly excuses me ;-) It more looks like crippled something in my ipf.rules that is being happily swallowed by old code, yet new code chokes on it. (similar thing may be true in case of another person's problem). I'll post to this threat if I find something like that in my case. > >> >> I wonder if anyone knows URl of official website of ipfilter. Both >> project >> info on sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipfilter/) and >> wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPFilter) point at the >> place >> which apparently doesn't exist so you end up getting just front page of >> the university: http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/ ... > > The handbook page on ipfilter links to http://www.phildev.net/ipf/ > which is only a faq page, so it looks like the man pages are the best > docs. Indeed, if nothing changed in the rule syntax, then FreeBSD DocBook is the best place to go, and I personally don't feel I need anything more. Valeri > > Sourceforge could still be the place of all development, the cvs repo > has a few files that were changed 7 months ago. > >> One does want to read the documentation to be able to keep using >> ipfilter >> on FreBSD 10.x (as one did on FreeBSD 9.x in the past). And with syntax >> changed, one does have to read Documentation (and here brilliant FreeBSD >> documentation seems to be outdated...) >> >> Thanks a lot for your answers! >> >> Valeri > > -- > FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing > > Shane Ambler > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 16:06:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84975957 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B16EA31 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a1so2634925wgh.0 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:06:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9TAsS4uPDhiMKRCZx1IibmBHJQ7l8qFJF3TLla8b7eI=; b=f3S1vj2DrIcq0oO+jtN00PwGDkwQsmH4YHfiRAgrH5tVFAzdYQkoW5tA3a/rBLqWI7 esZGgkNcB4X2Zkkromf5r3k0F/jZI+xdRWWS7INHOY1e2Lh9LTni/Eyb6In8Vg4AjOf2 yAZF90b6diju8rwiB3Uj+7II0hQm9NpyShtttAbO4gwJ4eAvakJuVSirJTnR4Jv7eW6/ 96yfSm+h3gmfTIJIFY1aP3mKpWIMGdIdW7P6d0wCia50DktZWUwXXUyEHRu/jYYQ6MYV fZxNjjnCHzv0Jv+Lqwk/JnrTJ9uGfTAFva9cJWhllt5HLyU6opgq+fwoR7luVGHG63ei mk6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.143.12 with SMTP id sa12mr4299213wjb.101.1421942788447; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.127.71 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.127.71 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:06:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150122163626.416a4980.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20150122105925.42ca6bd64d4a8cf96f9574db@yahoo.es> <20150122163626.416a4980.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:06:28 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Raid hard disk From: Kumar Perumal To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Eduardo Morras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:06:30 -0000 Thank you. It is V6 . Regards, Kumar Perumal On 22-Jan-2015 6:36 pm, "Polytropon" wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:59:25 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:44:37 +0300 > > Kumar Perumal wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I am not able to raid both hard disk in my server 6.0.0. > > > > > > Earlier I was using "raidctl -s raid0" for server 5.7.1 > > > > Are you sure it's FreeBSD? There's no 5.7.1 FreeBSD version, [...] > > That's correct, 5.4 was the last version in v5. Additionally, > both v5 and v6 are out of support now. > > Also see the HISTORY section of > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=raidctl&sektion=8&manpath=FreeBSD+5.0-RELEASE > > The raidctl command doesn't seem to be part of 5.3 and later. > > > > > [...] and version numbering uses X.Y schema, not X.Y.Z. > > THat's not fully correct. See /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree > for some examples, such as 2.1.5, 2.1.6, even 2.1.6.1, > 2.2.1 up to 2.2.8, 3.5.1, 4.1.1, 4.6.1 or 5.2.1. :-) > > > > > Show us the output of uname -a > > That should be helpful. > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 16:10:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DD3A4D for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.ssimicro.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD69A71 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from markham.ssimicro.com (markham.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0MGAB2G009430 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:10:12 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54C120E6.5090301@corp.ssimicro.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:10:14 -0700 From: markham breitbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration References: <20150120010551.c17d9f50.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150120010551.c17d9f50.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:10:14 -0000 On 2015-01-19 5:05 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> Is there a better way to do this? > Usually not, because dump + restore is _the_ way to do it. > Except of course you're using ZFS. :-) I have often done system migrations using rsync over ssh something like rsync -aHv / root@targethost:/ The great thing about rsync is that is will only transfer what it needs to, so the first run will take a while to get pretty much everything over. I then run a second time with a --delete switch to catch anything that changed while the first run was going (A full sync of my mail store can take well over 24 hours!). The second run will go much faster, depending on the size of the initial run. Finally, I will mount RO, so I know nothing is changing and run a final sync, which usually only takes a couple of minutes, then light up the new system. If you already have a system dump/restore you could also just use rsync as the final step to catch the stragglers. -Markham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 16:42:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C37FF2 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF644E34 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l18so2779751wgh.10 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:42:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:reply-to:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+K2Jv07lLF56dW6EIAbmRc6z3OmNPqHtQ/82vdhmTWM=; b=iMhEl2ZfBBKVViDxUUCtnTddmUTgtnTq8DkwQmgpMO3ofN0TMG1LAs7Z4T26har6cs bAiIv7RxyLlVybH+BvIO+fAHDk+/9f7CuQ0qU/6R1rxIKwLJsI0pMoLeoaSezXhDmviH MnbGOuPxJs25ImDPc9FyAgLL4A9O1HD95JtuyT6qO+UmTaVh1w963vJUdDcfNNfFx5yB IWOoYDI/B5MeAXR5ENoW40Wg/6tBRy4yMEuOwdQMQZwyxqE17jZGBIQhygFTnv2883i/ oIQw4D5+XEkG5ElB4Iqf71bbkZrUNYKwQoXNTPsrA6RpskoT1pqSA7kbui/EqgWtEY4l Qntg== X-Received: by 10.194.2.34 with SMTP id 2mr5025686wjr.58.1421944957390; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from alipour-PC ([5.234.117.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dv9sm3708534wib.14.2015.01.22.08.42.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:42:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <02206e90-42026-01208420226505@alipour-pc> Reply-To: "Global Researchers Journals" From: "Global Researchers Journals" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Call for Paper January 2015 { Vol 05 | Issue 01} Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:12:32 +0330 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:42:39 -0000 Call for Paper Dear Colleagues You are cordially invited to submit or recommend papers to: [1]http://www.grjournals.com January 2015 (Volume 05 | Issue 01) ·Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology Advances (JPPA) [2]http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6537 · Journal of Animal Production Advances (JAPA) [3]http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6538 Journal of Animal Science Advances (JASA) [4]http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6401 Journal of Veterinary Advances (JVA) [5]http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6536 Journal of Recent Advances in Agriculture (JRAA) http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6878 Global Researchers Journals, a fast track peer-reviewed and open access academic journal published by Grjournals Publishing, which is one of the largest open access journal publishers around the world. Grjournals is using online article submission, review and tracking system for quality and quick review processing. Journal provides rapid publication of research article. After 30 days Rapid Review Process by the editorial/review board members or outside experts, an accepted paper will be placed under In Press within 24 hours and will be published in the next issue. Instructions for authors are available on our website: [6]http://www.grjournals.com Submitted papers must follow the Instructions to authors to be considered for review and publication. Refereeing of manuscripts is conducted anonymously and the identity of the referees is not disclosed. The manuscripts which get an acceptance will publish with DOI number. Your Manuscript(s) can be one of these kinds: Review, Original Article, Case Report, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Mini Review Article and Hypothesis. Some of Abstracted/Index in: CAB reviews, Chemical Abstract Service (CAS), Genamics JournalSeek, Index Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Index Electronic Journals Library and SCIRUS, ISC and the World most Popular University Electronic Library. [7]http://grjournals.com/Defaul t.aspx?tabid=7329 Now you can clear the clutter by accessing your favorite journals online: · Full text, full archive that's always there when you need it · Easy access anywhere, anytime and anyhow · Impact your practice, not the environment NOTICE: Authors that cite [8]www.grjournals.com manuscripts as reference in their ISI articles, they can send their manuscripts to one of above journals as FREE of charge. After evaluation and get an acceptance it will publish without any Article Processing Fee with DOI. We apologize if you have received this email twice, or our journal is not your field. With Warm Regards Sincerely, Grjournals team Site: [9]www.grjournals.com E_Mail: [10]grjournals@gmail.com References 1. http://www.grjournals.com/ 2. http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6537 3. http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6538 4. http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6401 5. http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=6536 6. http://www.grjournals.com/ 7. http://grjournals.com/Default.aspx?tabid=7329 8. http://www.grjournals.com/ 9. http://www.grjournals.com/ 10. mailto:grjournals@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 17:03:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ADA9DED for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0D9399 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0C3646D86BAB; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:03:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:03:36 -0800 From: David Benfell To: mortoxa Subject: Re: i915 at boot Message-ID: <20150122170336.GA76736@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150118012258.GA18726@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150121005618.GA34833@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF05BE.2040107@gmx.us> <20150121024215.GA21785@home.parts-unknown.org> <54BF18DF.6090707@gmx.us> <20150122022403.GA6514@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150122075335.GA78991@home.parts-unknown.org> <54C0E108.7060206@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C0E108.7060206@gmx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:03:37 -0000 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:37:44PM +1100, mortoxa wrote: >=20 > I had some trouble with the i915 module when I loaded it via=20 > loader.conf. It just went to a black screen and I had to reset the box. Your situation might be related to this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D194420 I don't see that it's been resolved. There's also this, which is fairly scary-looking: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193613 It looks like i915kms needs some love that it hasn't gotten yet and I might be seeing only a milder failure. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUwS1nAAoJEBV64x4SNmAreG8P/13+nLTDRTlJfdXcb/1H7mTf ZIpvaPN835P3mlH7dCmYckWx59IDIWiCVWv/plquqk3BguPi9AiYhx64cuTvs60P j9wo/N/pUFd02xUoRpg5og9zhxs75owMvLgbyH/jkeFo2qj1+RrGgaqihfZNX8Dq oGK3u4HGHv26lhM79lBll376xB8g0CkDMgOxdhHj1l6gsgNK2R8JfCP8ZvcW+CB0 k4HlR8TtFMZkgC5X9/srif8v9LduemdjZHHjAdhLE/pKB3A4k3AFi2zEZcA3nMR7 00lWPBOq1i2/umDBNTsQ3FMW/z4wpVJSb2avT6LhK0hmcCgiMmTEjmGzh0iXY5k6 HFq37WpOxwPJpNi9lS1raORs1en9vgHuSbyMs4Tu2r5Qo1o9W7Oi3rFe7G0eUIe6 wulvKDubUmf1oGYYMpxrUdWNIJGuHOy8AZOyI5NT1Ti1jglObQa7sa2oYnbduXvY a/m0Wy7/o3m5DByZqyW7LDNUfbXqYhPzZcwBX03HwGwqnM+I6qn5Q18DNbdju4K6 pCWC4uoK3vhk4+LuN4z0YsUCI1YcmbWNPc11LllZ9r4H9CEC/K7mGqCXOEGgcBfV sw+tSOdkyMvF0AGu0bxgqyEUm87zNDuP85mQ9dCOCdRyViyEsk/0l7pf/1hddVC5 tfYMyERlqPabT7PYhTZ8 =Yt6c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 17:38:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5F0C46 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7759A7 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id vy18so2662581iec.8 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KT7VqN+4LZC3jw+uslUQfYopv+whRjpn7gwVHWsD03A=; b=UAx7yGhlDvzUJyQtqROk9DBMViN+jWdQ/IgFEf8c0bbO8kHufTb6gGDeB9LGBXVEx3 2lclWqlGJMLMZ6A3UsvfOHwJAA+lM24QzhzYMJnUsLcYOTBe2Eq5WhOgaJZv5fPc/NyN qsng7Bh2Mmq5CKFfPs/gvS/ICmn4oJlqJu99zhGDHNbRvH+rizC8yUvflBxSgMCwkt2X NqYUWOE75UrmSNcS7VBSlVhsp9bCBrChh5FCDrQZ4dFGy9+TYNv/wpC9PeRVbHpIPGAh u/bQnsbXav7JdikP92j+d57X6/UX5o9AeEXvhwwkBawNfcWTIsJvrmhtL+nEq9F2AgEs /oKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.130.7 with SMTP id t7mr4407905ics.25.1421948292928; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: christopher.maness@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.122.212 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C120E6.5090301@corp.ssimicro.com> References: <20150120010551.c17d9f50.freebsd@edvax.de> <54C120E6.5090301@corp.ssimicro.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RsUvxnS2kbNCDFURBumPU5SGXT0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration From: Chris Maness To: markham breitbach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:38:13 -0000 On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:10 AM, markham breitbach < markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com> wrote: > > On 2015-01-19 5:05 PM, Polytropon wrote: > >> Is there a better way to do this? > > Usually not, because dump + restore is _the_ way to do it. > > Except of course you're using ZFS. :-) > I have often done system migrations using rsync over ssh something like > > rsync -aHv / root@targethost:/ > > The great thing about rsync is that is will only transfer what it needs > to, so the first run will take a while to get pretty much everything > over. I then run a second time with a --delete switch to catch anything > that changed while the first run was going (A full sync of my mail store > can take well over 24 hours!). The second run will go much faster, > depending on the size of the initial run. Finally, I will mount RO, so > I know nothing is changing and run a final sync, which usually only > takes a couple of minutes, then light up the new system. > > If you already have a system dump/restore you could also just use rsync > as the final step to catch the stragglers. > > -Markham > > > That actually sounds pretty good. The target system has been running for a few days source system powered off. I am not sure if a rsync right now would do more harm than good. However, I do understand that rsync will ignore files that have already changed. I use rsync -vaur flags on most of my backups. Thanks, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 17:46:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C511C99 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF42AEC for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC022767C; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:46:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0MHk4WK002382; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:46:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:46:04 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Dump/Restore for system migration Message-Id: <20150122184604.4e089604.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20150120010551.c17d9f50.freebsd@edvax.de> <54C120E6.5090301@corp.ssimicro.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , markham breitbach X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:46:12 -0000 On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:38:12 -0800, Chris Maness wrote: > > On 2015-01-19 5:05 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > >> Is there a better way to do this? > > > Usually not, because dump + restore is _the_ way to do it. > > > Except of course you're using ZFS. :-) > > I have often done system migrations using rsync over ssh something like > > > > rsync -aHv / root@targethost:/ > > > > The great thing about rsync is that is will only transfer what it needs > > to, so the first run will take a while to get pretty much everything > > over. I then run a second time with a --delete switch to catch anything > > that changed while the first run was going (A full sync of my mail store > > can take well over 24 hours!). The second run will go much faster, > > depending on the size of the initial run. Finally, I will mount RO, so > > I know nothing is changing and run a final sync, which usually only > > takes a couple of minutes, then light up the new system. > > > > If you already have a system dump/restore you could also just use rsync > > as the final step to catch the stragglers. > > That actually sounds pretty good. The target system has been running for a > few days source system powered off. I am not sure if a rsync right now > would do more harm than good. However, I do understand that rsync will > ignore files that have already changed. > > I use rsync -vaur flags on most of my backups. Note that it's not just about file modification. The copying mechanism has to be able to deal with _all_ file attributes (standard file permissions, file flags, and also specials such as symlinks and hardlinks). With dump + restore, you definitely get an 1:1 copy, especially when you dump from the source system (immutable!) to a clean (empty) disk of the target system. For transfering additional changes, rsync is a good tool. I'd also like to mention the program "cpdup" from the ports collection. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 17:55:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280A7354 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F4EC4F for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u10so2910473lbd.12 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:55:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bvZWvO4zCwnwWrLK+K873RPXw1x1vWwwwcBmeQ75f8U=; b=RX+6qTEXFXfQp2Pa3MipUoS8qNp51d/Uv4tL0W26ygy8AVv3pmusa3/KLw1n2Auwjq B9Bh7FC4HqP2HzEGObdJNdiLqptxSTlvUZ2ay5P5o5W6WYIZ8ugLizQf1t0XUiJmmGQQ +6xZ4z+Rg9tQaUP9bwl/4cKu9zrZlPs7Q8UwyeSdB807WewDZOKQJccDV2kEJ18DPVHU OzUOAaD1APjCJY/Q1Ww8OU2h4AXM2IhtV36+UbBgmi0ayjM8mTL2tO6/E+cIkbVY6Z2m z8Vd32/fGctWuIGZkKWs0lIlFhvpfRvpDXnhUloYxqzV/dvxS/jzk7Dizz5qCdXzZxrV N+gQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlG0MNi7YduOC7n4tYNltDG1drg4kV0xd4l3zoWmPgTx3IomsCjreY5R2dYx3Ux0rXdOYSs MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.234.140 with SMTP id ue12mr3043305lac.78.1421949314881; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.47.75 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:55:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150118223345.b2014c1b.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20150119024349.T82172@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20150118223345.b2014c1b.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:55:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? From: Damien Fleuriot To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Ian Smith , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:55:24 -0000 On 18 January 2015 at 22:33, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:45:56 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith wrote: > > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 554, Issue 7, Message: 3 > > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:09:06 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:24:12 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part > of BASE ? > > > > > > > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > > > > > > > I for one, would very much like it. > > > > > > I think the same. If you look into FreeBSD's history of > > > dealing with source code checkout methods, you'll find > > > this: port cvsup-without-gui -> base csup -> move to > > > SVN -> port subversion -> ? - here a tool to get updates > > > from source control would be nice. In the past, the > > > CVS-based tool did allow you to "make update" for the > > > /usr/src and /usr/ports tree. For the ports, we have > > > portsnap to obtain a snapshot (not _precisely_ current), > > > but for /usr/src, we currently don't have a tool in > > > the base system. Installing the full subversion port > > > isn't that hard, but a csup-lookalike in the base > > > would be nice, for the simple task to checkout sources, > > > even if it's just a bootstrap mechanism (cf. pkg). > > > > No it isn't that hard, but unless you're developing for the tree, svn's > > pretty heavyweight on space-constrained systems; lots of dependencies > > and lots of extra space used. > > This was my primary concern. It's not the problem of > installing it per se, but the user might be on a system > where every MB is "expensive", or he might follow the > concept of "I only install what I need" and therefore > consider the many dependencies "not needed". > > You very much nailed it here. My main concern is a 8-box cluster of firewalls for a platform that is PCI-DSS compliant. You may very well imagine how loath I am to install any additional software on these boxes. Hell we even had to remove 'screen' from them so, the less stuff, the better. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 09:11:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571B9915 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364DB638 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id t0N9B1sF079493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:11:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id t0N9B1Lv079492 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:11:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA13591; Fri, 23 Jan 15 00:26:20 PST Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:26:09 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: how to get broken pkg build server fixed? Message-Id: <54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:11:11 -0000 No answer from ports@ and the problem persists; maybe someone here knows. A week ago I got an email complaining of a package build failure in a port I maintain, with the first reported error being: !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100052, Host: 1100050) !!! !!! This is not supported. !!! !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! !!! Expect build failures. !!! That obviously is not something I can fix -- it needs to be dealt with by whomever administers the FreeBSD package build server. This week I got two such messages, for the same port as last week, one from the amd64 build and the other from the i386 build. It seems the situation is getting worse rather than better. Who do I need to notify, to get these servers fixed? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 09:23:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C277AF8 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2AF77B6 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0N9Mfc9093941 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:22:50 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0N9Mfc9093941 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1422004970; bh=U3X6y4yBfJjK3meR40F5w3bBbQoPRg571/ENAXkUBiY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Fri,=2023=20Jan=202015=2009:22:30=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20how=20to=20get=20broken=20pkg=20b uild=20server=20fixed?|References:=20<54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%pe rryh@pluto.rain.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%per ryh@pluto.rain.com>; b=Ilbw31pwwqATaqaPQuEFdqrLDcWSrUH4qnCizGQ+yxodlNbpS1yy2sLzFJTkYDZHJ dJbTVMBRjmXEoh61PhF8Mv95QAKb2jmkOPyrhJYQxbVFpqwwnucaSXjPfuZtgHrzGE QL2z6ZSdqM32cCwu8CMoxfECd1s8FVh0Z03w4Bac= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <54C212D6.6030005@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:22:30 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to get broken pkg build server fixed? References: <54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:23:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/23/15 08:26, Perry Hutchison wrote: > No answer from ports@ and the problem persists; maybe someone > here knows. >=20 > A week ago I got an email complaining of a package build failure > in a port I maintain, with the first reported error being: >=20 > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100052, Host: 1100050) !!! > !!! This is not supported. !!! > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > !!! Expect build failures. !!! This is something that portmgr and the build server admins will already be aware of. While it looks alarming, in this case, it is in fact completely harmless. > That obviously is not something I can fix -- it needs to be dealt > with by whomever administers the FreeBSD package build server. >=20 > This week I got two such messages, for the same port as last week, > one from the amd64 build and the other from the i386 build. > It seems the situation is getting worse rather than better. >=20 > Who do I need to notify, to get these servers fixed? You're focusing on the wrong problem. The 'Jail newer than host' thing would affect *every* package build on the cluster for FreeBSD HEAD. Since all port maintainers are not receiving build-failure nastygrams continually, ergo it's some other problem you need to attend to. Keep reading further down the email: usually the breakage you are responsible for looking at will occur near the end. Cheers, Matthew --vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUwhLgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnrS8P/2hAtoE/0J12EfDCTMK/pHHX 1ZbX8H1Tnvn4l1re16dvAc7KMKqmOX9FEs/4sNq6DwUfRqMtng6nXDPvttvU9hbH FnYkU4tOxitGcRk7bqDf/vMl6MEWo5eWcjbV+MOD5/u2RgUvY/Itc2zLz08Of6fy x2UbzLtIjZhQG29x4gP0D1CKZOePJo/B3hztN8oKQkkbL556GbD1ISWl0kyeo8Dw XP6HR9kHNOOI++fkYgftYGrRxZjbrV484SE+qEw+8V619W5cOTJizmOvU903JSdY xWo/EMApBWgR25k4O4LqWFKVNopfuXONBBd1S9AJuAjQg1gh2ftS9VOGmucZ9jEY FTK5ODApONBSA1WEsA78NKqQIpbU72TZnJVB1D0noLMMUHfEqsCoyaQjAODevIGU kG1qtPQ++wcOCP92zchfAtrTeRLg9LSHNIfjOqVQvTnQm20OL9FuDJH/8thaemE8 ksu8FpStHlb+zAtCGyLwlI+bYKcZ2gH0yF9dX1OvmdnzSGCcnFTaolZ+2uhcOYek 85PaS2ZSBQsZKW3yI1gPMhqG8GIa9NvKu+JRIILYOUvtATJcaWuf2ZVMoAtoqbLB LUn0HAKNS8Fev/ppoRXZz3dAbdQZKK3STkcIlIkZFRzTFlTnFcS89yRTSZEebfGK h/94arOpf37xhtlfXlUp =4OLn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vF4gKejcxj7TONltQwfgXEporbK9TFNKp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 16:20:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A49AD75 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8D5C58 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-124-78.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.124.78]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1422030007969629.0975689490268; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:20:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:20:05 -0600 From: Bigby James To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and manually compile applications without gcc Message-ID: <20150123162005.GA5402@workbox.Home> References: <54BD0AF0.5040809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20150120185053.GA57651@slackbox.erewhon.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150120185053.GA57651@slackbox.erewhon.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Cc: Odhiambo Washington X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:20:33 -0000 > Running ./configure --help can be helpful. It shows what the possible options > and environment variables are. You can also read the Makefile for a port, or run 'make showconfig' and 'make showconfig-recursive.' The latter will show you a list of options that can be ticked off in the dialog box a build time; the former is a way to see any options that (for whatever reason) might not be presented in the dialog box. > For another app that I needed to compile outside of the ports tree... Consider having a look at two things: the Porter's Handbook,[1] and ports-mgmt/portshaker.[2] The first is self-explanatory; the second is a means of managing your own self-written ports in tandem with the official ports tree. If you're at all familiar with Gentoo, it's basically the same concept as a Portage overlay. [1]: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ [2]: https://www.freshports.org/ports-mgmt/portshaker/ -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 08:17:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E01655 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A927479 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k48so1258644wev.9 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:16:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ORVyFlu7egjDp1tFDhuD/71JLFroXrn1cZS9YQ6TpTM=; b=TQaDE14RD36L9fK51dlf/EZK4qJqTLrKh4a2yDyGsg+H4qPDe9xwXhNzoc/0p5eQJI +3l8Quhc2sG7G5jFn9YUIS9zYxWN2KHQEgGXXrr6pnlwm1rL2thY531rU9hI5YaA/DJK lqLttHQc+yJeYUojelo3fNVu80pTrg/HhjS9+/t/1N3sLM8WpGtdDUmexQq5oQtCvg0p zePgIMhzeujXu09JIZ2PEBEa7Wm0WJ9O91KaZ2s4aI5XKPBN7JS5jHkQXd/VWy441v8B UzXqFisxMF1FMchc0o2nYIPexphKXuKmOxmvHV9wkNVuaR7Jyl5AsXn7vglUAKAD9lgf 987w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmmFq2fEU7VHqr8HW3ma/sOqfYRdIOTpuHa+roto6QS4/zPR8GkObgu8D7ex7/0lOMiRhZD MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.206.14 with SMTP id lk14mr2571770wic.71.1422087419595; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.203.102 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:16:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:16:59 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: How to use two kinds of fonts in x11-wm/dwm bar? From: alphachi To: "list: freebsd" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:17:08 -0000 Hi! I installed x11-wm/dwm with XFT. I modified config.def.h to support CJK chars in bar: static const char font[] = "Noto Sans CJK SC Regular:style=Regular:size=11"; My locale setting is zh_CN.UTF-8 and everthing is fine. Now I want to combine the two fonts - use x11-fonts/terminus-font to display all chars it supports, and use x11-fonts/noto to display all chars that x11-fonts/terminus-font doesn't support. I did these things: 1. Add something in fonts.conf: monospace Terminus Noto Sans CJK SC 2. Modify config.def.h: static const char font[] = "monospace:size=11"; 3. Check font match: > fc-match -s monospace ter-112n.pcf.gz: "Terminus" "Regular" ter-x12n.pcf.gz: "Terminus" "Regular" NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf: "Noto Sans CJK SC" "Regular" ... After this, I set the default font to monospace in Firefox and test - it's ok. When I reinstall dwm, the default font of dwm changes to Terminus, but all chars that should use Noto, like CJK chars, can't display correctly - they display as many solid blocks. I dont' know what's wrong, thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 08:20:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA89708 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D525614A for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id t0O8KjwX047215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:20:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id t0O8KjcD047214; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:20:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA18446; Sat, 24 Jan 15 00:13:41 PST Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:13:30 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: how to get broken pkg build server fixed? Message-Id: <54c3542a.fxzPdaKPtvogn61R%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <54c205a1.nzckSmGXXPRQHMva%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <54C212D6.6030005@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <54C212D6.6030005@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:20:57 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 01/23/15 08:26, Perry Hutchison wrote: > > A week ago I got an email complaining of a package build failure > > in a port I maintain, with the first reported error being: > > > > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100052, Host: 1100050) !!! > > !!! This is not supported. !!! > > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > > !!! Expect build failures. !!! > > This is something that portmgr and the build server admins will > already be aware of. While it looks alarming, in this case, it > is in fact completely harmless. So, in this case, it is a bug in Poudriere to scream about it like that? How, in general, does one figure out whether this message matters in a particular case? (I figure it must sometimes be very important, or the Poudriere folks would not have made it so prominent.) > The 'Jail newer than host' thing would affect *every* package > build on the cluster for FreeBSD HEAD ... ... unless the particular incompatibility introduced by a particular instance of the misconfiguration turned out to affect only a few ports. > Keep reading further down the email: usually the breakage > you are responsible for looking at will occur near the end. The later errors also seem to involve configuration problems -- it looks like a mismatch between the port's code and some .h file. The port hasn't been touched in months -- at least, not to my knowledge -- and it does not depend on other ports, so if the Poudriere misconfiguration isn't the cause I guess that leaves an incompatible change in base sometime within a week or so before 1/11 (first Poudriere message regarding this, which I didn't notice at the time). That's not something I can easily look into, because I don't run HEAD. Now what? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 16:47:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D3951A for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F8E3E6 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-124-78.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.124.78]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1422118056279148.9206580872226; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:47:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:47:33 -0600 From: Bigby James To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use two kinds of fonts in x11-wm/dwm bar? Message-ID: <20150124164733.GA1669@workbox.Home> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Cc: alpachi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:47:44 -0000 > After this, I set the default font to monospace in Firefox and test - it's > ok. When I reinstall dwm, the default font of dwm changes to Terminus, but > all chars that should use Noto, like CJK chars, can't display correctly - > they display as many solid blocks. The short answer is that you can only have one font in the dwm statusline. There's a patch that allows you to use multiple TTF fonts, which a) you'll have to apply yourself using patch(1); and b) is incompatible with the XFT patch.[1] It also heavily modifies the dwm source code, so any other patches you wish to apply afterward will almost certainly have to be applied manually (using a text editor to paste in the diff). If you're seeing Terminus in the statusline after reinstalling dwm, then you likely overwrote your modified source with the default source during reinstallation. That's the only explanation I can see for your font changing to the default without you modifying the config file. [1]: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/pango -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 17:09:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E26D8F8 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.webtent.net (mx2.webtent.net [216.139.202.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E5C7E1 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Exchange) with ESMTP id 4F025D795E for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:04:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx2.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95497-03 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:04:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (static-72-64-143-96.tampfl.fios.verizon.net [72.64.143.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: robert@mx2.webtent.net) by mx2.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Exchange) with ESMTPSA id 4189DD7916 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:04:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <54C3D0A0.1000500@webtent.org> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:04:32 -0500 From: Robert Fitzpatrick User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Subject: Root partition size too small for FreeBSD 10.1? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:09:47 -0000 I have a server I tried to upgrade to 10.1-RELEASE and it gave me out of disk space errors when it came time at the end to making changes to /boot/kernel. I reverted the snapshot taken on this VPS back to 8.4 for now. The root partition is 85% used of a 500MB, and since more than half the used space is in /boot/kernel, I think its the new kernel size that is the issue and the root partition will have to grow? If that is the case, I would have to make some room.... root@www:/usr/local/etc # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 484M 378M 67M 85% / devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev /dev/da0s1d 9.5G 1.6G 7.1G 18% /usr /dev/da0s1e 9.2G 2.7G 5.7G 32% /var /dev/da1s1 19G 4.0G 13G 23% /www Looking at the handbook, perhaps I could use the swap to extend the root partition and resize /var to add swap back in single user mode? And would that be enough space, still less than 1GB. root@www:/usr/local/etc # gpart show da0 => 63 41942977 da0 MBR (20G) 63 41929587 1 freebsd [active] (20G) 41929650 13390 - free - (6.6M) root@www:/usr/local/etc # gpart show da0s1 => 0 41929587 da0s1 BSD (20G) 0 1024000 1 freebsd-ufs (500M) 1024000 524288 2 freebsd-swap (256M) 1548288 20480000 4 freebsd-ufs (9.8G) 22028288 19901299 5 freebsd-ufs (9.5G) Thanks for any help or pointers...? -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 18:00:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485566D9 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08858C61 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [24.134.45.92] (helo=michael-think.fritz.box) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YF4Y4-0004Re-9r; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:31:04 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: FreeBSD , "Robert Fitzpatrick" Subject: Re: Root partition size too small for FreeBSD 10.1? References: <54C3D0A0.1000500@webtent.org> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:30:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54C3D0A0.1000500@webtent.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.98.5/19972/Sat Jan 24 12:52:56 2015) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:00:45 -0000 On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:04:32 +0100, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I have a server I tried to upgrade to 10.1-RELEASE and it gave me out of > disk space errors when it came time at the end to making changes to > /boot/kernel. I reverted the snapshot taken on this VPS back to 8.4 for > now. The root partition is 85% used of a 500MB, and since more than half > the used space is in /boot/kernel, I think its the new kernel size that > is the issue and the root partition will have to grow? If that is the > case, I would have to make some room.... > Deleting all kernel debugging symbols: find /boot -name "*.symbols" | xargs rm and (optionally) building your new kernel without the config line makeoptions DEBUG=-g should also do it: > find /boot -name "*.symbols" | xargs rm > du -h /boot/ 4,0K /boot/zfs 4,0K /boot/firmware 85M /boot/kernel 28K /boot/defaults 4,0K /boot/dtb 4,0K /boot/modules 85M /boot/kernel.old 173M /boot/ Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 18:44:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2824F14 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD807C1 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4EFD5CB8C9D; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:44:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:44:29 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <39795.128.135.70.2.1422125069.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <54C3D0A0.1000500@webtent.org> References: <54C3D0A0.1000500@webtent.org> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:44:29 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Root partition size too small for FreeBSD 10.1? From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "FreeBSD" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:44:36 -0000 On Sat, January 24, 2015 11:04 am, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I have a server I tried to upgrade to 10.1-RELEASE and it gave me out of > disk space errors when it came time at the end to making changes to > /boot/kernel. I reverted the snapshot taken on this VPS back to 8.4 for > now. The root partition is 85% used of a 500MB, and since more than half > the used space is in /boot/kernel, I think its the new kernel size that > is the issue and the root partition will have to grow? If that is the > case, I would have to make some room.... > > root@www:/usr/local/etc # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/da0s1a 484M 378M 67M 85% / > devfs 1.0k 1.0k 0B 100% /dev > /dev/da0s1d 9.5G 1.6G 7.1G 18% /usr > /dev/da0s1e 9.2G 2.7G 5.7G 32% /var > /dev/da1s1 19G 4.0G 13G 23% /www > > Looking at the handbook, perhaps I could use the swap to extend the root > partition and resize /var to add swap back in single user mode? And > would that be enough space, still less than 1GB. > > root@www:/usr/local/etc # gpart show da0 > => 63 41942977 da0 MBR (20G) > 63 41929587 1 freebsd [active] (20G) > 41929650 13390 - free - (6.6M) > > root@www:/usr/local/etc # gpart show da0s1 > => 0 41929587 da0s1 BSD (20G) > 0 1024000 1 freebsd-ufs (500M) > 1024000 524288 2 freebsd-swap (256M) > 1548288 20480000 4 freebsd-ufs (9.8G) > 22028288 19901299 5 freebsd-ufs (9.5G) > > Thanks for any help or pointers...? > One thing I have learned over the time is: all systems from release to release demand more and more disk space (some want slightly more, others, like MS Windows or latest Linux releases, almost twice as much). FreeBSD is on decent side here, still, if you originally planned your / partition somewhere around FreeBSD 6, and were just upgrading system in place, at the level of FreeBSD 10 you will have / too small in size, and even if you succeed upgrading it in place, your / partition is too small to allow you to maintain FreeBSD 10 hassle free in a long run. My take would be: either mirror current system on new drive with larger partitions, then upgrade that, or build FreeBSD 10 fresh, then migrate all from older system to it. When I was building my workstation I used 2 GB /, others may give better advises on most suitable partition sizes. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 20:04:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38316921 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x241.google.com (mail-pa0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A716A84 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f65.google.com with SMTP id rd3so4081815pab.0 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:04:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vnKctZj13K53biDnXVKFRQRDCJirXHNQkkRD9pzicZg=; b=ZGuA6OEYyWlqSyZ2+5xh7GH+XpFmjSRwRhCcphSmiJmLXFFRiHZMT3S1VMli1ksKMp 1Xexjacitq7yByCdmdeAY5mqAxOREFvk8xnEPGG1UDzfWidcx9ufXq1eVgURFitHpeqi eUWRs41NmwpJn3iGuJc4dJSeOlc6rkDQcrA0mQqy6BsFzUkxShS69KIMHrck5gjl6KvC TXrs3E186J0SIt0zvVJ+9tuVl7mLdpWetKVCX0zS1qvFtDU6C5MM6oD0i42J5ZQCh0cl ufYh1kegKPpksTxH/gkfT5c/Jp5GXW376IEMfJiqoeEWQUqCaBIBIUDcU41emvFbm6W4 HWKg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.62.138 with SMTP id y10mr13979324par.51.1422129877709; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:04:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.158.234 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:04:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:04:37 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD From: Alex Maleev To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:04:38 -0000 What do you recommend for the release of the computer: Nvidia GeForse GTH 550 Ti, Intel Core i3-2100 3.10GHz